Conditions: Diabetes Depression Quality of Life
Keywords: Vitamin D Diabetes Self-Management Depression Women
Allocation: RANDOMIZED | Intervention model: PARALLEL
Enrollment: 265
Healthy volunteers: no

Brief summary:
This is a randomized clinical trial (RCT) to determine the effectiveness of vitamin D3 supplementation on depressive symptoms, self-management, and blood pressure in approximately 180 adult women with type 2 diabetes who have significant depressive symptoms. Consenting adult women who are eligible to participate will be randomly assigned to either a weekly dose of 50,000 international units of vitamin D3 supplementation or a matching weekly active comparator of 5,000 international units of vitamin D3 for six months. Participants will complete approximately four in-person study visits and several telephone visits throughout the six month trial period, where the researchers will assess depressive symptoms, diabetes self-management, and systolic blood pressure.

Detailed description:
The primary aim of this study is to determine the effect of vitamin D supplementation on depressive symptoms, self-management, and systolic blood pressure compared to placebo. The hypothesis is that women receiving vitamin D supplementation will report fewer depressive symptoms, increased diabetes self- management mediated by depression improvement, and will have a lower systolic blood pressure compared to those taking placebo at three and six months follow-up.

The secondary aim is to explore the mechanistic effect of vitamin D supplementation on inflammatory biomarkers and their association with depression. Here, the hypothesis is that women receiving vitamin D supplementation will have a decrease in inflammatory biomarkers which will be associated with fewer depressive symptoms compared to those taking placebo at three and six months follow-up.

Arms:
arm 1: 50,000 international units (IUs) weekly Vitamin D3 arm 2: 5,000 international units (IUs) of a weekly Vitamin D3 comparator

Interventions: intervention 1: Vitamin D3 intervention 2: Vitamin D3 comparator
Intervention descriptions: intervention 1: 50,000 international units (IUs) weekly Vitamin D3 intervention 2: 5,000 international units (IUs) of a weekly Vitamin D3 comparator

Protocol document:
Prot_SAP_000.pdf: 
1 
 
Clinical Intervention Protocol 
 
Protocol Title:  Sunshine 2 Study for Women with Diabetes 
Protocol Version: 2.13 
Modification date:  4-26-19 
Protocol Date:  08/11/2016 
Principal Investigator: Sue Penckofer, Ph.D., R.N. 
Medical Director:  Mary Ann Emanuele, MD 
Research Team Staff: Angelos Halaris, MD, Ramon Durazo, PhD, Joanne Kouba, PhD, RD, Mary Byrn, PhD, 
RN, Pauline Camacho, MD, Patricia Mumby, PhD, William Adams, MS, Meghan Meehan, RN, MSN, FNP, 
Patricia Sheean, PhD, RD, Jennifer Woo, RN, MSN, WHNP, Collen Kordish, RN, BSN, Monique Ridosh, PhD, 
Alan Wolfe, PhD, Iwashima Makio, PhD,  Jawed Fareed, PhD, Deborah Moorman, PhD, Gayle Roux, PhD, 
RN, Catherine Putonti, PhD, Lakeshore Campus  
Research Volunteers:  Mary Batrich (Undergraduate recently completed CITI training and working with Dr. 
Catherine Putonti at Lakeshore Campus) Completed: Sana Rivzi, BS, Carly Francis, Sabrina Hameed, RN, 
BSN, Ambris Saravanan In Progress: Loyola Students- Lauren  Wells (Nursing UG) , Awatef  Ibraheem (Grad), 
Katelyn Sullivan (Nursing UG), Melissa Gesbeck (previously Howell (PhD 2015 LU Sociology), Lamyaa 
Alyaba (Nursing PhD student).   
 
Précis 
 
Specific Aims.  Diabetes affects 1 in 10 persons in the United States and is projected to increase to 1 in 4 
persons by 2050 (1), resulting in a 72% increase in health care costs (2, 3).  Women with type 2 diabetes have 
worse glycemic control and diabetes self-care behaviors than men with type 2 diabetes (4-6).  One reason for 
these poor outcomes is the influence of depression which affects over 25% of women with diabetes (7).  
 
Depression interferes with self-care behaviors and significantly impacts glycemic control in women with type 2 
diabetes (8-12).  Although there is significant research to indicate that depression can negatively affect 
diabetes self-management (8-10), there is limited evidence on whether treating depression can improve self-
management (13-15).  Antidepressants can effectively relieve depression and its related symptoms in persons 
with type 2 diabetes (16, 17). However, these medications can also disrupt glycemic control (18-20) and cause 
weight gain (21, 22) making diabetes self-management more challenging.  
 
Vitamin D is being studied for its effects on depression (23-26). Cross sectional studies report that low vitamin 
D levels are associated with depressive symptoms (depression) (27-30).  Several intervention studies have 
reported that vitamin D supplementation can reduce depression (31-33); however consistent limitations were 
the lack of significant depressive symptomology or depression as inclusion criteria.  One such study, a large, 
randomized clinical trial (RCT) trial of healthy, overweight and obese adults, found that weekly vitamin D 
supplementation (40,000 IUs) improved depressive symptoms; suggesting its use for amelioration of these 
symptoms (23).  Vitamin D supplementation is associated with few side effects and is inexpensive (34-36). To 
our knowledge, there are no published studies on vitamin D supplementation for persons with diabetes who 
have depression.  
 
We recently completed a six month proof of concept study using a one group, pre-post test design to examine 
the effects of weekly vitamin D supplementation (50,000 IUs weekly) in women (n=50) with type 2 diabetes 
who had significant depressive symptoms (a score > 16 on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression 
Tool (CES-D) (NIH 5P60DK020595, pilot project).  We found a significant decrease in depression and 
improvements in diabetes self-management.  We also found a decrease in systolic blood pressure. Depression 
is associated with hypertension and an increased risk of stroke (37-39). Evidence suggests that vitamin D 
supplementation may lower blood pressure (BP) by direct and indirect vascular activity (40-44).  
 
We now propose a randomized trial to determine the efficacy of vitamin D3 supplementation on depressive 
symptoms, self-management, and blood pressure in women (n=180) with type 2 diabetes who have significant 
depressive symptoms (CES-D > 16).  Using a stratified block randomization (strata based on depression 


2 
 
symptom severity) women will be assigned to either weekly vitamin D3 supplementation of 50,000 IUs or   5000 
IUs  for a period of six months. Since guidelines recommend assessing vitamin D levels at three months upon 
initiating this dose,  study measurements will collected at baseline, three, and six months.  The following 
outcomes will be measured: depressive symptoms, diabetes self-management (self-efficacy, diabetes distress, 
diabetes self-care behaviors), and systolic blood pressure.  We will also explore a possible mechanistic effect 
of vitamin D3 supplementation on depression.  Evidence indicates that in depression, pro-inflammatory 
biomarkers, notably cytokines and C-reactive protein (CRP), are elevated (45-48). Several studies (not 
depression studies) have reported that Vitamin D can decrease levels of inflammatory biomarkers (49-51). 
Thus we will explore whether vitamin D3 supplementation decreases inflammatory biomarkers (CRP,   
interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor- α) providing evidence for a possible mechanism of antidepressant 
activity.  
 
Aim 1:  To determine the effect of 50,000 IUs of vitamin D3 supplementation on depressive symptoms (primary 
outcome), self-management (secondary outcome), and systolic BP (exploratory outcome) compared to 5000 
IUs.  
   
 
Hypothesis:  Women receiving 50,000 IUs of vitamin D3 supplementation will report fewer depressive 
symptoms, increased diabetes self- management mediated by depression improvement, and have a lower 
systolic BP compared to those taking 5000 IUs at three and six months follow-up. 
 
Aim 2:  To explore the mechanistic effect of vitamin D supplementation on inflammatory biomarkers and their 
association with depression. 
  
Hypothesis:  Women receiving 50,000 IUs of vitamin D3 supplementation will have a decrease in inflammatory 
biomarkers which will be associated with fewer depressive symptoms compared to those taking 5000 IUs at 
three and six months follow-up.  
 
UPDATED AIMS 
 
A sub-study was added to investigate family functioning in women with Diabetes and Depression titled 
Family Matters in Diabetes and Depression (FAMDD). This study is also funded under LU#   208808          
This sub-study of the Sunshine 2 Study has the following specific aims and hypotheses:  
 
Aim 1: Describe the impact of family functioning on self-management, barriers to self-management, and FQOL 
in women with depression and T2DM. (qualitative) 
 
Aim 2:  Determine the relationship of depressive symptoms, family functioning and FQOL.  
 
Hypothesis 1a: Depressive symptoms will be associated with poor family functioning.  
Hypothesis 1b: Higher depressive symptoms will be associated with poor FQOL.  
Hypothesis 3c: Depressive symptoms mediate the relationship of family functioning and FQOL.  
 
Aim 3: Determine the relationship of family functioning, self-management and FQOL.  
 
Hypothesis 2a: Better family functioning will be associated with more self-management behaviors.  
Hypothesis 2b: Better family functioning will be associated with better FQOL. 
 
 
A sub-study was added to investigator the urinary microbiome and lower urinary tract symptoms in 
women with type 2 diabetes titled “The Urinary Microbiome and Vitamin D in Women with Type 2 
Diabetes” study has recently been submitted for review for potential funding to Novo Nordisk under 
LU# 208880.  
 
This substudy of the Sunshine 2 Study has the following specific aims: 
 


3 
 
Primary Objectives: (1) To determine the FUM composition in women with T2DM, using high throughput 16S 
rRNA gene sequencing & enhanced quantitative urine culture (EQUC), and determine the FUM’s association 
with LUTS in women with T2DM. (2) To determine the impact of glycemic control on LUTS and the FUM 
composition in women with T2DM.  
 
Secondary Objective: To determine whether there is an association between vitamin D status (sufficient, 
insufficient, and deficient), the FUM and LUTS in women with T2DM.    
Exploratory Aim: To examine the relationship of the phage activity with glycemic control, and Urine PH in 
biobanked urine samples in the laboratory of Catherine Putonti.  Proctocal additions from Putonti lab included in 
Modifications included in section 


4 
 
Table of Contents 
 
 
I. Significance………………………………………………………………………………………………………4-5 
 
II. Innovation……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 5-6 
 
III. Conceptualization…………………………………………………………………………………………….....6 
 
IV. Preliminary Studies……………………………………………………………………………………………..6-8 
 
V. Approach………………………………………………………………………………………………………….8-16 
a. Design………………………………………………………………………………………………...8--9 
b. Sample………………………………………………………………………………………………  9-10 
c. Procedures…………………………………………………………………………………………10-11 
d. Measurements……………………………………………………………………………………   11-14 
e. Data management and Analysis……………………………………………………………… 15-17 
f. 
Potential Problems and Alternative Solutions……………………………………………….….17 
g. Timeline………………………………………………………………………………………………...17 
 
VI. Protection of Human Subjects……………………………………………………………………………….18-22 
 
VII. References………………………………………………………………………………………………………22-33 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


5 
 
I. Significance.   
 
Diabetes and Depression.  Depression occurs more often in women with diabetes than men with diabetes (7, 
52) and over 25% of women with diabetes have depression (7).  For women having both depression and 
diabetes, the risk of mortality is significantly higher (RR=3.11) than for having either diabetes (RR=1.71) or 
depression (RR=1.76) (53). Of significance is that the cost of treating diabetes and co-morbid depression is 
almost four times higher ($247 million) than treating diabetes alone ($55 million) (54, 55).     
 
Depression Treatment and Diabetes. Drug therapy for treatment of depression can disrupt glycemic control (18-
20) and cause weight gain (21, 22). In the Diabetes Prevention Program for persons who were at risk for 
diabetes, continuous antidepressant use was associated with an increased risk of diabetes in both the placebo 
(RR=2.60) and the intensive lifestyle (RR=3.39) study arms (56). Although cognitive behavioral therapy is an 
effective treatment for depression and depressive symptoms in persons with diabetes (57-59); lack of available 
trained personnel, poor access to mental health services for many individuals, and cost can be challenges for its 
greater use (60, 61).  Thus, exploration of other strategies to treat depression are needed. 
 
