การอ้างอำนาจ
เชิงอรรถและอ้างอิง

↑  นิพัทธ ผึ้งไผ่งาม (May 2014). "2 เอกสารและงานวิจัยที่เกี่ยวข้อง". การใช้เหตุผลวิบัติในการโต้แย้งบนเว็บบอร์ด (PDF) (วิทยานิพนธ์ ปริญญาการศึกษามหาบัณฑิต). มหาวิทยาลัยศรีนครินทรวิโรฒ. 3. เหตุผลวิบัติ (Fallacy), 3.2 ประเภทของเหตุผลวิบัติ, p. 18. เก็บ (PDF)จากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 2022-12-06. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2023-12-08. การอ้างอ นาจโดยไม่ชอบ (Appeal to inappropriate authority)
1 2 3 4 5  "Fallacies". University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 2023-11-14.
1 2  
Lewiński, Marcin (2008). "Comments on 'Black box arguments'". Argumentation. 22 (3): 447–451. doi:10.1007/s10503-008-9095-x.
1 2  
Eemeren, Frans (2010). Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-dialectical Theory of Argumentation. John Benjamins. p. 203. ISBN 978-9027211194.
↑  Hansen, Vilhem (1998). "Locke and Whately on the Argumentum ad Ignorantiam". Philosophy & Rhetoric, Vol. 31, No. 1. Philosophy & Rhetoric. Vol. 31. Penn State University Press. p. 60. JSTOR 40237981. (...) Locke thought no better or worse of the ad ignorantiam than he did of ad verecundiam or ad hominem (…) At the end of his discussion of the ad hominem as a fallacy, Whately says, "The same observations will apply to 'argumentum ad verecundiam' and the rest" (1853, 3.1). (…) If we use this analysis of the ad hominem as a model for how Whately thought of the other ad arguments, then the ad verecundiam will be an argument with premises that say that amazing authority . . . [or] some venerable institution" and a conclusion claiming that the one to whom the ad verecundiam is addressed ought to accept the conclusion in question on pain of being at odds with those commitments. Similarly, an ad populum argument will be one that includes among its premises the claim that such and such is a widely held opinion or commitment "of the multitude" and the conclusion will be that the person to whom the argument is directed is bound to accept a logical consequence of the commitments invoked.
1 2  Williamson, Owen. "Master List of Logical Fallacies". The University of Texas at El Paso. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 2023-11-22.
↑  Goodwin, Jean (May 1998). "Forms of Authority and the Real Ad Verecundiam". Argumentation. 12 (2): 267–280 – โดยทาง Springer Science+Business Media.
1 2 3 4  Garrett, Aaron (2014). The Routledge Companion to Eighteenth Century Philosophy. Routledge. p. 280. ISBN 9781317807926. demonstrations proceed deductively while probable reasoning involves inductive inferences.
1 2  
McBride, Michael. "Retrospective Scientific Evaluation". Yale University. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 2010-07-24. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2017-08-10.
1 2 3  
Zinser, Otto (1984). Basic Principles of Experimental Psychology. McGraw-Hill. p. 37. ISBN 9780070728455.
1 2  
Stephen, Leslie (1882). The Science of Ethics. G. P. Putnam's sons. p. viii.
↑  Ruggiero, Tim. "Logical Fallacies".
↑  Bennett, Bo. "Appeal to the Common Man". Logically Fallacious.
↑  "Argument from False Authority". Logically Fallcious.
1 2  Sismondo, Sergio (1999). "Scepticism and Authority in Popular Science (review)", Queen's Quarterly, Kingston, Vol. 106, Iss. 1, (Spring 1999). p106.
1 2  Sagan, Carl (2011-07-06). The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark. Ballantine Books. ISBN 9780307801043.
↑  
Stevenson, I. (1990). Some of My Journeys in Medicine (PDF). The University of Southwestern Louisiana. p. 18.
