Kokteyl partisi etkisi
Hayvanlarda etkisi

Koro halinde iletişim kuran kurbağalar ve böcekler, akustik iletişim kuran ötücü kuşlar; aynı anda birden fazla sinyale maruz kaldıklarından kokteyl partisi etkisini yaşayabilir. İnsanlardaki gibi, ses hayvanların çevrelerindeki önemli şeyleri (örn. eşler, tehditler, vb.) dinlemelerine izin verir. Bazı kırlangıçlar ve kral penguenler için sesli iletişim, gürültülü ortamlarda ebeveyn ve yavruların birbirlerini tanınmasını sağlar. Dişi kurbağalar erkeklerin çiftleşme çağrılarını dinleyip ayırt edebilirken, erkekler diğer erkeklerin saldırganlık çağrılarına fark edebilirler.
1 2 3  Getzmann (2016). "Switching of auditory attention in "cocktail-party" listening: ERP evidence of cueing effects in younger and older adults". Brain and Cognition. 111: 1-12. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2016.09.006. PMID 27814564.
↑  Bronkhorst, Adelbert W. (2000). "The Cocktail Party Phenomenon: A Review on Speech Intelligibility in Multiple-Talker Conditions" (PDF). Acta Acustica United with Acustica. 86: 117-128. Erişim tarihi: 18 Nisan 2010. [ölü/kırık bağlantı][ölü/kırık bağlantı]
↑  Shinn-Cunningham, Barbara G. (2008). "Object-based auditory and visual attention" (PDF). Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 12 (5): 182-186. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.003. PMC 2699558 $2. PMID 18396091. 23 Eylül 2015 tarihinde kaynağından (PDF) arşivlendi. Erişim tarihi: 20 Haziran 2014.
1 2  Getzmann (2015). "The mismatch negativity as a measure of auditory stream segregation in a simulated "cocktail-party" scenario: effect of age". Neurobiology of Age. 36 (11): 3029-3037. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.07.017. PMID 26254109.
↑  Narayan (2007). "Cortical interference effects in the cocktail party problem". Nature Neuroscience (İngilizce). 10 (12): 1601-1607. doi:10.1038/nn2009. ISSN 1546-1726. PMID 17994016.
↑  "The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: how frequent are attention shifts to one's name in an irrelevant auditory channel?". J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 21 (1): 255-60. Ocak 1995. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.255. PMID 7876773.
1 2  "The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: the importance of working memory capacity". Psychon Bull Rev. 8 (2): 331-5. Haziran 2001. doi:10.3758/BF03196169. PMID 11495122.
1 2  Cherry (1953). "Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears" (PDF). The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 25 (5): 975-79. doi:10.1121/1.1907229. ISSN 0001-4966. 22 Kasım 2009 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi (PDF). Erişim tarihi: 5 Eylül 2020.
↑  Companion to Clinical Neurology. 2nd. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2003. s. 206. ISBN 0-19-515938-1. 30 Haziran 2020 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi. Erişim tarihi: 5 Eylül 2020.
1 2  Evans (22 Aralık 2015). "Getting the Cocktail Party Started: Masking Effects in Speech Perception". Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 28 (3): 483-500. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00913. ISSN 0898-929X. PMC 4905511 $2. PMID 26696297.
↑  "The benefit of binaural hearing in a cocktail party: effect of location and type of interferer" (PDF). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115 (2): 833-43. Şubat 2004. doi:10.1121/1.1639908. PMID 15000195. 20 Ekim 2016 tarihinde kaynağından (PDF) arşivlendi. Erişim tarihi: 21 Temmuz 2013.
↑  "Auditory attention--focusing the searchlight on sound". Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 17 (4): 437-55. Ağustos 2007. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2007.07.011. PMID 17714933.
↑  Best, Virginia; Mason, Christine R.; Kidd, Gerald; Iyer, Nandini; Brungart, Douglas S. (Şubat 2015). "Better-ear glimpsing in hearing-impaired listeners". The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 137 (2): EL213-219. doi:10.1121/1.4907737. ISSN 1520-8524. PMC 4327925 $2. PMID 25698053.
↑  Human factors: understanding people-system relationships. New York: Wiley. 1983. ISBN 978-0-471-09594-1. OCLC 8866672.