Vitamin D and Depression.   Evidence from observational studies suggests a relationship between low levels of 
vitamin D and depression (25-30), but no randomized clinical trials in persons with depression are available to 
confirm this evidence.  However, reports indicate that Vitamin D receptors in the brain may have an important 
role in neuroendocrine functioning (62-64).  For example, low levels of serotonin are present in depression, 
and vitamin D has been linked with the production of serotonin (65).  Research also indicates that lack of 
vitamin D negatively affects growth, cellular signaling, and neural activity in the brain (62, 66).  Thus, other 
mechanisms may be involved in the role of vitamin D and depression.     
 
There have been several studies examining the impact of vitamin D supplementation on mood.  In earlier 
studies, improvements in mood were not observed (67-69); however, variation in the amount of vitamin D 
given, frequency of dosing (daily, weekly, monthly), duration of dose and lack of achieving therapeutic vitamin 
D levels could have been reasons (25).  More recent studies report improved feelings of depression and well 
being for persons who are not depressed (31-33). One large trial of healthy, overweight and obese individuals 
(n=400) randomized to vitamin D3 supplementation (40,000 D3 IU weekly) or placebo for a year reported that 
symptoms of depression significantly decreased (23). However, a study limitation was that significant 
depression symptoms (depression) were not criteria for enrollment. Recently, a substudy of the VITAL trial 
(randomized trial of vitamin D and Omega A-3 examining cardiovascular health outcomes in healthy adults 
aged 55+) began assessing for depressive symptoms, but the dose of vitamin D (2000 IUs daily) may be 
insufficient for obese individuals (70, 71).   
 
Vitamin D supplementation for the treatment of persons who have significant depressive symptoms has not 
been studied.  Our pilot study included women with type 2 diabetes who had significant depressive symptoms 
(depression), but was a one-arm study (treatment only)   Following supplementation, we found a significant 
improvement in depressive symptoms and as well as other outcomes (See pilot). We now are proposing a 
randomized trial targeting treatment of depressive symptoms with vitamin D3 supplementation (Figure).  
 
Depression and Self-Management. We also observed an improvement in diabetes self-management 
(specifically, self-care behaviors and diabetes distress) in our pilot study.  We believe that this effect was due to 
an improvement in depression. Evidence indicates that depression negatively impacts diabetes self-
management (72-76), especially for women (6).  Self-management includes beliefs (i.e., self-efficacy), emotional 
responses (i.e., diabetes distress), as well as the ability to engage in self-care behaviors (diet, activity, medication 
adherence) (77). For women, depression is associated with lower self-efficacy (78, 79) and increased diabetes 
distress (80, 81), both of which can contribute to poor self-care behaviors (82).  Although there is significant 
research to indicate that depression impacts diabetes self-management, there is limited evidence as to whether 
treatment of depression improves diabetes self-management (13-15). This study will add to that body of 
knowledge.  For this study, we propose that if vitamin D supplementation reduces depression, self-management 
will improve as individuals begin to feel better and more actively participate in their care.  If depression subsides, 
we believe that self-efficacy, diabetes distress, and self-care behaviors will improve (Figure).   
 
Vitamin D and High Blood Pressure.  We also observed an improvement in blood pressure in our pilot study.    
Definitive mechanistic studies of vitamin D and blood pressure are currently in progress. Both in vitro and in 


6 
 
vivo studies of vitamin D receptor knockout mice have supported the hypothesis that Vitamin D may affect 
blood pressure by regulating activity of the renin-angiotensin system through suppression of renin biosynthesis 
(40, 44).  Vitamin D may also be effective in reducing deleterious effects of glycation end products on the 
endothelium (41), thus allowing for endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation (42, 43).   
 
The Nurses’ Health Study reported that women were twice as likely to develop hypertension if vitamin D levels 
were less than 15 ng/ml (83). Women have vitamin D levels as low as 15-20 ng/ml (84, 85), especially those 
with type 2 diabetes (86).  There have been few vitamin D trials in women to examine blood pressure effects, 
and results have been inconsistent (87-89).  The Women’s Health Initiative did not find a change in blood 
pressure with vitamin D supplementation; however, the dose (400 IU) daily may not have been sufficient (90).  
Yet Pfeifer and colleagues (91) did report a 7% decrease in systolic blood pressure in vitamin D deficient 
women following 800 IUs of vitamin D3 after 6 weeks.  
 
High blood pressure is a major risk factor for persons with diabetes which contributes significantly to their renal  
complications. Epidemiologic evidence indicates that low levels of vitamin D are associated with a higher 
systolic blood pressure (92).  Because persons with diabetes are at high risk for hypertension, this outcome is 
important in assessing as an additional benefit of vitamin D supplementation. In addition, because depression 
increases the risk for hypertension and stroke, this is another important reason for its study (37-39). Thus, we 
propose that vitamin D supplementation will decrease systolic blood pressure (Figure).  
 
Vitamin D and Diabetes.  Our pilot study did not demonstrate improvements in glycemic control following 
vitamin D supplementation; although women had type 2 diabetes for an average of 8 years and were under 
good metabolic control (see pilot data).  Some epidemiologic evidence suggests that vitamin D may prevent 
diabetes (93, 94), however, few RCTs are published (95, 96). The Women’s Health Initiative reported that that 
vitamin D did not prevent the development of type 2 diabetes (97).  Other studies have been inconclusive 
regarding the effects vitamin D supplementation on glycemia, with most showing no significant benefit (98, 99). 
 
Summary.  Depression is higher in women with type 2 diabetes and is costly to treat (7, 54-55).  Evidence from 
observational studies suggests a relationship between low levels of vitamin D and depression (27-30), but no 
randomized clinical trials in persons with depression are available to confirm this evidence.  Studying vitamin D 
supplementation as a treatment option can have significant implications.  The cost for vitamin D 
supplementation is low (as low as cost $3 per month) and it has few side effects (34, 36).  Given that 1 in 10 
Americans now take antidepressants (100) which can have negative effects on weight and metabolic control 
(18-22), this study could provide evidence as a treatment option for depression. Since women with diabetes 
have low vitamin D and high levels of depression, this group is being studied as efficacy is more likely to be 
demonstrated.  
II. Innovation. 
 
Vitamin D for Depression. The proposed study is innovative in that a randomized trial to examine the impact of 
vitamin D supplementation for treatment of depressive symptoms has not been conducted.  To target women 
with type 2 diabetes that are at highest risk for depression is innovative.  If vitamin D supplementation 
improves depressive symptoms, it may also improve diabetes self-management which is another novel aspect 
of this study.  Although there is evidence to suggest that depression impacts self-management, there are few 
studies to examine whether this is actually true. Finally, to study whether vitamin D supplementation can 
improve systolic blood pressure is also innovative.  
 
Dosing of  Vitamin D. Although the Institute of Medicine recommends 600 IUs day for women up to age 70 
(101), information regarding doses for persons who have chronic  diseases like depression or diabetes are 
almost nonexistent.  It has been reported that higher doses are needed to reach sufficient levels in persons 
who are overweight and obese (23, 35).  Evidence recommends that in obese patients, doses of at least 6000 
to 10,000 IUs day of vitamin D for at least eight weeks followed by similar dosing to maintain the level above 
30 ng/ml (34, 35).  A recent study reported that taking high doses (10,000 IUs daily) for almost one year did not 
have adverse effects (49, 96). Most persons with type 2 diabetes are overweight or obese.  The proposed 
study will be administering a dose of vitamin D that is adequate for replacement for overweight and obese 
persons (23, 35, 102) and is another novel aspect of this study.     
 


7 
 
Depression and Vitamin D Mechanism of Action.  The Cytokine Theory of Depression evolved when studies 
identified that inflammation played a significant role in the pathophysiology of depression (103-105). Research 
indicates that pro-inflammatory cytokines alter the metabolic pathway of tryptophan by shunting it away from 
serotonin synthesis via stimulation of the enzyme indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) (106). This cytokine-
serotonin interaction also explains the neurodegeneration observed in depression (106). Several studies (not 
depression studies) have reported that Vitamin D can decrease levels of pro-inflammatory biomarkers (49-50). 
Since individuals with depression have elevated inflammatory markers (CRP, IL-6, and TNF-α) (45-48), to 
explore whether vitamin D supplementation will decrease inflammation and subsequently ameliorate 
depressive symptoms is innovative and may provide information regarding a potential mechanism of action.    
 
Urinary microbiome and vitamin D supplementation. Because Vitamin D3 supplementation has been 
associated with decreased inflammation (Burton et al., 2010; Hopkins et al., 2011; Wobke et al., 2014), it is 
plausible that this decreased inflammatory response reduces ower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Indeed, two 
studies (one animal, one human) showed that Elocalcitol, a biologically active vitamin D3 analogue given for 
treatment of overactive bladder, reduces nonvoiding urinary contractions (Shapiro et al, 2013) and improved 
perceptions of bladder condition and reduced episodes of urinary incontence (Digesu et al., 2012). Since 
detrusor overactivity is associated with overactive bladder, vitamin D3 supplementation may alleviate symptoms 
by reducing overactive detrusor muscle activity, which is a significant problem for women with diabetes (James 
et al., 2014). 
 
Another potential mechanism for improved urinary symptoms following vitamin D3 supplementation in 
postmenopausal women is the increased synthesis of the human antimicrobial peptide cathelicidin, which has 
been shown to be up-regulated during E. coli infection, potentially to protect the urinary tract (Hertting et al., 
2010). Nseir et al. (2013) reported an association between serum levels of vitamin D and recurrent UTIs in 
premenopausal women; women with <15 ng/ml vitamin D, as measured by serum 25 (OH) D, were 4X more 
likely to have recurrent UTIs. The data collected in this study will provide insight regarding the relationship of 
vitamin D supplementation to UTI occurrence.  
 
 
 
III. Conceptualization.   
 
For this study, we hypothesize that the vitamin D supplementation will reduce depressive symptoms.  Diabetes 
self-management will improve as a result of the decrease in depression.  We also hypothesize that vitamin D 
supplementation will improve blood pressure.  
 
 
 
       Primary 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exploratory Outcome 
  
Outcome 
 
                                                         
 
         Secondary 
    
          Outcome 
       
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contributory factors such as diabetes, obesity, and lifestyle may impact depressive symptoms and will be 
assessed and included in the data analysis.  Diabetes is associated with more depression, especially for 
women (7).  Most women with type 2 diabetes are obese (107).  Evidence indicates that obesity may increase 
the risk of depression, particularly for women (108-110).  Obesity is also associated with low vitamin D levels 
for women (111) and inflammation (94), which may contribute to depression.  Physical activity can influence 
depression (112) and is also important to diabetes self-management. Other lifestyle factors such as dietary 
Depressive 
Symptoms 
Vitamin D Supplementation 
  Diabetes Self-Management 
(Self-Efficacy, Diabetes Distress, 
Diabetes Self-Care Behaviors) 
  Systolic Blood  
     Pressure  
Contributory Factors:  
Diabetes, obesity, lifestyle 
(physical activity, diet, sun 
exposure), previous 
depression  


8 
 
intake and sun exposure can affect vitamin D levels, which impact depression.  Finally, because previous 
depression may increase the potential for future depression episodes, this will be evaluated as well.  
 
 It is known that depressive symptoms may impact the management of your diabetes. Family resources and 
family quality of life may impact the ability to manage one’s health (i.e., diabetes and/or mood).  Family 
functioning is defined as the attributes of a family system that characterize how they operate or behave 
(McCubbin & McCubbin, 1987). Family functioning is an important variable in the study of adaptation to chronic 
conditions.  Thus, these measures will also be studied.  
    
IV. Preliminary Studies.  
 
The PI and members of the team have been developing and testing treatments for women with type 2 diabetes 
who have significant depressive symptoms. We have demonstrated our ability to recruit, retain and effectively 
treat women with type 2 diabetes for these symptoms in our previous work.     
 
Previous work in depression treatment for women.  Initially, to gain an understanding of the psychological 
impact of living with diabetes, we conducted focus groups.  This study was funded by the American Nurses 
Foundation (Gloria Smith Health Disparities Award) and findings were published (4).  Results indicated that 
women with type 2 diabetes experience depression and other emotions which significantly impact their well 
being, relationships with others, and diabetes self-management.  Based on these findings, a nurse-delivered 
group cognitive behavioral intervention (CBT) intervention for the education and treatment of dysphoric 
symptoms (SWEEP) in depressed women with type 2 diabetes was developed and tested. This was funded by 
NIH-NINR (K23 009240) with presentations and publications (113, 114).  The final study results were just 
reported in the Annals of Behavioral Medicine, a multidisciplinary journal (Impact factor 4.3, E-Pub Head, July 
2012) (59). Findings indicated that a nurse delivered CBT intervention was more effective than usual care for 
the treatment of depressed women with type 2 diabetes as there were significant improvements in depression, 
anxiety, and anger and improvements in metabolic outcomes.    
 
