Conditions: Disorder of Glucose Regulation
Keywords: prediabetes impaired fasting/impaired glucose tolerance post gestational diabetes diabetes prevention
Allocation: RANDOMIZED | Intervention model: PARALLEL
Enrollment: 36
Healthy volunteers: no

Brief summary:
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is defined as "any degree of glucose intolerance with onset or first recognition during pregnancy." GDM is one of the most frequent metabolic disorders occurring during pregnancy. Approximately 7% of all pregnancies in the United States are complicated by gestational diabetes resulting in more than 200,000 cases annually. There is epidemiologic evidence associating GDM with insulin resistance, glucose intolerance, and type 2 diabetes (DM2). Among all the risk factors of diabetes mellitus, the experience of gestational diabetes is the strongest one. Systematic reviews of older studies conclude that 35-60% women with gestational diabetes will develop type 2 diabetes at rates much greater than control groups who did not have glucose intolerance during pregnancy. Studies are needed for optimal postpartum and long-term health of women who have had GDM. Recent evidence suggests that incretin-based therapies may be useful for the treatment of DM2 because continuous administration of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) produces substantial improvements in glucose control and ß-cell function in subjects with DM2. Inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) increases the concentration of GLP-1 and may potentially delay disease progression in GDM considering the ß-cell function improvement in DM2 and ß-cell mass shown to increase in animal models. This study will examine if combination sitagliptin (a DPP-4 inhibitor)-plus metformin is more effective than metformin alone or placebo in improving metabolic parameters, specifically the impact on β-cell function, in prior GDM women with glucose abnormalities.

Detailed description:
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is defined as "any degree of glucose intolerance with onset or first recognition during pregnancy." GDM is one of the most frequent metabolic disorders occurring during pregnancy. Approximately 7% of all pregnancies in the United States are complicated by gestational diabetes resulting in more than 200,000 cases annually. There is epidemiologic evidence associating GDM with insulin resistance, glucose intolerance, and type 2 diabetes (DM2). Among all the risk factors of diabetes mellitus, the experience of gestational diabetes is the strongest one.

Gestational diabetes is often the culmination of years of unrecognized and unmodified diabetes risk factors that lead to overt and occult clinical manifestations during pregnancy. Systematic reviews of older studies conclude that 35-60% women with gestational diabetes will develop type 2 diabetes at rates much greater than control groups who did not have glucose intolerance during pregnancy. The higher rates were in studies of particular ethnic groups in the U.S. Presently, in the literature, there are described new, more efficient methods of diabetes prevention in groups with a high risk of this disorder, which involve both, lifestyle modification and pharmacological therapies. Lifestyle intervention was found to reduce the incidence of type 2 diabetes by 58% and metformin by 31% as compared with placebo. Studies are needed for optimal postpartum and long-term health of women who have had GDM. Considerable recent evidence suggests that incretin-based therapies may be useful for the treatment of DM2 because continuous administration of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) produces substantial improvements in glucose control and ß-cell function in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) increases the concentration of GLP-1 and may potentially delay disease progression in GDM considering the ß-cell function improvement in DM2 and ß-cell mass shown to increase in animal models. This study will examine if combination sitagliptin-plus metformin is more effective than metformin alone or placebo in improving metabolic parameters, specifically the impact on β-cell function, in at-risk women with a recent history of GDM.

Arms:
arm 1: 50 mg/1000 mg twice a day (BID) arm 2: 1 pill/BID for 16 weeks arm 3: 1000 mg BID

Interventions: intervention 1: Sitagliptin-Metformin intervention 2: Metformin intervention 3: Placebo pill
Intervention descriptions: intervention 1: Experimental -dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor- oral medication intervention 2: Biguanide- insulin sensitizer intervention 3: Will evaluate effect of lifestyle and diet only

Protocol document:
Prot_SAP_000.pdf: 
 
1
 
 
 
Project Title: 
A randomized pilot study evaluating combination DPP4 inhibitor 
sitagliptin plus biguanide metformin compared to metformin 
monotherapy or placebo on glycemic and metabolic abnormalities 
in women with a recent history of gestational diabetes mellitus 
 
 
Principal Investigators: 
Karen Elkind-Hirsch, M.Sc., PhD 
Martha Paterson, M.D. 
 
. 
 
Address 
 
 
Woman's Health Research Department 
 
 
 
 
Woman’s Metabolic Health Center 
 
 
 
 
100 Woman’s Way 
 
 
 
 
Baton Rouge, LA  70817 
 
 
 
 
 
Trial Registration.     Clinical trial reg. no. NCT1856907, clinicaltrials.gov  
 


 
2
A randomized pilot study evaluating combination dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP4) inhibitor sitagliptin 
plus biguanide metformin compared to metformin monotherapy or placebo on glycemic and 
metabolic abnormalities in women with a recent history of gestational diabetes mellitus 
 
Project Overview/Summary 
 
The objective of the present proposal is to compare the clinical, endocrine and 
metabolic effects of therapy with combination sitagliptin and metformin to metformin 
monotherapy and placebo in former GDM women with prediabetic hyperglycemia.  Sitagliptin 
is an oral dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-4) inhibitor whose mechanism of action is to prolong the 
duration of blood glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1) levels by inhibiting its degradation and thereby 
augmenting insulin secretion This study will serve as a pilot investigation to open perspectives 
for future studies combining anti-diabetic drugs with different mechanisms of action in women 
with a history of GDM for whom standard treatment with metformin is less effective. 
 
