Conditions: Nicotine Dependence Smoking Cessation
Keywords: Smoking Cessation Pregnancy Nicotrol Inhaler Placebo Inhaler Nicotine Inhaler
Allocation: RANDOMIZED | Intervention model: PARALLEL
Enrollment: 154
Healthy volunteers: yes

Brief summary:
This is a clinical trial to determine if the nicotine inhaler in combination with counseling will help pregnant women quit smoking, and whether it is safe when compared to placebo (an inactive inhaler).

Detailed description:
This project will examine the safety and efficacy of the nicotine inhaler as an aid to smoking cessation during pregnancy. The specific aims are: (1) To examine the efficacy of the nicotine inhaler compared to a matching placebo for smoking cessation during pregnancy; (2) To compare the nicotine inhaler with placebo on overall nicotine exposure (i.e., serum cotinine concentrations), and on birth outcomes (i.e., birth weight and gestational age); (3) To identify factors that determine which women benefit most from the use of the nicotine inhaler for smoking cessation during pregnancy; (4) To explore mechanisms by which the nicotine inhaler increases birth weight and gestational age.

Subjects will be recruited from two prenatal clinics that serve primarily a low-income, minority population.

Pregnant smokers (n=270) who smoke at least 5 cigarettes/ day will receive nurse-delivered behavioral counseling and be randomized to receive a 6-week course of treatment with either a nicotine inhaler or placebo, followed by a 6-week taper. Birth outcomes will be obtained on all participants

Arms:
arm 1: Nicotrol Inhaler, 1-12 cartridges per day, for 6 weeks with a 6 week taper. arm 2: Placebo inhaler, 1-12 cartridges per day, for 6 weeks with a 6 week taper

Interventions: intervention 1: Nicotrol Inhaler intervention 2: Placebo Inhaler
Intervention descriptions: intervention 1: Nicotrol Inhaler, 1-12 cartridges per day, for 6 weeks with a 6 week taper intervention 2: Placebo inhaler, 1-12 cartridges per day, for 6 weeks with a 6 week taper

Protocol document:
Prot_SAP_000.pdf: 
i – information sheet 
 
Nicotine Replacement for Smoking Cessation During 
Pregnancy 
 
 
Nicotrol® Inhaler (nicotine inhalation system) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investigators:  
 
 
 
Cheryl Oncken, MD, MPH 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ellen Dornelas, PhD 
Heather Sankey, MD 
Pamela Griswold, MD 
Chia-Ling Kuo 
 
Sponsor: 
 
 
 
 
NICHD 
 
IND No: 
 
 
 
 
104,914 
 
Version: 
 
 
 
 
7.8 
Date of Version 
 
 
 
January 18, 2016 
 
Participating Institutions: 
 
 
University of Connecticut Health Center 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hartford Hospital 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Baystate Medical Center  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Nicotine Replacement for Smoking Cessation during Pregnancy 
v. 7.8 January 18, 2016 
 
 
1 
Protocol Sign Off 
 
 
 
Protocol title: 
Nicotine Replacement for Smoking Cessation During Pregnancy 
Protocol version: 
7.8 
Protocol issue date:  
January 18, 2016 
I agree to do the following: 
• To perform the study in accordance with the procedures set out in the study protocol  
• To ensure that all persons assisting with the trial are adequately informed about the 
protocol and any amendments 
• To perform the study in accordance with the current version of the Declaration of 
Helsinki, ICH-GCP and in accordance with local ethical, legal and regulatory 
requirements  
• To perform Investigator related tasks in conformity with the Institutional Review 
Board SOP and FDA regulations. In addition to comply with local requirements on 
data protection and privacy legislation 
• Not to enroll the first patient into the study until I have received written approval from 
appropriate ethics committee, where applicable and local legal requirements have been 
fulfilled 
UCHC 
Principal Investigator 
Name: 
 
Date: __________ 
Principal Investigator 
Signature: 
 
 
 
 
Site : __________ 
Investigator Name: 
(Print) 
 
Date: __________ 
Investigator 
Signature: 
 
 
 
PROTOCOL VERSION # AND/OR DATE:     Version #7.8 January 18, 2016 


Nicotine Replacement for Smoking Cessation during Pregnancy 
v. 7.8 January 18, 2016 
 
 
2 
 
1. Title:  Nicotine Replacement for Smoking Cessation during Pregnancy 
 
2. Background: 
 
A.1. Importance of the Problem: Cigarette smoking during pregnancy is one of the most important 
modifiable causes of poor pregnancy outcomes in the United States [8, 9].  Although maternal smoking 
increases the risk of spontaneous abortion, placental complications, preterm delivery, and fetal and 
neonatal death, the most consistent effect is low birth weight (LBW, i.e., <2500 grams) [8, 10, 11].  
Maternal smoking doubles the risk of delivering a LBW neonate [12].  LBW neonates, particularly those 
weighing <1500 g, have exponentially greater morbidity and mortality than normal weight infants [13].  
In the US, maternal smoking is responsible for 30% of LBW babies, 10% of premature deliveries, and 5% 
of all infant deaths [14].  Nicotine affects nervous system development in animal studies, and similar 
effects have been observed in babies born to women who smoke.  Smoking cessation during pregnancy 
has numerous health benefits; by 16 weeks gestation [15, 16], or even as late as the third trimester [16], 
cessation results in a near-normal birth weight infant. Smoking reduction also has beneficial effects on 
birth weight [17].  Because smoking has serious health risks for the mother and infant, robust efforts are 
needed to help pregnant women quit smoking.                                                  
 
Despite the risks, the majority of women who are smoking when they become pregnant continue to smoke 
throughout pregnancy.  Women who quit smoking usually do so before their first prenatal visit and 
women who smoke into the second trimester are much less likely to quit [18].  These women are more 
likely to be single, heavier smokers (>1/2 pack per day), and to have a partner who smokes [19, 20].  Less 
educated women with greater nicotine dependence are particularly likely to continue smoking during 
pregnancy [19]. 
 
Behavioral treatments during pregnancy are consistently but only modestly effective in helping pregnant 
women quit smoking [2, 21]. A recent meta-analysis of studies of augmented psychosocial interventions 
of at least 3 minutes duration (e.g., discussing the risks of smoking and benefits of cessation, providing 
self-help materials) that used biochemical verification of abstinence [2] showed mean cessation rates of 
13.3% in the intervention group and 7.6% in the usual care group [2]. Similarly, a meta-analysis of 64 
randomized and quasi-randomized trials (with a total of 28,000 subjects) [21] showed a significantly 
greater reduction of risk in the intervention groups (RR = 0.94; 95% CI = 0.93-0.95), such that 6% more 
women quit with a behavioral intervention than with usual care.   
 
Despite their potential value for smoking cessation, augmented behavioral interventions are least effective 
in heavier smokers [22].  The estimated quit rate for behavioral counseling is 20% in women who smoke 
<10 CPD, while women who smoke 10-19 CPD have a 15% quit rate, and women who smoke >20 CPD 
have only a 5% chance of quitting [22].  Moreover, the majority of pregnant smokers, even light smokers, 
do not quit smoking during pregnancy, even with augmented behavioral interventions [21].   
 
In summary, smoking has serious health risks for the mother and infant, and robust efforts are needed 
to help pregnant women quit smoking. Most women do not quit smoking during pregnancy, this is 
particularly true for women with less education and heavier smokers.   Behavioral interventions have a 
modest, but consistent, beneficial effect on quitting, but are least effective in heavier smokers.  
 
 
A.2. Addressing a Critical Barrier to Progress in the Field: Evaluating the utility of medications for 
pregnant smokers is important because current best practice treatments help only a small minority of 


Nicotine Replacement for Smoking Cessation during Pregnancy 
v. 7.8 January 18, 2016 
 
 
3 
pregnant women to quit smoking.  Women who continue to smoke after learning of their pregnancy and 
of the risks to the fetus may be more dependent smokers who are less able to quit with a behavioral 
intervention alone [22].  Indeed, one survey shows that pregnant women report nicotine withdrawal 
symptoms and cravings as major reasons for their inability to quit smoking during pregnancy [23]. 
 
Medications are a first-line treatment for smoking cessation in non-pregnant smokers and could enhance 
smoking cessation rates during pregnancy [2].  Nicotine replacement therapies (NRTs) aim to replace the 
nicotine usually obtained by smoking, thereby relieving cravings and withdrawal symptoms [24,25].  
Compared to placebo, the odds ratio [OR (95% CI)] of abstinence with nicotine gum is 1.5 (1.2-1.7), with 
the patch it is 1.9 (1.7-2.1), with the inhaler it is 2.1 (1.5-2.9), and with the nasal spray it is 2.3 (1.7-3.0). 
Bupropion SR, a non-nicotine medication that inhibits the neuronal reuptake of dopamine and 
norepinephrine [26], has an OR of 2.0 (1.8-2.2). Varenicline, an α4β2 nicotinic receptor partial agonist 
[27], has an OR of 3.1 (2.5-3.8).  All of these medications are effective for this indication and none is 
preferred for smoking cessation.  The utility of any treatment in an individual patient depends on the 
safety, tolerability, and perceived helpfulness of the agent.   
 
The use of medication could be particularly beneficial in enhancing quit rates during pregnancy.  Some 
nicotine withdrawal symptoms (e.g., irritability, anxiety, difficulty concentrating, insomnia, restlessness, 
increased appetite, depressed mood, drowsiness) are also commonly experienced during pregnancy [28].  
Because these symptoms are present in pregnant smokers before the initiation of cessation, it may be 
more difficult for these women to quit because of the additional symptoms of withdrawal [23]. Further, 
the clearance of nicotine is accelerated during pregnancy, so pregnant smokers may need higher doses of 
replacement therapy than non-pregnant smokers to optimize efficacy [29]. Finally, pregnancy is 
associated with markedly elevated levels of progesterone, which is postulated to contribute to heightened 
withdrawal during the late luteal phase of the menstrual cycle [30]. Consequently, medication may be 
especially efficacious for smoking cessation in pregnant smokers. Studying the risk/benefit profile of 
different medications is also important since surveys suggest that 10-30% of practitioners prescribe or 
recommend NRT for pregnant smokers [31, 32].  Medications are safe and effective for smoking 
cessation in non-pregnant smokers.  Research is needed to establish their efficacy and safety in 
pregnant smokers.  
 
 
A.2.a Effectiveness studies of medications for smoking cessation during pregnancy: Three 
randomized controlled trials (RCTs) collectively have shown that NRT may be effective for smoking 
cessation during pregnancy [33-35].  We did not find any effectiveness studies utilizing bupropion SR or 
varenicline for smoking cessation during pregnancy. In one NRT effectiveness study, pregnant women 
who smoked at least 5 CPD received cognitive-behavioral counseling (CBT) and were randomized to 
receive a choice of NRT (gum, patch, or lozenge) or no medication. Although the quit rate in the NRT 
group was approximately double that of the comparison group, the study was stopped because the 
NRT/CBT group had twice the serious adverse event (SAE) rate of the control group.  The most frequent 
SAE in this study was preterm delivery (i.e., delivery at < 37 weeks gestation).  However, after adjusting 
for a history of preterm delivery, the difference in SAE rate between groups was not statistically 
significant (p=0.09). Effectiveness studies suggest that NRT increases quit rates in pregnant smokers.  
However, without a placebo control, patients’ expectations are potential confounders.  Thus, although the 
results of one study have been cited in guidelines and by investigators to call attention to potential safety 
problems with NRT in pregnancy [2, 36], placebo-controlled studies are needed to examine the safety of 
this treatment.  Further research is also needed to determine whether some individuals are at elevated risk 
for adverse effects of NRT, which individuals those may be, and the potential mechanisms of these 
effects.  RCTs suggest that NRT is effective in enhancing quit rates in pregnant smokers, but one study 
raised safety concerns. Consequently, randomized, placebo-controlled studies are needed to examine 
the safety and efficacy of NRT in pregnancy.  
 


Nicotine Replacement for Smoking Cessation during Pregnancy 
v. 7.8 January 18, 2016 
 
 
4 
A.2.b Efficacy studies of medications for smoking cessation during pregnancy: Placebo-controlled 
RCTs are the “gold standard” to assess the safety and efficacy of medications for smoking cessation.  
Two efficacy studies of NRT with sufficient sample size have been conducted in pregnancy [1, 7].  In a 
Danish study, all women received counseling by a nurse midwife and either 6 weeks of a nicotine patch 
(15 mg/16 hours) or a matching placebo [7].  At the end of pregnancy, neither quit rates (28% vs. 25%, 
respectively) nor the mean number of CPD (7.2 vs. 7, respectively) differed between the groups.  
However, patch compliance was poor (i.e., the average use being only 2 weeks), which may have reduced 
quit rates. The authors noted that the Danish Medical Authority advised against NRT use during 
pregnancy, and this national recommendation may have influenced compliance with treatment in their 
study. Importantly, however, the mean birth weight was 186 grams (95% CI 35-336) greater in the 
nicotine group than in the placebo group. 
 
