Conditions: Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection
Keywords: Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection Postmenopausal Vaginal Estrogen
Allocation: RANDOMIZED | Intervention model: PARALLEL
Enrollment: 35
Healthy volunteers: no

Brief summary:
The investigators would like to know if the use of vaginally applied estrogen can prevent the problem of repeated urinary tract infections (UTI) in women who have gone through menopause. The investigators will use two forms of vaginal estrogen that are available by prescription (a ring and a cream) and compare their efficacy to that of a placebo (without any active ingredient). The investigators are going to look at if the vaginal estrogen can prevent UTIs altogether and also the number of UTIs each group experiences over a 6 month period. After 6 months, all subjects will receive vaginal estrogen and the women on the non-active treatment will be able to choose whether they would like to use either the estrogen ring or cream. The investigators will then be able to compare the number of UTIs on and off active vaginal estrogen treatment within those subjects who started on the placebo. The investigators are also going to look at quality of life before and during treatment using questionnaires and whether subjects stop using the treatments or do not use them as directed (compliance).

Detailed description:
This was an investigator-initiated, multicenter, single-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial of vaginal estrogen (delivered by estradiol ring or conjugated estrogen cream) compared to placebo cream. This study was conducted by the Divisions of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery at three academic institutions.

Potential participants were recruited from women receiving care for rUTIs in the clinics of each institution. Women were postmenopausal as defined by amenorrhea for \>12 months, history of bilateral salpingoophrectomy, or in patients with prior hysterectomy defined as menopausal symptoms for \>1 year or age \>55. Participants had documented rUTI (three or more in one year or two in six months) by positive urine culture. Participants were excluded if they had undergone urologic surgery within three months of screening or planned surgery within one year of screening, had the diagnosis of painful bladder syndrome, history of UTI requiring the use of intravenous antibiotics or one oral antibiotic available for treatment based on allergies and resistance profiles, known etiology of infections (e.g. urologic stones, fistulas, fecal incontinence, catheterization or poorly controlled diabetes), urothelial cancer, or actively treated estrogen sensitive tumor. Participant enrollment was deferred in the setting of undiagnosed hematuria or vaginal bleeding, but enrollment could occur after negative workup for malignancy. Participants deferred enrollment if they used vaginal androgens, estrogens or progestins within six months or if they used medications or supplements known to prevent UTI (e.g. cranberry products, D mannose, prophylactic antibiotics, methenamine hippurate) within three months of enrollment, but could enroll after washout. Those with a remote history of estrogen-sensitive tumor required approval by her oncologist or primary care physician.

Participants were initially randomized to receive either vaginal estrogen (via estradiol ring or conjugated estrogen cream) or placebo cream in a 1:1:1 fashion and were told that there were placebo and vaginal estrogen arms, but were unaware that there was not a placebo ring. Participants were randomized to either conjugated estrogen cream at a strength of 0.625 mg/g dosed at 0.5g (0.312 mg) twice a week, estradiol ring containing 2mg of estradiol placed vaginally every three months by study personnel, or placebo cream which was an over-the-counter lubricant containing mineral oil, petrolatum, ceresin and paraffin dosed at 0.5g twice a week. If participants in any arm developed three UTI in the six-month treatment period, they were unblinded. If on placebo, they were provided active study drug or if they were in the vaginal estrogen arm, they were treated according to the provider's clinical practice and their outcomes recorded for the remainder of the study. The primary outcome of occurrence of UTI was assessed at six months or the end of study blinding, whichever occurred first. In order to improve recruitment and assess long-term compliance, satisfaction and efficacy, we offered open label use of estradiol ring or conjugated estrogen cream after unblinding until month 12 of the study.

Clean-catch urine cultures were collected when participants were symptomatic: fever (\>38 degrees C), urgency, frequency, dysuria or suprapubic tenderness. Women were asked to have all urine labs done at the parent site as per standard clinical practice. The primary outcome of the study was the presence of a UTI in the randomized six months. We also assessed rates of UTI over the course of the 12-month study in all participants as-treated. Quality of life (QOL) questionnaires were administered at baseline, six months or unblinding, and 12 months. Questionnaires included the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20), Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), Medical, Epidemiologic, and Social Aspects of Aging Questionnaire (MESA), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ), Global Perception of Improvement (GPI) and Estimated Percent Improvement (EPI) rating scales. Baseline medical history and concomitant pelvic medicine diagnoses were also collected. Participants using a cream treatment were asked to keep medication diaries and return tubes for weighing at months three, six, nine and 12. Adherence was defined as presence of the estrogen ring or tube weights within 20% of expected at follow up visits. In addition, before unblinding, the participants were asked whether they believed they were on active treatment, placebo, or were unsure.

Arms:
arm 1: Conjugated estrogen vaginal cream 0.5g per vagina 2 times weekly arm 2: Estradiol Ring per vagina every 3 months arm 3: Per vagina

Interventions: intervention 1: Conjugated Estrogen Vaginal Cream intervention 2: Estradiol Ring intervention 3: Placebo
Intervention descriptions: intervention 1: None intervention 2: None intervention 3: None

Protocol document:
Prot_SAP_000.pdf: 
Vaginal Estrogen for the Prevention of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection in 
Postmenopausal Women 
 
NCT01958073 
 
Date of Research Plan: February 21, 2017 


 
 
UCSD Human Research Protections Program 
New Biomedical Application 
RESEARCH PLAN 
Instructions for completing the Research Plan are available on the HRPP website. 
The headings on this set of instructions correspond to the headings of the Research Plan. 
General Instructions: Enter a response for all topic headings.  
Enter “Not Applicable” rather than leaving an item blank if the item does not apply to this project. 
Version date: 05/11/2011 
1. 
PROJECT TITLE 
Vaginal Estrogen for the Prevention of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection in Postmenopausal 
Women 
 
2. 
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR  
Emily Lukacz, MD 
 
3. 
FACILITIES 
UCSD, Thornton Campus 
New York University, 150 E 32nd Street, New York, NY 
 
4. 
ESTIMATED DURATION OF THE STUDY 
4 years 
 
5. 
LAY LANGUAGE SUMMARY OR SYNOPSIS (no more than one paragraph) 
We would like to know if the use of vaginally applied estrogen can prevent the problem of repeated urinary 
tract infections (UTI) in women who have gone through menopause. We will use two forms of vaginal estrogen 
that are available by prescription (a ring and a cream) and compare their efficacy to that of a commercially 
available cream without any active ingredient. We are going to look at if the vaginal estrogen can prevent UTIs 
altogether and also the number of UTIs each group experiences over a 6 month period. After 6 months, all 
subjects will receive vaginal estrogen and the women will be able to choose which form of vaginal estrogen 
(ring or cream) they would like to use. We will then be able to compare the number of UTIs on and off active 
vaginal estrogen treatment within those subjects who started on the cream without estrogen. We are also 
going to look at quality of life before and during treatment using questionnaires and whether subjects stop 
using the treatments or do not use them as directed (compliance). Additionally, urine and vaginal swab 
specimens will be collected and processed for bacterial 16s rRNA characterization at baseline and after 
treatment.  
 
