Conditions: End Stage Heart Disease Hepatitis C
Keywords: Heart Disease Heart Transplant HCV Hepatitis C
Allocation: NA | Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Enrollment: 40
Healthy volunteers: no

Brief summary:
This is a proof of concept, single center study for the donation of HCV-positive hearts to HCV negative recipient patients, with preemptive, interventional treatment with 12 weeks of commercially available DAA therapy to prevent HCV transmission upon transplantation.

Detailed description:
The goal of this study is to determine if preoperative dosing and sustained administration of pan-genotypic DAA therapy after cardiac transplantation prevents the transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection from an HCV-positive donor heart to an HCV naïve recipient.

Arms:
arm 1: 12 weeks of treatment with HCV Direct Acting Antiviral tablet

Interventions: intervention 1: Clinically prescribed direct acting antiviral
Intervention descriptions: intervention 1: HCV treatment for 12 weeks

Protocol document:
Prot_SAP_000.pdf: 
Version Date: 7/3/2019 
1 
Partners Human Research Committee Detailed Protocol 
Title: Pan-genotypic direct acting antiviral therapy in donor HCV-positive to recipient HCV-negative 
heart or simultaneous heart-kidney transplant 
PI: Raymond Chung, MD 
I.
Background and Significance
Donor heart availability continues to be a limiting factor in the number of cardiac transplants performed 
in the United States. While heart failure prevalence continues to rapidly rise the number of annual 
transplants has remained unchanged over the last decade.1 This drives a growing disparity between 
cardiac organ supply and demand. In 2015 there were 4,183 patients awaiting cardiac transplant, while a 
total of 2,804 heart transplants took place.2-3  As there continues to be a definite shortage of transplant 
viable organs in the U.S., it is of paramount importance and in accordance with the OPTN Final Rule that 
available resources are handled efficiently; namely, that all potentially transplantable organs are 
recognized for their enormous value as scarce resources and utilized to their maximum potential for the 
maximum benefit (the principle of Utility).3 
In 2015 there were a total of 2,804 cardiac transplants performed in the United States1. In Region 1, 
which encompasses the New England states, there were 262 patients awaiting a heart transplant and a 
total of 97 cardiac transplants performed.3 During the same one-year-period there were 41 HCV-positive 
donors who met standard criteria for cardiac donation, however these hearts were unfortunately discarded 
and not used for transplant given HCV-positivity.4,5  
It has been well established that there exists a quality of life and survival benefit for patients with end 
stage heart disease who receive a well-functioning cardiac transplant.6,7 Success with transplantation 
requires ongoing immunosuppression to prevent immune graft rejection, which can become complicated 
if persistent viral infection in donors is transmitted to recipients in the process of organ transplantation. 
However, given the severe shortage of available organs and significant waitlist mortality, the use of 
organs from HCV-positive donors has previously been considered.8 Unfortunately there are limited 
studies investigating cardiac transplant outcomes in recipients with either pre-existing or de novo HCV 
infection, but conclusions drawn from the existing data state that the presence of HCV infection post-
transplant, and the subsequent need for interferon based therapy, has been associated with poorer post-
transplant outcomes and an increased risk of graft rejection.9-20  These dated findings have led to 
guidelines recommending that otherwise acceptable heart donors be excluded on the basis of HCV 
infection.21 
It is important to note that the above risks associated with transplantation of HCV-positive donor hearts 
were all determined prior to the current era of HCV treatment. Heretofore, the options for HCV treatment 
in the setting of cardiac transplantation have been severely constrained. Traditional anti-HCV therapy has 
depended on Interferon as the linchpin of single or combination therapy, and these Interferon based 
regimens have been generally poorly tolerated and correlated with an increased risk of serious systemic 
side-effects.22 The potential association between the use of Interferon therapy and allograft rejection, 
necessitating a further increase in net immunosuppression to treat rejection, can cause an increase in viral 
replication, setting off a vicious cycle. This concern over graft rejection has been one of the most 
NCT03208244


 
Version Date: 7/3/2019 
2 
 
formidable arguments against Interferon use in the immediate post-transplant setting. In addition to the 
Interferon-based HCV regimens being poorly tolerated and prone to complications, they have also 
produced underwhelming cure rates of approximately 50% (genotype 1).23 
Direct acting antiviral agents (DAAs) have dramatically improved treatment options and outcomes for 
patients with HCV in both the pre-and post-transplant setting. Modern DAAs offer exceedingly high cure 
rates with minimal side-effects as compared to previous Interferon based treatment regimens.23-25 
SOLAR-1 was a large, multicenter, randomized controlled trial of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir with weight-
based ribavirin in 223 liver-transplant recipients infected with HCV genotypes 1 and 4, with a wide range 
of liver disease severity.  The cure rate for 12 weeks of combination therapy was 96%.  In patients with 
HCV without cirrhosis in the allograft, cure rates of many DAA regimens have been reported in the range 
of 95% or higher. The discontinuation rate for these medications is low and side effects rare.  Importantly, 
the sofosbuvir-based regimens do not have major interactions with the commonly used post-transplant 
immunosuppressive regimens. 
 