In another placebo-controlled RCT, we recruited 194 pregnant smokers from prenatal clinics to 
participate in a randomized trial of 2 mg gum or placebo for smoking cessation [1]. Participants received 
individualized behavioral counseling and were assigned to receive either 2 mg nicotine or placebo gum 
for 6 weeks followed by a 6-week taper.  Biochemically-validated smoking cessation rates were non-
significantly higher in the nicotine group at major endpoints (after 6 weeks: 13% vs. 9.6%, p= 0.45 and at 
32-34 weeks gestation: 18% vs. 14.9%, p= 0.56). Importantly, nicotine produced a greater reduction in 
CPD and cotinine concentrations than placebo.  There was also better treatment retention in the nicotine 
vs. placebo group. Mean (SD) birth weight and gestational age were also significantly greater in the 
nicotine group than in the placebo group [3287 g (569) vs. 2950 g (657); p<0.001 and 38.9 wk (1.7) vs. 
38.0 wk (3.3); p=0.014, respectively].  Further, the most striking difference between treatment groups was 
the greater incidence of babies with LBW and preterm delivery in the placebo group compared with the 
nicotine gum group (Table 1).  
                          
Table 1: Serious Adverse Events in the Nicotine and Placebo Groups 
 
Placebo (N=87) 
Nicotine (N=97) 
P-Value 
Low Birth Weight  
     <2500 grams 
 
16 (18 %) 
 
2 (2%) 
 
<0.001 
Very Low Birth Weight 
     <1500 grams 
 
4 (5 %) 
 
1 (1%) 
 
0.19 
Preterm Delivery  
16 (18 %) 
7 (7.2%) 
0.027 
Newborn Death 
2 (2 %) 
1 (1%) 
0.60 
NICU Admission 
11 (13%) 
7 (7%) 
0.20 
Any Serious Adverse Event 
33 (37.9%) 
24 (24.7%) 
0.057 
 
Although two large efficacy studies in pregnant smokers did not show an increase in quit rates with NRT, 
they did show an increase in birth weight and improved infant outcomes. The lack of efficacy in the trial 
by Wisborg et al. (7) is likely due to poor medication compliance.  In our study (1), the lack of efficacy on 
quit rate could be due to the lower efficacy of nicotine gum compared to other NRTs, compounded by the 
inadequate daily use of the gum by participants.  Nausea (a common complaint in pregnancy and a 
common adverse effect of nicotine gum) may have reduced the rates of gum use. There was an increase of 
20% in the prevalence of nausea in the NRT group vs. a 2% decrease with placebo (p=0.019), suggesting 
that nicotine gum has limited clinical utility in this population. Although NRT has not been shown to 
enhance quit rates in pregnant women, it has reduced the number of CPD and yielded better infant 
outcomes.  Placebo-controlled RCTs are needed to test the safety and efficacy of each first-line 
medication in pregnant smokers. 
 
A.2.c.Rationale for the choice of the nicotine inhaler for smoking cessation during pregnancy: Any 
of the first-line therapies could reasonably be used for smoking cessation in pregnancy.  In the absence of 
clear guidelines, we have relied on the consensus of our study obstetricians that it is preferable to 


Nicotine Replacement for Smoking Cessation during Pregnancy 
v. 7.8 January 18, 2016 
 
 
5 
withdraw pregnant women from a drug that they are already taking (i.e., nicotine) than to add a new drug 
with unknown effects (e.g., varenicline). Moreover, many women in our previous study were already 
taking antidepressants.  Adding bupropion (because of drug interactions) or varenicline (rare risk of 
neuropsychiatric effects) in these individuals is not desirable We chose to study an intermittent nicotine 
delivery system, rather than a continuous delivery system because it limits nicotine exposure, can be used 
to manage smoking urges, and allows the dose of nicotine to be titrated by the patient [6]. This choice is 
consistent with guidelines [2,38] and expert recommendations [37] on the optimal approach to smoking 
cessation treatment in pregnancy.   
 
Of the intermittent replacement products, the inhaler and nasal spray have better efficacy than the gum, 
and nausea is not a common adverse effect of either.  We chose to use the inhaler because: 1) it provides 
some of the sensory and ritualized components of smoking; 2) it is a preferred treatment among smokers 
sampling intermittent NRT products [39]; 3) with ad libitum use it produces nicotine concentrations that 
are relatively low (i.e., 6-9 ng/mL) and overall nicotine exposure is approximately 60% of that with 
smoking [6, 40]; and 4) it is well accepted by low-income, non-pregnant smokers who attend the smoking 
cessation clinic at Hartford Hospital, a population similar to the pregnant women to be examined in this 
study.  Although the nasal spray enhances quit rates in non-pregnant smokers, it is difficult for patients to 
use, and is associated with nasal adverse effects, which can worsen nasal stuffiness, a common symptom 
of pregnancy [41].   
 
A.2.c.Pilot study: We chose the nicotine inhaler as the pharmacotherapy to be examined in pregnant 
smokers because of theoretical reasons (intermittent delivery system, good efficacy in non-pregnant 
smokers, adverse event profile in non-pregnant smokers).  Our pilot study results confirm that the nicotine 
inhaler is a reasonable option for smoking cessation during pregnancy and allowed us to better 
characterize the dosing regimen for smoking cessation in light smokers.  
  
Six women received open label use of nicotine inhaler women for a 4 week pilot study. Subjects were 
approximately 26.8 years old (range 22-38), and 67% were minorities (two Black, 2 Hispanic). Subjects 
smoked a mean 6.4 (range 5-10) CPD at study entry, and were smoking for approximately 10 years. Two 
subjects were on methadone maintenance, and one recently completed treatment for marijuana abuse. 
Three subjects had a previous history of adverse pregnancy outcome (2 spontaneous abortion,1 stillbirth).                            
Subject retention rate was 83% (one subject dropped out for housing issues). Mean cartridge use was 2 
(range 1-4) inhalers per day. There was a mean (SD) reduction of 5.7 (2.3) CPD from baseline to 4 weeks, 
and 3 of the 6 women enrolled quit smoking (1 women who dropped out was counted as smoking).  Mean 
percent nicotine replacement (cotinine value at 2 weeks/baseline value x 100) was 66%. All subjects rated 
the statement “The inhaler relieves urges to smoke,” either “definitely true” or “very definitely true.”  In 
response to the statement “I would use the nicotine inhaler as a method to quit smoking, one person chose 
5 (probably), and the rest chose 6 “definitely” or 7 “very definitely”.  
 
Adverse effects: On at least one visit, 4 subjects reported mouth/throat irritation with inhaler use (3 were 
of mild and 1 was of moderate severity).  This resolved in all subjects with continued use and instruction 
to take shallower breaths. Two subjects complained of headache, which resolved with shallower puffs on 
the inhaler.  One subject complained of mild nausea, which she thought was unrelated to inhaler use.   
 
Our pilot data show that the nicotine inhaler is a good choice for smoking cessation during pregnancy.  
Study subjects used it effectively and reported it to be acceptable. Percent nicotine replacement with ad 
libitum use is in line with that observed in non pregnant smokers (approximately 60%)[6]. Fifty 
percent of individuals quit smoking.  Side effects were minimal and were reduced when subjects were 
instructed to take shallower breaths. The proposed study (described in methods) builds on the existing 
literature by examining the safety and efficacy of the nicotine inhaler for smoking cessation during 
pregnancy.  


Nicotine Replacement for Smoking Cessation during Pregnancy 
v. 7.8 January 18, 2016 
 
 
6 
 
A 3. Importance of Measuring Biomarkers: We will evaluate specific biomarkers of smoking-related 
harm during pregnancy, which may help explain how smoking cessation or reduction increases birth 
weight and gestational age. Although biomarkers of chemical exposure (e.g., exhaled CO, cotinine, 
anabasine/anatabine, thiocyanate) can be used to measure tobacco exposure, we believe that it is 
scientifically important to carefully evaluate potential biomarkers of smoking-related harm (i.e., 
physiological change biomarkers), because these may help to elucidate the mechanisms by which tobacco 
cessation/reduction increases gestational age and birth weight [46].  Although many biomarkers have 
been theorized to contribute to cardiovascular disease, pulmonary disease, or cancer in non-pregnant 
smokers, none have been shown to predict clinical outcomes, because of the length of time it takes to 
develop various diseases [46]. Pregnancy is a unique situation that lends itself to the examination of 
biomarkers of tobacco risk, because of the rapid fetal growth that occurs during a 9-month period. 
 
In this study we will examine two biomarkers of interest [high sensitivity C-reactive protein (a marker of 
inflammation), and soluable intracellular adhesion molecule (sICAM), a measure of inflammation and 
endothelial function] as potential mediators of tobacco-related harm.  We chose these biomarkers because 
they: 1) have been implicated in medical harm (particularly vascular disease) in non-pregnant smokers 
[46, 47], which may be applicable to pregnancy because the placenta is highly vascularized; 2) are 
associated with tobacco use, change with cessation, and are dose-related to smoking [46, 48]; and 3) have 
been associated independently with birth weight or gestational age in pregnant women who do not smoke 
(suggesting biological plausibility). In pregnancy, increased systemic inflammation (as evidenced by 
increased C-reactive protein concentration) has been linked to preterm delivery [49], low birth weight 
[50], and placental accidents and stillbirths [51].   Additionally, inflammation likely contributes to the 
endothelial dysfunction observed in smokers. Extensive endothelial damage has been identified in the 
umbilical arteries from placentas obtained from smoking mothers [52, 53], and may contribute to the 
reduced placental blood flow, increased thrombosis and platelet aggregation, and reduced fetal growth 
associated with maternal smoking.  Indeed, sICAM, a cell surface adhesion molecule that is increased in 
inflammatory states, is elevated in pregnant smokers [48] and is linked to fetal growth restriction [54] and 
preterm delivery [55].  Based on the aforementioned data, both sICAM and C-reactive protein are 
potentially high-yield biomarkers that may mediate the relationship between tobacco exposure and LBW 
and preterm delivery. An examination of the mechanisms underlying the longer gestational age and 
greater birth weight that we saw in our prior study [1] is important, given the clinical significance of these 
outcomes on infant morbidity and mortality [13]. 
 
Evidence that these biomarkers are mediators of pregnancy outcomes that are affected by smoking has 
important implications for other pharmacotherapy studies in pregnant smokers by providing surrogate 
measures of potential risk [46] or in studies of reduced-exposure products (e.g., e-cigarettes, smokeless 
tobacco) that may be used by pregnant women.  Since the FDA has recently been authorized to regulate 
tobacco products [56] there is likely to be heightened interest in biomarkers of tobacco product risk, 
particularly in vulnerable populations. 
  
3. Hypotheses, aims and objectives: 
Hypothesis 1:   
We hypothesize that the nicotine inhaler compared to placebo inhaler will double the 7-day point 
prevalence abstinence rates (confirmed by exhaled CO) at 32-34 weeks gestation and will reduce 
the number of cigarettes smoked per day (CPD).  
Aims / objectives 1:  
To examine the efficacy of the nicotine inhaler compared to a matched placebo for smoking 
cessation and reduction among pregnant smokers. 
 


Nicotine Replacement for Smoking Cessation during Pregnancy 
v. 7.8 January 18, 2016 
 
 
7 
Hypothesis 2: 
a) The nicotine inhaler will yield lower cotinine concentrations than placebo at 32-34 weeks 
gestation.   
b) Infants born to mothers in the NRT group will have higher birth weights and greater 
gestational age than infants born to mothers randomized to placebo. 2c) Fewer nicotine-treated 
subjects will deliver a low birth weight (<2500 grams) or a preterm (<37 weeks) infant than those 
in the placebo group. 
Aim/Objective 2:  
To compare the nicotine inhaler with placebo on safety measures which include a) overall 
nicotine exposure (i.e., serum cotinine) and b) birth outcomes (i.e., birth weight and gestational 
age). 
 
Hypothesis 3: Pregnant women who are heavier smokers (i.e., >= 10 cigarettes/day) will be less 
able to quit with behavioral treatment alone than lighter smokers and the inhaler will increase 
cigarette abstinence more in heavier smokers.  
Aim/Objective 3: To identify factors that determine which women benefit most from the use of 
nicotine inhaler for smoking cessation during pregnancy 
 
Hypothesis 4: We hypothesize that birth weight will be negatively correlated with CPD and 
exhaled CO at the end of pregnancy, and that smoking cessation or reduction in the third trimester 
will explain the effect of treatment group on birth weight.  We will also explore the interrelations 
among birth outcomes, tobacco exposure, and other promising biomarkers.  
Aim/Objective 4: To explore mechanisms by which the nicotine inhaler increases birth weight 
and gestational age. 
   
