麥克斯·施蒂納
参考资料

1 2  Crosby, Donald A. . . Taylor and Francis. § Cosmic nihilism. 1998. ISBN 9780415250696. doi:10.4324/9780415249126-N037-1.
↑  Welsh, John F. . Lexington Books. 2010.
↑  https://archive.org/details/sparrowsnest-10358/mode/2up The False Principle of our Education
by Stirner, Max; Publication date 1967
↑  The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, volume 8, The Macmillan Company and The Free Press, New York 1967.
↑  Iwan Bloch. Der Marquis de Sade und seine Zeit 的存檔，存档日期2021-04-13.
↑  Wolfi Landstreicher. The Unique and Its Property 的存檔，存档日期2020-06-25.
↑  Beiser, Frederick C.. Weltschmerz: Pessimism in German Philosophy, 1860-1900, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, p. 233.
↑  Bernd A. Laska. Otto Gross zwischen Max Stirner und Wilhelm Reich 的存檔，存档日期2016-03-04., In: Raimund Dehmlow and Gottfried Heuer, eds.: 3. Internationaler Otto-Gross-Kongress, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München. Marburg, 2003, pp. 125–162, ISBN 3-936134-06-5 LiteraturWissenschaft.de 的存檔，存档日期2018-07-11..
↑  Raoul Vaneigem. The Revolution of Everyday Life 的存檔，存档日期2020-05-16..
↑  Stepelevich, Lawrence.  (PDF). 1985  [2020-10-02]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2020-10-27）.
1 2 3  Leopold, David. . 扎尔塔, 爱德华·N  (编). . 2006-08-04.
1 2  Goodway, David. Anarchist Seeds Beneath the Snow. Liverpool University Press, 2006, p. 99.
↑  A Ready Reference to Philosophy East and West 的存檔，存档日期2019-12-30..
↑  Anarchism: A Criticism and History of the Anarchist Theory 的存檔，存档日期2019-12-29..
1 2 3  "John Henry Mackay: Max Stirner – Sein Leben und sein Werk" 的存檔，存档日期2016-11-09.. p. 28.
↑  The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, volume 8, The Macmillan Company and The Free Press, New York 1967.
↑  Stepelevich 1985，第602頁.
↑  Marshall, Peter. . Harper Collins. 1992: 221. ISBN 0002178559.
↑  Stirner, Max. . 由金, 海民翻译 1. 北京: 商务印书馆. 1989-12: 译者前言ii页  [2021-06-30]. ISBN 7-100-00028-9. （原始内容存档于2022-06-09）.
1 2 3  Lawrence L Stepelevich. The Revival of Max Stirner.
↑  Gide, Charles and Rist, Charles. A History of Economic Doctrines from the Time of the Physiocrats to the Present Day. Harrap 1956, p. 612.
↑  The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 8, The Macmillan Company and The Free Press, New York 1967.
↑  Carlson, Andrew R. . . Metuchen, New Jersey: Scarecrow Press. 1972: 55–56  [2021-07-01]. ISBN 0-8108-0484-0. OCLC 490643062. （原始内容存档于2021-12-14）.
↑  Stirner, Max. . 由金, 海民翻译 1. 北京: 商务印书馆. 1989-12: 作者前言第1页  [2021-06-30]. ISBN 7-100-00028-9. （原始内容存档于2022-06-09）.
↑  Stepelevich, Lawrence S. . Journal of the History of Ideas. 1978, 39 (3): 452  [2021-07-01]. ISSN 0022-5037. doi:10.2307/2709388. Only Bruno Bauer and Ludwig Buhl represented the Young Hegelians at his funeral.
↑  Stirner, Max. . 由金, 海民翻译 1. 北京: 商务印书馆. 1989-12  [2021-06-30]. ISBN 7-100-00028-9. （原始内容存档于2022-06-09）.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  McKay, Iain (编). .  II. Stirling: AK Press. 2012. ISBN 9781849351225.
1 2  Thomas, Paul (May 1975). "Karl Marx and Max Stirner". Political Theory. Sage Publications. 3 (2): 159–179. JSTOR 190930.
↑  Roudine, Victor. The Workers Struggle According to Max Stirner. p. 12.
↑  Stirner, Max. . 由金, 海民翻译 1. 北京: 商务印书馆. 1989-12: 38–40  [2021-07-02]. ISBN 7-100-00028-9.
↑  Stirner, Max. . 由金, 海民翻译 1. 北京: 商务印书馆. 1989-12: 80–81  [2021-07-02]. ISBN 7-100-00028-9. （原始内容存档于2022-06-09）.
↑  Heider, Ulrike. Anarchism: Left, Right and Green, San Francisco: City Lights Books, 1994, pp. 95–96.
