Conditions: Multiple Sclerosis
Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED | Intervention model: PARALLEL
Enrollment: 200
Healthy volunteers: yes

Brief summary:
This is a prospective between and within group observational study to determine differences in tolerability, immunogenicity and safety related outcomes for 100 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients who have been administered at least two infusions of rituximab, six months apart and are willing to be switched to ocrelizumab compared to a 100 patients who are continuing on rituximab as a comparison cohort from the clinic population treated as part of clinical care.

Detailed description:
Studies of rituximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody against CD20 have shown that B-cell depletion is of clinical beneﬁt as a potential treatment in relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS).1 Ocrelizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets CD20 and selectively depletes CD20 expressing cells, while preserving the capacity for B cell reconstitution. When compared with rituximab, ocrelizumab is associated with increased antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxic eﬀects, and reduced complement-dependent cytotoxic eﬀects in vitro.2 By increasing antibody-dependent cell mediated cytotoxic eﬀects, ocrelizumab might modulate tissue-dependent mechanisms of pathogenic response more eﬀectively compared to rituximab. As a humanized molecule, ocrelizumab is expected to be less immunogenic with repeated infusions and might thus present a more favorable safety profile when compared to rituximab.2

Despite rituximab's current off label use in the treatment of MS, currently there is only data available from phase 2 trials. The HERMES group conducted a phase 2, double-blind, 48-week trial involving 104 patients with relapsing forms of MS; 69 patients received 1000 mg of intravenous rituximab and 35 patients received placebo on days 1 and 15.3 A significantly higher number of patients in the rituximab group (78.3%) versus the placebo group (40.0%) had an infusion related reaction (IRR) events within 24 hours after the first infusion. Within 24 hours after the second infusion, fewer patients in the rituximab group (20.3%) than in the placebo group (40%) had similar events. A majority of the rituximab group with IRR events (92.6%) were classified as mild to moderate (grade 1 or 2) in severity.

Safety data from the Investigators Brochure on the OPERA I and II phase 3 trials comparing ocrelizumab to interferon β-1a on relapsing MS patients showed that IRRs were the most common adverse events experienced by patients treated with 600 mg of ocrelizumab.4 The percentage of patients experiencing IRRs was higher in the ocrelizumab group (relapsing forms of MS: 34.3%; primary progressive forms of MS 39.9%) compared with the interferon β-1a (active control) group who received placebo infusions (relapsing forms of MS: 9.7%; primary progressive forms of MS: 25.5%). The rate of IRRs was highest during the first infusion or Dose 1 (27.5% on Day 1; 4.71% on Day 15 of Dose 1) and decreased over time (13.7%; 9.6% and 7.8% following Dose 2, 3, and 4 respectively) for the ocrelizumab treated group. Comparatively, interferon β-1a users experienced 6.5% of IRRs on Day 1, 2.58% on Day 15, \< 2.00% after doses 2, 3 and 4 respectively. The reported IRRs were primarily mild-to-moderate in severity (Grades 1 and 2). Serious IRRs occurred in 0.1% and 1.0% respectively of relapsing and progressive patients and treated with ocrelizumab.

Clinical data describing the efficacy and tolerability profile of rituximab and ocrelizumab has utilized populations with different prior treatment characteristics. In the phase 2 HERMES trials, a majority (78.5%) of rituximab patients had been previously been treated with a disease modifying therapy in the last 2 years.3 In contrast, the OPERA I and II phase 3 clinical trials, a majority of ocrelizumab patients (72.9% in OPERA I and 73.8% in OPERA II) represented a treatment naïve population.4 Examining IRRs in patients who have switched from rituximab to ocrelizumab versus those continuing on rituximab will examine the magnitude of the IRRs and subsequent tolerability of ocrelizumab in a real world population.

Earlier concepts of MS disease pathology have suggested that pathogenic T cells are sufficient for the full expression of MS. However, it is now evident that full autoimmune B cells and humoral immune mechanisms also play key roles. 5 Ocrelizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets CD20 and selectively depleted CD-20 expressing B cells. CD20 is a B cell surface molecule that is expressed on pre B cells and mature B cells, but not expressed earlier in the development of B cells or on mature plasma cells. In all three ocrelizumab studies (with relapsing and progressive populations), treatment with 600 mg of ocrelizumab led to rapid and complete depletion of circulating CD19+ B cells within 14 days post treatment. 4 B cell depletion was sustained throughout treatment period. The median time to repletion of B cells was 72 weeks (range 27-175 weeks). We hypothesize that in switching rituximab treated patients to ocrelizumab, the proportion of patients with B cell depletion (\< 1%) 6 months after the first and third infusion of ocrelizumab will be the same as the baseline assessment which will be 6 months after the last dose of rituximab and similar to findings in OPERA I and II.

Immunogenicity results from the OPERA I and II trials examined the number of patients who had treatment induced anti-drug antibodies (ADA) to ocrelizumab. 4 Of the 807 patients who received ocrelizumab and had an ADA assay from a post baseline sample during the controlled treatment period, 3 patients (0.4%) showed treatment induced ADA to ocrelizumab. Of these, 1 patient tested positive for neutralizing antibodies (NAB) to ocrelizumab. During the open label extension phase, the prevalence of ADA continued to remain low with post baseline incidence of 1.9% (2/103 with treatment induced ADA). Currently there is little evidence examining the prevalence of treatment induced ADAs to both rituximab and ocrelizumab in patients that switch from the former to the latter in comparison to continuing rituximab patients. Therefore, we will perform assays to detect ADAs to both rituximab and ocrelizumab in all patients switching from rituximab to ocrelizumab at Day 1, 6 months and 12 months on ocrelizumab.

Finally, IRRs have been hypothesized to be a reaction by autoantibodies to the treatment drug or possibly from the release of cytokines from CD20 expressing cells as they are destroyed by ocrelizumab causing a "cytokine storm". Understanding this process may lead to mechanisms that may aid in ameliorating these infusion reactions. If they are associated with ADA, then it might be possible to predictively premedicate these patients only. Alternatively, if they are associated with cytokine release, it may be possible to eliminate premedication in patients who are already CD20+cell depleted in subsequent infusions. Therefore, we will assay the profile of certain cytokines in the serum 4 hours after start of ocrelizumab infusion.

With ocrelizumab expected to enter the MS therapeutic market within the next year, we expect third party payers within and outside the US will require that the FDA or EMA approved versions of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies be used in the treatment of MS, namely ocrelizumab. Currently, we estimate several thousand MS patients in the US and Sweden are taking rituximab currently. Thus, it will be important to demonstrate that switching from a chimeric anti-CD20 to a fully humanized anti-CD20 does not lead to unexpected infusion reactions and does not increase the probability of development of anti-drug antibodies.

The Rocky Mountain MS Center (RMMSC) at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus prescribed rituximab infusions for 533 MS patients in the last 12 months, of which 323 patients received their infusion at the University of Colorado Hospital's Outpatient Infusion Center between September, 2015-March, 2016. The RMMSC is one of the few sites nationwide with large numbers of MS patients treated with rituximab. With the anticipated approval of ocrelizumab, current rituximab users are being counselled by their MS providers at RMMSC to consider switching to ocrelizumab post approval, particularly if US Payers adopt the FDA approved version as the preferred anti-CD20 agent for MS.

Arms:
arm 1: 600 mg of ocrelizumab will be administered as one 600-mg IV infusions at a scheduled interval of every 24 weeks. The first dose of ocrelizumab will be a split dose of 300 mg on day 1 and day 15 followed by 600 mg, six months later. Each ocrelizumab infusion should be given as a slow IV infusion over approximately 150 minutes (2.5 hours) for the 300-mg dose. Ocrelizumab must not be administered as an IV push or bolus. Well-adjusted infusion pumps should be used to control the infusion rate, and ocrelizumab should be infused through a dedicated line. arm 2: Standard of care rituximab doses are 1000 mg infusion given as first dose followed by 500mg (or 1000 mg if evidence of early B cell recovery) infusion every 6 months thereafter. Rituximab must not be administered as an IV push or bolus. Well-adjusted infusion pumps should be used to control the infusion rate, and rituximab should be infused through a dedicated line

Interventions: intervention 1: Ocrelizumab intervention 2: Rituximab
Intervention descriptions: intervention 1: A humanized monoclonal antibody that targets CD20 and selectively depleted CD-20 expressing B cells intervention 2: A chimeric monoclonal antibody against CD20.

Protocol document:
Prot_SAP_000.pdf: 
CONFIDENTIAL 
 
This is a University of Colorado document that contains confidential 
information.  It is intended solely for the recipient clinical investigator(s) 
and must not be disclosed to any other party.  This material may be used 
only for evaluating or conducting clinical investigations; any other 
proposed use requires written consent from the University of Colorado. 
 
Protocol:  Ocrelizumab University of Colorado 
P/IST template 06-2016 1.0 
 
 
5Decmber2016 
PROTOCOL 
 
 
 
STUDY TITLE: 
Evaluating the Tolerability and Safety Profile of 
Switching from Rituximab to Ocrelizumab: A 
Real World Evaluation of Patients with 
Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis 
 
 
STUDY DRUG: 
 
 
OCREVUS (ocrelizumab) 
 
 
SUPPORT PROVIDED BY: 
Genentech, Inc. 
 
 
INVESTIGATOR: 
Timothy Vollmer MD, 12631 E. 17th Ave. 
Aurora, CO, 80045, Mail Stop B185, Phone- 
303-724-2187, Fax- 303-724-0985 
timothy.vollmer@ucdenver.edu  
 
 
SUB INVESTIGATORS: 
 
Kavita V. Nair, PhD. 
Enrique Alvarez, MD., PhD 
 
 
 
 
STUDY NUMBER:  
 
