inputs: hypothesis: Greenpeace wants to protect whales. premise: Greenpeace activist Adele blogged the news from their Stockholm office expressing reservations over the legitimacy of the vote saying it  would "change little or nothing" as previous votes had already been passed in favour of the anti-whaling group of countries. Mike Townsley from  Greenpeace International said, "Greenpeace is disgusted that any member of the IWC would seek to promote whaling based upon the false notion that whales  consume so much fish that they are a threat to food security for coastal nations". He added that the declaration was more like a whaler's "wish list,  peddling predictable and well-rehearsed rhetoric".