Conditions: Crohn Disease
Keywords: Crohn's Disease Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation Hematopoietic cell transplantation
Allocation: NA | Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Enrollment: 2
Healthy volunteers: no

Brief summary:
This phase II trial studies how well giving a donor bone marrow transplant (BMT) works in treating patients with refractory Crohn's Disease. We will select patients with severe Crohn's Disease and active inflammation despite the best medical and surgical treatments. These patients must be healthy enough to undergo a transplantation procedure. They cannot have an active infection, and their heart, lungs, kidneys, and liver cannot be failing. The transplant procedure starts with chemotherapy and a small dose of radiation, to weaken a patient's immune system so that it will accept bone marrow cells from another person. After that other person's bone marrow cells are given to the patient, immune suppressive medicines are given to prevent the new cells from being rejected and to stop those cells from damaging the patient. After the new donor cells start to work, blood counts will rise and the new immune system will start to grow. During this time, there is a risk of infection. Antibiotics and anti-viral drugs will be given to prevent infection. When the new donor cells are well-established, immune suppressive medicines are discontinued. We will examine parts of the intestine that were inflamed before the start of the transplant procedure, to be sure the Crohn's Disease has disappeared after the transplant. Patients will be formally evaluated for Crohn's activity at around 100 days after transplant, and yearly after that for 5 years.

Detailed description:
BACKGROUND:

There is strong evidence for genetic susceptibility to Crohn's Disease (CD), with environmental factors interacting with genetic polymorphisms. Some patients remain refractory to the best available therapies. In patients with intestinal inflammation related to other genetic disorders, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation has led to disappearance of inflammation, for example, in patients with IPEX (immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked) and with a mutation in the Interleukin-10 receptor, characterized by a severe, early onset, fistulating colitis for which transplantation is the only therapy that offers benefit. Eleven patients with typical CD who achieved allogeneic donor chimerism after transplant had resolution of signs and symptoms of CD that was sustained for up to 15 years. These case series suggest that allogeneic transplantation has substantial potential to cure CD.

HYPOTHESIS AND SPECIFIC AIMS:

The hypothesis is: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) can achieve sustained remissions in patients with refractory CD, and can be done safely. The specific aims are: 1) To evaluate the safety and efficacy of allogeneic HCT as treatment for refractory CD. 2) To evaluate treatment effect on CD activity/severity using the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and the Simple Endoscopic Score for CD (SES-CD). 3) To evaluate safety by scoring regimen-related toxicities, time to engraftment, infectious complications, acute and chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD), and treatment-related mortality. 4) To evaluate the effect on quality of life.

METHODS:

This study is a prospective single-arm Phase II clinical trial that will enroll 12 patients.

PATIENT SELECTION: Patients will have documented CD (see eligibility criteria below); signs and symptoms that have failed to respond satisfactorily to medical and surgical therapies; active intestinal inflammation by endoscopy and histology, and CDAI \>= 250 or need for total parenteral nutrition or recurrent inflammation after resection. Donors will be a Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)-matched sibling or unrelated donor.

ALLOGENEIC TRANSPLANT PROCEDURE: Patients will receive a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen of cyclophosphamide, fludarabine and low-dose Total Body Irradiation (TBI), a regimen that has been used successfully in patients receiving haploidentical allografts. Marrow will be used as the graft source to reduce the risk of GVHD. GVHD prophylaxis will consist of post-transplant high-dose cyclophosphamide followed by the combination of tacrolimus and enteric coated mycophenolic acid. Supportive care includes the use of N-acetyl cysteine infusions to reduce the risk of sinusoidal liver injury from cyclophosphamide; prophylaxis with ursodiol to prevent cholestatic liver disease; and antimicrobial drugs as prophylaxis and preemptive treatment for infections by bacteria, fungi, herpes viruses, and Pneumocystis jiroveci. Tissue and blood samples will be archived for future studies and evaluation of immune reconstitution at predefined intervals.

EFFICACY AND SAFETY ENDPOINTS: Safety and efficacy will be based on clinical assessments, laboratory testing, and gastrointestinal endoscopy and histology at baseline, at day 100 post-transplant, and yearly for 5 years. The primary endpoint is event-free survival at 1 year, defined as alive and free of active CD by endoscopy and biopsy. Transplant-related mortality is death occurring at any time after start of allogeneic HCT. Disease activity will be evaluated using CDAI. Quality of Life will be measured using the Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire.

RISKS AND POTENTIAL BENEFITS: The major risks include regimen-related toxicity, infections, graft rejection, and GVHD. Autologous stem cells will be reserved in case of graft rejection. Recent advances in transplant technique have substantially reduced the mortality risk. Balancing these risks is the potential for allogeneic transplant to effect sustained remissions and cures of CD.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. The primary objective is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of HCT as treatment for refractory CD.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To evaluate treatment effect on CD activity and severity.

II. To evaluate safety of allogeneic HCT as determined by regimen-related toxicities, infectious complications, acute and chronic GVHD, treatment-related mortality, overall total mortality, and time to engraftment.

III. To evaluate the effect of allogeneic HCT on quality of life (QOL) in patients with severe refractory CD.

OUTLINE:

CONDITIONING THERAPY: Patients receive fludarabine phosphate intravenously (IV) over 30-60 minutes on days -6 to -2 and cyclophosphamide IV over 1-2 hours on days -6 and -5. Patients undergo 200 cGy of TBI on day -1.

TRANSPLANTATION: Patients undergo allogeneic BMT on day 0.

IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE THERAPY: Patients receive high-dose cyclophosphamide IV over 1-2 hours on days 3-4, tacrolimus IV daily or orally (PO) twice daily (BID) on days 5-180 with taper to day 365, and mycophenolate acid enteric coated or mycophenolate mofetil PO three times daily (TID) on days 0-35.

After completion of conditioning therapy and infusion of donor bone marrow cells, patients are followed up at 1 month, 3 months, 12 months, and then yearly thereafter for up to 60 months.

Arms:
arm 1: CONDITIONING THERAPY: Patients receive fludarabine phosphate IV over 30-60 minutes QD on days -6 to -2 and cyclophosphamide IV over 1-2 hours QD on days -6 and -5. Patients undergo total body irradiation on day -1.

TRANSPLANTATION: Patients undergo donor BMT on day 0.

IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE THERAPY: Patients receive high-dose cyclophosphamide IV over 1-2 hours QD on days 3-4, tacrolimus IV daily or PO BID on days 5-180 with taper to day 365, and mycophenolate acid enteric coated or mycophenolate mofetil PO TID on days 0-35.

Interventions: intervention 1: Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation intervention 2: Cyclophosphamide intervention 3: Fludarabine Phosphate intervention 4: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis intervention 5: Mycophenolate Mofetil intervention 6: Mycophenolic Acid intervention 7: Quality-of-Life Assessment intervention 8: Tacrolimus intervention 9: Total-Body Irradiation
Intervention descriptions: intervention 1: Undergo allogeneic BMT intervention 2: Given IV intervention 3: Given IV intervention 4: Correlative studies intervention 5: Given PO intervention 6: Given PO intervention 7: Ancillary studies intervention 8: Given IV or PO intervention 9: Undergo TBI

Protocol document:
Prot_SAP_000.pdf: 
FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
"1 l''''"c"D SEP 1 8 2019 
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER 
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE 
SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL 
Current version: 8/21/15 
Previous version: 8/25/14 
Title of Protocol: 
ALLOGENEIC HEMATOPOIETIC CELL TRANSPLANTATION FOR PATIENTS WITH TREATMENT-
REFRACTORY CROHN'S DISEASE: A PHASE 2 STUDY 
List of Investigators: 
Investigator  
Professional Title 
Phone Number 
George E. Georges, MD  Associate Member, FHCRC; Associate Professor, UW 
(Transplant Oncology) 
(206) 667 6886 
Laurie M. Burroughs, MD  Assistant Member, FHCRC; Assistant Professor, UW & 
Seattle Children's (Pediatric Transplant Oncology) 
(206) 667 2396 
Timothy L. Zisman, MD, MPH  Assistant Professor, UW (Gastroenterology) 
(206) 598 4377 
David L. Suskind, MD  Associate Professor, UW & Seattle Children's Hospital 
(Pediatric Gastroenterology) 
(206) 987 2521 
Chris Damman, M.D.  Acting Instructor, Medicine (Gastroenterology), UW 
(206) 680 1019 
Richard A. Nash, MD  Affiliate Investigator, FHCRC 
(720) 754 4800 
James Lord, MD, PhD  Research Associate, FHCRC; Assistant Clinical 
Professor, UW (Gastroenterology) 
(206) 223 2319 
Melissa P. Upton, MD  Associate Professor, UW 
(Gastrointestinal and Liver Pathology) 
(206) 598 4377 
Biostatistician: 
Katherine A. Guthrie, PhD  Associate Member, FHCRC 
(206) 667 5595 
Research Staff! Study Coordinator: 
Bernadette A. McLaughlin, RN  Clinical Research Nurse, FHCRC 
(206) 667 4916 
FHCRC IRB Approval 
OCT 30 2019 
Document Released Date 
Page 1 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 
• 1.0  INTRODUCTION  
Page 5 
2.0  BACKGROUND  
Pages 5-14 
2.1  Crohn's Disease 
2.2  Clinical Data to Date 
2.3  Study Regimen 
2.4  Rationale for proposed treatment 
2.5  Risks/Benefits 
3.0  STUDY OBJECTIVES  
Pages 14-15 
3.1  Hypothesis 
3.2  Primary Objectives 
3.2  Secondary Objectives 
4.0  STUDY DESIGN  
Pages 15-16 
4.1  Description of Study 
4.2  Endpoints 
5.0  SUBJECT SELECTION  
Pages 16-19 
5.1  Inclusion Criteria 
5.2  Exclusion Criteria 
6.0  DONOR SELECTION  
Page 19 
6.1  Inclusion Criteria 
6.2  Exclusion Criteria 
7.0  INFORMED CONSENT OF SUBJECT AND DONOR  
Page 19 
8.0  SUBJECT REGISTRATION  
Page 19 
9.0  SUBJECT WITHDRAWAL  
Page 20 
10.0 PLAN OF TREATMENT  
Pages 21-27 
11.0 EVALUATION  
Pages 27-31 
11.1  First phase screening visit 
11.2  Second phase screening visit 
11.3  Pre-transplant tests, counseling, and informed consent 
11.4  Study procedures from time of initiation of HCT 
12.0 DRUGS, IRRADIATION AND MARROW ADMINISTRATION TOXICITIES AND COMPLICATIONS 
 
Pages 31-34 
12.1  G-CSF and prednisone used for autologous PBSC collection 
12.2 Cyclophosphamide 
12.3 Fludarabine 
12.4  Total Body Irradiation 
12.5 Tacrolimus 
12.6  Mycophenolic acid or mofetil 
12.7  Allogeneic marrow transplantation 
13.0 GUIDELINES FOR ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING  
Pages 34-36 
12.1  Adverse Event Reporting/ Institutional Policy 
12.2  Study-Specific Adverse Event Capture 
Page 2 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00  
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
14.0 ASSESSMENT OF DISEASE RESPONSE  
 
14.1  Definition of study end-points and disease responses 
14.2.  Quality of life instruments 
Page 36 
15.0 DATA AND SAFETY MONITORING PLAN  
Page 37 
16.0 DATA MANAGEMENT/CONFIDENTIALITY  
Page 37 
17.0 STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS  
Pages 37-38 
18.0 TERMINATION OF THE STUDY  
Page 39 
REFERENCES  
Pages 40-47 
APPENDICES  
Pages 48-69 
Page 3 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


yf 
 
14 
 
Patient potentially eligible   Request for detailed patient records 
Patient comes to Seattle for 
First Phase Screening Visit 
Patient eligibility discussed 
by Eligibility Review Group 
z 
 
