Conditions: COVID-19
Keywords: GM-CSF Acute Lung Injury Hypoxia Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Corona virus COVID-19 SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome) Alveolar Macrophage Acute Hypoxic respiratory failure
Allocation: RANDOMIZED | Intervention model: PARALLEL
Enrollment: 87
Healthy volunteers: no

Brief summary:
Phase IV study to evaluate the effectiveness of additional inhaled sargramostim (GM-CSF) versus standard of care on blood oxygenation in patients with COVID-19 coronavirus infection and acute hypoxic respiratory failure.

Detailed description:
Leukine® is a yeast-derived recombinant humanized granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (rhuGM-CSF, sargramostim) and the only FDA approved GM-CSF. GMCSF, a pleiotropic cytokine, is an important leukocyte growth factor known to play a key role in hematopoiesis, effecting the growth and maturation of multiple cell lineages as well as the functional activities of these cells in antigen presentation and cell mediated immunity.

Leukine inhalation or intravenous administration, as an adjuvant therapy, may confer benefit to patients with ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome) due to COVID-19 exposure, who are at significant risk of mortality. While there is no active IND (Investigational New Drug) for Leukine in the proposed patient population, Leukine is being studied in Fase II as an adjuvant therapy in the management of life-threatening infections to boost the hosts innate immune response to fight infection, reduce the risk of secondary infection, and in varied conditions as prevention of infection during critical illness. Inhaled Leukine has also been successfully used as primary therapy to improve oxygenation in patients with disordered gas exchange in the lungs. We propose that based on preclinical and clinical data, Leukine inhalation, as an adjuvant therapy, has an acceptable benefit-risk for use in patients with hypoxic respiratory failure and ARDS due to COVID-19 exposure, who are at significant risk of mortality.

Confirmed COVID19 patients with hypoxic respiratory failure (saturation below 93% on minimal 2 l/min O2) will be randomized to receive sargramostim 125mcg twice daily for 5 days as a nebulized inhalation on top of standard of care, or to receive standard of care treatment. Upon progression of disease requiring initiation of mechanical ventilatory support within the 5 day period, in patients in the active group, inhaled sargramostim will be replaced by intravenous sargramostim 125mcg/m2 body surface area until the 5 day period is reached. From day 6 onwards, progressive patients in the active group will have the option to receive an additional 5 days of IV sargramostim, based on the treating physician's assessment. In the control group progressive disease requiring mechanical ventilatory support, from day 6 onwards, the treating physician will have the option to initiate IV sargramostim 125mcg/m2 body surface area for 5 days. Safety data, including blood leukocyte counts, will be collected in all patients. Efficacy data will also be collected and will include arterial blood gases, oxygenation parameters, need for ventilation, lung compliance, organ function, radiographic changes, ferritin levels, etc. as well as occurrence of secondary bacterial infections.

Arms:
arm 1: Inhaled sargramostim 125mcg twice daily for 5 days on top of standard of care. Upon progression to ARDS and initiation of mechanical ventilator support within the 5 day period, inhaled sargramostim will be replaced by intravenous sargramostim 125mcg/m2 body surface area once daily until the 5 day period is reached. From day 6 onwards, progressive patients in the active group will have the option to receive an additional 5 days of IV sargramostim, based on the treating physician's assessment arm 2: standard of care. Subjects progressing to ARDS and requiring invasive mechanical ventilatory support, from day 6 onwards, will have the option (clinician's decision) to initiate IV sargramostim 125mcg/m2 body surface area once daily for 5 days

Interventions: intervention 1: Sargramostim intervention 2: Control
Intervention descriptions: intervention 1: Inhalation via mesh nebulizer and/or IV administration upon Clinical deterioration intervention 2: Standard of care

Protocol document:
SAP_002.pdf: 
University Hospital Ghent 
 
Protocol No. SARPAC 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
 
Page 1 of 31 
Confidential 
 
Draft v0.7: 05 March 2021 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
Study Protocol Number: SARPAC 
Study Title: 
A prospective, randomized, open-label, interventional study to 
investigate the efficacy of sargramostim (Leukine®) in 
improving oxygenation and short- and long-term outcome of 
COVID-19 patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure. 
Study Sponsor: 
University Hospital Ghent. 
 
Protocol Version 3.0 Date: 
14 May 2020 
 
 
Prepared by: 
Ruoxuan Qi, MS 
EffectStats LLC. 
77 Lakeview Ave 
Cambridge, MA 02138 USA 
Draft v0.7 
05 March 2021 
 
 


University Hospital Ghent 
 
Protocol No. SARPAC 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
 
Page 2 of 31 
Confidential 
 
Draft v0.7: 05 March 2021 
Table of Contents 
Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ 2 
1 
Signature Page ........................................................................................................................ 5 
2 
Amendment/Modification History .......................................................................................... 7 
3 
Abbreviations .......................................................................................................................... 8 
4 
Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 9 
5 
Study Objectives and Endpoints ............................................................................................. 9 
5.1 
Primary Objective ............................................................................................................ 9 
5.1.1 
Primary Endpoint ...................................................................................................... 9 
5.1.2 
Secondary Objectives & Endpoints ........................................................................ 10 
6 
Study Design ......................................................................................................................... 11 
6.1 
Study Design Overview ................................................................................................. 11 
6.2 
Randomization ............................................................................................................... 12 
6.3 
Study Schedule ............................................................................................................... 12 
6.4 
Duration of Treatment and Study ................................................................................... 13 
6.5 
End of Study Definition ................................................................................................. 13 
6.6 
Study Drug Administration ............................................................................................ 13 
6.7 
Study Assessments ......................................................................................................... 13 
6.7.1 
Safety Evaluations .................................................................................................. 13 
6.7.2 
Efficacy Evaluations ............................................................................................... 14 
7 
Statistical Analysis Methods ................................................................................................. 14 
7.1 
General Considerations .................................................................................................. 14 
7.1.1 
Study Day................................................................................................................ 15 
7.1.2 
Baseline Definition ................................................................................................. 16 


University Hospital Ghent 
 
Protocol No. SARPAC 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
 
Page 3 of 31 
Confidential 
 
Draft v0.7: 05 March 2021 
7.1.3 
Analysis Period ....................................................................................................... 16 
7.1.4 
Missing Data Handling ........................................................................................... 16 
7.2 
Sample Size .................................................................................................................... 17 
7.3 
Data Safety Monitoring Board ....................................................................................... 17 
7.4 
Analysis Population........................................................................................................ 17 
7.5 
Patient Disposition ......................................................................................................... 18 
7.6 
Protocol Deviations ........................................................................................................ 19 
7.7 
Demographics and Baseline Disease Characteristics ..................................................... 20 
7.8 
Medical History .............................................................................................................. 20 
7.9 
Concomitant Medications .............................................................................................. 20 
7.10 
Extend of Exposure and Treatment Compliance ........................................................ 21 
7.11 
Efficacy Evaluations ................................................................................................... 22 
7.11.1 Oxygenation after 5 days of Sargramostim Intervention ........................................ 22 
7.11.2 Mean Change in Ordinal Scale Between Day 1 and Day 6 .................................... 24 
7.11.3 Effects on Progression to Mechanical Ventilation and/or ARDS ........................... 24 
7.11.4 Nosocomial Infections ............................................................................................ 25 
7.11.5 Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)....................................................... 26 
7.11.6 National Early Warning Score (NEWS-2) .............................................................. 26 
7.11.7 Clinical Sign Score ................................................................................................. 26 
7.11.8 Mortality ................................................................................................................. 27 
7.11.9 Hospitalization ........................................................................................................ 28 
7.11.10 
Feature of Secondary Haemophagocytic............................................................. 28 
7.11.11 
Favourable Effect on long term follow up .......................................................... 28 
7.12 
Safety Evaluations ...................................................................................................... 28 


University Hospital Ghent 
 
Protocol No. SARPAC 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
 
Page 4 of 31 
Confidential 
 
Draft v0.7: 05 March 2021 
7.12.1 Adverse Event ......................................................................................................... 29 
7.12.2 Laboratory data ....................................................................................................... 30 
7.12.3 Physical Examination.............................................................................................. 30 
7.12.4 Vital Signs ............................................................................................................... 31 
7.12.5 Electrocardiogram (ECG) ....................................................................................... 31 
7.12.6 Patient Profiles ........................................................................................................ 31 
8 
Data Presentation .................................................................................................................. 31 
8.1 
Insufficient Data for Presentation .................................................................................. 31 
9 
Revison History .................................................................................................................... 31 
10 Reference .............................................................................................................................. 31 
 
 
 


University Hospital Ghent 
 
Protocol No. SARPAC 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
 
Page 5 of 31 
Confidential 
 
Draft v0.7: 05 March 2021 
1 Signature Page  
Documents Prepared by: 
 
 
 
 
_______________________________________________                         __________________  
Ruoxuan Qi, MS 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Date 
Statistician 
EffectStats, LLC. 
 
 
 


University Hospital Ghent 
 
Protocol No. SARPAC 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
 
Page 6 of 31 
Confidential 
 
Draft v0.7: 05 March 2021 
Reviewer 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Printed Name 
 
Title 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Signature 
 
dd-mmm-yyyy 
 
 
Approval 
The undersigned have reviewed and approved the Statistical Analysis Plan and find the 
document to be consistent with the requirements of the Protocol. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Printed Name 
 
Title 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Signature 
 
dd-mmm-yyyy 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Printed Name 
 
Title 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Signature 
 
dd-mmm-yyyy 
 
 
 


University Hospital Ghent 
 
Protocol No. SARPAC 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
 
Page 7 of 31 
Confidential 
 
Draft v0.7: 05 March 2021 
2 Amendment/Modification History 
The following table documents any changes made to the previously approved versions of the 
document. 
Version # 
Page # / Section 
Summary of Changes 
Date 
1.0 
Original 
NA 
xx-xxx-2020 
 
 
 


University Hospital Ghent 
 
Protocol No. SARPAC 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
 
Page 8 of 31 
Confidential 
 
Draft v0.7: 05 March 2021 
3 Abbreviations 
AE :                      Adverse Event 
AECC :                American-European Consensus Conference 
ALT:                  Alanine Aminotransferase 
ARDS :                Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome 
AST:                   Alanine Aminotransferase 
CK:                      Creatine Kinase 
COVID-19 :         Coronavirus induced disease-2019 
CRP:                  C-reactive protein 
DSMB :                Data Safety Monitoring Board 
ECG :                    Electrocardiogram 
ESR:                     Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate 
eCRF :                  electronic Case Report Form 
FiO2 :                    Fraction of inspired oxygen 
FVC :                    Forced vital capacity 
GM-CSF :             Granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor 
ICF :                      Informed Consent Form 
ICU:                      Intensive Care Unit 
LDH:                   Lactate Dehydrogenase 
PaO₂ :                    Partial pressure of oxygen 
SAE :                    Serious Adverse Event 
SUSAR :               Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction 
TLC :                    Total Lung Capacity 
WBC:  
 White Blood Cells 
 
 
 


University Hospital Ghent 
 
Protocol No. SARPAC 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
 
Page 9 of 31 
Confidential 
 
Draft v0.7: 05 March 2021 
4 Introduction 
The purpose of this statistical analysis plan (SAP) is to describe the procedures and statistical 
methodologies that will be used in the analysis and reporting of results for Protocol SARPAC. 
This document is prepared based on the following documents: 
 the study protocol version 3.0 dated 14 May 2020;  
 the Case Report Form version 2.0 dated 08 April 2020. 
Readers are referred to the final study protocol (and any amendments or addenda), the case 
report form (CRF), and CRF completion guidelines for details of the study design, conduct and 
data collection. Any significant changes to these documents in terms of the principle features of 
the study analyses may result in a SAP amendment; any other changes will be denoted in the 
Clinical Study Report as changes to the planned analyses. 
This SAP must be finalized prior to the locking of the clinical database for this study. The mock 
summary tables, figures and by subject data listings (TFLs) are provided in a separate document. 
5 Study Objectives and Endpoints 
5.1 
Primary Objective 
The primary objective is to investigate whether the administration of sargramostim (Leukine®) 
improves oxygenation and short and long-term outcomes in COVID-19 patients with acute 
hypoxic respiratory failure. 
5.1.1 Primary Endpoint 
To measure the effectiveness of sargramostim on restoring lung homeostasis, the primary 
endpoint of this intervention is measuring oxygenation after 5 DAYS of inhaled (and 
intravenous) treatment through assessment of pretreatment (day 1) and post-treatment (day 6) 
ratio of PaO2/FiO2 and through measurement of the P(A-a)O2 gradient.  
During the 5 day treatment period, daily measurements of oxygen saturation (pulse oximetry) in 
relation to FiO2 will be performed, and the slope of alterations in this parameters could also be 
an indicator of correctness of study hypothesis. 


University Hospital Ghent 
 
Protocol No. SARPAC 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
 
Page 10 of 31 
Confidential 
 
Draft v0.7: 05 March 2021 
The post-treatment evaluations should be assessed within 24 hours of the last dose of treatment. 
That is, Day 6 will be the timepoint for measures of efficacy endpoints based on 5 days of 
treatment, and Day 10for patients who complete 10 days of treatment.  If the patient is 
discharged from hospital prior to the day 6 (or day 10) efficacy evaluations , the values at day of 
discharge will be used as value for measuring efficacy endpoints. 
5.1.2 Secondary Objectives & Endpoints  
 to study if early intervention with sargramostim is safe (number of AEs/SAEs) 
o Incidence of AEs/SAEs. 
 to study if early intervention with inhaled sargramostim affects clinical outcome 
o Length of  hospital stay. 
o Mean change in 6-point ordinal scale between day 1 and day 6. 
o Mean change in clinical sign score between day 1 and day 6. 
o Time to clinical sign score<6 maintained for 24h. 
o Mean change of SOFA score between day 1 and day 6 or between day 1 and day 
10. 
o Mean change NEWS2 score between day 1 and day 6 or between day 1 and day 
10. 
o Time to NEWS2 score less than 2 for at least 24h. 
 to study if early intervention with sargramostim affects the rate of nosocomial infection 
o Rate of nosocomial infection. 
 to study if early intervention with inhaled sargramostim affects progression to mechanical 
ventilation and/or ARDS 
o Number of patients requiring initiation of mechanical ventilation. 
o Duration of invasive and non-invasive ventilation and/or supplemental oxygen. 
 to study if treatment with sargramostim affects all cause mortality rate at 20 weeks post 
inclusion 
o All-cause mortality rate at 4 and 20 weeks post inclusion. 
 to study if treatment with sargramostim affects features of secondary haemophagocytic 
lymphohistiocytosis, as defined by Hs score (temp, organomegaly, cytopenia, 
triglycerides, fibrinogen, ferritin, AST and known immunosuppression) 


University Hospital Ghent 
 
Protocol No. SARPAC 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
 
Page 11 of 31 
Confidential 
 
Draft v0.7: 05 March 2021 
o Features of secondary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. 
 to study if treatment with sargramostim has a favourable effect on long term 10-20 week 
follow up 
o Clinical exams performed at 10-20 weeks follow up. 
o Pulmonary function tests (including FVC, TLC and diffusion capacity) performed 
at 10-20 weeks follow up. 
o Laboratory tests (ferritin, lymphocytes, leukocytes) performed at 10-20 weeks 
follow up. 
6 Study Design 
6.1 
Study Design Overview 
This is phase 4 academic, prospective, randomized, open-label, interventional study designed to 
investigate the efficacy of sargramostim (Leukine®) in improving oxygenation and short- and 
long-term outcome of COVID-19 patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure. 
Patients with confirmed COVID19 with acute hypoxic respiratory failure (saturation below 93% 
on minimal 2 l/min O2 or PaO2/FiO2 <350) will be randomizied to receive sargramostim 
125mcg twice daily for 5 days as a nebulized inhalation on top of standard of care (active group), 
or to receive standard of care treatment (control group). Upon progression of disease to requiring 
initiation of non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilatory support within the 5 day period, in 
patients in the active group, inhaled sargramostim will be replaced by intravenous sargramostim 
125mcg/m2 body surface area until the 5 day period is reached. 
The number of subjects that will be included in this study is: 80. 
These are divided into following sub-groups: 
Group A: active sargramostim treatment group, treatment for initial 5 days, no deterioration 
after 5 days 
Number of patients : 40 
Group B: control group : no treatment with sargramostim in first 5 days 


University Hospital Ghent 
 
Protocol No. SARPAC 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
 
Page 12 of 31 
Confidential 
 
Draft v0.7: 05 March 2021 
Number of patients : 40 
Group C and D: 
From day 6 onwards, progressive patients in the active group (Group A) will have the option to 
receive an additional 5 days of IV sargramostim 125mcg/m2 body surface area once daily, based 
on the treating physician’s assessment. This group will be called group C. It is estimated that 
some 30% of patients might deteriorate and require noninvasive or invasive mechanical 
ventilation, resulting potentially in 12 patients that progress from group A to group C, if the 
clinician decides to move forward with the drug. 
In the control group (Group B) progressing to requiring invasive or non-invasive mechanical 
ventilatory support, from day 6 onwards, the treating physician will have the option to initiate IV 
sargramostim 125mcg/m2 body surface area once daily for 5 days. This group will be called 
group D. It is estimated that some 30% of patients might deteriorate to mechanical ventilation or 
ARDS, resulting potentially in 12 patients that progress from group B to group D, if the clinician 
decides to move forward with the drug. 
Comparisons between group A (early sargramostim) versus group B (no sargramostim) at day 6 
will be important for reaching primary endpoint, and for key secondary endpoints. Comparisons 
of Group A (early 5 day intervention with sargramostim) with Group D (late 5 day intervention 
with sargramostim) will also be very informative for secondary endpoint analysis. 
Refer to Section 5.1 of the Study Protocol for a more detailed description of the study. Section 
1.6.2 of the Study Protocol is a schematic of the study design. 
6.2 
Randomization 
In this open label trial patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio. Randomization in Belgium will 
be done using REDCap (electronic IVRS system). 
6.3 
Study Schedule 
The scheduled assessments will be carried out during the study as described in Section 9.4 of the 
Study Protocol.  


University Hospital Ghent 
 
Protocol No. SARPAC 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
 
Page 13 of 31 
Confidential 
 
Draft v0.7: 05 March 2021 
6.4 
Duration of Treatment and Study 
The total treatment duration of the study is 5 days, followed by possible 5 day extension upon 
deterioration. The entire study duration is 10-22 weeks to final follow up visit. 
6.5 
End of Study Definition 
The subject has completed the study if he or she has completed all phases of the study, including 
the last visit (week 10-20 clinical follow up visit) or the last scheduled procedures (refer to 
protocol section “9. Study Specific Procedures”). 
6.6 
Study Drug Administration 
Refer to Sections 8 and 9.2 of the Study Protocol. 
6.7 
Study Assessments 
6.7.1 Safety Evaluations 
The safety and tolerability of study drug in each dosing cohort will be evaluated through: 
 Incidence of AEs/SAEs. 
 Pulmonary function tests  
 Laboratory tests  
 Physical examination 
 ECG 
 Chest X-ray 
 Vital signs (including height and weight) 
Adverse events (AEs) will be collected from the signing of informed consent form (ICF) to last 
subject contact/visit/end of post-treatment follow-up period. 
Clinical exam, pulmonary function tests (including FVC, TLC and diffusion capacity), and a 
laboratory test (ferritin, lymphocytes, leukocytes) will be performed on routine check-up by 
pulmonologist at 10-20 weeks after discharge from hospital. Safety data, including blood 
leukocyte counts, will be collected in all patients. 