16-1354 
 
 
PROTOCOL VERSION/DATE: 
Version 07Nov2018 


 
2 
 
 
Table of Contents 
1. 
INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 4 
2. 
OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................ 6 
2.1 Primary Objectives ................................................................................................................. 6 
2.2 Secondary Objectives ............................................................................................................ 6 
3. 
STUDY DESIGN ....................................................................................................................... 7 
3.1 Description of the Study ......................................................................................................... 7 
3.2 Rationale for Study Design ..................................................................................................... 8 
3.3 Outcome Measures ................................................................................................................ 9 
3.3.1 Primary Outcome Measure .............................................................................................. 9 
3.3.2 Secondary Outcome Measures ..................................................................................... 10 
3.3.3 Ancillary Safety Outcome Measures ............................................................................. 11 
3.4 Safety Plan ........................................................................................................................... 11 
3.5 Compliance with Laws and Regulations............................................................................... 11 
4. 
MATERIALS AND METHODS ................................................................................................ 11 
4.1 Subjects ................................................................................................................................ 11 
4.1.1 Subject Selection ........................................................................................................... 12 
4.1.2 Inclusion Criteria ............................................................................................................ 12 
4.1.3 Exclusion Criteria ........................................................................................................... 13 
4.2 Method of Treatment Assignment ........................................................................................ 13 
4.3 Study Treatment ................................................................................................................... 15 
4.3.1 
Dosage, Preparation, Administration and Storage..................................................... 15 
4.3.2 
 Dosage Modification .................................................................................................. 17 
4.3.3 
 Overdosage ............................................................................................................... 17 
4.4 Concomitant and Excluded Therapy .................................................................................... 17 
4.5 Study Assessments .............................................................................................................. 17 
4.5.1 
 Assessments during Treatment ................................................................................ 17 
4.5.2. 
 Follow-Up Assessments ........................................................................................ 21 
4.6 Discontinuation of Protocol-Specified Therapy .................................................................... 21 
4.7 Subject Discontinuation ........................................................................................................ 21 
4.8 Study Discontinuation ........................................................................................................... 21 
4.9 
Statistical Methods ............................................................................................................. 21 
4.9.1 
Analysis of the Conduct of the Study ............................................................................. 21 
4.9.2. 
Analysis of Treatment Group Comparability .......................................................... 22 
4.9.3 
Efficacy Analysis –Not Applicable .................................................................................. 22 
4.9.4 
Safety Analysis ............................................................................................................... 22 
4.9.5 
Missing Data .................................................................................................................. 24 
4.9.6 
Determination of Sample Size........................................................................................ 24 
4.10 Data Quality Assurance ...................................................................................................... 25 
5. 
REPORTING OF ADVERSE EVENTS ................................................................................... 25 
5.1 Assessment of Safety ........................................................................................................... 25 
5.2 Methods and Timing for Assessing and Recording Safety Variables .................................. 26 
5.3 Procedures for Eliciting, Recording, and Reporting Adverse Events ................................... 27 
5.4 MedWatch 3500A Reporting Guidelines .............................................................................. 31 
5.5 Additional Reporting Requirements for IND Holders ............................................................ 31 
6. 
Investigator Requirements ...................................................................................................... 33 
6.1 Study Initiation ...................................................................................................................... 33 
6.2 Study Completion ................................................................................................................. 33 
6.3 Informed Consent ................................................................................................................. 34 
6.4 Institutional Review Board or Ethics Committee Approval ................................................... 34 
6.5 Study Monitoring Requirements ........................................................................................... 34 
6.6 Data Collection ..................................................................................................................... 34 
6.7 Study Medication Accountability (if applicable) .................................................................... 34 
6.8 Disclosure and publication of Data ....................................................................................... 35 


 
3 
 
6.9 Retention of Records ............................................................................................................ 35 
REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................... 36 
TABLES AND FIGURES .................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 
APPENDICES .................................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 
APPENDIX A: SAFETY REPORTING FAX COVER SHEET ........................................................ 37 
 
 
 
 


 
4 
 
1. INTRODUCTION 
Studies of rituximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody against CD20 have shown 
that B-cell depletion is of significant clinical beneﬁt as a treatment of relapsing 
forms of multiple sclerosis (MS).1 Ocrelizumab is a humanized monoclonal 
antibody that targets CD20 and selectively depletes CD20 expressing cells, while 
preserving the capacity for B cell reconstitution. When compared with rituximab, 
ocrelizumab is associated with increased antibody-dependent cell-mediated 
cytotoxic eﬀects, and reduced complement-dependent cytotoxic eﬀects in vitro.2 
By increasing antibody-dependent cell mediated cytotoxic eﬀects, ocrelizumab 
might modulate tissue-dependent mechanisms of pathogenic response more 
eﬀectively compared to rituximab. As a humanized molecule, ocrelizumab is 
expected to be less immunogenic with repeated infusions and might thus present 
a more favorable safety profile when compared to rituximab.2  
 
Despite rituximab’s current off label use in the treatment of MS, currently there is 
only data available from phase 2 trials and open label trials. The HERMES group 
conducted a phase 2, double-blind, 48-week trial involving 104 patients with 
relapsing forms of MS; 69 patients received 1000 mg of intravenous rituximab 
and 35 patients received placebo on days 1 and 15.3  A significantly higher 
number of patients in the rituximab group (78.3%) versus the placebo group 
(40.0%) had an infusion related reaction (IRR) events within 24 hours after the 
first infusion. Within 24 hours after the second infusion, fewer patients in the 
rituximab group (20.3%) than in the placebo group (40%) had similar events. A 
majority of the rituximab group with IRR events (92.6%) were classified as mild to 
moderate (grade 1 or 2) in severity.  
 
Safety data from the Investigators Brochure on the OPERA I and II phase 3 trials 
comparing ocrelizumab to interferon β-1a on relapsing MS patients showed that 
IRRs were the most common adverse events experienced by patients treated 
with 600 mg of ocrelizumab.4 The percentage of patients experiencing IRRs was 
higher in the ocrelizumab group (relapsing forms of MS: 34.3%;  primary 
progressive forms of MS 39.9%) compared with the interferon β-1a (active 
control) group who received placebo infusions (relapsing forms of MS: 9.7%; 
primary progressive forms of MS: 25.5%). The rate of IRRs was highest during 
the first infusion or Dose 1 (27.5% on Day 1; 4.71% on Day 15 of Dose 1) and 
decreased over time (13.7%; 9.6% and 7.8% following Dose 2, 3, and 4 
respectively) for the ocrelizumab treated group. Comparatively, interferon β-1a 
users experienced 6.5% of IRRs on Day 1, 2.58% on Day 15, < 2.00% after 
doses 2, 3 and 4 respectively. The reported IRRs were primarily mild-to-moderate 
in severity (Grades 1 and 2).  Serious IRRs occurred in 0.1% and 1.0% 
respectively of relapsing and progressive patients and treated with ocrelizumab. 
 
Clinical data describing the efficacy and tolerability profile of rituximab and 
ocrelizumab has utilized populations with different prior treatment characteristics. 
In the phase 2 HERMES trials, a majority (78.5%) of rituximab patients had been 
previously been treated with a disease modifying therapy in the last 2 years.3 In 
contrast, the OPERA I and II phase 3 clinical trials, a majority of ocrelizumab 


 
5 
 
patients (72.9% in OPERA I and 73.8% in OPERA II) represented a treatment 
naïve population.4  Examining IRRs in patients who have switched from 
rituximab to ocrelizumab versus those continuing on rituximab will evaluate the 
magnitude of the IRRs and subsequent tolerability of ocrelizumab in a real world 
population of MS patients previously been exposed to rituximab. 
 
Earlier concepts of MS disease pathology have suggested that pathogenic T 
cells are sufficient for the full expression of MS. However, it is now evident that 
full autoimmune B cells and humoral immune mechanisms also play key roles. 5 
Ocrelizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets CD20 and 
selectively depleted CD-20 expressing B cells.  CD20 is a B cell surface 
molecule that is expressed on pre B cells and mature B cells, but not expressed 
earlier in the development of B cells or on mature plasma cells. In all three 
ocrelizumab studies (with relapsing and progressive populations), treatment with 
600 mg of ocrelizumab led to rapid and complete depletion of circulating CD19+ 
B cells within 14 days post treatment. 4 B cell depletion was sustained throughout 
treatment period. The median time to repletion of B cells was 72 weeks (range 
27-175 weeks). We hypothesize that in switching rituximab treated patients to 
ocrelizumab, the proportion of patients with B cell depletion (CD19+ and CD20+< 
1%) 6 months after the first and third infusion of ocrelizumab will be the same as 
the baseline assessment which will be 6 months after the last dose of rituximab 
and similar to findings in OPERA I and II.  
 
Immunogenicity results from the OPERA I and II trials examined the number of 
patients who had treatment induced anti-drug antibodies (ADA) to ocrelizumab. 4 
Of the 807 patients who received ocrelizumab and had an ADA assay from a 
post baseline sample during the controlled treatment period, 3 patients (0.4%) 
showed treatment induced ADA to ocrelizumab.  Of these, 1 patient tested 
positive for neutralizing antibodies (NAB) to ocrelizumab. During the open label 
extension phase, the prevalence of ADA continued to remain low with post 
baseline incidence of 1.9% (2/103 with treatment induced ADA). Currently there 
is little evidence examining the prevalence of treatment induced ADAs to both 
rituximab and ocrelizumab in patients that switch from the former to the latter in 
comparison to continuing rituximab patients. Therefore, we will perform assays to 
detect ADAs to both rituximab and ocrelizumab in all patients switching from 
rituximab to ocrelizumab at Day 1, 6 months and between 12 and 18 months on 
ocrelizumab.   
 
Finally, IRRs have been hypothesized to be a reaction by autoantibodies to the 
treatment drug or possibly from the release of cytokines from CD20 expressing 
cells as they are destroyed by ocrelizumab causing a “cytokine storm”.  
Understanding this process may lead to mechanisms that may aid in ameliorating 
these infusion reactions.  If they are associated with ADA, then it might be 
possible to predictively premedicate these patients only.  Alternatively, if they are 
associated with cytokine release, it may be possible to eliminate premedication in 
patients who are already CD20+cell depleted in subsequent infusions.  
Therefore, we will assay the profile of certain cytokines in the serum 4 hours after 
start of ocrelizumab infusion. 


 
6 
 
 
Since ocrelizumab has entered the market, third party payers within and outside 
the US have required that the FDA or EMA approved versions of anti-CD20 
monoclonal antibodies be used in the treatment of MS, namely ocrelizumab. 
Currently, we estimate several thousand MS patients in the US and Sweden are 
taking rituximab currently. Thus, it will be important to demonstrate that switching 
from a chimeric anti-CD20 to a more fully humanized anti-CD20 does not lead to 
unexpected infusion reactions and does not increase the probability of 
development of anti-drug antibodies. 
 
The Rocky Mountain MS Center (RMMSC) at the University of Colorado 
Anschutz Medical Campus prescribed rituximab infusions for 533 MS patients in 
the last 12 months, of which 323 patients received their infusion at the University 
of Colorado Hospital’s Outpatient Infusion Center between September, 2015-
March, 2016. The RMMSC is one of the few sites nationwide with large numbers 
of MS patients treated with rituximab. On March 28, 2017, Ocrevus (ocrelizumab) 
was approved by the FDA for the treatment of primary progressive and relapsing 
multiple sclerosis. With the approval of ocrelizumab, current rituximab users are 
being counselled by their MS providers at RMMSC to consider switching to 
ocrelizumab it it is the only anti-CD20 MAB covered by their insurance. 
 
2.  OBJECTIVES 
2.1 Primary Objectives 
Primary objective: Our primary objective is to assess the frequency and severity 
of IRRs in MS patients with sustained use rituximab (> 2 infusions) at least six 
months apart who switch to ocrelizumab (switching group). IRRs will be 
compared to: a) patients continuing to receive rituximab (comparator group) at 
each infusion cycle, and b) with rates observed in the OPERA I and II 
randomized clinical trials after the first and second infusion of ocrelizumab. 
Grading criteria for IRR will be assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria 
for Adverse Events (CTCAE) developed by the National Cancer Institutes and 
utilized in the OPERA I and II trials.6 We will also compare the rates of IRRs 
between the first, second and third dose of ocrelizumab. In addition, patient 
reported outcomes of their experience with IRRs will also be captured at all 
infusions of ocrelizumab..  
 
