Finally, in compliance with section 604(a)(5), the analysis describes the significant alternatives considered and rejected, including universal applicability to commercial mobile voice services, automatic exclusion of all rural cellular carriers, and a Commission-developed set of standards for implementation.
Significant alternatives were considered and dismissed in compliance with section 604(a)(5) and section 605(a)(2).
mnli hypothesis: Significant alternatives were considered and dismissed in compliance with section 604(a)(5) and section 605(a)(2). premise: Finally, in compliance with section 604(a)(5), the analysis describes the significant alternatives considered and rejected, including universal applicability to commercial mobile voice services, automatic exclusion of all rural cellular carriers, and a Commission-developed set of standards for implementation.