Conditions: Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
Allocation: RANDOMIZED | Intervention model: PARALLEL
Enrollment: 172
Healthy volunteers: no

Brief summary:
Low vitamin D levels have been shown to increase a person's risk of developing multiple sclerosis (MS), and patients with MS who have lower vitamin D levels are at increased risk of having attacks. However, it is not known if giving supplemental vitamin D to those with MS reduces the risk of attacks, and some research suggests that vitamin D could even be harmful to people with MS.

In this clinical trial, patients with relapsing-remitting MS will receive high-dose or low-dose oral vitamin D in addition to an approved therapy for MS, glatiramer acetate. Patients will be evaluated for two years, and the effect of high-dose vitamin D supplementation on the rate of MS attacks and on the number of new lesions and change in brain volume on MRI will be determined. Establishing this association will have major implications for the treatment of individuals with MS throughout the world.

Detailed description:
Vitamin D insufficiency has recently emerged as a risk factor for susceptibility to multiple sclerosis (MS). The investigator's observational data suggest that lower vitamin D levels in patients with relapsing-remitting MS are associated with a higher subsequent relapse rate. However, it is unknown if providing vitamin D supplementation to such patients leads to a reduction in the risk of an exacerbation. Historically, several nutritional supplements that appeared to be helpful in observational studies of various diseases did not demonstrate a benefit or were harmful in randomized trials. Further, a vitamin D response element was recently identified in the promoter region of Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)-DRB1\*15, the gene believed to be critical to initiating the autoimmune response in MS, and 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 increases the expression of the gene in vitro, suggesting that vitamin D supplementation could even be harmful in established MS.

This is a randomized, double-blind trial of high- versus low-dose vitamin D3 supplementation as an add-on to glatiramer acetate in 172 patients with relapsing-remitting MS. Subjects will be randomized to 600 IU or 5000 IU of oral vitamin D3 daily for two years. A standardized brain MRI scan will be performed at baseline and at the end of the first and second years. The impact of high-dose vitamin D supplementation on the number of relapses, the number of new lesions on brain MRI, and the change in brain volume will be assessed. Establishing these associations will have major implications for the treatment of patients with MS throughout the world and will provide rationale for further investigations of the role of vitamin D in the immunopathogenesis of MS, possibly leading to the identification of new therapeutic targets.

Arms:
arm 1: None arm 2: None

Interventions: intervention 1: Vitamin D3
Intervention descriptions: intervention 1: Patients will be assigned to low dose (600 IU/day) versus high-dose (5000 IU/day) of vitamin D3 as an add-on therapy to glatiramer acetate (Copaxone).

Protocol document:
ICF_002.pdf: 
 
Approved July 17, 2020  
 
Date: July 17, 2020 
Principal Investigator:  Ellen M. Mowry, M.D., M.C.R. 
Application No.: NA_00049137 
 
Page 1 of 12 
Combined Informed Consent/Authorization June 2015 Version 15 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RESEARCH PARTICIPANT INFORMED CONSENT AND PRIVACY 
AUTHORIZATION FORM 
 
Protocol Title:  
A randomized controlled trial of vitamin D supplementation in 
multiple sclerosis 
 
Application No.:    NA_00049137 
 
 
Sponsor: 
 
 
National Multiple Sclerosis Society 
 
Principal Investigator: Ellen M. Mowry, M.D., M.C.R. 
 
 
 
 
Department of Neurology  
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine 
 
 
 
 
Pathology 627 
600 N. Wolfe Street 
 
 
 
 
Baltimore, MD 21287 
Phone: 410-502-0675; Fax: 410-735-6521 
  
 
1. 
What you should know about this study:   
 You are being asked to join a research study. This consent form explains the research study and your 
part in it. Please read it carefully and take as much time as you need. Ask your study doctor or the 
study team to explain any words or information that you do not understand. 
 You are a volunteer.  If you join the study, you can change your mind later.  There will be no penalty 
or loss of benefits if you decide to quit the study.   
 During the study, we will tell you if we learn any new information that might affect whether you 
wish to continue to participate. 
 If we think your participation in this study may affect your clinical care, information about your 
study participation will be included in your medical record, which is used throughout Johns Hopkins.   
Doctors outside of Johns Hopkins may not have access to this information.  You can ask the research 
team to send this information to any of your doctors. 
 When Johns Hopkins is used in this consent form, it includes The Johns Hopkins University, The 
Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Howard County General Hospital, 
Johns Hopkins Community Physicians, Suburban Hospital, Sibley Memorial Hospital and All 
Children’s Hospital.  
 Biospecimens will be collected in this study.  Biospecimens may include any of the following: 
blood, tissue, saliva, urine, bone marrow, cells, etc.  Most biospecimens contain DNA, which is the 
genetic code for each person. 
If you are using Epic, you must fax a copy of 
this signed consent form to 410-367-7382. 
 
 
 
 
 
Patient I.D. Plate 


 
Approved July 17, 2020  
 
Date: July 17, 2020 
Principal Investigator:  Ellen M. Mowry, M.D., M.C.R. 
Application No.: NA_00049137 
 
Page 2 of 12 
Combined Informed Consent/Authorization June 2015 Version 15 
 A description of this clinical trial will be available on http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov, as required by 
U.S. Law.  This Web site will not include information that can identify you. At most, the Web site 
will include a summary of the results. You can search this Web site at any time.  
 If you would like to review the information for this study, or a summary of the results, ask the study 
team doctor for the ClinicalTrials.gov study registration number. 
 
2. 
Why is this research being done? 
This research is being done to study the effectiveness of vitamin D when given as an add-on to standard 
therapy with glatiramer acetate (Copaxone) to people with multiple sclerosis (MS).  
 
The use of vitamin D in this research study is investigational. The word “investigational” means that vitamin 
D is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of MS. The FDA is 
allowing the use of vitamin D in this study.  
 
Glatiramer acetate is FDA approved for the treatment of MS.  
 
Studies have suggested that people with MS who have lower vitamin D levels have more attacks of MS. In 
animals with an MS-like disease, giving vitamin D improves the disease. Some doctors of people with MS 
give them vitamin D already, although they don’t know if it is helpful or not. It is not known if giving extra 
vitamin D to people with MS helps make the disease better or not. The Institute of Medicine recommends 
that every person take 600 international units (IU) of vitamin D3 each day. The study doctors want to know 
if giving a higher dose of vitamin D3, 5,000 IU each day, results in lower risk of MS attack or worsening.  
 
Half of the people in this study will receive standard-dose vitamin D, and half will receive high-dose vitamin 
D. All participants in this study will receive called glatiramer acetate.  
 
People aged 18 to 50, with certain types of MS who have had recent MS activity (as determined by the study 
doctors), may join.  
 
People who have been exposed to certain MS medications or who have other contraindications will not be 
eligible.  
 
How many people will be in this study?  
One hundred seventy-two people will take part in the study at all sites. About 55 people will take part in this 
study at Johns Hopkins 
 
3. 
What will happen if you join this study? 
If you agree to be in this study, we will ask you to do the following things:  
 
Before you begin the main part of the study…  
You will need to have the following “screening” exams, tests or procedures to find out if you can be in the 
main part of the study:  
 
• Physical examination: You will have a physical examination, similar to those done for regular medical 
care. A neurological examination will also be performed.  
 
• Medical chart review: Your medical chart will be reviewed by the study doctors 
 
 


 
Approved July 17, 2020  
 
Date: July 17, 2020 
Principal Investigator:  Ellen M. Mowry, M.D., M.C.R. 
Application No.: NA_00049137 
 
Page 3 of 12 
Combined Informed Consent/Authorization June 2015 Version 15 
• Vitamin D assessment: In order to be enrolled in this study, you must have had a Vitamin D level checked 
within the previous 30 days. If your level is below 15 ng/ml (Vitamin D deficient), you will not be able to 
enroll in the study. If you wish to take Vitamin D supplementation and be retested and rescreened for 
enrollment, please discuss with your neurologist.  
 
• Blood draw: You will be asked to give a blood sample for laboratory tests. Less than 1 tablespoon of blood 
will be drawn by inserting a needle into a vein in your arm for these tests.  
 
• Genetic study: You will be asked to read a consent form for an additional genetic study. This study will be 
done to help doctors understand how vitamin D influences the immune system in MS. You are not required 
to participate in the genetic study.  
 
• Pregnancy testing: Because it is unknown if the drugs in the study can affect a fetus, pregnant women 
cannot participate in the study. A urine test will therefore be done, if you are a woman, to make sure you are 
not pregnant.  
 
• Starting glatiramer acetate: If the screening exams, tests or procedures show that you can be in the study, 
you will come in for an additional visit and start glatiramer acetate (Copaxone) injections for MS. This is a 
standard treatment for MS, and you will continue it during the study. If you take the glatiramer acetate for a 
month without difficulties, you will be eligible to continue for the main part of the study.  
 
During the main part of the study…  
If you are able and choose to continue to take part in the study, then you will be randomly assigned (by 
chance, like the flip of a coin) to receive either 5,000 IU daily (high dose) or 600 IU daily (standard dose) of 
oral vitamin D3.  
 
You will be asked to come every three months for a study visit. Some visits will be short (months 3, 6, 9, 15, 
21), lasting about 30 minutes. The baseline, year 1, and year 2 visits will be longest, lasting about 2 ½ to 3 
hours. The remainder of the visits will take about 1 to 1 ½ hours.  
 
During the visits, you will have the following tests and procedures done as detailed below:  
 
• Start taking vitamin D supplements: You will be given a sufficient supply of vitamin D3 capsules at each 
visit to last until the next visit. You will take one capsule each day. You will need to bring the pill bottle with 
you to each study visit.  
 
While in this study, you may not take any additional vitamin D supplements, nor may you take cod 
liver oil.  
 
• Update medical record: The study doctor or study coordinator will update your medical history and verify 
the medications you are taking. They will also check to see whether you have been able to take the 
medications associated with the study.  
 
• Physical examination: A physical examination will be conducted at the baseline visit and once a year 

• Neurological examination: A neurological examination will be conducted by the doctor at the baseline 
visit and once a year after that. Additional neurological and vision testing will be conducted by the study 
coordinator every six months.  
 
• Questionnaire: We will ask you to fill out questionnaires determining your sun exposure habits have been 
and about how you are feeling periodically.  


 
Approved July 17, 2020  
 
Date: July 17, 2020 
Principal Investigator:  Ellen M. Mowry, M.D., M.C.R. 
Application No.: NA_00049137 
 
Page 4 of 12 
Combined Informed Consent/Authorization June 2015 Version 15 
• Blood draw: You will be asked to give a blood sample every three months during the study. Up to 2 
tablespoons of blood will be drawn by inserting a needle into a vein in your arm for these tests. If you 
participate in the genetics study, approximately 3 tablespoons of blood will be taken at the baseline visit and 
2 tablespoons of blood will be taken at the year 1 and year 2 visits.  
 
• MRI: At the baseline study visit and at the year 1 and year 2 study visits, you will have an MRI scan of the 
brain. In order to ensure the MRI scan quality is sufficient, we will do a dry-run MRI scan on one individual. 
You may be asked to allow for your baseline scan to be used as the dry-run for quality purposes. This will 
not result in having an additional MRI. The MRI exam will take approximately 1 ½ hours. Prior to your 
exam, you will be asked to complete a standard questionnaire. The purpose of this questionnaire is to ensure 
that you are able to safely enter the MRI area. If you have a history of metal in your head or eyes, you cannot 
take part in this study.  
 
To start your MRI test, you will lie on a padded table. The table on which you are lying will be moved to the 
center of an MRI magnet, which looks like a long narrow tube. Even though the tube is open, some people 
feel confined in small places. If this bothers you, please notify the MRI staff. You may end your participation 
in this study at any time by telling the MRI staff. When MRI pictures are taken, radio-signals and magnetic 
fields are used. When this happens, it is normal for the MRI machine to make loud, banging, and clicking 
noises. You will be asked to wear earplugs or headphones for your comfort during the exam.  
 
During the exam, the MRI staff is able to see and hear you. You will be able to hear the MRI staff. The MRI 
staff will be talking to you throughout your MRI exam and may issue simple instructions regarding holding 
your breath, maintaining position, etc. You will generally be requested to lie perfectly still throughout the 
exam.  
 
At some point during your MRI exam the MRI staff will interrupt the scanning procedure in order to give a 
contrast agent. The agent is given through a needle placed (an IV) in your arm. The IV will be placed using 
standard hospital techniques.  
 
Incidental Findings  
The MRI you are having as part of this research study will be reviewed by a qualified person just as it would 
be if you were having the MRI as part of your routine medical care.  
 
There is a possibility that while reviewing MRI we may see an abnormality that we did not expect to see in 
this study. This is what is called an “incidental finding.”  
 
We will let you know if we see such an incidental finding. Depending on the type of incidental finding, we 
may contact you by mail or by phone. In the case of a potential serious emergency, someone may go to your 
home. 
 
A qualified person (usually a member of the research team) will talk to you if there is an incidental finding. 
You do not have an option to decline information about an incidental finding.  
 
If you want, we will give information about this incidental finding to your primary doctor or we will refer 
you to an appropriate doctor for further evaluation.  
-   An incidental finding may cause you to feel anxious.  
-   Since an incidental finding will be part of your medical record, you could face greater difficulty in getting              
health or life insurance.  
-   The costs for any care that will be needed to diagnose or treat an incidental finding would not be paid for 
by this research study. These costs would be your responsibility.  
 