6. 
SPECIFIC AIMS 
Primary Objective 
The primary purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of vaginal estrogen versus placebo at 6 months on 
the prevention of urinary tract infections (UTI) in postmenopausal women with history of recurrent UTI. 
 
Secondary Objectives 
[1]  
a] To assess overall rates of UTI over 6 months in postmenopausal women with history of recurrent 
UTI receiving vaginal estrogen (ring or cream). 
b] To compare rates of UTI between 6 and 12 months of those subjects initially randomized to placebo. 
[2] To assess the impact of treatment of recurrent UTI with vaginal estrogen on quality of life at 6 and 12 
months in postmenopausal women with history of recurrent UTI. 
[3] To assess compliance with vaginal estrogen (ring or cream) treatment at 12 months in postmenopausal 
women with history of recurrent UTI. 
[4] To assess efficacy of vaginal estrogen at 12 months in those compliant with treatment. 
 
Primary Hypothesis 
Vaginal estrogen (ring and cream) will be superior to placebo in the prevention of UTI at 6 months of treatment 
in postmenopausal women with a history of recurrent UTI. 
 
Secondary Hypotheses 
[1]  
a] Overall rates of UTI in the first 6 month period in those women receiving vaginal estrogen will be 


 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 2 
lower compared to those receiving placebo. 
b] Rates of UTI will decrease between 6 and 12 months for those initially on placebo and subsequently 
using estrogen. 
[2] Vaginal estrogen will result in improved QOL in postmenopausal women with history of recurrent UTI. 
a] compared to placebo at 6 months.  
b] compared to baseline at 12 months. 
[3] Adherence with vaginal ring will be superior to cream. 
[4] At 6 and12 months, vaginal estrogen will be effective at preventing UTI in those adherent to therapy. 
 
7. 
BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE 
Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection 
Recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) in postmenopausal women is common, negatively affects the quality of 
life for millions and has significant impact on health care delivery [1]. The annual social cost of UTIs has been 
estimated at 1.6 billion dollars with 11.3 million prescriptions written for treatment [2]. Up to 15% of women 
over 60 will develop frequent UTIs [3]. This number increases to 20% over the age of 65 and between 25-50% 
of patients 80 years of age and older experience bacteruria [4]. Recurrent UTI is defined as three or more UTIs 
in 12 months or two UTIs in 6 months [5]. The pathogenesis of recurrent UTI in postmenopausal women may 
in part be related to the declining levels of systemic estrogen after menopause. This change causes 
differences in the bacterial flora of the vagina due to increasing vaginal pH, resulting in colonization by 
uropathogens (escherichia coli and enterococcus) as opposed to the normal lactobacillus flora seen in 
premenopausal women. While not entirely clear, the general consensus is that this vaginal colonization with 
enteric bacteria leads to more frequent UTIs [6]. Thus, a common therapy for prevention of recurrent UTI is 
topical vaginal estrogen. While commonly used in practice, there is a paucity of data on the efficacy of vaginal 
estrogen for the prevention of recurrent UTI in currently prescribed vehicles and doses.   
 
Vaginal Estrogen 
There are a number of modes of delivery for vaginal estrogen (full and low dose) such as tablets (Vagifem™), 
creams (Estrace™ and Premarin™) and vaginal rings (Estring™ and Femring™). After safety concerns raised 
by the Women’s Health Initiative, use of hormones is a concern for both patients and practitioners regarding 
the use of these compounds by any method. As such, the goals of treatment with hormones are to identify the 
minimum dose of therapy needed to achieve benefit. Given concerns regarding systemic hormone 
replacement therapy (HRT), topical dosing has become the mainstay of local therapy for vaginal 
atrophy/dyspareunia. Vagifem™, Estring™, Estrace™ and Premarin™ cream have been FDA approved for the 
treatment of atrophic vulva, atrophy of the vagina, urethral atrophy [7]. Circulating levels of estradiol have been 
shown to be minimal with low dose vaginal estrogen creams, tablets and the estrogen ring [6, 8]. Thus, 
systemic effects from these low dose topical therapies are felt to be extremely low. With the estrogen ring, 
serum estradiol increased from a baseline of 16+22 pmol/l to 49+64 pmol/l at week 24, then fell to 20+19 
pmol/l by week 48 [10]. With administration of 0.5g twice weekly,serum estradiol increased from a baseline of 
15+33 pmol/l to 36+51 pmol/l at week 24 and remained there at week 48 [10]. These levels are substantially 
than the upper limit of normal (130 pmol/l) for postmenopausal women. The other concern with any unopposed 
estrogen is endometrial safety. There have been several large studies that have established endometrial 
safety of various low-dose formulations of vaginal estrogen (Vagifem™, Estring™ and conjugated estrogen 
cream at a dose of 0.3mg) [9-11]. Controlled studies of more than 1,000 women on unopposed estrogen ring 
and estrogen cream at doses proposed in this study have not identified any endometrial cancers. With low 
systemic absorption and no significant increase in endometrial pathology with low dose vaginal estrogen, it is 
generally thought that the use of progestins is not necessary to protect the endometrium [12]. Additionally, 
because systemic absorption is minimal, it can be assumed that there should not be an effect on patients with 
breast cancer, however, the data is limited [13]. Topical, low dose vaginal estrogen is in general well tolerated, 
with dropout rates of 7 and 8% in prior studies with the ring and cream respectively. Only reported adverse 
events significantly higher than placebo was breast pain, however, the incidence of this is low [13]. Other 
reported adverse events in uncontrolled observational studies include vaginal bleeding, which occurred rarely 
in one study, however, endometrial sampling in those women with vaginal bleeding revealed no evidence of 
hyperplasia or malignancy[14].  


