Broaddrick's story is believable because of its wretched familiarity, wrote columnist Michael Kelly, citing Clinton's piggish behavior with Lewinsky as evidence that he could be a brute.
Many people believed what Broaddrick had to say because the story was so familiar.
mnli hypothesis: Many people believed what Broaddrick had to say because the story was so familiar. premise: Broaddrick's story is believable because of its wretched familiarity, wrote columnist Michael Kelly, citing Clinton's piggish behavior with Lewinsky as evidence that he could be a brute.