Primary Objective:  
 To assess the effects of sitagliptin plus metformin therapy compared to metformin 
monotherapy and placebo on pancreatic beta cell (β-cell) compensatory function and 
glycemic parameters in former GDM women with prediabetic hyperglycemia who are at 
high risk of developing Type 2 diabetes (DM2).  Our findings focus on delineating which 
medication(s) show the best promise for slowing or arresting the β-cell dysfunction and 
increased risk of developing diabetes in women with recent GDM. 
 
Secondary Objective(s) 
 To analyze the impact of sitagliptin + metformin therapy compared to metformin alone 
and placebo in improving select cardiometabolic markers (lipid fractions and blood 
pressure) in at-risk prior GDM women with prediabetic hyperglycemia. 
 
Study Background and Rationale 
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the most frequent metabolic disorders 
occurring during pregnancy that complicates both the course of pregnancy and the delivery, 
and also has significant implications for the future health of the mother.1, 2  Although the 
precise definition of GDM remains unclear, it is widely assumed to be an early manifestation of 
type 2 diabetes (DM2) resulting from insulin resistance and inadequate insulin secretion 
associated with overweight and obesity, and the diabetogenic effects of placental hormones.3-5 
Insulin resistance and beta cell dysfunction are the main pathophysiological factors of 
GDM just as they are for diabetes outside of pregnancy.6-7 There may be a finite level of 
pancreatic “beta cell reserve” that is further depleted with recurring GDM. It is possible that 
recurrent episodes of heightened insulin resistance, such as with recurrent pregnancy, place 


 
3
high demands on the pancreas and contribute to an eventual decline in beta cell function that 
leads to type 2 diabetes (DM2) in high-risk individuals.  After an index pregnancy with 
gestational diabetes, GDM recurs in 30-84% of subsequent pregnancies.8-10  Gestational 
diabetes is also a strong risk factor for the development of DM2 at a later stage of life in 
previous GDM woman.  Among all the risk factors of diabetes mellitus, the experience of 
gestational diabetes is the strongest one.  The incidence of various forms of diabetes in this 
group balances from 10 to 60% over a period from 2 to 10 years.  Russell et al 11 found that 
36% of GDM women had some degree of persistent abnormal glucose tolerance when tested 
at any time postpartum. Recently, Nelson et al 12 found that 8.9% of patients tested 
immediately postpartum had DM2, another 31.3% had other glucose metabolism 
abnormalities; only 55.8% had normal 2-hour glucose tolerance tests.  
Most, but not all women with a history of GDM have falling β-cell compensation for 
chronic insulin resistance during the first 5–10 years after the index pregnancy. In this setting, 
two general factors influence the risk of diabetes.  The first is the level of metabolic 
deterioration that is present during and soon after pregnancy.  In general, women with the 
highest glucose levels (e.g. impaired glucose or impaired A1C after pregnancy) are closest to 
diabetes and require relatively little deterioration to “cross the line” to that diagnosis.  They 
are clearly prime targets for aggressive measures to prevent additional deterioration to 
diabetes.  The second general factor that influences diabetes risk is the rate of deterioration.  
Rising glucose is a clinical indicator of deterioration. Hyperglycemia ensues when insulin 
secretion fails to compensate for the degree of insulin resistance.  Defects in insulin secretion 
have been reported following a 75 g oral glucose load with a diminished response at 30 and 60 
minutes in previous GDM women of European origin.13 Among pharmacological interventions 
for the non-pregnant population, thiazolidinediones have the largest impact on diabetes risk 
reduction—in the range of 55–70% compared with placebo.14,15  Interventions such as 
metformin or acarbose that primarily lower glucose produce smaller risk reductions (25–33%) 
and provide less evidence for slowing of rates of progression in general.16,17  However, in the 
DPP,18 metformin had a particularly strong effect to reduce diabetes risk or delay its onset in 
women with a history of GDM. 
Whether pharmacological therapy should be prescribed for diabetes prevention is an 
open question given that waiting to add drug therapy until diabetes develops can arrest β-cell 
decline, albeit at a lower level of β-cell function than when medications are used for 
prevention.19  Studies are needed for optimal postpartum and long-term health of women who 
have had GDM.  Considerable recent evidence suggests that incretin-based therapies may be 
useful for the prevention of DM2.  Whereas native GLP-1 has a very short half-life, continuous 
infusion of GLP-1 improves first and second-phase insulin secretion suggesting that early GLP-1 
therapy may preserve ß-cell function in subjects with IGT or mild DM2.  Incretin mimetics and 
inhibitors of the protease dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 use the anti-diabetic properties of the 


 
4
incretin hormone, glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-120 hormone to not only augment glucose-
induced insulin secretion in a highly glucose-dependent manner,21 thus preventing GLP-1 alone 
from provoking hypoglycemia.  Additional beneficial effects of GLP-1 on endocrine pancreatic 
islets are that it 1) supports the synthesis of proinsulin to replenish insulin stores in β-cells; 2) 
reduces the rate of β-cell apoptosis when islets are incubated in a toxic environment 
(glucotoxicity, lipotoxicity, cytotoxic cytokines); and 3) promotes differentiation of precursor 
cells with the ability to develop into β-cells and proliferation of β-cell lines, and in whole 
animals (rodent studies), this leads to an increased β-cell mass within a few days or weeks 20,22.  
Furthermore, GLP-1 can lower glucagon concentrations, i.e., induce α-cells to respond again to 
the inhibitory action of hyperglycemia, while leaving the counterregulatory glucagon responses 
undisturbed, as in the case of hypoglycemia.21,23  Additional activities of GLP-1 are the 
deceleration of gastric emptying, 24 which slows the entry of nutrients into the circulation after 
meals, a reduction in appetite, and earlier induction of satiety, 25 leading to weight reduction 
with chronic exposure.26  Inhibition of DPP-4 increases the concentration of GLP-1 and may 
potentially delay disease progression in GDM considering the ß-cell function improvement in 
DM2 and ß-cell mass shown to increase in animal models.  This study will examine if 
combination sitagliptin-plus metformin is more effective than metformin alone or placebo in 
improving metabolic parameters, specifically the impact on β-cell function, in at-risk women 
with a recent history of GDM and prediabetic hyperglycemia. 
 