The daily, fixed-dose, of co-formulated sofosbuvir (400 mg)/velapatasvir (100 mg) (EpclusaTM) is 
similarly effective to its predecessor sofosbuvir/ledispasvir but has pan-genotypic activity. It is currently 
recommended as a first-line therapy for treatment-naïve, noncirrhotic HCV infection for genotypes 1-5.  
Reported cure rates in the non-transplant setting have been high in the 98-100% range. In the ASTRAL-1, 
ASTRAL-2 and ASTRAL-3 studies, more than 1,000 patients have been treated with EpclusaTM with an 
overall cure rate of 98%. EpclusaTM has not been approved in the U.S. for use in the post-transplant 
setting, but is approved in Europe based on existing safety and efficacy data.  There is an ongoing study 
in New Zealand that has administered EpclusaTM for 4 weeks (starting immediately post-transplant). 
There have been no safety concerns and all recipients achieved rapid virologic suppression and remain 
negative through 4 weeks after completion of therapy. A second pan-genotypic DAA –glecaprevir 
(300mg)/pibrentasvir (120mg) (G/P, MavyretTM), has also recently been approved by the FDA. Reported 
cure rates are comparable to EpclusaTM (in the 99% range in ENDURANCE-1) and adverse reactions low 
with <1% of patients discontinuing therapy in the ENDURANCE-2 and ENDURANCE-3 trials.  In light 
of these recent advances in HCV therapy, we believe that DAAs have the potential to play an important 
role in curtailing the current discard rates for HCV-positive donor organs. While the studies mentioned 
above are specific to liver transplantation, it is postulated that HCV cure, as confirmed by documentation 
of sustained virologic response (SVR), should be at least similar if not higher in transplantation of other 
non-HCV reservoir organs, such as heart.  We hypothesize that utilizing DAA therapy can prevent or 
eliminate HCV infection post transplant when an HCV-positive heart is transplanted into a HCV naïve 
host.  
If this approach proves successful, it has the potential to result not only in a large increase in the number 
of organs available in the cardiac donor pool but also an overall increase in the quality of organ offers. 
The reason for this is that, unfortunately, many potential donors who are HCV-positive belong to a young 
demographic, aged 18 to 35 years, who are now caught up in the national epidemic of opioid and 
intravenous drug abuse, their deaths resulting from drug overdosing. Sadly, despite availability of curative 
HCV therapies, very few intravenous drug users (IVDUs) are able to access these therapies. Thus, it is 
estimated that the HCV epidemic will continue to spread amongst young IVDUs throughout the 
foreseeable future. HCV-positive donor hearts originating from this potential donor cohort, by virtue of 
their young age and statistical estimates of projected allograft performance after transplantation, may be 


 
Version Date: 7/3/2019 
3 
 
some of the most robust in the cardiac donor pool. Demonstration of successful preemptive and/or 
immediate post-transplant treatment of HCV in this model could expand the viable cardiac donor pool 
and result in a reduction in morbidity, mortality, and long-term healthcare costs for patients with end 
stage heart disease. 
Please note, throughout this protocol the use of HCV-positive refers to HCV nucleic acid testing 
(NAT)-positive organs. We address evaluation and management of NAT-negative organs under the 
Study Procedures section of this document and in the separate Protocol Summary document.  
 
II. 
Specific Aims 
 
Primary Objective - Aim 1 
Determine if preemptive administration of pan-genotypic direct-active antiviral (DAA) therapy in cardiac 
transplantation prevents the transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection from an HCV-positive 
donor heart to an HCV-negative recipient patient..   
Secondary Objectives - Aim 2-3 
Aim 2 
Evaluate the safety and tolerability of pan-genotypic DAA therapy in patients undergoing cardiac 
transplantation.  
 
Aim 3 
Determine the proportion of subjects with undetectable serum HCV RNA at study day 7, 14, 28, 56, 84, 
112, 140, 224, and 365 in cardiac transplant recipients receiving pan-genotypic DAA therapy following 
transplant from an HCV infected donor 
 
Clinical hypotheses 
Hypothesis 1. 
We hypothesize that preemptive administration of pan-genotypic DAA therapy following cardiac 
transplantation will be well-tolerated and halt the development of HCV infection in a transplant recipient 
as evidenced by a negative HCV viral RNA at 12 weeks post treatment.   
Hypothesis 2. 
We hypothesize that preemptive administration of pan-genotypic DAA therapy after HCV-positive donor 
heart transplantation will produce non-inferior survival results in recipient patients as compared to 
historical Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) and The International Society for Heart 
and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) data.  
 
III. 
Subject Selection 
 
  Cohort study (N=100) 
 
This is a single center study evaluating if preemptive administration of pan-genotypic DAA therapy in 
cardiac transplantation prevents the transmission of hepatitis C virus infection from an HCV-positive 
donor heart to an HCV-negative recipient. Up to 100 patients will be enrolled study wide, with upto 50 
total patients receiving transplant and treatment with study drug. We plan to enroll all 100 subjects and 
perform all 50 transplants at MGH. 


