PATENT DOCUMENT

Publication Number: US-10320194-B2
Application Number: US-201715850752-A
Country: US
Kind Code: B2

Title: Control feedback loop design with fast transient response for multi-level converter

Abstract:
Disclosed herein are a system, method and non-transitory program storage device that are intended to provide a control system with quick response for a multi-level power converter. The control system may regulate an output voltage of the power converter based on one or more feedback signals. The feedback signals may be generated based on a differential between the output voltage and a reference voltage. The control system may further include one or more feed-forward signals representative of either the output voltage or transients of the output voltage. The control system may further include one or more switches in parallel with the one or more capacitors to selectively enable and/or disable direct feed-forward and capacitive feed-forward responsive to the output voltage at different levels.

Claims:
The invention claimed is: 
     
       1. A multi-output voltage power converter control system comprising:
 a shunt regulator configured to provide a feedback signal representative of a differential between an output voltage of the power converter and a reference voltage; and 
 an optocoupler configured to receive the feedback signal and provide a command signal based on the feedback signal and a feed-forward signal; 
 a capacitor and switch coupled to the optocoupler, the shunt regulator, and the output voltage of the power converter so as to selectively provide one of:
 a direct feed-forward signal representative of the output voltage of the power converter; and 
 a capacitive feed-forward signal representative of output voltage transients to the optocoupler; and 
 
 control logic configured to receive the command signal and provide a control signal for the power converter based on the command signal. 
 
     
     
       2. The multi-output voltage power converter control system of  claim 1 , wherein the optocoupler and shunt regulator are coupled in series to an output terminal of the power converter. 
     
     
       3. The multi-output voltage power converter control system of  claim 1 , wherein the switch is configured to selectively enable and disable the direct feed-forward and capacitive feed-forward signals responsive to the output voltage at different levels. 
     
     
       4. The multi-output voltage power converter control system of  claim 1 , further comprising a bias circuit coupled to the shunt regulator and configured to provide a bias current to the shunt regulator. 
     
     
       5. A method to control a multi-output voltage power converter, comprising:
 providing a feedback signal by a shunt regulator representative of a differential between an output voltage of the power converter and a reference voltage; 
 providing the feedback signal and a feed-forward signal to an optocoupler to generate a command signal, wherein the feed-forward signal is representative of the output voltage of the power converter, wherein the feed-forward signal is selectively one of:
 a direct feed-forward signal representative of the output voltage of the power converter; and 
 a capacitive feed-forward signal representative of transients of the output voltage of the power converter; and 
 
 providing the command signal to control logic to generate a control signal for the power converter to regulate the output voltage. 
 
     
     
       6. The method of  claim 5 , wherein the optocoupler and shunt regulator are coupled in series to an output terminal of the power converter. 
     
     
       7. The method of  claim 5 , further comprising selectively enabling and disabling the direct feed-forward and capacitive feed-forward signals responsive to the output voltage at different levels using a switch in parallel with the capacitor. 
     
     
       8. The method of  claim 5 , further comprising providing a bias current to the shunt regulator using a bias circuit. 
     
     
       9. A multi-output voltage power converter, comprising:
 a power conversion circuit including one or more switches configured to regulate an input voltage to an output voltage; 
 a shunt regulator configured to provide a feedback signal representative of a differential between the output voltage and a reference voltage; 
 an optocoupler configured to receive the feedback signal and provide a command signal based on the feedback signal and a feed-forward signal, wherein the feed forward signal is selectively one of:
 a direct feed-forward signal representative of the output voltage of the power converter; and 
 a capacitive feed-forward signal representative of transients of the output voltage to the optocoupler; and 
 
 control logic configured to receive the command signal and provide a control signal for the one or more switches based on the command signal. 
 
     
     
       10. The multi-output voltage power converter of  claim 9 , wherein the optocoupler and shunt regulator are coupled in series to an output terminal of the power converter. 
     