Rationale 
The diagnosis of GDM identifies young women with abnormalities in pancreatic beta cell 
function that worsens over time, leading to diabetes.  Weight loss and medications that 
mitigate impairments in insulin secretion show the best promise for delaying or preventing 
DM2, the dominant form of diabetes that develops after GDM.  
 
The Primary Aims of this study are to determine whether administration of combination 
sitagliptin plus metformin will be more effective compared with metformin alone or placebo in: 
 Improving ß-cell compensatory function by enhancing insulin release after an oral 
glucose load and thus improve or delay a decline in glucose tolerance estimated by the 
disposition index defined as the product of insulin action (Matsuda index) and insulin 
secretion (insulinogenic index) derived from the OGTT (SIOGTT x Δinsulin30–0 min to 
glucose30–0 min). 
 Improving markers of insulin sensitivity and secretion after an oral glucose load as 
measured by the Matsuda index and early insulin response adjusted for insulin 
sensitivity (insulinogenic index/HOMA-IR),  
 Correcting glucose control as evaluated by fasting and 2 hour glucose levels after an 
OGTT.  


 
5
Metformin failure in this patient population is associated with ß-cell dysfunction. We propose 
that combination sitagliptin plus metformin treatment will be superior to metformin 
monotherapy or placebo treatment in improving pancreatic ß-cell response resulting in a 
greater improvement in β-cell compensatory function which reflects a shift away from impaired 
glucose tolerance and DM2. 
Secondary Aims 
We will further examine whether the addition of sitagliptin to metformin therapy is 
more beneficial than metformin alone or placebo in altering the development or progression of 
select cardiometabolic risk factors as measured by changes in: 
 plasma lipid fractions 
 blood pressure 
 anthropometric parameters, including body mass index [BMI], absolute body weight, 
waist circumference, waist: hip ratio, waist-height ratio 
Direct comparison to metformin monotherapy is not expected to yield significantly differential 
weight loss or reduced central body weight in favor of combination sitagliptin plus metformin 
treatment given that both metformin and DPP-inhibitors are generally weight neutral.  Given 
the short interval of treatment (12 weeks at full dose), no significant differences between 
placebo treatment and medical intervention on anthropometric measures or body fat 
distribution is anticipated. 
 
Study Design  
Design   
Parallel 3 treatment group, single-blinded prospective, randomized, outpatient drug efficacy 
trial  
Subjects 
Women who are > 18 years to 42 years of age with a recent history of GDM in the 
previous 12 months (diagnosis of GDM using Carpenter-Coustan criteria according to Fifth 
International Workshop—Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in the index pregnancy), 
meet all inclusion/exclusion and shown to have postpartum metabolic abnormalities will be 
offered participation in the study.  It is inclusive of only those patients with previous GDM that 
require pharmacological intervention added to diet and exercise.  Subjects will be recruited 
using flyers distributed in the obstetric clinics and pathology laboratory associated with 
Woman’s Hospital.  Participants will give written informed consent for participation in the IRB-
approved study.  All subjects will undergo a verbal screen, and if they are eligible and sign a 
medical release form, their prenatal records will be obtained to confirm their pregnancy 
history. A formal two hour Oral Glucose Tolerance test (OGTT) will be performed using a 75 
gram oral glucose load.  Patients will be eligible for randomization if they have impaired fasting 
glucose (IFG), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), or both (IFG/IGT) by OGTT. 


 
6
  Inclusion Criteria 
 Females 18 years to 42 years of age who experienced GDM during recent (within 12 
months) pregnancy  with  prediabetic hyperglycemia determined by an oral glucose 
tolerance test (OGTT) with 75 g glucose postpartum. Study subjects will  be inclusive of 
prior GDM women with impaired fasting glucose (IFG), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), 
or both (IFG/IGT) postpartum. 
 Written consent for participation in the study 
 
  Exclusion Criteria 
 Cholestasis during the past pregnancy  
 Any hepatic diseases in the past (viral hepatitis, toxic hepatic damage, jaundice of 
unknown etiology)  
 Serum AST and/or ALT level exceeding more than twice normal lab values  
 Presence of hypersensitivity to sitagliptin or other DPP-4 inhibitor  
 Current use of metformin, thiazolidinediones, GLP-1 receptor agonists, DPP-4 inhibitors, 
or weight loss medications (prescription or OTC)  
 Prior use of medication to treat diabetes except gestational diabetes  
 Use of drugs known to exacerbate glucose tolerance  
 History of diabetes or prior use of medications to treat diabetes except GDM 
 Renal impairment (e.g., serum creatinine levels ≥1.4 mg/dL for women and eGFR less 
than 60 mL/minute/1.73 m2  
 Pregnancy planned during the coming 6 months 
 Currently lactating 
 Patient not willing to use adequate contraception during study period (unless sterilized) 
 