Campaign to increase 
awareness of protocol by 
patients and physicians 
Patient or physician 
inquiries come to Study 
Coodinator 
Patient not eligible 
Patient not eligible 
Patient potentially eligible 
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
SCHEMA 
Patient potentially eligible 
Patient not eligible 
Inquiry regarding insurance 
or other coverage for 
hematopoietic cell 
transplantation 
Insurance will cover 
transplant procedure 
..6444%%11444641111q HLA typing and donor search—H  -matched donor identified 
Patient comes to Seattle for 
Second Phase Screening Visit 
Patient eligible 
4 
Collection of autologous PBSC 
Informed consent for transplant 
signed after baseline studies and 
counseling of patient completed 
Start of transplant procedure 
Follow-up at pre-specified times, to 5 years after transplant 
Page 4 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
IRE Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
1.0 INTRODUCTION 
This document describes a clinical research study to be conducted in compliance with the Fred Hutchinson 
Cancer Research Center's IRB approved protocol, associated Federal regulations, all applicable IRB 
requirements, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Investigational New Drug application #15081. The 
rationale for this study is as follows: Genetic and epidemiologic evidence suggests that Crohn's Disease (CD) is 
an inherited disorder of immune dysregulation [1-4]. By providing patients with an immune system from a donor 
without CD or genetic predisposition to CD, we predict that CD would disappear and not recur in the allografted 
patient. The hypothesis to be tested is that allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) can achieve 
complete, sustained remissions in patients with treatment-refractory CD. 
2.0 BACKGROUND 
2.1  Crohn's Disease 
CD is an inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal tract that affects mostly the distal small intestine and colon, 
but which can affect mucosa from the mouth to the anus as well as extraintestinal tissues [1]. CD inflammation 
can be discontinuous and involve all intestinal layers (that is, there can be transmural involvement of segments of 
the intestine). The most common symptoms are diarrhea, weight loss, abdominal pain, and fever, sometimes 
complicated by fistulas and intestinal strictures that may require surgery. Continued active disease is frequently 
accompanied by malaise, decreased energy, depression, body image concerns, and poor psychosocial function 
and quality of life. Children and adolescent patients with CD often have the additional morbidity of abnormal 
growth, sexual maturation, and psychosocial development. The natural history of CD varies among patients, with 
some patients having a relatively indolent course but others have aggressive fistulizing disease or recurrent 
intestinal structuring and inflammation. There are no curative treatments, but therapy is usually effective in 
lessening the severity of symptoms. However, despite recent advances in biologic therapies, there remains a 
cohort of patients with CD whose disease is either refractory to therapy, or recurs after each surgery or therapy. 
These refractory patients are the intended subjects for the phase 2 study of allogeneic HCT proposed here. 
2.1.1. Pathogenesis: Genetics and Environment. There is strong evidence for genetic susceptibility to 
inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in general and CD in particular [2] [Elding H, et al, Refinement in localization 
and identification of gene regions associated with Crohn Disease. Am J Human Genetics 2013; 92: 1-7-113]. 
Recent refinement in identification of gene regions associated with CD has provided evidence for 200 such 
regions, confirming that CD is a complex, polygenic disorder. Family members of patients with IBD are at 
increased risk of developing IBD, with a 15-fold relative risk among first degree relatives, and 20% of patients with 
CD have at least one affected relative [5]. Ashkenazi Jews have a 2-4-fold increased risk of developing IBD than 
non-Jews in the same geographic location and are at greater risk of having multiple family members with IBD. 
The concordance rate among monozygotic twins has been reported to be as high as 67% for CD. More than 70 
susceptibility loci have been convincingly identified with CD in Genome-Wide Association (GWA) studies [3]; four 
pathways related to disease pathogenesis have emerged: 
1. One pathway involves the defective sensing of intracellular bacteria and reduced production of 13-
defensins, antibacterial proteins secreted by intestinal Paneth cells, through allelic variants in the 
NOD2/CARD15 gene. NOD2 is expressed by lymphocytes, macrophages, antigen-presenting 
cells, Paneth cells, fibroblasts, and epithelial cells. Activation of NOD2 by microbial ligands 
activates NF-KB and protein kinase signaling, functioning as a positive regulator of immune 
defense. The presence of variant genes on both chromosomes yields an odds ratio of 17.1 (10-7 — 
27.2) for CD, with heterozygotes having an OR of 2.5 (2.0 — 2.9). Variant NOD2/CARD15 genes 
are found in 20 — 30% of patients with CD, but the penetrance of variant genes is <1% suggesting 
that environmental factors are important in disease expression [2,6]. 
2. A second pathway with a genetic link to CD involves the processes of autophagy and xenophagy, 
processes that clear intracellular proteins and bacteria and integrate innate and adaptive immune 
responses [7,8] Autophagy 16-like 1 (ATG16L1) is strongly associated with CD; it is expressed in 
mucosal Paneth cells and mediates exocytosis of cryptidins (antibacterial peptides). Genes that 
encode immunity-related guanosine triphosphatase M (IRGM) and leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 
(KRRK2), regulators of autophagy, are also associated with CD in GWAS studies. 
Page 5 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
3. A third pathway associated with CD involves the IL-23 gene and gene products. A rare Single 
Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) in the IL23R gene is strongly protective for CD. Other, more 
common SNPs confer increased risk of CD. Variants of the IL12B, the JAK2, and STAT3 genes, 
with roles in IL23R signaling and Th17 differentiation, are associated with susceptibility to CD. 
4. A fourth pathway involves lymphocyte activation, survival, and growth. Meta analyses have 
demonstrated stronger associations between HLA class II and class I genes and ulcerative colitis 
than between these genes and CD. Nonetheless, DR81*0410, DQB*0401, and DR81*0103 confer 
risk for CD (odds ratios 3.9, 2.8, and 2.07, respectively); among class I genes, Cw8 and 821 confer 
risk for CD (ORs 3.4 and 2.3, respectively) [9]. 
Environmental factors appear to interact with genetic susceptibility in leading to CD. This conclusion is derived 
from data showing that identified susceptibility loci in GSAS studies account for <25% of predicted heritability [3]; 
the low penetrance of the NOD2/CARD15 gene; and epidemiologic studies that have identified risk factors for CD 
vs. controls without CD [10]. These epidemiologic studies implicate as risk factors for CD white-collar work status 
(as compared to outdoor physical labor), a diet with few fresh fruits and vegetables, use of NSAIDS, and smoking. 
Breast feeding during infancy may be protective. More convincing data for environmental influences come from 
studies showing geographic variation in CD prevalence (higher in northern latitudes), rising incidence rates in 
some countries across time, and studies of migrant populations [10]. 
2.1.2. Pathogenesis: Microbes, epithelial function, and innate immunity. The proximate cause of intestinal 
inflammation in CD is thought to be microbial in origin, with higher numbers of mucosa-associated bacteria and 
fewer varieties of commensal bacteria, but it is not entirely certain which comes first, chicken (abnormal 
mucosa/immunity) or egg (abnormal microbes) [11]. There is evidence for altered mucosal epithelial cell function 
as an early event in CD, related to abnormalities in autophagy and intracellular bacterial sensing (interacting 
pathways in dendritic cells, intestinal epithelial cells, and Paneth cells), and unfolded protein responses [7]. 
Normally, the innate immune system senses microbes, and epithelial cells, dendritic cells, and macrophages 
respond initially, with the overall effect being one of immune tolerance to microbes, with disease being a result of 
loss of tolerance [12]. 
2.1.3. Pathogenesis: Adaptive immune responses. 
Adaptive immunity involving the 1L12/1L23 pathway 
appears to be deranged in patients with CD, with a shift to Th1 and Th17 responses, in turn upregulating effector 
T cell responses. Defects in regulatory T cells may also affect the inflammatory cascade. Alterations in the 
function of dendritic cells in maintaining mucosal tolerance leads to expression of TNFa within the mucosa, 
resulting in a cascade of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Mucosal macrophages and dendritic cells also activate T 
cells through antigen presentation and a co-stimulatory signal. Leukocyte trafficking amplifies the mucosal 
immune response. 
2.1.4. Clinical presentation, complications, and natural history of CD. Although CD can affect any part of 
the gastrointestinal tract, the most common sites are the terminal ileum and right colon; a third of patients have 
disease confined to the small intestine; and some have only colonic involvement. Esophageal, gastric, and 
duodenal CD are rare, but if present, there is almost always ileal or colonic disease. The clinical presentation is 
highly variable, some patients presenting with only malaise, weight loss, and fever and others with symptoms that 
point clearly to the gut as the source--abdominal pain, diarrhea, bleeding, and symptoms of obstruction. In 
children, growth retardation and weight loss can be presenting symptoms; when there is anorexia, nausea, and 
vomiting in a younger patient, gastroduodenal CD should be suspected. Perianal disease usually occurs at or 
after the onset of gut symptoms, but perianal disease may be the initial CD presentation. Fistulas and strictures 
are highly characteristic of CD and cause considerable morbidity independent of ongoing mucosal inflammation. 
Perianal fistulas develop in 15-35% of patients and can be extensive. Fistulas from one segment of the gut to 
another and from the gut to adjacent organs (vagina, bladder, abdominal wall) are also common. It has been 
estimated that a quarter of patients with CD will have an intra-abdominal abscess sometime during the course of 
the disease [13]. Stricturing of segments of the gut involved with CD are also common causes of obstruction, 
presenting with pain and bloating after meals. Surgical resection and stricturoplasty are operations for intractable 
symptoms or complete obstruction. However, it may be difficult to differentiate between an inflammatory 
narrowing and one with irreversible fibrosis. 
Aside from gut symptoms, there are numerous complications of CD that can be debilitating. Weight loss is 
usually due to poor oral caloric intake and not to malabsorption of macronutrients, although extensive small 
Page 6 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
intestinal involvement and enteric fistulas can lead to malabsorption of both macro- and micronutrients. Malaise, 
lack of energy, and low grade fever are common problems in patients with active inflammation. Anemia can be 
due to blood loss, folate or B12 deficiency, or inflammatory block of erythropoiesis. Other problems in patients 
with long-term CD include cholesterol gallstones in patients with ileal resections and oxalate renal stones in those 
with fat malabsorption (enteric hyperoxaluria); arthritis, arthralgias, osteopenia, and osteoporosis; the skin lesions 
pyoderma gangrenosa and erythema nodosum; eye involvement with episcleritis, scleritis, and uveitis; and rarely, 
heart and lung inflammation. 
"What is past, is prologue" applies to prognosis in patients with CD. In the first year after initial diagnosis, the 
cumulative rate of relapse of active disease is —50%. Active disease in one year predicts a high likelihood of 
active disease in the next year. However, among those with a diagnosis of CD whose disease has been 
quiescent for a year, 80% will remain in a quiescent state for the next year; 22% will remain quiescent for the 
subsequent four years; 25% will have recurrent and persistent symptoms; and 53% will fluctuate between active 
CD and quiescent disease [14]. Serologic markers (antibodies to microbial and carbohydrate antigens) are 
predictive of more complicated CD and more rapidly progressive disease. If polymorphisms are present in the 
NOD2/CARD15 gene, the likelihood of intestinal stricture formation is higher [15-18]. 
2.1.5. Diagnosis and differential diagnosis. 
The diagnosis of CD may be difficult at the onset of symptoms, 
but once a finding of intestinal mucosal inflammation is confirmed by imaging or histology, the differential 
diagnosis narrows to other forms of inflammatory bowel disease (especially ulcerative colitis), NSAID 
medications, ischemic bowel disease, connective tissue diseases, diffuse malignant disorders (lymphoma, 
carcinoma), diverticular disease, and infections of the gut, particularly in patients with immune deficiency, either 
congenital or acquired. The gold standard for the diagnosis of CD is consistent findings in the clinical 
presentation, physical examination, radiologic and ultrasound imaging, endoscopic appearance, and histology of 
mucosal biopsy or surgical specimens. No single test, sign, or symptoms is diagnostic of CD. When the known 
natural history of CD is played out over many years in an individual patient, one can be more confident that the 
diagnosis of CD is secure. 
In a patient with a consistent history, physical examination, and laboratory studies, the diagnosis is usually 
confirmed by imaging the gut indirectly (barium contrast x-rays, CT enterography, sono-contrast ultrasound, MR 
enterography, radionuclide imaging) or directly (endoscopic visualization). The accuracy of indirect imaging in 
making the diagnosis of CD has improved markedly with the advent of more sensitive methods [19]. When 
compared to a consensus diagnosis based on clinical and all available imaging methods, CT enterography had a 
sensitivity of 82%, a specificity of 89%, and accuracy of 85% [20]. MR enterography had a diagnostic accuracy of 
91%, compared to a diagnosis based on ileoscopy/colonoscopy as the gold standard [21]. In children with 
suspected CD, leukocyte scintigraphy with 99Tc had an accuracy of 84% compared to intraoperative findings [22]. 
PET/CT may have similar diagnostic capabilities. 
Histological examination of mucosal biopsy specimens and surgically-resected segments of intestine play an 
important role in defining the presence of inflammation and in differentiating CD from other causes of 
inflammation. No one histologic feature, however, is sensitive and specific for CD. Findings of focal inflammation 
of crypts, intense focal inflammation in the lamina propria, and aphthae and ulcers adjacent to normal mucosa are 
typical of CD. The presence of granulomas in mucosal biopsy specimens is highly characteristic of CD, but not 
specific or sensitive as a diagnostic test. CD granulomas are composed of epithelioid histiocytes and 
inflammatory cells, usually scattered in the lamina propria. Later histologic findings typical of CD include 
coalescence of aphthae into larger, serpiginious ulcers that can lead to a cobblestone appearance of the mucosa. 
Transmural inflammation, while typical of CD, can be focal in distribution. Larger ulcers, sinus tracts, and 
strictures are features of CD of longer duration. Sinus tracts end blindly, while fistulas enter adjacent organs 
(bowel, bladder, vagina, skin). Fibrosis can be seen as irregular thickening of the bowel wall and may contribute 
to strictures. 
Almost all patients with CD come to endoscopic evaluation, including biopsies of both abnormal and normal-
appearing mucosa. Typical endoscopic features of CD include mucosal edema, aphthous ulcers, cobblestone 
appearance to mucosa, luminal narrowing, lesions within normal-appearing mucosa, discontinuous involvement, 
abnormal mucosa in the terminal ileum. Many of these features differ from those in typical ulcerative colitis, but 
there is a category of IBD termed "indeterminate colitis", in which histologic features do not permit separation of 
CD from UC, and these cases comprise about 10% of patients presenting with IBD. The discriminant features of 
CD (vs. a diagnosis of UC or indeterminant colitis) include small intestinal mucosal inflammation, mostly right-
sided colon inflammation, rectal sparing, fistulas, perineal complications, and granulomas on histology. In cases 
where the diagnosis is not clear, the passage of time often allows the diagnosis of CD to become more secure 
Page 7 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
when there is accumulation of additional findings typical of CD. In addition, separation of CD from UC may be 
easier when histologic features can be evaluated in a resection specimen, where transmural inflammation and 
fistulas are more evident than on small biopsy samples. 
FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
At the onset of symptoms, when there may be diagnostic uncertainty about the precise diagnosis, examination of 
a panel of immunologic markers (pANCA, ASCA, anti-OmpC, anti-CBir1) can provide additional evidence for or 
against the diagnosis of CD. When there is a high prevalence of CD in the study population, the Positive 
Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) for a diagnostic algorithm incorporating these 
markers is 96% and 93% for CD, respectively; these results fall to 74% and 73% in a low-prevalence situation [1]. 
2.1.6. Assessment of severity of disease. For research purposes, particularly when comparative drug studies 
attempt to measure and compare treatment responses, several composite scoring systems have been devised, 
combining symptom assessment with objective parameters of disease activity (findings on examination and 
laboratory results). Although these scoring systems have their flaws (for example, some degree of interobserver 
variation and symptoms that reflect obstruction rather than intestinal inflammation), they are widely used. The 
most common systems, ones that will be used in this protocol, is the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and 
the Harvey-Bradshaw Index [Vermeire S, et al. Correlation between the Crohn's disease activity and Harvey-
Bradshaw indices in assessing Crohn's disease activity. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 357-363], or, for 
pediatric patients, the Pediatric CD Activity Index (PCDAI), Appendix A); on-line calculators are available for 
computation (e.g., http://www.ibdjohn.com/cdai/ and http://gastro.cchmc.org/calculators/pcdai/,  respectively). 
Measurements of laboratory parameters reflecting intestinal inflammation have been used to assess CD activity, 
but in general these measures lack sensitivity and specificity.  These parameters include Erythrocyte 
Sedimentation Rate (ESR), C-reactive Protein (CRP) and orosomucoid which in turn reflect serum levels of pro-
inflammatory cytokines; fecal calprotectin and lactoferrin; and quantification of radiolabeled leukocytes [23,24]. 
Histologic evaluation of mucosal biopsy specimens, along with studies of immune activation in these specimens, 
can be accurate if biopsies are well-targeted and a standardized approach to processing and evaluation is 
followed. 
Because CD is a disorder that causes considerably more morbidity than it does mortality, measures of health-
related quality of life instruments have been included in treatment protocols. The instruments in common use for 
adult patients are the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) and the Short Inflammatory Bowel 
Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ, Appendix B), which incorporate elements of social, systemic and emotional 
symptoms, as well as bowel related symptoms into an activity index. The IBDQ and SIBDQ correlate well with the 
CDAI in assessing disease activity and are accurate in quantifying the effect of symptoms on perceived quality of 
life. [25,26]. For pediatric patients, the comparable instruments are the Pediatric CDAI and the Impact-Ill QOL 
instrument [27-29]. Several endoscopic scoring systems for the extent of CD lesions have been developed; the 
system to be used in this protocol is the Simple Endoscopic Score for CD (SES-CD, Appendix C) [30]. 
2.1.7. Treatment. As there is no current curative therapy, the goals of treatment are to treat active CD to a 
state of symptomatic quiescence, and to maintain these symptomatic remissions, while avoiding harm from 
treatment. Maintaining optimal nutritional status and, in children, achieving normal growth and development are 
important additional goals. Methods of treatment fall into five general categories: standard medical therapy, 
biologic response modifier therapy, surgical approaches, nutritional approaches, and novel therapies [1,31,32]. 
Standard medical therapy includes aminosalicylates, antibiotics, glucocorticoids, thiopurines, 
methotrexate, and other immune modulators, as reviewed in [1] and [31]. Briefly, sulfasalazine is useful for 
treating patients with mild to moderate colonic CD. Antibiotics (metronidazole, ciprofloxacin, clarithromycin, 
rifaximin) have been used for treating perineal CD, fistulas, active colonic CD, and as post-surgical 
prophylaxis, but randomized trials have not shown these drugs to offer long term remissions, and biologic 
response modifiers have largely supplanted antibiotics for these indications. Systemic glucocorticoids are 
very effective in achieving short- term remissions, but have an adverse toxicity profile, especially when used 
in higher doses, for prolonged periods of time, and with biologic response modifiers. Oral topical 
glucocorticoids (budesonide, beclomethasone dipropionate) have similar short-term effects as systemic 
glucocorticoids for milder disease, but neither systemic nor topical glucocorticoids are suitable for long-term 
maintenance therapy. The thiopurine antimetabolites azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine have been 
extensively used for treatment of active CD in whom glucocorticoids fail, or in those who cannot be tapered 
off glucocorticoids without a flare, or in those who require glucocorticoid-sparing long-term therapy to 
prevent flares. Methotrexate is used as an alternative to thiopurine drugs in patients who are intolerant or 
Page 8 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
unresponsive; monthly pulsed doses of cyclophosphamide are also used for this indication [33,34]. Both 
thiopurines and methotrexate are used as glucocorticoid-sparing agents in long-term use. Calcineurin 
inhibitors and mycophenolic acid-related drugs may have a role in treating glucocorticoid-resistant CD. 
Biologic response modifier therapies fall into three general classes—anti-TNFct, anti-a4-integrin, and 
other antibodies in early clinical trials. Treatment with the anti-TNFcc antibodies infliximab, adalimumab, and 
certolizumab pegol are effective for treating moderate to severe CD, with 60% initial responses and 
maintenance of responses for 6 - 12 months in 40%. Enteracept is not effective. Anti-TNF agents are 
reasonably well tolerated but carry risks of infusion reactions; antibody formation; infections caused by 
organisms from pyogenic foci, M. tuberculosis, and herpesviruses; and development of lymphomas. Fatal 
infections have been seen [35,36]. Experts in this area have the impression that aggressive treatment that 
includes anti-TNF therapy early in the course of CD can lead to mucosal healing without resorting to 
prolonged prednisone exposure. The most recent randomized trial examining optimal medical therapy for 
treatment of young adults with moderate to severe CD found that an infliximab/azathioprine regimen 
resulted in -50% of patients being in glucocorticoid-free remission at one year [37]. Anti-a4-integrin therapy 
with natalizumab, designed to inhibit leukocyte migration into inflamed gut tissues, showed evidence of 
efficacy in treatment and maintenance of patients with moderate to severe CD. Development of JC-virus-
related progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in seropositive patients and rare cases of hepatic 
necrosis suggest that safety issues may limit this approach to long-term care in patients who are 
susceptible to these complications. Other antibody-based therapies in clinical trials include anti-IL12, anti-
1L6, and anti-CD3. 
Surgical approaches are indicated for patients with abscesses, medically-intractable fistulas, fibrotic 
intestinal strictures leading to obstruction, toxic megacolon, cancer, and refractoriness to medical therapy, 
particularly when prolonged glucocorticoid exposure and toxicity are present. Several series have noted 
that 25-45% of patients require surgery within 3 years of diagnosis; 25 - 38% of resected patients require a 
second operation within 5 years; and -33% of these undergo a third surgery [38]. Recurrent CD almost 
always occurs proximal to the anastomosis. After 20 years have passed from disease onset, about 75% of 
patients with CD will have had a surgical procedure [39]. Surgeons strive to preserve intestine to avoid 
malnutrition and requirement for TPN support, in the case of short bowel syndrome. 
Nutritional approaches have proven disappointing as primary treatment modalities, but in patients with 
protein calorie malnutrition and specific micronutrient deficiencies (e.g., fat soluble vitamins, B12, folate, 
calcium), supplements are critical to good health. Some patients with severe CD and many patients with 
short bowel syndrome require TPN to sustain life. 
Novel therapies have been legion in a disease without a definitive cure. Current investigational agents 
include porcine whipworm (induction of T regulatory cells), GM-CSF (correcting defective innate immune 
responses), mesenchymal stem cells, thalidomide or lenalidomide, probiotic approaches, and approaches 
aimed at unique therapeutic targets (cytokines, adhesion molecules, T regulatory cells, for example) 
[32,40]. 
2.1.8. Econometric considerations in CD. While the mortality rate in patients with CD is higher than in 
controls in population-based studies, the fact is that this disease, with its usual onset in the teen and young adult 
years, permits substantial longevity, albeit with a waxing and waning of chronic illness in the majority of patients. 
Several econometric studies have been carried out before the era of biologic response modifier therapy, that is, 
patients were treated with standard medical therapies and surgery for complications. In these studies, surgical 
and hospitalization costs comprise the most expenditures. No published CD population-based data has been 
published in the current era of expensive biologic response modifier therapy, but the hypothesis is that the cost of 
ongoing maintenance therapy would be partially offset by avoidance of hospitalization and surgery [41]. Yearly 
costs of maintenance therapy plus the cost of caring for flares, multiplied by a nearly normal lifespan for the 
average CD patient, amounts to a considerable cumulative cost. 
2.1.9. Morbidity and mortality. 
While there is variation from patient to patient in the natural history of CD, 
morbidity is highest in patients with persistent, unresponsive disease; recurrent disease after surgical or medical 
therapies; and major fistulizing or stenotic complications. Over time, approximately 10% of patients with CD are 
disabled by their disease and its many complications [33,42-50]. Although CD is usually either a chronic, 
unremitting illness or one that is characterized by remission/relapse cycles of activity, the actuarial mortality risk is 
Page 9 of 69 
FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
only 40% higher than in controls: 66.9 vs. 49.7 deaths per 10,000 person years [51]. Excess deaths are related to 
the disease itself, surgical complications, and cancer [35,52-58]. When CD involves the colon, the risk of colon 
cancer is the same as in patient with long-standing ulcerative colitis. There are also increased risks of small 
intestinal adenocarcinoma, anal canal squamous cell carcinoma, and possibly lymphomas. Paradoxically, the 
advent of more effective biologic therapies to control signs and symptoms of CD has led to fatal infections related 
to immune suppression [35,36]. 
2.2  Clinical data to date on hematopoietic cell transplantation for autoimmune 
diseases, aplastic anemia, and Crohn's Disease. 
Data from numerous centers show that both autologous and allogeneic HCT alter the natural history of 
autoimmune diseases and aplastic anemia. Data from Northwestern University show that a cyclophosphamide-
based conditioning regimen followed by autologous HCT results in clinically-meaningful remissions of CD, but 
with evidence that over five years of follow-up, the frequency of recurrent CD requiring additional treatment 
increases with time [59]. Data from two centers support the hypothesis that allogeneic HCT can result in 
sustained remissions of CD [60,61] 
2.2.1. Results of autoloqous HCT as treatment for autoimmune diseases. High-dose immunosuppressive 
therapy (HDIT) followed by autologous HCT for autoimmune diseases (AID) [62-73] has been well-tolerated; 
significant responses have been observed with refractory severe autoimmune diseases [62-71,73,74]. Although 
some patients have had durable responses, in others a high-incidence of relapse has been noted, e.g., 
rheumatoid arthritis [59,75,76]. 
2.2.2. 
Results of autoloqous HCT as treatment for CD. HDIT followed by autologous HCT for CD has yielded 
clinically meaningful improvement in the years following transplant [59,77] [Hawkey CJ. Dig Dis 2012; 30 (suppl) 
3): 139-139]. The series with the longest follow-up enrolled 24 patients (average age 27) who had failed medical 
and surgical therapies. A conditioning regimen of cyclophosphamide 200 mg/kg and antithymocyte globulin was 
used. Bacteremias and fever were common until engraftment, but importantly there were no transplant-related 
deaths in this cohort. A prompt fall in CD activity was seen, as reflected by CDAI scores. However, with 5 year 
follow-up, clinical relapse free survival (free of medical therapy) is 96% at 1 year, 63% at 3 years, and 36% at 5 
years [59]. Eight patients required surgical resections for recurrent CD. Among patients requiring 
immunosuppression to sustain clinical CD remission after autologous transplant, immune tolerance was not 
established and it is expected that most autografted patients will relapse with further follow-up, given the strong 
genetic influence for CD [78,79]. A multicenter, randomized trial of autologous HCT vs. delayed autologous HCT 
for CD (the Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation International Crohn's Disease — ASTIC — trial) has reported 
interim results.[Hawkey C et al. Clinical and endoscopic improvement following hemopoietic stem cell 
transplantation vs. mobilization alone in Crohn's Disease. Gut 2013; 62 (Suppl 1): A6 (OC-014)]. As of January 
2013, data from 34 patients were available, showing that autologous transplant can substantially reduce clinical 
severity and endoscopic appearance of CD but with significant toxicity, including one transplant-related death. 
2.2.3. Results of alloqeneic HCT as treatment for aplastic anemia and autoimmune diseases. Allogeneic 
HCT from an HLA-matched donor is a standard therapy for aplastic anemia. In a report of 94 patients, overall 
survival was 88% with a median follow-up of 6 years and all mortality events occurred before 1 year after HCT 
[80]. Grade II and grade III-IV acute GVHD was observed in 21% and 8% of patients respectively. Chronic GVHD 
occurred in 32% and most responded completely to treatment. At a median of 2.6 years after allogeneic HCT, 
only 8% of patients required immunosuppressive therapy. Data from our center suggests that limiting the marrow 
cell dose was associated with a reduced incidence of chronic GVHD [81]. In a follow-up prospective study of 14 
patients with aplastic anemia, we found that when the marrow cell dose was limited to 2.0-2.5 x 108 nucleated 
cells/kg, no cases of grade III-IV acute GVHD occurred, only 1 patient has developed chronic GVHD, and there 
have been no deaths during a median follow-up of 2 years (unpublished). Outcomes have improved for 
allogeneic HCT of aplastic anemia and similar or better outcomes may be possible after allogeneic HCT in 
patients with CD since patients will not be pancytopenic before HCT, although they may be immune suppressed. 
There have been numerous publications showing that allogeneic HCT may induce sustained remissions 
of autoimmune diseases (AID) (reviewed in [82]). In a series of patients with blood disorders and a concomitant 
AID, freedom from relapse of the AID was 89% at 18 years after allogeneic HCT vs. 38% at 5 years after 
autologous HCT (p= 0.0002) [83]. 
2.2.4. Results of alloqeneic HCT as treatment for patients with primary immune deficiency disorders who 
have underlying autoimmune enteropathies similar in phenotype to CD. Several studies have shown 
Page 10 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
excellent outcomes with disease resolution following allogeneic HCT using both related and unrelated donors in 
patients with primary immune deficiency disorders who have underlying autoimmune enteropathies similar to 
patients with CD. Patients with IPEX (immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked) often 
have significant diarrhea to the point of TPN dependence due to significant failure to thrive. Allogeneic HCT has 
resulted in resolution of their underlying enteropathy [84-86]. In addition, several studies have shown disease 
resolution following allogeneic HCT for patients with a rare immune deficiency resulting from a mutation in the 
Interleukin-10 receptor. As a result, patient's cells are unresponsive to the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10. This 
immune deficiency is characterized by a severe, early onset, fistulating colitis for which bone marrow 
transplantation is the only therapy that offers any significant benefit [87,88]. Available medical therapy for this 
condition is limited to supportive care and if patients do not receive allogenic HCT, patients typically die of severe, 
uncontrolled bowel inflammation. 
2.2.5. Results of allogeneic HCT as treatment for CD. When patients with CD who underwent allogeneic HCT 
for leukemia were studied, those who achieved donor chimerism had resolution of signs and symptoms of CD that 
was sustained for up to 15 years following HCT. In patients with leukemia and concomitant CD, we reported in 
1998 that 4 of 5 evaluable patients had no signs of CD after allogeneic HCT with a median follow-up of 8.4 years 
[60]. These observations were later confirmed in a similar series in which 11 patients with inflammatory bowel 
disease (CD=7; ulcerative colitis=4) and leukemia underwent allogeneic HCT. Of 10 surviving patients, none 
showed IBD activity at a median of 34 months after allogeneic HCT except for 1 patient with mild persistent 
symptoms after a limited follow-up [61]. Rare autosomal recessive mutations in the genes encoding IL-10 and the 
IL-10 receptor lead to a clinical disease indistinguishable from CD; children with these mutations have been cured 
with allogeneic HCT [87,88]. These case series suggest that allogeneic HCT has substantial potential to cure CD. 
2.3  Study Regimen 
After first screening, it may take several months to obtain approval by third-party payers for transplant and find a 
suitable HLA-matched donor. Since patients being considered for this protocol will have treatment-refractory 
active CD, it is possible that intestinal ulcerations, fistulas, phlegmons, and abscesses will require treatment 
before eligibility criteria are met. Medical and possibly surgical therapy may be required, at the direction of each 
patient's referring physician.  It is anticipated that therapies such as methotrexate, monthly pulse 
cyclophosphamide, and thiopurine antimetabolites might be used to achieve short—term improvements. 
For patients who meet eligibility criteria, we propose to use a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen of 
fludarabine, cyclophosphamide , and low dose total body irradiation (FLU-CY-TBI) which has been successfully 
piloted for transplantation of marrow grafts from HLA-haploidentical donors [89]), a regimen that has resulted in 
successful outcomes despite past difficulties with engraftment and GVHD after haploidentical transplants. A 
reduced-intensity regimen was chosen over a myeloablataive regimen to decrease the risk of severe regimen-
related toxicities and thus, decrease transplant-related mortality in patients with refractory CD. To prevent acute 
and chronic GVHD, high-dose cyclophosphamide will be given on day +3 and +4, along with tacrolimus and 
Myfortic starting on day +5. To further reduce the risk of GVHD, related and unrelated donors will be required to 
be HLA-matched and the source of the graft will be marrow rather than peripheral blood. Supportive care will 
include N-acetyl cysteine infusions to restore hepatocyte and sinusoidal endothelial cell levels of reduced 
glutathione (GSH) to reduce the risk of sinusoidal liver injury [90]; prophylaxis with ursodiol, started two weeks 
before the start of conditioning therapy (to prevent cholestatic liver disease) [91,92]; and antimicrobial drugs as 
prophylaxis and pre-emptive treatment for infections caused by bacteria, fungi, herpesviruses, and Pneumocystis 
jiroveci. 
Engraftment of allogeneic marrow grafts has been successfully achieved after both standard-dose and reduced-
intensity conditioning regimens. To reduce regimen-related toxicity in patients already suffering from injury to the 
gastrointestinal tract, a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen of low-dose cyclophosphamide (50 mg/kg), 
fludarabine (150 mg/m2) and low-dose TBI (200 cGy) will be used in this study. 
Importantly, this FLU-CY-TBI regimen has been used effectively to achieve engraftment of allogeneic 
hematopoietic cell grafts from HLA-haploidentical donors [89,93,94]. In these reports of 66 patients, graft rejection 
occurred in 9 recipients [89]. All but 1 of the patients experiencing graft rejection had recovery of autologous 
hematopoiesis. If graft rejection had occurred after a myeloablative conditioning regimen, autologous recovery 
would have been expected to have been very, delayed or not to have occurred. In a more recent phase 2 study by 
BMT-CTN investigators of reduced-intensity conditioning and marrow transplantation from HLA-haploidentical 
donors followed by high-dose cyclophosphamide (n=55), only one patient experienced graft failure [95,96]. The 
barrier to engraftment is greater with marrow grafts from HLA-haploidentical donors than it would be from HLA- 
Page 11 of 69 
Printed on 9/1 8/20 19 


IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
matched donors; thus, the risk of graft rejection is expected to be less with allografts from the HLA-identical 
donors in this protocol. The protocol includes the collection of autologous cells that will be held in reserve for use 
in the event of graft rejection. 
FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
For patients conditioned with a myeloablative regimen of busulfan and cyclophosphamide and transplanted with 
cells from HLA-matched related or unrelated donors, post-transplant high-dose cyclophosphamide has been 
studied for GVHD prevention [34]. In these studies, a myeloablative conditioning regimen was used because of 
concern about the increased risk of relapse of hematological malignancies resulting from the potentially reduced 
graft-vs-leukemia effect associated with the expected reduced incidence of GVHD from post-transplant 
cyclophosphamide infusions. However, recurrent malignancy is not a concern in patients with CD and there is 
likely little benefit derived from a myeloablative conditioning regimen, which increases the risk of severe regimen-
related toxicity. Therefore, there is rationale for using reduced intensity conditioning in high-risk patients with CD. 
Multiple studies have shown excellent outcomes following reduced-intensity conditioning followed by HLA-
matched related or unrelated grafts for patients with nonmalignant diseases [97]. 
The major risk associated with allogeneic HCT is acute and chronic GVHD. High-dose cyclophosphamide at day 
+3 and +4 in combination with tacrolimus and MMF has been effective for reducing the risk of GVHD after 
transplantation from HLA-haploidentical donors and was associated with low transplant-related mortality [89]. In 
this report, the cumulative incidences of grades II-IV and grades III-IV acute GVHD by day 200 were 34% and 
6%, respectively. In the recent study from BMT-CTN of haploidentical grafts following the FLU-CY-TBI regimen 
with posttransplant cyclophosphamide and tacrolimus/MMF for GVHD prevention, the incidence of grade II acute 
GVHD was 31% at day +56 and no grade III-IV acute GVHD was reported [95,96]. The incidence of chronic 
GVHD at day +180 was 11%. In the report by Luznick et al of a phase 2 study on the use of high-dose 
cyclophosphamide alone after marrow transplantation from HLA-matched related and unrelated donors, the 
incidence of grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute GVHD was 43% and 10%, respectively [34]. Patients received 
posttransplant high-dose cyclophosphamide without tacrolimus or MMF for prevention of GVHD. Since patients 
with nonmalignant disorders such as CD do not benefit from GVHD, we propose to give patients tacrolimus and 
MMF in addition to the high-dose cyclophosphamide to reduce the incidence of GVHD. It is expected that the 
increased posttransplant immunosuppression following the reduced — intensity FLU-CY-TBI regimen would also 
result in a decreased risk of graft rejection. High-dose cyclophosphamide posttransplant in combination with 
tacrolimus and MMF has been well-tolerated after transplantation from HLA-haploidentical donors with a TRM of 
5% at 6 months and 7% at 12 months [95,96]. TRM may be less after transplantation from HLA-matched donors 
since GVHD should occur less frequently and the use of high-dose corticosteroids will be less. 
In summary, the proposed reduced-intensity conditioning regimen for this study is expected to be safe in patients 
with CD and to be sufficiently immunosuppressive to prevent graft rejection after transplantation of marrow grafts 
from HLA-matched donors. Post-transplant cyclophosphamide in combination with tacrolimus and intravenous 
MMF or oral enteric coated mycophenolic acid (Myfortic) is expected to reduce substantially the risk of GVHD and 
to improve overall outcomes after transplant. Myfortic will be preferentially used instead of MMF when oral 
medications are tolerated because it is associated with significantly fewer gastrointestinal adverse effects than 
MMF. 
2.4  Rationale for the proposed plan of treatment 
Conventional immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory therapy may not be adequate for achieving and 
maintaining remission in patients with severe CD. These patients experience ongoing medical problems and 
frequent surgeries putting them at risk for short bowel syndrome. High-dose immunosuppressive therapy followed 
by autologous HCT results in effective early control of CD but most patients relapse by 5 years and, based on the 
slope of the event-free survival curve, all patients would be expected to relapse if followed long enough [59]. The 
high relapse rate after high-dose immunosuppressive therapy followed by autologous HCT might be expected 
since there is a strong genetic factor predisposing patients to CD. We have proposed to investigate treatment of 
CD with allogeneic • HCT since sustained remissions have been observed in CD patients transplanted for 
hematological malignancies [60,61]. 
2.5  Risks/Benefits 
2.5.1 Risk of death and disability as a result of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation 
The causes of death after allogeneic HCT can be broadly categorized as follows: 1) toxicity from the conditioning 
regimen that affects the liver, lungs, heart, kidneys, and gastrointestinal tract; 2) infections during times of cellular 
Page 12 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
and humoral immune deficiency; 3) acute GVHD; 4) bleeding as a result of low platelet counts; 5) complications 
related to medications; and 6) chronic GVHD. To increase safety of the procedure, a reduced-intensity 
conditioning regimen will be used to decrease severe regimen-related toxicity and related infections. There is a 
risk of graft rejection following reduced intensity conditioning regimen in patients who receive HLA matched grafts. 
Unpublished data was forwarded from Ephraim Fuchs and Carol Ann Huff on the Johns Hopkins University 
experience with a dose escalation trial for patients with hematologic malignancy based on a conditioning regimen 
of fludarabine (30 mg/m2/day x 3 days) plus 200 cGy TBI on day -1, followed by marrow or PBSC allograft from an 
HLA-matched donor and post-transplant cyclophosphamide. The groups and graft outcomes were as follows: 
Arm A — CY 50 mg/kg on day +3 only (2/4 engrafted) 
Arm B — CY 50 mg/kg on days +3 and +4 only (5 /8 engrafted) 
Arm C — CY 50 mg/kg on days +3 and +4 and MMF 15 mg/kg BID days 5-34 (21/24 engrafted) 
Arm D — CY 50 mg/kg days +3 and +4 and MMF 15 mg/kg BID with peripheral blood graft (28/30 engrafted). 
The data suggest that post-transplant high-dose cyclophosphamide does not increase the risk of graft rejection 
and that the addition of MMF to the post-transplant regimen decreases the risk of graft rejection. The conditioning 
regimen for this protocol will be more immunosuppressive than that used at Hopkins and includes Flu 150 mg/rn` 
over 5 days, 50 mg/kg of cyclophosphamide and TBI (200 cGy). Post-transplant, patients will be 
immunosuppressed with both tacrolimus BID and Myfortic TID in the Crohn's protocol whereas JHU protocol 
patients received only MMF BID in groups 3 and 4. That is, as the proposed conditioning and immune 
suppression in this protocol is substantially more immune suppressive than what the JHU group gave to patients 
in their Arm C, the increased intensity of the pre-transplant conditioning and the addition of both tacrolimus and 
Myfortic post-transplant is expected to reduce the risk of graft rejection in the proposed transplant regimen for 
Crohn's disease. To reduce the risk of a fatal outcome in the event of graft rejection and pancytopenia, 
autologous stem cells will be harvested and stored for use if such an eventuality occurs. The risk of infection will 
be reduced by use of prophylactic and pre-emptive therapies for microbes. After transplant, treatment with high-
dose cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus, and Myfortic will reduce the risk of acute GVHD. In a recent report of a 
multicenter study, transplant-related mortality was 7% at 12 months after transplantation from HLA-haploidentical 
donors, a type of transplant that poses more problems than we expect with HLA-matched donors. Long-term 
disability after allogeneic HCT is related to chronic GVHD and the protracted use of glucocorticoids. High-dose 
cyclophosphamide after transplant has reduced this risk but the incidence of severe disability in long-term 
transplant survivors may be 5% or higher. 
2.5.2 Probability of a 'cure' of CD 
Based on studies of CD patients undergoing allogeneic HCT for hematological malignancies, we expect that 
patients will likely achieve a sustained remission of CD. 
2.5.3 Overview of risks and benefits 
In this phase 2 study, treatment-refractory CD would be the only indication for allogeneic HCT. We considered 
this approach 12 years ago, following the publication of our case series showing that allogeneic HCT could effect 
sustained remissions of CD [60]. At that time, we estimated the mortality from allogeneic transplantation for CD at 
—20%, which we thought was unacceptably high. Recent advances in the technique of allogeneic HCT have 
substantially reduced the mortality risk, particularly for patients with non-malignant conditions [80,81,92,95,96]. 
We consider these to be the mutually exclusive outcomes of patients with treatment-refractory CD: 
a) Continued disability and low quality of life with no effective CD treatment, including the possibility of 
requiring total parenteral nutrition to sustain life; 
b) A risk of death caused by cancer or a complication of surgery or related to an infection because of CD 
therapies that suppress the immune system; 
c) Small bowel transplantation and life-long high-dose immune suppression; 
d) The future discovery of a new medical therapy for CD that results in sustained disease remission; 
e) Spontaneous remission of CD; 
f) 
Sustained remissions of CD after successful allogeneic transplantation; 
g) 
Recurrent CD after allogeneic transplantation 
h) 
The risk of death as a complication of allogeneic transplantation. 
Outcomes (a), (b), or (c) are the most likely outcomes for patients who meet eligibility criteria for this study but 
who are not transplanted. While outcome (d), an effective medical therapy to be discovered sometime in the 
future, is a possibility, it seems unlikely that any medicinal therapy will be curative for a disorder rooted in genetic 
susceptibility to disease. Similarly, a spontaneous CD remission is an unlikely event in patients who have already 
evinced progressive and debilitating disease. These adverse outcomes have to be balanced against the 
Page 13 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
possibility of a cure or long-term remission of CD following allogeneic HCT (f), while taking into consideration the 
possibility of recurrent CD after HCT (g), or the risk of death as a result of HCT (h). 
The expected mortality following allogeneic transplantation of carefully selected patients with refractory Crohn's 
Disease enrolled on this protocol is zero. This figure is based on data from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer 
Research Center where these transplants will be carried out, specifically the outcomes of allogeneic 
transplantation in the 17 consecutive, most recent patients with aplastic anemia, in whom there were no 
deaths. Patients with aplastic anemia are an appropriate comparison cohort for those with Crohn's Disease in our 
protocol: Both are benign, non-malignant disorders; both are commonly treated with immune suppressive drugs; 
and both can be potentially cured with allogeneic transplantation. We also note that there were no deaths in the 
cohort of 24 patients with severe Crohn's Disease reported from Northwestern who underwent conditioning 
therapy with high-dose cyclophosphamide followed by autologous cell infusion [59]. For comparison, the actuarial 
mortality risk among all patients with Crohn's Disease (CD) is 40% higher than in controls: 66.9 vs. 49.7 deaths 
per 10,000 person years. Excess deaths are related to the disease itself, surgical complications, and cancer. 
When CD involves the colon, the risk of colon cancer is the same as in patient with long-standing ulcerative 
colitis. There are also increased risks of small intestinal adenocarcinoma, anal canal squamous cell carcinoma, 
and possibly lymphomas. Paradoxically, the advent of more effective biologic therapies to control signs and 
symptoms of CD has led to fatal infections related to immune suppression. Morbidity and mortality are highest in 
patients with persistent, unresponsive CD; recurrent CD after surgical or medical therapies; and major fistulizing 
or stenotic complications. Overtime, approximately 10% of patients with CD are disabled by their disease and its 
many complications--these are the patients that we intend to enroll in this protocol. We estimate that the actuarial 
mortality risk is higher among patients in this 10 percentile with refractory CD than among those with responsive 
CD. In absolute terms, patients with refractory Crohn's Disease have an estimated 0.007 deaths per patient year, 
or a 0.7% risk. 
Another source of data on the mortality of allogeneic transplantation is the recent experience from Johns Hopkins 
that demonstrated that a patient population which in the past has been very difficult to successfully allograft 
(patients with malignancy who received haploidentical donor cells) can now undergo successful allogeneic 
transplantation using improved transplant methods. In the Hopkins experience with these difficult patients, 
transplant-related mortality was 5% at 6 months and 7% at 12 months. We do not expect that the mortality risk in 
our eligible patients with Crohn's Disease will approach these figures because a) our allogeneic donors will be 
HLA-matched, not haploidentical; b) our patients will not have been pre-treated with chemotherapy for cancer; 
and c) our patients will not have a need to minimize post-transplant immune suppression to promote graft-vs-
leukemia effects. In our proposed protocol, specific techniques will be employed to lower the risk of fatal 
complications, namely exclusion of patients with medical co-morbidities; optimal GVHD prophylaxis (we do not 
have to be concerned about the necessity of a graft-vs.-leukemia effect, as we would in a patient with 
malignancy); optimal infection prophylaxis; and the storage of autologous hematopoietic cells before the start of 
conditioning therapy, to be reinfused in the event of graft-rejection after transplant. 
The ethical equipoise in our proposed protocol is that of a life of continued misery and disability from CD, in 
addition to an increased mortality risk related to CD and its complications, balanced against an expected mortality 
risk of zero following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation and a potential cure of CD. Published experience 
from our group and from investigators in Germany strongly suggest that allogeneic transplantation can cure 
patients with Crohn's Disease, when patients came to transplant with both a hematologic malignancy and CD. We 
do not use the word "cure" lightly here, but with abundant evidence pointing to underlying genetic polymorphisms 
as the root cause of Crohn's Disease, the replacement of a patient's dysfunctional immunogenetics with a normal 
immune system leads to the logical expectation of cure. 
3.0  STUDY OBJECTIVES 
3.1  Hypothesis 
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) can achieve complete, sustained remissions in patients with 
refractory CD, and can be done safely. 
3.2  Primary Objectives 
The primary objective is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of allogeneic HCT as treatment for refractory CD. 
Page 14 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00  
I R B Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
3.3  Secondary Objectives 
To evaluate treatment effect on CD activity and severity. 
To evaluate safety of allogeneic HCT as determined by regimen-related toxicities, infectious complications, acute 
and chronic GVHD, treatment-related mortality, overall total mortality, and time to engraftment. 
To evaluate the effect of allogeneic HCT on quality of life (Q0L) in patients with severe refractory CD. 
4.0  STUDY DESIGN 
4.1  Description of Study 
This study is a prospective, open-label, single-arm Phase II clinical trial evaluating allogeneic HCT for the 
treatment of refractory CD. Eligible subjects will have active CD that has responded poorly to standard therapy 
and for whom an eligible donor has been identified; a description of each patient's CD history will be recorded 
(Appendix D). Eligible donors will be an HLA genotypically identical sibling or an unrelated donor who is HLA-
matched by standard molecular methods. Autologous hematopoietic cells will be collected and stored, to be used 
in the event of graft rejection after transplant. Patients will receive a reduced intensity conditioning regimen of 
cyclophosphamide, fludarabine and low-dose TBI. Marrow will be used as the graft source instead of peripheral 
blood stem cells to reduce the risk of GVHD. GVHD prophylaxis will consist of post-transplant high-dose 
cyclophosphamide followed by the combination of tacrolimus and enteric coated mycophenolic acid. 
Subjects will be extensively studied for safety and efficacy utilizing clinical assessments, laboratory testing, 
endoscopy of the gastrointestinal tract, and histologic examination of tissue samples. Tissue and blood samples 
will be collected and archived for future studies and evaluation of immune reconstitution at predefined intervals. 
Well-validated scoring systems will be used at baseline and at intervals after transplant, specifically for activity of 
CD (CDAI), quality of life (SIBDQ), and endoscopic extent of inflammatory lesions (SES-CI), shown in Appendices 
A, 6, and C, respectively. 
This study will enroll 12 subjects over a 2-year period. The active treatment period will be approximately 3-4 
months after transplant (day 0). Evaluations of CD status and safety endpoints are at 1 month, 3 months, and 12 
months then annually up to 60 months (5 years). Subjects are expected to be in study for 5 years. Total study 
duration will be 84 months (7 years) from transplant of first patient to the 5-year evaluation of the last subject who 
was transplanted. 
4.2 Endpoints 
Primary Endpoint 
The primary endpoint will be event-free survival at 1 year after transplant, defined as alive and free of active CD. 
Active CD is defined as abnormal mucosal inflammation characteristic of CD identified by endoscopy and biopsy 
of the gastrointestinal tract. Event-free survival has been selected as the primary endpoint measurement because 
it permits the evaluation of both efficacy and safety. 
Secondary Endpoints 
1. Event-Free Survival - The EFS from 2 through 5 years will be calculated from the time of treatment. An event is 
defined as for the primary endpoint. Patients alive at the time of last contact are censored. 
2. Overall Survival - Overall survival at 1 through 5 years will be calculated from the time of treatment 
assignment. Death due to any cause is the event for this endpoint. Patients alive at the time of last contact are 
censored. 
3. Treatment-related mortality - TRM is defined as death occurring at any time after start of allogeneic HCT and 
definitely or probably resulting from treatment given in the study and not associated with other unrelated causes. 
The protocol team will attribute cause of death after reviewing clinical and autopsy data in order to determine this 
endpoint. 
Page 15 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol P2551.00 
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
4. Regimen-related Toxicity - Adverse events (AEs) as defined by the modified Common Terminology Criteria for 
Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 and as described in section 13.2 and Appendix J. AEs will be tabulated for 
each patient; reporting requirements for AEs and SAEs in patient enrolled on this protocol are described in 
Appendix J. 
5. Development of Infectious Complications - The incidence of definite and probable viral, fungal and bacterial 
infections will be tabulated for each patient. 
6. Quality of Life — will be measured using the previously validated Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease 
Questionnaire for adults. 
7. Disease activity- Activity will be evaluated using a standardized tool for evaluating CD (Crohn's Disease Activity 
Index (CDAI) for adults. 
8. Incidence of Graft Rejection- Engraftment is defined as achieving >5% donor peripheral blood CD3 T cell 
chimerism by Day 84 after HCT. Primary graft failure is defined as a donor peripheral blood CD3 T cell chimerism 
peak of <5% by Day 84 post-HCT. Secondary Graft Failure is defined as documented engraftment followed by 
loss of the graft with donor peripheral blood CD3 T cell chimerism <5% as demonstrated by a chimerism assay. 
9. Incidence and Severity of Graft versus Host Disease - The grading of acute and chronic GVHD will follow 
previously published guidelines but will also include capture of symptoms and characterization of alternative 
causes (Appendices F and G). The highest level of organ abnormalities, the etiologies contributing to the 
abnormalities and biopsy results pertaining to GVHD will be identified. Since both GVHD and CD involve the 
gastrointestinal tract, all diagnostic biopsies of these organs will be reviewed by pathologists experienced in the 
diagnosis of GVHD and IBD, respectively. 
10. Incidence of Disease-Modifying Drugs for CD Initiated Post Transplant. Subjects are not expected to receive 
additional disease-modifying therapy for CD in the absence of disease activity, as defined above. A decision to 
initiate disease-modifying therapy other than that specified in the protocol after allogeneic HCT will be considered 
treatment failure and thus, fulfill a secondary endpoint. In general, this would include the administration of any 
therapy (drugs, biologics, or any other treatments) clearly given as immunomodulatory therapy for underlying CD. 
Use of immunosuppressive agents for the treatment for GVHD in the transplant arm will not be considered for this 
endpoint. 
5.0  SUBJECT SELECTION 
Potential patients will be referred to the study by gastroenterologists or be self-referred. Potential patients will 
have access to information regarding the clinical trial and can provide information to determine if they are eligible 
for the study. No further follow-up of these patients will be undertaken if they are ineligible. If patients are 
potentially eligible, then this information will be forwarded to the study team and follow-up will be done by the 
study coordinator. The study team may also be contacted directly by the patient or the patient's physician by 
telephone or by email. 
If the patient is potentially eligible for study, the study team will request medical records that will be reviewed by 
the study coordinator and P.I. If, after this assessment, the patient is still potentially eligible for this protocol, the 
patient will be invited to Seattle for further evaluation at a First Phase Screening Visit (see section 11.1). An 
informed consent document for the detailed screening by. a study investigator will be completed before the 
evaluation in Seattle. Patients will be counseled regarding the experimental nature of allogeneic HCT for CD. 
After the screening, an eligibility checklist (Appendix E) will be completed and forwarded to the Eligibility Review 
Group, composed of one gastroenterology investigator, one transplant investigator, and the PI (see list of 
investigators, page 1 of this protocol). This group must approve all transplants for this protocol. 
Following approval by the Eligibility Review Group, medical insurance companies or third-party payers will then be 
contacted to request coverage for the donor search and the procedure of allogeneic hematopoietic cell 
transplantation, as described in this protocol. After confirmation of coverage for these procedures is obtained, 
HLA typing and a donor search will be started. Patients with HLA-matched related or unrelated donors will return 
to Seattle for a Second Phase Screening Visit (see Section 11.2) consisting of baseline studies including 
additional disease staging by gastroenterologists on the study team. The informed consent document for 
Page 16 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
autologous peripheral blood stem cell collection and hematopoietic cell transplantation will be signed after 
baseline studies are completed and the patient is counseled in depth about the protocol by a transplant attending 
physician (Pre-transplant counseling, testing, and informed consent, section 11.3). 
FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
5.1  Inclusion Criteria 
CD is an inflammatory, often treatment-refractory disease that is evaluable using imaging and endoscopic means. 
Eligible patients would be those who continued to have significant symptoms or disruption of quality of life (as 
defined by CDAI and SIBDQ, respectively) caused by intestinal inflammation despite standard immune 
suppressive therapies (including anti-TNFa) and surgical approaches to strictures and fistulae, or who were facing 
small intestinal resection that would result in short bowel syndrome. 
1. A diagnosis of CD established by referring physician(s) and confirmed by our review of the clinical 
presentation, clinical course, endoscopic and imaging findings, and histology of mucosal tissue 
specimens. 
2. An adverse prognosis, documented by persistent signs and symptoms of CD that have failed to 
respond satisfactorily to medical and surgical therapies in the past, including but not limited to 
systemic immune suppressive drugs and biopharmaceuticals, as outlined above in section 2.1.6. To 
be considered as refractory to medical and surgical therapy, there must be clinical, endoscopic, and 
histologic .evidence of active inflammatory Crohn's Disease that has either persisted or recurred 
despite  exhaustive  treatment  with  available  pharmaceutical  and  surgical 
therapies. Exhaustive treatment will be defined as prior exposure to the following, without durable 
improvement: 
a) Systemic glucocorticoids at or above a prednisone equivalent of 40 mg/day for at least 2 weeks, or 
until drug toxicity or intolerance develops. 
b) Methotrexate (25 mg per week for at least 3 months, or until drug toxicity or intolerance develops) 
and/or a thiopurine antimetabolite (either 2.5 mg/kg azathioprine or 1.5 mg/kg 6-mercaptopurine in 
patients homozygous wild-type for the TPMT gene, or either 1.5 mg/kg azathioprine or 1 mg/kg 6-
mercaptopurine in patients heterozygous for TPMT, or doses of these drugs capable of producing a 
6-thioguanine nucleotide level of 230-400 without producing a 6-methylmercaptopurine nucleotide 
level above 5700 for at least 3 months, or until drug allergy, intolerance or toxicity develops). If a 
patient is homozygous mutant for the TPMT gene, thiopurines would be contraindicated and their use 
would not be a requirement for enrollment in this protocol. 
c) Use of at least two anti-TNF-alpha therapies, that is, infliximab (at least 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks for 
at least 3 months, or until drug allergy, toxicity or intolerance or anti-infliximab antibodies develop) 
and/or adalimumab (at least 40 mg SQ every 2 weeks for at least 3 months, or until drug allergy, 
toxicity or intolerance develops) and/or certolizumab pegol (at least 400 mg SQ every 4 weeks for at 
least 3 months, or until drug allergy, toxicity or intolerance develops). 
d) Due to the serious risk of Progressive Multifocal Leukokencephalopathy (PML) and the reluctance 
of some patients to agree to therapy that carries such risk, prior exposure to natalizumab is not 
required to meet the definition of exhaustive pharmaceutical treatment. Neither will use of 
natalizumab among patients who are JC virus antibody seronegative be an exclusionary criterion. 
e) Exhaustive surgical treatment will be defined as indicated operations for complications of Crohn's 
Disease up to the point where the risks of surgery (for example, mortality or post-operative morbidity 
such as short bowel syndrome or extensive adhesions with high risk for inadvertent enterotomy) are 
deemed by patients and their physicians to be unacceptably high. Indicated operations for 
complications of Crohn's Disease include, but are not limited to, surgical resection of involved 
intestine, stricturoplasty, drainage, curettage, or adhesiolysis of tissues affected by Crohn's disease). 
f) Exposure of patients to investigational drug therapies for Crohn's Disease, that is, to drugs that are 
not FDA approved for this indication, will not be a criterion for either inclusion or exclusion. 
The intent of these requirements is to identify patients with Crohn's Disease whose signs, symptoms, 
Page 17 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
and intestinal inflammation have not been controlled by the best available therapies and whose future 
is highly likely to be one characterized by disability and misery. 
3.  Endoscopic and histologic evidence of active intestinal inflammation consistent with CD. In the event 
that the involved mucosa cannot be readily reached by endoscopic biopsy, an imaging test that 
shows typical changes of CD in the intestinal tract will suffice as evidence of active intestinal 
inflammation. The presence of intestinal stomas does not exclude the patient from study. 
4.  Severe CD as defined by one of the following: 
a. CDAI 250 
b. 
Need for total parenteral nutrition to maintain weight 
c. Recurrent intestinal inflammation caused by CD following surgical resection 
5. Identification of an HLA-matched hematopoietic cell donor without a history of a disorder that can be 
transmitted by hematopoietic cells, including but not limited to inflammatory bowel disease, and 
without NOD2 mutations in the case of an HLA matched sibling. 
6. Age from 18 through 60 years. 
5.2  Exclusion Criteria 
1. A current complication of CD that would jeopardize survival after hematopoietic cell transplantation, 
including but not limited to the following: 
a. 
Abscess, phlegmon, necrotizing skin lesion, or inflammatory fistula 
b. 
Intestinal fibrotic stricture and intestinal obstruction 
c. Uncontrolled mucosal, organ, or systemic infection with a bacterial, viral, fungal, or 
parasitic organism 
d. 
Sclerosing cholangitis 
2. History of Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy 
3. Organ dysfunction or disease that would jeopardize survival after hematopoietic cell transplantation, 
including but not limited to the following: 
a. Renal insufficiency as defined by an estimated GFR < 60 mUminute 
b.  Cardiac dysfunction as defined by symptomatic coronary artery disease, congestive heart 
failure, valvular heart disease, cardiomyopathy, uncontrolled arrhythmia(s), or left 
ventricular ejection fraction <50% 
c. Pulmonary dysfunction that poses a risk of mortality after transplant, as defined in 
Appendix F as Pulmonary disease-moderate, using pre-transplant pulmonary function 
testing per the FHCRC Standard Practice Manual. 
d. Necroinflammatory or fibrotic liver disease with evidence of liver dysfunction, including 
but not limited to jaundice, hepatic encephalopathy, or portal hypertension 
e.  Marrow dysfunction that poses a risk of pen-transplant mortality, defined as an absolute 
neutrophil count or lymphocyte count below the lower limit of normal, or a platelet count 
below 50,000/mm3. 
e. Poorly controlled hypertension despite appropriate therapy, defined as a diastolic blood 
pressure greater than 90 mm Hg while on therapy. 
f.  Neurologic dysfunction that affects activities of daily living and medical care 
g. Poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, defined as persistent hyperglycemia despite therapy 
or recurrent hypoglycemia while on therapy. 
h. Extreme protein-calorie malnutrition defined by Body Mass Index <18 kg/m2  and 
unintentional weight loss (3 kg in the last month or 6 kg in the last 6 months [98,99]. 
4.Pregnancy 
5. 
Fertile men or women unwilling to use contraceptive techniques during and for 12 months following 
transplant 
6. 
History of smoking either tobacco or other herbal products in the last 3 months. 
7. 
HIV, HBV, or HCV seropositivity 
8. 
Patients whose life expectancy is severely limited by illness other than CD 
9. 
Untreated psychiatric illness, including drug/alcohol abuse, that would compromise compliance 
10. Inability to give voluntary informed consent or obtain a parent or guardian's informed consent 
11. Demonstrated lack of compliance with prior medical care 
Page 18 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


