(Scalia offered a different textualist reading of the Equal Protection Clause, grounding his arch dissent firmly in majoritarianism--The Court has mistaken a Kulturkampf for a fit of spite.
Scalia agreed with The Court's view and offered no retort.
mnli hypothesis: Scalia agreed with The Court's view and offered no retort. premise: (Scalia offered a different textualist reading of the Equal Protection Clause, grounding his arch dissent firmly in majoritarianism--The Court has mistaken a Kulturkampf for a fit of spite.