Method 
All study patients will undergo the following clinical, metabolic and laboratory 
evaluations before and during treatment.  A full physical examination will be performed 
including measurement of body mass index (BMI), waist and hip circumference (WHR), and vital 
signs (blood pressure, respiration and temperature) at the initial and final study visit.  The total 
body adiposity (total fatness), defined as the accumulation of body fat without regard to 
regional distribution, will be expressed as BMI and calculated as weight (kg)/ height (m) 2, 
whereas the waist-to-hip girth ratio (WHR) is a measure of body fat distribution.  Height will be 
measured to the nearest centimeter and weight measured by a sliding weight balance to the 
nearest 0.1 kg.  Waist circumference will be measured at the minimum circumference between 
the rib cage and iliac crest (in centimeters) and hip circumference at the level of the largest 
circumference around the buttocks.  The circumference measurements will be taken in the 


 
7
upright position using a 15-mm width flexible metric tape held close to the body but not tight 
enough to indent the skin.  
All patients will randomly be assigned to one of 3 medication treatment groups-– either 
sitagliptin-metformin (50 mg/1000 mg BID), metformin (1000 mg BID) or placebo (1 pill/BID); all 
subjects will be allocated to one of these 3 groups based on computer-generated random 
numbers using a block randomization method.  The pharmacy will “single-blind” all the 
treatment arms to the physicians and clinical coordinators by filling prescription containers with 
1 of 3 medications- A) sitagliptin -metformin, B) metformin and  C)placebo and dispensing 
open-label tablets to study patients in blinded coded (A,B,C) bottles.  Oral glucose tolerance 
tests (OGTTs) with glucose (G) and insulin (I) measured at 0, 30, 60, and 120 after glucose load 
to assess diabetes, fasting (FBG) and mean blood glucose (MBG) concentrations, insulin 
resistance and pancreatic ß-cell function will be performed prior to randomization and at 12-14 
weeks after full study medications are reached.  Mean blood glucose (MBG) concentrations will 
be calculated by summing glucose values obtained at 0,30,60 and 120 minutes during the OGTT 
and dividing by 4.  Baseline blood samples will also be analyzed for lipid profiles, TSH,liver 
enzymes creatinine with eGFR, and quantitative ßhCG levels.  A negative serum pregnancy test 
is a prerequisite for commencing treatment.  .  All patients will meet with the registered 
dietician and receive postpartum lifestyle (diet and exercise) plans. At study completion, all 
medications will be stopped and subjects will be allowed to continue or given a prescription for 
other medications if needed. (See Flow charts 1 & 2)  
Treatment 
Eligible patients will be randomized to one of three treatment groups; either sitagliptin-
metformin (50 mg/1000 mg BID), metformin (1000 mg BID), or placebo. For all patients taking 
metformin only, the initial oral dose will be 1000 mg Q.D. (with dinner) for 2-3 weeks and then 
increased to an oral dose of 1000 mg BID (breakfast and dinner) to reduce side effects.  Patients 
assigned to combined therapy will be started on oral sitagliptin-metformin (50 mg/1000 mg) 
Q.D. (with dinner) for 2-3 weeks.  They then will be increased to an oral dose of sitagliptin-
metformin (50 mg/1000 mg) BID (breakfast and dinner).  For placebo, the same regimen for 
other 2 treatments will be followed with patients starting with one pill in evening for 2-3 weeks, 
followed by one pill twice a day.  All patients will receive the same counseling concerning the 
benefits of lifestyle modification through diet and exercise.  The patients will be also 
encouraged to increase daily exercise (such as walking, using stairs), although this will not be 
formally assessed.  The participants will receive further encouragement to adhere to the regime 
during follow-up phone calls.  Side effects of the treatment and reason for any withdrawals 
from the study will be recorded.  (See Figures 1 & 2).   
Assessment of insulin sensitivity and secretion 
Indexes of insulin sensitivity and secretion using the serum glucose and insulin 
concentrations obtained in the fasting state and during the 2hr OGTT with INS will be computed 


 
8
by several measures previously validated in women.  Fasting and glucose-stimulated insulin 
sensitivity will be estimated by homeostasis model assessment of insulin sensitivity (HOMA-IR) 
and by Matsuda's insulin sensitivity index [SIOGTT]. 27,28  Early pancreatic β-cell response will be 
estimated as the insulinogenic index (IGI) derived from the ratio of the increment of insulin to 
that of glucose 30 minutes after a glucose load (insulin 30 min − insulin 0 min/glucose 30 min − 
glucose 0 min) corrected for by the relative level of insulin resistance (IGI/HOMA-IR).29  An 
estimation of β-cell compensatory function will be calculated as the index of insulin secretion 
factored by insulin resistance (ΔINS/ΔPG 30 x Matsuda insulin index) during the OGTT.30 
Collateral Research 
Several other endpoints will be assessed at each study visit.  Baseline blood samples will 
also be collected for measurement of lipid profiles (cholesterol, HDL and LDL cholesterol, and 
triglycerides), TSH, and liver enzymes (AST/ALT). Dyslipidemia is defined as the presence of at 
least one of the mentioned lipid parameters abnormalities. 
Weight, height, BMI, waist circumference (WC), body fat distribution (waist/hip ratio 
[WHR] and waist/height ratio (WHtR), and blood pressure (BP) will also be determined.   
The safety criteria will include incidence and intensity of adverse events, withdrawals 
because of adverse events, physical exams, vital signs and laboratory parameters 
 
Concomitant Medications and Therapy  
 
None of the patients will be allowed to take medications likely to influence metabolic 
profiles except thyroid supplementation.  The following medications cannot be used 
immediately prior to or concomitant with the treatment therapy;  drugs known to affect 
gastrointestinal motility, lipid lowering agents (statins), other medications known to affect 
carbohydrate metabolism (glucocorticoids, anabolic steroids) or anti-diabetes medications 
(metformin, thiazolidinediones, GLP-1 receptor agonists, pramlintide; DPP4 inhibitors) or 
weight reducing agents.  Vitamins and topical medications can continue to be used.  Use of IUD 
and hormonal contraceptives are also permitted. 
 
