Conditions: Prostate Cancer Endometrial Cancer
Allocation: RANDOMIZED | Intervention model: PARALLEL
Enrollment: 12
Healthy volunteers: no

Brief summary:
This is a phase 1/phase 2a study of the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitor (nivolumab) in combination with the PARP inhibitor (rucaparib) for patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and metastatic/recurrent endometrial cancer.

In the phase 1 portion, the safety of the combination dosing will be determined. If the combination dosing is determined to be safe and feasible, the study will move onto phase 2a.

In the phase 2a portion, participants will be randomized to receive either: rucaparib alone, nivolumab alone, or combination therapy (rucaparib and nivolumab).

Detailed description:

Arms:
arm 1: Participants will receive rucaparib plus nivolumab in 4 week cycles. arm 2: Participants randomized to receive rucaparib alone in 4 week cycles. arm 3: Participants randomized to receive nivolumab alone in 4 week cycles. arm 4: Participants randomized to receive rucaparib plus nivolumab in 4 week cycles. Participants will receive rucaparib alone in cycle 1 and begin nivolumab on day 1 of Cycle 2.

Interventions: intervention 1: Rucaparib intervention 2: Nivolumab
Intervention descriptions: intervention 1: 600 mg taken by mouth twice daily. intervention 2: 480 mg given by intravenous (IV) infusion every 4 weeks.

Protocol document:
Prot_SAP_000.pdf: 
 
IRB18-0154 
Page 1 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
Local Protocol #: IRB18-0154 
BMS Protocol #CA209-9AW  
IND #: 138314 
 
TITLE:  A Phase Ib/II Study of Rucaparib (PARP inhibitor) combined with Nivolumab in 
Metastatic Castrate – Resistant Prostate Cancer and Advanced/Recurrent Endometrial Cancer. 
 
 
 
Lead Site:  
 
 
 
 
University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center (UCCCC) 
 
Lead Principal  
Investigator: 
Walter Stadler, MD 
The University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center 
5841 S. Maryland 
MC2115 
Chicago, IL  60637 
Telephone: 773-702-4400 
Fax: 773-834-0188 
E-mail: wstadler@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu 
 
Co-Principal  
 
Investigators: 
Gini F. Fleming, M.D. 
 
The University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center 
 
Knapp Center for Biomedical Discovery, Room 8118 
 
900 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637 
 
Telephone: 773-834-3519 
 
Fax: 773-834-0778 
 
E-mail: gfleming@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu 
 
Akash Patnaik, M.D., Ph.D., M.M.Sc. 
 
The University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center 
 
Knapp Center for Biomedical Discovery, Room 7152 
 
900 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637 
 
Telephone: 773-834-3519 
 
Fax: 773-834-0778 
 
E-mail: apatnaik1@uchicago.edu 
 
Additional Site:  
Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern 
University 
 
 
 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 2 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
Northwestern  
Investigators: 
Emma Barber, M.D. (Local PI)  &  Daniela Matei, M.D. (Co-I) 
 
Northwestern University 
 
Robert H Lurie Medical Research Ctr Room 5-121 
 
303 East Superior 
 
Chicago, IL 60622 
 
312-472-4684 
 
emma.barber@northwestern.edu 
 
Daniela.matei@northwestern.edu 
 
 
Statistician:  
Theodore Karrison, PhD 
 
Dept. of Health Studies, MC2007 
5841 S. Maryland Avenue 
Chicago, IL 60637 
tkarrison@health.bsd.uchicago.edu 
 
UCCCC Research Nurses:  Elia Martinez, R.N. 
                                                University of Chicago, Department of Medicine 
                                                Section of Hematology/Oncology 
                                                5841 S. Maryland Ave. MC2115 
                                                Chicago, IL 60637 
                                                773-702-4135 
                                                emartinez1@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu 
 
                                                Brittany Dyer, RN 
                                                Section of Hematology/Oncology 
                                                5841 S. Maryland Ave MC 2115 
                                                Chicago, IL 60637 
                                                773-702-4978 
                                                bhill10@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu 
 
 
Study Monitor Contact:  
PhaseIICRA@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu 
 
Study Regulatory Contact:  PCCC_Regulatory@bsd.uchicago.edu  
 
UCCCC Data Manager:       Julie Gruszczynski 
                                                University of Chicago, Department of Medicine 
                                                Section of Hematology/Oncology 
                                                5841 S. Maryland Ave. MC2115 
                                                Chicago, IL 60637 
                                                Phone: 773-834-9961 
                                                Fax: 773-834-6757 
 
 
This is a multi-institutional study being conducted by institutional members of the Personalized 
Cancer Care Consortium (PCCC), as well as additional sites. 
 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 3 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
Protocol Version History: 
Initial Version; 4/19/2018 
Amendment 1; 8/24/2018 
Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
 
 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 4 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
 
 
 
SUMMARY 
 
Study design:   
 
This is a phase Ib/phase II, open label study of the immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab in 
combination with the PARP inhibitor rucaparib for patients with metastatic castration resistant 
prostate cancer (mCRPC) and metastatic/recurrent endometrial cancer.  
 
To determine the feasibility of combination therapy with Rucaparib and Nivolumab, the first 4-
12 patients, beginning with patients enrolled under Amendment 1, will be enrolled into the Phase 
Ib portion of this study. Patients who are non-evaluable for toxicity during this phase of the study 
will be replaced. These patients will undergo a pretreatment biopsy, then will begin combination 
therapy with Rucaparib and Nivolumab. Patients enrolled to the Phase Ib portion of the study 
will begin dosing of Rucaparib and Nivolumab on cycle 1 day 1. Rucaparib will be dosed 600 
mg BID continuous daily dosing for a cycle length of 28 days. Nivolumab 480 mg will be 
administered intravenously on day 1. Subjects will then undergo a second biopsy at the end of 
the treatment cycle.  
 
Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) is defined as any grade 3 or 4 toxicity requiring interruption of 
rucaparib therapy for more than one week in the first 4 weeks of therapy. If two or fewer of the 
first 8 patients or 3 or fewer of the first twelve patients have dose-limiting toxicity, the 
combination will be deemed feasible. If the combination is deemed feasible, subsequent patients 
will be enrolled to the Phase II portion of the study.  
 
Patients enrolled to the Phase II portion of the study will be randomized to either the single-agent 
rucaparib arm, the single-agent nivolumab arm, or the combination rucaparib and nivolumab 
arm. These patients will undergo a pre-treatment biopsy, then will begin study treatment. During 
the first cycle of treatment, patients randomized to single-agent rucaparib will be dosed 600 mg 
BID continuous daily dosing for a cycle length of 28 days. Patients randomized to single-agent 
nivolumab will be dosed at 480 mg on day 1 of a 28 day cycle. Patients randomized to the 
combination therapy arm will be dosed with rucaparib 600 mg BID daily and nivolumab 480 mg 
IV on day 1 of a 28 day cycle. At the end of this treatment cycle, subjects will undergo a second 
biopsy.  For cycle 2 onwards, all subjects will be crossed over to receive the combination therapy 
of rucaparib plus nivolumab (unless they experience toxicity that makes this not feasible). 
 
Primary objectives:   
 
 Phase 1b: To determine feasibility of the combination of rucaparib and nivolumab in 
advanced endometrial and prostate cancer. Feasibility is defined as a dose-limiting toxicity 
(DLT) rate less than or equal to 25%.  DLT is defined in Section 5.5.   
 Phase II: To compare T cell inflammatory infiltrate within the tumor microenvironment after 
single agent rucaparib, single agent nivolumab, or the combination, by Nanostring RNA 
sequencing 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 5 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
 
Secondary objectives 
 To estimate objective and biochemical (PSA, CA-125) response rates to rucaparib plus 
nivolumab. 
 To estimate progression free survival of rucaparib plus nivolumab by radiographic and 
serologic (PSA, CA-125) criteria. 
 To characterize baseline and changes in T cell inflammatory infiltrate within the tumor 
microenvironment after single agent rucaparib, single agent nivolumab, or the 
combination, by IHC.  
 To correlate changes in T-cell inflammatory infiltrate with PTEN status. 
 
 
Exploratory objectives: 
 
Assess DNA damage (p-gH2AX)/ HRD score in pre- and on-treatment tumor 
biopsy samples. 
 
Assess tumor infiltrating T-cell diversity. Using using flow cytometry 
 
Examine peripheral immune alterations, using flow cytometry 
 
 
Key eligibility criteria:   
 
Patients must have histologically or cytologically confirmed endometrial cancer 
or mCRPC that is metastatic.  
 
They must have disease lesions amenable to safe biopsy and be willing to undergo 
two mandatory biopsies 4 weeks apart. 
 
ECOG performance status 0 or 1.  
 
Adequate organ function (liver, renal, hematologic). 
 
Sample size 
60 patients will be enrolled on the study, starting with patients enrolled under Amendment 1.  In 
the Phase Ib portion of the study, the first 4-12 patients will be enrolled on the combination arm 
to ensure feasibility of the combination for 8 weeks. Patients who are non-evaluable for toxicity 
during this phase of the study will be replaced.  If the combination is deemed feasible, then we 
will proceed to the Phase II portion of the study.  
 
In the Phase II portion of the study, we will randomize 48-52 patients (depending on feasibility 
results) to either combination therapy, an initial 4 weeks single agent rucaparib followed by 
crossover to combination therapy, or an initial 4 weeks nivolumab followed by crossover to 
combination therapy, such that 20 patients will have been enrolled on each arm across the phase 
Ib and II study parts. 
 
Therapies and route of administration:  Nivolumab will be given at 480 mg IV q4 weeks and 
Rucaparib at 600 mg PO BID. 
 
 
 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 6 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
Key study procedures:   
 Two mandatory tissue biopsies  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 7 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
 
SCHEMA 
 
 
Schema for Phase Ib feasibility lead-in (minimum n = 4, maximum n = 12 evaluable):  
 
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 8 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
 
 
 
 
Schema for Phase II portion  
 
Rucaparib (n = 20); Nivolumab (n = 20); Rucaparib + Nivolumab (n <=12)    
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 9 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
 
 
2 
Table of Contents 
1. BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................14 
1.1  Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer.........................................................14 
1.2  Current Treatment Paradigms for Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate 
Cancer ....................................................................................................................14 
1.3   Immunotherapy in prostate cancer .............................................................................15 
1.4  PARP Inhibition in mCRPC .......................................................................................15 
1.5 Endometrial Cancer ..................................................................................................16 
1.6 Current Treatment of Metastatic Endometrial Cancer ..............................................16 
1.7 Immunotherapy in Endometrial Cancer ....................................................................17 
1.8 PARP Inhibition in Endometrial Cancer...................................................................17 
1.9   Rucaparib ...................................................................................................................17 
1.10   Nivolumab................................................................................................................18 
1.11   Rationale for combination of Rucaparib with Nivolumab .......................................19 
1.12 Correlative Studies Background ................................................................................19 
1.12.1 Assessing changes in a T-cell inflamed gene signature and immune 
infiltrates within the tumor microenvironment ..........................................19 
1.12.2  Measuring DNA damage responses in tumor cells ....................................20 
1.12.3  Assessing T-cell diversity ..........................................................................21 
2 
OBJECTIVES .........................................................................................................................22 
2.1 Primary Objectives....................................................................................................22 
2.2 Secondary Objectives................................................................................................22 
2.3 Exporatory Objectives ..............................................................................................22 
3. PATIENT SELECTION .........................................................................................................22 
3.1  Inclusion Criteria ......................................................................................................22 
3.2  Exclusion Criteria .....................................................................................................24 
3.3  Patients or Partners of Patients of Reproductive Potential .......................................26 
3.4  Inclusion of Minorities ................................................................................................27 
4.  REGISTRATION PROCEDURES ..........................................................................................27 
4.1 General Guidelines.......................................................................................................27 
4.2 Registration Process .....................................................................................................28 
4.3 Treatment Allocation and Randomization Processes ..................................................29 
4.3.1 Treatment Allocation for Phase I-B portion .................................................29 
4.3.2 Treatment Allocation for Phase II portion ....................................................29 
5. TREATMENT AND BIOPSY PLAN .......................................................................................30 
5.1    Study Agent Administration .....................................................................................30 
5.1.1 Phase I-B Portion ..........................................................................................30 
5.1.2 Phase II Portion .............................................................................................31 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 10 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
5.2  Nivolumab...................................................................................................................32 
5.2.1  Nivolumab Administration ..........................................................................32 
5.2.2 Nivolumab Packaging, Labeling and Storage ............................................32 
5.2.2  Management of Nivolumab-related Infusion Reactions ..............................33 
5.3 Rucaparib .....................................................................................................................34 
5.3.1 Description of Treatment(s) and Storage ......................................................34 
5.3.2 Rucaparib Packaging and Labeling ..............................................................35 
5.3.3 Administration ..............................................................................................35 
5.4 Research Biospy Plan ..................................................................................................35 
5.4.1 Rationale for Collection of Research Biospies .............................................36 
5.4.2 Handling of Biopsy Samples .........................................................................36 
5.5 Definition of Dose-Limiting Toxicity (Phase I-B portion) ..........................................36 
5.6 Determination of Feasibility of Combination Arm (Phase I-B portion) ......................37 
5.7 General Concomitant Medications/Treatments and Supportive Care 
Guidelines ..............................................................................................................37 
5.7.1   Concomitant Medication .............................................................................37 
5.7.2 Palliative Radiotherapy .................................................................................39 
5.7.3 Surgical Procedures ......................................................................................39 
5.7.4 Supportive Care Guidelines for Rucaparib and Nivolumab .........................39 
5.8 Duration of Therapy .....................................................................................................39 
5.9 Duration of Follow Up .................................................................................................39 
5.10  Criteria for Removal from Study ..............................................................................40 
6. STUDY ASSESSMENTS .........................................................................................................40 
6.1 Pre-treatment Screening Evaluation (Phase I-b and II) ...............................................40 
6.2 On Study Visits ............................................................................................................40 
6.2.1 Phase I-B Portion ..........................................................................................40 
6.2.2  Phase II Portion ............................................................................................41 
6.3 Off Study Assessments ................................................................................................42 
7. STUDY CALENDAR ...............................................................................................................43 
7.1 Phase I-b portion ..........................................................................................................43 
7.2 Phase II portion ............................................................................................................45 
8. DOSING DELAYS/DOSE MODIFICATIONS........................................................................47 
8.1 General Guidelines.......................................................................................................47 
8.2 Nivolumab-related Toxicity .........................................................................................47 
8.3   Rucaparib Dose Modifications ..................................................................................47 
Rucaparib Dose Reduction Steps .......................................................................................48 
8.4 Management of Anemia including Evaluation for MDS/AML and Follow-up 
of Patients who Discontinue Treatment with Ongoing Anemia ............................48 
8.5 Management of Rucaparib Treatment-Emergent ALT/AST Elevations .....................49 
8.7  Treatment of Overdose ...............................................................................................49 
9. ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING REQUIREMENTS ............................................................50 
9.1 Adverse Event ..............................................................................................................50 
9.2 Adverse Events of Special Interest ..............................................................................50 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 11 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
9.2.1 Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia ..........................50 
9.2.2 Reporting of AESIs to Clovis .......................................................................51 
9.3 Serious Adverse Events ...............................................................................................51 
9.3.1 Definition of Serious Adverse Event ............................................................51 
9.3.2 Events or Outcomes Not Qualifying as Serious Adverse Event ...................51 
9.4 Suspected Adverse Reactions ......................................................................................52 
9.5 Unexpected Events.......................................................................................................52 
9.6  Adverse Event Reporting Requirements .....................................................................52 
9.6.1 Routine Adverse Event Reporting ................................................................52 
9.6.2 Serious Adverse Event Reporting to the Coordinating Center .....................52 
9.6.3 Serious and Unexpected Adverse Event reporting by the 
Coordinating Center ...................................................................................53 
9.7 Other Safety Considerations ........................................................................................56 
9.7.1  Laboratory Data ...........................................................................................56 
9.7.2 Procedure in Case of Pregnancy or Drug Exposure during Pregnancy ........56 
9.7.3 Medication Errors .........................................................................................57 
9.7.4 Infusion Reactions ........................................................................................57 
9.8 Follow-Up of Adverse Events .....................................................................................57 
10. PHARMACEUTICAL  INFORMATION ...............................................................................57 
10.1 Rucaparib ...................................................................................................................58 
10.1.1 Description of the Dosage Form .................................................................58 
10.1.2  Destruction of Study Drug Provided by Clovis .........................................58 
10.2 Nivolumab..................................................................................................................59 
10.2.1 Description of the Dosage Form .................................................................59 
10.2.2 Drug Product Preparation ...........................................................................59 
10.2.3 Recommended Storage and Use Conditions ...............................................60 
10.2.4  Undiluted Nivolumab Injection and Diluted Nivolumab injection 
in the IV Container.....................................................................................60 
10.2.5 Nivolumab Preparation and Dispensing .....................................................60 
10.2.6 Destruction of Study Drug Provided by BMS ............................................60 
11.     BIOMARKER, CORRELATIVE, AND SPECIAL STUDIES ..........................................61 
11.1 Biomarker Studies ......................................................................................................61 
11.1.1 Sample Collection .......................................................................................61 
11.1.2 Sample Processing ......................................................................................62 
11.1.3 Sample Storage and Shipment ....................................................................62 
11.2  Special Studies ..........................................................................................................63 
11.2.1 Immunological Monitoring .........................................................................63 
11.2.2 Assess changes in T-cell inflamed gene signature, STING pathway 
activation and macrophage subsets by Nanostring ....................................63 
11.2.3 Assess changes in T cell and myeloid immune infiltrates within the 
tumor microenvironment by IHC...............................................................64 
11.2.4 Assess changes in immune populations within the tumor 
microenvironment and in peripheral blood by flow cytometry .................64 
11.2.5 DNA damage (p-γH2AX) / HRD score ......................................................64 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 12 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
11.2.6 Tumor-infiltrating T-cell diversity ..............................................................65 
11.3.7 PTEN Immunohistochemistry ...................................................................65 
12. MEASUREMENT OF EFFECT..............................................................................................66 
12.1 Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 
Guidelines ..............................................................................................................66 
12.1.1 Categorizing Lesions at Baseline ................................................................66 
12.1.2 Recording Tumor Assessments...................................................................67 
12.1.3 Objective Response Status at Each Evaluation ...........................................67 
12.2  Outcome Measures for Prostate cancer patients based on PSA Decline ..................70 
12.2.1 Prostate-Specific Antigen Working Group Criteria [84] ............................71 
12.3 Duration of Response .................................................................................................72 
12.4 Progression-Free Survival ..........................................................................................72 
13. DATA REPORTING ...............................................................................................................72 
14. STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS ....................................................................................73 
14.1 Study Design/Endpoints.............................................................................................73 
14.2 Sample Size/Accrual Rate..........................................................................................74 
14.3 Stratification Factors ..................................................................................................74 
14.4 74 
Phase II Primary Endpoint: Assess changes in T-cell inflamed gene signature by 
Nanostring. .............................................................................................................74 
14.5 Phase II Secondary Endpoint: Response rate and time to disease progression 
for prostate cancer and endometrial cancer patients ..............................................74 
14.6 Phase II Secondary Endpoints: Assess changes in immune populations in the 
tumor microenvironment by IHC...........................................................................75 
14.7 Phase II Exploratory Endpoints: ................................................................................75 
15. STUDY MANAGEMENT AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS ...............................................76 
15.1 Multicenter Guidelines...............................................................................................76 
15.2 Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval and Consent .........................................76 
15.3 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Approval ......................................................76 
15.4 Required Documentation ...........................................................................................77 
15.5 Data and Safety Monitoring .......................................................................................77 
15.6 Auditing .....................................................................................................................78 
15.7 Amendments to the Protocol ......................................................................................78 
15.8 Annual IRB Renewals, Continuing Review and Final Reports .................................79 
15.9 Record Retention .......................................................................................................79 
15.10 Obligations of Study Site Investigators ...................................................................80 
REFERENCES ..............................................................................................................................81 
APPENDIX A 
PERFORMANCE STATUS CRITERIA ..................................................87 
APPENDIX B 
MULTICENTER GUIDELINES ...............................................................88 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 13 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
APPENDIX C: PATIENT MEDICATION DIARY .....................................................................89 
 
 
 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 14 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
1. 
BACKGROUND 
 
1.1  Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer 
 
Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy among men in the United States, and the 
second-most common cause of cancer-related mortality, with approximately 27,000 men dying 
of the disease each year [1]. Although most men are diagnosed with early stage, curable prostate 
cancer, prostate cancer (CaP) recurrence is seen in ~40% of patients over time [2]. The course of 
prostate cancer from diagnosis to death is often a series of clinical states progressing from 
localized disease to metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), a disease state 
characterized by resistance to standard androgen deprivation therapies that accounts for the 
majority of prostate cancer deaths.  
 
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) remains the mainstay of initial treatment of metastatic 
disease, and 80-90% of patients with advanced disease will experience a response to ADT.  
Initial ADT results in a variable median progression-free survival of 12 to 33 months, at which 
time a castration-resistant phenotype commonly emerges. This accounts for the median overall 
survival of 60 months from the initiation of androgen deprivation[3]. 
 
The biology of metastatic prostate cancer and castration-resistance is complex. PTEN loss-of-
function (PTEN LOF), found in up to 75% of mCRPC patients, contributes to tumor 
development, leads to poor clinical outcomes, and is associated with an immunosuppressive 
tumor microenvironment. Given the correlation between PTEN loss and a lack of responsiveness 
to immunotherapy in melanoma and leiomyosarcoma [4, 5], finding strategies to sensitize PTEN-
deficient cancers to immunotherapy would have a significant impact on the therapeutic success 
for patients with lethal prostate cancer. In addition to its effects on the immune 
microenvironment, PTEN loss leads to genomic instability, causing these tumor cells to become 
reliant on DNA repair enzymes such as PARP. As such, PTEN-deficient tumors are potentially 
susceptible to PARP inhibition, which not only has direct anti-tumor activity, but could also 
induce DNA-damage associated increased tumor mutational burden and increased 
immunostimulatory activity. Preliminary data in the Patnaik laboratory has shown that rucaparib 
treatment can result in c-GAS/STING pathway induction in PTEN-proficient cell lines derived 
from the TRAMP and hi-myc models. In contrast, the corresponding isogenic cell lines 
generated with CRISPR/CAS9 mediated deletion of PTEN, are incapable of activating the 
pathway. Given the association between PTEN loss and immunosuppression, genomic instability 
and sensitivity to PARP inhibition, as well as the potentially immunostimulatory effects of 
PARPi, targeting PARP in combination with T cell checkpoint blockade therapy could represent 
a viable therapeutic approach to target PTEN-proficient cancers. In addition to PTEN potentially 
driving aggressive disease, its loss has also been implicated in resistance to androgen pathway 
inhibition[6]. 
 
1.2  Current Treatment Paradigms for Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer 
Over the last 10 years, multiple FDA-approved therapies have been shown to confer a modest 
survival benefit for patients with mCRPC, which include next generation hormonal therapies 
abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide, docetaxel and cabazitaxel chemotherapies, the vaccine-
based immunotherapy sipuleucel-T, and the radionuclide Radium-223 dichloride [7-12]. Based 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 15 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
on their tolerability and proven efficacy in the pre-chemotherapy setting, abiraterone acetate and 
enzalutamide have become common first-line therapies for mCRPC; however, patients progress 
on these agents after a median duration of 16-18 months of treatment. Response rates to a second 
regimen of AR-directed therapy are low, therefore systemic chemotherapy is often considered as 
the next treatment option for patients who have progressed on AR-directed therapy. Docetaxel 
(75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) plus prednisone demonstrated good activity (45% PSA response rate 
and 19.2 months overall survival [OS]) in chemotherapy-naïve CRPC patients who progressed 
on ADT. Radium Ra 223 dichloride received approval for treatment of bone-metastatic mCRPC 
based on modest efficacy with overall survival (OS) benefit (median of 14 versus 11.2 months 
for placebo)[13].   
 
1.3   Immunotherapy in prostate cancer 
 
There has been a resurgent interest in cancer immunotherapy, partly based on the profound and 
durable clinical responses following checkpoint blockade. However, there are still subsets of 
patients across all malignancies that fail to respond to these therapies. Despite the FDA approval 
of sipuleucel-T mCRPC, the majority of these patients do not exhibit clinically meaningful 
responses to immunotherapies. In a randomized 2:1, phase III, placebo-controlled trial of men 
with minimally symptomatic mCRPC, patients who received sipuleucel-T had a median OS of 
25.8 months compared with 21.7 months in patients who received placebo[14].  
 
Immune checkpoint blockade has shown limited success in mCRPC. For example, ipilimumab, a 
fully human monoclonal antibody that binds to the inhibitory cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 
(CTLA-4), failed to show a benefit in overall survival compared with placebo in mCRPC 
patients [15]. Additionally, in a Phase I trial with nivolumab, none of the 17 patients with 
mCRPC experienced objective clinical responses[16]; thus, the clinical development of targeting 
PD-1/PDL-1 as a monotherapy was curtailed. There are several potential mechanisms to explain 
the lack of antitumor responses obtained with blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis. These include a 
paucity of PD-L1 expression in the prostate tumor microenvironment[17], low mutational load, 
absence of MHC Class I expression and increased release of immunosuppressive cytokines 
resulting in increased infiltration of Treg and myeloid derived suppressor cell populations [18].  
 
