吉尔·德勒兹
引用注释

1 2  . Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.   [17 February 2011]. （原始内容存档于2010-07-11）.  See also: "Difference and Repetition is definitely the most important work published by Deleuze." (Edouard Morot-Sir, from the back cover of the first edition of the English translation), or James Williams' judgment: "It is nothing less than a revolution in philosophy and stands out as one of the great philosophical works of the twentieth century" (James Williams, Gilles Deleuze's Difference and Repetition: A Critical Introduction and Guide [Edinburgh UP, 2003], p. 1).
↑  Simon Choat, Marx Through Post-Structuralism: Lyotard, Derrida, Foucault, Deleuze, Continuum, 2010, ch. 5.
↑  Deleuze and Parnet, Dialogues II pp.57-8, trans. Hugh Tomlinson and Barbara Habberjam: "Apart from Sartre, the most important philosopher in France was Jean Wahl." Deleuze goes on to credit Wahl for introducing him to English and American thought. Wahl was among the very first to write about Whitehead and James - both arguably very important to Deleuze - in French. The idea of Anglo-American pluralism in Deleuze's work shows influence of Jean Wahl (see also Mary Frances Zamberlin, Rhizosphere (New York: Routledge, 2006))
↑  Macherey, Pierre (1998), 'Deleuze in Spinoza'. In: en|Warren Montag|Warren Montag  (ed.), In A Materialist Way: Selected Essays by Pierre Macherey. (New York: Verso, 1998)
↑  See, for example, Steven Best and Douglas Kellner, Postmodern Theory (Guilford Press, 1991), which devotes a chapter to Deleuze and Guattari.
↑  "Bergson's Conception of Difference", in Desert Islands, p. 33.
↑  Ibid., p. 32.
↑   Proust, Remembrance of Things Past, Translated from the French by Stephen Hudson, Vol. 7 Time Regained，CHAPTER III AN AFTERNOON PARTY AT THE HOUSE OF THE PRINCESSE DE GUERMANTES
↑  普鲁斯特.《追忆似水年华》.第七部 重现的过去
↑  Desert Islands, p. 36.
↑  See "The Method of Dramatization" in Desert Islands, and "Actual and Virtual" in Dialogues.
↑  Difference and Repetition, p. 39.
↑  A Thousand Plateaus, p. 20.
↑  Desert Islands, p. 262.
↑  Negotiations, p. 136.
↑  What Is Philosophy?, p. 22.
↑  Negotiations, p. 21: "We're strict functionalists: what we're interested in is how something works".
↑  Essays Critical and Clinical, p. 135.
↑  Nietzsche and Philosophy, p. 88.
↑  Negotiations, p. 6.
↑  Desert Islands, p. 144.
↑  Negotiations, pp. 124-125.
↑  See, e.g., the approving reference to Deleuze's Nietzsche study in Jacques Derrida's essay "Différance", or Pierre Klossowski's monograph Nietzsche and the Vicious Circle, dedicated to Deleuze. More generally, see D. Allison (ed.), The New Nietzsche (MIT Press, 1985), and L. Ferry and A. Renaut (eds.), Why We Are Not Nietzscheans (University of Chicago Press, 1997).
↑  Sometimes in the same sentence: "one is thus traversed, broken, fucked by the socius" (Anti-Oedipus, p. 347).
↑  See, for example, Steven Best and Douglas Kellner, Postmodern Theory (Guilford Press, 1991), which devotes a chapter to Deleuze and Guattari.
↑  Barry Smith (ed.), European Philosophy and the American Academy, p. 34.
↑  Slavoj Žižek, Organs without Bodies, pp. 19-32, esp. p. 21: "Is this opposition not, yet again, that of materialism versus idealism? In Deleuze, this means The Logic of Sense versus Anti-Oedipus." See also p. 28 for "Deleuze's oscillation between the two models" of becoming.
↑  Ibid., p. 21
↑  Ibid., pp. 32, 20, and 184.
↑  摘自豆瓣“德勒兹网上资料”