URAP
Kabul ve Tanınırlık > URAP ile İlgili Araştırma, Kitap ve Raporlar

URAP, çeşitli çalışmalarda küresel sıralamalara atıfta bulunularak bahsedilmekte ve kullanılmaktadır. Higher Education Policy and Management Dergisi'nde yayınlanan “World University Ranking Systems: An Alternative Approach Using Partial Least Squares Path Modelling” makalesinde önerilen modelde URAP, dünya çapındaki 9 büyük sıralama sistemleri arasına dahil edilmiştir (Diğerleri ARWU, QS, Times, Webometrics, Taiwan, Leiden, SIR ve CWUR'dur.). Aynı çalışmada URAP yalnızca yayın performansına dayalı sıralama sistemleri arasında kategorize edilmiştir. Aynı kategorideki diğer sıralama sistemleri Performance Ranking of Scientific Papers for World Universities, CWTS Leiden Ranking ve SCImago Institutions Rankings'tir.

Aşağıda URAP'ı ele alan ya da modellerine veya kıyaslamalarına URAP'ı dahil eden kitap, hakemli makaleler ve konferans bildirilerinin bir kısmı listelenmektedir.
Where Are the Global Rankings Leading Us? An Analysis of Recent Methodological Changes and New Developments, European Journal of Education
World university ranking systems: an alternative approach using partial least squares path modelling, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management
Sustainable Development and Quality Assurance in Higher Education: Transformation of Learning and Society
Determinants of University Choice: A Study on Economics Departments in Turkey, Journal of Higher Education.
Collecting University Rankings for Comparison Using Web Extraction and Entity Linking Techniques, Information and Communication Technologies in Education, Research, and Industrial Applications.
URAP-TR: a national ranking for Turkish universities based on academic performance, Scientometrics.
Using VIKOR methodology for ranking universities by academic performance, Journal of Mathematics, Statistics and Operations Research (JMSOR).
Global University Rankings and Their Impact, EUA Report in Rankings 2013, European University Association.
Contributions of Turkish academicians supervising PhD dissertations and their universities to economics: an evaluation of the 1990–2011 period, Scientometrics.
A Type-2 Fuzzy MCDM Method for Ranking Private Universities in İstanbul, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, 2014.
Adoption of Web 2.0 in academic libraries of top African universities, The Electronic Library.
Examining Job Description to Develop Job Performance Indicators for Higher Education Institution Based on MBNQA Education Criteria, Journal of Education & Vocational Research.
Methodology for comparative analysis of university rankings, with the Mediterranean and Black sea region countries taken as an example, Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research.
Software Quality in Academic Curriculum: A Case Study in Turkey, 12th International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications (ICCSA).
University Ranking Lists: A directory., 2013 Report, Division of Analysis and Evaluation, University of Göteborg.
Apeejay Stya Eğitim Araştırma Kurumu tarafından yayınlanan “ ASERF E Eğitim Haber Bülteni” (ASERF E News Bulletin on Education) bazı ülkelerdeki en iyi 10 üniversitenin THE'daki sıralama sonuçlarını, URAP ve QS dahil olmak üzere diğer sıralama sistemlerinin sıralama sonuçları ile kıyaslamaktadır.