2.2 Secondary Objectives 
Secondary Objective: Our secondary objective is to assess the impact of 
switching from rituximab to ocrelizumab (only in the switching group) on the 
incidence and prevalence of anti-drug antibodies to ocrelizumab.   The presence 
of anti-drug binding antibodies will be assessed prior to the first and third 
ocrelizumab infusion and six to twelve months after the last ocrelizumab infusion.  
The serum drawn before the first infusion of ocrelizumab will be the baseline 
comparator since these patients will only have been exposed to at least two 
rituximab infusions over 6 months with no prior exposure to ocrelizumab.  This 
means we will have 100 serum samples prior to ocrelizumab exposure and 200 
after ocrelizumab exposure.  These assays will be performed by PPD Bio A 


 
7 
 
Laboratories (in Richmond, VA) who will assess the anti-drug antibodies to 
ocrelizumab”, and “QPS (Netherlands) who will assess the anti-drug antibodies 
to rituximab as a single batch once all samples have been collected and 
cryopreserved.    
 
Other secondary objectives that will be assessed in the switching group only 
include the following: 
a. We will assess the percent of ocrelizumab treated patients that exhibit 
early recovery of CD19+ and/or CD20+B cells (>1%) prior to each 
ocrelizumab infusion and at month 12 or 18 which is 12 or 18 months 
following the first infusion of ocrelizumab.  We will compare this to the 
percent of patients with evidence of early recovery from rituximab as 
assessed by the baseline B cell panel. Our test will also identify CD19 
antigen expression to confirm depeletion since presence of anti-CD 20 
MAB in patients blood may confound the CD-20 expression assay. 
 
b. We will assess cytokines to evaluate for possible contribution of a cytokine 
storm to infusion reactions. Cytokines will be assessed using the 
MesoScale platform.  These blood samples will be collected before  the 
start of each ocrelizumab infusion and following infusion completion. Blood 
samples will also be collected during a moderate or serious IRR. 
 
c. We will describe all adverse events and serious adverse events in addition 
to IRRs (for example infections) as described in the investigator’s 
brochure. 
 
3.  STUDY DESIGN 
 
3.1 Description of the Study 
This is a prospective between and within group observational study to determine 
differences in tolerability, immunogenicity and safety related outcomes for MS 
patients who have been administered at least two infusions of rituximab, with the 
last dose of rituximab within 12 months of screening and are willing to be 
switched to ocrelizumab, compared to patients who are continuing on rituximab 
as a comparison cohort from the clinic population treated as part of routine 
clinical care in our program.  
 
The comparator arm is an observational arm only. In addition to prospective data 
collection, we will collect infusion-related reaction data retrospectively for 
infusions done after August 1, 2016 (when we began collecting infusion reactions 
in a standardized way as part of standard of care at the infusion center). 
 
Retrospective data will be collected only after consent is obtained.  
 
In a prospective evaluation with patients at RMMSC who are currently on 
sustained rituximab treatment for their MS, we will examine the frequency and 


 
8 
 
severity of IRRs for 100 patients who switch to ocrelizumab (switching group) 
compared to 200 patients continuing rituximab as our primary outcome 
(comparator group). Our secondary outcome is to examine anti-drug antibody 
formation post switching from rituximab to ocrelizumab (switching group). 
Comparisons for the both outcomes will also be made to findings from the 
OPERA I and II randomized clinical trials. Other exploratory outcomes including 
the measurement of B cell reconstitution, cytokine reactions and adverse event 
profiles will also be examined.  
 
For patients who are switching to ocrelizumab, the first dose of ocrelizumab will 
be a split dose of 300 mg on day 1 and day 15 followed by 600 mg, six months 
later as approved by the FDA. The timing of 12 month dose may be delayed due 
to vagaries in the approval of biologics by third payors.  Therefore, we will include 
data from patients at the T3 visit between the month 12 and 18 after starting 
ocrelizumab.  Standard of care rituximab doses are 1000 mg given as first dose 
followed by 500mg (or 1000 mg if evidence of early B cell recovery) every 6 
months thereafter. Study patients will be current patients of the RMMSC who 
meet the inclusion criteria and are currently receiving rituximab infusions from the 
University of Colorado Hospital’s Outpatient Infusion Center. Analysis of IRRs will 
be conducted by the research team at RMMSC. Anti-drug antibody analysis will 
be conducted by two external vendors: PPD Bio A Laboratories, Richmond, VA 
will conduct the anti-drug antibodies assays for ocrelizumab, QPS Netherlands, 
Netherlands will conduct the anti-drug antibodies assays for rituximab using 
cryopreserved blood samples sent by the RMMSC research team as a single 
batch at the end of the study. Cytokine analysis will be conducted by personnel at 
the biobank repository at RMMSC.  Study duration, including the recruitment 
(estimated to take 6 months), data analysis and manuscript development is 
anticipated to be 24 months.  
 
The study design is represented in Figure 1 below and described in further detail 
in section 4.5.1  
 
 
 
3.2 Rationale for Study Design 
Ocrelizumab and rituximab are among the most effective disease modifying 
therapies studied to date.  Also, their safety profile to date (in terms of serious 
adverse events) is better than the other highly effective therapies including 
natalizumab, fingolimod, alemtuzumab, daclizumab and dimethyl fumurate.  
Several centers including the RRMSC and the Swedish Coalition of MS Clinics 
have large MS populations on rituximab, some for more than 6 years.  However, 
rituximab does not have a patient assistance program, will remain off label for 
MS and will have significant uncertainty about access for the seeable future.  
Also, Ocrelizumab has been positioned to possibly be superior to rituximab in 
terms of IRRs, ADA and efficiency of B cell depletion.  Although, these 
statements have not been proved, they will be influential to some MS patients, 
rituximab prescribers and third party payers.  Thus a significant amount of 


 
9 
 
switching from rituximab to ocrelizumab is likely to occur.  We know of no data 
describing the consequence of such switching in terms of IRRs, formation of 
ADAs and efficiency of B cell depletion.  The proposed study has good power to 
address these 3 issues.  It is not powered to look at any efficacy outcomes and 
none are included.  We will monitor for safety per standard operating procedures 
for our study team. 
 
3.3 Outcome Measures 
3.3.1.  Primary Outcome Measure 
Primary endpoint:  
 
a. Primary endpoint: The primary end point will be proportion of infusions 
with > 1 IRR between the switching and comparator groups. 
 
b. Secondary IRR assessments:   
a. We will also report the difference in the total number of IRRs after 
each infusion of ocrelizumab in the switching group compared to 
similar rituximab infusions in the comparator group.  
  
b. The difference in proportion of patients with > 1 IRR across any of 
their infusions between the switching and comparator groups 
 
c.  We will also compare the proportion of patients with an IRR 
following day 1 infusion versus the proportion of patients with an 
IRR at day 15 and month 6 infusions of ocrelizumab in the 
switching group.  
 
d. The severity of IRRs will be assessed following each infusion of   
ocrelizumab in the switching and comparator group using the 
National Cancer Institute’s Common Terminology for Adverse 
Events Scale.6 The frequency of each severity grade of IRR will be 
compared in a similar fashion. 
 
Nursing staff at the University of Colorado’s Outpatient Infusion Center will 
be responsible for classifying the severity of an IRR for each patient at the 
end of every ocrelizumab and rituximab infusion using the scale below. 
Nursing staff will be asked to record the highest grade of an IRR that they 
observed or intervened upon for each patient after completion of their 
infusion.  
 
Severity of IRR:  
Grade 0:  No infusion reaction 
Grade 1: Mild reaction (transient flushing or rash drug fever < 38 
degrees C); infusion interruption not indicated; intervention not 
indicated  


 
10 
 
Grade 2: Requires therapy or infusion interruption but responds 
promptly to symptomatic treatment (e.g., antihistamines, NSAIDs, 
narcotics); prophylactic medications indicated for 24 hours. 
Grade 3: Prolonged (i.e., not rapidly responsive to symptomatic 
medication and/or brief interruption of infusion); recurrence of 
symptoms following initial improvement; hospitalization indicated for 
other clinical sequelae (e.g., renal impairment, pulmonary infiltrates)  
Grade 4: Life threatening consequences; urgent intervention 
indicated. 
Grade 5: Death  
3.3.2 Secondary Outcome Measures 
a. Anti-drug antibodies (ADAs):  We will measure the number of patients who 
have treatment induced ADAs against rituximab and ocrelizumab prior to 
every ocrelizumab infusion (T0, T1, T2) and at the research termination visit 
(T3=between month 12 and 18) in ONLY the switching group. This 
analysis will be performed by PPD Bio A Laboratories (in Richmond, VA) 
who will assess the anti-drug antibodies to ocrelizumab”, and “QPS 
(Netherlands) who will assess the anti-drug antibodies to rituximab a 
single batch at end of study for the switching group.  
  
b. Treatment efficiency:   We will be measure B cell depletion before each 
ocrelizumab infusion (T0, T1 and T2), by the clinical laboratories (T cell and 
B cell panel) at the University of Colorado Hospital. We will measure the 
proportion of patients who are B cell depleted (CD-19+ and CD-20+) by 
the time of the next infusion and 6 to 12 months after the last infusion in 
the switching group.  
 
c. Cytokine profile:  To better characterize infusion reactions and evaluate 
the contribution by either hypersensitivity reactions to ocrelizumab directly 
and/or by release of cytokines from dyeing CD20 positive cells, serum 
levels of cytokines will be evaluated. Cytokines will be measured using the 
MesoScale platform before the start of each ocrelizumab infusion, and 
after the infusion is completed (T0,T1,T2,T3). In addition, blood samples will 
be collected for those who experience a moderate to severe IRR to further 
examine cytokine profiles during an IRR. Plasma samples will be analyzed 
using the V-PLEX Human Biomarker 40-Plex Kit which assays for IFN-γ, 
IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-13, TNF-α, GM-CSF, IL-5, 
IL-16, IL-7, IL-12/IL-23p40, IL-1α, VEGF-A, IL-17A, IL-15, TNF-β, IL-8 
(HA), MCP-1, MCP-4, Eotaxin, IP-10, MDC, Eotaxin-3, TARC, MIP-1α, 
MIP-1β, VEGF-C, VEGF-D, Tie-2, Flt-1/VEGFR-1, PlGF, FGF (basic), 
SAA, CRP, VCAM-1, ICAM-1 per manufacturer’s recommendation on a 
MesoScale SECTOR Imager 2400. This array of cytokines will provide 
information on the levels of cytokines being released during the infusion to 
determine if they are limited to those released by B cells. Patients will be 
categorized as either not having had an IRR (Grade 0), having had a mild 


 
11 
 
reaction (Grades 1-2), or a moderate/severe reaction (Grades 3-5). These 
patient groups will also be evaluated for difference before and after their 
infusions for changes in each of the above cytokines.  These groups of 
patients will also be evaluated for the presence of antibodies to 
ocrelizumab as described above.  
 
d. Patient reported infusion tolerance: A short patient reported outcome scale 
describing the patient’s experience to any IRR during the ocrelizumab 
infusion developed by the research team at RMMSC. will be administered 
by the study coordinators at the end of each infusion. Scale items will 
measure patient responses to their perception and experience of IRRs. 
 
 
3.3.3 Ancillary Safety Outcome Measures 
We will report all adverse and serious adverse events for both study groups as 
described in the investigators brochure guide.4 In addition, we will run an 
immunoglobulin panel in the switching group as well. 
 