↑  
Quick, James Campbell; Little, Laura M.; Cooper, Cary L.; Gibbs, Philip C.; Nelson, Debra (2010). "Organizational Behavior". International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology: 278.
↑  Painter, Theophilus S. (April 1923), "Studies in mammalian spermatogenesis. II. The spermatogenesis of man", Journal of Experimental Zoology, 37 (3): 291–336, doi:10.1002/jez.1400370303
1 2 3  
Glass, Bentley (1990). Theophilus Shickel Painter (PDF). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences. pp. 316–17.
1 2  Mertens, Thomas (October 1979). "The Role of Factual Knowledge in Biology Teaching". The American Biology Teacher. 41 (7): 395–419. doi:10.2307/4446671. JSTOR 4446671.
↑  Tjio, Joe Hin; Levan, Albert (May 1956), "The Chromosome Number of Man", Hereditas, 42 (1–2): 723–4, doi:10.1111/j.1601-5223.1956.tb03010.x, PMID 345813
↑  O'Connor, Clare (2008), Human Chromosome Number, Nature, สืบค้นเมื่อ 2014-04-24
↑  Gartler, Stanley (2006). "The Chromosome Number in Humans: A Brief History". Nature Reviews Genetics. 7 (8): 655–60. doi:10.1038/nrg1917. PMID 16847465. S2CID 21365693.
1 2  
Orrell, David PhD. (2008). The Future of Everything: The Science of Prediction. pp. 184-85.
1 2  Kevles, Daniel J. (1985). "Human Chromosomes--Down's Disorder and the Binder's Mistakes" (PDF). Engineering and Science: 9.
↑  T. C., Hsu (1979). "Out of the Dark Ages: Human and Mammalian Cytogenetics: An Historical Perspective" (PDF). Cell. 18 (4): 1375–1376. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(79)90249-6. S2CID 54330665.
↑  Unger, Lawrence; Blystone, Robert (1996). "Paradigm Lost: The Human Chromosome Story" (PDF). Bioscene. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิม (PDF)เมื่อ 2006-09-05. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2016-03-24.
↑  Sammut, Gordon; Bauer, Martin W (2011). "Social Influence: Modes and Modalities". The Social Psychology of Communication (PDF). pp. 87–106. doi:10.1057/9780230297616_5. ISBN 978-0-230-24736-9.
↑  
Delameter, Andrew (2017). "Contrasting Scientific & Non-Scientific Approaches to Acquiring Knowledge". City University of New York.
↑  
Sheldon, Brian; Macdonald, Geraldine (2010). A Textbook of Social Work. Routledge. p. 40. ISBN 9781135282615.
↑  
Bates, Jordan (2016-03-16). "12 Psychological Tactics Donald Trump Uses to Manipulate the Masses". 11. Appeals to Authority.
↑  McLeod, Samuel (2008), Asch Experiment, Simply Psychology
↑  Webley, Paul, A partial and non-evaluative history of the Asch effect, University of Exeter
1 2  Milgram, S (1965). "Some conditions of obedience and disobedience to authority". Human Relations. 18 (1): 57–76. doi:10.1177/001872676501800105. S2CID 37505499.
↑  "December 2014 - Page 2". Disrupted Physician. 2014-12-22.
↑  
"Definition of GROUPTHINK". Merriam-Webster. 2023-12-08. เก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 2023-05-24. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2023-12-09.
↑  
Rossi, Stacey (2006). "Examination of Exclusion Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools" (PDF).
↑  David, Phillip J.; Hersh, Reuben (1998). New Directions in the Philosophy o Mathematics (PDF). Princeton University Press. p. 8. คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิม (PDF)เมื่อ 2016-03-04.
↑  Lookwin, B. (2015). "Biopharma Training". คลังข้อมูลเก่าเก็บจากแหล่งเดิมเมื่อ 2017-09-12. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2017-09-12.
↑  Janis, Irving L. (1971). "Groupthink" (PDF). Psychology Today.