University Hospital Ghent 
 
Protocol No. SARPAC 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
 
Page 14 of 31 
Confidential 
 
Draft v0.7: 05 March 2021 
Physical examination and vital signs will be tested from screening to last subject 
contact/visit/end of post-treatment follow-up period. 
ECG and chest X-ray will be collected on clinical ground.  
Refer to study protocol section 9.4 for the detailed schematic overview of the data collection & 
interventions.  
6.7.2 Efficacy Evaluations 
To measure the effectiveness of sargramostim on restoring lung homeostasis, the primary 
endpoint of this intervention is measuring oxygenation after 5 DAYS of inhaled (and 
intravenous) treatment through assessment of pretreatment (day 0) and post-treatment (day 5) 
ratio of PaO2/FiO2 and through measurement of the P(A-a)O2 gradient. 
The post-treatment evaluations should be assessed within 24 hours of the last dose of treatment. 
That is, Day 6 will be the timepoint for measures of efficacy endpoints based on 5 days of 
treatment, and Day 10 for patients who complete 10 days of treatment.  If the patient is 
discharged from hospital prior to the day 6 (or day 10) efficacy evaluations , the values at day of 
discharge will be used as value for measuring efficacy endpoints. 
Efficacy data will also be collected and will include arterial blood gases, oxygenation 
parameters, need for ventilation, lung compliance, organ function, radiographic changes, ferritin 
levels, triglyceride levels, etc. as well as occurrence of secondary bacterial infections. 
7 Statistical Analysis Methods 
7.1 
General Considerations 
All safety analyses will be based on Safety Population; all efficacy analyses will be based on 
mITT population, unless otherwise specified. Some specific sensitivity analyses of efficacy may 
be based on ITT (for primary endpoints only). 
All analyses will be considered as descriptive analyses. Derivation of two-sided 95% confidence 
intervals and p-values will be generated where applicable. 


University Hospital Ghent 
 
Protocol No. SARPAC 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
 
Page 15 of 31 
Confidential 
 
Draft v0.7: 05 March 2021 
Time to event endpoints will be defined as the start date/time to the end date/time; censoring 
dates will be the last date/time the patient was determined to be event-free. Kaplan Meier 
methods will be used for time to event endpoint analyses; a log-rank test will be performed to 
compare the two survival curves. Timepoints estimates and median survival will be derived from 
the Kaplan Meier analysis. A Cox proportional hazards model may also be used to compare the 
treatment groups using a hazard ratio. 
Categorical endpoints will be calculated as the percentage of patients with the event, relative to 
the number of patients treated. Logistic regression approaches and/or repeated measures 
statistical approaches may be used to compare patients on the sargramostim and control arms, in 
addition to Fisher’s Exact or Chi2 tests (as appropriate). 
Continuous endpoints will be summarized by n, means, medians, minimum, maximum, and 25th 
and 75th percentiles. F-test and two sample t-test may be used to compare patients on the 
sargramostim and control arms. 
In the event that the underlying assumptions and/or distributions for a given statistical method 
are not satisfied, alternative statistical methods will be employed. 
Additional exploratory analyses may be performed to evaluate the robustness and sensitivity of 
the study results, including but not limited to the analysis populations, subgroup analyses, 
treatment interactions, adjusted or stratified analyses, and/or alternative statistical methods. 
7.1.1 Study Day 
Study day will be calculated as follows: 
 For the sargramostim arm, first dose date is the first sargramostim dose date.  
 For the control arm, the randomization date will be used as the first dose date.  
  Assessments/events prior to the first dose date, study day will be the assessment date 
minus the first dose date. Assessments/events on or after the first dose date, study day 
will be the assessment date minus the first dose date plus one. 


University Hospital Ghent 
 
Protocol No. SARPAC 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
 
Page 16 of 31 
Confidential 
 
Draft v0.7: 05 March 2021 
7.1.2 Baseline Definition  
In general, the last observed measurement prior to the first dose of study treatment will be 
considered the baseline measurement unless otherwise specified. For assessments on the day of 
first dose where time is not captured, a nominal pre-dose indicator, if available, will serve as 
sufficient evidence that the assessment occurred prior to first dose. 
Assessments on the day of the first dose where neither time nor a nominal pre-dose indicator are 
captured, will be considered prior to the first dose. 
In all summaries change from baseline variables will be calculated as the post-treatment value 
minus the value at baseline. The % change from baseline will be calculated as (post-baseline 
value - baseline value) / baseline value x 100. 
7.1.3 Analysis Period  
The post-treatment evaluations should be assessed within 24 hours of the last dose of treatment. 
That is, Day 6 will be the timepoint for measures of efficacy endpoints based on 5 days of 
treatment, and Day 10 for patients who complete 10 days of treatment.  If the patient is 
discharged from hospital prior to the day 6 (or day 10) efficacy evaluations , the values at day of 
discharge will be used as value for measuring efficacy endpoints. 
The main analysis period would be the Treatment Emergent period which is defined as the 
period from the date of the first dose until the end of earliest of the following 1) the date of Day 
28; or 2) Date of Early discontinuation from study. This analysis period will be used for all 
treatment emergent adverse event, laboratory evaluations and efficacy parameters.   
For the primary endpoints, the data collected within first 6 days will be used for analysis. 
7.1.4 Missing Data Handling  
Missing data may be imputed using last-observation-carried forward, or other advanced 
statistical imputation methods for sensitivity analysis. For the primary endpoint, if assessments 
on Day 6 is not available, assessments on Day 5 will be used for analysis. If the patient leaves 
hospital prior to the day 6 analysis point, oxygenation at day of discharge will be used as value 
for measuring primary endpoint.  Imputation for intubation rate and ordinal scale will not be 
performed.  


University Hospital Ghent 
 
Protocol No. SARPAC 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
 
Page 17 of 31 
Confidential 
 
Draft v0.7: 05 March 2021 
When using last observation carried forward, a missing follow-up visit value will be imputed as 
that patient's previously observed value. 
Regarding to time-to-event data, if no other specification in each section, the following rules will 
be used for missing data imputation: 
 Patients who are not lost to followed up or experienced the event will be censored at the 
actual date of end of study visit.  
 Patients who received no drug or standard of care will be excluded from analysis.  
 Patients without an event but lost to follow-up will be censored at last date of follow-up. 
7.2 
Sample Size 
The outcome(s) on which the sample size calculation is based upon, is the primary endpoint 
measurement of oxygenation, defined as ratio of Pa02/FiO2 and P(A-a)O2. 
Sample calculation and power analysis have been performed using Genstat. The target difference 
is the difference measured at the primary endpoint (at day 6) between the control and the treated 
group. Given a sample size of 40 patients each, a minimal improvement of 10% in the treated 
group relative to the control group will be detected as significant at a significance level of 0,01 
with a power of 0.90. The error variance was set at 100 units, corresponding with a standard 
deviation of 10 units. 
The post-treatment evaluations should be assessed within 24 hours of the last dose of treatment. 
That is, Day 6 will be the timepoint for measures of efficacy endpoints based on 5 days of 
treatment, and Day 10 for patients who complete 10 days of treatment.  If the patient is 
discharged from hospital prior to the day 6 (or day 10) efficacy evaluations , the values at day of 
discharge will be used as value for measuring efficacy endpoints. 
7.3 
Data Safety Monitoring Board  
Despite the known safety profile of the study medications and study design, a DSMB reviewed 
the data. 
7.4 
Analysis Population 


University Hospital Ghent 
 
Protocol No. SARPAC 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
 
Page 18 of 31 
Confidential 
 
Draft v0.7: 05 March 2021 
The following analysis populations will be used to summarize the results from this study. 
 Safety Population includes all patients who received at least one dose of sargramostim 
and/or SOC based on actual treatment received. Patients who did not receive any study 
treatment (either sargramostim and/or SOC) will be excluded from Safety Population. All 
safety analyses will be based on the Safety Population. 
 Intent-to-treat Population (ITT) includes all patients who were randomized. Selected 
efficacy analysis (P(A-a)O2) will be performed based on ITT population for the purpose of 
sensitivity, unless otherwise specified. 
 Modified Intent-to-treat Population (MITT) includes all patients who were randomized 
and received at least one dose of sargramostim and/or standard of care based on the 
treatment assigned at randomization. All efficacy analysis will be performed based on 
modified ITT population, unless otherwise specified. 
 Enrolled Population includes all patients who were eligible and signed informed constent 
form (ICF). 
If the ITT is identical, or less than 10% different compared to the MITT population, then the 
selected efficacy analyses may not be repeated across the ITT analysis population. 
7.5 
Patient Disposition 
Descriptive statistics by treatment will be used to summarize the number of patients screened, 
the number of screening failures, the number of patients enrolled, the number of patients in 
Safety Population, ITT, and mITT, number of patients who completed treatment period, 
completed the study, withdrawal from treatment, and withdrawal from the study, and reasons for 
withdrawals. The descriptive statistics will include numbers and percentages of patients in each 
identified category by treatment groups. A patient’s data listing will be provided for disposition 
that includes patients who are excluded from the analysis populations; who prematurely 
withdrew from the study and reasons for excluding each analysis set, and for early 
discontinuation (from treatment and from the study). 
For study completion status, the following logic will be used: 


University Hospital Ghent 
 
Protocol No. SARPAC 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
 
Page 19 of 31 
Confidential 
 
Draft v0.7: 05 March 2021 
 Patient will be considered completed the study, if all of the following met: 1) complete 
the study treatment,  2) complete the first 5 study days, and 3) have a follow-up visit; 
 Patient study completion status will be considered ongoing, if 1) patient started the study, 
and 2) the data cutoff date is less than 140 days away from the patient’s first visit date in 
the Day 1-5 period; 
 Patient will be considered discontinued from the treatment, if any of the following met: 
1) the last date of drug taken is before Day 6 if the patients are in Group A, 2) the last 
date of drug taken is before Day 10 if the patients are in Group C/ D, 3)the last visit date 
is before Day 6 if the patients are in the control arm. 
 Patient will be considered discontinued from the study, if any of the following met: 1) the 
patient is considered discontinued from the treatment, or 2) didn't complete the study 
treatment and the study status is not ongoing, or 3) didn't have a follow-up visit and the 
study status is not ongoing. 
For withdrawal from study reason, the following logic will be used: 
 If a patient was discharged before Day 6, the withdrawal from study reason would be 
“Discharged before Day 6”; 
 If a patient completed study treatment but did not have a follow-up visit, the withdrawal 
from study reason would be “Lost to follow-up”; 
 Else, the withdrawal from study reason would be the same as the withdrawal from 
treatment reason. 
Patients will also be summarized by enrollment calendar time and treatment group. 
7.6 
Protocol Deviations 
A subject listing of protocol deviations data will be presented.  
The following general categories will be considered important deviations and be listed and 
discussed in the CSR as appropriate for the study: 
 Deviation 1: Patients randomized but who did not receive study drug or standard of care 
 Deviation 2: Patients who deviate from the following key entry criteria: 
o Inclusion: 


University Hospital Ghent 
 
Protocol No. SARPAC 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
 
Page 20 of 31 
Confidential 
 
Draft v0.7: 05 March 2021 
o Exclusion: 
 Deviation 3: Patients randomized who received treatment other than that to which they 
were randomized to. 
7.7 
Demographics and Baseline Disease Characteristics 
Demographic information for Safety Population will be summarized based on the first treatment 
that patients have received in the study. The demographic data consists of age, gender, race, 
ethnicity, along with baseline height, body weight, body mass index (BMI), Body Surface Area 
(BSA). The baseline the disease assessment scales, including the SOFA score (including 
categorization of <6 versus ≥ 6) , ordinal scale, Hs Score, Clinical sign score, NEWS2 Score, 
CURB-65 score and APACHE II will be summarized. 
Individual demographics and other baseline factors will be listed by patient. 
Continuous variables (for example, age, height, body weight, body mass index, body surface area, 
disease assessment scales) will be summarized by n, means, medians, minimum, maximum, and 
25th and 75th percentiles. Number of patients and percentages will be used to describe categorical 
(discrete) variables (for example, gender, race and ethnicity).  
Individual demographics and baseline factrors will be listed by patient. 
7.8 
Medical History 
Medical condition and/or significant medical history will be coded using Medical Dictionary for 
Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Version 23.1, and listed by reported term, System Organ Class 
(SOC), and Preferred Term (PT). The number and percentage of patients will be summarized by 
SOC and PT by treatment group for Safety Population.  
Baseline medical history will be summarized separately. 
7.9 
Concomitant Medications  
All medications received after the consent to the study until the end of study will be coded using 
WHO Drug Enhanced Dictionary (WHODrug_20200901_B3) and categorized as Prior 
Medication, Concomitant Medication, or Post Medication based on the following:  


University Hospital Ghent 
 
Protocol No. SARPAC 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
 
Page 21 of 31 
Confidential 
 
Draft v0.7: 05 March 2021 
 Prior medications include medications that have a start date and end date before the 
date/time of the first dose of the study treatment; 
 Concomitant medications include medications that start date prior to, or after the date of 
first dose, that continues while the patient is on treatment (Day 10) and could continue on 
into follow up period; 
 Post medications include medications that have a start date after the end date of the study 
treatment (Day 10). 
Depending on the start and end date, a medication could be categorized as prior, concomitant, or 
post, or fall into more than 1 categories. For example, a medication with a start date prior to the 
first dose of study drug can be both prior and concomitant:if its end date is before the first dose 
of study drug, it would be prior medication; or it would be the concomitant medication only if 
the end date of the medication is after the first dose of the study drug.  
Concomitant medications will be summarized by treatment group, Anatomical Therapeutic 
Chemical (ATC) classes, and Preferred Term. Prior and Post Medications will be included in the 
patient’s listing of medications including the start and end dates, prior/concomitant/post flag, 
whether it is ongoing, dose, unit and indication. 
7.10 Extend of Exposure and Treatment Compliance 
Treatment duration and treatment compliance will be summarized by treatment group. For each 
patient, the treatment duration is defined as the number of days from the first treatment date to 
the last treatment date, and can be calculated as:  
Treatment Duration (Days) = Date of Last Treatment – Date of First Treatment +1. 
For the purpose of Day 1-5 treatment compliance though, the Date of Last treatment will be 
censored on Day 5 for patients who have taken sargoramostim beyond Day 5 (progressed and 
switched onto IV). For the overall treatment duration, the date of the last treatment will be either 
the date for the end of treatment record or the last treatment date in the database. For each patient 
the treatment compliance is defined as the actual treatment received as percentage of the planned 
treatment (K days). It can be calculated as: 


University Hospital Ghent 
 
Protocol No. SARPAC 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
 
Page 22 of 31 
Confidential 
 
Draft v0.7: 05 March 2021 
Treatment Compliance = 100*(Treatment Duration– Number of Days without Sargramostim 
within the period)/K 
In these calculations, the study treatment would be sargramostim. The study specified treatment 
duration of sargramostim is 5 days. Therefore, K = 5, in general. For discontinued patients, K 
would be equal to the number of days from the date the sargramostim study drug is first received 
to the date of early discontinuation. For patients who received sargramostim after day 5 (e..g, 
groups C and D), these data will be presented in a separate treatment duration and compliance 
table. The compliance for standard of care will not be calculated or summarized.  
7.11 Efficacy Evaluations 
Key timepoints of interest for endpoints include Day 6 and Day 11, where data are available. All 
available efficacy data will be tabulated and presented for all patients in the mITT Population. 
7.11.1 Oxygenation after 5 days of Sargramostim Intervention 
To measure the effectiveness of sargramostim on restoring lung homeostasis, the primary 
endpoint of this intervention is measuring oxygenation after 5 days of inhaled (and intravenous) 
treatment through assessment of pretreatment and post-treatment ratio of PaO2/FiO2, SpO2/FiO2 
and through measurement of the P(A-a)O2 gradient. During the 5 day treatment period, daily 
measurements of oxygen saturation (pulse oximetry) in relation to FiO2 will be performed. 
Negative value of P(A-a)O2 gradient would be removed from the primary analysis. 
P(A-a)O2 gradient, PaO2/FiO2 ratio and SpO2/FiO2 are defined as: 
P(A-a)O2 gradient=[(FiO2) × (Atmospheric Pressure – H2O Pressure) – (PaCO2/0.8)] – PaO2 
PaO2/FiO2=Partial Pressure Oxygen/Fraction of Inspired Oxygen*100 
SpO2/FiO2 = Oxygen Saturation/ Fraction of Inspired Oxygen*100 
Comparison will be between active group A receiving sargramostim on top of standard of care 
and control group B receiving standard of care. The change from baseline and daily change from 
baseline in oxygenation/respiratory parameter of P(A-a)O2 gradient,  ratio of PaO2/FiO2  and 
ratio of SpO2/FiO2  will be evaluated and summarized between group A and group B at Day 6. 
The difference of change from baseline between two groups will be tested by a t-test. In general, 


University Hospital Ghent 
 
Protocol No. SARPAC 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
 
Page 23 of 31 
Confidential 
 
Draft v0.7: 05 March 2021 
the last observed measurement prior to the first dose of study treatment occurred on Day 1 visit 
will be considered the baseline measurement. Day 6 is the primary analysis point. If the patient 
leaves hospital prior to the day 6 analysis point, oxygenation at day of discharge will be used as 
value for measuring primary endpoint. 
The analyses described above will also be performed between group A (early 5 day intervention 
with sargramostim) and group D (late 5 day intervention with sargramostim). Change from 
baseline (D1) to Day 10, daily change from baseline (D1) at Day 10 in oxygenation/respiratory 
parameter of P(A-a)O2 gradient, ratio of PaO2/FiO2 and ratio of SpO2/FiO2 will be summarized 
as well. A t-test will be conducted to compare the difference between the groups. 
The same analyses will be repeated for pathological oxygenation parameter of P(A-a)O2 
gradient, ratio of PaO2/FiO2 and ratio of SpO2/FiO2 including summary of their value and change 
from baseline at Day 6 and Day 10. A waterfall plot will be used to respent the change from 
baseline and percentage change from baseline on Day 6 for 1)oxygenation parameter of P(A-
a)O2 gradient; 2) pathological oxygenation parameter of P(A-a)O2 gradient;  3) ratio of 
PaO2/FiO2; 4) ratio of SpO2/FiO2. Percentage change from baseline of P(A-a)O2 gradient and 
ratio of PaO2/FiO2 on Day 6 and follow-up will be summarized. 
Reasons of missing AA gradient values on Day 6 will also be summarized. 
The normal value of AA gradient for room air is calculated as: 2.5+(0.21×Age). All the results 
including change from baseline, and maximum change from baseline after 5 day intervention 
with sargramostim, normal AA gradient value for room air and flag of abnormality on Day 6will 
be listed.  
At least 33% reduction from baseline, and at least 50% reduction from baseline in P(A-a)O2 
gradient and pathological gradient on Day 6 will be summarized for mITT population. 
Sensitivity analysis: 
For the purpose of evaluating the sensitivity and robustness of the primary analysis using the 
mITT population, the above analyses will be repeated in the ITT Population.  


University Hospital Ghent 
 
Protocol No. SARPAC 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
 
Page 24 of 31 
Confidential 
 
Draft v0.7: 05 March 2021 
7.11.2 Mean Change in Ordinal Scale Between Day 1 and Day 6 
Ordinal scale will be assessed at the Screening and Days 1-10. Baseline for the following 
analyses is defined as the last ordinal scale prior to administration of study drug. 
Ordinal Score at screening, day 1, day 6 and mean change between day 1 and day 6 will be 
summarized and listed between group A and group B.   
7.11.3 Effects on Progression to Mechanical Ventilation and/or ARDS 
Decreasing oxygenation often leads to the need for non-invasive or invasive mechanical 
ventilation, and if severe enough to a diagnosis of ARDS. We will therefore as a secondary 
endpoint also study if early intervention with inhaled sargramostim prevents progression to 
criteria-defined ARDS (according to the American-European Consensus Conference (AECC) 
diagnostic criteria for ARDS: acute onset; ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction 
of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) of 200 or less, regardless of positive end-expiratory pressure; 
bilateral infiltrates seen on frontal chest radiograph; and pulmonary artery wedge pressure of 18 
mm Hg or less when measured, or no clinical evidence of left atrial hypertension), requiring 
high-flow oxygen devices, non-invasive mechanical ventilation, mechanical ventilation, by 
measuring the day from admission when this diagnosis is made or therapies are initiated. 
Respiratory support includes high-flow oxygen devices, non-invasive mechanical ventilation, 
mechanical ventilation. The durations of respiratory support (days) are defined as: 
Duration of respiratory support 
= ෍(End Date time
⁄
on Day ݇௜–  Start Date time
⁄
on Day݇௜) 24
⁄
ே೔
௞೔ୀ଴
 
Where, ܰ௜ is the total number of available study days for any patient ݅.  
Number of patients with ARDS onset, ratio of partial pressure of arterial oygen to fraction of 
inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2), number of patients with bilateral infiltrates seen on frontal chest 
radiograph and duration of respiratory support will be summarized by treatment group. 