3.4 Safety Plan 
Patients will be evaluated at each study visit for the duration of their participation 
in the study (see Table 1 under section 4.5 for schedule of events conducted on 
the switching group; comparator group is standard of care).  Patients will be 
interviewed by the study coordinator at each visit to determine additional safety 
issues. See Section 5 (Assessment of Safety) for complete details of the safety 
evaluation for this study. 
3.5 Compliance with Laws and Regulations 
This study will be conducted in accordance with current U.S. Food and Drug 
Administration (FDA) Good Clinical Practices (GCPs), and local ethical and legal 
requirements. An investigator held IND has been granted (IND number 132705).  
 
4.  MATERIALS AND METHODS 
 
4.1 Subjects 
We plan to enroll 100 patients in the switching group and between 100 and 200 
patients in the comparator group (to study 200 infusions) for a total of up to 200-
300 patients which would provide adequate power (90%) for the study. To account 
for screen failures and withdrawals, we are seeking to enroll an additional 50 patients 
for a total of 250-350 patients. Patients are not confined to only one of the 2 groups. 
For example, data may be collected from a patient as part of the rituximab arm and 
then at a later point the patient decides to switch to ocrelizumab. This patient could 
then be consented into the switching group.  Enrollment will occur over a 3-month 
period at RMMSC.. Dropouts in the switching group that occur prior to the 6 month 
infusion will be replaced. All patients will be included in the analyses (Intent to Treat 
Analysis). 
 


 
12 
 
 
4.1.1 Subject Selection 
All subjects will be MS patients receiving care at the RMMSC at the University of 
Colorado Hospital 
4.1.2 Inclusion Criteria 
 
Switching group:  
• Current active patient of RMMSC 
• 18-65 years  
• Diagnosis of relapsing forms of MS 
• Completed > two doses of rituximab with the last dose having been 
administered: 
a) within 12 months of screening 
 and 
b)  at least 6 months prior to first planned infusion of study drug 
• Are receiving their current infusions of rituximab at the University of 
Colorado Outpatient Infusion Center 
• Have discussed the possibility of switching to ocrelizumab with their 
MS provider 
• Screened for Hepatitis B and C and TB within 2 years of first dose of 
ocrelizumab  
• A negative serum pregnancy test must be available for premenopausal 
women and for women <12 months after the onset of menopause, 
unless they have undergone surgical sterilization. 
• Women of childbearing potential must agree to use a “highly effective”, 
hormonal form of contraception or two “effective” forms of non-
hormonal contraception.  Contraception must continue for the duration 
of study treatment and for at least three months after the last dose of 
study treatment 
• Are able to complete patient reported outcomes developed as English 
written scales.  
• Must be able and willing to give meaningful, written informed consent 
prior to participation in the trial, in accordance with local regulatory 
requirements 
Comparator group:  
• Current active patient of RMMSC 


 
13 
 
• 18-65 years  
• Diagnosis of relapsing forms of MS 
• Completed > two doses of rituximab with the last dose having been 
administered within 12 months of screening as standard of care 
• Are receiving their current infusions of rituximab as standard of care at 
the University of Colorado Outpatient Infusion Center and will continue 
to do so 
• Are willing to be followed for subsequent rituximab infusions during the 
study period as standard of care, and/or allow retrospective data 
collection on previous rituximab infusions 
• Must be able and willing to give meaningful, written informed consent 
prior to participation in the trial, in accordance with local regulatory 
requirements 
 
4.1.3 Exclusion Criteria 
  
Both groups: 
• Pregnant or lactating women 
• Hypersensitivity to trial medications 
• Hepatic Dysfunction (liver enzymes are 5 times greater than normal) 
• History of Congestive Heart Failure 
• Any history of a positive blood assay for Hepatitis B or C 
• Any history of TB or a positive Quantiferon Gold Assay 
• Concurrent use of immunosuppressant medications 
• Any history of immunodeficiency or other medical condition increasing risk 
of anti-CD 20 therapy. 
•  Serious infection at the time of a scheduled study infusion.  
• Any medical, psychiatric or other condition that could result in the patient 
not being able to give fully informed consent, or to comply with the protocol 
requirements as determined by the investigator 
 
4.2 Method of Treatment Assignment  
The study will not be a randomized trial. Patients will not be assigned to the 
switching group, but rather will be enrolled after a clinical decision has been 
made with their provider about whether they will continue on rituximab or switch 


 
14 
 
to ocrelizumab. The following steps will be taken to minimize potential biases in 
sample selection. 
First, in an effort to impose some degree of similarity between the treatment 
groups, control patients will be matched, either 1:1 or 2:1 depending on the 
number of control patients, with switching patients on gender and age (+/- 2 
years) at recruitment.  The demographic information on switching patients will be 
scanned to find matches for the patients in the non-switching group.   
 
Furthermore, screening of additional patients beyond the 200 required for 
enrollment in the non-switching group will be also conducted to ensure the best 
possible matches. Second, baseline statistics will be monitored as patients enter 
the study, and selection of patients may be modified in order to maintain relative 
balance between treatment groups (if necessary using measures of disease 
severity other than age and gender) if we are able to overenroll the number of 
non-switchers. Third, demographic variables and measures of baseline disease 
severity, including age, gender, MS disease duration, type of MS at baseline (first 
infusion in both study groups), along with discontinuations, will be recorded and 
compared between treatment groups. 
 
All available observations will be used.  For continuous variables (age, MS 
disease duration), by treatment group means, standard deviations, medians, and 
ranges will be recorded, and differences among treatment groups will tested for 
with either with T-test/ANOVA methods or Wilcoxon/Kruskal Wallis tests.  For 
categorical variables (gender, type of MS, disability, discontinuations), 
frequencies and proportions will be presented, and differences among treatment 
groups will be tested for using chi-square/Fisher’s exact test. Fourth, following 
these measures, if treatment confounding is found to still be an issue, regression 
or propensity score methods, with covariates such as age, MS disease duration, 
and baseline EDSS score will be used post hoc to minimize confounding.  
Potential study patients will be identified from RMMSC electronic medical records 
(EPIC) using the study inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients will be recruited 
by the study coordinator through the University of Colorado’s Outpatient Infusion 
Center. Potential patients are already being identified through their MS providers 
at RMMSC with whom discussions about the possibility of switching to 
ocrelizumab are currently underway.  Study participants who complete the 
observation phase of the study will be offered the ability to continue to receive 
ocrelizumab infusions provided for free by Genentech until ocrelizumab is 
approved and available to them through their health insurance plan.  Once 
ocrelizumab is available by prescription they will receive priority for assistance 
through the Genentech/Roche Patient Assistance Program for Ocrelizumab for 
out of pocket expenses.  Ocrelizumab will be provided through priority placement 
in Genentech’s patient assistance program for those patients who are not able to 
receive insurance coverage for it.  
MS patients included in this study will have made a decision with their provider to 
either stay on rituximab or to switch to ocrelizumab outside of this study. The 
decision to switch to ocrelizumab or to stay on rituximab will be made as part of 


 
15 
 
the clinical treatment process between the patient and his/her provider based on 
his/her disease severity and suitability for treatment among other factors. 
Therefore, patients are not randomized into either treatment arm. For the group 
that stays on rituximab, participation in this study is purely observational. For 
those patients in the rituximab arm who are deemed to be appropriate candidates 
for switching to ocrelizumab, the option to do so will be provided as standard of 
care under priority access and/or patient assistance programs (contingent on 
their individual health insurance status). 
 
It is important to note that because the incidence of IRRs for infusions prior to 
enrollment are not collected prospectively for those continuing treatment with 
rituximab and because adverse events including IRRs will not be collected using 
the same methods for each treatment group following enrollment, interpretation 
of any difference in the incidence of these events will be limited.  
 
4.3  
Study Treatment  
Ocrelizumab will be provided free of charge by Genentech. The Sponsor 
Investigator of the study will ensure maintenance of complete and accurate 
records of the receipt, dispensation, and disposal or return of all study drug in 
accordance with 21 Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.), Part 312.57 and 
312.62 and Genentech requirements. Study drug will be managed with in the 
UCH research pharmacy. 
 
4.3.1 Dosage, Preparation, Administration and Storage  
 
Ocrelizumab Formulation Packaging, and Handling 
 
Ocrelizumab will be supplied by the Sponsor as a liquid formulation containing 
30-mg/mL ocrelizumab in 20 mM sodium acetate at pH 5.3, with 4% trehalose 
dihydrate and 0.02% polysorbate 20. The drug product is provided as a single-
use liquid formulation in a 15-cc, type I USP, glass vial fitted with a 20-mm, 
fluoro-resin, laminated stopper and an aluminum seal with a flip-off plastic cap 
and contains a nominal 300 mg ocrelizumab. No preservative is used as each 
vial is designed for single use. 
 
The ocrelizumab drug product must be diluted before administration. Solutions of 
ocrelizumab for IV administration are prepared by dilution of the drug product into 
an infusion bag containing 0.9% sodium chloride to a final drug concentration of 
1 to 2 mg/mL. 
 
Ocrelizumab may contain fine translucent and/or reflective particles associated 
with enhanced opalescence. Do not use the solution if discolored or if the 
solution contains discrete foreign particulate matter. The infusion solution must 
be administered using an infusion set with an in-line, sterile, non-pyrogenic, low-
protein-binding filter (pore size of up to 0.2 micrometer). 
 


 
16 
 
The prepared infusion solution of ocrelizumab is physically and chemically stable 
for 24 hours at 2−8°C and subsequently 8 hours at room temperature. The 
prepared infusion solution should be used immediately. If not used immediately, 
it can be stored up to 24 hours at 2−8°C. Infusion solution must be completely 
administered to the patient within 32 hours of preparation (not exceeding 24 
hours at 2−8°C and 8 hours at room temperature). In the event an IV infusion 
cannot be completed the same day, the remaining solution should be discarded. 
For information on the formulation and handling of ocrelizumab, see the 
Ocrelizumab Investigator's Brochure. 
 
Dosage, Administration, and Compliance 
 
Ocrelizumab 600 mg will be administered as 600 mg will be administered as one 
600-mg IV infusions at a scheduled interval of every 24 weeks. The first dose of 
ocrelizumab will be a split dose of 300 mg on day 1 and day 15 followed by 600 
mg every 6 months thereafter. 
  
Standard of care rituximab doses are 1000 mg given as first dose followed by 
500mg (or 1000 mg if evidence of early B cell recovery) every 6 months 
thereafter. However, The B cell depletion with rituximab can last up to two years 
in some patients with good efficacy demonstrated after a single dose in the 
HERMES study for up to a year.3 Patients are often out of window due to 
difficulties in obtaining insurance approval within the 6 month time window. 
Therefore, we will include those patients that receive rituximab infusions within a 
12 month window. 
 
Although ocrelizumab may be administered on an outpatient basis, patients may 
be hospitalized for observation at the discretion of the investigator. Ocrelizumab 
infusions should always be administered in a hospital or clinic environment under 
close supervision of the investigator or a medically qualified staff member. 
Each ocrelizumab infusion should be given as a slow IV infusion over 
approximately 150 minutes (2.5 hours) for the 300-mg dose. To reduce potential 
Infusion Related Reactions (IRRs), all patients will receive prophylactic treatment 
with 100 mg of methylprednisolone (or equivalent IV steroid), administered by 
slow IV infusion, to be completed approximately 30 minutes before the start of 
each ocrelizumab infusion. 
 