IR B Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
12. History of a malignancy, excluding adequately treated squamous cell skin cancer, basel cell 
carcinoma, and carcinoma in situ 
13. Hematopoietic Cell Transplant-Co-morbidity Index greater than 2 (Appendix F) 
6.0  DONOR SELECTION 
6.1  Inclusions 
1. Donors will be an HLA-identical sibling or HLA-matched unrelated donor. 
Unrelated donors are required to be matched by high resolution allele level typing for HLA-A, B, C and 
DRB1 and intermediate resolution SSOP, identifying alleles in groups of related families historically 
defined as antigens for DQB1. An unrelated donor is considered matched if patient and donor share HLA-
A, B, C alleles with identical sequences at exons 2 and 3, DRB1 alleles with identical sequences at exon 
2, and DQB1 results that include the same allele groups. 
2. Donors will have the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document for 
bone marrow harvest. 
6.2 Exclusions 
1. 
Identical twin 
2. 
Pregnant or lactating females 
3. 
HIV seropositivity or presence of HBV DNA or HCV RNA in the serum 
4. 
Current serious systemic illness including uncontrolled infections 
5. Malignancy within 10 years prior to donation of marrow, excluding adequately treated squamous cell 
skin cancer and basal cell carcinoma. Treatment must have been completed (with the exception of 
hormonal therapy for breast cancer) with cure/remission status verified for at least 10 years at time of 
marrow harvest. 
6. History of or symptoms consistent with inflammatory bowel disease or a serious autoimmune 
disorder. 
7. Homozygous NOD2 mutation 
8. History of a serious disease or disorder that could be adoptively transferred by infusion of donor 
hematopoietic cells. 
9. 
Failure to meet institutional criteria for donation as described in the Standard Practice Guidelines 
7.0  INFORMED CONSENT OF SUBJECT AND DONOR 
Subjects will be referred here for consideration of an allogeneic marrow transplant. Both subject and donor will be 
completely evaluated. The protocol will be discussed thoroughly with subject, donor and family, and all known 
risks to the subject and donor will be described. The procedure and alternative forms of therapy will be presented 
as objectively as possible and the risks and hazards of the procedure explained to the subject or, in the case of 
minors, to the subject's responsible family members. Consent will be obtained using forms approved by the 
Institutional Review Board of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. A summary of the conference will be 
dictated for the medical record detailing what was covered. 
8.0  SUBJECT REGISTRATION 
Eligible subjects will be identified and registered into the system by the Clinical Coordinators Office (CCO) (Intake 
Office) and assigned a UPN (Unique Patient Number). The CCO will register the subject on to the protocol 
through the Data Management Office. 
FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
Page 19 of 69 
Printed on 9/1 8/20 I 9 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
9.0  SUBJECT WITHDRAWAL 
9.1  Description of Subject Completion 
Subjects are considered to have completed the study if they have undergone transplantation and have completed 
5 years of follow-up. 
9.2  Withdrawal of Individual Subjects 
The investigator(s) will make every reasonable effort to keep each subject in the study through the year-5 visit. If 
a subject withdraws from the study, the reason for withdrawal must be documented in the study chart. Possible 
reasons for withdrawal include: 
• 
Patient's preference 
• 
Adverse experiences 
• 
Protocol deviation, including non-compliance 
• 
Subject lost to follow-up 
• 
Discretion of investigator(s) 
Subjects shall be withdrawn from the study immediately if any of the following occur: 
• 
The subject or subject's guardian requests withdrawal from the study. 
• 
The investigator believes it is in the best interest of the subject. 
• 
There is clinically significant deterioration of the subject's medical status that warrants termination from 
the study. 
• 
There are clinically significant abnormal laboratory results that warrant termination from the study. 
9.3  Withdrawal of Subject from Study Following Adverse Events 
The site investigator must apply his/her clinical judgment to determine if an adverse event (AE) is of sufficient 
severity to require that the subject should immediately be withdrawn from the study. If the withdrawal from the 
study is due to an AE, the subject should be given appropriate care under medical supervision until the symptoms 
of the AE resolve or his/her condition becomes stable. Subsequent review by the DSMB, the FHCRC IRB or the 
Steering Committee may also result in the suspension of further trial treatments at a site. The DSMB retains the 
authority to suspend additional enrollment and treatments for the entire study as applicable. 
A subject may also voluntarily withdraw from treatment. If voluntary withdrawal is requested, or if withdrawal 
occurs for any reason, the subject should be asked to continue (at least limited) scheduled evaluations, complete 
an end-of-study evaluation, and be given appropriate care under medical supervision until the symptoms of any 
AE resolve or the subject's condition becomes stable. 
9.4  Procedures for Handling Withdrawals 
In case of early withdrawal, subjects should be asked to continue (at least limited) scheduled evaluations and to 
complete an end-of study evaluation which includes all scheduled exams, procedures, and laboratory tests as if it 
is the year-5 visit; and should be given appropriate care under medical supervision until the symptoms of any AE 
resolve or the subject's condition becomes stable. If the subject is unwilling or unable to complete visits, he/she 
should be asked to return for the end-of-study visit and then should be followed through telephone calls by the 
site study coordinator. 
Subjects who do not complete study therapy will continue to be followed to the extent possible and asked to 
provide the same data as subjects who did not withdraw. 
9.5  Subject Replacement 
Subjects will not be replaced once treated with allogeneic transplantion. Subjects will be encouraged to continue 
in more limited follow-up even if they drop out. 
Page 20 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
10.0 PLAN OF TREATMENT 
10.1. Collection of autologous peripheral blood stem cells 
We expect that all patients will be on some form of immune suppressive therapy at the time of their two visits to 
Seattle for eligibility screening. We do not want to deliberately cause a flare of symptoms and severity by 
discontinuing this therapy, but after consenting the patient for transplant, we will restage their Crohn's Disease 
while on therapy, then stop therapy before mobilization of autologous hematopoietic cells. This mobilization 
procedure employs G-CSF, prednisone and possibly cyclophosphamide (if there are problems with harvesting 
adequate numbers of cells); these medications are effective therapies in patients with Crohn's Disease. The 
rationale for collection of autologous hematopoietic cells is for storage and later use in the event of graft 
rejection after transplant. 
10.1.1. Mobilization Schedule 
The mobilization schedule is outlined in Table 1 below. Peripheral blood stem cells will be collected after 
treatment with G-CSF at a dose of 16 pg/kg/day. G-CSF dosing can be rounded based on subject's actual body 
weight and available G-CSF vial sizes to best approximate 16 jig/kg. CD34+ cell content in peripheral blood will 
be measured daily from Day 4 of G-CSF treatment (5 mL peripheral blood in heparin). Leukapheresis will be 
performed on a continuous flow cell separator according to institutional standards. Daily leukapheresis collection 
will continue until a minimum of 2.0 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg have been collected and cryopreserved. 
Institutional standards for supportive care will be followed during mobilization and leukapheresis. 
Table 1: Stem Cell Mobilization with G-CSF 
1  
Day 
0 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
Prednisone (1 mg/kg/day) a  
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
G-CSF (16 pg/kg/day) 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Xu  
Peripheral Blood CD34 Assay 
X 
Leukapheresis 
X 
X6- 
a For a total of 10 days. 
b Day 5 G-CSF and leukapheresis required unless 2.0 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg cryopreserved after the 
first leukapheresis. It is expected that a maximum of 4 leukaphereses will be required to achieve target 
dose of 2.0 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg cryopreserved. 
To prevent possible relapses or exacerbations of CD secondary to G-CSF, all subjects will be treated 
with prednisone 1 mg/kg/day, starting 1 day before the start of G-CSF. Prednisone will be continued for 
a total of 10 days. If there is evidence of an exacerbation or flare of CD during mobilization, the G-CSF 
will be stopped and the transplant will be delayed until the subject is reassessed for continued eligibility. 
10.1.2. Second Mobilization with Cyclophosphamide if Failure to Mobilize with G-CSF 
and Prednisone 
If after 4 collections there is a failure to reach the minimum requirement of 2 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg, leukapheresis 
collections may be stopped at the discretion of the attending physician. Two weeks later, a subsequent attempt at 
mobilization may be undertaken using cyclophosphamide and G-CSF (Table 2). For subjects requiring the repeat 
attempt at mobilization, cyclophosphamide 2.0 g/m2 IV will be administered on Day 0. Seventy-two hours later, the 
subject will begin daily G-CSF (10 jig/kg/day subcutaneously). It is recommended that leukapheresis collection 
begin when the CD34+ cell content is 20,000/mL or as soon as feasible thereafter. Daily G-CSF will continue and 
leukapheresis will be performed daily as necessary to reach the minimum number of CD34 + cells (> 2.0 x 106  
CD34./kg). If unsuccessful, other strategies for collection of stem cells will be reviewed with the Pl. 
Page 21 01 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
Table 2: Stem Cell Mobilization with Cyclophosphamide and G-CSF 
Day 
0 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
10+ 
Subsequent Days 
Cyclophosphamide 2g/m' 
X 
G-CSF (10 pg/kg/day) 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X°  
CBC and Differential 
X 
X°  
Peripheral Blood CD34 Assay 
X 
X 
Leukapheresisa  
X°  
a  It is recommended that leukapheresis continues until > 2.0 x 106  CD34 + cells/kg subject weight are 
cryopreserved (it is expected that a maximum of 4 leukaphereses will be required to collect sufficient CD34+ 
cells). 
b If required. 
10.1.3. Crohn Disease Exacerbation or Flare During Mobilization 
If there is an exacerbation or flare of CD during mobilization, G-CSF will be stopped. The subject may be treated 
with high-dose corticosteroids or other disease-modifying therapy at the discretion of the treating physician. Prior 
to continuing on protocol, the patent will undergo repeat gastrointestinal assessment for status of CD. To 
continue on protocol, the subject will have to meet the original eligibility criteria. 
10.2. Pre-conditioning medications 
10.2.1. Ursodiol 
Ursodiol (ursodeoxycholic acid) will be given orally at a dose of 12-15 mg/kg/day, in divided doses, starting 2 
weeks before the start of conditioning therapy, and continued through day 140 after transplant. The purpose of 
prophylactic ursodiol is to prevent or ameliorate the effects of cholestatic liver disease [91,92]. 
10.2.2. N-acetyl cysteine 
N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) replenishes hepatocyte mitochondrial and cytosolic glutathione stores, and because 
sinusoidal endothelial cell GSH is derived from hepatocytes, sinusoidal endothelial cell GSH is also replenished. 
Both oral and intravenous NAC are agents with few significant side effects found during clinical human trials in 
Europe and the USA. Intravenous NAC is approved for the treatment of acute liver failure caused by 
acetaminophen overdoses, for acute liver failure of other causes [100], and for a wide range of other medical 
conditions including chronic lung disease [101,102]. The rationale for its use before the start of conditioning 
therapy in this protocol is as follows: Patients with CD may come to transplantation in a malnourished state or 
following therapies that might affect hepatic GSH stores. Although the reduced-intensity conditioning regimen 
below is not notably toxic to sinusoidal endothelial cells, it may cause GSH depletion to some extent, and will be 
followed by cyclophosphamide in doses that are potentially toxic to sinusoidal endothelial cells [103]. Animal 
studies of a toxin that closely mimics cyclophosphamide's effect on sinusoidal endothelial cells show that GSH 
depletion worsens the toxicity and GSH repletion prevents it [90]. Thus, the administration of NAC at a dose of 
600 mg BID (Twinlab, Hauppauge, New York) for two weeks before the start of conditioning therapy through day 
+5 post transplant is intended to replenish hepatocyte and sinusoidal endothelial cell GSH in order to prevent 
sinusoidal injury from the toxin cyclophosphamide. 
Page 22 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
IRS Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
10.3. Hematopoietic cell transplant schedule of medications and irradiation 
Table 3. Schedule of medications and irradiation from day -6 through day +5. 
Day 
Treatment 
-6 
Fludarabine 30 mg/M2 + Cyclophosphamide 25 mg/kg + Mesna 25 mg/kg IV 
-5 
Fludarabine 30 mg/M2  + Cyclophosphamide 25 mg/kg + Mesna 25 mg/kg IV 
-4 
Fludarabine 30 mg/Mg  
-3 
Fludarabine 30 mg/M' 
-2 
Fludarabine 30 mg/M2 
-1 
j TBI 200 cGy 
0 
T cell replete marrow transplant 
+3 
Cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg + Mesna 50 mg/kg IV 
+4 
Cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg + Mesna 50 mg/kg IV 
+5 
Tacrolimus + Myfortic or Mycophenolate mofetil + G-CSF 
10.3.1. Fludarabine 
Fludarabine 30 mg/m2/day will be administered over 30-60 minutes intravenous infusion on Days —6 through —2. 
Fludarabine will be dosed according to the recipient's actual body weight, unless the actual body weight is greater 
than or equal to two times their ideal body weight, in which case the Protocol Team must be consulted for 
instruction. 
For decreased creatinine clearance (<61 mUmin) determined by the Cockcroft Formula: 
Cc, = (140 — age) x ideal body weight (IBVV) (kg) x 0.85 (for women) 
PCr x 72 
Fludarabine dosage should be reduced as follows: 
Cc, 46-60 mi./min, fludarabine = 24 mg/m2 
Cc, 31-45 mUmin, fludarabine = 22.5 mg/m2 
Cc, 21-30 mL/min, fludarabine = 19.5 mg/m2.  
C. < 20 mUmin, fludarabine = 15 mg/m2 
10.3.2. Pre-transplant Cyclophosphamide 
CV 25 mg/kg/day will be administered as a 1-2 hour intravenous infusion with a high volume fluid flush on Days — 
6 and —5. CY will be dosed according to the recipient's adjusted body weight (see 10.3.5 for formulas). Please 
follow FHCRC Standard Practice Guidelines for weight adjustment/infusion guidelines of cyclophosphamide. 
Mesna will be given in divided doses IV 30 min pre- and at 3, 6, and 8 hours after each dose of 
cyclophosphamide. Mesna dose is based on the cyclophosphamide dose being given. The total daily dose of 
mesna is equal to 100% of the total daily dose of cyclophosphamide. 
10.3.3. Total Body Irradiation 
Total body irradiation: 200 cGy will be administered in a single fraction on Day —1 from a linear accelerator at a 
rate of 6-15 cGy/min. 
Page 23 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
I R B Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
10.3.4. Marrow Transplantation 
Patients will receive T cell replete marrow on day 0. If there is a major ABO incompatibility, the red blood cells will 
be depleted from the donor marrow. Donor bone marrow will be harvested with a target yield of 4 x 108 nucleated 
cells/kg recipient IBW. A sample of the product to be infused will be sent for flow cytometry to determine the 
content of CD34+ CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ cells. 
10.3.5. Post-transplant Cyclophosphamide 
Hydration for high-dose cyclophosphamide administration may be given according to institutional standards. 
Mesna will be given in divided doses IV 30 min pre- and at 3, 6, and 8 hours after each dose of 
cyclophosphamide. Mesna dose is based on the cyclophosphamide dose being given. The total daily dose of 
mesna is equal to 100% of the total daily dose of cyclophosphamide. 
Cyclophosphamide [50 mg/kg IBW] will be given on Day 3 post-transplant (between 60 and 72 hours after marrow 
infusion) and on Day 4 post-transplant (approximately 24 hours after Day 3 cyclophosphamide). 
Cyclophosphamide will be dosed according to the recipient's adjusted body weight, (see below for formulas). 
Cyclophosphamide will be given as an IV infusion over 1-2 hours. Please follow FHCRC Standard Practice 
Guidelines for weight adjustment/infusion guidelines of cyclophosphamide. 
Ideal Body Weight (IBW) Formulas: 
Male Ideal Body Weight = 50 kg + 2.3 kg/inch over 5 feet 
Female Ideal Body Weight = 45.5 kg + 2.3 kg/inch over 5 feet 
Adjusted Body Weight Formula: 
Adjusted Body Weight = Ideal Body Weight + [(0.25) x (Actual Body Weight — Ideal Body Weight)] 
No immunosuppressive agents should be given until 24 hours after the completion of the post-transplant 
cyclophosphamide. This includes corticosteroids such as dexamethasone as anti-emetics. 
10.3.6. Tacrolimus 
Tacrolimus will be given at a dose of 1 mg IV daily or 1 mg po twice daily from day +5 until day +180. If tacrolimus 
is initiated using the IV formulation it will be changed to a PO dosing schedule once a therapeutic level is 
achieved. Serum levels of tacrolimus will be measured around day +7 and then should be checked at least weekly 
thereafter and the dose adjusted accordingly to maintain a level of 5-15 ng/mL to approximately day +180. 
Tacrolimus will be tapered starting at approximately day +180 and then discontinued on approximately day +365. 
Tacrolimus may be continued if active GVHD is present. If there is nausea and vomiting at anytime during 
tacrolimus treatment, the drug should be administered intravenously and dose adjusted to the levels described 
above. Cyclosporine (target concentration 200-400 ng/mL) may be substituted for tacrolimus if the patient is 
intolerant of tacrolimus. 
In the absence of GVHD or treatment for GVHD, tacrolimus is to be tapered 25% on approximately day +180 and 
then 25% every 2 months until discontinued at day 365. The referring physician, who will receive explicit 
instructions and guidelines for detecting and managing GVHD, may manage this tacrolimus taper. 
Blood pressure, renal function (assessed with serum creatinine, BUN), electrolytes and magnesium should be 
followed three times per week during the first month, twice weekly until day +100, then once per week until 
tacrolimus is tapered off (or according to institutional practice), unless clinical circumstances suggest the need for 
more frequent evaluations. 
Monitoring and Dose Adjustments - Whole blood "trough" levels (i.e. 11-12 hours from the prior dose) of 
tacrolimus will be evaluated weekly until day +180. Dose reductions should be made if tacrolimus toxicity (such as 
renal insufficiency) is present, or levels exceed 15 ng/ml in the absence of toxicity on more than 2 occasions. If 
toxicity or high levels are present, more frequent monitoring will be initiated as clinically indicated. Dose 
reductions for high levels with or without toxicity should be conservative, e.g. 25%, to avoid inadequate immune 
suppression. 
Drugs that may affect tacrolimus levels: dilantin, phenobarbital, rifampicin (may lower tacrolimus levels); and 
glucocorticoids, fluconazole, ketoconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, cimetidine (may increase tacrolimus 
levels). Discontinuation of fluconazole will likely lower tacrolimus levels. 
Page 24 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
10.3.7. Mycophenolic acid enteric coated (Myfortic) or Mycophenolate Mofetil 
The enteric formulation of mycophenolate sodium (Myfortic) that delivers the active moiety of mycophenolic acid 
is associated with less gastrointestinal side effects than MMF. Myfortic will be dosed by actual body weight at a 
dose of 11 mg/kg PO TID. The drug is supplied as 180 mg and 360 mg tablets. The maximum total daily dose 
should not exceed 2,160 mg. If there is nausea and vomiting at any time preventing the oral administration of 
Myfortic, MMF should be administered intravenously. If an IV formulation is required, MMF will be used at a dose 
of 15 mg/kg. The maximum daily dose should not exceed 3,000 mg. Myfortic or MMF will be discontinued after 
the last dose on Day 35, or may be continued if active GVHD is present. Myfortic doses will be rounded to the 
nearest 180 mg. 
Guidelines for Myfortic or MMF dose adjustment: If in the clinical judgment of the investigator the observed toxicity 
is related to Myfortic or MMF administration, a dose adjustment will occur. Based on previous organ transplant 
studies, dose adjustments are likely to occur because of hematopoietic or gastrointestinal adverse effects. Dose 
adjustments will not be made for hematopoietic toxicity unless severe neutropenia develops or persists after day 
21 post transplant (ANC < 7500/4). In the event of gastrointestinal toxicity that requires medical intervention 
including medication for control of persistent vomiting or diarrhea that is considered to be due to Myfortic, a 20% 
dose reduction will occur or MMF may be given IV. For severe G.I. toxicity related to Myfortic (severe refractory 
diarrhea, or overt gastrointestinal bleeding), the Myfortic or MMF may be temporarily stopped. 
10.4. Growth Factor Support 
G-CSF will be given beginning on Day 5 at a dose of 5 mcg/kg/day (rounding to the nearest vial dose is allowed), 
until the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) is >1,000/mm3 for three consecutive days. 
10.5. Transfusion Support 
Platelet and packed red cell transfusions will be given per FHCRC standard of practice. Platelet counts will be 
maintained >20,000 after transplant to prevent bleeding from the gastrointestinal tract. 
10.6. Anti-Ovulatory Treatment 
Menstruating females should be started on an anti-ovulatory agent before the initiation of the conditioning 
regimen, as outlined in the FHCRC Standard Practice Manual. 
10.7. Nutritional Support 
Patients will receive nutritional support according to FHCRC Standard Practice Guidelines including total 
parenteral nutrition through a central venous catheter if unable to maintain body weight by oral caloric intake. 
10.8. Infection Prophylaxis Guidelines 
All prophylactic antibiotics may be changed or discontinued according to clinical circumstances (such as subject 
allergy) as determined by attending physician(s). If there are discrepancies between the recommendations below 
(reflecting current recommendations) and revised Standard Practice Guidelines, the extant FHCRC Standard 
Practice Guidelines for infection prophylaxis will be followed in this protocol, 
10.8.1. Antibacterial Prophylaxis 
If not already on broad-spectrum antibiotics, once neutropenia (neutrophils < 0.5x109/L) occurs, prophylactic 
broad-spectrum oral antibiotics will be started. Levofloxacin is the standard antibiotic for prophylactic use in adults 
over 18 years of age. 
10.8.2. Antifungal Prophylaxis 
In general, the guidelines in the Standard Practice Manual will be followed, to wit: Fluconazole 400 mg PO will be 
administered daily from start of conditioning therapy until day +75 post-transplant. Begin vorlconazole if there is a 
pretransplant history of invasive aspergillosis or evidence of colonization with Aspergillus species or a 
Galactomannen test suggesting aspergillus infection. Post-transplant, if patients develop GVHD and require 
treatment with prednisone or methylprednisolone >1 mg/kg, stop fluconazole and start posaconazole 200 mg TID 
PO. If patient is unable to take oral agents, then start voriconazole 4 mg/kg intravenously BID. 
10.8.3. Antiviral Prophylaxis 
For patients who weigh ..ttO kg, valacyclovir (500 mg PO BID) or equivalent will be administered from the start of 
conditioning therapy to day 365 post-transplant for patients who are serologically positive for VZV. For patients 
Page 25 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
weighing <40 kg, the dose of valacyclovir will be 250 mg PO BID. Antiviral therapy will be given to day +100 for 
patients who are serologically negative for VZV but serologically positive for HSV. Acyclovir 250 mg/m2 q 12 hr IV 
will be substituted in subjects unable to tolerate oral medication. Acyclovir/valacyclovir doses will be adjusted 
according to renal function. 
10.8.4. Anti-Pneumocystis Prophylaxis 
For adults, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole DS tablet will be given PO BID 2 days per week or equivalent, starting 
after engraftment and continuing for 1 year after transplant. Subjects intolerant or allergic to trimethoprim-
sulfamethoxazole will be treated with dapsone, pentamidine, or atovaquone according to local institutional 
standard of practice. Patients will be treated beyond 1 year if chronic GVHD develops requiring treatment. 
10.8.5. Cytomegalovirus 
Subjects who are CMV seronegative will be administered CMV-negative screened blood products or leuko-
depleted blood products. The subjects will be monitored with a pretransplant test and then monitored weekly for 
CMV reactivation using CMV antigenemia or CMV DNA assays until day +60 after transplant. For patients who 
have CMV diagnosed before day +60, patients will continue to be monitored until 1 year after transplant. 
Subjects who are CMV seropositive or who have seropositive donors will be monitored with weekly for CMV 
reactivation using CMV antigenemia or CMV DNA assays post-HCT beginning on about day 0 and continuing 
until discharge or day +100. CMV monitoring will occur at least every other week during follow-up visits until 6 
months post-HCT. For those patients that have reactivated CMV before day 100, or for those who are taking 
prednisone for chronic GVHD after day 100, weekly CMV monitoring will continue to 1 year after transplant 
according to institutional practice. 
Subjects treated for CMV reactivation should have weekly CMV antigenemia titers for 3 weeks prior to reinitiating 
every other week monitoring. 
10.8.6. Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) 
Baseline studies (pre-transplant): 
1. 
Serology for antibodies, including antibody titers, to EBV viral capsid antigen and/or nuclear antigen 
2. EBV PCR amplification to evaluate viral load in the peripheral blood, for individual subjects, when 
baseline EBV serology is negative 
Post-transplant surveillance monitoring beginning at Day +14 post-transplant, through Day +100 post-transplant: 
1. EBV PCR, perform weekly 
2. 
EBV PCR, perform twice per week, if there is evidence of rising copy number 
Post-transplant surveillance monitoring from Day 101 to 6 months post-transplant: 
1. EBV PCR, perform every other week 
2. If the test is positive, then perform EBV PCR twice per week. 
Subjects who develop a viral load of > 1000 copies per mL plasma will receive further individualized monitoring 
and/or therapy. 
10.9. Immunizations 
At 1-year post-HCT, subjects should be initiated on a program of re-vaccination according to the FHCRC 
Standard Practice Manual. 
Treatment of infectious diseases will be conducted according to the FHCRC standard of practice and the clinical 
judgment of the treating physician(s). 
10.10. Treatment of Graft-vs-Host Disease 
First-line therapy will be 1 or 2 mg/kg of prednisone or methylprednisolone. For patients who do not respond to 
treatment, second-line therapy will include additional immunosuppressive therapy as clinically indicated. 
Management of chronic GVHD will be based on the recommendations of physicians experienced in the care of 
transplant survivors with chronic GVHD. . 
Page 26 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/20 19 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00  
IR B Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
10.11. Management of Graft Rejection 
It is expected that patients will have recovery of autologous hematopoiesis after graft rejection but may have a 
prolonged period of neutropenia. Patients will be monitored and treated appropriately to prevent opportunistic 
infections during this recovery period. Patients who experience protracted neutropenia caused by graft rejection 
will be reviewed by the FHCRC Patient Care Conference faculty where a decision will be made about a second 
transplant using a patient's autologous hematopoietic cells that had been stored before the start of conditioning 
therapy. 
11.0 EVALUATION 
11.1. First Phase Screening Visit 
A consent document must be signed by the patient or an authorized parent or guardian before examinations and 
tests are begun, following counseling by a study investigator. The schedule of First Phase Screening Visit 
evaluations, as outlined below, can be found in Appendix G. The laboratory studies listed in the paragraphs 
3., 4. and 5. below may be performed at the First Phase Screening visit at the discretion of the study 
investigators. Following this first visit, the Eligibility Review Group Documentation form (Appendix K) 
will be completed and approved by the Eligibility Review Group before scheduling the Second Phase 
Screening Visit. 
1. Medical history and physical examination including vital signs, current medications, and detailed CD-
focused documentation. 
2. If no history of smoking or of cardiac or pulmonary problems or findings on physical examination, defer 
pulmonary and cardiac tests until the Second Phase Screening Visit. If there is a clinical suspicion of 
cardiopulmonary issues, pulmonary evaluations will include pulmonary function tests (including FVC, 
FEV1 and hemoglobin adjusted Dl_co) pre and post bronchodilator (if required) and resting 02 saturation 
by pulse oximetry. Cardiac evaluations will include echocardiogram and electrocardiogram (ECG). 
3. 
CBC with differential, comprehensive metabolic panel including uric acid, PT, PTT, direct Coomb's, ESR. 
4. Renal evaluations include complete urinalysis (UA) and spot urine collection for evaluation of protein, 
creatinine, and albumin:creatinine ratio (ACR). Creatinine clearance will be calculated using serum 
creatinine and the Cockcroft Gault Formula. 
5. 
Serum Quantitative-HCG pregnancy test for female subjects. 
6. 
Completion of the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-Comorbidity Index (Appendix F). 
7. 
Completion of the Crohn's Disease Activity Index and Harvey-Bradshaw Index (Appendix A). 
8. 
Determination of Body Mass Index (http://www.nhIbisupport.com/bmi/bmi-m.htm)  
9. 
If subjects have not had endoscopic biopsy confirmation of CD-related intestinal inflammation in the last 6 
months before arrival in Seattle, they may undergo endoscopic evaluation and biopsy of mucosa in 
Seattle, or defer these procedures until they return to the care of their gastroenterologist or surgeon. In 
the event that there is no active inflammation within reach of standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy and 
colonoscopyfileoscopy, determination of active inflammation will be made by CT enterography or another 
imaging method. Included in biopsy evaluation will be centrifugation culture for CMV and Adenovirus. 
Biopsy specimens in excess of those needed to determine the presence of active inflammation will be 
placed in a tissue bank for research purposes, as described in Section 11.2, #14. 
10. Fertility counseling. Cryopreservation of sperm should be offered to fertile male subjects. Testing and 
storage of sperm should be undertaken prior to any treatment on study. Fertile female subjects should be 
specifically counseled as to risks of infertility and possibility of in vitro fertilization and storage of fertilized 
embryos. 
11. To follow: HLA typing of patient and family members, upon review of eligibility criteria and insurance 
company approval of the procedure. 
Page 27 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/20 19 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
11.2. Second Phase Screening Visit and additional baseline testing 
Patients who come to Seattle for this visit will have undergone favorable reviews by the Eligibility Review Group 
and their insurance companies and an eligible HLA-matched allogeneic donor will have been identified. Patients 
will be assigned to an allogeneic transplant team at the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, and a consultation with the 
Gastroenterology/Hepatology Service pre-arranged. Unless more than 90 days have passed since the completion 
of the First Phase Screening Visit, or the patient has developed signs and symptoms that are changed from the 
first visit, some of the results of the first visit tests will be considered as baseline study assessments for subjects 
proceeding to transplant, to which will be added information from the Second Phase Screening Visit. 
1. Interval medical history and physical examination including vital signs and current medications. 
2. Dental evaluation (with referral to oral surgeon for abscess or infection if indicated). 
3. Evaluation for CD-related quality of life (SIBDQ , Appendix B) 
4. Pulmonary function tests (including FVC, FEV1 and hemoglobin adjusted IDLco) pre and post 
bronchodilator (if required) and resting 02 saturation by pulse oximetry. 
5. Cardiac evaluations will include echocardiogram and electrocardiogram (ECG), if not done at the first 
screening visit. 
6. Magnetic resonance imaging, CT enterography or a comparable intestinal imaging method 
7. Endoscopic evaluation and biopsy of mucosa, unless biopsies demonstrating CD-related inflammation 
had been demonstrated at the First Phase Screening visit within the previous 6 months. In the event 
that there is no active inflammation within reach of standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy and 
colonoscopy/ileoscopy, determination of active inflammation will be made by CT enterography or 
another imaging method. Included in biopsy evaluation will be centrifugation culture for CMV and 
Adenovirus. Biopsy specimens in excess of those needed to determine the presence of active 
inflammation will be placed in a tissue bank (see section 11.1, #9). 
8. Stool specimen for toxigenic Clostridium difficile by PCR, ova and parasite examination (including 
cryptosporidia and microsporidia), Giardia antigen, and enteric viruses. Stool specimens will also be 
collected for future studies of the intestinal microbiome, as follows: Subjects will be provided with stool 
hats for obtaining fecal samples. Fecal samples will be processed using a straw core technique. Straw 
cores will be pushed using a wooden stick into 2 ml screw cap cryovials containing 1 cc of the following 
solutions and frozen at -80 degrees C. These solutions will include PowerBead Solution with 0.1 glass 
beads; PBS:40% glycerol; and RNAlater. Additional stool cores will be placed in 4 cryovials without any 
solutions added. 
9. 
CD Activity Index and Harvey-Bradshaw Index (Appendix A) 
10. Clinical blood draw for CBC with differential, comprehensive metabolic panel, INR, quantitative 
immunoglobulins, anti-hepatitis C virus, hepatitis B surface antigen, anti-hepatitis B core, HIV, T4, TSH, 
antibodies to CMV, HSV, and VZV. 
11. Renal evaluations include complete urinalysis (UA) and spot urine collection for evaluation of protein, 
creatinine, and protein:creatinine ratio. Creatinine clearance will be calculated using serum creatinine 
and the Cockcroft-Gault formula. 
12. Serum pregnancy test (Quantitative-HCG). 
13. 
Research blood draws: Approximately 100 mL of blood will be drawn and archived for later 
research, briefly described below. Blood will be drawn into a 10 mL plain tube for serum, a 10 mL 
heparinized tube for plasma plus DNA, a 3 ml Tempus tube for mRNA, a 10 mL potassium oxalate-
containing tube for plasma, and six 10 ml heparinized tubes for peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). 
Tempus tubes, serum and plasma will be frozen at -80°C. Serum tubes will be centrifuged, and plasma will 
be extracted and likewise frozen, while buffy coat cells will be harvested and lysed so their DNA may be 
extracted and frozen. The remaining tubes will be centrifuged over Ficoll to isolate PBMC, which will be 
frozen gradually in 7% DMSO and stored in liquid nitrogen. DNA will be analyzed via immunochip for SNP's 
associated with CD and other autoimmune diseases. Serum will be analyzed for serological markers of CD, 
including C reactive protein and antibodies to intestinal microflora antigens. Plasma will also be analyzed 
by Luminex microbead assay for content of a panel of cytokines made by Th1, Th2, Th17, and Treg cells, 
as well as by cells of the innate immune system. PBMC will be analyzed by flow cytometry, using 12-color 
antibody panels that identify T cell and innate immune cell subsets, and will also be stimulated in vitro to 
analyze cytokine production by intracellular staining. 
Page 28 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FI-ICRC Protocol #2551.00 
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
14.  Research endoscopic biopsies: Four biopsy specimens will be taken from stomach, duodenum, 
ileum and/or colon, depending on the. endoscopic procedure. If both inflamed and uninflamed mucosa of 
one or more of the above anatomic sites are noted grossly, then 4 biopsies each from inflamed and 
uninflamed tissue) will be obtained. For each set of 4 biopsies, one will be snap-frozen for mRNA analysis. 
One will be frozen embedded in OCT for immunohistology. Then each of the remaining 2 biopsies will be 
gradually frozen in 7% DMSO/FCS to allow release and analysis of viable lymphocytes at a future date. 
After the second visit has verified that eligibility criteria have been met, and the Eligibility Review Group has 
confirmed that the subject has met eligibility criteria (see Appendix E) subjects will then undergo final Pre-
transplant tests, counseling and informed consent (Section 11.3) 
11.3.  Pre-transplant tests, counseling and informed consent 
If a review of results of the first and second screening visits confirms eligibility, subjects will proceed to the final 
steps toward transplantation. However, certain testing may need to be repeated at the discretion of the 
investigators as clinically indicated to ensure patient safety and to re-establish baseline values. 
1. 
Interval history and physical examination, including vital signs. 
2. Safety Laboratory Tests: CBC with differential, comprehensive metabolic panel, and serum Quantitative-
HCG pregnancy test. 
3. CMV DNA (by PCR) 
4. Screening should be done for respiratory viruses (RSV, parainfluenza, and influenza) with nasal wash 
and throat swab prior to initiating the conditioning regimen. If the screen is positive, transplant should be 
delayed for 3-4 weeks until repeat cultures/PCR are negative. 
5. Counseling about the transplant procedure by a transplant attending physician (Allogeneic Transplant 
Service). 
6. 
Signing of an informed consent document for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. 
7. 
Placement of a two-lumen Hickman catheter. 
11.4.  Study Procedures from Time of Initiation of Hematopoietic Cell Transplant 
While in Seattle and until discharge to the care of each patient's provider(s), all hospitalized patients are 
evaluated daily by transplant physicians at the University of Washington Medical Center or Seattle Children's 
Hospital, and all out-patients are evaluated frequently (at least once weekly, depending on medical issues) by 
transplant physicians at the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance. All patients are expected to be housed within a 30 
minute journey to the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance outpatient facility. The frequency of standard laboratory tests 
and radiologic studies following transplantation will be those in the FHCRC Standard Practice Manual. Additional 
evaluations, including clinical, laboratory, endoscopic, and imaging tests, will be undertaken for exigent clinical 
circumstances. The following protocol-specific assessments will be undertaken at months 1, 3, and 12 after 
transplant and at yearly intervals thereafter for 5 years. 
11.4.1 Clinical assessments at Month 1 (Day 28 ±4 days) 
The following evaluations will be performed at Month 1 (Day 28; +/- 4 days) after allogeneic HCT. 
1. 
Detailed physical examination. 
2. 
CBC with differential and comprehensive metabolic panel. 
5. CMV DNA. 
11.4.2 Clinical assessments at Month 3 (Day 80 ± 5 days) 
1. 
Detailed physical examination. 
2. 
PFTs with DLCO and FVC and resting pulse oximetry for 02 saturation. 
3. 
Endoscopic evaluation and biopsy of intestinal mucosa. In the event that there is no active inflammation 
within reach of standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy/ileoscopy, determination of 
active inflammation will be made by magnetic resonance imaging, CT enterography or another imaging 
method. Included in biopsy evaluation will be centrifugation culture for CMV and Adenovirus. Biopsy 
Page 29 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


