The court invalidated, as impermissible viewpoint discrimination, the qualification that representation could not involve an effort to amend or otherwise challenge existing law, because it clearly seeks to discourage challenges to the status quo.
It clearly seeks to discourage challenges to the status quo.
mnli hypothesis: It clearly seeks to discourage challenges to the status quo. premise: The court invalidated, as impermissible viewpoint discrimination, the qualification that representation could not involve an effort to amend or otherwise challenge existing law, because it clearly seeks to discourage challenges to the status quo.