 
Approved July 17, 2020  
 
Date: July 17, 2020 
Principal Investigator:  Ellen M. Mowry, M.D., M.C.R. 
Application No.: NA_00049137 
 
Page 5 of 12 
Combined Informed Consent/Authorization June 2015 Version 15 
• Communication with study coordinator: A study coordinator will call or e-mail you periodically to 
determine how you are doing with the study medicines, whether you are having new symptoms, and to 
remind you about appointments.  
 
• Additional visits: If you are having neurological symptoms that are concerning for an MS relapse or if you 
are having any symptoms concerning for side effects, you should report them to the study doctor within 48 
hours. You may be asked to come within the next three days for an examination. If so, you will be examined 
by the study doctors. If they think it is necessary, you may be given treatment to help with the relapse 
symptoms. The treatment would not be paid for by the study.  
 
• Communication with your doctors: We will inform your primary care doctor and your neurologist at the 
beginning of the study that you have enrolled in the study so that they know you are taking vitamin D and 
glatiramer acetate.  
 
During the COVID-19 pandemic, we may conduct some of the study assessments on an altered 
schedule or provide some of the assessments remotely, in accordance with institutional guidelines and 
the principal investigator’s goal to minimize risk. 
 
Storage and Use of Samples  
The study will involve storage of blood samples for future research at the baseline visit and at months 3, 6, 
12, 18, and 24. These samples will be used to test vitamin D levels at the end of the study and to see what 
effects vitamin D has on the immune system.  
 
How long will you be in the study?  
You will be in this study for two years. 
 
4. 
What are the risks or discomforts of the study? 
 
Vitamin D (cholecalciferol)  
Vitamin D toxicity can result from excess intake of this vitamin, and may lead to high calcium levels 
(hypercalcemia). Individuals at particular risk include those with hyperparathyroidism, kidney disease, 
sarcoidosis, or tuberculosis. Chronic hypercalcemia may lead to serious or even life-threatening 
complications, and should be managed by a physician. Early symptoms of hypercalcemia may include 
nausea, vomiting, and appetite/weight loss, followed by excess urination, excess thirst, weakness, fatigue, 
somnolence, headache, dry mouth, metallic taste, vertigo, ear ringing, and unsteadiness on your feet. Kidney 
function may become impaired, and kidney stones can occur. Treatment involves stopping the intake of 
vitamin D or calcium, and lowering the calcium levels under strict medical supervision, with frequent 
monitoring of calcium levels.  
 
Glatiramer acetate (Copaxone)  
The most common side effects are irritation, redness, itchiness, pain, or swelling at the injection sites. 
Bruising may occur with injections. There is a small risk of infection associated with the injections 
Some people rarely report a sensation of anxiety, agitation, flushing, rapid heartbeat, or chest pain upon 
injecting the medication. These symptoms should go away within minutes. A rare but serious risk is that of 
an allergic reaction, in which rash and trouble breathing can occur. Over the long term, changes in the skin 
can occur that make it look lumpy.  
 
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Examination  
The effects of magnetic fields in an MRI scanner have been extensively studied, and there are no known 
significant risks with an MRI exam. You may, however, be bothered by feelings of confinement 
(claustrophobia), and by the noise made by the magnet during the procedure. You will be asked to wear 


 
Approved July 17, 2020  
 
Date: July 17, 2020 
Principal Investigator:  Ellen M. Mowry, M.D., M.C.R. 
Application No.: NA_00049137 
 
Page 6 of 12 
Combined Informed Consent/Authorization June 2015 Version 15 
earplugs or earphones while in the magnet. You may not participate in this study if you have a pacemaker, an 
implanted defibrillator or certain other implanted electronic or metallic devices. It is important for you to 
advise the MRI staff if you have had brain surgery for a cerebral aneurysm, or if you have implanted medical 
or metallic devices, shrapnel, or other metal, such as metal in your eye.  
 
MRI Contrast Agent  
The contrast agent you will receive is FDA-approved and used routinely for MRI exams. It contains a 
material called gadolinium. The injection of contrast may cause discomfort, tingling or warmth in the lips, 
metallic taste in the mouth, tingling in the arm, nausea, or headache. These symptoms occur in less than 1% 
(less than 1 in 100) of people and go away quickly.  
 
There is a small risk of an allergic reaction to gadolinium; however, a severe allergic reaction occurs in less 
than one in 300,000 people.  
 
Insertion of the needle (small plastic tube) to give you gadolinium may cause minor pain, bruising and/or 
infection at the injection site.  
 
People with severe kidney failure who receive gadolinium are at risk of developing Nephrogenic Systemic 
Fibrosis/Nephrogenic Fibrosing Dermopathy (NSF/NFD). This disease causes fibrosis, which is the 
formation of too much connective tissue in the skin and internal organs throughout the body. People develop 
skin thickening that may prevent bending and extending joints, resulting in decreased movement of the 
joints. The skin changes can cause feelings of burning, itching and pain that can be severe. In addition, 
people may experience fibrosis that spreads to other parts of the body such as the diaphragm, muscles in the 
thigh and lower abdomen, and the lining of blood vessels in the lung. NSF/NFD is a serious progressive 
disease and can result in death.  
 
If you have severe kidney failure and receive gadolinium, the risk of developing NSF/NFD is 1-5 % (up to 1 
to 5 per 100 people). We may require a blood sample (about 1 tablespoon) to check your kidney function 
before you receive gadolinium contrast for your MRI.  
 
Please notify a doctor, nurse or technologist if you are allergic to gadolinium, if you have any kidney 
problems, or if you experience any of these or other side effects. If you do not know if you have kidney 
problems or if you do not know if your kidney problems fall in the severe category, you can ask the principal 
investigator of your study to give you this information.  
 
A doctor will be available during the procedure to administer any necessary care if side effects do occur, and 
to determine when or if the injection of the gadolinium should be stopped.  
 
Blood Draw 
Taking blood may cause discomfort, bleeding or bruising where the needle enters the body. In rare cases, it 
may result in fainting. There is a small risk of infection.  
 
Confidentiality  
Despite the protections and the best efforts of the research team, there may still be a risk if information about 
you were to become known to people outside of this study.  
 
Questionnaires  
You may get tired or bored when we are asking you questions or you are completing questionnaires. You do 
not have to answer any question you do not want to answer.  
 
There may be side effects and discomforts that are not yet known. 


 
Approved July 17, 2020  
 
Date: July 17, 2020 
Principal Investigator:  Ellen M. Mowry, M.D., M.C.R. 
Application No.: NA_00049137 
 
Page 7 of 12 
Combined Informed Consent/Authorization June 2015 Version 15 
5. 
Are there risks related to pregnancy? 
There are no known risks of vitamin D or glatiramer acetate in pregnancy. Glatiramer acetate is used by 
some doctors during pregnancy, and vitamin D has been shown to be safe for pregnant women. Nonetheless, 
these medications will be stopped for anyone who becomes pregnant in the research study as a safety 
precaution.  
 
All women of childbearing potential will be tested for pregnancy at each study visit by a urine test.  
 
All women in the research study will be asked to use one or more forms of birth control if of childbearing 
potential.  
 
MRI imaging is not known to cause risk to the developing fetus though there may be risks that are not known 
at this time. MRI contrast is known to cross the placenta and subsequent risks to the developing fetus are not 
known.  
 
This research may hurt an embryo or fetus in ways we do not currently know. 
 
6. 
Are there benefits to being in the study? 
There may or may not be a direct benefit to you from being in this study. However, you may help future 
people with MS know if vitamin D makes the disease better 
 
7. 
What are your options if you do not want to be in the study? 
You do not have to participate in the study. If you decide not to join this study, other options are available. 
You do not have to join this study to get treatment. Other treatments include being prescribed a treatment 
through your regular neurologist or joining another research study, if you qualify. You could also take 
vitamin D without joining the study. 
 
You do not have to join this study.  If you do not join, your care at Johns Hopkins will not be affected. 
 
8. 
Will it cost you anything to be in this study? 
You will receive a separate Insurance and Research Participant Financial Responsibility Information 
Sheet (Sheet).  
 
This Sheet will give you the following information: 
 The procedures, tests, drugs or devices that are part of this research and that will be paid for by 
the study (no cost to you).   
 The procedures, tests, drugs or devices that will be billed to you and/or your health insurer.  If 
you have health insurance, you will be responsible for any co-pays or deductibles not covered by 
your insurance.  
 
9. 
Will you be paid if you join this study? 
 
No. 
 
10. 
Can you leave the study early? 
 You can agree to be in the study now and change your mind later. 
 If you wish to stop, please tell us right away. 
 Leaving this study early will not stop you from getting regular medical care.  


 
Approved July 17, 2020  
 
Date: July 17, 2020 
Principal Investigator:  Ellen M. Mowry, M.D., M.C.R. 
Application No.: NA_00049137 
 
Page 8 of 12 
Combined Informed Consent/Authorization June 2015 Version 15 
 If you leave the study early, Johns Hopkins may use or give out your health information that it 
already has if the information is needed for this study or any follow-up activities. 
 
11. 
Why might we take you out of the study early? 
You may be taken out of the study if: 
 Staying in the study would be harmful. 
 You need treatment not allowed in the study. 
 You fail to follow instructions. 
 You become pregnant. 
 The study is cancelled. 
 There may be other reasons to take you out of the study that we do not know at this time.  
 
If you are taken out of the study early, Johns Hopkins may use or give out your health information that it 
already has if the information is needed for this study or any follow-up activities 
 
12. 
How will your privacy be protected? 
We have rules to protect information about you.  Federal and state laws and the federal medical Privacy 
Rule also protect your privacy.  By signing this form you provide your permission, called your 
“authorization,” for the use and disclosure of information protected by the Privacy Rule. 
 
The research team working on the study will collect information about you.  This includes things learned 
from the procedures described in this consent form.  They may also collect other information including 
your name, address, date of birth, and information from your medical records. This could include 
information about HIV, drug, alcohol or STD treatment and genetic test results, or mental health 
treatment. 
 
The research team will know your identity and that you are in the research study.  Other people at Johns 
Hopkins, particularly your doctors, may also see or give out your information. We make this information 
available to your doctors for your safety.   
 
People outside of Johns Hopkins may need to see or receive your information for this study.  Examples 
include government agencies (such as the Food and Drug Administration), safety monitors, other sites in 
the study and companies that sponsor the study.   If you are in a cancer study that receives federal 
funding, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) now requires that we report identifiable information (such 
as, zip code) about your participation.  You may contact the NCI if you have questions about how this 
information is used. 
 
We cannot do this study without your authorization to use and give out your information.  You do not 
have to give us this authorization.  If you do not, then you may not join this study. 
 
We will use and disclose your information only as described in this form and in our Notice of Privacy 
Practices; however, people outside Johns Hopkins who receive your information may not be covered by 
this promise or by the federal Privacy Rule.  We try to make sure that everyone who needs to see your 
information keeps it confidential – but we cannot guarantee that your information will not be re-
disclosed. 
 
 


 
Approved July 17, 2020  
 
Date: July 17, 2020 
Principal Investigator:  Ellen M. Mowry, M.D., M.C.R. 
Application No.: NA_00049137 
 
Page 9 of 12 
Combined Informed Consent/Authorization June 2015 Version 15 
The use and disclosure of your information has no time limit. You may revoke (cancel) your permission 
to use and disclose your information at any time by notifying the Principal Investigator of this study by 
phone or in writing.  If you contact the Principal Investigator by phone, you must follow-up with a 
written request that includes the study number and your contact information.  The Principal 
Investigator’s name, address, phone and fax information are on page one of this consent form.  
 
If you do cancel your authorization to use and disclose your information, your part in this study will end 
and no further information about you will be collected. Your revocation (cancellation) would not affect 
information already collected in the study, or information we disclosed before you wrote to the Principal 
Investigator to cancel your authorization. 
 
13. 
Will the study require any of your other health care providers to share your health 
information with the researchers of this study?  
As a part of this study, the researchers may ask to see your health care records from your other health care 
providers.  
 
You will be asked to give us a list of other health care providers, particularly the neurologist that you 
use.  
 
14. 
What treatment costs will be paid if you are injured in this study?  
Johns Hopkins does not have a program to pay you if you are hurt or have other bad results from being in the 
study. However, medical care at Johns Hopkins is open to you as it is to all sick or injured people. 
 
The costs for any treatment or hospital care you receive as the result of a study-related injury that are not 
covered by a health insurer will be billed to you. 
 
By signing this form you will not give up any rights you have to seek compensation for injury.  
 
15. 
What other things should you know about this research study? 
a. What is the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and how does it protect you?  
The Johns Hopkins Medicine IRB is made up of: 
 Doctors 
 Nurses 
 Ethicists 
 Non-scientists 
 and people from the local community.  
 
The IRB reviews human research studies. It protects the rights and welfare of the people taking part 
in those studies.  You may contact the IRB if you have questions about your rights as a participant or 
if you think you have not been treated fairly.  The IRB office number is 410-955-3008. You may 
also call this number for other questions, concerns or complaints about the research.  
 
