羅傑·潘洛斯
參考文獻

1 2  NobelPrize.org. . THE NOBEL PRIZE. Nobel Media AB 2020. 2020-10-06  [2020-10-06]. （原始内容存档于2021-04-24） （英语）. one half awarded to Roger Penrose "for the discovery that black hole formation is a robust prediction of the general theory of relativity"
↑  Ogilvie, Megan. . Toronto Star. 2009-03-23  [2020-10-09]. （原始内容存档于2021-01-07）.
↑  Penrose, Roger. . Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 1955, 51 (3): 406–413.
↑  Ferguson, Kitty. . Franklin Watts. 1991: 66. ISBN 978-0-553-29895-6.
↑  . Rice History Corner. 2013-05-22  [2020-10-12]. （原始内容存档于2016-06-17）.
↑  .   [2007-07-09]. （原始内容存档于2008-04-16）.
↑ Criticism of the Lucas/Penrose argument that intelligence can not be entirely algorithmic: Sources that indicate Penrose's argument is generally rejected: Sources that also note that different sources attack different points of the argument:
MindPapers: 6.1b. Godelian arguments （页面存档备份，存于）
References for Criticisms of the Gödelian Argument （页面存档备份，存于）*
Boolos, George, et al. 1990. An Open Peer Commentary on The Emperor's New Mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (4) 655.
Davis, Martin 1993. How subtle is Gödel's theorem? More on Roger Penrose. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 611-612. Online version at Davis' faculty page at http://cs.nyu.edu/cs/faculty/davism/ （页面存档备份，存于）
Feferman, Solomon 1996. Penrose's Gödelian argument （页面存档备份，存于）. PSYCHE 2, 21–32.
Krajewski, Stanislaw 2007. On Gödel's Theorem and Mechanism: Inconsistency or Unsoundness is Unavoidable in any Attempt to 'Out-Gödel' the Mechanist. Fundamenta Informaticae 81, 173–181. Reprinted in Topics in Logic, Philosophy and Foundations of Mathematics and Computer Science:In Recognition of Professor Andrzej Grzegorczyk (2008), p. 173 （页面存档备份，存于）
LaForte, Geoffrey, Patrick J. Hayes, and Kenneth M. Ford 1998. Why Gödel's Theorem Cannot Refute Computationalism （页面存档备份，存于）. Artificial Intelligence, 104:265–286.
Lewis, David K. 1969. Lucas against mechanism （页面存档备份，存于）. Philosophy 44 231–233.
Putnam, Hilary 1995. Review of Shadows of the Mind. In Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 32, 370–373（also see Putnam's less technical criticisms in his New York Times review （页面存档备份，存于））
Bringsford, S. and Xiao, H. 2000. A Refutation of Penrose's Gödelian Case Against Artificial Intelligence （页面存档备份，存于）. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 12: 307–329. The authors write that it is "generally agreed" that Penrose "failed to destroy the computational conception of mind."
In an article at .   [2010-10-22]. （原始内容存档于2001-01-25）.  L.J. Landau at the Mathematics Department of King's College London writes that "Penrose's argument, its basis and implications, is rejected by experts in the fields which it touches."
Princeton Philosophy professor John Burgess writes in On the Outside Looking In: A Caution about Conservativeness （页面存档备份，存于） (published in Kurt Gödel: Essays for his Centennial, with the following comments found on pp. 131–132 （页面存档备份，存于）) that "the consensus view of logicians today seems to be that the Lucas–Penrose argument is fallacious, though as I have said elsewhere, there is at least this much to be said for Lucas and Penrose, that logicians are not unanimously agreed as to where precisely the fallacy in their argument lies. There are at least three points at which the argument may be attacked."
Dershowitz, Nachum 2005. The Four Sons of Penrose （页面存档备份，存于）, in Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Logic Programming for Artificial Intelligence and Reasoning（LPAR; Jamaica）, G. Sutcliffe and A. Voronkov, eds., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3835, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 125–138.
↑  Marvin Minsky. "Conscious Machines." Machinery of Consciousness, Proceedings, National Research Council of Canada, 75th Anniversary Symposium on Science in Society, June 1991.
↑  Tegmark, Max. 2000. "The importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes". Physical Review E. vol 61. pp. 4194–4206.
↑  Tetlow, Philip. . Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. 2007: 166. ISBN 978-0-470-13794-9.
↑  Hagan, S., Hameroff, S., and Tuszyński, J. . Physical Review E. 2002, 65: 061901. Bibcode:2002PhRvE..65f1901H. arXiv:quant-ph/0005025 . doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.65.061901.
↑  .   [2012-07-07]. （原始内容存档于2020-12-28）.
↑  .   [2012-08-13]. （原始内容存档于2012-06-16）.
↑  . ResearchGate.   [2014-02-22]. （原始内容存档于2015-02-20）.
↑  . ScienceDaily.   [2014-02-22]. （原始内容存档于2015-12-17）.
↑  S. Hameroff; R. Penrose. . Physics of Life Reviews. 2014, 11 (1): 39–78  [2014-03-29]. Bibcode:2014PhLRv..11...39H. PMID 24070914. doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2013.08.002. （原始内容存档于2014-07-29）.
↑  Harris, Sam. . SamHarrisOrg.   [2020-06-05]. （原始内容存档于2010-12-29）.  Quoting Penrose's blurb for Harris's book Letter to a Christian Nation.
↑  . BBC News. 2010-09-25  [2010-12-01]. （原始内容存档于2010-11-30）. .
↑  See A Brief History of Time 的存檔，存档日期2012-02-25., quote starts at about 1:12:43 in the video.