 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 3 
 
While no formulation of vaginal estrogen is approved for prevention of UTIs, it is commonly used “off label”. 
The theory is that recurrent UTIs in postmenopausal women are directly a result of vaginal atrophy. The 
hypothesis behind its efficacy involves re-estrogenizing the vaginal mucosa, although it does not lead to 
premenopausal circulating levels of estradiol, leads to local effects on the balance of bacterial flora mimicking 
premenopausal states. In premenopausal women, the vagina is colonized by lactobacilli which result in a low 
vaginal pH and inhibits overgrowth of other bacteria. In postmenopausal states the vaginal pH is increased 
which allows overgrowth of pathogens. Previous trials with vaginal estrogen have shown that vaginal estrogen 
administration changes the pH of the vagina to premenopausal states, resulting in restoration of the bacterial 
balance [15]. However, this study examined higher doses of estrogen cream (0.5mg daily for 2 weeks followed 
by twice a week, as opposed to current dosing of 0.3125 mg twice a week) and only explored one preparation.   
 
UTI definitions  
There is debate over the optimal definition for recurrent UTI. In general, the most commonly accepted 
definition is the presence of 3 or more symptomatic UTI in 1 year or 2 in 6 months [16]. Symptomatic UTI has 
been defined by the Center for Disease Control (CDC) as a combination of signs, symptoms and laboratory 
measures. We will use this definition of UTI for our primary outcome: individuals experiencing at least one 
symptom (fever >38 degrees C, urgency, frequency, dysuria OR suprapubic tenderness) AND a positive urine 
culture that is > 10 ^5 microorganisms per milliliter (mL) of urine with no more than 2 species of 
microorganisms. Alternatively, if the specimen is collected via catheterization, a culture as low as 10 ^3 
microorganisms per mL of urine will be considered positive. Given that guidelines do not require primary care 
physicians to obtain urine cultures to diagnose a urinary tract infection, we will only require one positive urine 
culture and the other urinary tract infections may be diagnosed with urinalysis. From a practical and clinical 
standpoint, UTIs are generally diagnosed based on symptoms, urine analysis and/or culture and rarely are 
catheterized specimens collected in routine practice. Thus, presence of UTI will be determined using 
symptoms and a positive clean-catch culture as the primary outcome unless a patient cannot obtain a clean 
catch (in which case we will use a catheterized specimen). In order to minimize false positives, urine will be 
placed in preservative within 10 min of collection. Urine cultures are up to 95% sensitive and 99% specific at 
diagnosing UTI [17].  
 
• Innovation 
Given the high prevalence of recurrent UTI in the postmenopausal population, the growing elderly population 
and the increasing prevalence of multidrug resistant bacterial infections, prevention of UTI in this high-risk 
population is of utmost importance. Recurrent UTI does not currently have one accepted treatment and 
various regimens are used based on provider preference. One option is the use of cranberry, although a 
recent Cochrane review shows a smaller benefit than previously thought with cranberry performing similarly to 
placebo, water and no treatment (RR0.86, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.04) [18]. Other options include antibiotic 
suppression with daily treatment. Nitrofurantoin, cephalexin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole have all been 
proven effective at preventing recurrent UTI when taken daily for prophylaxis with success rates ranging from 
36-94% [19-22]. Patients who associate their UTIs with sexual intercourse have had 66-68% success with 
postcoital treatment with single dosing of antibiotic [23-25]. However, treating prophylactically with antibiotics 
has undesirable side effects such as promoting fungal infections, gastro intestinal flora upset, and resistance, 
making recurrent infections harder to treat. In addition, these antibiotics can have serious side effects including 
blood dyscrasias, pulmonary fibrosis, tendon rupture, peripheral neuropathy, hepato and renal toxicity.  
 
Prevention of recurrent urinary tract infection could greatly minimize the problems associated with chronic 
administration of antibiotics. While use of vaginal estrogen is often routine practice for prevention of UTI, only 
one study has ever explored using vaginal estrogen for this purpose in a randomized controlled trial and this 
study used a higher dose than currently used in clinical practice [15]. As such, there is no data on the efficacy 
of vaginal estrogen using modern doses and formulations. We hope that these results will help us better 
understand treatment for a disease where there is no ‘gold standard’. Using evidence from a randomized 
placebo controlled trial will allow us to definitively report on the efficacy of vaginal estrogen in the prevention of 
recurrent UTI and explore satisfaction, quality of life and efficacy between two commonly used preparations.  


 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 4 
8. 
PROGRESS REPORT 
We have completed enrollment.  
9. 
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS 
Overall Design 
This is an investigator initiated, multicenter, single blind, randomized placebo controlled trial of vaginal 
estrogen (delivered by ring or cream) compared to placebo control. During the blinded portion, subjects will be 
randomized to either receive vaginal estrogen (via ring or cream), or receive a placebo cream. Conjugated 
estrogen cream at a strength of 0.625mg/g and a dose of 0.5g (0.312 mg) twice a week will be used, as will 
estradiol ring containing 2mg of estradiol placed vaginally every 3 months. These two doses are standard 
clinical dosing based on FDA approved treatment of vaginal atrophy and result in similar vaginal effects. The 
placebo cream will be a commercially available over the counter oil based vaginal lubricant which is semi-solid 
at room temperature and contains no active ingredients. Primary outcome will be assessed at 6 months with 
vaginal estrogen group compared to the placebo control. However, in order to improve recruitment and assess 
long term compliance, satisfaction and efficacy in the as treated groups, we will offer open label use of ring or 
active cream after 6 months of blinded treatment. Those on placebo at 6 months will be allowed to choose 
which vaginal estrogen form (ring or cream) she would like to use for another 6 months and secondary 
outcomes captured after their 6 months of active treatment will be combined with those 6 month measures 
collected from those originally randomized to active therapy. Vaginal estrogen group will also be allowed to 
choose which administration (ring or cream) they would like to continue with at 6 months. Subjects will not be 
told which preparation is the placebo in order for them to remain blinded to treatment. Providers, however, will 
not be blind to this. We chose not to use a placebo ring, as we felt this could be a nidus for infection skewing 
the results and unnecessarily placing subjects at risk. We will attempt to minimize bias by having providers 
blinded to outcome measures and questionnaire responses. 
 
