# Economic Trilemma Explained: Definition, Theory, and Real-World Examples

![Panoramic view of the London financial district.](https://www.investopedia.com/thmb/dRevG6vOGr3moX4NsvTQdM1PNgs=/1500x0/filters:no_upscale():max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/WhatIsaTrilemmaandHowIsItUsedinEconomicsGettyImages-1053513836-ac9fd5bdd234407ca6c98019776399e9.jpg)

*— John Lamb / Getty Images*

## What Is a Trilemma?

A trilemma in economics offers three possible solutions to a complex problem, unlike a dilemma which only has two. A trilemma suggests that countries have three options from which to choose when making fundamental decisions about managing their international monetary policy agreements. However, the options of the trilemma are conflictual because of mutual exclusivity, which makes only one option of the trilemma achievable at a given time.

The trilemma, or "impossible trinity," reveals the instability of managing the three main options in a country's international monetary policy.

### Key Takeaways

*   The trilemma, or impossible trinity, posits that a country can only achieve one of three options—fixed exchange rates, free capital flow, or independent monetary policy—at a given time.
*   Most countries today prefer free capital flow and autonomous monetary policy, prioritizing economic flexibility over fixed exchange rates.
*   The trilemma challenges governments to determine which options best align with their economic goals and how to manage competing priorities.
*   The Mundell-Fleming trilemma was developed in the 1960s, highlighting the complex relationship between exchange rates, capital flows, and monetary policy.
*   The eurozone and the Bretton Woods Agreement serve as real-world examples of how countries navigate the trilemma's trade-offs.

## Breaking Down the Economic Trilemma

When making fundamental decisions about managing international monetary policy, a trilemma suggests that countries have three possible options from which to choose. The Mundell-Fleming trilemma model presents these options:

1.  Setting a fixed currency [exchange rate](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/exchangerate.asp)
2.  Allowing capital to flow freely with no fixed currency [exchange rate](https://www.investopedia.com/articles/forex/090314/how-calculate-exchange-rate.asp) agreement
3.  Autonomous [monetary policy](https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/040315/how-do-fiscal-and-monetary-policies-affect-aggregate-demand.asp)

![Trilemma](https://www.investopedia.com/thmb/24imrli5FX7D9Gc2fsdGgzrUmVI=/1500x0/filters:no_upscale():max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/Trilemma_Explained2-d0bbbbea44c94416bca3d5a738f5cccb.PNG)

**

Because each option is mutually exclusive, only one side of the trilemma triangle is achievable at a time.

*   **Side A**: A country can choose to fix exchange rates with one or more countries and have a free flow of capital with others. If it chooses this scenario, independent monetary policy is not achievable because interest rate fluctuations would create currency arbitrage stressing the currency pegs and causing them to break.
*   **Side B**: The country can choose to have a free flow of capital among all foreign nations and also have an autonomous monetary policy. Fixed exchange rates among all nations and the free flow of capital are mutually exclusive. As a result, only one can be chosen at a time. So, if there is a free flow of capital among all nations, there cannot be fixed exchange rates.
*   **Side C**: If a country chooses fixed exchange rates and independent monetary policy it cannot have a free flow of capital. Again, in this instance, fixed exchange rates and the free flow of capital are mutually exclusive.

## Navigating Government Policy Choices in a Trilemma

The challenge for a government's monetary policy is deciding which option to pursue and how to manage it. Generally, most countries favor side B of the triangle because they can enjoy the freedom of independent monetary policy and allow the policy to help guide the flow of capital.

## Academic Insights and Theorists Behind the Trilemma

The theory of the policy trilemma is frequently credited to the economists [Robert Mundell](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/o/optimal-currency-area.asp) and Marcus Fleming, who independently described the relationships among exchange rates, capital flows, and monetary policy in the 1960s. Maurice Obstfeld, who became chief economist at the [International Monetary Fund (IMF)](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/imf.asp) in 2015, presented the model they developed as a "trilemma" in a 2004 paper.

The French economist Hélène Rey argued that the trilemma is not as simple as it appears. In the modern day, Rey believes that the majority of countries are faced with only two options, or a dilemma, since fixed currency pegs are not usually effective, leading to a focus on the relationship between independent monetary policy and free capital flow.

## Practical Implications: Trilemma in Action

A real-world example of solving these trade-offs occurs in the [eurozone](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/eurozone.asp), where countries are closely interconnected. By forming the eurozone and using one currency, the countries have ultimately opted for side A of the triangle, maintaining a single currency (in effect a one-to-one peg coupled with the free capital flow).

After World War II, wealthy nations chose side C under the [Bretton Woods Agreement](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/brettonwoodsagreement.asp), pegging currencies to the U.S. dollar while setting their own interest rates. Cross-border capital flows were so small that this system held for a couple of decades—the exception being Mundell's native Canada, where he gained special insight into the tensions inherent in the Bretton Woods system.

## The Bottom Line

The trilemma, or "impossible trinity," offers a complex framework for understanding a country's monetary policy decisions, presenting three mutually exclusive options: fixed exchange rates, free capital flow, and autonomous monetary policy. Each option interacts uniquely, necessitating strategic choices by governments. Most favor free capital flow and autonomous monetary policy to balance economic stability.

Historical examples, such as the eurozone's single currency strategy and the Bretton Woods Agreement, illustrate diverse approaches to navigating these trade-offs. Understanding the trilemma can empower countries and policymakers to make informed decisions that align with their economic goals and constraints.

> **Article Sources**
>
> 1.  Obstfeld, Maurice, et al. "[The Trilemma in History: Tradeoffs among Exchange Rates, Monetary Policies, and Capital Mobility](https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w10396/w10396.pdf)." _National Bureau of Economic Research_, Working Paper 10396, March 2004, pp. 1.
>     
> 2.  Boughton, James M. "[On the Origins of the Fleming-Mundell Model](https://www.imf.org/External/Pubs/FT/staffp/2003/01/PDF/Bough.pdf)." _International Monetary Fund Staff Papers_, vol. 50, no. 1, 2003, pp. 1-2.
>     
> 3.  Obstfeld, Maurice and et al. "[The Trilemma in History: Tradeoffs Among Exchange Rates, Monetary Policies, and Capital Mobility](https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w10396/w10396.pdf)." _National Bureau of Economic Research_, Working Paper 10396, March 2004, pp. 1-41.
>     
> 4.  Rey, Hélène. "[Dilemma not Trilemma: The Global Financial Cycle and Monetary Policy Independence](https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w21162/w21162.pdf)." _National Bureau of Economic Research_, Working Paper 21162, May 2015, pp. 1-42.
>     
> 5.  Library of Congress. "[Bretton Woods Conference & the Birth of the IMF and World Bank](https://guides.loc.gov/this-month-in-business-history/july/bretton-woods-conference)."