     
       11. The multi-output voltage power converter of  claim 9 , further comprising a switch coupled in parallel with a capacitor. 
     
     
       12. The multi-output voltage power converter of  claim 11 , wherein the switch is configured to selectively enable and disable the direct feed-forward and capacitive feed-forward signals responsive to the output voltage at different levels. 
     
     
       13. The multi-output voltage power converter of  claim 9 , further comprising a bias circuit coupled to the shunt regulator and configured to provide a bias current to the shunt regulator.

Description:
TECHNICAL FIELD 
     This disclosure relates generally to the field of power converters and, in particular, to the design of control systems for multi-level converters. 
     BACKGROUND 
     In some applications, it is desirable for power converters to have a capability of supplying multi-level output voltages to electronic devices of different ratings. For example, the evolving Universal Serial Bus Power Delivery (USB PD) Standard prefers power supplies to provide supply voltages of, for example, 5V, 9V, 12V, 15V and/or 20V. Request for such diverse voltage levels may pose challenges to the design of power converters, especially with respect to the stability of power converters over a wide operating range. Commercially available components used in the control system of a power converter for one or more voltage levels (e.g., low voltages) may not be usable and/or available any more for other voltage levels (e.g., high voltages). For example, power supplies may typically employ one or more shunt regulators to implement closed loop control. A popular shunt regulator such as a 1.24V TLVH431 may fit a power supply of low voltage level(s) (e.g., 5V, 9V and/or 15V), but may not operate properly at high voltage level(s) (e.g., 20V) because of the shunt regulator&#39;s limited voltage rating. Conversely, a shunt regulator such as a 2.5V TL431 may fulfill the requirement of high voltage level(s) (e.g. 20V) because the TL431 regulator may withstand high voltage(s) up to 36V, but may not work reliably under low voltage(s) (e.g., 5V) because of instability issues. Therefore, what is needed is a design of control system to fulfill both performance and commercial requirements of multi-level power converters. 
     SUMMARY 
     Disclosed herein are a system, method and non-transitory program storage device that are intended to provide a control system with quick response for a multi-level power converter. In some embodiments, the control system may regulate an output voltage of the power converter based on one or more feedback signals. The feedback signals may be generated by, for example, a shunt regulator based on a differential between the output voltage and a reference voltage. 
     In some embodiments, the control system may include one or more feed-forward signals. The feed-forward signals may represent a control path directly from the output voltage (hereinafter referred to as “direct feed-forward”) and may be generated, for example, via an optocoupler. The use of feed-forward in the control system may shorten a response time of the power converter and thus improve its performance under transients. 
     In some embodiments, the feed-forward signals may be provided to the optocoupler through one or more capacitors (hereinafter referred to as “capacitive feed-forward). The capacitors may function as one or more high-pass filters, thus isolating (i.e., blocking) a high direct current (DC) voltage (such as a high output voltage) from, but still passing transient signal(s) to, the optocoupler and shunt regulator. 
     In some embodiments, the control system may include one or more switches coupled in parallel with the one or more capacitors. The switches may be used to selectively enable and/or disable direct feed-forward and capacitive feed-forward responsive to levels of the output voltage. 
     In some embodiments, the control system may further include a bias circuit that may be configured to supply a bias current to the shunt regulator, which may ensure the shunt regulator&#39;s operation in an appropriate range and thus enhance its stability. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
       Various embodiments of the disclosed concepts are illustrated by way of example and not by way of limitation in the accompanying drawings in which like references indicate similar elements. It should be noted that references to “an”, “one” or “another” embodiment in this disclosure are not necessarily to the same or different embodiment, and they mean at least one. A given figure may be used to illustrate the features of more than one embodiment, or more than one species of the disclosure, and not all elements in the figure may be required for a given embodiment or species. Additionally, features from multiple figures may be combined into some embodiments. 
         FIG. 1  is a schematic diagram illustrating an exemplary converter without feed-forward. 
         FIG. 2  is a schematic diagram illustrating an exemplary converter with direct feed-forward. 
         FIG. 3  is a schematic diagram illustrating an exemplary converter with capacitive feed-forward and bias circuit. 
         FIG. 4  are waveforms illustrating performance of the different exemplary converters. 
         FIG. 5  is a schematic diagram illustrating an exemplary converter with a selective circuit between direct feed-forward and capacitive feed-forward. 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
     In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the disclosed concepts. As part of this description, some of this disclosure&#39;s drawings represent structures and devices in block diagram form to avoid obscuring the disclosure. In the interest of clarity, not all features of an actual implementation are described in this disclosure. Moreover, the language used in this disclosure has been principally selected for readability and instructional purposes, and may not have been selected to delineate or circumscribe the disclosed subject matter, resort to the claims being necessary to determine such disclosed subject matter. 
       FIG. 1  is a schematic diagram illustrating converter  100 . As shown in  FIG. 1 , converter  100  may include transformer  105 , switch  110  and rectifier  115 , wherein switch  110  and rectifier  115  may be coupled in series with primary and secondary windings of transformer  105  respectively. Converter  100  may use control logic  120  to produce control signal  125  for switch  110 , converting an input voltage V IN  to an output voltage V OUT . Converter  100 , as shown in  FIG. 1 , may comprise a closed loop control system. For example, converter may include sensing circuit  130 , including resistors R 1 /R 2 /R 3  and capacitor C 1  that, together, may provide voltage dividing, filtering and/or compensation. The voltage at node  135  may be fed to shunt regulator  140  (e.g., TLV431), which may in turn produce voltage V k  at a cathode of shunt regulator  140  according to equation (1): 
                     V   k     =       -       Z   1       Z   2         ×     V   OUT               (   1   )               
where V OUT  represents the output voltage of flyback converter  100 , V k  is the cathode voltage of shunt regulator  140 , Z 1  is an alternating current (AC) impedance of network  132  (including, e.g., resistor R 4  and capacitor C 2 ), and Z 2  is an AC impedance of network  130  (including, e.g., resistors R 1 /R 2  and capacitor C 1 ). Since the following descriptions of  FIG. 1  may focus on primarily transient analysis, only the AC components of networks  130 / 132 &#39;s impedances are considered here. Further, network  132  may function as a compensation network to improve the gain and/or phase margins for a closed loop control system of converter  100 .
 
