I’m often aske d questions about crowdsourcing. Usually, they’re revolving around this central theme: what can crowdsourcing do? Can crowdsourcing solve this problem? Can crowdsourcing solve that problem? On occasion, a more perceptive question is posed: can crowdsourcing define a problem?
My answer to all these questions is standard: yes, it can. What I want my interlocutors to understand is that crowdsourcing is first and foremost a question, a question that you ask a carefully selected crowd of people. And it doesn’t really matter what this question is about, for as long as it well-thought-out, properly defined and clearly articulated. Yes, it can be a question about a solution to a problem. Yes, it can be a question about a problem itself.
Two examples of using crowdsourcing in both incarnations came from the same organization, Harvard Medical School. The first example shows how HMS scientists used crowdsourcing to solve a problem. This particular problem was how to improve the capacity of a DNA sequencing algorithm employed in one of the HMS projects. (Let me skip technical details here because I wrote about this case only a few weeks ago.) HMS first decided to solve the problem in-house and indeed made a significant (5.5-fold) improvement in the algorithm capacity. But this wasn’t enough, and they launched a two-week-long crowdsourcing campaign. 122 algorithms from the outside of HMS have been submitted, and the winning solution provided a 1,000-fold improvement over the initial algorithm, a 180-fold improvement over the internal solution.
But a few years before, HMS put the crowdsourcing approach in reverse: they use it to define a problem. Specifically, they asked a question: what do we not know to cure Type 1 diabetes? The idea behind the question was that as every prominent scientific topic, the Type 1 diabetes research was following a limited number of popular directions, chasing essentially the same set of problems. HMS decided to ask members of the Harvard community, as well as general public, to identify “neglected” problems, the problems that for whatever reasons were off the radars of existing labs involved in Type 1 diabetes research. Essentially HMS wanted the crowd to come up with different, better problems, regardless of whether the crowd had the expertise or resources to solve these problems.
The results were quite impressive. Of total of about 190 entries to the contest, 12 were chosen as the most “out-of-the-box.” (Interestingly enough, among people submitting winning proposals was a diabetes patient, an undergraduate student, an HR representative and a researcher with no immediate expertise in the diabetes field.) Some of the most promising problems were later converted into bona fide research projects.
So when asked what one needs to run a successful crowdsourcing campaign, my answer is, only two things: a question and a crowd.
This entry was posted in Crowdsourcing and tagged Crowdsourcing, diabetes, Drug Development, Harvard Catalyst, Harvard Medical School, Innovation, Open Innovation, Open Innovation Tools, Type 1 diabetes, unmet medical needs. Bookmark the permalink.	
Are you interested in house history? Maybe you want to learn more about how Portland neighborhoods were shaped by architectural styles and city planning. Perhaps you think your home may have been built from a plan book? Or maybe you are researching a notable Oregon architect? The Architectural Heritage Center invites you to learn about the resources available in the AHC research library.
The public is invited to attend the Architectural Heritage Center’s library open house. This is a rare opportunity to have free access to the AHC library and get a peak into the closed archives.
Learn about great research resources available for your family, neighborhood, business or organization. Staff and volunteers will be on hand to answer your questions and share library resources.
Understanding the structure and function of the oropharynx is paramount for providing excellent patient care. In clinical oncology, the oropharynx is generally divided into four distinct components: (i) the base of the tongue; (ii) the soft palate; (iii) the palatine tonsillar fossa; and (iv) the pharyngeal wall. The oropharyngeal mucosa is distinct from other mucosal surfaces in the body, as it is composed of a reticulated epithelium with a discontinuous basement membrane, also known as lymphoepithelium. This review describes the anatomy, histology, immunology and surgical resection of the oropharynx as they relate to oncological care.
Loneliness in old age has a negative influence on quality of life, health, and survival. To understand the phenomenon of loneliness in old age, the voices of lonely older adults should be heard. Therefore, the purpose of this meta-synthesis was to synthesize scientific studies of older adults’ experiences of loneliness. Eleven qualitative articles that met the inclusion criteria were analyzed and synthesized according to Noblit and Hare’s meta-ethnographic approach. The analysis revealed the overriding meaning of the existential human core of loneliness in old age expressed through the metaphor “trapped in an empty waiting room.” Four interwoven themes were found: (a) the negative emotions of loneliness, (b) the loss of meaningful interpersonal relationships, (c) the influence of loneliness on self-perception, and (d) the older adults’ endeavors to deal with loneliness. The joint contribution of family members, health care providers, and volunteers is necessary to break the vicious circle of loneliness.