4.  Study Design & Procedures:   
Study design: This is a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled  trial of the safety and efficacy of 
the nicotine inhaler in combination with behavioral counseling for smoking cessation during pregnancy.  
A total of 360 pregnant smokers will receive nicotine or placebo inhaler medication (1:1 ratio) for 6 
weeks followed by a 6-week taper, with double-blind treatment conditions maintained throughout the 
study. Smoking cessation counseling and medication will be provided by a nurse at each ambulatory 
clinic. Nurses will be closely supervised by a psychologist with extensive expertise in smoking cessation 
(Dr. Dornelas), an obstetrician (Dr. Griswold or Dr. Sankey), and Dr. Oncken. 
 
Overview of the behavioral intervention:  The behavioral intervention, which will be utilized in both 
arms of the proposed study, exceeds many of the augmented interventions described in the USPHS 
guidelines [38]. The behavioral counseling will include a 35-minute counseling sessions at each of the 
first two visits, and 10 minutes of smoking cessation counseling at subsequent visits, delivered by the 
study nurses.  
 
Overview of pharmacotherapy intervention:  We will administer a 6-week course of therapy, 
consistent with instruction on the package insert. Dosage recommendations are based on the literature and 
on our pilot data, and will vary according to the level of maternal smoking. Pfizer Pharmaceuticals has 
agreed to supply us with nicotine inhaler and placebo treatments (see letter of support).  To enhance 
compliance and to confirm patient reports and proper inhaler use, , subjects will asked to keep a daily 
diary of the number of cartridges used and to return all cartridges at the next study visit.  Subjects will be 
instructed to bring medication and empty cartridges to next visit when they receive their reminder 
telephone call regarding upcoming appointments.  For convenience, subjects will receive a plastic 
container to transport study drug.  At Visit 5 (6 week visit), patients will be instructed on an 
individualized basis to taper their use over the next 6 weeks. If a study subject does not quit smoking 


Nicotine Replacement for Smoking Cessation during Pregnancy 
v. 7.8 January 18, 2016 
 
 
8 
during the first 6 weeks of active treatment, it is unlikely that she will quit during the medication taper. 
Consequently, at visit 5 (6 week visit), subjects who have not quit smoking (7 day point prevalence 
abstinence confirmed with exhaled carbon monoxide measurement) will be discontinued from medication 
treatment and reminded to return all study medication at the next scheduled visit.  
 
Recruitment: We will recruit 360 pregnant women from patients seeking care at the Women’s Health 
Ambulatory Clinic located at Hartford Hospital (HH) or the Wesson Women’s & Infants' Unit at Baystate 
Medical Center (BMC) and Community Health Services (CHS) in Hartford.  Study visits will occur at 
either Hartford hospital (referrals from HH clinic, CHS, or the surrounding greater Hartford area) or 
Baystate Medical Center (referrals from Wesson Women’s Clinic and Baystate Maternal Fetal Medicine 
Clinic).  Baystate will also accept referrals from several Baystate Health Medical practices in other 
locations, including Baystate Midwifery and Women’s Health (3300 Main Street); Baystate Wesson 
Women’s Group (3300 Main Street); Baystate Mary Lane (Ware, MA), Women’s Health Associates and 
Baystate Wing (Ludlow, MA and Palmer, MA).  Study visit will occur at either Baystate Medical Center 
or at one of the above locations, depending on the subject’s preference. 
 
Study staff will also accept referrals from each of the practice locations noted above.  In addition, 
potential participants may refer themselves to the study by contacting study staff directly or by leaving 
their contact information on the study voicemail.  These individuals will be contacted to determine if they 
are interested in participating in the study.  For the convenience of our subjects, those who receive their 
prenatal care at a Baystate practice location outside of Baystate Medical Center will be offered the option 
of receiving study visits at their prenatal care location.  The Clinical RN Study Coordinator will travel to 
the practice location to conduct study visits.  Study drug will be dispensed at these visits in the same 
manner as it is dispensed at Baystate Medical Center.  Study drug will be signed out from Baystate 
Investigational Pharmacy prior to the study visit and will be transported by the study RN to the site.  The 
study drug will remain in the RN’s possession until it is dispensed to the subject per the protocol; drug 
dispensing will be documented in the subject’s record as well as in the study drug accountability log per 
protocol. 
 
Pregnant smokers will first be identified by clinic personnel and referred to our recruiter after expressing 
an interest in study participation. Study sites will also utilize direct mailings and Internet advertising for 
recruitment purposes.  Study personnel at Baystate will review CIS to assess potential eligibility of 
women identified in the daily appointment report of all women scheduled for OB appointments at Wesson 
Women’s Clinic, Baystate Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Baystate Midwifery and Women’s Health, Baystate 
Wesson Women’s Group, Baystate Mary Lane, and Baystate Wing. Women identified as potential 
participants will be approached to determine if they are interested in participating in the study. 
Subjects who are eligible and wish to participate will be asked to provide written informed consent before 
any other information is obtained.  Potential subjects 16 and 17 years of age enrolled in CT will require 
parental consent. After the subject gives informed consent, basic inclusion/exclusion criteria will be 
assessed. If there are questions regarding the appropriateness of the subject’s study participation, 
eligibility will be reviewed by the study nurse and physician prior to randomization. Given the young age 
of the population, a proportion will be adolescent, which is responsive to the NIH policy concerning 
pediatric populations.     
 
Screening Procedures and who will perform them:  A study recruiter will accept study referrals, and 
perform screening procedures. If the study recruiter not available to speak with a referred potential 
subject, the study nurse or physician may obtain consent and perform screening procedures.  
 
Screening procedures will include consent signing, assessing inclusion/exclusion criteria, and other 
contact information.  The following questionnaires/assessments will be obtained: 


Nicotine Replacement for Smoking Cessation during Pregnancy 
v. 7.8 January 18, 2016 
 
 
9 
1. Demographics: Age, education, race/ethnicity, income, and type of insurance (public or private],  
2. Smoking  history: We will inquire about past and current smoking, including CPD currently and 
prior to pregnancy, intention to quit, partner smoking, motivation to quit and number of years of 
smoking [20, 71]. We will also evaluate prior use of medication to stop smoking and other drugs, 
including symptoms of other drug abuse or dependence. Smoking social networks will be 
assessed with items on the smoking status of partner and friends, the number of household 
smokers, perceived support for staying abstinent and the composition of the household (age and 
relationship to the subject) [72].The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence [70], a 6-item 
scale (internal consistency = 0.61), will be used to measure dependence on nicotine.  
3. Screening medical and obstetrics history will include the number of pregnancies, previous 
pregnancy outcomes (preterm, term, living, abortions), and information on any current pregnancy 
problems or underlying medical disorders (e.g., diabetes or HIV infection). Current and past drug 
abuse history will be recorded. Ongoing medications will be recorded.   
4. Vital signs (blood pressure, pulse) and weight will also be recorded. 
5. PHQ: We have chosen to identify major psychopathology using the PRIME-MD Patient Health 
Questionnaire [74]. This questionnaire consists of  nine questions that screen for depression. Each 
item yields a score of 0-3, and the highest possible total score for all items is 27. The scale can be 
used longitudinally to identify trends in depressed mood. Subjects with evidence of suicidal 
ideation or any other severe, acute psychiatric symptom (e.g., psychosis) will be excluded from 
the study. Subjects who answer “more than half the days” to 5 or more items will be excluded 
from the study.  Since the questionnaire relies on patient self-report, all responses will be verified 
by the principal investigator, if a subject answers “more than half the days” to 5 or more items to 
confirm exclusion is warranted. 
6. Self-efficacy questionnaires: Evaluates confidence to resist smoking across a number of 
different situations [60].  The scale yields a total score, as well as subscores for positive & 
negative affect situations, and habit/craving items. This scale has been a strong predictor of 
smoking outcomes in previous studies [73]. 
7. Exhaled carbon monoxide measurement.  Subjects will be asked to blow into a machine that 
measures CO in parts per million (ppm). Levels <9 ppm are consistent with cigarette abstinence 
[69]. 
8. Urine sample:  A urine sample  will only be collected at BL, V2, V5, and V6 and analyzed only 
if serum can not be obtained.  Urine will be tested using the NicAlert method. 
The screening visit is expected to take 1.5 hours. The participant will be given a handout to record 
cigarette intake prior to subsequent study visits. 
  
Study Procedures and who will perform them:    
 
Baseline: Eligible subjects scheduled to return for a baseline (i.e. randomization) visit approximately 1 
week after screening (+ 14 Days). The study nurse will review the patient’s medical history and confirm 
current medical and pregnancy history.   She will discuss each case with the study obstetrician (at the 
performance site) who will sign off on entry of subject into the study.  
 
1. Randomization assignment: As previously noted randomization will be 1:1 for nicotine inhaler 
or placebo assignment. To ensure comparability of subjects in the treatment groups, we will 
employ urn randomization, a probabilistic balancing procedure that assigns patients to conditions 
so that groups are balanced on key variables [57].  Key variables that we would like to balance 
groups on include history of preterm delivery (yes/no), gestational age at study entry (<19 weeks 
vs. >19 weeks), and number of CPD (<10 vs. > 10). 
The nurse will fax key variables for a given subject to the research pharmacist at 
UCONN who will enter these variables into a specially developed computer algorithm by that is 


Nicotine Replacement for Smoking Cessation during Pregnancy 
v. 7.8 January 18, 2016 
 
 
10 
the basis for the urn randomization procedure. In this way, treatment groups will be comparable 
on important features that may influence treatment outcome.  Once the pharmacist enters these 
variables, the computer assigns a treatment assignment.  The pharmacist will communicate with 
the study nurse (by fax or e-mail) which medication box # to dispense to the subject.  
2. Maternal blood draw (approximately 15 cc): Venipuncture will be performed using standard 
sterile blood drawing techniques by trained personnel.  Serum will be separated on site and stored 
at -20 degrees C on at least a biweekly basis until transfer to UCHC where it will be stored at -70 
C. Samples will be measured for cotinine, the major metabolite of nicotine, and a reliable 
measure of overall nicotine intake.  Cotinine will be measured by GC/Mass Spectrometry at Yale 
University.  UCHC Core Lab will ship transport tubes to Yale after subjects’ Week 2 visit.  If the 
subject does not come to Visit 2, the blood will be obtained at the next scheduled visit.  Serum 
will also be measured for hydroxycotinine/cotinine ratio, the rate at which nicotine is 
metabolized.  Samples will be shipped in compliance with DOT/IATA regulations (dry ice, Fed-
Ex Overnight Express, etc.).  The results will be emailed to the P.I. and the study coordinator at 
each site.  Serum will measured for high sensitivity C-reactive protein (Siemans Medical 
Diagnostics, Los Angeles CA) by solid phase chemiluminescent immunometric assay and sICAM 
(R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN) measured by sandwich EIA in the GCRC core laboratory. If 
possible, this blood draw will be incorporated with other routine prenatal blood draws.  
3. Urine sample:  Urine will only be used as a backup for cotinine if necessary.   
4. Exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) measurement and Nicotine Use survey (which assesses any 
smoking last seven days and since the last study visit and use of other smoking cessation aids)  
5. Vital Signs (blood pressure and heart rate) and Weight will be obtained.  
6. Adverse Effects Inhaler:  Subjects will rate potential adverse effects (cough, throat irritation, 
rhinitis, and mouth irritation, which have been noted in other nicotine inhaler studies [6, 40, 66]) 
on a 4-point scale: 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, and 3=severe.  Other AE’s will also be 
recorded and severity rated.  This will be done before the subject is administered treatment so we 
have a baseline to compare other visits. 
7. Concomitant Medication: Subjects will be asked about their current medication use, including 
any prescription medication, over the counter medication, supplement, and/or vitamins.     
8. The Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale (MNWS) measures symptoms of tobacco 
withdrawal on a scale of 0 (not present) to 4 (severe) [24].  We will calculate a total score and a 
score excluding craving to evaluate withdrawal symptoms during cessation.   
9. Release of Information: A release of information will be obtained at the baseline visit so the 
study physicians are able to obtain delivery records if the participant will deliver at a hospital 
other than HH or BMC. 
10. Counseling:  There are 4 primary goals in the initial counseling session:  (1) establishing a 
rapport with the patient, (2) functional analysis of smoking including a review of self-efficacy in 
various situations, (3) increasing motivation and confidence to quit smoking (using techniques 
described in the manual), (4) helping the patient to set and prepare for a quit date.  
The study nurse provides 35 min of smoking cessation counseling. Subjects will be given “Need 
Help putting out that Cigarette?” a booklet available for purchase through the American College 
of Obstetrics and Gynecology.  This booklet is written in English or Spanish, is at a 6th grade 
reading level, provides information about smoking in pregnancy, and outlines steps to prepare to 
quit and stay quit during pregnancy.  The nurse will use responses to the self efficacy 
questionnaire and diary to help subjects recognize high-risk situations and develop specific 
strategies to deal with them.  The treatment manual describes four primary sources that influence 


Nicotine Replacement for Smoking Cessation during Pregnancy 
v. 7.8 January 18, 2016 
 
 
11 
self-efficacy (1) prior experience, (2) modeling or vicarious experience, (3) positive social 
persuasion and (4) somatic/physiological and/or emotional states [3] and specific techniques that 
can be used to address self efficacy in each of these domains.  Multiple studies have established 
that the use of these techniques reliably increases self-efficacy across a variety of addictive 
behaviors [4].  
The nurse will teach participants to use the inhaler properly (see below on instructions), and have 
them try it under supervision.  Subjects asked to identify a quit date (within the next week), and 
are prepared for this quit date by the study nurse. Active inhaler or placebo dispensed with 
instructions to begin regular use on the quit date. 
11. Dispense Study Drug/Usage Instructions: Because there is no known safe level of smoking, the 
goal of treatment will be total abstinence.  Subjects will be informed that the nicotine inhaler is 
most effective if used regularly and that they should use the medication for breakthrough 
cravings, as needed.  We will instruct subjects that each use of the inhaler should consist of 
puffing on it frequently up to a 20-30 minute period (as in previous studies) [66]. As a rough 
guide, subjects will be informed that 80 puffs on the inhaler (3-4 puffs per minute for 20-30 
minutes) delivers a dose of nicotine that is approximately equal to one that would be delivered by 
1 cigarette (i.e., 1 mg of nicotine). The study nurse will demonstrate for the subject the proper 
inhaler use.  
 
