Conditions: Schizophrenia Tobacco Use
Allocation: RANDOMIZED | Intervention model: PARALLEL
Enrollment: 32
Healthy volunteers: no

Brief summary:
Craving for cigarettes is an important aspect that leads to challenges with smoking cessation. Persons with schizophrenia are more likely to smoke and to be heavier smokers than persons without schizophrenia, and may experience craving differently as well. Minocycline is an antibiotic medication that may impact craving. We will conduct a two-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group pilot study to investigate the effects of minocycline vs. placebo on craving and smoking behaviors in smokers with schizophrenia. Participants will take minocycline or matching placebo for two weeks. Participants will be assessed on aspects of craving and smoking behavior at baseline and after 1 and 2 weeks of minocycline or placebo treatment.

Detailed description:
Nicotine dependence is high in schizophrenia; nearly three times more prevalent than the general population. In smokers with schizophrenia, the risk of all-cause mortality is doubled and cardiovascular mortality risk is twelvefold higher than nonsmokers. Many factors influence smoking in persons with schizophrenia, but predictors of craving and smoking behavior are not well established. Craving is a major contributor to smoking behaviors, and, importantly, is a predictor of relapse risk. Since craving may precede relapse, it can be advantageous as a screening tool for those attempting cessation. In addition, focusing on treatments aimed to reduce craving may lead to better therapeutic targets. Minocycline may affect craving, perhaps due to inhibition of nitric oxide (NO) formation, as NO acts as a second messenger for glutamate and dopamine receptors. NO also facilitates the effects of nicotine in the reward circuit, and blockade of NO has been demonstrated to eliminate nicotine abstinence symptoms in rats. A small study has demonstrated that minocycline reduces cigarette craving in human subjects without severe mental illness. The investigators will conduct a two-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group pilot study to investigate the effects of minocycline vs. placebo on craving and indicators of smoking intensity in smokers with schizophrenia. Participants will take minocycline up to 200 mg daily or matching placebo for two weeks. Participants will complete cigarette cue-elicited craving platforms and related assessments at baseline, and after 1 and 2 weeks of minocycline or placebo treatment.

Arms:
arm 1: Participants will take 50 mg minocycline capsules twice daily for 1 week, then take 100 mg capsules twice daily for 1 week. arm 2: Participants will take capsules that match active drug, but contain no active ingredients, twice daily for week 1, and then will take capsules that match active drug, but contain no active ingredients, twice daily for week 2.

Interventions: intervention 1: Minocycline intervention 2: Placebo
Intervention descriptions: intervention 1: Minocycline capsules taken twice daily for two weeks. intervention 2: Placebo capsules taken twice daily for two weeks.

Protocol document:
Prot_SAP_000.pdf: 
Version 2.0 
 
May 1, 2020 
1 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Minocycline and tobacco craving in smokers with schizophrenia 
 
NCT 02968602 
 


Version 2.0 
 
May 1, 2020 
2 
 
 
Minocycline and tobacco craving in smokers with schizophrenia 
 
Protocol number:   
 
HP-00072110 
 
Principal Investigator:  
Deanna L. Kelly, PharmD  
 
Coinvestigators:   
 
 
Heidi J. Wehring, PharmD, BCPP 
Stephen J. Heishman, PhD 
 
 
 
 
David Gorelick, MD 
 
 
 
 
 
Robert P. McMahon, PhD 
Charles Richardson, MD 
 
 
 
Gopal Vyas, DO 
 
 
Nicotine dependence is high in schizophrenia; nearly three times more prevalent than the 
general population 1, 2.  In smokers with schizophrenia (SWS), the risk of all-cause mortality is 
doubled and cardiovascular mortality risk is twelvefold higher than nonsmokers 3, 4.  Many 
factors influence smoking in SWS 5; however, predictors of craving and smoking behavior are 
not well established. Craving is a major contributor to smoking behaviors, and, importantly, is a 
predictor of relapse risk 6.  Since craving may precede relapse, it can be advantageous as a 
screening tool for those attempting cessation.  In addition, focusing on treatments aimed to 
reduce craving may lead to better therapeutic targets. A combination of cessation strategies 
may be associated with reduced relapse, primarily due to craving suppression 7, so targeting 
craving may offer important gains in improving abstinence.  The DSM-5 has included craving as 
a symptom in diagnosing substance use disorders, which may increase attention to craving 
research 8-10. 
 
Most addictive drugs, including nicotine, enhance dopamine release in the mesolimbic “reward” 
pathway 11. Nicotine then mediates reinforcement from smoking via dopaminergic transmission, 
which is significant in schizophrenia as dopamine-mediated responses to rewarding stimuli may 
be abnormal 12.  This phenomenon, thought to be related to reward circuitry deficits, may be 
further complicated by the dopaminergic antagonism of antipsychotics.  Together, these factors 
may affect craving and/or smoking behavior in SWS.  Since persons with schizophrenia are not 
only heavier smokers, but also less likely to quit smoking, additional research is needed to 
develop specific information leading to interventions for this population.   
 
The proposed 2-week randomized double-blind comparison of adjunctive minocycline vs. 
placebo in tobacco smokers with schizophrenia is designed to assess potential effects of 
minocycline on craving and/or smoking behaviors in smokers with schizophrenia.  This protocol 
is funded as a K23 grant for the principal investigator to develop data towards an R01 
application to benefit smokers with schizophrenia. 
 
Primary Study Aim: 
 
To determine if treatment with minocycline will result in decreased craving for cigarettes 


Version 2.0 
 
May 1, 2020 
3 
 
in SWS compared to placebo.   
Hypothesis: Treatment with minocycline will result in decreased craving for cigarettes in SWS 
compared to placebo. Decreased craving will have effects on cigarette use and/or intensity of 
smoking in SWS, as defined by changes in cigarette intake, expired carbon monoxide (CO), and 
urine cotinine.  
A published pilot study13 in smokers without serious mental illness suggests that minocycline 
exhibits anti-craving effects. This proposed two week pilot study will measure the safety and 
efficacy of minocycline on craving intensity in SWS in response to triggers for craving presented 
in a VR environment. Measures of cigarette use (intake of cigarettes daily, CO, urine cotinine) 
will be used to analyze the relationship between cigarette craving and use.  
 
Secondary Study Aim: 
To determine the relationship between changes in craving, cigarette smoking intensity, 
and responses to individualized triggers of craving in SWS.  
Hypothesis:  Specific environmental triggers to craving will drive responsivity to changes in 
craving levels for SWS treated with minocycline. Changes in craving will coincide with changes 
in smoking intensity. 
Data from this protocol will identify relationships between triggers, craving, changes in craving 
and its relationship to smoking intensity in SWS treated with minocycline or placebo.  Data 
regarding the temporal association of craving and smoking intensity changes impart valuable 
information for further study, even if minocycline shows little evidence of effectiveness. 
 
RESEARCH STRATEGY 
 
Significance 
Up to 60% -70% of persons with schizophrenia smoke cigarettes 1, 2 compared to roughly 20% 
of adults in the US general population. This issue is of great importance to public health, since 
persons with schizophrenia are three times more likely to initiate smoking, are more likely to be 
heavy smokers, and five times less likely to quit than people in the general population14-17. SWS 
are often highly nicotine dependent, with greater carbon monoxide boost and puffs per cigarette 
14, 18, 19. Smoking is known to cause physical health problems, and the risk of smoking-related 
fatalities is greater in schizophrenia than the general population20. Although cessation is an 
important issue in all populations, it is of increased relevance to clarify the factors involved with 
smoking in SWS and determine appropriate interventions for reduction and cessation.  
 
Motivation to quit smoking is lower in SWS compared with normal controls 21. There are many 
reasons why people smoke (environment, stress reduction, boredom, habit) and craving is a 
major issue that may incite relapse in smokers attempting cessation22, 23.  Multiple cues or 
triggers may induce craving in smokers, and these may differ among populations and among 
individuals.  Preliminary studies suggest that SWS may have differences in reasons for smoking 
and in the experience of craving.  In addition, recent evidence indicates that most addictive 
drugs, including nicotine, enhance dopamine release in the mesolimbic “reward” pathway in the 
brain11.  Growing evidence suggests that persons with schizophrenia have abnormal dopamine-
mediated responses to rewarding stimuli, presumably due to deficits in function of mesolimbic 
reward circuitry12. 
 
