He also refused to acknowledge GAOas basic statutory authorities and asserts that if the aComptroller Generalas misconstruction of the statutes- were to prevail, ahis conduct would unconstitutionally interfere with the functioning of the Executive Branch.
The Supreme Court later ruled that his argument was specious.
mnli hypothesis: The Supreme Court later ruled that his argument was specious. premise: He also refused to acknowledge GAOas basic statutory authorities and asserts that if the aComptroller Generalas misconstruction of the statutes- were to prevail, ahis conduct would unconstitutionally interfere with the functioning of the Executive Branch.