PATENT DOCUMENT

Publication Number: US-9665594-B2
Application Number: US-201213350452-A
Country: US
Kind Code: B2

Title: Local backup

Abstract:
Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on a computer storage medium, for storing data. In one aspect, a method includes detecting at a kernel a plurality of operations, each of a particular type from a plurality of types, to be performed on a respective data item; and generating respective entries in a delta store in response to the detected plurality of operations wherein each entry for a data item includes a marker attribute corresponding to the operation type of the plurality of types.

Claims:
What is claimed is: 
     
       1. A method performed by a data processing apparatus, the method comprising:
 detecting, at a kernel, a plurality of operations to be performed on respective data items in a file system, wherein each of the plurality of operations is of a respective operation type; and 
 generating respective entries in a hierarchy of a delta store in response to the detected plurality of operations, wherein generating each entry comprises:
 generating, for a particular detected operation, a marker corresponding to the operation type of the particular detected operation, and 
 storing the marker in the hierarchy of the delta store, 
 
 wherein the file system and the delta store are both stored in local storage of the data processing apparatus, 
 wherein the hierarchy of the delta store mimics at least a portion of a hierarchy of the file system for a path of at least one of the data items, 
 and 
 wherein at least one directory above at least one of the data items in the hierarchy of the file system is represented in the hierarchy of the delta store by a fault file. 
 
     
     
       2. The method of  claim 1 , further comprising:
 generating a virtual file system using the entries in the delta store, the virtual file system including a representation of a path within the hierarchy of the file system corresponding to each data item, where at least one directory above at least one respective data item in the file system hierarchy is represented by a respective fault file and where at least one data item is represented by a respective marker. 
 
     
     
       3. The method of  claim 2 , wherein a particular marker corresponds to a deletion operation performed with respect to a particular data item, and wherein the particular data item is further represented in the virtual file system by data of the particular data item prior to deletion. 
     
     
       4. The method of  claim 2 , wherein a particular marker corresponds to a change operation performed with respect to a particular data item, and wherein the particular data item is further represented in the virtual file system by data of the particular data item file prior to the change. 
     
     
       5. The method of  claim 2 , wherein a particular marker corresponds to a move operation performed with respect to a particular data item, and wherein the particular data item is further represented in the virtual file system by a pointer identifying a moved location of the particular data item. 
     
     
       6. The method of  claim 1 , further comprising generating a backup at a particular point in time, the backup including contents of the delta store added to the delta store within a specified time period. 
     
     
       7. The method of  claim 6 , where generating the backup includes adding creation markers to the delta store based on detected creation events within the specified time period. 
     
     
       8. The method of  claim 1 , further comprising:
 generating a virtual file system from information of the delta store associated with a particular backup. 
 
     
     
       9. The method of  claim 8 , wherein the virtual file system is generated dynamically in response to a particular request. 
     
     
       10. The method of  claim 8 , further comprising using the virtual file system to generate a visual representation of the backup. 
     
     
       11. The method of  claim 1 , wherein only a first operation performed on a particular data item within a specified time period results in a corresponding entry being generated in the hierarchy of the delta store. 
     
     
       12. The method of  claim 1 , further comprising:
 detecting at the kernel a particular operation; 
 detecting subsequent event information associated with the particular operation; and 
 generating an entry in the delta store based on the particular operation and the subsequent event information. 
 
     
     
       13. A system comprising:
 one or more local storage devices; 
 one or more processors; 
 one or more non-transitory computer-readable media including one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by the one or more processors, causes:
 detecting, at a kernel a plurality of operations to be performed on respective data items in a file system, wherein each of the plurality of operations is of a respective operation type; and 
 generating respective entries in a hierarchy of a delta store in response to the detected plurality of operations, wherein generating each entry comprises:
 generating, for a particular detected operation, a marker corresponding to the operation type of the particular detected operation, and 
 storing the marker in the hierarchy of the delta store, 
 
 wherein the file system and the delta store are both stored by the one or more local storage devices, 
 wherein the hierarchy of the delta store mimics at least a portion of a hierarchy of the file system for a path of at least one of the data items, 
 and 
 wherein at least one directory above at least one of the data items in the hierarchy of the file system is represented in the hierarchy of the delta store by a fault file. 
 
 
     
     
       14. The system of  claim 13 , wherein the one or more sequences of instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, further causes:
 generating a virtual file system using the entries in the delta store, the virtual file system including a representation of a path within the hierarchy of the file system corresponding to each data item, where at least one directory above at least one respective data item in the file system hierarchy is represented by a respective fault file and where at least one data item is represented by a respective marker. 
 
     
     
       15. The system of  claim 14 , wherein a particular marker corresponds to a deletion operation performed with respect to a particular data item, and wherein the particular data item is further represented in the virtual file system by data of the particular data item prior to deletion. 
     
     
       16. The system of  claim 14 , wherein a particular marker corresponds to a change operation performed with respect to a particular data item, and wherein the particular data item is further represented in the virtual file system by data of the particular data item prior to the change. 
     
     
       17. The system of  claim 14 , wherein a particular marker corresponds to a move operation performed with respect to a particular data item, and wherein the particular data item is further represented in the virtual file system by a pointer identifying a moved location of the particular data item. 
     
     
       18. The system of  claim 13 , wherein the one or more sequences of instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, further causes:
 generating a backup at a particular point in time, the backup including contents of the delta store added to the delta store within a specified time period. 
 
     
     
       19. The system of  claim 18 , where generating the backup includes adding creation markers to the delta store based on detected creation events within the specified time period. 
     
     
       20. The system of  claim 13 , wherein the one or more sequences of instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, further causes:
 generating a virtual file system from information of the delta store associated with a particular backup. 
 