Studies of cue induced craving reactions in smokers exposed to smoking paraphernalia under 
lab conditions have found that environmental cues (sight or smell of cigarettes) may trigger 


Version 2.0 
 
May 1, 2020 
4 
 
strong craving urges even after the attenuation of nicotine withdrawal24.  Environmental smoking 
cues have been shown to play an important role in the maintenance of nicotine addiction and in 
relapse to smoking.  Studies have demonstrated greater increases in self-reported craving and 
changes in autonomic functioning when smokers were exposed to smoking cues compared with 
neutral cues25.  Differences in craving experiences appear to exist between persons with severe 
mental illness and the general population.  This potential issue is being addressed within the 
Principal Investigator’s protocols funded by a K23 grant from NIDA. Thus, SWS may require 
specific interventions designed to address unique factors contributing to their craving.  
 
Minocycline is a synthetic, FDA approved derivative of tetracycline with a more tolerable side 
effect profile than other agents in this class.  Minocycline has been of increasing interest to the 
field of psychiatry in recent years, and several trials have investigated the efficacy of 
minocycline to reduce symptoms of schizophrenia 26-30.  All published studies showed favorable 
safety and tolerability profiles for minocycline use in this population.   
 
 
Proposed Treatment Rationale:   
 
Minocycline and possible effects on substance use and craving:  Minocycline may affect 
craving, perhaps due to inhibition of nitric oxide (NO) formation, as NO acts as a second 
messenger for glutamate and dopamine receptors13, 31.  NO also facilitates the effects of nicotine 
in the reward circuit, and blockade of NO has been demonstrated to eliminate nicotine 
abstinence symptoms in rats32, 33. A small study has demonstrated that minocycline reduces 
cigarette craving in human subjects without severe mental illness13. Although no published data 
exists with the use of minocycline as an anticraving medication in SWS, the small study 
described above in the non-mentally ill population has demonstrated the potential use of this 
medication.  The results, which showed decreased craving, provides a rationale for use SWS, 
who seem particularly vulnerable to craving with potential for exaggerated craving responsivity. 
With preliminary data suggesting a strong craving response in SWS, and the knowledge that 
SWS are less motivated to stop smoking, developing a stronger understanding of craving and 
testing a novel anti-craving intervention will contribute valuable information for future larger-
scale research.  In a previous study of adjunctive minocycline use in persons with 
schizophrenia, we were able to pilot the use of this technology in 7 SWS through double blind 
10 week pilot trial of minocycline or placebo where we assessed symptom changes as well as 
tobacco craving measures.  Although the numbers of participants were too low to adequately 
address questions of statistical significance, we demonstrated that SWS were able to tolerate 
the medication and recruitment and execution of study is feasible.  With preliminary data 
suggesting a strong craving response in SWS, and the knowledge that SWS are less motivated 
to stop smoking, developing a stronger understanding of craving and testing a novel anti-craving 
intervention will contribute valuable information for future larger-scale research. The study 
results from this protocol will provide preliminary data necessary to plan a larger study that may 
be funded through an R01 application.  This study is exempt from requiring IND application per 
21CFR312.2(b).  
 


Version 2.0 
 
May 1, 2020 
5 
 
Methods 
 
Study Overview 
 
We will conduct a two-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group pilot 
study to investigate the effects of minocycline vs. placebo on craving and indicators of smoking 
intensity in SWS. Participants will be initiated at minocycline 50 mg PO BID (or matching 
placebo) for week 1 and then the dose will be increased to 100 mg PO BID (or matching 
placebo) for week 2. Participants will complete cigarette cue-elicited craving platforms and 
related assessments at baseline, and after 1 and 2 weeks of minocycline or placebo treatment, 
as well as measurements of cigarette use, expired CO, and urine cotinine at baseline and after 
1 and 2 weeks of treatment. Prior to the study, all participants must meet inclusion and 
exclusion criteria including a physical exam and bloodwork. 
 
Innovative virtual reality (VR) technology will be used to elicit cue-elicited craving in SWS, 
measured by self report and physiological responses. Use of multisensory VR to elicit craving is 
a novel approach in SWS with potential to more consistently elicit craving than traditional 
methods of studying cue induced craving by exposure to neutral of smoking associated objects. 
The VR platform is valuable in order to study social, environmental, and attentional cues that 
contribute to craving in SWS, and to further explore how environmental factors influence 
physiological and behavioral aspects of craving.  VR environments are particularly useful in this 
setting as the exposure to cues will be standardized across subjects and very little variation may 
occur.  SWS report a variety of triggers to craving, including environmental, social, and 
emotional factors.  Laboratory experiments (including those with VR) designed to elicit craving 
are more likely to trigger environmental and socially cued craving.  Therefore, it is important to 
determine whether SWS who identify emotional factors as primary craving triggers will respond 
to cue-elicited craving induced in the laboratory.  This is an important aspect, as a generalizable 
method of craving elicitation is required to assess the outcome in craving prevention studies.  I 
have led the MPRC Virtual Reality laboratory for the past four years and have served as PI for 3 
separate studies using virtual reality in persons with schizophrenia, including piloting the use of 
a tobacco smoking cue-elicited craving platform.  We have established safety and tolerability of 
virtual reality platforms for smokers with schizophrenia (Wehring et al., in preparation). 
 
 
Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria 
 
Yes No Inclusion Criteria 
 
 
DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder 
 
 
Male or Female 
 
 
Age: 18 to 65 years 
 
 
Caucasian or Non-Caucasian 
 
 
Smoke at least 10 cigarettes daily or using nicotine-containing electronic 
cigarette/vaping 10 times daily with urine cotinine above inclusion threshold of ≥100 
ng/ml. 
 
 
Urine cotinine level ≥ 100 ng/ml (NicAlert® reading ≥ 3)   
 
 
Agrees to wear a head mounted display (HMD) for up to 45 minutes 
 
 
Able to complete the Evaluation to Sign Consent (ESC) with  minimum score of 80% 


Version 2.0 
 
May 1, 2020 
6 
 
 
Yes No Exclusion Criteria 
 
 
History of organic brain disease 
 
 
DSM-IV diagnosis of Alcohol or Substance Dependence within the last six months 
(except nicotine)  
 
 
DSM-IV diagnosis of Alcohol or Substance Abuse within the last one month (except 
nicotine)  
 
 
Pregnancy or lactation 
 
 
Severe liver dysfunction (LFT 3X upper limit of normal)  
 
 
Previous known hypersensitivity to tetracyclines 
 
 
Current treatment with tetracycline or derivative 
 
 
Treatment with oral contraceptives (unless a second form of birth control is used and 
documented) 
 
 
Treatment with cholestryramine or colestipol 
 
 
Treatment with Urinary alkalinizers (e.g., sodium lactate, potassium citrate) 
 
 
Treatment with warfarin 
 
 
Treatment with bupropion, varenicline, or nicotine replacement products in the month 
prior to study inclusion 
 
 
Less than two months treatment of adjunctive medications AND less than one month 
on same dose: beta blockers, antidepressants, mood stabilizers, antianxiety 
medications. 
 
 
Medical condition whose pathology or treatment would significantly increase the risk 
associated with the proposed protocol. 
 