     Still referring to  FIG. 1 , converter  100  may also include optocoupler  150 , which may be coupled between a supply voltage V SUP  and shunt regulator  140 . Optocoupler  150  may include a light-emitting diode (LED) at input and a phototransistor at output. Current I LED    145  may flow through the LED and generate light. The light may be applied to the phototransistor and generate, typically proportionally, a collector current I C  that, in turn, may adjust a collector-to-emitter voltage V CE  across the collector (or “C”) and emitter (or “E”) of the phototransistor. Converter  100  may further include a supply voltage V SUP  that may provide a bias voltage for optocoupler  150  and shunt regulator  140 . When the supply voltage V SUP  is chosen to be a constant DC voltage, the AC component of V SUP  may be treated as a zero voltage. Therefore, in an AC small signal analysis for transients of converter  100 , current I LED    145  of optocoupler  150  may be determined according to equation (2), with reference to equation (1): 
                     I   LED     =       -       V   k       R   5         =         Z   1       Z   2       ×       V   OUT       R   5                   (   2   )               
where R 5  is the resistance of resistor R 5  shown in  FIG. 1 . Note that a conduction voltage drop of LED diode of optocoupler  250  may be a small value and thus ignored in equation (2). As aforementioned, the collector current I C  of the phototransistor of optocoupler  150  may be determined by current I LED    145 , typically proportionally with a current transfer ratio (CTR):
 