The primary outcome is occurrence of one or more symptomatic UTIs within 6 months of treatment. Subjects 
will perform a clean catch for a urine culture when they have symptoms of a UTI using the CDC definition of 
symptoms, as above. If the subject cannot perform a clean catch themselves, a provider may obtain a 
catheterized specimen as clinically indicated, in which case the threshold for bacterial count will decrease to 
10 ^3 microorganisms per mL. Secondary outcomes include assessing rate of UTI over the course of the year 
in those women who received placebo and then vaginal estrogen, as well as comparing the rates of UTI in the 
placebo and vaginal estrogen group. Quality of life (QOL) questionnaires will be administered at baseline, at 
the end of randomization and at drop out or 12 months. There are no validated questionnaires that assess UTI 
specifically, therefore we have chosen questionnaires which relate to general QOL, as well as those which 
include symptoms similar to that of UTI. In addition, we know that vaginal estrogen can treat dyspareunia, so 
we will capture sexual function. We will be using the SF 12, as well as the overactive bladder satisfaction 
questionnaire (OAB-SAT-q), the medical, epidemiological and social aspects of aging questionnaire (MESA), 
the urogenital distress inventory (UDI-6) and the female sexual function index (FSFI) along with the patient 
satisfaction global ratings: patient satisfaction question (PSQ), estimated percent improvement (EPI) and 
global perception of improvement (GPI). The SF 12 is a general quality of life questionnaire initially used to 
survey health status [26]. The OAB-SAT-q is a questionnaire evaluating satisfaction pertaining to overactive 
bladder symptom treatment, symptoms which are similar to those of a UTI [27]. The MESA questionnaire 
explores lower urinary tract symptoms [28]. The UDI-6 is the short form of the urogenital distress inventory 
which surveys life impact and symptom distress of urinary incontinence and related issues in women [29]. The 
FSFI is a validated questionnaire assessing female sexual function [30]. The PSQ, EPI and GPI are patient 
global ratings, satisfaction, perception of improvement and estimated percent improvement validated 
previously in the treatment of urinary incontinence [31]. These questionnaires will allow us to assess whether 
general quality of life, irritative urinary symptoms, as well as sexual function are improved by vaginal estrogen, 
which could occur secondary to the correction of atrophic vaginitis alone. We will also assess whether QOL 
changes when UTIs occur with less frequency and will assess overall patient satisfaction with treatment. We 
will also be evaluating adherence in each treatment arm. Adherence with creams will be assessed by 
medication diary and weighing the tubes at each 3 month visit and vaginal rings will be accounted for by 
confirming that the ring is still in place in the vagina and then exchanging it for the new ring. Adherence is 
defined as >80% usage.  


 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 5 
 
The open label portion of the study will start at month 6. All of those women using placebo cream will be 
allowed to choose a vaginal estrogen preparation to use for the remainder of the study (ring or cream). Those 
women initially randomized to vaginal estrogen will be allowed to choose which vaginal estrogen preparation 
they want to continue with. The rationale behind an open label portion of the study is an incentive to 
participate. Vaginal estrogen is available to patients via prescription, as an off label indication, but coverage for 
this therapy can be limited and treatment costly (up to $300 per prescription refill). The open label portion of 
the study should provide incentive for women to enroll when the study drug is already available, as will modest 
reimbursement for study visits. We will also be able to compare the rates of UTI in those women who received 
placebo initially to their rate of UTI on drug. 
 
Eligible women will be consented and block randomized using preset, opaque and sealed envelopes. These 
cards will either say “study drug 1, 2 or 3“ and will be placed in numbered envelopes in a random order and 
selected by study staff and dispensed to the subject. These drugs will be stored in a locked cabinet in the 
Female Pelvic Medicine clinic. After the subject receives her study drug, she will receive administration 
instructions. If the assigned treatment is a ring, the subject will have it placed by the provider, if it is a cream, 
the cream will be weighed at baseline and she will be shown how to place it vaginally herself and instructed on 
bringing the remaining study drug to each 3 month visit for weighing.  
 
 
 
Methodology 
Details of the Intervention 
Screening/Baseline 
Subject meets inclusion/exclusion criteria 
Estradiol Ring 
Conjugated Estrogen 
Cream 
Placebo Cream 
Choice of vaginal estrogen mode of treatment  (ring or active cream) 
Phone calls every month for first 3 months, visits & specimens every 3 months, questionnaires at baseline & at end of randomization, 
PRN UCx 
6 mo 
12 mo 
th f
3
d
f
If >3 
Visits every 3 months, questionnaires at drop out (if possible) or 12 months, PRN UCx 
Assess presence of UTI in first 6 months in placebo versus vaginal estrogen groups 
Assess rate of UTI in placebo then estrogen group, also compare placebo v estrogen in 
randomization period 
Compare QOL in placebo versus vaginal estrogen groups and within patient comparison of 
placebo first group 


 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 6 
Women will be randomized to one of the two vaginal estrogen arms or placebo in a 1:1:2 fashion. For those 
randomized to the ring, the ring will be placed by the provider in 3 month intervals at their visits. Subjects 
randomized to cream arm will receive 0.5g (0.312 mg) conjugated estrogen vaginal cream per vagina at 
bedtime two times per week. The placebo cream will be administered in a similar fashion. These cream tubes 
will be weighed at baseline and again at the every 3 month office visits to assess adherence. They will also be 
given diaries to keep track of their medication administration. Subjects will be called once a month for the first 
3 months by study personnel to assess for adverse events as well as UTI symptoms. After the first 3 months, a 
relationship will be established with study personnel and the participants will be encouraged to call with 
symptoms.  
 
Written quality of life questionnaires will be administered at baseline, at the end of randomization or 6 months 
and at drop out (if possible) or 12 months. The questionnaires include the OAB-SAT-q, MESA, UDI-6, FSFI 
and PSQ, GPI and EPI rating scales and are previously validated questionnaires referenced above in Overall 
Design [26-31]. These will assess global QOL, as well as irritative bladder symptoms and sexual function. We 
will also collect baseline data with respect to medical history and concomitant pelvic medicine diagnoses.  
 
Safety and Toxicity Measures 
If subjects in any arm develop 3 UTIs in the 6 month treatment period, they will be unblinded. If on placebo, 
they will be provided active study drug as would have been done at the 6 month visit or if they are on study 
drug, they will be treated according to the provider’s clinical practice and their outcomes recorded for the 
remainder of the study. Six month outcome assessments will be administered early to capture QOL data for 
the secondary analyses. We will also be monitoring for adverse events monthly with phone calls for the first 3 
months, specifically querying symptoms of pain, bleeding or abnormal discharge which would prompt 
evaluation for relatedness to study participation. Events related to participation will not be billed to insurance, 
however, any events which are part of routine clinical care (ie. UTI or other pelvic floor disorder treatment such 
as urinary incontinence) will be billed according to standard clinical care. After that subjects will be encouraged 
to call with any adverse reactions. Attribution of these events to study participation will be assigned by the 
investigator and reported to the IRB according to local policy. 
 
