Oh Kristen Stewart how i have missed non grainy pictures of your face. I didn’t post the pictures from the other day because you could barely see her outfit and i didn’t want to be sued for pictures Celebuzz paid a rumoured 300k for. Moving on.
I’ve mixed some pictures of Kristen departure from Montreal airport to LAX with Robert, to point out a few items she is wearing for you wonderful readers. Oh how i have missed outfit breakdowns!
Kristen wore a white Joe Jeans ‘The Zoe’ Tank which you can purchase Here for $58. Kristen wears her favourite Converse Chuck Taylor All Star High Top Sneakers which can be purchased from Converses own webpage Here for $45. Kristen takes a break from her favourite sunglasses brand and wears a pair of Oliver People Pierson Wayfarer sunglasses, this particular model is unavailable to purchase out with the USA, if you are interested in purchasing a pair then go Here. Along with Kristen’s favourite Nike All Access Lair Backpack she carries a American Apparel Unisex Flex Fleece Zip Hoodie in ‘Sea Blue’ which you can purchase Here for $46. Kristen is wearing a Woolrich Women's Buffalo Check Flannel Shirt which you can purchase Here for $49.
*Thank you to the wonderful kstewartfans for all the Kristen pictures. All other content is taken from above listed websites and Google.*
do you know where i can get hold of the cute little cream cardigan/shrug looking thing!? (bad description, i know)
I applaud you for not posting the Celebuzz pictures, but I'm a little disappointed with the reasoning behind your decision. I hope that the only reason you didn't post them wasn't because you were afraid of getting sued and you couldn't see her outfit. If you're a real fan of Kristen, you would be disgusted that these pictures were released and not posted them because it is an invasion of privacy and just another pat on the back to the paparazzis. This has gone way too far, and I hope you avoid posting invasive pictures like these on your blog. I think we all can agree that Kristen must be going through hell right now. We have to support her.
Darling, Kristen, crank up your iPod and blow off the paps. Get into the music and be oblivious to those stalkers. It's all in the mind.
I know this is a fashion blog so that's what I'll stick to but I just want to say to anon 15:42, did you look at the pictures in montreal, or do you only dislike pictures were Kristen looks unhappy, because surely that's selective suspension of morals?
did she change on flight? She is soo tiny, she can wear anything. I love how she bags looser baggy clothing and still knots it at the waist :)
Naturally if you read this blog you are aware that i am extremely selective of the pictures i post. I'm not against paparzzi pictures, what i am against is Kristen looking visibly upset in them. I'd like to hope that this blog can at least give her that slot of privacy she deserves. It's about fun, beauty and fashion and most of all Kristen. This is a place to come with no drama and just enjoy being a fan of this wonderful woman.
She's a very casual and plain Jane girl just like me, that's why i can relate to her look . i've been dressing this way sense i was a kid i'm only 19 now.
But i Guarantee if i put on everything she's wearing i'd look great because this is how i dress on the regular bases. and another thing we have in common i use to always flip my t'shirts up she nots hers i use to just twist it and flip it. it's actually the same thing.
Remember how excited we were when we first committed our lives to Jesus Christ? That excitement and love for Him is to be how we characterize our relationship with Him always going forward. Do we lack joy and excitement in our walk with Christ? Perhaps we have left our first love. We must repent and come back to Him. He can restore our joy and love as we restore our relationship with Him.
Father, I desire Your love to come through my life. I confess that I have drifted from You and I need to come back and focus on You, my first love. I desire You and want to make sure that everyone I am around knows of my first love for You.
This entry was posted in Devotional and tagged bible study for women, bible study tools, christian devotional, devotional for the day, God's love, online devotional for women, online devotions, Revelation by Kristi Burchfiel. Bookmark the permalink.	
One of the trends I’ve seen everywhere this fall is hair styled on one side. There’s something quite elegant and simultaneously playful about the look. This reminds me of a fashionista who rocked the aforementioned effortlessly. Check her out in my video. Fire!!!:)
Throwback post: I ran into this fashion femme fatale outside of the Lincoln Center during Mercedes Benz New York Fashion Week. She garnered much attention and with good reason-down to the side swept hairstyle, she was working it! Here she tells me about her vintage details and Fendi pants…
Aren't glMatrixMode and stuff deprecated in GL3? You should setup all MVP matrices without any gl call (usually glm is used for this as it supports) and send them shaders as any other parameter.
Yes that is correct, which is why I originally commented it out. It should be noted however that this piece of code is in an if-statement that checks whether we are not using GL3.2+. So it is even weirder how something that shouldn't execute in the first place has an effect on unrelated code.
I should also say that Qt doesn't use any matrices in their shaders and that is fine. But if they did they would probably use their own QMatrix class.
The Mesa-based open-source drivers don't support compat profiles either, so this should improve the experience for many Linux users.
"DKT argues that requiring it to adopt and to certify that it has a policy explicitly opposing prostitution and sex trafficking as a condition of entering into an agreement (or sub-agreement) with USAID to receive funding for its HIV/AIDS prevention work constitutes viewpoint-based restriction on speech." Today, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia agreed with DKT's argument and issued an opinion holding that "defendant USAID is permanently ENJOINED from (1) requiring DKT to have a policy explicitly opposing prostitution and sex trafficking under 42 U.S.C. § 7631(f); and (2) requiring DKT to certify that it has a policy explicitly opposing prostitution under AAPD 05-04."
The link to the opinion is bad (the problem seems to be in the coding of the .pdf file) so we have to take How Appealing's word for what it says but I believe it.
So, let's see. We, the taxpayers, have to give them our money but we cannot, as a condition of giving them our money, ask them to formulate a policy against prostitution and sex trafficking? I think some smart clerk at the courthouse deliberately degraded the .pdf file just so fewer people will realize how nutty some of our judges are.
Well, why would anyone expect Clinton appointee Judge Emmet G. Sullivan to think that there's anything wrong with prostitution and sex-trafficking sufficient to condition the receiving of tax dollars on their disavowal.