Therefore, there is a strong preclinical rationale for combining DNA-damaging agents, such as 
PARP inhibitors that can potentially increase mutational load and activate innate immune 
sensing pathways, with agents targeting PD-1/PD-L1 to successfully treat advanced prostate 
cancer.  
 
1.4  PARP Inhibition in mCRPC 
 
Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is constantly damaged by both endogenous and exogenous 
(environmental) assaults. Normal cells repair single-strand breaks (SSBs) in DNA through a 
process known as base excision repair (BER) [19]. While there are several variations of BER, all 
pathways rely on the activity of poly (adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase (PARP) 
enzymes. SSBs that are not repaired result in stalled replication forks and the development of 
double-strand breaks (DSBs), which are in turn repaired by homologous recombination (HR) 
DNA repair, a complex process involving multiple proteins, including those encoded by breast 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 16 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
cancer susceptibility gene 1 and 2 (BRCA1 and BRCA2), as well as RAD51, Fanconi anemia 
core complex, ataxia telangiectasia mutated serine/threonine kinase (ATM) and ataxia 
telangiectasia and RAD3-related (ATR) protein, among others [19]. 
 
Homologous recombination defects or PARP inhibition on their own can be overcome by a cell, 
but the combination is fatal, a concept termed “synthetic lethality”, which forms the basis of the 
therapeutic approach of using PARP inhibition to kill cancer cells with a HR deficient 
background [19-21]. Recent efforts from the Stand Up to Cancer Dream Team East Coast 
demonstrated that somatic mutations in the HR genes ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CDK12, 
CHEK2, FANCA, NBN, PALB2, RAD51B, and RAD51C have been observed in approximately 
20% of mCRPC patients [22]. Data from the recent phase II trial, TOPARP, investigating the 
poly (adenosine diphosphate (ADP)–ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib in mCRPC, 
showed an 88% response rate in a heavily pre-treated mCRPC patient population with defects in 
DNA repair genes who received prior docetaxel (100%), abiraterone or enzalutamide (98%), and 
cabazitaxel (58%)[23]. Collectively, these data demonstrate that a substantial fraction of mCRPC 
patients with HRD will benefit from PARP inhibitor therapy [23]. Moreover, a recent study 
showed that approx. 12% of patients with metastatic prostate cancer have germline alterations in 
DNA mismatch repair genes[24]. While less common in prostate cancer, germline mutations in 
BRCA1 are also associated with more aggressive disease [25]. Prostate cancer patients with 
germline BRCA1/2 mutations have been demonstrated to be sensitive to PARPi in several 
studies.  
 
1.5   Endometrial Cancer 
 
Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States with 
an expected 61,380 new cases and 10,920 deaths in 2017[26]. Approximately two thirds of 
women with endometrial cancer present with early-stage, uterus-confined disease which is 
typically treated surgically with or without radiotherapy with excellent outcomes. However, 
women with recurrent disease or metastatic disease are incurable with a five year survival rate 
of 17% and limited treatment options[27]. Endometrial cancers have been historically classified 
as either type I or type II cancers. Type I cancers comprise approximately 85% of endometrial 
cancers and are generally of low to intermediate-grade endometrioid histology. Type II cancers 
include non-endometrioid cases, most commonly of papillary serous or clear cell histology.  
The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project studied more than 500 newly diagnosed serous and 
endometrioid endometrial cancers, and categorized them into four molecular subgroups: 
Polymerase-E (POLE)-mutated, microsatellite unstable, copy number low, and copy number 
high. POLE mutated tumors have a good prognosis and rarely recur. The copy number high 
subgroup is characterized by p53 mutations and includes serous tumors and some of the grade 
3 endometrioid tumors. Microsatellite unstable (MSI) and POLE-mutated tumors have a very 
high mutational burden and may be good candidates for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy; 
pembrolizumab is now FDA approved for use in MSI tumors, including endometrial cancer, 
that have failed standard treatment options. PTEN mutations are very common in both the 
microsatellite unstable and the copy number low subgroups. [28]. 
 
1.6 Current Treatment of Metastatic Endometrial Cancer 
 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 17 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
Endometrial cancer, particularly type I lower grade endometrial cancer may be a hormonally 
sensitive disease. Responses up to 38% have been reported in studies of progestins for 
endometrial carcinoma. Responses are more likely among patients with grade 1 and 2 tumors 
with a prolonged time to recurrence. Type II cancers rarely respond to hormonal therapy, thus 
chemotherapy is usually the primary treatment for these patients [29]. First line treatment for 
metastatic or recurrent disease is the carboplatin/paclitaxel doublet. This produces response rates 
in the range of 40-50% and a median survival in the range of 15 months. Tumors resistant to 
carboplatin/paclitaxel have poor response rates to other agents, generally less than 10-15%. 
Antiangiogenic agents (including bevacizumab, sunitinib, and brivanib) have reported response 
rates in the 10-20% range, but no antiangiogenic agents or other newer targeted agents are 
approved for the treatment of endometrial cancer.  
 
1.7 Immunotherapy in Endometrial Cancer 
 
There are limited data on the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in endometrial cancer. The 
endometrial cancer cohort of the KEYNOTE-28 pembrolizumab study selected patients for PD-
L1 expression (but did not evaluate mutation burden or MSI status) and enrolled 24 heavily 
pretreated patients. The objective response rate was 13%, and all responses appeared durable, 
with patients remaining on treatment at the time of reporting[30]. As POLE mutation and MSI 
have been associated with a high number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and a high 
neoantigen load[31], it has been hypothesized that these molecular subsets might respond well to 
immunotherapy. A trial selecting for MSI tumors independent of histology enrolled 9 
endometrial cancer patients. Of 8 who appeared evaluable, all but one had disease shrinkage, and 
six had an objective response by RECIST including two complete responses. The responses 
appeared durable, and were continuing at the time of report[32]. Pembrolizumab is now FDA 
approved in MSI tumors, including endometrial cancer, that have failed standard treatment 
options. 
 
1.8 PARP Inhibition in Endometrial Cancer 
 
Loss of PTEN occurs in 30% to 60% of ECs, and in up to 80% of EC of endometrioid histology. 
Mutations of the PIK3CA gene are reported in 2% to 14% of type I and approximately 50% of 
type II endometrial cancers[33]. PTEN deficiency in endometrioid EC cells is associated with 
loss of HR DNA repair, which is hypothesized to sensitize them to PARP inhibitors. There is one 
case report of a patient with metastatic endometrial cancer with a significant response to olaparib 
on a phase I trial. Tumor biopsy confirmed no BRCA mutation but did show PTEN loss[34]. 
PTEN deficiency has been reported to predict for PARPi sensitivity in endometrial cancer cell 
lines [35] while other preclinical data suggest some endometrial cancers are sensitive to PARPi 
but this is unchanged by PTEN knockdown.  
 
 
1.9   Rucaparib  
 
There are a growing number of PARP inhibitors in clinical development, and demonstrated 
clinical activity as a single agent for treatment of ovarian, prostate, and breast cancer associated 
with a BRCA mutation (germline or somatic), as well as ovarian cancer patients without a BRCA 
mutation [36-45].  


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 18 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
 
Rucaparib (CO-338) is a small molecule inhibitor of poly (adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) 
polymerase (PARP) being developed for the treatment of ovarian cancer associated with 
homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Rucaparib has been shown to potently inhibit 
PARP-1, PARP-2, and PARP-3 and has demonstrated activity in a background of breast cancer 
gene 1 and 2 (BRCA1 and BRCA2) mutations in both clinical and nonclinical studies. 
Rucaparib has been approved by the FDA for maintenance therapy in the treatment of platinum 
sensitive ovarian cancers, with a greater benefit seen in patients with a BRCA mutation. The 
therapeutic rationale for PARP inhibition with rucaparib in the presence of HRD is induction of 
synthetic lethality.  
In clinical studies, the most common adverse reactions (Grades 1-4) in ≥20% of patients 
included anemia (34%), nausea (75%), fatigue (including asthenia) (68%), vomiting (43%), 
diarrhea (31%), dysgeusia (21%), dyspepsia (25%), headache (25%), decreased appetite (25%), 
nasopharyngitis/pharyngitis/URI (43%), cough (21%), arthralgia/musculoskeletal pain (32%), 
myalgia (25%), back pain (25%), dermatitis/rash (25%), and abdominal pain/discomfort (47%). 
Rucaparib is currently undergoing clinical development in several other cancers, including 
mCRPC. 
 
The clinical data with PARP inhibitors provide a compelling evidence for use of rucaparib in the 
selected population of patients with mCRPC or endometrial cancer with predicted loss-of-
function alterations in HR genes such as BRCA1/2 and ATM, CDK12, CHEK2, FANCA, NBN, 
PALB2, RAD51B, RAD51D, and RAD51C. Its activity in a broader population within these 
diseases is unknown. 
 
1.10   Nivolumab 
 
PD-1 is a transmembrane protein primarily expressed on activated T cells, B cells, myeloid cells, 
and APCs [46]. Binding of PD-1 to PD-L1 and PD-L2 has been shown to down-regulate T-cell 
activation in both murine and human systems [47-50]. PD-1/PD-L1 interactions may also 
indirectly modulate the response to tumor antigens through T-cell/APC interactions. Therefore, 
PD-1 engagement may represent one means by which tumors evade immunosurveillance and 
clearance [51]. Blockade of the PD-1 pathway has shown potent efficacy and byFDA approval in 
multiple cancers. Nivolumab has been studied in a variety of preclinical in vitro assays, and anti-
tumor activity using a murine analog of nivolumab has been shown in a number of 
immunocompetent mouse cancer models.  
 
Rationale for Flat Dose Regimens 
 
Nivolumab is currently FDA approved in the treatment of a variety of malignancies including 
melanomas, non-small cell lung cancers, renal cell carcinoma, hodgkins lymphoma, colorectal, 
and liver malignancies. The standard dosing regimen is either 240mg every 2 weeks or 480mg 
every 4 weeks. A flat dose of nivolumab 480 mg Q4W was selected since it is identical to a 
dose of 3 mg/kg for subjects weighing 80 kg, the observed median body weight in nivolumab 
treated cancer patients.. Across the various tumor types, nivolumab has been shown to be safe 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 19 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
and well tolerated up to a dose level of 10 mg/kg, and the relationship between nivolumab 
exposure produced by 3 mg/kg and efficacy and safety has been found to be relatively flat. 
Hence, a flat dose of 480 mg nivolumab Q4W will be pursued in this study. 
 
1.11   Rationale for combination of Rucaparib with Nivolumab 
 
There has been a resurgent interest in cancer immunotherapy, partly based on the profound and 
durable clinical responses following checkpoint blockade. However, there are still subsets of 
patients across all malignancies that fail to respond to these therapies. Despite the FDA approval 
of sipuleucel-T in mCRPC, the majority of these patients do not exhibit clinically meaningful 
responses to immunotherapies[9] . One of the most common alterations in mCRPC patients and 
the single most common alteration in endometroid endometrial cancer is loss of PTEN function. 
PTEN deficiency is associated with an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment [52-55]and 
a non-T cell inflamed phenotype, which predicts for a lack of response to immunotherapy[56]. 
Given the correlation between PTEN loss and a lack of responsiveness to immunotherapy, 
finding strategies to sensitize PTEN-deficient cancers to immunotherapy would have a 
significant impact on the therapeutic success of immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with 
lethal prostate and endometrial cancers.  
 
In addition to its suppressive effects on the immune microenvironment, PTEN loss leads to 
genomic instability, causing these tumor cells to become reliant on DNA repair enzymes such as 
PARP [57]. As such, PTEN-deficient tumors are particularly susceptible to PARP inhibition 
[35]. In addition to direct anti-tumor activity, PARP inhibition has been shown to have 
immunostimulatory activity via induction of senescence and other mechanisms [35, 54, 58]. 
Given the association between PTEN loss and immunosuppression, genomic instability and 
sensitivity to PARP inhibition, as well as the potentially immunostimulatory effects of PARPi, 
targeting PARP in combination with T cell checkpoint blockade therapy could represent a viable 
therapeutic approach to target PTEN-deficient cancers. Given the preponderance of PTEN 
deficiency in both mCRPC and advanced endometrioid EC, these diseases have been chosen for 
this initial feasibility study. The combination of PD-L1 and PARP inhibitors have been deemed 
feasible in multiple studies which reported most the common adverse effects as fatigue, anemia, 
hepatitis in less than 25% of patients[59-61]. 
 
This combination is thus being evaluated here as well as several additional phase 2 studies (See 
ClinicalTrials.gov).  Under the initial version of the protocol, each of the first 4 patients enrolled 
experienced an anemia DLT. As a result, the protocol was extensively amended to exclude 
patients at high risk for anemia, and to redefine the DLT as a grade ≥3 toxicity only in the first 4 
weeks of treatment, since that period is also critical for the laboratory based endpoints.  
 
1.12 Correlative Studies Background  
 
1.12.1 Assessing changes in a T-cell inflamed gene signature and immune infiltrates within the 
tumor microenvironment 
 
In a number of malignancies, the prevalence of T cell infiltration into the tumor is associated 
with enhanced clinical outcomes and response to immunotherapy[62]. Research conducted by 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 20 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
our team at the University of Chicago found that tumors with a T cell-inflamed gene signature 
are associated with increased T-cell infiltration and as such respond better to immunotherapy[54, 
63, 64]. Furthermore, an analysis of melanoma patients showed that loss of PTEN is associated 
with the lack of a T-cell inflamed gene signature[54]. In addition, biallelic loss of PTEN was 
recently identified as a resistance mechanism to PD-1 immunotherapy in a patient with uterine 
leiomyosarcoma, who had an exceptional response to this therapy[4].   
 
In the context of primary prostate cancer, our preliminary research has shown that 90% of 
primary prostate cancers are T-cell non-inflamed “cold” tumors (Figure 1), and a preliminary 
analysis of metastatic prostate lesions have found a similar preponderance of T-cell non-inflamed 
tumors (Figure 1B). Furthermore, when these tumors were evaluated for PTEN status, it was 
found that loss of PTEN was associated with the lack of a T-cell inflamed gene signature (Figure 
1C-D).  
 
 
 
1.12.2  Measuring DNA damage responses in tumor cells 
 
One of the central cell autonomous consequences of PTEN LOF is increased defects in 
homologous recombination of double-stranded DNA breaks[57], which causes PTEN-deficient 
cells to become increasingly reliant on the function of PARP. Thus, treatment with PARP 
inhibitors results in increases in unresolved DNA damage and ultimately cell death. As a result, 
one of the central means of monitoring the efficacy of PARP inhibitors is monitoring persistent 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 21 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
DNA damage using markers such as p-γH2AX. The H2A family member H2AX is a component 
of histones that is phosphorylated following DNA damage, and is an initiating step of recruiting 
the DNA repair complex, and as such serves as a biomarker for DNA damage[65]. In addition to 
evaluating these specific alterations following DNA damage, another means of monitoring 
defects in DNA repair following PARP inhibition is through calculating a homologous 
recombination deficiency score using commercially available tests such as the myScore HRD™ 
test from Myriad Genetics, which measures alterations to BRCA1/2 (two genes whose loss are 
commonly associated with DNA damage repair defects) as well as global alterations to loss of 
heterozygosity (LOH), telomeric allelic imbalance (TAI), and large-scale state transitions (LST), 
to provide a comprehensive evaluation of features associated with increased DNA damage[66]. 
Given the underlying hypothesis that the central pharmacological readout of PARP inhibition is 
increased DNA damage, these biomarkers can be used to evaluate DNA damage in both tumor 
biopsies and circulating tumor cells, and have been incorporated into clinical trials evaluating 
these inhibitors in patients with advanced cancers[67-70]. 
 
1.12.3  Assessing T-cell diversity 
 
While increased T cell infiltration has been shown to correlate with enhanced prognosis and 
improved responses to immunotherapy, utilizing next generation sequencing (NGS) to further 
characterize these responses has allowed for the advancement past enumeration and towards 
evaluating the nature of these T cell responses.  This is accomplished through NGS of the 
complementarity determining regions (CDRs) of the T cell receptor variable beta (TCR Vβ) 
region, which allows for a quantitative evaluation of the diversity of the infiltrating T cell 
responses (i.e. the number of different antigens being recognized), with the rationale being that 
increased T cell diversity is a measure of ‘antigen-spread’, where infiltrating T cells recognize an 
increasing number of tumor-associated antigens and thus potentially have enhanced anti-tumor 
recognition.  Given the underlying hypothesis that PARP inhibition alters the tumor 
microenvironment to promote a T-cell inflamed gene signature, and when combined with 
checkpoint blockade can increase T cell activation and proliferation, evaluating T cell diversity 
can provide a surrogate biomarker of enhanced T cell responsiveness not just in the periphery but 
within the tumor itself.   
 
The evaluation of T cell diversity has been incorporated into a number of clinical trials, including 
several trials evaluating checkpoint blockade, which have shown that checkpoint blockade 
results in an increased T cell repertoire (as measured by increased TCR diversity), and that this 
increased diversity can correspond with enhanced clinical responses[71, 72].  Additionally, using 
this means of analysis to detect the expansion of particular clonotypes can provide information as 
to the evolving nature of the anti-tumor immune response, as an evaluation of ipilimumab-treated 
patients with either metastatic melanoma or prostate cancer showed that overall survival 
associated with the maintenance of high-frequency clones observed at baseline and not a global 
increase in T cell clonality[73].  T cell diversity both at the site of disease as well as in peripheral 
blood will be monitored to identify whether changes within the tumor microenvironment are also 
observed in the periphery.   
  


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 22 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
2 
OBJECTIVES 
 
2.1 
Primary Objectives 
 
 Phase 1b: To determine feasibility of the combination of rucaparib and nivolumab in 
advanced endometrial and prostate cancer. Feasibility is defined as a dose-limiting 
toxicity (DLT) rate less than or equal to 25%.  DLT is defined in Section 5.5.   
 Phase II: To compare T cell inflammatory infiltrate within the tumor microenvironment 
after single agent rucaparib, single agent nivolumab, or the combination, by Nanostring 
RNA sequencing 
 
2.2 
Secondary Objectives 
 To estimate objective and biochemical (PSA, CA-125) response rates to rucaparib plus 
nivolumab. 
 To estimate progression free survival of rucaparib plus nivolumab by radiographic and 
serologic (PSA, CA-125) criteria. 
 To characterize baseline and changes in T cell inflammatory infiltrate within the tumor 
microenvironment after single agent rucaparib, single agent nivolumab, or the 
combination, by IHC.  
 To correlate changes in T-cell inflammatory infiltrate with PTEN status. 
 
2.3 
Exporatory Objectives 
 
 Assess DNA damage (p-gH2AX)/ HRD score in pre- and on-treatment tumor biopsy 
samples. 
 Assess tumor infiltrating T-cell diversity. Using flow cytometry 
 Examine peripheral immune alterations. 
 
 
3. 
PATIENT SELECTION 
 
3.1  
Inclusion Criteria  
 
3.1.1  Patients must have the ability to understand and the willingness to signed a written 
informed consent document.  
 
3.1.2 Patients must have histologically or cytologically confirmed CRPC or endometrial cancer 
that is metastatic. Evidence of disease progression on a prior therapy is not required.  
 
3.1.3  Patients must have at least one lesion that is amenable to biopsy and the treating 
physician must deem this safe. 
 
3.1.4  Patient must be willing to undergo two mandatory research-only biopsies. 
 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 23 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
3.1.5  For prostate cancer patients: subjects must be surgically or medically castrated, with 
serum testosterone levels ≤ 50 ng/mL Patients being treated with GnRH agonists must have such 
therapy continued throughout the study.  
 
3.1.6   Prostate cancer patients: 
Patients should have received at least one AR-targeted therapy with abiraterone 
acetate or enzalutamide. Multiple lines of prior, therapy, except as noted in Section 
3.2.4 and 3.2.5 below are permitted. A washout of two weeks from prior endocrine 
therapy (other than GnRH agonist); four weeks washout period from prior cytotoxic 
chemotherapy or other anticancer agents is required (prior to day 1 of study therapy); 
six weeks washout period to allow for anti-androgen withdrawal for patients 
managed with bicalutamide.  
Endometrial cancer patients:  
 
An unlimited number of prior hormonal and/or chemotherapy regimens are 
permitted. A washout of two weeks from prior endocrine therapy (other than GnRH 
agonist) and four weeks from prior cytotoxic chemotherapy or other anticancer 
agents is required (prior to day 1 of study therapy). 
 
3.1.7  At least 5 days should have elapsed since any non-study related minor surgical procedure 
and at least 21 days since any major surgical procedure prior to the first dose of rucaparib and the 
first dose of nivolumab.  
 
3.1.8  Must have an ability to swallow pills or capsules. Patients should have no current clinical 
evidence of bowel obstruction. 
 
3.1.9 Age must be ≥ 18 years. 
 
3.1.10 ECOG performance status must be ≤ 1 
 
3.1.11  Patients must have normal hepatic, renal and marrow function as defined below:  
 Hemoglobin 
> 10 g/dL (without transfusion in the last 4 weeks) 
 leukocytes 
≥ 3,000/mcL 
 absolute neutrophil count 
≥ 1,500/mcL 
 platelets 
≥ 100,000/mcL 
 total bilirubin 
within normal institutional limits 
 ALT and AST  
 
 
≤ 1.5 × institutional upper limit of normal 
 creatinine  
 
 
 
≤ 1.5 × institutional upper limit of normal 
 
OR 
 creatinine clearance 
≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 for patients with creatinine levels 
above institutional normal. 
 
3.1.12 Patients must have a serum albumin > 2.5 
 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 24 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
3.1.13  Prior palliative radiotherapy must have been completed at least 2 weeks prior to first dose 
of study drug. Subjects with symptomatic tumor lesions at baseline that may require palliative 
radiotherapy within 4 weeks of first dose of study drug are strongly encouraged to receive 
palliative radiotherapy prior to enrollment. 
 
3.1.14  Reproductive Status 
 
Rucaparib caused post-implantation loss (100% early resorptions) at all doses 
administered in an embryo-fetal development study. Based on its mechanism of action, 
nivolumab can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Pregnant 
women are therefore not eligible for this study.  
 
 Women of child-bearing potential (WOCBP) must have a negative serum pregnancy 
test result less than 3 days prior to administration of the first dose of rucaparib. 
 WOCBP must not be considering getting pregnant during the study. 
 WOCBP and their male partners must agree to use a highly effective, reliable form of 
contraception described in section 3.3 during treatment; for 6 months following the 
last dose of rucaparib; and for at least 5 months following the last dose of nivolumab.  
 Men who are sexually active with WOCBP must agree to use a highly effective, 
reliable form of contraception described in section 3.3 during treatment;  6 months 
following the last dose of rucaparib; and for a period of 7 months after the last dose of 
nivolumab . 
 In addition to the above methods of contraception, use of a condom by male patients is 
recommended to prevent transfer of drug through semen. 
 
3.2  
Exclusion Criteria 
 
3.2.1  Patients with active, known, or suspected autoimmune disease. Subjects with vitiligo, 
type I diabetes, mellitus, residual hypothyroidism due to autoimmune condition only requiring 
hormone replacement, psoriasis not requiring systemic treatment, childhood asthma that is not 
currently active, or conditions not expected to recur in the absence of an external trigger are 
permitted to enroll.  
 
3.2.2  Patients with a condition requiring systemic treatment with either corticosteroids (> 10 
mg daily prednisone equivalents) or other immunosuppressive medications within 14 days of 
study drug administration except for adrenal replacement steroid doses > 10 mg daily prednisone 
equivalent in the absence of active autoimmune disease.   
Note: Treatment with a short course of steroids (< 5 days) up to 7 days prior to    initiating study 
drug is permitted. 
 
3.2.3  Patients who are receiving any other investigational agents. 
 
3.2.4  Prior exposure to PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors, other immune checkpoint inhibitors (e.g. 
anti-LAG-3, and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies), or PARP inhibitors.  
 
3.2.5 Prior exposure to Ra223 or other systemic radionuclides 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 25 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
 
3.2.6  Patients with a “currently active” second invasive malignancy other than non-melanoma 
skin cancers. Patients are not considered to have a “currently active” malignancy if they have 
completed therapy and have been free of disease for ≥ 1 years. 
 
3.2.7  Patients with known and untreated or progressing brain metastases are excluded from this 
clinical trial because of their poor prognosis and because they often develop progressive 
neurologic dysfunction that would confound the evaluation of neurologic and other adverse 
events.  
Patients whose brain metastases have been treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy and 
are without evidence of progression on scan for at least 4 weeks, and are off steroids or 
antiseizure medications, will be eligible .  
 
3.2.8  Patients with symptomatic or impending spinal cord compression are not eligible unless 
appropriately treated. 
 
3.2.9  History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic 
composition to nivolumab or rucaparib. 
 
3.2.10  Patients on parenteral nutrition are not eligible. Patients must not have a pre-existing 
duodenal stent or any gastrointestinal disorder or defect that would, in the opinion of the treating 
investigator, interfere with absorption of rucaparib. 
 