 
Version Date: 7/3/2019 
4 
 
 
Patients will be selected based on their diminished likelihood of receiving a heart from the waitlist within 
a period during which they would be likely to succumb to severe comorbidities. This will be determined 
in part through use of a patient’s listing status (1A, 1B, 2) and clinical judgment.  
To ensure maximal benefit for the recipient, only high quality donor hearts will be accepted as determined 
by ‘traditional’ cardiac donor selection criteria. These ‘traditional’ donor criteria, based on expert opinion 
and transplant experience, include: age less than 55 years, no history of chest trauma or cardiac disease, 
no prolonged hypotension or hypoxemia, appropriate hemodynamics (mean arterial pressure >60mmHg, 
central venous pressure 8-12mmHg), ionotropic support less than 10mg/kg/min (dopamine or 
dobutamine), normal electrocardiogram, normal echocardiogram, normal cardiac angiograph (if indicated 
by donor age and history), and negative serologies other than hepatitis C (including hepatitis B surface 
antigen, and human immunodeficiency virus).21  Donors will be deemed acceptable if they meet 8 out of 8 
traditional cardiac donor selection criteria.  
1. Donor Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria 
1a. Donor Inclusion Criteria: 
Brain death diagnosed 
Detectable HCV RNA  
Traditional Donor Selection Criteria Met - acceptable for transplantation per usual evaluation 
 
1b. Donor Exclusion Criteria: 
Cardiac anatomical damage or significant pathology noted during recovery 
Liver disease or signs of liver decompensation (splenomegaly, ascites, advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis)  
Donor has been known to have previously received HCV treatment (interferon, ribavirin or DAA) 
Any standard contra-indication to donation noted in donor (significant malignancy, infection with human 
immunodeficiency virus (HIV), prion-related disease, unusual infection).   
 
2. Recipient Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria 
2a. Recipient Inclusion Criteria: 
Recipient is Age ≥ 18 years 
Met MGH transplant center criteria, listed for cardiac transplant 
Able to sign informed consent 
 
2b. Recipient Exclusion Criteria: 
Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women 
HIV positivity 
Any contra-indication to cardiac transplantation per center protocol 
For study patients in whom EpclusaTM therapy is being considered, exclusion criteria includes patients on 
the following p-glycoprotein inducers or moderate to potent CYP inducers that cannot stop therapy: 
carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, oxcarbazepine, rifabutin, rifampin, rifapentine, St. John’s wort.  
For study patients in whom MavyretTM therapy is being considered, exclusion criteria includes patients on 
the following medications who cannot stop therapy: carbamazepine, rifampin, St. John’s wort, and ethinyl 
estradiol-containing oral contraceptives.  
 
For any patient receiving pan-genotypic DAA therapy, the corresponding drug administration instructions 
will be followed as listed in the EpclusaTM or MavyretTM package insert. This includes review of 
potentially significant drug interactions and discontinuation or alteration in dosages and monitoring as 


 
Version Date: 7/3/2019 
5 
 
recommended. The Tables that will be followed can be found on the EpclusaTM package insert pg. 7 Table 
2 and the MavyretTM package insert pg. 8 Table 5.  
 
A subset of patients awaiting cardiac transplant also require kidney transplant. The efficacy of DAAs in 
the treatment of donor derived HCV infection in kidney transplant has been documented in recent reports 
at the University of Pennsylvania and John’s Hopkins Hospitals. Given this recent data, patients requiring 
simultaneous heart-kidney transplant (SHKT) are being considered for enrollment in this study. If patients 
screened for enrollment meet inclusion criteria for cardiac transplant, they will not be excluded based on 
the need for SHKT. Their case will be discussed with the study’s transplant nephrologist, and enrolled 
accordingly with plans to update UNET listing status for SHKT HCV-positive transplant. As far as DAA 
therapy is concerned, if a patient is already undergoing treatment based on receipt of an HCV-positive 
heart, there are no changes in EpclusaTM or MavyretTM therapy duration that would be required if a kidney 
transplant is also performed. In patients receiving SHKT, a patient’s renal function and potential for 
delayed graft function (DGF) will come into play when determining initial DAA selection; we anticipate 
that Mavyret will be the therapy of choice in patients undergoing SHKT. As described above previously, 
we will adhere to the recommended dosing, medications adjustments, and monitoring as outlined in the 
EpclusaTM and MavyretTM package inserts as documented in the detailed protocol. 
Please note: Amiodarone use will not be a recipient exclusion criteria. This has been discussed with the 
cardiac surgeons and transplant cardiologists. For any patients on amiodarone prior to transplantation, 
pacing wires will be in place post-OHT (per usual protocol) with plans to monitor for bradycardia. In 
general patients no longer require amiodarone post-transplant, however to remain cautious during the 
wash-out period, the ability to pace symptomatically bradycardic patients will remain in place until 
amiodarone is out of the system or DAA treatment has been completed. 
 