 
History of head injury, seizures, or stroke 
 
 
Positive urine toxicology screen for substances of non-therapuetic use prior to 
craving assessments 
 
 
Plan to implement smoking cessation within next three months 
 
Schedule of events 
 
Schedule of Events 
 
 
 
 
 
Encounter # → 
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
Week of Study/Study Visit →  
Screening 
Baseli
ne 
Wk 1 
(med 
initiat
e) 
Wk 
2 
(dos
e 
incre
ase) 
EOS 
assess 
Procedure ↓ 
 
 
 
 
 
Informed consent 
R 
 
 
 
 
Demographic Forms 
R 
 
 
 
 
Patient Past Psychiatric and Medication History 
Form 
R 
 
 
 
 
SCID-Interview 
R 
 
 
 
 
Medical History 
R  
 
 
 
 
Physical Exam and height 
R 
 
 
 
 
SMAC incl gluc, lipids, CBC, UA, BUN, LFT 
R (or base)  
 
 
 


Version 2.0 
 
May 1, 2020 
7 
 
Cotinine and biomarkers for smoking (blood) 
R (or base)  
 
 
R 
Urine Pregnancy Test (female subjects) 
R 
R 
 
R 
 
Expired CO 
R 
R 
R 
R 
R 
DAUS 
R 
 
 
 
 
Cigarette use form 
R 
R 
R 
R 
R 
Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence 
 
R 
 
 
R 
Practice VR session 
 
R  
 
 
 
**Craving paradigm (assessments include 
Cigarette Craving Visual Analogue Scale, Tobacco 
Craving Questionnaire Short Form, Questionnaire 
for Smoking Urges- Short Form, Triggers to 
Smoke, Wisconsin Withdrawal Scale, and, 
physiological measures including blood pressure, 
heart rate, temperature, skin conductance, urine 
toxicology 
 
R 
 
R 
R 
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale  
R 
R 
R 
R 
R 
Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms  
R 
R 
R 
R 
R 
Side Effect Checklist 
R 
R 
R 
R 
R 
Monitoring for Skin Pigmentation 
 
 
R 
R 
R 
Pill Count 
 
 
 
R 
R 
Urine toxicology 
R or base 
R or 
scree
n 
 
 
 
**separate schedule as below 
 
Craving paradigm schedule of assessments (performed at base, med initiation study visit, after first week 
of drug study visit, and after 2nd week of drug/EOS visit) 
 
 
Pre Session  
Post Cue 1 
Post Cue 2 
Post Cue 3 
Post Cue 4 
Post 
Session 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TCQ-SF 
X 
 
 
 
 
X 
QSU-Brief 
X 
 
 
 
 
X 
SEC 
X 
 
 
 
 
X 
CCVAS 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Physiological 
measures 
(NOT IN DB) 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
Triggers to 
Smoke 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
Wisconsin 
Withdrawal 
Scale 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
BPRS 
(will be done 
at beginning 
of study visit) 
 
 
 
 
X 


Version 2.0 
 
May 1, 2020 
8 
 
 
 
 
Assessments for primary outcome measures:  
 
 Primary Assessments 
Cigarette Craving Visual Analogue Scale (CCVAS), Questionnaire of Smoking Urges-Brief 
(QSU-Brief) and Tobacco Craving Questionnaire-Short Form (TCQ-SF): During the Cue trials 
the Cigarette Craving Visual Analogue Scale (CCVAS) will be administered to measure 
cigarette craving. The CCVAS will be projected into the VR environment and participants will 
respond via hand controller.   
 
Secondary Assessments 
Secondary assessments include The Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives 
(WISDM-68), Wisconsin Smoking Withdrawal Scale (WSWS), Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine 
Dependence (FTND), the Drug and Alcohol Use Survey (DAUS), Smoking History Form, 
questions regarding cigarette and cue preferences, which will be given during the 
training/adaptation session, and the Mood form which will be administered at baseline and 
following the cue session, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Schedule for the 
Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), and Side Effect Checklist (SEC), which will be 
administered prior to the VR session.  The physiologic monitoring of heart rate, blood pressure, 
and skin conductance) will occur continuously during the session.  The Triggers for Smoking 
(TFS) form will be used to identify self-asserted triggers for smokers, divided by emotional, 
social, and environmental factors. 
 
 
Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence:  The FTND is a measure of nicotine dependence34. 
 
Drug and Alcohol Use Survey:  The DAUS will be used to determine usage of substances of 
abuse. 
Tobacco Craving Questionnaire-Short Form:  The TCQ-SF is a reliable and valid 12-item self-
report instrument that assesses tobacco craving in four dimensions: emotionality, expectancy, 
compulsivity, and purposefulness35.  
Questionnaire of Smoking Urges-Brief (QSU-Brief):  This is a 10-item assessment used to 
measure craving to smoke and used in studies of smokers with schizophrenia36.   
Wisconsin Smoking Withdrawal Scale (WSWS):  The WSWS is a 28-item self-report scale with 
a highly reliable 4-item craving subscale37. 
  
Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives (WISDM-68):  The WISDM-68 is a scale 
with 13 subscales that assesses motives of smoking dependence (Piper et al., in press) 
                                                                       
Cigarette Craving Visual Analogue Scale (CCVAS):   This is a 4-item scale used to assess, on a 
Likert Scale (0-100), the amount of craving for cigarettes, attention paid to cigarette sight, 
attention paid to cigarette scent, and the amount of thought devoted to cigarettes at given 


Version 2.0 
 
May 1, 2020 
9 
 
moment in time.  
 
Assessments for Other Psychiatric Symptoms and Safety:   
 
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS): The BPRS is an 18-item scale which measures positive 
symptoms, general psychopathology and affective symptoms.  The BPRS will be used to 
assess for symptom exacerbation during the experimental session. 
 
The Schedule for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS): Scale for the Assessment of 
Negative Symptoms: the SANS total score, minus the global items, inappropriate affect, poverty 
of content of speech, and attention items, will be used to measure negative symptoms.   
 
Side Effect Checklist (SEC):  The SEC will be completed at all study visits, and before and after 
the experimental sessions.  Adverse effects will be defined as follows:  a score of 4 on any item, 
unless the item is 4 at baseline, or an increase of 2 on any one item from baseline score.  This 
will include side effects specific to minocycline use.  
 
Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) 38: the CGI severity of illness and change scores items 
will assess severity of illness and global changes.   
 
Laboratory Measures:   Participants will undergo blood draw at baseline to ensure physical 
health to be included in the study.  Each will have a CBC, and laboratory assessments for liver 
enzymes and renal function (BUN/creatinine). We will also measure fasting glucose, total 
cholesterol, HDL, and LDL.  Blood will also be taken to quantify smoking status (baseline and 
end of study) and measure potential for biomarkers for propensity to craving responsivity 
(baseline only).  An estimated total of 13.5 teaspoons of blood will be taken, total, for this study.  
In addition, urine will be collected during screen/baseline and at study visits when craving 
assessments are performed to measure urine cotinine as well as screen for substances of 
abuse.   
 
Study Procedures and Dosing:   
Minocycline Dosing:   
 
Minocycline (Dynacin® or generic) will be available in 50 and 100 mg capsules (not pellet filled 
dosage form; i.e. Minocin®).  There will be matched placebo-minocycline capsules for each 
minocycline capsule strength. Study medication will be dispensed on a weekly basis.  They will 
be given two extra days of medication in case of a missed appointment.  Inpatient subjects will 
receive their study medication daily from the nurses in the Spring Grove Hospital Center 
Treatment Research Program.  During the first week subjects will receive one 50 mg capsule 
BID (minocycline 100 mg total or matching placebo) and during week 2, subjects will receive 1- 
100 mg capsule BID (minocycline 200 mg total or matching placebo). This dose is based on the 
dose from published double blind studies in persons with schizophrenia which showed excellent 
safety and tolerability profiles, including one 6-month study in which only 4 patients had side 
effects (11%) and were discontinued from the study 39 including our 10 week clinical trial in 
schizophrenia patients28.  Many tetracycline preparations have chelation with calcium and iron. 
This is not a significant concern with minocycline; it can be given without regard to meals. 
Standard dosing will be requested to occur at approximately 9:00 am and 9:00 pm. Patients will 


Version 2.0 
 
May 1, 2020 
10 
 
be instructed to avoid OTC medications such as antacids or Pepto-Bismol that may impede 
absorption of minocycline within 2 hours of dosing.  
 