↑  Stirner, Max. . 由金, 海民翻译 1. 北京: 商务印书馆. 1989-12: 270–280  [2021-07-02]. ISBN 7-100-00028-9. （原始内容存档于2022-06-09）.
↑  Moggach, Douglas. The New Hegelians. Cambridge University Press, 2006 p. 194.
↑  .   [2019-11-28]. （原始内容存档于2019-11-28）.
↑   (PDF).   [2019-12-13]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2019-12-13）.
↑  .   [2019-11-28]. （原始内容存档于2019-11-28）.
↑  Guérin, Daniel (1970). Anarchism: From Theory to Practice. Monthly Review Press. pp. 70–71. ISBN 9780853451280.
↑  Thomas, Paul. . London: Routledge/Kegan Paul. 1985: 142. ISBN 0-7102-0685-2.
↑  Cohn, Jesse. . Postmodern Culture. September 2002, 13 (1)  [2018-12-02]. ISSN 1053-1920. S2CID 145475500. doi:10.1353/pmc.2002.0028. （原始内容存档于2016-09-25） –Project MUSE （英语）.
↑  Nyberg, Svein Olav.  (PDF). Non Serviam (Oslo, Norway: Svein Olav Nyberg): 13–14.   [2012-09-01]. OCLC 47758413. （原始内容 (PDF)存档于2010-12-07）.
↑   (PDF).   [2020-05-08]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2020-04-20）.
↑  Stepelevich 1985.
1 2  Moggach, Douglas and De Ridder, Widukind. "Hegelianism in Restoration Prussia, 1841–1848: Freedom, Humanism and 'Anti-Humanism' in Young Hegelian Thought". In: Hegel's Thought in Europe: Currents, Crosscurrents and Undercurrents, ed. Lisa Herzog (pp. 71–92). Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, pp. 82–83.
↑  "Hegelianism in Restoration Prussia, 1841–1848: Freedom, Humanism and 'Anti-Humanism' in Young Hegelian Thought.", In: Hegel's Thought in Europe: Currents, Crosscurrents and Undercurrents, ed. Lisa Herzog (pp. 71–92). Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, p. 75.
↑  Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (1967). The Macmillan Company and The Free Press: New York.
↑  Art and Religion, p. 110.
↑  Stirner, Max. . 由金, 海民翻译 1. 北京: 商务印书馆. 1989-12: 408  [2021-07-02]. ISBN 7-100-00028-9. （原始内容存档于2022-06-09）.
↑  Stirner, Max. . 由金, 海民翻译 1. 北京: 商务印书馆. 1989-12: 13–14  [2021-07-02]. ISBN 7-100-00028-9.
↑  "The Philosophical Reactionaries: 'The Modern Sophists' by Kuno Fischer", Newman, Saul (ed.), Max Stirner (Critical Explorations in Contemporary Political Thought), Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 90 (2011).
↑  "The Philosophical Reactionaries: 'The Modern Sophists' by Kuno Fischer", Newman, Saul (ed.), Max Stirner (Critical Explorations in Contemporary Political Thought), Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 99 (2011).
↑  "The Philosophical Reactionaries: 'The Modern Sophists' by Kuno Fischer", Newman, Saul (ed.), Max Stirner (Critical Explorations in Contemporary Political Thought), Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 104 (2011).
1 2  Lobkowicz, Nicolas.  (PDF).  illustrated. Heidelberg: Springer Netherlands. 1970. ISBN 9789024702121. []
1 2  Stedman-Jones, Gareth (2002). "Introduction". In Engels, Friedrich; Marx, Karl. The Communist Manifesto (illustrated, reprinted, revised ed.). London: Penguin Adult. ISBN 9780140447576.
1 2  Alexander, Green.  (PDF). Non Serviam: 5–42.   [2020-05-08]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2020-04-20）.
↑  弗里德里希·艾伯特·朗格. . 由李石岑翻译. 中华书局. 1936-08.  使用|accessdate=需要含有|url= (帮助)
↑  See Bernd A. Laska: Nietzsche's initial crisis 的存檔，存档日期2017-10-20.. In: Germanic Notes and Reviews, vol. 33, n. 2, Fall/Herbst 2002, pp. 109–133.
↑  George J. Stack, Lange and Nietzsche, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, 1983, p. 12, ISBN 978-3-11-008866-3.
1 2  扎尔塔, 爱德华·N (编). . .
↑  "Max Stirner, a durable dissident – in a nutshell" 的存檔，存档日期2006-05-18..
↑  Quoted in Read's book, "The Contrary Experience", Faber and Faber, 1963.
↑  见：Memoirs of a revolutionary, 1901–1941 by Victor Serge. Publisher Oxford U.P., 1967.