Safety Measures  
 
This protocol and the associated Informed Consent as well as any addenda or 
amendments, must be reviewed and approved by the Woman’s Hospital Foundation 
Institutional Review Board (WHIRB) review committee prior to the start of the study.  All 
revisions to this Protocol are considered “protocol amendments” these must be approved in 
advance, in writing, by the WHIRB.  Every patient will have given her written informed consent 
prior to participating in the study.  Prior to participation in this trial, each subject will have an 
opportunity to ask questions and will sign (and date) a written Informed Consent, which must 
be witnessed.  The signed consent forms will be filed with the investigator's study charts for 


 
9
each subject.  Any subject may voluntarily withdraw from the study at any time without 
prejudicing treatment. 
Patients starting all oral therapies will be advised that they may have minor 
gastrointestinal side effects.  The most common side effects of metformin are diarrhea, nausea 
or vomiting, flatulence, indigestion, abdominal discomfort and rarely, a metallic taste in the 
mouth.  These acute reversible adverse effects occur in 5–20% of patients treated with 
metformin.  The symptoms are dose related and remit if the dose is reduced, sometimes an 
increase in the dose can later be tolerated.  Taking the drug with or after food, and starting 
therapy with low dosages that may be increased slowly can minimize these.  The dose can then 
be increased slowly at intervals of two weeks.  Lactic acidosis is the biguanide-related adverse 
effect of most concern with an estimated incidence of less than 0.01 to 0.08 cases.  Should a 
patient have lactic acidosis attributable to metformin, the drug can be removed by 
hemodialysis.  Other contraindications to the use of metformin include concurrent liver disease 
and a previous history of lactic acidosis.  Oral therapy will also be stopped if the blood lactate 
concentration is substantially increased by any illness.  Oral therapy will be temporarily 
suspended for all major surgical procedures that involve restriction of fluid intake.  Metformin 
and combined metformin plus DPP4 inhibitors are classified as United States Food and Drug 
Administration category B drugs (i.e., "no evidence of risk in humans").  This means that, while 
there is no evidence of teratogenesis or adverse fetal effects, insufficient data exist to state that 
harm does not occur.  Metformin does cross the placenta, prompting a cautious approach to its 
use in pregnancy.  There have been several published reports of the use of metformin during 
pregnancy, predominantly in women with insulin resistance and PCOS.  Some clinicians 
routinely use metformin to treat diabetes in pregnant women.  However, most experts believe 
that if medication is needed to control blood sugar during pregnancy, insulin is the drug of 
choice, not an oral antihyperglycemic agent.  If patients become pregnant during the study, 
metformin will be stopped immediately. 
For safety, all subjects who enter the study are evaluable.  Subjects will be monitored 
for safety by assessment of adverse events, physical exams, vital signs and laboratory values.  
Continued patient safety assessment will be carried out and all adverse events documented and 
reported to the WHIRB.  On each visit, compliance with treatment will be checked with 
questions about the side-effects and a subjective evaluation of the tolerability of the 
administered drug; the patients will also asked about incidental missed administrations. 
Adverse Event Procedures    
 
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study 
subject administered a pharmaceutical product, and which does not necessarily have a causal 
relationship with the treatment.  An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable or 
unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease that is 
temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not it is considered 


 
10
related to that product.  All observed or volunteered adverse events regardless of treatment 
group or suspected causal relationship to study drug will be recorded in the patient’s record.  
Events involving adverse drug reactions, illnesses with onset during the study, or exacerbations 
of pre-existing illnesses will be recorded.  Exacerbation of pre-existing illness may include 
worsening or increase in severity of signs or symptoms of the illness, increase in frequency of 
signs and symptoms of an intermittent illness, or the appearance of a new 
manifestation/complication.  Exacerbation of a pre-existing illness should be considered when a 
patient/subject requires new or additional concomitant drug or non-drug therapy for the 
treatment of that illness during the trial.  Lack of or insufficient clinical response, benefit, 
efficacy, therapeutic effect, or pharmacologic action, will not be recorded as an adverse event.  
The investigator will make the distinction between exacerbation of pre-existing illness and lack 
of therapeutic efficacy.  In addition, clinically significant changes in physical examination 
findings and abnormal objective test findings (e.g., laboratory, x-ray, ECG) will also be recorded 
as adverse events.  Any abnormal test result that is determined to be an error does not require 
reporting as an adverse event.   
In order to avoid vague, ambiguous, or colloquial expressions, the adverse event term 
will be recorded using standard medical terminology rather than the subject’s own words.  
Every attempt will be made to describe the adverse event in terms of a diagnosis.  All related 
signs, symptoms and abnormal test results will be grouped together as a diagnosis if applicable 
and recorded as a single adverse event.  All adverse events will be evaluated for intensity and 
causal relationship with use of the study medication.  For all adverse events, sufficient 
information should be obtained by the investigator to determine the causality of the adverse 
event (i.e., study drug or other illness).  Follow-up of the adverse event, after the date of 
therapy discontinuation, is required if the adverse event or its sequelae persist.  Follow-up is 
required until the event or its sequelae resolve or stabilize at a level acceptable to the 
investigator or his/her designated representative.  Clinically significant changes, in the 
judgment of the investigator, in physical examination findings (abnormalities) will be recorded 
as adverse events.  All subjects who have adverse events, whether or not the adverse events 
are considered associated with the use of the study medication, will be monitored until the 
adverse event resolves, stabilizes, or becomes chronic.  The clinical course of the adverse event 
will be followed according to accepted standards of medical practice, even after the end of the 
observation period, until a satisfactory explanation for the adverse event is found or the 
investigator considers it medically justifiable to terminate follow-up.  
SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS:  A SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENT (SAE) IS ANY ADVERSE DRUG 
EXPERIENCE OCCURRING AT ANY DOSE THAT: 
1. 
results in death; 