                     I   C     =       CTR   ×     I   LED       =     CTR   ×       Z   1       Z   2       ×       V   OUT       R   5                   (   3   )               
In an AC small signal analysis, the AC component of collector-to-emitter voltage V CE  of optocoupler  150  may then be determined as:
 
                     V   CE     =         -     I   C       ×     R   6       =       -   CTR     ×       R   6       R   5       ×     (         Z   1       Z   2       ×     V   OUT       )                 (   4   )               
where R 6  is the resistance of resistor R 6  shown in  FIG. 1 . The collector-to-emitter voltage V CE  may be fed to control logic  120  as command signal  155  to produce control signal  125 . For example, command signal  155  may be sent to a non-inverting input of control logic  120  to set a threshold during which control signal  125  may become active for switch  110  to conduct currents, which essentially determines a switching duty cycle for switch  110 .
 
     During a transient of converter  100 , for example, when the output voltage V OUT  decreases, through networks  130  and  132 , V OUT  may lead to an increase of the cathode voltage V K  of shunt regulator  140  according to equation (2). Consequently, the increment of V k  may cause a decrease of collector current I C  of optocoupler  150  according to equation (3), and an increase of command signal  155  according to equation (4). The increment of command signal  155  may lead to a longer conduction duration of switch  110 , which, in turn, may transfer more energy from the primary winding of transfer  105  to the secondary winding and thus restore the output voltage V OUT . This performs an operation of a closed loop control with negative feedback. Note that, in converter  100 , the supply voltage V SUP  may be a constant voltage that does not vary with V OUT . Thus, transients of V OUT  may have to pass through networks  130  and  132  in order to be reflected in command signal  155 . This may cause delays that may slow down the response time of the closed loop control system. Note that  FIG. 1  depicts switch  110  as a field-effect transistor (FET) merely for purposes of illustration only. As an alternative to FET, converter  100  may use other types of semiconductor devices deemed appropriate, e.g., metal-oxide-semiconductor FET (MOSFET), insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT), Gallium Nitride FET (GaN), etc. Similarly, rectifier  115  may be a diode or a switch such as FET, MOSFET, IGBT, GaN, etc. to rectify the secondary winding voltage of transformer  105 . 
       FIG. 2  shows a schematic diagram illustrating converter  200  that may include direct feed-forward. As shown in  FIG. 2 , converter  200  may include transformer  205 , switch  210  and rectifier  215 , wherein switch  210  and rectifier  215  may be coupled in series with primary and secondary windings of transformer  205  respectively. Converter  200  may use control logic  220  to produce control signal  225  for switch  210 , converting an input voltage V IN  to an output voltage V OUT . Converter  200  may also include sensing circuit  230  (e.g., including resistors R 1 /R 2 /R 3  and capacitor C 1 ) and shunt regulator  240  (e.g., TLV 431), which may operate in substantially the same way as sensing circuit  130  and shunt regulator  140  in  FIG. 1 . Note that converter  200  may employ resistors R 4  and C 2  to form an optional compensation network  232  to improve the gain and/or phase margins of converter  200 , similar to network  132  described in  FIG. 1 . 
     Still referring to  FIG. 2 , converter  200  may also include optocoupler  250 , which may be coupled between converter  200 &#39;s output terminal and shunt regulator  240 . Optocoupler  250  may include an LED at input and a phototransistor at output. Current I LED    245  may flow through the LED and generates light. The light may be applied to the phototransistor and generate a proportional collector current that, in turn, may adjust a collector-to-emitter voltage V CE  across the phototransistor&#39;s collector (or “C”) and emitter (or “E”). The collector-to-emitter voltage VCE may be sent to control logic  220  as command signal  255  to produce control signal  225 . Note that, unlike  FIG. 1 , the LED of optocoupler  250  may be coupled to the output terminal of converter  200  rather than a supply voltage V SUP  and thus provide a feed-forward configuration. 
     Current I LED    245  may be determined based on a differential voltage across the LED according to equation (5): 
                     I   LED     =           V   OUT     -     V   k         R   5       =           V   OUT     -     (       -       Z   1       Z   2         ×     V   OUT       )         R     5   ⁢                 =         V   OUT       R   5       +           Z   1       Z   2       ×     V   OUT         R   5                     (   5   )               
where V OUT  represents the output voltage of converter  200 , R 5  is a resistance of resistor R 5 , Z 1  is an AC impedance of network  230 , and Z 2  is an AC impedance of network  232 . Note that a conduction voltage drop of LED diode of optocoupler  250  is ignored here in equation (5). However, when the value of output voltage VOUT is low, the impact of the conduction voltage drop may become more significant, and the conduction voltage drop may have to be taken into account. Again, since the following descriptions of  FIG. 2  may focus on primarily transient analysis, only the AC components of network  230 / 232 &#39;s impedances are considered herein. By comparing equations (2) and (5), it may be noted that besides the feedback signal as shown in equation (2), equation (5) may further include a feed-forward signal represented by the output voltage V OUT . Since the feed-forward signal is provided to optocoupler  250  from the output voltage V OUT , the feed-forward signal may represent the output voltage V OUT  of converter  200  and thus may be treated as direct feed-forward. As current I LED  includes both feedback and feed-forward elements, the collector-to-emitter voltage V CE  and ultimately control signal  225  may also comprise feedback and feed-forward signals based on the output voltage V OUT . With reference to the descriptions in  FIG. 1 , during an output transient, for example, when the output voltage V OUT  of converter  100  decreases, this V OUT  transient may be directly fed to optocoupler  250  through input LED because of the feed-forward configuration. As a result, the output collector current I C  of optocoupler  250  may immediately decrease. On top of it, the feedback signal may also cause a decrease of collector current I C  through networks  230 / 232  and shunt regulator  240 , in a similar manner as described in  FIG. 1 . Consequently, command signal  255  may increase. The increment of command signal  255  may in turn lead to an increased conduction duration for switch  210 , which may result in a recovery of output voltage V OUT . Compared to  FIG. 1 , the feed-forward mechanism, on top of the feedback, may reduce delays of the closed loop control system of converter  200  and provide a faster transient response than converter  100 .
 