Concomitant Medications: 
Subjects may remain on other medications not excluded from the protocol.  In order to decrease 
the likelihood that any observed change in tobacco craving or smoking habits during the study is 
related to one of these adjunctive treatments, a subject must have been on the adjunctive 
medication(s) for at least 2 months and on their current dose(s) of adjunctive medication(s) for 
at least 1 month prior to study participation.  The dose of adjunctive medication will remain fixed 
throughout the conduct of the study, except for required side effect-related adjustments (e.g., in 
anticholinergic or β-blocker agents).  Although not expected for this short-term, non-symptom-
related study, if at any time throughout the study the subject’s condition worsens (as defined 
below), the subject may be withdrawn from the study.   
 
Procedures/Methods:  
This study will utilize the cue-elicited VR platform and a standard box mechanism cue-reactivity 
platform to examine the effects of smoking versus neutral cues on measures of cue-elicited 
reactivity in smokers treated with minocycline or placebo. In the randomized box mechanism 
cue elicited craving platform participants open a box which contains either a pencil and 
sharpener (neutral) or a lighter and cigarette (smoking cue) and handle these objects. Cigarette 
cue-elicited craving platforms, and measures of cigarette intake, will be performed at baseline, 
the end of week 1, and the end of week 2.  
 
In addition to the measures used in Aim 1, cigarette intake will be measured by self-report, urine 
cotinine levels, and expired carbon monoxide levels will be collected.  Additional safety 
measures include monitoring for side effects of minocycline (see below risks of minocycline). 
During the VR Cue trials (as used in Aim 1) the CCVAS will be administered at baseline, after 
each cue session, and after the experimental session. The TCQ-SF/QSU Brief will be 
administered to measure cigarette craving at baseline and after the session. During the 
experiment participants will be monitored for physiological reactivity (heart rate, blood pressure, 
and skin conductance response) to cues of smoking as well as neutral cues measured.  During 
the standard cue-elicited craving platform, participants will be administered a CCVAS at 
baseline after a cigarette, 15 minutes after the cigarette, and after each cue (neutral, smoking) 
as well as after the experimental session, and will be monitored for physiological reactivity to 
cues of smoking and neutral cues. Participants will be exposed to each and will repeat the 
session after 1 and 2 weeks of treatment.  Mixed model analysis of covariance will be used to 
estimate the difference in magnitude of cue-induced craving and physiological responses in the 
minocycline versus placebo groups at Week 2, adjusting for corresponding cue-induced 
responses at baseline (pre-drug) session. Smoking intensity will be measured via cigarette 
intake, urine cotinine, and expired CO levels at baseline, Week 1, and Week 2.  
 
Study Procedures for Virtual Reality Cue-elicited craving sessions:  
 
General procedures.  The general procedures for this study are modeled after the design 
utilized by Bordnick and colleagues (2005) in their study of virtual reality cue reactivity in 
cigarette smokers, in addition to pilot studies performed by this PI and research group in 
smokers with schizophrenia.  Participants will be allowed to smoke ad libitum before study 
sessions.  Women will have a urine pregnancy test done before each session.  If a pregnancy 


Version 2.0 
 
May 1, 2020 
11 
 
test is positive, the participant will be dismissed from the study because smoking is toxic to fetal 
development.  Pregnant women will be offered information regarding smoking cessation.   
 
 
Training/adaptation session.  A training session will take place prior to the baseline study 
session so participants can be familiarized with the equipment and assesed from potential side 
effects of VR immersion (headache, dizziness). An adaptation session will follow during which 
participants will be familiarized with the HMD and hand controllers. Subjects will be informed to 
immediately report any nausea, dizziness, headache, or other physical or psychological 
discomfort durng the session.  Subjects will be asked the standardized question “Do you feel 
comfortable with the use of the virtual reality equipment?”.  Subjects expressing discomfort will 
discuss this with the study personnel and will be offered relaxation tapes.  Participants who 
continue to express discomfort after relaxation tapes and further discussion will be removed 
from the study. 
 
 
Experimental sessions.  There will be a baseline and endpoint experimental session for 
the craving endpoints in the primary aim. Pre-gelled electrodes will be placed at this time for 
physiological and skin conductance measurements. All participants will smoke one cigarette of 
their choice and then take a 20-30 minute break prior to the virtual reality program.  Participants 
will complete the CCVAS after each cue exposure using a game pad immediately upon 
completion of the experimental session; physiological measures will be recorded continuously.  
Participants will complete the TCQ-SF, QSU-Brief, CCVAS, Mood form, and SEC at the end of 
the cue session.  
 
VR Cue-reactivity Assessment (VRCRA).   Participants will be asked to put on the VR 
helmet and make adjustments for comfort.  The VR helmet is equipped with two-way audio and 
with a monitored video display.  Participants will hold a hand controller in their dominant hand.  
The VR-NCRAS program will be started and participants will enter a relaxation phase for 5 
minutes.  During this time, subjects will be immersed in a dark room while listening to music. 
After 5 minutes, the VR-NCRAS will move each along a preprogrammed path to the next 
stimulus.  At the start of the VRCRA session, participants will complete the CCVAS.   
 
Each participant will then experience a neutral cue room, two smoking cue rooms (one 
inanimate smoking cue room and the other a social interaction party scene room involving 
smoking) ending with a final neutral cue room.  Subjects will experience cues in order of 
Neutral- Smoking- Smoking- Neutral.  The order of smoking cue presentation will be the 
inanimate smoking room followed by the social interaction smoking room.  Each room provides 
3 minutes of exposure that will include timed pauses in front of stimuli that allow viewing of each 
relevant stimulus or social interaction. After each cue room, participants enter a questionnaire 
room and rate their craving intensity on a visual analog scale (VAS) by using the game pad to 
select a position along a line anchored on the left by “not at all “ and on the right by “more than 
ever”.  The CCVAS is integrated into VR to help maintain immersion in the VR experience. The 
entire VR NCRAS session will be computer guided. The experimental session of VAS will take 
26 minutes. The VR-NCRAS neutral cues consist of nature based video scenes with 
accompanying audio arranged in a room. At preprogrammed interval, participants will be guided 
to each nature scene. The VR NCRAS smoking cues include a room that contains smoking 
paraphernalia (i.e., burning cigarettes, cigarette packs, a bar and percolating coffee pot) and a 
separate room that consists of a party setting.  The party setting allows participants to interact 


Version 2.0 
 
May 1, 2020 
12 
 
with people in VR who are smoking, drinking and who offer a cigarette to the participant. The 
experimenter controls the VR social interactions using a keyboard interface. Each social 
interaction will occur between participants and video of people inserted into the three 
dimensional world. Responses from the VAS, as well as physiological and skin conductance 
measures, will be captured by computer and downloaded to the study database.  Upon 
completion of the VRCRA session, participants will be debriefed as described below.  The 
schedule of the VRCRA session is depicted in Table 1.   
 
Table 1.  Virtual Reality Cue Exposure laboratory schedule 
 
Time (minutes) Activity 
Arrival 
00:00 – 10:00 
Equipment setup 
Placement of electrodes 
Relax  
10:00 – 11:00 
Begin VRCE session 
Baseline Assessment 
11:01 – 14:00 
Neutral Cue Room exposure 
14:01 – 15:00 
Assessment 1 
15:01 – 18:00 
Smoking Cue Room 1 exposure  
Smoking paraphernalia 
18:01 – 19:00 
Assessment 2 
19:01 – 20:00 
Smoking Cue Room 2 exposure  
Social Interaction 
20:01 – 21:00 
Assessment 3 
21:01 – 24:00 
Neutral Cue Room exposure 
24:01 – 25:00 
Assessment 4 
25:01  
End of VRCE Session 
 
 
Virtual Reality Equipment:  A virtual reality nicotine cue reactivity assessment system (VR-
NCRAS) already developed and used in studies of nicotine dependent subjects (without mental 
illness) will be used for the experimental session. Disposable pre-gelled skin conductance 
electrodes will be attached to the index and ring finger of the nondominant hand. Participants 
will be seated in a nonreclining chair. The skin conductance electrodes will be hooked up to 
Biopac monitoring equipment and monitoring of skin conductance response will begin. The 
Biopac Physiologic monitor will be used to continuously monitor blood pressure, heart rate, and 
skin conductance via arm cuff, and data will be collected and downloaded via computer to the 
study database.  Participants will wear the HMD (NVIS Sx high resolution display head set) and 
will be provided with a game pad. Using a custom interface the researcher will select the 
experimental path, brand representation/type of cigarettes, presence of alcoholic beverages and 
gender of person offering cigarettes.  An olfactory system is also included to release scent 
based upon cues in the virtual environment (smell of cigarette smoke, food, etc.). 
 
