新加坡宪法第15条
注脚

↑  Constitution of the Republic of Singapore (1999 Reprint （页面存档备份，存于）).
1 2  Nappalli Peter Williams v. Institute of Technical Education [1999] 2 S.L.R.(R.) [Singapore Law Reports (Reissue)] 529, Court of Appeal (Singapore).
↑  Nappalli, p. 537, para. 28.
↑  Republic of Singapore Independence Act 1965 (No. 9 of 1965 （页面存档备份，存于）), s. 6(1).
↑  Re Mohamed Said Nabi, deceased [1965] M.L.J. [Malayan Law Journal] 121, High Court (Singapore).
1 2  Mohamed Said Nabi, para. 8.
↑  Mohamed Said Nabi, para. 9.
↑  Mohamed Said Nabi, para. 10.
↑  Mohamed Said Nabi, para. 13.
↑  Mohamed Said Nabi, para. 12.
↑  Daud bin Mamat v. Majlis Agama Islam [2001] 2 M.L.J. 390, High Court (Kota Bahru, Malaysia).
↑  Daud bin Mamat, p. 402.
↑  Donald v. The Board of Education for the City of Hamilton [1945] O.R. 518.
↑  Nappalli, p. 537, para. 25.
↑  Nappalli, p. 537, para. 26.
↑  Nappalli, p. 538, para. 28.
↑  Nappalli, p. 538, para. 29.
↑  Halimatussaadiah v. Public Service Commission, Malaysia [1992] 1 M.L.J. 513, H.C. (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia).
1 2  Ebralinag v. Superintendent of Schools of Cebu [1993] 219 S.C.R.A. 256, Supreme Court (Philippines), archived from the original on 27 May 2011.
↑  Stanislaus v. State of Madhya Pradesh A.I.R. 1977 S.C. 908, Supreme Court (India).
↑  H.M. Seervai,  3rd, Bombay: N.M. Tripathi: 1287, 1983 , cited in Thio Li-ann, , Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 2010: 484–515 at 496, SSRN 1802653  .
↑  Bryan A. Garner (编), ,  7th, St. Paul, Minn.: West: 890, 1999, ISBN 978-0-314-24130-6, Law that is neither local nor confined in application to particular persons. Even if there is only one person or entity to which a given law applies when enacted, it is general law if it purports to apply to all persons or places of a specified class throughout the jurisdiction.
↑  Thio Li-ann, , The Straits Times, 30 October 2007: 24 .
↑  , Singapore: Printed by the Government Printer, 1966, OCLC 51640681 , para. 38.
1 2  K. Kesavapany, , The Straits Times, 30 September 2009: 22 .
↑  见《法国宪法》第二条，以及Loi du 9 décembre 1905 relative à la séparation des Églises et de l'État（有关政教分离的1905年12月9日法律）。
↑  Thio Li-ann, , Singapore Law Review, 1995, 16: 26–103 at 34 and 36  [2017-09-02], （原始内容存档于2012-10-21） .
1 2  Thio, "The Secular Trumps the Sacred".
↑  Education Act (Cap. 87, 1985 Rev. Ed. （页面存档备份，存于）).
↑  Thio Li-ann, , Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 2002: 328–373 at 356, SSRN 426950  .
↑  , The Straits Times, 27 January 2002: 33 .
↑  Chan Hiang Leng Colin v. Public Prosecutor, [1994] ICHRL 26 （页面存档备份，存于）, [1994] SGHC 207, [1994] 3 S.L.R.(R.) 209, archived from the original on 26 October 2012, H.C. (Singapore).
↑  Societies Act (Cap. 311, 1985 Rev. Ed. （页面存档备份，存于）).
↑  Undesirable Publications Act (Cap. 338, 1985 Rev. Ed. （页面存档备份，存于）).
↑  Chan Hiang Leng Colin v. P.P. (1994), p. 233, paras. 58–59.
↑  Tan Boon Liat v. Menteri Hal Ehwal Dalam Negeri, Malaysia [1976] 2 M.L.J. [Malayan Law Journal] 83, High Court (Ipoh, Malaysia).
↑  Emergency (Public Order and Prevention of Crime) Ordinance 1969 (No. 5 of 1969) (Malaysia).
↑  Tan Boon Liat, pp. 86–87, citing Kanu Biswas v. State of West Bengal A.I.R. 1972 S.C. 1656 at 1658–1659, Supreme Court, (India), archived from the original on 20 October 2012.
↑  Chan Hiang Leng Colin v. P.P. (1994), p. 237, para. 68.
↑  Chan Hiang Leng Colin v. P.P. (1994), p. 235, paras. 63–64, citing Commissioner, H.R.E. v. L.T. Swamiar A.I.R. 1954 S.C. 282, S.C., India.
↑  Chan Hiang Leng Colin v. Minister for Information and the Arts [1995] 2 S.L.R.(R.) 627, H.C. (Singapore).
↑  Chan Hiang Leng Colin v. MITA (1995), p. 639, para. 28.
↑  Thio, "The Secular Trumps the Sacred", pp. 72–73.
↑  Thio, "The Secular Trumps the Sacred", p. 76.
↑  R. (Ghai) v. Newcastle City Council [2009] EWHC 978 (Admin) （页面存档备份，存于）, [2011] Q.B. 591, High Court (England and Wales).
↑  Ghai, pp. 644–645, paras. 120–122.
↑  R. (Ghai) v. Newcastle City Council [2010] EWCA Civ 59 （页面存档备份，存于）, [2011] Q.B. 591, Court of Appeal (England and Wales).
1 2  Chan Hiang Leng Colin v. P.P. (1994), pp. 233–234, para. 59.
↑  Minister for Home Affairs, Malaysia v. Jamaluddin bin Othman [1989] 1 M.L.J. 418
↑  Chan Hiang Leng Colin v. P.P. (1994), p. 235, para. 63, citing Jamaluddin bin Othman at p. 419.
1 2  Chan Hiang Leng Colin v. P.P. (1994), p. 235, para. 64.
↑  Chan Hiang Leng Colin v. Minister for Information and the Arts [1996] 1 S.L.R.(R.) 294, Court of Appeal (Singapore).
↑  Chan Hiang Leng Colin v. MITA (1996), pp. 305–306, para. 36.
↑  Chan Hiang Leng Colin v. MITA (1996), p. 306. para. 38.
1 2  Thio, "The Secular Trumps the Sacred", p. 78.
↑  Thio, "The Secular Trumps the Sacred", pp. 82–83.
↑  Thio, "The Secular Trumps the Sacred", p. 84.
↑  R. v. Oakes 1986 CANLII 46, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 103, Supreme Court (Canada).
↑  Multani v. Marguerite-Bourgeoys (Commission scolaire) 2006 SCC 6 （页面存档备份，存于）, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 256, S.C. (Canada).
《新加坡宪法》1999年再版的副本中的第15条
三名马来族回教徒女孩身穿回教头巾希贾布。由于政府坚守世俗主义，新加坡的公立小学不允许身穿回教头巾。
旧最高法院大厦，2005年以前上诉庭和高庭坐落于大厦内。在1994年的个案，高庭将《宪法》第15条第4款的“公共秩序”等同于《社团法令》第24条第1款a项的“公共治安、福利与良好秩序”，而不是以不法暴力作为公共秩序的威胁。