奧古斯丁主義
參考文獻

↑  Rogers, Katherine. The Neoplatonic Metaphysics and Epistemology of Anselm of Canterbury (Lewiston, New York: Edwin Mellen Press. 1997).
↑  .   [2020-10-01]. （原始内容存档于2019-08-03）.
↑  .   [2020-10-01]. （原始内容存档于2020-01-08）.
↑  Augustinism （页面存档备份，存于） in McClintock and Strong Biblical Cyclopedia]
↑  Augustinianism （页面存档备份，存于） 
Encyclopedia.com
↑  .   [2020-10-01]. （原始内容存档于2020-01-08）.
1 2  .   [2020-10-01]. （原始内容存档于2019-11-30）.
↑  .   [2020-10-01]. （原始内容存档于2023-01-08）.
↑  Wallace M. Alston, The Church of the Living God: A Reformed Perspective （页面存档备份，存于） (Westminster John Knox Press, 2002 ISBN 978-0-664-22553-7), p. 53
↑  De deo Socratis, XVII–XIX)
1 2  Mendelson, Michael. . Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 12 November 2010  [9 October 2011]. （原始内容存档于2021-03-04）.
↑  .   [2020-10-01]. （原始内容存档于2019-12-10）.
↑  Smith's Hagenbach, History of Doctrines, 1, 299
↑  Wiggers Augustinisnm and Pelagianism, p. 268
↑  Tina Manferdini, Comunicazione ed estetica in Sant'Agostino, p. 249, Bologna, ESD, 1995
↑  Fr. Alberto Esmeralda, OSA.  (PDF). www.merrimack.edu.   [2006-11-23]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2006-09-01）.
↑  Helm, Paul. . Oxford University Press. 1981. ISBN 0-19-875049-8.
↑  Chandler, Hugh. . Peter Lang. 2007. ISBN 978-0-8204-8858-5.
↑  Austin, Michael W. . Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 21 August 2006  [15 August 2012]. （原始内容存档于2019-07-19）.
↑  Robert L. Holmes. . ChristianityToday.com.   [25 April 2015]. （原始内容存档于2021-03-06）.
↑  Contra Faustum Manichaeum book 22 sections 69–76
↑  Holte 1962
↑  De civitate dei 19.4
↑  Wolterstorff 2012
↑  De beata vita 10
↑  De civitate dei 10.1
↑  De trinitate 13.7
↑  Confessions IV.xv.25
↑  Confessions XII.xxv.35
↑  Summa theologiae 1a2ae 109.1c
↑  Cf. A. Gianni, pp.148–149
↑  Hendrics, E., p. 291.
1 2  Massuti, E., p.98.
↑  De cura pro mortuis gerenda CSEL 41, 627[13–22]; PL 40, 595: Nullo modo ipsa spernenda sunt corpora. (...)Haec enim non ad ornamentum vel adiutorium, quod adhibetur extrinsecus, sed ad ipsam naturam hominis pertinent; Contra Faustum, 22.27; PL 44,418.
↑  Augustine of Hippo, Enarrationes in psalmos, 143, 6.
↑  CCL 40, 2077 [46] – 2078 [74]; 46, 234–35.
↑  Augustine of Hippo, De utilitate ieiunii, 4, 4–5.
↑  El concepto del substantia segun san Agustin, pp. 305–350.
↑  De ordine, II, 11.31; CCL 29, 124 [18]; PL 32,1009; De quantitate animae, 25,47–49; CSEL 89, 190–194; PL 32, 1062–1063
↑  Cf. Ch. Couturier SJ, p. 543
↑  Cross, Frank Leslie; Livingstone, Elizabeth A. (编).  3rd rev. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2005. ISBN 978-0-19-280290-3.
