In this episode, I have a fascinating interview with David McLaughlin, founder and CEO of QuantaVerse, which has artificial intelligence and data analytics tools to help companies manage risk more effectively. We discuss the use of such tools and techniques for risk reduction solutions to provide insight into the details of your customer’s customers, which allows a company to not only identify bad actors but also aggressively fight financial crime, including fraud, bribery and corruption. We explore how this downstream approach would allow you to more effectively manage subcontractors to your company’s prime contractors. We consider how artificial Intelligence is transforming internal audit investigations with technology; how it is enhancing compliance programs with predictive data analytics and how artificial intelligence can Help companies reduce FCPA risk.
We conclude with a discussion how the use of AI can bring a more holistic approach to compliance as a business process rather than simply policies and procedures so that the end of the day a company is more profitable. The implications for the compliance profession are profound and these concepts will lead improvements on compliance efficiencies.
AI will allow the compliance practitioner visibility down into 3rd and 4th tier contractors for compliance issues.
If you thought I would go the full week without a proper homage to Stan Lee, think again, as today I profile my favorite Marvel characters, the Fantastic Four. Over the next two blog posts I will paying tribute to Lee’s creation. Today, I will look at how the Fantastic Four became ‘fantastic’. Tomorrow, I will take up each character. Which of the Fantastic Four is your favorite character? Leave a note in the message tab and let’s find out. So a big thank you to Stan Lee for his creation of the Fantastic Four, all of whom have given me many years of enjoyment in print, TV and film.
The Fantastic Four gained superpowers after exposure to cosmic rays during a scientific mission to outer space. In this trip, the ship carrying the four was bombarded with cosmic rays. According the Comic Vine, “When the rocket ship eventually crash-landed back on Earth the crew saw Sue briefly disappear when as turned invisible. This caused Ben to get angry with and aggressive towards Reed which triggered a radical physical transformation causing Ben to suddenly change into a monstrous “thing.” Ben tried to attack Reed, but Reed transformed into Mr. Fantastic, using his lengthy arms to wrap them around Ben. Johnny then suddenly changed into the Human Torch. Reed gathered the group together and convinced them that they must use their powers to help mankind. Thus the Fantastic Four was formed, though Ben was somewhat reluctant. By the way, it was Susan Storm who first called Ben “a Thing” and so when it came time for each member of the team to choose names, Ben decided to go with the name that Susan had already given him. This must have been Ben’s way of getting back a little at Reed and Sue, for their being at least partially responsible for his tragic transformation.”
The Fantastic Four introduce four questions that Goldman Sachs will have to answer around its role in the 1MDB scandal. While the company has tried to separate itself from its former partner Tim Leissner and former Managing Directors Roger Ng and Andrea Vella; given Leissner’s remarks about company culture and the company’s expectations at his guilty plea hearing this past summer. David Crow, writing in a Financial Times (FT) article, entitled “Key questions for Goldman Sachs about Malaysian scandal”, said that Goldman Sachs was scheduled to meet with the Department of Justice (DOJ) this week. Crow believes there are four key areas of inquiry the DOJ will pose to Goldman.
Was Leissner really a rogue employee or was the culture of Goldman Sachs such that it was expected that a partner could misrepresent to the compliance function? In a court hearing, “Leissner said concealing facts from internal compliance officials was “very much in line” with the culture at the bank”, stating, ““I conspired with other employees and agents of Goldman Sachs very much in line of its culture of Goldman Sachs to conceal facts from certain compliance and legal employees of Goldman Sachs,” he said.”
Goldman has tried to claim, “that much of the information in the complaint against Mr Leissner was provided by the bank.” However the underlying information on the 1MDB scandal has been known for years. It has consistently been reported on in the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) and FT. According to Dennis Lormel, a former chief of the FBI’s Financial Crimes Program, “prosecutors will ask when Goldman first suspected that Mr Leissner had acted illegally, and how quick it was to inform the relevant authorities.” Further, ““The fact the bank is co-operating is in their best interests, but the question becomes ‘did Goldman self-report when they became aware of any problems’. If they did so expeditiously, they will be less culpable,” he said.”
It is clear that Leissner attempted “to conceal the importance of Jho Low, a Malaysian financier at the heart of the 1MDB scandal who acted as a middleman to grease the wheels on deals with Goldman.” Unfortunately it has now come out that “Lloyd Blankfein, former chief executive and current chairman, attended a meeting with Mr Low on two occasions.” John Byrne, a former head of the Association of Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists, noted, “Even if the bank can show Mr Leissner acted entirely alone, prosecutors could argue that Goldman had “collective knowledge” of the illegality.” He further stated, “If the business people knew something and the compliance did not, you can combine those to get a collective knowledge theory of liability.”