University Hospital Ghent 
 
Protocol No. SARPAC 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
 
Page 25 of 31 
Confidential 
 
Draft v0.7: 05 March 2021 
Date of ARDS onset, ratio of partial pressure of arterial oygen to fraction of inspired oxygen 
(PaO2/FiO2), present of bilateral infiltrates seen on frontal chest radiograph and details 
regarding respiratory support will also be listed by patient. 
Time to progression to invasive ventilation (days) is calculated as: 
Time to invasive ventilation (Days)  = Date of first invasive ventilation/Censoring– Date 
of randomization +1 
All patients without progression to invasive ventilation during the study will be censored on the 
date of end of the follow up period, early discontinuation or death whichever is earlier. 
The probability function of progression to invasive ventilation will be estimated by Kaplan-
Meier method. The median time and its 95% confidence interval for each group will be reported. 
Cumulative progression rates estimated by the KM method for day 6, 10, and available visits 
during the follow up period and the 95% confidence intervals will be reported.  
7.11.4 Nosocomial Infections 
As part of routine clinical care, sputum samples will be collected in patients suspected of 
secondary bacterial pneumonia, and checked for the presence of bacteria. 
Identification / occurrence of nosocomial infections through the evaluation of BAL 
(bronchoalveolar lavage), sputum, skin, urine and blood culture results or other microbiology 
results, as well as adverse events, or via other medical procedures performed will be listed and 
summarized by treatment group using descriptive analyses.  
Nosocomial infection rate per 1000 patient per day will be calculated as: 
 
Nosocomial infection rate = total number of nosocomial infection cases / total number of 
hospitalization days for all patients * 1000 
Wald test will be used to compare nosocomial infection rate between treatment groups. 


University Hospital Ghent 
 
Protocol No. SARPAC 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
 
Page 26 of 31 
Confidential 
 
Draft v0.7: 05 March 2021 
7.11.5 Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) 
Overall calculated SOFA score will be summarized by treatment group for each available 
timepoint. Mean change of SOFA score between day 1 and day 6 and between day 1 and day 10 
will be summarized by treatment group as well.  
Individual GCS and SOFA scores will be provided in a patient data listing. 
7.11.6 National Early Warning Score (NEWS-2) 
National Early Warning Score (NEWS-2) in each available measure and the calculated overall 
NEWS-2 score will be summarized by treatment group for each available timepoint using 
descriptive analyses. Mean change of NEWS2 score between day 1 and day 6 and between day 1 
and day 10 will be summarized by treatment group as well. Individual measures and overall 
score will be provided in patient data listing. 
NEWS2 score less than 2 for at least 24h will be condisered as an event.  
Time to NEWS score<2 for at least 24h (days) is calculated as: 
Time to NEWS score<2 (Days)  = Date of first NEW2 score<2 for at least 
24h/Censoring– Date of randomization +1 
All patients without achieving NEWS2 score less than 2 for at least 24h during the study will be 
censored on the date of end of the follow up period, early discontinuation or death whichever is 
earlier. 
The probability function of progression to invasive ventilation will be estimated by Kaplan-
Meier method. The median time and its 95% confidence interval for each group will be reported. 
Cumulative progression rates estimated by the KM method for day 6, 10, and available visits 
during the follow up period and the 95% confidence intervals will be reported.  
7.11.7 Clinical Sign Score 
Clinical sign score ranges from 0-18 based on 6 parameters each scored 0-3 (by patient, except 
T°C). Overall clinical sign score and score on each parameter will be summarized by treatment 
group for each available timepoint using descriptive analyses. Mean change of clinical sign score 


University Hospital Ghent 
 
Protocol No. SARPAC 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
 
Page 27 of 31 
Confidential 
 
Draft v0.7: 05 March 2021 
between day 1 and day 6 will be summarized by treatment group as well. Individual overall 
clinical sign score and score on each parameter will be provided in patient data listing. 
Clinical sign score less than 6 maintained for 24h will be considered as an event. 
Time to clinical sign score<6 maintained for 24h (days) is calculated as: 
Time to clinical sign score<6 (Days)  = Date of first clinical sign score<6 maintained for 
24h/Censoring – Date of randomization +1 
All patients without achieving clinical sign score less than 6 maintained for 24h during the study 
will be censored on the date of end of the follow up period, early discontinuation or death 
whichever is earlier. 
The probability function of progression to invasive ventilation will be estimated by Kaplan-
Meier method. The median time and its 95% confidence interval for each group will be reported. 
Cumulative progression rates estimated by the KM method for day 6, 10, and available visits 
during the follow up period and the 95% confidence intervals will be reported.  
7.11.8 Mortality 
Survival status will be collected up to follow-up period (20 weeks after day 1). Death is 
considered as an event. All the mortality events and cause of death will be listed by treatment 
group and by patient. Number of patients died and survival time will be summarized by 
treatment group. Survival time will also be listed by patient. Risk and risk difference of all 
causes mortality by Day 28 and during the study period will also be summarized. 
The hazard ratio will be estimated by the Cox proportional hazards model with treatment group 
as a covariate in the model. Relevant hazard rates, hazard ratio between treatment groups and 
associated p-values will be tabulated. 
Survival Time (days) is calculated as: 
       Survival Time (Days) = Date of Death/Censoring - Date of randomization +1 
It is defined as the number of days from the date of first dose of study drug to the date of death or 
censoring. For patients who did not have deaths within 140 days’ follow up time, the date of 


University Hospital Ghent 
 
Protocol No. SARPAC 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
 
Page 28 of 31 
Confidential 
 
Draft v0.7: 05 March 2021 
censoring is the earliest of the following (1) early study distontinuations; (2) end of 140 days 
after the first dose; (3) last record in the datebase for those who were lost to follow up. 
The probability function of death will be estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. The median time 
and its 95% confidence interval for each group will be reported. Cumulative progression rates 
estimated by the KM method for day 6, 10, and available visits during the follow up period and 
the 95% confidence intervals will be reported.  
7.11.9 Hospitalization 
The duration of hospitalization (days) is defined as:  
Duration of hospitalization (Days) = Date of Discharge – Date of Randomization + 1. 
Duration of hospitalization will be listed for each patient, and summarized by treatment group.  
The duration of ICU (days) is defined as: 
Duration of ICU(Days) = Date of Discharge from ICU – Date of ICU Admission + 1. 
Number of patients who ever went to ICU and went to ICU on or before Day 28, along with ICU 
stay duration will be summarized and listed. 
 
7.11.10 Feature of Secondary Haemophagocytic 
Features of secondary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis is defined by Hs score including 
temperature, organomegaly, cytopenia, triglycerides, fibrinogen, ferritin, AST and known 
immunosuppression. Hs score will be summarized by treatment group for each available 
timepoint using descriptive analyses. Individual Hs score will be provided in patient data listing. 
7.11.11 Favourable Effect on long term follow up 
At 10-20 weeks after discharge from hospital, patients will be seen on routine check-up by 
pulmonologist, who will perform a clinical exam (cyanosis, crepitation’s and rales, heart 
murmurs, peripheral edema), pulmonary function tests (including FVC, TLC and diffusion 
capacity), and a laboratory (ferritin, lymphocytes, leukocytes). All the results will be listed by 
paitent. 
7.12 Safety Evaluations 


University Hospital Ghent 
 
Protocol No. SARPAC 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
 
Page 29 of 31 
Confidential 
 
Draft v0.7: 05 March 2021 
Safety assessments will include monitoring of vital signs, adverse events (AEs), clinical 
laboratory tests, 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECG) and physical examinations. The main analysis 
period would be the Treatment Emergent period which is defined as the period from the date of the 
first dose until the end of earliest of the following 1) Date of Study Day 6 if a patient was not 
enrolled to Group C or D, or Date of Study Day 10 if a patient was determined to be enrolled in 
next 5 day treatment period; or 2) Date of Early discontinuation from study. This analysis period 
will be used for all treatment emergent adverse event, laboratory evaluations. 
Safety variables will be tabulated and presented for all patients in the Safety Population and 
Intent-to-treat Population.  
7.12.1 Adverse Event 
Refer to protocol section 13.1 to see the definitions of adverse event. All adverse events will be 
coded using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) version 23.1. Adverse 
event will be categorized as prior events, treatment emergent adverse event, and post treatment 
adverse event: 
 Prior Events includes all adverse event with a start date before the first dose of the study 
drug or date of on study treatment (for SOC arm) regardless of the end date.  
 Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) are defined as adverse events with a start 
date (or date of worsening) on or after the date of on-study treatment.  
TEAE will be summarized by: 1) treatment group; 2) system organ classification (SOC) and 
preferred term (PT); 3) PT; 4) SOC, PT and the maximum severity.  
Treatment-related TEAE, serious TEAE and treatment-related serious TEAE will be summarized 
by SOC and PT coded by the most current version of MedDRA dictionary, and the maximum 
severity. SAEs and deaths will be listed by patient. 
The frequency of treatment-emergent serious adverse event (TESAEs) will be summarized by 
treatment group, SOC, and preferred term.  Severity (using CTCAE) and relationship of TEAEs 
to treatment (sargramostim, sargramostim inhalation device or standard of care) will be based on 
the scales as as recorded on eCRF  (also refer to Section 13.1 of the Study Protocol for 
definitions).  


University Hospital Ghent 
 
Protocol No. SARPAC 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
 
Page 30 of 31 
Confidential 
 
Draft v0.7: 05 March 2021 
If a patient experiences more than one TEAE within a preferred term, the patient will be counted 
only once in the calculation of incidence of TEAE within that preferred term. Similarly, if a 
patient experiences more than one TEAE within a SOC, the patient will be counted only once in 
the calculation of incidence of TEAE within that SOC. If a patient experiences more than one 
TEAE within a preferred term (or SOC), the occurrence with the highest severity will be used in 
the calculation of the incidence of TEAE within that preferred term (or SOC) by severity. If a 
patient experiences more than one TEAE within a preferred term (or SOC), the occurrence 
considered most closely related to study drug will be used in the calculation of the incidence of 
TEAE with that preferred term (or SOC) by relationship to study drug. 
A data listing for all AEs will be provided with flags for TEAE, relatedness and CTCAE 
severity. AEs related to sargramostim treatment will be listed. Any serious AEs and deaths will 
be listed.  
7.12.2 Laboratory data 
Laboratory data, as performed and collected as part of SOC (see Section 9 in the Study Protocol), 
will be collected and include hemoglobin, WBC, Eosinophil count, lymphocyte count, CD4+, 
CD8+, TBC, ESR, CRP, Creatinine, AST, ALT, Bilirubin, LDH, Troponins, CKs, Ferritin, 
Fibrinogen, Triglycerides, beta-HCG, D-Dimers and so on. 
Descriptive statistics for baseline value, actual value and change from baseline to each scheduled 
postbaseline visit will be provided by treatment group for clinical hematology, chemistry 
laboratory, and immune profiling (where available) tests. Baseline for these tests is defined as the 
last assessment prior to administration of study drug. Conventional Units will be used for 
reporting the laboratory test results.  
Serum pregnancy test results will be listed. Values for any chemistry, hematology, and immune 
profiling values outside the clinical reference ranges will be flagged on the individual patient 
data listings.  
7.12.3 Physical Examination 
Physical examination findings will be listed by treatment group and patient. 


University Hospital Ghent 
 
Protocol No. SARPAC 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
 
Page 31 of 31 
Confidential 
 
Draft v0.7: 05 March 2021 
7.12.4 Vital Signs 
Vital signs (including temperature, respiratory rate, blood pressure and pulse) will be measured 
during the Screening visit,Treatment period, Post-treatment period (within 24hrs), Study period, 
End of study and Follow-up period.  
Baseline for vital signs is defined as the last assessment prior to administration of study drug.  
All vital sign data including unscheduled records will be listed. Unscheduled records will be 
excluded from the summary statistics. Vital sign data including baseline value, actual value, and 
change from baseline to each post-baseline visit will be summarized by treatment group and 
timepoint. 
7.12.5 Electrocardiogram (ECG) 
Electrocardiogram examination findings for ECGs will be listed by treatment group and patient 
for each ECG parameter. 
7.12.6 Patient Profiles 
Key lab parameters for patients with SAEs, discontinuation due to AE, and deaths will be 
presented in patient profiles, in which the demographics and treatment data will be included. 
Additional profiles may be generated for any identified suspected unexpected serious adverse 
reactions (SUSARs). 
8 Data Presentation 
8.1  Insufficient Data for Presentation 
Some of the TFLs may not have sufficient numbers of patients or data for presentation. If this 
occurs, the blank TFL shell will be presented with a message printed in the table, such as, “None 
reported”. 
9 Revison History 
10  Reference 
 

Prot_000.pdf: 
SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
1/555
A prospective, randomized, open-label, interventional study to 
investigate the efficacy of sargramostim (Leukine®) in 
improving oxygenation and short- and long-term outcome of 
COVID-19 patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure. 
 
Sargramostim in patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure due to 
COVID-19 (SARPAC)  
 
 
Acronym / Protocol code  
 
 
SARPAC 
Protocol version and date  
 
 
4.0, 07 June 2021 
Phase  
 
 
 
 
 
4 
EudraCT n°  
 
 
 
 
2020-001254-22 
Sponsor 
 
 
 
 
 
University Hospital Ghent,  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
C. Heymanslaan 10 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
9000 Ghent 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Belgium 
Financial/Material Support: 
Partner 
Therapeutics 
will 
provide 
sargramostim 
 
Coordinating Investigator:  
 
 
Bart N. Lambrecht, MD, PhD 
Department of Internal Medicine & Pediatrics, 
Department of Respiratory Medicine 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
University Hospital Ghent 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Corneel Heymanslaan  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
9000 Ghent, Belgium 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
+32/93329110  
 
Co-investigators:   
 
 
 
Multicenter Trial in Belgium 
 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
2/555
A prospective, randomized, open-label, interventional study to 
investigate the efficacy of sargramostim (Leukine®) in 
improving oxygenation and short- and long-term outcome of 
COVID-19 patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure. 
 
Sargramostim in patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure due to 
COVID-19 (SARPAC) 
 
 
Protocol Co-ordinating Investigator signature page 
 
 
 
 
I certify that I will conduct the study in compliance with the protocol, any amendments, 
GCP and the declaration of Helsinki, and all applicable regulatory requirements. 
 
 
Investigator: 
 
 
Name: Prof. Dr. B. Lambrecht 
 
 
Function: Pulmonologist 
 
 
Institution: UZ Ghent 
 
 
 
Date:  
 
 
 
 
 
Signature: 
 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
3/555
A prospective, randomized, open-label, interventional study to 
investigate the efficacy of sargramostim (Leukine®) in improving 
oxygenation and short- and long-term outcome of COVID-19 
patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure. 
 
Sargramostim in patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure due to 
COVID-19 (SARPAC) 
 
 
Protocol Site Principal Investigator signature page 
 
 
 
 
I certify that I will conduct the study in compliance with the protocol, any amendments, 
GCP and the declaration of Helsinki, and all applicable regulatory requirements. 
 
 
Investigator: 
 
 
Name:  
 
 
Function:  
 
 
Institution:  
 
 
 
Date:  
 
 
 
 
 
Signature: 
 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
4/555
Protocol Amendment History: 
 
 
 
Version
Number 
Date
Description of amendment
1.4 
10APR2020 
Specification of participating centers (UZ Ghent and AZ Sint Jan 
Brugge to multicenter trial 
 
 
Section 10.3: extra sampling only in selected centers 
2.0 
15APR2020 
 Section 6.1: Inclusion criteria 1 removed and changed to COVID-
19 diagnosis confirmed by antigen detection test and/or PCR 
and/or positive serology, or any emerging and validated 
diagnostic laboratory test for COVID-19 within this period. 
Section 1.5, 6.1: Extra Inclusion criteria: In some patients, it may 
be impossible to get a confident laboratory confirmation of 
COVID-19 diagnosis after 24h of hospital admission because 
viral load is low and/or problems with diagnostic sensitivity.  In 
those cases, in absence of an alternative diagnosis, and with 
highly suspect bilateral ground glass opacities on recent (<24h) 
chest-CT scan (confirmed by a radiologist and pulmonary 
physician as probable COVID-19), a patient can be enrolled as 
probable COVID-19 infected. In all cases, this needs 
confirmation by later seroconversion 
Section 10: redefining sampling.due to addition of extra study 
sites. 
Section 8.1.5: better definition of duration of treatment  
Section 13.6: Despite the known safety profile of the study 
medications and study design, a DSMB is foreseen. 
General: Better definition of progressive disease: Progression to 
ARDS requiring mechanical ventilation is removed and replaced 
by: progressive disease requiring mechanical ventilatory 
support.  
General: Safety follow-up period is 10-20 weeks. 
Section 1.6.1, 8.1.5: Nebulizing is preferably done in an isolation 
negative pressure chamber, and if not, personnel should use an 
FFP2 mask. Patient should self-administer the medication and 
where possible, the room should not be entered within one 
hour after administration. 
 
Section 9.4: arterial blood 
 gas mandatory at D1, D6 and FU 
Section 9.2, 9.4: if arterial blood gas is taken within 24h before 
first dose administration, as described in point° the arterial 
blood gas of screening can be used as D1 value 
 
Section 7.1.2: If a patient decides to leave hospital before day 6 
of the study, for example because of clinical improvement, the 
oxygenation parameters at day of discharge will be used to 
calculate the primary endpoint measurement.  
 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
5/555
3.0 
14 May 2020 
Section 9.4: Schematic overview of the data collection & 
interventions: lay-out was updated to improve clarity. 
 
 
Section 9.4: Added to flowchart, as per standard of care during 
follow-up visit: 
- 
6 minutes walk test (Section 4.2) 
- 
HRCT scan to assess HRCT fibrosis score 
 
 
Section 10:  
- Clarification on study blood sampling added: EDTA only to be 
collected in selected sites. 
- processing details of samples were updated from 1500RPM or 
410g to 1770 g. 
General: Typo’s were corrected. 
General: “requiring invasive mechanical ventilatory support”: 
wording “invasive” changed to “non-invasive / invasive“. 
Section 9.2: “on page 36” added to “as described in point°”. 
Section 9.4: clinical assessments added to flowchart: 
Ordinal Scale Category, Clinical Sign Sore, NEWS2 Score, SOFA 
Score, HScore, CURB-65, APACHE II and Glasgow Coma Scale. 
Section 3.2, 4.2: Mean change of SOFA score between day 1 and 
day 6 or between day 1 and day 11: updated to day 10. 
Mean change NEWS2 score between day 1 and day 6 or 
between day 1 and day 11: updated to day 10. 
 