3.2.11  Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, requirement for oxygen 
therapy, ongoing or active infection other than minor urinary tract infection, symptomatic 
congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social 
situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.  
 
 
3.2.12  Known history of chronic hepatitis B or C as evidenced by: 
 Positive test for hepatitis B surface antigen 
 Positive test for qualitative hepatitis C viral load (by polymerase chain reaction  
[PCR]) 
*Note: Subjects with positive hepatitis C antibody and negative quantitative hepatitis C 
by PCR are eligible.  
 
3.2.13  HIV-positive patients on combination antiretroviral therapy are ineligible because of the 
potential for pharmacokinetic interactions with rucaparib. In addition, these patients are at 
increased risk of lethal infections when treated with marrow-suppressive therapy.  
 
3.2.14  Prior organ allograft or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. 
 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 26 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
3.2.15  Adverse effect of prior therapy not improved to CTCAE Grade 1 or below with the 
exception of alopecia. Ongoing Grade 2 non-hematologic toxicity (e.g. neuropathy) related to 
most recent treatment regimen may be permitted with prior advanced approval from the Lead 
Principal Investigator. 
 
3.2.16  Initiated denosumab or bisphosphonate therapy or adjusted denosumab or bisphosphonate 
dose/regimen within 4 weeks prior to first dose of rucaparib. Patients on a stable denosumab or 
bisphosphonate regimen are eligible and may continue treatment. 
 
3.2.17  Evidence or history of active or latent tuberculosis infection including PPD recently 
converted to positive. 
 
3.2.18  Use of non-oncology vaccines containing live virus for prevention of infectious diseases 
within 12 weeks prior to study drug. The use of inactivated seasonal influenza vaccines, e.g., 
Fluzone®, will be permitted on study without restriction. 
 
3.2.19 Endometrial cancer patients who may require pelvic radiation to address vaginal bleeding 
should have such treatment prior to enrolling on the study. 
 
3.3  
Patients or Partners of Patients of Reproductive Potential 
 
As noted in the inclusion criteria, pregnancy is an exclusion criterion and women of childbearing 
potential must not be considering getting pregnant during the study.   
A woman is considered to be of childbearing potential unless one of the following applies: 
 
She is considered to be permanently sterile. Permanent sterilization methods 
include hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy, and bilateral oophorectomy. 
 
She is postmenopausal, defined as no menses for 12 months without an alternative 
medical cause. A high follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level consistently in 
the postmenopausal range (30 mIU/mL or higher) may be used to confirm a 
postmenopausal state in women not using hormonal contraception or hormonal 
replacement therapy. However, in the absence of 12 months of amenorrhea, a 
single FSH measurement is insufficient to confirm a postmenopausal state. 
WOCBP and their male partners must practice total abstinence or use a highly effective, reliable 
method of contraception (failure rate < 1% per year) during treatment; for 6 months following 
the last dose of rucaparib; and for at least 5 months following the last dose of nivolumab . Men 
who are sexually active with WOCBP must use a highly effective, reliable means of 
contraception during treatment; for 6 months following the last dose of rucaparib; and for a 
period of at least 7 months after the last dose of nivolumab.  
The following are the only forms of contraception allowable for the study: 
 Ongoing use of progesterone-only injectable or implantable contraceptives (e.g., Depo 
Provera, Implanon, Nexplanon) 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 27 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
 Placement of an intrauterine device or intrauterine system 
 Bilateral tubal occlusion 
 Male sterilization, with appropriate post-vasectomy documentation of absence of sperm 
in ejaculate 
 True, complete (as opposed to periodic) abstinence. 
 In addition to the above methods of contraception, use of a condom by male patients is 
recommended to prevent transfer of drug through semen. 
 
Patients will be instructed to notify their treating investigator if pregnancy is discovered either 
during or within 6 months of completing treatment with rucaparib or within 5 months of 
completing nivolumab for WOCBP and within 7 months of completing nivolumab for partners 
of men taking nivolumab.  
3.4  Inclusion of Minorities 
 
Men and women of all races and ethnic groups are eligible for the trial.   
 
 
4.  REGISTRATION PROCEDURES 
 
4.1 General Guidelines 
 
Prior to registration and any study-specific evaluations being performed, all patients must have 
given written informed consent for the study and must have completed the pre-treatment 
evaluations.  Patients must meet all of the eligibility requirements listed in Section 2. Eligible 
patients will be entered on study centrally by the University of Chicago study coordinators. All 
sites should call the study coordinator at (773) 834-1746 or 
PhaseIICRA@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu to verify availability of a slot.  
 
Reservations for potential subjects will only be held for subjects who have signed consent for 
that particular study. 
 
An investigator will confirm eligibility criteria and a member of the study team will complete the 
protocol-specific eligibility checklist. 
 
Following registration, patients should ideally have their biopsy within 7 days and begin protocol 
treatment within 14 days. Issues that would cause treatment delays should be discussed with the 
Principal Investigator.  If a patient does not receive study biopsy or protocol therapy following 
registration, the patient’s registration on the study will be canceled.  The study coordinator/CRA 
should be notified of cancellations as soon as possible. 
 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 28 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
4.2 Registration Process 
 
When a potential patient has been identified, notify the CRA via phone or email to ensure a 
reservation on the study ((773) 834-1746 or PhaseIICRA@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu) a 
minimum of 48 hours prior to expected study biopsy start date: 
 
 Provider of information 
 Treating Physician  
 Patient name and hospital ID number 
 Patient's zip code of residence 
 Date & copy of signed informed consent 
 Race, gender, date of birth of patient 
 Diagnosis and date of initial diagnosis 
 Complete Phase II Consortium Affiliate Clinical Trial Patient Registration Form 
 Source documentation for eligibility and pre-study procedures 
 
The research nurse or data manager at the participating site will then call the study coordinator to 
confirm all selection criteria listed in Section 3.  
 
To complete the registration process, the UCMC Coordinator will: 
1.) Assign a patient study number 
2.) Register the patient on the study 
3.) Fax or e-mail the patient study number to the participating site 
4.) Fax or e-mail, within 48 hours of completed registration, the assigned treatment dose (for 
phase I portion) or treatment arm (for phase II portion) 
5.) Call the research nurse or data manager at the participating site and verbally confirm 
registration. 
 
When registering a subject, the following must occur:  
 
 Confirm that the institution has a current IRB approval letter for the correct version of 
protocol/consent and has an annual update on file, if appropriate.  
 Submit all required materials (Eligibility Checklist, Source documentation, & signed 
consent form) to confirm eligibility and required pre-study procedures to the CRA a 
minimum of 48 hours prior to the subject’s scheduled therapy start date.  
 Source documentation includes copies of all original documents that support each 
inclusion/exclusion criteria.  The eligibility checklist does not serve as source 
documentation but rather as a checklist that original source documentation exists for each 
criterion. 
 Communicate with the CRA to ensure all necessary supporting source documents are 
received and the potential subject is eligible to start treatment on schedule. If there are 
questions about eligibility, the CRA will discuss it with the PI. PI may clarify, but not 
overturn, eligibility criteria.  
 Affiliate sites must confirm registration of subjects by obtaining a subject study ID 
number from the CRA via phone, fax or email.  


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 29 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
 If a subject does not start on the scheduled day 1 treatment date, promptly inform the 
CRA as the delay in start may deem the subject ineligible and/or require further or repeat 
testing to ensure eligibility.  
 The date the patient is randomized if randomization is involved or receives treatment for 
the first time will be considered the patient’s “OnStudy Date.” The patient’s subject ID 
will be assigned and a confirmation of registration will be issued by the CRA on this 
date. Subjects that sign consent and do not go “OnStudy” will be recorded in the database 
with the date they signed consent and the reason for not going “OnStudy” (e.g., 
Ineligible, Screen Failure or Withdrawn Consent).  
 
4.3 Treatment Allocation and Randomization Processes  
 
4.3.1 Treatment Allocation for Phase I-B portion  
 
Under the initial version of the protocol, each of the first 4 patients enrolled experienced an 
anemia DLT. As a result, the protocol was extensively amended to exclude patients at high risk 
for anemia, and to redefine the DLT as a grade ≥3 toxicity requiring dose interruption for > 7 
days only in the first 4 weeks of treatment, since that period is also critical for the laboratory 
based endpoints. See also 5.5 
 
All patients on phase IB will initially receive combination therapy consisting of rucaparib 
(600mg PO BID) plus nivolumab (480mg, IV q4wk) for four weeks.  A minimum of 4 and a 
maximum of 12 evaluable patients enrolled under Amendment 1 or later will be studied to 
determine feasibility of this combination (see stopping rules in study design-statistics in section 
14.1).  Patients who are non-evaluable for toxicity during this phase of the study will be 
replaced.  In this cohort, following four weeks of combination treatment, patients will receive an 
on-treatment tumor biopsy. After biopsy, they will continue to receive both rucaparib and 
nivolumab until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. 
 
 Enrollment on the study will be held for 4 weeks after the first four, the first eight, and 
the first 12 evaluable subjects (if applicable) on the IB portion of the study while they are 
being assessed for toxicity, unless it is already clear that the dose level will be feasible 
(e.g. if three of the first four evaluable patients have completed 4 weeks therapy with no 
DLT, enrollment does not need to be held to allow the fourth pt to complete Assess DNA 
damage (p-gH2AX)/ HRD score in pre- and on-treatment tumor biopsy samples. 
 Assess tumor infiltrating T-cell diversity. Using flow cytometry 
 Examine peripheral immune alterations. 
 weeks, as it is clear that enrollment will continue regardless of whether this patient experiences 
DLT or not). If the combination arm is deemed feasible  (as defined in section 13.1 ) then we 
will proceed to the Phase II portion of the study, in which subjects will be randomized to single-
agent Rucaparib, single-agent Nivolumab, or combination therapy with Rucaparib and 
Nivolumab. If the combination is deemed infeasible the protocol may be amended to explore 
alternative dosing regimens. 
 
4.3.2 Treatment Allocation for Phase II portion 
 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 30 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
If the combination therapy is deemed feasible, patients will be enrolled to Phase II. Patients will 
be randomized to combination therapy, rucaparib alone, or nivolumab alone.  Twenty patients 
will be assigned to each of the single agent arms, and up to 16 patients will be randomized to the 
combination treatment arm, depending on the number of patients who completed at least 4 weeks 
of therapy with an attempted on therapy biopsy in the phase I-B portion and were considered 
evaluable. For example, if 8patients are entered into phase I-B, then 12will be randomized to 
combination therapy in phase II.  II.  Patients enrolled on the phase II portion of the study will 
receive a pre-treatment biopsy, followed by treatment with either rucaparib alone (600mg PO 
BID), nivolumab (480mg, IV q4wk) or both agents for four weeks. For these purposes, the first 4 
patients enrolled under the initial version of the protocol, who all experienced a DLT, will not be 
considered evaluable. 
 
Randomization will be performed by the University of Chicago study coordinator using the web-
based randomization module in REDCap.  The randomization sequence will be prepared by the 
study statistician using the method of permuted blocks once the Phase I-B portion of the study is 
completed. Participating sites will be notified by the coordinator within 48 hours of registered 
patient’s open label, randomized treatment group assignment. 
 
5. TREATMENT AND BIOPSY PLAN    
 
5.1    Study Agent Administration 
 
Treatment will be administered on an outpatient basis.  Appropriate dose modifications and 
discontinuations for Nivolumab and for Rucaparib are described in Section 8   
 
No investigational or commercial agents or therapies other than those described below may be 
administered with the intent to treat the patient's malignancy, with the exception of the 
following:  
 
 
Prostate cancer patients who are chemically castrated would continue to receive 
an LHRH agonist or an LHRH antagonist.   
 
 
Medications for bone health (e.g. zoledronic acid or denosumab) should be 
continued if being taken prior to study entry..  
 
Patients will complete and return study drug administration diaries, which are found in Appendix 
D. Patients will also return bottles of Rucaparib and any unused Rucaparib tablets so that the 
research nurse may review and assess patient compliance with drug dosing.  
 
5.1.1 Phase I-B Portion  
 
Patients enrolled to the Phase I-B portion of the study will begin with dosing of nivolumab and 
Rucaparib on cycle 1 day 1.  
 
The first dose of Rucaparib  600 mg will be administered in clinic by the study nurse. Rucaparib 
will be dosed at 600 mg BID for a cycle length of 28 days. Nivolumab 480 mg will be 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 31 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
administered intravenously on day 1.  
 
A mandatory research biopsy will be performed prior to start of study therapy, and at the 
completion of four weeks of combination therapy with Rucaparib and Nivolumab. The post-
treatment biopsy will be performed between days 25 and 31. 
 
Treatment will continue until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.  
 
5.1.2 Phase II Portion 
 
If the combination treatment used in the Phase I-B portion has been deemed feasible, we will 
proceed with enrollment of subjects to the Phase II portion of the study.  
 
As described above, n=20 patients will be randomized Rucaparib alone, n=20 to Nivolumab 
alone, and up to 12 patients to Rucaparib plus Nivolumab.. The maximum sample size for the 
entire trial will be N=60 patients, excluding the first 4 patients enrolled under the initial protocol 
version.  
 
Patients in the Phase II portion of this study will be randomized for the first 4 week cycle either: 
single-agent Rucaparib; single-agent Nivolumab; or combination therapy with Rucaparib and 
Nivolumab.   
 
A mandatory research biopsy will be performed prior to start of study therapy, and at the 
completion of four weeks of therapy. The post-treatment biopsy will be performed between days 
25-31 
 
After the completion of the first cycle of treatment, patients will receive combination therapy 
with Rucaparib and Nivolumab. 
 
5.1.2.1   Single-agent Rucaparib Arm 
 
Subjects randomized to this arm will begin single-agent Rucaparib 600 mg BID starting on cycle 
1 day 1 and continuing through day 28 of the cycle.  At the end of this cycle, a second mandatory 
biopsy will be performed.   
 
Subjects will receive combination treatment with Rucaparib and Nivolumab starting on cycle 2 
onwards. Patients will continue Rucaparib 600 mg BID. Nivolumab 480 mg IV will be dosed on 
day 1 of each cycle. Combination treatment will continue until disease progression or 
unacceptable toxicity.  
 
5.1.2.2  Single-agent Nivolumab Arm 
 
Subjects randomized to this arm will begin single-agent Nivolumab 480 mg IV starting on cycle 
1 day 1. At the end of the 28-day cycle, a second mandatory biopsy will be performed.  
 
Subjects will receive combination treatment with Rucaparib and Nivolumab starting on cycle 2 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 32 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
onwards. Subjects will continue Nivolumab 480 mg IV on day 1 each cycle. Subjects will start 
Rucaparib 600 mg BID starting on cycle 2 day 1 and continuing through day 28 of the cycle.  
Combination treatment will continue until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.  
 
5.1.2.3  Combination Rucaparib and Nivolumab Arm 
 
Subjects randomized to this arm will receive combination treatment with Rucaparib and 
Nivolumab starting on cycle 1 day 1. Subjects will begin Nivolumab 480 mg IV on day 1 . 
Subjects will begin Rucaparib 600 mg BID starting on cycle 1 day 1 and continuing through day 
28 of the cycle. At the end of this cycle, a second mandatory biopsy will be performed.  
 
Subjects will continue receiving combination treatment from cycle 2 onwards until disease 
progression or unacceptable toxicity.  
 
5.2  Nivolumab 
 
5.2.1  Nivolumab Administration 
 
Nivolumab will be administered at 480 mg flat dose on day 1of a 28-day cycle. Nivolumab 
may be administered up to 3 days before or after the scheduled day of administration of each 
cycle due to administrative reasons. 
 
Nivolumab will be administered as a 30 minute IV infusion. There are no premedications 
recommended for Nivolumab treatment.  
 
Sites should make every effort to target nivolumab infusion timing to be as close 30 minutes as 
possible. However, given the variability of infusion pumps from site to site, time windows of 
minus 10 minutes and plus 40 minutes is permitted (i.e., infusion time of 20-70 minutes). The 
exact duration of infusion should be recorded in both source documents and CRFs. Possible 
modifications of the infusion rate for the management of infusion-related reactions are 
described in later sections.  
 
5.2.2 Nivolumab Packaging, Labeling and Storage 
Nivolumab will be provided as investigational supply by Bristol-Myers Squibb, Co. 
 
PRODUCT INFORMATION TABLE: Please also see Nivolumab Investigator Brochure. 
Table 
Product Description 
Product 
Description and 
Dosage Form 
Potency 
Primary 
Packaging 
(Volume) 
Appearance 
Storage 
Conditions 
(per label) 
Nivolumab BMS-
936558-01 
Solution for 
Injection 
100 mg  
(10 mg/mL) 
10 mL vial 
Clear to opalescent 
colorless to pale 
yellow liquid. May 
contain particles. 
2 to 8°C. Protect 
form light and 
freezing. 
*Nivolumab may be labeled as BMS-936558-01 Solution for Injection 
 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 33 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
If stored in a glass front refrigerator, vials should be stored in the carton. Recommended safety 
measures for preparation and handling of nivolumab include laboratory coats and gloves. 
 
For additional details on prepared drug storage and use time of nivolumab under room 
temperature/light and refrigeration, please refer to the BMS-936558 (nivolumab) Investigator 
Brochure section for “Recommended Storage and Use Conditions”. 
 
5.2.2  Management of Nivolumab-related Infusion Reactions 
 
Since Nivolumab contains only human immunoglobulin protein sequences, it is unlikely to be 
immunogenic and induce infusion or hypersensitivity reactions. However, if such a reaction were 
to occur, it might manifest with fever, chills, rigors, headache, rash, pruritus, arthralgia, 
hypertension, bronchospasm, or other symptoms. 
 
All Grade 3 or 4 infusion reactions should be reported within 24 hours to BMS Global Safety at 
Worldwide.Safety@BMS.com and reported as an SAE if criteria are met. Refer to sections 9.6.3 
and 9.7.4 for details. Infusion reactions should be graded according to NCI CTCAE v4.03 
guidelines. Treatment recommendations are provided below and may be modified based on local 
treatment standards and guidelines as appropriate:  
 
For Grade 1 symptoms: (Mild reaction; infusion interruption not indicated; intervention not 
indicated):  
 
Remain at bedside and monitor subject until recovery from symptoms. The following 
prophylactic premedications are recommended for future infusions: diphenhydramine 50 mg (or 
equivalent) and/or acetaminophen 325 to 1000 mg at least 30 minutes before additional study 
drug administrations. 
 
For Grade 2 symptoms: (Moderate reaction requires therapy or infusion interruption but 
responds promptly to symptomatic treatment (e.g., antihistamines, nonsteroidal anti-
inflammatory drugs, narcotics, corticosteroids, bronchodilators, IV fluids); prophylactic 
medications indicated for  24 hours.) 
 
Stop the nivolumab infusion, begin an IV infusion of normal saline, and treat the subject with 
diphenhydramine 50 mg IV (or equivalent) and/or acetaminophen 325 to 1000 mg; monitor 
subject until resolution of symptoms.  Bronchodilator or corticosteroid therapy may also be 
administered as appropriate. The infusion may be restarted at 50% of the original infusion rate 
when symptoms resolve; if no further complications ensue after 30 minutes, the rate may be 
increased to 100% of the original infusion rate. Monitor subject closely. If symptoms recur, then 
no further nivolumab, will be administered at that visit. The amount of study drug infused must 
be recorded on the case report form. 
 
The following prophylactic premedications are recommended for future infusions: 
diphenhydramine 50 mg (or equivalent) and/or acetaminophen 325 to 1000 mg should be 
administered at least 30 minutes before additional nivolumab administrations. If necessary, 
corticosteroids (up to 25 mg of SoluCortef or equivalent) may be used. 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 34 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
 
Late-occurring symptoms: In the case of late-occurring hypersensitivity symptoms (e.g., 
appearance of a localized or generalized pruritus within 1 week after treatment), symptomatic 
treatment may be given (e.g., oral antihistamine or corticosteroids).  
 
For Grade 3 or Grade 4 symptoms: (Severe reaction; Grade 3: prolonged [e.g., not rapidly 
responsive to symptomatic medication and/or brief interruption of infusion]; recurrence of 
symptoms following initial improvement; hospitalization indicated for other clinical sequelae 
[e.g., renal impairment, pulmonary infiltrates]; Grade 4: life-threatening; pressor or ventilatory 
support indicated.) 
 
Immediately discontinue study drug infusion. Begin an IV infusion of normal saline and treat the 
subject as follows: recommend bronchodilators; epinephrine 0.2 to 1 mg of a 1:1,000 solution for 
subcutaneous administration or 0.1 to 0.25 mg of a 1:10,000 solution injected slowly for IV 
administration; and/or diphenhydramine 50 mg IV with methylprednisolone 100 mg IV (or 
equivalent), as needed. Subject should be monitored until the investigator is comfortable that the 
symptoms will not recur. Nivolumab will be permanently discontinued. Investigators should 
follow their institutional guidelines for the treatment of anaphylaxis. Remain at bedside and 
monitor subject until recovery from symptoms.  
 
In the case of late-occurring hypersensitivity symptoms (e.g., appearance of a localized or 
generalized pruritus within 1 week after treatment), symptomatic treatment may be given (e.g., 
oral antihistamine, or corticosteroids). 
 
5.3 Rucaparib 
 
5.3.1 Description of Treatment(s) and Storage 
 
This study will use the investigational drug rucaparib. Rucaparib camsylate (also known as CO-
338; formerly known as PF-01367338-BW and AG-014447) is an oral formulation with a 
molecular weight of 555.67 Daltons. Rucaparib 300 mg tablets for oral administration will be 
supplied by Clovis.  
 
A brief description of the investigational product is provided below. 
 
Drug Name: 
Rucaparib 
INN: 
Rucaparib 
Formulation: 
Tablet; film coated; 200 mg, 250 mg, 300 mg 
How Supplied: 
200, 250, and/or 300 mg strength (based on free 
base) in high-density polyethylene bottles or 
equivalent with child-resistant caps. Patients may 
receive 1 or more strengths. Each bottle contains 
60 tablets 
Storage Conditions: 
15–30 °C (59 and 86° F)  
 
The physical appearances of the tablets are unique in order to ensure proper identification. The 
200 mg tablets are blue, round (11 mm) tablets de-bossed with ‘C2’. The cosmetic blue film 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 35 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
coating is Opadry II containing polyvinyl alcohol, titanium dioxide, polyethylene 
glycol/macrogol, talc, FD&C Blue #1 colorant, brilliant blue FCF aluminum lake, and FD&C 
blue indigo carmine aluminum lake. The 250 mg tablets are white, diamond shaped (15 mm x 11 
mm) tablets de-bossed with ‘C25’. The cosmetic white film coating is Opadry II containing 
polyvinyl alcohol, titanium dioxide, polyethylene glycol/macrogol, and talc. The 300 mg tablets 
are yellow, oval tablets (16 mm x 8 mm) de-bossed with ‘C3’. The cosmetic yellow film coating 
is Opadry II containing polyvinyl alcohol, titanium dioxide, polyethylene glycol/macrogol, talc, 
and irradiated yellow iron oxide.  
 
5.3.2 Rucaparib Packaging and Labeling 
 
All tablets are provided in high-density polyethylene (HDPE) bottles with child-resistant caps 
and should be stored in the provided containers between 15° and 30° C (59 and 86° F). Patients 
will be dispensed one or more strengths depending on their current dose of rucaparib. The 
number of bottles of each strength dispensed will be sufficient to supply 28 days treatment per 
cycle, including a small overage. 
 
Bottles containing rucaparib tablets will be labeled according to national regulations for 
investigational products. 
 
5.3.3 Administration 
 
All patients enrolled in this study will receive rucaparib at an initial dose of 600 mg BID. 
Patients may take rucaparib with or without food. Each dose should be taken with at least 8 oz 
(240 mL) of room temperature water. Tablets should be swallowed whole without crushing or 
chewing.  Patients should take rucaparib doses as close to 12 hours apart as possible, preferably 
at the same times every day. If a patient misses a dose (i.e., does not take it within 4 hours of the 
scheduled time), the patient should skip the missed dose and resume taking rucaparib with the 
next scheduled dose. Missed or vomited doses should not be made up. Dosing with rucaparib 
may be held or reduced as described in Section 9.2 
 
Patients will be instructed to record daily doses taken or not taken in a patient diary. Treatment 
with rucaparib is continuous and each cycle will comprise 28 days. 
 
Patients will be provided a sufficient quantity of study drug for 28 days or until the next study 
drug dispensation visit (slight excess may be appropriate). Patients will also be provided with a 
patient diary to record daily doses. Patients will be instructed to bring their patient diary, their 
rucaparib tablets, and all containers (empty, partially used, and/or unopened) to the next 
scheduled visit for reconciliation by site personnel. 
 