     
     
       21. The system of  claim 20 , wherein the virtual file system is generated dynamically in response to a particular request. 
     
     
       22. The system of  claim 20 , wherein the one or more sequences of instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, further causes:
 using the virtual file system to generate a visual representation of the backup. 
 
     
     
       23. The system of  claim 13 , wherein only a first operation performed on a particular data item within a specified time period results in a corresponding entry being generated in the hierarchy of the delta store. 
     
     
       24. The system of  claim 13 , wherein the one or more sequences of instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, further causes:
 detecting at the kernel a particular operation; 
 detecting subsequent event information associated with the particular operation; and 
 generating an entry in the delta store based on the particular operation and the subsequent event information. 
 
     
     
       25. One or more non-transitory computer storage media encoded with a computer program, the program comprising instructions that when executed by a data processing apparatus cause the data processing apparatus to perform operations comprising:
 detecting, at a kernel, a plurality of operations to be performed on respective data items in a file system, wherein each of the plurality of operations is of a respective operation type; and 
 generating respective entries in a hierarchy of a delta store in response to the detected plurality of operations, wherein generating each entry comprises:
 generating, for a particular detected operation, a marker corresponding to the operation type of the particular detected operation, and 
 storing the marker in the hierarchy of the delta store, 
 
 wherein the file system and the delta store are both stored in local storage of the data processing apparatus, 
 wherein the hierarchy of the delta store mimics at least a portion of a hierarchy of the file system for a path of at least one of the data items, 
 and 
 wherein at least one directory above at least one of the data items in the hierarchy of the file system is represented in the hierarchy of the delta store by a fault file.

Description:
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS 
     This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of the filing date of U.S. Patent Application No. 61/433,158, for Local Backup, which was filed on Jan. 14, 2011, and which is incorporated here by reference. 
    
    
     BACKGROUND 
     This specification relates to storing data. 
     Users can conventionally store data as part of one or more backups (e.g., of a file system or specified files or folders) to one or more external locations. Thus, if there is a failure to a user device, particular backup versions of data can be recovered. Typically, the data can only be viewed and recovered when the user device is connected to the corresponding external location having the backup data. 
     SUMMARY 
     This specification describes technologies relating to storing data. 
     In general, one aspect of the subject matter described in this specification can be embodied in methods that include the actions of detecting at a kernel a plurality of operations, each of a particular type from a plurality of types, to be performed on a respective data item; and generating respective entries in a delta store in response to the detected plurality of operations wherein each entry for a data item includes a marker attribute corresponding to the operation type of the plurality of types. Other embodiments of this aspect include corresponding systems, apparatus, and computer programs recorded on computer storage devices, each configured to perform the operations of the methods. 
     These and other embodiments can each optionally include one or more of the following features. The method further includes generating a virtual file system using the entries in the delta store, the virtual file system including a representation of a path within a file system hierarchy corresponding to each data item, where each directory above each respective data item in the file system hierarchy is represented by a file fault and where each data item is represented by the respective marker attribute. A particular marker attribute corresponds to a deletion operation and a corresponding data item is further represented in the virtual file system by the data of the file prior to deletion. A particular marker attribute corresponds to a change operation and a corresponding data item is further represented in the virtual file system by the data of the file prior to the change. A particular marker attribute corresponds to a move operation, wherein a move operation is identified using an operation detected at the kernel along with information for a subsequent event. 
     The method further includes specifying a backup at a particular point in time, the backup including the contents of the delta store added to the delta store within a specified time period. Generating the backup includes adding created file markers to the contents of the delta store based on detected creation events within the specified time period. The virtual file system is generated dynamically in response to a particular request. The method further includes using the virtual file system to generate a visual representation of the backup. Only a first operation performed on a particular data item within a specified time period results in a corresponding entry being generated in the delta store. The method further includes detecting at the kernel a particular operation; detecting subsequent event information associated with the particular operation; and generating an entry in the delta store based on the particular operation and the subsequent event information. 
     Particular embodiments of the subject matter described in this specification can be implemented so as to realize one or more of the following advantages. Backup data can be stored locally when a user is disconnected from an external storage device. The locally stored backup can be captured in a compact virtual file system representation to reduce storage requirements. The local backup data can be stored in an analogous form to the external backups. Data changes can be captured for adding to the local backup prior to being made. A backup user interface can be presented that allows users to view visual representations of the virtual file system as if it were the actual file system at times in the past. 
     The details of one or more embodiments of the subject matter described in this specification are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, aspects, and advantages of the subject matter will become apparent from the description, the drawings, and the claims. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
         FIG. 1  is a block diagram of an example system. 
         FIG. 2  is a block diagram of an example architecture for the local backup and restoration of data. 
         FIG. 3  is a flow diagram of an example process for generating a local backup. 
         FIGS. 4A-4C  are example diagrams of storing data in a virtual file system. 
         FIG. 5  is a flow diagram of an example process for displaying local backup data. 
         FIG. 6  is a flow diagram of an example process for generating a visual representation of a particular local snapshot. 
         FIG. 7  is an example backup user interface. 
         FIG. 8  is a flow diagram of an example process for migrating local backups to remote backups. 
     