Standard of care at Partners includes confirming that female patients are not pregnant at the time of organ 
transplantation. For women of childbearing potential, a urine pregnancy test will be performed prior to 
enrollment. A negative result will be required at the time of transplant and prior to continuing study 
treatment. 
 
IV. Subject Enrollment 
 
This is a proof of concept, single center study for the donation of HCV-positive hearts to HCV-negative 
recipients, with preemptive treatment to prevent HCV transmission upon 
transplantation.  
 
Any patient interested in learning about HCV infection and this study will be invited to voluntarily attend 
a one-on-one information session where they will be provided information on HCV including treatment 
options and its current role in cardiac transplantation. Patients will have the opportunity to ask questions 
throughout this meeting. After the session patients will be given the informed consent information to 
review at home. If interested they will subsequently return for a screening visit. 
 
A study clinician investigator (licensed physician) will obtain informed consent. The consent form and 
protocol will be reviewed with the potential subject and any questions will be answered. The subject may 
be seen in a private area located in the Cardiology Clinic. Subjects will again have the option to take the 
consent form home with them for at least 24 hours to decide whether or not they wish to participate. 
 
Ability to provide informed consent will be determined by the study investigator in discussion with the 
subjects treating physician. Subjects who cannot provide informed consent due to their clinical 
presentation will not be included. Surrogate consent will not be allowed in this study. 


 
Version Date: 7/3/2019 
6 
 
 
 
V. Study Procedures 
 
Prior to enrollment in the study, research staff will be working with patient insurance to confirm that the 
patient insurer will be covering the cost of HCV treatment. In the event that insurance does not agree to 
cover the cost of HCV DAA therapy, the cost of medication will be covered by pre-established hospital 
funds.  
Patients will initially sign informed consent to be “waitlisted” for HCV-positive donor hearts under this 
protocol.  At the time a heart transplant becomes available, the “waitlisted” patients will be contacted and 
again sign informed consent for transplantation (standard of care). 
 
Upon receiving notification that an HCV-antibody (Ab) positive donor organ is available, we will review 
if the organ is nucleic acid testing (NAT) positive or negative. A pre-emptive treatment approach will be 
used in patients receiving NAT-positive donor organs, and a reactive treatment approach will be 
performed in patients receiving NAT-negative donor organs, as outlined below: 
 
A study patient who receives an HCV NAT-negative donor heart (or heart and kidney)  will be 
followed with HCV viral load (VL) testing per study protocol (on study days 1, 3, 7, 14, 28, 56, 84, 112, 
140, 224, 280, and 365) 
• 
If the study patient does not develop a positive VL during this 365 day duration they will not 
undergo treatment with DAA therapy.  
• 
If the study patient does demonstrate seroconversion with a positive HCV VL then we will initiate 
pan-genotypic therapy per study protocol. A patient’s case will be reviewed and DAA selection 
made based on individual patient factors with plans to complete a DAA course and monitor for 
SVR at 12 weeks post-therapy completion.   
 
Upon receiving notification that an HCV-positive donor organ is available with plans for transplantation, 
a patient’s case will be reviewed and the appropriate DAA selected based on individual patient factors 
including current labs, medications, and anticipated future post-transplant therapies for any interactions 
that would preclude safe administration of DAA. A study patient who receives an HCV NAT-positive 
donor heart (or heart and kidney) will be scheduled to receive preemptive treatment with one of the 
following pan-genotypic DAAs: 
• 
co-formulated sofosbuvir (400 mg)/velapatasvir (100 mg) (EpclusaTM) given orally for a duration 
of 8 weeks post-transplantation.  
OR 
• 
co-formulated glecaprevir (300mg)/pibrentasvir (120mg) (MavyretTM) given orally for a duration 
of 8 weeks post-transplantation.  
 
In summary: Patients who receive HCV NAT-negative organs are monitored with HCV VL testing as per 
usual protocol. HCV treatment is only initiated in patients who seroconvert and become NAT-positive.  
 
Targeted physical assessment, vital sign measurements, emergence of adverse events and concomitant 
medication usage will be assessed at scheduled visits and as needed at the time of any unscheduled 
contact during the 56 day study period and/or the 365 day post-dosing safety follow-up.  
 
Study visits post-cardiac transplantation will occur on days 0, 1, 3, 7, 14, 28, 42, 56, 70, 84, 112, 140, 
224, 280, 365. 
 