5.4 Research Biospy Plan 
 
Two mandatory research biopsies will be collected during this study. The feasibility of 
performing research biopsies should be determined prior to study enrollment. One biopsy will be 
obtained within 7-21 days of being enrolled on study, but prior to the start of study treatment.  A 
second biopsy will be obtained after a four-week (28 day) cycle of treatment. This biopsy will be 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 36 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
performed between days 25 and 31. and before starting any crossover therapy. It is required that 
patients have taken rucaparib for at least the 7 days leading up to the biopsy date. The biopsy 
date may be delayed to allow for this. Patients should have a complete blood count and 
coagulation studies performed and within normal limits prior to each biopsy 
 
5.4.1 Rationale for Collection of Research Biospies  
 
Pre-treatment biospies are collected in order to assess the microenvironment of the tumor prior to 
treatment.  
 
On-treatment metastatic biopsies are collected between days 25-31 in order to assess changes in 
the T cell inflammatory infiltrate within the tumor microenvironment, as described in the 
primary objectives.  
 
5.4.2 Handling of Biopsy Samples  
 
Biopsies will be obtained under radiologic or other guidance, as appropriate, per institutional 
procedures. A minimum of 4 core biopsies are requested. However, less than the goal amount of 
tissue is acceptable, and should be based upon the clinical judgment of the clinician performing 
the procedure.  One core will be collected into a PAXgene tube for RNA collection, and a 
second core placed in neutral buffered formalin and then embedded in FFPE (Formalin Fixed 
Paraffin Embedded) no more than 16 hours after exposure to neutral buffered formalin, and then 
placed in 18% EDTA for slow decalcification until core is pliable enough for cutting on 
microtome. A third core will be placed in EDTA followed by zinc-based fixative and also 
embedded in paraffin embedded block. A fourth core will be placed in a centrifuge tube for flow 
cytometry.  
 
Biopsies will be performed at the University of Chicago and Northwestern University only, and 
a team from Dr. Patnaik lab will be present on the day of biopsies to collect and transport the 
specimens. The team should be notified at least 48 hours ahead of scheduled biopsy date.  
 
The best ways to reach the laboratory members would be to contact: 
Dr. Priyanka Duttagupta: Ph: 773-795-0995. Email: pgupta6@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu 
Dr. Raanan Alter: Ph: 847-707-2708. Email: Raanan.Alter@uchospitals.edu 
 
5.5 Definition of Dose-Limiting Toxicity (Phase I-B portion) 
 
There will be a 4 week DLT monitoring period (after combination treatment) during the phase IB 
portion of the study, in which patients will be assessed for toxicity weekly for the first two 
weeks, then every two weeks until the end of the 4 week monitoring period. Any grade 3 or 4 
toxicity requiring interruption of rucaparib therapy for more than one week in the first 4 weeks, 
is considered a DLT.  
 
Subjects who are taken off study treatment during the first 4 weeks of Phase IB due to reasons 
other than a DLT (and without experiencing DLT), will be replaced.  
 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 37 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
 
5.6 Determination of Feasibility of Combination Arm (Phase I-B portion) 
 
Under the initial version of the protocol, each of the first 4 patients enrolled experienced an 
anemia DLT. As a result, the protocol was extensively amended to exclude patients at high risk 
for anemia, and to redefine the DLT as a grade ≥3 toxicity requiring dose interruption for > 7 
days only in the first 4 weeks of treatment. These initial 4 patients will thus not be utilized to 
determine feasibility.  
 
With Amendment 1, four patients will be enrolled to the Phase I-B portion. If a DLT is observed  
in 3 or more of these patients, the combination treatment will be declared infeasible and the trial 
will be terminated or amended. If no DLT is observed, an additional 4 patients will be enrolled,  
and if < 2 of 8  patients have a DLT, the combination will be declared feasible and the trial will 
proceed to Phase II.  If > 4 of 8 patients have DLTs then the combination will be declared too 
toxic and the study terminated or amended.  If exactly 3 of 8 patients have a DLT, then four 
more patients will be enrolled for a total of 12 patients. At this stage, if < 3 of 12 have a DLT, 
the combination will be considered feasible and the study will proceed to phase II. Otherwise, if 
> 4 of 12 have a DLT, the combination will be declared too toxic and the study will be stopped 
or amended.  
 
 
5.7 General Concomitant Medications/Treatments and Supportive Care Guidelines 
 
Because there is a potential for interaction of Nivolumab and rucaparib with other concomitantly 
administered drugs, including drugs metabolized through the cytochrome P450 system for 
rucaparib, the case report form must capture the concurrent use of all other drugs, over-the-
counter medications, or alternative therapies.   
 
5.7.1   Concomitant Medication 
 
Concomitant treatment considered necessary for the patient’s well-being may be given 
at discretion of the treating physician. 
 
Concomitant medications and treatments will be recorded from 28 days prior to the start of 
study treatment and up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. All concomitant 
medications, (e.g.: supportive care drugs for antiemetic management and prophylaxis and drugs 
used to treat adverse events or chronic diseases) and non-drug supportive interventions (e.g.: 
tranfusions should be recorded in the concomitant medications and treatments case report form 
(CRF).  
 
Medications intended solely for supportive care (i.e., antiemetics, analgesics, and megestrol 
acetate for anorexia) are allowed. 
 
5.7.1.1 Drug Interactions with Rucaparib 
 
Based on in vitro CYP interaction studies, caution should be used for concomitant medications 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 38 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
with a narrow therapeutic window that are substrates of CYP2C19, CYP2C9, and/or CYP3A.  
Selection of an alternate concomitant medication is recommended. Caution should also be 
exercised for concomitant use of certain statin drugs (e.g. rosuvastatin and fluvastatin) due to 
potential increase in exposure from inhibition of BCRP and CYP2C9. An updated list of 
clinically relevant P450 drug interactions (e.g: Flockhart Table  
http://medicine.iupui.edu/clinpharm/ddis/main-table/ ) should be reviewed while screening 
patients for study.   
 
Patients taking warfarin should have international normalized ration (INR) monitored regularly 
according to standard institutional practices 
 
Because rucaparib is a moderate inhibitor of P-gp in vitro, caution should be exercised for 
patients receiving rucaparib and requiring concomitant medication with digoxin. Patients taking 
digoxin should have their digoxin levels monitored after starting rucaparib and then regularly per 
standard clinical practice. 
 
5.7.1.2 Concomitant Medications for Management of Castration-Related Symptoms 
 
Treatment with androgens, estrogens, or progestins to control hot flashes is not allowed.  
However, selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or gabapentin are permitted for the 
management of hot flashes. 
 
5.7.1.3  Use of Steroids 
 
Data indicate that corticosteroids have an adverse effect on T-cell function and that they inhibit 
and damage lymphocytes[74]. Furthermore, as with all immunotherapies intended to augment 
cell-mediated immunity, there is a risk that concomitant immunosuppressives such as steroids 
will counteract the intended benefit of the proposed study treatment. However, studies with anti-
CTLA4 compounds indicate that short-term use of steroids may be employed without 
compromising clinical outcomes [75]. Therefore, the use of steroids during this trial is restricted 
as follows: 
 
 
Therapeutic use: for the treatment of infusion-related reactions and short-term 
treatment of Immune-related Adverse Events (irAEs), steroids are permitted 
according to the modalities indicated in Management of irAEs in the Adverse 
Effect portion of this protocol (Section 8.2)  
 
 
Physiologic use: steroid replacement for adrenal insufficiency at doses equivalent 
to ≤10 mg prednisone daily is acceptable. 
 
 
Prophylactic use, e.g., for the prevention of acute infusion-related reactions: is 
prohibited. There are no prohibited therapies during the Post-Treatment Follow-
up Phase. 
 
 
For treatment of nivolumab associated immunotherapy toxicity (See Section 8.0) 
 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 39 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
5.7.2 Palliative Radiotherapy 
 
Palliative radiotherapy to specific sites of disease is permitted if considered medically 
necessary by the treating physician, but will be considered as evidence for disease progression.  
 
5.7.3 Surgical Procedures 
 
In case of major surgical procedure, treatment should be delayed. Re-initiation of study 
treatment should be discussed with the Lead PI. 
 
5.7.4 Supportive Care Guidelines for Rucaparib and Nivolumab 
 
Detailed criteria for determining relatedness of a toxicity to rucaparib and/or nivolumab 
and dose modifications is provided in Section 8.0. There will be no dose reductions for 
nivolumab. 
 
Patients should use appropriate sun protection while taking rucaparinb due to increased 
susceptibility to sunburn.  
 
Supportive care guidelines for immune-related adverse events should be managed 
according to Appendix 3 of the nivolumab investigator’s brochure and ASCO Guidelines 
(see www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines OR PMID: 29442540).   
 
5.8 Duration of Therapy 
 
Therapy with Rucaparib or Nivolumab or Rucaparib/Nivolumab will continue until one of the 
following events occurs. 
 Progression of disease according to Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 
criteria  [76] or GCIG CA-125 criteria are met,  
 Progression of disease according to RECIST 1.1 criteria, 
 Unacceptable toxicity is encountered, 
 Patient decides to withdraw from the study 
 Patient is withdrawn from study at the discretion of the investigator, 
 Intercurrent illness that prevents further administration of treatment, 
 General or specific changes in the patient's condition render the patient unacceptable for 
further treatment in the judgment of the investigator, 
 Lost to follow-up/Non-compliance, 
 Study termination 
 
5.9 Duration of Follow Up 
 
Patients will be followed for survival after discontinuation from active treatment until the end of 
study or until death, whichever occurs first, but no longer than 2 years after treatment 
discontinuation.  Patients removed from study for unacceptable adverse event(s) will be followed 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 40 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
until resolution or stabilization of the adverse event.  Subjects will be followed for AEs/SAEs for 
100 days after their last dose of study drug(s). 
 
5.10  Criteria for Removal from Study 
 
Patients will be removed from study when any of the criteria listed in Section 5.8 apply.  The 
reason for study removal and the date the patient was removed must be documented in the Case 
Report Form. 
 
 
6. STUDY ASSESSMENTS 
 
These assessments are summarized below and in the study calendar in Section 7.0. 
 
6.1 Pre-treatment Screening Evaluation (Phase I-b and II) 
 
Eligible patients who have signed informed consent and have had eligibility confirmed will be 
seen in the outpatient clinic within 28 days of starting the study. They will undergo a history and 
physical examination, and will have ECOG performance status, concomitant medications, and a 
baseline adverse event evaluation documented at this visit.   
 
Patients will also have standard of care screening labs drawn as part of eligibility testing within 
28 days of initiating therapy. These labs include: CBC (white blood cell count, hemoglobin, 
platelet count, white blood cell differential) and serum chemistries (sodium, potassium, chloride, 
bicarbonate, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, glucose, calcium, alanine aminotransferase, 
aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin, total protein, alkaline phosphatase, and albumin). A 
serum cholesterol will also be obtained. Serum testosterone will be obtained from patients with 
mCRPC. PT, INR will be collected prior to each biopsy. 
 
WOCBP must have a negative serum pregnancy test result less than 3 days prior to 
administration of the first dose of rucaparib. 
 
Disease burden must be evaluated within 30 days prior to study entry. Disease evaluation may be 
performed with: a nuclear medicine bone scan or Fluoride PET; CT or MRI of the abdomen and 
pelvis; and CT chest (when clinically indicated).   
 
A mandatory research biopsy will be collected after enrollment and prior to the first dose of 
study treatment.  
 
Study entry date is defined as the day of the first pre-treatment biopsy.  
 
6.2 On Study Visits 
 
6.2.1 Phase I-B Portion 
 
On study visits will be every 2 weeks, and after week 12, visits will be every 4 weeks. Patients 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 41 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
are seen frequently during the first portion of study therapy to ensure adequate patient safety 
while on study. On-study visits can occur +/- 3 days of the scheduled visit.   
 
The following procedures and assessments will be completed on Day 1 of each cycle:   
 
 Physical exam;  
 Vital signs including Weight; 
 Concomitant medications and procedures;  
 ECOG performance status;  
 
 CBC with differential; 
 Serum chemistry 
 Cholesterol monthly for the first three cycles and then as clinically indicated 
 AE monitoring  
 Thyroid function tests (Cycles, 1, 2, and 3, then as clinically indicated) 
 PSA or CA125 
 
For WOCBP, a serum pregnancy test must be performed < 3 days prior to Day 1 of every cycle 
from Cycle 2 and beyond. 
 
The following procedures and assessments will be completed on Day 15 of each cycle when the 
patient is seen:  
 Physical exam;  
 Vital signs; 
 Concomitant medications and procedures;  
 ECOG performance status 
 CBC with differential 
 Serum chemistry 
 AE monitoring  
 
Refer to the Study Calendar for patients enrolled to Phase I-b for details.  
 
The second mandatory research biopsy will be obtained at the completion of four weeks of study 
therapy. 
 
Disease assessment with imaging will be repeated every 12 weeks while on study, starting at first 
day of concomitant daily study drug administration. The same method of assessment and the 
same technique that was used to assess disease at screening should be used.  
 
6.2.2  Phase II Portion  
 
On study visits will be every 2 weeks and . after week 12, visits will be every 4 weeks. Patients 
are seen frequently during the first portion of study therapy to ensure adequate patient safety 
while on study.  On-study visits can occur +/- 3 days of the scheduled visit.   
 
The following procedures and assessments will be completed on Day 1 of each cycle:   


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 42 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
 
1. Physical exam;  
2. Vital signs including Weight; 
3. Concomitant medications and procedures;  
4. ECOG performance status;   
5. CBC with differential; 
6. Serum chemistry; 
7. Cholesterol for the first three cycles and then as clinically indicated; 
8. AE monitoring;  
9. Thyroid function tests (Cycles, 1, 2, and 3, then as clinically indicated); 
10. PSA or CA125 
 
For WOCBP, a serum pregnancy test must be performed < 3 days prior to Day 1 of every cycle 
from Cycle 2 and beyond. 
 
The following procedures and assessments will be completed on Day 15 of each cycle when the 
patient is seen:  
1. Physical exam;  
2. Vital signs; 
3. Concomitant medications and procedures;  
4. ECOG performance status; 
5. CBC with differential; 
6. Serum chemistry; 
7. AE monitoring  
 
Refer to the Study Calendar for patients enrolled to Phase II for details.  
  
The second mandatory research biopsy will be obtained as close as possible to the completion of 
four weeks of study therapy, and before starting a crossover therapy.  
 
Disease assessment with imaging will be repeated every 12 weeks while on study, starting at first 
day of any study drug administration. The same method of assessment and the same technique 
that was used to assess disease at screening should be used.  
 
6.3 Off Study Assessments 
 
Patients will be followed with the assessments described in Sections 6.2.1 and 6.2.2 and the 
study calendars in Sections 7.1 and 7.2 until taken off study.  Upon study discontinuation, 
subjects will undergo a complete evaluation with a history and physical examination, ECOG 
performance status, concomitant medications, and toxicity evaluation documented at this visit.   
Standard laboratory studies, specifically, CBC with platelets, and serum chemistries will also be 
collected at this visit unless already collected within past 2 weeks. PSA and testosterone will be 
collected from mCRPC patients and CA-125 will be collected from endometrial cancer patients 
unless already collected in past 2 weeks.  
A serum pregnancy test will also be performed at the End of Treatment Visit for WOCBP. 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 43 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
Radiologic tumor assessments will be performed, unless already performed within four weeks of 
being taken off study.  Study participant refusal or inability to undergo these evaluations will be 
noted.  This visit should be done on the day patients are taken off study medication but may be 
completed within 30 days of coming off treatment.      
In addition, an optional tumor biopsy may be obtained at time of disease progression for those 
patients who are being removed from study treatment for progression, to elucidate resistance 
mechanisms to the combination therapy. 
 
7. STUDY CALENDAR 
 
7.1 Phase I-b portion 
 
Baseline evaluations are to be conducted within 28 days prior to start of protocol therapy. Scans 
and x-rays must be done <4 weeks prior to the start of therapy. Laboratory evaluations, physical 
examination, and assessment of concomitant medications and adverse events may be performed 
+/- 3 days prior to the scheduled visit.  In the event that the patient’s condition is deteriorating, 
laboratory evaluations should be repeated within 48 hours prior to initiation of the next cycle of 
therapy. A cycle of therapy in the Phase I-b portion of this study is defined as four weeks (28 
days) of therapy.  
 
Pre- 
Study 
C 1 
day 
1  
(+/- 3 
days) 
C 1 
day  
8  
(+/- 3 
days) 
C 1 
day 
15  
(+/- 3 
days) 
C1 
day 
22  
(+/- 3 
days) 
C 2 
day 
1  
(+/- 3 
days) 
C2 
day 
8  
(+/- 3 
days) 
C 2 
day 
15 
(+/- 3 
days) 
C 2 
day 
22  
(+/- 3 
days) 
Day 1 of 
subse-
quent 
cycles  
(+/- 3 days) 
Day 
15 of 
subse-
quent 
cycles 
End of 
Tx j 
28-day 
follow-
up  
Long Term 
Follow Up 
(l, m) 
Nivolumab  
 
A 
 
 
 
A 
 
 
 
A 
 
 
 
 
Rucaparib  
 
B 
B 
B 
B 
B 
B 
B 
B 
B  
B 
 
 
 
Informed consenta 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Demographics 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Medical history 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Survival status 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X 
Concomitant med and 
procedure review 
X 
X-------------------------------------------------------------------------X 
 
 
 
Physical exam 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
Vital signs 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
Height 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weight 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
Performance status 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
CBC w/diff, plts 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
Serum  chemistryb 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
Thyroid Function 
X 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
Xd 
 
X 
X 
 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 44 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
 
 
 
Panelc  
Cholesteroln 
X 
 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
Testosteronee 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X 
X 
 
PSA or CA125 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
X 
X 
 
Hep B Virus Testing 
(HBs-Ag; HBs-AB, 
HBV-DNA) 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hep C Virus Testing 
(HCVAb, HCV RNA) 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PT, INR 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Xk 
 
 
Adverse event 
evaluation 
 
X-------------------------------------------------------------------------X 
X 
 
Xk,m 
Tumor measurements f 
X 
Tumor measurements are repeated every 12 weeks.  Documentation 
(radiologic) must be provided for patients removed from study for 
progressive disease. 
X 
 
 
Radiologic evaluation f   
X 
Radiologic measurements should be performed every 12   weeks. 
X 
 
 
Bone Scang 
X 
Radiologic measurements should be performed every   12   weeks. 
X 
 
 
B-HCGh 
X 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
X 
 
 
Mandatory Correlative 
Studies: 1 Red top 10 
mL (serum/plasma)i 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
Xd 
 
X 
 
 
Mandatory Correlative 
Studies: 2 10 mL 
purple top (whole 
blood)i 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
Xd 
 
X 
 
 
Tumor Biopsy 
X 
 
 
 
Xo 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Xk 
 
 
A:    Nivolumab:  Starting dose: 480 mg IV every four weeks 
B: 
Rucaparib: Starting dose: 600 mg PO BID. 
a: 
Written informed consent must be obtained before any study-specific screening assessments are performed.  
b:   Serum chemistry includes: Albumin, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, bicarbonate, BUN, calcium, chloride, creatinine, glucose, potassium, total 
protein, SGOT [AST], SGPT [ALT], sodium, cholesterol. 
c:   Thyroid Function Panel includes: TSH, reflexive free T4, and free T3. 
d:    Cycle 3 day 1, Cycle 4 day 1, then corresponding to all imaging assessment time points. 
e:    Prostate cancer patients only.  
f:   Assessment of effect by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), Version  1.1. 
g:   For patients with bone metastases. 
h:   Serum pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential. Must be performed <3 days prior to day 1 of every cycle. 
i:    See sections 11.1 and 11.2 for details regarding required samples.  
j:    Off-study evaluation. 
k:   Tumor biopsy optional only at off-study evaluation. 
l:    Follow patients till the end of study or until death, whichever comes first. 
m: All SAEs and AEs must be collected from during the treatment period and for a minimum of 100 days of the last dose of nivolumab. 
n: For patients getting rucaparib alone or rucparib/nivolumab combination therapy 
o: Tumor biopsies are to be at or before C1D28 
 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 45 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
 
7.2 Phase II portion 
  
Baseline evaluations are to be conducted within 28 days prior to start of protocol therapy. Scans 
and x-rays must be done < 4 weeks prior to the start of therapy. Laboratory evaluations, physical 
examination, and assessment of concomitant medications and adverse events may be performed 
+/- 3 days prior to the scheduled visit. In the event that the patient’s condition is deteriorating, 
laboratory evaluations should be repeated within 48 hours prior to initiation of the next cycle of 
therapy. A cycle of therapy in the phase II portion of this study is defined as four weeks of 
therapy.  
 
 
Pre- 
Study 
C1 
day 
1  
(+/- 3 
days) 
C1 
day 
8  
(+/- 3 
days) 
C1 
day 
15 
(+/- 3 
days) 
C1 
day 
22 
(+/- 3 
days) 
C2 
day 
1  
(+/- 3 
days) 
C2 
day 
8  
(+/- 3 
days) 
C2 
day 
15 
(+/- 3 
days) 
C2 
day 
22 
(+/- 3 
days) 
Day 1 
of 
subse-
quent 
cycles  
(+/- 3 
days) 
Day 
15 of 
subse-
quent 
cycles 
Off 
Study
k 
28-day 
follow-
up visit 
Long 
Term 
Follow 
Up m, n    
Randomization 
 
Xa 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Randomized study 
treatment 
 
A 
A 
A 
A 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Combination treatment  
 
 
 
 
 
B 
B 
B 
B 
B 
B 
 
 
 
Informed consent b 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Demographics 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Medical history 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Survival status 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X 
Concomitant med 
review 
X 
X-----------------------------------------------------------------------X 
 
 
 
Physical exam 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
Vital signs 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
 
 
Height 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X 
 
Weight 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
Performance status 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
CBC w/diff, plts 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
Serum chemistry c 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
Thyroid Function 
Paneld 
X 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
Xe 
 
X 
 
 
Cholesterolo 
X 
 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
X 
 
Testosteronef 
X 
 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
X 
 
 
PSA or CA125 
X 
 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
X 
 
 
Hep B Virus Testing 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 46 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
 
Pre- 
Study 
C1 
day 
1  
(+/- 3 
days) 
C1 
day 
8  
(+/- 3 
days) 
C1 
day 
15 
(+/- 3 
days) 
C1 
day 
22 
(+/- 3 
days) 
C2 
day 
1  
(+/- 3 
days) 
C2 
day 
8  
(+/- 3 
days) 
C2 
day 
15 
(+/- 3 
days) 
C2 
day 
22 
(+/- 3 
days) 
Day 1 
of 
subse-
quent 
cycles  
(+/- 3 
days) 
Day 
15 of 
subse-
quent 
cycles 
Off 
Study
k 
28-day 
follow-
up visit 
Long 
Term 
Follow 
Up m, n    
(HBs-Ag; HBs-Ab, 
HBV-DNA) 
Hep C Virus Testing 
(HCV Ab, HCV RNA) 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PT, INR 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Xl 
 
 
Adverse event 
evaluation 
 
X-----------------------------------------------------------------------X 
 
X 
 
Xm 
Tumor measurementsg 
X 
Tumor measurements are repeated every 12 weeks.  
Documentation (radiologic) must be provided for patients 
removed from study for progressive disease. 
 
X 
 
 
Radiologic evaluationg 
X 
Radiologic measurements should be performed every 12 
weeks. 
 
X 
 
 
Bone Scan h 
X 
Radiologic measurements should be performed every 12 
weeks. 
 
 
 
 
B-HCGi 
X 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
X 
 
 
Mandatory Correlative 
Studies: 1 10 mL red 
top (serum/plasma)j 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
Xe 
 
X 
 
 
Mandatory Correlative 
Studies: 2 10 mL purple 
tops (whole blood )j 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
Xe 
 
X 
 
 
Tumor Biopsy  
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Xl 
 
 
A: Subjects shall be randomized to either: Rucaparib 600 mg PO BID daily for 4 weeks, starting on cycle 1 day 1; or Nivolumab 480 mg IV every 
four weeks for 4 weeks, starting on cycle 1 day 1; or the combination treatment arm (Rucaparib 600 mg PO BID daily and Nivolumab 480  mg 
IV every four  weeks for 4 weeks.) 
B: 
All subjects shall  receive combination treatment with Rucaparib 600 mg PO BID daily and Nivolumab 480  mg IV every 4 weeks starting at 
cycle 2  
a: 
Randomization will occur after eligibility has been confirmed, but before a pre-treatment biopsy is obtained. 
b: 
Written informed consent must be obtained before any study-specific screening assessments are performed.  
c: 
Serum chemistry includes: Albumin, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, bicarbonate, BUN, calcium, chloride, creatinine, glucose, potassium, 
total protein, SGOT [AST], SGPT [ALT], and sodium. 
d:   Thyroid Function Panel includes: TSH, reflexive free T4, and free T3. 
e:    Cycle 3 day 1, Cycle 4 day 1, then corresponding to all imaging assessment time points. 
f.     Prostate cancer patients only 
g:    Assessment of effect by both the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST1.1)   
h:   For patients with bone metastases 
i:      Serum pregnancy test  for women of childbearing potential. Must be performed <3 days prior to day 1 of every cycle. 
j:   See sections 11.1 and 11.2 for details regarding required samples.  
k:  Off-study evaluation.   
l:   Tumor biopsy optional only at off-study evaluation 
m: Follow patients till the end of study or until death, whichever comes first. 
n:  All SAEs and AEs must be collected from during the treatment period and for a minimum of 100 days of the last dose of nivolumab. 
o: For patients getting rucaparib alone or rucparib/nivolumab combination therapy 
 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 47 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
 
8. DOSING DELAYS/DOSE MODIFICATIONS 
 
8.1 General Guidelines  
 
Every effort should be made to administer study treatment on the planned dose and schedule. If a 
toxicity is seen, the treating physician should ascertain and document relatedness to either or 
both of the study drugs. 
Note that a rise in creatinine or a transaminitis within the first 4 weeks or myelosuppression 
during combination therapy are most likely related to rucaparib rather than nivolumab. In 
general, these toxicities should be managed as per rucaparib dose modification guidelines in 
Section 8.3 below.  For creatinine elevations or transaminitis noted after 4 weeks, or for 
myelosuppression that does not resolve in a timely manner, an immune related AE should be 
considered and treated accordingly. In unclear cases, biopsy or other work up for an immune 
related AE or a myelodysplastic syndrome may be necessary. 
 