    
    
     Like reference numbers and designations in the various drawings indicate like elements. 
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
     Backups of file system data can be made even when a user device is not coupled to an external storage device. In particular, a virtual file system can be generated that provides a compact representation of the file system during an epoch in order to generate a locally stored backup at the end of each epoch. An epoch is a specified period of time between each backup. The backups can be generated as snapshots of the file system for that epoch. The virtual file system is generated as versions of data items are added for inclusion in the backup. While the hierarchical file system of the actual file system is mimicked, directories above a given version being stored in the backup can be faults (e.g., zero data items). Additionally, the virtual file system can only include the portions of the file system in which changes have occurred, reducing storage space needed for a given backup. The data items added for inclusion in the backup can be copies of files captured prior to deletion or modification. Additionally, or alternatively, the data items can be markers indicating the type of change to the data item (e.g., a marker indicating a file has been deleted, modified, or moved). 
     Visual representations of each backup can be generated and presented in a backup interface. The visual representations present the backup file system data as it occurred at that point in time. In particular, the visual representation can be presented as a visual representation of a file system widow corresponding to an actual file system window previously being presented except that the contents of the file system window correspond to the data present that the time of the backup operation. A user can interact with the visual representation. For example, a user can select one or more data items presented in the visual representation for restoration to the current file system. A user can also provide input to present a visual representation of a different (e.g., an earlier) backup. 
       FIG. 1  is a block diagram of an example system  100 . The system  100  can allow a user to generate, view, navigate, and restore data, for example, in either remote backup storage or local backups. The system  100  can further provide visual representations of locally stored backup data as part of a virtual file system. The visual representation can correspond to a visual representation of a user interface window, for example, of a user interface window providing various file system information including, for example, icons, files, folders, or other data. The visual representation can be presented in a particular backup interface. However, rather than presenting a simple image of the user interface window, a user can interact with the visual representation to navigate through a hierarchy of windows or to select one or more individual data items presented within the visual representation. Various types of data items from a file system can be subjected to a backup operation by a backup component  117 , e.g., files, folders, system settings, metadata, state information, etc. 
     The system  100  includes a computing device  102  (e.g., a personal computer such as a desktop or notebook computer, a tablet device, a mobile device, etc.) communicatively coupled to a remote storage  107  through a network interface  116  and a network  108  (e.g., local area network, wide area network, wireless network, Internet, intranet, etc.). The computing device  102  generally includes a processor  103 , a memory  105 , one or more input devices  114  (e.g., keyboard, mouse, etc.), and one or more output devices  115  (e.g., a display device). A user interacts with the system  100 , for example, using the input and output devices  114 ,  115 . The system  100  includes various hardware elements. The system  100  can include hardware, software, and combinations of the two. 
     The computing device  102  also includes a local storage device  106  and a graphics module  113  (e.g., a graphics card) for storing information and generating graphical objects, respectively. The local storage device  106  can be used to store backup data as part of a virtual file system. In some implementations, backup data is stored locally only when the computing device  102  is not connected to the remote storage  107 . 
     Though discussion is made with reference representations of user interfaces, theses visual representations can be based on various data structures, files, processes, and other aspects of information management. Modification to file structures, data and the like is also contemplated in order to achieve various interactions and displays of the visual representation. 
     The computing device  102  includes the backup component  117  that allows for the storage of versions of file system data (e.g., files or other items), for example within the local storage  106  or in an external storage repository (e.g., remote storage  107 ) as part of a backup operation. In some implementations, the backup component  117  also allows a user to select any of the stored versions and use it to initiate a restoration of backup data corresponding to that version in the computing device  102  (e.g., a restoration of a file to the current file system). In some implementations, separate backup components  117  are used for local backups and external backups. 
     In some implementations, the computing device  102  includes a search component  118  that allows for searches of the computer&#39;s files or other items, for example within the local storage  106  or an external storage repository. This can include searching locally stored backup information within the virtual file system. In some implementations, the search component  118  can interact with the backup component  117  to perform searches of stored versions of files or other items on the computing device  102 . Particularly, in one implementation, the search component  118  provides that a user can select search results identified in an earlier version and use them to initiate a restoration of that version in the computing device  102 . 
     In some implementations, when a user searches for a file but the file is not found, the user can invoke the backup component  117  (or a portion thereof) to show one or more previous backup states corresponding to, for example, the various locations within a hierarchical file system for a specific earlier point in time. For example, if the user is looking for content of the C: drive (that does not currently hold the sought file), the user (or the computer) can launch a backup component to present visual representations of previous states of the C: drive to see if the file has been included in a backup (either locally or, if connected, on a remote storage device). This operation can be facilitated by the search environment forwarding information (e.g., an identity of the sought file) to the backup environment for showing the correct archive(s). 
       FIG. 2  is a block diagram of an example architecture  200  for the local backup and restoration of data. The data can include, e.g., files such as application files or system files, application data, settings, parameters etc. The backup component  117  provides backup and restoration capability for the system. Many different items or elements can be the subject of a backup operation in the system. For example, folders, files, items, information portions, directories, images, system parameters, playlists, address books, e-mails, e-mail folders, a state of an application or state of the system, preferences (e.g., user or system preferences), etc. all can be included in one or more backup operations. 
     In this example, the backup component  117  includes a local storage device  204  and an external storage device  232 . Backup data can be stored on either. In particular, backups can be periodically stored on the external storage device  232  according to particular backup criteria (e.g., as defined by a backup application or a user). Additionally, particular backup data can be stored on the local storage device  204 . Specifically, in some implementations, a delta store  214  can be used to temporarily store local backups when the user&#39;s device is not connected to the external storage device  232 . The delta store  214  can be used to generate a virtual file system, e.g., based on an encoded representation of the file system stored in the delta store. In particular, the encoded representation of the file system can encode a particular file system state and include incremental changes to data items, e.g., changed data for particular files, added files, deleted files, or moved files. In some implementations, the virtual file system provides a read-only synthetic representation of how the backup of the file system would appear as a full file system backup instead of including just the changes to the file system. The virtual file system can be generated on the fly from the delta store&#39;s encoded representation in order to provide a visual representation of the backup, as described in greater detail below. 
     Once the connection to the external storage device  232  has been reestablished, the temporary backup data can be converted into one or more backups on the external storage device  232  using a migration process. 
     Various numbers of local and/or external storage devices can be used by the backup component  117  for storing backup data corresponding to the versions. In some implementations, the backup component  117  stores the backup data in a format corresponding to a file system structure. However, storage on the local storage device  204  can be a reduced representation of the file system hierarchy. In particular, the local storage device  204  can includes the delta store  214  in which incremental changes to data for the virtual file system representations for various local backups are stored. 
