Hume follows by asking whether this means that Starr's office is committed to eventually delivering a report (thereby indicating that Starr has credible evidence of impeachable malfeasance).
Hume doesn't inquire about the report.
mnli hypothesis: Hume doesn't inquire about the report. premise: Hume follows by asking whether this means that Starr's office is committed to eventually delivering a report (thereby indicating that Starr has credible evidence of impeachable malfeasance).