フレデリクス・テオドルス・ヴィッサー
作品 > その他

1931-32: Rooms-Katholieke Encyclopaedie（オランダ語版）の英語学と英文学の項目への貢献
1939: ‘Borrowings by Shakespeare from St. Thomas Moore’, Pompen Anniversary Issue, Tijdschrift voor Taal en Letteren, p. 232.
1941: Dissertation: A Syntax of the English Language of St. Thomas More, Part I, Librairie Universitaire Uystpruyst.
1944: Review of Franz, Die Sprache Shakespeares, English Studies, p. 13. doi:10.1080/00138384408596763
1944: ‘The term “Syntactic Unit”’, English Studies, p. 144. doi:10.1080/00138384408596764
1945: ‘„Dutch” of „Netherland(s)”?’, Katholiek Cultureel Tijdschrift, 15 August.
1945: ‘“To note” in Shakespeare’, English Studies, p. 142 and p. 173.
1945: ‘Two remarkable constructions in Shakespeare’, Neophilologus, p. 30. doi:10.1007/BF01510819
1947: ‘The Construction “I had heard her cried”’, English Studies, p. 144. doi:10.1080/00138384708596789
1948: Review of Delcourt’s Chaucer translation, English Studies, p. 49. doi:10.1080/00138384808596804
1948: Enige opmerkingen betreffende de studie van de historische syntaxis van het Engels, (開会演説), Nijmegen.
1949: ‘Emendation of Genesis & Exodus 2253-4’, English Studies, p. 13. doi:10.1080/00138384908596835
1949: ‘Chaucer’s “this ilke monk feet olde thynges pace”’, English Studies, p. 133. doi:10.1080/00138384908596835
1949: Review of Mossé’s Esquisse d’une histoire de In langue anglaise, English Studies, p. 45. doi:10.1080/00138384908596834
1949: Some Causes of Verbal Obsolescence (開会演説), Nijmegen.
1950: ‘Two or more Auxiliaries with a Common Verbal Complement’, English Studies, p. 11. doi:10.1080/00138385008596840
1951: ‘The Cockney expression “What are you doing of?”’, English Studies, p. 76. doi:10.1080/00138385108596869
1951: Review of Forsberg’s A Contribution to a Dictionary of Old English Place-Names, Museum, p. 5.
1953: Review of Brunner’s Die englische Sprache, English Studies, p. 24 and p. 73. doi:10.1080/00138385308596915
1954: ‘Beowulf 991/2’, English Studies, p. 116. doi:10.1080/00138385408596934
1954: Review of Dietrich’s Die Syntax der ‘do’-Umschreibung bei ‘have’, English Studies, p. 266. doi:10.1080/00138385408596933
1955: ‘Three Suggested Emendations of the Middle English Dictionary’, English Studies, p.23. doi:10.1080/00138385508596962
1955: ‘The Terms “Subjunctive” and “Indicative”’, English Studies, p. 205. doi:10.1080/00138385508596947
1958: ‘Pearl 609-11’, English Studies, p. 20. doi:10.1080/00138385808597021
1959: ‘The Middle English Dictionary. Some Criticisms’, English Studies, p. 18. doi:10.1080/00138385908597028
1960: Answer to Prof. Kurath’s Objections, English Studies, p. 254. doi:10.1080/00138386008597088
1960: Review of Söderlind’s Verb Syntax in John Dryden’s Prose, Studia Neophilologica, pp. 356-8. doi:10.1080/00393276008587223
1961: Brief Mention to de Vocht’s Professor W. Bang and His Work in English Philology, English Studies, p. 411. doi:10.1080/00138386108597108
1961: Review of Carstensen’s Studien zur Syntax des Nomens, Pronomens and der Negation in den Paston Letters, English Studies, p. 376. doi:10.1080/00138386108597106
1962: ‘Middle English “leten for” = “to regard as”’, English Studies, p. 491. doi:10.1080/00138386208597147
1964: ‘The Historical Present in Middle English Verse Narratives’, English Studies, (Zandvoort Number), p. 134. doi:10.1080/00138386408597198