4.0
07 June 2021
General: Typo’s were corrected. 
4.0 
07 June 2021 
Section 1.5 and 6.2 
-patients on high dose systemic steroids (> 20 mg 
methylprednisolone or equivalent) 
Replaced by 
-patients on high dose systemic steroids (> 20 mg 
methylprednisolone or equivalent) for COVID-19 unrelated 
disorder 
 
AND 
 
- Patients with serum ferritin >2000 mcg/ml (which will exclude 
ongoing HLH) 
Replaced by  
- Patients with serum ferritin >2000 mcg/L (which will exclude 
ongoing HLH) 
4.0 
07 June 2021 
Section 3.3 and Sections 4.1 and 4.2  
Further clarification of Primary and Secondary endpoint 
measurements 
 
4.0 
07 June 2021 
Section 4.3: 
 Enumeration and description of planned pharmacodynamic 
measurements 
(biomarkers, 
flow 
cytometry, 
immunomonitoring) 
4.0 
07 June 2021 
Section 9.3.6: 
Clarification on role of VIB-UGent Center for Inflammation 
Research 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
6/555
Clarification 
of 
which 
pharmacodynamic 
parameters, 
biomarkers, immunomonitoring assays will be performed 
4.0 
07 June 2021 
Definitions of follow-up visit were made consistent. 
4.0 
07 June 2021 
Section 11: 
Shipment process of optional samples was updated.  
4.0 
07 June 2021 
Section 11.3:  
Typo selected centres corrected to all centres 
Better description of sample handling and analysis by centers 
 
07June 2021 
Secion 11.4 
Clarification of sample storage and shipment, including role of 
VIB 
4.0 
07 June 2021 
Section 12.3: correction statistical analysis team 
Further clarification on statistical analysis performed 
4.0 
07 June 2021 
Section 13.4: 
Access to data and data ownership better defined 
4.0 
07 June 2021 
Section 14.7: 
Period of first DSUR reporting modified to 1 year + 60 days 
 
 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
7/555
TABLE OF CONTENTS 
 
 
Section 9.4: Schematic overview of the data collection & interventions: lay-out was updated to 
improve clarity. ................................................................................................................................... 5 
Section 9.4: Added to flowchart, as per standard of care during follow-up visit: .............................. 5 
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................... 11 
1. 
Protocol Summary ......................................................................................................................... 12 
1.1. 
Protocol specifics ................................................................................................................... 13 
1.2. 
Study Type and Study Phase ................................................................................................. 13 
1.3. 
Aim of the study (including primary endpoints) ................................................................... 13 
1.4. 
Subjects ................................................................................................................................. 13 
1.4.1. 
Number of subjects ....................................................................................................... 13 
1.4.2. 
Target group .................................................................................................................. 13 
1.5. 
Inclusion and exclusion criteria ............................................................................................. 13 
1.6. 
Study Interventions ............................................................................................................... 14 
1.6.1. 
IMPs and dosage ........................................................................................................... 15 
1.6.2. 
Schematic overview of the data collection & interventions ......................................... 16 
1.7. 
Study duration ....................................................................................................................... 16 
2. 
Rationale and background ........................................................................................................ 17 
2.1. 
Rationale .............................................................................................................................. 17 
2.2. 
Background .......................................................................................................................... 18 
2.3. 
Risk/Benefit Assessment ....................................................................................................... 20 
2.4. 
Limitations ............................................................................................................................. 20 
3. 
Objectives ...................................................................................................................................... 21 
3.1. 
Primary Objectives ................................................................................................................ 21 
3.2. 
Secondary Objectives ............................................................................................................ 22 
4. 
End Points + Time Points ............................................................................................................... 22 
4.1. 
Primary End Points + Time Points ......................................................................................... 22 
4.2. 
Secondary End Points + Time Points .............................................................................. 23 
4.3. 
Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic endpoints ..................................................... 24 
5. 
Study design ................................................................................................................................ 25 
5.1. 
Description of study design ............................................................................................... 25 
5.2. 
End of Study Definition ...................................................................................................... 26 
5.2.1. 
For an individual subject ............................................................................................ 26 
5.2.2. 
For the whole study .................................................................................................... 26 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
8/555
5.3. 
Estimated duration of the study ........................................................................................ 26 
6. 
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria ............................................................................................... 27 
6.1. 
Inclusion Criteria ................................................................................................................. 27 
6.2. 
Exclusion Criteria ................................................................................................................ 27 
6.2.1. 
Screen failures ............................................................................................................... 28 
7. 
Target Population .......................................................................................................................... 29 
7.1. 
Subjects ................................................................................................................................ 29 
7.1.1. 
Number of subjects and planned recruitment rate ................................................ 29 
7.1.2. 
Withdrawal and replacement of subjects ..................................................................... 29 
7.2. 
Method of recruitment ........................................................................................................ 30 
7.3. 
Screening ............................................................................................................................. 30 
8. 
Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) .................................................................................. 31 
8.1. 
Name of the IMP ................................................................................................................. 31 
8.1.1. 
Composition and active substance of the IMP ....................................................... 31 
8.1.2. 
Producer and Distributor of the IMP ........................................................................ 31 
8.1.3. 
Preparation + Dosage + administration of the IMP ............................................... 31 
8.1.4. 
Permitted dose adjustments and interruption of treatment .................................. 32 
8.1.5. 
Duration of treatment ................................................................................................. 32 
8.1.6. 
Packaging and Labeling of the IMP ......................................................................... 32 
8.1.7. 
Storage conditions of the IMP ................................................................................... 32 
8.1.8. 
Known side effects of the medication ...................................................................... 32 
8.2. 
Concomitant / Rescue Medication ................................................................................... 33 
9. 
Study Specific Procedures ........................................................................................................ 34 
9.1. 
Randomization .................................................................................................................... 34 
9.2. 
Study specific interventions ............................................................................................... 34 
9.3. 
Overview of collected data ................................................................................................ 35 
9.4. 
Schematic overview of the data collection & interventions .......................................... 37 
10.1. 
Restrictions for subjects during the study ................................................................... 40 
11. 
Sampling .................................................................................................................................. 40 
11.1. 
Types and number of samples ..................................................................................... 40 
11.2. 
Timepoints of sampling .................................................................................................. 40 
11.3. 
Sample Handling & Analysis ......................................................................................... 40 
11.4. 
Sample Storage and/or shipping .................................................................................. 40 
11.5. 
Future use of stored samples ....................................................................................... 41 
12. 
Statistical Considerations ...................................................................................................... 42 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
9/555
12.1. 
Sample size calculation ................................................................................................. 42 
12.2. 
Type of statistical methods ............................................................................................ 42 
All endpoints will be summarized and where relevant represented graphically .................................. 42 
Oxygenation after 5 days of Sargramostim Intervention .............................................................. 42 
12.3. 
Statistical analysis team ................................................................................................ 43 
13. 
Data handling .......................................................................................................................... 43 
13.1. 
Method of data collection ............................................................................................... 43 
13.1.1. 
Case Report Form .................................................................................................. 43 
13.1.2. 
Data directly collected in the CRF (no source available) .................................. 44 
13.2. 
Data storage .................................................................................................................... 44 
13.3. 
Archiving of data ............................................................................................................. 44 
13.4. 
Access to data ................................................................................................................. 44 
14. 
Safety ........................................................................................................................................ 45 
14.1. 
Definitions ........................................................................................................................ 45 
14.2. 
Reporting requirements ................................................................................................. 46 
14.2.1. 
AE reporting ............................................................................................................. 46 
14.2.2. 
SAE reporting .......................................................................................................... 46 
14.2.3. 
SUSAR reporting .................................................................................................... 47 
14.3. 
List of contact details for safety reporting ................................................................... 47 
14.4. 
Flowchart Reporting ....................................................................................................... 47 
14.5. 
Events, excluded from reporting ................................................................................... 48 
14.6. 
Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) ....................................................................... 48 
14.7. 
Development Safety Update Report ............................................................................ 48 
15. 
Monitoring/Auditing/Inspection ............................................................................................. 49 
15.1. 
Monitoring ........................................................................................................................ 49 
15.1.1. 
General ..................................................................................................................... 49 
15.1.2. 
Monitoring team ...................................................................................................... 49 
15.1.3. 
Scope ........................................................................................................................ 49 
15.2. 
Inspection ......................................................................................................................... 49 
15.3. 
Protocol Deviation policy ............................................................................................... 49 
15.4. 
Serious breach to GCP and/or the protocol ................................................................ 49 
16. 
Ethical and legal aspects ....................................................................................................... 50 
16.1. 
Good Clinical Practice .................................................................................................... 50 
16.2. 
Informed Consent ........................................................................................................... 50 
16.3. 
Approval of the study protocol ...................................................................................... 50 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
10/55
16.3.1. 
General ..................................................................................................................... 50 
16.3.2. 
Protocol amendments ............................................................................................ 51 
16.4. 
Confidentiality and Data Protection.............................................................................. 51 
16.5. 
Liability and Insurance ................................................................................................... 51 
16.6. 
End of Study Notification ............................................................................................... 52 
17. 
Publication policy .................................................................................................................... 53 
18. 
Reference List ......................................................................................................................... 53 
Appendices .......................................................................................................................................... 55 
Appendix 1: USPI (US Package insert) ....................................................................................... 55 
 
 
 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
11/55
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 
AE 
 
= 
Adverse Event 
AECC  
= 
American-European Consensus Conference  
ARDS  
=  
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome 
CI 
 
= 
Coordinating Investigator 
COVID-19 
= 
Coronavirus induced disease-2019 
CT 
 
= 
Clinical Trial Unit 
DSMB 
= 
Data Safety Monitoring Board 
DSUR  
= 
Development Safety Update Report 
EC 
 
= 
Ethics Committee 
ECG  
= 
Electrocardiogram 
eCRF  
= 
electronic Case Report Form 
EDC  
= 
Electronic Data Capture 
EPD  
= 
Electronic Patient Dossier 
FAMHP 
= 
Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products 
FiO2  
= 
Fraction of inspired oxygen 
FPI 
 
= 
First Patient In 
FVC  
= 
Forced vital capacity 
GCP  
= 
Good Clinical Practice 
GDPR 
= 
General Data Protection Regulation 
GM-CSF 
= 
Granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor 
GMP  
= 
Good Manufacturing Practice 
HIRUZ 
= 
Health, Innovation and Research Institute UZ Ghent 
HLH  
= 
Hyperferritinemia and Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis 
IB 
 
= 
Investigator’s Brochure 
ICF 
 
= 
Informed Consent Form 
ICH 
 
= 
International Council for Harmonisation 
IMP 
 
= 
Investigational Medicinal Product 
IMPD  
= 
Investigational Medicinal Product Dossier 
LVLS  
= 
Last Visit, Last Subject 
PCWP 
= 
Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure 
PEEP  
= 
Positive End Expiratory Pressure 
PI 
 
= 
Principal Investigator 
PaO₂  
= 
Partial pressure of oxygen 
SAE  
= 
Serious Adverse Event 
sHLH  
= 
secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis 
SmPC 
= 
Summary of Product Characteristics 
SOP  
= 
Standard Operating Procedure 
SUSAR 
= 
Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction 
TERENA 
= 
Trans-European Research and Education Networking Association 
TLC  
= 
Total Lung Capacity 
TLS 
 
= 
Transport Layer Security 
 
 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
12/55
 
1. Protocol Summary 
 
SARPAC trial : Use of sargramostim in patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure due to COVID-19 
Title 
A prospective, randomized, open-label, interventional study to 
investigate the efficacy of sargramostim (Leukine®) in improving 
oxygenation and short- and long-term outcome of COVID-19 patients 
with acute hypoxic respiratory failure. 
Protocol number 
SARPAC 
Protocol version 
V4.0 
EudraCT number 
2020-001254-22 
Sponsor 
University Hospital Ghent 
Co-ordinating Investigator 
Bart N. Lambrecht 
Type of study 
Interventional 
Fase 
IV 
Methodology 
prospective, randomized, open-label study 
Study duration 
22 weeks 
Purpose of study 
To study the effectiveness of additional sargramostim (GM-CSF) 
inhalation versus standard of care on blood oxygenation in patients 
with COVID-19 coronavirus infection and acute hypoxic respiratory 
failure 
Number of participants 
80 
Study population and 
main inclusion criteria 
Patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection and acute hypoxic 
respiratory failure 
Presence of hypoxic respiratory failure defined as O2 saturation 
below 93% on minimal 2l/min O2 therapy and/or ratio PaO2/FiO2 
below 350 
Investigational drug, dose, 
route 
Sargramostim/Leukine®  125 mcg BID via inhalation, for 5 days
Sargramostim/Leukine®  125 mcg/m2 once daily IV upon progression, 
for 5 days 
Treatment duration 
5 days, followed by possible 5 day extension upon deterioration 
 
 
 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
13/55
 
1.1. 
Protocol specifics 
 
 EudraCT number : 2020-001254-22 
 
University Hospital Ghent 
 
1.2. 
Study Type and Study Phase 
 
This is phase 4 academic, prospective, randomized, open-label, interventional study designed to 
investigate the efficacy of sargramostim (Leukine®) in improving oxygenation and short- and long-term 
outcome of COVID-19 patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure.  
 
1.3. 
Aim of the study (including primary endpoints) 
 
The primary objective is to investigate whether the administration of inhaled sargramostim (Leukine®) 
at a dose of 250 mcg daily during 5 days improves oxygenation in COVID-19 patients with acute hypoxic 
respiratory failure. 
 
The secondary objectives are:  
- to study if early intervention with sargramostim is safe (number of AEs/SAEs) 
- to study if early intervention with inhaled sargramostim affects clinical outcome defined by  
duration of hospital stay, 6-point ordinal scale, clinical sign score, SOFA score, NEWS2 score 
- to study if early intervention with sargramostim affects the rate of nosocomial infection  
- to study if early intervention with inhaled sargramostim affects progression to mechanical ventilation 
and/or ARDS 
- to study if treatment with sargramostim affects all-cause mortality rate at 4 and 20 weeks post 
inclusion 
-to study if treatment with sargramostim affects features of secondary haemophagocytic 
lymphohistiocytosis, defined by HS score 
- to study if treatment with sargramostim has a favourable effect on long term 10-20 week follow up 
 
1.4. 
Subjects 
 
1.4.1. Number of subjects 
A total of 80 patients with confirmed COVID-19 and acute hypoxic respiratory failure will be enrolled, 
40 in the active and 40 in the control group. 
 
1.4.2. Target group 
Confirmed COVID-19 patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure admitted to the COVID-19 
isolation ward. 
 
 
1.5. 
Inclusion and exclusion criteria 
 
Inclusion criteria 
The following patients will be enrolled: 
 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
14/55
- Recent (≤2weeks prior to randomization) confident diagnosis of COVID-19 confirmed by antigen 
detection and/or PCR, and/or seroconversion or any other emerging and validated diagnostic test. 
- In some patients, it may be impossible to get a confident laboratory confirmation of COVID-
19 diagnosis after 24h of hospital admission because viral load is low and/or problems with 
diagnostic sensitivity.  In those cases, in absence of an alternative diagnosis, and with highly 
suspect bilateral ground glass opacities on recent (<24h) chest-CT scan (confirmed by a 
radiologist and pulmonary physician as probable COVID-19), a patient can be enrolled as 
probable COVID-19 infected. In all cases, this needs confirmation by later seroconversion. 
- Presence of acute hypoxic respiratory failure defined as (either or both) 
 
saturation below 93% on minimal 2 l/min O2 
 
PaO2/FiO2 below 350 
- Admitted to specialized COVID-19 ward 
- Age 18-80 
- Male or Female 
- Willing to provide informed consent 
 
Exclusion criteria 
- Patients with known history of serious allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, to human 
granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor such as sargramostim, yeast-derived products, or 
any component of the product.  
- mechanical ventilation before start of study 
- patients with peripheral white blood cell count above 25.000 per microliter and/or active myeloid 
malignancy 
-patients on high dose systemic steroids (> 20 mg methylprednisolone or equivalent) for COVID-19 
unrelated disorder 
-patients on lithium carbonate therapy  
- Patients enrolled in another investigational drug study 
- Pregnant or breastfeeding females (all female subjects regardless of childbearing potential status 
must have negative pregnancy test at screening)  
- Patients with serum ferritin >2000 mcg/L (which will exclude ongoing HLH) 
 
 
1.6. 
Study Interventions 
Confirmed or highly suspect COVID-19 patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure (saturation 
below 93% on minimal 2 l/min O2 or PaO2/FiO2 <350) will be randomized to receive sargramostim 
125mcg twice daily for 5 days as a nebulized inhalation on top of standard of care (active group), or to 
receive standard of care treatment (control group). Upon progression of disease requiring initiation of 
non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilatory support within the 5 day period, in patients in the 
active group, inhaled sargramostim will be replaced by intravenous sargramostim 125mcg/m2 body 
surface area once daily until the 5 day period is reached. From day 6 onwards, progressive patients in 
the active group will have the option to receive an additional 5 days of IV sargramostim, based on the 
treating physician’s assessment. In the control group with progressive disease requiring non-invasive 
or invasive mechanical ventilatory support, from day 6 onwards, the treating physician will have the 
option to initiate IV sargramostim 125mcg/m2 body surface area once daily for 5 days.   
Safety data, including blood leukocyte counts, will be collected in all patients. Efficacy data will also 
be collected and will include arterial blood gases, oxygenation parameters, need for ventilation, lung 
compliance, organ function, radiographic changes, ferritin levels, triglyceride levels, etc. as well as 
occurrence of secondary bacterial infections. 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
15/55
Patients will stop the investigational drug if there is unacceptable toxicity according to investigator’s 
judgement.  
 
1.6.1. IMPs and dosage 
LEUKINE® (sargramostim) prepared and administered for inhalation using nebulizer 
LEUKINE for injection is a sterile, preservative-free lyophilized powder that requires reconstitution with 
2mL normal saline solution. Once reconstituted, LEUKINE can be inhaled as an aqueous aerosol using 
either a vibrating mesh nebulizer (Philips InnospireGo) or jet nebulizer, per manufacturer instructions. 
(Nebulizers studied include: AKITA2 Apixneb, PARI LC-Plus set, PulmoAide, Pan LC, Aeroneb Solo 
Device). Use reconstituted LEUKINE® solution for inhalation within 16 hours following reconstitution 
and/or dilution. 
Nebulizing is preferably done in an isolation negative pressure chamber, and if not, personnel should 
use an FFP2 mask. Patient should self-administer the medication and where possible, the room should 
not be entered within one hour after administration. 
 
LEUKINE® (sargramostim) prepared and administered intravenously 
For patients that are on a mechanical ventilator and cannot be treated with LEUKINE® inhalation:  
 
The recommended dose is 125 mcg/m2/day administered intravenously over a 4-hour period 
once daily for up to 5 days.  
 
For intravenous injection: Administer LEUKINE injection in 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, 
USP. Dilute LEUKINE for intravenous infusion in 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP. If the 
final concentration of LEUKINE is below 10 mcg/mL, add Albumin (Human) at a final 
concentration of 0.1% to the saline prior to addition of LEUKINE to prevent adsorption to the 
components of the drug delivery system. To obtain a final concentration of 0.1% Albumin 
(Human), add 1 mg Albumin (Human) per 1 mL 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP (e.g., use 
1 mL 5% Albumin [Human] in 50 mL 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP). 
 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
16/55
1.6.2. Schematic overview of the data collection & interventions 
 
 
 
 
1.7. 
Study duration 
The total treatment duration of the study is 10 days, and the entire study duration is 10-22 weeks to 
final follow up visit. 
 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
17/55
2. Rationale and background 
2.1. 
Rationale 
Sargramostim (Leukine®) is a yeast-derived recombinant humanized granulocyte-macrophage colony 
stimulating factor (rhuGM-CSF, sargramostim) and the only FDA approved GM-CSF (Leucine Package 
Insert). GM-CSF, a pleiotropic cytokine, is an important leukocyte growth factor known to play a key 
role in haematopoiesis, effecting the growth and maturation of multiple cell lineages as well as the 
functional activities of these cells in antigen presentation and cell mediated immunity (1). Since its 
initial FDA approval in 1991, over 500,000 patients have received Leukine®, providing extensive clinical 
and post-marketing data in a broad range of treated individuals - from preterm neonates to the elderly 
and including males and females - representing a well-characterized safety profile for Leukine®. 
Leukine® administered as a subcutaneous or intravenous injection is approved for six indications 
including use as a medical countermeasure for radiation exposure. The US Government currently holds 
Leukine® in the Strategic National Stockpile. Leukine® may benefit patients with beginning signs of 
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19 Infection. GM-CSF is a critical cytokine 
for the health of lungs. The alveolar macrophages are dependent on GM-CSF for differentiation and 
normal functioning. In addition, GM-CSF is an immunomodulator that plays a critical role in host 
defense by promoting differentiation of dendritic cells, and stimulating antiviral immunity (2-4).  
 
As described in detail below, it is being studied as an adjuvant therapy in the management of life-
threatening infections to boost the hosts innate immune response to fight infection, reduce the risk of 
secondary infection, and in varied conditions to prevent infection during critical illness (5-8). In 
addition, it has been studied in pulmonary conditions that affect alveolar macrophages, such as 
autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (“aPAP”), with beneficial outcomes (9, 10). We propose 
based on preclinical and clinical data and the safety data from more than 500,000 adult and pediatric 
patients treated with Leukine®, that patients with beginning signs of acute lung injury and/or ARDS 
due to COVID-19 infection be given Leukine®. ARDS due to COVID-19 carries a high mortality rate (11) 
and Leukine® may confer benefit by both active management of this complication as well as in 
prevention of secondary infections. 
 
In animal models of postviral ARDS and mortality, GM-CSF has demonstrated immunomodulatory 
effects that improve the clinical response and symptoms associated with influenza and other viral 
respiratory infections (12-14), and represents a promising candidate for the prevention of ARDS in 
patients with COVID-19. 
 
 
 
 
 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
18/55
2.2. 
Background 
 
The proposed development plan was guided by three specific considerations: 
 
1. Supportive Scientific Rationale:  
The biology and effects of GM-CSF on the lung, specifically alveolar macrophages and epithelial cells, 
as well its immunomodulatory activities in stimulating antiviral immunity make GM-CSF a critical 
cytokine for healthy pulmonary function and defence. Detailed studies have shown that GM-CSF is 
necessary for the maturation of alveolar macrophages from fetal monocytes and the maintenance of 
these cells in adulthood (1).  
GM-CSF has a wide array of effects on myeloid cells. GM-CSF has been shown to be a myelopoietic 
growth factor that has pleiotropic effects not only in promoting the differentiation of immature 
precursors into polymorphonuclear neutrophils, monocytes/ macrophages and dendritic cells, but also 
in controlling the function of fully mature myeloid cells (15). GM-CSF is also known to reverse 
immunoparalysis seen in sepsis by immune activation, resulting in beneficial outcomes (5). 
 