     In some implementations, the backup component  117  runs as a background task on an operating system  230 , where the task is generally not visible to the user. In particular, the backup component can operate in coordination with a kernel  224  of the operating system in order to identify triggering events for backup operations. For example, a particular triggering event can be a type of file operation, e.g., an incoming write call for a modification to a file. In response to the trigger, the kernel can facilitate a copy of the unmodified version of the file being stored in the local storage prior to allowing the file operation to proceed. The backup component  117  can be configured to run across multiple user accounts. 
     A backup management engine  216  coordinates the collection, storage, and retrieval of backups performed by the backup component  117 . For example, the backup management engine  216  can manage the triggering events for storing data, the frequency of performing backups, as well as determine whether a backup is to be performed on the external storage device  232  or whether a local backup is to be generated. 
     A backup capture engine  220  stores data to the local storage  204  identified for inclusion of a backup during an epoch from which a particular virtual file system representation can be generated. The backup capture engine  220  can also generate and store markers and other metadata within the local storage  204  providing information about the data items stored in the delta store  214 , these markers can then be used when generating each particular virtual file system representation from the delta store  214 . The backup capture engine  220  can also store identified data to the external storage device  232  during particular backup operations. The backup capture engine  220  can track multiple local backups stored in the local storage  204  as well as backups stored on external storage devices (e.g., external storage device  232 ). 
     The backup component  117  includes a backup restoration engine  222  to restore particular data from one or more backups, both remotely stored and locally stored. In some implementations, the backup restoration engine  222  provides a user interface (e.g., a graphical user interface) where a user can select the item(s) to be restored. 
     The search component  118  can search directly within the one or more applications  228  for current versions of files or other items. In addition, the search component  118  can search earlier versions of the files and other items using the backup component  117 . For example, the search component  118  can provide a search interface within a backup user interface that allows searches of earlier versions of the files or other items. In addition, the search component  118  can provide a search interface within a user interface (e.g., a desktop user interface) that allows searches of the current version of the files or other items. 
     For example, the search component  118  can be used to initiate a search to find a particular item or element, for example, an image file. If this search finds the sought item, and if the item meets the user&#39;s expectations, there may be no need to do any further searching at that time. However, if the search does not find the sought item, or if the item that is found does not meet the user&#39;s expectations, the user can choose to perform a search of the backup data. In some implementations, the user activates a backup user interface to search the backup data. 
     An overlay engine  218  can generate a virtual file system for each respective local backup using the delta store  214 . The backup component  117  can use the generated virtual file system to generate a corresponding visual representation of the local backup, for example, within the backup interface. The overlay engine  218  can generate the virtual file system on demand in response to a request, e.g., a request to display a visual representation of a particular backup, using the data in the delta store as well as the data of the current file system. 
       FIG. 3  is a flow diagram of an example process  300  for generating a local backup. The process  300  can be performed by a system including one or more computing devices, for example, the computing device  102  of  FIG. 1 . 
     A file operation of a particular type is detected  302 . In particular, files can have associated extended attributes indicating that a copy of the file should be stored in a backup prior to particular types of file operations (e.g., the file being modified or deleted). Additionally, the extended attribute can also indicate that a record should be made before a file is moved. That such an extended attribute exists can be indicated in a flag bit of a file i-node. The i-node is a unique identifier for each file. 
     Consequently, when a process calls into the kernel to perform a particular file operation, e.g., a write operation to modify the file, the kernel determines whether or not the flag bit is set for the file. If so, the associated extended attribute is read which indicates particular actions to be performed before allowing the write to occur. In particular, the extended attribute can indicate a file handler associated with the backup to be requested so that the file can be processed for the backup (e.g., a copy stored). Once the file handler has performed the requested action, the write operation on the file can be allowed to proceed. Additional details can be found in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/433,180, filed on Jan. 14, 2010, and entitled “File System Management” the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. 
     An addition is determined to be made to a delta store ( 304 ). For example, the determination can be based on the detection of the flag bit or the calling of the special file handler by the kernel. Thus, once the file handler is called, the determination can be made to store information in the delta store. In some other implementations, a kernel event can be stored, e.g., in user-space memory. The kernel event can later be used in conjunction with subsequent event information to generate a full record of an event, e.g., a move. This combined information can then be used to generate an entry in the delta store. 
     In some other implementations, a further determination is made based on whether or not there has already been an addition to the delta store for a particular backup made within a same epoch. For example, if the file has already been modified once during the epoch, the delta store is not modified for any subsequent modifications during the epoch. An epoch can be a period of time between designated backup points defining the contents of a given local backup (e.g., an hour). Thus, the file handler for the backup has been called and no other data associated with the file has been added to the delta store during the present epoch, then a determination can be made to make an addition to the delta store. 
     The path of the file and delta store information is identified ( 306 ). The path of the file is the directory path from a root to the file (e.g., naming directories from a root directory to the location of the file within the hierarchical file system). For example, a file path can be home/dir1/dir2/dir3/example.doc. The delta store information identified depends upon the type of file operation to be performed on the file. In some implementations, the delta store information includes the file data captured prior to an operation on the file being performed. In some other implementation, the delta store information only includes a marker or other metadata describing the file operation and allowing the virtual file system representation to be generated. The marker can indicate, for example, that the entry corresponds to a modification to the file, a deletion of the file, or a move of the file to a different location within the hierarchical file system. 
     A delta store entry corresponding to the file is generated ( 308 ). In particular, the delta store contents for a particular local backup operation can be generated dynamically as items are added during an epoch. The delta store entry includes data for the file, e.g., the file system marker and, in some examples, file data. For example, for files that were being modified, the entry includes the file data prior to the modification. Similarly, for a file to be deleted, the entry includes the file data prior to the deletion. The entry further includes a marker or other metadata indicating the nature of the entry (e.g., a modification, deletion, or move). 
     Additionally, the delta store entry can identify the portion of the file system corresponding to the path of the file. In particular, the local backup is built in the delta store as needed to store backup data. As a result, in a hierarchical file system, the directories in the path for the file may not exist in the delta store. However, when generating the corresponding virtual file system, fault directories can be generated in order to replicate the hierarchical file system for the path of the file corresponding to the current file system. Each fault file can be a zero data file so that the virtual file system uses less storage space. Thus, for the example file above, each of dir1, dir2, and dir3 can be zero data fault files. Consequently, the fault directories allow for an on-demand directory hierarchy to be generated for the virtual file system. 
     A backup is created for the present epoch ( 310 ). For each epoch time, e.g., an hour, the data added to the delta store is used to define a particular backup or snapshot. Following creation of a given backup, backup data added to the delta store is associated with a next backup. 