Subjects will be instructed to begin using the inhaler on their quit date. Our choice of dosage is 
aimed at relieving withdrawal symptoms, so we will encourage heavier smokers to use more 
inhaler cartridges than lighter smokers. Subjects who smoke >10 CPD will be instructed to begin 
with 4-12 cartridge inhalers/day, which is consistent with other inhaler studies that have 
recommended a minimum use of 2 inhalers per day [67], or 4 inhalers per day [66], although use 
of at least 6 inhalers per day was recommended by others [40], including the package insert.  
However, clinical efficacy is observed with use of at least 4 cartridges per day, which is the 
minimum dose we will recommend for women who smoke > 10 CPD.  Women who smoke 5-9 
CPD will be instructed to begin by using 1-4 cartridge inhalers/day, based on an estimated 1-2 mg 
of nicotine per cigarette, with each cartridge inhaler estimated to release 4 mg of nicotine [6]. Use 
of 1-4 cartridges/day by 4 light smokers in the pilot study resulted in 62% nicotine replacement. 
Dosage adjustments will be made in response to withdrawal symptoms and cotinine levels. We 
will monitor cotinine levels after the women have used the inhaler for 2 weeks.  Subjects will be 
notified by the  research study nurse if there is a significant increase in cotinine above baseline 
values while smoking (see DSMP for cotinine monitoring). In our previous study [1], this 
approach worked well previously to ensure that cotinine levels were not excessive. 
 
Nurse will distribute a 2 week supply of study medication. The participant will be given a 
handout to record inhaler use and any concommitat smoking prior to subsequent study. The 
baseline visit will take 1.5 hours. 
 
12. Phone call (On Target Quit Date): Subjects will receive a telephone call on their quit date (+/- 2 
days) to discuss cognitive behavioral strategies identified for high risk situations, inhaler use, and 
to provide support for smoking cessation. 
13. Reminder Phone Calls:  Subjects may receive reminder phone calls and/or text messages via a 
secure device based on participant preference, regarding appointment dates and times.  They will 
also be instructed to return study medication, when appropriate. 
14. Missed Visits:  Since this population has a high “no show” rate for assigned visits, some 
procedures will need to be adjusted for safety purposes and to achieve research goals. 
 
 


Nicotine Replacement for Smoking Cessation during Pregnancy 
v. 7.8 January 18, 2016 
 
 
12 
Visit 1: Subjects seen approximately 1 week (+/- 4days) after their quit date to assess adverse effects and 
progress in smoking cessation. At this visit, the nurse administers behavioral counseling (35 minutes) and 
assesses medication usage. The study coordinator will administer all assessments.   
1. Vital signs and weight  
2. Exhaled CO measurement  
3. Nicotine Use Survey  
4. Questionnaires: MNWS 
5. Adverse Effects Inhaler & Adverse Events 
6. Concomitant Medication 
7. Inhaler usage: We will collect used cartridges from patient and review diary of inhaler useage.  
8. Counseling:  The second counseling session is scheduled 1 week after the quit date.   The primary 
focus of this session will be to assess reactions to the initial session, smoking status, and the 
effectiveness of the intervention, and to discuss strategies to deal with smoking urges and tobacco 
withdrawal symptoms.  Subsequent sessions will focus on achieving or maintaining abstinence, 
increasing self-efficacy, skills training (depending on the patient’s smoking status), and providing 
support. 
       
This visit will take 45 minutes.  
 
Visits 2 (2 weeks after the quit date +/- 4 days).  The following items will be assessed by research 
nurse. 
1. Vital signs and weight  
2. Exhaled CO measurement  
3. Maternal Blood draw (15 cc) If possible, this blood draw will be incorporated with other routine 
prenatal blood draws.  Will collect urine as backup. 
4. Nicotine Use Survey  
5. Questionnaires: MNWS, PHQ 
6. Adverse Effects Inhaler & Adverse Events 
7. Concomitant Medication 
8. Inhaler usage: We will collect used cartridges from patient and review diary of inhaler useage.  
9. Dispensement:  We will dispense a 2 week supply of study medication, if needed.  
10. Counseling (10 Minutes):  Counseling will focus on achieving or maintaining abstinence (set another 
quit date if necessary), increasing self-efficacy, skills training (depending on the patient’s smoking 
status), and providing social support, and using inhaler to combat urges to smoke).  
 
This visit will take 45 minutes. After the session the nurse will send the two maternal serum samples for 
cotinine analyses. If the visit 2 sample exceeds that of baseline by 40%, the study nurse will call the 
patient and advise a decrease in inhaler dosage that will be recommended by Dr. Oncken.   
 
Visit 3 (3 weeks after the quit date +/- 4 days).  The following items will be assessed by research 
nurse. 
 
1. Vital signs and weight  
2. Exhaled CO measurement  
3. Nicotine Use Survey  
4. Assignment: To examine whether the blinding was successful, subjects will be asked which treatment 
they think they received (active or placebo inhaler).   
5. Adverse Effects Inhaler & Adverse Events 
6. Concomitant Medication 


Nicotine Replacement for Smoking Cessation during Pregnancy 
v. 7.8 January 18, 2016 
 
 
13 
7. MNWS Questionnaire 
8. Inhaler usage: We will collect used cartridges from patient and review diary of inhaler useage.  
9. Counseling (10 Minutes):  Counseling  will focus on achieving or maintaining abstinence (set another 
quit date if necessary), increasing self-efficacy, skills training (depending on the patient’s smoking 
status), and providing social support, and using inhaler to combat urges to smoke).  
 
This visit will take 45 minutes.  
 
Visit 4 (4 weeks after the quit date +/- 4 days).  The following items will be assessed by research 
nurse. 
 
1. Vital signs and weight  
2. Exhaled CO measurement  
3. Nicotine Use Survey 
4. Questinnaires: MNWS  
5. Adverse Effects Inhaler & Adverse Events 
6. Concomitant Medication 
7. Inhaler usage: We will collect used cartridges from patient and review diary of inhaler useage.  
8. Dispensement: We will dispense a 2 week supply of study medication, if needed. 
9. Counseling (10 Minutes):  Counseling will focus on achieving or maintaining abstinence (set another 
quit date if necessary), increasing self-efficacy, skills training (depending on the patient’s smoking 
status), and providing social support, and using inhaler to combat urges to smoke).  
 
This visit will take 45 minutes.  
 
Visit 5 (6 weeks after the quit date +/-10days).  The following items will be assessed by research 
nurse. 
 
1. Vital signs and weight  
2. Exhaled CO measurement  
3. Nicotine Use Survey 
4. Questionnaires: MNWS, PHQ 
5. Adverse Effects Inhaler & Adverse Events 
6. Concomitant Medication 
7. Inhaler usage: We will collect used cartridges from patient and review diary of inhaler useage.  
8. Taper: (Discuss scheduled taper with goal of being off medication by 6 weeks for subjects who are 
abstinent from cigarette smoking (no smoking last 7 days confirmed with exhaled CO) 
9. Maternal Blood draw (15cc). If possible, this blood draw will be incorporated with other routine 
prenatal blood draws.  Will collect urine as backup. 
10. Counseling (10 Minutes):  Counseling will focus on achieving or maintaining abstinence (set another 
quit date if necessary), increasing self-efficacy, skills training (depending on the patient’s smoking 
status), and providing social support, and using inhaler to combat urges to smoke).  
11. Serum will be sent for cotinine analysis only if the nurse identifies that the subject has significantly 
changed her smoking and/or inhaler use patterns (see DSMP for cotinine monitoring). 
 
This visit will take 45 minutes.  
 
Visit 6 (32-34 weeks gestation).  The following items will be assessed by research nurse. 
 
1. Vital signs and weight  
2. Exhaled CO measurement  


Nicotine Replacement for Smoking Cessation during Pregnancy 
v. 7.8 January 18, 2016 
 
 
14 
3. Nicotine Use Survey 
4. Questionnaires: MNWS, PHQ 
5. Adverse Effects Inhaler & Adverse Events 
6. Concomitant Medication 
7. Inhaler usage: We will collect used cartridges from patient and review diary of inhaler useage.  
8. Maternal Blood Draw (15 cc) If possible, this blood draw will be incorporated with other routine 
prenatal blood draws.  Will collect urine, if necessary. 
9. Counseling (10 Minutes):  Counseling will focus on achieving or maintaining abstinence (set another 
quit date if necessary), increasing self-efficacy, skills training (depending on the patient’s smoking 
status), and providing social support, and using inhaler to combat urges to smoke). 
10.  Serum will be sent for cotinine analysis only if the nurse identifies that the subject has significantly 
changed her smoking and/or inhaler use patterns (see DSMP for cotinine monitoring). 
 
This visit will take 45 minutes.  
 
Birth outcomes:  the research nurse or study coordinator will collect birth outcomes by chart review.  
Permission to conduct chart review for labor and delivery records will be included in the informed 
consent form. Information to be collected includes: Apgar scores, birth weight, infant sex, gestational age, 
head circumference, NICU admission, and infant length of stay.  Other rare events associated with 
tobacco use during pregnancy and maternal medical conditions will also be recorded. Time to collect birth 
outcomes is estimated at 30 minutes.  
 
Visits 7 & 8: 1- and 6-month postpartum follow-up visits will be completed to assess smoking relapse. 
We have chosen these time points because the majority of post-partum relapses occur during this period 
[18].  To reduce subject burden visit 7 will be done by phone.  If unable to contact participant, the chart 
will be reviewed for smoking status. 
 
Visit 7 (1 month postpartum +/- 7 days). The following items will be assessed by research nurse or 
study coordinator via a telephone call.Nicotine Use survey 
1. Counseling to encourage abstinence postpartum 
 
Visit 8 (approximately 6 months postpartum +/- 14 days).  The following items will be assessed by 
research nurse or study coordinator. 
1. Nicotine Use survey 
2. Exhaled CO measurement if visit is attended 
3. Counseling to encourage abstinence postpartum 
 
As a back-up plan, study staff (not R.N.) will perform study procedures at visits that do not 
require study drug dispensement (Visits 1, 3, and 6).  In this instance, the R.N. will complete the 
behavioral counseling via the telephone. 
Sample size and justification:  
Aim 1: Based on our nicotine gum study, we estimate that the quit rate will be 14.9% in the placebo 
group and 26.9% in the nicotine inhaler group (consistent with an odds ratio of 2.1 obtained in meta-
analyses of inhaler effects in non-pregnant smokers [2]. Thus, 360 women (180 in each of the treatment 
group) would yield power of 0.80 to detect a significant difference using a two-tailed test and α=0.05.  
Thus, 360 women (180 in each of the treatment group) would yield power of 0.80 to detect a significant 
difference using a two-tailed test and α=0.05.   


Nicotine Replacement for Smoking Cessation during Pregnancy 
v. 7.8 January 18, 2016 
 
 
15 
Aim 2:  Using data from our completed study, a total of 226 subjects will yield power=0.80 (two-sided 
α=0.05) to detect a difference of 100 ng/mL (SD=360) in the reduction in cotinine concentrations 
between groups.  In our completed study (N=194), we observed a difference in birth weight of 
approximately 300 grams (SD 607), which was highly significant.  Assuming a comparable effect size, 
we will have more than adequate power to detect birth weight differences between groups. Thus, our 
sample size of 360 is more than sufficient for this aim. 
Aim 3: In our completed study, the effect of nicotine gum appeared to depend on  
cigarettes per day during the pretreatment period. For light smokers, the cessation rates were 18% and  
21% for the control and nicotine groups, respectively, while for heavy smokers the rates were 0% and  
15%,  respectively.  Since a similar effect in a sample of 150 women would provide power=0.80, using a 
two-sided α=0.05, our proposed sample of 360 pregnant smokers will provide more than adequate power  
to detect the effect. 
 
