تقدم اجتماعي
المصادر والمراجع

أحمد زكى بدوى، "معجم مصطلحات العلوم الاجتماعية"، مكتبة لبنان، بيروت، 1986.
↑  "معلومات عن تقدم اجتماعي على موقع britannica.com". britannica.com. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2015-10-28.
↑  "معلومات عن تقدم اجتماعي على موقع id.loc.gov". id.loc.gov. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2019-12-15.
↑  "معلومات عن تقدم اجتماعي على موقع jstor.org". jstor.org. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2020-03-13.
↑  "Our World in Data". Our World in Data. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2020-02-22. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2019-08-23.
↑  "About". Our World in Data. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2020-02-22. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2019-08-23.
1 2  Wesseling, Henk (Aug 1998). "History: Science or art?". European Review (بالإنجليزية). 6 (3): 265–267. DOI:10.1017/S106279870000329X. ISSN:1474-0575. Archived from the original on 2018-09-18.
↑  Kuhn, T., 1962, "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions", University of Chicago Press, p. 137: "Partly by selection and partly by distortion, the scientists of earlier ages are implicitly presented as having worked upon the same set of fixed problems and in accordance with the same set of fixed canons that the most recent revolution in scientific theory and method made seem scientific."
↑  Golinski، Jan (2001). Making Natural Knowledge: Constructivism and the History of Science (ط. reprint). University of Chicago Press. ص. 2. ISBN:9780226302324. When [history of science] began, during the eighteenth century, it was practiced by scientists (or "natural philosophers") with an interest in validating and defending their enterprise.  They wrote histories in which ... the science of the day was exhibited as the outcome of the progressive accumulation of human knowledge, which was an integral part of moral and cultural development.
↑  Nisbet, Robert (1980). History of the Idea of Progress. New York: Basic Books Ch. 5
↑  Porter M (10 أبريل 2015). "Why social progress matters". World Economic Forum. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2020-02-17. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2020-02-17.
↑  Kontler, László (2004). "Beauty or Beast, or Monstrous Regiments? Robertson and Burke on Women and the Public Scene," Modern Intellectual History 1 (3): 305–30.
↑  Allen, Ann Taylor (1999). "Feminism, Social Science, and the Meanings of Modernity: the Debate on the Origin of the Family in Europe and the United States, 1860–914," American Historical Review 104 (4): 1085–113; Nyland, Chris (1993). "Adam Smith, Stage Theory, and the Status of Women," History of Political Economy 25 (4): 617–40.
↑  Vernoff, Edward, & Peter J. Seybolt, (2007). Through Chinese Eyes: Tradition, Revolution, and Transformation, APEX Press, pp. 45ff.
↑  Dimand, Robert William, & Chris Nyland (2003). The Status of Women in Classical Economic Thought. Edward Elgar Publishing, p. 109; Ryrie, Charles Caldwell (1958). The Place of Women in the Church, The Macmillan Company, Ch 1.
↑  Marx, Leo, & Bruce Mazlish (1998). Progress: Fact or Illusion?. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, p. 5.
↑  Appleby, Joyce; Lynn Hunt, and Margaret Jacob (1995). Telling the Truth about History. W.W. Norton, p. 78.
↑  The following annotated reference list appears in جون بانيل بيوري's study: The Idea of Progress, published in 1920 and available in full on the web: «The history of the idea of Progress has been treated briefly and partially by various French writers; e.g. Comte, Cours de philosophie positive, vi. 321 sqq.; Buchez, Introduction a la science de l'histoire, i. 99 sqq. (ed. 2, 1842); Javary, De l'idee de progres (1850); Rigault, Histoire de la querelle des Anciens et des Modernes (1856); Bouillier, Histoire de la philosophie cartesienne (1854); Caro, Problemes de la morale sociale (1876); Brunetiere, "La Formation de l'idee de progres", in Etudes critiques, 5e serie. More recently M. Jules Delvaille has attempted to trace its history fully, down to the end of the eighteenth century. His Histoire de l'idee de progres (1910) is planned on a large scale; he is erudite and has read extensively. But his treatment is lacking in the power of discrimination. He strikes one as anxious to bring within his net, as theoriciens du progres, as many distinguished thinkers as possible; and so, along with a great deal that is useful and relevant, we also find in his book much that is irrelevant. He has not clearly seen that the distinctive idea of Progress was not conceived in antiquity or in the Middle Ages, or even in the Renaissance period; and when he comes to modern times he fails to bring out clearly the decisive steps of its growth. And he does not seem to realize that a man might be "progressive" without believing in, or even thinking about, the doctrine of Progress. Leonardo da Vinci and Berkeley are examples. In my Ancient Greek Historians (1909) I dwelt on the modern origin of the idea (p. 253 sqq.). Recently Mr. R. H. Murray, in a learned appendix to his Erasmus and Luther, has developed the thesis that Progress was not grasped in antiquity (though he makes an exception of Seneca),—a welcome confirmation.» نسخة محفوظة 15 فبراير 2020 على موقع واي باك مشين.
| 0 | 1 |
| --- | --- |
ضبط استنادي: وطنية :  المكتبة الوطنية الفرنسية (BnF)  المكتبة القومية الإسرائيلية (J9U)  مكتبة الكونغرس (LCNAF)  قاعدة البيانات الوطنية التشيكية (NLCR AUT) 
في كومنز مواد ذات صلة بـ تقدم اجتماعي.
بوابة الاقتصاد
بوابة السياسة
بوابة علم الأحياء التطوري
بوابة علم الإنسان
بوابة علم الاجتماع
بوابة فلسفة
بوابة مجتمع