Preliminary work for pilot study. During the SWEEP study, there was evidence to suggest that insufficient 
vitamin D may impact depression and other health outcomes.   Our literature reviews on this topic were 
published in the Issues in Mental Health  Nursing, Circulation, and Diabetes Educator (25, 44, 94).  With funds 
from our School of Nursing and  IRB approval, we were able to assess the vitamin D levels in our SWEEP 
participants.  Findings indicated that 72% of our women from SWEEP had vitamin D levels less than 30 ng/ml 
(> 30 is normal), and there was a significant relationship between vitamin D deficiency and depression (CES-
D) (r=-.39, p<.05).  Relationships also existed for HBA1c (r=-.20) and fasting glucose (r=-.28), but were not 
statistically significant.   
 
Pilot study description and findings.  Using this preliminary data from SWEEP, we applied and were funded for 
a “proof of concept study” to examine whether vitamin D supplementation in women with 2 diabetes with low 
Vitamin D levels could improve depression and metabolic outcomes (NIH 5P60DK020595 pilot study, University 
of Chicago Diabetes Research and Training Center).  It was branded as the “Sunshine Study”.  A one-group 
pre-post test design study was used to test for feasibility, compliance, and the impact of vitamin D2 
supplementation. Weekly ergocalciferol (D2) of 50,000 IUs was administered for six months.  This formulation 
of vitamin D is approved for the treatment of low vitamin D, and was being used at our clinical practice site at 
the time of the study. Women were enrolled if they had: type 2 diabetes greater than 6 months, significant 
depressive symptoms (CESD > 16),  were not taking vitamin D supplements or had stopped them for at least 1 
month prior to enrollment, had a vitamin D level < 30 ng/ml, and were not hypercalcemic.   These same 
inclusion and exclusion criteria are being proposed in this study.  Over 300 women were phone screened for 
participation.  Fifty women were enrolled at baseline.  They were a mean age of 55 years, had diabetes an 
average of 8 years with a mean HBA1c of 6.8%, and 60% were white. At three months, 49 or 98% continued 
and at six months, 46 or 92% were retained.  Procedures for dispensing the vitamin D and follow-ups are the 
same being proposed for this study (see procedures).  Women came within 10 days following baseline 
screening to obtain their prescription of vitamin D, were then sent a weekly message (their preferred method 
as phone, text, or e-mail) to take their vitamin D, and called at 4 to 6 weeks.  This was done to determine if any 


9 
 
concerns with the supplementation and to ensure that their depression did not worsen (and it did not).  Women 
were then seen at three months for follow-up measures and for prescription refill.  For all 3 time points, patients 
completed questionnaires that included: depression (CES-D) and diabetes self-management which included 
diabetes self-care inventory (SCI) and diabetes distress using the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAIDS).  
For the pilot study, labs and physical measurements were also assessed and included vitamin D, calcium, 
PTH, HbA1c, blood pressure, and weight.  Depression was verified at baseline using the Diagnostic Interview 
Schedule (DIS).  Following completion of the study, all patients were given their labs and referred to their 
healthcare provider for future follow-up.      
 
Repeated measures ANOVA results indicated that depression symptoms decreased significantly over time.  In 
addition, there was a significant improvement in self-care behaviors and less diabetes distress.  Vitamin D 
levels increased to a therapeutic level, and there were no significant changes in labs (calcium and parathyroid 
hormone).  Although there was no improvement in HBA1c, the average baseline value indicated very good 
control (<7%).  Other investigators have reported no change in HBA1c with vitamin D supplementation (97-98).  
A clinically and statistically significant decrease in systolic blood pressure was observed.  There was also a 
small decrease in weight. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Given our preliminary data, we hypothesize a significant decrease in depression symptoms, improved diabetes 
self-management, and a lowering of systolic blood pressure in the treatment group (vitamin D) compared to the 
control group using a RCT.  In our proposed study, we will measure weight since it can impact on both blood 
pressure and vitamin D levels (102).  Since vitamin D levels could be affected by external factors such as sun 
exposure and dietary intake (27, 115, 116), we measured these as well. Women reported an average of 10% 
body exposure to the sun (largely their head and upper forearm) with no change over time in our pilot study.  
Dietary intake of vitamin D was low (153 IUs/ day), but given the limited natural food sources for vitamin D, this 
finding was not surprising.  Since other research has addressed these factors, we will continue to measure 
these factors and address them in the data analysis.     
 
Pilot work on depression and inflammation.  Dr. Halaris, co-investigator and psychiatrist, has studied 
depression and inflammation but not vitamin D. His study of 48 patients with major depressive disorder (MDD 
assessed by DSM IV criteria) and 23 healthy controls (HC) were compared for pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-
6, TNFα) and hs CRP using a compact biochip array system (Randox Technologies; Evidence Investigator 
TM).  Depressed patients demonstrated significantly higher levels of inflammation than healthy controls as 
reflected in plasma levels of TNF-α (MDD 2.15+/- 0.04 pg/ml  and HC 1.59+/-1.59 pg/ml, p=0.05) as well as 
plasma IL-6 (MDD 0.810 +/- 0.012 and HC 0.665+/- 0.023 pg/ml, p=0.05).  Similarly, hs-CRP in depressed 
individuals was significantly higher than in healthy control subjects (MDD 3.53 +/-0.4 mg/l; HC 1.79 +/- 0.7 
mg/l, p<0.05).  Given Dr. Halaris’ success in measuring inflammatory biomarkers in depressed patients, we 
have proposed exploration of these measures following treatment with vitamin D supplementation where we 
hypothesize women will have a significant improvement in depressive symptoms.  
 
Team Composition.  In summary, we have a strong interdisciplinary team of nursing (Dr. Penckofer), mental 
health  (Drs. Halaris and Mumby), endocrinology (Drs. Emanuele and Camacho), nutrition (Drs. Kouba and 
Sheean) and preventive medicine (Dr. Durazo) that has conducted the pilot studies necessary for this 
application.  We have demonstrated success on the recruitment, retention, implementation, and measurement 
of the outcomes proposed for this RCT.   We also have outstanding consultants who have had success with 
vitamin D implementation in research studies (Dr. Pittas) as well as clinical practice (Dr. Wallis).  We believe 
that the uniqueness and strength of this team makes this application strong for its success if awarded.  
Variables  
Baseline 
Mean (SD) 
Three Months 
Mean (SD) 
Six Months 
Mean (SD) 
P value 
Depression-CES-D 
26.83 (7.6) 
15.13 (8.9) 
12.15 (8.3) 
<.001 
Self Care (SCI) 
2.76 (.58) 
2.87 (.57) 
2.88 (.64) 
.041 
Distress (PAIDS) 
29.00 (14.2) 
21.29 (14.4) 
19.36 (14.9) 
.001 
Vitamin D (ng/ml) 
18.78 (7.0) 
34.39 (9.4) 
37.5 (9.5) 
<.001 
Systolic  BP   (mmHG) 
140.43 (17.1) 
135.04 (17.1) 
132.46 (14.3) 
.007 
Weight  (pounds) 
226.10(59.0) 
224.64 (59.9) 
223.58 (59.4) 
.026 


10 
 
 
V. Approach.  
 
1. Design.  This is a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of six months duration.  Women will be randomly 
assigned to either 50,000 IU of vitamin D3 (n=75) or 5000 IUs of vitamin D3 (n=75) (both dispensed by the Loyola 
University Medical Center pharmacy).    
 
a. Treatment Schedule and Dose.  The supplements will be administered once a week for six months. The 
dose of vitamin D3 (50,000 IUs) is recommended for overweight and obese individuals to achieve adequate 
blood levels (34, 35, 102).  In addition, doses such as these have been safely used (23, 49, 96).   
 
The weekly dosing is being used to increase compliance to therapy (i.e., not having to remember to take it 
daily).  A once a week administration schedule has been very successful in treating women for other disorders 
(117).  To further increase compliance, women will receive a weekly reminder (preferred method of telephone, 
e-mail or text) to take their supplement.  This was very successful in our pilot study.     
 
Patients will be seen at baseline, 3 and 6 months with physical assessment and lab data as with our pilot 
study.  Published guidelines recommend monitoring calcium, parathyroid hormone (PTH), and vitamin D at 
baseline and 3 months when initiating vitamin D at this dose (50,000 IU) to assess for a therapeutic level (35, 
44).  In addition, since treatment of depression is usually a minimum of 12 weeks, we will capture the time 
when typically evaluated if receiving treatment for depression (57, 59).  Women will also be contacted by 
telephone at months 2, 4, for assessment of depressive symptoms as well as any potential side effects of the 
supplement. 
 
Vitamin D3  also known as cholecalciferol, has been selected as the treatment since it is the natural form of 
vitamin D, the more widely used supplement, and now recommended for clinical practice (34).  The Institute of 
Medicine recommends 600 IUs of Vitamin D per day for individuals up to age 70 (101).  Thus, the 5000 IUs 
dose will approximate follow that recommendation (600 IUs x 7 days= 4200 IUs) and be given once per  
week as well.  The use of a dose with the minimum recommended amount for comparison is consistent with 
other studies examining the benefit of vitamin D supplementation on health outcomes (35, 95).  Bio Tech 
Pharmacal, Inc. will prepare the vitamin D3 supplements. This company complies with all applicable Food and 
Drug Administration regulations and follows Good Manufacturing Practices that are designed to ensure that the 
products meet the highest quality standards.   
 
b. Treatment Randomization.  A stratified block randomization will be used with blocks of random size 2, 4 
and 6.  There will be two strata based upon depression symptom severity using the CES-D guidelines (118).  
These strata will be (1) moderate severity for CES-D scores of 16 to 26 and (2) high severity for CES-D scores 
greater than 26. In our previous work, about half of the women were in each stratum at baseline.  With 
stratified randomization, factors associated with depression should be more evenly distributed as 
randomization with stratification induces more balanced groups (119). A randomization list will be developed by 
Dr. Durazo, statistician and co-investigator. The list will be retained by the research pharmacist at Loyola, who 
is independent from those involved with the conduct of the study.  The research pharmacist will use the list to 
assign subjects to the treatments..   
 
c. Blinding. The study supplements will be administered by the pharmacist in a blinded fashion during the study 
so that the patient and clinical site personnel (except for the pharmacist) will not be aware of the patient’s 
assigned treatment.  
 
d. Treatment side effects.  Published reports suggest that 50,000 IU per day of vitamin D (note that the 
proposed study dose is 50,000 IU per week) can increase vitamin D levels to more than 150 ng/dl and cause 
hypercalcemia (35).  The current dose for this study is one capsule of 50,000 IU per week which equates to 
about 7000 IU per day. The dose at which the Vitamin D is being administered has minimal side effects, which 
may include gastrointestinal symptoms of constipation, stomach upset, and loss of appetite.  Symptoms 
associated with vitamin D toxicity include bone pain, nausea, and vomiting (35, 120).   We will be monitoring 
patient labs and for these symptoms at all study visits (baseline, 3, 6 months).  Telephone interview (months 2, 
4) will be used when patients are not seen for these assessments as with our pilot study (see procedures).       
 


11 
 
e. Safety.  The vitamin D levels will be sent to the endocrinologist who will monitor the labs for the study, and 
inform the PI if the supplement needs to be stopped.   This will be done when a study subject has either:  (1) 
hypercalcemia or (2) vitamin D level of greater than 100 ng/ml with normal serum calcium or symptoms of 
vitamin D previously listed that may be indicative of possible toxicity (35).   Patients  will be requested to return 
for a serum level of vitamin D within one month (since the half life is approximately two weeks) of stopping 
therapy (120) and then again at the end of the study.   The depression assessment will be reviewed with the 
psychiatrist prior to enrollment and subjects will be monitored for depression over the course of the study when 
they are seen (baseline, 3, 6 months) as well as when they are not seen (months 2, 4) by telephone.  Subjects 
will be withdrawn if there is significant worsening of depression (see Human Subjects).  These protocols were 
followed for the pilot study and no adverse effects occurred.     
 
