小節 (言語学)
通言語間の差異 > 目的語への繰り上げ > 英語

主動詞の補部に生起する小節は、その主語が主節の目的語位置に繰り上がることにより派生されると広く考えられている。
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

| ()   | a.   | The DA proved two meni/j [ti guilty] during each otherj’s trials. | The DA proved two meni/j [ti guilty] during each otherj’s trials. | The DA proved two meni/j [ti guilty] during each otherj’s trials. | The DA proved two meni/j [ti guilty] during each otherj’s trials. | The DA proved two meni/j [ti guilty] during each otherj’s trials. | The DA proved two meni/j [ti guilty] during each otherj’s trials. | The DA proved two meni/j [ti guilty] during each otherj’s trials. | The DA proved two meni/j [ti guilty] during each otherj’s trials. | The DA proved two meni/j [ti guilty] during each otherj’s trials. | The DA proved two meni/j [ti guilty] during each otherj’s trials. | The DA proved two meni/j [ti guilty] during each otherj’s trials. | The DA proved two meni/j [ti guilty] during each otherj’s trials. | The DA proved two meni/j [ti guilty] during each otherj’s trials. | The DA proved two meni/j [ti guilty] during each otherj’s trials. | The DA proved two meni/j [ti guilty] during each otherj’s trials. | The DA proved two meni/j [ti guilty] during each otherj’s trials. | The DA proved two meni/j [ti guilty] during each otherj’s trials. | The DA proved two meni/j [ti guilty] during each otherj’s trials. | The DA proved two meni/j [ti guilty] during each otherj’s trials. | The DA proved two meni/j [ti guilty] during each otherj’s trials. |
 : 


|  |  |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

| ()   | b.   | The DA proved no suspecti/j [ti guilty] during hisj trial. | The DA proved no suspecti/j [ti guilty] during hisj trial. | The DA proved no suspecti/j [ti guilty] during hisj trial. | The DA proved no suspecti/j [ti guilty] during hisj trial. | The DA proved no suspecti/j [ti guilty] during hisj trial. | The DA proved no suspecti/j [ti guilty] during hisj trial. | The DA proved no suspecti/j [ti guilty] during hisj trial. | The DA proved no suspecti/j [ti guilty] during hisj trial. | The DA proved no suspecti/j [ti guilty] during hisj trial. | The DA proved no suspecti/j [ti guilty] during hisj trial. | The DA proved no suspecti/j [ti guilty] during hisj trial. | The DA proved no suspecti/j [ti guilty] during hisj trial. | The DA proved no suspecti/j [ti guilty] during hisj trial. | The DA proved no suspecti/j [ti guilty] during hisj trial. | The DA proved no suspecti/j [ti guilty] during hisj trial. | The DA proved no suspecti/j [ti guilty] during hisj trial. | The DA proved no suspecti/j [ti guilty] during hisj trial. | The DA proved no suspecti/j [ti guilty] during hisj trial. | The DA proved no suspecti/j [ti guilty] during hisj trial. | The DA proved no suspecti/j [ti guilty] during hisj trial. |
 : 


|  |  |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
上記の例において、期間を表す付加部は主節の要素であり、束縛条件Aにより照応詞は同一節内に先行詞を持つ必要があるため、繰り上げを仮定しなければこの束縛に関する事実を捉えることができない。