Outcomes 
The primary outcome will be the occurrence of symptomatic UTI within the 6 month treatment period. Clean 
catch urine culture will be collected whenever subjects report symptoms of a UTI: fever (>38 degrees C), 
urgency, frequency, dysuria or suprapubic tenderness. Standing orders for urine analysis and culture will be 
present at the local institution’s lab and women will be asked to have all urine labs done at the parent site as 
per standard clinical practice. If subjects are not able to submit a specimen to the local site, lab orders will be 
faxed to a local laboratory for collection and results sent to parent institution as per clinical care standards. 
Treatment will be up to the discretion of the treating physician. If they are unable to perform a clean catch, they 
may come in to the office for a catheterized specimen according to the treating physician’s clinical 
recommendations. As these cultures would be obtained regardless of study participation, they will be obtained 
and billed according to standard of care. The presence of a UTI in the 6 month window will be the primary 
outcome of the study, but secondarily we will assess the rate of UTIs over the course of the year that occur in 
order to assess efficacy. 
 
Other secondary outcomes include QOL questionnaires mentioned above. These will help us to look at 
changes in general QOL, as well as irritative bladder symptoms and sexual function, impacted by study drug. 
Adherence will also be assessed. We will weigh tubes of cream to determine adherence with creams, as well 
as collect medication diaries (adherence will be defined as >80% use as measured by weight of the vaginal 
cream tubes). For the ring, compliance will be assessed based on presence of the ring vaginally at 3 month 
visits.  
 
Analysis 
Sample Size Consideration 
The primary outcome is whether there is any occurrence of symptomatic UTI at the end of the randomized 


 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 7 
treatment period. Based on the literature [15] we assume that the rate of at least one UTI in the placebo group 
is 63%. With 20 subjects at the end of the randomized treatment period in each of the two treatment groups, 
we will have 80% power to detect a difference using Fisher’s exact test if the corresponding rate in an active 
treatment group is 16% [15] under a two-sided significance level of 0.05. A total sample size of 48 (24 subjects 
per group) will be needed allowing for 20% attrition seen to date in the study.  
Data Analysis 
Subject characteristics including baseline measures will be compared across the randomized groups using t-
test or chi-squared test (or their nonparametric / small sample counterparts) as appropriate, and will be 
adjusted in a regression model in addition to the primary comparisons above. It is known that even if the 
characteristics are balanced across the groups, such adjust can improve the efficiency of the comparisons 
[32]. For the secondary outcomes, frequencies (counts) of UTIs in the randomized period as well as the 
additional follow-up period will be compared between groups using a Poisson model; the QOL outcomes will 
be compared between groups using t-tests, and between baseline and 12 months within an active treatment 
group using paired t-test; adherence will be compared between the ring group and the active cream group as a 
dichotomous variable, with adherence for the latter group defined as >80%. While the primary comparisons 
are intent-to-treat, secondary comparisons will be carried out among those subjects who have adhered. In 
addition, for the variables that are collected at three or more time points, longitudinal data analysis will be 
performed using random effects models. As the attrition rate is expected to be as high as 20%, whether the 
missing data mechanism might be informative will be checking using methods such as those described by 
Ridout et al. [33] in case of informative (non-ignorable) missingness, sensitivity analysis will be carried out. 
10. 
HUMAN SUBJECTS 
Our total subject recruitment will be 48 subjects (assuming 20% drop out). However, if we do not such a drop 
out rate, once we reach 40 subjects total who have completed 6 months (achievement of the primary 
outcome), we will stop study enrollment. 
 
Target and Study Population  
The target population is postmenopausal women with the diagnosis of recurrent UTI as defined by 3 or more 
symptomatic UTIs within 1 year or 2 UTIs within 6 months. For purposes of this study, we will use the CDC 
definition of symptomatic UTI as defined above. Our study population will be selected from patients seen at the 
UCSD Women’s Pelvic Medicine clinic as well as those referred from primary care offices at UCSD and those 
subjects recruited from Researchmatch, Craigslist and approved flyers. In addition, New York University Pelvic 
Medicine Center will also be recruiting patients from their clinic once IRB approved. A total of 184 new patients 
were seen with a diagnosis of recurrent UTI between July 2011 to June 2012 at the Women’s Pelvic Medicine 
Clinic.   
 
Inclusion Criteria 
1. Postmenopausal status as defined by amenorrhea for >12 months, OR history of bilateral 
salpingoophrectomy, OR if the patient has had a hysterectomy defined by menopausal symptoms for 
>1 year OR age >55  
2. Recurrent UTIs (3 or more in the last year or 2 or more in the last 6 months). Patients must have one 
culture documented UTI, but the others may be documented by urinalysis.  
3. Ability to provide informed consent 
Exclusion Criteria 
1. Use of any investigational drug or device within thirty days of screening 
2. Urologic surgery within the past 3 months of screening or plan for surgery within one year of screening 
3. Diagnosis of Interstitial Cystitis/painful bladder syndrome 
4. History of urinary tract infections which require the use of IV antibiotics or where only one oral antibiotic 
is available for treatment, or where the risk of treatment with vaginal estrogen only is deemed 
unacceptable by the principle investigator secondary to the severity of prior urinary tract infections 
5. Known etiology of infection such as, but not limited to: kidney or bladder stones, enterovaginal/vesical 
fistula, fecal incontinence, intermittent catheterization, indwelling catheter, poorly controlled diabetes 
6. Urothelial cancer 
7. Actively treated estrogen sensitive tumor (breast or endometrial cancer) 


 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 8 
8. Undiagnosed vaginal bleeding 
9. Inability to use a vaginal ring (secondary to advanced prolapse or shortened vaginal length) 
10. Any medical reason the investigator deems incompatible with treatment with vaginal estrogen 
11. Prolapse requiring pessary use 
Deferral Criteria 
1. Undiagnosed hematuria – may enroll after malignancy is ruled out 
2. Use of a progestin containing intrauterine device or use of any vaginal androgens, estrogens or 
progestins within 3 months of enrollment – may enroll after wash out 
3. Use of drugs/supplements known to prevent UTIs (ie cranberry products, prophylactic antibiotics, 
methenamine hippurate) 1 month prior to enrollment – may enroll after wash out if still meets inclusion 
criteria. 
History of estrogen sensitive tumor (breast or endometrial cancer) – requires approval by the subject’s primary 
oncologist or primary care physician 
 
11. 
RECRUITMENT 
The subjects will be recruited from those patients referred to the Women’s Pelvic Medicine clinic at UCSD, 
Thornton campus. Patients are frequently referred to this clinic by primary care physicians when they have 
repeated UTIs We will also send out an email to primary care physicians to inform them of the study and post 
flyers in primary care offices. We will also place an advertisement on Craigslist (see separate document) and we 
will use ResearchMatch for recruitment (please see separate document for recruitment message).  
 