2.   Sample.  
a. Criteria for Participation.  Inclusion criteria are:  1) women aged 21 and older, 2) having significantly 
elevated depressive symptoms as measured by a score >  to 16 using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies 
Depression Tool (CES-D) (118,121) and/or taking antidepressant medication and having a score >12 using the 
CES-D and/or CES-D score average of >16 of phone screen and face to face screen, 3) type 2 diabetes and 
under the care of a health care provider, (4) level of vitamin D also known as 25 hydroxyvitamin D, 25 (OH) D 
less than 32 ng/dl.  Exclusion criteria are: 1) current alcohol or substance abuse disorders, 2) a history of 
bipolar depression or any other psychotic disorder, 3) debilitating chronic illness (e.g., cancer, multiple 
sclerosis), 4)  severe complications of diabetes (e.g., blindness or amputation) since these will impact 
depression, 5)  malabsorption disorders (e.g., crohn’s disease, celiac sprue, gastric bypass) since this impacts 
vitamin D absorption (122), 6)  elevated serum calcium since vitamin D may increase serum calcium (123). 7) 
taking St. John’s Wort unless they stop for 3 weeks prior to enrollment since it can impact mood (124).  8) use 
of vitamin D supplements (1000 IUS or greater) in past 2 months and unwillingness to discontinue for at least 1 
month prior to study  9) Pregnant or planning a pregnancy. 10) Baseline systolic blood pressure greater than 
160 mmHG or diastolic greater than 100 mmHG. Having active treatment for depression (e.g., antidepressant 
therapy) will not be exclusion criteria if the patient has been under treatment for six weeks or more. Similar 
criteria were used for our pilot.    
  
b. Recruitment. We contacted diabetes centers within a 20 mile radius of LUMC (most are within a 5 to 10 mile 
radius) with the closest facilities.  The diabetes educators provided estimates of potential patients with type 2 
diabetes per month.  Support letters have been provided by the recruitment sites.  To facilitate recruitment, a 
meeting will be held at each site (with educators and endocrinologists) to discuss the study, review study 
brochure, procedures for participating, and follow-up information.  We used these sites and this 
recruitment strategy for our pilot and SWEEP study. We will also work with our marketing department for 
recruitment of study participants.    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
In order to allow patients from Loyola to know about the study, we will have the endocrinologists (Camacho, 
Emanuele, Charnogusky, Mazhari, Michelfelder, Bading) send letters about the study to their patients.  A 
waiver of HIPPA authorization will be used to identify patients from these physicians who meet the study 
criteria using CPT codes.   We have contacted the diabetes nurses at these various locations and have 
provided them a copy of the approved patient letter that is being used for our mailing.  However, we would also 
like to provide flyers at the Diabetes Centers and Primary Care Centers for patients to contact us.  This is the 
Diabetes Center Sites  
# Patients/Mo  
Diabetes Center Sites 
# Patients/Mo 
Loyola University Health Systems, 
Maywood IL (includes 10 satellites) 
800 
 
Elmhurst  Hospital, Elmhust IL 
240 
MacNeal Hospital, Berwyn IL 
85 
Gottlieb Hospital, Melrose Park 
IL 
15 
Rush Oak Park, Oak Park IL 
280 
Edward Hospital, Naperville IL 
350 
LaGrange Medical, LaGrange IL 
100 
Lutheran General Hospital, 
Park Ridge, IL 
 
85 
DuPage Medical, Dupage County 
800 
 
 
Total Patients per Month  2775 
 
 
 


12 
 
same flyer that was used in Sunshine 1 study.   Additional recruitment is delineated in Appendix 1. (See  
Appendix 1 at end of protocol after references) 
 
3. Procedures  
a. Phone Screening of Participants. We will use the protocol established in our previous studies. Interested 
participants will be given a phone interview to describe the study.  If interested, age, health information, and 
questions regarding diabetes and mental health will be asked to screen for potential eligibility.  The CES-D is 
administered on all participants. Candidates who are not eligible to participate in the trial because of enrollment 
criteria but have elevated CESD scores will be asked to speak with their primary healthcare provider about their 
symptoms.  We may also send these excluded candidates our resource list of local mental healthcare providers 
developed by Dr. Mumby.   If participants meet eligibility criteria, they will be scheduled for a baseline visit.  
 
b. Baseline Screening and Enrollment.  As with our previous work, the baseline screening will occur within a 
week to reduce the potential for change in depression over time.  Subjects will be able to come to the Loyola 
School of Nursing (SON) Research Room in Maywood, IL on weekday or Saturdays. Women will fast for 10 
hours prior to their appointment (they will be allowed to drink water) and to bring their supplements with them.  
They will be informed that first baseline testing will last between 2 and 3 hours and subsequent visits will last 
between 1 to 2 hours.  Upon arrival at the site, informed consent will be obtained and their blood will be drawn 
by a study nurse.  The physical measures (i.e. weight and height) will then be done.  Study subjects will then 
be provided breakfast, reminded to take their prescribed supplements, and instructed to complete the 
questionnaires.  The researcher will review the questionnaires for missing data and assess if the items were 
skipped or not answered due to personal choice.   
 
 
The diagnostic interview schedule (based on the DSM-IV) to assess current and past mental health will be 
administered by a trained study nurse (25 to 30 minutes).  Exclusionary criteria such as bipolar and psychotic 
disorders and alcohol/substance abuse will be verified.  Active suicidal ideation will also be assessed using a 
form developed by Dr. Mumby (attached). If a participant has active suicidal ideation, Dr. Halaris, psychiatrist 
and co-investigator and/or Dr. Patricia Mumby, psychologist and co-investigator, will be contacted and the 
safety protocol followed (See Human Subjects).  These subjects will not be enrolled. The same procedures will 
be implemented at all follow-up visits.  In addition, if  the patient answers question #9 on the PhQ-9 depression 
tool with a response other than “Not at all”, the suicide assessment form will also be completed on these 
patients as well and similar procedures followed if active suicidal ideation.  
 
At the baseline visit, both groups will receive a list of resources for mental health services developed by the 
psychiatrist (as with our previous study) as they will not be prevented from getting help if needed as a safety 
measure.  In our previous depression study, this occurred infrequently (<3%), as 1 woman started an 
antidepressant and 1 woman restarted therapy.  
 
Prior to leaving the data collection site, the participants will be asked to partake in a brief history and physical 
that will be conducted by a trained health care professional.  This assessment will take 20 minutes.  
 
c. Study Visits.  Following the first visit, the lab tests (vitamin D, calcium, PTH, Cardiometabolic profile as 
recommended by the FDA) will be reviewed by Dr. Emanuele,endocrinologist and co-investigator to ensure 
that blood enrollment criteria are met.  If so, the patient will be scheduled for a second visit within 10 days of 
their initial visit  At that visit, the patient will have a body composition scan to assess for body composition 
(which includes bone, lean and fat mass) which should take 30 minutes.  Prior to the scan, a pregnancy test 
will be administered to ensure the subject is not pregnant (see human subjects).  Upon completion, a small 
conference room at that site will be used for the research nurse to provide the study supplement, review the 
weekly schedule, and discuss all subsequent contacts (phone and scheduled visits).  The study nurse will also 
review potential side effects and reiterate the reproductive risks associated with the treatment at baseline visit 
2  and  3 month visit when the supplement is provided. The patient will be told that an automated message 
(preferred as phone, e-mail or text) will remind them to take their weekly supplement.  They will be informed 
that at three and six months, they will return for data collection of physical measurements and questionnaires.  
They will be told that in the months (2, 4,) when they don’t have a scheduled visit, the study nurse will conduct 
a formal phone call follow-up where they will be asked about their compliance, side effects, and be screened 
for their depressive symptoms (CES-D).  These procedures will be followed for all phone call visits (Appendix).   


13 
 
Upon completion of these verbal and written instructions, the supplement will be dispensed.  There will be a 
total of 12 pills for the period of 12 weeks.  Following the dispensing directions, the nurse will ask the subject if 
they have any questions to ensure there is an understanding and to call the study nurse if questions arise.    
 
The third visit (three months following initiation of treatment) will occur at the SON. The protocol established at 
baseline will be followed by the nurse (blood will be drawn, physical measures, questionnaires, and interview).  
Questionnaires that do not address mental health will be sent to participants prior to their visit with a reminder 
appointment letter.  This is to limit the time spent onsite for data collection.  It will not be mandatory that they 
bring them completed as they can complete them onsite if they so choose.  The nurse will also request the study 
bottle and count the remaining pills (if any).  If supplement is remaining, the nurse will record the reasons and 
the bottle will not be returned to the patient.  All study questionnaires will be reviewed.  Upon completion of these 
procedures, study supplement will be dispensed and the protocol for taking the supplement will be reviewed. To 
protect subjects, their depression level will be assessed and safety protocol implemented (if needed) using the 
same procedures described at baseline. The labs drawn at this time will be reviewed by the endocrinologist to 
inform the PI if patients need to stop their prescribed therapy (Study Design: Safety-1e).   The fourth and final 
visit (six months following initiation of treatment) will occur at the SON.  The patient will have the following 
assessed at end of study: vital signs, weight, walk test, neurosensory exam of feet, and assessment for any 
complaints.   Questionnaires will be administered and reviewed as delineated in the protocol as well. The 
participant will be informed of optional interview at the six month visit.  An optional informed consent will be 
signed at the time of the interview and participants will also complete the family questionnaires. The procedures 
previously described will be followed, although no supplement will be dispensed and patients will be informed to 
follow-up with the primary care provider regarding future supplementation. The patient will be sent their study 
lab tests (performed by Quest) and DEXA scan in the mail, informed that the dose of the medication will not be 
known until the end of the study, thus following up with their healthcare provider for future dosing of vitamin D is 
recommended.  Letter to study participant is attached.  
 
Patients will be called 3 months after completion of the Sunshine Study treatment intervention (which is 9 months 
from baseline) to see if they have followed up with their healthcare provider about the final test results mailed to 
them.  They will be asked general questions about their physical well-being and the CES-D for depression 
symptom assessment will be conducted. (See attached, 9 month revised phone interview).  Protocol for this 
phone screen will be congruent with procedures for baseline phone screen (see Protocol 3a)   
 
Patients may be asked to provide clean urine sample using a clean catch midstream voided urine samples with 
60 ml urine cups at study visits as well as complete several questionnaires on bladder and pelvic symptoms (see 
measurements). 
 
    
d. Optional Biobanking.  Participants may optionally agree to reposit up to six tablespoons of blood (i.e., 
approximately two tablespoons) and 8 tablespoons of urine at each at Baseline, Month 3, and Month 6) into 
CRO-BIOREP (LU# 204853) for future research purposes.  Participants will sign a second informed consent 
document should they agree to reposit their blood and/or urine.  The research team members and Biorepository 
staff will each retain a copy of the signed repository informed consent document.  It is important to point out that 
participants do not need to agree to reposit blood and/or urine in order to participate in the trial.   
 
All patients who agree to reposit blood specimens into CRO-BIOREP (LU# 204853) will be assigned a unique 
code using our SMART-ID system. This number will be used to connect coded specimens and coded data to 
other studies conducted by the Clinical Research Office in which they may participate.  To receive this number, 
we will ask participants for sex at birth, month of birth, day of birth, year of birth, and social security number.  
This information is entered into a secure website where it is hashed into a unique ID using a java script.  The 
participant and research team will receive the unique ID number.  Once the number is created, the information 
that was entered is immediately deleted.  This means the website will not retain any of the information that is 
entered to create the SMART-ID.  However, should anyone need to retrieve a SMART-ID number, you will be 
able to get it again at a later date by going to the website and entering the same information (i.e., sex, date of 
birth, and social security number) that was entered before.   


14 
 
 
Freezerworks, the biospecimen tracking software used in the repository, will also automatically assign 
specimen numbers to incoming specimens. These numbers will identify all donated specimens.  The list that 
links these codes with patients’ identifying information will be kept separate from all research specimens and 
clinical data. 
 