Aim 4:  is exploratory and no sample size was calculated.  
Explain on what basis it is reasonable to assume that the sample size will be obtained:  
Recruitment will take place over 39 months, requiring enrollment of approximately 9 subjects per month. 
In our previous study, we had an on-site recruiter at each site (Baystate and Hartford Hospital) and were 
able to screen 3 pregnant smokers and enroll 2 subjects/week (i.e.,1 subject/site). We will also recruit 
from CHS in Hartford, where we expect to recruit 1 subject/month. Recruitment sites will be provided 
with materials designed to raise awareness of the study, including posters and brochures to be displayed 
prominently in all clinic areas.  We will also encourage referrals from clinicians in the surrounding areas 
at each site, and recruit through newspapers and maternity magazines. Based on our history of 
recruitment, we are confident that we can reach the proposed recruitment goal.  
Subject characteristics:  
• 
Age:  at least 16 years of age  
• 
Ethnicity:  Hispanic and non-Hispanic. All race and ethnic groups will be eligible 
• 
Gender:  F 
• 
Other characteristics - (e.g. primary language etc.):  English or Spanish speaking 
Inclusion Criteria:   
a) smoking at least 5 CPD for the preceding 7 days 
b) previous attempt to quit smoking during pregnancy by self report  
c) 13-26 weeks gestation 
d) at least 16 years of age 
e) able to speak English or Spanish;  
f) intent to carry pregnancy to term; and 
g) stable residence 
Exclusion criteria: 


Nicotine Replacement for Smoking Cessation during Pregnancy 
v. 7.8 January 18, 2016 
 
 
16 
a) current drug or alcohol abuse or dependence (other than methadone maintenance) 
 
b) twins or other multiple gestation 
 
c) unstable psychiatric disorder 
 
d) unstable medical problems (e.g., pre-eclampsia, threatened abortion, hyperemesis gravidarum) 
 
e) known congenital abnormality.  
Describe length of subject’s participation in the study including number of visits, frequency 
of visits, and length of visits:   
The subject will be in the study from the time of enrollment (13-26 weeks gestation) until 6 months after 
delivery. Each subject will have 10 visits. The screen and baseline visit are each 1.5 hours long. The 
remaining visits are approximately 45 minutes long.    
Methods of Data Collection and Types of Data to be collected (may refer to attached surveys/ forms etc.)  
See Attached surveys 
Method(s) of data analysis:  
Specific Aim 1: To compare the efficacy in pregnant smokers of the nicotine inhaler or matching 
placebo for smoking cessation and reduction in pregnant smokers We will first examine variation in 
the main outcome (7 day PPA rates at 32-34 weeks gestation) by treatment site using the intraclass 
correlation coefficient. If there is a difference by site, it will be used as a nesting factor in a generalized 
estimating equations logistic model. At the end of patient follow-up, the difference in the proportion of 
subjects who successfully quit smoking will be calculated along with a 95% confidence interval for the 
“true” difference between treatment groups.  To evaluate whether randomization was effective, summary 
statistics for patient characteristics in the two study arms will be compared.  If there is an imbalance in 
patient characteristics, statistical adjustment will be used to ensure that the initial results were not biased 
by those imbalances.  
We will use a linear mixed model to evaluate the effects of the nicotine inhaler on smoking 
reduction or exhaled CO from baseline first to 6 weeks and then to 32 weeks gestation.  Prior to 
these analyses, the distribution of the dependent variables, number of CPD (and exhaled CO), will be 
examined for normality and outliers and transformations will be performed if necessary.  Treatment group 
and visit will be fixed factors and the intercept will be random.  The model will also include a treatment-
by-time interaction to test whether, over time, the number of CPD changes differentially by treatment 
group. 
Specific Aim 2.a: To compare effects of the nicotine inhaler with placebo on overall nicotine 
exposure (i.e., measured as serum cotinine), and birth outcomes [i.e., birth weight, gestational age, 
% of subjects who deliver a LBW (<2500 g) or preterm (<37 wk gestation) infant]. We will use a 
linear mixed model (see above) to determine whether cotinine concentration changes differentially over 
time by treatment group.                                                                                                                                                             
Specific Aim 2.b:  Birth Outcomes. Mean birth weight will be compared for treatment groups using a 
two-sample t-test, or analysis of covariance if necessary to adjust for imbalances in patient characteristics.  
We will also compare the percentage of subjects in each group who deliver an infant of LBW (1500-2500 
g) or preterm delivery using chi square or logistical regression.  
Specific Aim 3: To determine which subjects benefit most from NRT, we will use logistic regression 
to examine the following predictors of treatment response (i.e., smoking cessation at 6 or 32 wks 


Nicotine Replacement for Smoking Cessation during Pregnancy 
v. 7.8 January 18, 2016 
 
 
17 
gestation): pretreatment CPD, FTND score, perceived stress, motivation to quit, self-efficacy, treatment 
group, and the interaction of treatment group and the other independent (i.e., potential moderator) 
variables. Analyses: First, we will use a stepwise procedure to choose predictor variables and interaction 
terms that are significant (α=0.05).  A significant interaction between treatment group and other variables 
(e.g., \pretreatment CPD) implies that the regression coefficients for this variable are not homogeneous 
with respect to the efficacy of the medication. The Johnson-Neyman procedure [79], which yields values 
of the continuous moderator variable at which the treatment groups differ significantly on the dependent 
variable, will be used to determine the “break point” nicotine inhaler efficacy. In our completed study[1], 
the effect of nicotine gum appeared to depend on CPD during the pretreatment period. For light smokers, 
the cessation rates were 18% and 21% for the control and nicotine groups, respectively, while for heavy 
smokers the rates were 0% and 15%, respectively.  Since a similar effect in a sample of 150 women 
would provide power=0.80, using a two-sided α=0.05, our proposed sample of 360 pregnant smokers will 
provide more than adequate power to detect the effect.   
Mediational analyses: Measures of nicotine withdrawal, depressive symptoms, and perceived stress 
measured at baseline and at each study visit will serve as potential mediators.  Specifically, we expect that 
the nicotine inhaler will result in a greater reduction in nicotine withdrawal symptoms than placebo, and 
that these variables will partially mediate the effects of treatment. Tests of mediation using the Mplus 
statistical package [80], which allows for missing data, will provide evidence of a causal link between 
treatment, the mediator variable(s), and the outcomes. 
Specific Aim 4: To explore mechanisms by which the nicotine inhaler increases birth weight and 
gestational age.  Based on the results of our completed study [3] and another NRT trial [7], we anticipate 
that offspring born to women in the inhaler group will have a higher birth weight and gestational age than 
those in the placebo group. If NRT increases birth weight, potential mediators of this effect will be 
explored. Measures of tobacco use (cigarettes per day, and exhaled co) and 7 day point prevalence 
abstinence at each study visit will serve as potential mediators.  Specifically, we expect that the nicotine 
inhaler will result in cessation or a greater reduction in CPD or exhaled CO, and that these variables will 
partially mediate an increase in birth weight. We will use a Mplus statistical package to the perform 
meditational analyses [80]. The same analytic approach will be used separately to examine gestational age 
(in wk).  
Depending on whether smoking cessation or reduction mediates the effect of NRT on birth weight, the 
appropriate variable will be used a predictor variable in an additional meditational model that examines 
potential biomarkers (C-reactive protein or sICAM) as mediators of birth weight or gestational age. 
Specifically we will test with Mplus statistical software whether cessation (or reduction) influences a 
change in biomarker concentration and whether this increases birth weight or gestational age.   
We would be remiss if we did not also consider a mediational model that includes nicotine exposure per 
se to explain increased birth weight in an NRT trial.  Wisborg et al. [7] hypothesized that in their study, it 
was not tobacco reduction, but an independent anti-inflammatory effect of nicotine, that increased birth 
weight via reduced platelet aggregation. Consistent with this statement is the fact that they found no 
measurable effects on tobacco reduction in their study and nicotine per se reduces inflammation [81, 82] 
and platelet aggregation [83, 84]. Evidence against this argument is that nicotine levels in two NRT 
pregnancy trials were similar [7] or lower in the nicotine versus placebo groups. To determine the effects 
of nicotine per se during pregnancy, we will examine effects of cotinine (independent of tobacco 
reduction) on pregnancy outcomes and on biomarkers.    
             
Safety: See data and safety monitoring plan for details on safety considerations. In the case of a serious 
adverse event due to study treatment, the medication will be stopped and the blind may be broken by 
contacting research pharmacy at UCONN.  


Nicotine Replacement for Smoking Cessation during Pregnancy 
v. 7.8 January 18, 2016 
 
 
18 
Retention: Efforts will be made to obtain follow-up information on all subjects regardless of adherence 
to treatment.  Letters will be mailed prior to the telephone follow-up call.  Home visits to collect follow-
up data will be scheduled when necessary. We will obtain permission during the informed consent 
process to contact a significant other to obtain the participant’s current telephone number should they 
change residences.   
 
Incentives: These include parking validation, bus tokens, and lunch vouchers. Participants will be 
reimbursed $20 per visit for childcare and travel expenses. The use of these incentives made it possible to 
collect data from 75% of subjects in our completed trial [1]. 
 
Drug Handling and Accountability: We will have study personnel (the same person who will 
dispense the medication) transport study medication from UCONN to Baystate or Hartford Hospital and 
place it in the locked cabinet.  If for some reason the study nurse is unable to transport drug, a research 
assistant will pick up the drug and pharmacy and transport to Baystate to give to study nurse who will 
sign off that she received the medication. A signature log has been developed for drug transport and 
storage (see drug accountability log).  
Drug Storage: Boxes of nicotine and placebo inhaler will be labeled with a study number, kept at study 
sites in a locked filing cabinet (with a daily temperature log) in a research room or research pharmacy at 
each recruitment site. 
 
Training of counselors: Dr. Dornelas will train the nurses to deliver smoking cessation counseling 
using standardized procedures.  One of the nurses is Spanish speaking.   Counselors will be trained using 
videotaped case examples from prior studies [1, 58].  A treatment manual and adherence checklist that 
were developed by Dr. Dornelas will be adapted for this study. Nurses will be judged to be competent at 
behavioral counseling when they have: 1) completed two 2-hour didactic educational sessions on the 
theory and methods of the treatment; 2) shadowed the trainer (Dr. Dornelas) for 2 visits and 3) had the 
trainer sit in on 2 cases with them and judged to meet a criterion level.  The trainer will remain available 
for the duration of the study for supervision as needed and follow up on any psychological issues or 
referrals that are needed.  At each counseling session, the nurse will complete an adherence checklist.  
Counseling sessions may be audio taped and 15% may be selected at random and reviewed for adherence 
to the treatment protocol.  
  
Monitoring and Auditing: Since Dr. Oncken holds the IND for this study, she is considered the 
sponsor and has the ethical, legal, and scientific obligation to carefully follow this study in a detailed and 
orderly manner in accordance with established research principles and FDA regulations.  Periodic 
monitoring visits will be scheduled as necessary at each site based on enrollment at each site. The 
sponsor’s designee will be responsible for auditing this study. The study monitoring will be done at each 
site initially after the site has enrolled the first 5 subjects and then it will be done approximately every  
two to three months or as frequently as necessary to be determined by the investigator/monitor.  
Monitoring will include:  
 
a. Verification that the staff and facilities, including laboratories and equipment remain 
adequate throughout the trial period (which will include review of staff delegation log, 
examining carbon monoxide calibration logs , freezer logs for specimen storage) 
b. Verification that 
i. written informed consent was obtained before each subject’s participation in the   
trial in accordance with 21 CFR Parts 50 and 56, 


Nicotine Replacement for Smoking Cessation during Pregnancy 
v. 7.8 January 18, 2016 
 
 
19 
ii. enrolled subjects met eligibility criteria and 
iii. all study procedures are completed as outlined in the study protocol. 
c. Verification of protocol adherence and verification that all deviations from the protocol 
are documented with an explanation of circumstances. 
d. Verification that subjects failing to complete the study and the reason for each failure 
are noted 
e. Performance of a serious adverse event review; with emphasis on the proper follow-up 
and reporting of adverse events 
f. Verification of investigational product accountability (review drug handling, drug 
accountability, drug temperature logs, review each chart for physician sign off). 
g. Performance of a review of the study regulatory file  
h. Performance of a review of the data and safety monitoring plan meeting minutes/notes. 
 