There is a large body of evidence generated with GM-CSF in animal studies suggesting the potential 
use in ARDS and infections (16). For the purpose of brevity, we will point to the data that reflects the 
potential value in viral lung infections and preventing secondary bacterial infections and progression 
to ARDS: 
 
Halstead and colleagues demonstrated that in vivo high airway levels of GM-CSF profoundly rescue 
mice from lethal influenza pneumonia. While in vitro GM-CSF is canonically described as an M1-
polarizing cytokine, their data demonstrated that in vivo, during influenza A virus infection, GM-CSF 
instead temporizes the type II interferon-induced M1 polarization of airway macrophages and reduces 
inflammation induced damage (12, 13). Unkel and colleagues demonstrated GM-CSF–dependent 
cross-talk between influenza virus infected alveolar epithelial cells and CD103+ dendritic cells is crucial 
for effective viral clearance and recovery from injury and thus pointing to the potential use of GM-CSF 
treatment in severe influenza virus pneumonia (17). Investigations have shown that GM-CSF conferred 
resistance to influenza in mice via alveolar phagocytes and through alveolar macrophages which 
became more resistant to influenza- induced apoptosis. Delivery of intranasal GM-CSF to wild-type 
mice also conferred resistance to influenza (18). There is evidence that inhaled GM-CSF prevents 
bacteremia in post influenza bacterial pneumonia primarily through locally-mediated improved lung 
antibacterial resistance to systemic bacteremia during influenza A viral infection (13). 
 
Conclusions: GM-CSF confers resistance to influenza by enhancing innate immune mechanisms that  
depend on alveolar macrophages, which are dependent on GM-CSF for their health and normal 
functioning. Pulmonary delivery of this cytokine has the potential to reduce morbidity and mortality 
due to viral pneumonia. This is summarized in the diagram below: 
 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
19/55
 
 
2. Experience: Use of Leukine® has beneficial effect in the treatment of conditions that are similar 
to ARDS seen with COVID-19. 
A small (18 patient) double blind randomized placebo controlled clinical trial of low-dose (3mcg/kg 
daily for 5 days) intravenous GM-CSF treatment in adult patients with severe sepsis and respiratory 
dysfunction, led to the conclusion that GM-CSF treatment was associated with improved gas exchange 
and might play a homeostatic role (6). In a phase II study, 130 patients with severe sepsis with 
respiratory dysfunction were randomized to GM-CSF (250mcg/m2 intravenously daily for 14days) or 
placebo. The results showed an improvement in 28day mortality on GM-CSF; this did not reach 
statistical significance due to the small sample size (7). 
 
Herold and colleagues used Leukine® by inhalation route on a compassionate basis in six patients with 
moderate to severe community-acquired pneumonia or ventilator-associated pneumonia ARDS who 
were not improving despite all measures and at least 6 days of mechanical ventilation(8). 125mcg of 
Leukine® were applied by Aeroneb Solo device (Covidien, Neustadt, Germany) at an interval of 48 
hours. Compared to historical controls, the authors observed significant improvement in oxygenation 
and lung compliance with GM-CSF therapy. This resulted in improved morbidity using standard scoring 
systems and 4 of the six patients recovered and were discharged from the hospital. There is an ongoing 
study of inhaled GM-CSF across multiple centers in Germany (GI HOPE; NCT02595060) recruiting 
patients with diagnosis of pneumonia associated ARDS.  
 
There is a large body of evidence of inhaled Leukine® in autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis 
(aPAP), which results in accumulation of surfactant in alveolar sacs with resultant hypoxia. Tazawa and 
colleagues conducted a phase II study of inhaled Leukine® at 9 pulmonary centers throughout Japan 
in patients with unremitting or progressive aPAP with hypoxia and symptoms (9). Patients received 
250mcg daily by inhalation, using an LC-PLUS nebulizer with a manual interrupter valve connected to 
a PARI Turbo BOY compressor, for 7 days and this cycle was repeated every other week for six cycles 
(total 12 weeks). The treatment was well tolerated with no serious adverse events. Adverse events 
were reported in just 7 of the 39 patients oxygenation, radiological changes as well as symptoms. 
Following these results, a larger randomized phase 3 study (PAGE study) was conducted by the 
Japanese investigators in 12 centers. 64 patients with mild to moderate aPAP with hypoxia were 
randomized to receive placebo or Leukine® (33 patients) at a dose of 125mcg twice a day for 7days 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
20/55
followed by a week of no treatment. This two-week cycle was repeated 12 times over a period of 24 
weeks. The treatment was again well tolerated with no significant differences in adverse events 
between the two groups. The GM-CSF treated patients had significantly improved hypoxia parameters 
and radiographic changes (10). This clinical experience of use of Leukine® in viral pneumonia suggests 
salutary effects. In addition, these studies establish the safety of inhaled Leukine® and provide 
evidence for activity of inhaled Leukine®. 
 
3. Expediency: Toxicology, pharmacologic and safety data supports the immediate clinical use of 
Leukine® in hypoxic respiratory failure with acute lung injury leading to ARDS due to COVID-19. 
Investigator brochure is available and contains detailed information on toxicity. 
 
2.3. 
Risk/Benefit Assessment 
  
COVID-19 poses a very significant risk of mortality of 3-7% and this percentage rises to mortality of 
20% in patients with co-morbidity (11, 19). Of all infected patients, some 15-20% develop severe 
respiratory symptoms necessitating hospital admission. Around 5% of infected patients will require 
invasive mechanical ventilation, and many of those (40-50% will die). The current world-wide 
pandemic of COVID-19 is putting unforeseen stress on the entire primary, secondary and tertiary 
medical system, leading to unseen triage of patients that potentially benefit or not from admission to 
ICU units when they develop respiratory failure. 
GM-CSF (sargramostim, Leukine®) has been given systemically to almost 500.000 patients in the past.  
It is therefore a well characterized product. Inhalation of GM-CSF has also been used to treat patients 
with interstitial lung disease and reduced oxygen saturation (i.e. partial acute hypoxic respiratory 
failure) with few significant side effects above the placebo arm. The protocol is set up to give twice 
daily inhalation with GM-CSF, followed by intravenous administration if the patient would move to the 
ICU unit on mechanical ventilation.  
Although GM-CSF has been given systemically and via inhalation to patients with pneumonia-
associated ARDS, there are no current data on the safety profile of this drug in patients with COVID-
19. Given the severity of the clinical syndrome caused by COVID-19, and the prior triage of patients 
before hospital admission to the COVID-19 ward, this trial will be performed in a hospital setting on a 
COVID-19 ward with close monitoring of vital parameters (continuous ECG, oxygen saturation, 
temperature, vital clinical signs), which will allow intermediate intervention should serious side effects 
occur. Once on the ICU unit, patients will be intensively monitored for all vital parameters, as part of 
the routine ICU monitoring. 
There are currently no treatments directed at improving lung repair and local immunity in COVID-19 
patients, and no treatment that attempt to halt the progression from manageable acute hypoxic 
respiratory failure to ARDS. Preventing such progression to ARDS could have a huge impact on the 
foreseeable overflow of the ICU units. We therefore believe the benefits of administering inhaled GM-
CSF treatment in early stage COVID-19 acute hypoxic respiratory failure outweighs the risks associated 
with a phase 4 IMP administration via a different route and unknown indication.  
2.4. 
Limitations 
There is a large number of COVID-19 infected patients that are currently being hospitalized across the 
globe. In just 9 days time, our COVID-19 ward at Ghent University Hospital has admitted 25 confirmed 
cases, of which a significant portion (50%) already fulfill eligibility criteria for the current proposed 
protocol. We therefore believe that given the current ascending part of the epidemiology curve, with 
numbers of patients rising sharply, there will be no shortage of patients that are eligible. 
Partner Therapeutics has offered to give (free of charge) enough GM-CSF to treat 20 patients for a 10 
day period and an additional 20 controls for 5 days (should deterioration occur). There are large 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
21/55
amounts of GM-CSF in the United States strategic national stockpile, so should this therapy work, there 
might be immediate worldwide application of a GM-CSF inhalation therapy. 
3. Objectives  
 
3.1. 
Primary Objectives 
This is phase 4 academic, prospective, randomized, open-label, interventional study designed to 
investigate the efficacy of sargramostim (Leukine®) in improving oxygenation and short- and long-term 
outcome of COVID-19 patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure. There are currently no 
treatments directed at improving lung repair and local immunity in COVID-19 patients, and no 
treatment that attempt to halt the progression from manageable acute hypoxic respiratory failure to 
ARDS in patients with COVID-19 infection.   
 
Justification for our objective is that preventing progression from early acute hypoxic respiratory 
failure to ARDS could have a huge impact on the foreseeable overflow of the ICU units, that is already 
happening in some countries and is bound to happen on a global scale. The outcome of our study could 
thus have large impact from a medical, ethical and economic perspective. 
 
The hypothesis of the proposed intervention is that GM-CSF has profound effects on antiviral 
immunity, can provide the stimulus to restore immune homeostasis in the lung with acute lung injury 
post COVID-19, and can promote lung repair mechanisms, that lead to a 25% improvement in lung 
oxygenation parameters.  
 
This hypothesis is based on experiments performed in mice showing that GM-CSF treatment can 
prevent mortality and prevent ARDS in mice with post-viral acute lung injury. 
 
To address our hypothesis, we will randomize patients with confirmed COVID-19 with acute hypoxic 
respiratory failure (saturation below 93% on minimal 2 l/min O2 or PaO2/FiO2 <350) to receive 
sargramostim 125mcg twice daily for 5 days as a nebulized inhalation on top of standard of care (active 
group), or to receive standard of care treatment (control group). Upon progression of disease requiring 
initiation of non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilatory support within the 5 day period, in patients 
in the active group, inhaled sargramostim will be replaced by intravenous sargramostim 125mcg/m2 
body surface area once daily until the 5 day period is reached.   
 
To measure the effectiveness of sargramostim on restoring lung homeostasis, the primary endpoint 
of this intervention is measuring oxygenation after 5 DAYS of inhaled (and intravenous) treatment 
through assessment of pretreatment and post-treatment ratio of PaO2/FiO2 and through 
measurement of the P(A-a)O2 gradient, which can easily be performed in the setting of clinical 
observation of patients admitted to the COVID -19 ward or ICU COVID-19 unit. During the 5 day 
treatment period, we will perform daily measurements of oxygen saturation (pulse oximetry) in 
relation to FiO2, and the slope of alterations in these parameters could also be an indicator that our 
hypothesis is correct.  
 
Comparison will be between active group A receiving sargramostim on top of standard of care and 
control group B receiving standard of care.  
 
Data from the Wuhan COVID-19 epidemic show that patients that deteriorate are facing a prolonged 
period of mechanical ventilation. Therefore, from day 6 onwards, progressive patients in the active 
group will have the option to receive an additional 5 days of IV sargramostim, based on the treating 
physician’s assessment. This group will be called group C.  In the control group, for patients with 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
22/55
progressive disease  requiring (non-) invasive mechanical ventilatory support, from day 6 onwards, the 
treating physician will have the option to initiate IV sargramostim 125mcg/m2 body surface area once 
daily for 5 days. This group will be called group D. Comparisons of Group A (early 5 day intervention 
with sargramostim) with Group D (late 5 day intervention with sargramostim) will also be very 
informative.  
 
3.2. 
Secondary Objectives 
 
- to study if early intervention with sargramostim is safe (number of AEs/SAEs) 
 
- to study if early intervention with inhaled sargramostim affects clinical outcome defined by  
Duration of hospital stay 
Mean and median change in 6-point ordinal scale between day 1 and day 6 
Mean and median change in clinical sign score between day 1 and day 6 
Time to clinical sign score <6 maintained for 24h 
Mean and median change of SOFA score between day 1 and day 6 or between day 1 and day 10. 
Mean and median change NEWS2 score between day 1 and day 6 or between day 1 and day 10. 
Time to NEWS2 score less than 2 for at least 24h 
 
- to study if early intervention with sargramostim affects the rate of nosocomial infection  
 
- to study if early intervention with inhaled sargramostim affects progression to mechanical 
ventilation and/or ARDS 
 
-to study if treatment with sargramostim affects all cause mortality rate at 28 days and 20 weeks 
post inclusion 
 
-to study if treatment with sargramostim affects features of secondary haemophagocytic 
lymphohistiocytosis, as defined by Hs score (temp, organomegaly, cytopenia, triglycerides, 
fibrinogen, ferritin, AST and known immunosuppression) 
 
- to study if treatment with sargramostim has a favourable effect on long term 10-20 week follow 
up 
4. End Points + Time Points 
4.1. Primary End Points + Time Points 
To measure the effectiveness of sargramostim on restoring lung homeostasis, the primary endpoint 
of this intervention is measuring oxygenation after 5 DAYS of inhaled (and intravenous) treatment 
through assessment of pretreatment (day 0) and post-treatment (day 5) ratio of PaO2/FiO2 and 
through measurement of the P(A-a)O2 gradient, which can easily be performed in the setting of clinical 
observation of patients admitted to the COVID -19 ward or ICU COVID-19 unit. Preferentially, this 
measurement should be done in the upright position, while breathing room air for a minimum of 3 
minutes. If this is impossible due to need for supplemental oxygen, FiO2 and oxygen supplementation 
method should be recorded in patient record, so that A-a gradient can be normalized for age expected 
normal A-a gradient while on supplemental oxygen use. 
During the 5 day treatment period, we will perform daily measurements of oxygen saturation (pulse 
oximetry) in relation to FiO2, and the slope of alterations in this parameters could also be an indicator 
that our hypothesis is correct. 
If the patient leaves hospital prior to the day 6 analysis point, oxygenation at day of discharge will be 
used as value for measuring primary endpoint. 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
23/55
Improvement will be expressed as % of patients showing an improvement in P(A-a)O2 gradient and 
PaO2/FiO2 ratio between day 6 and day 1 of at least 25%; at least 33% and at least 50% in each 
treatment arm and expressed also as mean and median change in P(A-a)O2 gradient and PaO2/FiO2 
ratio comparing D6 to D1 in both treatment arms.  
 
4.2. Secondary End Points + Time Points 
 
- to study if early intervention with sargramostim is safe (number of AEs/SAEs) 
Although sargramostim has been given previously by inhalation to patients with ARDS and interstitial 
lung disease, data on safety in patients with COVID-19 infection are currently lacking. Since we are 
randomizing against 5 days of no sargramostim treatment, comparison of AEs and SAEs between group 
A and group B will be very informative. 
 
-to study if early intervention with inhaled sargramostim affects clinical outcome defined by  
Length of hospital stay 
Mean and median change in 6-point ordinal scale change between day 1, day 6 
Mean and median change in clinical sign score between day 1 and day 6 
Time to clinical sign score <6 maintained for 24h 
Mean and median change of SOFA score between day 1 and day 6 or between day 1 and day 10. 
Mean and median change NEWS2 score between day 1 and day 6 or between day 1 and day 10. 
Time to NEWS2 score less than 2 for at least 24h 
 
 
- to study if early intervention with sargramostim affects the rate of nosocomial infection 
Patients with viral respiratory infection are at risk of secondary bacterial infections. As part of routine 
clinical care, sputum samples will be collected in patients suspected of secondary bacterial pneumonia, 
and checked for the presence of bacteria. 
 
-to study if early intervention with inhaled sargramostim affects progression to mechanical 
ventilation and/or ARDS 
Decreasing oxygenation often leads to the need for non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation, 
and if severe enough to a diagnosis of ARDS. We will therefore as a secondary endpoint also study if 
early intervention with inhaled sargramostim prevents progression to criteria-defined ARDS (according 
to the American-European Consensus Conference (AECC) diagnostic criteria for ARDS: acute onset; 
ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) of 200 or less, 
regardless of positive end-expiratory pressure; bilateral infiltrates seen on frontal chest radiograph; 
and pulmonary artery wedge pressure of 18 mm Hg or less when measured, or no clinical evidence of 
left atrial hypertension), requiring high-flow oxygen devices, non-invasive mechanical ventilation, 
mechanical ventilation, by measuring the day from admission when this diagnosis is made or therapies 
are initiated. 
 
-to study if treatment with sargramostim affects all-cause mortality rate at 4 and 20 weeks post 
inclusion. 
 
-to study if treatment with sargramostim affects features of secondary haemophagocytic 
lymphohistiocytosis. 
A large subset of patients with severe COVID-19 developing respiratory failure might have a cytokine 
storm syndrome, designated as secondary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (sHLH). sHLH is an 
under-recognised, hyperinflammatory syndrome characterised by a fulminant and fatal 
hypercytokinemia with multi-organ failure. Cardinal features of sHLH include unremitting fever, 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
24/55
cytopenias, and hyperferritinaemia; hypertriglyceridemia, pulmonary involvement can present as 
ARDS. A cytokine profile resembling sHLH is associated with COVID-19 disease severity, characterised 
by increased interleukin (IL)-2, IL-7, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, interferon-γ inducible 
protein 10, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1, macrophage inflammatory protein 1-α, and tumour 
necrosis factor-α.  
Predictors of fatality from a recent retrospective, multicentre study of 150 confirmed COVID-19 cases 
in Wuhan, China, included elevated ferritin (mean 1297·6 ng/ml in non-survivors vs 614·0 ng/ml in 
survivors; p<0·001) and IL-6 (p<0·0001), suggesting that mortality might be due to virally driven 
hyperinflammation. 
To address the effect of sargramostim treatment on sHLH, we will measure levels of ferritin, these 
chemokines and cytokines at the beginning of the trial day 0 and after the initial 5 day treatment. PBO 
including leukocytes and lymphocytes are performed on a routine clinical basis in these patients. 
 
- to study if treatment with sargramostim has a favourable effect on long term 10-20 week follow 
up 
At 10-20 weeks after Day 1, patients will be seen on routine check-up by pulmonologist, who will 
perform a clinical exam, pulmonary function tests (including FVC, TLC and diffusion capacity), a 
laboratory (ferritin, lymphocytes, leukocytes) and a 6 minutes walk test and HRCT if done per standard 
of care. 
 
4.3. 
Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic endpoints 
 
Pharmacodynamic endpoints: 
Plasma and serum samples will be collected for summary and exploratory analysis by the Primary 
Immunodeficiency lab at UZ Gent and the VIB-UGent Inflammation Research Center (IRC) as 
appropriate (e.g. descriptive statistics, compare change from baseline between the two treatment 
arms), may include but are not limited to:  
 
• anti-drug antibodies (ADA) – D1 and long-term follow-up serum samples (Summary only to indicate 
presence or not)  
• Local safety labs such as D-dimers, LDH, ferritin, CRP, fibrinogen, eosinophils, lymphocytes  
• Cytokines and biomarkers (from selected centres) on D1, and D6 (or at hospital discharge, if 
    earlier) and follow up 
o Cytokines may include, but not limited to:  
▪ IL-1beta, IL-1RA, IL-2, IL-8, IL-6, TNFa, GM-CSF, G-CSF, IP-10, MCP-1, MIP-1a, IFNg, 
and IL-10  
o Biomarkers may include, but are not limited to  
▪ sRAGE, Angiopoietin-2, KL6, GDF-15, suPAR. 
 
Immunomonitoring (from selected centers) on D1, and D6 (or at hospital discharge, if 
    earlier) and follow up will include  
o flow cytometry analysis of numbers of peripheral blood lymphocyte and monocyte 
subsets, and their activation status by flow cytometry 
o ELISPOT assays to measure the number of IFNg, TNFa, IL-2 and GM-CSF producing CD4 and 
CD8 T cells following restimulation of frozen and thawed peripheral blood mononuclear 
cells (PBMC) with a SARS-CoV2 megapool of immunogenic peptides. 
 
 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
25/55
5. Study design  
 
5.1. 
Description of study design 
 
This is phase 4 academic, prospective, randomized, open-label, interventional study designed to 
investigate the efficacy of sargramostim (Leukine®) in improving oxygenation and short- and long-term 
outcome of COVID-19 patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure. There are currently no 
treatments directed at improving lung repair and local immunity in COVID-19 patients, and no 
treatment that attempt to halt the progression from manageable acute hypoxic respiratory failure to 
ARDS in patients with COVID-19 infection. Justification for our objective is that preventing progression 
from early acute hypoxic respiratory failure to ARDS could have a huge impact on the foreseeable 
overflow of the ICU units, that is already happening in some countries and is bound to happen on a 
global scale. 
 