When the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Institutional Review Board (IRB) reviews a study at 
another site, that site (institution) is solely responsible for the safe conduct of the study and for 
following the protocol approved by the Johns Hopkins IRB.   
 
If you are a participant at Anne Arundel Medical Center, you may contact the AAMC IRB office at 443-
481-1320. 
 


 
Approved July 17, 2020  
 
Date: July 17, 2020 
Principal Investigator:  Ellen M. Mowry, M.D., M.C.R. 
Application No.: NA_00049137 
 
Page 10 of 12 
Combined Informed Consent/Authorization June 2015 Version 15 
b. What do you do if you have questions about the study?    
Call the principal investigator, Dr. Ellen Mowry at 410-502-0675. If you wish, you may contact the 
principal investigator by letter at or by fax. The address and fax number are on page one of this consent 
form. If you cannot reach the principal investigator or wish to talk to someone else, call the IRB office at 
410-955-3008.  
 
If you are taking part at Anne Arundel Medical Center, call Dr. Arash Farhadi at 301-922-6683. 
 
c. What should you do if you are injured or ill as a result of being in this study? 
Call the study doctor, Dr. Ellen Mowry at 410-502-0675 if you have an urgent medical problem related 
to your taking part in this study. If you cannot reach the study doctor or wish to talk to someone else, call 
the IRB office at 410-955-3008.  
 
For 24 hour assistance please contact the Johns Hopkins Hospital Page Operator which at (410) 955-
4331 (http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/uhs/after_hours.html) and ask to be connected to Dr. Mowry. 
  
If you are taking part at Anne Arundel Medical Center and you have a medical problem related to your 
taking part in this study, call Dr. Arash Farhadi at 301-922-6683. If this doctor is not available, the 
operator will page the “on call physician.” 
 
d. What happens to Data and Biospecimens collected in the study?  
Johns Hopkins and our research partners work to understand and cure diseases. The biospecimens 
and/or data you provide are important to this effort. 
 
If you join this study, you should understand that you will not own your biospecimens or data, and 
should researchers use them to create a new product or idea, you will not benefit financially.  
 
With appropriate protections for privacy, Johns Hopkins may share your biospecimens and 
information with our research sponsors and partners.    
 
 
 
 


 
Approved July 17, 2020  
 
Date: July 17, 2020 
Principal Investigator:  Ellen M. Mowry, M.D., M.C.R. 
Application No.: NA_00049137 
 
Page 11 of 12 
Combined Informed Consent/Authorization June 2015 Version 15 
16. 
What does your signature on this consent form mean? 
 
Your signature on this form means that: 
 you understand the information given to you in this form  
 you accept the provisions in the form 
 you agree to join the study  
 
You will not give up any legal rights by signing this consent form.  
 
 
 
WE WILL GIVE YOU A COPY OF THIS SIGNED AND DATED CONSENT FORM 
 
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 
Signature of Participant                                                                       (Print Name)                                                 Date/Time  
 
 
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 
Signature of Person Obtaining Consent                                              (Print Name)                                               
 
Date/Time 
 
 
I have received the separate Insurance and Research Participant Financial Responsibility Information Sheet.   
 
 
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 
Signature of Participant, LAR or Parent/Guardian                               (Print Name)                                                        Date/Time 
 
 
NOTE: A COPY OF THE SIGNED, DATED CONSENT FORM MUST BE KEPT BY THE PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR; A COPY MUST BE GIVEN 
TO THE PARTICIPANT; IF YOU ARE USING EPIC FOR THIS STUDY A COPY MUST BE FAXED TO 410-367-7382; IF YOU ARE NOT USING EPIC 
A COPY MUST BE PLACED IN THE PARTICIPANT’S MEDICAL RECORD (UNLESS NO MEDICAL RECORD EXISTS OR WILL BE CREATED).  
 
ONLY CONSENT FORMS THAT INCLUDE THE JOHNS HOPKINS MEDICINE LOGO CAN BE USED TO OBTAIN THE CONSENT OF RESEARCH 
PARTICIPANTS. 
 
 
 


 
Approved July 17, 2020  
 
Date: July 17, 2020 
Principal Investigator:  Ellen M. Mowry, M.D., M.C.R. 
Application No.: NA_00049137 
 
Page 12 of 12 
Combined Informed Consent/Authorization June 2015 Version 15 
 
 
DOCUMENTATION OF PHYSICIAN/MID-LEVEL PROVIDER CONSENT 
 
My signature below indicates that I have discussed the risks, benefits, and alternatives, answered any 
questions, and believe the participant is able to make an informed choice to join the study. 
 
 
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 
Signature of Physician/Mid-Level Provider                     (Print Name)                                                                     
 
Date/Time   
 
 
 
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 
Signature of Participant                                                    (Print Name)                                                                    
 
Date/Time     
 
 
NOTE: A COPY OF THE SIGNED, DATED CONSENT FORM MUST BE KEPT BY THE PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR; A COPY MUST BE GIVEN 
TO THE PARTICIPANT; IF YOU ARE USING EPIC FOR THIS STUDY A COPY MUST BE FAXED TO 410-367-7382; IF YOU ARE NOT USING EPIC 
A COPY MUST BE PLACED IN THE PARTICIPANT’S MEDICAL RECORD (UNLESS NO MEDICAL RECORD EXISTS OR WILL BE CREATED).  
 
 
ONLY CONSENT FORMS THAT INCLUDE THE JOHNS HOPKINS MEDICINE LOGO CAN BE USED TO OBTAIN THE CONSENT OF RESEARCH 
PARTICIPANTS. 
 

Prot_000.pdf: 
Official Title: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Vitamin D Supplementation in Multiple 
Sclerosis 
 
Principal Investigator: Ellen M. Mowry, MD, MCR 
 
NCT01490502 
 
March 29, 2022 


1 
 
Protocol Title: A randomized controlled trial of vitamin D in multiple sclerosis 
 
Date: 03/29/2022 
 
Version: 2.0 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


2 
 
Synopsis 
Protocol Title: A randomized controlled trial of vitamin D in multiple sclerosis 
Rationale: Vitamin D insufficiency is a risk factor for multiple sclerosis (MS),1  but it is 
uncertain if it also influences the prognosis of those with established disease.  While vitamin D 
supplementation improves outcomes in an animal model of MS,2, 3 human studies are limited.  A 
vitamin D response element was recently identified in the promoter region of HLA-DRB1*15, a 
gene believed to be critical to MS risk, and 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 increases its expression 
in vitro.10 As such, vitamin D supplementation could even be harmful in established MS.4, 5   
Our observational data show that vitamin D levels are inversely associated with subsequent 
relapse rate.  However, other supplements that appeared to be helpful for other health conditions 
in observational studies had null or harmful effects in randomized trials.12-14  We propose a 
randomized controlled trial of high- versus low-dose vitamin D3 as an add-on to glatiramer 
acetate in patients with relapsing-remitting (RR) MS. 
Study Design: Multicenter, randomized controlled, double-blind study of vitamin D3 as add-on 
therapy to glatiramer acetate 
Study Location: University of California, San Francisco; Johns Hopkins University; University 
of Pennsylvania; Washington University St. Louis; Oregon Health & Science University; Mt. 
Sinai School of Medicine; Cleveland Clinic; Yale University; Columbia University; Swedish 
Medical Center; University of Virginia; University of Rochester; Stanford University; Anne 
Arundel Medical Center; University of Massachusetts, Worcester and Dignity Health Medical 
Foundation.  
Study Objectives: 
• To determine if high-dose versus low-dose vitamin D3 supplementation as an add-on to 
first-line therapy for RRMS is associated with a decrease in the proportion of patients 
who experience a relapse. 
• To determine if high-dose vitamin D3 as an add-on to first-line therapy for MS is 
associated with a decrease in new T2 lesions in patients with RRMS.   
• To determine if high-dose vitamin D3 supplementation as an add-on to first-line therapy 
for MS is associated with a reduced rate of neurodegeneration. 
Number of Planned Subjects: 172 
Study Population: RRMS subjects (MAGNIMS criteria) 9, aged 18 to 50 years, with a baseline 
Expanded Disability Status score between 0.0 and 4.0 (and disease duration  ≤ 10 years if 
MAGNIMS and McDonald RRMS, or ≤ 1 year if McDonald CIS meeting MAGNIMS RRMS 
criteria based on brain MRI).  Patients who meet the McDonald RRMS criteria (rather than 
McDonald CIS that is now classified as MAGNIMS MS): must have had one clinical attack in 


3 
 
past two years AND at least one new silent T2 or gadolinium-enhancing lesion on brain MRI 
within the past year, or have had two clinical attacks in past two years, one of which occurred in 
the past year.  Patients must have no prior history of treatment with rituximab, any 
chemotherapeutic agent, or total lymphoid irradiation.  No treatment in the past six months with 
natalizumab, fingolimod, or fumarate.  If patient has received glatiramer acetate, they have not 
been exposed to more than three months of treatment, and most recent treatment occurred greater 
than one month ago.  Patients have received no treatment with other investigational therapies for 
MS and can’t be receiving regular corticosteroids (e.g. scheduled pulse steroids or daily oral 
steroids).  Patients must not have used interferon beta therapy or steroids for one month prior to 
screening and can’t have used more than 1,000 IU supplemental vitamin D3 (in addition to 
multivitamin) daily in the three months prior to screening.  The 25-hydroxyvitamin D level must 
be ≥ 15 ng/mL within 30 days of screening; if not available, this will be added to the screening 
visit labs.  Patients who have a level < 15 ng/mL may be referred back to their neurologist for 
appropriate repletion.  Such patients may be rescreened for the vitamin D trial and enrolled 
successfully if all eligibility criteria are met at that time. 
Treatment Groups: There will be a one-month run-in in which eligible subjects after screening 
will initiate subcutaneous glatiramer acetate 20 mg daily for one month.  Those who are 
compliant (≤ 3 missed doses in one month, assessed at the baseline visit) will be randomized 
(1:1) to high (5000 IU/day) or low (600 IU/day) dose oral vitamin D3.  Randomization will be 
stratified by center and schedule for each center will be based on randomly permuted blocks of 
varied size to ensure proper balance of treatment assignments within each center. Subjects will 
receive 1 tablet of vitamin D3 daily and will also receive subcutaneous glatiramer acetate 20 mg 
daily:  
 
vitamin D3 600 


4 
 
Subjects who experience excessive activity (clinically, on MRI, or both) may be offered a switch 
from glatiramer acetate to another disease-modifying therapy for MS at the discretion of the 
treating physician but will remain in the study.  This treatment will not be covered by the study.   
Visit Schedule: 
1st Year of Study 
• Screening Visit 
• Run-In Visit 
• Baseline Visit  
• Visits 1 through 4 
• Premature Study Withdrawal Visit (if necessary) 
• Unscheduled Relapse Visit (if necessary; within 5 days of onset of suspected 
relapse) 
2nd Year of Study 
• Visits 5 through 8 
• Premature Study Withdrawal Visit (if necessary) 
• Unscheduled Relapse Visit (if necessary; within 5 days of onset of suspected 
relapse) 
Additional Subject Contact 
Patients will be contacted by the study coordinator at months 1 and 2, six weeks after the 
month 3 visit and every three months thereafter (alternating with study visits) to assess 
for potential new symptoms and encourage compliance, using a standardized transcript.   
Study Visit Window 
All study visits will occur within 10 days of the scheduled visit.  Visits that occur outside 
of the window will be recorded. 
After we re-open from the COVID-19 pandemic, we will continuously assess whether there 
appear to be any impending COVID-19-related shutdowns or serious concerns that may prevent 
in-person study visits. During and after the COVID-19 pandemic, investigators will, at their 
discretion, be allowed to relax study windows as much as is needed in order to minimize risk to 
participants while also securing outcomes needed for the trial, such as end-of-study assessments. 
Questionnaires, although quite short, may be administered remotely at the discretion of the site 
PI. 
In order to minimize the need for research-only in-person visits, telemedicine visits may be 
substituted for in-person clinical trial visits or portions of clinical trial visits where determined to 


5 
 
be appropriate and where determined by the investigator not to increase the participant’s risks. 
Prior to initiating telemedicine for study visits the study team will explain to the participant, what 
a telemedicine visit entails and confirm that the study participant is in agreement and able to 
proceed with this method. Telemedicine acknowledgement will be obtained in accordance with 
the Guidance for Use of Telemedicine in Research. In the event telemedicine is not deemed 
feasible, the study visit will proceed as an in-person visit. Telemedicine visits will be conducted 
using HIPAA compliant method approved by the Health System and within licensing 
restrictions.  
Efficacy Assessments:  Clinical relapse assessments, EDSS, MSFC, MRI brain with and 
without gadolinium, low-contrast visual acuity (2.5% Sloan chart, measured binocularly), health-
related quality of life (FAMS) 
Safety Assessments: Patients will have screening laboratory tests (BUN, creatinine, calcium, 
AST, ALT, and urine pregnancy).  Calcium and pregnancy tests will occur during the study.  
Suicidality assessment will occur every 3 months, per the FDA. 
Assessment of last menstrual period and ordering of urine pregnancy tests for unexplained gaps 
will take the place of urine pregnancy tests during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.  
Additional Assessments: 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels will be measured from samples at 
baseline and at months 3, 6, 12, and 24 (Heartland Laboratories, Ames, IA) as a batch at the end 
of the study to ensure the best possibility reproducibility.  Serum will also be stored for use in 
immunologic studies as well as genetic studies. 
Co-Consent for Genetics Study: All subjects will be asked at the screening visit to participate 
in a parallel study in which genotyping and gene expression analyses will be conducted using 
samples provided at study visits, as described in a related protocol.  Participation in this study 
will be optional. 
Statistical Analysis: 
Primary Outcome: The proportion of subjects in each group who have had a relapse at 
two years 
Secondary Outcomes 
Clinical: annualized relapse rate; number of relapses requiring treatment with 
high-dose steroids; time to first on-study relapse; occurrence of sustained clinical 
disease progression on EDSS; change in MSFC score; change in low-contrast 
letter acuity; change in Functional Assessment in MS score  


