Use case: Data Processing, Formatting & Math
Instruction type: Negative
Prompt style: Rambling/Stream-of-Consciousness

Prompt:
So we have a lot of branches at our company and obviously we want to keep them all productive, I mean, more productive than they are right now -- make them more productive, or, more specifically, make them as productive as they can be. In other words, we want them to each be the best of which they can be capable of being. So what I want from you is, can you rank the branches based on their percentage change in each branch's total sales in Q3 of last year versus Q3 of this year? Like, if the total combined sales from all the salespeople at a single branch rose from 500 in last year's Q3 to 750 in this year's Q3, that'd be a 50% increase. Give each branch's change to the nearest percent, e.g. 95% or -15%, rather than 94.72% or -14.55%. List the branches in descending order of their percentage improvement, with the highest percentage increase at the top of the list and the highest percentage DECREASE at the end. Just give me those percentages followed by their respective branch locations, followed by the branch's biggest earner in parentheses  -- like, if the percent change at the Amarillo branch was -9.8% and John Smith was the highest earner in Q3 of this year, you'd write that listing as just:
-10%: Amarillo (Highest Earner: John Smith)

If the highest earner's a tie, write them both, e.g. "(Highest Earner: John Smith, Jane Smith)"

Put every branch's listing on separate lines, with no blank lines in between those listings. Don't put anything else in your answer.

Here's the quarterly data for each of the company's salespeople for last year, with sales in hundreds of thousands of dollars:

		Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4
Bing	Trent	59	81	46	63
Black	Dennis	32	45	32	88
Carlson	Deborah	38	37	59	36
Carr	Anna	53	77	27	68
Chao	Greg	57	63	35	38
Clayman	Calvin	81	59	29	52
Collins	Jerry	98	65	37	72
Comstock	John	60	66	38	73
DeCarlo	Rachel	82	81	31	73
Fitch	Rob	89	23	48	55
Foster	Rodney	59	82	32	55
Gallagher	Samuel	54	55	45	53
Gladstone	Matt	55	78	38	45
Gonzalez	Layla	59	63	35	67
Gorman	Victoria	61	67	39	74
Hayden	Josh	56	80	30	44
Henderson	Sonny	52	76	26	49
Hernandez	Izzie	65	33	55	37
Howell	Tamara	50	37	59	66
Jackson	Frances	51	38	60	67
Jones	Reggie	31	67	39	74
Larsen	Eloise	35	45	28	82
Lee	Amanda	59	73	33	82
Leonard	Inez	66	34	56	38
Mann	Ellie	36	79	29	83
Marciano	Bill	67	66	38	38
Martin	Mindy	78	62	34	69
Martinez	Joey	37	36	58	83
Maxwell	Liza	34	77	34	50
McGuinness	Julie	53	60	32	49
Mendelson	Adam	36	83	32	82
O’Toole	Ray	51	38	60	84
Ortega	Alejandro	79	67	27	98
Pearson	Bob	57	81	46	54
Perez	Carlos	39	37	59	83
Perez	Fernando	45	50	31	69
Plant	Jason	44	98	31	52
Pointer	Ervin	48	35	57	81
Ransom	Sandy	58	82	39	55
Reed	Paul	62	68	40	75
Reeves	John	98	69	41	68
Richards	Jim	64	32	54	78
Ross	Max	59	83	32	37
Sacks	Jessie	46	98	31	54
Schneider	Jenny	59	83	33	56
Scott	Stan	66	38	60	37
Smith	Bart	49	36	58	82
Smith	Meredith	68	67	39	66
Tomlinson	Chris	63	69	41	45
Tompkins	Kim	78	82	32	36
Vincent	Mike	81	73	33	45
Weiss	Jim	58	45	36	81
West	Peter	62	68	40	98
Winter	Nancy	80	64	46	68
Wong	Natasha	33	68	40	67

