ตัวแบบนอร์ดิก
เชิงอรรถและอ้างอิง

↑  The Nordic Way, Klas Eklund, Henrik Berggren and Lars Trägårdh. 2011.
↑  
Brandal, Nik; Bratberg, Øivind; Thorsen, Dag Einar (2013). The Nordic Model of Social Democracy. Springer. ISBN 9781137013279.
↑  
Pontusson, Jonas (2011-08-24). "Once Again A Model: Nordic Social Democracy in a Globalized World".  ใน Shoch, James; Ross, George W.; Cronin, James E. (บ.ก.). What's Left of the Left: Democrats and Social Democrats in Challenging Times. Duke University Press. pp. 89–115. ISBN 9780199322510.
↑  
"The surprising ingredients of Swedish success - free markets and social cohesion" (PDF). Institute of Economic Affairs. 2013-06-25. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2014-01-15.
1 2 3  McWhinney, James E. (25 June 2013). "The Nordic Model: Pros and Cons". Investopedia. สืบค้นเมื่อ 16 September 2015. The Nordic model is a term coined to capture the unique combination of free market capitalism and social benefits that have given rise to a society that enjoys a host of top-quality services, including free education and free healthcare, as well as generous, guaranteed pension payments for retirees. These benefits are funded by taxpayers and administered by the government for the benefit of all citizens.
↑  Petersen, Klaus (March 2009). "Constructing Nordic Welfare? Nordic Social Political Cooperation" (PDF).  ใน Christiansen, Niels Finn; Edling, Nils; Haave, Per; Petersen, Klaus (บ.ก.). The Nordic Model of Welfare: A Historical Reappraisal. Copenaghen: Museum Tusculanum Press. pp. 67–96. สืบค้นเมื่อ 3 October 2020 – โดยทาง Helsinki University.
↑  Hicks, Alexander (20 January 2000). Social Democracy and Welfare Capitalism: A Century of Income Security Politics. Cornell University Press. p. 130. ISBN 978-0801485565. By the late 1950s, labor had been incorporated alongside Swedish business in fully elaborated corporatist institutions of collective bargaining and policy making, public as well as private, supply-side (as for labour training) as well as demand side (e.g., Keynesian). During the 1950s and 1960s, similar neocorpratist institutions developed in Denmark and Norway, in Austria and the Netherlands, and somewhat later, in Belgium and Finland.
↑  McWhinney 2013 "The model is underpinned by a capitalist economy that encourages creative destruction. While the laws make it is easy for companies to shed workers and implement transformative business models, employees are supported by generous social welfare programs."
↑  Lane, Kenworthy (2013). Social Democratic America. New York City: Oxford University Press. pp. 88–93. ISBN 9780199322527.
↑  Kenworthy, Lane (January 2014). "America's Social Democratic Future". Foreign Affairs (January/February 2014). สืบค้นเมื่อ 2 April 2014.
↑  Kenworthy, Lane (1 March 2016). "Social Democracy". The Next System Project. สืบค้นเมื่อ 27 April 2020. The chief goals social democracy attempts to realize, and that distinguish it from other actually-existing capitalisms, are economic security, equality (low inequality) of opportunity, and shared prosperity. ... Modern social democracy consists, to put it simply, of market capitalism plus generous and employment-friendly social policy... .
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9  Andersen, Torben M.; Holmström, Bengt; Honkapohja, Seppo; Korkman, Sixten; Söderström, Hans Tson; Vartiainen, Juhana (2007). The Nordic Model: Embracing globalization and sharing risks (PDF). Yliopistopaino, Helsinki: Taloustieto Oy. ISBN 978-951-628-468-5. สืบค้นเมื่อ 26 July 2016.
↑  "Economy Rankings". Doing Business. The World Bank Group. 2016. สืบค้นเมื่อ 26 July 2016.