 
 
Timetable:    
Expected Start Date:  12/1/10 
Timeline of Study Procedures (including time to administer questionnaires and other 
procedures):  
 
Assessment 
Pt 
time 
(min)
Screen Baseline 
(wk -1  
before  
QD) 
Visit 1 
(wk 1 
after  
QD) 
Visit 2 
(wk 2 
after  
QD) 
Visit 3 
(wk 3 
after  
QD) 
Visit 4 
(wk 4 
after  
QD) 
Visit 5 
(wk 6 
after  
QD) 
Visit 6 
(32-36 
wk GA) 
Visits  7** & 8 
(1 & appox. 6 
months 
    postpartum) 
Visit window 
 
 
 
+/- 4 
+/- 4 
+/- 4 
+/- 4 
+/- 10 
N/A 
V.7(+/- 7),  
V.8(+/- 14) 
Demographics 
2  
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Smoking and 
FTND 
10 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Medical Screen 
20  
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Social Support 
and Self-Efficacy 
Questionnaires 
5 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PRIME-MD PHQ 
2 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
 
X 
X 
 
Vital signs  
& Weight 
5 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
Nicotine Use 
Survey 
1  
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
       x 
Cotinine,  
Biomarkers, and 
hydroxycotinine/c
otinine ratio 
5 
 
X 
 
X 
 
 
X 
X 
                     
Carbon monoxide 
2 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
      x 
Urine sample as 
backup 
 
5 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
X 
 
Smoking 
cessation 
counseling a 
10 
 
 X a 
X a 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
               
MNWS 
2 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
 


Nicotine Replacement for Smoking Cessation during Pregnancy 
v. 7.8 January 18, 2016 
 
 
20 
Adverse Effects 
2  
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
Concomitant 
Medication 
2 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
Medication 
Dispensement 
5 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
 
 
Inhaler Usage 
2  
 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
Assignment 
Question 
1 
 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
Birth Outcomes* 
30 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*Information obtained by chart review by study personnel; ** phone interview; GA = Gestational Age; QD=Quit 
Date; a Counseling will be approximately 35 minutes for the first 2 sessions, and 10 minutes for subsequent 
sessions; b Proposed medication dispensing times. If the subject misses a visit, drug may be dispensed at a 
subsequent visit. 
 
 
Timeline of Performance Goals for the entire study:  
Activity 
Year 1 
Year 2 
Year 3 
Year 4 
Year 5 
Staff training & preparation 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Subject enrollment 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Endpoint assessments (32-34 wk gestation)  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1- and 6-month post-partum assessments 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Data entry & cleaning  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Data analyses 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Report writing 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Expected Completion Date: February, 2017  
Budget / resources:  
See attached proposed budget. The actual budget will depend on NIH funds.   
Dissemination: 
We intend to publish our findings in a journal article when completed, and present it at SRNT 
annual meeting.  
References / Literature Review:   
1. Oncken C, Dornelas E, Greene J, Sankey H, Glasmann A, Feinn R, Kranzler HR., Nicotine 
gum for pregnant smokers: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol, 2008. 112(4): p. 
859-67. PMC 2630492 – NIHMS 82626 
2. Fiore MC, Jaén CR, Baker TB, Bailey WC, Benowitz NL, Curry SJ, Dorfman SF, Froelicher 
ES, Goldstein MG, Healton CG, Henderson PN, Heyman RB, Koh HK, Kottke TE, Lando 
HA, Mecklenburg RE, Mermelstein RJ, Mullen PD, Orleans CT, Robinson L, Stitzer ML, 
Tommasello AC, Villejo L, Wewers ME, Murray EW, Bennett G, Heishman S, Husten C, 
Morgan G, Williams C, Christiansen BA, Piper ME, Hasselblad V, Fraser D, Theobald W, 
Connell M, Leitzke C.., Treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update.  Clinical 
Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD:U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.  Public 
Health Service., 2008. May 2008. PMID: 18807274 
3. Bandura A. Self-efficacy, in Encyclopedia of mental health, V.S. Ramachaudran, Editor. 
1998, Academic press: San Diego. p. 71-81. 


Nicotine Replacement for Smoking Cessation during Pregnancy 
v. 7.8 January 18, 2016 
 
 
21 
4. Hyde J, Hankins M, Deale A, Marteau TM., Interventions to increase self-efficacy in the 
context of addiction behaviours: a systematic literature review. J Health Psychol, 2008. 
13(5): p. 607-23. PMID: 18519435 
5. Oncken CA, Hatsukami DK, Lupo VR, Lando HA, Gibeau LM, Hansen RJ. Effects of short-
term use of nicotine gum in pregnant smokers. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 1996. 59(6): p. 654-61. 
PMID: 8681490 
6. Schneider NG, Olmstead RE, Franzon MA, Lunell E., The nicotine inhaler: clinical 
pharmacokinetics and comparison with other nicotine treatments. Clin Pharmacokinet, 2001. 
40(9): p. 661-84. PMID: 11605715 
7. Wisborg K, Henriksen TB, Jespersen LB, Secher NJ., Nicotine patches for pregnant 
smokers: a randomized controlled study. Obstet Gynecol, 2000. 96(6): p. 967-71. PMID: 
11084187 
8. U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services, Women and Smoking: a Report of the Surgeon 
General, in 2001 Surgeon General's Report. 2001, Public Health Service, Center for 
Disease Control and Prevention: Washington, DC. 
9. Fried PA, Watkinson B, Gray R., Differential effects on cognitive functioning in 13- to 16-
year-olds prenatally exposed to cigarettes and marihuana. Neurotoxicol Teratol, 2003. 
25(4): p. 427-36. PMID: 12798960 
10. Bernstein IM, Mongeon JA, Badger GJ, Solomon L, Heil SH, Higgins ST., Maternal smoking 
and its association with birth weight. Obstet Gynecol, 2005. 106(5 Pt 1): p. 986-91. PMID: 
16260516 
11. Mathai M, Skinner A, Lawton K, Weindling AM. Maternal smoking, urinary cotinine levels 
and birth-weight. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 1990. 30(1): p. 33-6. PMID: 2346450 
12. Ventura SJ, Hamilton BE, Mathews TJ, Chandra A., Trends and variations in smoking during 
pregnancy and low birth weight: evidence from the birth certificate, 1990-2000. Pediatrics, 
2003. 111(5 Part 2): p. 1176-80. PMID: 12728134 
13. Hoyert DL, Mathews TJ, Menacker F, Strobino DM, Guyer B., Annual summary of vital 
statistics: 2004. Pediatrics, 2006. 117(1): p. 168-83. PMID: 16396875 
14. Salihu HM, Aliyu MH, Pierre-Louis BJ, Alexander GR, Levels of excess infant deaths 
attributable to maternal smoking during pregnancy in the United States. Matern Child Health 
J, 2003. 7(4): p. 219-27. PMID: 14682499 
15. MacArthur C, Knox EG., Smoking in pregnancy: effects of stopping at different stages. Br J 
Obstet Gynaecol, 1988. 95(6): p. 551-5. PMID: 3390400 
16. Ahlsten G, Cnattingius S, Lindmark G., Cessation of smoking during pregnancy improves 
foetal growth and reduces infant morbidity in the neonatal period. A population-based 
prospective study. Acta Paediatr, 1993. 82(2): p. 177-81. PMID: 8477164 
17. Li CQ, Windsor RA, Perkins L, Goldenberg RL, Lowe JB., The impact on infant birth weight 
and gestational age of cotinine-validated smoking reduction during pregnancy. Jama, 1993. 
269(12): p. 1519-24. PMID: 8445814 
18. Fingerhut LA, Kleinman JC, Kendrick JS., Smoking before, during, and after pregnancy. Am 
J Public Health, 1990. 80(5): p. 541-4. PMID: 2327529 
19. Gilman SE, Breslau J, Subramanian SV, Hitsman B, Koenen KC., Social factors, 
psychopathology, and maternal smoking during pregnancy. Am J Public Health, 2008. 98(3): 
p. 448-53. PMC 225364 – NIHMS11053 
20. Schneider S, Maul H, Freerksen N, Pötschke-Langer M., Who smokes during pregnancy? 
An analysis of the German Perinatal Quality Survey 2005. Public Health, 2008. 122(11): p. 
1210-6. PMID: 18632123 
21. Lumley J, Oliver SS, Chamberlain C, Oakley L., Interventions for promoting smoking 
cessation during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2004(4): p. CD001055. PMID: 
15495004 


Nicotine Replacement for Smoking Cessation during Pregnancy 
v. 7.8 January 18, 2016 
 
 
22 
22. Windsor R, Oncken C, Henningfield J, Hartmann K, Edwards N, Behavioral and 
pharmacological treatment methods for pregnant smokers: issues for clinical practice. J Am 
Med Womens Assoc, 2000. 55(5): p. 304-10. PMID: 11070654 
23. Heil SH, Higgins ST, Mongeon JA, Badger GJ, Bernstein IM., Characterizing nicotine 
withdrawal in pregnant cigarette smokers. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol, 2006. 14(2): p. 165-
70. PMID: 16756420 
24. Hughes J, Hatsukami DK., Errors in using tobacco withdrawal scale. Tob Control, 1998. 
7(1): p. 92-3. PMID: 9706762 
25. Henningfield JE, Fant RV, Buchhalter AR, Stitzer ML.., Pharmacotherapy for nicotine 
dependence. CA Cancer J Clin, 2005. 55(5): p. 281-99; quiz 322-3, 325. PMID: 16166074 
26. Hurt RD, Sachs DP, Glover ED, Offord KP, Johnston JA, Dale LC, Khayrallah MA, 
Schroeder DR, Glover PN, Sullivan CR, Croghan IT, Sullivan PM., A comparison of 
sustained-release bupropion and placebo for smoking cessation. N Engl J Med, 1997. 
337(17): p. 1195-202.PMID: 9337378 
27. Gonzales D, Rennard SI, Nides M, Oncken C, Azoulay S, Billing CB, Watsky EJ, Gong J, 
Williams KE, Reeves KR; Varenicline Phase 3 Study Group., Varenicline, an alpha4beta2 
nicotinic acetylcholine receptor partial agonist, vs sustained-release bupropion and placebo 
for smoking cessation: a randomized controlled trial. Jama, 2006. 296(1): p. 47-55. PMID: 
16820546 
28. Oncken CA, Kranzler HR., Pharmacotherapies to enhance smoking cessation during 
pregnancy. Drug Alcohol Rev, 2003. 22(2): p. 191-202. PMID: 12850906 
29. Dempsey D, Jacob P 3rd, Benowitz NL., Accelerated metabolism of nicotine and cotinine in 
pregnant smokers. J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 2002. 301(2): p. 594-8. PMID: 11961061 
30. Allen SS, Hatsukami D, Christianson D, Brown S., Effects of transdermal nicotine on 
craving, withdrawal and premenstrual symptomatology in short-term smoking abstinence 
during different phases of the menstrual cycle. Nicotine Tob Res, 2000. 2(3): p. 231-41. 
PMID: 11082823 
31. Hickner J, Cousineau A, Messimer S., Smoking cessation during pregnancy: strategies used 
by Michigan family physicians. J Am Board Fam Pract, 1990. 3(1): p. 39-42. PMID: 2305639 
32. Oncken CA, Pbert L, Ockene JK, Zapka J, Stoddard A., Nicotine replacement prescription 
practices of obstetric and pediatric clinicians. Obstet Gynecol, 2000. 96(2): p. 261-5. PMID: 
10908774 
33. Pollak KI, Oncken CA, Lipkus IM, Lyna P, Swamy GK, Pletsch PK, Peterson BL, Heine RP, 
Brouwer RJ, Fish L, Myers ER., Nicotine replacement and behavioral therapy for smoking 
cessation in pregnancy. Am J Prev Med, 2007. 33(4): p. 297-305. PMID: 17888856 
34. Hegaard HK, Kjaergaard H, Møller LF, Wachmann H, Ottesen B., Multimodal intervention 
raises smoking cessation rate during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2003. 82(9): 
p. 813-9. PMID: 12911442 
35. Hotham ED, Gilbert AL, Atkinson ER., A randomised-controlled pilot study using nicotine 
patches with pregnant women. Addict Behav, 2006. 31(4): p. 641-8. PMID: 15985339 
36. Pauly 
JR, 
Slotkin 
TA., 
Maternal 
tobacco 
smoking, 
nicotine 
replacement 
and 
neurobehavioural development. Acta Paediatr, 2008. 97(10): p. 1331-7. PMID: 18554275 
37. Dempsey DA, Benowitz NL., Risks and benefits of nicotine to aid smoking cessation in 
pregnancy. Drug Saf, 2001. 24(4): p. 277-322. PMID: 11330657 
38. A US Public Health Service Report. A clinical practice guideline for treating tobacco use and 
dependence: The Tobacco Use and Dependence Clinical Practice Guideline Panel, Staff, 
and Consortium Representatives. Jama, 2000. 283(24): p. 3244-54. PMID: 10866874 
39. Schneider NG, Olmstead RE, Nides M, Mody FV, Otte-Colquette P, Doan K, Patel S., 
Comparative testing of 5 nicotine systems: initial use and preferences. Am J Health Behav, 
2004. 28(1): p. 72-86. PMID: 14977161 


Nicotine Replacement for Smoking Cessation during Pregnancy 
v. 7.8 January 18, 2016 
 