     Additionally, the backup can add additional information to the delta store. In particular, additional entries can be added to the delta store for data items created during the epoch. 
     For example, if a new file is created during the epoch an entry can be made to the delta store including creating any necessary path directory fault files and including a creation marker. The creation marker indicates that the virtual file system generated from the backup should not include the file and any visual representation of the backup because the file did not exist prior to the backup. Thus, no file data is included in the entry to the delta store. New files being created can be identified using event reporting by applications, for example, though event notifications provided through the FSEvents API. 
       FIGS. 4A-4C  are example diagrams showing a file system structure generated for a virtual file system. The virtual file system can be generated, for example, using data stored in the delta store.  FIG. 4A  shows a portion of a virtual file system generated when a file is being deleted within a particular epoch. In particular,  FIG. 4A  shows three fault directories  402   a - c  along the path of the file. The fault directories  402   a - c  correspond to the structure of the current file system hierarchy, but can have zero data. 
     The entry for the file  404  includes a deletion marker indicating that the file is being deleted and therefore should not be included in later backups. Additionally, the file data for the file prior to deletion is included in the backup so that it can be restored. Thus, when displaying a representation of the file system corresponding to the backup, the file corresponding to the entry will be presented as present in the file system. This is in contrast to entries for created items, which do not include the file data and do not present the newly created items when displaying a representation of the file system in the backup for that epoch (but will appear in representations of later backups unless deleted). 
       FIG. 4B  shows three fault directories  406   a - c  along the path of the file. The fault directories  406   a - c  correspond to the structure of the current file system hierarchy, but can have zero data. The entry for the file  408  includes a change marker indicating that the file is being modified. Additionally, the file data for the file prior to modification is included in the backup. Thus, when displaying a representation of the file system corresponding to the backup, the unmodified file will be presented as present in the file system. Additionally, this version of the file can be restored from the locally stored backup. 
       FIG. 4C  shows three fault directories  410   a - c  along the path of the file. The fault directories  410   a - c  correspond to the structure of the current file system hierarchy, but can have zero data. The entry for the file  412  includes a move marker indicating that the file is being moved. The move marker can further include a pointer identifying the moved location of the file. The file data, however, is not included since the current file system file has the same data, just the location has been changed. 
       FIG. 5  is a flow diagram of an example process  500  for displaying local backup data. The process  500  can be performed by a system including one or more computing devices, for example, the computing device  102  of  FIG. 1 . 
     A request is received to view backup content ( 502 ). In some implementations, a user request to view backup content is submitted from a user interface window of the current file system (e.g., a window displaying folders or files of the current file system). For example, the user can submit the request in order to restore an earlier version of a file or restore a deleted file that is no longer present in the current file system. The window displaying content from the current file system can include an icon or menu item to enter a backup interface that can be selected by the user. 
     A determination is made as to whether local backups are the only available or whether backups stored on external storage device are available ( 504 ). For example, when the user&#39;s device is disconnected from an external storage device for storing backup data, only local backups may be available. Alternatively, when the user&#39;s device is connected to the external storage device, externally stored backup data is available. 
     When externally stored backups are available, a backup interface is generated including one or more representations of the backup content from the external storage backups ( 506 ). In some implementations, the backup interface provides one or more visual representations of the same file system window previously presented to the user. However, the content in the visual representations of the file system window correspond to the content present in the particular backup. For example, the window can display files or folders present in the backup of the file system. 
     In some implementations, the user can interact with the visual representations to select particular data items (e.g., for restoration) or to navigate the file system hierarchy (e.g., opening a folder to view the contents within another visual representation. A different visual representation can be presented for each backup, for example, one at a time or as part of a stack of visual representations to which the user can navigate. In some implementations, both any local backups locally stored and the externally stored local backups are both presented in the backup interface. The different types of backups can be differentiated in the backup interface, for example, using different visual cues (e.g., different colors or different visual effects such as badging) to distinguish the locally stored and externally stored backup data. 
     When only local backups are available, a first visual representation of a first local backup is generated ( 508 ). The first visual representation is generated using the virtual file system generated using data of the most recent local backup as well as the current file system data. Generating the first visual representation is described in greater detail below with respect to  FIG. 6 . 
     The first visual representation is presented, for example, within a backup interface ( 510 ). The first visual representation can be presented in a similar manner to the visual representations of externally stored backups. Thus, the first visual representation can present a file system window corresponding to the file system window previously presented to the user but with content corresponding to the particular local backup. The visual representation is tied to the underlying data of the virtual file system. 
     A user input is received in the backup interface ( 512 ). In particular, the user can interact with the visual representation, for example, to navigate within the file system of the backup as well as to select one or more displayed items for restoration. The user can also provide an input to view another visual representation corresponding to an earlier local backup. For example, a particular file the user is looking for may not be in the most recent local backup. Therefore, the user can look in an earlier backup. 
     A determination is made as to whether the input is a restore input, a request to view a visual representation of an earlier local backup, or a navigational input ( 514 ). If the input is a restore input, the virtual file system is used to identify corresponding data in the delta store to restore ( 516 ). The restore input can be received, for example, according to a user selection of one or more data items in the first visual representation. For example, the user can select one or more files for restoration. The data within the virtual file system corresponding to the selected file is identified. The data item is then restored to the current file system ( 518 ). Restoring can include replacing a current version of the data item with the restored version. Alternatively, restoring the data item can include copying the restored data item to the current file system such that both the existing version of the data item and the restored version are retained. 
     If the input is a navigation input, a corresponding modification is performed ( 520 ). For example, the navigation input can be to display a different level of the file system hierarchy of the backup (e.g., by opening a folder). The visual representation can be modified to present the selected portion of the file system. In another example, the navigation input can be to exit the backup interface. The backup interface can be dismissed (with or without animation) and the user returned to the same file system window from which the backup interface was invoked. 
     If the input is to view a visual representation of an earlier local backup, a second visual representation corresponding to the requested earlier local backup is generated and presented ( 520 ). 
       FIG. 6  is a flow diagram of an example process  600  for generating a visual representation of a particular local backup. The process  600  can be performed by a system including one or more computing devices, for example, the computing device  102  of  FIG. 1 . 
     In response to the request to display a visual representation of the local backup, the contents of the current file system are identified ( 602 ). Data from a first virtual file system of a local backup is also identified ( 604 ). In some implementations, the first virtual file system data of the most recent local backup is identified. The first virtual file system data can be generated on the fly, e.g., in response to a request for a display of a particular local backup. The first virtual file system can be generated, for example, using data corresponding to the local backup located in a particular delta store of a local storage device. In some alternative implementations, a virtual file system is generated for each local backup using the delta store and stored, e.g., in the local storage device. 