IR B Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
specimens in excess of those needed to determine the presence of active inflammation will be placed in a 
tissue bank (see section 11.1, #9). 
4. CD activity index and Harvey-Bradshaw Index 
5. SIBDQ QOL instrument 
6. CBC with differential and comprehensive metabolic panel. 
7. Renal evaluations include complete urinalysis (UA) and spot urine collection for evaluation of protein, 
creatinine, and albumin:creatinine ratio. Creatinine clearance will be calculated using serum creatinine 
and the Cockcroft-Gault formula. 
8. Body Mass Index 
9. Quantitative Immunoglobulins (Serum IgG, IgM, and IgA). 
10. CMV DNA as per FHCRC Standard Practice Manual and EBV DNA per protocol. 
11. Chimerism studies of CD33+ and CD3+ cells in peripheral blood. 
12. Vaccine antibody titers per FHCRC Standard Practice Manual. 
13. Evaluation for chronic Graft-vs-Host Disease, per FHCRC Standard Practice Manual (Appendix H). 
14. Research blood draws: see section 11.2, #13. 
15. Research stool collection: Stool specimens will also be collected for future studies of the intestinal 
microbiome, as follows: Subjects will be provided with stool hats for obtaining fecal samples. Fecal 
samples will be processed using a straw core technique. Straw cores will be pushed using a wooden 
stick into 2 ml screw cap cryovials containing 1 cc of the following solutions and frozen at -80 degrees 
C. These solutions will include PowerBead Solution with 0.1 glass beads; PBS:40% glycerol; and 
RNAlater. Additional stool cores will be placed in 4 cryovials without any solutions added. 
11.4.3. Clinical assessments at Month 12 (Day 365 ± 20 days) 
1  Detailed physical examination. 
2. 
CT enterography or a comparable intestinal imaging method 
3. 
Endoscopic evaluation and biopsy of intestinal mucosa. In the event that there is no active inflammation 
within reach of standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy/ileoscopy, determination of 
active inflammation will be made by magnetic resonance imaging, CT enterography or another imaging 
method. Included in biopsy evaluation will be centrifugation culture for CMV and Adenovirus. Biopsy 
specimens in excess of those needed to determine the presence of active inflammation will be placed in a 
tissue bank (see section 11.1, #9). 
4. CD activity index and Harvey-Bradshaw Index 
5. SIBDQ QOL instrument 
6. 
CBC with differential and comprehensive metabolic panel. 
7. Renal evaluations include complete urinalysis (UA) and spot urine collection for evaluation of protein, 
creatinine, and albumin:creatinine ratio. Creatinine clearance will be calculated using serum creatinine 
and the Cockcroft-Gault formula. 
8. Pulmonary function tests 
9. Body Mass Index 
10. Quantitative Immunoglobulins (Serum IgG, IgM, and IgA). 
11. Chimerism studies of CD33+ and CD3+ cells in peripheral blood. 
12. Evaluation for chronic Graft-vs-Host Disease, per FHCRC Standard Practice Manual (Appendix G). 
13. Vaccine antibody titers per FHCRC Standard Practice Manual. 
14. Research blood draws: see section 11.2, #13. 
Page 30 of 69 
FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
15. Research stool collection: Stool specimens will also be collected for future studies of the intestinal 
microbiome, as follows: Subjects will be provided with stool hats for obtaining fecal samples. Fecal samples 
will be processed using a straw core technique. Straw cores will be pushed using a wooden stick into 2 ml 
screw cap cryovials containing 1 cc of the following solutions and frozen at -80 degrees C. These solutions 
will include PowerBead Solution with 0.1 glass beads; PBS:40% glycerol; and RNAlater. Additional stool 
cores will be placed in 4 cryovials without any solutions added. 
11.4.4. Clinical assessments at Years 2 through 5. 
Although highly desirable, it may not be practical for subjects to return to Seattle annually after the first year. In 
this case, the CDAI and SIBDQ will be. administered by study investigators by telephone, mail, or email 
correspondence, and blood specimens for chimerism studies and research blood draws will be sent to FHCRC for 
processing. The detailed physical examination and endoscopic or imaging evaluations at years 3 and 5 will be 
done in Seattle if possible, but if travel to Seattle is not feasible, these procedures can be carried out locally, 
following protocol guidelines, and the results reviewed by study investigators. Tissue specimens will be sent to 
the FHCRC for independent evaluation. 
1. Detailed physical examination. 
2. At years 3 and 5, or at any time that there are clinical signs and symptoms that could indicate recurrent 
CD, endoscopic evaluation and biopsy of intestinal mucosa. In the event that there is no active 
inflammation within reach of standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy/ileoscopy, 
determination of active inflammation will be made by magnetic resonance imaging, CT enterography or 
another imaging method. Included in biopsy evaluation will be centrifugation culture for CMV and 
Adenovirus. Biopsy specimens in excess of those needed to determine the presence of active 
inflammation will be placed in a tissue bank (see section 11.1, #9). 
3. 
CD Activity Index and Harvey-Bradshaw Index 
4. SIBDQ 
5. 
CBC with differential and comprehensive metabolic panel. 
6. Renal evaluations include complete urinalysis (UA) and spot urine collection for evaluation of protein, 
creatinine, and albumin:creatinine ratio. Creatinine clearance will be calculated using serum creatinine 
and the Cockcroft-Gault formula. 
7. Quantitative Immunoglobulins (Serum IgG, IgM, and IgA). 
8. 
Chimerism studies of CD33+ and CD3+ cells in peripheral blood (to be carried out at FHCRC). 
9. 
Research blood draws: see section 11.2, #13. 
10. Research stool collection: Stool specimens will also be collected for future studies of the intestinal 
microbiome, as follows: Subjects will be provided with stool hats for obtaining fecal samples. Fecal 
samples will be processed using a straw core technique. Straw cores will be pushed using a wooden 
stick into 2 ml screw cap cryovials containing 1 cc of the following solutions and frozen at -80 degrees 
C. These solutions will include PowerBead Solution with 0.1 glass beads; PBS:40% glycerol; and 
RNAlater. Additional stool cores will be placed in 4 cryovials without any solutions added. 
11.4.5. Evaluation at an early withdrawal visit 
If a patient withdraws from the study prematurely, an Endpoint Evaluation Visit will be carried out as described for 
the Year 1 evaluation (see 11.4.3). Our Long-Term Follow-Up section follows all of our past transplant patients for 
life, through yearly questionnaires (per our Standard Practice Manual) and through communication with 
physicians who care for our former patients--unless patients specifically designate their desire to not participate in 
any way in follow-up. 
12.0 DRUGS, IRRADIATION AND MARROW/STEM CELL ADMINISTRATION TOXICITIES 
AND COMPLICATIONS 
12.1. G-CSF for autologous PBSC collection 
Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) is a growth factor given to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells into 
Page 31 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
IR B Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
the peripheral blood and boost granulocyte counts. It has been used for the collection of stem cells in normal 
allogeneic donors as well as in candidates for autologous transplants. It has been administered to subjects with 
primary or acquired granulocyte deficiencies. Most frequently it is used to aid granulocyte recovery after drug-
induced myelosuppression, including conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy for cancer and also after marrow 
transplantation. G-CSF is produced by recombinant DNA technology and acts by binding to specific receptors on 
hematopoietic cells. It stimulates proliferation, differentiation, and some functional activities of granulocytes and 
their precursors. G-CSF is administered either by subcutaneous injection or intravenous infusion. Elimination 
half-life is approximately 3.5 hours. The primary toxicities of G-CSF are usually mild and include symptoms of 
myalgia and bone pain. Rarely splenic rupture has been reported. Vasculitis has been reported, and inflammatory 
processes or autoimmune diseases may be exacerbated. G-CSF has been studied as a treatment for CD, as 
immune cells exposed to G-CSF can develop a Th-2 response-that decreases the inflammatory Th-1 response in 
CD. 
12.2. Cyclophosphamide 
Cyclophosphamide is an alkylating agent used to treat a variety of malignancies. Cyclophosphamide (total dose 
50 mg/kg) will be given as part of the conditioning regimen before infusion of donor bone marrow to reduce the 
risk of graft rejection and given again early after bone marrow transplant at a total dose of 100 mg/kg to prevent 
GVHD. It requires hepatic metabolism to the active metabolite phosphoramide mustard which reacts with 
nucleophilic groups and leads to immune suppression.. The half-life of the parent compound is 5.3 hours in 
adults, and the half-life of the major metabolite, phosphoramide mustard, is 8.5 hours. Liver or renal dysfunction 
will lead to prolonged serum half-life. When given in high doses after allogeneic HCT, cyclophosphamide targets 
proliferating alloreactive T cells and successfully prevents GVHD in mouse models and humans [104]. It has been 
hypothesized that the timing of the high-dose, post-transplant cyclophosphamide results in selective killing of 
activated alloreactive T cells while sparing resting T cells specific for infectious agents. The major dose-limiting 
side effect at high doses is cardiac necrosis but this is an unusual complication in patients with normal cardiac 
function pre-transplant. Hemorrhagic cystitis can occur and is mediated by the acrolein metabolite; it can be 
prevented by co-administration of Mesna or by continuous bladder irrigation. Other side effects include nausea, 
vomiting, alopecia, sinusoidal liver damage, myelosuppression, infertility, secondary malignancies, and syndrome 
of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH). 
12.3. Fludarabine 
Fludarabine is an antimetabolite with significant immunosuppressive activity. A total dose of 150 mg/m2 will be 
given in the conditioning regimen. It is a highly immunosuppressive agent and is being given to prevent graft 
rejection. Fludarabine monophosphate is a purine nucleoside analogue that, after administration, undergoes rapid 
conversion in plasma to 2-fluoro ara-A (F-araA). F-araA subsequently enters cells where it is phosphorylated to F-
araATP and the monophosphate F-araAMP. Once activated, F-araATP inhibits DNA polymerase and 
ribonucleotide reductase. The monophosphate F-araAMP, once incorporated into DNA, is an effective DNA chain 
terminator. Following IV administration, the drug is metabolized to 2-F-araA and widely distributed in tissues. 1-F-
araA is excreted primarily in urine and has a terminal elimination half-life of 7-12 hr. The dose of fludarabine used 
in this protocol is myelosuppressive but not myeloablative. It also causes significant, prolonged 
immunosuppression by in vivo depletion of especially CD4+ cells. The immunosuppression associated with the 
use of fludarabine increases the risk of infection which can be life threatening. Other side effects associated with 
fludarabine include anorexia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and stomatitis. Neurological side effects observed at 
high doses include agitation, visual disturbances, confusion, coma, peripheral neuropathies. With high doses, 
confusion, blindness, coma and death have been reported (when used in doses of at least 120 mg/m2 daily for 4-
5 days or a total dose of 500 mg/m2). 
12.4. Total Body Irradiation (TBI) 
TBI will be given in one 2.0 Gy fraction from a linear accelerator at a rate of 6-15 cGy/min. Although this is a low-
dose of TBI, studies in dogs and humans have shown that it contributes significantly to the immunosuppression 
required to prevent graft rejection after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Dosimetry calculations are 
performed by the radiation therapist. TBI may be associated with nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea; decline in 
hematocrit, platelet and white blood cell counts, and infection. Pulmonary, brain, hepatic toxicity and second 
malignancies have also been associated with TBI at higher doses. The risks and severity of many these effects 
are dose-related. 
12.5. Tacrolimus 
Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive agent used to prevent and treat GVHD as well as prevent graft rejection 
after allogeneic HCT in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. It is also used prevent the rejection of 
Page 32 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00  
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
transplanted kidneys, hearts and livers. The drug inhibits T-lymphocyte function with minimal activity against B-
cells. Tacrolimus will be administered after posttransplant high-dose cyclophosphamide in combination 
withMyfortic or MMF. A calcineurin inhibitor in combination with MMF has been used routinely to prevent GVHD 
and rejection after reduced-intensity conditioning regimens and allogeneic HCT. Nephrotoxicity is the most 
frequent side effect of tacrolimus. Other frequently observed side effects include hypertension, dizziness, 
headache, insomnia, tremor, pruritus, rash, diabetes mellitus, hyperkalemia, hyperlipemia, hypomagnesemia, 
hypophosphatemia, renal tubular acidosis, constipation, diarrhea, dyspepsia, nausea, vomiting, arthralgia, back 
pain, weakness and paresthesia. Patients are also at risk of neurological complications including agitation, 
amnesia, anxiety, confusion, depression, encephalopathy, hallucinations, somnolence and psychosis. A 
characteristic complication associated with calcineurin inhibitors is posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome 
(PRES). Patients with PRES present with headache, visual disturbance, hypertension and characteristic changes 
on brain MRI. 
12.6. Mycophenolic acid enteric coated (Myfortic) or Mycophenolate Mofetil 
Mycophenolic acid is an immunosuppressive agent, used in this protocol to prevent allograft rejection and GVHD. 
It can be delivered as an enteric formulation of mycophenolate sodium or MMF Previous clinical studies in 
patients after renal allografting suggested that the principal adverse reactions associated with the administration 
of MMF include diarrhea, leukopenia, sepsis, vomiting and possibly a higher incidence of certain viral infections 
(CMV, VZV, Herpes Simplex). In the setting of marrow transplantation, MMF has an increased incidence of 
digestive system adverse events, including Cl tract ulceration, and hemorrhage (3% of patients receiving MMF). 
GI tract perforations have rarely been observed. Most patients in these studies were also on other drugs known to 
be associated with these complications. Myfortic has been shown to reduce the risk of gastrointestinal 
complications. Up to 2% of patients receiving MMF for prevention of rejection developed severe neutropenia 
(ANC <50/pL). The development of neutropenia may be related to MMF itself, concomitant medications, viral 
infections or some combination of these causes. 
12.7. Allogeneic Marrow Transplantation (GVHD and Graft rejection) 
We have hypothesized that allogeneic HCT will result in a sustained remission of CD by either 1) the elimination 
of the autoreactive host immune effector cells if full donor hematopoietic chimerism is established, or 2) 
modulation of the regulatory immune activity if mixed hematopoietic chimerism is established . Sustained 
remissions of autoimmune diseases have been observed in recipients with mixed hematopoietic chimerism after 
allogeneic HCT. 
We will use marrow rather than peripheral blood stem cells as the source of the allogeneic hematopoietic cell graft 
to reduce the risk of chronic GVHD. 
The major transplant-related complications are GVHD, graft rejection and delayed immune reconstitution which 
increases the risk of opportunistic infections. Acute GVHD is an acute inflammatory process that may involve skin, 
gastrointestinal tract and liver. Severe gastrointestinal GVHD may result in prolonged hospitalization from large 
volume diarrhea and gastrointestinal bleeding and possibly death. Staging and grading will be performed 
according to Appendix I. Chronic GVHD may involve skin, liver and lung and if severe may result in organ failure. 
An oral/ocular sicca syndrome is also commonly observed in patients with chronic GVHD. Chronic GVHD will be 
staged according to the NIH criteria (Appendix H). Patients with acute and chronic GVHD are treated with high-
dose glucocorticoids and are at risk of opportunistic infections and other complications associated with steroid 
use. 
Luznik et al (Blood 2010) reported that in a study of post-transplant high-dose cyclophosphamide after HLA-
matched transplants from related or unrelated donors (n=117), the day-100 cumulative incidences of grades II 
through IV and III through IV acute GVHD for all patients were 43% (95% Cl, 34%-52%) and 10% (95% CI, 6%-
17%), respectively using only post-transplant high-dose cyclophosphamide for GVHD prevention [34]. Among 
recipients of grafts from related donors, the cumulative incidence of grades II through IV acute GVHD at day 100 
was 42% (95% CI, 30%-52%), and for recipients of unrelated donor grafts the incidence was 46% (95% Cl, 30%-
61%). This difference was not significant (HR 0.87, 95% CI, 0.50-1.54, P=0.64). The cumulative incidences of 
grades III through IV acute GVHD at day 100 were 12% (95% Cl, 6%-20%) and 8% (95% CI, 2%-19%) for 
recipients of related and unrelated donor grafts, respectively (HR 1.56, 95% Cl, 0.43-5.62, P=0.50. This incidence 
of acute GVHD is mildly decreased from that the expected incidence of acute GVHD using a calcineurin inhibitor 
and methotrexate or MMF. It is expected that adding the combination of tacrolimus and MMF or Myfortic after 
high-dose cyclophosphamide will further decrease the risk of acute GVHD and the need for glucocorticoid 
treatment or additional immunosuppressive therapy. 
Page 33 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
With a median follow-up of surviving patients of 26.3 months (range, 10-55 months), the cumulative incidence of 
chronic GVHD for all patients was 10% (95% Cl, 5%-16%). At 2 years after transplantation, the cumulative 
incidences of chronic GVHD for recipients of related and unrelated donor grafts were 9% (95% Cl, 4%-17%) and 
11% (95% Cl, 3%-25%), respectively (HR 0.83, 95% Cl, 0.25-2.88, P=0.79). Only 3 new cases occurred beyond 6 
months after transplantation. Of 11 patients with chronic GVHD, 7 had classic limited and 3 had classic extensive 
forms of the disease. According to the National Institutes of Health severity scale, 3 had severe disease (2 with 
obliterative bronchiolitis). A total of 3 patients with chronic GVHD, remained on systemic immunosuppression at 
the time of last follow-up. The observed incidence of chronic GVHD after high-dose cyclophosphamide was 
markedly decreased compared to the expected incidence with standard GVHD prevention using calcineurin 
inhibitor and methotrexate or MMF. 
Graft rejection will be defined as evidence that donor chimerism in CD33+ and CD3+ cells are <2%. GG: Earlier 
you wrote 5%--see section 4, Secondary endpoints, #8). After a standard-dose conditioning regimen of busulfan 
and cyclophosphamide, graft rejection was observed in 4.3% of cases [34]. The use of marrow rather than 
peripheral blood stem cells likely increased the risk of graft rejection but importantly may have contributed to the 
low risk of chronic GVHD. The proposed reduced-intensity regimen has been successfully used for HLA-
haploidentical transplantation so it is expected that this regimen will successfully prevent rejection of HLA-
identical grafts. The addition of tacrolimus and Myfortic or MMF after transplant is also expected to reduce the risk 
of graft rejection. Pretransplant treatment with pulse cyclophosphamide to treat and stabilize CD may precondition 
patients and further lower the risk of graft rejection. Since a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen is being used, 
if graft rejection occurs, recovery of autologous hematopoiesis is expected although there may be a prolonged 
period or pancytopenia before counts recover. This may result in severe or fatal infections. Second transplants 
have been performed successfully after graft rejection [105]. Patients who experience protracted neutropenia 
caused by graft rejection, will be reviewed by the FHCRC Patient Care Conference faculty where a decision will 
be made about a second transplant with autologous cells. 
To manage the risk of opportunistic infections, patients will be monitored closely and receive preventative therapy 
according to Section 10.8. 
13.0 GUIDELINES FOR ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING 
13.1 Adverse Event Reporting/Institutional Policy 
For a complete statement of institutional policy, see Unanticipated Problems Involving Risks to Subjects or Others 
IRB Policy 2.6 on the FHCRC IRO/IRB website at http://extranet.fhcrc.orq/EN/sections/iro/irb/ae.html.  In 
accordance with institutional policy, all adverse events which in the opinion of the principal investigator are 
unexpected and related or possibly related to the research and serious or suggest that the research places 
research participants or others at greater risk of physical or psychological harm than was previously known or 
recognized be reported to the IRB within 10 calendar days of learning of the problem. 
13.2 Definitions: 
Adverse Event - Any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a 
pharmaceutical product, medical treatment or procedure and which does not necessarily have to have a causal 
relationship with this treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign 
(including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use 
of a medicinal product, medical treatment or procedure whether or not considered related to the medicinal 
product. 
Life-threatening Adverse Event — Any adverse event that places the patient or subject, in view of the 
investigator, at immediate risk of death from the reaction. 
Unexpected Adverse Event — An adverse event is "unexpected" when its nature (specificity), severity, or 
frequency are not consistent with (a) the known or foreseeable risk of adverse events associated with the 
research procedures described in the Protocol-related documents, such as the IRB-approved research protocol, 
Page 34 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
informed consent document and other relevant sources of information such as product labeling and package 
inserts; and are also not consistent with (b) the characteristics of the subject population being studied including 
the expected natural progression of any underlying disease, disorder or condition any predisposing risk factor 
profile for the adverse event. 
A listing of expected AEs for the subject population is included in Appendix J. 
Serious Adverse Event (SAE) — Any adverse event occurring that results in any of the following outcomes: 
• 
death 
• 
a life-threatening adverse event (real risk of dying) 
• 
inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization 
• 
a persistent or significant disability/incapacity 
• 
a congenital anomaly 
• 
requires intervention to prevent permanent impairment of damage 
Hospitalization is a part of the treatment plan and will not be considered an SAE unless it is unexpected or the 
duration of the hospital stay is unexpected. 
Attribution - The following are definitions for determining whether an adverse event is related to a medical 
product, treatment or procedure: 
• 
An adverse event is "related or possibly related to the research procedures "if in the opinion of the 
principal investigator, it was more likely than not caused by the research procedures. 
• 
Adverse events that are solely caused by an underlying disease, disorder or condition of the subject or by 
other circumstances unrelated to either the research or any underlying disease, disorder or condition of 
the subject are not "related or possibly related." 
• 
If there is any question whether or not an adverse event is related or possibly related, the adverse event 
should be reported. 
The Cancer Consortium Expedited Reporting Form should be completed for all adverse events that meet the 
expedited reporting requirements. The AE form will be faxed to the IRO at (206) 667-6831. All available 
information should be submitted. 
13.3. Safety Monitoring and Reporting 
13.3.1 Overview 
Safety data will be recorded on case report forms (CRFs) specifically designed for this purpose. All safety data 
will be reviewed monthly by the principal investigators and at least annually by the Data Safety and Monitoring 
Board (DSMB). The DSMB can recommend that any participant be withdrawn from the study and/or that the study 
be terminated because of safety findings. 
13.3.2 Adverse Event Grading 
Adverse Events will be graded according to the current version of the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for 
Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4. The full text of the NCI CTCAE is available online at: 
http://evs.nci.nih.qovfftp1/CTCAE/About.html  
13.3.3 FHCRC IRB policies and forms for reportable events 
All reportable adverse events will be collected and reported according to the FHCRC reporting guidelines. 
Definitions, instructions and forms associated with reportable events can be found in Appendix J and on the 
FHCRC's Institutional Review Office (IRO) extranet website: http://extranet.fhcrc.orp/EN/sections/iro/irb/ae.html.  
Additional information about non-compliance and unanticipated problems can be found on the FHCRC's IRB 
Policy and Procedures extranet website: http://extranet.fhcrc.orp/EN/sections/iro/irb/policy/index.html.  
13.3.4 Tracking of Events 
Adverse events will be collected from the time the subject starts mobilization until day +365 after allogeneic HCT 
or until he/she prematurely withdraws from the study. From the start of mobilization of autologous stem cells until 
Page 35 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/20 19 


IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
day +100 after allogeneic HCT, grades 3, 4 and 5 adverse events will be captured. There are some exceptions 
that are outlined in Appendix J. Grades 3 and 4 adverse events in organs involved with CD will be reported only if 
they represent a significant change from baseline (pre-transplant) status. 
FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
By day +100, it is expected that patients will have recovered from the regimen-related toxicities associated with 
the conditioning regimen. Therefore only Grades 4 and 5 will be reported from day +100 through day +365 after 
transplant. After day +365, patients will be followed for CD and late sequella of allogeneic transplant. All deaths 
that occur throughout the course of the study, regardless of cause, will be reported to the IRB. Those occurring 
prior to year 1 will be reported in an expedited fashion and those occurring after 1 year will be reported with the 
annual renewal. 
There are some categories of adverse events that will not be considered reportable events due to the lack of 
relevance to the evaluation of the protocol treatment. (see Appendix J). Certain adverse events are expected after 
high-dose immunosuppressive therapy and allogeneic HCT and are not informative and therefore will only be 
reported if they are > Gr.4 from the start of mobilization until day +28. During this same period, there are some 
Gr. 3 and 4 adverse events that will not be reported at all. (see Appendix J). From day +29 until day +100, some 
grades 3 and 4 adverse events of the blood and lymphatic system will not be reported (see Appendix J). 
14.0 ASSESSMENT OF DISEASE RESPONSE 
14.1. Definition of study end-points and disease responses 
Primary endpoint: event-free survival, defined as alive and free of active CD at 1 year after transplant. 
Active CD: defined as abnormal mucosal inflammation characteristic of CD identified by endoscopy and biopsy of 
the gastrointestinal tract, or, if the area of intestinal inflammation cannot be reached with an endoscopy, 
identification will be by imaging such as CT or ultrasound or barium contrast study. The severity of CD will be 
scored using the CDAI (Appendix A) and the extent and severity of intestinal inflammatory lesions using SES-CD 
(Appendix C). 
Event-Free Survival. Event-free is defined as for the primary endpoint. Patients alive at the time of last contact are 
censored. 
Overall Survival: Death due to any cause is the event for this endpoint. Patients alive at the time of last contact 
are censored. 
Treatment-related mortality: TRM is defined as death occurring at any time after start of allogeneic HCT and 
definitely or probably resulting from treatment given in the study and not associated with other unrelated causes. 
14.1. Quality of life instruments 
Because CD is a disorder that causes considerable morbidity, this protocol will include a quality of life instrument 
developed and validated in cohorts of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The instrument to be used is the 
Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ) (Appendix B), which incorporate elements of social, 
systemic and emotional symptoms, as well as bowel related symptoms into an activity index [25,26]. The SIBDQ 
will be administered at the following times: at baseline (before the start of conditioning therapy) and at intervals 
after transplant, as outlined in section 11. 
15.0 DATA AND SAFETY MONITORING PLAN 
Institutional support of trial monitoring is provided in accordance with the FHCRC Data and Safety Monitoring 
Plan (DSMP). The PDMC reviews accrual, serious adverse events, stopping rules and adherence to the protocol-
specific data and safety monitoring plan. Under the provisions of the DSMP, the Clinical Research Support office 
provides monitoring for quality process and compliance by qualified monitors unaffiliated with the conduct of the 
study. Monitoring visits occur at specified intervals determined by the assessed risk level of the study and the 
findings of the previous visit. The scope of monitoring is specified in the DSMP 
http://www.cancerconsortium.org/rto/prr/  
Page 36 of 69 
Printed on 9/1 8/20 19 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
Monitoring during the progress of the trial: 
This clinical trial will be a single institution clinical trial that is monitored by the principal investigator (PI), the 
FHCRC Protocol and Data Monitoring Committee (PDMC) and the Institutional Review Board (IRB). The PI will 
review outcome data with the sub-investigators during scheduled monthly meetings or at a minimum, quarterly. 
Adverse events are reviewed with the PI on an ongoing basis in weekly meetings. The adverse event reporting in 
this clinical trial will follow the FHCRC Guidelines for adverse event reporting. For patients enrolled on this 
protocol but not being cared for at FHCRC, the outside facilities communicate with the PI and study coordinator 
for these reporting purposes. The PI for this study is responsible for adverse event reporting and summarizing 
reports of the toxicities with the annual renewal. The stopping rules provide an additional safeguard for adverse 
event analysis and reporting in this protocol. All collaborating investigators on the protocol will have fulfilled all 
NIH requirements for training in human subjects' protection. 
All patients on study will be considered in the safety analysis. Because this is a phase 2 study, regimen related 
toxicities (RRT) and transplant related mortality (TRM) will be closely monitored. Aggregate study data will be 
evaluated to identify trends in adverse events. 
Gastroenterologists that are co-investigators on this study will evaluate the disease responses. The potential 
safety and efficacy of the allograft approach will be evaluated by follow-up of patients over 5 years from the time 
of transplant. 
Data Safety Monitoring Board 
A Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) will be constituted for this study and be composed of two CD experts 
and two experts in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. The PI for this study is responsible for adverse 
event reporting and summarizing reports of the toxicities. The stopping rules provide an additional safeguard for 
adverse event analysis and reporting in this protocol. They will review a listing of reported AEs and SAEs at least 
semi-annually (see Appendix J). The DSMB will review any events as requested by the investigators or the 
monitors. Further, the DSMB will be informed of all SAEs that are determined to warrant an expedited safety 
report. All deaths of patients enrolled in the protocol will be reviewed by the DSMB (see Section 17). If there is 
one episode of graft rejection with the first 5 patients on this protocol, a meeting of the DSMB will be convened to 
review potential changes to the protocol to prevent further episodes of graft rejection. After each DSMB meeting, 
recommendations will be forwarded to the investigators and to the FHCRC IRB. 
16.0 DATA MANAGEMENT/CONFIDENTIALITY 
Clinical Statistics maintains a subject database at FHCRC to allow storage and retrieval of subject data collected 
from a wide variety of sources. The investigator will ensure that data collected conform to all established 
guidelines for coding, collection, key entry and verification. Each subject is assigned a unique patient number to 
assure subject confidentiality. Subjects will not be referred to by this number, by name, or by any other individual 
identifier in any publication or external presentation. The licensed medical records department, affiliated with the 
institution where the subject receives medical care, maintains all original inpatient and outpatient chart 
documents. Subject research files are scanned and stored in a secure database (OWL). OWL records are 
maintained by the FHCRC data abstraction staff. Access is restricted to personnel authorized by the Division of 
Clinical Research. 
17.0 STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS 
This is a single-arm Phase II study with the objective of demonstrating the safety and efficacy of allogeneic HCT 
in treatment-refractory CD. The proposed sample size for this protocol is 12 subjects. The primary endpoint will be 
event-free survival at 1 year after transplant, defined as alive and free of active CD. Secondary endpoints will 
include event-free survival at 2 through 5 years; complete response rate at 1-5 years (CR defined as alive and 
free of active CD without immunosuppressive drugs); adverse events; frequency and severity of GVHD; and 
patient-reported outcomes. 
No formal power analyses were conducted, since the study objectives require no hypothesis testing but rather 
descriptive statistics. The study sample size of 12 should allow a description of the rate of event-free survival with 
an exact 90% confidence interval that is less than ± 0.24 relative to the point estimate. An outcome of no disease 
Page 37 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