6 
 
MRI: number of new or enlarging T2-weighted hyperintense MRI lesions; change 
in T2 lesion volume, percentage brain volume, normalized gray matter volume, 
and cortical thickness 
Primary Predictor: Treatment group (high- versus low-dose vitamin D3) 
Secondary Predictor: Change in 25-hydroxyvitamin D level (baseline to month 24) 
Study Activities: 
 
Screen 
Run-
In 
Baseline Months 
3, 9, 
15, 21 
Months 
6, 12, 
18 
Month 
24 
Relapse 
Visit 
Informed consent 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Co-enrollment in 
genetics study 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Medical history and 
medication check 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Clinical exam 
X 
 
 
 
 
X 
X§§ 
Vital signs 
 
 
X 
 
X*** 
X 
X§§ 
EDSS 
X 
 
X 
 
X*** 
X 
X 
MSFC 
X 
X 
X 
 
X 
X 
 
MRI 
 
 
X 
 
X*** 
X 
 
Suicidality assessment 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Low-contrast acuity 
 
 
X 
 
X 
X 
 
FAMS 
 
 
X 
 
X 
X 
 
Sun exposure survey 
 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
Skin tone card 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
Fitzpatrick skin tone 
survey^ 
 
 
X 
 
 
X 
 
Sodium screener 
 
 
 
 
X*** 
X 
 
Screening labs 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Urine pregnancy test 
 
 
X 
X 
X 
 
 
Calcium 
 
 
 
X* 
X 
X 
 
Vitamin D level  
X 
 
X 
X** 
X 
X 
 
Blood storage 
 
 
X 
 
X*** 
X 
 
Dispensing study drug  
 
 
X 
X 
X 
 
 
Compliance check  
 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
Relapse verification 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Evaluation of blind 
 
 
 
 
 
X 
 
*months 3 and 9; **month 3; ***month 12; §§ if clinically indicated; ^ slightly different version 
given at baseline and at final study visit; please consult the MOP 
 
 


7 
 
INTRODUCTION 
Vitamin D deficiency is associated with a greater risk of MS.  MS prevalence increases as 
distance from the equator increases,10, 11 and those who migrate adopt the risk of the new area. 10, 
12-14  Ultraviolet radiation (the main source of vitamin D) and skin cancer are inversely correlated 
with MS risk.11, 16-20  In a nested case-control study, higher vitamin D levels conferred a lower 
subsequent risk of MS.1  In experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), a mouse model 
of MS, ultraviolet radiation or 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 prevents the onset of the disease.2, 3, 21 
Vitamin D is a potent immunomodulator.  1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 downregulates dendritic 
cells.22, 23  It prevents the proliferation of and enhances apoptosis of activated B cells.24  In mice, 
vitamin D receptor agonists reduce IL-17,25 a modulator of EAE,26 and inhibit proinflammatory 
TH1 cells.23  Vitamin D receptor agonists also promote CD4+CD25+TREG cells.27, 28  These data 
suggest that vitamin D plays key roles in innate and acquired immunity.29  In EAE, giving 
vitamin D improves recovery 2, 3, 30-32 and reduces inflammation.30, 33   
It is not known if vitamin D supplementation modifies the course of MS.  Our preliminary 
data show a strong inverse association between vitamin D levels and subsequent relapse rates; 
these results were recently replicated in an adult MS cohort.34, 35  Older pilot studies did not 
confirm the effect of vitamin D in MS, perhaps because they were small or non-randomized.36-38  
A recent pilot study randomized 49 MS patients to very high-dose versus discretionary vitamin 
D3 (up to 4,000 IU/day) for one year and found a trend for better outcomes in the intervention 
group.  However, subjects were not blinded or otherwise treated identically (limited follow-up of 
controls; actual control use of vitamin D not recorded).39  Vitamin D increased the expression of 
HLA-DRB1*15 in vitro, presumably by acting on the concomitantly-reported vitamin D response 
element in the gene’s promoter, suggesting that vitamin D could even worsen MS.4  Moreover, 
other supplements that seemed beneficial for other diseases in observational studies had a null or 
negative impact in randomized trials.6-8 
Vitamin D may be neuroprotective.  As the duration of RRMS increases, many patients 
develop insidious disability progression, thought to be caused by neurodegeneration (the likely 
cause of volume loss, or atrophy, on brain MRI).40, 41-48  Loss of normalized gray matter volume 
is associated with later disability, making it an attractive outcome measure for trials.40, 49-54 
Vitamin D and its receptor are widespread in the central nervous system.55, 56  In cell culture 
excitotoxicity models, vitamin D was neuroprotective.57-61  While there are no published data in 
MS, 1, 25 dihydroxyvitamin D3 reduces activated T cell-mediated axonal damage in EAE.62 
 
 
 


8 
 
OBJECTIVES 
Primary Objective 
• To determine if high-dose versus low-dose vitamin D3 supplementation as an add-on to 
first-line therapy for RRMS is associated with a decrease in the proportion of patients 
who experience a relapse. 
Secondary Objectives 
The secondary objectives of the study are to determine if high-dose vitamin D3 as an add-on to   
first-line therapy for MS, as compared to low-dose vitamin D3, is associated with: 
• a decrease in new T2 lesions in patients with RRMS.   
• a reduction in the loss of brain volume (whole brain; normalized gray matter; cortical 
thickness) 
• a lower annualized relapse rate in the two-year study 
• a reduction in the number of relapses requiring intravenous steroid therapy 
• a prolongation of the time to the first relapse 
• a reduction in the occurrence of sustained EDSS progression 
• less worsening of disability as assessed by the MSFC  
• less worsening of low-contrast letter acuity 
• better health-related quality of life 
We will also determine if high-dose vitamin D3 as an add-on to first-line therapy for MS, as 
compared to low-dose vitamin D3, is associated with the same effects as a function of time 
except for EDSS endpoint, as progression can only be confirmed after two years. 
 
STUDY DESIGN 
Overview 
This is a prospective, double-blind, randomized multi-center trial of high- versus low-dose 
vitamin D3 as add-on therapy to a standard therapy for RRMS, glatiramer acetate.  Subjects will 
be randomized (1:1 ratio) to 600 IU or 5000 IU of oral vitamin D3 daily for two years. The 
primary outcome will be the proportion of patients that experiences a clinical relapse during the 
study.   
All study staff will be blinded to the treatment assignment; only in an emergency will unblinding 
occur.  The study drug packages will be identical.  Continental Vitamin Company (Los Angeles, 
CA) will manufacture capsules identical in size, color, odor, and taste.  At the end of the study, 
subjects and coordinators will be asked to guess which group they were in. 


9 
 
Subjects who experience two or more relapses or who have excessive brain MRI activity at year 
1 (or a combination; see “Study Treatment” section) may be offered a switch from glatiramer 
acetate to another disease-modifying therapy for MS at the discretion of the treating physician 
but will remain in the study.  This treatment will not be covered by the study.   For confirmed 
relapses, subjects may be offered a three-day course of high-dose intravenous 
methylprednisolone if deemed necessary by the treating physician.  The cost of steroid treatment 
will not be covered by the study.    
Overall Study Duration and Follow-Up 
For the first year, the study will consist of the screening, run-in, and baseline visits, followed by 
visits at months 3, 6, 9, and 12 (visits 1-4).  The second year will consist of visits at months 15, 
18, 21, and 24 (visits 5-8).  Visits 1, 3, 5, and 7 will be abbreviated visits at which the treating 
physician and examining physician do not need to perform any assessments.  Premature 
withdrawal visits and unscheduled relapse visits will be conducted as needed.  The unscheduled 
relapse visit may be merged with a scheduled visit if the two visits coincide and neither visit will 
fall out of window. 
Efficacy Measures 
Relapse: Relapses are new or recurring symptoms referable to the central nervous system lasting 
for at least 24 hours after a remission of 30 days or more since the prior event.  Pseudo-
exacerbations (worsening in the context of a fever/infection) will be excluded.  Relapses must be 
accompanied by worsening of the EDSS (≥ 0.5 points) or in the Functional Systems (FS) scales 
(2 points on at least one FS scale or 1 point ≥ 2 FS scales), as determined by the examining 
neurologist.63  Patients will be asked to report new symptoms within 48 hours of onset.  Those 
with suspected relapses will be assessed within five days of onset.  For confirmed relapses, 
subjects may be offered a three-day course of high-dose steroids if deemed necessary by the 
treating physician.  The cost of steroid treatment will not be covered by the study.  MRIs will be 
delayed for one month after the last date of steroid use. 
We will also document probable relapses.  These relapses include new or recurring symptoms 
referable to the central nervous system lasting for at least 24 hours after a remission of 30 days or 
more since the prior event.  Pseudo-exacerbations (worsening in the context of a fever/infection) 
will be excluded.  However, there will not be a requirement for an accompanying change on 
EDSS or FS scales.  While relapse criteria are very stringent for many drug trials, relapses in 
practice may not involve a new examination finding (e.g. mild optic neuritis; sensory changes) 
Disability Progression: A patient will be considered to have had sustained progression of 
disability if there is an increase in the EDSS score at month 12 by at least 1.0 point that is 
confirmed on the final examination, as performed by the examining neurologist, one year later. 


10 
 
MS Functional Composite (MSFC): The MSFC will be done by a research coordinator at the 
screening, run-in, and baseline visits and then every six months until month 24.  The MSFC will 
also be performed at visits for relapses.64   
Vision: Binocular low contrast letter acuity will be assessed by 2.5% Sloan charts.65   
MRI: MRI scans will be performed at 3T and processed at baseline, month 12, and month 24. 
Since they are considered standard of care, the MRI scans will be read locally by the attending 
radiologist at each study site, and the local readings will be used for making decisions about 
changing therapy if disease activity is judged to be excessive, as detailed above, as well as for 
identifying and acting on incidental findings, as detailed in the IRB application.  Prior to June 1, 
2015, MRIs will be sent to Dr. Daniel Pelletier’s laboratory at Yale University, which will 
perform MRI post-processing and analysis; laboratory members will be blinded to treatment 
group and disease course.  In order to ensure the MRI scan quality is sufficient, each site will do 
a dry-run MRI scan on one individual.  Since the MRI protocol being used is a standard clinical 
MS scan, the dry-run MRI may be conducted on a patient in the MS clinic who is already 
planning to have a follow-up scan as part of their routine clinical care.  The scan will be loaded 
on a CD and sent to Yale University for approval.    The dry-run MRI will be de-identified.  For 
routine study participants, at Johns Hopkins, the study scans will be de-identified.  If other sites 
do not wish to de-identify their scans, then the sites must provide proof to the study managers 
and to the Yale IRB that both their IRB-approved protocol and the IRB-approved patient consent 
form state that identifiers will remain on the CD and images.   The discs will be stored in a 
secure facility and not used for any purpose other than this research study. 
As of June 1, 2015, Dr. Pelletier’s laboratory and all stored MRI study materials will move to 
University of Southern California (USC).  Local IRBs will need to be updated that MRIs will be 
sent to USC for the remainder of the trial.  
Brain lesions will be identified on simultaneously-viewed, high-resolution T1-weighted, T2-
weighted, and proton density-weighted images.  Regions of interest will be drawn based on a 
semi-automated threshold with manual editing utilizing in-house software, and T1- and T2-lesion 
masks will be created.66  Intra- and inter-observer variability analyses will performed to ensure 
accuracy.  T2-lesion volumes will be calculated by multiplying the area of the lesion by the slice 
thickness and the number of slices penetrated using in-house software.  For atrophy, brain 
segmentation and normalization will be performed using SIENAX (Oxford, UK).  Whole brain 
volume change will be calculated from high-resolution 3D T1-weighted images by SIENA.67  
Output will be converted into percentage brain volume change. Novel measures, such as cortical 
thickness, will also be assessed.  The MRI endpoints will be evaluated as soon as the final 
subject completes the month 24 visit.  
Health-related Quality of Life: The Functional Assessment in MS (FAMS) Version 4.0 will be 
administered at the beginning of each study visit at which it is scheduled.68   


11 
 
   
STUDY POPULATION 
Inclusion Criteria: 
1. Must meet MAGNIMS criteria for relapsing-remitting MS 
2. Age 18 to 50 years 
3. EDSS score ≤ 4.0 
4. MS disease duration ≤ 10 years if McDonald RRMS; ≤ 1 year if meets MAGNIMS 
RRMS criteria but not McDonald RRMS criteria 
5. If the patient meets the McDonald RRMS criteria (rather than McDonald CIS that is now 
classified as MAGNIMS MS):  
- 
Must have had one clinical attack in past two years AND at least one new 
silent T2 or gadolinium-enhancing lesion on brain MRI within the past year 
OR 
- 
Must have had two clinical attacks in past two years, one of which occurred in 
the past year 
6. Females of child-bearing age must be willing to use at least one form of pregnancy 
prevention throughout the study. 
7. Must have had a 25-hydroxyvitamin D level of ≥ 15 ng/mL within past 30 days 
8. Must be willing to stop taking additional supplemental vitamin D, except as part of a 
multivitamin (can contain up to 600 IU), and must be willing to not take cod liver oil.  
 
