אבדוקציה
הערות שוליים

↑  אִסְלוּק במילון טכנולוגיית המידע: בינה מלאכותית (תשס"ד), באתר האקדמיה ללשון העברית
↑  Elliot Sober, Core Questions in Philosophy: A Text with Readings, 1991
↑  Daniel G. Campos, On the distinction between Peirce’s abduction and Lipton’s Inference to the best explanation, Synthese
↑  Douglas Walton, Abductive, presumptive and plausible arguments, Informal Logic
↑  Karl Popper, Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Routledge; 2nd edition, 2002, עמ' 536
↑  Peirce, C. S. (1903), Harvard lectures on pragmatism, Collected Papers v. 5, paragraphs 188–189.
1 2 3 4  Peirce, C. S., Carnegie Application (L75, 1902, New Elements of Mathematics v. 4, pp. 37–38. See under "Abduction" at the Commens Dictionary of Peirce's Terms: 

Methodeutic has a special interest in Abduction, or the inference which starts a scientific hypothesis. For it is not sufficient that a hypothesis should be a justifiable one. Any hypothesis which explains the facts is justified critically. But among justifiable hypotheses we have to select that one which is suitable for being tested by experiment.
1 2 3  Peirce, C.S. (1902), application to the Carnegie Institution, see MS L75.329-330, from Draft D of Memoir 27:


Consequently, to discover is simply to expedite an event that would occur sooner or later, if we had not troubled ourselves to make the discovery. Consequently, the art of discovery is purely a question of economics. The economics of research is, so far as logic is concerned, the leading doctrine with reference to the art of discovery. Consequently, the conduct of abduction, which is chiefly a question of heuristic and is the first question of heuristic, is to be governed by economical considerations.
↑  Peirce, C. S., the 1866 Lowell Lectures on the Logic of Science, Writings of Charles S. Peirce v. 1, p. 485. See under "Hypothesis" at Commens Dictionary of Peirce's Terms.
↑  Peirce, C. S., "A Syllabus of Certain Topics of Logic", written 1903. See The Essential Peirce v. 2, p. 287. Quote viewable under "Abduction" at Commens Dictionary of Peirce's Terms.
↑  Peirce, "Pragmatism as the Logic of Abduction" (Lecture VII of the 1903 Harvard lectures on pragmatism), see parts III and IV. Published in part in Collected Papers v. 5, paragraphs 180–212 (see 196–200, Eprint and in full in Essential Peirce v. 2, pp. 226–241 (see sections III and IV). 

.... What is good abduction? What should an explanatory hypothesis be to be worthy to rank as a hypothesis? Of course, it must explain the facts. But what other conditions ought it to fulfill to be good? .... Any hypothesis, therefore, may be admissible, in the absence of any special reasons to the contrary, provided it be capable of experimental verification, and only insofar as it is capable of such verification. This is approximately the doctrine of pragmatism.
↑  Peirce, C. S. (1902), Application to the Carnegie Institution, Memoir 27, Eprint: "Of the different classes of arguments, abductions are the only ones in which after they have been admitted to be just, it still remains to inquire whether they are advantageous."
↑  Rapezzi, C; Ferrari, R; Branzi, A (24 בדצמבר 2005). "White coats and fingerprints: diagnostic reasoning in medicine and investigative methods of fictional detectives". BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.). 331 (7531): 1491–4. doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7531.1491. PMC 1322237. PMID 16373725. {{cite journal}}:  (עזרה)
↑  Rejón Altable, C (באוקטובר 2012). "Logic structure of clinical judgment and its relation to medical and psychiatric semiology". Psychopathology. 45 (6): 344–51. doi:10.1159/000337968. PMID 22854297. נבדק ב-17 בינואר 2014. {{cite journal}}:  (עזרה)
↑  Lipton, Peter. (2001). Inference to the Best Explanation, London: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-24202-9.
↑  April M. S. McMahon (1994): Understanding language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-44665-1
| --- | --- |
בקרת זהויות :  NLI: 987007292973605171  BNE: XX543096  BnF: cb11978122t (data)  GND: 4120817-1  LCCN: sh85000116  SUDOC: 027821897