Debriefing 
At the conclusion of the last experimental session, subjects will be allowed to smoke one 
cigarette.  Following this break, the PI, MAI, or other qualified research staff with bachelor level 
or higher degrees and significant clinical experience and training will meet with participants to 


Version 2.0 
 
May 1, 2020 
13 
 
answer any questions they might have about the study.  This will also serve as an opportunity to 
intervene with respect to the participant’s tobacco dependence.  The investigator will counsel 
the participant on the risks of continued smoking and the benefits of quitting and give them a 
referral list of smoking treatment programs.  Subjects will be assessed for any increase in 
psychotic symptoms.  If the BPRS Positive symptom scale increases by one point or greater, or 
subject reports distress or discomfort, relaxation tapes will be offered along with further 
interaction with the investigator.  Subjects will be reassessed at the conclusion of the relaxation 
tape for need to further intervene.  If the participant expresses ongoing distress, the participant 
will be offered additional relaxation tapes and discussion for a period of at least twenty minutes.  
If the participant still expresses distress, he or she must be seen by the PI or coinvestigator for 
further evaluation and intervention.   
 
 
Data Analysis:   
All data analysis will be conducted on an intention to treat basis including all available data from 
patients with at least one post baseline measure, using methods (e.g. mixed models for 
incomplete repeated measures) that allow analysis of data for participants with missing visits.  
Exploratory analyses will be conducted using mixed models for repeated measures analysis of 
covariance to explore the effects of minocycline versus placebo on subjective dimensions and 
physiological craving responses to smoking cues presented in a VR environment.  For each 
craving measure we will fit the model:  follow-up craving measurement  = baseline craving 
measurement + minocycline week 1 + placebo week 1 + minocycline week  2 + placebo week  
2, where the variables “minocycline week  1,” etc. are yes/no indicators marking the week the 
measure was collected and the participants treatment group.  The model will be fitted without an 
intercept to make the parameters identifiable, and I will estimate the following contrasts of the 
parameter estimates: minocycline week 1 - placebo week 1, minocycline week 2 - placebo week 
2, ½[(minocycline week 1 - placebo week 1) + (minocycline week 2 - placebo week 32)] and 
(minocycline week 1 - placebo week 1) - (minocycline week  2 - placebo week 2).  These define, 
respectively, acute (1 week) effect of minocycline on craving, longer term (week 2) effect of 
minocycline on craving, average (over time) effect of minocycline on craving (treatment main 
effect) and change from week 1 to week 2 in effect of minocycline on craving (treatment x week 
interaction), which may reflect minocycline dose escalation after week 1.  For each craving 
response, we will calculate these effect estimates, together with 95% confidence intervals, to 
assist in planning future studies of minocycline as an adjunct treatment to supplement smoking 
cessation interventions.  For the secondary aim, descriptive statistics (mean, median, s.d.) will 
be calculated by treatment group on the magnitude of craving change from the start of the study 
in participants reporting each trigger type experience during at weeks 1 and 2, both at pre-VR 
baseline each week and when presented with environmental or social cues during the VR 
sessions. Even if minocycline has no effect on craving, data regarding the relationship of 
craving and smoking intensity across time will impart valuable information for further study.   
Baseline and end of study data in all subjects (n=30) will be used to estimate Spearman 
correlations between measures of smoking intensity and craving; Fisher’s z-transformation will 
be used to calculate confidence limits on these correlations.  There will be power>0.8 to detect 
correlations ≥r=0.5.   Both cross-sectional correlations between craving and smoking at baseline 
and correlations in changes in craving level and smoking will be examined.  As noted above, 
treatment effects on concurrent treatment-related changes in craving and smoking intensity will 
be estimated. In order to get 30 subjects that will complete the study procedures, 60 participants 


Version 2.0 
 
May 1, 2020 
14 
 
will sign consent documents. 
 
Power for primary outcome:  As is common in pilot studies, there will be adequate power to 
detect only strong effects; power will depend on the strength of the within-subject correlation, r, 
between baseline and follow-up measures.  For example, to detect a treatment differences at 
week 2, with n=13 per group (≈15% dropout), we would have power=0.80 to detect an effect 
size of d=0.92 for r=0.6, or d=0.82 for r=0.7. Smoking intensity will be measured via cigarette 
intake (self report), urine cotinine, and expired carbon monoxide (CO) levels at baseline, Week 
1, and Week 2; treatment-related changes in these measures will be estimated using models 
similar to those outlined above.  
 
Recruitment  
Patients with schizophrenia will be recruited by MPRC through their patient recruiting network 
including the Treatment Research Program and the Outpatient Research Program and affiliated 
sites.    
 
ResearchMatch.org will be utilized as a recruitment tool for this protocol. ResearchMatch.org is 
a national electronic, web-based recruitment tool that was created through the Clinical & 
Translational Science Awards Consortium in 2009 and is maintained at Vanderbilt University as 
an IRB-approved data repository. 
 
Medication Adherence 
Patients receiving >75% of their assigned medication will be considered adherent.  Outpatient 
adherence will be monitored through weekly pill counts and subject interviews.  Medications will 
be dispensed on a weekly basis and will only be dispensed after adherence is assessed and all 
other assessments are completed.  Inpatient adherence will be monitored through inpatient 
medication records.  If a patient is observed to have an adherence problem, then this will be 
discussed with the patient and a plan formulated to bring the patient back into adherence.   
 
Randomization and Blinding 
Treatment assignment will be random with equal numbers of subjects assigned to each 
treatment group. Subjects will be randomly assigned to minocycline or placebo-minocycline 
using a permuted block randomization system with separate randomization sequences for 
inpatients and outpatients. Treatment assignment order is random within each block, and an 
equal number of subjects are assigned to each treatment within a block.  The block sizes will 
vary in random sequence and randomization will be stratified for inpatient/outpatient status.  
Thus, it will be difficult to ascertain the next treatment assignment, even if a subject becomes 
unblinded, while the imbalance of numbers between the treatment groups is kept within tight 
limits.  Randomization requests are sent to the study statistician, who sends a coded treatment 
assignment to an unblinded pharmacist. Separate emergency unblinding envelopes for each 
subject will be kept in a locked cabinet at each dispensing pharmacy.  All raters, investigators 
and other staff will be blind to treatment assignment except for the pharmacist.  The pharmacist 
does not participate in study assessments and conveys no information about treatment 
assignment to subjects or staff except in a medical emergency.   
 
Sources of Materials 
All records of the research will be kept in locked files with subjects’ evaluation study materials 


Version 2.0 
 
May 1, 2020 
15 
 
identified by code only.  A separate file will hold the code key.  Patients will not be personally 
identified in any publications or reports of the study.  All blood specimens drawn for research 
purposes will be identified at the laboratory by code only.  Whenever possible, existing clinical 
laboratory data will be used as a source of information for the study, which will minimize testing 
done on subjects.  Any data used will be recopied to research files with the subject identified by 
code only. The highest standards of subject confidentiality will be kept and no subjects will have 
identifiable information available. Computerized records of data are kept in password-only 
accessible computer in a locked room. Appropriate firewalls and protections of computerized 
data are maintained to ensure that entry by those other than research personnel is not possible. 
 