IR B Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
relapses in the 12 patients will allow us reasonable confidence (86%) that the true rate of relapse associated with 
this treatment is less than 15%. 
FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
The probability of event-free survival up to 5 years after transplant will be described graphically using a Kaplan-
Meier estimate. An estimate of EFS at 1 year will be generated with confidence intervals using Greenwood's 
formula to calculate the standard error. The secondary outcomes will be characterized by the event rates as 
functions of all patients enrolled and at risk of the event, with exact confidence intervals. 
The occurrence of one death of an enrolled patient will trigger a temporary cessation of the protocol. If a death 
occurs, no additional patients will be screened or consented or have the transplant procedure started until the 
death is reviewed by the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center's Institutional Review Organization, the 
Protocol #2551 Data Safety and Monitoring Board, and FDA. The possible outcomes of this review process are a) 
temporary cessation of patient screening, consenting, and starting the transplant procedure while additional 
informative data is being collected; b) resumption of patient screening, consenting, and starting the transplant 
procedure, using the same protocol; c) resumption of patient screening and consenting under the aegis of a 
revised protocol, to be approved by the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center IRO, the Protocol #2551 Data 
Safety and Monitoring Board, and FDA; or d) permanent closure of the protocol to enrollment. 
A stopping rule will be imposed for transplant-related mortality (TRM) occurring within one year of transplant. The 
study will be stopped if at any point there is moderately strong evidence that the rate of TRM exceeds 10%. 
Moderately strong evidence will be taken to mean that the lower bound of a one-sided 80% confidence interval for 
the true rate of TRM is above 10%. Operationally, this criterion will be met if 2 deaths are observed within the first 
8 patients or 3 deaths observed in 9-12 patients. The table below summarizes the operating characteristics of this 
stopping rule, where the probability of stopping the trial is estimated from 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations. Should 
the study be completed without stopping, it is recognized that an estimate of the rate of TRM will be biased 
downward. To the extent that various toxicities are correlated with mortality, estimates for the rates of these may 
also be biased downward. 
Table 4. Probability of stopping the trial for excess transplant-related deaths. 
Number of patients 
True Rate of TRM 
Probability of 
Stopping 
6 
10% 
0.11 
9 
10% 
0.13 
12 
10% 
0.16 
6 
20% 
0.35 
9 
20% 
0.39 
12 
20% 
0.51 
6 
30% 
0.58 
9 
30% 
0.65 
12 
30% 
0.79 
Table 5. Projected Target Accrual (ETHNIC AND GENDER DISTRIBUTION CHART) 
TARGETED / PLANNED ENROLLMENT: Number of Subjects 
Ethnic Category 
Sex / Gender 
Females 
Males 
Total 
Hispanic or Latino 
1 
1 
2 
Not Hispanic or Latino 
5 
5 
10 
Ethnic Category Total of All Subjects` 
6 
6 
12 
Racial Categories 
Page 38 of 69 
Printed on 9/1 8/20 I 9 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
American Indian / Alaska Native 
0 
0 
0 
Asian 
0 
0 
0 
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 
0 
0 
0 
Black or African American 
1 
1 
2 
White 
5 
5 
10 
Racial Categories: Total of All Subjects* 
6 
6 
12 
18.0 TERMINATION OF STUDY 
The PI may terminate the study at any time. The IRB also has the authority to terminate the study should it be 
deemed necessary. 
Page 39 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
REFERENCES 
1. Sands BE, Siegel CA. Crohn's disease. In: Feldman M, Friedman LS, Brandt LJ (eds): Sleisenger and 
Fordtran's Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease: Pathophysiology/Diagnosis/Management Volume 2. 
Philadelpha, PA: Saunders Elsevier, p. 1941-1973, 2010. 
2. Cho JH, Brant SR. Recent insights into the genetics of inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 
140: 1704-1712, 2011. 
3. Franke A, McGovern DP, Barrett JC, Wang K, Radford-Smith GL, Ahmad T, Lees CW, Balschun T, Lee J, 
Roberts R, Anderson CA, Bis JC, Bumpstead S, Ellinghaus D, Festen EM, Georges M, Green T, 
Haritunians T, Jostins L, Latiano A, Mathew CG, Montgomery GW, Prescott NJ, Raychaudhuri S, Rotter 
JI, Schumm P, Sharma Y, Simms LA, Taylor KD, Whiteman D, Wijmenga C, Baldassano RN, Barclay M, 
Bayless TM, Brand S, Buning C, Cohen A, Colombel JF, Cottone M, Stronati L, Denson T, de Vos M, 
D'Inca R, Dubinsky M, Edwards C, Florin T, Franchimont D, Gearry R, Glas J, Van Gossum A, Guthery 
SL, Halfvarson J, Verspaget HW, Hugot JP, Karban A, Laukens D, Lawrance I, Lemann M, Levine A, 
Libioulle C, Louis E, Mowat C, Newman W, Panes J, Phillips A, Proctor DD, Regueiro M, Russell R, 
Rutgeerts P, Sanderson J, Sans M, Seibold F, Steinhart AH, Stokkers PC, Torkvist L, Kullak-Ublick G, 
Wilson D, Walters T, Targan SR, Brant SR, Rioux JD, D'Amato M, Weersma RK, Kugathasan S, Griffiths 
AM, Mansfield JC, Vermeire S, Duerr RH, Silverberg MS, Satsangi J, Schreiber S, Cho JH, Annese V, 
Hakonarson H, Daly MJ, Parkes M. Genome-wide meta-analysis increases to 71 the number of 
confirmed Crohn's disease susceptibility loci. Nat Genet 42: 1118-1125, 2010. 
4. Khor B, Gardet A, Xavier RJ. Genetics and pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature 474: 
307-317, 2011. 
5. 
Peeters M, Nevens H, Baert F, Hiele M, de Meyer AM, Vlietinck R, Rutgeerts P. Familial aggregation in 
Crohn's disease: increased age-adjusted risk and concordance in clinical characteristics. 
Gastroenterology 111: 597-603, 1996. 
6. Zhou Z, Lin XY, Akolkar PN, Gulwani-Akolkar B, Levine J, Katz S, Silver J. Variation at NOD2/CARD15 
in familial and sporadic cases of Crohn's disease in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. Am J 
Gastroenterol 97: 3095-3101, 2002. 
7. 
Kaser A, Blumberg RS. Autophagy, microbial sensing, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and epithelial 
function in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 140: 1738-1747, 2011. 
8. Cadwell K, Patel KK, Maloney NS, Liu TC, Ng AC, Storer CE, Head RD, Xavier R, Stappenbeck TS, 
Virgin HW. Virus-plus-susceptibility gene interaction determines Crohn's disease gene Atg16L1 
phenotypes in intestine. Cell 141: 1135-1145, 2010. 
9. Fernando MM, Stevens CR, Walsh EC, De Jager PL, Goyette P, Plenge RM, Vyse TJ, Rioux JD. 
Defining the role of the MHC in autoimmunity: a review and pooled analysis (Review). PLoS Genetics 4: 
e1000024,2008. 
10. Cosnes J, Gower-Rousseau C, Seksik P, Cortot A. Epidemiology and natural history of inflammatory 
bowel diseases. Gastroenterology 140: 1785-1794, 2011. 
11. Chassaing B, Darfeuille-Michaud A. The commensal microbiota and enteropathogens in the 
pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology 140:1720-1728, 2011. 
12. Abraham C, Medzhitov R. Interactions between the host innate immune system and microbes in 
inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 140: 1729-1737, 2011. 
13. Yamaguchi A, Matsui T, Sakurai T, Ueki T, Nakabayashi S, Yao T, Futami K, Arima S, Ono H. The 
clinical characteristics and outcome of intraabdominal abscess in Crohn's disease. Journal of 
Gastroenterology 39: 441-448, 2004. 
Page 40 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/20 19 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
14. Munkholm P, Langholz E, Davidsen M, Binder V. Disease activity courses in a regional cohort of Crohn's 
disease patients. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 30: 699-706, 1995. 
15. Abreu MT, Taylor KD, Lin YC, Hang T, Gaiennie J, Landers CJ, Vasiliauskas EA, Kam LY, Rojany M, 
Papadakis KA, Rotter JI, Targan SR, Yang H. Mutations in NOD2 are associated with fibrostenosing 
disease in patients with Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 123: 679-688, 2002. 
16. 
Cuthbert AP, Fisher SA, Mirza MM, King K, Hampe J, Croucher PJ, Mascheretti S, Sanderson J, Forbes 
A, Mansfield J, Schreiber S, Lewis CM, Mathew CG. The contribution of NOD2 gene mutations to the risk 
and site of disease in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 122: 867-874, 2002. 
17. Hampe J, Grebe J, Nikolaus S, Solberg C, Croucher PJ, Mascheretti S, Jahnsen J, Mourn B, Klump B, 
Krawczak M, Mirza MM, Foelsch UR, Vatn M, Schreiber S. Association of NOD2 (CARD 15) genotype 
with clinical course of Crohn's disease: a cohort study. Lancet 359: 1661-1665, 2002. 
18. Lesage S, Zouali H, Cezard JP, Colombel JF, Belaiche J, Almer S, Tysk C, O'Morain C, Gassull M, 
Binder V, Finkel Y, Modigliani R, Gower-Rousseau C, Macry J, Merlin F, Chamaillard M, Jannot AS, 
Thomas G, Hugot JP. CARD15/NOD2 mutational analysis and genotype-phenotype correlation in 612 
patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Hum Genet 70: 845-857, 2002. 
19. Fletcher JG, Fidler JL, Bruining DH, Huprich JE. New concepts in intestinal imaging for inflammatory 
bowel diseases. Gastroenterology 140: 1795-1806, 2011. 
20: Solem CA, Loftus EV, Jr., Fletcher JG, Baron TH, Gostout CJ, Petersen BT, Tremaine WJ, Egan LJ, 
Faubion WA, Schroeder KW, Pardi DS, Hanson KA, Jewell DA, Barlow JM, Fidler JL, Huprich JE, 
Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, Zinsmeister AR, Sandborn WJ. Small-bowel imaging in Crohn's disease: a 
prospective, blinded, 4-way comparison trial. Gastrointest Endosc 68: 255-266, 2008. 
21. Girometti R, Zuiani C, Toso F, Brondani G, Sorrentino D, Avellini C, Bazzocchi M. MRI scoring system 
including dynamic motility evaluation in assessing the activity of Crohn's disease of the terminal ileum. 
Academic Radiology 15: 153-164, 2008. 
22. Almer S, Granerus G, Strom M, Olaison G, Bonnet J, Lemann M, Smedh K, Franzen L, Bertheau P, 
Caftan P, Rain JD, Modigliani R. Leukocyte scintigraphy compared to intraoperative small bowel 
enteroscopy and laparotomy findings in Crohn's disease. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 13: 164-174, 
2007. 
23. Lewis JD. The utility of biomarkers in the diagnosis and therapy of inflammatory bowel disease. 
Gastroenterology 140: 1817-1826, 2011. 
24. Strober W, Fuss IJ. Proinflammatory cytokines in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases. 
Gastroenterology 140: 1756-1767, 2011. 
25. Irvine EJ, Feagan B, Rochon J, Archambault A, Fedorak RN, Groll A, Kinnear D, Saibil F, McDonald JW. 
Quality of life: a valid and reliable measure of therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of inflammatory bowel 
disease. Canadian Crohn's Relapse Prevention Trial Study Group. Gastroenterology 106: 287-296, 
1994. 
26. Pallis AG, Mouzas IA, Vlachonikolis IG. The inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire: a review of its 
national validation studies (Review). Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 10: 261-269, 2004. 
27. Hyams JS, Ferry GD, Mandel FS, Gryboski JD, Kibort PM, Kirschner BS, Griffiths AM, Katz AJ, Grand 
RJ, Boyle JT. Development and validation of a pediatric Crohn's disease activity index. Journal of 
Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition 12: 439-447, 1991. 
28. Hyams J, Markowitz J, Otley A, Rosh J, Mack D, Bousvaros A, Kugathasan S, Pfefferkorn M, Tolia V, 
Evans J, Treem W, Wyllie R, Rothbaum R, del Rosario J, Katz A, Mezoff A, Oliva-Hemker M, Lerer T, 
Griffiths A. Evaluation of the pediatric crohn disease activity index: a prospective multicenter experience. 
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition 41: 416-421, 2005. 
Page 41 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
29. Griffiths AM, Otley AR, Hyams J, Quiros AR, Grand RJ, Bousvaros A, Feagan BG, Ferry GR. A review of 
activity indices and end points for clinical trials in children with Crohn's disease (Review). Inflammatory 
Bowel Diseases 11: 185-196, 2005. 
FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
30. Daperno M, D'Haens G, Van Assche G, Baert F, Bulois P, Maunoury V, Sostegni R, Rocca R, Pera A, 
Gevers A, Mary JY, Colombel JF, Rutgeerts P. Development and validation of a new, simplified 
endoscopic activity score for Crohn's disease: the SES-CD. Gastrointest Endosc 60: 505-512, 2004. 
31. Burger D, Travis S. Conventional medical management of inflammatory bowel disease. 
Gastroenterology 140: 1827-1837, 2011. 
32. Plevy SE, Targan SR. Future therapeutic approaches for inflammatory bowel diseases. 
Gastroenterology 140: 1838-1846, 2011. 
33. Stallmach A, Wittig BM, Moser C, Fischinger J, Duchmann R, Zeitz M. Safety and efficacy of intravenous 
pulse cyclophosphamide in acute steroid refractory inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 52: 377-382, 2003. 
34. Schmidt KJ, Fellermann K, Wellhoner P, Weitz G, Homann N, Herrlinger K, Lehnert H, Ludwig D, Buning 
J. Clinical trial: cyclophosphamide pulse therapy - a promising therapeutic alternative in refractory 
Crohn's disease. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 29: 1230-1239, 2009. 
35. Lichtenstein GR, Feagan BG, Cohen RD, Salzberg BA, Diamond RH, Chen DM, Pritchard ML, Sandborn 
WJ. Serious infections and mortality in association with therapies for Crohn's disease: TREAT registry 
[Erratum appears in Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Jul;4(7):931]. Clinical Gastroenterology and 
Hepatology 4: 621-630, 2006. 
36. Marehbian J, Arrighi HM, Hass S, Tian H, Sandborn WJ. Adverse events associated with common 
therapy regimens for moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol 104: 2524-2533, 2009. 
37. Colombel JF, Sandborn WJ, Reinisch W, Mantzaris GJ, Kornbluth A, Rachmilewitz D, Lichtiger S, 
D'Haens G, Diamond RH, Broussard DL, Tang KL, van der Woude CJ, Rutgeerts P. lnfliximab, 
azathioprine, or combination therapy for Crohn's disease. N Engl J Med 362: 1383-1395, 2010. 
38. Whelan G, Farmer RG, Fazio VW, Goormastic M. Recurrence after surgery in Crohn's disease. 
Relationship to location of disease (clinical pattern) and surgical indication. Gastroenterology 88: 1826-
1833, 1985. 
39. Mekhjian HS, Switz DM, Watts HD, Deren JJ, Katon RM, Beman FM. National Cooperative Crohn's 
Disease Study: factors determining recurrence of Crohn's disease after surgery. Gastroenterology 77: 
907-913, 1979. 
40. Villablanca EJ, Cassani B, von Andrian UH, Mora JR. Blocking lymphocyte localization to the 
gastrointestinal mucosa as a therapeutic strategy for inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology 
140: 1776-1784, 2011. 
41. Jaisson-Hot I, Flourie B, Descos L, Colin C. Management for severe Crohn's disease: a lifetime cost-
utility analysis. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 20: 274-279, 2004. 
42. Bernstein LH, Frank MS, Brandt U, Boley SJ. Healing of perineal Crohn's disease with metronidazole. 
Gastroenterology 79: 357-365, 1980. 
43. Brynskov J, Freund L, Rasmussen SN, Lauritsen K, de Muckadell OS, Williams N, MacDonald AS, 
Tanton R, Molina F, Campanini MC. A placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial of cyclosporine 
therapy in active chronic Crohn's disease. N Engl J Med 321: 845-850, 1989. 
44. Kozarek RA, Patterson DJ, Gelfand MD, Botoman VA, Ball TJ, VVilske KR. Methotrexate induces clinical 
and histologic remission in patients with refractory inflammatory bowel disease. Ann Intern Med 110: 
353-356, 1989. 
Page 42 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
45. Markowitz J, Grancher K, Kohn N, Lesser M, Daum F. A multicenter trial of 6-mercaptopurine and 
prednisone in children with newly diagnosed Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 119: 895-902, 2000. 
46. Present DH, Korelitz BI, \Nisch N, Glass JL, Sachar DB, Pasternack BS. Treatment of Crohn's disease 
with 6-mercaptopurine. A long-term, randomized, double-blind study. N Engl J Med 302: 981-987, 1980. 
47. Present DH, Rutgeerts P, Targan S, Hanauer SB, Mayer L, van Hogezand RA, Podolsky DK, Sands BE, 
Braakman T, DeWoody KL, Schaible TF, van Deventer SJ. Infliximab for the treatment of fistulas in 
patients with Crohn's disease. N Engl J Med 340: 1398-1405, 1999. 
48. 
Rao SS, Cann PA, Holdsworth CD. Clinical experience of the tolerance of mesalazine and olsalazine in 
patients intolerant of sulphasalazine. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 22: 332-336, 1987. 
49. Sandborn WJ, Present DH, Isaacs KL, Wolf DC, Greenberg E, Hanauer SB, Feagan BG, Mayer L, 
Johnson T, Galanko J, Martin C, Sandler RS. Tacrolimus for the treatment of fistulas in patients with 
Crohn's disease: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Gastroenterology 125: 380-388, 2003. 
50. 
Willoughby JM, Beckett J, Kumar PJ, Dawson AM. Controlled trial of azathioprine in Crohn's disease. 
Lancet 2: 944-947, 1971. 
51. Hutfless SM, Weng X, Liu L, Allison J, Herrinton U. Mortality by medication use among patients with 
inflammatory bowel disease, 1996-2003. Gastroenterology 133: 1779-1786, 2007. 
52. Farmer RG, Whelan G, Fazio VW. Long-term follow-up of patients with Crohn's disease. Relationship 
between the clinical pattern and prognosis. Gastroenterology 88: 1818-1825, 1985. 
53. 
Jess T, Winther KV, Munkholm P, Langholz E, Binder V. Mortality and causes of death in Crohn's 
disease: follow-up of a population-based cohort in Copenhagen County, Denmark. Gastroenterology 
122: 1808-1814, 2002. 
54. 
Jess T, Loftus EV, Jr., Harmsen WS, Zinsmeister AR, Tremaine WJ, Melton LJ, III, Munkholm P, 
Sandborn WJ. Survival and cause specific mortality in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a long 
term outcome study in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1940-2004. Gut 55: 1248-1254, 2006. 
55. Lapidus A, Bemell 0, Hellers G, Lofberg R. Clinical course of colorectal Crohn's disease: a 35-year 
follow-up study of 507 patients. Gastroenterology 114: 1151-1160, 1998, 
56. 
Loftus EV, Jr., Silverstein MD, Sandborn WJ, Tremaine WJ, Harmsen WS, Zinsmeister AR. Crohn's 
disease in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1940-1993: incidence, prevalence, and survival [Erratum appears 
in Gastroenterology 1999 Jun;116(6):1507]. Gastroenterology 114: 1161-1168, 1998. 
57. Persson PG, Bernell 0, Leijonmarck CE, Farahmand BY, Hellers G, Ahlbom A. Survival and cause-
specific mortality in inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based cohort study. Gastroenterology 110: 
1339-1345, 1996. 
58. Wolters FL, Russel MG, Sijbrandij J, Schouten LJ, Odes S, Riis L, Munkholm P, Bodini P, O'Morain C, 
Mouzas IA, Tsianos E, Vermeire S, Monteiro E, Limonard C, Vatn M, Fornaciari G, Pereira S, Moum B, 
Stockbrugger RW. Crohn's disease: increased mortality 10 years after diagnosis in a Europe-wide 
population based cohort. Gut 55: 510-518, 2006. 
59. Burt RK, Craig RM, Milanetti F, Quigley K, Gozdziak P, Bucha J, Testori A, Halverson A, Verda L, de 
Villiers WJ, Jovanovic B, Oyama Y. Autologous nonmyeloablative hematopoietic stem cell 
transplantation in patients with severe anti-TNF refractory Crohn disease: long-term follow-up. Blood 
116: 6123-6132, 2010. 
60. Lopez-Cubero SO, Sullivan KM, McDonald GB. Course of Crohn's disease after allogeneic marrow 
transplantation. Gastroenterology 114: 433-440, 1998. 
FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
Page 43 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
61. Ditschkowski M, Einsele H, Schwerdtfeger R, Bunjes D, Trenschel R, Beelen DW, Elmaagacli AH. 
Improvement of inflammatory bowel disease after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. Transplantation 
75: 1745-1747, 2003. 
62. Vonk MC, Marjanovic Z, van den Hoogen FH, Zohar S, Schattenberg AV, Fibbe WE, Larghero J, 
Gluckman E, Preijers FW, van Dijk AP, Bax JJ, Roblot P, van Riel PL, van Laar JM, Farge D. Long-term 
follow-up results after autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for severe systemic sclerosis 
[Erratum appears in Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Feb;67(2):280]. Ann Rheum Dis 67: 98-104, 2008. 
63. Tehlirian CV, Hummers LK, White B, Brodsky RA, Wigley FM. High-dose cyclophosphamide without 
stem cell rescue in scleroderma. Ann Rheum Dis 67: 775-781, 2008. 
64. Milanetti F, Bucha J, Kwasny M, Boyce K, Quigley K, Yaung K, Burt RK. Autologous non-myeloablative 
hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with systemic sclerosis. Haematopoietic Stem Cell 
Transplantation for Severe Autoimmune Diseases Abstract Book: 44-45, #9, 2009.(Abstract) 
65. Oyama Y, Barr WG, Statkute L, Corbridge T, Gonda EA, Jovanovic B, Testori A, Burt RK. Autologous 
non-myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with systemic sclerosis. Bone 
Marrow Transplant 40: 549-555, 2007. 
66. Dussan KB, Magder L, Brodsky RA, Jones RJ, Petri M. High dose cyclophosphamide performs better 
than monthly dose cyclophosphamide in quality of life measures. Lupus 17: 1079-1085, 2008. 
67. Petri M, Jones RJ, Brodsky RA. High-dose cyclophosphamide without stem cell transplantation in 
systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 48: 166-173, 2003. 
68. 
Burt RK, Traynor A, Statkute L, Barr WG, Rosa R, Schroeder J, Verda L, Krosnjar N, Quigley K, Yaung K, 
Villa BM, Takahashi M, Jovanovic B, Oyama Y. Nonmyeloablative hematopoietic stem cell 
transplantation for systemic lupus erythematosus. JAMA 295: 527-535, 2006. 
69. Couri CE, Oliveira MC, Stracieri AB, Moraes DA, Pieroni F, Barros GM, Madeira MI, Malmegrim KC, 
Foss-Freitas MC, Simoes BP, Martinez EZ, Foss MC, Burt RK, Voltarelli JC. C-peptide levels and insulin 
independence following autologous nonmyeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in newly 
diagnosed type 1 diabetes mellitus. JAMA 301: 1573-1579, 2009. 
70. Burt RK, Loh Y, Cohen B, Stefoski D, Balabanov R, Katsamakis G, Oyama Y, Russell EJ, Stern J, Muraro 
P, Rose J, Testori A, Bucha J, Jovanovic B, Milanetti F, Storek J, Voltarelli JC, Burns WH. Autologous 
non-myeloablative haemopoietic stem cell transplantation in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a 
phase I/II study [Erratum appears in Lancet Neurol. 2009 Apr;8(4):309]. Lancet Neurology 8: 244-253, 
2009. 
71. Nash RA, Bowen JD, McSweeney PA, Pavletic SZ, Maravilla KR, Park M-S, Storek J, Sullivan KM, Al-
Omaishi J, Corboy JR, DiPersio J, Georges GE, Gooley TA, Holmberg LA, LeMaistre CF, Ryan K, 
Openshaw H, Sunderhaus J, Storb R, Zunt J, Kraft GH. High-dose immunosuppressive therapy and 
autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for severe multiple sclerosis. Blood 102: 2364-
2372, 2003. 
72. Nishimura J, Kanakura Y, Ware RE, Shichishima T, Nakakuma H, Ninomiya H, DeCastro CM, Hall S, 
Kanamaru A, Sullivan KM, Mizoguchi H, Omine M, Kinoshita T, Rosse WE. Clinical course and flow 
cytometric analysis of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria in the United States and Japan. Medicine 
83: 193-207, 2004. 
73. Gratwohl A, Passweg J, Bocelli-Tyndall C, Fassas A, van Laar JM, Farge D, Andolina M, Arnold R, 
Carreras E, Finke J, Kotter I, Kozak T, Lisukov I, Lowenberg B, Marmont A, Moore J, Saccardi R, 
Snowden JA, van den HF, Wulffraat NM, Zhao XW, Tyndall A. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell 
transplantation for autoimmune diseases. Bone Marrow Transplant 35: 869-879, 2005. 
FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
Page 44 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00  
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
74. Nash RA, McSweeney PA, Crofford LJ, Abidi M, Chen C-S, Godwin JD, Gooley TA, Holmberg L, Henstorf 
G, LeMaistre CF, Mayes MD, McDonagh KT, McLaughlin B, Molitor JA, Nelson JL, Shulman H, Storb R, 
Viganego F, Wener MH, Seibold JR, Sullivan KM, Furst DE. High-dose immunosuppressive therapy and 
autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for severe systemic sclerosis: long-term follow-up of the 
U.S. multicenter pilot study. Blood 110: 1388-1396, 2007. 
75. Snowden JA, Passweg J, Moore JJ, Milliken S, Cannell P, van Laar J, Verburg R, Szer J, Taylor K, Joske 
D, Rule S, Bingham SJ, Emery P, Burt RK, Lowenthal RM, Durez P, McKendry RJ, Pavletic SZ, Espigado 
I, Jantunen E, Kashyap A, Rabusin M, Brooks P, Bredeson C, Tyndall A. Autologous hemopoietic stem 
cell transplantation in severe rheumatoid arthritis: a report from the EBMT and ABMTR. J Rheumatol 31: 
482-488, 2004. 
76. 
Snowden JA, Biggs JC, Milliken ST, Fuller A, Brooks PM. A phase I/II dose escalation study of intensified 
cyclophosphamide and autologous blood stem cell rescue in severe, active rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis 
& Rheumatism 42: 2286-2292, 1999. 
77. Cassinotti A, Annaloro C, Ardizzone S, Onida F, Della VA, Clerici M, Usardi P, Greco S, Maconi G, Porro 
GB, Deliliers GL. Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation without CD34+ cell selection in 
refractory Crohn's disease. Gut 57: 211-217, 2008. 
78. 
Wang B, Yamamoto Y, El-Badri NS, Good RA. Effective treatment of autoimmune disease and 
progressive renal disease by mixed bone-marrow transplantation that establishes a stable mixed 
chimerism in BXSB recipient mice. PNAS 96: 3012-3016, 1999. 
79. 
van Bekkum DW, Bohre EP, Houben PF, Knaan-Shanzer S. Regression of adjuvant-induced arthritis in 
rats following bone marrow transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86: 10090-10094, 1989. 
80. Storb R, Blume KG, O'Donnell MR, Chauncey T, Forman SJ, Deeg HJ, Hu VVVV, Appelbaum FR, Doney 
K, Flowers MED, Sanders J, Leisenring W. Cyclophosphamide and antithymocyte globulin to condition 
patients with aplastic anemia for allogeneic marrow transplantations: the experience in four centers. Biol 
Blood Marrow Transplant 7: 39-44, 2001. 
81. Kahl C, Leisenring W, Deeg HJ, Chauncey TR, Flowers MED, Martin PJ, Sanders JE, Storb R. 
Cyclophosphamide and antithymocyte globulin as a conditioning regimen for allogeneic marrow 
transplantation in patients with aplastic anaemia: a long-term follow-up. Br J Haematol 130: 747-751, 
2005. 
82. Nash RA. Hematopoietic cell transplantation for autoimmune diseases. In: Appelbaum FR, Forman SJ, 
Negrin RS, Blume KG (eds): Thomas' Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 
p. 1014-1029, 2009. 
83. 
Hinterberger W, Hinterberger-Fischer M, Marmont A. Clinically demonstrable anti-autoimmunity mediated 
by allogeneic immune cells favorably affects outcome after stem cell transplantation in human 
autoimmune diseases. Bone Marrow Transplant 30: 753-759, 2002. 
84. Burroughs LM, Torgerson TR, Storb R, Carpenter PA, Rawlings DJ, Sanders J, Scharenberg AM, Skoda-
Smith S, Englund J, Ochs HD, Woolfrey AE. Stable hematopoietic cell engraftment after low-intensity 
nonmyeloablative conditioning in patients with immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, 
X-linked syndrome. J Allergy Clin Immunol 126: 1000-1005, 2010. 
85. Baud 0, Goulet 0, Canioni D, Le Deist F, Radford I, Rieu D, Dupuis-Girod S, Cerf-Bensussan N, 
Cavazzana-Calvo M, Brousse N, Fischer A, Casanova JL. Treatment of the immune dysregulation, 
polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked syndrome (IPEX) by allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. 
N Engl J Med 344: 1758-1762, 2001. 
86. Rao A, Kamani N, Filipovich A, Lee SM, Davies SM, Dalal J, Shenoy S. Successful bone marrow 
transplantation for IPEX syndrome after reduced-intensity conditioning. Blood 109: 383-385, 2007. 
Page 45 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol *2551.00 
1RB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
87. 
Glocker EO, Kotlarz D, Boztug K, Gertz EM, Schaffer AA, Noyan F, Perro M, Diestelhorst J, Allroth A, 
Murugan D, Hatscher N, Pfeifer D, Sykora KW, Sauer M, Kreipe H, Lacher M, Nustede R, Woeliner C, 
Baumann U, Salzer U, Koletzko S, Shah N, Segal AW, Sauerbrey A, Buderus S, Snapper SB, 
Grimbacher B, Klein C. Inflammatory bowel disease and mutations affecting the interleukin-10 receptor. 
N Engl J Med 361: 2033-2045, 2009. 
88. Clocker EO, Frede N, Perro M, Sebire N, Elawad M, Shah N, Grimbacher B. Infant colitis—it's in the 
genes. Lancet 376: 1272,2010. 
89. Luznik L, O'Donnell PV, Symons HJ, Chen AR, Leffell MS, Zahurak M, Gooley TA, Piantadosi S, Kaup M, 
Ambinder RF, Huff CA, Matsui W, Bolarios-Meade J, Borrello I, Powell JD, Harrington E, Warnock S, 
Flowers M, Brodsky RA, Sandmaier BM, Storb RF, Jones RJ, Fuchs EJ. HLA-haploidentical bone 
marrow transplantation for hematologic malignancies using nonmyeloablative conditioning and high-dose, 
post-transplantation cyclophosphamide. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 14: 641-650, 2008. 
90. Wang X, Kanel GC, DeLeve LD. Support of sinusoidal endothelial cell glutathione prevents hepatic veno-
occlusive disease in the rat. Hepatology 31: 428-434, 2000. 
91. Ruutu T, Eriksson B, Remes K, Juvonen E, Volin L, Remberger M, Parkkali T, Hagglund H, Ringden 0. 
Ursodeoxycholic acid for the prevention of hepatic complications in allogeneic stem cell transplantation. 
Blood 100: 1977-1983, 2002. 
92. Gooley TA, Chien JW, Pergam SA, Hingorani S, Sorror ML, Boeckh M, Martin PJ, Sandmaier BM, Marr 
KA, Appelbaum FR, Storb R, McDonald GB. Reduced mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic-cell 
transplantation. N Engl J Med 363: 2091-2101, 2010. 
93. O'Donnell PV, Luznik L, Jones RJ, Vogelsang GB, Leffell MS, Phelps M, Rhubart P, Cowan K, Piantados 
S, Fuchs EJ. Nonmyeloablative bone marrow transplantation from partially HLA-mismatched related 
donors using posttransplantation cyclophosphamide. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 8: 377-386, 2002. 
94. Kasamon YL, Luznik L, Leffell MS, Kowalski J, Tsai HL, Bolatios-Meade J, Morris LE, Crilley PA, 
O'Donnell PV, Rossiter N, Huff CA, Brodsky RA, Matsui WH, Swinnen U, Borrello I, Powell JD, Ambinder 
RF, Jones RJ, Fuchs EJ. Nonmyeloablative HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation with high-
dose posttransplantation cyclophosphamide: effect of HLA disparity on outcome. Biol Blood Marrow 
Transplant 16: 482-489, 2010. 
95. Fuchs EJ, Wu J, Carter S, Brunstein CG, Costa U, Wingard JR, Jagasia M, D'Elia J, Eapen M, O'Donnell 
PV. Phase II trial of non-myeloablative conditioning and partially HLA-mismatched (HLA-haploidentical) 
bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for patients with hematologic malignancies: results of Blood and 
Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) protocol 0603. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 12 
(Suppl. 2): S151, #5, 2011.(Abstract) 
96. Brunstein CG, Fuchs EJ, Carter SL, Karanes C, Costa U, Wu J, Devine SM, VVingard JR, Aljitawi OS, 
Cutler CS, Jagasia MH, Balien KK, Eapen M, O'Donnell PV. Alternative donor transplantation: results of 
parallel phase II trials using HLA-mismatched related bone marrow or unrelated umbilical cord blood 
grafts. Blood prepublished online April 28, 2011; doi:10.1182/blood-2011-03-344853, 9999. 
97. Burroughs LM, Storb R, Leisenring VVM, Pulsipher MA, Loken MR, Torgerson TR, Ochs HD, Woolfrey AE. 
Intensive postgrafting immune suppression combined with nonmyeloablative conditioning for 
transplantation of HLA-identical hematopoietic cell grafts: results of a pilot study for treatment of primary 
immunodeficiency disorders. Bone Marrow Transplant 40: 633-642, 2007. 
98. Meijers JM, van Bokhorst-de van der Schueren MA, Schols JM, Soeters PB, Halfens RJ. Defining 
malnutrition: mission or mission impossible? Nutrition 26: 432-440, 2010. 
99. Valentini L, Schulzke JD. Mundane, yet challenging: the assessment of malnutrition in inflammatory 
bowel disease (Review). European Journal of Internal Medicine 22: 13-15, 2011. 
Page 46 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
100. Lee VVM, Hynan LS, Rossaro L, Fontana RJ, Stravitz RT, Larson AM, Davern TJ, Murray NG, 
McCashland T, Reisch JS, Robuck PR, Acute Liver Failure Study Group. Intravenous N-acetylcysteine 
improves transplant-free survival in early stage non-acetaminophen acute liver failure. Gastroenterology 
2009; 137: 856-864, 864. 
101. Decramer M, Rutten-van Molken M, Dekhuijzen PN, Troosters T, van Herwaarden C, Pellegrino R, van 
Schayck CP, Olivieri D, Del Donno M, De Backer W, Lankhorst I, Ardia A. Effects of N-acetylcysteine on 
outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Bronchitis Randomized on NAC Cost-Utility Study, 
BRONCUS): a randomised placebo-controlled trial [Erratum appears in Lancet. 2005 Sep 17-
23;366(9490):984]. Lancet 365: 1552-1560, 2005. 
102. Grandjean EM, Berthet P, Ruffmann R, Leuenberger P. Efficacy of oral long-term N-acetylcysteine in 
chronic bronchopulmonary disease: a meta-analysis of published double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical 
trials. Clin Ther 22: 209-221, 2000. 
103. McDonald GB, Slattery JT, Bouvier ME, Ren S, Batchelder AL, Kalhom TF, Schoch HG, Anasetti C, 
Gooley T. Cyclophosphamide metabolism, liver toxicity, and mortality following hematopoietic stem cell 
transplantation. Blood 101: 2043-2048, 2003. 
104. Luznik L, Jalla S, Engstrom LW, lannone R, Fuchs EJ. Durable engraftment of major histocompatibility 
complex-incompatible cells after nonmyeloablative conditioning with fludarabine, low-dose total body 
irradiation, and posttransplantation cyclophosphamide. Blood 98: 3456-3464, 2001. 
105. Gyurkocza B, Cao TM, Storb RF, Lange T, Leisenring W, Franke GN, Sorror M, Hoppe R, Maloney DG, 
Negrin RS, Shizuru JA, Sandmaier BM. Salvage allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with 
fludarabine and low-dose total body irradiation after rejection of first allografts. Biol Blood Marrow 
Transplant 15: 1314-1322, 2009. 
Page 47 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
APPENDICES 
Appendix A: 
Appendix B. 
Appendix C: 
Appendix D: 
Appendix E: 
Appendix F: 
Appendix G: 
Appendix H: 
Appendix I: 
Appendix J: 
Appendix K: 
Crohn's Disease Activity Index and Harvey-Bradshaw Index for adult patients 
Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire—Quality of life instrument 
Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) 
Crohn's Disease Detailed History 
Eligibility Checklist 
Hematopoietic Cell Transplant-Comorbidity Index 
Schedule of visits 
Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease Grading 
Acute GVHD Grading Scale 
Adverse events reporting guidelines for this protocol 
Eligibility Review Group Documentation 
Page 48 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
1RB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
APPENDIX A 
Crohn's Disease Activity Index for adult patients 
Variables, severity scale, and weighting 
Variable 
Scale of Severity 
Weight 
Liquid or very soft stools 
Number of stools summed daily for 7 days 
2 
Abdominal pain 
Sum of 7 days of daily ratings, where 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = 
moderate and 3 = severe 
5 
General well-being 
Sum of 7 days of daily ratings, where 0 = generally well, 1 = slightly 
below par, 2 = poor, 3 = very poor and 4 = 
terrible 
7 
Features of extraintestinal 
disease 
Any of the following present during the recent 7 day period: 
-arthritis or arthralgia 
-skin or mouth lesions, including pyoderma 
gangrenosum, erythema nodsum, aphthous stomatitis 
-iritis or uveitis 
-anal fissure, fistula, or perirectal abscess 
-other external fistula 
-fever >100 degree F. 
20 each 
Opiates for diarrhea 
0 = no, 1 = yes 
30 
Abdominal mass 
0 = none, 2 = questionable, 5 = definite 
10 
Hematocrit value 
Males, 47 minus hematocrit; females, 42 minus hematocrit 
6 
% body weight below standard 
100 x (1 minus body weight/standard weight) 
1 
Page 49 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/20 19 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00  
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
Harvey-Bradshaw Index 
1. General well-being (yesterday) 
0 Very well = 0 
0 Slightly below par = 1 
0 Poor = 2 
0 Very poor = 3 
0 Terrible = 4 
2. Abdominal pain (yesterday) 
0 None = 0 
0 Mild = 1 
0 Moderate = 2 
0 Severe = 3 
3. Number of liquid or soft stools per day (yesterday) 
(give number) 
4. Abdominal mass 
0 None = 0 
0 Dubious = 1 
0 Definite = 2 
0 Definite and tender = 3 
5. Complications (check any that apply; score one per 
item except for "None") 
0 None 
0 Arthralgia 
0 Uveitis 
0 Erythema nodosum 
0 Aphthous ulcers 
0 Pyoderma gangrenosum 
0 Anal fissure 
0 New fistula 
0 Abscess 
HARVEY-BRADSHAW INDEX SCORE (add scores 
of questions 1 through 5) 
HBI score = 
Remission <5 
Mild disease 5 — 7 
Moderate disease 8 — 16 
Severe disease >16 
Page 50 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/20 19 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
I RB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
APPENDIX B 
Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire—Quality of life instrument 
This Evaluation is designed to find out how you have been feeling during the last 2 weeks. This can help us 
assess how much your disease is affecting your life. You will be asked about symptoms you are having as a 
result of your inflammatory bowel disease, the way you have been feeling in general, and how your mood has 
been. If you are uncomfortable answering any of these questions, you do not have to answer them. 
1. How often has the feeling of fatigue or of being tired and worn out been a problem for you during the 
last 2 weeks? Please indicate how often the feeling of fatigue or tiredness has been a problem for you 
during the last 2 weeks by picking one option from: 
1  
All of the time 
2  
Most of the time 
3  
A good bit of the time 
4  
Some of the time 
5  
A little of the time 
6  
Hardly any of the time 
7  
None of the time 
2. How often during the last 2 weeks have you had to delay or cancel a social engagement because of 
your bowel problem? Please choose an option from: 
1  
All of the time 
2  
Most of the time 
3  
A good bit of the time 
4  
Some of the time 
5  
A little of the time 
6  
Hardly any of the time 
7  
None of the time 
3. How much difficulty have you had, as a result of your bowel problems, doing leisure or sports 
activities you would have like to have done over the last 2 weeks? Please choose an option from: 
1  
A great deal of difficulty, activities made impossible 
2  
A lot of difficulty 
3  
A fair bit of difficulty 
4  
Some difficulty 
5  
A little difficulty 
6  
Hardly any difficulty 
7  
No difficulty; the bowel problems did not limit sports or leisure activities 
SUBTOTAL: 
Page 51 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
4. How often during the last 2 weeks have you been troubled by pain in the abdomen? Please choose 
an option from: 
FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
1  
All of the time 
2  
Most of the time 
3  
A good bit of the time 
4  
Some of the time 
5  
A little of the time 
6  
Hardly any of the time 
7  
None of the time 
5. How often during the last 2 weeks have you felt depressed or discouraged? Please choose an option 
from: 
1  
All of the time 
2  
Most of the time 
3  
A good bit of the time 
4  
Some of the time 
5  
A little of the time 
6  
Hardly any of the time 
7  
None of the time 
6. Overall, in the last 2 weeks, how much of a problem have you had passing large amounts of gas? 
Please choose an option from: 
1  
A major problem 
2  
A big problem 
3  
A significant problem 
4  
Some trouble 
5  
A little trouble 
6  
Hardly any trouble 
7  
No trouble 
7. Overall, in the last 2 weeks, how much of a problem have you had maintaining or getting to the weight 
you would like to be? Please choose an option from: 
1  
A major problem 
2  
A big problem 
3  
A significant problem 
4  
Some trouble 
5  
A little trouble 
6  
Hardly any trouble 
7  
No trouble 
SUBTOTAL: 
Page 52 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
8. How often during the last 2 weeks have you felt relaxed and free of tension? Please choose an option 
from: 
FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
1  
None of the time 
2  
A little of the time 
3  
Some of the time 
4  
A good bit of the time 
5  
Most of the time 
6  
Almost all of the time 
7  
All of the time 
9. How much of the time during the last 2 weeks have you been troubled by a feeling of having to go to 
the toilet even though your bowels were empty? Please choose an option from: 
1  
All of the time 
2  
Most of the time 
3  
A good bit of the time 
4  
Some of the time 
5  
A little of the time 
6  
Hardly any of the time 
7  
None of the time 
10. How much of the time during the last 2 weeks have you felt angry as a result of your bowel problem? 
Please choose an option from: 
1  
All of the time 
2  
Most of the time 
3  
A good bit of the time 
4  
Some of the time 
5  
A little of the time 
6  
Hardly any of the time 
7  
None of the time 
SUBTOTAL: 
TOTAL SCORE: 
Page 53 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
APPENDIX C 
Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) 
Variable 
Simple Endoscopic Score (SES) for CD values, for each anatomic area 
0 
1 
2 
3 
Size of ulcers 
None 
Aphthous ulcers, 
diameter 0.1 — 0.5 cn 
Large ulcers, 
diameter 0.5 —2 cm 
Very large ulcers, 
diameter > 2 cm 
Ulcerated surface (%) 
None 
<10% 
10— 30% 
>30% 
Affected surface (%) 
Anatomic area 
unaffected 
<50% 
50 — 75% 
>75% 
Presence of narrowings 
None 
Single, can be 
passed with 
endoscope 
Multiple, can be 
passed with 
endoscope 
Cannot be passed 
with endoscope 
SES-CD Scoring Form* 
Anatomic area examined 
Total 
Stomach 
& duodenum 
Jejunum 
Ileum 
Right 
colon 
Transverse 
colon 
Left 
Colon 
Rectosigmoid 
Colon 
Presence and 
size of ulcers 
(0 — 3) 
Extent of 
ulcerated 
surface 
(0 — 3) 
Extent of 
affected surface 
(0 — 3) 
Presence and 
type of 
narrowings 
(0 — 3) 
— 
SES-CD 
Page 54 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
I R B Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
APPENDIX D 
Crohn's Disease Detailed History 
Patient Name 
FHCRC Unique Patient 
Number 
Date of Birth 
University of 
Washington U-number 
Age at onset of CD 
symptoms (year) 
SURGICAL HISTORY 
MEDICATION HISTORY 
Number of surgical 
procedures for CD 
Number of years on 
CD medications 
Year of lst surgery 
and description 
Check list of CD 
medications—check 
the appropriate box if 
any medications in this 
category have been 
taken at any time in the 
past 
0  Aminosalicylate 
0  Antibiotic 
0  Budesonide 
0  Azathioprine 
0  6-mercaptopurine 
0  6-thioguanine 
0  Methotrexate 
0  Cyclophosphamide 
0  Calcineurin inhibitor 
0  Prednisone 
0  Anti-TNFa 
0  Anti-integrin 
0  Another Rx (list) 
Year of 2`th surgery 
and description 
Number of different 
medical treatment 
regimens in the last 12 
months (list) 
Year of 31(  surgery 
and description 
Current medications 
for CD and its 
symptoms (list) 
Year of e surgery 
and description 
Current medications 
for other conditions 
(list) 
Year of 5th surgery 
and description 
CURRENT ANATOMY OF THE GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT 
Page 55 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
Current anatomy 
0 Anatomy normal 
Current anatomy: 
0 Anatomy normal 
and CD activity: 
0 Anatomy abnormal 
stomach 
0 Anatomy abnormal 
Esophagus 
(describe) 
(describe) 
0 Inflammation absent 
0 Inflammation absent 
0 Inflammation present 
0 Inflammation present 
(describe) 
(describe) 
Current anatomy: 
0 Anatomy normal 
Current anatomy: 
0 Anatomy normal 
duodenum 
0 Anatomy abnormal 
jejunum-ileum 
0 Anatomy abnormal 
(describe) 
(describe) 
• 
0 Inflammation absent 
0 Inflammation absent 
0 Inflammation present 
0 Inflammation present 
(describe) 
(describe) 
Current anatomy: 
0 Anatomy normal 
Current anatomy: 
0 Anatomy normal 
colon 
0 Anatomy abnormal 
anorectal 
0 Anatomy abnormal 
(describe) 
(describe) 
0 Inflammation absent 
0 Inflammation absent 
0 Inflammation present 
0 Inflammation present 
(describe) 
(describe) 
Current 
0 Skin 
Current laboratory 
extra-intestinal 
0 Liver 
abnormalities related 
manifestations of 
0 Eyes 
to CD 
CD 
0 Lungs 
• 
0 Other site(s) (list) 
WEIGHT AND HEIGHT 
Body weight 
Current height 
cm 
•current body 
weight in kg 
kg 
(in both meters and 
centimeters) 
m 
•maximum body 
Page 56 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00  
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
weight (at this 
approximate age) 
kg (@ age _) 
•minimum body 
weight (at this 
approximate age) 
kg (@ age 
_) 
Adjusted Ideal 
Body Mass Index 
Body Weight 
kg 
(weight in kg / height 
in meters) 
Page 57 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
APPENDIX E 
Eligibility Checklist 
Inclusion criteria (all must be checked)  
Exclusion criteria (none can be checked) 
O 
Certain diagnosis of Crohn's Disease 
Adverse prognosis as indicated by treatment-refractory 
gastrointestinal mucosal inflammation, and documented by 
persistent signs and symptoms of CD that have failed to 
respond to medical and surgical therapies, including the 
use of systemic immune suppressive drugs and 
biopharmaceutical(s). Refer to Section 5.1, paragraph 2 (a 
through f) for details of past therapies that constitute the 
criteria for refractoriness to treatment, of which the following 
is a summary: 
O 
Systemic glucocorticoids (see Section 5.1) 
O 
Methotrexate and/or a thiopurine antimetabolite (see 
Section 5.1). If a patient is homozygous mutant for the 
TPMT gene, thiopurines would be contraindicated and their 
use would not be a requirement for enrollment in this 
protocol. 
0 Use of at least two anti-TNF-alpha therapies (infliximab 
and/or adalimumab and/or certolizumab pegol. 
O 
Exhaustive surgical treatment will be defined as 
indicated operations for complications of Crohn's Disease 
up to the point where the risks of surgery are deemed by 
patients and their physicians to be unacceptably high. 
Indicated operations for complications of Crohn's Disease 
include, but are not limited to, surgical resection of involved 
intestine,  stricturoplasty,  drainage, . curettage,  or 
adhesiolysis of tissues affected by Crohn's disease). 
O 
Endoscopic/histologic or imaging evidence of current 
intestinal inflammation 
O 
Severe Crohn's Disease as defined by one of the 
following: 
O 
CDAI >250 
O 
Need for TPN 
O 
Recurrent inflammation after surgical resection 
O 
HLA-matched donor negative for a history of or signs 
and symptoms consistent with inflammatory bowel disease, 
a serious autoimmune disease, or another serious disorder 
that can be passaged by bone marrow transplantation, and  " 
Page 58 of 69 
O 
Current complication of CD that would 
jeopardize survival: 
O 
Abscess, phlegmon, necrotizing 
O 
Intestinal fibrotic stricture orintestinal 
obstruction 
O 
Infection 
O 
Sclerosing cholangitis 
O 
Other 
O 
History of Progressive Multifocal 
Leukoencephalopathy 
O 
Organ dysfunction or disease that would 
I jeopardize survival 
0 Renal insufficiency 
O 
Cardiac dysfunction 
O 
Significant pulmonary dysfunction 
O 
Necroinflammatory/fibrotic liver dis. 
O 
Marrow dysfunction 
O 
Poorly controlled hypertension 
O 
Neurologic dysfunction 
O 
Poorly controlled diabetes mellitus 
O 
Extreme protein-calorie malnutrition 
O 
Pregnancy 
O 
Unwillingness to practice contraception 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
without NOD2 mutation (in the case of an HLA-matched 
sibling). 
OR 
0 HLA-matched unrelated donor negative for a history of 
or signs and symptoms consistent with inflammatory bowel 
disease, a serious autoimmune disease, or another serious 
disorder that can be passaged by bone marrow 
transplantation as determined by NMDP screening of donor 
medical issues. 
 I 
 
