The recipients argued that the regulations constituted impermissible viewpoint discrimination favoring an antiabortion position over a proabortion approach in the sphere of family planning.
Regulations were favoring antiabortion instead of proabortion in family planning.
mnli hypothesis: Regulations were favoring antiabortion instead of proabortion in family planning. premise: The recipients argued that the regulations constituted impermissible viewpoint discrimination favoring an antiabortion position over a proabortion approach in the sphere of family planning.