Information that may readily identify patients will never be shared with anyone. 
 
 
d. Retention, Adherence, and Drop Outs.  To enhance retention, participants will be scheduled for visits on a 
day that is convenient for them (oftentimes Saturdays).  Free parking will be provided for visits.  Honorarium for 
data collection points will be given in a stepped manner ($25-baseline 1, $25 baseline 2,  $30-three months, 
$35-six months, $40 optional qualitative interview after 6 month visit) with a personalized thank you note.  We 
have published on these strategies (114). To enhance adherence to treatment we will have automated weekly 
reminders to take supplements (preferred method: phone, e-mail, or text). Retention in our pilot study was 92% 
using these techniques.  To assess for treatment adherence, we are obtaining blood vitamin D levels and 
requesting that patients bring their bottle (to count for the number of unused pills, if any) at both 3 and 6 
months. For persons who drop out, we will assess the reason for drop out and the extent to which they require 
further treatment with referral to their provider as stated in informed consent document (Human Subjects). 
  
4.  Measurements (Appendix).   Variables, measures, and times are delineated below. In our pilot study, 
respondent burden was not an issue. Measurements are in the Appendix. 
 
 
 
 
Variables 
 
Measures  
 
Timing  
Aim 1 
Depression  (Primary) 
 
 
 
Center for Epidemiologic Studies 
(CES-D), Patient Health 
Questionnaire (PhQ-9) 
 Diagnostic Interview Schedule 
(DIS)  
Suicidal Assessment Form (if 
applicable) 
0,  3, 6  months (Phone CES-
D @  months 2, 4,and 9mos) 
 
Baseline   
 
0, 3, 6 months 
 
Self- Management (Secondary) 
Self-Efficacy  
Diabetes Distress 
Self-Care Behaviors  
 
 
Diabetes Self-Efficacy Scale  
Problem Areas in Diabetes   
Diabetes Self-Care Inventory , 
Summary of Diabetes Self-Care 
Activities  
Appraisal of Diabetes Scale   
 
 
0,  3, 6 months  
0,  3, 6   
0,  3, 6  
 
Blood Pressure  (Exploratory) 
 
Blood Pressure (mm HG) 
 
0, 3 , 6 months 
Aim 2  
Exploratory 
Inflammatory Biomarkers  
 
Vascular Markers 
e.g., CRP,  IL-6, TNF alpha 
 
e.g., VEG-F and clotting factors 
 
0,3, 6  months   
Treatment  
 
Vitamin D, CA, PTH  Levels 
Cardiometabolic Profile (CMP) 
Serum  Vitamin D, CA, PTH 
 Serum labs 
Pill counts  
0,  3, 6 months  
Baseline  
3, 6 months 
Contributory 
Obesity 
 
 
Diabetes 
 
 
Lifestyle 
Factors 
 
 Bone, Lean and Fat Mass   
 Body Mass Index 
 
Glycemic Control 
Diabetes History and Care 
 
Physical Activity 
 
 
Dietary Intake 
Sun Exposure 
Depression History  
 
Body Composition Scan 
Height, Weight 
 
HBA1c, Fasting glucose 
Diabetes Care Profile 
 
Godin Leisure-Time Exercise 
NHS 4 –item Questionnaire 
Block Diet Inventory 
Sun Exposure Tool s 
Diagnostic Interview Schedule 
 
0 months 
0, 3, 6 months 
 
0, 3, 6 months 
0, 3, 6 months 
 
0, 3, 6 months 
 
 
0, 3, 6 months 
0, 3, 6 months 
 
Other Factors 
Sleep 
Quality of Life 
Diabetes Symptoms 
Anxiety 
Stress 
Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index 
Ferrans Quality of Life Index 
Diabetes Symptom  Scale 
State Trait Anxiety 
Cohen Stressor Scale 
0, 3, 6 months 
 
 
 
 


15 
 
Social support  
Sociodemographic  Information 
 
Family Demographics 
Family Resources 
Family Quality of Life  
 
 
Qualitative Interview 
 
 
Urinary Microbiome 
Overactive Bladder Tool 
Pelvic Floor  Distress Inventory 
 
 
Putonti Lab Protoco (Appendix 2) 
Physical Exam 
 
 
MOS Social Support  
Sociodemographic  Form 
 
Questionnaire 
FIRM 
Global Family Quality of Life 
Scale 
 
Interview Guide (Optional 
Consent) 
 
Clean Catch Urine Specimen 
Microbiome and Phage activity 
OAB-q 
PFDI 
ICIQ 
 
 
History and Physical Exam  
(UTI history) 
 
 
 
0 (baseline and visit 2), 3, 6 
months, and time of the 
qualitative interview. 
 
After 6 month  visit 
 
 
0 (baseline and visit 2), 3 and 
6 months  
 
 
 
 
 
 
0,  6 months 
 
 
 
a. Depression Outcomes.  The CES-D and the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) will be used.  
(1) The CES-D (20 items) is well accepted for depression screening.  The Center for Epidemiologic Studies 
Depression Tool is 20 items and measures symptoms of depression and their severity (0=none to 3=most of 
the time).  A cutoff score of > 16 has been used to indicate depression.  The tool has excellent internal 
reliability (Cronbach alpha from .85 to .90).  It has also been reported that the CES-D and the Beck Depression 
Inventory performed comparably as depression screening tools (118, 121). In our SWEEP trial, the CES-D was 
reliable (Cronbach alpha from.87 to .92) and was validated by the DIS.  We were able to detect changes in 
level of depression symptoms and whether patients changed from the depressed to the non-depressed 
category using the CES-D guidelines (59).  The Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) is used in clinical 
practice to assess for depression and will be used to compare to CES-D and DIS (Kroenke et al., 2001).  
(2) The DIS will be used to screen and verify mental information. It is a structured mental health interview that 
uses the criteria specified in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) to generate 
diagnoses that can be used for research purposes (125, 126).  It has been reported that results of the DIS 
correlate significantly with clinical diagnoses (127-128). It will be used to obtain a history of mental illness, 
depression characteristics (e.g., suicidality, # of previous depressive episodes, age of onset, and duration of 
episodes) and to verify the CES-D measure. (3) Suicidal Assessment form was developed by Dr. Mumby and 
will be used to assess for those patients who have positive ideation on the DIS and/or positive score on the 
PhQ-9  with item #9.  
 
b. Self-Management Outcomes include Self-Efficacy, Diabetes Distress, and Self Care Behaviors.  
(1) Diabetes Self-Efficacy Scale was developed by Lorig and based on previous chronic-disease self-efficacy 
scales (130).  It consists of 8 items that assess an individual’s confidence in caring for their diabetes on a likert 
scale from “1=not confident” to “10=totally confident”.  It has established reliability of .83 (131) and has been 
reported to be effective in capturing self-efficacy for persons in diabetes clinical trials (132, 133).   
(2) Diabetes-Related Distress (PAIDS) is a 20-item tool that measures the current burden of diabetes and its 
treatment.  A sample question includes the following: Feeling discouraged with your diabetes treatment plan? 
which is scored on a 5-point scale (0=not a problem to 4=serious problem).  Higher scores indicate greater 
emotional distress.  The PAIDS has high internal reliability (alpha= .95).  Predictive as well as concurrent 
validity have been established by correlations with other measures (e.g., psychosocial factors, regimen 
adherence, and glycemic control) (134, 135).The responsiveness of the tool to detect changes in distress has 
also been established using data from seven prospective diabetes intervention studies (136).  
(3) Self-Care Behaviors:  (a) Self-Care Inventory was developed to assess patient’s perceptions of the degree 
to which they adhere to treatment recommendations for diabetes self-care (1= never do it to 5= always do it).  
The tool has 16 items that addresses the areas of medication adherence, dietary regulation, exercise, and 
management of blood sugar (137, 138).  The Self-Care Inventory unlike measures that only assess the 
frequency of self-care behaviors doesn’t presume that all individuals have the same treatment prescription and 
thus is able to assess adherence to different treatment regimens (e.g., insulin or not taking insulin).  Studies 
have used the tool which has demonstrated psychometrics of reliability (Cronbach alpha .87) and validity 
(correlations with diabetes distress, depression, and HBA1c ) (137-139).  (b) Summary of Diabetes Self-Care 


16 
 
Activities has 11 questions about self-care activities and 14 questions about recommended activities (Toobert 
et al. 2000) (c) Appraisal of Diabetes Scale (ADS) which is items to assess patient perceptions of diabetes 
(Carey et al., 1991).  c. Blood Pressure Outcome. Blood pressure will be measured in a standardized fashion 
using calibrated equipment in accordance with JNC guidelines (140).  The protocol and training developed for 
the ongoing international studies assessing blood pressure by Dr. Durazo, co-investigator will be used.  Blood 
pressure will be measured using the Omron Automatic Digital Blood Pressure Monitor (model HEM-7471c, 
Omron Healthcare, Bannockburn, IL, USA). After at least 5 minutes of resting, with the antecubital fossa at 
heart level, 3 blood pressure readings will be taken 5 minutes apart and the mean of the last 2 used for 
analysis (141).   
 
d. Inflammatory and Vascular Biomarkers.  (1) C-Reactive Protein (high sensitivity) will be measured by 
either Dr. Halaris team or Quest Lab depending upon price agreement.    (2) Cytokines (e.g., TNF-α, IL-6 IL-1) 
will be measured by Dr. Halaris and his team in their lab (see Resources) using the radioimmunoassay or 
with the technique of Randox Technologies, “Evidence InvestigatorTM”. This compact Biochip array system is 
comprised of a super-cooled Charge Coupled Device (CCD) camera and unique image processing software. 
We have already validated this Biochip technology for blood samples in preliminary studies. The results of the 
Biochips are comparable to results obtained by individual ELISAs for each of the individual parameters.  
Several cytokines, chemokines and growth factors can be analyzed simultaneously. (3) Vascular Factors (e.g., 
VEG-F) will be measured by Dr. Halaris using similar methodologies described above.  
 
e. Treatment (1) Labs: Serum vitamin D, calcium and PTH will be measured for each time by Quest 
Laboratories which is accredited by the College of American Pathologists (CAP) and Clinical Laboratory 
Improvement Amendments (CLIA) and has performed these assays for our pilot study at minimal cost.  Quest 
will send the results either electronically or by fax with the patient ID number, initials, and date of birth. There 
will be no other identifiers on the labs.  Serum vitamin D will be measured by liquid chromatography/tandem 
mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) which is the standard for the measurement of vitamin D and its components.  
This method provides a total 25 hydroxyvitamin D (25 OH- D) which includes 25 (OH) D2 and the 25 (OH) D3.  
Thus, we will be able to determine the effectiveness of vitamin D3 supplementation. PTH Intact and calcium 
will be measured by Quest.  The PTH is measured via an immunoassay and Calcium is measured by 
spectrophotometry 
 
Cardiometabolic Profile will be measured by Quest Laboratories to assess normal lab function prior to 
enrollment as recommended by the FDA.  This test includes the assessment of:  Albumin, Albumin/Globulin 
Ratio (calculated), Alkaline Phosphatase, ALT, AST, BUN/Creatinine Ratio (calculated), Calcium, Carbon 
Dioxide, Chloride, Creatinine with GFR Estimated, Globulin (calculated), Glucose, Potassium, Sodium, Total 
Bilirubin, Total Protein, Urea Nitrogen.  (2) Vitamin D Pill counts:  At 3 and 6 month visits, supplement bottle 
will be checked for number of unused pills and reason for not taking.  
 
f. Contributory Factors include obesity, diabetes, and lifestyle factors.    
(1) Obesity (a) Body composition (which includes bone, lean and fat mass) will be measured using dual-
emission x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) with a whole body scanner (Discovery W by Hologic) provided by Dr. 
Durazo (co-investigator) who has an international study on vitamin D.  The protocol for that study will be used: 
(a) an intrinsic CV will be determined by the DXA machine by the scanning of a phantom and (b) all DXA 
operators will be required to complete an intra-observer CV.  The method for assessing body composition 
using DXA has been reported to be precise, accessible, and requires short scanning (142-144).  The percent 
body fat measured by DXA has been used in examining vitamin D and its relationship to weight in 
postmenopausal women (145-146).  (b) Body Mass Index will be calculated from weight using an electronic 
calibrated scale and height using a stadiometer.  
(2) Diabetes:  (a) Glycemic Control will be measured by hemoglobin A1C using the DCA 2000 (Miles 
Diagnostic Division). The within CV is 2.1 to 4.5% and the between CV is 0.8 to 4.4%.  Fasting blood sugar will 
also be measured by Quest Laboratory from the Cardiometabolic Profile previously listed. (b) Diabetes 
History and Care will be measured using the Diabetes Care Profile from the Michigan Diabetes Research and 
Training Center. This has information on demographics and medical information such as current treatment, 
comorbidities, all medications (e.g., diabetes, depression), and previous diabetes education. Development, 
validity, and reliability of the Diabetes Care Profile have been reported (147). Demographics related to family 
composition (e.g., children) will be measured as well.  