 
The hypothesis of the proposed intervention is that GM-CSF has profound effects on antiviral 
immunity, can provide the stimulus to restore immune homeostasis in the lung with acute lung injury 
post COVID-19, and can promote lung repair mechanisms, that lead to a 25% improvement in lung 
oxygenation parameters. This hypothesis is based on experiments performed in mice showing that 
GM-CSF treatment can prevent mortality and prevent ARDS in mice with post-viral acute lung injury. 
 
We will randomize patients with confirmed COVID19 with acute hypoxic respiratory failure (saturation 
below 93% on minimal 2 l/min O2 or PaO2/FiO2 <350) to receive sargramostim 125mcg twice daily for 
5 days as a nebulized inhalation on top of standard of care (active group), or to receive standard of 
care treatment (control group). Upon progression of disease to requiring non-invasive or invasive 
mechanical ventilatory support within the 5 day period, in patients in the active group, inhaled 
sargramostim will be replaced by intravenous sargramostim 125mcg/m2 body surface area until the 5 
day period is reached.   
Dosing of inhaled and systemic sargramostim are based on prior experience of this drug in patients 
with pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (inhaled) and with pneumonia associated ARDS (inhaled and 
intravenous). The inhaled route is preferred first, because high local concentrations of GM-CSF have a 
favourable effect on lung immunity, lung homeostasis and lung repair. The switch to intravenous 
treatment with deterioration requiring initiation of mechanical ventilation  is necessitated by the fact 
that patients with COVID-19 poorly tolerate ventilation in the absence of high level positive end 
expiratory pressure (PEEP), especially when they develop ARDS.  For giving the sargramostim via 
inhalator in a ventilated patient, this would involve PEEP-free ventilation for at least 10-15 minutes, 
which will not be tolerated in COVID-19 associated severe hypoxic respiratory failure and/or ARDS 
according to expert opinion (Prof. Dr. Pieter Depuydt, Intensive Care Unit, UZ Ghent). 
 
To measure the effectiveness of sargramostim on restoring lung homeostasis, the primary endpoint 
of this intervention is measuring oxygenation after 5 days of inhaled (and intravenous) treatment 
through assessment of pretreatment and post-treatment ratio of PaO2/FiO2 and through 
measurement of the P(A-a)O2 gradient, which can easily be performed in the setting of clinical 
observation of patients admitted to the COVID -19 ward or ICU COVID-19 unit. Supplemental oxygen 
use will be recorded, and if needed A-a gradient will be normalized against expected age- and 
supplemental oxygen dependent A-a gradient.  During the 5 day treatment period, we will perform 
daily measurements of oxygen saturation (pulse oximetry) in relation to FiO2, and the slope of 
alterations in this parameters could also be an indicator that our hypothesis is correct. If the patient 
leaves hospital prior to the day 6 analysis point, oxygenation at day of discharge will be used as value 
for measuring primary endpoint. 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
26/55
 
 
Comparison will be between active group A receiving sargramostim on top of standard of care and 
control group B receiving standard of care.  
 
Data from the Wuhan COVID-19 epidemic show that patients that deteriorate are facing a prolonged 
period of mechanical ventilation. Therefore, from day 6 onwards, progressive patients in the active 
group will have the option to receive an additional 5 days of IV sargramostim, based on the treating 
physician’s assessment. This group will be called group C. In the control group with progressive disease 
requiring non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilatory support or developing ARDS, from day 6 
onwards, the treating physician will have the option to initiate IV sargramostim 125mcg/m2 body 
surface area once daily for 5 days. This group will be called group D. Comparisons of Group A (early 5 
day intervention with sargramostim) with Group D (late 5 day intervention with sargramostim) will 
also be very informative.  
 
 
 
5.2. 
End of Study Definition 
5.2.1. For an individual subject 
 
The subject has completed the study if he or she has completed all phases of the study, including the 
last visit (week 10-20 clinical follow up visit) or the last scheduled procedures, as described in this 
protocol (see section “9. Study Specific Procedures”). 
 
5.2.2. For the whole study 
 
Overall, the end of the study is reached when the last study procedure for the last subject has occurred: 
last subject, last visit (LSLV). 
As soon as the whole study has ended (cfr. the definition above), the co-ordinating Investigator shall 
notify the HIRUZ Clinical Trial Unit, so that the Competent Authority and the Ethics Committee can be 
informed in a timely manner according to the regulatory requirements (within 90 days after end of the 
study, or if the study had to be terminated early, this period must be reduced to 15 days and the 
reasons should clearly explained). 
 
5.3. 
Estimated duration of the study 
 
There is a large number of COVID-19 infected patients that are currently being hospitalized across the 
globe.  In just 9 days time, our COVID-19 ward at Ghent University Hospital has admitted 25 confirmed 
cases, of which a significant portion (50%) already fulfill eligibility criteria for the current proposed 
protocol.  We therefore believe that given the current ascending part of the epidemiology curve, with 
numbers of patients rising sharply, there will be no shortage of patients that are eligible.  We estimate 
the study to terminate in 30 weeks, including last clinical follow up visits.  
 
 
 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
27/55
6. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria 
 
6.1. 
Inclusion Criteria 
 
The following patients will be enrolled 
 
 Recent (≤2weeks prior to randomization) - Confident COVID-19 diagnosis confirmed by antigen 
detection test and/or PCR and/or positive serology, or any emerging and validated diagnostic 
laboratory test for COVID-19 within this period.  
 
-In some patients, it may be impossible to get a confident laboratory confirmation of COVID-
19 diagnosis after 24h of hospital admission because viral load is low and/or problems with 
diagnostic sensitivity.  In those cases, in absence of an alternative diagnosis, and with highly 
suspect bilateral ground glass opacities on recent (<24h) chest-CT scan (confirmed by a 
radiologist and pulmonary physician as probable COVID-19), a patient can be enrolled as 
probable COVID-19 infected. In all cases, this needs confirmation by later seroconversion. 
-Presence of acute hypoxic respiratory failure defined as (either or both)  
saturation below 93% on minimal 2 l/min O2 
PaO2/FiO2 below 350 
-Admitted to specialized COVID-19 ward 
-Age 18-80 
-Male or Female 
-Willing to provide informed consent 
 
 
6.2. 
Exclusion Criteria  
 
-Patients with known history of serious allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, to human granulocyte-
macrophage colony stimulating factor such as sargramostim, yeast-derived products, or any 
component of the product.  
 
 -mechanical ventilation before start of study 
 
-Patients enrolled in another investigational drug study 
 
-Pregnant or breastfeeding females (all female subjects regardless of childbearing potential status 
must have negative pregnancy test at screening)  
 
- patients with peripheral white blood cell count above 25.000 per microliter and/or active myeloid 
malignancy 
 
-patients on high dose systemic steroids (> 20 mg methylprednisolone or equivalent) for COVID-19 
unrelated disorder 
 
 
-patients on lithium carbonate therapy  
 
-Patients with serum ferritin >2000 mcg/L (which will exclude ongoing HLH) 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
28/55
 
 
6.2.1. Screen failures 
 
Screen failures are defined as subjects who consent to participate in the clinical study but are not 
subsequently randomly assigned to the study intervention or entered in the study. A minimal set of 
screen failure information will be kept to ensure transparent reporting of screen failure subjects.  
 
 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
29/55
7. Target Population 
 
7.1. 
Subjects 
 
7.1.1. Number of subjects and planned recruitment rate 
 
There is a large number of COVID-19 infected patients that are currently being hospitalized across 
the globe. In just 9 days time, our COVID-19 ward at Ghent University Hospital has admitted 25 
confirmed cases, of which a significant portion (50%) already fulfill eligibility criteria for the current 
proposed protocol.  Similar numbers of patients are currently being seen in all centers. We therefore 
believe that given the current ascending part of the epidemiology curve, with numbers of patients 
rising sharply, there will be no shortage of patients that are eligible.  
 
 
The number of subjects that will be included in this study is: 80. 
These are divided into following sub-groups: 
 
Group A : active sargramostim treatment group, treatment for initial 5 days, no deterioration after 5 
days  
Number of patients : 40 
  
Group B : control group : no treatment with sargramostim in first 5 days 
Number of patients : 40 
 
Group C and D :  
Data from the Wuhan COVID-19 epidemic show that patients that deteriorate are facing a prolonged 
period of mechanical ventilation. Therefore, from day 6 onwards, progressive patients in the active 
group will have the option to receive an additional 5 days of IV sargramostim sargramostim 
125mcg/m2 body surface area once daily, based on the treating physician’s assessment. This group 
will be called group C.  It is estimated that some 30% of patients might deteriorate and require non-
invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation, giving potentially rise to 12 patients that progress from 
group A to group C, if the clinician decides to move forward with the drug. 
 
In the control group progressing to requiring non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilatory support, 
from day 6 onwards, the treating physician will have the option to initiate IV sargramostim 125mcg/m2 
body surface area once daily for 5 days. This group will be called group D. It is estimated that some 
30% of patients might deteriorate to mechanical ventilation or ARDS, giving potentially rise to 12 
patients that progress from group A to group C, if the clinician decides to move forward with the drug 
 
Comparisons between group A (early sargramostim) versus group B (no sargramostim) at day 6 will be 
important for reaching primary endpoint, and for key secondary endpoints. Comparisons of Group A 
(early 5 day intervention with sargramostim) with Group D (late 5 day intervention with sargramostim) 
will also be very informative for secondary endpoint analysis. 
 
 
 
7.1.2. Withdrawal and replacement of subjects 
 
Subjects are free to withdraw from participation in the study at any time upon request.  


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
30/55
An investigator may discontinue or withdraw a subject from the study for the following reasons:  
• allergic reactions (anaphylactic shock) to sargramostim 
• Pregnancy 
 
Progression to non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation and/or ARDS between 
screening and randomization 
• Significant study intervention non-compliance  
• If any clinical adverse event (AE), laboratory abnormality, or other medical condition or 
situation occurs such that continued participation in the study would not be in the best 
interest of the subject 
• If the subject meets an exclusion criterion (either newly developed or not previously 
recognized) that precludes further study participation  
 
In all cases, the reason why subjects are withdrawn must be recorded in detail in the eCRF and in the 
subject’s medical records. 
 
If a patient decides to leave hospital before day 6 of the study, for example because of clinical 
improvement, the oxygenation parameters at day of discharge will be used to calculate the primary 
endpoint measurement.  
 
The following actions must be taken if a subject fails to return to the clinic for a required study visit 
(visit at 10-20 weeks after Day 1) :  
• The site will attempt to contact the subject and reschedule the missed visit within 4 weeks 
and counsel the subject on the importance of maintaining the assigned visit schedule and 
ascertain if the subject wishes to and/or should continue in the study.  
• Before a subject is deemed lost to follow-up, the investigator or designee will make every 
effort to regain contact with the subject (where possible, 3 telephone calls and, if necessary, 
a certified letter to the subject’s last known mailing address or local equivalent methods). 
These contact attempts should be documented in the subject’s medical record or study file.  
• Should the subject continue to be unreachable, he or she will be considered to have 
withdrawn from the study with a primary reason of lost to follow-up.  
 
7.2. 
Method of recruitment 
 
Subjects will be recruited at the COVID-19 hospitalization ward at the participating centers. The study 
will be proposed by the treating physician to all subjects with PCR-Confirmed COVID-19 infection and 
a presence of acute hypoxic respiratory failure. 
 
There will be no compensation for study participation. Partner Therapeutics Inc. is providing 
sargramostim to the study subjects, free of charge. 
 
Since this is a hospital based trial, taking place over a minimum of five days in which patients are 
severely ill, we suspect the retention in the trial to be high.  
 
  
 
7.3. 
Screening 
 
Patients will be informed about the study by the treating physician. 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
31/55
After receiving full explanation, having received sufficient time to considerer the trial, asking 
questions and receiving satisfying responses to all questions, patients will be asked to sign ICF. 
 
A serum pregnancy test will be done (female patients only). 
Medical history will be checked for review of exclusion criteria and relevant subject information. 
 
Patients will be continuously monitored on the COVID-19 ward. 
Exams (standard of care) include, but are not limited to: 
- 
ECG 
- 
Chest X-Ray, and CT-scan 
- 
Laboratory  tests for leukocyte formula, kidney and liver function, ferritin levels 
- 
Vital signs 
- 
Pulse oximetry, Arterial blood gas, capnography 
As soon as all in- and exclusion criteria are checked and patient is considered eligible, patient can be 
randomized. There is no minimal window to randomize the patient. 
 
 
 
8. Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) 
 
 
8.1. 
Name of the IMP 
LEUKINE® 
8.1.1. Composition and active substance of the IMP 
Sargramostim, Granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), is the active substance of 
Leukine®.  
 
8.1.2. Producer and Distributor of the IMP 
The producer and distributor of Leukine® is Partner Therapeutics Inc, an integrated commercial-stage 
biotech company focused on the development and commercialization of therapeutics that improve 
health outcomes in the treatment of cancer. The distribution of IMP will be done by Tanner Pharma. 
 
 
8.1.3. Preparation + Dosage + administration of the IMP 
 
For inhalation: LEUKINE® is a sterile, preservative-free lyophilized powder that requires reconstitution 
with 4mL normal saline solution, to reach a concentration of 62,5 mcg/ml. Once reconstituted, 
LEUKINE® can be inhaled as an aqueous aerosol using either a vibrating mesh nebulizer or jet nebulizer, 
aerosolizing 2 ml twice daily. Reconstituted LEUKINE® solution for inhalation should be used within 16 
hours following reconstitution and/or dilution. Dosage for inhalation: 125mcg twice daily via nebulizer.  
Nebulizing is preferably done in an isolation negative pressure chamber, and if not, personnel should 
use an FFP2 mask. Patient should self-administer the medication and where possible, the room should 
not be entered within one hour after administration. 
 
 
For intravenous injection:  LEUKINE® injection in 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP. Dilute LEUKINE® 
for intravenous infusion in 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP. If the final concentration of LEUKINE® 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
32/55
is below 10 mcg/mL, add Albumin (Human) at a final concentration of 0.1% to the saline prior to 
addition of LEUKINE to prevent adsorption to the components of the drug delivery system. To obtain 
a final concentration of 0.1% Albumin (Human), add 1 mg Albumin (Human) per 1 mL 0.9% Sodium 
Chloride Injection, USP (e.g., use 1 mL 5% Albumin [Human] in 50 mL 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, 
USP). Once diluted for infusion, LEUKINE® is stable for 6h. Dosage for intravenous injection: 
125mcg/m2/day over a 4-hour period for up to 5 days. 
 
 
  
8.1.4. Permitted dose adjustments and interruption of treatment 
No dose adjustments and interruptions are permitted during this trial.  In case of anaphylaxis or 
severe AE, the drug will be immediately interrupted. 
 
8.1.5. Duration of treatment 
LEUKINE® will be administered for 5 days, with a possible 5 day extension to a maximum of 10 days in 
case of progression of disease and need for mechanical ventilation.  
 
8.1.6. Packaging and Labeling of the IMP 
 
LEUKINE® (sargramostim) for injection is a sterile, preservative-free, white lyophilized powder 
supplied in a carton containing five 250 mcg single-dose vials.  
 
LEUKINE® (sargramostim) injection is a sterile, clear, colorless solution preserved with 1.1% benzyl 
alcohol supplied in a carton containing one 500 mcg/mL multiple-dose vial and a carton containing five 
500 mcg/mL multiple-dose vials (NDC 0024-5844-05). 
 
Storage and Handling : Leukine should be stored at 4 °C.   
 
Drug will be labeled by Pharmacy UZ Ghent (for UZ Ghent enrolment) for inhaled or intravenous use. 
 
8.1.7. Storage conditions of the IMP 
Store LEUKINE® vials refrigerated at 2°C-8°C (36°F-46°F) in the original carton to protect from light. Do 
not freeze or shake. Do not use beyond the expiration date printed on the vial. 
Leukine® is to be shipped refrigerated at 2°C-8°C (36°F-46°F). The medication will be delivered to the 
pharmacy of the participating centers. Temperature during shipment and storage is to be monitored 
continuously. Whenever a temperature deviation occurs, Partner Therapeutics Inc. should be 
contacted. Partner Therapeutics Inc. might allow further use of the medication vials depending on the 
duration and intensity of the temperature excursion. The co-ordinating investigator should be 
informed of this deviation as well. 
 
 
8.1.8. Known side effects of the medication 
To date, there have been no new safety signals associated with LEUKINE® (sargramostim). Observed 
side effects with aerosolized LEUKINE® at 250mcg dose and in at least one evaluation have included: 
bronchospasm, cough, dyspnea, a decrease in vital capacity and/or forced expiratory volume 
associated with bilateral infiltrates, pleural effusions, increased phlegm, throat irritation, and back 
pain. 
 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
33/55
8.2. 
Concomitant / Rescue Medication 
 
There are no restrictions regarding concomitant/rescue medication. 
 
 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
34/55
9. Study Specific Procedures 
Patients will be informed about the study by the treating physician. 
After receiving full explanation, having received sufficient time to considerer the trial, asking questions 
and receiving satisfying responses to all questions, patients will be asked to sign ICF. 
The ICF process will be performed before any other study related procedure. 
 
9.1. 
Randomization 
In this open label trial patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio. Randomization in Belgium will be done 
using REDCap (electronic IVRS system).  
 
9.2. 
Study specific interventions 
This is a hospital based intervention trial, in which patients with COVID-19 will be treated at least for 
5 days with sargramostim. Patients with COVID-19 infection and respiratory failure are severely ill, and 
will require multiple daily clinical exams, blood sampling, vital parameter measurements, blood 
oxygenation measurements, and chest X-rays.  These are all part of the clinical management plan of 
the patients, and data stored in the electronic patient file will be used as part of the assessment of 
efficacy and safety profile of sargramostim.  
 
On screening, blood sample will be taken, preferentially during routine blood sampling, to determine 
exclusion criteria (pregnancy, high ferritin level). 
 
On day 1, prior to sargramostim treatment in group A, and during the day in group B control patients, 
a tube of blood serum (5 ml) and an EDTA tube (10 ml) will be collected for measuring blood cytokine 
and chemokine levels, and activation of immune cells in selected centers. Also in each center, an 
arterial blood gas determination via arterial puncture will be taken. This sample should be taken in an 
upright position, while breathing room air for a minimum of 3 minutes. If this is impossible due to 
dependency on supplemental oxygen, FiO2, oxygen flow rate, and method of oxygen delivery should 
be noted in the patient file. If arterial blood gas is taken within 24h before first dose administration,  
the arterial blood gas of screening can be used as D1 value. 
 
 
 
 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
35/55
On day 6 or on day of discharge before day 6 , a tube of blood serum (5ml) and an EDTA tube (10 ml) 
will be collected for measuring blood cytokine and chemokine levels, and activation of immune cells in 
selected centers. Also in each center, an arterial blood gas determination via arterial puncture will be 
taken.  
 
On days 1-5, patients in group A will inhale sargramostim 125mcg twice daily for 5 days as a nebulized 
inhalation using a Philips InnoSpire Go portable mesh nebulizer on top of standard of care. This device 
is a handheld mesh nebulizer that can be fitted with a facial mask. Patients will be instructed prior to 
receiving the first dose on how to use this simple device, by a physician.  This procedure is finished in 
5-10 minutes, and will be performed twice daily, in the morning (between 6 a.m. and 11 a.m.) and 
evening (between 6 p.m. and 11 p.m.). 
 
Upon progression of disease requiring initiation of non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilatory 
support within the 5 day period, in patients in the active group, inhaled sargramostim will be replaced 
by intravenous sargramostim 125mcg/m2 body surface area once daily until the 5 day period is 
reached. This administration will occur via a centrally placed catheter or peripheral catheter, that will 
be in place as part of routine medical care at the ICU. 
 
On a final clinical visit between week 10-20 an additional serum tube (5ml) and an EDTA tube (10 ml) 
will be taken in selected centers. 
 