↑  Augustine taught that Adam's sin was both an act of foolishness (insipientia) and of pride and disobedience to God of Adam and Eve. He thought it was a most subtle job to discern what came first: self-centeredness or failure in seeing truth. Augustine wrote to Julian of Eclanum: Sed si disputatione subtilissima et elimatissima opus est, ut sciamus utrum primos homines insipientia superbos, an insipientes superbia fecerit (Contra Julianum, V, 4.18; PL 44, 795). This particular sin would not have taken place if Satan had not sown into their senses "the root of evil" (radix Mali): Nisi radicem mali humanus tunc reciperet sensus (Contra Julianum, I, 9.42; PL 44, 670)
↑  "Original Sin" （页面存档备份，存于）. Biblical Apologetic Studies. Retrieved 17 May 2014. Augustine of Hippo (354–430) taught that Adam's sin is transmitted by concupiscence, or "hurtful desire", sexual desire and all sensual feelings resulting in humanity becoming a massa damnata (mass of perdition, condemned crowd), with much enfeebled, though not destroyed, freedom of will.
↑  William Nicholson. A Plain But Full Exposition of the Catechism of the Church of England （页面存档备份，存于）, page 118. Retrieved 17 May 2014.
↑  Thomas Aquinas explained Augustine's doctrine pointing out that the libido (concupiscence), which makes the original sin pass from parents to children, is not a libido actualis, i.e. sexual lust, but libido habitualis, i.e. a wound of the whole of human nature: Libido quae transmittit peccatum originale in prolem, non est libido actualis, quia dato quod virtute divina concederetur alicui quod nullam inordinatam libidinem in actu generationis sentiret, adhuc transmitteret in prolem originale peccatum. Sed libido illa est intelligenda habitualiter, secundum quod appetitus sensitivus non continetur sub ratione vinculo originalis iustitiae. Et talis libido in omnibus est aequalis (STh Iª–IIae q. 82 a. 4 ad 3).
↑  Non substantialiter manere concupiscentiam, sicut corpus aliquod aut spiritum; sed esse affectionem quamdam malae qualitatis, sicut est languor. (De nuptiis et concupiscentia, I, 25. 28; PL 44, 430; cf. Contra Julianum, VI, 18.53; PL 44, 854; ibid. VI, 19.58; PL 44, 857; ibid., II, 10.33; PL 44, 697; Contra Secundinum Manichaeum, 15; PL 42, 590.
1 2  Justo L. Gonzalez. . Abingdon Press. 1970–1975.
↑  Augustine of Hippo, De gratia Christi et de peccato originali （页面存档备份，存于）, I, 15.16; CSEL 42, 138 [v. 24–29]; Ibid., I,4.5; CSEL 42, 128 [v.15–23].
↑  .   [2020-10-01]. （原始内容存档于2019-06-24）.
↑   name="Levering">{{Cite book|last=Levering|first=Matthew|title=Predestination: Biblical and Theological Paths|location=New York|publisher=Oxford University Pres
↑  The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, "The Problem of Evil （页面存档备份，存于）", Michael Tooley
↑  The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, "The Evidential Problem of Evil （页面存档备份，存于）", Nick Trakakis
↑  Menn 2002, p. 168
↑  Menn 2002, p. 170
↑  The City of God, Augustine of Hippo, Book XI, Chapter 9
↑  Bennett, Peters, Hewlett & Russell 2008, p. 126
↑  Svendsen & Pierce 2010, p. 49
↑  Menn 2002, p. 174
↑  Bennett, Peters, Hewlett & Russell 2008, p. 127
↑  Menn 2002, p. 176
↑  John Henry Newman: Reason, Rhetoric, and Romanticism pg. 167 （页面存档备份，存于）
↑  .   [2020-10-01]. （原始内容存档于2020-01-08）.
↑  Gutting, Gary. . Cambridge University Press. : 116. ISBN 9780521649735. Modernity begins with Descartes' mutation of Augustinianism. Taylor emphasizes that "Descartes is in many ways profoundly Augustinian".
米开朗基罗亚当和夏娃从罪中的画西斯廷教堂天花板