1 2  "Index of Economic Freedom – Countries". Index of Economic Freedom. The Heritage Foundation. 2008. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 25 December 2008. สืบค้นเมื่อ 26 July 2016.
↑  "Corruption Perceptions Index 2015". Transparency International. Full Table and Rankings. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 2019-11-13. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2017-01-01.
↑  Bruhn, Anders; Kjellberg, Anders; Sandberg, Åke (2013).  Sandberg, Åke (บ.ก.). A New World of Work Challenging Swedish Unions (PDF). Nordic Lights. Work, Management and Welfare in Scandinavia. Stockholm: SNS. pp. 126–186.
↑  "Trade Union Density". OECD StatExtracts. OECD. 2010. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2016-07-26.
↑  Kjellberg, Anders (2006-04-04). "The Swedish unemployment insurance - will the Ghent system survive?" (pdf). Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research: 87–98. doi:10.1177/102425890601200109. ISSN 1024-2589. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2016-07-26 – โดยทาง Lund University. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal ต้องการ |journal= (help)
↑  "The Nordic Model". In focus 2001. Nordic Labour Journal. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2016-07-26.
↑  Growing Unequal? Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries. OECD. 2008. p. 233. doi:10.1787/9789264044197-en. ISBN 978-92-64-04418-0. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 2018-02-09. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2017-09-14 – โดยทาง Keepeek 360.
↑  "Skattetrykket". Danish Ministry of Taxation. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 2012-05-31. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2012-06-24.
↑   "The Nordic model is about more than high taxes - CapX". 2015-01-15.
↑   "How Scandinavian Countries Pay for Their Government Spending - Tax Foundation". 2015-06-10.
↑  Gregoire, Carolyn (2015-08-01). "The Happiest Countries In The World". The Huffington Post (ตีพิมพ์ 2013-09-10). สืบค้นเมื่อ 2016-07-27.
↑  Wearing, David (2014-05-22). "Where's the worst place to be a worker? Most of the world". The Guardian. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2016-07-27.
↑  Rosser, Mariana, V; Barkley, J Jr. (2003-07-23). Comparative Economics in a Transforming World Economy. MIT Press. p. 226. ISBN 978-0262182348. Liberal corporatism is largely self-organized between labor and management, with only a supporting role for government. Leading examples of such systems are found in small, ethnically homogeneous countries with strong traditions of social democratic or labor party rule, such as Sweden's Nordic neighbors. Using a scale of 0.0 to 2.0 and subjectively assigning values based on six previous studies, Frederic Pryor in 1988 found Norway and Sweden the most corporatist at 2.0 each, followed by Austria at 1.8, the Netherlands at 1.5, Finland, Denmark, and Belgium at 1.3 each, and Switzerland and West Germany at 1.0 each…with the exception of Iceland all the Nordic countries have higher taxes, larger welfare states, and greater corporatist tendencies than most social market economies.
↑  "Norway: The rich cousin". The Economist. 2013-02-02. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2014-10-27.
1 2  "The Nordic countries: The next supermodel". The Economist. 2013-02-02. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2016-07-27.
↑  "The secret of their success". The Economist. 2013-01-31.
↑  
Hopkin, Jonathan; Lapuente, Victor; Moller, Lovisa (2014-01-29). "Lower levels of inequality are linked with greater innovation in economies". London School of Economics. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2016-06-27.
↑  
Lane, Kenworthy (2013-12-03). Social Democratic America. USA: Oxford University Press. pp. 88–93. ISBN 9780199322527.
↑  
Westerlund, Per-Åke (2014-03-22). "IS SWEDEN A MODEL TO FOLLOW?". Socialist Alternative. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2016-07-27.
↑  
Rozworski, Michal (2015-02-27). "Beyond the Swedish Model". Jacobin. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2016-07-27.
↑  "Swedish riots rage for fourth night". The Guardian. 2013-05-23. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2016-07-27.
