Such heavy-handed conceptual humor is a far cry from Duchamp's mercurial wit, or from the visceral delight of Meret Oppenheim's Object (1936), the famous fur-lined teacup.
Meret Oppenheim Object was not a delight.
mnli hypothesis: Meret Oppenheim Object was not a delight. premise: Such heavy-handed conceptual humor is a far cry from Duchamp's mercurial wit, or from the visceral delight of Meret Oppenheim's Object (1936), the famous fur-lined teacup.