It is also strongly recommended that the infusion is accompanied by prophylactic 
treatment with an analgesic/antipyretic such as acetaminophen/paracetamol (1 g) 
and/or an IV or oral antihistamine (such as IV diphenhydramine 50 mg or 
equivalent dose of alternative) 30 − 60 minutes prior to the start of an infusion to 
reduce potential IRRs. Patients administered a sedating antihistamine for the 
treatment or prevention of IRRs should be given appropriate warnings 
concerning drowsiness and potential impairment of ability to drive or operate 
machinery. 
 


 
17 
 
Since transient hypotension may occur during ocrelizumab infusion, the 
investigator may wish to withhold anti-hypertensive medications 12 hours prior to 
ocrelizumab infusion. 
 
Ocrelizumab must not be administered as an IV push or bolus. Well-adjusted 
infusion pumps should be used to control the infusion rate, and ocrelizumab 
should be infused through a dedicated line. It is important not to use evacuated 
glass containers (to prepare the infusion), which require vented administration 
sets, because this causes foaming as air bubbles pass through the solution. 
 
After completion of the infusion, the IV cannula should remain in situ for at least 1 
hour to allow for administration of drugs intravenously, if necessary, in the event 
of a delayed reaction. If no adverse events occur during this period of time, the IV 
cannula may be removed and the patient may be discharged. 
See the Ocrelizumab Investigator’s Brochure for detailed instructions on drug 
preparation, storage, and administration. 
 
4.3.2  
Dosage Modification 
Dose modification of ocrelizumab is not permitted.   
 
4.3.3  
Overdosage 
There is no experience with overdosage in human clinical trials.   
4.4 Concomitant and Excluded Therapy 
e.g., Infusion protocol concomitant therapy:  all patients will receive prophylactic 
treatment with 100 mg of methylprednisolone (or equivalent IV steroid), 
administered by slow IV infusion, to be completed approximately 30 minutes 
before the start of each ocrelizumab infusion 
Excluded medications are any significantly immunosuppressive medications or 
treatments (i.e., radiation therapy) as determined by the treating neurologist. 
 
4.5 Study Assessments 
Full protocol review and approval will be obtained from the University of 
Colorado’s IRB board, known as the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board 
(COMIRB) including a scientific review from COMIRB’s Scientific Advisory and 
Research Committee. Signed, IRB-approved informed consent will be obtained 
from patients prior to any assessments.   
 
4.5.1  
Assessments during Treatment 
The following evaluations will be conducted during and post treatment: 
Study Visits and Procedures Summary: 


 
18 
 
Study visits for the switching group include a) screening visit, b) first infusion of 
300 mg of ocrelizumab (day 1 or T0), c) 300 mg of ocrelizumab infusion on day 
15 (T1), d) 600 mg of ocrelizumab at 6 months (+/- 2 weeks) after day 1 (T2) and, 
e) a research termination visit between month 12 and 18 - (+/- 2 weeks)(T3).  In 
some cases, screening procedures may be performed on the first infusion day 
rather than as a separate visit. .The patient may continue on 600 mg of 
ocrelizumab or (if the patient prefers) 500mg rituximab at T3, or 12 to 18 months 
after Day 1 (T0). A month is defined as 28 days.  Study visits for the comparator 
group include only standard of care infusion of rituximab, up to two infusions per 
patient, approximately 6 months apart. Research data on IRRs for the 
comparator group will be collected from the medical records.  
 
A summary of all procedures for switching group is outlined under “Schedule of 
Events” in Table 1 below. During the screening visit, patients will be consented 
for the study and receive both a medical and full neurological exam.  Verification 
of their hepatitis B and C status including testing will be conducted if a patient 
has not been tested in the last two years. MS disease history and demographic 
information will also be collected. Patients will also receive an EDSS exam and 
take an online version of the PDDS (done as standard of care- on an IPad).  
 
The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) is a commonly used 
assessment that allows clinicians to objectively measure changes in the disability 
status of MS patients using unbiased clinical raters.7  The EDSS provides a total 
score on a scale that ranges from 0 to 10.  The first levels 1.0 to 4.5 refer to 
people with a high degree of ambulatory ability and the subsequent levels 5.0 to 
9.5 refer to the loss of ambulatory ability.  The range of main categories include 
(0) = normal neurologic exam; to (5) = ambulatory without aid or rest for 200 
meters; disability severe enough to impair full daily activities; to (10) = death due 
to MS. In addition, it also provides seven subscale measurements called 
Functional System (FS) scores.  
 
The Patient-Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) is a PRO version of the clinician-
reported EDSS which hones the stages of cane use and thus is more responsive 
to mid-range disability changes.8 This tool asks the patient to characterize level 
of disability into one of nine steps (0=normal, 1=mild disability, 2=moderate 
disability, 3=gait disability, 4=early cane, 5=late cane, 6=bilateral support, 
7=wheelchair scooter, 8=bedridden). The PDDS will be used to characterize (and 
to control for) disability in both study groups at all study time points.  
 
Following the screening visit, patients in the switching group will be scheduled 
for their first infusion of ocrelizumab at their next regularly scheduled infusion 
date (no more than six months after their last rituximab infusion). Study infusion 
cycle T1 will have an acceptable window of +/- 4 days since it is given 15 days 
apart, while infusion cycles T2 and T3 will have an acceptable window of +/- 14 
days since it is administered 6 months later.  
 
Prior to the start of the infusion, blood samples will be collected that will be 
utilized for several purposes. At infusion cycle time points, T0, T2 and T3 blood 
samples for the following assessments will be drawn. First, patients will be 


 
19 
 
monitored through standard of care assessments for this population to include a 
complete metabolic panel (CMP) and complete blood counts (CBC) with 
differential. Second, their immune profile will be evaluated through an 
immunoglobulin panel and analyzing T and B cell subsets using flow cytometry 
by the clinical laboratories at the University of Colorado Hospital. Samples for the 
cytokine analysis will be drawn on a similar schedule. For the cytokine analysis, 
blood samples will be collected prior to and after each infusion in CPT tubes 
Because moderate to severe infusions reactions can delay infusions, we will plan 
to add an additional blood draw when these reactions are detected to keep timing 
of the blood draws more consistent and to capture any possible peak in cytokine 
levels during these reactions should they be occurring. Plasma will be derived by 
centrifuging at 1500g for 15 min and then will be aliquoted and stored at -80C.  
Cells will be reconstituted in freezing media (20% fetal bovine serum, 10% 
DMSO) and stored at -80C for further analysis. Additionally, plasma samples will 
be analyzed by MesoScale SECTOR Imager 2400 for evaluation of cytokine 
levels. Blood draws for the anti-drug antibody analysis will also be drawn at T1 
and sent to PPD Laboratories, Richmond, VA using cryopreserved blood samples 
as a single batch at the end of the study and analyzed for cytokine analysis.  
 
Patients will receive 100 mg of methylprednisolone 30 minutes before 
administration of ocrelizumab at each infusion cycle (T0-T2). Following the 
infusion, nursing staff will record IRR using the National Cancer Institute’s 
Common Terminology for Adverse Events Scale. Patient self-assessment of IRRs 
will also be captured. Adverse events will also be recorded as described in 
Section 5 by either the nursing staff or study coordinators. Finally, at the last 
research termination visit (T3), only blood samples, AEs and concomitant 
medications will be collected from study patients. Concomitant medications 
include those used for the treatment for spasticity, depression, or fatigue and 
other prescription and non-prescription concomitant treatments that will be 
captured from the patient directly. 
 
Patients will then receive ocrelizumab or rituximab, if they wish, as ongoing 
therapy. Ocrelizumab and infusion costs will be provided by Genentech until 
ocrelizumab is approved by the FDA and available to the patient through their 
insurance plan. 
 
For the comparator group, they may be approached to gauge interest in the 
study via telephone. If they are interested, the consent can be sent to them. 
These patients will be given the following options: 1) complete consent process 
orally over the phone with coordinator (and a treating physician if patient 
desires), sign and date the consent form and send back to coordinator via mail, 
fax, or email, 2) complete consent process with coordinator (and a treating 
physician if patient desires) in person at their next scheduled rituximab infusion. 
In either case, data collection will not begin until written consent is obtained.    
Following each rituximab infusion, nursing staff will record IRR using scales as 
part of standard care. 
 


 
20 
 
As required by the University of Colorado’s Institutional Review Board, an 
independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) will meet at initiation of 
the study and every 6 months thereafter until the end of the study. 
 
Table 1. Schedule of Events (for switching group) 
Data Collection Event 
Screening 
Visitª 
Day 1 (T0) 
300 mg of 
OCRª 
Day 15 (T1) 
300 mg of 
OCR) 
6 months  (T2) 
(600 mg of 
OCR) 
12 -18 
months 
research 
termination 
visit (T3) 
Informed Consent 
X 
 
 
 
 
Medical Exam 
X 
 
 
 
 
Physical Exam 
X 
 
 
 
 
Demographics and MS Disease History 
X 
 
 
 
 
Concomitant Meds 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X* 
Vital Signs 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Hepatitis B and C evaluation confirmed 
X 
 
 
 
 
EDSS  
X 
 
 
 
 
PDDS 
X 
 
 
 
X* 
Pre-infusion blood draw: 
 
 
 
 
 
     Lab: CBC, CMP 
 
X 
 
X 
X 
     Lab: B and T cell subsets by flow    
     cytometry 
 
X 
 
X 
X 
     Lab: immunoglobulin panel 
 
X 
 
X 
X 
     Lab: Binding antibodies 
 
X 
 
X 
X 
Pre and post-infusion blood draw and 
during moderate/severe reactions: 
 
 
 
 
 
     Lab: Cytokine  levels 
 
X 
X 
X 
 
Administration of Ocrelizumab 
 
X 
X 
X 
 
Pre-medication of 100 mg of 
methylprednisolone 
 
X 
X 
X 
 
Nurses record IRRs 
 
X 
X 
X 
 
Nurses/Study Coordinator record AE 
 
X 
X 
X 
X* 
Patient self-report of IRRs 
 
X 
X 
X 
 
* may be completed over the phone 


 
21 
 
4.5.2.  
Follow-Up Assessments 
Refer to 4.5.1. For comparator group, follow-up assessments are performed per 
standard of care and IRR information will be collected from the medical records. 
 
4.6 Discontinuation of Protocol-Specified Therapy 
Protocol-specified therapy may be discontinued for any of the following reasons: 
• Unacceptable toxicity 
• Patient election to discontinue therapy (for any reason) 
• Physician’s judgment 
 
4.7 Subject Discontinuation 
 
Patients will be withdrawn from the study if they get pregnant during the 
treatment period or withdraw consent. If patients discontinue ocrelizumab for any 
reason they will be asked to continue the study assessments per protocol until 
end of study for safety assessments. Patients in the switching group who 
withdraw from the study before their first infusion at 6 months will be replaced.  
 
The reason for premature discontinuation of a subject will be recorded on the 
Case Report Form. 
 