 
Version Date: 7/3/2019 
7 
 
The screening visit will take place within an estimated 1-5 months prior to cardiac transplantation. When 
enrollment is complete the patient’s insurer will be contacted to confirm coverage of a pan-genotypic 
DAA.  Day 0 of this study represents the day of cardiac transplantation, initiation of study drug will begin 
within 7 days of transplantation. After initiation of therapy, each subject will receive their study drug 
daily through course completion. 
Pre-screening workup 
Informed consent for evaluation 
Completed education session with RN and MD/NP 
Complete medical history 
Complete physical exam 
Laboratory screening (HCV Ab and VL, HIV, CMP, CBC with differential, Coagulation tests) 
ECG monitoring 
Quality of life assessment (SF-36) 
 
Baseline testing (day of transplant, day 0) 
HCV RNA, CMP, LFTs, CBC with differential, Coagulation tests 
Review of concomitant meds 
 
Week 1 (Visits on Day 3, 7) 
HCV RNA, CMP, LFTs, CBC with differential 
Adverse event reporting 
Standard of care post-transplant visit  
ECG monitoring 
Review of concomitant meds 
 
Week 2 (Day 14) 
HCV RNA, CMP, LFTs, CBC with differential 
Adverse event reporting 
Standard of care post-transplant visit  
Review of concomitant meds 
 
Week 4 (Day 28) 
HCV RNA, HCV Ab, CMP, LFTs, CBC with differential 
Adverse event reporting 
Standard of care post-transplant visit 
Review of concomitant meds 
 
Week 6 (Day 42) 
HCV RNA, CMP, LFTs, CBC with differential 
Adverse event reporting 
Standard of care post-transplant visit  
Review of concomitant meds 
 
Week 8 (Day 56) 
HCV RNA, CMP, LFTs, CBC with differential 
Adverse event reporting 
Standard of care post-transplant visit  
Review of concomitant meds 
Quality of life assessment (SF-36) 


 
Version Date: 7/3/2019 
8 
 
 
Week 9, (Day 63); One week post DAA completion 
Tacrolimus level (for patients on Mavyret) 
 
Week 10, SVR 2 (Day 70) 
HCV RNA, HCV Ab, CMP, LFTs, CBC with differential 
Tacrolimus level 
Adverse event reporting 
Standard of care post-transplant visit  
Review of concomitant meds 
 
Week 12, SVR 4 (Day 84) 
HCV RNA, CMP, LFTs, CBC with differential 
Adverse event reporting 
Standard of care post-transplant visit  
Review of concomitant meds 
 
Week 16, SVR 8 (Day 112) 
HCV RNA, CMP, LFTs, CBC with differential 
Adverse event reporting 
Standard of care post-transplant visit  
Review of concomitant meds 
 
Week 20, SVR 12 Visit (Day 140) 
HCV RNA, CMP, LFTs, CBC with differential 
Review of concomitant meds 
Quality of life assessments (SF-36) 
 
Week 32, SVR 24 Visit (Day 224) 
HCV RNA, CMP, LFTs, CBC with differential 
Review of concomitant meds 
 
1 year visit (Day 365) 
HCV RNA, CMP, LFTs, CBC with differential 
Review of concomitant meds 
Quality of Life assessment (SF-36) 
 
Serum pregnancy tests (for all females of childbearing potential) will be conducted at screening and 
performed immediately prior to transplantation for all women of reproductive age as a standard of care. 
Because the effect, if any, of EpclusaTM or MavyretTM on an embryo or fetus (developing baby still in the 
womb) is not known, patients may not participate in this study if they are pregnant, breastfeeding, or 
planning to become pregnant. Females who are able to become pregnant must agree to use adequate birth 
control use throughout the duration of the study. For the purposes of this study, adequate birth control 
means one of the following: 
 
1. Intrauterine device (IUD) 
2. Condom with spermicide 
3. Diaphragm with spermicide 
4. Complete abstinence (not having sex at all) 
 
Hormonal forms of birth control including birth control pills, vaginal rings (like NuvaRung), implants 
(like Implanon), or injections (like Depo-Provera) may not work during treatment with EpclusaTM or 


 
Version Date: 7/3/2019 
9 
 
MavyretTM and are not on the acceptable forms of birth control list. After patients have been off 
EpclusaTM or MavyretTM for at least two weeks, they can again begin to use a hormonal form of birth 
control.  
 
Men enrolled in the protocol must also agree to use adequate contraception while participating in this 
study. Adequate contraception is:  
1. Condom with spermicide, and  
2. Female partners must use an approved method of birth control as listed above 
Men must also agree that they will not donate sperm during the entire study period. 
Donor genotyping – HCV genotyping will be performed by the MGH Core Lab. Because the treatment 
in this study is pan-genotypic, we do not need genotype results to return prior to medication 
administration; delays in HCV genotyping will not influence initiation of the study drug. 
 
Achievement of Sustained Virologic Response (SVR). Patients who received an HCV NAT-positive 
donor heart who have an undetectable viral load 12 weeks after completing therapy (SVR 12) are patients 
in whom the use of DAA has successfully prevented HCV infection transmission. If during monitoring 
for these patients a positive viral load is detected and at the end of their 8 week therapy course, a plan will 
be made to extend the patient’s course of Epclusa™ or MavyretTM from 8 weeks to 12 weeks. We may 
also add additional Hep C medications to increase the chance of curing the Hep C infection. If this 
happens, we will plan to review all of these details in person with the patient and determine, based on 
recent updates and clinical practice, the best regimen with which to treat the patient and achieve HCV 
cure.  
 
