CVE-2017-18203 (published 2018-02-27T20:29Z)

The dm_get_from_kobject function in drivers/md/dm.c in the Linux kernel before 4.14.3 allow local users to cause a denial of service (BUG) by leveraging a race condition with __dm_destroy during creation and removal of DM devices.

Severity: LOW
CVSS v2 base score: 1.9 (AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P)
CVSS v3 base score: 4.7, MEDIUM (CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H)

Weakness information:
cwe_id: CWE-362
cwe_name: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')
description: The product contains a code sequence that can run concurrently with other code, and the code sequence requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence that is operating concurrently.
extended_description: 
            This can have security implications when the expected synchronization is in security-critical code, such as recording whether a user is authenticated or modifying important state information that should not be influenced by an outsider.
            A race condition occurs within concurrent environments, and is effectively a property of a code sequence. Depending on the context, a code sequence may be in the form of a function call, a small number of instructions, a series of program invocations, etc.
            A race condition violates these properties, which are closely related:
               
                  Exclusivity - the code sequence is given exclusive access to the shared resource, i.e., no other code sequence can modify properties of the shared resource before the original sequence has completed execution.
                  Atomicity - the code sequence is behaviorally atomic, i.e., no other thread or process can concurrently execute the same sequence of instructions (or a subset) against the same resource.
               
            A race condition exists when an "interfering code sequence" can still access the shared resource, violating exclusivity. Programmers may assume that certain code sequences execute too quickly to be affected by an interfering code sequence; when they are not, this violates atomicity. For example, the single "x++" statement may appear atomic at the code layer, but it is actually non-atomic at the instruction layer, since it involves a read (the original value of x), followed by a computation (x+1), followed by a write (save the result to x).
            The interfering code sequence could be "trusted" or "untrusted." A trusted interfering code sequence occurs within the product; it cannot be modified by the attacker, and it can only be invoked indirectly. An untrusted interfering code sequence can be authored directly by the attacker, and typically it is external to the vulnerable product.
         
         

Fix information:
repo_url: https://github.com/torvalds/linux
commit_details: repo_url: https://github.com/torvalds/linux
author: Hou Tao
author_date: 2017-11-01 15:42:36+08:00
msg: dm: fix race between dm_get_from_kobject() and __dm_destroy()

The following BUG_ON was hit when testing repeat creation and removal of
DM devices:

    kernel BUG at drivers/md/dm.c:2919!
    CPU: 7 PID: 750 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 4.1.44
    Call Trace:
     [<ffffffff81649e8b>] dm_get_from_kobject+0x34/0x3a
     [<ffffffff81650ef1>] dm_attr_show+0x2b/0x5e
     [<ffffffff817b46d1>] ? mutex_lock+0x26/0x44
     [<ffffffff811df7f5>] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0x83/0xcf
     [<ffffffff811de257>] kernfs_seq_show+0x23/0x25
     [<ffffffff81199118>] seq_read+0x16f/0x325
     [<ffffffff811de994>] kernfs_fop_read+0x3a/0x13f
     [<ffffffff8117b625>] __vfs_read+0x26/0x9d
     [<ffffffff8130eb59>] ? security_file_permission+0x3c/0x44
     [<ffffffff8117bdb8>] ? rw_verify_area+0x83/0xd9
     [<ffffffff8117be9d>] vfs_read+0x8f/0xcf
     [<ffffffff81193e34>] ? __fdget_pos+0x12/0x41
     [<ffffffff8117c686>] SyS_read+0x4b/0x76
     [<ffffffff817b606e>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x71

The bug can be easily triggered, if an extra delay (e.g. 10ms) is added
between the test of DMF_FREEING & DMF_DELETING and dm_get() in
dm_get_from_kobject().

To fix it, we need to ensure the test of DMF_FREEING & DMF_DELETING and
dm_get() are done in an atomic way, so _minor_lock is used.

The other callers of dm_get() have also been checked to be OK: some
callers invoke dm_get() under _minor_lock, some callers invoke it under
_hash_lock, and dm_start_request() invoke it after increasing
md->open_count.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
repository: repo_url: https://github.com/torvalds/linux
repo_name: torvalds/linux
description: Linux kernel source tree
repo_language: C
owner: torvalds
file_changes: filename: dm.c
change_type: ModificationType.MODIFY
diff: @@ -2711,11 +2711,15 @@ struct mapped_device *dm_get_from_kobject(struct kobject *kobj)
 
 	md = container_of(kobj, struct mapped_device, kobj_holder.kobj);
 
-	if (test_bit(DMF_FREEING, &md->flags) ||
-	    dm_deleting_md(md))
-		return NULL;
-
+	spin_lock(&_minor_lock);
+	if (test_bit(DMF_FREEING, &md->flags) || dm_deleting_md(md)) {
+		md = NULL;
+		goto out;
+	}
 	dm_get(md);
+out:
+	spin_unlock(&_minor_lock);
+
 	return md;
 }
 

programming_language: C