Exclusion Criteria: 
1. Pregnant or nursing 
2. Ongoing renal or liver disease 
3. Known history of nephrolithiasis, hypercalcemia (non-spurious), sarcoidosis or other 
serious chronic illness including cancer (other than basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma 
of the skin), clinically relevant (non-benign) cardiac disease, or HIV. 
4. Ongoing hyperthyroidism or active infection with Mycobacterium species 
5. Known gastrointestinal disease (ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease, celiac disease/gluten 
intolerance) or use of medications associated with malabsorption. 
6. History of self-reported alcohol or substance abuse in past six months. 
7. Prior history of treatment with rituximab, any chemotherapeutic agent, or total lymphoid 
irradiation.  Treatment in the past six months with natalizumab, fingolimod, or fumarate 
is prohibited.  If patient has received glatiramer acetate, exposure to more than three 
months of treatment is prohibited.  No glatiramer acetate for one month prior to 
screening.Treatment with other unapproved therapies for MS is prohibited. 
8. Use of interferon beta therapy for one month prior to screening 
9. Use of more than 1,000 IU vitamin D daily (average) in the three months prior to 
screening 
10. Condition that would limit the likelihood of completing the MRI procedures 
11. Use of thiazide diuretics, digoxin, diltiazem, verapamil, cimetidine, heparin, low-
molecular weight heparin, certain anticonvulsants (carbamazepine, phenytoin, or 


12 
 
phenobarbital), routine corticosteroids (eg scheduled monthly steroids, daily, etc), 
rifampin, or cholestyramine.   
12. Steroids within a month of screening. 
13. Recent active suicidal ideation in past 6 months (no “yes” answers to questions 2-5 on the 
screening Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale [C-SSRS]);  no passive suicidal 
ideation in the past 2 months (answers “yes” to question 1 on the C-SSRS); suicidal 
attempts or preparatory attempts in the past 5 years (answers “yes” to any of the suicide 
attempt questions when referencing the past 5 years).  Serum calcium.> 0.2 mg/dL above 
the upper limit of normal. 
 
ENROLLMENT AND RANDOMIZATION 
Patients who meet inclusion criteria and want to participate in the study will initiate therapy with 
glatiramer acetate for a one month run-in period.  Those who successfully complete the run-in 
period and remain compliant with glatiramer acetate (compliance defined by no more than three 
missed doses in the run-in period) will then be randomized (stratified by site) in a 1:1 fashion to 
receive either 5,000 IU daily or 600 IU daily of oral vitamin D3.  The run-in was chosen so that it 
will reduce the risk of randomizing non-compliant individuals. 
For subjects who have successfully completed the run-in, the study statistician will generate the 
randomization schedule (which will be stratified by site in order to account for differences in 
ultraviolet light in each location and will be based on randomly permuted blocks of varying sizes 
to ensure proper balance of treatment assignments within each center) in conjunction with the 
Investigational Drug Services (IDS) group at Johns Hopkins; the site coordinator (or study 
pharmacist, if necessitated by the site IRB) will distribute the study drug after confirming 
eligibility to the IDS.  Each subject will be assigned a unique identification number, which will 
be used on all of the subject’s Case Report Forms.  In order to inform other providers and 
prevent unblinding, the subjects’ primary care physician and regular neurologist will be informed 
that the subject is in the trial and will be asked not to check vitamin D levels during the trial in 
order to prevent unblinding. 
STUDY TREATMENT: DESCRIPTION AND ALLOCATION 
Subjects will be randomized to oral vitamin D3 5,000 IU or 600 IU once daily in a 1:1 fashion.  
All patients will be treated with subcutaneous glatiramer acetate 20 mg daily throughout the 
course of the study.  Subjects who experience two or more relapses or excessive MRI activity 
(more than 3 new T2 lesions on the year 1 brain MRI) or one relapse plus more than 2 new T2 
lesions on the year 1 MRI, may be offered a switch from glatiramer acetate to another disease-
modifying therapy for MS at the discretion of the treating physician but will remain in the study.  
This treatment will not be covered by the study.  The rules for discontinuing study treatment are 
described below.  A subject may withdraw from the study if they choose to do so.  The treating 
physician may also terminate a subject due to poor compliance, safety, or other issues. 


13 
 
Dose Rationale for Study Drug: The ideal serum level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D is still debated.  
Several experts have suggested that 30 ng/mL (75nmol/L; conversion factor from ng/mL to 
nmol/L is 2.496) is the minimum desired 25-hydroxyvitamin D level;69 however, levels above 40 
ng/mL were protective against MS.1 Further, in our pediatric-onset MS study, there was no 
evidence of a threshold above which vitamin D was not important (up to 60 ng/mL, the highest 
level measured);34 no threshold was determined in the Australian study either.35  Many experts 
consider 10,000 IU the tolerable upper dose limit; in the most systematic pharmacokinetic study, 
this dose produced a final 25-hydroxyvitamin D level that approached 100 ng/mL (see Figure).70, 
71  
It thus seems likely that the appropriate target level is between 40 ng/mL and 100 ng/mL.  In the 
Heaney vitamin D3 pharmacokinetic study,70 healthy subjects with a mean baseline level of 28 
ng/mL were treated with vitamin D3 5,000 IU daily for 20 weeks and had a final 25-
hydroxyvitamin D level of 60 ng/mL.  From our preliminary data, the mean 25-hydroxyvitamin 
D level in MS subjects was 22 ng/mL.  We propose that 5,000 IU daily is a justifiable dose for 
the target 25-hydroxyvitamin D level of 60 ng/mL. 
The control dose of 600 IU vitamin D3, the current recommended daily allowance (RDA), was 
chosen for equipoise; however, this dose should produce little change in serum 25-
hydroxyvitamin D levels (see Figure).70 
 
Intervention Group: 86 subjects will receive glatiramer acetate 20 mg subcutaneously once a 
day, which will be given for one month prior to randomization, as described above.  After 
randomization, subjects in this group will take 5,000 IU (125 mcg) of oral vitamin D3 daily. 
 Control Group: 86 subjects will take glatiramer acetate 20 mg subcutaneously once daily.  After 
one month, subjects randomized to this group will take 600 IU (15 mcg) of oral vitamin D3 
daily. 
10,000 IU/day 
 
5,000 IU/day 
 
1,000 IU/day 
Placebo 


14 
 
Methods for Maximizing Adherence and Compliance: The run-in period will allow investigators 
to assess compliance with glatiramer acetate.  Patients who report missing more than three doses 
of glatiramer acetate during the run-in will not be eligible for randomization.  Patients will be 
encouraged to take glatiramer acetate and the study drug together at the same time each day to 
minimize the chance that they will be forgotten.  Patients will be instructed to take the 
medication within an hour of a meal, since oral vitamin D is fat-absorbed.  A study coordinator 
will contact all subjects (texting or emailing, or phone call if preferred) to query about new 
symptoms and assess compliance.   Subjects will be asked to complete an online or telephone 
survey if they are having new symptoms.  Compliance will be assessed at each three-month visit 
by pill count.     
Drug Accountability: The site principal investigator will maintain adequate records of the 
disposition of the study drug, including receipt, storage, dates, quantity of drug received, to 
whom dispensed, and accounts of any study drug accidentally or deliberately destroyed. A drug-
dispensing log will be kept current for each participant and should contain the identification 
number of each participant and the date and quantity of drug dispensed.  
Treatment Acquisition and Storage: All vitamin D will be stored in a secure location and will be 
dispensed by the study coordinator.  The Johns Hopkins Investigational Drug Services will 
distribute the vitamin D capsules to each site to ensure study medication blinding. Vitamin D 
will be provided by Continental Vitamin Company; Teva Pharmaceuticals will provide 
glatiramer acetate. 
 
SCHEDULE OF EVENTS 
Study Personnel  
At each site, the following personnel will participate in the study: 
Treating physician: This person will be responsible for informed consent (a designee can consent 
e.g. the study coordinator), patient monitoring, adverse event assessment, physical examination 
and identifying possible relapses.  The treating physician will remain blinded to treatment 
assignment. 
Examining physician: This physician will perform the Expanded Disability Status Scale for 
scheduled and unscheduled visits for possible relapses. The examining physician will remain 
blinded to treatment assignment and to any details about a subject’s course. 
Pharmacist: If a site is unable to store and dispense the vitamin D and glatiramer acetate, a site 
pharmacy will store and distribute study medications.   


15 
 
Study coordinator: The coordinator will be responsible for administrative duties associated with 
study and will remain blinded to treatment assignment.   
Injection training nurse: Injection training may be done by each site’s nurse or referred to Teva, 
as determined by the site training physician. 
Study technician:  An examining technician will conduct the health-related quality of life, 
MSFC, and low-contrast letter acuity testing.   
MRI technician: Each site technician will conduct the MRI protocol.  This person will be blinded 
to treatment assignment and disease course. 
Schedule of Events 
 
Screening Visit 
Treating physician 
 Informed consent (can also be done by study coordinator) 
 Consent for genetics study 
 Eligibility criteria/verification 
 Medical history 
 Medication history 
 Physical examination 
 Suicidality assessment 
 
Study coordinator 
 Collection of blood for screening labs and vitamin D level (if not done within past  
month), and urine for pregnancy test (in women of childbearing potential) 
 
 
Examining physician 
 Expanded Disability Status Scale 
 
Study technician 
 MS Functional Composite 
 
Run-in Visit  
Study coordinator 
 Suicidality assessment 


16 
 
 Instructions to start glatiramer acetate (training by nurse at each site/injection nurse) 
 
Study technician 
 
 MS Functional Composite 
 
Baseline Visit (Day 0) 
Treating physician 
 Verification of compliance with glatiramer acetate injections 
 Updating medical record (medical history, medications, contraceptive use) 
 Adverse effect evaluation 
 Documentation of relapses 
 Suicidality assessment 
 
Study coordinator 
 Vital signs 
 Collection of urine for pregnancy test 
 Collection of blood for storage (for baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and future 
studies, including immunologic studies) 
 Randomization  
 Dispense study drug and glatiramer acetate 
 Inform primary care doctor and neurologist of participation in study 
 
Examining physician 
 Expanded Disability Status Scale 
 
Study technician 
 MS Functional Composite 
 Health-related quality of life (FAMS) 
 Low-contrast visual acuity testing 
 Sun Exposure Questionnaire 
 Skin tone measurement (skin tone card, longer Fitzpatrick) 
 
MRI technician 
 Conducting the baseline brain MRI  
 
 


17 
 
Month 3, 9, 15, 21 Visits 
Study coordinator 
 Verification of compliance with glatiramer acetate injections and study drug 
 Collection of blood for safety labs (months 3 and 9 only) and urine for pregnancy test 
 Storage of blood for vitamin D levels (only at month 3) 
 Updating medical record (medical history, medications, contraceptive use) 
 Dispensing study drug and glatiramer acetate 
 Suicidality assessment 
 
Study technician 
 Sun Exposure Questionnaire 
 
 
Month 6, 12, 18 Visits 
Treating physician 
 Adverse event evaluation 
 Suicidality assessment 
 
Study coordinator 
 Vital signs (month 12 only) 
 Collection of blood for safety labs and urine for pregnancy test 
 Collection of blood for storage for vitamin D levels  
 Collection of blood for storage for future studies (month 12 only) 
 Updating medical record (medical history, medications, contraceptive use) 
 Verifying compliance with glatiramer acetate injections and study drug 
 Dispensing study drug and glatiramer acetate 
 
Examining physician 
 Expanded Disability Status Scale (month 12 only) 
 
Study technician 
 MS Functional Composite 
 Health-related quality of life (FAMS) 
 Sodium Screener (month 12 only) 


18 
 
 Low-contrast visual acuity testing (binocular, 2.5%) 
 Sun Exposure Questionnaire 
 
MRI technician 
 Conducting the brain MRI (month 12 only) 
 
 
Month 24/End of Study Visit 
Treating physician 
 Physical examination including adverse event evaluation 
 Suicidality assessment 
 
Study coordinator 
 Vital signs 
 Collection of blood for safety labs (calcium only) 
 Collection of blood for 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels 
 Collection of blood for storage for future studies 
 Updating medical record (medical history, medications, contraceptive use) 
 Verifying compliance with glatiramer acetate injections and study drug 
 Evaluation of the blind (patients, treating physician, examining physician, study 
technician) 
 
Examining physician 
 Expanded Disability Status Scale 
 
Study technician 
 MS Functional Composite 
 Health-related quality of life (FAMS) 
 Low-contrast visual acuity testing 
 Sun Exposure Questionnaire 
 Sodium screener 
 Skin tone measurement (Fitzpatrick short version) 
 
MRI technician 
 Conducting the brain MRI  
 
 


19 
 
Unscheduled Relapse Visit 
Treating physician 
 Physical examination, if indicated, including adverse event evaluation 
 Verification of relapse 
 Determination of need for intravenous methylprednisolone 
 Suicidality assessment 
 
Study coordinator 
 Vital signs, if indicated 
 Urinalysis, urine culture and/or complete blood count (as needed, per the treating 
physician) 
 Updating medication record 
 
Examining physician 
 Expanded Disability Status Scale 
 
Additional Patient Contact 
Between study visits, patients will be contacted by the study coordinator (months 1, 2, 4.5, 7.5, 
10.5, 13.5, 16.5, 19.5, 22.5) to ask about new symptoms and encourage compliance, as well as to 
set up study visits. 
 