In addition, we will perform a search of the EPIC system to identify patients with the CPT code diagnosis of 
recurrent UTI and will contact their primary care physicians to inform them that their patient may be eligible for 
the study, allowing the primary care physicians to contact their own patients. This presents minimal risk to the 
patients as the diagnosis of recurrent urinary tract infection carries no stigma and their own physician would 
contact them about the study should they qualify. There will be no direct contact between the patients and the 
study staff, just between the study staff and the patients’ physicians. We are requesting a waiver of consent for 
recruitment purposes as a consent form would be the only document linking these patients to the study and 
would therefore subject them to more risk than the waiver of consent as there is a risk of breech of confidentiality 
by having the consent document. Because of the large number of patients seen in the UCSD Health System, it 
would not be practical to try to consent them all to look at their charts for the diagnosis of recurrent urinary tract 
infection.  
 
We are also requesting a partial waiver of HIPAA authorization. We will request a list of medical record numbers 
and names of patients with a diagnosis of recurrent urinary tract infections from EPIC. In addition, we will ask for 
the names of these patient’s listed primary care providers. This list will be sent electronically over encrypted mail 
and will be downloaded onto a secure password protected computer. The primary care physicians will then be 
sent an email with the name of the patient (again over secure, encrypted email) along with the already approved 
text informing them about the study, letting them know that their patient may qualify. As soon as these emails are 
sent out, we will destroy the electronic document. We anticipate this process will take about one week. Again, 
because of the large number of patients seen in the UCSD Health System, it would not be practical to try to 
obtain HIPAA authorization to look at their charts for the diagnosis of recurrent urinary tract infection. In addition, 
this could not be done without the use of PHI as we need to inform the primary care physicians the names and 
medical record numbers of the patients so that they can contact them should they feel it is appropriate. The 
contacted patients may greatly benefit from receiving potential treatment for their recurrent urinary tract infections 
through this study. The privacy risk to these patients is minimal given that only EPIC and study staff will see the 
list and this part of recruitment will be complete and the list destroyed within a week. Amendment was submitted 
in July 2013 to add recruitment flyers to UCSD primary care and gynecology clinics. 
 
Subjects will also be recruited at the NYU Pelvic Medicine Center where four collaborative board certified 
Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery attendings see their patients (similar to the Women’s Pelvic 
Medicine clinic at UCSD). Only deidentified data will be shared between the principal investigators at the sites. 
 


 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 9 
12. 
INFORMED CONSENT 
Women with recurrent UTI will be introduced to the study opportunity and referred to the physician investigator 
to be counseled about risks and benefits of enrollment in the study. Patients are typically approached for study 
participation in the context of their clinic visit and thus consent and study procedures are performed in a 
private setting as their clinic visit would be. The physician/investigator will explain in detail about the risks and 
benefits associated with participation in this study.  Patients will specifically be consented to randomization to 
a vaginal ring or one of two vaginal preparations. We will also request that they sign a separate authorization 
for the use of personal health information as this research is subject to HIPAA privacy rule provisions. Patients 
who are recruited from outside institutions must provide documentation of UTIs at their recruitment visit and 
must sign an authorization for the transfer of urine culture and urinalysis results from their healthcare center. 
 
13. 
ALTERNATIVES TO STUDY PARTICIPATION 
The patient may receive vaginal estrogen by prescription. Other therapies in the prevention of recurrent UTI 
include antibiotic prophylaxis, either postcoital or daily dosing. They may also use cranberry, such as the FDA 
approved drug Elura, or cranberry supplements along with probiotics. Alternatively, they may take 
methenamine hippurate daily which is a bactericidal turning urine to formaldehyde and ammonia. Notably, 
none of these alternative approaches have proven more effective than vaginal estrogen.  
 
14. 
POTENTIAL RISKS 
The potential risk to all subjects is continued UTI. However, if a subject has 3 UTIs in a 6 month period, we will 
unblind them and if they are on placebo, we will place them on study drug. If they are already on study drug, 
they will be treated according to the attending physician’s clinical practice and observed for the study.  
 
Risks of vaginal estrogen are not separated from oral hormone replacement therapy (HRT) estrogen on the 
package insert and state that the risks include thromboembolism, retinal thrombosis, heart attack, stroke, 
hypertension, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer, endometrial hyperplasia, uterine fibroid 
enlargement, hypercalcemia, cholestatic jaundice, pancreatitis, hepatic hemangioma enlargement, depression, 
dementia, migraine, chorea exacerbation, seizure exacerbation, asthma exacerbation, porphyria aggravation, 
systemic lupus erythematous exacerbation, anaphylaxis, erythema multiforme, erythema nodosum, ischemic 
colitis, intestinal obstruction, vaginal ulceration/erosion, toxic shock syndrome.  However, numerous studies of 
transvaginal dosing with significantly lower (less than 1/7) doses than typically administered for oral hormone 
therapy have failed to identify any of the risks associated with full strength oral HRT. As discussed in the 
background section above, there have been no reported cases of endometrial hyperplasia, breast or 
endometrial cancer and systemic levels after 3 months of therapy are no different than those prior to initiation 
of therapy [9-14]. 
 
Reactions reported in randomized controlled trials of vaginal estrogen include application site reaction, vaginal 
bleeding/spotting, breast changes/pain, abdominal bloating/cramps, nausea/vomiting, cervical secretion 
changes, headache/migraine, fluid retention, elevated blood pressure, mood changes, candidiasis, glucose 
intolerance, weight changes, libido changes, contact lens intolerance, vision changes, rash, 
melasma/choasma, hair loss and hirsutism. These were significantly different from placebo. 
 
There is also the risk of loss of confidentiality, as with any study. Specimens will be labeled only with the 
subject’s unique identifying study number and no PHI will be transferred to Loyola University. 
 
The risks associated with specimen collection are minimal and mostly related to inconvenience of providing a 
urine specimen and discomfort associated with a pelvic examination, however most of these subjects will be 
having a pelvic examination as part of their clinical care or with placement of the vaginal estrogen ring.  
Subjects may opt out of having specimens collected at any time. 
 