17 
 
 
(3) Lifestyle: (a) Physical Activity:  Short physical activity scale called the Godin Leisure-Time exercise 
Questionnaire which is 2 questions and assesses level of activity and if it is regular enough to work up a sweat 
(http://www.godin.fsi.ulaval.ca/Fichiers/Quest/Godin%20leisure-time.pdf).  In addition, 4 items from the Nurses 
Health Study that asks the number of minutes per week for recreational outdoor activities, indoor activities 
(e.g., standing, sitting), usual walking pace, and number of flights of stairs per day.  
 
(b) Food Dietary Intake (which includes vitamin D and calcium will be assessed by the Block 
Questionnaire(s).  These have been developed using a data-based approach from the National Health and 
Nutrition Examination Survey (N-HANES) to create the selection of the foods, appropriate portion sizes and 
nutrient composition selected. The questionnaire for this study has about 110 food items to estimate usual and 
customary intake of a wide array of nutrients and food groups.  The food list and nutrient database for its 
analysis were developed from the Block 1998 Food Frequency Questionnaire.  The food list was developed 
from (NHANES) 1998 to 2002 dietary recall data and the nutrient database was developed from the USDA 
Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies. Food is quantified in terms of portion size and pictures are 
provided to enhance accuracy (151, 152). The 110 item will be administered at second baseline visit and 6 
months and the shorter version which assesses vitamin D and calcium only will be measured at baseline to 
capture this information for all enrolled subjects.   
 
 (c) Sun Exposure: Participants will be enrolled in the fall or early spring as these are the times that we have 
identified depresses subjects in our previous studies. To assess for sun exposure two methods will be used: 
amount of sun exposure and seasonality.   (1)  Amount of sun exposure has been developed using a method 
develop by Barger-Lux and Heaney  (153) where sun exposure is assessed by the amount of time in the sun 
and usual attire worn.  A quantifiable sun exposure is generated. (2) Season of study enrollment will also be 
recorded as a measure of sun exposure as done by other studies (116).  (3) Cancer Sun Exposure Tool which 
is 14 items to screen for sun exposure (Glanz et al., 2008). 
 
(d) Other Factors:  Factors that contribute to the overall health of persons with diabetes will also be assessed 
and include sleep using the validated Pittsburg Sleep Index (Buyssee et al., 1998), perceived quality of life 
using Ferrans Quality of Life Index (Ferrans, 2013), and diabetes symptoms developed by Grootenhuis (1994), 
and state-trait anxiety developed by Speilberger (1983), the Perceived Stressor Scale developed by Cohen  
(1983) and the MOS Social Support tool developed by Sherbourne and Stewart (1991).  Addition of 
assessment for sarcopenia, muscle function, and falls has been added as Appendix 2 with scientific 
justification.   
 
(e). Family Quality of Life Outcomes: (1) Family Inventory of Resources for Management (FIRM). Used to 
assess internal family and social support services.  Reliability (α= 0.87-0.92) has been strong in families with 
chronic illness (Ridosh, Sawin & Brei, 2013; Sawin, Brei, Buran, & Fastenau 2003). (2) FQOL is the “overall 
appraisal of the domains of life important to the family” measured with a 3-item scale, The G-FQOL Scale 
(parent perception of their off-spring QOL, their own QOL and their FQOL) reported on a scale from 0 (poor) to 
100 (excellent). The G-FQOL Scale has strong preliminary reliability (α = 0.86 – 0.90) in a study of women of 
children with chronic condition (Ridosh, Sawin, Brei & Schiffman, 2015). (3) Qualitative Interview Questions 
developed by Ridosh to assess how patients manage their health after the study and how the  family may 
impact their ability to manage their health (i.e., diabetes and/or mood) will be conducted after the 6 month  
study visit.  An optional consent to participate will be obtained.  The consent indicates that the audiotape will be 
transcribed word for word into a written document (transcript). The audiotape and transcription will be 
destroyed when the study is complete.  
 
  (f) Urinary Microbiome and Self-Report Measures. (1) Assessment of the urinary microbiome will occur in 
the laboratory of Dr. Alan Wolfe at LUMC.  Three tests will be conducted on the urine: the (i) general screen of 
bacteria, (ii) 16S rDNA sequencing, and (iii) both EQUC and standard urine cultures. Each sample will be 
labeled with the participant’s identification number from the parent grant and refrigerated. Samples not used 
will be biobanked  (repository consent approved).  (2) Assessment of urinary symptoms will include the use of 
the use of the (a) Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (QAB-q)  which has been used in women with diabetes 


18 
 
(Palleschi et al., 2014) and .(b) Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (Barber et al., 2001; 2011) which asks about 
urinary symptoms and is able to classify individuals  into categories of urinary continence. (c) Urinary 
Incontinence Questionaire to determine impact of this variable on health and quality of life (International 
Consultation on Incontinence Modular  Questionnaire; ICIQ-  http://www.iciq.net/structure.html) . (d) Urinary 
tract history completed by patient or administered during nurse administered physical exam.  (2) Assessment 
of the urine for inflammatory markers in the laboratory of Dr. Iwashima Makio at LUMC. This will be done by 
biochip for cytokine analysis.  
Putonti Lab protocol (e-mail 4-12-19_Specimens transported using FEDEx through Wolfe Lab protocal.  Urines 
stored -80.C and padlocked.  Working protocal to isoloate and congreate phages from urines in Appendix 2 of 
protocol. 
 
5. Data Management and Analysis 
a. Data Management: The goals of data management are to: (a) ensure that data collected during the study 
are properly and accurately entered and documented; (b) ensure that data will be stored in an electronic format 
that will allow the primary investigators of the project to retrieve data easily and to export data to statistical 
packages; and (c) ensure the confidentiality of subjects. After the data are entered and checked, several data 
quality checks will also be conducted, including descriptive statistics and graphic plots to detect outliers and 
influential observations. All computer data will be stored in a password-protected network server with back-up. 
The original raw data will be stored in a locked cabinet accessed only by key project personnel. We will run 
univariate and bivariate analyses for all variables prior to our main analyses. We will evaluate continuous 
variables using t-tests or F-tests and categorical variables using 2. We will examine data distributions and test 
all variables for linear relationships or non-linear relationships. Descriptive statistics (means, standard 
deviation, frequency) and correlations (both Pearson and Spearman) between variables will be conducted to 
preliminarily assess the data. Necessary transformations and imputations will be conducted on based the raw 
data.   
 
b. Data Analysis:  The conceptual relations in the model for the study (Figure) are being used to guide the 
testing of the primary, secondary, and exploratory outcomes.  
 
SUNSHINE PRIMARY STUDY: 
Hypothesis 1: Women receiving 50,000 IUs vitamin D supplementation will report fewer depressive symptoms 
(primary outcome), increased diabetes self-management mediated by depression improvement (secondary 
outcome), and have a lower systolic BP (exploratory) compared to those 5000 IUs at three and six months 
follow-up. 
   
For analysis of the primary outcome (depressive symptoms) generalized, linear, mixed models (GLMM) for 
repeated measures will be used (154).  The proposed model will have one between-subjects variable GROUP 
(vitamin D supplementation; control) with two levels and one within-subjects variable TIME with three levels 
(baseline, 3 and 6 months). The test of the hypotheses will hinge on the GROUP by TIME interaction as an 
indication of group differences in the variable of interest over time. A given hypothesis will be supported with 
the finding of a statistically significant GROUP by TIME interaction, and the finding that the means are in the 
hypothesized direction. GLMM will be implemented using SPSS which will provide estimates of the means for 
each outcome variable by time and treatment groups.  The results will be summarized with adjusted means 
and 95% confidence intervals. A compound symmetric covariance structure will be assumed. If necessary, 
other covariance structures, such as Huynh-Feldt, will be investigated. An intention-to-treat analysis (ITT) 
which includes an analysis of completers and noncompleters will also be done using GLMM.  Stratification by 
depression severity should provide comparable groups at baseline; however, differences will be assessed.   All 
analyses will control for baseline values of body composition (body fat), race (white compared with nonwhite), 
and time at entry into the study (as season of the year, winter, summer, spring, fall) as previously done by our 
consultant, Dr. Pittas, in his vitamin D trials.  Other covariates, related to diabetes (length of time with diabetes, 
HBA1c), lifestyle factors, (physical activity, diet), and previous depression will be added to generate a 
multivariate model which is parsimonious and based on the clinical relevance and statistical significance of 
these factors.   
 
For analysis of the secondary outcome (self-management), regression analysis will be used to test whether an 
improvement in self-management is mediated by an improvement in depressive symptoms (Figure). The 
Preacher and Hayes macro add-on for SPSS will be used. This technique estimates the path coefficients and 


19 
 
generates bootstrap confidence intervals for total and specific indirect effects of the independent variable 
(vitamin D supplementation) on the dependent variable (diabetes self-management) through one or more 
mediator variables (depressive symptoms). This method allows for testing indirect effects through a mediating 
variable without the estimation of a direct link between and independent variable on an outcome, and also 
adjusts for the potential influence of covariates (155, 156).    
 
For the exploratory outcome (blood pressure), GLMM will be used to examine for the direct effect of vitamin D 
on blood pressure since there is physiologic evidence to support this. The GLMM statistical procedures 
described above will be used.   
 
Hypothesis 2:  Women receiving 50,000 IUs vitamin D supplementation will have a decrease in inflammatory 
biomarkers which will be associated with fewer depressive symptoms compared to 5000 IUs  at three and six 
months follow-up.  
 
For this exploratory hypothesis, to determine if there is a decrease in the inflammatory markers, the same 
procedures (GLLM) will be used. If significant, then correlational methods (parametric and non-parametric) will 
be used to explore the association between vitamin D supplementation, depression, and the inflammatory bio 
markers.  
 
1.For the sub-study FAMDD, the qualitative component (Aim 1) interview data is being transcribed.  
Following transcription, there will be verification of the transcription by Dr. Ridosh.  Once these data have been 
verified, a narrative analysis will be conducted. Narrative inquiry was chosen to focus on the relationship 
between individuals’ life stories and it guides synthesis of data to represent the participants’ stories as a whole. 
Particular modifiable factors that mitigate health risks for family members and factors that facilitate self-
management will be identified. Study team involved in this component of qualitative analysis includes Dr. 
Penckofer, Dr. Ridosh, Dr. Roux and Ms. Meghan Meehan. 
For the analysis of the quantitative measures, descriptive statistics will be used to generate information that will 
allow for exploring the relationship of these measures to the other study variables being collected (e.g., 
severity of depression and diabetes) (Aim 2).  The descriptive data will also allow comparison of these data to 
other studies that have used these tools. Reliability will be established for each tool at each time point using 
Cronbach alpha. The current analysis will test The Global Family Quality of Life Scale-Adult Women Version 
and detail its psychometric properties, specifically construct validity and reliability. Descriptive statistics will 
include mean age, gender, level of education, race and ethnicity. Data from total sample will be analyzed. 
Regression analysis will be used to address Aims 2 and 3. Mediational analyses will be used as appropriate 
 
2. For the sub-study on the Urinary Microbiome, the following analysis was proposed. 
 
 Primary Objectives  
(1) To determine the FUM composition in women with T2DM using high throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing 
& enhanced quantitative urine culture (EQUC), and to determine the FUM’s association with LUTS in women 
with T2DM.  
  
Hypothesis: Among women with T2DM, their FUM composition is a salient predictor of LUTS. 
Planned Analyses:  To test this hypothesis, LUTS is the response variable and FUM is the primary explanatory 
variable.  FUM will be measured in at least two ways:  First as a microbial diversity index (e.g., Shannon, Chao 
1) and as an individual microbial taxa count.  When diversity indices are used, a log transformation may be 
applied to adjust for heterogeneity or lack of linearity.  
In this repeated measures study (baseline, 3, and 6 months), a linear mixed effects model will be used to estimate 
the effect of FUM on patients’ LUTS severity score while allowing random intercepts for each participant to 
account for the within subject correlation engendered by the repeated measurements. Since we are documenting 
UTIs over the trial, we will also explore the odds of experiencing at least one UTI, to be estimated as a function 
of the FUM using a generalized linear mixed effects model that also allows random intercepts for each participant; 
a binomial distribution with logit link will be specified to determine the odds ratio for the FUM diversity index and 
microbial taxa count. In these models, extreme error variances will be monitored using the ratio of the Pearson 
chi-square fit statistic over its degrees of freedom. When necessary, UTI may be treated as a count variable 


20 
 
(particularly if there are enough participants experiencing multiple UTI events) and a Poisson distribution with 
negative binomial link may be used to adjust for observed overdispersion. 
 