Study Visit Windows 
All study visits will occur within 10 days of the scheduled visit.  Visits that occur outside of the 
window will be recorded. 
During and after the COVID-19 pandemic, investigators will, at their discretion, be allowed to 
relax study windows as much as is needed in order to minimize risk to participants while also 
securing outcomes needed for the trial, such as end-of-study assessments. 
 
SAFETY AND ADVERSE EVENT MONITORING 
Screening will include blood (BUN, creatinine, AST, ALT, calcium), and urine pregnancy tests.  
Urine pregnancy testing will occur at baseline and every three months thereafter; serum calcium 
will be repeated at months 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24.  All safety data will be recorded; serious 


20 
 
adverse events will be reported on a serious adverse event form and in the chart.  This algorithm 
will be used if hypercalcemia is detected during the study: 
 Serum calcium level ≥1 mg/dL above the upper limit of normal: discontinue the study drug, 
and repeat labs in one week.  If it normalizes, the drug will be restarted, and the level will be 
checked every other week for six weeks.  If the level again is ≥1 mg/dL above the upper limit of 
normal, the patient will stop the drug for the rest of the study.  If the repeat level is > 0.5 mg/dL 
above the upper limit of normal but is <1 mg/dL above the upper limit of normal, the patient will 
decrease the dose to one tablet every other day and will have serum calcium checked monthly for 
the rest of the study.   
 Serum calcium is >0.5 mg/dL above the upper limit of normal but is <1 mg/dL above the 
upper limit of normal: labs repeated in one week; if the level continues to be in this range, 
patients will take only one tablet every other day for the remainder of the study and will have 
levels checked monthly until they normalize.   
 Patients will be educated about symptoms of nephrolithiasis, will be instructed to call if they 
occur, and will be evaluated within 24 hours by the treating physician or by the Emergency 
Department.  If nephrolithiasis is confirmed, the study drug will be stopped.   
 
In compliance with the FDA regulations on assessing for suicidality in prospective trials 
(http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/
UCM225130.pdf), the treating physician will administer the Columbia Classification Algorithm 
for Suicide Assessment at the screening visit, at baseline, and every three months as well as at 
unscheduled visits. 
 
Adverse Event: An adverse event is any occurrence or worsening of an undesirable or unintended 
sign, symptom (or abnormal laboratory test), or disease temporally associated with the use of a 
medicinal product, whether or not it is considered related to the medicinal product.  The 
investigator will record all study adverse events in the chart and will treat participants with 
adverse events appropriately, observing them until they resolve or stabilize.  Adverse events will 
be collected from the start of the study until a participant terminates from the study; those that 
are unresolved at the time of termination will be followed until they resolve or up to 30 days. 
 
Unexpected Adverse Event An adverse event is considered unexpected when its nature 
or severity is not consistent with the product information (e.g. package insert safety information, 
the investigational plan, the investigator’s brochure, the protocol, or the informed consent form). 
 
Serious Adverse Event: A serious adverse event (any adverse event that suggests a significant 
hazard, contraindication, side effect, or precaution) must be reported. This includes, but may not 
be limited to, death, a life-threatening event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing 
hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/ incapacity, congenital anomaly/ birth defect, 
other protocol-specified conditions, or an event that requires intervention to prevent permanent 
impairment or damage.  Serious adverse events will be collected from informed consent signing 
until 30 days after study completion or until 30 days after a participant withdraws from the study. 
 
 
 


21 
 
Grading of Adverse Events 
We will use the National Cancer Institute’s Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 
(CTCAE) version 4.0 to report and grade all adverse events, whether or not they are related to 
disease progression or treatment.  The relationship between an adverse event and the study drug 
will be determined by the site investigator and recorded on the appropriate form.  
 
Serious Adverse Event Reporting The following process for reporting a serious adverse event 
will ensure compliance with the International Conference on Harmonisation guidelines: 
1. The Institutional Review Board will be notified in one business day of a serious adverse event. 
2.  Standard reporting will occur if the event is serious, expected and drug-related, serious, 
expected and not drug-related, or serious, unexpected and not drug-related. 
3. Expedited reporting is required if the event is serious, unexpected and drug-related. This type 
of event must be reported to the appropriate authorities within 15 days unless it is fatal or life-
threatening; a fatal or life-threatening event must be reported within 7 days.  
 
Pregnancy (Serious Adverse Event Reporting Requirements): Any pregnancy that occurs during 
a clinical study with an investigational drug will be reported as a serious adverse event, and 
pregnancies will be followed to their conclusion.  Female participants should immediately 
inform the investigator of pregnancies and will stop taking the study medications. The 
investigator will report pregnancies to the Institutional Review board within one business day. 
The investigator will counsel the participant about the risks of continuing the pregnancy.  
 
Criteria for Discontinuing Study Drug or Terminating the Study The study drug will be 
discontinued if the participant becomes pregnant or develops nephrolithiasis or persistently 
elevated serum calcium levels (as above), if it is in the participant’s best interest (decided by the 
treating physician), if the participant experiences an adverse event grade 3 or higher that is at 
least possibly related to the study drug, or if the subject cannot tolerate the study drug or wants to 
discontinue treatment.  Any death that is at least possibly related to the study will put the study 
on hold.  The Data and Safety Monitoring Board will determine if it is safe to resume the study.  
Subjects who become suicidal during the study (codes 1-4, 
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/U
CM225130.pdf) will be referred to a psychiatrist or to a psychiatric emergency room for 
evaluation at the discretion of the site treating physician. 
Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) 
The independent DSMB consists of two neurologists (Amy Waldman, M.D., Children’s Hospital 
of Philadelphia; Jill Conway, M.D., Carolinas Health Care) and one statistician (Ciprian 
Crainiceanu, Ph.D., Johns Hopkins University).  The DSMB will meet, in person, or by 
teleconference, two times per year and will convene by teleconference or through e-mail any 
time a serious adverse event occurs.   


22 
 
For suicide, if there are more than three suicides or deaths in the study, the DSMB will be 
unblinded to treatment assignment.  If the statistician deems this to be related to vitamin D 
dosage, the DSMB will be asked to make a recommendation about how to proceed.  If more than 
5 patients develop severe hypercalcemia (serum calcium ≥1 mg/dL above the upper limit of 
normal), a similar procedure will occur, with unblinding of the DSMB, the determination of 
whether this is likely related to vitamin D dose, and any recommendations for modification of 
the protocol.  All serious adverse events will be reported to the DSMB members within one 
business day of the event’s documentation.  A recommendation from the DSMB when the 
thresholds above have been reached will be expected within three business days of the receipt of 
the report. 
MRI and glatiramer acetate are part of the standard of care for MS patients, so adverse events 
will be reported to the DSMB, but the plan of care will be adjudicated and determined by the site 
PI, in consultation with the overall study PI, Dr. Mowry, as needed. 
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS 
Primary Outcome: The proportion of subjects in each group who have had a relapse at two years 
Secondary Outcomes 
Clinical: annualized relapse rate; number of relapses requiring treatment with high-dose steroids; 
time to first on-study relapse; proportion with probable relapse; annualized probable relapse rate; 
occurrence of sustained clinical disease progression on EDSS; change in MSFC score; change in 
low-contrast letter acuity over two years; change in Functional Assessment in MS score over two 
years 
MRI: number of new or enlarging T2-weighted hyperintense MRI lesions; percentage of patients 
with a new T2 lesion; change in T2 lesion volume, percentage brain volume, normalized gray 
matter volume, and cortical thickness 
Primary Predictor: Treatment group (high- versus low-dose vitamin D3) 
Secondary Predictor: Change in 25-hydroxyvitamin D level (baseline to month 24) 
Statistical Analyses 
Efficacy Outcomes: All statistical tests will be considered significant at a two-sided alpha of 
0.05.  Intention-to-treat will be used for all analyses. 
The primary outcome is the proportion of individuals with a relapse during the two years of 
follow-up.  Parameter estimates will be calculated using generalized estimating equations (GEE) 
with robust standard errors.  A longitudinal logistic regression model with a saturated cell means 
model (including indicators for each visit and each visit by treatment interaction) and an 
unstructured covariance matrix will be used.  The interaction term for the two-year visit 


23 
 
represents the comparison of the odds of relapse at two years for the two dose levels.  Negative 
binomial regression will be used to compare the annual relapse rates and a Cox proportional 
hazards model will be used to compare the time to first relapse. 
The occurrence of sustained EDSS progression will be assessed using the techniques described 
for the primary outcome.  Longitudinal linear regression models will be used to evaluate changes 
in continuous outcomes (MS function composite score, T2 lesion volume, percentage brain 
volume, normalized gray matter volume, cortical thickness, low-contrast letter acuity, and 
Function Assessment in MS score).  GEE with saturated mean models and unstructured 
covariance matrices will be applied.  For all analyses, we will explore the potential effects of co-
intervention (e.g. sun exposure;72 use of multivitamin) and of baseline skin tone (using Skin 
Tone measurement card and Fitzpatrick scale) by adjusting for these variables in the models 
described above. 
Adverse Event Outcomes: All participants who receive any vitamin D3 will be included in the 
analysis of safety.  Adverse events occurring before baseline, but not worsening or not related to 
study therapy during study, will not be considered as treatment-emergent adverse events.   
Summary: The principal features of the design of this study and of the plan for statistical analysis 
of the data are outlined in this protocol. Any changes in these principal features will require a 
protocol amendment that will then be subject to review by the study sponsor. 
 
Role of Johns Hopkins as Coordinating Center 
Dr. Mowry, the coordinating center PI, has the contact information for all centers.  The study 
managers, Sandra Cassard and Susan Emrich, will assist Dr. Mowry in the oversight of the trial 
conduct.  Dr. Mowry and/or the study managers will assist the participating centers in the 
submission of their IRB approval documents and consent forms and in drafting any response 
letters to the IRBs.  All approved IRB applications and consent forms will be submitted to the 
coordinating center prior to starting the study at each site for review by Dr. Mowry/overall study 
managers to ensure modifications will not threaten the integrity of the study or the safety of the 
patients. 
When modifications to the protocol are initiated by the coordinating center, the study managers 
will disseminate those modifications to each participating site.  The managers will follow up 
within 10 days to ensure that the modifications have been submitted by each site to their IRB and 
will check in every three weeks after submission until written confirmation acknowledging the 
protocol modifications are provided from each site’s IRB.  The study managers will also be 
responsible for training study coordinators at participating sites in data entry.  REDCap, a web-
based database, will be used for data collection.  The study managers will do spot checks of all 
data, using faxed data entry sheets (coded to maintain confidentiality) to assess for data entry 


24 
 
errors.  The study managers will monitor data entry on an ongoing basis to ensure data are 
entered efficiently and within an expected window of subjects’ study visits. 
Protocol events and deviations will be reported directly to the study PI (Dr. Mowry) and to the 
study managers within 5 business days; serious adverse events must be reported immediately by 
e-mail and phone to Dr. Mowry and the study managers. 
LITERATURE CITED 
1. Munger KL, Levin LI, Hollis BW, Howard NS, Ascherio A. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D 
levels and risk of multiple sclerosis. JAMA 2006;296:2832-2838. 
2. Mattner F, Smiroldo S, Galbiati  F, et al. Inhibition of Th1 development and treatment of 
chronic-relapsing experimental allergic encephalomyelitis by a non-hypercalcemic analogue 
of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Eur J Immuno 2000;30:498-508. 
3. Spach KM and Hayes CE. Vitamin D3 confers protection from autoimmune 
encephalomyelitis only in female mice. J Immunol 2005;175:4119-4126. 
4. Ramagopalan SV, Maugeri NJ, Handunnetthi L, et al. Expression of the multiple sclerosis-
associated MHC class II allele HLA-DRB1*1501 is regulated by vitamin D. PLoS Genet 
2009;5:e1000369. 
5. Hiremath G, Cettomai D, Baynes M, et al. Vitamin D status and effect of low-dose 
cholecalciferol and high-dose ergocalciferol supplementation in multiple sclerosis. Multiple 
Sclerosis 2009;15:735-740. 
6. Mei W, Rong Y, Jinming L, Yongjun L, Hui Z.  Effect of homocysteine interventions on the 
risk of cardiocerebrovascular events: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.  Int J 
Clin Pract 2010;64:208-215.. 
7. Song Y, Cook NR, Albert CM, Van Denburgh M, Manson JE.  Effects of vitamins C and E 
and beta-carotene on the risk of type 2 diabetes in women at high risk of cardiovascular 
disease: a randomized controlled trial.  Am J Clin Nutr 2009;90:429-437. 
8. Kang JH, Cook NR, Manson JE, Buring JE, Albert CM, Grodstein F.  Vitamin E, vitamin C, 
beta carotene, and cognitive function among women with or at risk of cardiovascular 
disease: the women’s antioxidant and cardiovascular study.  Circulation 2009;119:2772-
2780. 
9. Montalban X, Tintore M, Swanton J, et al. MRI criteria for MS in patients with clinically 
isolated syndromes.  Neurology 2011; 74:427-434. 
10. Kurtzke JF. Epidemiologic contributions to multiple sclerosis: an overview. Neurology 
1980;30:61-79. 
11. Norman JE, Kurtzke JF, Beebe GW. Epidemiology of multiple sclerosis in US veterans: 2. 
Latitude, climate, and the risk of multiple sclerosis. J Chron Disease 1983;3:551-559. 
12. Hammond SR, English DR, McLeod JG. The age-range of risk of developing multiple 
sclerosis: evidence from a migrant population in Australia. Brain 2000;123:968-974. 
13. Alter M, Kahana E, Zilber N, Miller A. Multiple sclerosis frequency in Israel’s diverse 
populations. Neurology 2006;66:1061-1066. 
14. Cabre P. Migration and multiple sclerosis: the French West Indies experience. J Neurol Sci 
2007;262:117-121. 


