CVE-2018-20847 (published 2019-06-26T18:15Z)

An improper computation of p_tx0, p_tx1, p_ty0 and p_ty1 in the function opj_get_encoding_parameters in openjp2/pi.c in OpenJPEG through 2.3.0 can lead to an integer overflow.

Severity: MEDIUM
CVSS v2 base score: 6.8 (AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P)
CVSS v3 base score: 8.8, HIGH (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H)

Weakness information:
cwe_id: CWE-190
cwe_name: Integer Overflow or Wraparound
description: The product performs a calculation that can
         produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic
         assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than
         the original value. This occurs when an integer value is
         incremented to a value that is too large to store in the
         associated representation. When this occurs, the value may
         become a very small or negative number.
extended_description: 
            
            
            
            
         
         

Fix information:
repo_url: https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg
commit_details: repo_url: https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg
author: Antonin Descampe
author_date: 2015-01-15 18:16:29+00:00
msg: [trunk] fixed a buffer overflow in opj_tcd_init_decode_tile

Update issue 431
repository: repo_url: https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg
repo_name: uclouvain/openjpeg
description: Official repository of the OpenJPEG project
repo_language: C
owner: uclouvain
file_changes: filename: pi.c
change_type: ModificationType.MODIFY
diff: @@ -708,10 +708,10 @@ void opj_get_all_encoding_parameters(   const opj_image_t *p_image,
 	q = tileno / p_cp->tw;
 
 	/* here calculation of tx0, tx1, ty0, ty1, maxprec, l_dx and l_dy */
-	*p_tx0 = opj_int_max((OPJ_INT32)(p_cp->tx0 + p * p_cp->tdx), (OPJ_INT32)p_image->x0);
-	*p_tx1 = opj_int_min((OPJ_INT32)(p_cp->tx0 + (p + 1) * p_cp->tdx), (OPJ_INT32)p_image->x1);
-	*p_ty0 = opj_int_max((OPJ_INT32)(p_cp->ty0 + q * p_cp->tdy), (OPJ_INT32)p_image->y0);
-	*p_ty1 = opj_int_min((OPJ_INT32)(p_cp->ty0 + (q + 1) * p_cp->tdy), (OPJ_INT32)p_image->y1);
+	*p_tx0 = (OPJ_INT32)opj_uint_max(p_cp->tx0 + p * p_cp->tdx, p_image->x0);
+	*p_tx1 = (OPJ_INT32)opj_uint_min(p_cp->tx0 + (p + 1) * p_cp->tdx, p_image->x1);
+	*p_ty0 = (OPJ_INT32)opj_uint_max(p_cp->ty0 + q * p_cp->tdy, p_image->y0);
+	*p_ty1 = (OPJ_INT32)opj_uint_min(p_cp->ty0 + (q + 1) * p_cp->tdy, p_image->y1);
 
 	/* max precision and resolution is 0 (can only grow)*/
 	*p_max_prec = 0;

programming_language: C
filename: tcd.c
change_type: ModificationType.MODIFY
diff: @@ -701,10 +701,11 @@ static INLINE OPJ_BOOL opj_tcd_init_tile(opj_tcd_t *p_tcd, OPJ_UINT32 p_tile_no,
 	/*fprintf(stderr, "Tile coordinate = %d,%d\n", p, q);*/
 	
 	/* 4 borders of the tile rescale on the image if necessary */
-	l_tile->x0 = opj_int_max((OPJ_INT32)(l_cp->tx0 + p * l_cp->tdx), (OPJ_INT32)l_image->x0);
-	l_tile->y0 = opj_int_max((OPJ_INT32)(l_cp->ty0 + q * l_cp->tdy), (OPJ_INT32)l_image->y0);
-	l_tile->x1 = opj_int_min((OPJ_INT32)(l_cp->tx0 + (p + 1) * l_cp->tdx), (OPJ_INT32)l_image->x1);
-	l_tile->y1 = opj_int_min((OPJ_INT32)(l_cp->ty0 + (q + 1) * l_cp->tdy), (OPJ_INT32)l_image->y1);
+	l_tile->x0 = (OPJ_INT32)opj_uint_max(l_cp->tx0 + p * l_cp->tdx, l_image->x0);
+	l_tile->y0 = (OPJ_INT32)opj_uint_max(l_cp->ty0 + q * l_cp->tdy, l_image->y0);
+	l_tile->x1 = (OPJ_INT32)opj_uint_min(l_cp->tx0 + (p + 1) * l_cp->tdx, l_image->x1);
+	l_tile->y1 = (OPJ_INT32)opj_uint_min(l_cp->ty0 + (q + 1) * l_cp->tdy, l_image->y1);
+
 	/* testcase 1888.pdf.asan.35.988 */
 	if (l_tccp->numresolutions == 0) {
 		fprintf(stderr, "tiles require at least one resolution\n");

programming_language: C