Nanoteknolojinin etkileri
Nanoteknolojinin etkisi üzerine çalışmalar

The first major attempt to assess the societal impact of nanotechnology was a workshop held at the National Science Foundation, September 28–29, 2000. A second extensive follow-on workshop was held at NSF December 2–3, 2003. The reports of these meetings were co-edited by Mihail C. Roco and William Sims Bainbridge: Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology4 Mart 2016 tarihinde Wayback Machine sitesinde arşivlendi., Nanotechnology: Societal Implications - Maximizing Benefits for Humanity, and Nanotechnology: Societal Implications - Individual Perspectives4 Mart 2016 tarihinde Wayback Machine sitesinde arşivlendi..
The Royal Society's nanotech report  was inspired by Prince Charles' concerns about nanotechnology, including molecular manufacturing. However, the report spent almost no time on molecular manufacturing. (See Center for Responsible Nanotechnology criticism of omission of molecular manufacturing.)20 Temmuz 2011 tarihinde Wayback Machine sitesinde arşivlendi.  In fact, the word "Drexler" appears only once in the body of the report (in passing), and "molecular manufacturing" or "molecular nanotechnology" not at all. The report covers various risks of nanoscale technologies, such as nanoparticle toxicology. It also provides a useful overview of several nanoscale fields. The report contains an annex (appendix) on grey goo, which cites a weaker variation of Richard Smalley's contested argument against molecular manufacturing. It concludes that there is no evidence that autonomous, self-replicating nanomachines will be developed in the foreseeable future, and suggests that regulators should be more concerned with issues of nanoparticle toxicology.
In 2008, the city of Cambridge, MA in the United States considered whether to institute nanotechnology regulation similar to that in Berkeley, CA, the latter being the only city in the United States to currently regulate nanotechnology. The Cambridge Nanomaterials Advisory Committee's final report14 Temmuz 2011 tarihinde Wayback Machine sitesinde arşivlendi. of July 2008 recommended against such regulations, recommending instead other steps to facilitate information-gathering about potential effects of nanomaterials.
In July 2003 the United States Environmental Protection Agency  issued the first research solicitation in the area of nanotechnology impact, "Exploratory Research to Anticipate Future Environmental Issues - Part 2: Impacts of Manufactured Nanomaterials on Human Health and the Environment." 8 Mayıs 2009 tarihinde Wayback Machine sitesinde arşivlendi.  In September 2004 US EPA partnered with the National Science Foundation and the Centers for Disease Control to issue a second research solicitation, "Nanotechnology Research Grants Investigating Environmental and Human Health Effects of Manufactured Nanomaterials: A Joint Research Solicitation - EPA, NSF, NIOSH."
In August 2005, a task force consisting of 50+ international experts from various fields was organized by the Center for Responsible Nanotechnology to study the societal impact of molecular nanotechnology 2 Şubat 2016 tarihinde Wayback Machine sitesinde arşivlendi..
In October 2005, the National Science Foundation announced that it would fund two national centers to research the potential societal impact of nanotechnology. Located at the University of California, Santa Barbara 13 Ocak 2016 tarihinde Wayback Machine sitesinde arşivlendi. and Arizona State University [ölü/kırık bağlantı], researchers at these two centers are exploring a wide range of issues including nanotechnology's historical context, technology assessment, innovation and globalization issues, and societal perceptions of risk.
Determining a set of pathways for the development of molecular nanotechnology is now an objective of a broadly based technology roadmap project 7 Ağustos 2011 tarihinde Wayback Machine sitesinde arşivlendi. led by Battelle (the manager of several U.S. National Laboratories) and the Foresight Institute. That roadmap should be completed by early 2007.
In October 2006, the International Council on Nanotechnology (ICON) based at Rice University published a survey of nanomaterial handling practices being used by industrial and academic workplaces on four continents. The survey revealed that more information is needed to protect against the potential occupational risks associated with handling free nanoparticles. ICON also maintains the Virtual Journal of Nanotechnology Environment, Health & Safety (VJ-NanoEHS) which is a compilation of citations to peer-reviewed studies on risk issues.
In 2007 Springer SBM started the journal NanoEthics 13 Şubat 2021 tarihinde Wayback Machine sitesinde arşivlendi. Ethics for Technologies that Converge at the Nanoscale. This journal is a multidisciplinary forum for exploration of issues presented by converging technology applications. While the central focus of the journal is on the philosophically and scientifically rigorous examination of the ethical and societal considerations and the public and policy concerns inherent in nanotechnology research and development.
Nanotechnologies26 Temmuz 2011 tarihinde Wayback Machine sitesinde arşivlendi. Summary of the assessment on the safety of nanotechnologies by DG-SANCO's Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks
Center for Nanotechnology in Society @ Arizona State University19 Temmuz 2011 tarihinde Wayback Machine sitesinde arşivlendi. is a major NSF-funded research center focused on analyses of the societal impact of nanotechnology.
American Elements' "information center6 Ekim 2014 tarihinde Wayback Machine sitesinde arşivlendi." on the past, present, and future impacts of nanotechnology.