The maximum time rucaparib may be held due to toxicity is 28 days and the maxium time 
nivolumab may be held due to toxicity is 84 days. If drug holds exceed this time frame, the 
patient must be discontinued from study participation. Exception: subjects completing a steroid 
taper for nivolumab toxicity or for whom nivolumab is permanently discontinued, may resume 
rucaparib after a longer interval if clinically appropriate.  
 
8.2 Nivolumab-related Toxicity 
 
When encountering nivolumab related toxicities, please reference Appendix 3 of the 
nivolumab investigator’s brochure and the published ASCO guidelines for immunotherapy 
toxicity management (www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines0. In general: 
 For all grade 3-4 toxicities, steroid therapy should be initiated and therapy should 
be discontinued. 
 For grade 1 or 2 toxities, treatment may resume when toxicity resolves to baseline. 
 
No dose modifications are permitted for nivolumab in this study. Doses may be omitted based on 
persistent toxicity as per above general guidelines.  
 
8.3   Rucaparib Dose Modifications  
 
The most common effects of rucaparib treatment include: gastrointestinal disorders (nausea, 
vomiting, diarrhea, and constipation); asthenia/fatigue; elevations in clinical chemistries 
(ALT/AST, creatinine, and cholesterol); myelosuppression (decreased hemoglobin, lymphocytes, 
platelets, and neutrophils); dysgeusia; and decreased appetite.  
 
Modification of rucaparib doses may be a necessary component of AE management. Dose 
interruptions, with or without subsequent dose reductions, may help to ameliorate AEs attributed 
to rucaparib therapy. Additional guidance for management of ALT/AST, cholesterol elevations, 
and myelosuppression ifor subjects taking rucaparib is provided below 
 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 48 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
Treatment with rucaparib should be held if any of the following are observed and a dose 
reduction should be considered or implemented. 
 Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity 
 Grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity (except for alopecia, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea 
adequately controlled with systemic antiemetic/antidiarrheal medication administered in 
standard doses according to the study center routines) 
 In addition, and at the discretion of the investigator, the dose of rucaparib may be held 
and/or reduced for Grade 2 toxicity not adequately controlled by concomitant 
medications and/or supportive care. 
If not otherwise specified below, treatment with rucaparib should be held until the toxicity 
resolves to ≤ CTCAE Grade 2. BID dosing may then be resumed at either the same dose or a 
lower dose, per investigator discretion. If treatment is resumed at the same dose, and the patient 
experiences the same toxicity, the dose should be reduced following resolution of the event to 
≤ CTCAE Grade 2. If the patient continues to experience toxicity, additional dose reduction steps 
are permitted. If a patient continues to experience toxicity despite dose reduction to dose level -3, 
or if dosing with rucaparib is interrupted for > 28 consecutive days due to toxicity, rucaparib 
treatment should be discontinued.. For patients on combination therapy, nivolumab may be 
continued at the investigator’s discretion. 
Grade 3/4 myelosuppressive events have been successfully treated with supportive care and dose 
interruption/reduction. Additional diagnostic evaluation, including bone marrow examination, 
should be considered for patients with persistent myelosuppression that does not stabilize or 
recover with rucaparib treatment modification (see below). 
 
Dose reduction steps are presented below: 
 
Rucaparib Dose Reduction Steps 
 
Starting Dose 
600 mg BID 
Dose Level -1 
500 mg BID 
Dose Level -2 
400 mg BID 
Dose Level -3 
300 mg BID 
 
8.4 Management of Anemia including Evaluation for MDS/AML and Follow-up of Patients who 
Discontinue Treatment with Ongoing Anemia 
 
 
If the patient develops anemia CTCAE Grade ≥ 3, , rucaparib treatment should be held 
and dose reduced. If rucaparib is held due to anemia, once itimproves to CTCAE Grade ≤ 
2, daily dosing should then be resumed at either the same dose or a lower dose, per 
treating investigator discretion. 
 If the duration of dosing is interrupted for > 28 consecutive days due to anemia CTCAE 
Grade ≥ 3, treatment should be permanently discontinued,. 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 49 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
 In addition, if a patient develops anemia CTCAE Grade ≥ 3, thenthen weekly complete 
blood counts should be performed until resolution of the event. In addition, serum folate 
levels should be checked. 
 If, after 42 days of interruption of rucaparib, the anemia has not improved to CTCAE 
Grade ≤ 1 then the patient should be considered for analysis of the bone marrow with 
cytogenetic studies according to standard hematologic practice. 
 The bone marrow analysis should include a bone marrow aspirate (for cellular 
morphology, cytogenetic analysis, and flow cytometry) and a core biopsy (for bone 
marrow cellularity). 
Dose re-escalation upon resolution of toxicity to ≤ CTCAE Grade 1 is permitted, upon the 
treating investigator’s discretion. 
8.5 Management of Rucaparib Treatment-Emergent ALT/AST Elevations  
 
 
Grade 4 ALT/AST elevations:  
a. 
hold rucaparib until values have returned to Grade 2 or better, then 
resume rucaparib with a dose reduction.  
b. 
Monitor liver function tests weekly for 3 weeks after rucaparib has been 
restarted. 
 
Grade 3 ALT/AST elevations:   
a. 
Monitor liver function tests weekly until resolution to ≤ Grade 2. 
b. 
Continuation of rucaparib with elevation of ALT/AST up to Grade 3 is 
permitted provided bilirubin is < ULN, alkaline phosphatase is < 3 x 
ULN, and there are no other signs of liver dysfunction.  
c. 
If patient is trying to cross over to combination therapy, dose reduction of 
rucaparib may also be employed in an attempt to reduce transaminitis to 
grade 1 or less. 
 
Subjects with grade 2 or higher transaminitis on single agent rucaparib may continue on 
rucaparib and or dose reduce per package insert guidelines. However nivolumab may not be 
started unless transaminitis is grade 1 or lower. Subjects with persistent transaminitis on single 
agent rucaparib at 12 weeks or later (such that addition of nivolumab is not feasible) may elect to 
discontinue rucaparib and start single agent nivolumab when transaminitis resolves. 
 
If patient has Grade 3 ALT/AST and continues on rucaparib, and levels do not decline within 2 
weeks or they continue to rise, treatment interruption and resolution to ≤ Grade 2 will be 
required before rucaparib can be resumed, either at the current dose or at a reduced dose. 
 
 8.7  Treatment of Overdose  
 
There is no specific treatment in the event of rucaparib overdose, and symptoms of overdose are 
not established. In the event of suspected overdose, physicians should follow general supportive 
measures and should treat symptomatically. 
 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 50 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
9. ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING REQUIREMENTS  
 
9.1 Adverse Event  
 
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation 
subject administered a pharmaceutical product that does not necessarily have a causal 
relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can be any unfavorable and unintended sign 
(including a laboratory finding), symptom or disease temporally associated with the use of a 
medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) 
product. 
 
At each evaluation patients should be interviewed in a non-directed manner to elicit potential 
adverse reactions from the patient. The occurrence of an adverse event will be based on changes 
in the patient’s physical examination, laboratory results, and/or signs and symptoms, and review 
of the patient’s own record of adverse events. 
 
Adverse events will be followed until resolution while the patient remains on-study. Once the 
patient is removed from study, events thought to be related to the study medication will be 
followed until resolution or stabilization of the adverse event, or until the patient starts a new 
treatment regimen, or death, whichever comes first.  Subjects will be followed for AEs/SAEs for 
100 days after their last dose of study drug(s). 
 
The descriptions and grading scales found in the revised NCI Common Terminology Criteria for 
Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03 will be utilized for AE reporting. All appropriate 
treatment areas should have access to a copy of the CTCAE version 4.03.  Assessment of 
toxicities and adverse events will be graded according to CTCAE version 4.03. A copy of the 
CTCAE version 4.0 can be downloaded from the CTEP web site  
http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm. 
 
 
9.2 Adverse Events of Special Interest   
 
Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) are defined as serious or non-serious AEs of 
scientific and medical concern specific to Clovis’s product or program, for which ongoing 
monitoring and rapid communication by the investigator to Clovis can be appropriate. Such an 
event might warrant further investigation in order to characterize and understand it. Depending 
on the nature of the event, rapid communication by the Sponsor-Investigator to other parties such 
as regulatory agencies might also be warranted. 
9.2.1 Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia  
 
As of June 27, 2016 there have been 3 events of myleodyplastic syndrome (MDS) and 3 events 
or Acute Myeloid leukemia (AML)  reported in patients participating in Clovis-sponsored 
clinical studies. The 3 events of MDS were reported in open-label clinical studies. More than 
1,000 patients have received oral rucaparib and these events have been observed in <0.6% of all 
patients on these studies. Events of MDS and AML have also been reported with another PARP 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 51 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
inhibitor [77]. 
 
9.2.2 Reporting of AESIs to Clovis 
 
Details on Clovis’s currently agreed list of AESIs for rucaparib can be found in the current 
rucaparib IB. As of protocol writing they include the below, however updates may occur. 
 MyelodysplasticSyndrome and Acute Myeloid Leukemia 
These AESIs are to be reported to Clovis expeditiously within 24 hours of investigator 
knowledge of the event, according to the procedures below. 
 
9.3 Serious Adverse Events 
 
9.3.1 Definition of Serious Adverse Event  
 
An adverse event is considered serious if it results in ANY of the following outcomes:  
 
 Death 
 Is immediately life-threatening (e.g. places subject at immediate risk of death, this does 
not include events that might have caused death if they occurred a greater severity) 
 Results in inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization for ≥ 24 
hours  
 A persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct 
normal life functions  
 A congenital anomaly/birth defect. 
 Important Medical Events (IME) that may not result in death, be life threatening, or 
require hospitalization may be considered serious when, based upon medical judgment, 
they may jeopardize the patient or subject and may require medical or surgical 
intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed in this definition. 
 
Examples of IMEs include:  intensive treatment in an emergency room or at home for allergic 
bronchospasm; blood dyscrasias or convulsions that do not result in hospitalization; or 
development of product dependency or product abuse. 
 
Additional study-specific events to be reported as SAEs are described below in Section 9.6.2 and 
9.7 . 
 
9.3.2 Events or Outcomes Not Qualifying as Serious Adverse Event 
The following are not considered SAEs and therefore do not need to be reported as such: 
1. 
Pre-planned or elective hospitalization including social and/ or convenience situations 
(e.g., respite care) 
 
2. 
Hospital visits of less than 24 hours duration (e.g., patient presents to the emergency 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 52 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
room, but is not admitted to a ward)  
 
3. 
Overdose of either Clovis study drug, nivolumab, or concomitant medication unless the 
event meets SAE criteria (e.g., hospitalization). However, the event should still be 
captured as a nonserious AE. 
 
4. 
Events of progression of the patient’s underlying cancer as well as events clearly related 
to progression of the patient’s cancer (signs and symptoms of progression) should not be 
reported as a serious adverse event unless the outcome is fatal within the safety reporting 
period. If the event has a fatal outcome within the safety reporting period, then the event 
of Progression of Disease must be recorded as an AE and as a SAE with CTC Grade 5 
(fatal outcome) indicated.  
 
9.4 Suspected Adverse Reactions 
 
An adverse event (AE) is considered to be a suspected adverse reaction if there evidence to 
suggest a causal relationship to the study agent.  This may include a single occurrence of an 
event strongly associated with drug exposure (e.g. Stevens-Johnson Syndrome), one or more 
occurrence of an event otherwise uncommon is the study population, or an aggregate analysis of 
specific events occurring at greater frequency than expected from historical controls. 
 
9.5 Unexpected Events 
 
Unexpected events are those not listed at the observed specificity or severity in the protocol, 
investigator brochure, and/or FDA-approved package.  This includes adverse events listed in the 
protocol or consent as occurring within the class of drugs or otherwise expected from the drug’s 
pharmacological properties but which have not been previously observed with the investigational 
agent(s). 
 
9.6  Adverse Event Reporting Requirements 
 
9.6.1 Routine Adverse Event Reporting 
 
All Adverse Events must be reported in routine study data submissions.  AEs reported using 
the Serious Event Reporting Form and/or MedWatch Form discussed below must also be 
reported in routine study data submissions.   
All adverse events (except grade 1 and 2 laboratory abnormalities that do not require an 
intervention), regardless of causal relationship, are to be recorded in the case report form and 
source documentation. The Investigator must determine the intensity of any adverse events 
according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03 
and their causal relationship.  
9.6.2 Serious Adverse Event Reporting to the Coordinating Center 
 
Use the UCCCC protocol number and the protocol-specific patient ID assigned during trial 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 53 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
registration on all reports. 
 
All serious adverse events (as defined in sections 9.3, 9.4, and 9.5) require expedited reporting to 
the University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center (UCCCC).  The responsible Research 
Nurse or other designated individual at the treating site should report the SAE to the Study Lead 
Investigator, the University of Chicago CRA and the CCTO within 24 hours of discovery.  
Reports should be made using the ‘Serious Event Report’ Form.  Please scan and send via email 
(preferred) or fax to the following: 
 
University of Chicago Phase II CRA General: 
PhaseIICRA@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu 
Phone: 773-834-1746 
Fax: 773-702-4889 
 
UCCCC Cancer Clinical Trials Office Quality Assurance: 
qaccto@bsd.uchicago.edu 
   
All unexpected adverse reactions must be reported to the IND holder so that the University of 
Chicago CCTO can inform the FDA.  The responsible Research Nurse or other designated 
individual at the treating site should provide a complete written report using the FDA MedWatch 
3500A form.  The completed form should be sent to the CCTO at qaccto@bsd.uchicago.edu and 
to the Phase II CRA at PhaseIICRA@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu  within the specified timelines 
below regardless of whether all information regarding the event is available.  If applicable, a 
follow-up report should be provided to the CCTO if additional information on the event becomes 
available.  
 
Participating sites should not forward any adverse event reports directly to the FDA, Clovis or 
BMS.  The U of C  CCTO will report all events to the FDA as per the current FDA guidelines. 
The U of C study coordinator will also report to Clovis and BMS.    
 
 
All serious adverse events should also be reported to the local IRB of record according to their 
policies and procedures.   
 
9.6.3 Serious and Unexpected Adverse Event reporting by the Coordinating Center 
 
The designated UCCCC Regulatory Manager will notify all participating sites of all unexpected 
and serious adverse reactions that occur on this clinical trial and which are reported to the FDA 
and/or UC Institutional Review Board (IRB).  When reported to the FDA, a copy of the 
completed Form 3500A (MedWatch) will be provided to the responsible Regulatory Manager by 
the CCTO IND Coordinator for distribution to all participating sites. 
 
Reporting to Clovis: 
 
In addition to the FDA, a copy of the completed MedWatch Form 3500A will be submitted to 
Clovis Oncology, which is providing rucaparib for this study. All SAEs and AESIs, regardless of 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 54 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
relationship to study drug, must be reported to the Clovis Oncology within 24 hours of Lead 
Investigator knowledge of the event, during the study through 30 days after receiving the last 
dose of study treatment, according to the procedures below. After the 30-day specified window, 
only SAEs considered to be treatment-related and all AESIs, regardless of treatment relationship, 
should be reported. It is important that the investigator provide an assessment of relationship of 
the SAE or AESI to study treatment at the time of the initial report. 
The MedWatch Form 3500A must be used for reporting SAEs and AESIs.  This may be sent to: 
(Drugsafety@clovisoncology.com or fax: +1.303.261.8319). 
Preganacies occurring in a trial subject or female partner should be reported within 48 hours of 
Lead Investigator knowledge of the event. 
Reporting To Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS): 
 All Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) that occur following the subject’s written consent to 
participate in the study through 100 days of discontinuation of dosing must be reported to 
BMS Worldwide Safety (worldwide.safety@bms.com). 
 Medwatch should be used to report SAEs. The BMS protocol ID number must be included 
on whatever form is submitted by the Sponsor/Investigator. 
 Following the subject’s written consent to participate in the study, all SAEs, whether 
related or not related to study drug, are collected, including those thought to be associated 
with protocol-specified procedures. The investigator should report any SAE occurring after 
these time periods that is believed to be related to study drug or protocol-specified 
procedure.  
 In accordance with local regulations, BMS will notify investigators of all reported SAEs 
that are suspected (related to the investigational product) and unexpected (ie, not previously 
described in the IB). In the European Union (EU), an event meeting these criteria is termed 
a Suspected, Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction (SUSAR). Investigator notification of 
these events will be in the form of an expedited safety report (ESR).  
o Other important findings which may be reported as an ESR include: increased 
frequency of a clinically significant expected SAE, an SAE considered associated with 
study procedures that could modify the conduct of the study, lack of efficacy that 
poses significant hazard to study subjects, clinically significant safety finding from a 
nonclinical (eg, animal) study, important safety recommendations from a study data 
monitoring committee, or sponsor decision to end or temporarily halt a clinical study 
for safety reasons. 
o Upon receiving an ESR from BMS, the investigator must review and retain the ESR 
with the IB. Where required by local regulations or when there is a central IRB/IEC 
for the study, the sponsor-investigator will submit the ESR to the appropriate 
IRB/IEC. The investigator and IRB/IEC will determine if the informed consent 
requires revision. The investigator should also comply with the IRB/IEC procedures 
for reporting any other safety information.  
o In addition, suspected serious adverse reactions (whether expected or unexpected) 
shall be reported by BMS to the relevant competent health authorities in all concerned 
countries according to local regulations (either as expedited and/or in aggregate 
reports). 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 55 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
 
SAEs, whether related or not related to study drug, and pregnancies must be reported to BMS 
within within 24 hours of knowledge of the event.  SAEs and pregnancies must be recorded 
on a MedWatch Form. 
SAE Email Address:  Worldwide.Safety@BMS.com 
SAE Facsimile Number:  609-818-3804 
 
If only limited information is initially available, follow-up reports are required. (Note: 
Follow-up SAE reports should include the same investigator term(s) initially reported.)  
If an ongoing SAE changes in its intensity or relationship to study drug or if new information 
becomes available, a follow-up SAE report should be sent within 24 hours to the BMS (or 
designee) using the same procedure used for transmitting the initial SAE report.  
 
BMS will be provided with a simultaneous copy of all adverse events filed with the FDA.  
 
All SAEs should be followed to resolution or stabilization. 
 An SAE report should be completed for any event where doubt exists regarding its 
seriousness.  
 For studies with long-term follow-up periods in which safety data are being reported, 
include the timing of SAE collection in the protocol. 
 If the investigator believes that an SAE is not related to study drug, but is potentially 
related to the conditions of the study (such as withdrawal of previous therapy or a 
complication of a study procedure), the relationship should be specified in the 
narrative section of the SAE Report Form. 
 If only limited information is initially available, follow-up reports are required. (Note: 
Follow-up SAE reports should include the same investigator term(s) initially 
reported.) 
 If an ongoing SAE changes in its intensity or relationship to study drug or if new 
information becomes available, a follow-up SAE report should be sent within 24 
hours to BMS using the same procedure used for transmitting the initial SAE report. 
All SAEs should be followed to resolution or stabilization. All SAEs should be 
followed to resolution or stabilization. 
 
Potential Drug Induced Liver Injury (DILI)  
Wherever possible, timely confirmation of initial liver-related laboratory abnormalities 
should occur prior to the reporting of a potential DILI event. All occurrences of potential 
DILIs, meeting the defined criteria, must be reported as SAEs. Potential drug induced liver 
injury is defined as: 
1) ALT or AST elevation > 3 times upper limit of normal (ULN)  
AND 
2) Total bilirubin > 2 times ULN, without initial findings of cholestasis (elevated serum 
alkaline phosphatase) 
AND 
3) No other immediately apparent possible causes of AST/ALT elevation and 
hyperbilirubinemia, including, but not limited to, viral hepatitis, pre-existing chronic 
or acute liver disease, or the administration of other drug(s) known to be hepatotoxic. 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 56 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
 
Pregnancy 
If, following initiation of the investigational product, it is subsequently discovered that a study 
subject is pregnant or may have been pregnant at the time of investigational product exposure, 
including five months after the last dose of nivolumab and 6 months after the last dose of 
rucaparib, the investigational product will be permanently discontinued in an appropriate 
manner (e.g., dose tapering if necessary for subject safety).  
 
The sponosor-investigator must immediately notify Worldwide Safety @BMS.com of this 
event via the MedWatch Form in accordance with SAE reporting procedures.  
 
Follow-up information regarding the course of the pregnancy, including perinatal and neonatal 
outcome and, where applicable, offspring information must be reported on the Pregnancy 
Surveillance Form [provided upon request from BMS]. 
 
Any pregnancy that occurs in a female partner of a male study participant  up to 7 months after 
last dose of nivolumab should be reported to BMS. Information on this pregnancy will be 
collected on the Pregnancy Surveillance Form. 
 
Overdose 
An overdose is defined as the accidental or intentional administration of any dose of a product 
that is considered both excessive and medically important. All occurrences of overdose must 
be reported as an SAE to BMS. 
 
 
9.7 Other Safety Considerations 
 
9.7.1  Laboratory Data 
 
All laboratory data obtained during the course of the study should be reviewed. Any abnormal 
value that leads to a change in subject management (e.g., dose reduction or delay, requirement 
for additional medication or monitoring) or is considered to be of clinical significance by the 
investigator should be reported as an adverse event or serious adverse event as appropriate, 
unless this value is consistent with the patient’s present disease state or is consistent with values 
obtained prior to entry into the study. 
 
9.7.2 Procedure in Case of Pregnancy or Drug Exposure during Pregnancy 
 
The effect of rucaparib and  nivolumab in pregnant and lactating women is not known, and the 
exposure of a fetus or nursing infant is considered a potential risk. Both drugs can cause fetal 
harm when administered to a pregnant woman based on its mechanism of action.  
 
 Female patients of reproductive potential and their male partners must practice total 
abstinence or use a highly effective method of contraception as dexcribed in section 2.3 
during treatment and for 6 months following the last dose of rucaparib and for at least 5 
months following the last dose of nivolumab..  


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 57 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
 
Men who are sexually active with WOCBP must agree to use a reliable form of 
contraception described in section 2.3 during treatment, and for 7 months after the last 
dose of nivolumab and 6 months following the last dose of rucaparib. 
 
If a patient becomes pregnant during the study the investigator is to stop dosing with study drugs 
immediately. 
A pregnancy is not considered to be an AE or SAE; however, any pregnancy occurring in a study 
patient or partner of a study patient during study participation or within 6 months of last dosing 
of rucaparib must be reported to Clovis using the Pregnancy Report Form within the same 
timelines as an SAE. 
A pregnancy should be followed through to outcome, whenever possible. Once the outcome of 
the pregnancy is known, the Pregnancy Outcome Report Form should be completed and reported 
to Clovis. 
AEs, SAEs, or AESIs that occur during pregnancy will be assessed and processed according to 
the AE or SAE/AESI processes using the appropriate AE or SAE/AESI forms.  
 
9.7.3 Medication Errors 
 
Any medication error that results in an adverse event, even if it does not meet the definition of 
serious, requires reporting to the UCCCC CCTO as above. 
 
9.7.4 Infusion Reactions 
 
As noted in section 5.2.2, all grade 3 or 4 infusion reactions should be reported within 24 hours 
to BMS Global Safety at Worldwide.Safety@BMS.com and reported as an SAE if criteria are 
met.  Refer to section 9.6.3 for details. 
 
 
9.8 Follow-Up of Adverse Events 
 
Any SAE or AE assessed as possibly related that led to treatment discontinuation (including 
clinically significant abnormal laboratory values that meet these criteria) and is ongoing 100 
days after last dose of nivolumab  must be followed until either resolution of the event or 
determination by the investigator that the event has become stable or irreversible. This follow-up 
guidance also applies to possibly-related serious adverse events that occur greater than 30 days 
after last dose of study treatment. The status of all other continuing adverse events will be 
documented as of 100 days after last dose of  nivolumab. 
 