This study has received IND exemption from the FDA regarding use of pan-genotypic DAA therapy; a 
letter has been posted on the Attachments tab in Insight to provide documentation.  
 
VI. Biostatistical Analysis 
 
Variables/Time Points of Interest 
The primary variable of interest will be HCV RNA at the multiple time-points assessed during and after 
treatment. 
 
The primary efficacy outcome “Prevention of HCV Transmission” will be determined by a negative HCV 
RNA test. 
 
The safety outcomes include summation of treatment related adverse events and transplant rejection or 
patient mortality. On treatment eGFR, proteinuria, hemoglobin, and liver function tests will be 
summarized to assess safety. 
 
Statistical Methods 
Patient characteristics for this cohort (N=50 receiving HCV+ organ) will be presented with summary 
statistics for baseline demographics and clinical variables. The SVR12 rate will be presented and 95% CI 
constructed with the exact test. Mean and standard deviation for on-treatment laboratory values will be 
presented to analyze safety. 
 
Power/Sample Size: 
This is a pilot study. Up to 100 patients will be enrolled (consented for the possible receipt of an HCV-
positive organ), the total number of patients eligible to receive transplant and study drug = 50. 
 
 


 
Version Date: 7/3/2019 
10 
 
VII. Risks and Discomforts 
 
Psychological risk 
Participation in research may result in undesired changes in thought process or emotion (episodes of 
depression, stress, guilt). Patients may experience discomfort when being asked questions about their 
medical history that they deem to be private. 
 
Risks related to transplantation with an HCV infected heart (or heart and kidney)  
Liver problems 
While unlikely, it is possible that DAAs will not result in the same efficacy following cardiac transplant. 
If HCV is transmitted and not eradicated it is possible that HCV infection post-transplant could cause 
health problems, including liver injury. In the short term, infection with HCV can cause a flu-like illness 
that includes fatigue, nausea, fever, abdominal pain, vomiting, joint pain, and yellowing of the skin 
(jaundice). Although it is very rare, infection with HCV can cause severe inflammation of the liver or 
even liver failure, including a condition called fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis. The risk of this complication 
in patients without HCV who receive a transplant from a donor with HCV is unknown. This complication 
can be treated and cured in the majority of cases with the HCV medications. 
 
Cirrhosis of the liver can cause someone to experience leg swelling, yellow skin, skin itching, abdominal 
bleeding, shortness of breath, and the abdomen to fill with fluid (ascites). Liver failure can also cause 
death. Based on the limited data available, it would be extremely rare for someone in the study to 
experience liver failure in the first few months after transplantation because the study will be giving HCV 
treatment right away.  
 
In the unlikely event that the patient develops HCV infection despite DAA therapy, we will be prepared 
to offer 2nd line treatment using + ribavirin or MavyretTM + ribavirin plus an additional DAA agent. In the 
unlikely event that this fails, there may be continued inflammation and scarring of the liver that over 
many years (10-30) that can lead to cirrhosis. If HCV causes cirrhosis, the patient is at increased risk of 
developing liver cancer, liver failure requiring a subsequent liver transplant, or death. Of note, we 
anticipate that with study drug treatment, or if necessary additional HCV therapies, we will be able to 
successfully prevent transmission and eradicate HCV in our study population.  
 
Additional risks of HCV: 
HCV can cause other types of inflammation in the body, such as arthritis, rash, anemia, nerve pain and 
inflammation damage to your kidney transplant. These problems are rare, and affect less than 2% of 
people who have HCV. These problems should respond to effective HCV treatment. 
 
 
Risks Related to Study Medications 
Risks of sofosbuvir/velapatasvir (EpclusaTM) 
Sofosbuvir/velapatasvir (EpclusaTM) is an FDA approved pan-genotypic regimen for treating HCV 
infection. Thousands of patients have received this medication for HCV treatment. 
 
In patients receiving EpclusaTM for 8 weeks the most common side effects were fatigue, headache, and 
nausea (occurring in approximately 1 in 10 patients). Only 0.2% of patients had side effects so severe that 
they had to stop treatment. 
 
The safety and tolerability of EpclusaTM after cardiac transplantation has not yet been extensively studied. 
It is possible that taking immunosuppressant medications needed after cardiac transplant may change the 
effectiveness or side effects of EpclusaTM.  


 
Version Date: 7/3/2019 
11 
 
 
Risks of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (MavyretTM) 
Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (MavyretTM) is an FDA approved pan-genotypic regimen for treating HCV 
infection. Thousands of patients have received this medication for HCV treatment.  
 
The adverse reactions data for MavyretTM in subjects without cirrhosis were derived from nine Phase 
2 and 3 trials which evaluated approximately 2,300 subjects infected with HCV genotype 1, 2, 3, 4, 
5, or 6 who received MavyretTM for 8, 12 or 16 weeks. In patients receiving MavyretTM the most 
common side effects were headache (13%), fatigue (11%), and nausea (8%). The overall proportion of 
subjects who permanently discontinued treatment due to adverse reactions was 0.1% for subjects 
who received MavyretTM for 8, 12 or 16 weeks.  
 