 
11
2. 
is life-threatening (adverse drug experience that places the patient/subject at 
immediate risk of death from the reaction as it occurred, i.e., it does not include a reaction that, 
had it occurred in a more severe form, might have caused death); 
3. 
results in inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; 
4. 
results in a persistent or significant disability/incapacity (defined as a substantial 
disruption of a person’s ability to conduct normal life functions); or 
5. 
results in congenital anomaly/birth defect. 
6. 
Important medical events that may not result in death, be life-threatening, or require 
hospitalization may be considered serious adverse drug experiences when, based upon 
appropriate medical judgment, they may jeopardize the patient/subject and may require 
medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed in this definition.  
Examples of such medical events include allergic bronchospasm requiring intensive treatment 
in an emergency room or at home, blood dyscrasias or convulsions that do not result in 
inpatient hospitalization, or the development of drug dependency or drug abuse 
 
The term “severe” is often used to describe the intensity (severity) of a specific event (as 
in mild, moderate, or severe pain); the event itself, however, may be of relatively minor medical 
significance (such as severe headache).  By contrast, the term “serious” is used to describe an 
event based on an event outcome or actions usually associated with events that pose a threat 
to a patient’s life or functioning.  Seriousness (not severity) serves as a guide for defining 
regulatory reporting obligations.  The collection of serious adverse event information will begin 
at the signing of informed consent and continue through 30 days after administration of the 
last dose of study medication.  Regardless of the above criteria, any additional adverse 
experiences which an investigator considers serious should be immediately reported.  If an SAE 
occurs, the investigator should initiate appropriate support procedures. 
All serious adverse events regardless of treatment group or suspected relationship to 
study drug must be reported to MedWatch in an expedited manner.  The investigator will 
determine expectedness by referring to the most current version of the Investigator’s Brochure 
in conjunction with any sponsor-generated IND Safety Reports.  Since the trial is being 
conducted under a physician’s IND, Drs. Paterson and Elkind-Hirsch are responsible for 
submitting all IND Safety Reports to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).  The FDA 3500A 
Form 
with 
built-in 
instructions 
will 
be 
downloaded 
at: 
http://www.fda.gov/medwatch/getforms.htm.  They will also be reported immediately to the 
Woman’s Hospital Foundation Institutional Review Board at (225) 924-8516 and Woman’s 
Health Research Institute at (225) 231-5275.  After submitting an expedited MedWatch 3500A 
report to the FDA, a courtesy copy will be sent by fax to NovoNordisk.  NovoNordisk Safety 
personnel may fax a follow-up form to the study site to request additional information or 
clarification of information that was included on the FDA 3500A Report.  Queries that address 
medical issues must be signed by a medically qualified (MD, DO) principal or sub-investigator.  


 
12
In cases where the investigator learns of the SAE after its occurrence and resolution, the time 
and circumstances of the event will be recorded.  The reporting requirements will still be 
followed. 
Any serious adverse event or death will be reported immediately independent of the 
circumstances or suspected cause if it occurs or comes to the attention of the investigator at 
any time during the study through the last follow-up visit required by the protocol or 30 days 
after the last administration of study drug, whichever comes later.  Any serious adverse event 
occurring at any other time after completion of the study will be promptly reported if a causal 
relationship to study drug is suspected.  The only exception to these reporting requirements are 
serious adverse events that occur during a pre-randomization/washout run-in period, during 
which placebo alone or no active study drug or no protocol-specified background drug is 
administered.  
Discontinuations 
The reason for a subject discontinuing from the study will be recorded in the patient 
chart.  A discontinuation occurs when an enrolled subject ceases participation in the study, 
regardless of the circumstances, prior to completion of the protocol.  The investigator must 
determine the primary reason for discontinuation.  Withdrawal due to adverse event will be 
distinguished from withdrawal due to insufficient response according to the definition of 
adverse event noted earlier.  The final evaluation required by the protocol will be performed at 
the time of study discontinuation.  The investigator will record the reason for study 
discontinuation, provide or arrange for appropriate follow-up (if required) for such subjects, 
and document the course of the subject’s condition.  They will also to be reported to Woman’s 
Hospital Foundation Institutional Review Board at (225) 924-8516 and Woman’s Health 
Research Institute at (225) 231-5275.  
 
