In the second study, RAPS and AUDIT were more sensitive than TWEAK and CAGE, identifying 79 percent and 78 percent compared with 72 percent and 71 percent, respectively, of patients with an ICD-10 or DSM-IV diagnosis of alcohol dependence, harmful drinking, or abuse.
it was in the second study that AUDIT was more sensitive than TWEAK.
mnli hypothesis: it was in the second study that AUDIT was more sensitive than TWEAK. premise: In the second study, RAPS and AUDIT were more sensitive than TWEAK and CAGE, identifying 79 percent and 78 percent compared with 72 percent and 71 percent, respectively, of patients with an ICD-10 or DSM-IV diagnosis of alcohol dependence, harmful drinking, or abuse.