 
23 
40. Schneider NG, Olmstead R, Nilsson F, Mody FV, Franzon M, Doan K.., Efficacy of a nicotine 
inhaler in smoking cessation: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Addiction, 1996. 91(9): 
p. 1293-306. PMID: 8854366 
41. Bastian LA, B.H. Diagnosis and clinical manifestations of early pregnancy.   [cited; Available 
from:http://www.utdol.com/online/content/topic.do?topicKey=antenatl/22517&selectedTitle=21~150
&source=search_result. 
42. Benowitz NL, Dains KM, Hall SM, Stewart S, Wilson M, Dempsey D, Jacob P 3rd., 
Progressive commercial cigarette yield reduction: biochemical exposure and behavioral 
assessment. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2009. 18(3): p. 876-83. PMC 2802575 – 
NIHMS 153458 
43. ACOG committee opinion. Number 316, October 2005. Smoking cessation during 
pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol, 2005. 106(4): p. 883-8. PMID: 16199654 
44. USPSTF, Counseling and interventions to prevent tobacco use and tobacco-caused disease 
in adults and pregnant women: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force reaffirmation 
recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med, 2009. 150(8): p. 551-5. PMID: 19380855 
45. Osadchy, A., A. Kazmin, and G. Koren, Nicotine replacement therapy during pregnancy: 
recommended or not recommended? J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2009. 31(8): p. 744-7. PMID: 
19772709 
46. Hatsukami DK, Benowitz NL, Rennard SI, Oncken C, Hecht SS.., Biomarkers to assess the 
utility of potential reduced exposure tobacco products. Nicotine Tob Res, 2006. 8(4): p. 600-
22. PMID: 16920658 
47. Halvorsen B, Lund Sagen E, Ueland T, Aukrust P, Tonstad S.., Effect of smoking cessation 
on markers of inflammation and endothelial cell activation among individuals with high risk 
for cardiovascular disease. Scan J Clin Lab Invest 2007. 67: p. 604-11. PMID: 17852807 
48. Lain KY, Luppi P, McGonigal S, Roberts JM, DeLoia JA., Intracellular adhesion molecule 
concentrations in women who smoke during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol, 2006. 107(3): p. 
588-94. PMID: 16507929 
49. Lohsoonthorn V, Qiu C, Williams MA., Maternal C-reactive protein concentrations in early 
pregnancy and subsequent risk of preterm delivery. Clinical Biochemistry, 2007. 40: p. 330-
5. PMID: 17289011 
50. Trevisanuto D, Doglioni N, Altinier S, Zaninotto M, Plebani M, Zanardo V., High-sensitivity C-
reactive protein in umbilical cord of small-for-gestational-age neonates. Neonatology, 2007. 
91(3): p. 186-9. PMID: 17377404 
51. Axemo P, Liljestrand J, Bergström S, Gebre-Medhin M., Aetiology of late fetal death in 
Maputo. Gynecol Obstet Invest, 1995. 39: p. 103-9. PMID: 7537709 
52. Ahlsten G, Ewald U, Tuvemo T., Prostacyclin-like activity in umbilical arteries is dose-
dependently reduced by maternal smoking and related to nicotine levels. Biol Neonate, 
1990. 58(5): p. 271-8. PMID: 2076446 
53. Jauniaux E, Burton GJ., Morphological and biological effects of maternal exposure to 
tobacco smoke on the feto-placental unit. Early Hum Dev, 2007. 83(11): p. 699-706. PMID: 
17900829 
54. Johnson MR, Anim-Nyame N, Johnson P, Sooranna SR, Steer PJ., Does endothelial cell 
activation occur with intrauterine growth restriction? Bjog, 2002. 109(7): p. 836-9. PMID: 
12135223 
55. Aliefendioğlu D, Erdem G, Tülek N, Yurdakök M., Neonatal and Maternal Serum levels of 
Soulable ICAM-1 in preeclamptic and normal pregnancies. American Journal of 
Perinatology, 2002. 19(6): p. 333-9. PMID: 12357425 
56. HumanServices, 
U.a 
.3/8/2010 
[cited; 
Available 
from: 
http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/PublicHealthFocus/ucm168412.htm. 


Nicotine Replacement for Smoking Cessation during Pregnancy 
v. 7.8 January 18, 2016 
 
 
24 
57. Stout RL, Wirtz PW, Carbonari JP, Del Boca FK., Ensuring balanced distribution of 
prognostic factors in treatment outcome research. J Stud Alcohol Suppl, 1994. 12: p. 70-5. 
PMID: 7723001 
58. Dornelas EA, Magnavita J, Beazoglou T, Fischer EH, Oncken C, Lando H, Greene J, 
Barbagallo J, Stepnowski R, Gregonis E., Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a clinic-based 
counseling intervention tested in an ethnically diverse sample of pregnant smokers. Patient 
Educ Couns, 2006. 64(1-3): p. 342-9. PMID: 16859864 
59. Lancaster T, Stead LF., Individual behavioural counselling for smoking cessation. Cochrane 
Database Syst Rev, 2005(2): p. CD001292. PMID: 15846616 
60. Velicer WF, Diclemente CC, Rossi JS, Prochaska JO., Relapse situations and self-efficacy: 
an integrative model. Addict Behav, 1990. 15(3): p. 271-83. PMID: 2378287 
61. Rice VH, Stead L., Nursing intervention and smoking cessation: meta-analysis update. 
Heart Lung, 2006. 35(3): p. 147-63. PMID: 16701109 
62.  Zhu S and Pierce JP., A new scheduling for time-limited counseling. Prof Psychol:Res & 
Practice, 1995. 26: p. 624-5. 
63. Melvin CL, Tucker P., Measurement and definition for smoking cessation intervention 
research: the smoke-free families experience. Smoke-Free Families Common Evaluation 
Measures for Pregnancy and Smoking Cessation Projects Working Group. Tob Control, 
2000. 9 Suppl 3: p. III87-90. PMID: 10982919 
64. Ludman EJ, McBride CM, Nelson JC, Curry SJ, Grothaus LC, Lando HA, Pirie PL., Stress, 
depressive symptoms and smoking cessation among pregnant women. Health Psychology, 
2000. 19: p. 21-7. PMID: 10711584 
65. Oncken C, Gonzales D, Nides M, Rennard S, Watsky E, Billing CB, Anziano R, Reeves K.., 
Efficacy and safety of the novel selective nicotinic acetylcholine receptor partial agonist, 
varenicline, for smoking cessation. Arch Intern Med, 2006. 166(15): p. 1571-7. PMID: 
16908789 
66. Hjalmarson A, Nilsson F, Sjöström L, Wiklund O., The nicotine inhaler in smoking cessation. 
Arch Intern Med, 1997. 157(15): p. 1721-8. PMID: 9250233 
67. Tønnesen P, Nørregaard J, Mikkelsen K, Jørgensen S, Nilsson F., A double-blind trial of a 
nicotine inhaler for smoking cessation. Jama, 1993. 269(10): p. 1268-71. PMID: 8437304 
68. Malchodi CS, Oncken C, Dornelas EA, Caramanica L, Gregonis E, Curry SL., The effects of 
peer counseling on smoking cessation and reduction. Obstet Gynecol, 2003. 101(3): p. 504-
10. PMID: 12636954 
69. Stookey GK, Katz BP, Olson BL, Drook CA, Cohen SJ., Evaluation of biochemical validation 
measures in determination of smoking status. J Dent Res, 1987. 66(10): p. 1597-601. PMID: 
3305621 
70. Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerström KO., The Fagerstrom Test for 
Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict, 
1991. 86(9): p. 1119-27. PMID: 1932883 
71. Woodby LL, Windsor RA, Snyder SW, Kohler CL, Diclemente CC., Predictors of smoking 
cessation during pregnancy. Addiction, 1999. 94(2): p. 283-92. PMID: 10396795 
72. Ershoff DH, Quinn VP, Mullen PD, Relapse prevention among women who stop smoking 
early in pregnancy: a randomized clinical trial of a self-help intervention. Am J Prev Med, 
1995. 11(3): p. 178-84. PMID: 7662397 
73. Dornelas EA, Sampson RA, Gray JF, Waters D, Thompson PD., A randomized controlled 
trial of smoking cessation counseling after myocardial infarction. Prev Med, 2000. 30(4): p. 
261-8. PMID: 10731452 
74. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB., Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-
MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient 
Health Questionnaire. Jama, 1999. 282(18): p. 1737-44. PMID: 10568646 


Nicotine Replacement for Smoking Cessation during Pregnancy 
v. 7.8 January 18, 2016 
 
 
25 
75. Spinelli MG., Interpersonal psychotherapy for depressed antepartum women: a pilot study. 
Am J Psychiatry, 1997. 154(7): p. 1028-30. PMID: 9210760 
76. Spinelli MG, Endicott J., Controlled clinical trial of interpersonal psychotherapy versus 
parenting education program for depressed pregnant women. Am J Psychiatry, 2003. 
160(3): p. 555-62. PMID: 12611838 
77. O'Hara MW, Stuart S, Gorman LL, Wenzel A., Efficacy of interpersonal psychotherapy for 
postpartum depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2000. 57(11): p. 1039-45. PMID: 11074869 
78. Holcomb WL Jr, Stone LS, Lustman PJ, Gavard JA, Mostello DJ., Screening for depression 
in pregnancy: characteristics of the Beck Depression Inventory. Obstet Gynecol, 1996. 
88(6): p. 1021-5. PMID: 8942846 
79. Schafer, W., Graphical description of interaction outcomes for regressions with groups.  
Measurement and evaluation in counseling and development. 1992. 25: p. 50-2. 
80. Muthen LK, M.B., Mplus User's guide, ed. M. Muthen. 2007, Los Angeles, CA. 
81. Sharentuya N, Tomimatsu T, Mimura K, Tskitishvili E, Kinugasa-Taniguchi Y, Kanagawa T, 
Kimura T., Nicotine Suppresses Interleukin-6 Production From Vascular Endothelial Cells: A 
Possible Therapeutic Role of Nicotine for Preeclampsia. Reprod Sci. PMID: 20220107 
82. de Jonge WJ, Ulloa L., The alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor as a pharmacological 
target for inflammation. Br J Pharmacol, 2007. 151(7): p. 915-29. PMID: 17502850 
83. Rubenstein D, Jesty J, Bluestein D., Differences between mainstream and sidestream 
cigarette smoke extracts and nicotine in the activation of platelets under static and flow 
conditions. Circulation, 2004. 109(1): p. 78-83. PMID: 14691035 
84. Ramachandran J, Rubenstein D, Bluestein D, Jesty J., Activation of platelets exposed to 
shear stress in the presence of smoke extracts of low-nicotine and zero-nicotine cigarettes: 
the protective effect of nicotine. Nicotine Tob Res, 2004. 6(5): p. 835-41. PMID: 
15700919     
 
template 
drawn 
from 
http://e-articles.info/e/a/title/How-to-Prepare-a-Research-Proposal-~-The-
contents-of-a-propsal/ 


Nicotine Replacement for Smoking Cessation during Pregnancy 
v. 7.8 January 18, 2016 
 
 
26 
APPENDIX A 
Additional Details Pertaining to Study Design for Clinical Trials 
 
Appendix A must be completed for investigator/student initiated research projects that require review by 
the convened board.  For example, studies that use investigational test articles, that present more than 
minimal risk to subjects, or that involve prisoners, must be reviewed by the convened board.    
 
Note that for studies requiring review by the convened board the full board application must be 
completed, data safety monitoring must be addressed (e.g. by completion of Appendix B to the main 
application) and the Investigator Brochure and /or package insert must also be submitted if available.  
 
1. For a clinical trial (e.g. a Phase I, II or III study), the use of the intervention must be fully described 
e.g., the treatment regimen for use of drugs, placebo, medical device etc.  Also include plans for receipt of 
test article, storage, dispensing and reconciliation.: 
Treatment Regimen: We will administer a 6-week course of therapy, consistent with instruction on the 
package insert. Subjects will receive nicotine or placebo inhaler (1:1 ratio). Pfizer Pharmaceuticals has 
agreed to supply us with nicotine inhaler and placebo treatments (see letter of support).  To enhance 
compliance and to confirm patient reports and proper inhaler use, subjects will asked to keep a daily diary 
of the number of cartridges used and to return all cartridges at the next study visit.  Subjects will be 
instructed to return study medication when they receive their reminder telephone call regarding upcoming 
appointments.  For convenience, subjects will receive a plastic container to transport study drug.  Patients 
will be instructed on an individualized basis to taper their use over the next 6 weeks. If a study subject 
does not quit smoking during the first 6 weeks of active treatment, it is unlikely that she will quit during 
the medication taper. Consequently, at visit 5 (6 week visit), subjects who have not quit smoking (7 day 
point prevalence abstinence confirmed with exhaled carbon monoxide measurement) will be discontinued 
from medication treatment and reminded to return all study medication.    
 
