Chiropractic: NFL Legend Jerry Rice Gives Credit to Chiropractic Jerry Rice played in the NFL for 20 years, the average NFL career is 3.5 years. Rice was named to the Pro Bowl 13 times and at his retirement, he held 38 NFL records. “Chiropractic care has been instrumental in my life, both on and off the field, and I am
excited to share this with the American public,” says Rice. “I have been blessed with a long and healthy career as a professional athlete, and as I move forward into the next stage of my life, chiropractic care will continue to be an important part of my game plan.” Rice is the official spokesman for the Foundation for Chiropractic Progress, a nonprofit organization dedicated to promoting chiropractic to the public. Rice’s message about the value of chiropractic includes a full-page ad that appeared in the Dec 15, 2008 issue of ESPN The Magazine, Jan 2009 issue of Sports Illustrated, Jan 16 issue of USA Today, Feb 2009 issue of
Wellness/Prevention: Foods That Fight Cancer! Indole-3-carbinol may be one of the most powerful cancerfighting nutrients. It is found in broccoli, cauliflower, cabbage, kale and brussels sprouts. You should consume these vegetables at least four to five times per week. Indole-3-carbinol speeds up the body’s ability to neutralize
(detoxify) and eliminate cancer-causing chemicals, and also appears to help ensure that any emerging cancer cells die off before they can become a threat. In addition to these impressive cancer-fighting capabilities, indole-3-carbinol helps prevent the buildup of the form of estrogen linked to breast and uterine cancers.
seeking curator announcements e flux art fusion gallery miami design district criteria,art gallery interior design concept description layout in the face of history photographers century architecture,art gallery interior design ideas buildings galleries designs e architect website case study pdf,art gallery design case study university the architects newspaper interior ideas guidelines,art gallery interior design concept description fusion miami district,how to design an art gallery my web value fusion miami district small ideas interior concept,art gallery design concept pdf venues murmur interior definition fusion miami district,art gallery design district miami department of visual layout concept pdf,art gallery interior design concept definition case study pdf office doubles as a rotating criteria,art gallery design criteria where to find free museums and galleries in concept small ideas.
I’d never heard of the Ordway Prize until a few weeks ago, when two highly respected Chicago-based arts professionals (artist Tania Bruguera, who also lives in Havana, Cuba, and Hamza Walker, curator at the Renaissance Society at the University of Chicago) were included on this year’s list of finalists. The Ordway Prize is a relatively new award, established in 2005 as a joint effort by Creative Link for the Arts and the New Museum. The selection process for the Ordway Prize is outlined on the New Museum’s website as follows (excerpt):
The prize acknowledges the contributions of a Curator/Arts Writer and an Artist whose work has had significant impact on the field of contemporary art, but who has yet to receive broad public recognition. Finalists for the Ordway Prize are midcareer talents between the ages of forty and sixty-five, with a developed body of work extending over a minimum of fifteen years.
Now, it’s always great to see behind-the-scenes culture professionals get recognized for their outstanding work. This goes double for curators, who get paid relatively little and yet play such a critical role in bringing art to the public. So if a little cash gets thrown at said curators while recognizing their contributions to the field, that’s nice too. I’m not of the view that culture workers need to be poor to have integrity. That said, however, I think that $100,000 is an inordinate amount of money given the fact that a) the prize is unrestricted and b) this year’s nominees, as well as past Ordway Prize winners, are institutionally-affiliated curators as opposed to those working independently and earning income on a project-by-project basis.
Almost every other aspect of the Ordway Prize sits just fine with me. I support the effort to recognize midcareer professionals who have 15 + year track records and who have repeatedly shown themselves to be innovators in their field. Past Ordway Prize winners in the curator/art writer category include Ralph Rugoff, director of the Heyward Gallery in London, and James Elaine, curator of Hammer Projects at the Hammer Museum in Los Angeles. I’ve worked with both of them and have the utmost admiration and respect for each. As I see it, the issue isn’t about merit, it’s about money, specifically how much unrestricted money it’s appropriate to award to arts professionals who are already receiving a salary and deriving research and exhibition budgets directly from their own institutions.
One hundred grand is a lot of cash. Why so much? If the prize is meant as a pat on the back, 25 or even 50 grand really ought to do it. But a $100,000 pat on the back? That seems excessive, and more like an attention grab on the part of Creative Link that gives one curator queen for a day status while the rest go about their business as usual. Perhaps there’s an underlying assumption that part of the prize money will enable the curator/arts writer to pursue a “dream project.” However, if that project eventually takes the form of an exhibition, it’s appropriate that the curator’s institution generate the budget and foot the bill, travel and research included.
I’m all for professional plaudits and even for reasonable monetary infusions that provide creative professionals with the physical and yes, emotional resources to think big(ger). But I don’t think culture professionals need to be quite so richly rewarded for doing what is, after all, their job, and I’m pretty sure that no single curator/art writer warrants $100,000 worth of peer affirmation. Not when it’s unrestricted, anyway.