     As converter  200  is adapted to provide multi-level output voltages V OUT , commercially available components, such as shunt regulator  240 , may not fit the wide operating range of converter  200 . For example, a shunt regulator TLVH431 with 1.25V internal reference voltage V REF  may be rated for a maximum voltage of 18V. The 1.25V shunt regulator TLVH431 may not operate under 20V output voltage. Alternatively, a shunt regulator TL431 with 2.5V internal reference voltage V REF  may have a maximum voltage rating of 36V and fit the 20V output voltage. However, the 2.5V shunt regulator TL431 may not be desired or even feasible for 5V output voltage because of instability issues. For example, with the feed-forward configuration, when the output voltage V OUT  is a low voltage, e.g., 5V, current I LED    245  of optocoupler  240  may not be sufficient to provide a meaningful regulation of V OUT  because the differential voltage across resistor R 5 , as shown in equation (5), may be too small, considering the further LED conduction voltage drop of optocoupler  240  and required minimum operating voltage of shunt regulator  240 . 
     To address those restraints,  FIG. 3  shows a schematic diagram of converter  300  with capacitive feed-forward and bias circuit. As shown in  FIG. 3 , converter  300  may include transformer  305 , switch  310  and rectifier  315 , wherein switch  310  and rectifier  315  may be coupled in series with primary and secondary windings of transformer  305  respectively. Converter  300  may use control logic  320  to produce control signal  325  for switch  310 , converting an input voltage V IN  to an output voltage V OUT . Converter  300  may also include sensing circuit  330  (e.g., including resistors R 1 /R 2 /R 3  and capacitor C 1 ) and shunt regulator  340  (e.g., TLV 431), which may operate in substantially the same way as sensing circuits  130 / 230  and shunt regulators  140 / 240  in  FIGS. 1 and 2 . Further,  FIG. 3  may comprise optocoupler  350 , operating in substantially the same way as optocoupler  250  in  FIG. 2 . 
     Additionally, converter  300  may include capacitor  360  and optional bias circuit  365  as shown in  FIG. 3 . In particular, capacitor  360  may be coupled between an output terminal of converter  300  to an input LED of optocoupler  350 . Capacitor  360  may function as a high-pass filter, providing several capabilities. First, capacitor  360  may isolate (i.e., block) the DC output voltage V OUT  from optocoupler  350  and shunt regulator  340 . Thus, the above-mentioned low-voltage shunt regulator, e.g., 1.24V TLVH431, may now be used for high output voltage(s) V OUT  (e.g., 20V). Second, capacitor  360  may still pass transient signal(s) created by, for example, load variations to optocoupler  350  and shunt regulator  340 , thus providing a feed-forward signal to the control system of converter  300 . Because the feed-forward signal is provided through capacitor  360 , the feed-forward signal may not directly represent the output voltage V OUT  of converter  300  but rather V OUT &#39;s transients. Thus, the feed-forward signal may be thought of as capacitive feed-forward so as to be distinguished from the direct feed-forward in  FIG. 2 . 
     Diode D and voltage supply V SUP  may form an optional bias circuit  365 . Bias circuit  365  may be coupled to shunt regulator  340 , for example, through optocoupler  350 . Bias circuit  365  may produce a bias current and/or voltage to shunt regulator  340 . For certain types of shunt regulator  340 , it may ensure the shunt regulator&#39;s operation in the appropriate range and thus enhance its stability. The voltage supply V SUP  may be powered from converter  300 &#39;s input and/or output voltage (V IN  and/or V OUT ) or a separate power source. 
       FIG. 4  depicts exemplary waveforms illustrating performance of converters  100 / 200 / 300 . In  FIG. 4 , the horizontal axis may represent time in milliseconds (ms), while the top and bottom vertical axes may represent voltage and current respectively. As shown in  FIG. 4 , around 100 ms, the converters may have a load reduction, shown by a change in waveform  405  of output current from 2.5 A to 0.5 A. Waveforms  410 / 415 / 420  represent the respective output voltage V OUT  of converter  100 / 200 / 300 . As shown in  FIG. 4 , among the three converters, waveform  410  of converter  100  (without feed-forward) may produce a maximum voltage over-shoot, waveform  415  of converter  200  (with direct feed-forward) may have a minimum voltage over-shoot, and waveform  420  of converter  300  (with capacitive feed-forward) may include an intermediate voltage over-shoot. Thus, converter  200  may produce better transient performance than converter  300 , which, in turn, may behave better than converter  100 . 