15. RISK MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES AND ADEQUACY OF RESOURCES 


 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 10 
Monitoring Plans for Safety 
Data safety and monitoring for adverse events will be overseen by a committee composed of the PI, the study 
statistician and research mentor. The study staff will conduct monthly telephone interviews with the subjects 
during the first 3 months of the study to ascertain any adverse events in the treatment arms. The subjects will 
then be encouraged to call should they experience any adverse reactions. The PI will be notified of any 
adverse events, which will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. Any serious adverse events requiring 
hospitalization and/or surgical intervention will be reported to the institutional IRB within 24 hours of 
identification of the event. Data will be reviewed on a quarterly basis to assess for completeness, accuracy, or 
any trends that may require alteration of study protocol, including number of UTIs in each subject. Any errors, 
omissions or adverse events will be brought to the attention of the PI. 
 
Adequacy of Resources 
Statistical support for this project will be provided under the direction of Dr. Xu together with the UCSD Clinical 
and Translational Institute (CTRI). A team approach will be used with biostatistics, faculty member (Xu, 
Director of CTRI Design, Biostatistics and Ethics) partnered with an experienced staff statistician. This team 
approach provides a number of advantages. The faculty member brings knowledge and skill in the application 
and interpretation of contemporary biostatistical tools, while the trained staff statistician can efficiently 
implement any required data analysis. The budget for this project covers a 100 hour commitment of a staff 
statistician to carry out the data analysis under Dr. Xu's supervision. 
 
Other resources include an administrative assistant, library facilities and office space with workstations with 
computers, internet, printer, copier, fax, as well as secure filing cabinet and basic supplies needed to conduct 
research for data analysis and writing. 
 
Patients with pelvic floor disorders are seen at the UCSD Women’s Pelvic Medicine Center, housed at 
Chancellor Park. This clinic is equipped to see patients with pelvic floor disorders and has the ability to perform 
the spectrum of diagnostic tests and therapeutic procedures. In addition, they offer a full range of therapies 
from behavioral and medical to minimally invasive surgeries and total pelvic floor reconstruction. Annually, 
UCSD Women’s Pelvic Medicine physicians see over 830 new patients with 4900 patient encounters. One 
hundred and eighty four of these new patients had a diagnosis of recurrent UTI in the last year from July 2011 
to June 2012.  
 
16. PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY CONSIDERATIONS INCLUDING DATA ACCESS AND MANAGEMENT 
There is also a risk of loss of confidentiality, however, the data obtained from this study will be identified with a 
subject identifier that does not contain identifiable information. The key which links the subject identifiers to 
protected health information will be kept in a binder in a locked cabinet in a locked physician’s office within the 
Women’s Pelvic Medicine Center clinic in Chancellor Park. All subject paper forms for the study and any paper 
data collected will also be kept in a binder separate from identifiable information in the locked cabinet. Only the 
study staff (co-investigators) will have access to the records. In terms of the electronic data captured, the 
database will be encrypted and placed on a password protected secure server provided by UCSD. Select 
study staff will have access to the database, including the PI and those entering data, as well as those study 
staff who are on the Data Safety Monitoring Committee. This database will not include the subjects’ names, or 
medical record numbers as they will be identified by a subject identifier. The key linking the subject’s name 
and medical record number to the identifier will be kept on the same password protected secure server as a 
separate file, as well as paper copy kept in a locked cabinet in the clinic discussed previously. This will not be 
destroyed until all data analyses have been completed. PHI will be coded only to subject identifiers and will be 
kept in a separate file. The statisticians at UCSD will also have access to de-identified data. HIPAA 
authorization will be obtained in order to collect clinical outcomes of interest for this study (ie UTIs, clinic 
visits), however all of this data will be transferred to a case report form using subject identifier.  
 
All women evaluated in the Women’s Pelvic Medicine Clinic for recurrent UTIs, as well as other pelvic floor 
disorders, are seen, evaluated an counseled in private examination rooms as part of routine clinical care. 
Estrogen ring changes for clinical care are always done in a private exam room setting and will be performed 


 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 11 
in the same way for this study.  
 
17. POTENTIAL BENEFITS 
Potential benefits include prevention of recurrent UTIs. Vaginal estrogen is also known to relieve vulvovaginal 
atrophy and associated symptoms including dyspareunia. Data from this study will help to inform appropriate 
treatment protocols and options for millions of women who suffer from recurrent UTI.  
 
18. RISK/BENEFIT RATIO 
The risks of systemic effects from vaginal estrogen are low. In clinical practice, vaginal estrogen is routinely 
prescribed for vaginal atrophy. Currently in our clinics, we also use it to treat recurrent UTI, although there is 
only one randomized trial to support this practice, which used higher doses of estrogen and only the cream 
form. Recurrent UTIs can seriously affect the day to day quality of life of patients. Thus, we feel that the benefit 
to the subjects is greater than the risks of rare serious adverse reactions. Also, since we already use this in 
clinical practice, knowing whether vaginal estrogen truly does prevent recurrent UTI is a benefit to current and 
future patients. Thus the overall risk benefit ratio favors study participation. 
 
19. EXPENSE TO PARTICIPANT 
There will be no expense to the subject over and above standard clinical care other than the cost of time, gas 
and parking for 4 extra visits. We plan to compensate the participants for these costs (see below). 
 
20. COMPENSATION FOR PARTICIPATION 
The subjects will receive $40 for their 3 month and 6 month visits in the study. They will then be paid $20/visit 
at their 9 and 12 month visits. The change monetary compensation is to incentivize follow up for the primary 
outcomes in the first 6 months. In general, subjects will be compensated for visits because they are visits 
which would not be occurring without participation in the study and the compensation is designed to cover the 
costs of time, gas and parking. 
 
21. BIBLIOGRAPHY 
1. 
Bermingham, S.L. and J.F. Ashe, Systematic review of the impact of urinary tract infections on health-
related quality of life. BJU Int, 2012. 
2. 
Foxman, B., et al., Urinary tract infection: self-reported incidence and associated costs. Ann Epidemiol, 
2000. 10(8): p. 509-15. 
3. 
Romano, J.M. and D. Kaye, UTI in the elderly: common yet atypical. Geriatrics, 1981. 36(6): p. 113-5, 
120. 
4. 
Karram, M.M., Lower Urinary Tract Infection, in Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, 
M.D.a.K. Walters, M.M., Editor 2007, Mosby Elsevier: Philidelphia. 
5. 
Raz, R., et al., Effectiveness of estriol-containing vaginal pessaries and nitrofurantoin macrocrystal 
therapy in the prevention of recurrent urinary tract infection in postmenopausal women. Clin Infect Dis, 
2003. 36(11): p. 1362-8. 
6. 
Stamey, T.A. and C.C. Sexton, The role of vaginal colonization with enterobacteriaceae in recurrent 
urinary infections. J Urol, 1975. 113(2): p. 214-7. 
7. 
Package Insert on Estradiol, in Micromedex: online. 
8. 
Ellerington, M.C., S.I. Whitcroft, and M.I. Whitehead, HRT: developments in therapy. Br Med Bull, 
1992. 48(2): p. 401-25. 
9. 
Simon, J., et al., Endometrial safety of ultra-low-dose estradiol vaginal tablets. Obstet Gynecol, 2010. 
116(4): p. 876-83. 
10. 
Weisberg, E., et al., Endometrial and vaginal effects of low-dose estradiol delivered by vaginal ring or 
vaginal tablet. Climacteric, 2005. 8(1): p. 83-92. 
11. 
Bachmann, G., et al., Efficacy and safety of low-dose regimens of conjugated estrogens cream 
administered vaginally. Menopause, 2009. 16(4): p. 719-27. 
12. 
The 2012 hormone therapy position statement of: The North American Menopause Society. 
Menopause, 2012. 19(3): p. 257-71. 