1 2 3 4 5  Human Cognition : Theory and Practice. New York, NY: Worth Pub. 2007. s. 59. ISBN 9780716756675. OCLC 779665820.
↑  Moray (1959). "Attention in dichotic listening: Affective cues and the influence of instructions" (PDF). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 11 (1): 56-60. doi:10.1080/17470215908416289. ISSN 0033-555X. [ölü/kırık bağlantı]
↑  "The development of selective attention: a life-span overview". Acta Psychol (Amst). 86 (2–3): 227-72. Ağustos 1994. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(94)90004-3. PMID 7976468.
↑  Newman (2005). "The Cocktail Party Effect in Infants Revisited: Listening to One's Name in Noise". Developmental Psychology (İngilizce). 41 (2): 352-362. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.41.2.352. PMID 15769191.
↑  Newman (2005). "The Cocktail Party Effect in Infants Revisited: Listening to One's Name in Noise". Developmental Psychology. 41 (2): 352-362. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.41.2.352. PMID 15769191.
↑  Driver J (Şubat 2001). "A selective review of selective attention research from the past century" (PDF). Br J Psychol. 92 Part 1: 53-78. doi:10.1348/000712601162103. PMID 11802865. 21 Mayıs 2014 tarihinde kaynağından (PDF) arşivlendi. Erişim tarihi: 21 Temmuz 2013.
↑  Straube (1979). "Dichotic shadowing and selective attention to word meanings in schizophrenia". Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 88 (4): 346-353. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.88.4.346.
↑  Nielsen (1981). "Emotion, personality, and selective attention". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 41 (5): 945-960. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.5.945. ISSN 0022-3514.
↑  Cohen (2006). "Selective Attention". Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. doi:10.1002/0470018860.s00612. ISBN 978-0470016190.
↑  Scharf (1990). "On hearing what you listen for: The effects of attention and expectancy". Canadian Psychology. 31 (4): 386-387. doi:10.1037/h0084409.
↑  "Cocktail party listening in a dynamic multitalker environment". Percept Psychophys. 69 (1): 79-91. Ocak 2007. doi:10.3758/BF03194455. PMID 17515218. 8 Mart 2021 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi. Erişim tarihi: 5 Eylül 2020.
↑  Haykin (17 Ekim 2005). "The Cocktail Party Problem". Neural Computation. 17 (9): 1875-1902. doi:10.1162/0899766054322964. PMID 15992485.
↑  Gray J.A. (1960). "Grouping strategies with simultaneous stimuli". Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 12 (3): 180-184. doi:10.1080/17470216008416722. 8 Ocak 2015 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi. Erişim tarihi: 21 Temmuz 2013.
↑  Treisman (1969). "Strategies and models of selective attention". Psychological Review. 76 (3): 282-299. doi:10.1037/h0027242. PMID 4893203.
↑  Deutsch (1963). "Attention: Some Theoretical Considerations". Psychological Review. 70 (I): 80-90. doi:10.1037/h0039515. PMID 14027390.
↑  Norman (1968). "Toward a theory of memory and attention". Psychological Review. 75 (6): 522-536. doi:10.1037/h0026699.
↑  Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort 22 Şubat 2018 tarihinde Wayback Machine sitesinde arşivlendi.. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
↑  Narayan (2007). "Cortical interference effects in the cocktail party problem". Nature Neuroscience. 10 (12): 1601-1607. doi:10.1038/nn2009. PMID 17994016.
↑  Dalton (2009). "The role of working memory in auditory selective attention". The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 62 (11): 2126-2132. doi:10.1080/17470210903023646. PMID 19557667.
↑  Koch (9 Mayıs 2011). "Switching in the cocktail party: Exploring intentional control of auditory selective attention". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 37 (4): 1140-1147. doi:10.1037/a0022189. PMID 21553997.
↑  Shapiro (1 Ocak 1997). "Personal names and the attentional blink: A visual "cocktail party" effect". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 23 (2): 504-514. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.23.2.504.
↑  Bee (2008). "The cocktail party problem: What is it? How can it be solved? And why should animal behaviorists study it?". Journal of Comparative Psychology (İngilizce). 122 (3): 235-251. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.122.3.235. ISSN 1939-2087. PMC 2692487 $2. PMID 18729652.
| --- | --- |
Otorite kontrolü :  GND: 4365818-0