     The current file system data is compared to the first virtual file system data ( 606 ). In some implementations, one or more set operations are performed to identify differences between the two file systems. These differences can indicate content to be added or removed from the visual representation of the backup relative to the current file system. For example, if the current file system does not include a particular file while the virtual file system does includes a file indicating that the file was deleted, then the file should be shown in any generated visual representation. Similarly, if a file exists in the current file system while a creation marker is present in the virtual file system, then the file should not be presented (the creation marker causes the file to be subtracted in the comparison). However, if the file exists in the current file system and the virtual file system does not include a marker for that file, then the file should be presented as the current file is consistent with the backup. 
     Whether to add or remove a particular data item such as a file as a result of the comparison depends on the particular virtual file system markers. Thus, starting with the full file system from the current file system, data items are added or subtracted based on the markers in the virtual file system. This allows for the generation of visual representations of the full backup file system using a reduced representation provided by the virtual file system. 
     A visual representation of the backup is generated from the result set of the comparison ( 608 ). The identified file system hierarchy of the result set is used to generate the visual representation of that file system hierarchy, in particular, the portion corresponding to the file system window that was previously being presented to the user prior to requesting the backup. Additional visual representations of different portions of the backup can be generated from the result set as the user navigates the visual representation. 
     A request is received to view a second visual representation corresponding to an earlier backup ( 610 ). In response to the request, a second virtual file system corresponding to the earlier backup is identified ( 612 ). In particular, the second virtual file system can correspond to the next earlier backup relative to the first virtual file system and can be generated in response to the request. A comparison is made between the previous result set (e.g., between the current and first virtual file system) and the second virtual file system ( 614 ). For example, the comparison can include one or more set operations as described above. A second visual representation is generated from the second result set. 
     In some implementations, the virtual file system representations are cumulative such that in order to identify the content to display in a visual representation of a given backup all virtual file system representations between the current file system and the backup content to be displayed are traversed. Thus, if the backup content of a fifth virtual file system corresponding to a fifth backup from the current file system is to be displayed, the fifth virtual file system is compared with a result set corresponding to a comparison of the prior result sets for each step from the current file system (e.g., between the current file system and the first virtual file system, between the first result set and the second virtual file system, etc.). While increasing processing for displaying older backups, each virtual file system is allowed to be more compact while being able to fully reconstruct the file system at that point in time. 
       FIG. 7  is an example backup user interface  700 . The backup interface can be generated, for example, within a desktop user interface of a user&#39;s computing device in response to a user request to view backup data. In some implementations, the user request is initiated from a user interface window displaying particular current file system content (e.g., a particular directory of the file system). In some implementations, the backup interface is a window presented within the desktop user interface. In some other implementations, the backup interface is presented as an overlay to the desktop user interface such that only the backup user interface is visible. 
     The backup user interface  700  includes a first visual representation  702  of backup data. The first visual representation  702  can correspond to a visual representation of the same user interface window (e.g., as previously viewed by the user before initiating the backup interface), but displaying content corresponding to the backup as defined by the virtual file system. Thus, the first visual representation  702  presents the user interface window as it appeared at the time of the backup. 
     The first visual representation  702  is not an image; however, but an interactive representation from which the user can navigate the file system of the backup (e.g., by opening file  704  to view the corresponding contents) as well as select one or more items (e.g., item  706 ) for restoration, for example, by then selecting a restore button  708 . Additional visual representations corresponding to other backups can be presented (e.g., as placeholders or actual backup visual representation). For example, a stack  710  can be used to represent additional backup visual representations in chronological order. In some implementations, the contents of each visual representation in the stack are generated upon selection, or are navigated to, by the user. 
       FIG. 8  is a flow diagram of an example process  800  for migrating local backups to remote backups. The process  800  can be performed by a system including one or more computing devices, for example, the computing device  102  of  FIG. 1 . For example, when a user reconnects to a remote storage device used for storing backups, the particular local backups that were generated for local storage while the remote storage device was disconnected can be migrated to backups for the remote storage device. 
     A connection is made with an external storage device ( 802 ). For example, the user a portable computing device can reconnect with an external storage location used for backups (e.g., an external storage disk, a server, a cloud storage location on a network, etc.). 
     A backup is generated of the current file system and stored on the external storage device ( 804 ). Thus, a backup is generated corresponding to the current file system existing on the user device (e.g., generated based on all changes between the previous backup on the external storage device and the current data). 
     Local backups for migration are identified ( 806 ). Since the current data has already been backed up, for each local backup there is already an older and a newer backup on the external storage device. For example, consider a scenario where the next newest backup on the remote storage device generated three hours ago is backup-3 and the newest backup just taken is backup-now. Additionally, there are two locally stored backups backup-1 and backup-2, where backup-1 was generated 1 hour ago and backup-2 was generated two hours ago. In some implementations, there may still be local backups stored that are older than the next externally stored backup (e.g., older than three hours in the example). These can be ignored since they are older than the externally stored backup. 
     Identified local backups are migrated to the external storage ( 810 ). In particular, in some implementations, the local backups are migrated from newest to oldest (e.g., first backup-1 and then backup-2). In order to migrate the local backups, the virtual file system entries are examined. For example, when looking at a particular folder, a determination needs to be made as to whether that folder has changed or whether anything within that folder is different than what was in either the latest externally stored backup or the previously stored external backup (e.g., backup-3 and backup-now). Whenever changed information is added to the virtual file system of a given backup, a marker or extended attribute is added to the virtual file system as well. This marker indicates that the item present in the virtual file system is a copy in the delta store of the local storage, not the original. Thus, this is likely an item that needs to be migrated to the external storage. These items are then copied and linked to identical content in other externally stored backups (e.g., using hardlinks). In particular, when migrating backup-1, items that are identified as the same as what is in the current disk (backup-now) (e.g., there is no corresponding virtual file system entry for unchanged items and therefore no marker) are linked to the matching path on the current backup (backup-now). 
     Items that are likely to be different based on the existence of the marker are compared directly to the corresponding item in the current backup (backup-now) and linked to the corresponding path in backup-now if they are identical, and then compared to the prior external backup (backup-3) and linked to the corresponding path there if identical. If neither matches, the content of the data is copied to the backup-1 being created (e.g., the data does not exist on any other backup). The process continues sequentially for each local backup. However, going back in time the comparison is not to the current backup but to the most closely generated external backup following the one being migrated. For example, after backup-1 has been migrated, when migrating backup-2 the comparison is between backup-3 and backup-1 instead of backup-3 and backup-now. 