 (2) To determine the impact of glycemic control on the LUTS and FUM composition in women with T2DM.  
  
Hypothesis: In women with T2DM, the effect of FUM on LUTS depends on glycemic control (HBA1C), which 
may be measured as a continuous or binary (i.e., >7% versus <= 7%) variable.  
Planned Analyses: Testing this hypothesis is largely a continuation of the investigation specified in prior 
objective, except that each model will evaluate if any effect of the FUM on LUTS severity depends on women’s 
level of glycemic control. Consequently, for this aim, an interaction term between FUM and glycemic control will 
be estimated for each model specified above. If the interaction is not significant, adjusted estimates will be 
provided for the effect of FUM on LUTS after controlling for the effect of glycemic control, as well as other salient 
covariates (e.g., race, age, depression level, body mass index, and concomitant medications). 
For both hypotheses, all comparisons, including all possible pairwise interaction terms, will be evaluated using 
an alpha level of 0.05 and the tests will be two tailed, meaning that an effect in either direction will be interpreted. 
 
Secondary Objective:  
To determine whether there is an association between vitamin D status (sufficient, insufficient, and deficient), 
LUTS, and the FUM.   
Hypothesis (a): Women with T2DM who have less vitamin D will have will have a different FUM composition 
than those with sufficient vitamin D. 
Hypothesis (b): Women with T2DM who have less vitamin D will have will have more LUTS than those with 
sufficient vitamin D. 
Planned Analyses: For this secondary objective, a generalized linear mixed effects model will be used to 
determine the odds of at least one UTI as a function of ordinal vitamin D status (deficient, insufficient, and 
sufficient), again allowing random intercepts for each participant to account for within subject correlation due to 
repeated measurements; these models will specify a binomial distribution with logit link to determine the odds 
ratio for each pairwise comparison of vitamin D status. As before, extreme error variances will be monitored 
using the ratio of each model’s Pearson chi-square fit statistic over its degrees of freedom. When necessary, a 
negative binomial link may be used to account for observed over-dispersion. Finally, a linear mixed effects model 
will be used to estimate the effect of ordinal vitamin D status on patients’ FUM indices and microbial taxa count 
as well as their LUTS symptom severity score, again allowing random intercepts for each participant. For this 
objective, all model terms will be evaluated using an alpha level of 0.05 and the tests will be two tailed, meaning 
that an effect in either direction will be interpreted.   
To compare vitamin D, LUTS and the FUM, each individual will function as her own control, with the first time 
point establishing the baseline FUM profile with which to compare the effect of treatment dose at 6 months 
(endpoint of trial). We will model the outcome using a GLMM, which takes into account the correlation between 
2 observations on the same woman. We will determine if there is a change in a women’s FUM baseline to end 
of study by treatment. We will use similar procedures to determine treatment group differences. Similar data 
analyses will be conducted on the urinary symptoms reported by each participant across time points and between 
groups.      
Exploratory Aim: To examine the relationship of the phage activity with glycemic control, other labs including  
Urine PH in biobanked urine samples in the laboratory of Catherine Putonti.  
Other Exploratory Analysis:  We will be able to make comparisons of the FUM with persons who do not have 
diabetes. Drs. Wolfe and Brubaker have sequence and culture data from healthy and incontinent (UUI) women 
from their prior cohort studies (see Fig. 2) (Hilt et al., 2014; Pearce et al., 2014). In addition, 180 well-
characterized UITN subjects are adult women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) that have had clean catch 
midstream voided urine sequenced (see Fig. 1) (Thomas-White et al., 2016b). Thus, comparisons with these 


21 
 
data offer a unique opportunity to determine the impact of having the comorbid condition of diabetes on urinary 
outcomes to those who do not have diabetes.   
 
c. Missing Data. Item missing data (e.g., a subject fails to answer a particular questionnaire item), will be 
imputed using procedures such as EM algorithm. For unit missing data (where a subject is missing at a data 
collection time point), we will determine whether missing data are MCAR (data are missing completely at 
random), MAR (data are missing at random), or NMAR (not missing at random). If missing data are MCAR or 
MAR, it is likely that the standard multivariate computations will not result in biased standard error estimates.  
However, if missing data are NMAR, we will use the "pattern mixture" approach to compute a "weighted 
average" of the parameters that are associated with the missing data to estimate what the data would have 
been (157).   
 
d. Sample Size Estimation.  Based on our power estimates, a sample of 75 women per group will be needed 
for a final sample of 150 women.  We have planned for a conservative attrition (15%) which is higher than our 
Sunshine pilot (8%) but consistent with our SWEEP trial (59).  Therefore, 180 (90 per group) will be enrolled 
into the treatment arms. Thus far, out of 169 patients enrolled, only 83 (49%) have been randomized to 
treatment arms.  Thus, we will enroll 360 as we have had a screen failure of almost 50% to allow for a 
sufficient number of persons to be randomized.  For the power analysis, we used a repeated measures 
approach formulae developed by Hedeker et al. (158) which allows comparisons of the group means across 
time while adjusting for baseline values and accounting for the correlation between baseline and follow-up 
observations.  We have assumed a 2 tailed test with a type I error rate of 0.05 for each outcome.  Depression:  
There was a 14 point decrease in depression from baseline to 6 months following vitamin D supplementation 
using the CES-D (see pilot data).  Using the control group in the SWEEP study (which had the same 
enrollment criteria for depression and did not receive treatment), there was a 7 point decrease in depression 
(28.8 to 21.4) as depression symptoms can improve without treatment.  Given these group difference, the 
effect size is .46. A sample size of 30 per group would provide 95% power. We also powered for depression 
remission (CED-D < 16) as other depression trials (159). In our vitamin D study, 55% of women had remission 
of their depression at 3 months and 63% at 6 months. Using the control group data from the SWEEP study, 
30% had remission of depression at 3 months and 20% at 6 months.  Having this information, a sample size of 
75 per group (n=150) would be needed to detect differences in depression remission at 3 months and a 
sample of 25 per group (n=50) to see the difference at 6 months. Diabetes Self-Management:  There were 
significant differences from baseline to six months (see pilot data) to calculate the effect sizes. We calculated 
an effect size of .70 for diabetes distress and .33 for self-care.  For diabetes self-efficacy, an effect size of .30 
based on our previous research (SWEEP) will be used.  A sample of 75 per group (n=150) will achieve 85% 
power on these study outcomes. Blood Pressure: We observed a decrease of 8 mmHg in the vitamin D study 
but no change in a control group from the SWEEP study (136.2 mmHg to 135.9 mmHg).  Pfeifer et al. (96) 
reported a 7% decrease in blood pressure in women after 800 IUs of D3 for 6 weeks.  To be conservative, we 
will assume a difference of about 5 mmHg to account for the placebo effect and regression to the mean 
phenomena commonly observed in clinical trials.  This difference yields an effect size of about 0.3. A final 
sample of 150 (75 per group) would provide 80% power to assess this outcome.  Inflammation (Exploratory): 
Using pilot data of Dr. Halaris (see pilot data) a sample size of 75 per group provides 85% power to detect 
differences between groups on depression and inflammation. For the meditational analyses, power was 
estimated using effect sizes from our previous research and current pilot study. Although the depression effect 
sizes discussed above are large (160), a more conservative approach anticipating medium effect sizes was 
employed for the mediation analysis.  With medium effects for self-care outcomes, a total sample of 135 would 
achieve 95% power. 
 
Sample size estimation: 
For the sub-study (FAMDD), the qualitative component of the study, the sample size proposed was 50 women. 
For the quantitative component, it is estimated that since these tools have been used previously, that the 
estimate needed for adequate power will be determined by power analysis. An a-priori sample size by these 
investigators for multiple regression indicates with a medium effect size, p = .05, power of .80 and up to 6 
independent variables a minimum sample of 97 will be needed for quantitative analysis. 
 
6. Potential Problems and Alternative Solutions.  Although subject accrual is a concern for all research, we 
have been successful in our previous studies. We have established relationships with key clinical sites (see 
diabetes educators, physicians support letters) which have reported a high volume of accessible patients (see 


22 
 
2b, recruitment table). Although attrition is another potential issue, it has been low in our previous studies (6% 
pilot vitamin D, 15% SWEEP).  And, we have provided steps for addressing adherence, retention, and drop-
outs (see 3d).  To prevent measurement issues, protocols for training of staff to ensure consistency with the 
collection of data have been established in our prior work.  It is possible that factors like diet and sunshine may 
impact on vitamin D levels.  Although the impact of these variables in our pilot work was not substantial, they 
will be measured. Because body fat may affect vitamin D levels, body composition has been added as 
measurement.  Treatments will be assessed at all time points and evaluated for their contribution to the study 
outcomes.  In our prior work, we did not seen significant changes in medications as women were on 
established medications prior to enrollment.  The placebo effect may have been a factor for the positive 
findings in our one-arm pilot study; hence a randomized trial is the next logical step.  Study staff will be blinded 
to the treatment and we have protocols if the blind needs to be broken (see 1c-e).  Staff will not provide 
additional support to the patient for treatment; however, protocols for increased depression have been 
delineated (3b).   Finally, it is possible that if depression improves, self-management may not.  Therefore, the 
next planned study would be a randomized trial to see if treating depression with vitamin D prior to diabetes 
self-management education could enhance learning and self-management outcomes.  
       
7. Timeline.  We have proposed a timeline of four years with the enrollment of 180 in the treatment arms and 
follow-up of all women completed by Year 4.  For year 1, time is committed for start up, enrollment and start of 
intervention.  We plan to enroll 50 subjects into the treatment arms in year 1.  For years 2 and 3 we will plan to 
enroll 65 each year into the treatment arms.  We will complete intervention delivery by the third month of year 4 
with follow-ups complete by the sixth month of that year. Final data analysis and reports will be completed by 
the end of Year 4.   
 
VI.  PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS.  
 
A.  Risks to the Subjects   
(1) Human Subjects Involvement and Characteristics.  We will enroll a total of 360women to allow for 
attrition and screen failure over the course of the study (our pilot study had an attrition of 8%).  Women 21 and 
older with a depression score of  CES-D > 16 and/or taking antidepressant medication with a CES-D 
depression score of >12 and/or CES-D score average of >16 of phone screen and face to face screen,, and 
type 2 diabetes who are under the care of a health care provider will be recruited.  They must also have a 
vitamin D level of less than 32 ng/ml verified by laboratory testing.    
 
Participants will be excluded  if they have: 1) current alcohol or substance abuse disorders, 2) a history of 
bipolar depression or any other psychotic disorder, 3) debilitating chronic illness (e.g., cancer, multiple 
sclerosis), 4)  severe complications of diabetes (e.g., blindness or amputation) since these will impact 
depression, 5)  malabsorption disorders (e.g., crohn’s disease, celiac sprue, gastric bypass) since this impacts 
vitamin D absorption (122),  6)  Elevated serum calcium since vitamin D may increase serum calcium (123). 7) 
Taking St. John’s Wort and not willing to stop for 3 weeks prior to enrollment) (124),  8) Use of vitamin D 
supplements in past 2 months and unwillingness to discontinue for 1 month prior to study 9) Pregnant or 
planning a pregnancy. 10) Baseline systolic blood pressure greater than 160 mmHG or diastolic greater than 
100 mmHG. Having active treatment for depression (e.g., antidepressant therapy) will not be exclusion criteria 
if the patient has been under treatment for six weeks or more.  Similar criteria were used for our pilot.    
 
These exclusion criteria will be assessed over the phone verified at the baseline enrollment visit.  In addition at 
baseline enrollment, the participant’s depression will be verified using the diagnostic interview schedule.  If 
during that interview the patient screens positive for self-harm, they will be excluded from participation (see 
Protection Against Risks, B2).   
 