 
 
9.3. 
Overview of collected data 
1. patient demographics 
 
age, sex, ethnicity, day of admission 
2. day of COVID-19 PCR positivity, and conversion to negative 
2. patient biometry 
 
weight, length, BMI, body surface area 
3. Clinical and laboratory parameters on screening day and during trial 
 
-first day of illness, potential source of infection 
-clinical examination findings (cyanosis, crepitation’s and rales, heart murmurs, peripheral 
edema) 
 
-vital signs (temperature, blood pressure, heart rate, breathing rate) 
 
-pulse oximetry data (SaO2) 
 
-clinical blood gas sampling (PaO2, PaCO2, HCO3) 
-clinical chemistry sampling (ferritin, leukocyte formula, platelets, kidney and liver function, 
fibrinogen, triglycerides) 
-Chest X-ray and/or CT characteristics and radiology clinical report 
-in case of admission to ICU : invasive monitoring data (arterial blood pressure, PCWP, 
continuous O2 saturation, continuous ECG, ventilatory parameters (tidal volume, FiO2, PEEP 
pressure, peak pressure, minute ventilation) 
4. All standard care drugs used during the trial and on day of enrolment of the trial, including oxygen 
flow rate. 
5. Basic clinical data on prior medical history (prior lung diseases, smoking history, prior lung function 
measurements (preferentially within 5 preceding years), prior gas exchange measurements) and 
medication use will be collected from electronic medical record. 
 
6. Study specific measurements 
On serum samples from selected centers, at each of the indicated timepoints exploratory analysis 
may include but is not limited to: 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
36/55
 
Anti-drug antibodies (ADA) (D1-D6-FU) using ELISA  
 
Quantification of sRAGE (D1-D6-FU) using ELISA 
 
Quantification of Ang2 (D1-D6-FU) using ELISA 
 
Quantification of MUC1 (D1-D6- FU) using ELISA 
 
Quantification of GDF15 (D1-D6- FU) using ELISA 
 
Quantification of suPAR (D1-D6-FU) using ELISA 
 
Quantification of cytokines GM-CSF, IL-1b, IL1RA, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL12p40, IL17A, IL-
18, IL23p19, CCL2, CXCL9, CXCL10, INFgamma, TNF (D1-D6-FU) using Luminex at VIB-
UGhent. 
 
Quantification of IFNalpha2 (D1-D6-FU) using SIMOA 
 
Quantification of GM-CSF (D1-D6-FU) using MSD. 
 
Quantification of S1 specific IgG and IgA antibodies (D1-D6-FU) using ELISA 
 
Quantification of NCP specific IgG (D1-D6-FU) using ELISA 
 
 
will be measured on samples collected at the various centers at day 1 or day 6 or 
discharge (whichever comes first) and at 12-22 weeks follow up visit. 
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells will be prepared at UZ Gent, following shipment of EDTA-
blood samples by selected centers,  for Immunomonitoring purposes on D1, and D6 (or at 
hospital discharge, if earlier) and follow up visit.  PBMC samples will be vitally frozen until 
analysis. When all samples are available from the selected centers, they will be thawed and 
PBMCs will be analyzed by the Primary Immunodeficiency Lab at UZ Ghent, in collaboration 
with the VIB-UGent Center for Inflammation Research. VIB-UGhent will perform some these 
assays as a service to UZGhent labs. Analyseswill include : 
o flow cytometry analysis of numbers of peripheral blood lymphocyte and 
monocyte subsets, and their activation status by flow cytometry 
o ELISPOT assays to measure the number of IFNg, TNFa, IL-2 and GM-CSF 
producing CD4 and CD8 T cells following restimulation of frozen and thawed 
peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) with a SARS-CoV2 megapool of 
immunogenic peptides. 
 
 
 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
37/55
 
9.4. 
Schematic overview of the data collection & interventions 
10. Procedure 
Screening 
D1 
D2-D5 
D6/discharge 
 
D7-D9 
D10 
Follow-up (10-20 weeks 
after D1) 
Informed consent 
X 
  
  
  
 
  
  
Inclusion/exclusion criteria 
X 
  
  
  
 
  
  
Randomization 
  
X 
  
  
 
  
  
Medical history & biometry 
X 
  
  
  
 
  
  
Anamnesis and (S)AE inquiry 
X 
  
X 
Concomitant medication 
X 
   
X 
Physical examinationl 
X 
  
X 
6 Minutes Walk Test o, l 
 
 
 
X 
Vital signs a 
X 
  
X 
ECGl 
 
On clinical grounds 
  
Chest X-ray and/or (HR)CT scan 
 
On clinical grounds 
X m 
Lung functionl 
  
  
  
  
 
  
X 
Routine laboratory assessmentsl on clinical 
grounds, except: 
X  
 
Xb 
  
Xc 
 
  
Xc 
 - screening/day 1 and day 6/discharge 
Serum pregnancy test 
X 
  
  
  
 
  
  
Study blood sampling  
  
X 
  
X 
 
  
  
 - 5 ml serum tube 
X 
 - 10 ml EDTA tube (selected centers only) 
Arterial blood gas d 
  
X 
  
X 
 
 X 
Score assessments 
 
  
  
- 6-point ordinal scale e 
  
X 
- Clinical sign score f 
  
X 
- NEWS2 score g 
  
X 
- SOFA score h 
  
X 
  
X 
 
X  
X 
- HScore i 
  
X 
  
X 
 
  
X 
- CURB-65 j 
  
X 
  
  
 
  
  


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
38/55
- APACHE II k 
  
X 
  
  
 
  
  
- Glasgow Coma Scale 
 
X 
- HRCT fibrosis scorem 
 
X 
IMPn 
  
(X) 
(X) 
(X) 
(X) 
(X)  
Drug compliance 
  
 
  
  
 
 
a Includes morning assessment (7-10 am) of T°C (actual and highest last 24h), Pulse rate, Blood Pressure, Respiratory Rate, SpO2 by pulsoximetry. Time point assessment (7-10 am) is not applicable for the Follow-Up 
visit. 
 
b Should minimally include haemoglobin, platelets, WBC count, eosinophils, lymphocytes, CD4 and CD8 T cell count, CRP, bilirubin, AST, ALT, LDH, creatinine, fibrinogen, triglycerides, ferritin, ureum, troponin, D-dimers.  
 
c Should minimally include haemaglobin, hematocrit, platelets, WBC count, neutrophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, CD4 and CD8 T cell count, CRP, bilirubin, AST, ALT, LDH, creatinine, fibrinogen, triglyceride, ferritin, 
troponin, D-dimers, ESR, CK 
 
d Patient sitting upright breathing room air for a minimum of 3 minutes. If this is impossible due to dependency to supplemental oxygen, FiO2, oxygen flow rate, and method of oxygen delivery should be noted in the 
patient file. If arterial blood gas is taken within 24h before first dose administration, the arterial blood gas of screening can be used as D1 value.  
 
e Defined as 1 = Death; 2 = Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO; 3 = Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 4 = Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5 = 
Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen; 6 = Not hospitalized. 
 
f (0-18) by scoring 6 clinical signs from 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe): Fever (0 = <37°C; 1 = 37.1-38°C; 2 = 38.1-39°C; 3 = >39°C) last 24h; Cough; Fatigue; Shortness of breath; Diarrhea; Body 
pain. 
 
g NEWS2 (see https://www.mdcalc.com/national-early-warning-score-news-2): requires RR, SpO2, T°C, SBP and pulse. 
 
 h SOFA score (see https://www.mdcalc.com/sequential-organ-failure-assessment-sofa-score): requires PaO2, FiO2, platelet count, GCS, bilirubin, MAP and creatinine.  
 
I HScore (see https://www.mdcalc.com/hscore-reactive-hemophagocytic-syndrome): requires T°C, haemoglobin, WBC count, platelets, ferritin, triglycerides and AST (BM aspirate is not required). 
 
j CURB-65 (see https://www.mdcalc.com/curb-65-score-pneumonia-severity): requires confusion, BUN, RR, blood pressure and age.  
 
k APACHE II (see https://www.mdcalc.com/apache-ii-score): requires age, T°C, MAP, pH, pulse, RR, sodium, potassium, hematocrit, creatinine, WBC count, GCS and FiO2.  
 
l Intervention is standard of care and is being performed regardless of inclusion in the study. 
 
m Preferably HRCT if done per standard of care, which will be used to evaluate fibrosis at follow visit. This is a subjective assessment of the overall extent of normal attenuation, reticular abnormalities, honeycombing 
and traction bronchiectasis will be performed.  A reticular abnormality is defined as a collection of innumerable areas of small linear opacity. Honeycombing is defined as the presence of a cystic airspace measuring 3–
10 mm in diameter, with 1- to 3-mm thick walls. Traction bronchiectasis is defined as irregular bronchial dilatation within the surrounding areas showing parenchymal abnormalities. The morphological criteria on HRCT 
scans include bronchial dilatation with respect to the accompanying pulmonary artery, a lack of tapering of the bronchi and the identification of bronchi within 10 mm of the pleural surface. The HRCT findings will be 
graded on a scale of 1–4 based on the classification system: 1. normal attenuation; 2. reticular abnormality; 3. traction bronchiectasis; and 4. honeycombing. The presence of each of the above four HRCT findings will 
be assessed independently in three (upper, middle and lower) zones of each lung. The upper lung zone is defined as the area of the lung above the level of the tracheal carina, the lower lung zone is defined as the area 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
39/55
of the lung below the level of the inferior pulmonary vein and the middle lung zone is defined as the area of the lung between the upper and lower zones. The extent of each HRCT finding will be determined by visually 
estimating the percentage (to the nearest 5%) of parenchymal involvement in each zone. The score for each zone will be calculated by multiplying the percentage of the area by the grading scale score. The six zone 
scores will be averaged to determine the total score for each patient. The highest score is 400 points and the lowest score is 100 points using this calculation method. The total score is the “HRCT fibrosis score”. 
(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3922654/pdf/1465-9921-15-10.pdf) 
 
n Patients randomized in the treatment group will receive inhaled sargramostim from D1 untill D5. In case of progression requiring mechanical ventilation within the first 5 days, IV sargramostim can be initiated until 
the 5 day period is reached. From day 6 onwards, progressive patients in the active group will have the option to receive an additional 5 days of IV sargramostim, based on the treating physician’s assessment. Patients 
in the control group will have the option to receive 5 days of IV sargramostim in case of progression requiring mechanical ventilation, based on the treating physician’s assessment. IMP should always be administered 
after other assessments, where possible. 
 
o 6 MWT: to assess the distance walked over 6 minutes as submaximal test of aerobic capacity/endurance. 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
40/55
 
10.1. Restrictions for subjects during the study 
There are no subject restrictions during this trial. 
 
11. 
Sampling 
 
11.1. Types and number of samples 
D1: serum blood sample 5ml, EDTA blood sample 10 ml  
D6 or discharge before day 6 : serum blood sample 5ml, EDTA blood sample, 10 ml 
W10-20 follow-up visit :  serum blood sample 5ml, EDTA blood sample, 10 ml 
 
EDTA blood samples should only be collected in selected sites. 
 
 
11.2. Timepoints of sampling 
These samples are to be taken on D1 and D6 (or discharge if before day 6)  and on final follow up visit 
between week 10 and 20. There’s no time window allowed. 
 
11.3. Sample Handling & Analysis 
In all centers samples will be taken during hospitalization together with the blood draw for standard 
of care. 
 
After clotting for 30-60 minutes the samples will be processed at 1770 g during 10 minutes at room 
temperature. 3 aliquots will be filled and frozen at -80°C until further analysis. 
Centrifugation and storage will be done by qualified personal.  
 
EDTA blood samples (only for selected sites) will be processed to purify peripheral blood mononuclear 
cells (PBMC) by gradient centrifugation and stained for flow cytometric analysis of number of 
monocytes, HLA-DR expression on monocytes and dendritic cells, and lymphocyte activation, 
described under 4.3. Flow cytometry will be performed on paraformaldehyde fixed samples.   
 
Multiple cytokines and chemokines will be measured by multiplex bead based ELISA assay, described 
under 4.3. Development of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) will be measured using protocol developed by 
PartnerTherapeutics on serum samples taken at day 1 and follow up visit. 
 
 
11.4. Sample Storage and/or shipping 
Serum samples will be stored at minus 20 degrees temperature at the participating research centers. 
These samples will be shipped to sponsor at regular intervals, and in any case at the end of the study. 
In selected samples, EDTA blood will be collected for flow cytometry analysis and shipped to the PID 
lab at UZGhent for purification of PBMCs, freezing and later flow cytometry.  These samples will be 
shipped same day (with a 24h tolerance) to UZGhent.  
Frozen PBMC’s may also be analyzed in specific participating centers if this was agreed with PI of the 
study. Storage conditions of frozen PBMCs is at  -80°C prior to thawing and flow cytometry analysis. 
 
For all sites where PBMC manipulation is being done at site for analysis at that site, samples will be 
destroyed at the end of the study. For samples which go directly to PID lab at UZGhent, for purification 
of PBMCs, freezing and later analysis. VIB shall help in the analysis of flow cytometry experiments, but 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
41/55
will not become the owner of the samples, nor of the data ensuing from those samples. At all times, 
UZGhent remains the owner of the samples and data resulting from these analyzes by VIB. 
 
 
 
11.5. Future use of stored samples 
Initially samples will be stored for the use as described within this protocol. If at a later time point 
samples will be stored for future use, they will be stored in a FAGG certified biobank. In that scenario, 
the Ethics comite of UZGhent will be asked for permission to store the material in a FAGG certified 
biobank.  If permission is not granted, samples will be destroyed after completion of the study.


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
42/55
12. 
Statistical Considerations 
 
12.1. Sample size calculation 
The outcome(s) on which the sample size calculation is based upon, is the primary endpoint 
measurement of oxygenation, defined as ratio of Pa02/FiO2 and P(A-a)O2. 
Sample calculation and power analysis have been performed using Genstat. The target difference is 
the difference measured at the primary endpoint (at day 6) between the control and the treated group. 
Given a sample size of 40 patients each, a minimal improvement of 10% in the treated group relative 
to the control group will be detected as significant at a significance level of 0,01 with a power of 0.90. 
The error variance was set at 100 units, corresponding with a standard deviation of 10 units. 
The post-treatment evaluations should be assessed within 24 hours of the last dose of treatment. That 
is, Day 6 will be the timepoint for measures of efficacy endpoints based on 5 days of treatment, and 
Day 10 for patients who complete 10 days of treatment.  If the patient is discharged from hospital prior 
to the day 6 (or day 10) efficacy evaluations , the values at day of discharge will be used as value for 
measuring efficacy endpoints. 
 
12.2. Type of statistical methods 
All endpoints will be summarized and where relevant represented graphically 
 
A detailed statistical analysis plan (SAP) has been set up by EffectStats LLC, Cambridge Massachusetts, 
USA.  The statistical tests to be used to look at improvements in oxygenation between treatment 
groups will be a Chi-square test.  Mortality frequencies will be analyzed using Wald test.  
Key timepoints of interest for endpoints include Day 6 and Day 11, where data are available. All 
available efficacy data will be tabulated and presented for all patients in the mITT Population. 
Oxygenation after 5 days of Sargramostim Intervention 
To measure the effectiveness of sargramostim on restoring lung homeostasis, the primary endpoint of 
this intervention is measuring oxygenation after 5 days of inhaled (and intravenous) treatment through 
assessment of pretreatment and post-treatment ratio of PaO2/FiO2, SpO2/FiO2 and through 
measurement of the P(A-a)O2 gradient. During the 5 day treatment period, daily measurements of 
oxygen saturation (pulse oximetry) in relation to FiO2 will be performed. Negative value of P(A-a)O2 
gradient would be removed from the primary analysis. 
P(A-a)O2 gradient, PaO2/FiO2 ratio and SpO2/FiO2 are defined as: 
P(A-a)O2 gradient=[(FiO2) × (Atmospheric Pressure – H2O Pressure) – (PaCO2/0.8)] – PaO2 
PaO2/FiO2=Partial Pressure Oxygen/Fraction of Inspired Oxygen*100 
SpO2/FiO2 = Oxygen Saturation/ Fraction of Inspired Oxygen*100 
Comparison will be between active group A receiving sargramostim on top of standard of care and 
control group B receiving standard of care. The change from baseline and daily change from baseline 
in oxygenation/respiratory parameter of P(A-a)O2 gradient,  ratio of PaO2/FiO2  and ratio of SpO2/FiO2  
will be evaluated and summarized between group A and group B at Day 6. The difference of change 
from baseline between two groups will be tested by a t-test. In general, the last observed 
measurement prior to the first dose of study treatment occurred on Day 1 visit will be considered the 
baseline measurement. Day 6 is the primary analysis point. If the patient leaves hospital prior to the 
day 6 analysis point, oxygenation at day of discharge will be used as value for measuring primary 
endpoint. 
The analyses described above will also be performed between group A (early 5 day intervention with 
sargramostim) and group D (late 5 day intervention with sargramostim). Change from baseline (D1) to 
Day 10, daily change from baseline (D1) at Day 10 in oxygenation/respiratory parameter of P(A-a)O2 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
43/55
gradient, ratio of PaO2/FiO2 and ratio of SpO2/FiO2 will be summarized as well. A t-test will be 
conducted to compare the difference between the groups. 
The same analyses will be repeated for pathological oxygenation parameter of P(A-a)O2 gradient, ratio 
of PaO2/FiO2 and ratio of SpO2/FiO2 including summary of their value and change from baseline at Day 
6 and Day 10. A waterfall plot will be used to respent the change from baseline and percentage change 
from baseline on Day 6 for 1)oxygenation parameter of P(A-a)O2 gradient; 2) pathological oxygenation 
parameter of P(A-a)O2 gradient;  3) ratio of PaO2/FiO2; 4) ratio of SpO2/FiO2. Percentage change from 
baseline of P(A-a)O2 gradient and ratio of PaO2/FiO2 on Day 6 and follow-up will be summarized. 
Reasons of missing AA gradient values on Day 6 will also be summarized. 
The normal value of AA gradient for room air is calculated as: 2.5+(0.21×Age). All the results including 
change from baseline, and maximum change from baseline after 5 day intervention with sargramostim, 
normal AA gradient value for room air and flag of abnormality on Day 6will be listed.  
At least 25% reduction from baseline, at least 33% reduction from baseline, and at least 50% reduction 
from baseline in P(A-a)O2 gradient and pathological gradient on Day 6 will be summarized for mITT 
population. 
 
Survival status will be collected up to follow-up period (20 weeks after day 1). Death is considered as 
an event. All the mortality events and cause of death will be listed by treatment group and by patient. 
Number of patients died and survival time will be summarized by treatment group. Survival time will 
also be listed by patient. Risk and risk difference of all causes mortality by Day 28 and during the study 
period will also be summarized. 
The hazard ratio will be estimated by the Cox proportional hazards model with treatment group as a 
covariate in the model. Relevant hazard rates, hazard ratio between treatment groups and associated 
p-values will be tabulated. 
 
 
12.3. Statistical analysis team 
The statistical analysis will be performed by EffectStats LLC, Cambridge Massachusetts, USA, under 
guidance of Dr Ella Li, statistician. 
 
 
13. 
Data handling 
 
 
13.1. Method of data collection 
 
Subjects that are included in the study , will be assigned a unique study number upon their registration 
in REDCap.. On all documents submitted to the coordinating center, sponsor or CI, patients will only 
be identified by their study number. The subject identification list will be safeguarded by the site. The 
name and any other directly identifying details will not be included in the study database. 
 
13.1.1. 
Case Report Form 
An electronic data capture (EDC) system, i.e. REDCap, will be used for data collection. Data reported 
on each eCRF should be consistent with the source data. If information is not known, this must be 
clearly indicated on the eCRF. All missing and ambiguous data will be clarified.  
Only the data required by the protocol are captured in the eCRF. The eCRFs and the database will be 
developed, based on the protocol. The final eCRF design will be approved by the Co-ordinating 
Investigator. 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
44/55
All data entries and corrections will only be performed by study site staff, authorized by the 
investigator. Data will be checked by trained personnel (monitor, data manager) and any errors or 
inconsistencies will be clarified. The investigator must verify that all data entries in the eCRF are 
accurate and correct. 
 
REDCap is provided and maintained by Vanderbilt University; a license for use was granted to the 
Health, Innovation and Research Institute (HIRUZ). REDCap is a web-based system.  
The study site staff is responsible for data entry in REDCap. 
 
13.1.2. 
Data directly collected in the CRF (no source available) 
N.A. 
13.2. Data storage 
The data is accessed through a web browser directly on the secure REDCap server. The server is 
hosted within the UZ Ghent campus and meets hospital level security and back-up requirements.  
 