4.8  
Study Discontinuation 
Genentech Study Center, and the Principal Investigator has the right to terminate 
this study at any time.  Reasons for terminating the study may include the 
following: 
• The incidence or severity of adverse events in this or other studies indicates a 
potential health hazard to subjects 
• Subject enrollment is unsatisfactory 
• Data recording are inaccurate or incomplete 
• Study protocol not followed 
4.9 
STATISTICAL METHODS 
4.9.1 Analysis of the Conduct of the Study 
 
The study will consist of a convenience sample of eligible MS patients at the 
Rocky Mountain MS Center who are currently active patients and are taking 
rituximab for the treatment of their MS.  


 
22 
 
We will keep track of the number enrolled in each study group and log any 
protocol deviations, lack of compliance, no shows or drop outs.  Frequencies and 
proportions will be presented and compared between treatment groups. 
4.9.2. Analysis of Treatment Group Comparability 
As described in section 4.2, demographic variables and measures of baseline 
disease severity, including age, gender, MS disease duration, baseline PDDS, 
type of MS at baseline (first infusion in both study groups), along with 
discontinuations, will be recorded and compared between treatment groups. All 
available observations will be used.  For continuous variables (age, MS disease 
duration), by treatment group means, standard deviations, medians, and ranges 
will be recorded, and differences among treatment groups will tested for with 
either with T-test/ANOVA methods or Wilcoxon/Kruskal Wallis tests.  For 
categorical variables (gender, type of MS, disability, discontinuations), 
frequencies and proportions will be presented, and differences among treatment 
groups will be tested for using chi-square/Fisher’s exact test. 
 
4.9.3 
Efficacy Analysis –Not Applicable 
a. Primary Endpoint: NA 
b. Secondary Endpoints: NA 
  
4.9.4 Safety Analysis 
The default analysis will be available case for all eligible participants on an intent 
to treat basis.  Alpha = 0.05 for all tests. As in the OPERA I and II randomized 
clinical trials, the primary and secondary end points will be descriptively 
presented. Frequencies and percentages for the severity of IRR grades (Grades 
0-5) will be presented for both study groups following each infusion time point 
and overall between groups. 95% confidence intervals for the proportions will be 
calculated.  Differences in the distribution of IRR severity grades between 
independent samples (i.e. comparison between groups at a common time point) 
will be tested with the chi-square or Fisher’s exact association test, and 
additionally with ordinal or multinomial logistic regression.  If sample sizes are 
small among some levels of IRR severity grades, they may be collapsed or 
dichotomized (i.e. Grade 3 or higher, any reaction or no reaction, severe reaction 
or none as examples) and methods described for binary outcomes under 
secondary endpoints will be utilized.  Dichotomization may be used to make 
analysis and presentation of results more manageable as well.  
The primary endpoint will be the proportion of whether any IRR occurred (yes or 
no) per infusion cycle per patient in each study group. The secondary endpoints 
include the proportion per infusion per patient of severe infusion reaction (grade 
3 or greater), the proportion of infusion reactions and severe infusion reaction per 
patient across all infusions, the proportion patients with anti-drug antibodies, and 
the proportion of patients with depleted B cells. The primary outcome, binary 
occurrence of IRR per infusion per patient, could be analyzed with logistic or 
relative risk models, with GEE (generalized estimating equations) and/or GLMM 


 
23 
 
(generalized linear mixed models) methods to incorporate correlation on 
repeated infusions on a patient.  The same method will apply to other longitudinal 
binary outcomes.  Poisson or negative binomial models with exposure terms 
could calculate rates of IRR per infusion per patient as a counting process. 
Similar methods will be used to compare IRR rates between the switching group 
and OPERA I and II phase 3 clinical trials.  The total number of IRRs experienced 
in each patient, will be analyzed with Poisson or negative binomial models.    
Paired T tests will be used to assess differences in specific cytokine markers 
between pre and post infusion at each infusion cycle.  Patient reported outcomes 
will also be reported descriptively.  Frequencies and proportions will be reported 
for adverse and serious events and loss to follow up 
 
As contingency methodology, exact tests and confidence intervals for measures 
of association between categorical variables can be utilized when necessary, if 
the sample sizes for some of the cells are small. Transforms or rank based 
methods, such as Wilcoxon sign rank, can be used in place of the T-test if 
deviation for normality is severe. Otherwise the T-test is a robust test of mean 
differences for medium to large sample sizes. If matching leads to good balance 
between the treatment groups on the demographic and disease variables, 
including age, MS disease duration, and baseline PDDS score, then confounding 
will not be an issue and the proposed unadjusted tests should be adequate.  
Alternatively, if the demographic and disease variables are not balanced, then 
regression or propensity score methods will be used to adjust for potential 
confounding.  Sensitivity analysis comparing unadjusted and adjusted results will 
be used to determine the extent of the confounding effect.  Adjustment for 
covariates can sometimes improve the precision of the estimated treatment 
difference by reducing random noise in the outcome. 
 
Separate descriptive statistics will be presented for relapsing and progressive MS 
patients. Similar descriptive analysis will be conducted for subgroups according 
to age (in tertiles) and baseline disability (mild, moderate, severe) as measured 
by baseline PDDS score. However, the study is not powered for subgroup 
analyses and no inferences for subgroups or interactions are planned.  As the 
sample is one of convenience, the study is generalizable to the extent patients at 
the Rocky Mountain MS center who are willing to participate are representative of 
MS patients. 
 
With only one primary endpoint, adjustment for multiple comparisons will not be 
much of an issue.  Secondary endpoints will be tested univariately. The study is 
not powered for multiple tests with control of the family-wise error rate. 
Bonferroni, iterative Bonferroni, false discovery rates, and, in some cases, 
protective overall tests could also be used if adjustment for multiple tests is 
desired. 
All adverse events, lack of compliance, protocol violations, and drop outs will be 
logged, and frequencies and proportions will be presented. Safety will be 
assessed at each infusion. 


 
24 
 
 
4.9.5 Missing Data 
Descriptive statistics will be run on missing data and checked for patterns.  We 
anticipate few missing data issues other than possibly a few data points missing 
completely at random, as patients who enroll in the switching are choosing to 
receive their only course of MS treatment at no cost to them. Treatment is 
administered in clinic once every 24 weeks and is important to the patient, so 
patient compliance should not be much of an issue, unless they drop out of the 
study.  Patients who miss a treatment will be followed up. Mixed models and 
GLMM (generalized linear mixed models) for longitudinal data can take into 
account missingness at random.   
 
4.9.6 Determination of Sample Size 
The sample size will be a convenience sample.   It is anticipated a minimum of 
100 patients will qualify for each cohort (200 total) resulting in studying 300 
infusions with ocrelizumab and 200 infusions with rituximab. This is an 
observational study not designed to demonstrate superiority of ocrelizumab over 
rituximab in efficacy but instead indicate the magnitude of the relative 
tolerability and immunogenicity.  The primary endpoint is the difference in the 
percentage of IRRs between the two study groups. In addition, both study groups will 
include treatment experienced patients on rituximab who have experienced a minimum 
of two infusions and either continue to stay on rituximab or switch to ocrelizumab.  
 
To estimate study power with the proposed sample size of 100 infusions in each group, 
we conducted a chart review of 50 patients at the Rocky Mountain MS Center who are 
currently taking rituximab and examined their IRRs using the proposed IRR grading 
scale (see section 3.3.1) from Grade 0-5. The number and severity of IRRs were 
captured following their third rituximab infusion. The highest grade of an IRR that 
occurred during the infusion was recorded. Our pilot data revealed that following the third 
rituximab infusion, 14.3% of patients had an IRR of which 85.71% were Grade 0, 
12.24% were grade 2 and 2.05% were Grade 3. Hauser et al., found that following the 
second infusion of rituximab in patients, the majority of whom (60%) were not taking a 
DMT for 6 months prior to initiating rituximab only 20.3% experienced in an IRR. 3 
 
Using IRR estimates from our pilot data and establishing a clinically meaningful 
difference of 20% increase in IRRs, we conducted the following power analysis for a 
sample of 95 patients (assuming a 5% attrition rate after recruiting 100 patients in each 
study group). An IRR proportion for ocrelizumab users at 34.3% compared with 
14.3% for rituximab (obtained from our pilot data) for a two sided (alpha = 0.05) 
two sample proportion test for the null hypothesis of no difference between 
rituximab and ocrelizumab in proportion of IRRs would result in 90% power for 95 
patients per group. 
 
In response to the FDA IND letter, “the power analysis in Section 4.9.6 of the 
protocol appears to compare the infusion-related reaction (IRR) rate at the third 
rituximab infusion (14.3%) to that of the first infusion of OCR (34.3%). Because 


 
25 
 
the incidence of an IRR for most monoclonal antibodies is highest with the first 
infusion and declines with subsequent infusions, we recommend that you revise 
your sample size and power calculations using the IRR incidence for a 
comparable number of infusions; for example, the first, second, or third infusion”: 
 
Our response is that neither the switching and comparison groups are receiving 
their very first infusion of any anti-CD 20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab or 
ocrelizumab) following enrollment in the study. Both study groups have received 
a minimum of at least two infusions of rituximab prior to enrollment in the study. 
The first study related infusion for ocrelizumab in the switching group represents 
(at minimum) their third infusion for an anti-CD monoclonal antibody which will be 
compared to their third standard of care infusion for rituximab (at minimum) 
following study enrollment. As a result, we believe both groups represent those 
patients who have experienced at least three infusions of an anti-CD monoclonal 
antibody agent. Thereby our power calculations were based on the IRRs 
observed following the third infusion of rituximab in our pilot sample (at 14.3%) 
and using a clinically meaningful difference of 20% increase in IRRs for the ocrelizumab 
group (34.3%) to provide 90% power for 95 patients per study group (assuming a 5% 
attrition rate after recruiting 100 patients in each study group).  
 
As there is only one primary outcome  to power the study on, there is no need to 
reduce the alpha level of the univariate test as part of multiple testing adjustment. 
Adjustment for interim analysis is not an issue as there are no early stopping 
rules. 
 
4.10 Data Quality Assurance 
Accurate, consistent, and reliable data will be ensured through the use of 
standard practices and procedures. 
 
5.  REPORTING OF ADVERSE EVENTS 
 
5.1 Assessment of Safety 
 
Safety Review 
All AEs and SAEs will be reviewed by the project Steering Committee at their 
monthly project management meetings.  This Committee will be composed of 
Drs. Vollmer, Nair and Alvarez supported by Stefan Sillau PhD and the lead 
study coordinator, Shane Curran-Hays.  We will also establish an external DSMB 
as required by UCD that will meet at baseline, then every 6 months and at the 
time of any SAE.  This committee will consist of two neurologists and Dr. Stefan 
Sillau PhD biostatistics. 
 
 
Adverse Events 
An AE is any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally 
associated with the use of an investigational medicinal product (IMP) or other 


 
26 
 
protocol-imposed intervention, regardless of attribution. For the patients on 
Ocrelizumab, all AEs occurring between the time of consent and the study 
termination visit will be recorded.   
 
For the comparator group, IRRs are the only AEs that will be collected. In 
addition, clinical relapses documented during the clinical process will also be 
collected.  
 
