That was exactly the reasoning endorsed by the Supreme Court in 1988, when it upheld the right of Sharp Electronics to terminate the dealership of a chronic discounter.
The Supreme Court did not allow Sharp Electronics to terminate the contract.
mnli hypothesis: The Supreme Court did not allow Sharp Electronics to terminate the contract. premise: That was exactly the reasoning endorsed by the Supreme Court in 1988, when it upheld the right of Sharp Electronics to terminate the dealership of a chronic discounter.