The principal investigator or designated research staff will conduct the final consent interview 
with all subjects. All participating research staff will undergo documented HIPAA training and all 
study records and data will be monitored for HIPPA compliance throughout the study.   As 
previously stated, all laboratory data and records will be identified only by code numbers and 
kept in a locked cabinet.  The PI and Medically Accountable Physician will be available to 
handle any emergencies or adverse reactions.  When medically indicated, the patient will be 
sent to University Hospital for emergency and/or continued care. All adverse effects will be 
reviewed by the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (see below) and all Serious Adverse Effects 
will be reported to the IRB as per their specific requirements (see below).    
 
Data will be entered into a Microsoft Access database.  All forms are identified within this 
database by a unique participant ID number, participant initials, and the protocol ID number and 
acronym, together with the protocol phase and visit.  The protocol data collection schedule is 
kept in a data base table and is used to monitor the progress of patients through the protocol, 
missing assessments, and other protocol deviations during the study. Data entry screens 
incorporate range checks or lists of valid responses for each item.  Forms with missing or invalid 
data in key identifying fields are referred back to raters for correction before entry.  Patient 
confidentiality is maintained by restricting study data access to specified study personnel.  Most 
authorized personnel will have read-only access, and write/edit access will be restricted to data 
entry and data management staff assigned to the study.  An electronic audit trail records all 
changes to the data base once data have been entered.  The database resides on a central 
server, and all server data are backed up several times weekly.  Access to the server from 
outside the MPRC is restricted by a firewall.  Norton Anti-Virus software, updated automatically 
whenever new virus data files are provided, is installed on the server and all PCs linked to the 
server.  Development of the data management system for this study will be facilitated by the 
existence of this data base structure, which already contains tables and data entry screens for 
many of the assessments used in this study. 
 
 
Potential Risks  
Risks of the study include: transient increase in craving for cigarettes, skin irritation at site of 
physiological monitoring leads, bruising at the site of blood draw, boredom or uncomfortable 
with questions or assessments, side effects of virtual reality (dizziness, headache, nausea, 
motion sickness) and privacy of information concerns.  
 
Potential risks from the minocycline may include GI side effects (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, 
loose stools, anorexia, and flatulence), dizziness, drowsiness, headache, fatigue and tinnitus. 
Side effects will be assessed weekly. Photosensitivity has occurred with tetracyclines, however 


Version 2.0 
 
May 1, 2020 
16 
 
photosensitivity with minocycline is usually not reported. All subjects in the study will be asked 
to wear sunscreen when going outside during the two weeks of intervention. Vaginal candidiasis 
may occur with antibiotic treatment. A maculopapular, morbilliform or erythematous rash has 
occurred in rare instances. This will also be assessed at each visit. Increases in blood urea 
nitrogen (BUN) and liver enzyme elevations (LFT) have also been reported. The most frequently 
occurring side effects are nausea and dizziness. Antibiotic resistance to tetracycline derivatives 
has been identified however tetracyclines have been widely used due to their low toxicity and 
broad spectrum of activity. This class of medications is used in the long term for acne vulgaris.  
Rare but serious side effects include: esophageal ulcers, exfoliative dermatitis, or acute renal 
failure.  In the rate event an infection arises during the course of minocycline, antibiotics other 
than tetracyclines or penicillins (possible drug interaction) will be prescribed.   
 
Skin pigmentation is an infrequent reported side effect of minocycline and the subjects in the 
study will be examined by study clinician weekly for any notice of skin changes. The patient will 
be asked to watch for any discoloration of the skin particularly in areas of scar tissue. There are 
3 types of skin pigmentation that may occur. Type 1, is the most common, is reversible and 
consists of blue-black macule in areas of scarring or inflammation. Type 2 consists of well 
circumscribed blue-grey pigmentation on the shins and forearms, also reversible. Type 3 is rare 
and composed of a diffuse muddy brown discoloration accentuated in sun-exposed skin. It may 
persist indefinitely. The reported incidence of type 1 pigmentation ranges from 2.4-14.8% based 
on long-term studies. Types 2 and 3 are known to be associated with long term administration 
(6 months – 4 years) and high cumulative doses (>100 grams)40. Many long term studies have 
recently been completed (12-24 months) for various disorders and they all report rates of 
discontinuation due to skin pigmentation to be very low (i.e., <5%)41-45. In our recently completed 
10-week study of minocycline compared to placebo for adjunctive treatment of schizophrenia 
symptoms, four (14%) participants assigned minocycline and 2 (9%) assigned placebo were 
noted to have skin pigmentation or skin discoloration during the study (p=0.54)28. The potential 
for skin pigmentation will be taken seriously and proactively and will include dermatologic 
consultation if needed. Skin will be examined weekly, however, we anticipate few or none to 
have any pigmentation during this short-term (2 week) exposure, and most likely type 
1(reversible, mild and present on scar tissue). The likelihood of serious adverse events 
occurring is very low.  It is not expected that other unexpected frequent side effects would 
occur. Females of childbearing age will agree to the use of medical approved birth control, 
which includes condoms, diaphragms and intrauterine device.  Pregnant and lactating females 
will be excluded. Oral contraceptives are excluded, unless there is a second documented form 
of birth control, as minocycline may decrease the efficacy.  
 
Protection Against Risks 
Informed Consent 
All participants must be judged capable of signing informed consent and must give their consent 
to participate in the study.  Patients will be given a signed copy of the consent form and a copy 
will be placed in their research file. We pay particular attention to the consent process in the 
population of persons with schizophrenia. The Evaluation to Sign Consent (ESC), which tests 
understanding of study procedures, study risks and right to refuse consent and/or withdraw 
without affecting normal treatment, prior to signing consent. The consent procedure is usually a 
process. Dr. Carpenter, former Director of our Center has had several grants in research ethics 
and we have found previously that the ESC is a valid and reliable instrument to assess 


Version 2.0 
 
May 1, 2020 
17 
 
understanding of the study procedures and risks. All research staff are trained in great detail on 
the ESC and consent process. 
 
Clinical Worsening and Side Effects 
If clinical worsening would occur, although unexpected in this short-term, non-symptom-
intervention study, the subject will be discontinued from the study. Worsening is in the opinion of 
the treating psychiatrist and PI and may be defined as the following: worsening of symptoms 
(relative to the baseline BPRS, an increase of 3 or more points on a positive symptom item OR 
an increase of 2 or more on the CGI global severity OR the subject is judged to be entering an 
exacerbation of his/her illness by the treating clinician). 
 
If adverse events occur, clinical judgment will be used in following standardized steps for 
possible rechallenge, with results recorded as part of physician judgment of the probability that 
an event is linked to the experimental treatment (drug or placebo).   Once a participant is 
discontinued from the study, completion ratings will be performed if possible.   
 
These studies are not expected to be associated with clinical worsening. The PI as well as the 
medically accountable investigator (MAI) will be available to handle any emergencies or adverse 
reactions.  When medically indicated, the patient will be sent to University Hospital for 
emergency and/or continued care.   If clinical worsening would occur a participant will be 
discontinued from the study. If adverse events occur, clinical judgment will be used in following 
standardized steps for continuing study participation, with the results recorded as part of 
medically accountable physician judgment of the probability that an event is linked to the 
experiment.   Once a participant is discontinued from the study for whatever reason, completion 
ratings will be performed if possible. 
 
Data storage and participant confidentiality  
All records created during research will be kept in locked files with participants' evaluation study 
materials identified by code only.  A separate file will hold the code key.  Participants will not be 
personally identified in any publications or reports of the study.  All specimens (blood, saliva, 
urine) drawn for research purposes will be identified at the laboratory by code.  Whenever 
possible, existing clinical laboratory data will be used as a source of information for the study, 
which will minimize testing done on subjects.  Any data used will be recopied to research files 
with the subject identified by code only. The highest standards of participant confidentiality will 
be kept and no participants will have identifiable information available. Computerized records of 
data are kept in password-only accessible computer in a locked room. Appropriate firewalls and 
protections of computerized data are maintained to ensure that entry by those other than 
research personnel is not possible.   
 