Statistical Evaluation 
    A priori sample size analysis was performed using the online calculator provided by the 
Massachusetts 
General 
Hospital 
Mallinckrodt 
General 
Clinical 
Research 
Center 
(http://hedwig.mgh.harvard.edu/sample_size/size.html).  The primary outcome is comparison 
in β-cell compensatory function between prior GDM women treated with sitagliptin-metformin, 
metformin or placebo using a Ss/Groups by repeated measures ANOVA in which the effects of 
drug intervention (12-14 weeks at full dose) between the 3 treatment groups will be analyzed  
Given there were no previous studies utilizing sitagliptin or combination treatment for previous 
GDM women, sample size analysis was based on the assumption that the smallest mean 
difference between treatment groups is 20% with an average SD of 12%;  the sample size with a 
statistical power of 0.80 and two-sided P-value <0.05 is calculated to be 10 for each group. The 
study is designed to recruit 12 patients in each arm to ensure that the number of subjects 
completing the study as derived by the sample size calculation is met.  Data will be analyzed on 


 
13
the basis of intention to treat and also on completed treatment parameters where relevant.  
The intent-to-treat population (ITT) is defined as all randomized subjects who received one oral 
dose of medication starting from the evening of day 1.  The evaluable population is defined as 
all randomized subjects who complete treatment through week 14- 16 (12-14 weeks full dose). 
     The primary outcome measure is β-cell compensatory function and secondary outcome 
measures include changes in insulin sensitivity and early pancreatic ß-cell response, glycemic 
parameters (fasting blood glucose [FBG] and 2 hour glucose after a 75-g OGTT), mean blood 
glucose (MBG), anthropometric parameters, blood pressure and lipid profiles.  The normality of 
all variables will be checked using the Kolmogorov-Smirov test.  When necessary, non-normally 
distributed data will be subjected to logarithmic or square-root transformation to obtain a 
normal distribution before group comparison.  Direct and indirect estimates of insulin 
sensitivity and secretion (HOMA, SIOGTT, IGI/HOMA and ß-cell compensatory), glycemic 
parameters (FBG, MBG, 2 hour post OGTT glucose level) anthropometric measurements (body 
weight, BMI), fat distribution (WC, WHR and WHtR), BP and lipid profiles will be considered as 
dependent variables.  For all analyses, in which the measures are continuous, data from 
evaluable subjects will be submitted to a repeated-measures general linear model (SS/ Drug 
treatments x repeated measures ANOVA) including the arm of drug treatment as the between-
subjects effect, and the visit (baseline and 16 wks.) as the within-subjects effect.  To evaluate 
the differences in the response to each treatment over visits, the interaction effect will be 
calculated.  Only where a statistically significant interaction effect is found (P 0.05) will the 
contrast test applied to locate the differences between the 3 medication groups.  Baseline 
comparisons between groups (intent-to treat population) will be made by one-way ANOVAs 
and post hoc comparisons performed with the Bonferroni-Dunn test to analyze the variation 
among the three groups if the ANOVA shows overall baseline differences were significant 
(p<0.05).  Dysglycemia occurrence before and after different treatment will be compared with 
the McNemar test (complex chi square for paired data), which formally tests for a change 
between the observed proportions of k related samples.  Results will be reported as mean +/- 
S.E.M unless otherwise noted.  Calculations will be performed using SPSS for Windows (version 
11.01, SPSS, Inc.; Chicago, Ill).   
 
Additional Information 
Woman’s Hospital is one of the largest, not-for-profit women’s specialty hospitals in the 
United States.  The hospital‘s most valuable asset is its patient population.  Woman’s statistics 
of over 8400 births (2012), 75,000 pap smears, 47,000 mammograms, 300,000 lab tests, and 
13,000 biopsies annually in a centralized location make it ideal for clinical research studies in 
women’s health.  The ethnic mix is about 60% Caucasian and 40% African American.  In the 
calendar year of 2012, 704 patients with gestational diabetes delivered at Woman’s hospital.  
The rate of GDM was 8.4% for the year 2012. 


 
14
The Physician Office Building, which is on the hospital campus, offices approximately 65 
private obstetrician-gynecologist offices that actively participate in Woman’s Health Research 
Institute clinical trials and encourage patient participation.  This study will utilize the research 
staff (nurses, physicians, PhD) of the Woman’s Hospital Metabolic Health Clinic and Health 
Research Department for recruitment and patient consenting.  The Woman’s Hospital 
Pathology laboratory facility will be utilized for all metabolic and glucose tolerance testing.  
Study administrative work (IRB approval and updates) and statistical analyses will be done 
through the Woman’s Health Research Department.  The staff of the Woman’s Metabolic 
Health Clinic will be used for all patient follow-up, medication instruction and medical care. 
 