The safety and tolerability of MavyretTM after cardiac transplantation has not yet been extensively studied. 
It is possible that taking immunosuppressant medications needed after cardiac transplant may change the 
effectiveness or side effects of MavyretTM. 
 
Risk of allergic reaction 
As with any drug, an allergic reaction can occur. Allergic reactions can be mild or serious, and can even 
result in death in some cases. Common symptoms of an allergic reaction are rash, itching, skin problems, 
swelling of the face and throat, or trouble breathing. 
 
Risks Related to Study Procedures 
 
Risks of Blood Draws 
The patient may have a bruise (a black-and-blue mark) or pain where researchers take the blood samples. 
There is also a small risk of feeling lightheaded, fainting, or infection.  A total of up to 53 tablespoons of 
blood will be drawn over the course of the entire study. 
 
Risks to an Embryo or Fetus, or to a Breastfeeding Infant 
Because the effect, if any, of EpclusaTM or MavyretTM on an embryo or fetus is not known, the patient 
may not participate in this study if they are pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning to become pregnant. This 
is not a new requirement necessitated by this protocol, as patients on the cardiac transplant list must also 
agree to not become pregnant while awaiting and for a period of time after transplantation.  
Study Drug Exposure 
Patients will not receive the study drug until post-transplant or just prior to their transport to the operating 
room (OR) to receive a donor organ. We anticipate that the likelihood of a patient not receiving an organ 
after taking a dose of study drug is extremely low. However, in the event that a patient does receive the 
initial dose of study drug and not an HCV-positive heart, we would then plan to immediately stop the 
study drug. No additional study drug would be given unless the patient was again offered an HCV-
positive organ and returning to the OR.  
 
 
 
VIII. Potential Benefits 
 
Receipt of an organ 


 
Version Date: 7/3/2019 
12 
 
Participants may receive a cardiac transplant because they are enrolled in this study. For some patients, 
they may have not received an organ at all if the severity of their disease would have otherwise led to 
death while awaiting organ transplant. 
 
Shortened wait time 
Participants may spend a shorter duration of time on the transplant waitlist than they otherwise would 
have if they had not been a part of the research study.  
 
Improved patient quality of life  
A heart that would have otherwise gone to waste can potentially be used to prolong the life and 
significantly improve morbidity for an individual.  
 
Cost Reduction 
This procedure could also eliminate costs associated with the management of end stage heart disease and 
hospitalization.  
 
Increase organ donor pool (an otherwise stagnant number) 
This study could increase the number of viable hearts for transplant and greatly reduce the HCV-positive 
cardiac discard rate. 
 
 
IX. Monitoring and Quality Assurance 
An independent data safety monitoring board (DSMB) will not be used in this study as it is an open label 
study, will have low enrollment, and will only take place at 1 site. 
 
Once a patient is enrolled, Dr. Lewis, Dr. Chung, Dr. Bethea, and Dr. D’Alessandro will meet in person 
every three months to review any safety concerns. More frequent meetings will occur if needed. 
 
Dr. Lewis and Dr. Chung will be regularly monitoring the study documents for accuracy and meeting 
with study staff to review the study status. This protocol will be incorporated into the cardiology standard 
of care post-transplant protocol. A pool of heart failure attendings, including Dr. Gregory Lewis, Dr. 
Stephanie Moore, Dr. Erin Coglianese, Dr. Sunu Thomas, and Dr. William Carlson will potentially be 
caring for the patients enrolled in this study. Dr. Lewis will ultimately be responsible for protecting the 
rights, safety and welfare of all subjects enrolled in this study. In the case of Dr. Lewis’s absence, 
monitoring responsibilities will be delegated to one of the subinvestigators listed on the 1572 as well as 
the IRB protocol application. 
 
Adverse events will be thoroughly assessed at each treatment visit. Adverse events will be reported to the 
HRC as per current guidelines. We plan to comply with the reporting of any IND safety reports or any 
other federal regulations. The study coordinator will work with the physician investigators to process the 
report of these events as they happen.  
 
Adverse events and unanticipated problems involving risks to subjects or others will be reported to the 
PHRC in accordance with PHRC adverse event and unanticipated problems reporting guidelines. 
 
Dr. Lewis will ensure that all adverse events are reported according to the PHRC guidelines. 
 
Dr. Lewis and the study staff will meet monthly to review the accuracy and completeness of case report 
form entries, source documents, informed consent, and all regulatory documents. 
 