10. PHARMACEUTICAL  INFORMATION 
 
The study drugs will be requested by the Principal Investigator (or their authorized designees) at 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 58 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
the University of Chicago. Other sites that require study agent will submit a completed Clinical 
Drug Request Forms to the University of Chicago Investigational Drug Service by fax (773) 834-
7461. Orders received on Fridays will not be shipped until the following business day.  
 
For questions about drug orders, transfers, returns, or accountability call (773) 834-7466 Monday 
through Friday between 8:00 am and 4:30 pm (CST) or email 
IDS.PHARMACY@uchospitals.edu.  
 
The investigator is responsible for maintaining accurate records of the delivery of study drugs, 
drug inventories, use by each enrolled subjects, and disposition of study drugs. This 
responsibility may be delegated to an appropriate pharmacist or another appropriate individual 
under the supervision of the investigative site.   
 
 
10.1 Rucaparib  
 
Rucaparib will be provided by Clovis and shipped to the University of Chicago for use on site 
and distribution to participating institutions upon patient registration and treatment allocation.      
10.1.1 Description of the Dosage Form 
 
Refer to section 5.3.2 for a description of the containers in which all tablets are provided, a brief 
description of the investigational product, and storage conditions.  Each bottle provided to the 
subjects will be labeled with the protocol number, dosing and storage instructions, and expiration 
date.   Bottles of drug will be labeled and dispensed as described in section 5.3.2.  
 
10.1.2  Destruction of Study Drug Provided by Clovis 
 
Sites are required to submit a Study Drug Destruction Authorization Form to Clovis Supply 
Chain (Rucasupply@clovisoncology.com) for ALL undispensed study drug that they would 
like to destroy, regardless of whether the drug will be destroyed locally or returned to a local 
depot for destruction.  
 
It is expected that returned, unused, damaged, expired or otherwise out of specification study 
drug will be destroyed by the site where possible, using internal site procedures for the safe 
disposal of cytotoxic materials for chemotherapy comparators and internal site procedures for the 
safe disposal of non-cytotoxic materials for rucaparib.  For all sites able to destroy materials 
please submit local SOPs/processes to your MSA.    
 
If a site has damaged/out of temperature specification, soon to expire/expired, or is requesting 
final drug destruction authorization at site close out, please notify your MSA.  The MSAs must 
complete and submit a Study Drug Destruction Authorization Form to Clovis Supply Chain 
(Rucasupply@ClovisOncology.com) for review and approval. Only after the request is approved 
by Clovis Supply Chain can unused study drug be destroyed. The quantity of bottles of study 
drug shipped, destroyed and returned must be reconciled.  Destruction of study drug should be 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 59 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
clearly documented in the site’s pharmacy records.  
 
In all cases, after the study drug has been destroyed, a confirmation of study drug destruction 
must be provided for documentation purposes and recorded in the site’s Drug Inventory Log. 
 
For sites that do not allow on-site destruction, please contact your MSA for further instructions. 
Refer to Study Drug Return Form for study drug return guidelines to depot. 
 
10.2 Nivolumab 
 
Nivolumab will be provided by Bristol-Myers Squibb and shipped to the University of Chicago 
for use on site and distribution to participating institutions upon patient registration and treatment 
allocation.  The nivolumab will be provided as a 100 mg/10 mL solution in a single-dose vial. A 
flat dose of 480 mg will be given to each patient, therefore five 100 mg/10 ml solution will be 
given per treatment, and the remaining 20 mg will be discarded upon administration.  Each 
infusion provided to the subjects will be labeled with the protocol number, dosing and storage 
instructions, and expiration date.  The contents of the label will be in accordance with applicable 
regulatory requirements.   
 
10.2.1 Description of the Dosage Form 
 
Nivolumab Injection, 100 mg/10 mL (10 mg/mL) is a clear to opalescent, colorless to pale 
yellow liquid, which may contain light (few) particulates. The drug product is a sterile, non-
pyrogenic, single-use, isotonic aqueous solution formulated at 10 mg/mL in sodium citrate, 
sodium chloride, mannitol, diethylenetriaminepentacetic acid (pentetic acid), and polysorbate 80 
(Tween 80), pH 6.0 and includes an overfill to account for vial, needle, and syringe holdup. It is 
supplied in 10-cc Type I flint glass vials, stoppered with butyl rubber stoppers and sealed with 
aluminum seals.  
 
10.2.2 Drug Product Preparation 
 
Nivolumab Injection, 100 mg/10 mL (10 mg/mL) is to be administered as an IV infusion through 
a 0.2-micron to 1.2-micron pore size, low-protein binding (polyethersulfone membrane) in-line 
filter at the protocol-specified doses and infusion times. It is not to be administered as an IV push 
or bolus injection. Nivolumab injection will be infused undiluted (10 mg/mL) or diluted with 
0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP or 5% Dextrose Injection, USP to protein concentrations 
as low as 0.35 mg/mL. 
 
During drug product preparation and handling, vigorous mixing or shaking is to be avoided. 
Instructions for dilution and infusion of nivolumab for injection will be provided in the clinical 
protocol, pharmacy binder, pharmacy manual, investigators brochure or pharmacy reference 
sheet. Care will be taken to assure sterility of the prepared solution as the product does not 
contain any antimicrobial preservative or bacteriostatic agent. Nivolumab infusions are 
compatible with polyvinyl chloride (PVC) or polyolefin containers and infusion sets, and glass 
bottles. 
 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 60 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
10.2.3 Recommended Storage and Use Conditions 
 
Vials of nivolumab injection must be stored at 2o C to 8o C (36o F to 46o F) and protected from 
light and freezing.  
 
10.2.4  Undiluted Nivolumab Injection and Diluted Nivolumab injection in the IV Container 
 
The administration of nivolumab infusion must be completed within 24 hours of preparation. If 
not used immediately, the infusion solution may be stored under refrigeration conditions (2°C to 
8°C, 36°F to 46°F) for up to 24 hours, and a maximum of 8 hours of the total 24 hours can be at 
room temperature (20°C to 25°C, 68°F to 77°F) and room light. The maximum 8-hour period 
under room temperature and room light conditions includes the product administration period. 
 
10.2.5 Nivolumab Preparation and Dispensing 
 
See the Dosage and Administration Instruction (DAI) for instructions on how to prepare 
the investigational product for administration.  
 
Nivolumab will be administered at the investigational sites. Investigational product should 
be prepared and dispensed by an appropriately qualified and experienced member of the 
study staff (e.g. physician, nurse, physician’s assistant, practitioner, or pharmacist) as 
allowed by local, state, and institutional guidance. Only qualified personnel who are 
familiar with procedures that minimize undue exposure to them and to the environment 
should undertake the preparation, handling, and safe disposal of chemotherapeutic and 
investigational agents.  
 
The contents of the nivolumab vials are sterile and nonpyrogenic, and do not contain 
bacteriostatic preservatives. Any spills that occur should be cleaned up using the 
facility’s standard cleanup procedures for biologic products. 
 
For administration in this trial, nivolumab must be diluted with 0.9% sodium chloride (normal 
saline solution). Detailed information on infusion bags and medical devices to be used for the 
preparation of the dilutions and subsequent administration will be provided in the DAI. Must 
use tubing with in-line, low protein binding 0.2 micron filter made of polyether sulfone (PES) 
during administration. 
 
Nivolumab must not be used for any purpose other than the trial. The administration of trial 
drug to patients who have not been enrolled into the trial is prohibited.  
 
Vials are single-use. Any unused portion of the solution should be discarded in biohazard 
waste disposal with final disposal by accepted local and national standards of incineration. 
 
10.2.6 Destruction of Study Drug Provided by BMS 
 
For this study, study drugs supplied by BMS, such as partially used study drug containers, vials 
and syringes, will be destroyed on site.  


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 61 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
 
On-site destruction is allowed provided the following minimal standards are met:  
 
1. 
On-site disposal practices must not expose humans to risks from the drug.  
2. 
On-site disposal practices and procedures are in agreement with applicable laws 
and regulations, including any special requirements for controlled or hazardous 
substances.  
3. 
Written procedures for on-site disposal are available and followed. The 
procedures must be filed with the site’s standard operating procedures and a copy 
provided to BMS upon request.  
4. 
Records are maintained that allow for traceability of each container, including the 
date disposed of, quantity disposed, and identification of the person disposing the 
containers. The method of disposal (ie, incinerator, licensed sanitary landfill, or 
licensed waste disposal vendor) must be documented.  
5. 
Accountability and disposal records are complete, up-to-date, and available for 
the monitor to review throughout the clinical trial period.  
6. 
A copy of the drug destruction certificate must be maintained for provision to 
BMS at the end of the study. 
 
Conditions for destruction will be handled as per institutional policy. It is the investigator’s 
responsibility to arrange for disposal of all empty containers, provided that procedures for proper 
disposal have been established according to applicable federal, state, local, and institutional 
guidelines and procedures, and provided that appropriate records of disposal are kept.  
 
It is the investigator’s responsibility to arrange for disposal of all empty containers, provided that 
procedures for proper disposal have been established according to applicable federal, state, local, 
and institutional guidelines and procedures, and provided that appropriate records of disposal are 
kept. 
 
 
11.     BIOMARKER, CORRELATIVE, AND SPECIAL STUDIES 
 
11.1 Biomarker Studies 
 
11.1.1 Sample Collection  
 
Upon entry into the study, each subject will be assigned a unique identification number.  All 
materials collected from that subject will be labeled with that number only, for reasons of 
confidentiality, and specimens may be listed with unique codes for individual subjects and 
obtained at the different time points. Blood will be stored in liquid nitrogen, and sera and bone 
marrow aspirates will be aliquoted and stored at –80°C in the research laboratory of the co-PI PI 
(Dr. Patnaik) for immune analyses.  
 
Blood sample collection will occur at the time points listed in the table below:  
 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 62 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
There is an option for further collection while on study protocol.   
 
11.1.2 Sample Processing 
 
Spin down red top tube for serum at 2600 x g for 10 minutes. Aliquot supernatant into 4 
cryovials containing 1 mL each.  
 
Spin down purple top EDTA tubes at 2600 x g for 10 minutes. Aliquot supernatant into 8 
cryovials containing 1 mL each. 
 
Add PBS to purple top tubes and gently resuspend blood.  
 
Pour suspension over Ficoll and spin down to separate PBMCs. Wash with ACK as needed to 
remove remaining RBCs. Once pellet is white in color, count cells, resuspend in freezing media 
and aliquot PBMCs into 4 cryovials containing 1mL each. 
 
All samples will be labeled with the patient ID number, time point (e.g.: cycle/day), and date of 
draw.  
 
11.1.3 Sample Storage and Shipment  
 
 
All tubes will be stored in cryovials in -80°C freezers and batched shipped on dry ice to:  
 
Attention: Dr. Priyanka Duttagupta (in Dr. Patnaik’s laboratory) 
                 Knapp Center for Biomedical Discovery 
     900 E. 57th St. 
     Room 7220 (Bench LB-38) 
                Chicago, IL 60637 
                Ph : 1-773-795-0995                  
 
Blood will then be stored in the laboratory of Dr. Patnaik in liquid nitrogen and used for 
immune analyses.  
Time Point 
Collection Tube 
Tube Volume 
Number of Tubes 
Cycle 1 Day 1 
Purple top EDTA  
10 mL 
2 
Red top with clot activator 
10 mL 
1 
Cycle 2 day 1 
Purple top EDTA  
10 mL 
2 
Red top with clot activator 
10 mL 
1 
Cycle 3 day 1 
Purple top EDTA  
10 mL 
2 
Red top with clot activator 
10 mL 
1 
Cycle 4 day 1 
Purple top EDTA  
10 mL 
2 
Red top with clot activator 
10 mL 
1 
Every 12 weeks 
thereafter 
Purple top EDTA  
10 mL 
2 
Red top with clot activator 
10 mL 
1 
End of 
Treatment  
Purple top EDTA  
10 mL 
2 
Red top with clot activator 
10 mL 
1 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 63 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
 
  
11.2  Special Studies 
 
11.2.1 Immunological Monitoring 
 
We will evaluate changes in T-cell inflamed gene signature and STING pathway activation by 
RNA-seq, immune infiltration by IHC and flow cytometry obtained from tumor biopsies, and T-
cell diversity/ctDNA analysis with peripheral blood collection.  To collect samples for evaluation 
of peripheral immune responses, blood will be collected by a peripheral blood draw (up to 30-40 
mL) pre-treatment, following the four week lead in period, and at time of progression.  
Heparinized whole blood will be interrogated for immune alterations as defined in the assays 
below.  Remaining heparinized blood samples will be cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen using 
90% fetal calf serum and 10% DMSO.  Sera will be prepared from non-heparinized blood 
samples and stored in aliquots at -80oC. 
 
For collection of immune cells from bone biopsies, 10mL bone marrow aspirates will be collected 
using a 20mL syringe (containing 1mL sodium heparin, 1000 USP units/mL).  4mL of aspirate 
will be placed into four PAXgene Bone Marrow RNA tube, immediately inverted 5 times, and 
kept at room temperature for 2 hours before transfer to -20oC freezer (and transferred to a -80oC 
freezer the following day). Remaining 6mL of bone marrow aspirate will be transferred to a 15mL 
centrifuge tube, and centrifuged at 1200xg for 20min at 4oC. Following centrifugation, supernatant 
(equivalent to sera) collected and aliquoted to cryovials for cryopreservation at -80oC (being 
careful not to remove cloudy layer, which contains PBMC).  Resuspend pellet in monolayer 
(approximately 1.5mL), and aliquot 400μl to immune analysis (described below).  Aliquot 
remaining 1mL into two cryovials, and freeze in Mr. Frosty containers at -80oC.   
 
11.2.2 Assess changes in T-cell inflamed gene signature, STING pathway activation and 
macrophage subsets by Nanostring 
 
RNA samples isolated from tumor biopsy samples will be used to isolate RNA for sequence 
analysis by Nanostring, as we have previously published[5].  The purpose of these studies is to 
determine whether PTEN-deficient patients lack a T-cell inflamed gene signature prior to 
treatment, and whether treatment with rucaparib, nivolumab, or both results in a T cell-inflamed 
gene signature and STING pathway activation within the tumor immune microenvironment.  A 
cryopreserved PAXgene RNA tube will be used to isolate RNA using an RNeasy kit (QIAGEN, 
Venlo, Netherlands) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The expression profile of 770 genes 
included in the PanCancer Immune Profiling Panel (Nanostring Technologies) and 30 candidate 
genes potentially associated with immune resistance described in our previous study, will be 
determined for each sample using the Nanosting nCounter analysis system.  Normalization of the 
raw Nanostring data will be conducted using the expression of 40 reference genes by nSolver 
Analysis Software v1.1 (Nanostring Technologies). We will utilize the quantification methods as 
previously published to calculate a Tumor Inflammation Signature (TIS) score and adopt their 
threshold in the definition of inflamed versus non-inflamed tumor [78, 79]. 
 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 64 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
11.2.3 Assess changes in T cell and myeloid immune infiltrates within the tumor 
microenvironment by IHC 
 
 
Tissue biopsies will be obtained from metastatic lesions (the same lesion per patient) prior to 
treatment and following four week lead-in period. The purpose of these studies is to determine 
the impact of tumor PTEN and HRD status on the immune profile at baseline, and how treatment 
with rucaparib, nivolumab, affects infiltration of T cells (or other immune populations) into the 
tumor microenvironment, and whether treatment alters the expression of activation or regulatory 
ligands on various immune populations (such as activation marker 4-1BB or regulatory 
molecules such as PD-1 on T cells) or tumor cells (e.g. MHC class I or PD-L1).  Biopsy samples 
obtained pre-treatment and after the four week lead-in period will be stained with antibodies 
specific for CD3, CD4, CD8, FoxP3, 4-1BB, PD-1, HLA-A2, and potentially other markers.  
Staining and quantification will be reviewed by a pathologist blinded to the treatment groups to 
determine CD8+ T cells per field, CD4+FoxP3+ (Treg):CD8+ T cell ratio, PD-L1 expression, 
and whether these or the expression of CD8+ T cells expressing one regulatory receptors (or 
tumor cells expressing one or more regulatory ligands) change following the four week lead in 
treatment period.  
 
11.2.4 Assess changes in immune populations within the tumor microenvironment and in 
peripheral blood by flow cytometry 
 
The frequency of immune populations within the tumor microenvironment and in the peripheral 
blood will be assessed by flow cytometry. The purpose of these studies will be to conduct an 
unbiased evaluation of immune populations that are altered within the tumor microenvironment 
and the periphery, to determine whether treatment with rucaparib, nivolumab, or both agents 
combined result in an increase infiltration of inflammatory immune cells into the tumor (and 
whether this alterations in the tumor microenvironment are also detected in circulation).  
Specifically, bone marrow aspirates and peripheral whole blood will be stained in replicates in 96-
well round bottom microtiter plates (Corning, Cambridge, MA). Cells will then be stained with 
cell surface markers to characterize the various immune populations (including, but not limited to, 
CD3, CD4, CD8, CD11b, CD11c, CD14, CD16, CD19, CD33, CD45, CD56, CD66b, CD209), 
various markers of immune activation or inhibition (such as 4-1BB, PD-1, or PD-L1), and 
intracellular markers such as Foxp3 to identify regulatory T cells. Samples prior to treatment and 
following the four-week lead in period will be analyzed to determine alterations in immune 
populations following treatments. 
 
11.2.5 DNA damage (p-γH2AX) / HRD score 
 
The prevalence of DNA damage in biopsy samples pre-treatment and following the four-week lead 
in period will be quantitated by p-γH2AX staining and HRD score (Myriad Genetics) in order to 
determine if rucaparib, nivolumab, or both in combination result in increased DNA damage. To 
calculate the HRD score, we will utilize the clinically validated myChoice® HRD test from Myriad 
Genetics, as has been reported[80]. For these studies, paraffin-embedded tumor slides will be 
provided to Myriad Genetics, which will extract DNA from these slides for next-generation 
sequencing and genomic analyis. Using this data, algorithms will be used to assess genomic 
instability using loss of heterozygosity, telomeric abnormalities, and large-scale state transitions. 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 65 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
Using the sum of these measurements, tumor biopsy samples will be classified as HRD-positive 
or HRD negative (and will further be characterized for loss of BRCA1/2, as well as PTEN status).  
Using the results from these assays, HRD positivity will be defined as any tumor biopsy that scores 
greater than 42 or has a deleterious mutation to BRCA1/2, and HRD negativity will be determined 
by any test that scores less than 42 and does not have BRCA1/2 deleterious mutations. Since HRD 
scores are a dynamic variable a range of cutoffs may be evaluated based on emerging data. 
 
For evaluation of p-γH2AX expression on tumor biopsies, paraffin-embedded tumor tissue will be 
stained immunohistochemically for p-γH2AX as has been published[81]. Paraffin-embeded tissue 
will be stained for Ser139-phosphorylated γ-H2AX, and developed using DAB with a hematoxylin 
counterstain. Stained sections will be quantified by a blinded pathologist counting the number of 
p-γH2AX positive tumor cells.   
 
Additional methods for assessing HRD scores and/or DNA damage will be considered. 
 
11.2.6 Tumor-infiltrating T-cell diversity 
 
Clonality of tumor-infiltrating T cells will be evaluating using TCF β-chain sequencing, as our 
collaborators have published[82]. The purpose of these studies will be to determine whether 
rucaparib, nivolumab, or both agents in combination result in an increase in the diversity of T 
cell clones infiltrating the tumor immune microenvironment.  For these studies, a cryopreserved 
PAXgene RNA tube will be used to isolate total RNA using RNeasy mini kits (Qiagen). To 
convert to cDNA, samplmes will be amplified using 5’ rapid amplification of cDNA end 
(RACE) method using Switching Mechanism at 5’ end of RNA Transcript (SMART) kits 
(Clonentech, Mountain View, CA). The TCRα and TCRβ chains will be amplified separately 
using reverse primers specific to the constant region of each chain and forward primers for the 
SMART adapter. Amplicon size and quality will be assessed by the TapeStation system (Agilent 
Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). PCR products in the 300-950 bp range were selected using the 
Pippin Prep system (Sage Science, Beverly, MA). Samples will be barcoded using the Nextera 
XT Index PCR kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA) and pooled in groups of eight α and eight β per 
sequencing run. Sequencing was performed on the Illumina MiSeq platform, using 600v3 
reagents (Illumina) using 300-bp paired-end reads. To identify V, (D), J and C segments in 
individual sequencing reads, each of the sequence reads in FASTQ files were mapped to the 
reference sequences provided by IMGT/GENE-DB using Bowtie2 aligner (Version 2.1.0). Raw 
FASTQ files were analyzed using Tcrip software. 
 
 
11.3.7 PTEN Immunohistochemistry 
 
Tumor biopsy sections prior to treatment will be evaluated for PTEN status [83] with 
immunohistochemistry using a CLIA/CAP-accredited assay. We will evaluate the impact of 
PTEN status on immune contexture within the tumor microenvironment. Slides will be 
microwaved for antigen retrieval in citrate buffer, and developed using diaminobezandine (DAB) 
with a hematoxylin counterstain.  Slides will be interpreted by a blinded pathologist, who will 
also identify/characterize tumor tissue histology. This pathologist will manually circle tumor and 
exclude normal tissue, and sections will be analyzed for the frequency of positive cells per field.   
 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 66 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
12. MEASUREMENT OF EFFECT 
 
Measurement of effect will be assessed by both the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid 
Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1.  
 
For prostate cancer patients, the Prostate Cancer Working Group criteria (PCWG3) will also 
be used to assess response. 
 
12.1 Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 Guidelines 
 
12.1.1 Categorizing Lesions at Baseline  
 
Measurable disease include the following:   
 Lesions that can be accurately measured in at least one dimension. 
 Lesions with longest diameter twice the slice thickness and at least 10mm or greater 
when assessed by CT or MRI (slice thickness 5-8mm). 
 Superficial lesions with longest diameter 10mm or greater when assessed by 
caliper. 
 Malignant lymph nodes with the short axis 15mm or greater when assessed by CT. 
 
The shortest axis is used as the diameter for malignant lymph nodes, longest axis for all other 
measurable lesions. 
 
Non-measurable disease includes the following:  
 
Lesions too small to be considered measurable (including nodes with short axis 
between 10 and 14.9mm)  
 
Pleural or pericardial effusions  
 
Ascites 
 
Inflammatory breast disease,  
 
Leptomeningeal disease  
 
Lymphangitic involvement of skin or lung, clinical lesions that cannot be 
accurately measured with calipers 
 
Abdominal masses identified by physical exam that are not measurable by 
reproducible imaging techniques 
 
Bone disease (with the exception of soft tissue components that can be evaluated 
by CT or MRI and meet the definition of measurability at baseline.) 
 
A previously irradiated lesion (or lesion subjected to other local treatment) is 
non-measurable unless it has progressed since completion of treatment. 
 
Normal sites 
 
Cystic lesions: Simple cysts should not be considered as malignant lesions and should not be 
recorded either as target or non-target disease.  Cystic lesions thought to represent cystic 
metastases can be measurable lesions, if they meet the specific definition above.If non-cystic 
lesions are also present, these are preferred as target lesions. 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 67 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
 
Normal nodes: Nodes with short axis <10mm are considered normal and should not be 
recorded or followed either as measurable or non-measurable disease. 
 
12.1.2 Recording Tumor Assessments 
 
All sites of disease must be assessed at baseline.  Baseline assessments should be done as 
close as possible prior to study start.  For an adequate baseline assessment, all required scans 
must be done within 28 days prior to treatment and all disease must be documented 
appropriately.  If baseline assessment is inadequate, subsequent statuses generally should be 
indeterminate. 
 
Target lesions 
 
All measurable lesions up to a maximum of 2 lesions per organ, 5 lesions in total, 
representative of all involved organs, should be identified as target lesions at baseline.  Target 
lesions should be selected on the basis of size (longest lesions) and suitability for accurate 
repeated measurements. Record the longest diameter for each lesion, except in the case of 
pathological lymph nodes for which the short axis should be recorded.  The sum of the 
diameters (longest for non-nodal lesions, short axis for nodal lesions) for all target lesions at 
baseline will be the basis for comparison to assessments performed on study. 
 
If two target lesions coalesce the measurement of the coalesced mass is used.  If a large 
target lesion splits, the sum of the parts is used. 
 
Measurements for target lesions that become small should continue to be recorded.  If a target 
lesion becomes too small to measure, 0mm should be recorded if the lesion is considered to 
have disappeared; otherwise a default value of 5mm should be recorded. 
 
NOTE: When nodal lesions decrease to <10mm (normal), the actual measurement should 
still be recorded. 
 
Non-target disease 
 
All non-measurable disease is non-target.  All measurable lesions not identified as target 
lesions are also included as non-target disease.  Measurements are not required but rather 
assessments will be expressed as ABSENT, INDETERMINATE, PRESENT/NOT 
INCREASED, INCREASED.  Multiple non-target lesions in one organ may be recorded as a 
single item on the case report form (e.g., ‘multiple enlarged pelvic lymph nodes’ or ‘multiple 
liver metastases’). 
 