25 
 
15. van der Mei IA, Ponsonby AL, Blizzard L, Dwyer T.  Regional variation in multiple 
sclerosis prevalence in Australia and its association with ambient ultraviolet radiation. 
Neuroepidemiology 2001;20:168-174. 
16. van der Mei IA, Ponsonby AL, Dwyer T, et al.  Past exposure to sun, skin phenotype, and 
risk of multiple sclerosis: case-control study.  BMJ 2003;327:316-321. 
17. Sutherland JM, Tyrer JH, Eadie MJ. The prevalence of multiple sclerosis in Australia. Brain 
1962;85:146-164. 
18. Acheson ED, Bachrach CA, Wright FM. Some comments on the relationship of the 
distribution of multiple sclerosis to latitude, solar radiation, and other variables. Acta 
Psychiatr Scand 1960;147:132-147. 
19. Leibowitz U, Sharon D, Alter M. Geographical considerations in multiple sclerosis. Brain 
1967;90:871-886. 
20. Goldacre MJ, Seagroatt V, Yeates D, Acheson ED.  Skin cancer in people with multiple 
sclerosis: a record linkage study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004;58:142-144. 
21. Hauser SL, Weiner HL, Che M, Shapiro ME, Gilles F, Letvin NL. Prevention of 
experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE) in the SJL/J mouse by whole body 
ultraviolet irradiation. J Immunol 1984;132:1276-1281. 
22. Gauzzi MC, Purificato C, Donato K, et al. Suppressive effect of 1 α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 
on type I IFN-mediated monocyte differentiation into dendritic cells: impairment of 
functional activities and chemotaxis. J Immunol 2005;174:270-276. 
23. Lyakh LA, Sanford M, Chekol S, Young HA, Roberts AB. TGFβ- and vitamin D3 utilize 
distinct pathways to suppress IL-12 production and modulate rapid differentiation of human 
monocytes into CD83+ dendritic cells. J Immunol 2005;174:2061-2070. 
24. Chen S, Sims GP, Chen XX, Gu YY, Chen S, Lipsky PE.  Modulatory effects of 1,25-
dihydroxyvitamin D3 on human B cell differentiation. J Immunol 2007;179:1634-1647. 
25. Penna G, Amuchastequi S, Cossetti C, et al. Treatment of experimental autoimmune 
prostatitis in nonobese diabetic mice by the vitamin D receptor agonist elocalcitol. J 
Immunol 2006;177:8504-8511. 
26. Stromnes IM, Cerretti LM, Liggitt D, Harris RA, Governman JM. Differential regulation of 
central nervous system autoimmunity by T(H)1 and T(H)17 cells. Nat Med 2008;14:337-
342. 
27. Gregori S, Giarratana N, Smiroldo S, Uskokovic M, Adorini L. A 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin 
D3 analog enhances regulatory T cells and arrests autoimmune diabetes in NOD mice. 
Diabetes 2002;51:1367-1374. 
28. Gregori S, Casorati M, Amuchastequi S, Smiroldo S, Davalli AM, Adorini L. Regulatory T 
cells induced by 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and mycophenolate mofetil treatment mediate 
transplant tolerance. J Immunol 2001;167:1945-1953. 
29. Adorini A and Penna G. Control of autoimmune diseases by the vitamin D endocrine 
system. Nat Clin Pract Rheum 2008;4:404-412. 
30. Nashold FE, Miller DJ, Hayes CE. 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 treatment decreases 
macrophage accumulation in the CNS of mice with experimental autoimmune 
encephalomyelitis. J Neuroimmunology 2000;103:171-179. 
31. Garcion E, Sindji, Nataf S, Brachet P, Darcy F, Montero-Menei CN. Treatment of 
experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in rat by 1.25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 leads to 
early effects within the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol 2003;105:438-448. 


26 
 
32. Cantorna MT, Hayes CE, DeLuca HF. 1,25-dixydroxyvitamin D3 reversibly blocks the 
progression of relapsing encephalomyelitis, a model of multiple sclerosis. Pro Nat Acad Sci 
1996;93:7861-7864. 
33. Pederson LB, Nashold FE, Spach KM, Hayes CE. 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 reverses 
experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by inhibiting chemokine synthesis and 
monocyte trafficking. J Neurosci Res 2007;85:2480-2490. 
34. Mowry EM, Krupp LB, Milazzo M, et al. Vitamin D status is associated with relapse rate in 
pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2010;67:618-624. 
35. Simpson S, Taylor B, Blizzard L, et al. Ann Neurol 2010;68:193-203. 
36. Kimball SM, Ursell MR, O’Connor P, Vieth R. Safety of vitamin D3 in adults with multiple 
sclerosis. Am J Clin Nutr 2007;86:645-651. 
37. Goldberg P, Fleming MC, Picard EH. Multiple sclerosis: decreased relapse rate through 
dietary supplementation with calcium, magnesium and vitamin D. Medical Hypotheses 
1986;21:193-200. 
38. Wingerchuk DM, Lesaux J, Rice GP, Krememnchutzky M, Ebers GC. A pilot study of oral 
calcitriol (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3) for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 
Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76:1294-1296. 
39. Burton JM, Kimball S, Vieth R, et al. A phase I/II dose-escalation trial of oral vitamin D3 
with calcium supplementation in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2010;74:1852-
1858.  
40. Losseff NA, Wang L, Lai HM, et al. Progressive cerebral atrophy in multiple sclerosis: a 
serial MRI study. Brain 1996;119:2009-2019. 
41. Barkhof F, Scheltens P, Frequin ST, et al. Relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: sequential 
enhanced MR imaging vs. clinical findings in determining disease activity. AJR 
1992;159:1041-1047. 
42. Trapp BD, Peterson J, Ransohoff RM, Rudick R, Mork S, Bo L.  Axonal transsection in the 
lesions of multiple sclerosis.  N Engl J Med 1998;338:278-285. 
43. Ferguson B, Matyszak MK, Esiri MM, Perry VH.  Axonal damage in acute multiple 
sclerosis lesions.  Brain 1997;120:393-399. 
44. Thompson AJ, Miller DH, Youl B, et al. Serial gadolinium enhanced MRI in relapsing 
remitting multiple sclerosis of varying disease duration. Neurology 1992;42::60-63. 
45. Harris JO, Frank JA, Patronas N, McFarlin DE, McFarland HF. Serial gadolinium-enhanced 
magnetic resonance imaging scans in patients with early, relapsing-remitting multiple 
sclerosis: implications for clinical trials and natural history. Ann Neurol 1991;29:548-555. 
46. Henry RG, Shieh M, Okuda DT, Evangelista A, Gorno-Tempini ML, Pelletier D. Regional 
grey matter atrophy in clinically isolated syndromes at presentation. J Neurol Neurosurg 
Psychiatry 2008;79:1236-1244. 
47. Dalton CM, Chard DT, Davies GR, et al. Early development of multiple sclerosis is 
associated with progressive grey matter atrophy in patients presenting with clinically 
isolated syndromes. Brain 2004;127:1101-1107. 
48. Kidd D, Thorpe JW, Kendall BE, et al. MRI dynamics of brain and spinal cord in 
progressive MS. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 1996;60:15-19. 
49. Horakova D, Dwyer MG, Havrdova E, et al. Gray matter atrophy and disability progression 
in patients with early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a 5-year longitudinal study. J 
Neurol Sci 2009;282:112-119. 


27 
 
50. Gauthier SA, Berger AM, Liptak Z, et al. Rate of brain atrophy in benign vs. early multiple 
sclerosis. Arch Neurol 2009;234-237. 
51. Rudick RA, Lee JC, Nakamura K, Fisher E. Gray matter atrophy correlates with MS 
disability progression measured with MSFC but not EDSS. J Neurol Sci 2009;282:106-111. 
52. Fisher E, Lee JC, Nakamura K, Rudick RA. Gray matter atrophy in multiple sclerosis: a 
longitudinal study. Ann Neurol 2008;64:255-265. 
53. Fisniku LK, Chard DT, Jackson JS, et al. Gray matter atrophy is related to long-term 
disability in multiple sclerosis. Annals of Neurology 2008;64:247-254. 
54. Fisher E, Rudick RA, Cutter G, et al. Relationship between brain atrophy and disability: an 
8-year follow-up study of multiple sclerosis patients. Multiple Sclerosis 2000;6:373-377. 
55. Zehnder D, Bland R, Williams MC, et al. Extrarenal expression of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3-
1α-hydroxylase. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001;86:888-894. 
56. Eyles DW, Smith S, Kinobe R, Hewison M, McGrath JJ. Distribution of the vitamin D 
receptor and 1α-hydroxylase in human brain. J Chem Neuroanatomy 2005;29:21-30. 
57. Brewer LD, Thibault V, Chen K, Langub MC, Landfield PW, Porter NM. Vitamin D 
hormone confers neuroprotection in parallel with downregulation of L-type calcium channel 
expression in hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci 2001;21:98-108. 
58. Ibi M, Sawada H, Nakanishi M, et al. Protective effects of 1α,25-(OH)2D3 against the 
neurotoxicity of glutamate and reactive oxygen species in mesencephalic culture. 
Neuropharm 2001;40:761-771. 
59. Taniura H, Ito M, Sanada N, et al. Chronic vitamin D3 treatment protects against 
neurotoxicity by glutamate in association with upregulation of vitamin D receptor mRNA 
expression in cultured rat cortical neurons. J Neurosci Res 2006;83:1179-1189. 
60. Ekici F, Ozyurt B, Erdogan H. The combination of vitamin D3 and dehydroascorbic acid 
administration attenuates brain damage in focal ischemia. Neurol Sci 2009;30:207-212. 
61. Atif F, Sayeed I, Ishrat T, Stein DG. Progesterone with vitamin D affords better 
neuroprotection against excitotoxicity in cultured cortical neurons than progesterone alone. 
Mol Med 2009;15:328-336. 
62. Sloka S, Silva C, Wang J, et al.  Novel neuroprotective outcomes of vitamin D in models of 
multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2010;74:A483.  
63. Kurtzke J. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status 
scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983;33:1444. 
64. Fischer JS, Rudick RA, Cutler GR, Reingold SC. The multiple sclerosis functional 
composite (MSFC): an integrated approach to MS clinical outcome assessment.  National 
MS Society Clinical Outcomes Assessment Task Force. Mult Scler 1999;5:244-250. 
65. Balcer LJ, Baier ML, Pelak VS, et al. New low-contrast vision charts: reliability and test 
characteristics in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2000;:163-171. 
66. Blum D, Yonelinas AP, Luks T, et al. Dissociating perceptual and conceptual implicit 
memory in multiple sclerosis patients. Brain Cogn 2002;50:51-61. 
67. Smith SM, De Stefano N, Jenkinson M, Matthews PM. Normalized accurate measurement 
of longitudinal brain change. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001; 25: 466-75. 
68. Cella DF, Dineen K, Arnason B, et al. Validation of the functional assessment of multiple 
sclerosis quality of life instrument. Neurology 1996;47:129-139. 
69. Holick M. High prevalence of vitamin D inadequacy and implications for health. Mayo Clin 
Proc 2006;81:353-373. 


28 
 
70. Heaney RP, Davies KM, Chen TC, Holick MF, Barger-Lux MJ. Human serum 25-
hydroxycholecalciferol response to extended oral dosing with cholecalciferol. Am J Clin 
Nutr 2003;77:204-210. 
71. Hathcock JN, Shao A, Vieth R, Heaney R. Am J Clin Nutr 2007;85:6-18. 
72. Chan J, Jaceldo-Siegl K, Fraser GE.  Determinants of serum 25 hydroxyvitamin D levels in 
a nationwide cohort of blacks and non-Hispanic whites. Cancer Causes Control 
2010;21:501-511. 
 