Subjects will be instructed to begin using the inhaler on their quit date. Our choice of dosage is aimed at 
relieving withdrawal symptoms, so we will encourage heavier smokers to use more inhaler cartridges than 
lighter smokers. Subjects who smoke >10 CPD will be instructed to begin with 4-12 cartridge 
inhalers/day, which is consistent with other inhaler studies that have recommended a minimum use of 2 
inhalers per day [67], or 4 inhalers per day [66], although use of at least 6 inhalers per day was 
recommended by others [40], including the package insert.  However, clinical efficacy is observed with 
use of at least 4 cartridges per day, which is the minimum dose we will recommend for women who 
smoke > 10 CPD.  Women who smoke 5-9 CPD will be instructed to begin by using 1-4 cartridge 
inhalers/day, based on an estimated 1-2 mg of nicotine per cigarette, with each cartridge inhaler estimated 
to release 4 mg of nicotine [6]. Use of 1-4 cartridges/day by 4 light smokers in the pilot study resulted in 
62% nicotine replacement. Dosage adjustments will be made in response to withdrawal symptoms and 
cotinine levels. We will monitor cotinine levels after the women have used the inhaler for 2 weeks.  
Subjects will be notified by the research nurse if there is a significant increase in cotinine above baseline 
values while smoking (see DSMP for cotinine monitoring). In our previous study [1], this approach 
worked well previously to ensure that cotinine levels were not excessive. 
 
Receipt: We will have study personnel (the same person who will dispense the medication) transport 
study medication from UCONN to Baystate or Hartford Hospital and place it in the locked cabinet.  If for 
some reason the study nurse is unable to transport drug, a research staff will pick up the drug from 
pharmacy and transport to Baystate to give to study nurse who will sign off that she received the 
medication. A signature log has been developed for drug transport and receipt (see drug accountability 
log).  
 


Nicotine Replacement for Smoking Cessation during Pregnancy 
v. 7.8 January 18, 2016 
 
 
27 
Storage: Drug will be stored on site in locked filing cabinet. A temperature log, which can be downloaded 
on a weekly basis, will provide evidence that the medication is kept within recommended guidelines (not 
to exceed 77 degrees Fahrenheit).  
 
Dispensing and reconciliation: The study medication will be dispensed by the research nurse at baseline, 
Visit 2, and Visit 4 . At or before the baseline visit, the study nurse will fax key variables for a given 
subject to the research pharmacist at UCONN who will enter these variables into a specially developed 
computer algorithm. Once the pharmacist enters these variables into the computer program, the computer 
assigns a treatment assignment.  The pharmacist will communicate with the study nurse (by fax or e-mail) 
which medication box # to dispense to the subject. Boxes of nicotine and placebo inhaler will be labeled 
with a study number, kept at study sites in a locked filing cabinet (with a daily temperature log) in a 
research room or research pharmacy depending on the site.  
 
Reconciliation: At every visit, subjects are asked to return used cartridges and unused medication. Used 
cartridges will be validated with patient reports of study records of use. Unused medication will be sent 
back to pharmacy where it will be destroyed.    
 
2. 
Provide a description of known adverse events due to the intervention and the plan to deal with 
such adverse events (e.g. does reduction, removal of device, removal from trial.): 
A. Potential Risks:  
The potential risks for subjects include blood drawing, psychological tests, breach of confidentiality, and 
risk of medication (adverse effects and serious adverse events and increased nicotine exposure). Medical 
histories will be reviewed prior to entry into the study at screening and subjects will be under medical 
supervision while in the study. Trained phlebotomists will draw all blood samples. Blood drawing may 
result in slight discomfort, bruising, or there may be soreness at the puncture site. In some instances, 
dizziness or fainting may occur. 
It is not known which of the adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with cigarette smoking may be a 
result of nicotine. These adverse effects include 1) spontaneous abortion; 2) preterm delivery; 3) low birth 
weight; 4) preterm delivery or preterm premature rupture of membranes; 5) placenta abruption and 
placenta previa; 6) sudden infant death syndrome. 
  
In phase 3 studies, the most common side effects with nicotine inhaler include cough, throat irritation, 
rhinitis and mouth irritation. We expect that these side effects will also occur in our population.  
The physiological, subjective and behavioral measures of withdrawal, will be physically noninvasive and 
should present no psychological and minimal medical risk to the subject. 
  
Although uncomfortable, withdrawal symptoms do not pose significant health risks smoking cessation 
results in increased irritability, anxiety, tension, depression, increased hunger and drowsiness. Some 
individuals may be a risk for depression with smoking cessation. This is particularly true for persons with 
a past history of depression.  
 
B. Procedures to minimize risks:  
1) Blood draw- sterile techniques will be utilized for blood drawing to reduce the risk of infection. 
2) Risk of breach of confidentiality- All data obtained through questionnaires will be kept in a 
double lock system. Data collected at study visits will take the form of subjective measures (case 
report forms) and/or directly into the REDCap system.  REDCap (Research Electronic Data 
Capture) is a secure, web-based application designed to support data capture for research studies, 
providing: 1) an intuitive interface for validated data entry; 2) audit trails for tracking data 
manipulation and export procedures; 3) automated export procedures for seamless data 


Nicotine Replacement for Smoking Cessation during Pregnancy 
v. 7.8 January 18, 2016 
 
 
28 
downloads to common statistical packages; and 4) procedures for importing data from external 
sources.  An electronic file that links patient name and number will be maintained and managed 
using REDCap electronic data capture tools hosted at UConn Health.   
Once a subject has completed the study the informed consent form and the case report form with 
identifiable information (subject information/locator information) will be kept at the site of 
recruitment in a locked file cabinet.  The rest of the case report forms that do not contain 
identifiable data will be sent to UConn Health. Once the study is closed in the IRB, all data will 
be sent to IRON mountain for long term storage until the data can be destroyed per IRB and FDA 
regulations.  
3) Psychological testing- trained personnel will administer psychological tests.  
4) Medication adverse events: a) inhaler adverse effects---To minimize potential adverse effects of 
the inhaler we will a) instruct subjects on proper usage; b)  inform subjects to stop medication use 
6 weeks after the quit date if they have not completely quit smoking. c) procedure to minimize the 
risk of increased nicotine exposure--- Although cotinine concentrations are not typically 
measured during smoking cessation trials, pregnant women are considered a vulnerable 
population who may be at risk for adverse effects from nicotine. Therefore we would like to 
ensure that subjects do not receive increased overall nicotine exposure from the nicotine inhaler 
than is usually obtained from smoking. As stated in the consent we recommend that subjects quit 
smoking completely when they start inhaler use. Serum cotinine concentrations will be collected 
at baseline (i.e., while smoking), and at visit 2 (approximately 1-2 weeks after inhaler use). After 
sample collection of serum from baseline and visit 2, these samples will be sent out for analyses 
to Yale University where samples will be analyzed on a weekly basis (see attached letter of 
support). The R.N. responsible for ongoing patient care at each site will keep a log of cotinine 
concentrations for each subject while smoking and while on nicotine or placebo inhaler. Subjects 
will be notified immediately by the R.N. if their cotinine concentrations obtained at visit 2 
exceeds concentrations obtained while smoking. A serum cotinine concentration while on 
treatment that exceeds a subject’s baseline or screening smoking levels by 40% will be 
considered an increase in overall nicotine exposure. Please note that this is a conservative 
approach because the normal individual variation of serum cotinine in pregnant women who 
continue to smoke is 30% (Oncken, et al 1996). If a subject is notified to decrease her inhaler use 
accordingly (or completely quit smoking if she is not totally obstaining from cigarettes). A repeat 
cotinine concentration will be repeated within a week on the new dosage regimen. If the repeat 
cotinine is elevated compared to baseline values as described above, the medication will be 
stopped. It is also noteworthy that we are examining an intermittent nicotine delivery system in 
this study in an attempt to minimize nicotine exposure. It would be difficult for a subject to 
smoke and use the inhaler at the same time, so we anticipate that nicotine exposure will not 
exceed baseline levels while smoking.  Also, if a subject clinically significantly increases her 
smoking while on treatment [ie., 1) she stopped smoking at visit 2 using the inhaler, but starts 
smoking at a later visit and continues to use the inhaler or 2) if she increases the average number 
of cigarettes per day over the previous 7 days by 25% compared to visit 2], we will perform a 
repeat cotinine test at the visit where thisis identified.  A significant change in smoking patterns 
and/or inhaler use will be decided by the research nurse.  If this cotinine test is elevated compared 
to baseline levels, the elevated cotinine will be handled as above. Subject’s who discontinue the 
study early will be asked to return the inhaler, including any unused cartridges, and no inhalers 
will be dispensed to the subject from this point.  
If for any reason we are unable to obtain blood for serum cotinine, overall nicotine 
exposure will be assessed with the nicalert urine test at each visit. With this system there 
are 5 levels of exposure (Level 0: 1-10, Level 1: 10-30, Level 2: 30-100, Level 3: 100-
200, Level 4: 200-500, Level 5: 500-1000, and Level 6 1000 plus) and an increase in any 


Nicotine Replacement for Smoking Cessation during Pregnancy 
v. 7.8 January 18, 2016 
 
 
29 
level would be consistent with an increase in exposure. This type of monitoring was 
utilized in one clinical trial that was monitored by the FDA to estimate overall nicotine 
exposure in pregnant women (33).    
5) Pregnancy adverse problems---We are only including subjects with chronic stable medical 
problems and no imminent pregnancy problems will be enrolled into the study. If there any 
questions regarding current pregnancy problems the case will be discussed with the primary care 
provider (after obtaining consent from subject) and also reviewed with study obstetricians. We 
are monitoring nicotine exposure in both groups which may decrease the risk of adverse 
pregnancy problems. Additionally, women receive a comprehensive behavioral intervention 
designed to help them quit smoking, which should decrease the risk of pregnancy adverse effects. 
Women are monitored closely throughout the study and if an adverse event occurs consultation 
and treatment will be coordinated with their obstetrician.  
6) Withdrawal and worsening mood symptoms--- although uncomfortable, nicotine withdrawal 
symptoms (irritability, craving for cigarettes, insomnia, increased appetite/weight gain, depressed 
mood) do not propose a significant medical risk. Nicotine replacement is designed to relieve 
withdrawal symptoms. Some studies suggest that especially persons with a history of depression 
may be at an added risk of depression with smoking cessation; however, we did not observe this 
in our last study (Oncken et al., 2008). If depressive symptoms occur (as evidenced by patient 
report or worsening symptoms on the beck questionnaire), the subject will be seen by a masters 
level counselor or Dr. Dornelas. Dr. Dornelas will help devise the treatment plan. Subjects who 
experience significant increases in depressed mood will be referred for further evaluation and 
treatment.  
 
3.  Describe circumstances that may lead to a subject being removed from the trial by the PI, e.g. due to 
failure to follow study procedures, and the process for doing so: 
We do not foresee withdrawing any subject from the study (since it is important to have as much 
information as possible in an efficacy and safety study), but may withdraw study drug if a subject is 
noncompliant or has a serious adverse event, or if they are still smoking after 6 weeks of treatment. If a 
participant either withdraws from the study or the investigator decides to discontinue a participant due to 
SAE, the participant will have appropriate follow-up medical monitoring. Monitoring will continue until 
the problem requiring hospitalization was resolved or stabilized with no further change expected, is 
clearly unrelated to study medication, or results in death.  
 
4. Describe any stopping rules for the study:   
The stopping rules will be established at the first DSMB meeting, and agreed upon by both the 
investigative team and the DSMB.  We propose to place particular emphasis was made on monitoring of 
overall serious adverse events, nicotine exposure, and efficacy rates. We propose that the board review 
serious adverse events by treatment group on an ongoing basis (approximately twice a year or more or 
less often depending on subject accrual). As in our previous study, a table will  provided to the board with 
treatment groups designated as “A” and “B” in order to maintain study medication assignment blinding. 
The 4 types of events are (1) perinatal mortality (includes stillbirths, miscarriage after 28 weeks gestation, 
infant death), (2) spontaneous abortion (i.e., miscarriage prior to 28 weeks gestation), and (3) low birth 
weight (LBW) and (4) preterm delivery and (5) any other serious adverse events.  General stopping rules 
proposed include 1)  A significantly higher rate of subjects have low birth rates or other serious adverse 
events in group “A” or “B”; 2) determination that the increased incidence is related to study medication; 
3) the emergence of unexpected serious adverse experience of unexpected serious adverse experience not 
specified in the study; 4) the board may recommend to stop the study after review of efficacy data once 
half the subject have been recruited if it appears to be little chance that a difference in efficacy will be 
observed between the 2 groups. 


Nicotine Replacement for Smoking Cessation during Pregnancy 
v. 7.8 January 18, 2016 
 
 
30 
As in our last study, these proposed monitoring rules were used as guidelines. Raw data, percentages, and 
statistics (if requested) were presented to the DSMB meetings. The DSMB has the ultimate decision as to 
whether the blind should be broken and the trial should remain open. 
 
5. Additional Comments by PI:   
None