↑  见：Bernd A. Laska: Ein dauerhafter Dissident. Nürnberg: LSR-Verlag 1996 (online 的存檔，存档日期2008-02-28.).
↑  Bernd A. Laska: Katechon und Anarch. Nürnberg: LSR-Verlag 1997 (online 的存檔，存档日期28 February 2008.).
↑  Huneker's book Egoists, a Book of Supermen (1909)contains an essay on Stirner.
↑  见：Goldman, Anarchism and Other Essays, p. 50.
↑  Wilson, A. N. . The Daily Telegraph (London). 2004-11-01  [2010-05-12]. （原始内容存档于2021-02-20）.
↑  Between Man and Man by Martin Buber, Beacon Press, 1955.
↑  From Hegel to Marx by Sidney Hook, London, 1936.
↑  "The long revolution is preparing to write works in the ink of action whose unknown or nameless authors will flock to join Sade, Fourier, Babeuf, Marx, Lacenaire, Stirner, Lautréamont, L'hautier, Vaillant, Henry, Villa, Zapata, Makhno, the Communards, the insurrectionaries of Hamburg, Kiel, Kronstadt, Asturias – all those who have not yet played their last card in a game which we have only just joined: the great gamble whose stake is freedom". Raoul Vaneigem. The Revolution of Everyday Life.
↑  David Goodway, Anarchist Seeds Beneath the Snow, Liverpool University Press, 2006. p. 75.
1 2 3  "Only the influence of the German philosopher of egoism, Max Stirner (né Johann Kaspar Schmidt, 1806–1856), as expressed through The Ego and His Own (Der Einzige und sein Eigentum) compared with that of Proudhon. In adopting Stirnerite egoism (1886), Tucker rejected natural rights which had long been considered the foundation of libertarianism. This rejection galvanized the movement into fierce debates, with the natural rights proponents accusing the egoists of destroying libertarianism itself. So bitter was the conflict that a number of natural rights proponents withdrew from the pages of Liberty in protest even though they had hitherto been among its frequent contributors. Thereafter, Liberty championed egoism although its general content did not change significantly". Wendy Mcelroy. "Benjamin Tucker, Individualism, & Liberty: Not the Daughter but the Mother of Order" 的存檔，存档日期2011-05-24..
↑  Daniel Guérin,Anarchism: From Theory to Practice
↑  "Four Ourselves, The Right To Be Greedy: Theses On The Practical Necessity Of Demanding Everything". 的存檔，存档日期2013-06-22.
↑  "What is Ideology?" by Jason McQuinn.
↑  Bonanno, Alfredo M. . Bern: Anares. 1996. ISBN 3-905052-61-X.  使用|accessdate=需要含有|url= (帮助)
↑  卡尔·亨利希·乌尔利克斯曾于1870年创办了同性恋报纸《普罗米修斯》，但只发行了一期。见：Kennedy, Hubert, Karl Heinrich Ulrichs: First Theorist of Homosexuality, In: 'Science and Homosexualities', ed. Vernon Rosario. New York: Routledge, 1997, pp. 26–45.
↑  Xavier Diez. "La insumisión voluntaria. El anarquismo individualista español durante la dictadura y la Segunda República" 的存檔，存档日期2019-12-20..
↑  Jacques Derrida. Specters of Marx. Routledge. 1994.
↑  "Human or divine, as Stirner said, the predicates are the same whether they belong analytically to the divine being, or whether they are synthetically bound to the human form" (Gilles Deleuze. The Logic of Sense. Continuum. 2004). p. 122.
↑  卡尔·马克思; 弗里德里希·恩格斯. . 中文马克思主义文库.   [2021-07-03]. （原始内容存档于2022-06-16）.
1 2  弗里德里希·恩格斯. . 中文马克思主义文库.   [2021-07-04]. （原始内容存档于2022-06-09）.
↑  "Chapter Sankt Max in Die deutsche Ideologie 的存檔，存档日期2011-09-29..
↑  I. Berlin, Karl Marx (New York, 1963), 143.
↑  Albert Levy, Stirner and Nietzsche, Paris, 1904; Robert Schellwien, Max Stirner and Friedrich Nietzsche, 1892; H.L. Mencken, The Philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche, 1908; K. Löwith, From Hegel To Nietzsche New York, 1964, p. 187; R. A. Nicholls, "Beginnings of the Nietzsche Vogue in Germany", in Modern Philology, Vol. 56, No. 1, August 1958, pp. 24–37; T. A. Riley, "Anti-Statism in German Literature, as Exemplified by the Work of John Henry Mackay", in PMLA, Vol. 62, No. 3, September 1947, pp. 828–843; Seth Taylor, Left Wing Nietzscheans, The Politics of German Expressionism 1910–1920, p. 144, 1990, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York; Gilles Deleuze, Nietzsche et la Philosophy, Presses Universitaires de France, 1962; R. C. Solomon and K. M. Higgins, The Age of German Idealism, p. 300, Routledge, 1993.