 
15
References (in order of citation) 
1. 
Metzger BE, Buchanan TA, Coustan DR, et al.  Summary and recommendations of the 
Fifth International Workshop—Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 
2007; 30: S251–S260. 
2. 
M.M. Engelgau, W.H. Herman, P.S. Smith, R.R. German and R.E. Aubert.  The 
epidemiology of diabetes and pregnancy in the U.S., 1988, Diabetes Care 1995; 18: 1029–
1033.  
3. 
Bian X, Gao P, Xiong X, Xu H, Qian M, Liu S.  Risk factors for development of diabetes 
mellitus in women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus. Chin Med J (Engl) 
2000;113:759-762 
4. 
Damm P. Gestational diabetes mellitus and subsequent development of overt diabetes 
mellitus. Dan Med Bull 1998; 45:495-509. 
5. 
Pallardo F, Herranz L, Garcia-Ingelmo T.  Early postpartum metabolic assessment in 
women with prior gestational diabetes. Diabetes Care 1999; 22:1053-1058. 
6. 
Hanna F, Peters JR. Screening for gestational diabetes; past, present and future. Diabet 
Med 2002; 19; 351–358. 
7. 
Catalano PM, Kirwan JP, Haugel-De Mouzon S, King J.  Gestational diabetes and insulin 
resistance: role in short- and long-term implications for mother and fetus. J Nutr 2003; 
133,1674S–1683S. 
8. 
Peters RK, Kjos SL, Xiang A et al.  Long term diabetogenic effect of single pregnancy in 
women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus, Lancet 1996; 347: 227–230.  
9. 
Kim C, Berger DK, Chamany S. Recurrence of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic 
review. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 1314-1319 
10. Kjos S, Buchanan T, Greenspoon J, Montoro M, Bernstein G, Mestman J: Gestational 
diabetes mellitus: the prevalence of glucose intolerance and diabetes mellitus in the first 
two months postpartum. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 93–98. 
11. Russell MA, Phipps MG, Olson CL, Welch HG, Carpenter MW.  Rates of postpartum 
glucose testing after gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108:1456-1462 
12. Nelson AL, Hien Le MH, Musherraf Z, et al. Intermediate-term glucose tolerance in 
women with a history of gestational diabetes: natural history and potential associations 
with breastfeeding and contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198( 6); 699.e1-699.e8 
13. Dornhorst A, Bailey PC, Anyaoku V, Elkeles RS, Johnston DG 7 Beard RW 1990 
Abnormalities of glucose tolerance following gestational diabetes. Quart J of Med 77, 1219-
1228 
14. Buchanan T. A. Xiang and R.K. Peters et al.  Preservation of pancreatic beta-cell function 
and prevention of type 2 diabetes by pharmacological treatment of insulin resistance in 
high-risk Hispanic women, Diabetes 2002; 51: 2796–2803.  
15. Gerstein H., S. Yusuf and J. Bosch et al.  DREAM (Diabetes REduction Assessment with 
ramipril and rosiglitazone Medication) Trial Investigators.  Effect of rosiglitazone on the 
frequency of diabetes in patients with impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting 
glucose: a randomized controlled trial.  Lancet 2006; 368: 1096-1105. 
16. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group:  The Diabetes Prevention Program: 
Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin.  N 
Engl J Med 2002; 346: 393–403. 


 
16
17. Buchanan TA.  How can we prevent type 2 diabetes?  Diabetes 2007; 56: 1502–1507. 
18. Ratner RE, Christophi CA, Metzger BE, Dabelea D, Bennett PH, Pi-Sunyer X, Fowler S, 
Kahn SE Prevention of diabetes in women with a history of gestational diabetes: effects of 
metformin and lifestyle interventions. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008; 93: 4774–4779. 
19. Xiang AH, Peters RK, Kjos SL, Goico J, Ochoa C, Marroquin A, Tan S, Hodis HN, Azen SP, 
Buchanan TA.  Pharmacological treatment of insulin resistance at two different stages in the 
evolution of type 2 diabetes: impact on glucose tolerance and β-cell function. J Clin 
Endocrinol Metab 2004; 89: 2846–2851. 
20. Drucker DJ, Nauck MA The incretin system: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists 
and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes. Lancet 2006; 368: 1696– 1705. 
21. Nauck MA, Heimesaat MM, Behle K, Holst JJ, Nauck MS, Ritzel R, Hüfner M, Schmiegel 
WH. Effects of glucagon-like peptide 1 on counterregulatory hormone responses, cognitive 
functions, and insulin secretion during hyperinsulinemic, stepped hypoglycemic clamp 
experiments in healthy volunteers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002; 87: 1239– 1246 
22. Brubaker PL, Drucker DJ.  Minireview: glucagon-like peptides regulate cell proliferation 
and apoptosis in the pancreas, gut, and central nervous system. Endocrinology 2004; 145: 
2653– 2659. 
23. Nauck MA, Heimesaat MM, Ørskov C, Holst JJ, Ebert R, Creutzfeldt W.  Preserved 
incretin activity of glucagon-like peptide 1 [7-36 amide] but not of synthetic human gastric 
inhibitory polypeptide in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest 1993; 91: 301– 
307. 
24. Wettergren A, Schjoldager B, Mortensen PE, Myhre J, Christiansen J, Holst JJ.  Truncated 
GLP-1 (proglucagon 78-107-amide) inhibits gastric and pancreatic functions in man. Dig Dis 
Sci 1993; 38: 665– 673. 
25. Flint A, Raben A, Astrup A, Holst JJ. Glucagon-like peptide-1 promotes satiety and 
suppresses energy intake in humans. J Clin Invest 1998; 101: 515– 520 
26. Zander M, Madsbad S, Madsen JL, Holst JJ. Effect of 6-week course of glucagon-like 
peptide 1 on glycaemic control, insulin sensitivity, and beta-cell function in type 2 diabetes: 
a parallel-group study. Lancet 2002; 359: 824– 830. 
27. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis 
model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and 
insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28(7):412-419 
28. Matsuda M, DeFronzo RA. Insulin sensitivity indices obtained from oral glucose 
tolerance testing: comparison with the euglycemic insulin clamp. Diabetes Care. 
1999;22(9):1462-1470 
29. Kosaka K, Kuzuya T, Hagura R, Yoshinaga H. Insulin response to oral glucose load is 
consistently decreased in established non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: the 
usefulness of decreased early insulin response as a predictor of non-insulin-dependent 
diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 1996;13(9 Suppl 6):S109-119 
30. DeFronzo RA, Tripathy D, Schwenke DC, et al. ACT NOW Study. Pioglitazone for diabetes 
prevention in impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med 2011; 364:1104-115.