Prosecutors will expect Goldman to show that it has investigated Leissner’s other deals and a more wide-ranging investigation of deals across the “region to ascertain whether 1MDB was an isolated instance, or if it was typical of his way of doing business. And they will ask how he managed to circumvent the bank’s oft-touted compliance operation. Elise Bean, a former congressional investigator, said she would ask questions such “Are these the only bribes he paid?” “Is this the only type of deal like this? How was he able to bypass compliance and legal personnel? And what has Goldman done to tighten its procedures?”
Just as the Fantastic Four were pummeled by cosmic rays that led to their transformation, Goldman Sachs continues to be pummeled literally across the globe. Reuters reported that “Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad said bankers at Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS.N) “cheated” the country in dealings with state fund 1MDB and that U.S. authorities have promised to help return the fees the Wall Street bank earned from the fund.” Bloomberg reported that the firm’s share price had dropped to its lowest level since 2011. It cited Gerard Cassidy, from RBC Capital Markets, who said ““It’s not so much the dollar amount. It’s more that we don’t know all of the facts yet, we don’t know all of the important points to the story at this time. It’s the fear of the unknown.””
Tomorrow I will look at the individual members of the Fantastic Four and consider four questions from the FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy.
In a win for fairness both Google and Facebook end forced arbitration for sexual harassment claims? (Washington Post)
They are dilent and dedicated guys whose compassion and patience are rare finds in most men.Boy Vey! The Shiksa's Guide to Dating Jewish Men Kristina Grish.
To begin an application, whether you are a new or recurring applicant, please download the application cover sheet.
Both hard-copy materials and e-mail attachment copies must be received by the following deadlines. (Regular delivery mail, please, not requiring a signature.) Incomplete applications will be forwarded to the next funding cycle pending receipt of missing materials. Staple and/or clip all materials into a single packet. Remember to send your narrative and budget information via e-mail to BurningFoundation@gmail.com.
If you are a new applicant to the Foundation, or have not received a grant in two of the previous three years:Please provide a letter of interest by the dates indicated above. (Received, not postmarked.) You will be notified whether the trustees will be requesting a full proposal, or whether your request has been declined. The letter of interest should include the following information:
Attach a brief project budget and your current annual organizational budget – actual and projected income and expenses. (If the project is sponsored by a larger organization, include that organization’s income/expense budget as well.)
Please note: The email version should strive to be a single PDF document (not multiple documents) and should be less than 5MB in size.
If you have received a grant at least twice within the last three years:You may skip the pre-application process, and submit a full proposal at the deadline indicated below. However, we want to know how many groups will be submitting a full proposal – therefore please send an e-mail to BurningFoundation@gmail.com by the pre-application deadline indicating your intent to apply. Be sure to include a completed application cover sheet with your e-mail.
You will be sent an e-mail confirmation of this intent to apply – you may not submit a full proposal without having received this acknowledgement. Once you have received confirmation, please follow the instructions below.
Narrative, not to exceed four pages. Clearly describe the strategies your project or organization will use to address the proposed issues. Explain why your approach was selected. Describe your organization’s special niche in your community. Discuss the general work-plan for the one-year grant period, and how you will evaluate the success/effectiveness of your project. If you are describing a particular geographical area, please include either a map or a clear description of the area’s location. Explain any relationship with sponsoring or coalition organizations.
Budget summary. For general operating support, submit a current year organizational budget (actual & projected sources of income). If you are requesting project support, provide a budget for both the project and the larger organization. Also submit the previous year financial statements, indicating actual year-end figures for both income and expenses. If there is an increase of 15% or higher in any income category (foundations, corporations, events etc.) between last year’s actual figures and this year’s budgeted figures, please explain your strategies to reach the income goal.
Supplemental: A copy of the following: IRS 501(c)(3) notification letter, list of Board members and their associations, and optional additional information: newsletters, press coverage, brochures.
Multi-Year Proposals Eligible applicants: Groups who have received Burning funding for 3 out of 5 previous years. Please submit by mail one copy of the narrative and budget stapled together. Include one set of the IRS letter, Board list, and any attachments. Provide one copy via e-mail.
Narrative, not to exceed four pages, describing goals, strategies, and workplan for the three year grant period. Also provide a proposed budget for the three year period, including likely sources of funding. As only one or two groups will be selected, we also want to be clear about your request for single-year funding – therefore please attach a very brief one-page description (bullet-point summary okay) of the amount you would request and how you would use a single-year grant.
Due-date: Instead of submitting a brief pre-application, full multiyear proposals are due at the pre-application deadline. If your project is not selected for multi-year consideration, the one-page summary of a one-year project will serve as a pre-application letter. All multi-year applicants will automatically be considered for funding when trustees review full proposals. Current multi-year grantees should submit a brief year-end update letter and budget summary at the pre-application deadline in lieu of a full proposal.
Years 2 and 3: Please submit a brief year-end report (including actual year-end budget) at the full proposal deadline. Trustees will review this report prior to allocating funding for years two and three.