     To combine the benefits of both direct and capacitive feed-forward,  FIG. 5  illustrates converter  500  with a selective circuit of direct feed-forward and capacitive feed-forward. Converter  500  may employ a substantially similar configuration as converter  300  in  FIG. 3 . However, converter  500  may include an additional switching circuit that may selectively enable and/or disable direct feed-forward and capacitive feed-forward. For example, converter  500  may include transformer  505 , switch  510  and rectifier  515 , wherein switch  510  and rectifier  515  may be coupled in series with primary and secondary windings of transformer  505  respectively. Converter  500  may use control logic  520  to produce control signal  525  for switch  510 , converting an input voltage V IN  to an output voltage V OUT . 
     Converter  500  may include sensing circuit  530  (e.g., including resistors R 1 /R 2 /R 3  and capacitor C 1 ) and shunt regulator  540  (e.g., TLV 431), which may operate in substantially the same way as sensing circuits  130 / 230 / 330  and shunt regulators  140 / 240 / 340  in  FIGS. 1-3 . Further,  FIG. 5  may comprise shunt regulator  540 , optocoupler  550  and optional bias circuit  565 , which may operate in substantially the same way as shunt regulator  140 / 240 / 340 , optocoupler  250 / 350  and bias circuit  365  as described in  FIGS. 1-3 . 
     Converter  500  may further have parallel-connected capacitor  560  and switch  570 , both of which may be coupled between an output terminal of converter  500  and an input LED of optocoupler  550 . When switch  570  is closed, switch  570  may bypass capacitor  560  and thus provide direct feed-forward to optocoupler  550 , as converter  200  in  FIG. 2 . Conversely, when switch  570  is open, capacitor  560  may be in series with optocoupler  550  (or in the feed-forward path) and thus produce capacitive feed-forward to optocoupler  550 . Thus, by controlling switch  570 , converter  500  may selectively enable and/or disable direct feed-forward and capacitive feed-forward. 
     Switch  570  may be controlled based on the output voltage V OUT  of converter  500 . For example, the control signal of switch  570  may be created by comparator  575  responsive to a differential between signal V SNS  (a measurement of the output voltage V OUT ) and threshold V TH . The threshold V TH  may then be selected appropriately to enable and/or disable direct and capacitive feed-forward according to converter  500 &#39;s output voltage levels. For example, threshold V TH  may be set to 6V, and comparator  575  may close switch  570  when the output voltage V OUT  is lower than 6V (e.g., 5V) and enable direct feed-forward (and disable capacitive feed-forward). Meanwhile, when the output voltage V OUT  becomes larger than 6V (e.g., 9/12/15/20V), comparator  575  may open switch  570  and enable capacitive feed-forward (and disable direct feed-forward). Note that threshold V TH  may be predetermined or adjustable during operation. 
     The disclosure uses several numerical values in the descriptions of above embodiments. However, it should be understood that these numerical values are for purposes of illustration only, and that other voltages, currents, component ratings, timings, etc. may be used. Also, note that the disclosed feedback, direct feed-forward and/or capacitive feed-forward for the design of control systems may apply to other types of power converters besides the exemplary converters, for example, non-isolating buck, boost or buck-boost converters, forward converters, push-pull converters, half-bridge or full-bridge converters, etc. 
     The various embodiments described above are provided by way of illustration only and should not be constructed to limit the scope of the disclosure. Various modifications and changes can be made to the principles and embodiments herein without departing from the scope of the disclosure and without departing from the scope of the claims.