12.1.3 Objective Response Status at Each Evaluation  
 
Disease sites must be assessed using the same technique as baseline, including consistent 
administration of contrast and timing of scanning.  If a change needs to be made the case must 
be discussed with the radiologist to determine if substitution is possible.  If not, subsequent 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 68 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
objective statuses are indeterminate. 
 
Target disease 
 
Complete Response (CR): Complete disappearance of all target lesions with the 
exception of nodal disease.  All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short 
axis <10mm).  All target lesions must be assessed. 
 
Partial Response (PR): Greater than or equal to 30% decrease under baseline of 
the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions.  The short diameter is used 
in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter is used in the sum for all 
other target lesions. All target lesions must be assessed. 
 
Stable: Does not qualify for CR, PR or Progression.  All target lesions must be 
assessed. 
Stable can follow PR only in the rare case that the sum increases by less than 20% 
from the nadir, but enough that a previously documented 30% decrease no longer 
holds. 
 
  
Objective Progression (PD): 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target 
measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no 
decrease in the sum is observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute 
increase of 5mm. 
 
Indeterminate:  Progression has not been documented, and: 
 
One or more target measurable lesions have not been assessed; or 
 
Assessment methods used were inconsistent with those used at 
baseline; or 
 
One or more target lesions cannot be measured accurately (e.g., poorly visible 
unless due to being too small to measure); or 
 
One or more target lesions were excised or irradiated and have not 
reappeared or increased. 
 
Non-target disease 
 
 
CR: Disappearance of all non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker 
levels. 
 
All lymph nodes must be ‘normal’ in size (<10mm short axis). 
 
Non-CR/Non-PD: Persistence of any non-target lesions and/or tumor marker 
level above the normal limits. 
 
PD: Unequivocal progression of pre-existing lesions.  Generally the overall 
tumor burden must increase sufficiently to merit discontinuation of therapy.  In 
the presence of SD or PR in target disease, progression due to unequivocal 
increase in non-target disease should be rare. 
 
Indeterminate: Progression has not been determined and one or more non-
target sites were not assessed or assessment methods were inconsistent with 
those used at baseline. 
 
New Lesions 
 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 69 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
The appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesion indicates PD.  If a new lesion is 
equivocal, for example due to its small size, continued assessment will clarify the etiology.  
If repeat assessments confirm the lesion, then progression should be recorded on the date of 
the initial assessment.  A lesion identified in an area not previously scanned will be 
considered a new lesion. Supplemental Investigations If CR determination depends on a 
residual lesion that decreased in size but did not disappear completely, it is recommended 
the residual lesion be 
investigated with biopsy or fine needle aspirate. If no disease is identified, objective status is 
CR. 
 
If progression determination depends on a lesion with an increase possibly due to necrosis, 
the lesion may be investigated with biopsy or fine needle aspirate to clarify status. 
 
Objective/Subjective 
 
Progression Patients requiring discontinuation of treatment without objective evidence of 
disease progression should not be reported as PD on tumor assessment CRFs.  This should be 
indicated on the end of treatment CRF as off treatment due to Global Deterioration of Health 
Status. 
Every effort should be made to document objective progression even after discontinuation 
of treatment. 
  
For Participants with Measurable Disease (i.e., Target Disease) 
 
Target 
Lesions 
Non-Target 
Lesions 
New 
Lesions 
Overall 
Response 
Best Overall Response when 
Confirmation is Required* 
CR 
CR 
No 
CR 
>4 wks Confirmation** 
CR 
Non-CR/Non- 
PD 
No 
PR 
>4 wks Confirmation** 
CR 
Not evaluated 
No 
PR 
PR 
Non-CR/Non- 
PD/not 
evaluated 
No 
PR 
SD 
Non-CR/Non- 
PD/not 
evaluated 
No 
SD 
Documented at least once >4 
wks from baseline** 
PD 
Any 
Yes or No 
PD 
no prior SD, PR or CR 
Any 
PD*** 
Yes or No 
PD 
Any 
Any 
Yes 
PD 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 70 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
 
See RECIST 1.1 manuscript for further details on what is evidence of a new lesion. 
** 
Only for non-randomized trials with response as primary endpoint. 
*** 
In exceptional circumstances, unequivocal progression in non-target lesions may be 
accepted as disease progression. 
Note:  Participants with a global deterioration of health status requiring discontinuation of 
treatment without objective evidence of disease progression at that time should be 
reported as “symptomatic deterioration.”  Every effort should be made to document the 
objective progression even after discontinuation of treatment. 
 
If the protocol allows enrollment of patients with only non-target disease, the following 
table should be used: 
 
For Participants with Non-Measurable Disease (i.e., Non-Target Disease) 
Non-Target Lesions 
New Lesions 
Overall Response 
CR 
No 
CR 
Non-CR/non-PD 
No 
Non-CR/non-PD* 
Not all evaluated 
No 
not evaluated 
Unequivocal PD 
Yes or No 
PD 
Any 
Yes 
PD 
 
 ‘Non-CR/non-PD’ is preferred over ‘stable disease’ for non-target disease since SD is 
increasingly used as an endpoint for assessment of efficacy in some trials so to assign 
this category when no lesions can be measured is not advised 
 
 
Determination of Best Overall Response 
 
The best overall response is the best response recorded from the start of the treatment until 
disease progression/recurrence (taking as reference for progressive disease the smallest sum 
on study).  For CR and PR, the patient’s best response assignment will depend on the 
achievement of both measurement and confirmation criteria.  CR and PR must be confirmed 
by 2 measurements at least 4 weeks apart.  In the case of SD, follow up measurements must 
have met the SD criteria at least once after study entry at a minimum interval of 6 weeks. 
 
 
12.2  Outcome Measures for Prostate cancer patients based on PSA Decline 
 
The following parameters will be recorded after the initial 12 weeks of therapy and at 12-week 
intervals thereafter.  
 
 PSA decline and response will be measured according to PSAWG-2 (2008) criteria. 
 PSA changes from baseline will be calculated for all patients and reported as a waterfall 
plot. 
 Time to progression (TTP) based on revised PSA Working Group-2 criteria (2008 
version).  


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 71 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
 PSA progression free survival: PSA measurements will be taken at screening (baseline) 
and subsequently at time points as indicated in the schedule of visits. Any unscheduled 
PSA measurement will be utilized in the periodic assessment of PSA progression.  
 The maximal decline in PSA for each patient will be recorded for each patient. 
 The date of the maximal PSA decline (nadir date) will be recorded for each patient, as 
will the duration from the start of therapy to the nadir PSA.  
 
12.2.1 Prostate-Specific Antigen Working Group Criteria [84] 
 
 
Progressive Disease after Androgen Deprivation Eligibility Criteria: 
PSA evidence for progressive prostate cancer consists of a PSA level of at least 5 ng/ml 
which has risen on at least 2 successive occasions, at least 2 weeks apart. If the 
confirmatory PSA (#3 below) value is less (i.e., #3b) than the screening PSA (#2) value, 
then an additional test for rising PSA (#4) will be required to document progression. 
 
 
Procedures for Assessing PSA Progression Post Study Treatment: 
PSA measurements will be taken on a monthly basis.  PSA increases and decreases will 
be tracked in order to assess disease response.  
PSA partial response is defined by at least a 50% decline from screening (baseline) PSA 
value.  The declined must be confirmed by a second PSA value obtained 4 or more weeks 
later.   
PSA progressive disease may be defined in both patients who have not shown a decrease 
in their PSA and those who have.  For patients who have not shown a decrease, 
progressive disease is defined as an increase of 25% over the screening (baseline) PSA 
value and an increase in the absolute-value PSA level by at least 5ng/mL.  This increase 
should be confirmed by a second value.   
For those patients whose PSA have decreased but has not reached response criteria, 
progressive disease is defined as 25% increase over the nadir PSA value provided that the 
increase is at least 5ng/mL and is confirmed. 
 
 
Duration of PSA Response:  
Duration of PSA Response is measured from the time when the PSA value first declines 
by at least 50% of the screening (baseline) and that was eventually confirmed by a second 
value.  It is calculated until the time at which there is an increase of 50% of PSA nadir, 
provided the absolute increase is at least 5 ng/mL. The increase must be confirmed by a 
second consecutive measurement that is at least 50% above the nadir. 
If the PSA never shows a 50% increase over the nadir value, then the patient will be 
censored at the last PSA measurement. 
 
 
Time to Disease Progression: 
For patients who have achieved a ≥ 50% decrease from the screening (baseline) PSA, 
assessment of time to disease progression is when the PSA has increased 50% above the 
nadir and at a minimum of 5ng/mL.   For patients without a PSA decrease of this 
magnitude or without a decrease, the time for progression is calculated at the time a 25% 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 72 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
increase from screening (baseline) PSA has been achieved.  
 
12.3 Duration of Response 
The duration of overall response is measured from the time measurement criteria are met for 
complete or partial response until the first date that recurrent or progressive disease is objectively 
documented (taking as reference for progressive disease the smallest measurements recorded 
since the treatment started). 
 
Stable disease is measured from the start of the treatment until the criteria for progression are 
met, taking as reference the smallest measurements recorded since the treatment started, 
including the baseline measurements.  
 
12.4 Progression-Free Survival 
Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the duration of time from start of treatment to time 
of progression (by either PSA or RECIST) or death, whichever occurs first.   
 
13. DATA REPORTING  
 
The University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center maintains a secure, password 
protected, and regularly backed up commercial clinical trials database called eVelos. Data 
reporting will be performed utilizing the eVelos electronic data capture system. The University 
of Chicago  study coordinator will provide study staff at participating sites with the applicable 
user registration information (e.g.: login credentials). All data for this trial will be stored in 
eVelos.  
 
Patients on the trial will be registered into the Velos database centrally at the University of 
Chicago by the study coordinator.  Data will be entered by the site Data Manager and stored 
within the database using the patient-study number as well as a unique identifier generated by 
study coordinator.  
 
Data entry guidelines will be sent to all participating sites for reference when completing data 
entry. All required data must be recorded in the eVelos database at the completion of each 
cycle.  AEs are to be entered in real time.  
 
SAEs are to be entered on the Serious Event Form within 24 hours of the site’s knowledge of 
the event and sent via email (preferred) or fax to the University of Chicago 
(PhaseIICRA@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu or qaccto@bsd.uchicago.edu; Fax: 773-702-4889).   
 
All case report forms must be completed by designated study personnel. Each screened 
(consented) patient is to be entered into eVelos within 48 hours of patient registration. In 
addition to direct data entry, site staff may be required to provide supporting source 
documentation.  
 
Source records are original documents, data, and records (e.g., medical records, raw data 
collection forms, pharmacy dispensing records, recorded data from automated instruments, 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 73 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
laboratory data) that are relevant to the clinical trial. Each site will prepare and maintain 
adequate and accurate source documents. These documents are designed to record all 
observations and other pertinent data for each subject enrolled in this clinical trial. Source 
records must be adequate to reconstruct all data transcribed onto the case report form.  
 
 
14. STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS 
 
14.1 Study Design/Endpoints 
 
Under the initial version of the protocol, each of the first 4 patients enrolled experienced an 
anemia DLT. As a result, the protocol was extensively amended to exclude patients at high risk 
for anemia, and to redefine the DLT as a grade ≥3 toxicity only in the first 4 weeks of treatment, 
since that period is also critical for the laboratory based endpoints. Data from these patients will 
be reported, but they will not be utilized to assess feasibility, and data from biopsies obtained, 
because of variability in drug exposure, will be utilized for descriptive purposes, but not for 
assessment of the primary phase II endpoint. 
 
A total of 60 patients with prostate or endometrial cancer will be enrolled into the trial (20 per 
treatment arm) starting with enrollment under Amendment 1. To assess the primary phase 1b 
endpoint, i.e., feasibility (acceptable safety profile) of the combination therapy, the first 4-12 
patients will be accrued to the Rucaparib+Nivolumab arm.  Based on historical data, we assume 
a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate for single-agent nivolumab of 15%, and a DLT rate for 
single-agent Rucaparib of 10%.  We expect non-overlapping toxicity for the combination and 
therefore set the maximum tolerable toxicity rate for Rucaparib+Nivolumab at 25%.  Thus, if 
there is early evidence that the true toxicity rate exceeds 25%, we will consider termination of 
the trial or a dose modification. Four patients will be enrolled and if DLT is observed  in 3 or 
more patients the combination treatment will be declared infeasible and the trial will be 
terminated.  Otherwise an additional 4 patients will be studied and if <2 of 8 have DLT the 
combination will be declared feasible and the trial will proceed to Phase II. If > 4 of 8 have 
DLTs then the combination will be declared too toxic and the study terminated.  If exactly 3 of 8 
have DLT, then four more patients will be entered for a total of 12.  At this stage if <3 of 12 have 
DLT the combination will be considered feasible and the study will proceed to phase II; 
otherwise if > 4 of 12 have DLT, the combination will be declared too toxic and the study will be 
stopped or modified. Patients who are non-evaluable for toxicity will be replaced. 
 
If the combination treatment in the Phase I-B portion has been deemed feasible, we will proceed 
with enrollment of subjects to the Phase II portion of the study. In this phase, n=20 patients will 
be randomized to Rucaparib alone, n=20 to Nivolumab alone, and up to 12 patients to Rucaparib 
plus Nivolumab, depending on the number of toxicities observed and the number of 
replacements required in phase I-B, as described in Section 3.3.2. The randomization sequence 
for phase II will be generated by the study statistician only after phase I-B has been completed 
using the method of permuted blocks, in order to accommodate the imbalance in the numbers to 
be assigned to the three treatment arms. No patients will be replaced in phase II, so that the 
maximum sample size for the entire trial will be N=60 patients, starting with enrollment under 
Amendment 1.  


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 74 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
 
For the  phase II primary objective, assuming  Rucaparib+Nivolumab is determined to be 
feasible, we will assess changes in T cell immune infiltrates within the tumor microenvironment 
by nanostring. Additional secondary objectives include determination of response rates and 
progression free survival to combination therapy, assessment of changes in T cell immune 
infiltrates by IHC and correlation of T-cell infiltrate changes with tumor PTEN status. Details 
regarding the analysis of these endpoints are provided in section 14.4 below.  Analysis of 
response rates and progression-free survival is described in section 14.5. 
 
14.2 Sample Size/Accrual Rate 
 
A total of 64 patients on the whole study, 20 patients on each arm as discussed above plus the 
initial 4 patients accrued prior to Amendment 1. We plan to accrue approximately four patients 
monthly. 
 
14.3 Stratification Factors 
 
None. 
 
14.4 Phase II Primary Endpoint: Assess changes in T-cell inflamed gene signature by 
Nanostring. 
 
The frequencies of patients for each study arm (and all arms combined) with T cell inflamed 
versus patients without a T cell inflamed gene signature, as defined in Section 11.2.2, will be 
summarized in tabular format. Comparisons between the treatment arms will be performed using 
a chisquare test.  The sample size of n=20 per group will provide 80% power to detect true 
differences in the percentage of patients with an inflamed signature of between 33% and 43%, 
depending on the underlying proportion.    
 
14.5 Phase II Secondary Endpoint: Response rate and time to disease progression for 
prostate cancer and endometrial cancer patients 
 
Time to disease progression (obtained via imaging and PSA/CA-125 levels), as well as 
progression-free survival, will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, controlled for by disease 
site. Response rates will also be summarized by disease site, along with 90% confidence intervals.  
It is recognized that the limited sample size for this phase Ib/II study will not provide sufficient 
power to detect statistically significant improvements in response and progression-free survival 
rates from historically reported rates.   
 
As criteria for what would be considered encouraging results, if the observed response rate was 
>30% and/or the observed progression-free survival rate at 12 months was > 50%, we believe this 
would indicate a sufficient level of activity to warrant further study for prostate cancer patients 
(based on approximate single agent response rates of 10% and 20% to nivolumab and rucaparib, 
respectively. Additionally, if the observed response rate was >20% and/or the observed 
progression-free survival rate at 6 months was > 40%, we believe this would indicate a sufficient 
level of activity to warrant further study for endometrial cancer patients (assuming that the 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 75 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
majority of patients would have microsatellite stable (MSS) disease. The activity of rucaparib is 
unknown and activity of checkpoint inhibitors in small studies for non-microsatellite-instable 
(MSI)  non- POLE- mutated endometrial cancer is generally < 10%)  
 
 
14.6 Phase II Secondary Endpoints: Assess changes in immune populations in the tumor 
microenvironment by IHC. 
 
  
Changes in T cell  and myeloid immune infiltrates based on IHC (number of cells/high powered 
field) from baseline to four weeks post treatment within each study arm will be evaluated using 
nonparametric, Wilcxon signed-rank tests.  We will then compare T cell immune infiltrates at four 
weeks based on IHC between the combination and single-agent treatment arms using 
nonparametric, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Assuming a standard deviation of 0.75 (range/4), and a 
30% biopsy sample loss rate, n=20 subjects (14 with paired biopsies available) per group (pooled 
over the two disease sites and across the two phases of the trial) will provide 80% power to detect 
a true difference in means of 0.82 (two-sided α=0.05). The associations between PTEN, HRD 
status and T-cell IHC will be analyzed by Wilcoxon rank-sum test.   
 
14.7 Phase II Exploratory Endpoints:  
 
Assess changes in immune populations in peripheral blood by flow cytometry. 
The frequency of circulating immune cells in the periphery pre-treatment and following the four 
week lead in period will be summarized in terms of means, standard deviations, and ranges for 
each study arm (and for all arms combined), as will the frequency of different checkpoint 
biomarkers.  .  Paired t-tests will be used to compare the frequency of peripheral immune cells pre-
treatment compared to four weeks post treatment Associations between PTEN, HRD status and 
changes in immune populations will be analyzed by Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. 
 
PTEN and HRD status 
The impact of PTEN and HRD status on T cell inflamed gene signature and STING pathway 
activation will also be analyzed by chisquare tests. A Cox proportional hazards regression model 
will be used to examine the association between the generation of a T cell-inflamed gene 
signature and the time to progression. 
 
DNA damage (p-γH2AX) / HRD score 
The frequency of p-γH2AX positive tumor cells, as well as the frequency of patients with a positive 
HRD score, as defined in Section 11.2.5, pre-treatment and after the four week treatment period 
will be summarized in tabular format for each treatment arm. Paired t-tests will be used to 
determine patients who have a significant increase in p-γH2AX or HRD positivity following the 
four week treatment period, and Fisher’s exact test will be used to compare the degree of target 
inhibition between arms.  
 
Tumor-infiltrating T-cell diversity 
Sequencing results to the human TCR loci will be analyzed as our collaborators have 
published[85].  Briefly, human TCR loci will be mapped using the Bowtie2 aligned and the V-
(D)-J regions of CDR3s will be decomposed.  Simpson’s DI will be used to quanify TCRα/β 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 76 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
clonality. 
 
 
 
15. STUDY MANAGEMENT AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS 
 
15.1 Multicenter Guidelines 
 
The specific responsibilities of the Principal Investigator and the Coordinating Center are 
presented in Appendix B.  Clinical studies coordinated by The University of Chicago must be 
conducted in accordance with the ethical principles that are consistent with Good Clinical 
Practices (GCP) and in compliance with other applicable regulatory requirements 
The Study Lead PI/Coordinating Center is responsible for distributing all official protocols, 
amendments, and IND Action Letters or Safety Reports to all participating institutions for 
submission to their individual IRBs for action as required.   
 
15.2 Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval and Consent 
 
Unless otherwise specified, each participating institution must obtain its own IRB approval. It is 
expected that the IRB will have the proper representation and function in accordance with 
federally mandated regulations.  The IRB should approve the consent form and protocol. 
 
In obtaining and documenting informed consent, the investigator should comply with the 
applicable regulatory requirement(s), and should adhere to Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and to 
ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki. 
 
 
 
Before recruitment and enrollment onto this study, the patient will be given a full explanation of 
the study and will be given the opportunity to review the consent form. Each consent form must 
include all the relevant elements currently required by the FDA Regulations and local or state 
regulations. Once this essential information has been provided to the patient and the investigator 
is assured that the patient understands the implications of participating in the study, the patient 
will be asked to give consent to participate in the study by signing an IRB-approved consent 
form. 
 
Prior to a patient’s participation in the trial, the written informed consent form should be signed 
and personally dated by the patient and by the person who conducted the informed consent 
discussion. 
15.3 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Approval 
 
This study will be conducted under an investigator-held IND at the University of Chicago.  The 
University of Chicago CCTO will be responsible for facilitating all communications with the 
FDA on behalf of the IND holder. Participating sites should not communicate directly with the 
FDA.   


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 77 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
15.4 Required Documentation 
 
Prior to the selection of a study site that is not a full member of the Personalized Cancer Care 
Consortium, the audit and trial oversight processes for the site must be reviewed and approved 
by the UC CCC Clinical Research Advisory Committee (CRAC).  
 
 
 
Before the study can be initiated at any site, the following documentation must be provided to 
the Cancer Clinical Trials Office (CCTO) at the University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer.  
Documents should be sent by email to: PCCC_Regulatory@bsd.uchicago.edu.  
 
A copy of the official IRB approval letter for the protocol and informed consent 
 
IRB membership list 
 
CVs and medical licensure for the principal investigator and any sub-investigators who 
will be involved in the study. 
 
Form FDA 1572 appropriately filled out and signed with appropriate documentation  
 
Financial disclosure form(s) for the principal investigator and any sub-investigators who 
will be involved in the study 
 
CAP and CLIA Laboratory certification numbers and institution lab normal values 
 
Investigational drug accountability standard operating procedures 
 
Additionally, before the study can be initiated at any site, the required executed research 
contract/subcontract must be on file with the University of Chicago. 
15.5 Data and Safety Monitoring  
 
This study will be remotely monitored by the designated University of Chicago Clinical Research 
Associate (CRA) in accordance with the University of Chicago, Section of 
Hematology/Oncology standard operating procedure titled Monitoring of Multi-Institutional 
Investigator Initiated Clinical Trials. 
 
Prior to subject recruitment, and unless otherwise specified, a participating site will undergo a 
Site Initiation Teleconference to be conducted by the designated University of Chicago research 
team. The site’s principal investigator and his or her study staff must attend the site initiation 
meeting.  
 
Monitoring will be conducted to verify the following: 
 
 Adherence to the protocol 
 Completeness and accuracy of study data and samples collected 
 Compliance with regulations  
 Submission of required source documents  
 
Participating sites will also undergo a site close-out teleconference upon completion, termination 
or cancellation of a study to ensure fulfillment of study obligations during the conduct of the 
study, and to ensure that the site Investigator is aware of his/her ongoing responsibilities. 
 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 78 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
Unless otherwise specified, this protocol will undergo weekly review at the multi-institutional 
data and safety monitoring teleconference as per procedures specified by the UC CCC NCI-
approved Data and Safety Monitoring Plan. The conference will review: 
 
o Enrollment rate relative to expectations, characteristics of participants 
o Safety of study participants (Serious Adverse Event & Adverse Event reporting) 
o Adherence to protocol (protocol deviations) 
o Completeness, validity and integrity of study data 
o Retention of study participants 
 
Protocol deviations are to be documented using the Protocol Deviation Form and sent via email 
to PhaseIICRA@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu. Deviations that are considered major because 
they impact subject safety or alter the risk/benefit ratio, compromise the integrity of the study 
data, and/or affect subjects’ willingness to participate in the study must be reported within 7 
days. Please contact the University of Chicago CRA 
(PhaseIICRA@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu) regarding questions about how to report 
deviations.  All major protocol deviations should also be reported to the local IRB of record 
according to their policies and procedures. 
15.6 Auditing 
 
In addition to the clinical monitoring procedures, the University of Chicago Comprehensive 
Cancer Center will perform routine Quality Assurance Audits of investigator-initiated clinical 
trials as described in the NCI-approved UC CCC DSM Plan. Audits provide assurance that trials 
are conducted and study data are collected, documented and reported in compliance with the 
protocol. Further, quality assurance audits ensure that study data are collected, documented and 
reported in compliance with Good Clinical Practices (GCP) Guidelines and regulatory 
requirements. The audit will review subjects enrolled at the University of Chicago in accordance 
with audit procedures specified in the UC CCC Data and Safety Monitoring plan. For institutions 
who are formal members of the Personalized Cancer Care Consortium (PCCC), the UC CCC will 
conduct on site quality assurance audits on average every two years during the enrollment and 
treatment phase of the study.  
 
Auditing procedures for participating sites that are not full members of the PCCC must be 
specified and approved by the UC CCC Clinical Research Advisory Committee.  In general, for 
sites that are not full members of the PCCC, auditing responsibility will be delegated to the 
participating center, with the annual audit report forwarded to the University of Chicago for 
review.   
 
A regulatory authority (e.g. FDA) may also wish to conduct an inspection of the study, during its 
conduct or even after its completion. If an inspection has been requested by a regulatory 
authority, the site investigator must immediately inform the University of Chicago Cancer 
Clinical Trials Office and Regulatory Manager that such a request has been made. 
15.7 Amendments to the Protocol 
 
All modifications to the protocol, consent form, and/or questionnaires will be submitted to the 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 79 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
University of Chicago IRB for review and approval. A list of the proposed modifications or 
amendments to the protocol and/or an explanation of the need of these modifications will be 
submitted, along with a revised protocol incorporating the modifications. Only the Study Lead 
PI can authorize any modifications, amendments, or termination of the protocol. Once a 
protocol amendment has been approved by the University of Chicago IRB, the Regulatory 
Manager will send the amended protocol and consent form (if applicable) to the affiliate 
institutions electronically. Upon receipt of the packet the affiliate institution is expected to do 
the following: 
 
 The affiliate must reply to the email from the Regulatory Manager indicating that the 
amendment was received by the institution and that it will be submitted to the local IRB.  
 
