The Court agrees with all this, yet applies a novel and unsupportable interpretation of our public-forum precedents to declare a504(a)(16) facially unconstitutional.
The reasons for declaring a504(a)(16) unconstitutional were based on an unusual reading of the previous cases.
mnli hypothesis: The reasons for declaring a504(a)(16) unconstitutional were based on an unusual reading of the previous cases. premise: The Court agrees with all this, yet applies a novel and unsupportable interpretation of our public-forum precedents to declare a504(a)(16) facially unconstitutional.