CVE-2017-10911 (published 2017-07-05T01:29Z)

The make_response function in drivers/block/xen-blkback/blkback.c in the Linux kernel before 4.11.8 allows guest OS users to obtain sensitive information from host OS (or other guest OS) kernel memory by leveraging the copying of uninitialized padding fields in Xen block-interface response structures, aka XSA-216.

Severity: MEDIUM
CVSS v2 base score: 4.9 (AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:N/A:N)
CVSS v3 base score: 6.5, MEDIUM (CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N)

Weakness information:
cwe_id: CWE-200
cwe_name: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
description: The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.
extended_description: 
	   There are many different kinds of mistakes that introduce information exposures. The severity of the error can range widely, depending on the context in which the product operates, the type of sensitive information that is revealed, and the benefits it may provide to an attacker.  Some kinds of sensitive information include:
       
         private, personal information, such as personal messages, financial data, health records, geographic location, or contact details
         system status and environment, such as the operating system and installed packages
		 business secrets and intellectual property
		 network status and configuration
		 the product's own code or internal state
         metadata, e.g. logging of connections or message headers
		 indirect information, such as a discrepancy between two internal operations that can be observed by an outsider
       
	    Information might be sensitive to different parties, each of which may have their own expectations for whether the information should be protected.  These parties include:
               
                  the product's own users
                  people or organizations whose information is created or used by the product, even if they are not direct product users
		  the product's administrators, including the admins of the system(s) and/or networks on which the product operates
                  the developer
               
	    Information exposures can occur in different ways:
               
                  the code explicitly inserts sensitive information into resources or messages that are intentionally made accessible to unauthorized actors, but should not contain the information - i.e., the information should have been "scrubbed" or "sanitized"
                  a different weakness or mistake indirectly inserts the sensitive information into resources, such as a web script error revealing the full system path of the program.
                  the code manages resources that intentionally contain sensitive information, but the resources are unintentionally made accessible to unauthorized actors. In this case, the information exposure is resultant - i.e., a different weakness enabled the access to the information in the first place.
               
	    It is common practice to describe any loss of confidentiality as an "information exposure," but this can lead to overuse of CWE-200 in CWE mapping. From the CWE perspective, loss of confidentiality is a technical impact that can arise from dozens of different weaknesses, such as insecure file permissions or out-of-bounds read.  CWE-200 and its lower-level descendants are intended to cover the mistakes that occur in behaviors that explicitly manage, store, transfer, or cleanse sensitive information.
         
         

Fix information:
repo_url: https://github.com/torvalds/linux
commit_details: repo_url: https://github.com/torvalds/linux
author: Jan Beulich
author_date: 2017-06-13 16:28:27-04:00
msg: xen-blkback: don't leak stack data via response ring

Rather than constructing a local structure instance on the stack, fill
the fields directly on the shared ring, just like other backends do.
Build on the fact that all response structure flavors are actually
identical (the old code did make this assumption too).

This is XSA-216.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
repository: repo_url: https://github.com/torvalds/linux
repo_name: torvalds/linux
description: Linux kernel source tree
repo_language: C
owner: torvalds
file_changes: filename: blkback.c
change_type: ModificationType.MODIFY
diff: @@ -1433,34 +1433,35 @@ static int dispatch_rw_block_io(struct xen_blkif_ring *ring,
 static void make_response(struct xen_blkif_ring *ring, u64 id,
 			  unsigned short op, int st)
 {
-	struct blkif_response  resp;
+	struct blkif_response *resp;
 	unsigned long     flags;
 	union blkif_back_rings *blk_rings;
 	int notify;
 
-	resp.id        = id;
-	resp.operation = op;
-	resp.status    = st;
-
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&ring->blk_ring_lock, flags);
 	blk_rings = &ring->blk_rings;
 	/* Place on the response ring for the relevant domain. */
 	switch (ring->blkif->blk_protocol) {
 	case BLKIF_PROTOCOL_NATIVE:
-		memcpy(RING_GET_RESPONSE(&blk_rings->native, blk_rings->native.rsp_prod_pvt),
-		       &resp, sizeof(resp));
+		resp = RING_GET_RESPONSE(&blk_rings->native,
+					 blk_rings->native.rsp_prod_pvt);
 		break;
 	case BLKIF_PROTOCOL_X86_32:
-		memcpy(RING_GET_RESPONSE(&blk_rings->x86_32, blk_rings->x86_32.rsp_prod_pvt),
-		       &resp, sizeof(resp));
+		resp = RING_GET_RESPONSE(&blk_rings->x86_32,
+					 blk_rings->x86_32.rsp_prod_pvt);
 		break;
 	case BLKIF_PROTOCOL_X86_64:
-		memcpy(RING_GET_RESPONSE(&blk_rings->x86_64, blk_rings->x86_64.rsp_prod_pvt),
-		       &resp, sizeof(resp));
+		resp = RING_GET_RESPONSE(&blk_rings->x86_64,
+					 blk_rings->x86_64.rsp_prod_pvt);
 		break;
 	default:
 		BUG();
 	}
+
+	resp->id        = id;
+	resp->operation = op;
+	resp->status    = st;
+
 	blk_rings->common.rsp_prod_pvt++;
 	RING_PUSH_RESPONSES_AND_CHECK_NOTIFY(&blk_rings->common, notify);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ring->blk_ring_lock, flags);

programming_language: C
filename: common.h
change_type: ModificationType.MODIFY
diff: @@ -75,9 +75,8 @@ extern unsigned int xenblk_max_queues;
 struct blkif_common_request {
 	char dummy;
 };
-struct blkif_common_response {
-	char dummy;
-};
+
+/* i386 protocol version */
 
 struct blkif_x86_32_request_rw {
 	uint8_t        nr_segments;  /* number of segments                   */
@@ -129,14 +128,6 @@ struct blkif_x86_32_request {
 	} u;
 } __attribute__((__packed__));
 
-/* i386 protocol version */
-#pragma pack(push, 4)
-struct blkif_x86_32_response {
-	uint64_t        id;              /* copied from request */
-	uint8_t         operation;       /* copied from request */
-	int16_t         status;          /* BLKIF_RSP_???       */
-};
-#pragma pack(pop)
 /* x86_64 protocol version */
 
 struct blkif_x86_64_request_rw {
@@ -193,18 +184,12 @@ struct blkif_x86_64_request {
 	} u;
 } __attribute__((__packed__));
 
-struct blkif_x86_64_response {
-	uint64_t       __attribute__((__aligned__(8))) id;
-	uint8_t         operation;       /* copied from request */
-	int16_t         status;          /* BLKIF_RSP_???       */
-};
-
 DEFINE_RING_TYPES(blkif_common, struct blkif_common_request,
-		  struct blkif_common_response);
+		  struct blkif_response);
 DEFINE_RING_TYPES(blkif_x86_32, struct blkif_x86_32_request,
-		  struct blkif_x86_32_response);
+		  struct blkif_response __packed);
 DEFINE_RING_TYPES(blkif_x86_64, struct blkif_x86_64_request,
-		  struct blkif_x86_64_response);
+		  struct blkif_response);
 
 union blkif_back_rings {
 	struct blkif_back_ring        native;

programming_language: C