 The amendment should be submitted to the affiliate institution’s IRB as soon as 
possible after receipt. The amendment must be IRB approved by the institution within 
3 months from the date that it was received.  
 
 The  University  of  Chicago  version  date  and/or  amendment  number  must  
appear  on  the  affiliate consent form and on the affiliate IRB approval letter.  The 
version dates can be found on the footer of every page of the protocol and consent form.  
The amendment number can be found on the University of Chicago IRB amendment 
approval letter that is sent with the protocol/amendment mailing.  
 
 The IRB approval for the amendment and the amended consent form (if amended consent 
is necessary) for the affiliate institution must be sent to the designated UC Regulatory 
Manager as soon as it is received.  
15.8 Annual IRB Renewals, Continuing Review and Final Reports 
 
The University of Chicago IRB and the participating institutions’ IRBs will complete a continuing 
review of the protocol at least once a year for the duration of the study. The annual IRB 
renewal approvals for participating institutions should be forwarded promptly to the Regulatory 
Manager. If the institution’s IRB requires a new version of the consent form with the annual 
renewal, the consent form should be included with the renewal letter. 
15.9 Record Retention 
 
Study documentation includes all CRFs, data correction forms or queries, source documents, 
Sponsor-Investigator correspondence, monitoring logs/letters, and regulatory documents (e.g., 
protocol and amendments, IRB correspondence and approval, signed patient consent forms). 
 
Source documents include all recordings of observations or notations of clinical activities and all 
reports and records necessary for the evaluation and reconstruction of the clinical research study. 
 
Government agency regulations and directives require that all study documentation pertaining to 
the conduct of a clinical trial must be retained by the study investigator.  In the case of a study 
with a drug seeking regulatory approval and marketing, these documents shall be retained for at 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 80 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
least two years after the last approval of marketing application in an International Conference on 
Harmonization (ICH) region.  In all other cases, study documents should be kept on file until 
three years after the completion and final study report of this investigational study. 
15.10 Obligations of Study Site Investigators 
 
The Study Site Principal Investigator is responsible for the conduct of the clinical trial at the site 
in accordance with Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations and/or the Declaration of 
Helsinki.  The Study Site Principal Investigator is responsible for personally overseeing the 
treatment of all study patients.  He/she must assure that all study site personnel, including sub-
investigators and other study staff members, adhere to the study protocol and all FDA/GCP/NCI 
regulations and guidelines regarding clinical trials both during and after study completion. 
 
The Study Site Principal Investigator at each institution or site will be responsible for assuring 
that all the required data will be collected and entered into the CRFs. Periodically, monitoring 
visits or audits will be conducted and he/she must provide access to original records to permit 
verification of proper entry of data.  
 
 
 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 81 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
REFERENCES 
 
 
1. 
Siegel, R.L., K.D. Miller, and A. Jemal, Cancer statistics, 2015. CA: a cancer journal for 
clinicians, 2015. 65(1): p. 5-29. 
2. 
Ward, J.F. and J.W. Moul, Rising prostate-specific antigen after primary prostate cancer 
therapy. Nature clinical practice Urology, 2005. 2(4): p. 174-182. 
3. 
Group, P.C.T.C., Maximum androgen blockade in advanced prostate cancer: an 
overview of the randomised trials. The Lancet, 2000. 355(9214): p. 1491-1498. 
4. 
George, S., et al., Loss of PTEN Is Associated with Resistance to Anti-PD-1 Checkpoint 
Blockade Therapy in Metastatic Uterine Leiomyosarcoma. Immunity, 2017. 46(2): p. 
197-204. 
5. 
Peng, W., et al., Loss of PTEN Promotes Resistance to T Cell-Mediated Immunotherapy. 
Cancer Discov, 2016. 6(2): p. 202-16. 
6. 
Carver, B.S., et al., Reciprocal feedback regulation of PI3K and androgen receptor 
signaling in PTEN-deficient prostate cancer. Cancer cell, 2011. 19(5): p. 575-586. 
7. 
Tannock, I.F., et al., Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for 
advanced prostate cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 2004. 351(15): p. 1502-
1512. 
8. 
Petrylak, D.P., et al., Docetaxel and estramustine compared with mitoxantrone and 
prednisone for advanced refractory prostate cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 
2004. 351(15): p. 1513-1520. 
9. 
Kantoff, P.W., et al., Sipuleucel-T immunotherapy for castration-resistant prostate 
cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 2010. 363(5): p. 411-422. 
10. 
De Bono, J.S., et al., Abiraterone and increased survival in metastatic prostate cancer. 
New England Journal of Medicine, 2011. 364(21): p. 1995-2005. 
11. 
Scher, H.I., et al., Increased survival with enzalutamide in prostate cancer after 
chemotherapy. New England Journal of Medicine, 2012. 367(13): p. 1187-1197. 
12. 
Parker, C., et al., Alpha emitter radium-223 and survival in metastatic prostate cancer. 
New England Journal of Medicine, 2013. 369(3): p. 213-223. 
13. 
Nguyen, N.C., et al., Radium-223 Therapy for Patients with Metastatic Castrate-
Resistant Prostate Cancer: An Update on Literature with Case Presentation. Int J Mol 
Imaging, 2016. 2016: p. 2568031. 
14. 
Beer, T.M., et al., Randomized trial of autologous cellular immunotherapy with 
sipuleucel-T in androgen-dependent prostate cancer. Clinical Cancer Research, 2011. 
17(13): p. 4558-4567. 
15. 
Kwon, E.D., et al., Ipilimumab versus placebo after radiotherapy in patients with 
metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that had progressed after docetaxel 
chemotherapy (CA184-043): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. The 
lancet oncology, 2014. 15(7): p. 700-712. 
16. 
Topalian, S.L., et al., Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in 
cancer. N Engl J Med, 2012. 366(26): p. 2443-54. 
17. 
Martin, A.M., et al., Paucity of PD-L1 expression in prostate cancer: innate and adaptive 
immune resistance. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 2015. 18(4): p. 325-32. 
18. 
Thakur, A., U. Vaishampayan, and L.G. Lum, Immunotherapy and immune evasion in 
prostate cancer. Cancers, 2013. 5(2): p. 569-590. 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 82 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
19. 
Annunziata, C.M. and J. O'Shaughnessy, Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase as a novel 
therapeutic target in cancer. Clinical Cancer Research, 2010. 16(18): p. 4517-4526. 
20. 
Bryant, H.E., et al., Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly 
(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Nature, 2005. 434(7035): p. 913-917. 
21. 
Farmer, H., et al., Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic 
strategy. Nature, 2005. 434(7035): p. 917-921. 
22. 
Kohn, E.C. Gynecologic Cancers: Emerging Novel Strategies for Targeting DNA Repair 
Deficiency. 2016. American Society of Clinical Oncology. 
23. 
Mateo, J., et al., DNA-Repair Defects and Olaparib in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. N 
Engl J Med, 2015. 373(18): p. 1697-708. 
24. 
Pritchard, C.C., et al., Inherited DNA-repair gene mutations in men with metastatic 
prostate cancer. N Engl J Med, 2016. 2016(375): p. 443-453. 
25. 
Castro, E., et al., Germline BRCA mutations are associated with higher risk of nodal 
involvement, distant metastasis, and poor survival outcomes in prostate cancer. Journal 
of Clinical Oncology, 2013. 31(14): p. 1748-1757. 
26. 
Siegel, R.L., et al., Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 
2017. 67(3): p. 177-193. 
27. 
Jemal, A., et al., Cancer statistics, 2009. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 2009. 59(4): 
p. 225-249. 
28. 
Network, C.G.A.R., Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. 
Nature, 2013. 497(7447): p. 67-73. 
29. 
Fiorica, J.V., et al., Phase II trial of alternating courses of megestrol acetate and 
tamoxifen in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. 
Gynecologic oncology, 2004. 92(1): p. 10-14. 
30. 
Ott, P.A., et al., Pembrolizumab in advanced endometrial cancer: Preliminary results 
from the phase Ib KEYNOTE-028 study. 2016, American Society of Clinical Oncology. 
31. 
Howitt, B.E., et al., Association of Polymerase e-Mutated and Microsatellite-Instable 
Endometrial Cancers With Neoantigen Load, Number of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes, 
and Expression of PD-1 and PD-L1. JAMA Oncol, 2015. 1(9): p. 1319-23. 
32. 
Diaz, L.A., et al., Programmed death-1 blockade in mismatch repair deficient cancer 
independent of tumor histology. 2016, American Society of Clinical Oncology. 
33. 
Oza, A.M., et al., Phase II study of temsirolimus in women with recurrent or metastatic 
endometrial cancer: a trial of the NCIC Clinical Trials Group. Journal of Clinical 
Oncology, 2011. 29(24): p. 3278-3285. 
34. 
Forster, M.D., et al., Treatment with olaparib in a patient with PTEN-deficient 
endometrioid endometrial cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2011. 8(5): p. 302-6. 
35. 
Dedes, K.J., et al., PTEN deficiency in endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinomas 
predicts sensitivity to PARP inhibitors. Science translational medicine, 2010. 2(53): p. 
53ra75-53ra75. 
36. 
Mateo, J., et al., DNA-repair defects and olaparib in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J 
Med, 2015. 2015(373): p. 1697-1708. 
37. 
Fong, P.C., et al., Poly (ADP)-ribose polymerase inhibition: frequent durable responses 
in BRCA carrier ovarian cancer correlating with platinum-free interval. Journal of 
Clinical Oncology, 2010. 28(15): p. 2512-2519. 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 83 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
38. 
Audeh, M.W., et al., Oral poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients 
with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and recurrent ovarian cancer: a proof-of-concept trial. 
The Lancet, 2010. 376(9737): p. 245-251. 
39. 
Tutt, A., et al., Oral poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in patients with 
BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and advanced breast cancer: a proof-of-concept trial. The 
Lancet, 2010. 376(9737): p. 235-244. 
40. 
Gelmon, K.A., et al., Olaparib in patients with recurrent high-grade serous or poorly 
differentiated ovarian carcinoma or triple-negative breast cancer: a phase 2, multicentre, 
open-label, non-randomised study. The lancet oncology, 2011. 12(9): p. 852-861. 
41. 
Kaye, S.B., et al., Phase II, open-label, randomized, multicenter study comparing the 
efficacy and safety of olaparib, a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, and pegylated 
liposomal doxorubicin in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and recurrent 
ovarian cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2011. 30(4): p. 372-379. 
42. 
Ledermann, J., et al., Olaparib maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive relapsed 
ovarian cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 2012. 366(15): p. 1382-1392. 
43. 
Sandhu, S.K., et al., The poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor niraparib (MK4827) in 
BRCA mutation carriers and patients with sporadic cancer: a phase 1 dose-escalation 
trial. The lancet oncology, 2013. 14(9): p. 882-892. 
44. 
De Bono, J.S., et al., First-in-human trial of novel oral PARP inhibitor BMN 673 in 
patients with solid tumors. 2013, American Society of Clinical Oncology. 
45. 
Kristeleit, R.S., et al., A phase I dose-escalation and PK study of continuous oral 
rucaparib in patients with advanced solid tumors. 2013, American Society of Clinical 
Oncology. 
46. 
Keir, M.E., et al., PD-1 and its ligands in tolerance and immunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol., 
2008. 26: p. 677-704. 
47. 
Freeman, G.J., et al., Engagement of the PD-1 immunoinhibitory receptor by a novel B7 
family member leads to negative regulation of lymphocyte activation. Journal of 
Experimental Medicine, 2000. 192(7): p. 1027-1034. 
48. 
Latchman, Y., et al., PD-L2 is a second ligand for PD-1 and inhibits T cell activation. 
Nature immunology, 2001. 2(3): p. 261-268. 
49. 
Carter, L.L., et al., PD‐1: PD‐L inhibitory pathway affects both CD4+ and CD8+ T 
cells and is overcome by IL‐2. European journal of immunology, 2002. 32(3): p. 634-
643. 
50. 
Barber, D.L., et al., Restoring function in exhausted CD8 T cells during chronic viral 
infection. Nature, 2006. 439(7077): p. 682-687. 
51. 
Pardoll, D.M., The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nature 
Reviews Cancer, 2012. 12(4): p. 252-264. 
52. 
Robinson, D., et al., Integrative clinical genomics of advanced prostate cancer. Cell, 
2015. 161(5): p. 1215-1228. 
53. 
Sircar, K., et al., PTEN genomic deletion is associated with p‐Akt and AR signalling in 
poorer outcome, hormone refractory prostate cancer. The Journal of pathology, 2009. 
218(4): p. 505-513. 
54. 
Peng, W., et al., Loss of PTEN promotes resistance to T cell–mediated immunotherapy. 
Cancer discovery, 2016. 6(2): p. 202-216. 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 84 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
55. 
Hollander, M.C., G.M. Blumenthal, and P.A. Dennis, PTEN loss in the continuum of 
common cancers, rare syndromes and mouse models. Nature Reviews Cancer, 2011. 
11(4): p. 289-301. 
56. 
Walsh, P.T., et al., PTEN inhibits IL-2 receptor-mediated expansion of CD4+ CD25+ 
Tregs. J Clin Invest, 2006. 116(9): p. 2521-31. 
57. 
Shen, W.H., et al., Essential role for nuclear PTEN in maintaining chromosomal 
integrity. Cell, 2007. 128(1): p. 157-170. 
58. 
Mendes‐Pereira, A.M., et al., Synthetic lethal targeting of PTEN mutant cells with 
PARP inhibitors. EMBO molecular medicine, 2009. 1(6-7): p. 315-322. 
59. 
Friedlander, M., et al., A phase 1b study of the anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody BGB-
A317 (A317) in combination with the PARP inhibitor BGB-290 (290) in advanced solid 
tumors. 2017, American Society of Clinical Oncology. 
60. 
Lee, J.-M., et al., Safety and Clinical Activity of the Programmed Death-Ligand 1 
Inhibitor Durvalumab in Combination With Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor 
Olaparib or Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 1-3 Inhibitor Cediranib in 
Women's Cancers: A Dose-Escalation, Phase I Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 
2017: p. JCO. 2016.72. 1340. 
61. 
Karzai, F., et al., Combination of PDL-1 and PARP inhibition in an unselected 
population with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). 2017, American 
Society of Clinical Oncology. 
62. 
Pages, F., et al., Immune infiltration in human tumors: a prognostic factor that should not 
be ignored. Oncogene, 2010. 29(8): p. 1093-1102. 
63. 
Spranger, S., et al., Mechanism of tumor rejection with doublets of CTLA-4, PD-1/PD-L1, 
or IDO blockade involves restored IL-2 production and proliferation of CD8+ T cells 
directly within the tumor microenvironment. Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2014. 
2(1): p. 3. 
64. 
Harlin, H., et al., Chemokine expression in melanoma metastases associated with CD8+ 
T-cell recruitment. Cancer research, 2009. 69(7): p. 3077-3085. 
65. 
Kuo, L.J. and L.-X. Yang, γ-H2AX-a novel biomarker for DNA double-strand breaks. In 
vivo, 2008. 22(3): p. 305-309. 
66. 
Mills, G., et al., Homologous recombination deficiency score shows superior association 
with outcome compared with its individual score components in platinum-treated serous 
ovarian cancer. Gynecologic Oncology, 2016. 141: p. 2-3. 
67. 
Nowsheen, S., J.A. Bonner, and E.S. Yang, The poly (ADP-Ribose) polymerase inhibitor 
ABT-888 reduces radiation-induced nuclear EGFR and augments head and neck tumor 
response to radiotherapy. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 2011. 99(3): p. 331-338. 
68. 
Wang, L.H., et al., Monitoring drug-induced γH2AX as a pharmacodynamic biomarker in 
individual circulating tumor cells. Clinical Cancer Research, 2010. 16(3): p. 1073-1084. 
69. 
Telli, M.L., et al., Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score predicts response 
to platinum-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple-negative breast 
cancer. Clinical Cancer Research, 2016. 22(15): p. 3764-3773. 
70. 
Wilcoxen, K., et al., Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score enriches for 
niraparib sensitive high grade ovarian tumors. J. Clin. Oncol., 2015. 33. 
71. 
Robert, L., et al., CTLA4 blockade broadens the peripheral T-cell receptor repertoire. 
Clinical Cancer Research, 2014. 20(9): p. 2424-2432. 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 85 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
72. 
Postow, M.A., et al., Peripheral T cell receptor diversity is associated with clinical 
outcomes following ipilimumab treatment in metastatic melanoma. Journal for 
immunotherapy of cancer, 2015. 3(1): p. 23. 
73. 
Cha, E., et al., Improved survival with T cell clonotype stability after anti–CTLA-4 
treatment in cancer patients. Science translational medicine, 2014. 6(238): p. 238ra70-
238ra70. 
74. 
Schleimer, R.P., et al., Inhibition of T cell-mediated cytotoxicity by anti-inflammatory 
steroids. The Journal of Immunology, 1984. 132(1): p. 266-271. 
75. 
Weber, J.S., K.C. Kähler, and A. Hauschild, Management of immune-related adverse 
events and kinetics of response with ipilimumab. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2012. 
30(21): p. 2691-2697. 
76. 
Scher, H.I., et al., Trial Design and Objectives for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: 
Updated Recommendations From the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3. 
J Clin Oncol, 2016. 34(12): p. 1402-18. 
77. 
Kim, G., et al., FDA approval summary: olaparib monotherapy in patients with 
deleterious germline BRCA-mutated advanced ovarian cancer treated with three or more 
lines of chemotherapy. Clinical Cancer Research, 2015. 21(19): p. 4257-4261. 
78. 
Danaher, P., et al., Pan-cancer adaptive immune resistance as defined by the Tumor 
Inflammation Signature (TIS): results from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). J 
Immunother Cancer, 2018. 6(1): p. 63. 
79. 
Ayers, M., et al., IFN-gamma-related mRNA profile predicts clinical response to PD-1 
blockade. J Clin Invest, 2017. 127(8): p. 2930-2940. 
80. 
Mirza, M.R., et al., Niraparib Maintenance Therapy in Platinum-Sensitive, Recurrent 
Ovarian Cancer. N Engl J Med, 2016. 375(22): p. 2154-2164. 
81. 
Matthaios, D., et al., gamma-H2AX expression detected by immunohistochemistry 
correlates with prognosis in early operable non-small cell lung cancer. Onco Targets 
Ther, 2012. 5: p. 309-14. 
82. 
Powles, T., et al., MPDL3280A (anti-PD-L1) treatment leads to clinical activity in 
metastatic bladder cancer. Nature, 2014. 515(7528): p. 558-62. 
83. 
Martin, N.E., et al., Measuring PI3K Activation: Clinicopathologic, 
Immunohistochemical, and RNA Expression Analysis in Prostate Cancer. Mol Cancer 
Res, 2015. 13(10): p. 1431-40. 
84. 
Scher, H.I., et al., Design and End Points of Clinical Trials for Patients With Progressive 
Prostate Cancer and Castrate Levels of Testosterone: Recommendations of the Prostate 
Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group. J Clin Oncol, 2008. 26(7): p. 1148-1159. 
85. 
Choudhury, N.J., et al., Low T-cell Receptor Diversity, High Somatic Mutation Burden, 
and High Neoantigen Load as Predictors of Clinical Outcome in Muscle-invasive 
Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol Focus, 2016. 2(4): p. 445-452. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 86 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 87 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
APPENDIX A 
PERFORMANCE STATUS CRITERIA 
 
ECOG Performance Status Scale 
Karnofsky Performance Scale 
Grade 
Descriptions 
Percent 
Description 
0 
Normal activity.  Fully active, able 
to carry on all pre-disease 
performance without restriction. 
100 
Normal, no complaints, no evidence 
of disease. 
90 
Able to carry on normal activity; 
minor signs or symptoms of disease. 
1 
Symptoms, but ambulatory.  
Restricted in physically strenuous 
activity, but ambulatory and able 
to carry out work of a light or 
sedentary nature (e.g., light 
housework, office work). 
80 
Normal activity with effort; some 
signs or symptoms of disease. 
70 
Cares for self, unable to carry on 
normal activity or to do active work. 
2 
In bed <50% of the time.  
Ambulatory and capable of all 
self-care, but unable to carry out 
any work activities.  Up and about 
more than 50% of waking hours. 
60 
Requires occasional assistance, but 
is able to care for most of his/her 
needs. 
50 
Requires considerable assistance and 
frequent medical care. 
3 
In bed >50% of the time.  Capable 
of only limited self-care, confined 
to bed or chair more than 50% of 
waking hours. 
40 
Disabled, requires special care and 
assistance. 
30 
Severely disabled, hospitalization 
indicated.  Death not imminent. 
4 
100% bedridden.  Completely 
disabled.  Cannot carry on any 
self-care.  Totally confined to bed 
or chair. 
20 
Very sick, hospitalization indicated. 
Death not imminent. 
10 
Moribund, fatal processes 
progressing rapidly. 
5 
Dead. 
0 
Dead. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 88 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
APPENDIX B 
MULTICENTER GUIDELINES 
 
Responsibility of the Study Lead PI  
 The Study Lead PI will be the single liaison with regulatory and data management 
staff, outside sponsor/s, FDA, and funding agencies  The Study Lead PI is 
responsible for the coordination, development, submission, and approval of the 
protocol as well as its subsequent amendments.  The protocol must not be 
rewritten or modified by anyone other than the Study Lead PI.  There will be only 
one version of the protocol, and each participating institution will use that 
document.  The Study Lead PI is responsible for assuring that all participating 
institutions are using the correct version of the protocol. 
 The Study Lead PI is responsible for the overall conduct of the study at all 
participating institutions and for monitoring its progress.  All reporting 
requirements are the responsibility of the Study Lead PI.  
 The Study Lead PI is responsible for the timely review of Adverse Events (AE) to 
assure safety of the patients. 
 The Study Lead PI will be responsible for the review of and timely submission of 
data for study analysis. 
 
Responsibilities of the Coordinating Center 
1. The Coordinating Center is responsible for maintaining copies of IRB approvals 
from each participating site.  
2. The Coordinating Center is responsible for central patient registration.  The 
Coordinating Center is responsible for assuring that IRB approval has been 
obtained at each participating site prior to the first patient registration from that 
site. 
3. The Coordinating Center is responsible for the preparation of all submitted data 
for review by the Study Lead PI. 
4. The Coordinating Center will maintain documentation of AE reports.  The 
Coordinating Center will submit AE reports to the Study Lead PI for timely 
review. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 89 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019 
 
APPENDIX C: PATIENT MEDICATION DIARY 
 
 
 
 
Instructions for the Patient: You will take Rucaparib twice a day. You will take ____ pills in the morning, 
and you will take _____ pills in the evening. You will take Rucaparib every day for the next 28 days.  Every 
time you take a dose of Rucaparib, write down the date, the time, and the number of pills of Rucaparib you 
took. If you have any comments or any side effects, write them down in the Comments section.  Keep your 
Rucaparib pills in the bottle that they came in. Please bring this diary and your bottle of Rucaparib with you 
when you come back to see your study doctor.  Even if the bottle is empty, please bring it back with you.  
 
  
Morning Dose 
Evening Dose 
Comments 
Day 
Date 
Time 
Number of 
Pills 
Time 
Number of 
Pills 
  
1 
  
  
  
  
  
  
2 
  
  
  
  
  
  
3 
  
  
  
  
  
  
4 
  
  
  
  
  
  
5 
  
  
  
  
  
  
6 
  
  
  
  
  
  
7 
  
  
  
  
  
  
8 
  
  
  
  
  
  
9 
  
  
  
  
  
  
10 
  
  
  
  
  
  
11 
  
  
  
  
  
  
12 
  
  
  
  
  
  
13 
  
  
  
  
  
  
14 
  
  
  
  
  
  
15 
  
  
  
  
  
  
16 
  
  
  
  
  
  
17 
  
  
  
  
  
  
18 
  
  
  
  
  
  
19 
  
  
  
  
  
  
20 
  
  
  
  
  
  
21 
  
  
  
  
  
  
22 
  
  
  
  
  
  
23 
  
  
  
  
  
  
24 
  
  
  
  
  
  
25 
  
  
  
  
  
  
26 
  
  
  
  
  
  
27 
  
  
  
  
  
  
28 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Patient Name/ Initials___________________________ Study ID#: ____________  
Cycle Number:_____  Date of Clinic Visit :________________ 
Patient Signature and Date:____________________________________ 
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------      
Research staff only: Date tablets returned:_________   Number of tablets returned:_______ 
Signature of Research Staff and Date: ____________________________________ 


 
IRB18-0154 
Page 90 of 90 
 
Protocol Version: Amendment 2; 03/01/2019