 
 
  
Potential Benefits of the Proposed Research to the Subjects and Others 
The study may not benefit the participants themselves, or participants in the minocycline arm 
may experience a decrease in craving for cigarettes.  The knowledge obtained by this research 
will be of great importance to further the study of craving in persons with schizophrenia with the 
ultimate goal of contributing to the development and assessment of interventions designed to 
attenuate craving and aid in smoking cessation and abstinence efforts.     
 


Version 2.0 
 
May 1, 2020 
18 
 
Importance of the Knowledge to be Gained 
 The importance of the knowledge gained outweighs any risks that may occur in this study. 
There is little information available regarding the assessment of craving in persons with 
schizophrenia, especially since pilot data have suggested differences in craving between 
schizophrenia and the general population.  The potential to utilize a systematically tested 
mechanism for cue-elicited craving, and to test a novel medication, minocycline, on craving and 
effect on cigarette intake, will be valuable for future research. In addition, the collection of pilot 
data will lead to a more concentrated effort to discover interventions for craving and smoking 
cessation.  
 
Data and Safety Monitoring Plan 
 
This study will use a Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB).  The MPRC DSMB consists of 
two research/practicing psychiatrists; one community psychiatrist; one internal and one external 
biostatistician; and one research pharmacist. 
 
The MPRC DSMB will: 
1) review proposed protocols and consent forms prior to the start of enrollment to assess how 
the PI will report adverse events, early withdrawals and terminations 
2) evaluate recruitment and rate of enrollment in relation to study targets 
3) monitor the occurrence of adverse events, serious adverse events, and early withdrawals or 
terminations 
4) evaluate study outcomes, when available 
5) monitor studies throughout their progress 
 
Meetings: Once a protocol has been initially reviewed, the DSMB will determine the frequency 
of review for each study, at minimum yearly. 
 
Meeting Format: The DSMB will have a standard quarterly meeting. Depending on the need, 
the DSMB will provide an interim review of a study with a conference call to the PI to facilitate 
the start of a study. The principal study investigator will prepare a protocol summary, which will 
be sent to the DSMB Coordinator two weeks prior to the meeting. 
 
Study Monitoring: If as a result of data monitoring or interim analysis, the DSMB determines 
that a trial (a) has answered the primary study question, (b) will not be able to reach a firm 
conclusion, (c) is not being conducted according to high scientific or ethical standards, or (d) 
poses an unreasonable or unnecessary risk to study participants, the DSMB will recommend to 
the principal investigator that the study be amended, temporarily suspended or terminated as 
appropriate. If in the Board’s judgment, safety concerns need to be conveyed to the MPRC 
Director and the IRB immediately, they will do so. 
 
Interim Analysis: An interim, unblinded analysis may be conducted in response to unusual 
patterns of side effects, response, or recruitment difficulties. In these rare circumstances, the 
study biostatistician will prepare a study data Closed Session report and forward it to the MPRC 
DSMB Coordinator to send to the DSMB members prior to the meeting. These reports will 
contain the most up-to-date data permitted by the timeframe necessary for the study 
biostatistician to prepare and review the analyses.  


Version 2.0 
 
May 1, 2020 
19 
 
 
Communication of DSMB Recommendations: At the conclusion of each DSMB meeting, the 
Board will provide a verbal report to the principal study investigator indicating areas of concern 
regarding performance and safety. The DSMB will not communicate any information that could 
lead to the unblinding of investigators or suggest interim treatment-specific results. The minutes 
from the DSMB Board will be sent to the principal investigator documenting (a) the date of the 
review, (b) that all relevant interim safety and efficacy data were reviewed, (c) recommendations 
concerning the study execution or modifications to the study protocol, and (d) the anticipated 
date of the next review. The PI must provide a copy of the DSMB minutes to all oversight IRBs 
or other governing bodies at the time of their regularly scheduled renewal or sooner if 
modifications are requested by the DSMB. Should the DSMB require additional information from 
the PI after a review, the PI must provide a formal written response to the DSMB and submit it 
to the DSMB Coordinator who will forward the document to the Board Members. 
 
Serious Adverse Events: A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical 
outcome occurring in the context of the conduct of research, that: 
 
• 
results in the death of the participant 
• 
is life threatening 
• 
requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization 
• 
results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity 
• 
results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect 
• 
requires intervention to prevent permanent impairment or damage 
 
The PI and Medically Accountable Physician will receive all SAE reports within 24 hours of their 
occurrence.  All serious adverse events (SAEs) will be reported to the DSMB, PI the University 
of Maryland School of Medicine IRB, and the appropriate NIH program officer.   Any SAE that 
occurs to a subject enrolled in a study in which the MPRC DSMB is the DSMB of record, must 
be reported to the DSMB within 5 working days; or within 48 hours if it is directly related to the 
research intervention.  The University of Maryland School of Medicine IRB will receive the 
reports within their required time frame, dependent of the nature of the event.  NIDA will receive 
SAE reports within 72 hours of occurrence in accordance with regulation.  If the incidence of any 
side effect/adverse event is 25% or more or any SAE occurs in excess in either treatment 
group, then the DSMB will notify the PI.  The PI, coinvestigators, and DSMB will determine 
whether possible protocol modifications are required to minimize the further occurrence of such 
events. 
 
Payment 
 
Participants will receive $25 each for screening visit and visit 4.  Participants will receive $50 
each for visits 2, 3, and 5, which will involve more time spent for study interventions   
Participants will be paid by check or as per MPRC protocol. Checks are disbursed monthly. 
 
References 
 
1. 
de Leon J, Diaz FJ. A meta-analysis of worldwide studies demonstrates an 
association between schizophrenia and tobacco smoking behaviors. 


Version 2.0 
 
May 1, 2020 
20 
 
Schizophr Res Jul 15 2005;76(2-3):135-157. 
2. 
Salokangas RK, Cannon T, Van Erp T, et al. Structural magnetic resonance 
imaging in patients with first-episode schizophrenia, psychotic and severe 
non-psychotic depression and healthy controls. Results of the 
schizophrenia and affective psychoses (SAP) project. Br J Psychiatry 
Suppl Sep 2002;43:s58-65. 
3. 
Kelly DL, McMahon RP, Wehring HJ, et al. Cigarette smoking and mortality 
risk in people with schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull Jul;37(4):832-838. 
4. 
Kelly DL, McMahon RP, Wehring HJ, et al. Cigarette Smoking and Mortality 
Risk in People With Schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull Dec 17 2011;37:832-838. 
5. 
Winterer G. Why do patients with schizophrenia smoke? Curr Opin 
Psychiatry Mar 2010;23(2):112-119. 
6. 
Berlin I, Singleton EG, Heishman SJ. Predicting smoking relapse with a 
multidimensional versus a single-item tobacco craving measure. Drug 
Alcohol Depend Oct 1 2013;132(3):513-520. 
7. 
Bolt DM, Piper ME, Theobald WE, Baker TB. Why two smoking cessation 
agents work better than one: role of craving suppression. J Consult Clin 
Psychol Feb 2012;80(1):54-65. 
8. 
Casey M, Adamson G, Shevlin M, McKinney A. The role of craving in AUDs: 
dimensionality and Differential Functioning in the DSM-5. Drug Alcohol 
Depend Sep 1 2012;125(1-2):75-80. 
9. 
Hasin DS. Introduction to DSM-5 criteria linked papers in drug and alcohol 
dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend Apr 1 2012;122(1-2):20-21. 
10. 
Baker TB, Breslau N, Covey L, Shiffman S. DSM criteria for tobacco use 
disorder and tobacco withdrawal: a critique and proposed revisions for 
DSM-5. Addiction Feb 2012;107(2):263-275. 
11. 
Nestler EJ. Is there a common molecular pathway for addiction? Nat 
Neurosci Nov 2005;8(11):1445-1449. 
12. 
Chau DT, Roth RM, Green AI. The neural circuitry of reward and its 
relevance to psychiatric disorders. Curr Psychiatry Rep Oct 2004;6(5):391-
399. 
13. 
Sofuoglu M, Waters AJ, Mooney M, O'Malley SS. Minocycline reduced 
craving for cigarettes but did not affect smoking or intravenous nicotine 
responses in humans. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 
2009;92(1):135-140. 
14. 
Williams JM, Ziedonis DM, Abanyie F, Steinberg ML, Foulds J, Benowitz NL. 
Increased nicotine and cotinine levels in smokers with schizophrenia and 
schizoaffective disorder is not a metabolic effect. Schizophrenia research 
2005;79(2):323-335. 
15. 
Tidey JW, Rohsenow DJ, Kaplan GB, Swift RM. Subjective and 
physiological responses to smoking cues in smokers with schizophrenia. 
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2005;7(3):421-429. 
16. 
Zhang XY, Li CB, Li M, et al. Smoking initiation and schizophrenia: a 