↑  "In Sweden, Riots Put an Identity in Question". The New York Times. 2013-05-26.
↑  Esping-Andersen, G (1991). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
1 2  The Nordic Council. "About the Nordic welfare model". Norden. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 2014-04-07. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2014-04-02.
↑  "We Can Reduce Poverty If We Want To. We Just Have To Want To". Mother Jones. 2013-09-26.
1 2 3  "Compare your country - Income distribution and poverty". OECD.
↑  Schröder, Martin (2013). Integrating Varieties of Capitalism and Welfare State Research. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 157.
↑  "Scandinavian Nonbelievers, Which Is Not to Say Atheists". The New York Times. 2009-02-27.
↑  Mander, Jerry (24 July 2013). "There Are Good Alternatives to US Capitalism, But No Way to Get There". Alternet. สืบค้นเมื่อ 27 July 2013.
↑  Matthews, Dylan (9 January 2014). "This sociologist has a plan to make America more like Sweden". The Washington Post. สืบค้นเมื่อ 11 March 2014.
↑  Sanders, Bernie (26 May 2013). "What Can We Learn From Denmark?". The Huffington Post. สืบค้นเมื่อ 11 March 2014.
↑  Issenberg, Sasha (9 January 2010). "Sanders a growing force on the far, far left". Boston Globe. You go to Scandinavia, and you will find that people have a much higher standard of living, in terms of education, health care, and decent paying jobs.
↑  Aleem, Zeeshan (4 May 2015). "Bernie Sanders Says the U.S. Could Learn a Lot From Scandinavia. Here's Why He's Right". Mic. สืบค้นเมื่อ 5 May 2015.
↑  "'Scandinavian Dream' is true fix for America's income inequality". CNN Money. 3 June 2015. สืบค้นเมื่อ 21 December 2019.
↑  "After I Lived in Norway, America Felt Backward. Here's Why". The Nation. 2016-01-28. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 2017-09-19. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2017-09-14.
↑  
Klein, Naomi (2008). The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. Picador. p. 276.
↑  
Whyman, Philip; Baimbridge, Mark; Mullen, Andrew (2012). The Political Economy of the European Social Model (Routledge Studies in the European Economy). Routledge. p. 108. In short, Gorbachev aimed to lead the Soviet Union towards the Scandinavian social democratic model.
↑  "The secret of their success". The Economist. 2013-02-02.
↑  Sales, Ben (2016-05-23). "Survey: Israeli Jews Want Broader Welfare State, Israeli Arabs Prefer 'American Model'". Haaretz.
↑  "The "Continuing Revelation" of Scandinavian Economies". The American Magazine. 2016-07-22.
↑  Bardhan, Pranab; Roemer, Johen E (1992). "Market socialism, a case for rejuvenation". Journal of Economic Perspectives. 6 (3): 104. ...we believe that social democracy requires rather special political circumstances that are absent in many countries for which our market socialism proposal may be feasible. Since it (social democracy) permits a powerful capitalist class to exist (90 percent of productive assets are privately owned in Sweden), only a strong and unified labor movement can win the redistribution through taxes that is characteristic of social democracy. It is idealistic to believe that tax concessions of this magnitude can be effected simply through electoral democracy without an organized labor movement, when capitalists organize and finance influential political parties. Even in the Scandinavian countries, strong apex labor organizations have been difficult to sustain and social democracy is somewhat on the decline now.
↑  Jónsson, Guðmundur (2014-08-08). "Iceland and the Nordic Model of Consensus Democracy". Scandinavian Journal of History. 39 (4): 510–528. doi:10.1080/03468755.2014.935473. ISSN 0346-8755.
↑  Landersøn, Rasmus; Heckman, James J. "The Scandinavian Fantasy: The Sources of Intergenerational Mobility in Denmark and the U.S." (PDF). National Bureau of Economic Research. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิม (PDF)เมื่อ 2017-07-22. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2017-05-06.