Metadata:
Filing Date: 20171221
Publication Date: 20190611
Grant Date: 20190611
Priority Date: 20170901
Inventors: YANG, ZAOHONG
BUCHERU, BOGDAN T.
Assignee: APPLE INC
CPC Classifications: [{"code": "H02M1/14", "inventive": true, "first": false, "tree": "[]"}, {"code": "H02M3/33569", "inventive": true, "first": false, "tree": "[]"}, {"code": "H02M1/42", "inventive": true, "first": false, "tree": "[]"}, {"code": "H02J3/1857", "inventive": true, "first": true, "tree": "[]"}, {"code": "H02M3/33538", "inventive": true, "first": false, "tree": "[]"}, {"code": "H02J3/36", "inventive": true, "first": false, "tree": "[]"}, {"code": "H02J3/1857", "inventive": true, "first": false, "tree": "[]"}, {"code": "H02M3/33507", "inventive": true, "first": true, "tree": "[]"}, {"code": "H02M3/33507", "inventive": true, "first": true, "tree": "[]"}, {"code": "H02M1/0019", "inventive": false, "first": false, "tree": "[]"}, {"code": "H02M1/0019", "inventive": false, "first": false, "tree": "[]"}, {"code": "H02M3/33538", "inventive": true, "first": false, "tree": "[]"}, {"code": "H02M1/42", "inventive": true, "first": false, "tree": "[]"}, {"code": "H02M1/14", "inventive": true, "first": false, "tree": "[]"}, {"code": "H02J3/36", "inventive": true, "first": false, "tree": "[]"}]
Family ID: 65518489