Version 2.0 
 
May 1, 2020 
21 
 
replication study in a Chinese Han population. Schizophrenia research 
2010;119(1):110-114. 
17. 
Hitsman B, Spring B, Wolf W, Pingitore R, Crayton JW, Hedeker D. Effects 
of acute tryptophan depletion on negative symptoms and smoking 
topography in nicotine-dependent schizophrenics and nonpsychiatric 
controls. Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American 
College of Neuropsychopharmacology 2005;30(3):640-648. 
18. 
Williams JM, Gandhi KK, Lu S-E, Kumar S, Shen J, Foulds J, Kipen H, 
Benowitz NL. Higher nicotine levels in schizophrenia compared with 
controls after smoking a single cigarette. Nicotine & Tobacco Research 
2010:ntq102. 
19. 
Tidey JW, Rohsenow DJ, Kaplan GB, Swift RM. Cigarette smoking 
topography in smokers with schizophrenia and matched non-psychiatric 
controls. Drug Alcohol Depend 2005;80(2):259-265. 
20. 
Brown S, Inskip H, Barraclough B. Causes of the excess mortality of 
schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry Sep 2000;177:212-217. 
21. 
Kelly DL, Raley HG, Lo S, et al. Perception of smoking risks and motivation 
to quit among nontreatment-seeking smokers with and without 
schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull May 2012;38(3):543-551. 
22. 
Allen SS, Bade T, Hatsukami D, Center B. Craving, withdrawal, and 
smoking urges on days immediately prior to smoking relapse. Nicotine & 
Tobacco Research 2008;10(1):35-45. 
23. 
Durcan MJ, Deener G, White J, Johnston JA, Gonzales D, Niaura R, Rigotti 
N, Sachs DP. The effect of bupropion sustained-release on cigarette 
craving after smoking cessation. Clinical therapeutics 2002;24(4):540-551. 
24. 
Bedi G, Preston KL, Epstein DH, Heishman SJ, Marrone GF, Shaham Y, de 
Wit H. Incubation of cue-induced cigarette craving during abstinence in 
human smokers. Biological psychiatry 2011;69(7):708-711. 
25. 
Carter BL, Tiffany ST. Meta‐analysis of cue‐reactivity in addiction research. 
Addiction 1999;94(3):327-340. 
26. 
Ghanizadeh A, Dehbozorgi S, OmraniSigaroodi M, Rezaei Z. Minocycline as 
add-on treatment decreases the negative symptoms of schizophrenia; a 
randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Recent patents on 
inflammation & allergy drug discovery 2014;8(3):211-215. 
27. 
Jhamnani K, Shivakumar V, Kalmady S, Rao NP, Venkatasubramanian G. 
Successful use of add-on minocycline for treatment of persistent negative 
symptoms in schizophrenia. The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical 
neurosciences 2013;25(1):E06-E07. 
28. 
Kelly DL, Sullivan KM, McEvoy JP, et al. Adjunctive minocycline in 
clozapine-treated schizophrenia patients with persistent symptoms. 
Journal of clinical psychopharmacology 2015;35(4):374-381. 
29. 
Miyaoka T, Yasukawa R, Yasuda H, Hayashida M, Inagaki T, Horiguchi J. 
Possible antipsychotic effects of minocycline in patients with 


Version 2.0 
 
May 1, 2020 
22 
 
schizophrenia. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological 
Psychiatry 2007;31(1):304-307. 
30. 
Qurashi I, Collins J, Chaudhry I, Husain N. Promising use of minocycline 
augmentation with clozapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Journal 
of Psychopharmacology 2014:0269881114527358. 
31. 
Vleeming W, Rambali B, Opperhuizen A. The role of nitric oxide in cigarette 
smoking and nicotine addiction. Nicotine & Tobacco Research 
2002;4(3):341-348. 
32. 
Schilström B, Mameli-Engvall M, Rawal N, Grillner P, Jardemark K, 
Svensson T. Nitric oxide is involved in nicotine-induced burst firing of rat 
ventral tegmental area dopamine neurons. Neuroscience 2004;125(4):957-
964. 
33. 
Malin DH, Lake JR, Shenoi M, Upchurch TP, Johnson SC, Schweinle WE, 
Cadle CD. The nitric oxide synthesis inhibitor nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA) 
attenuates nicotine abstinence syndrome in the rat. Psychopharmacology 
1998;140(3):371-377. 
34. 
Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, FAGERSTROM KO. The 
Fagerström test for nicotine dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom 
Tolerance Questionnaire. British journal of addiction 1991;86(9):1119-1127. 
35. 
Heishman SJ, Singleton EG, Pickworth WB. Reliability and validity of a 
Short Form of the Tobacco Craving Questionnaire. Nicotine & tobacco 
research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and 
Tobacco Apr 2008;10(4):643-651. 
36. 
Cox LS, Tiffany ST, Christen AG. Evaluation of the brief questionnaire of 
smoking urges (QSU-brief) in laboratory and clinical settings. Nicotine & 
Tobacco Research 2001;3(1):7-16. 
37. 
Welsch SK, Smith SS, Wetter DW, Jorenby DE, Fiore MC, Baker TB. 
Development and validation of the Wisconsin Smoking Withdrawal Scale. 
Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology 1999;7(4):354. 
38. 
Guy W. ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology, revised (DHEW 
Publication No. ADM 76-338). Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental 
Health; 1976. 
39. 
Levkovitz Y, Mendlovich S, Riwkes S, et al. A double-blind, randomized 
study of minocycline for the treatment of negative and cognitive symptoms 
in early-phase schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry Feb;71(2):138-149. 
40. 
N Geria A, L Tajirian A, Kihiczak G, A Schwartz R. Minocycline-induced skin 
pigmentation: an update. Acta Dermatovenerologica Croatica 2009;17(2):0-
0. 
41. 
Dodel R, Spottke A, Gerhard A, et al. Minocycline 1‐year therapy in 
multiple‐system‐atrophy: Effect on clinical symptoms and 
[11C](R)‐PK11195 PET (MEMSA‐trial). Movement Disorders 2010;25(1):97-
107. 
42. 
Fay BT, Whiddon AP, Puumala S, Black NA, O'Dell JR, Mikuls TR. 


Version 2.0 
 
May 1, 2020 
23 
 
Minocycline-induced hyperpigmentation in rheumatoid arthritis. JCR: 
Journal of Clinical Rheumatology 2008;14(1):17-20. 
43. 
Katoch K, Katoch V, Natarajan M, Gupta U, Sharma V, Singh H. 3 Long 
Term Follow-up Results of 1 Year MDT in MB Leprosy Patients Treated with 
Standard MDT+ once a Month Minocycline and Ofloxacin. Indian journal of 
leprosy 2008;80(4):331. 
44. 
Zhang Y, Metz LM, Yong VW, Bell RB, Yeung M, Patry DG, Mitchell JR. Pilot 
study of minocycline in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. The 
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences 2008;35(02):185-191. 
45. 
Gordon PH, Moore DH, Miller RG, et al. Efficacy of minocycline in patients 
with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a phase III randomised trial. The Lancet 
Neurology 2007;6(12):1045-1053.