Hẹn hò ngẫu hứng
Chú thích

1 2 3  Đằng sau việc 'hẹn hò cho vui' là gì? - Báo Thanh niên
↑  Belle, Heather; Michelle Fiordaliso (2009). Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Ex*. Sourcebooks Casablanca. ISBN 978-1-4022-2923-7.
↑  Chara PJ, Kuennen LM (tháng 2 năm 1994). “Diverging gender attitudes regarding casual sex: a cross-sectional study”. Psychol Rep. 74 (1): 57–8. doi:10.2466/pr0.1994.74.1.57. PMID 8153236. S2CID 46533373. Abstract: Students at five educational levels ranging from seventh graders to college seniors were surveyed regarding their attitudes about the acceptability of casual sex. A striking developmental contrast was found: males became increasingly accepting of casual sex; females were consistently opposed to casual sex at all educational levels.
↑  Cubbins LA, Tanfer K (tháng 6 năm 2000). “The influence of gender on sex: a study of men's and women's self-reported high-risk sex behavior”. Arch Sex Behav. 29 (3): 229–57. doi:10.1023/A:1001963413640. PMID 10992980. S2CID 5746253.
↑  Welsh DP, Grello CM, Harper MS (tháng 8 năm 2006). “No strings attached: the nature of casual sex in college students” (PDF). J Sex Res. 43 (3): 255–67. doi:10.1080/00224490609552324. PMID 17599248. S2CID 29600116. Bản gốc (PDF) lưu trữ ngày 24 tháng 2 năm 2007.
↑  Gwen J. Broude, 'Male-Female Relationships in Cross-Cultural Perspective: A Study of Sex and Intimacy' Cross-Cultural Research, Vol. 18, No. 2, 154–181 (1983) Abstract: Societies are neither entirely consistent nor entirely arbitrary in their patterning of heterosexual relationships. This research suggests that sexual relationships, and male sexual orientation are not highly related to each other.
↑  Roese NJ, Pennington GL, Coleman J, Janicki M, Li NP, Kenrick DT (tháng 6 năm 2006). “Sex differences in regret: all for love or some for lust?”. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 32 (6): 770–80. doi:10.1177/0146167206286709. PMC 2293329. PMID 16648202. Abstract: within romantic relationships, men emphasize regrets of inaction over action, whereas women report regrets of inaction and action with equivalent frequency. Sex differences were not evident in other interpersonal regrets (friendship, parental, sibling interactions) and were not moderated by relationship status
↑  Mô tả mối quan hệ yêu đương trong tiếng Anh
↑  Corbett, Sherry; Sherwin, Robert (1985). “Campus sexual norms and dating relationships: A trend analysis”. The Journal of Sex Research. 21 (3): 258–274. doi:10.1080/00224498509551266.
1 2 3 4 5 6  Grello, Catherine M.; Welsh, Deborah P.; Harper, Melinda S. (11 tháng 1 năm 2010). “No strings attached; The nature of casual sex in college students”. Journal of Sex Research. 43 (3): 255–267. doi:10.1080/00224490609552324. PMID 17599248. S2CID 29600116.
1 2  Maley, David. “'Friends With Benefits' Lets Couples Get Close But Not Too Close, Says Ithaca College Expert”. Truy cập ngày 24 tháng 4 năm 2012.
1 2 3  Lee, J.A. (1988). “Love Styles”. R.J Sternberg & M.L. Barnes: The Psychology of Love: 38–67. ASIN 0300045891.
1 2 3 4 5  Paul, Elizabeth L.; McManus, Brian; Hayes, Allison (tháng 2 năm 2000). “"Hookups": Characteristics and Correlates of College Students' Spontaneous and Anonymous Sexual Experiences”. The Journal of Sex Research. 37 (1): 76–88. doi:10.1080/00224490009552023.