↑  While discussion of possible influence has never ceased entirely, the period of most intense discussion occurred between 1892 and 1900 in the German-speaking world. During this time, the most comprehensive account of Nietzsche's reception in the German language, the 4-volume work of Richard Frank Krummel called Nietzsche und der deutsche Geist, indicates 83 entries discussing Stirner and Nietzsche. The only thinker more frequently discussed in connection with Nietzsche during this time is Schopenhauer, with about twice the number of entries. Discussion steadily declines thereafter, but it is still significant. Nietzsche and Stirner show 58 entries between 1901 and 1918. From 1919 to 1945, there are 28 entries regarding Nietzsche and Stirner.
↑  "Apart from the information which can be gained from the annotations, the library (and the books Nietzsche read) shows us the extent, and the bias, of Nietzsche's knowledge of many fields, such as evolution and cosmology. Still more obvious, the library shows us the extent and the bias of Nietzsche's knowledge about many persons to whom he so often refers with ad hominem statements in his works. This includes not only such important figures as Mill, Kant, and Pascal but also such minor ones (for Nietzsche) as Max Stirner and William James who are both discussed in books Nietzsche read". T. H. Brobjer, "Nietzsche's Reading and Private Library", 1885–1889, in Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 58, No. 4, October 1997, pp. 663–693; Stack believes it is doubtful that Nietzsche read Stirner, but notes "he was familiar with the summary of his theory he found in Lange's history." George J. Stack, Lange and Nietzsche, Walter de Gruyter, 1983, p. 276.
↑  Albert Levy, Stirner and Nietzsche, Paris, 1904.
↑  Bernd A. Laska: Nietzsche's initial crisis 的存檔，存档日期2017-10-20.. In: Germanic Notes and Reviews, vol. 33, n. 2, fall/Herbst 2002, pp. 109–133.
↑  Eduard von Hartmann, Nietzsches "neue Moral", in Preussische Jahrbücher, 67. Jg., Heft 5, May 1891, S. 501–521; augmented version with more express reproach of plagiarism in: Ethische Studien, Leipzig, Haacke 1898, pp. 34–69.
↑  This author believes that one should be careful in comparing the two men. However, he notes: "It is this intensive nuance of individualism that appeared to point from Nietzsche to Max Stirner, the author of the remarkable work Der Einzige und sein Eigentum. Stirner's influence in modern Germany has assumed astonishing proportions, and moves in general parallel with that of Nietzsche. The two thinkers are regarded as exponents of essentially the same philosophy." O. Ewald, "German Philosophy in 1907", in The Philosophical Review, Vol. 17, No. 4, July 1908, pp. 400–426.
↑  [in the last years of the nineteenth century] "The question of whether Nietzsche had read Stirner was the subject of great debate" R.A. Nicholls, "Beginnings of the Nietzsche Vogue in Germany", in Modern Philology, Vol. 56, No. 1, August 1958, pp. 29–30.
↑  Levy pointed out in 1904 that the similarities in the writing of the two men appeared superficial. Albert Levy, Stirner and Nietzsche, Paris, 1904
↑  R. A. Nicholls, "Beginnings of the Nietzsche Vogue in Germany", in Modern Philology, Vol. 56, No. 1, August 1958, pp. 24–37.
↑  "Stirner, like Nietzsche, who was clearly influenced by him, has been interpreted in many different ways," Saul Newman, From Bakunin to Lacan: Anti-authoritarianism and the Dislocation of Power, Lexington Books, 2001, p. 56; "We do not even know for sure that Nietzsche had read Stirner. Yet, the similarities are too striking to be explained away." R. A. Samek, The Meta Phenomenon, p. 70, New York, 1981; Tom Goyens, (referring to Stirner's book The Ego and His Own) "The book influenced Friedrich Nietzsche, and even Marx and Engels devoted some attention to it." T. Goyens, Beer and Revolution: The German Anarchist Movement In New York City, p. 197, Illinois, 2007.
↑  "We have every reason to suppose that Nietzsche had a profound knowledge of the Hegelian movement, from Hegel to Stirner himself. The philosophical learning of an author is not assessed by the number of quotations, nor by the always fanciful and conjectural check lists of libraries, but by the apologetic or polemical directions of his work itself." Gilles Deleuze (translated by Hugh Tomlinson), Nietzsche and Philosophy, 1962 (2006 reprint, pp. 153–154).
↑  Guido Giacomo Preparata, "Perishable Money in a Threefold Commonwealth: Rudolf Steiner and the Social Economics of an Anarchist Utopia". Review of Radical Economics 38/4 (Fall 2006). pp. 619–648.