 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 12 
13. 
Goldstein, S.R., Systemic effects and endometrial safety of local estrogen therapy. OBG Management, 
2010. Supp: p. S20-S25. 
14. 
Ayton, R.A., et al., A comparative study of safety and efficacy of continuous low dose oestradiol 
released from a vaginal ring compared with conjugated equine oestrogen vaginal cream in the 
treatment of postmenopausal urogenital atrophy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 1996. 103(4): p. 351-8. 
15. 
Raz, R. and W.E. Stamm, A controlled trial of intravaginal estriol in postmenopausal women with 
recurrent urinary tract infections. N Engl J Med, 1993. 329(11): p. 753-6. 
16. 
Grimes, C.L. and E.S. Lukacz, Urinary tract infections. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg, 2011. 17(6): 
p. 272-8. 
17. 
Gradwohl, S.E., Urinary Tract Infection Guideline, U.o.M.H. System, Editor 2005. 
18. 
Jepson, R.G., G. Williams, and J.C. Craig, Cranberries for preventing urinary tract infections. Cochrane 
Database Syst Rev, 2012. 10: p. CD001321. 
19. 
Stamey, T.A., M. Condy, and G. Mihara, Prophylactic efficacy of nitrofurantoin macrocrystals and 
trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in urinary infections. Biologic effects on the vaginal and rectal flora. N 
Engl J Med, 1977. 296(14): p. 780-3. 
20. 
Martinez, F.C., et al., Effect of prophylactic, low dose cephalexin on fecal and vaginal bacteria. J Urol, 
1985. 133(6): p. 994-6. 
21. 
Stamm, W.E., et al., Urinary prophylaxis with trimethoprim and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole: 
efficacy, influence on the natural history of recurrent bacteriuria, and cost control. Rev Infect Dis, 1982. 
4(2): p. 450-5. 
22. 
Wong, E.S., et al., Management of recurrent urinary tract infections with patient-administered single-
dose therapy. Ann Intern Med, 1985. 102(3): p. 302-7. 
23. 
Melekos, M.D., et al., Post-intercourse versus daily ciprofloxacin prophylaxis for recurrent urinary tract 
infections in premenopausal women. J Urol, 1997. 157(3): p. 935-9. 
24. 
Pfau, A., T. Sacks, and D. Engelstein, Recurrent urinary tract infections in premenopausal women: 
prophylaxis based on an understanding of the pathogenesis. J Urol, 1983. 129(6): p. 1153-7. 
25. 
Vosti, K.L., Recurrent urinary tract infections. Prevention by prophylactic antibiotics after sexual 
intercourse. JAMA, 1975. 231(9): p. 934-40. 
26. 
Ware, J.E., Jr. and C.D. Sherbourne, The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. 
Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care, 1992. 30(6): p. 473-83. 
27. 
Margolis, M.K., et al., Psychometric validation of the overactive bladder satisfaction with treatment 
questionnaire (OAB-SAT-q). Neurourol Urodyn, 2009. 28(5): p. 416-22. 
28.       Herzog AR, Diokno AC, Fultz NH. Urinary incontinence: medical and psychosocial aspects. Annu Rev 
Gerontol Geriatr. 1989;9:74-119 
29. 
Uebersax, J.S., et al., Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence 
in women: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence 
Program for Women Research Group. Neurourol Urodyn, 1995. 14(2): p. 131-9. 
30. 
Meston, C.M., Validation of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) in women with female orgasmic 
disorder and in women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder. J Sex Marital Ther, 2003. 29(1): p. 39-
46. 
31. 
Burgio, K.L., et al., Global ratings of patient satisfaction and perceptions of improvement with treatment 
for urinary incontinence: validation of three global patient ratings. Neurourol Urodyn, 2006. 25(5): p. 
411-7. 
32. 
Robinson, L.D. and N.P. Jewell, Covariate adjustment. Biometrics, 1991. 47(1): p. 342-3. 
33. 
Ridout, M.S., Testing for random dropouts in repeated measurement data. Biometrics, 1991. 47(4): p. 
1617-9; discussion 1619-21. 
 
22. FUNDING SUPPORT FOR THIS STUDY 
This study will be funded by a 2 year grant awarded by the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS). The 
dates of the funding are March 1, 2013 to February 28, 2017. This is an investigator initiated trial. Pfizer is 
donating drug for the trial only and is not participating in the trial in any other way. The company will provide no 
coverage for any adverse events associated with the study. 
 


 
 
Biomedical IRB Application Instructions 
Page 13 
23. BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS TRANSFER AGREEMENT 
N/A 
 
24. INVESTIGATIONAL DRUG FACT SHEET AND IND/IDE HOLDER 
Drug inserts for Estring and Premarin will be provided (see 2 separate attached files). 
 
We will not be seeking an IND as we qualify for exemption per the FDA requirements: 1) The studies are not 
intended to support FDA approval of a new indication or a significant change in the product labeling. 2) The 
studies are not intended to support a significant change in the advertising for the product. 3) Investigators and 
their IRBs determine that based on the scientific literature and generally known clinical experience, there is no  
significant increase in the risk associated with the use of the drug product. 4) The studies are to be conducted 
in compliance with IRB and informed consent regulations.5) The studies will not be used to promote 
unapproved indications. 
 
While we are looking at vaginal estrogen to prevent recurrent UTI, the mechanism by which vaginal estrogen 
cream and the estradiol ring will do so is by treating vaginal atrophy, an indication for which both drugs are 
already FDA approved. In essence we are looking at if the treatment of atrophic vaginitis by vaginal estrogen 
will prevent recurrent UTI.  
 
 
 
Version date: May 11, 2011