Serious Adverse Events 
An AE should be classified as an SAE if the following criteria are met: 
• It results in death (i.e., the AE actually causes or leads to death). 
• It is life threatening (i.e., the AE, in the view of the investigator, places the 
subject at immediate risk of death. It does not include an AE that, had it occurred 
in a more severe form, might have caused death.). 
• It requires or prolongs inpatient hospitalization. 
• It results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (i.e., the AE results in 
substantial disruption of the subject’s ability to conduct normal life functions). 
• It results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect in a neonate/infant born to a 
mother exposed to the IMP. 
• It is considered a significant medical event by the investigator based on 
medical judgment (e.g., may jeopardize the subject or may require 
medical/surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above). 
 
All SAEs reported or observed in either group will be recorded and reported 
as necessary. 
 
5.2 Methods and Timing for Assessing and Recording Safety Variables 
The investigator is responsible for ensuring that all AEs and SAEs that are 
observed or reported during the study, are collected and reported to the FDA, 
appropriate IRB(s), and Genentech, Inc. in accordance with CFR 312.32 (IND 
Safety Reports).  
 
Adverse Event Reporting Period 
The study period during which all AEs and SAEs must be reported begins after 
informed consent is obtained and initiation of study treatment or “initiation of any 
study procedures” and ends at T3 which is 6 months after last dose of study 
medication. After this period, investigators should only report SAEs that are 
attributed to prior study treatment. 
 
Assessment of Adverse Events 
AEs and SAEs may be collected from medical record review, or elicited by asking 
non-directive questions at each study visit both before and after the infusion.  
Infusion-related AEs will be captured by the infusion nurses as well as self-
reported by the patient as described in Outcome Measures.   Patients will also be 
reminded to alert the study team about any concerning health issues between 
study visits. Each recorded AE or SAE will be described by its duration (i.e., start 
and end dates) and will include, and actions taken.  


 
27 
 
 
For all recorded AEs, a study investigator will make an assessment of 
seriousness, and causality. To ensure consistency of AE and SAE causality 
assessments, investigators should apply the following general guideline: 
 
Yes 
There is a plausible temporal relationship between the onset of the AE and 
administration of the ocrelizumab, and the AE cannot be readily explained by the 
subject’s clinical state, intercurrent illness, or concomitant therapies; and/or the 
AE follows a known pattern of response to the ocrelizumab; and/or the AE abates 
or resolves upon discontinuation of the ocrelizumab or dose reduction and, if 
applicable, reappears upon re-challenge. 
 
No 
Evidence exists that the AE has an etiology other than the ocrelizumab (e.g., 
preexisting medical condition, underlying disease, intercurrent illness, or 
concomitant medication); and/or the AE has no plausible temporal relationship to 
ocrelizumab administration (e.g., event diagnosed 2 days after first dose of 
ocrelizumab). 
 
Expected adverse events are those adverse events that are listed or 
characterized in the Package Insert or current Investigator Brochure.  
 
Unexpected adverse events are those not listed in the Package Insert (P.I.) or 
current Investigator Brochure (I.B.) or not identified. This includes adverse events 
for which the specificity or severity is not consistent with the description in the P.I. 
or I.B. For example, under this definition, hepatic necrosis would be unexpected 
if the P.I. or I.B. only referred to elevated hepatic enzymes or hepatitis. 
 
5.3 Procedures for Eliciting, Recording, and Reporting Adverse Events 
 
Eliciting Adverse Events 
A consistent methodology for eliciting AEs at all subject evaluation time points 
should be adopted. Examples of non-directive questions include:  
• “How have you felt since your last clinical visit?” 
• “Have you had any new/changed health problems since you were last here?”  
 
Specific Instructions for Recording Adverse Events 
Investigators should use correct medical terminology/concepts when reporting 
AEs or SAEs. Avoid colloquialisms and abbreviations. 
a. 
Diagnosis vs. Signs and Symptoms 
If known at the time of reporting, a diagnosis should be reported rather than 
individual signs and symptoms (e.g., record only liver failure or hepatitis rather 
than jaundice, asterixis, and elevated transaminases). However, if a constellation 
of signs and/or symptoms cannot be medically characterized as a single 
diagnosis or syndrome at the time of reporting, it is ok to report the information 


 
28 
 
that is currently available. If a diagnosis is subsequently established, it should be 
reported as follow-up information. 
b. 
Deaths 
All deaths that occur during the protocol-specified AE reporting period (see 
Section 5.1.2), regardless of attribution, will be reported to the appropriate 
parties. When recording a death, the event or condition that caused or 
contributed to the fatal outcome should be reported as the single medical 
concept. If the cause of death is unknown and cannot be ascertained at the time 
of reporting, report “Unexplained Death”. 
c. 
Preexisting Medical Conditions 
A preexisting medical condition is one that is present at the start of the study. 
Such conditions should be reported as medical and surgical history. A preexisting 
medical condition should be re-assessed throughout the trial and reported as an 
AE or SAE only if the frequency, severity, or character of the condition worsens 
during the study. When reporting such events, it is important to convey the 
concept that the preexisting condition has changed by including applicable 
descriptors (e.g., “more frequent headaches”). 
d. 
Hospitalizations for Medical or Surgical Procedures 
Any AE that results in hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization should be 
documented and reported as an SAE. If a subject is hospitalized to undergo a 
medical or surgical procedure as a result of an AE, the event responsible for the 
procedure, not the procedure itself, should be reported as the SAE. For example, 
if a subject is hospitalized to undergo coronary bypass surgery, record the heart 
condition that necessitated the bypass as the SAE. 
 
Hospitalizations for the following reasons do not require reporting: 
• Hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization for diagnostic or elective surgical 
procedures for preexisting conditions 
• Hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization required to allow efficacy 
measurement for the study or 
• Hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization for scheduled therapy of the 
target disease of the study. 
e. 
Pregnancy 
If a female subject becomes pregnant while receiving ocrelizumab or within 90 
days after the last dose of study drug, a report should be completed and 
expeditiously submitted to the Genentech, Inc. Follow-up to obtain the outcome 
of the pregnancy should also occur. Abortion, whether accidental, therapeutic, or 
spontaneous, should always be classified as serious, and expeditiously reported 
as an SAE. Similarly, any congenital anomaly/birth defect in a child born to a 
female subject exposed to the ocrelizumab should be reported as an SAE. 
 
Additional information on any ocrelizumab-exposed pregnancy and infant will be 
requested by Genentech Drug Safety at specific time points (i.e. after having 


 
29 
 
received the initial report, at the end of the second trimester, 2 weeks after the 
expected date of delivery, and at 3, 6, and 12 months of the infant’s life). 
 
f. 
Post-Study Adverse Events 
The investigator should expeditiously report any SAE occurring after a subject 
has completed or discontinued study participation if attributed to prior 
ocrelizumab exposure. If the investigator should become aware of the 
development of cancer or a congenital anomaly in a subsequently conceived 
offspring of a female subject who participated in the study, this should be 
reported as an SAE.  
 
g. 
Reconciliation 
The Sponsor agrees to conduct safety reconciliation for the safety events 
reported on ocrelizumab. Genentech and the Sponsor will agree to the 
reconciliation periodicity and format, but agree at minimum to exchange quarterly 
line listings of cases received by the other party.  
 
If discrepancies are identified, the Sponsor and Genentech will cooperate in 
resolving the discrepancies. The responsible individuals for each party shall 
handle the matter on a case-by-case basis until satisfactory resolution.  The 
sponsor shall receive reconciliation guidance documents within the ‘Activation 
Package’. 
h.  
AEs of Special Interest (AESIs) 
AEs of Special Interest are defined as a potential safety problem, identified as a 
result of safety monitoring of the Product. The AEs of special interest listed below 
will also be recorded and must be reported to Genentech as described in Section 
i.    
  
Hys and Stiamp: 
1. Cases of potential drug-induced liver injury that include an elevated ALT 
or AST in combination with either an elevated bilirubin or clinical jaundice, 
as defined by Hy’s law 
2. Suspected transmission of an infectious agent by the study drug, as 
defined below: 
Any organism, virus, or infectious particle (e.g., prion protein transmitting 
transmissible spongiform encephalopathy), pathogenic or non-pathogenic, 
is considered an infectious agent.  A transmission of an infectious agent 
may be suspected from clinical symptoms or laboratory findings that 
indicate an infection in a patient exposed to a medicinal product.  This 
term applies only when a contamination of the study drug is suspected. 
 


 
30 
 
i. 
Adverse Event Reporting 
Investigators must report all SAEs to Genentech within the timelines described 
below. The completed Medwatch/case report should be faxed immediately upon 
completion to Genentech Drug Safety at: 
 
(650) 225-4682 
OR 
(650) 225--4630 
 
Relevant follow-up information should be submitted to Genentech Drug Safety as 
soon as it becomes available. 
 
Serious AE reports and AEs of Special Interest, whether related or unrelated to 
ocrelizumab, will be transmitted to Genentech within one (1) business day of the 
Awareness Date. 
 
Additional reporting requirements to Genentech include the following: 
• Any reports of pregnancy following the start of administration with 
ocrelizumab and within the follow-up period (for female patients within 90 
days after the last dose of ocrelizumab will be transmitted to Genentech 
within one (1) business day of the Awareness Date. Pregnancies will be 
followed up until the outcome of the pregnancy is known, whenever 
possible, based upon due diligence taken to obtain the follow-up 
information. 
• All non-serious ocrelizumab AEs originating from the study will be 
forwarded to Genentech quarterly. 
In addition to SAEs, pregnancy reports and AESIs, the following Special 
Situations Reports should be collected and transmitted to Genentech/Roche 
even in the absence of an Adverse Event within thirty (30) calendar days: 
 
• Data related to product usage during pregnancy or breastfeeding 
• Data related to overdose, abuse, misuse, inadvertent/erroneous 
administration, medication error or occupational exposure, with or without 
association with an AE/SAE unless otherwise specified in the protocol 
• Data related to a suspected transmission of an infectious agent via a 
medicinal product (STIAMP) 
• Lack of therapeutic efficacy 
In addition, reasonable attempts should made to obtain and submit the age or 
age group of the patient, in order to be able to identify potential safety signals 
specific to a particular population. 
 


 
31 
 
j. 
Aggregate Reports 
The University of Colorado will forward a copy of the Final Study Report to Roche 
upon completion of the Study. 
 
Note: Investigators should also report events to their IRB as required. 
 
5.4 MedWatch 3500A Reporting Guidelines 
In addition to completing appropriate patient demographic and suspect 
medication information, the report should include the following information within 
the Event Description (section 5) of the MedWatch 3500A form: 
• Protocol description (and number, if assigned) 
• Description of event, severity, treatment, and outcome if known 
• Supportive laboratory results and diagnostics 
• Investigator’s assessment of the relationship of the adverse event to each 
investigational product and suspect medication 
Follow-up Information 
Additional information may be added to a previously submitted report by any of 
the following methods: 
• Adding to the original MedWatch 3500A report and submitting it as follow-up 
• Adding supplemental summary information and submitting it as follow-up with 
the original MedWatch 3500A form  
• Summarizing new information and faxing it with a cover letter including patient 
identifiers (i.e. D.O.B. initial, patient number), protocol description and number, if 
assigned, brief adverse event description, and notation that additional or follow-
up information is being submitted (The patient identifiers are important so that the 
new information is added to the correct initial report) 
 
Occasionally Genentech may contact the reporter for additional information, 
clarification, or current status of the patient for whom an adverse event was 
reported. For questions regarding SAE reporting, you may contact the 
Genentech Drug Safety representative noted above or the MSL assigned to the 
study. Relevant follow-up information should be submitted to Genentech Drug 
Safety as soon as it becomes available and/or upon request. 
 