SAP_001.pdf: 
Official Title: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Vitamin D Supplementation in Multiple 
Sclerosis 
 
NCT01490502 
 
March 14, 2022 


Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
I. 
Title: The vitamin D to ameliorate multiple sclerosis (VIDAMS) trial: Statistical Analysis Plan 
II. 
Trial Manuscript Leadership Team: Ellen M. Mowry, MD, MCR (PI) and Sandra D. Cassard, ScD (Co-I, manuscript 
lead)  
III. 
Statistician: Kathryn C. Fitzgerald, ScD  
IV. 
Intervention 
a. Low dose vitamin D3 supplementation (LDVD) of 600 IU/day + glatiramer acetate 
b. High dose vitamin D3 supplementation (HDVD) of 5000 IU/day + glatiramer acetate 
V. 
Outcomes: 
a. Primary outcome (clinical outcome) 
i. Proportion of participants who experienced a confirmed relapse 
b. Secondary outcomes (separated out to clinical and radiographic) 
i. Clinical outcomes: 
1. Confirmed or probable relapse 
2. Annualized relapse rate 
3. Number of relapses requiring treatment 
4. Sustained disability progression 
a. Defined as change in EDSS scores at 1 year that was sustained at year 2. Progression is defined 
as an increase in EDSS score of 1.0. 
i. Use screening rather than baseline EDSS to compute change if relapse between screening 
and baseline.  
5. Change in multiple sclerosis (MS) functional composite (MSFC) 
a. Change in components of MSFC. These include walking speed, 9-hole peg test, and PASAT-3.  
b. MSFC will be considered as a Z score; MSFC component tests will be assessed as raw and Z 
scores.  
c. Sustained 20% worsening from baseline MSFC that is confirmed at a subsequent visit.  
6. Change in low contrast letter acuity (LCLA) 
a. Raw change in number of correct letters 
b. Sustained 20% worsening from baseline LCLA that is confirmed at a subsequent visit.  
c. Sustained change of ≥7 letter (clinically meaningful change) 
7. Change in health-related quality of life using the functional assessment in MS (FAMS) scores 
a. These include the total FAMS score and components for symptoms, mobility, fatigue, emotional 
well-being, social well-being 
b. 0.5 SD improvement in FAMS total and component scores  
8. Development of hypercalcemia and other adverse events 
a. Hypercalcemia is defined as serum calcium level 0.5 mg/dL above the upper limit of normal; 
severe hypercalcemia is defined as ≥1 mg/dL above the upper limit of normal.  
b. Self-reported development of kidney stones at any time during follow-up.  
ii. MRI outcomes:  
1. T2 lesion volume 
2. Number of new/enlarged T2 lesions 
3. Number of Gadolinium enhancing (Gd+) lesions  
4. Composite sum of number of new lesions (sum of Gd+ and new/enlarged T2 lesions) 
5. Proportion developing a new lesion over follow-up.  
6. Normalized brain parenchymal fraction (nBPV) 
7. Normalized gray matter volume (nGMV) 
8. Normalized white matter volume (nWMV) 
VI. 
Descriptive Analyses 
a. Characterize baseline cohort overall and by randomization arm for demographic, clinical, and patient 
characteristics in a table with 3 columns (overall, LDVD, HDVD) using descriptive statistics based on the 
variable in question (e.g., means and standard deviations, median and interquartile range, and percentages).  


i. These characteristics will be included: age, sex, race, ethnicity, disease subtype (relapsing remitting MS 
vs. clinically isolated syndrome), body mass index (BMI), previous treatment with a MS disease 
modifying therapy (DMT), EDSS scores, T2 lesion volume, skin tone, and sun exposure, nBPV, nGMV, and 
nWMV 
b. Characterize 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) levels overall and by randomization arm at baseline and over 
time (screening, baseline, and months 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24) 
i. Characterize missing data in 25(OH)D levels by randomization arm and by time 
ii. Calculate descriptive statistics for 25(OH)D levels by randomization arms and by time.  
iii. Plot means (SD) of 25(OH)D levels by randomization arm over time 
iv. Create spaghetti plots with overlaid loess curves for 25(OH)D levels by randomization arm over time.  
v. Plot 25(OH)D levels by season (or month) of blood draw and by randomization arm and time to confirm 
no differences.  
vi. Plot 25(OH)D levels by region of blood draw and by randomization arm and time to confirm no 
differences.  
VII. 
Consort Diagram 
a. A consort diagram will be created with the following levels: assessed for eligibility, randomized, treatment 
allocation, follow-up and analytic cohort.  
VIII. 
Regression models: Intention to treat analyses 
a. We will incorporate variables with differences between the treatment arms that exceed 10% as identified 
using results of the descriptive analyses (e.g., sex, race, or ethnicity).  
b. Eligible participants for the primary analysis are those with baseline data and at least one follow-up visit.  
c. Missing values for key baseline covariates of interest is expected to be small; however, primary analyses will 
include a missing indicator level for the categorical variable if it is included in analytic models. The sensitivity 
of results will be assessed using pattern mixture models1 and shared random effects models.2  
d. For mixed effects models, time will be considered as a linear variable in primary analyses. Secondary 
analyses will account for time as a categorical variable.  
e. Primary outcome: proportion of individuals with a relapse. 
i. Proportion with a confirmed relapse will be assessed using a Cox proportional hazards model to account 
for follow-up time and accounting for identified potentially unbalanced covariates 
ii. Plot unadjusted results using Kaplan Meier curves and test for significance using log-rank test (or other 
appropriate test if assumptions are not met for log-rank).  
f. 
Secondary outcome:  
i. Clinical outcomes  
1. Proportion with a confirmed or probable relapse  
a. Proportion with a confirmed or probable relapse will be assessed using a Cox proportional 
hazards model to account for follow-up time 
2. Annualized relapse rate (two sets: confirmed, confirmed or probable) 
a. Using an Andersen-Gill model for time to recurrent events correcting for dependence between 
multiple events assess risk of MS relapse 
b. Plot unadjusted results using Kaplan Meier curves and test for significance using log-rank test (or 
other appropriate test if assumptions are not met for log-rank).  
3. Number of relapses requiring treatment 
a. Using a negative binomial model incorporating follow-up time using as an offset term. Results 
will be presented as rate ratio estimates comparing HDVD vs. LDVD.   
4. Sustained disability progression 
a. Using a Cox proportional hazards model 
b. Plot unadjusted results using Kaplan Meier curves and test for significance using log-rank test (or 
other appropriate test if assumptions are not met for log-rank).  
5. Change in multiple sclerosis (MS) functional composite (MSFC) 
a. Rate of change in MSFC Z scores (and component Z scores) using a linear mixed effects model 
with unstructured covariance structure, random intercepts. If model fit is improved with the 
addition of random slopes, they will be added. 


b. Rate of change in raw components using a linear mixed effects model with unstructured 
covariance structure, random intercepts. If model fit is improved with the addition of random 
slopes, they will be added. A log transformation will be applied if data are skewed based on 
visual inspection.  
c. For 20% change models, we will fit statistical models if ≥10 events occurred. Time to 20% 
worsening in MSFC (and components) using a Cox proportional hazards model. 
d. Plot unadjusted results using Kaplan Meier curves for time to event outcomes and test for 
significance using log-rank test (or other appropriate test if assumptions are not met for log-
rank).  
6. Change in LCLA  
a. Rate of change in LCLA using a linear mixed effects model with unstructured covariance 
structure, random intercepts. If model fit is improved with the addition of random slopes, they 
will be added.  
b. For 20% change and 7-letter change models, we will fit statistical models if ≥10 events occurred. 
Time to 20% worsening or 7-letter loss in LCLA will be assessed using a Cox proportional hazards 
model. 
c. Plot unadjusted results using Kaplan Meier curves for time to event outcomes and test for 
significance using log-rank test (or other appropriate test if assumptions are not met for log-
rank).  
7. Change in health-related quality of life using the functional assessment in MS (FAMS) scores 
a. Rate of change in quality of life using a linear mixed effects model with unstructured covariance 
structure, random intercepts. If model fit is improved with the addition of random slopes, they 
will be added.  
b. For ≥ 0.5 SD improvement, we will fit statistical models if ≥10 events occurred. Time to ≥ 0.5 SD 
improvement in FAMS total score and subscale scores will be assessed via Cox proportional 
hazards model.  
c. Plot unadjusted results using Kaplan Meier curves and test for significance using log-rank test (or 
other appropriate test if assumptions are not met for log-rank).  
8. Development of hypercalcemia adverse events 
a. Proportion of patients developing hypercalcemia or kidney stones will be compared 
descriptively  
b. A logistic regression model will be considered if the number of events for either adverse event 
exceeds 10.  
ii. MRI outcomes: 
1. T2 lesion volume 
a. Rate of change in T2 lesion volume using a linear mixed effects model with unstructured 
covariance structure, random intercepts. If model fit is improved with the addition of random 
slopes, they will be added.  
2. Number of new/enlarged T2 lesions 
a. Using a negative binomial model incorporating follow-up time using as an offset term.  
3. Number of Gadolinium enhancing (Gd+) lesions  
a. Using a negative binomial model incorporating follow-up time using as an offset term.  
4. Composite number of new lesions (sum of Gd+ and new/enlarged T2 lesions) 
a. Using a negative binomial model incorporating follow-up time using as an offset term.  
5. Proportion developing a new lesion 
a. Proportion developing a new lesion will be assessed using a Cox proportional hazards model to 
account for follow-up time and accounting for identified potentially unbalanced covariates 
b. Plot unadjusted results using Kaplan Meier curves and test for significance using log-rank test (or 
other appropriate test if assumptions are not met for log-rank).  
6. nBPV 
a. Rate of change in nBPV using a linear mixed effects model with unstructured covariance 
structure, random intercepts. If model fit is improved with the addition of random slopes, they 
will be added.  


7. nGMV 
a. Rate of change in nGMV using a linear mixed effects model with unstructured covariance 
structure, random intercepts. If model fit is improved with the addition of random slopes, they 
will be added.  
8. nWMV 
a. Rate of change in nWMV using a linear mixed effects model with unstructured covariance 
structure, random intercepts. If model fit is improved with the addition of random slopes, they 
will be added.  
IX. 
Regression models: Planned per protocol analyses 
a. For planned per protocol analyses, we will consider the following analyses for the primary outcome 
proportion with a confirmed relapse and secondary outcomes including proportion with a confirmed or 
probable relapse, annualized relapse rate, proportion developing a new lesion, change in overall MSFC Z 
score.  
b. Overview of planned per-protocol analyses 
i. Accounting for change in disease modifying therapy using the following models: 
1. DMTs will be included as a time-varying covariate in Cox models.  
2. Individuals will be censored upon switching DMTs 
3. Inverse probability weighted models account for therapy changes; weights analysis will also 
incorporate premature censoring (see iv). 
ii. Assessing differences by adherence to study medication or drug  
1. Patient adherence to treatment will be included as a time-varying covariate; the variable will be 
derived using all available information (missed doses, pill counts). 
a. Likely to categorize to deal with heterogeneity in collection of data 
b. Missing carried forward  
2. Patient adherence to MS DMTs will be included as a time-varying covariate using self-reported 
patient medication adherence. 
iii. Mediation by change in 25(OH)D levels 
1. The effect of change in 25(OH)D on primary outcomes will be assessed using instrumental variables 
and 2-stage residual inclusion with study-group assignment as the instrument and change in 
25(OH)D level from baseline as the exposure of interest.3 
iv. Assessing predictors of drop-out/early censoring 
1. Baseline covariates will be used to assess whether certain characteristics were associated with 
follow-up time.  
2. Sensitivity analyses will fit inverse probability weighted models accounting for premature censoring 
or therapy changes (as in i).  
v. Determination of treatment response scores to quantify predictors of participants who will respond 
“responders” 
1. Treatment response scores will be derived using baseline participant characteristics to assess and 
quantify potential heterogeneous treatment effects4–6 
vi. Assessing whether inclusion of individuals with high inflammatory activity impact the results.  
1. A person with high inflammatory activity is defined as individuals with ≥4 relapses over the study 
period.  
2. Check the distribution for Gd+ enhancing lesions at baseline and over follow-up. If clear outliers 
(>+4SD) then analyses excluding these individuals.  
vii. Assessing effect modification by skin tone using Fitzpatrick scale and sun exposure 
1. Stratified analyses will assess effect modification by skin tone and sun exposure. 
 
References  
1.  Little RJA. Pattern-Mixture Models for Multivariate Incomplete Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 
1993;88(421):125–134. 
2.  Follmann D, Wu M. An Approximate Generalized Linear Model with Random Effects for Informative Missing Data. 
Biometrics 1995;51(1):151–168. 


3.  Terza JV, Basu A, Rathouz PJ. Two-stage residual inclusion estimation: Addressing endogeneity in health 
econometric modeling. Journal of Health Economics 2008;27(3):531–543. 
4.  Bovis F, Carmisciano L, Signori A, et al. Defining responders to therapies by a statistical modeling approach applied 
to randomized clinical trial data. BMC Med 2019;17(1):113. 
5.  Zhao L, Tian L, Cai T, et al. EFFECTIVELY SELECTING A TARGET POPULATION FOR A FUTURE COMPARATIVE STUDY. J 
Am Stat Assoc 2013;108(502):527–539. 
6.  Pellegrini F, Copetti M, Bovis F, et al. A proof-of-concept application of a novel scoring approach for personalized 
medicine in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2020;26(9):1064–1073.