00  
History of smoking within 3 months 
HIV, HBV, or HCV seropositive 
Short life expectancy 
Psychiatric illness 
Inability to consent 
Prior lack of compliance 
History of malignancy other than skin 
HCT-CI >2 (adults only) 
0 Age between 18 and 60 
Study Investigator's Signature 
Date 
Page 59 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
APPENDIX F 
Hematopoietic cell transplant co-morbidity index (HCT-CI) 
Patient Name  
U-number  
UPN 
Date 
Assign scores appropriately if the patient has any of these comorbidities 
Comorbidity 
Definition / compartments  
Yes 
Score 
1. Arrhythmia 
—Atrial fibrillation* 
0 
—Atrial flutter* 
0 
1 
— Sick sinus syndrome* 
0 
— Ventricular arrhythmia* 
0 
2. Cardiovascular 
— Coronary artery disease* 
0 
— Congestive heart failure* 
0 
1 
— Myocardial infarction* 
0 
— Ejection fraction 5 50%§ 
0 
3. Diabetes 
— Rx with insulin or oral hypoglycemic drugs* 
0 
1 
4. Cerebro-vascular 
— Transient ischemic attacks* 
0 
— Ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke* 
0 
5. Depression / anxiety 
— Requiring psych consult or specific Rx § 
0 
1 
6. Hepatic — mild 
— Chronic hepatitis § 
0 
—Total serum bilirubin >ULN to 1.5 X ULN§ 
0 
1 
—AST/ALT >ULN to 2.5XULN§ 
0 
7. Obesity 
— Body mass index >35 (adults) § 
0 
1 
— BMI-for-age  959.1  percentile (children) 
8. Infection 
— Requiring anti-microbial treatment before, during, and after 
the start of conditioning regimens  0 
1 
9. Rheumatologic 
— Required treatment* 
00 l7 
2 
10. Peptic ulcer 
— Confirmed by endoscopy and required Rx* 
0;_u 
2 
11. Renal 
—Serum creatinine > 2mg/dL (or >177 pmol/L)§ 0 
— On dialysis §  
0 
2 
— Prior renal transplantation* 
0 
12 Pulmonary — Moderate 
— DLco corrected for Hgb 66-80% of predicted § OCID 
— FEV, 66-80% of predicted § 
0 
2 
— Dyspnea on slight activity § 
00 
Page 60 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
13. Pulmonary — Severe 
14. Heart valve disease 
15. Prior malignancy 
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
— DLco corrected for Hgb 65% of predicted § Di ii 
— FEV, 65% of predicted §  
DE 
— Dyspnea at rest or requiring 02  therapy§ 
— Except asymptomatic mitral valve prolapse § Eli 
— Treated with surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy 
excluding non-melanoma skin cancer*  DLL 
3 
3 
3 
3 
16. Hepatic — moderate/severe — Liver cirrhosis§ 
— Total serum bilirubin >1.5 X ULN§ 
— AST/ALT >2.5XULN§ 
Total score = 
Diagnosed at any time in the patient's past history. 
§ Detected at the time of pretransplant assessment. 
Abbreviations: ULN indicates upper limit of normal; DLco, diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide; FEVI, forced 
expiratory volume in one second; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; and ALT, alanine aminotransferase. 
Page 61 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/20 19 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00 
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
APPENDIX G 
Study Calendar 
Study Evaluations 
During 1st  and 
2'd Phase 
Screening 
Visits 
During time from 
transplant 
of conditioning 
therapy 
Da ys post-transplant 
Long Term 
Follow-up 
consent to start
Weekly 
Day 0 
Daly to 
engraftment 
post 
ft
i  engrament to 
Day 80 
Day 80 
± 5 days 
To years 
1, 2, 3, 4, 5 
Informed Consent 
X 
X 
Medical History, Physical Exam 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
CBC, blood chemistries 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Urine collection 
X 
X 
X 
Pregnancy test 
X 
X 
Body Mass Index 
X 
X 
X 
Fertility counseling 
X 
Dental evaluation 
X 
CDAI 
X 
X 
X 
SIBDQ (QOL) 
X 
X 
X 
HCT-Comorbidity Index 
X 
Endoscopic evaluation 
X 
X 
X (years 1,3 
and 5) 
Magnetic resonance imaging, 
CT enterography or a 
comparable intestinal imaging 
method 
X 
(X) 
X (year 1) 
Pulmonary tests 
X 
X 
X (year 1) 
Cardiac tests 
X 
Stool specimen 
X 
Viral serologies 
X 
Research blood samples 
X 
X 
X 
Respiratory virus screening 
X 
Page 62 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol #2551.00  
I RB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
EBV DNA by PCR 
X 
X 
Per FHCRC 
Standard 
Practice 
Hickman catheter placement 
X 
Harvest of autologous PBSCs 
X 
CMV DNA Surveillance by PCR 
X 
Once weekly from Day 0 until Day 100 
Per FHCRC 
Standard 
Practice 
Chimerism — Peripheral Blood 
X 
X 
IgA, IgG, IgM levels 
X 
X 
Acute and chronic GVHD 
evaluation 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Vaccine antibody titers 
X 
X 
Page 63 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


O No Symptoms 
El <18% BSA with disease 
signs but NO sclerotic 
features 
El >50% BSA OR deep 
sclerotic features "hidebound" 
(unable to pinch) OR impaired 
mobility, ulceration or severe 
pruritus 
Rodnan score: 
SKIN 
Clinical features.  
o Maculopapular rash 
O Lichen planus-like 
features 
o Papulosquamous 
lesions or ichthyosis 
o Hyperpigmentation 
o Hypopigmentation 
O Keratosis pilaris 
O Erythema 
o Erythroderma 
El Poikiloderma 
O Sclerotic features 
O Pruritus 
O Hair involvement 
O Nail involvement 
% BSA 
involved 	
 
0 19-50% BSA OR 
involvement with 
superficial sclerotic 
features "not 
hidebound" (able to 
pinch) 
FHCRC Protocol 2551  
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
APPENDIX H 
Chronic graft-versus-host disease grading 
SCORE 0 	
SCORE I 	
SCORE 2 	
SCORE 3 
PERFORMANCE 
SCORE: 
KPS ECOG LPS 
O Asymptomatic 
and fully active 
(ECOG 0; KPS 
or LPS 100%) 
El Symptomatic, fully 
ambulatory, restricted only in 
physically strenuous activity 
(ECOG 1, KPS or LPS 80-
90%) 
0 Symptomatic, 
ambulatory, capable of 
self-care, >50% of 
waking hours out of 
bed (ECOG 2, KPS or 
LPS 60-70%) 
El Symptomatic, limited self-
care, >50% of waking hours in 
bed (ECOG 3-4, KPS or LPS 
<60%) 
O Abnormality present but NOT  thought to represent GVHD 
MOUTH 
Diagnosti/distinctive 
features 
O Present 
El Absent 
O Nosy mptoms 0 Mild symptoms with 
disease signs but not limiting 
oral intake significantly 
O Moderate symptoms 
with disease signs with 
partial limitation of 
oral intake 
0 Severe symptoms with 
disease signs on examination 
with major limitation of oral 
intake 
O Abnormality  present but NOT  thought to represent GVHD 
EYES 
Mean tear test (mm): 
O >10 
O 6-10 
O <5 
El Not done 
O Nosy mptoms 0 Mild dry eye symptoms 
not affecting ADL (requiring 
eyedrops < 3 x per day) OR 
asymptomatic signs of 
keratoconjunctivitis sicca 
O Moderate dry eye 
symptoms partially 
affecting ADL 
(requiring drops > 3 x 
per day or punctal 
plugs), WITHOUT 
vision impairment 
0 Severe dry eye symptoms 
significantly affecting ADL 
(special eyeware to relieve 
pain) OR unable to work 
because of ocular symptoms 
OR loss of vision caused by 
keratoconjunctivitis sicca 
O Abnormality present but NOT thought to represent GVHD 
GI TRACT 	
0 No symptoms 0 Symptoms such as nausea, 
vomiting,anorexia,dysphagia, 
abdominal pain or diarrhea 
without significant weight 
loss (<5%) 
O Abnormality present but NOT thought to represent GVHD 
O Symptoms 
associated with mild to 
moderate weight loss 
(5-15%) 
0 Symptoms associated with 
significant weight loss >15%, 
requires nutritional supplement 
for most calorie needs OR 
esophageal dilation 
Page 64 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol 2551 
SCORE 0 
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
SCORE 1  SCORE 2  
SCORE 3 
LIVER  
0 Normal LFT  0 Elevated Bilirubin,  0 Bilirubin >3 mg/di or  0 Bilirubin or enzymes > 5 x 
AP*, AST or ALT <2  Bilirubin, enzymes 2-5 x ULN 
x ULN  
ULN 
O Abnormality present but NOT thought to represent GVHD 
LUNGS t 
0 No symptoms 
0 Mild symptoms 
(shortness of breath 
after climbing one 
flight of steps) 
0 Moderate 
symptoms (shortness 
of breath after walking 
on flat ground) 
O Severe symptoms (shortness 
of breath at rest; requiring 02) 
FEV1 
DLCO.   0 FEV1 >80% OR  0 FEV I 60-79% OR 
LFS=2  
LFS 3-5 
O Abnormality present but NOT thought to represent GVHD  
L._  
0 FEV I 40-59% OR 
LFS 6-9 
O FEV1 <39% OR 
LFS 10-12 
JOINTS AND  0 No symptoms  0 Mild tightness of 
FASCIA  
arms or legs, normal 
or mild decreased 
range of motion 
(ROM) AND not 
affecting ADL 
O Abnormality present but NOT thought to represent GVHD 
0 Tightness of arms or 
legs OR joint 
contractures, erythema 
thought due to fasciitis, 
moderate decrease ROM 
AND mild to moderate 
limitation of ADL 
O Contractures WITH significant 
decrease of ROM AND 
significant limitation of ADL 
(unable to tie shoes, button shirts, 
dress self etc.) 
O Abnormality present but NOT though 
_ 
GENITAL TRACT 
0 No symptoms 
Diagnostic features:  
0 Present 
0 Absent 
0 Not examined 
0 Symptomatic with 
mild signs on exam 
AND no effect on 
coitus and minimal 
discomfort with 
gynecologic exam 
t to represent GVHD 
0 Symptomatic with 
moderate signs on exam 
AND with mild 
dyspareunia or 
discomfort with 
gynecologic exam 
0 Symptomatic WITH advanced 
signs (stricture, labial 
agglutination or severe ulceration) 
AND severe pain with coitus or 
inability to insert vaginal 
speculum 
Other indicators, clinical manifestations or complications related to chronic GVHD (check all that apply): 
El Weight loss 
1:1 Bronchiolitis obliterans 
El Bronchiolitis obliterans with organizing pneumonia 
El Esophageal stricture or web 
(serositis) 
El Pericardial Effusion 
Pleural Effusion(s) 
El Ascites 
El Nephrotic syndrome 
El Peripheral Neuropathy 
El Myasthenia Gravis 
CI 
Polymyositis 
El Malabsorption 
El Cardiac conduction defects 
El Coronary artery involvement 
El 
Cardiomyopathy 
El Eosinophilia >500/microliter 
El Other: 
El None 
Biopsy obtained: Ell'es ENo Organ system(s) biopsied:  
GVHD confirmed by histology: :Nes 
EINo 
OVERALL severity of GVHD: El None  El Mild  El Moderate  El Severe 
Change from previous evaluation: El None  0 Improved  El Stable  El Worse  El N/A 
(baseline) 
Completed by: 
 Date form completed:  
 
Pulmonary scoring should be performed using both the symptom and pulmonary function testing (PFT) scale whenever possible. When discrepancy exists 
between pulmonary symptom or PFT scores the higher value should be used for final scoring. Scoring using the Lung Function Score (LFS) is preferred, but 
if DLCO (carbon monoxide diffusion capacity corrected for hemoglobin) is not available, grading using FEV I (forced expiratory volume) should be used. 
The LFS is a global assessment of lung function after the diagnosis of bronchiolitis obliterans has already been establ ished.2  The percent predicted FEV I 
and DLCO (adjusted for hematocrit but not alveolar volume) should be converted to a numeric score as follows: > 80% = I; 70-79% = 2; 60-69% = 3; 50-
59% = 4; 40-49% = 5; <40% = 6. The LFS = FEV1 score + DLCO score, with a possible range of 2-12. 
Page 65 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol 2551 
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
APPENDIX I 
Acute GVHD Grading Scale 
Severity of Individual Organ Involvement 
System 
Severity 
Skin 
+1 
maculopapular eruption involving less than 25% of the body surface 
+2 
maculopapular eruption involving 25-50% of the body surface 
+3 
generalized erythroderma 
+4 
generalized erythroderma with bullous formation + desquamation 
Liver 
U 
+1 
bilirubin (2.0-3.0 mg/100 ml) 
+2 
bilirubin (3-5.9 mg/100 ml) 
+3 
bilirubin (6-14.9 mg/100 ml) 
III 
+4 
bilirubin > 15 mg/100 ml 
Gut 
LI 
+1 
5 1000 ml of liquid stool/day* (5 15m1 of stool/kg/day)t 
LI 
+1 
Nausea or vomiting or anorexia 
fl 
+2 
>1,000 ml of stool/day* (> 15m1of stool/kg/day)t 
+3 
>1,500 ml of stool/day* (> 20m1 of stool/kg/day)t 
+4 
2,000 ml of stool/day* (? 25m1 of stool/kg/day) 
*In the absence of infectious/medical cause 
Overall Grade  (Maximum grade) 
El 
I 
+1 to +2 skin rash. No gut or liver involvement. 
II 
+1 to +3 skin rash or 
+1 gastrointestinal involvement and/or +1 liver involvement 
III 
+2 to +4 gastrointestinal involvement and/or 
+2 to +4 liver involvement with or without a rash 
El 
IV 
Pattern and severity of GVHD similar to grade 3 with extreme constitutional symptoms or 
death. 
Page 66 of 69 
Printed on 9/1 8/20 1 9 


FHCRC Protocol 2551 
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
APPENDIX J 
Adverse events reporting guidelines for this protocol 
Adverse Events in certain categories that are not considered as reportable adverse events.  
The following events under certain categories will not be considered reportable adverse events due to the lack of 
relevance to the evaluation of the protocol treatment. Furthermore, in many cases, the event if significant will be 
captured more appropriately under another adverse event category (e.g. it is most relevant to report the event 
causing pain rather than the pain event itself): 
• 
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders 
• 
Endocrine disorders: puberty and growth related events 
• 
General disorders and administration site conditions: chills, edema, pain, fatigue, fever, flu-like symptoms, 
irritability and malaise. 
• 
Investigations: elevations in liver enzymes without increase in bilirubin, gonadotropin, prolactin, decreased 
lymphocyte and CD4 T cell count since this is expected with transplant, increase in amylase or lipase without 
clinical evidence of pancreatitis and weight gain or loss. 
• 
Metabolism and nutrition disorders: anorexia. 
• 
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders: exostosis, generalized muscle weakness, growth 
suppression, change in joint range of motion, kyphosis, lordosis, myalgia, myositis, scoliosis, trismus and 
unequal leg length. 
• 
Pain 
• 
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions: all events listed 
• 
Psychiatric disorders: agitation, anxiety, euphoria, insomnia, change in libido and restlessness 
• 
Reproductive system and breast disorders: all events listed 
• 
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders: dry skin, fat atrophy, hyperhidrosis, lipohypertrophy and pruritis 
• 
Social circumstances: both events listed 
• 
Vascular disorders: flushing, hot flashes 
• 
Surgical and medical procedures 
Grading of adverse events from the start of mobilization until day +28. 
1) Grade 3 and 4 adverse events that will not be reported during the first 28 days: 
Certain Grade 3 and 4 adverse events under particular categories in the CTC are expected as part of treatment or 
not uncommon in the HCT setting and do not represent a life-threatening event as detailed. These adverse events 
will not be reported at any time during the first 28 days: 
Anemia  
Weight gain 
Lymphocyte count decreased  
Weight loss 
Neutrophil count decreased  
Vomiting 
Platelet count decreased  
Hypokalemia 
White blood cell decreased  
Hyponatremia 
Fatigue  
Hypomagnesemia 
Fever  
Hyperglycemia 
Anorexia  
Hypocalcemia 
Insomnia  
Hypophosphatemia 
Chills 
The primary hospitalization and re-hospitalizations to manage expected events will not be automatically reported. 
Page 67 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


IR B Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
2) Adverse events that will be reported only if > Grade 4 during the first 28 days: 
Since the following events are to be expected in the setting of HCT, they will only be reported if they are Grade 
4 severity: 
FHCRC Protocol 2551 
Blood and Lymphatic System Disorders 
DIC 
Thrombotic microangiopathy 
Gastrointestinal Disorders  
Colitis 
Diarrhea associated with radiation or BMT 
studies 
Dysphagia, esophagitis, odynophagia 
Dysphagia-esophageal related to radiation 
Dysphagia-pharyngeal related to radiation 
Gastritis 
GI bleeding 
Ileus 
Mucositis 
Nausea 
Pancreatitis 
Stomatitis/pharyngitis/mucositis 
Vomiting 
Hepatobiliary disorders 
Hepatic hemorrhage 
Metabolism and Nutrition Disorders 
Dehydration 
Acidosis 
Alkalosis 
Hypercalcemia 
Hyperkalemia 
Hypermagnesemia 
Hypernatremia 
Hypertriglyceridemia 
Hyperuricemia 
Hypoglycemia 
Infections  
All infections 
Investigations  
Cholesterol high 
Blood bilirubin increased 
Creatinine increased 
Renal and urinary disorders 
Acute kidney injury 
Bladder spasms 
Cystitis noninfective 
Hematuria 
Renal hemorrhage 
Urinary electrolyte wasting 
Urinary frequency/urgency 
Urinary retention 
Reproductive system and breast disorders 
Menorrhagia 
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders 
Cough 
Hemoptysis 
Bronchopulmonary hemorrhage 
Hypoxia 
Laryngeal hemorrhage 
Pharyngeal hemorrhage 
Pleural hemorrhage 
Pleural effusion 
Pneumonitis/pulmonary infiltrates 
Voice alteration/stridor 
Vascular Disorders 
Hypertension 
Hypotension 
Grading of adverse events from day +29 to day +100.  
1) Grade 3 and 4 events that will not be reported: 
• 
Blood and lymphatic system disorders except for DIC, UP and HUS. 
• 
Decreases in blood counts including white blood cells, neutrophils, lymphocytes, hemoglobin (anemia) and 
platelets. 
2) All other grade 3 and 4 events will be reported 
Page 68 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019 


FHCRC Protocol 2551  
IRB Approved 
Consent Release Date: 11/05/2015 
Consent Expiration Date: 11/07/2016 
APPENDIX K 
PROTOCOL 2551: CROHN'S ALLOGENEIC TRANSPLANT STUDY 
ELIGIBILITY REVIEW GROUP DOCUMENTATION 
Patient Name: 
U-number: 
We reviewed the following to determine whether this patient potentially meets the eligibility criteria set 
forth in Protocol 2551, Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for patients with treatment-
refractory Crohn's Disease: A phase 2 study. 
•Patient-completed questionnaire (from www.CATS-FHCRC.orq) dated   
•Outside medical records 
•Consultation notes from visit to Seattle Cancer Care Alliance dated   
•Crohn's Disease Activity Index dated   
•Appendix E (Eligibility check list) Review of available patient data after First Phase screening 
visit. 
Eligibility determination (check one):  
O 
This patient meets eligibility criteria at this time 
O 
This patient does not meet eligibility criteria at this time 
O 
This patient may meet eligibility criteria in the future provided that the following 
issue(s) are addressed: 
Comments: 
Timothy L. Zisman, MD, MPH 
Date 
George E. Georges, MD  George B. McDonald, MD 
Date  
Date 
Page 69 of 69 
Printed on 9/18/2019