MedWatch 3500A (Mandatory Reporting) form is available at 
http://www.fda.gov/medwatch/getforms.html  
 
5.5 Additional Reporting Requirements for IND Holders 
For Investigator-Sponsored IND Studies, some additional reporting requirements 
for the FDA apply in accordance with the guidance set forth in 21 CFR § 600.80. 
 
Events meeting the following criteria need to be submitted to the Food and Drug 
Administration (FDA) as expedited IND Safety Reports according to the following 
guidance and timelines: 


 
32 
 
7 Calendar Day Telephone or Fax Report: 
The Investigator is required to notify the FDA of any fatal or life-threatening 
adverse event that is unexpected and assessed by the Investigator to be possibly 
related to the use of ocrelizumab. An unexpected adverse event is one that is not 
already described in the ocrelizumab Investigator Brochure. Such reports are to 
be telephoned or faxed to the FDA and Genentech within 7 calendar days of first 
learning of the event. 
15 Calendar Day Written Report 
The Investigator is also required to notify the FDA and all participating 
investigators, in a written IND Safety Report, of any serious, unexpected AE that 
is considered reasonably or possibly related to the use of ocrelizumab. An 
unexpected adverse event is one that is not already described in the ocrelizumab 
investigator brochure. 
 
Written IND Safety reports should include an Analysis of Similar Events in 
accordance with regulation 21 CFR § 312.32. All safety reports previously filed 
by the investigator with the IND concerning similar events should be analyzed 
and the significance of the new report in light of the previous, similar reports 
commented on. 
 
Written IND safety reports with Analysis of Similar Events are to be submitted to 
the FDA, Genentech, and all participating investigators within 15 calendar days 
of first learning of the event. The FDA prefers these reports on a MedWatch 3500 
form, but alternative formats are acceptable (e.g., summary letter). 
 
FDA fax number for IND Safety Reports: 
Fax: 1 (800) FDA 0178 
 
All written IND Safety Reports submitted to the FDA by the Investigator 
must also be faxed to Genentech Drug Safety: 
Fax: (650) 225-4682 or (650) 225-4630 
 
And to the Site IRB: 
Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board (COMIRB) office at 303-724-1055 
or COMIRB@ucdenver.edu.  
For questions related to safety reporting, please contact Genentech Drug 
Safety: 
Tel: (888) 835-2555 
Fax: (650) 225-4682    OR    (650) 225-4630 
 
IND Annual Reports 


 
33 
 
Copies to Genentech: 
All IND annual reports submitted to the FDA by the Sponsor-Investigator should 
be copied to Genentech when available: 
 
ocrelizumab-iis-d@gene.com and ctvist_drugsafety@gene.com  
 
Study Close-Out 
Any study report submitted to the FDA by the Sponsor-Investigator should be 
copied to Genentech. This includes all IND annual reports and the Clinical Study 
Report (final study report). Additionally, any literature articles that are a result of 
the study should be sent to Genentech. Copies of such reports should be mailed 
to the assigned Clinical Operations contact for the study: ocrelizumab-iis-
d@gene.com and your Genentech MSL 
 
6.  Investigator Requirements 
6.1 Study Initiation 
Before the start of this study, the following documents must be on file with 
Genentech or a Genentech representative: 
• Original U.S. FDA Form 1572 for each site (for all studies conducted under U.S. 
Investigational New Drug [IND] regulations), signed by the Principal Investigator 
The names of any sub-investigators must appear on this form.  Investigators 
must also complete all regulatory documentation as required by local and 
national regulations. 
• Current curriculum vitae of the Principal Investigator 
• Written documentation of IRB approval of protocol and informed consent 
document 
• A copy of the IRB-approved informed consent document 
• A signed Clinical Research Agreement 
 
6.2 Study Completion 
The following materials are requested by Genentech when a study is considered 
complete or terminated: 
• Any study report submitted to the FDA by the Sponsor-Investigator should be 
copied to Genentech. This includes all IND annual reports and the Clinical Study 
Report (final study report). Additionally, any literature articles that are a result of 
the study should be sent to Genentech. Copies of such reports should be mailed 
to the assigned Clinical Operations contact for the study: 
• Email : ocrelizumab-iis-d@gene.com  
 


 
34 
 
6.3 Informed Consent 
The informed consent document will be signed by the subject or the subject’s 
legally authorized representative before his or her participation in the study.  The 
case history for each subject will document that informed consent was obtained 
prior to participation in the study.  A copy of the informed consent document must 
be provided to the subject or the subject's legally authorized representative.  If 
applicable, it will be provided in a certified translation of the local language. 
Signed consent forms will remain in each subject’s study file and will be available 
for verification by study monitors at any time. 
 
6.4 Institutional Review Board or Ethics Committee Approval 
This protocol, the informed consent document, and relevant supporting 
information will be submitted to COMIRB for review and approved before the 
study is initiated.  The study will be conducted in accordance with U.S. FDA, 
applicable national and local health authorities, and IRB requirements. 
The Principal Investigator will be responsible for keeping COMIRB apprised of 
the progress of the study and of any changes made to the protocol as deemed 
appropriate, but in any case the IRB must be updated at least once a year.  The 
Principal Investigator must also keep the IRB informed of any significant adverse 
events. 
Investigators are required to promptly notify their respective IRB of all adverse 
drug reactions that are both serious and unexpected.  This generally refers to 
serious adverse events that are not already identified in the Investigator Brochure 
and that are considered possibly or probably related to the molecule or study 
drug by the investigator.  Some IRBs may have other specific adverse event 
requirements that investigators are expected to adhere.  Investigators must 
immediately forward to their IRB any written safety report or update provided by 
Genentech (e.g., IND safety report, Investigator Brochure, safety amendments 
and updates, etc.). 
 
6.5 Study Monitoring Requirements 
NA 
 
6.6 Data Collection 
See section 4.5.1. 
 
6.7 Study Medication Accountability (if applicable) 
If study drug will be provided by Genentech, accurate records of all study drug 
dispensed from and returned to the study site should be recorded by using the 
institution’s drug inventory log. 
All expired, partially used or empty containers should be disposed of at the study 
site according to institutional standard operating procedure.   


 
35 
 
 
6.8 Disclosure and publication of Data 
Subject medical information obtained by this study is confidential, and disclosure 
to third parties other than those noted below is prohibited. 
Upon the subject’s permission, medical information may be given to his or her 
personal physician or other appropriate medical personnel responsible for his or 
her welfare. 
Data generated by this study must be available for inspection upon request by 
representatives of the U.S. FDA, national and local health authorities, 
Genentech, and the IRB for each study site, if appropriate. 
The results of this study may be published or presented at scientific meetings. 
The Sponsor will comply with the requirements for the publication of study 
results.   
Additionally, Section 801 of the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act 
(FDAAA 801) (PDF) requires Responsible Parties to register and submit 
summary results of clinical trials with ClinicalTrials.gov. The law applies to certain 
clinical trials of drugs (including biological products) and medical devices. (Refer 
to FDAAA 801 Requirements to learn about Responsible Party, Applicable 
Clinical Trials, and deadlines for registration and results submission) 
 
6.9 Retention of Records 
U.S. FDA regulations (21 CFR §312.62[c]) require that records and documents 
pertaining to the conduct of this study and the distribution of investigational drug, 
including CRFs, consent forms, laboratory test results, and medication inventory 
records, must be retained by the Principal Investigator for 2 years after marketing 
application approval.  If no application is filed, these records must be kept 
2 years after the investigation is discontinued and the U.S. FDA and the 
applicable national and local health authorities are notified.  Genentech will notify 
the Principal Investigator of these events. 
For studies conducted outside the United States under a U.S. IND, the Principal 
Investigator must comply with U.S. FDA IND regulations and with the record 
retention policies of the relevant national and local health authorities. 


 
36 
 
REFERENCES 
 
1. Palanichamy A, Jahn S, Nickles D, Rituximab efficiently depletes increased 
CD20 expressing T cells in multiple sclerosis patients. J Immunol. 2014 July 15; 
193(2): 580–586. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1400118 
2. Ludwig Kappos, David Li, Peter A Calabresi, Paul O’Connor, Amit Bar-Or, 
Frederik Barkhof, Ming Yin, David Leppert, Robert Glanzman, Jeroen Tinbergen, 
Stephen L Hauser; Ocrelizumab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a phase 
2, randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial: Lancet 2011; 378: 1779–87 
3. Hauser SL, Waubant E, Arnold DL, et al, for the HERMES Trial Group. B-cell 
depletion with rituximab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 
2008; 358: 676–88 
4. F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD. INVESTIGATOR’S BROCHURE RO4964913 
Ocrelizumab Fourteenth Version, November 2015 Addendum No. 1 (February 
2016). 
5. Owens, GP; Bennet, JL. Gilden, DH, Burgeon, MP. The B cell response in 
multiple sclerosis. Neurol Res 2006;28;236-44. 
6. National Cancer Institute, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V 
4.0 (available 
ahttp://www.oncology.tv/SymptomManagement/NationalCancerInstituteUpdates
CTCAEtov403.aspx) 
7. Schwartz CE, Vollmer T, Lee H, North American Research Consortium on 
Multiple Sclerosis Outcomes Study Group. Reliability and validity of two self-
report measures of impairment and disability for MS Neurology 1999; 52: 63–71 
8. Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded 
disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology, November 1983;33(11). 1444. doi: 
10.1212/WNL.33.11.1444 
 
 
 
 


 
37 
 
APPENDIX B: SAFETY REPORTING FAX COVER SHEET 
 
 
 
 
Genentech Supported Research 
6.1.1.1.1.1.1 AE / SAE FAX No: (650) 225-4682 
6.1.1.1.1.1.2 Alternate Fax No: (650) 225-5288 
 
 
Genentech Study Number 
 
6.1.1.1.1.1.3 Principal 
Investigator 
 
6.1.1.1.1.1.4 Site Name 
 
6.1.1.1.1.1.5 Reporter name 
 
6.1.1.1.1.1.6 Reporter 
Telephone # 
 
6.1.1.1.1.1.7 Reporter Fax # 
 
 
 
 
6.1.1.1.1.1.8 Initial Report Date 
6.1.1.1.1.1.9 [DD] / [MON] / [YY] 
6.1.1.1.1.1.10 
Follow-up 
Report Date 
6.1.1.1.1.1.11 
[DD] / [MON] / [YY] 
6.1.1.1.1.1.12 
 
6.1.1.1.1.1.13 
Subject 
Initials 
6.1.1.1.1.1.14 
(Enter a 
dash if patient has 
no middle name) 
6.1.1.1.1.1.15 
[ ] - [ ] - [ ] 
 
SAE or Safety Reporting questions, contact Genentech Safety: (888) 835-2555