     Embodiments of the subject matter and the operations described in this specification can be implemented in digital electronic circuitry, or in computer software, firmware, or hardware, including the structures disclosed in this specification and their structural equivalents, or in combinations of one or more of them. Embodiments of the subject matter described in this specification can be implemented as one or more computer programs, i.e., one or more modules of computer program instructions, encoded on computer storage medium for execution by, or to control the operation of, data processing apparatus. Alternatively or in addition, the program instructions can be encoded on an artificially-generated propagated signal, e.g., a machine-generated electrical, optical, or electromagnetic signal, that is generated to encode information for transmission to suitable receiver apparatus for execution by a data processing apparatus. A computer storage medium can be, or be included in, a computer-readable storage device, a computer-readable storage substrate, a random or serial access memory array or device, or a combination of one or more of them. Moreover, while a computer storage medium is not a propagated signal, a computer storage medium can be a source or destination of computer program instructions encoded in an artificially-generated propagated signal. The computer storage medium can also be, or be included in, one or more separate physical components or media (e.g., multiple CDs, disks, or other storage devices). 
     The operations described in this specification can be implemented as operations performed by a data processing apparatus on data stored on one or more computer-readable storage devices or received from other sources. 
     The term “data processing apparatus” encompasses all kinds of apparatus, devices, and machines for processing data, including by way of example a programmable processor, a computer, a system on a chip, or multiple ones, or combinations, of the foregoing The apparatus can include special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) or an ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit). The apparatus can also include, in addition to hardware, code that creates an execution environment for the computer program in question, e.g., code that constitutes processor firmware, a protocol stack, a database management system, an operating system, a cross-platform runtime environment, a virtual machine, or a combination of one or more of them. The apparatus and execution environment can realize various different computing model infrastructures, such as web services, distributed computing and grid computing infrastructures. 
     A computer program (also known as a program, software, software application, script, or code) can be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted languages, declarative or procedural languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, object, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computer program may, but need not, correspond to a file in a file system. A program can be stored in a portion of a file that holds other programs or data (e.g., one or more scripts stored in a markup language document), in a single file dedicated to the program in question, or in multiple coordinated files (e.g., files that store one or more modules, sub-programs, or portions of code). A computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers that are located at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a communication network. 
     The processes and logic flows described in this specification can be performed by one or more programmable processors executing one or more computer programs to perform actions by operating on input data and generating output. The processes and logic flows can also be performed by, and apparatus can also be implemented as, special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) or an ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit). 
     Processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, and any one or more processors of any kind of digital computer. Generally, a processor will receive instructions and data from a read-only memory or a random access memory or both. The essential elements of a computer are a processor for performing actions in accordance with instructions and one or more memory devices for storing instructions and data. Generally, a computer will also include, or be operatively coupled to receive data from or transfer data to, or both, one or more mass storage devices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto-optical disks, or optical disks. However, a computer need not have such devices. Moreover, a computer can be embedded in another device, e.g., a mobile telephone, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a mobile audio or video player, a game console, a Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver, or a portable storage device (e.g., a universal serial bus (USB) flash drive), to name just a few. Devices suitable for storing computer program instructions and data include all forms of non-volatile memory, media and memory devices, including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices; magnetic disks, e.g., internal hard disks or removable disks; magneto-optical disks; and CD-ROM and DVD-ROM disks. The processor and the memory can be supplemented by, or incorporated in, special purpose logic circuitry. 
     To provide for interaction with a user, embodiments of the subject matter described in this specification can be implemented on a computer having a display device, e.g., a CRT (cathode ray tube) or LCD (liquid crystal display) monitor, for displaying information to the user and a keyboard and a pointing device, e.g., a mouse or a trackball, by which the user can provide input to the computer. Other kinds of devices can be used to provide for interaction with a user as well; for example, feedback provided to the user can be any form of sensory feedback, e.g., visual feedback, auditory feedback, or tactile feedback; and input from the user can be received in any form, including acoustic, speech, or tactile input. In addition, a computer can interact with a user by sending documents to and receiving documents from a device that is used by the user; for example, by sending web pages to a web browser on a user&#39;s client device in response to requests received from the web browser. 
     Embodiments of the subject matter described in this specification can be implemented in a computing system that includes a back-end component, e.g., as a data server, or that includes a middleware component, e.g., an application server, or that includes a front-end component, e.g., a client computer having a graphical user interface or a Web browser through which a user can interact with an implementation of the subject matter described in this specification, or any combination of one or more such back-end, middleware, or front-end components. The components of the system can be interconnected by any form or medium of digital data communication, e.g., a communication network. Examples of communication networks include a local area network (“LAN”) and a wide area network (“WAN”), an inter-network (e.g., the Internet), and peer-to-peer networks (e.g., ad hoc peer-to-peer networks). 
     The computing system can include clients and servers. A client and server are generally remote from each other and typically interact through a communication network. The relationship of client and server arises by virtue of computer programs running on the respective computers and having a client-server relationship to each other. In some embodiments, a server transmits data (e.g., an HTML page) to a client device (e.g., for purposes of displaying data to and receiving user input from a user interacting with the client device). Data generated at the client device (e.g., a result of the user interaction) can be received from the client device at the server. 
     While this specification contains many specific implementation details, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of any inventions or of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features specific to particular embodiments of particular inventions. Certain features that are described in this specification in the context of separate embodiments can also be implemented in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single embodiment can also be implemented in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitable subcombination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a subcombination or variation of a subcombination. 
     Similarly, while operations are depicted in the drawings in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirable results. In certain circumstances, multitasking and parallel processing may be advantageous. Moreover, the separation of various system components in the embodiments described above should not be understood as requiring such separation in all embodiments, and it should be understood that the described program components and systems can generally be integrated together in a single software product or packaged into multiple software products. 
     Thus, particular embodiments of the subject matter have been described. Other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims. In some cases, the actions recited in the claims can be performed in a different order and still achieve desirable results. In addition, the processes depicted in the accompanying figures do not necessarily require the particular order shown, or sequential order, to achieve desirable results. In certain implementations, multitasking and parallel processing may be advantageous.