Privacy and data integrity between the user's browser and the server is provided by mandatory use of 
Transport Layer Security (TLS), and a server certificate issued by TERENA (Trans-European Research 
and Education Networking Association). All study sites will have access to REDCap. Site access is 
controlled with IP restriction. 
 
13.3. Archiving of data 
The investigator and sponsor specific essential documents will be retained for at least 25 years. At that 
moment, it will be judged whether it is necessary to retain them for a longer period, according to 
applicable regulatory or other requirement(s). 
 
13.4. Access to data 
Direct access will be granted to authorised representatives from the Sponsor, host institution and the 
regulatory authorities to permit study-related monitoring, audits and inspections. 
Login in REDCap is password controlled. Each user will receive a personal login name and password 
and will have a specific role which has predefined restrictions on what is allowed in REDCap. 
Furthermore, users will only be able to see data of subjects of their own site. Any activity in the 
software is traced and transparent via the audit trail and log files. 
For access to the pseudonymized data needed for statistical analysis, a separate data transfer 
agreement is in place between UZGhent and EffectStats LLC.  UZGhent owns the data, and the results 
of the statistical analysis, and EffectStats LLC is not allowed to share these data with third parties.  Data 
generated at the VIB Center for Inflammation research (results of ELISA analysis, results of flow 
cytometry analysis)  remain property of UZ Ghent. 
 
 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
45/55
14. 
Safety  
 
14.1. Definitions 
 
Term
Definition
Adverse Event (AE)
Any untoward medical occurrence in a subject to whom a medicinal 
product has been administered, including occurrences which are not 
necessarily caused by or related to that product. 
Unexpected Adverse 
Event 
An adverse event, the nature or severity of which is not consistent with 
the applicable product information (e.g., Investigator's Brochure for an 
unapproved investigational product or package insert/summary of 
product characteristics for an approved product). 
Adverse Reaction (AR)
 
An untoward and unintended response in a subject to an investigational 
medicinal product which is related to any dose administered to that 
subject. 
The phrase "response to an investigational medicinal product" means 
that a causal relationship between a study medication and an AE is at 
least a reasonable possibility, i.e. the relationship cannot be ruled out. 
All cases judged by either the reporting medically qualified professional 
or the Sponsor as having a reasonable suspected causal relationship to 
the study medication qualify as adverse reactions. 
Serious Adverse Event 
(SAE) 
A serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence that:
 results in death 
 is life-threatening 
 requires inpatient hospitalisation or prolongation of existing 
hospitalisation 
 results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity 
 consists of a congenital anomaly or birth defect 
Other ‘important medical events’ may also be considered serious if they 
jeopardise the subject or require an intervention to prevent one of the 
above consequences. 
NOTE: The term "life-threatening" in the definition of "serious" refers to 
an event in which the subject was at risk of death at the time of the event; 
it does not refer to an event which hypothetically might have caused 
death if it were more severe. 
Serious Adverse 
Reaction (SAR) 
An adverse event that is both serious and, in the opinion of the reporting 
Investigator, believed with reasonable probability to be due to one of the 
study treatments, based on the information provided. 
Suspected Unexpected 
Serious Adverse 
Reaction (SUSAR) 
A serious adverse reaction, the nature and severity of which is not 
consistent with the information about the medicinal product in question 
set out: 
 in the case of a product with a marketing authorisation, in the 
summary of product characteristics (SmPC) for that product 
 in the case of any other investigational medicinal product, in the 
investigator’s brochure (IB) relating to the study in question 
 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
46/55
Attribution definitions 
An adverse event is considered associated with the use of the drug if the attribution is possible, 
probable or definitive. 
 
Not related 
An adverse event which is not related to the use of the drug. 
 
Unlikely 
An adverse event for which an alternative explanation is more likely - e.g. concomitant drug(s), 
concomitant disease(s), and/or the relationship in time suggests that a causal relationship is unlikely. 
 
Possible 
An adverse event which might be due to the use of the drug. An alternative explanation - e.g. 
concomitant drug(s), concomitant disease(s), - is inconclusive. The relationship in time is reasonable; 
therefore the causal relationship cannot be excluded. 
 
Probable 
An adverse event which might be due to the use of the drug. The relationship in time is suggestive (e.g. 
confirmed by dechallenge). An alternative explanation is less likely - e.g. concomitant drug(s), 
concomitant disease(s). 
 
Definitely 
An adverse event which is listed as a possible adverse reaction and cannot be reasonably explained by 
an alternative explanation - e.g. concomitant drug(s), concomitant disease(s). The relationship in time 
is very suggestive (e.g. it is confirmed by dechallenge and rechallenge). 
 
14.2. Reporting requirements 
14.2.1. 
AE reporting 
 
AE’s will be recorded from the first drug administration until the end of the study, as defined in section 
5.2.  
Special attention will be given to those subjects who have discontinued the study for an AE, or who 
experienced a severe or a serious AE. All AE’s should be recorded in the patient’s file and in the CRF.  
 
14.2.2. 
SAE reporting 
 
SAE’s occurring during the entire study period will be reported as below. 
 
All serious adverse events (initial and follow up information) and pregnancies occurring during this 
study must be reported by the local Principal Investigator within 24 hours after becoming aware of the 
SAE to: 
- 
The local ethics committee (it is the responsibility of the local PI to report the local SAE’s to 
the local EC) 
- 
HIRUZ CTU of the University Hospital Ghent 
- 
The National Coordinating Investigator (in case of multicenter studies) 
The company Partner Therapeutics that provides the IMP  
This reporting is done by using the appropriate SAE form. For the contact details, see below. 
 
 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
47/55
14.2.3. 
SUSAR reporting 
 
In case the Coordinating Investigator, in consultation with HIRUZ CTU, decides the SAE is a SUSAR 
(Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction), HIRUZ CTU will report the SUSAR to the Central EC 
and the FAMHP within the timelines as defined in national legislation. The Coordinating Investigator 
reports the SUSAR to all local PI’s. 
In case of a life-threatening and fatal SUSAR the entire reporting process must be completed within 7 
calendar days. In case of a non life-threatening SUSAR the reporting process must be completed within 
15 calendar days.  
 
 
14.3. List of contact details for safety reporting 
 
HIRUZ CTU: 
 
 
 
Ghent University Hospital 
C. Heymanslaan 10, 1K5 
9000 Ghent, Belgium 
e-mail: hiruz.ctu@uzgent.be   
Tel: 
+32 9 332 05 00 
Fax:  
+32 9 332 05 20 
 
Coordinating Investigator: 
 
Prof. dr. Bart Lambrecht 
Ghent University Hospital 
Department of pneumology 
C. Heymanslaan 10, 1K5 
9000 Ghent, Belgium 
email: bart.lambrecht@ugent.be  
Tel: 
+32 9 332 91 10 
 
Marketing Authorisation Holder: 
 
Partner Therapeutics,  
Dr. Debasish Roychowdhury  
e-mail: Debasish.Roychowdhury@partnertx.com 
Tel: +16107721703  
 
 
 
 
14.4. Flowchart Reporting 
 
Type of Adverse Event
Action to be taken
AE
List all AE’s per subject in the patient’s file and 
add this information to the CRF. 
SAE
Notify to HIRUZ CTU within 24 hours after 
becoming aware of the SAE + add the SAE to a 
list that will be reported yearly (see section 13.8)
SAR
Notify to HIRUZ CTU within 24 hours after 
becoming aware of the SAE 
 HIRUZ CTU will submit to the central EC 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
48/55
study team informs company that provides 
the IMP 
SUSAR
Notify to HIRUZ CTU within 24 hours after 
becoming aware of the SUSAR 
 HIRUZ CTU will submit to the central EC. 
 HIRUZ CTU will submit to the FAMHP 
 study team informs company that provides 
the IMP 
 
In case the (SU)SAR occurs at a local participating site, the local PI or study team should also contact: 
- 
The local Ethics Committee 
- 
The Co-ordinating Investigator 
 
14.5. Events, excluded from reporting 
COVID-19 infection is a very recent syndrome, on which few data are available. Normal symptoms and 
natural disease course symptoms that will not be reported as adverse events are dyspnea, coughing, 
malaise, fever, drop in oxygen saturation, progression to respiratory failure, progression to ARDS, 
severe drop in blood pressure in the ICU,progression to multi-organ failure.  
 
 
14.6. Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) 
All study medication is registered and used in current practice. Despite the known safety profile of the 
study medications and study design, a DSMB is foreseen.  
 
14.7. Development Safety Update Report 
The Coordinating Investigator will provide DSURs once a year throughout the entire duration of the 
clinical study, or on request, to the Competent Authority (FAMHP in Belgium), Ethics Committee and 
Sponsor. This DSUR will include all SAE’s (who were not categorized as SAR’s and were not immediately 
reported to the EC). 
The report will be submitted 1 year (+ maximum 60 days) after the ‘Development International Birth 
Date (DIBD)’ , and will subsequently be submitted each year until the study is declared ended. This 
DIBD is the date of the sponsor’s first overall authorisation to conduct the clinical trial in any country 
worldwide. HIRUZ CTU can provide a template that can be used to complete this DSUR. 
 
 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
49/55
15. 
Monitoring/Auditing/Inspection 
 
15.1. Monitoring 
15.1.1. 
General 
Monitoring of the study will be performed in compliance with GCP E6(R2) and the applicable regulatory 
requirements. The study team will be trained in an initiation visit by the monitor. A training and 
delegation log will be held. A detailed description of the monitoring tasks can be found in the latest 
version of the (study-specific) ‘Monitoring plan’. 
 
15.1.2. 
Monitoring team 
Monitoring services will be provided by HIRUZ CTU. All relevant contact details (e.g. primary contact 
person, can be found in the ‘Monitoring plan’. 
 
15.1.3. 
Scope 
Monitoring services will consist of the following (non-exhaustive list): 
- review of informed consents and the followed process 
- check on recruitment status 
- checking for protocol deviations/violations 
- checking GCP compatibility 
- check on safety reporting compliance 
- IMP handling and storage 
- review of study data 
… 
 
15.2. Inspection 
This study can be inspected at any time by regulatory agencies during or after completion of the study. 
Therefore access to all study records, including source documents, must be accessible to the inspection 
representatives. Subject privacy must be respected at all times, in accordance to GDPR, GCP and all 
other applicable local regulations. 
The investigator/study team should immediately notify the sponsor if he or she has been contacted by 
a regulatory agency concerning an upcoming inspection. 
 
15.3. Protocol Deviation policy 
Sponsor and all investigators agree to take any reasonable actions to correct protocol 
deviations/violations noted during monitoring/inspection, in consultation with the monitoring team. 
All deviations must be documented on a protocol deviation log by the study team that is kept available 
at any time for monitoring/inspection purposes. Under emergency circumstances, deviations from the 
protocol to protect the rights, safety or well-being of human subjects may proceed without prior 
approval of the sponsor and the EC. 
 
15.4. Serious breach to GCP and/or the protocol 
Critical issues that significantly affect patient safety, data integrity and/or study conduct should be 
clearly documented and will be communicated with the Coordinating Investigator, HIRUZ CTU and 
possibly both the applicable Ethics Committee(s) and Competent authority. (Please contact HIRUZ CTU 
asap in case of a serious breach: hiruz.ctu@uzgent.be and/or +3293320500). 
Early determination of the study (in a specific center or overall) may be necessary in case of major non-
compliance. 
 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
50/55
16. 
Ethical and legal aspects 
 
16.1. Good Clinical Practice 
The study will be conducted cfr the latest version of the ICH E6 (R2) GCP guidelines, creating a standard 
for the design, conduct, performance, monitoring, auditing, recording, analyses and reporting of 
clinical studies that provides assurance that the data and reported results are accurate and that the 
rights, integrity and confidentiality of study subjects are protected. 
 
16.2. Informed Consent 
Eligible subjects may only be included in the study after providing written (witnessed, if needed) 
Ethics Committee-approved informed consent, or, if incapable of doing so, after such consent has been 
provided by a legally acceptable representative(s) of the subject. 
Informed consent must be obtained before conducting any study-specific procedures (as described in 
this protocol).  
 
Prior to entry in the study, the investigator must explain to potential subjects or their legal 
representatives the study and the implication of participation. Subjects will be informed that their 
participation is voluntary and that they may withdraw consent to participate at any time. Participating 
subjects will be told that their records may be accessed by competent authorities and by authorized 
persons without violating the confidentiality of the subject, to the extent permitted by the applicable 
law(s) and/or regulations. By signing the Informed Consent Form (ICF), the subjects or legally 
acceptable representatives are authorizing such access. 
After this explanation and before entry to the study, written, dated and signed informed consent 
should be obtained from the subject or legally acceptable representative. The ICF should be provided 
in a language sufficiently understood by the subject. Subjects must be given the opportunity to ask 
questions. 
The subject or legally acceptable representative will be given sufficient time to read the ICF and to ask 
additional questions. After this explanation and before entry to the study, consent should be 
appropriately recorded by means of either the subject's or his/her legal representative's dated 
signature or the signature of an independent witness who certifies the subject's consent in writing. 
After having obtained the consent, a copy of the ICF must be given to the subject. 
In case the subject or legally acceptable representative is unable to read, an impartial witness must 
attest the informed consent. 
Subjects who are unable to comprehend the information provided or pediatric subjects can only be 
enrolled after consent of a legally acceptable representative. 
The following information should be added to the electronic patient dossier (EPD):   
• 
which version of the ICF was obtained 
• 
who signed the ICF  
• 
if sufficient time has been given to consider participation into the study 
• 
which investigator obtained ICF with the date of signature 
• 
if a copy was provided to the patient 
• 
start and end of participation in the study 
 
16.3. Approval of the study protocol 
16.3.1. 
General 
The protocol has been reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Ghent University 
(Hospital), designated as the central Ethics Committee, after consultation with the local Ethics 
Committees, and the Federal Agency for Medicine and Health Products (FAMHP). This study cannot 
start before both approvals have been obtained. 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
51/55
 
16.3.2. 
Protocol amendments 
Any significant change or addition to the protocol can only be made in a written protocol amendment 
that must be approved by the Central Ethics Committee (and the FAMHP if applicable). 
Only amendments that are intended to eliminate an apparent immediate safety threat to patients may 
be implemented immediately. 
Notwithstanding the need for approval of formal protocol amendments, the investigators are expected 
to take any immediate action, required for the safety of any subject included in this study, even if this 
action represents a deviation from the protocol. These actions should always be notified to the 
sponsor. 
 
16.4. Confidentiality and Data Protection 
All study data will be handled in accordance with the law on General Data Protection Regulation 
(GDPR) and institutional rules 
[Belgian law dated on 30 July 2018 and 22 Aug. 2002]. 
 
The collection and processing of personal data from subjects enrolled in this study will be limited to 
those data that are necessary to fulfill the objectives of the study. These data must be collected and 
processed with adequate precautions to ensure confidentiality and compliance with applicable data 
privacy protection laws and regulations. 
  
Appropriate technical and organizational measures to protect the personal data against unauthorized 
disclosures or access, accidental or unlawful destruction, or accidental loss or alteration must be put 
in place. Sponsor and site personnel whose responsibilities require access to personal data agree to 
keep the identity of subjects confidential. 
The informed consent obtained from the subject includes explicit consent for the processing of 
personal data and for the investigator/institution to allow direct access to his or her original medical 
records (source data/documents) for study-related monitoring, audit, Ethics Committee review and 
regulatory inspection. This consent also addresses the transfer of the data to other entities, if 
applicable. 
 
Privacy and confidentiality of data generated in the future on stored samples will be protected by the 
same standards applicable to all other clinical data. 
Stored samples will be pseudonymized throughout the sample storage and analysis process and will 
not be labeled with personal identifiers. 
 
 
16.5. Liability and Insurance 
The sponsor has taken a no fault insurance for this study, in accordance with the relevant legislation 
(article 29, Belgian Law of May 7, 2004). 
Sponsor: Ghent University Hospital 
Insurance Details: Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty; Uitbreidingstraat 86, 2600 Berchem; Tel: +32 
33 04 16 00 
Polis number: BEL000862 
 
 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
52/55
16.6. End of Study Notification 
If all subjects have completed the study, a notification of the end of the study should be submitted to 
the (Central) Ethics Committee and FAMHP. This notification should be made within 90 days of the end 
of the clinical study. In case of early termination (definition in CT-1, 4.2), this is reduced to 15 days.


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
53/55
17. 
Publication policy 
 
This study will be registered at ClinicalStudies.gov, and results information from this study will be 
submitted to ClinicalStudies.gov. In addition, every attempt will be made to publish results in peer-
reviewed journals. 
18. 
Reference List 
 
References 
1. 
G. Dranoff, The Cloning of GM-CSF. J Immunol 198, 2519-2521 (2017). 
2. 
M. Guilliams et al., Alveolar macrophages develop from fetal monocytes that differentiate into 
long-lived cells in the first week of life via GM-CSF. J Exp Med 210, 1977-1992 (2013). 
3. 
T. Naessens et al., GM-CSF treatment prevents respiratory syncytial virus-induced pulmonary 
exacerbation responses in postallergic mice by stimulating alveolar macrophage maturation. J 
Allergy Clin Immunol 137, 700-709 e709 (2016). 
4. 
L. van de Laar et al., Yolk Sac Macrophages, Fetal Liver, and Adult Monocytes Can Colonize an 
Empty Niche and Develop into Functional Tissue-Resident Macrophages. Immunity 44, 755-768 
(2016). 
5. 
B. Mathias, B. E. Szpila, F. A. Moore, P. A. Efron, L. L. Moldawer, A Review of GM-CSF Therapy in 
Sepsis. Medicine (Baltimore) 94, e2044 (2015). 
6. 
J. J. Presneill, T. Harris, A. G. Stewart, J. F. Cade, J. W. Wilson, A randomized phase II trial of 
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor therapy in severe sepsis with respiratory 
dysfunction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 166, 138-143 (2002). 
7. 
R. Paine, 3rd et al., A randomized trial of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony 
stimulating factor for patients with acute lung injury. Crit Care Med 40, 90-97 (2012). 
8. 
S. Herold et al., Inhaled granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor as treatment of 
pneumonia-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 189, 609-
611 (2014). 
9. 
R. Tazawa et al., Inhaled granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor as therapy for 
pulmonary alveolar proteinosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 181, 1345-1354 (2010). 
10. 
R. Tazawa et al., Inhaled GM-CSF for Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis. N Engl J Med 381, 923-932 
(2019). 
11. 
Z. Xu et al., Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress 
syndrome. Lancet Respir Med,  (2020). 
12. 
E. S. Halstead et al., GM-CSF overexpression after influenza a virus infection prevents mortality 
and moderates M1-like airway monocyte/macrophage polarization. Respir Res 19, 3 (2018). 
13. 
T. M. Umstead et al., Lower respiratory tract delivery, airway clearance, and preclinical efficacy 
of inhaled GM-CSF in a postinfluenza pneumococcal pneumonia model. Am J Physiol Lung Cell 
Mol Physiol 318, L571-L579 (2020). 
14. 
B. Rosler, S. Herold, Lung epithelial GM-CSF improves host defense function and epithelial repair 
in influenza virus pneumonia-a new therapeutic strategy? Mol Cell Pediatr 3, 29 (2016). 
15. 
Y. Zhan, A. M. Lew, M. Chopin, The Pleiotropic Effects of the GM-CSF Rheostat on Myeloid Cell 
Differentiation and Function: More Than a Numbers Game. Front Immunol 10, 2679 (2019). 
16. 
C. Schneider et al., Frontline Science: Coincidental null mutation of Csf2ralpha in a colony of 
PI3Kgamma-/- mice causes alveolar macrophage deficiency and fatal respiratory viral infection. 
J Leukoc Biol 101, 367-376 (2017). 
17. 
B. Unkel et al., Alveolar epithelial cells orchestrate DC function in murine viral pneumonia. J Clin 
Invest 122, 3652-3664 (2012). 
18. 
F. F. Huang et al., GM-CSF in the lung protects against lethal influenza infection. Am J Respir Crit 
Care Med 184, 259-268 (2011). 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
54/55
19. 
G. M. Tse et al., Pulmonary pathological features in coronavirus associated severe acute 
respiratory syndrome (SARS). J. Clin. Pathol. 57, 260-265 (2004). 
 
 


SARPAC 
 
 
SARPAC Version  4.0 – Date 07 June 2021 
55/55
Appendices 
Appendix 1: USPI (US Package insert)