X. References 


 
Version Date: 7/3/2019 
13 
 
1. OPTN Data accessed 8/30/16: https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/data/view-data-reports/national-data/  
2. Division of Transplantation, Bureau of Health Resources Development. 2005 Annual Report of the 
US Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients and the Organ Procurement and Transplantation 
Network — Transplant Data:1995-2004. Health Resources and Services Administration; US 
Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD 2005. 
3. OPTN Heart Data accessed 8/30/16: https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/data/view-data-reports/national-
data/# 
4. OPTN Final Rule §121.8 Allocation of organs, 64 FR 56659, Oct. 20, 1999, as amended at 64 FR 
71626, Dec. 21, 1999. 
5. Data from New England Organ Bank (NEOB): http://neob.org/  
6. International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) 
http://www.ishlt.org/registries/slides.asp?slides=heartLungRegistry 
7. Lund LH, Edwards LB, Kucheryavaya AY, et al. The Registry of the International Society for Heart 
and Lung Transplantation: Thirty-second Official Adult Heart Transplantation Report--2015; Focus 
Theme: Early Graft Failure. J Heart Lung Transplant 2015; 34:1244. 
8. Yusen RD, Edwards LB, Kucheryavaya AY, et al. The Registry of the International Society for Heart 
and Lung Transplantation: Thirty-second Official Adult Lung and Heart-Lung Transplantation 
Report--2015; Focus Theme: Early Graft Failure. J Heart Lung Transplant 2015; 34:1264. 
9. Kim E, Ko HH,Yoshida EM, A concise review of Hepatitis C in Heart and Lung Transplantation, Can 
J Gastroenterol. 2011 Aug;25(8):445-8. 
10. Pereira BJ, Milford EL, Kirkman RL, Levey AS. Transmission of hepatitis C virus by organ 
transplantation. N Engl J Med  1991;325:454-60. 
11. Pereira BJ, Milford EL, Kirkman RL, et al. Prevalence of hepatitis C virus RNA in organ donors 
positive for hepatitis C antibody and in the recipients of their organs. N Engl J Med 1992;327:910-5. 
12. Fagiuoli S, Minniti F, Pevere S, et al. HBV and HCV infections in heart transplant recipients. J Heart 
Lung Transplant 2001;20:718-24. 
13.  Fong TL, Hou L, Hutchinson IV, Cicciarelli JC, Cho YW. Impact of hepatitis C infection on 
outcomes after heart transplantation. Transplantation 2009;88:1137-41. 
14. Ong JP, Barnes DS, Younossi ZM, et al. Outcome of de novo hepatitis C virus infection in heart 
transplant recipients. Hepatology 1999;30:1293-8. 
15. Pfau PR, Rho R, DeNofrio D, et al. Hepatitis C transmission and infection by orthotopic heart 
transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2000;19:350-4. 
16. Marelli D, Bresson J, Laks H, et al. Hepatitis C-positive donors in heart transplantation. Am J 
Transplant 2002;2:443-7. 
17.  Pereira BJ, Milford EL, Kirkman RL, Levey AS. Transmission of hepatitis C virus by organ 
transplantation. N Engl J Med 1991;325:454-60. 
18. Zein NN, McGreger CG, Wendt NK, et al. Prevalence and outcome of hepatitis C infection among 
heart transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant 1995;14:865-9. 
19. Lunel F, Cadranel JF, Rosenheim M, et al. Hepatitis virus infections in heart transplant recipients: 
Epidemiology, natural history, characteristics, and impact on survival. Gastroenterology 
2000;119:1064-74. 
20.  Pereira BJ, Milford EL, Kirkman RL, et al. Prevalence of hepatitis C virus RNA in organ donors 
positive for hepatitis C antibody and in the recipients of their organs. N Engl J Med 1992;327:910-5. 
21. Kilic A, Emani S, Sai-Sudhakar CB, et al. Donor selection in heart transplantation. J Thorac 
Dis. 2014 Aug;6(8):1097-104. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.03.23. 
22. Foster G, Suddle A. Treatment of HCV infection with pegylated interferons. Current Hepatitis 
Reports [serial online]. 2005;(2):49. Available from: Academic OneFile, Ipswich, MA. Accessed 
August, 2016. 
23. Sharfuddin A, Taber T, Mujtaba M, Yaqub M, Mishler D, Kwo P, Vuppalanchi R. Treatment of 
Hepatitis C Virus in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Direct Acting Anti-Viral Agents: Early 
Results in 12 Cases [abstract]. Am J Transplant. 2015; 15 (suppl 3). 


Version Date: 7/3/2019 
14 
24. Roth D, Nelson DR, Bruchfeld A, et al. Grazoprevir plus asvir in treatment-naive and treatment-
experienced patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection and stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease
(the C-SURFER study): a combination phase 3 study. Lancet 2015;386:1537-45.
25. Kumar S, Deo SV, Altarabsheh SE, et al.  Effect of Hepatitis C Positivity on Survival in Adult
Patients Undergoing Heart Transplantation (from the United Network for Organ Sharing Database).
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Jul 1;118(1):132-7.
26. Division of Transplantation, Bureau of Health Resources Development. 2005 Annual Report of the
US Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients and the Organ Procurement and Transplantation
Network — Transplant Data:1995-2004. Health Resources and Services Administration; US
Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD 2005.