And then here's the quarterly data for each of the company's salespeople for this year, with sales in hundreds of thousands of dollars:
		Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4
Bing	Trent	46	81	31	73
Black	Dennis	89	23	48	55
Carlson	Deborah	59	82	32	83
Carr	Anna	54	55	45	53
Chao	Greg	45	78	38	45
Clayman	Calvin	61	63	35	67
Collins	Jerry	59	67	39	74
Comstock	John	73	80	30	59
DeCarlo	Rachel	52	76	26	44
Fitch	Rob	65	33	55	37
Foster	Rodney	50	37	59	66
Gallagher	Samuel	82	38	64	67
Gladstone	Matt	31	67	39	74
Gonzalez	Layla	35	45	26	90
Gorman	Victoria	59	73	33	82
Hayden	Josh	68	81	46	63
Henderson	Sonny	32	54	32	69
Hernandez	Izzie	38	37	62	36
Howell	Tamara	53	77	37	68
Jackson	Frances	57	63	35	38
Jones	Reggie	81	59	29	52
Larsen	Eloise	98	65	37	72
Lee	Amanda	60	71	34	46
Leonard	Inez	82	81	31	73
Mann	Ellie	89	23	48	55
Marciano	Bill	59	82	32	89
Martin	Mindy	54	55	45	53
Martinez	Joey	55	78	45	45
Maxwell	Liza	39	37	59	83
McGuinness	Julie	45	50	39	69
Mendelson	Adam	44	98	31	52
O’Toole	Ray	48	35	57	81
Ortega	Alejandro	58	82	39	67
Pearson	Bob	62	86	44	75
Perez	Carlos	98	69	41	68
Perez	Fernando	64	32	54	78
Plant	Jason	59	83	29	37
Pointer	Ervin	46	98	31	54
Ransom	Sandy	59	83	33	55
Reed	Paul	61	67	39	74
Reeves	John	56	80	30	44
Richards	Jim	52	76	43	49
Ross	Max	65	33	24	37
Sacks	Jessie	50	47	59	66
Schneider	Jenny	51	38	60	67
Scott	Stan	31	67	39	74
Smith	Bart	35	45	37	82
Smith	Meredith	59	73	33	82
Tomlinson	Chris	66	34	40	38
Tompkins	Kim	36	79	29	83
Vincent	Mike	67	76	38	38
Weiss	Jim	78	62	40	69
West	Peter	60	74	34	83
Winter	Nancy	67	35	57	39
Wong	Natasha	37	55	30	84

Whoops, and you'll need the team members, so here are those, sorry:
Amarillo: Jim W, Max, Rob, Samuel, Tamara
Ames: Amanda, Dennis, Joey, John R, Natasha
Bentonville: Bob, Ervin, Jenny, Kim, Rodney
Boulder: Bill, Chris, Greg, Sandy, Stan
Bozeman: Adam, Calvin, Carlos, Izzie, Peter
Columbia: Bart, Eloise, Paul, Rachel, Reggie
Norman: Deborah, Frances, Liza, Meredith, Victoria
Provo: Fernando, Jim R, John C, Josh, Mindy
Shreveport: Alejandro, Jessie, Julie, Sonny, Trent
Taos: Anna, Ellie, Jason, Matt, Mike
Tucson: Inez, Jerry, Layla, Nancy, Ray

Evaluation criteria:
The response should list the following percentages for each location: 26% for Taos, 23% for Shreveport, 17% for Provo, 12% for Bentonville, 0% for Amarillo, -6% for Bozeman, -8% for Ames, -10% for Tucson, -14% for Columbia, -15% for Boulder, and -17% for Norman.
The response should rank the branches in descending order based on their calculated percentage change in Q3 sales. Those calculations will result in the following ordering of branches from top to bottom: Taos, Shreveport, Provo, Bentonville, Amarillo, Bozeman, Ames, Tucson, Columbia, Boulder, Norman.
The response should accurately identify the highest earners for each location in Q3 of this year as follows: Ellie Mann for Taos, Jessie Sacks for Shreveport, Fernando Perez for Provo, Jenny Schneider for Bentonville, Samuel Gallagher for Amarillo, Izzie Hernandez for Bozeman, Dennis Black for Ames, Ray O’Toole and Nancy Winter for Tucson, Paul Reed for Columbia, Chris Tomlinson for Boulder, and Liza Maxwell for Norman.)
The response should, if two people tie for the highest-earning individual at a company branch in Q3 of this year, list those highest-earning individuals as follows: "(Highest Earner: [First and last name of tied highest earner #1], [First and last name of tied highest earner #2])"; specifically, since Ray O’Toole and Nancy Winter tied as the Tucson branch's highest earner, both individuals should be included in the Tucson listing, in the parenthetical "(Highest Earner: Ray O’Toole, Nancy Winter)" or "(Highest Earner: Nancy Winter, Ray O’Toole)".
The response should format the information about a branch as follows, with the brackets containing placeholder information: "[percentage change]%: [BranchName] (Highest Earner: [First and last name(s) of highest earner(s)])". For example, if the percent change at the Amarillo branch was -10% and John Smith was the highest earner at that branch in Q3 of this year, that information would be written as: "-10%: Amarillo (Highest Earner: John Smith)".
The response should identify each branch's highest earner(s) by both their first and last name.
The response should present the percentage change for each branch as an integer, rounded to the nearest percent.
The response should list each branch (and that branch's information) on its own single and separate line.
The response should not contain any content except the list of branches accompanied by percentages and the identities of the branch's highest earners.
The response should not include any blank lines between the lines listing the information about each branch.