Metadata:
Filing Date: 20120113
Publication Date: 20170530
Grant Date: 20170530
Priority Date: 20110114
Inventors: GIAMPAOLO DOMINIC B.
WEISS ERIC
CISLER PAVEL
MCINTYRE KRISTEN A.
Assignee: APPLE INC
CPC Classifications: [{"code": "G06F16/1873", "inventive": true, "first": true, "tree": "[]"}, {"code": "G06F16/24539", "inventive": false, "first": false, "tree": "[]"}, {"code": "G06F16/1734", "inventive": true, "first": false, "tree": "[]"}, {"code": "G06F11/1435", "inventive": false, "first": false, "tree": "[]"}, {"code": "G06F11/1451", "inventive": true, "first": false, "tree": "[]"}, {"code": "G06F2201/815", "inventive": false, "first": false, "tree": "[]"}, {"code": "G06F11/1456", "inventive": false, "first": false, "tree": "[]"}, {"code": "G06F11/1469", "inventive": false, "first": false, "tree": "[]"}, {"code": "G06F17/30144", "inventive": true, "first": false, "tree": "[]"}, {"code": "G06F11/1469", "inventive": false, "first": false, "tree": "[]"}, {"code": "G06F2201/815", "inventive": false, "first": false, "tree": "[]"}, {"code": "G06F17/3023", "inventive": true, "first": true, "tree": "[]"}, {"code": "G06F11/1451", "inventive": true, "first": false, "tree": "[]"}, {"code": "G06F11/1435", "inventive": false, "first": false, "tree": "[]"}, {"code": "G06F17/30457", "inventive": false, "first": false, "tree": "[]"}, {"code": "G06F11/1456", "inventive": false, "first": false, "tree": "[]"}]
Family ID: 46491585