All eligible subjects will be randomized into either the treatment group (vitamin D 50,000 IUs) or the 
comparison group (5000 IUs).  They will be requested to make 4 study visits for data collection over a period of 
6 months (baseline data, prescription pick up 10 days later, 3 month data collection and 6 month data 
collection). Women will also be called at months 2, 4  and 9 months (as noted under 3.c) to assess for any 
issues related to the study supplement as well as to assess for depressive symptoms.  
 


23 
 
(2) Sources of Data.  We will obtain questionnaire and interview data from all study subjects at baseline, 2, 3  
6 and 9 months.  Other data collected will consist of the following: a) a phlebotomy draw for blood specimens 
(one tube of 5 ml for Quest labs and one tube of 5 ml for immune markers) will be drawn from the participant at 
baseline, 3 and 6 months; and b) body measurements from the participant's physical exam (BP, height, weight) 
at baseline, 3 and 6 months; c) Body composition scan using dual-x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans at 
baseline, d) Urinary specimens (8 tablespoons) at study visits.  All medical data will be obtained from the 
subject.  Access to medical records is not being requested.   
 
(3) Potential Risks.  The potential risk to the research participants includes hemotoma at the site of the 
venipuncture when the blood is drawn at baseline, 3 and 6 months. Blood will be drawn by the staff that has 
been trained to do this, so risk of bleeding and hematoma will be minimized.   
 
DXA will be used to measure body composition (which includes bone, lean, and fat mass). Prior to DXA, 
female participants will undergo a pregnancy test.  Pregnant women will be excluded from the study due to the 
radiation. The radiation exposure with a DXA scan is about 12microSieverts, which is significantly less than the 
radiation absorbed by a passenger on a roundtrip transcontinental flight (about 60 microSieverts).  The scan 
will take approximately 10 minutes to perform.  
 
There is the potential that patients may become depressed over the course of the study.  If patients 
demonstrate significant increases in the depression scores (i.e., an increase of 30% or more), either Drs. 
Halaris or Mumby will be consulted, and a determination will be made regarding contact with the primary care 
provider and a referral to a mental health care provider (HIPPA signed, see protection again risks).  This will be 
done for those in treatment and control group at all points of contact (phone or face to face).  If during the 
course of the study patients begin any medication for mood (e.g., depression or anxiety), this information will 
be recorded.  If the patient begins therapy during the course of the study, the therapist will be contacted to 
ensure that the study does not conflict with the patient’s current treatment protocol. 
 
Hypercalcemia is a potential side effect of persons taking higher doses of vitamin D and this lab will be 
monitored to ensure that it is not present at time of enrollment and does not increase over the course of the 
study by the endocrinologist. Most recent evidence demonstrates that hypercalcemia may not be a significant 
side effect associated with vitamin D (49).   Vitamin D levels will be measured at baseline to ensure that the 
level is less than 32 ng/ml.  It will also be monitored over the course of the study to ensure that the levels do 
not increase or that there are symptoms of toxicity.  Safety procedures are listed (see protection against risks).  
 
To decrease the possibility of hypoglycemia from fasting, patients will be asked to make sure that they eat a 
protein before bedtime and bring their morning diabetes medications to take with the breakfast that is provided.  
For persons taking insulin, they will be informed that if they take insulin in the evening, to contact their health 
care provider about the dose that they should take when fasting for morning blood draws.  They will also be 
informed to bring their morning medications to their data collection visits to take with their breakfast.      
 
B. Adequacy of Protection Against Risks.  
 
(1) Recruitment.  We will actively recruit women from the LUMC endocrinology and general medicine clinics as 
well as diabetes centers in the surrounding communities as delineated in the recruitment section of the grant.  
We have received support letters for access to these sites (see letters of support). We have been very successful 
in our previous work.  Institutional Review Board approved flyers will be available at these sites so that nurses 
may distribute the information to prospective study participants.  Local newspapers to inform prospective 
participants about the research study will also be utilized.  We will recruit racial/ethnic groups consistent with 
previous work and participating institutions (white-60%, nonwhite-40%).   
  
(2) Protection Against Risks.   
As state previously, for protection against the risk of bleeding and hemotoma, all phlebotomy staff will have been 
trained.  For the DXA scan, the personnel will have been trained (per the NIH study of Dr. Durazo, co-investigator) 
on the use of the machine and procedures regarding radiation. The consent states that in the event that the 


24 
 
study participant demonstrates or verbalizes significant worsening of depression or suicidal ideation during the 
study, their health care provider will be informed.  Written permission to contact the health care provider (HIPPA 
form) will be obtained at time of enrollment.   
 
At baseline enrollment, the computerized diagnostic interview schedule will be administered to verify 
depression.  During that interview, the patient is asked about self-harm.  If active suicidal ideation is reported, 
the suicidal assessment form is completed.  In addition, if  the patient answers question #9 on the PhQ-9 
depression tool with a response other than “Not at all”, the suicidal assessment form will also be completed 
and similar procedures followed if active suicidal ideation.  
 
 
If during this time the nurse identifies any patient as having suicidal ideation and being at moderate to high risk 
for self-harm that requires urgent evaluation and intervention, s/he will page Drs. Halaris or Mumby.  The women 
will be evaluated by either Drs. Halaris, Mumby or psychiatry resident, who will confirm the treatment plan with 
the psychiatry attending on service that day.  If the patient has active suicidal ideation and is deemed to be in 
need of immediate psychiatric care, a member of the research team will escort the patient to the emergency 
room.  She will be seen by the psychiatry resident on call and reported to the psychiatry attending to confirm a 
treatment plan.  Drs. Halaris or Mumby will follow-up with the delineated treatment plan as this will be important 
for communication with the patient’s health care provider as well as for the integrity of the study.  These 
individuals will not be eligible for participation.   At baseline enrollment, both the treatment and control will receive 
a list of resources for mental health services developed by the clinical psychologist (as with our previous study), 
and will not be prevented from getting help if needed.  In our previous depression study this occurred infrequently 
(<3%) over the duration of the study (i.e., 1 woman started an antidepressant and 1 woman restarted therapy as 
she has seen a therapist in the past).  
 
During the course of the study, Dr. Halaris, psychiatrist and co-investigator or Dr. Mumby, psychologist and co-
investigator, will work with the research staff and consult as necessary.  During any time where the nurse 
identifies any patient as being at moderate to high risk for self harm or with significant worsening of depression 
(a 30% increase in the CES-D ), Drs. Halaris or Mumby will be contacted and procedures previously described 
followed. Subjects will be withdrawn if there is significant worsening of depression per Drs. Halaris or Mumby in 
consultation with their primary care provider.  Similarly, for persons who drop out, we will assess the reason for 
drop out and the extent to which they require further treatment in consultation with Dr. Halaris or Mumby and 
their primary care provider.  These protocols were followed for the pilot study and there were no adverse 
events.     
  
In terms of the treatment intervention, those assigned the comparison group of 5000 IUs placebo will have a 
dose that approximates that recommended by the IOM, to ensure that they have adequate intake which is 
consistent with other vitamin D trials.  For those who receive the treatment dose, published reports suggest 
that 50,000 IU per day of vitamin D (note that the proposed study dose is 50,000 IU per week) can increase 
vitamin D levels to more than 150 ng/dl and cause hypercalcemia (35).  The current dose for this study is one 
capsule of 50,000 IU per week which equates to about 7000 IU per day. 
 
The dose at which the Vitamin D is being administered has minimal side effects, which may include 
gastrointestinal symptoms of constipation, stomach upset, and loss of appetite.  Symptoms associated with 
vitamin D toxicity include bone pain, nausea, and vomiting (35, 120).   We will be monitoring patient labs and 
for these symptoms at all study visits (baseline, 3, 6 months).  Telephone interview (months 2, 4) will be used 
when patients are not seen for these assessments as with our pilot study (see procedures).      
 
The vitamin D levels will be sent to the endocrinologist who will monitor the labs for the study, and inform the 
PI if the supplement needs to be stopped.   This will be done when a study subject has either:  (1) 
hypercalcemia or (2) vitamin D level of greater than 100 ng/ml with normal serum calcium or symptoms of 
vitamin D previously listed that may be indicative of possible toxicity (35).   Patients  will be requested to return 
for a serum level of vitamin D within one month (since the half life is approximately two weeks) of stopping 
therapy (120) and then again at the end of the study.  


25 
 
 
Patients will be allowed to continue their preferred calcium intake but will be discouraged from taking more 
than 1200 mg total per day (to be consistent with the IOM guidelines, 97) as per the recommendation of our 
consultant, Dr. Pittas (see biosketch) who is an expert in vitamin D and calcium intake   This is consistent with 
our pilot study. 
 
Protection against potential for hypoglycemia at data collection will be taken as previously described.  It is also 
possible that as women become less depressed, they may engage in better self-care behaviors and improve 
their glycemic control, with potential for hypoglycemia.   
 
Because the urine is being examined for bacteria in a research laboratory, we will not be able to provide the 
test results to the patient.  However, if they have symptoms of urinary tract infection, they will be advised to 
speak to their healthcare provider.  
 
 
C. Data Safety Monitoring Plan. 
A monitoring plan has been established to ensure that the data remain confidential and that the participants 
are not experiencing any harm from the intervention, or experiencing significant increases in depression.  A 
committee to ensure that the plan is followed will be formed. The committee will meet twice a year to assess 
the activities of the study and any concerns or problems that may have occurred.  Members of the data safety 
monitoring board will include individuals who have demonstrated expertise in areas related to the project and 
have agreed to serve in this capacity.  Patrick Lustman, PhD, is a Professor and psychologist in the School of 
Medicine at Washington University in St. Louis, MO.  He has extensive experience in the assessment of 
depression in obese individuals as well as those with type 2 diabetes. He has conducted numerous clinical 
trials using psychotherapy as well as medication therapy for these individuals, and has published extensively in 
this area.  He also has more than 20 years of NIH funding to support his work.  Dr. Michael Holick, PhD, MD is 
a Professor of Medicine, Physiology, and Biophysics at Boston University School of Medicine.  Dr. Holick is 
known nationally for his program of research in vitamin D.  He has NIH funded studies examining vitamin D and 
its effect in different populations.  He is an expert on vitamin D dosing, regimen, and serum measurement.  He is 
nationally and internationally known for his work on vitamin D.  Dr. Grazia Allepo, Endocrinologist at 
Northwestern Hospital with expertise in diabetes will be a member.   Finally, Dr. Patsy Marie Brannon Professor 
of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University & Director of the Cornell Dietetic Internship Research who has 
expertise on nutrition and development including vitamin D, maternal and child nutrition, diet-gene regulation of 
the placenta and pancreas is willing to serve.  Dr. Brannon is a  Member of the Steering Committee on the 
International Vitamin D Standardization Project (2010 to present), Member of the IOM Committee on the DRI’s 
for Calcium and Vitamin D (2009-2010), member of Technical Expert Panel for the Systematic Evidence Based 
Review on “The Relationships of Vitamin D and Calcium Intakes to Nutrient Status Indicators and Health 
Outcomes.”, Tufts Evidence Based Practice Center, 2008-2009, Co-chair of the Federal Interagency Working 
Group on Vitamin D (2006-2008). At the data and safety meetings, they will review the research protocol, plans 
for data collection and safety monitoring and be responsible for noting adherence to the following:   
(1) The Progress of Study and Safety of Participants: The Data Safety Monitoring Plan (attached) has been 
modified to be congruent with the study protocol.  Since there is no upper limit for HBA1c, an increase in 
HBA1c of   3% or more will be monitored. The following data will be examined to evaluate safety issues: 
adverse events, attrition rates, reasons for attrition, and rates of adherence to treatment intervention at all 
contact points.  In order to provide a level of protection to all study subjects, the following will be specifically 
included for monitoring and follow-up:  (1) number (if any) of patients who had suicidal ideation during the 
course of the study, and adherence to safety protocol (2) number (if any) of patients who have experienced a 
30% increase in the CES-D score and  recommendations by Dr. Halaris for follow-up and referral (3) number (if 
any) of patients who began medication for mental health or sought additional therapy. 
 (4) number (if any) patients who had hypercalcemia or vitamin D levels greater than 100 ng/dl or symptoms of 
vitamin D toxicity and recommendations by Dr. Emanuele. 
 


26 
 
(2) Compliance with the reporting of adverse events: Determining whether all adverse events and/or 
unanticipated problems were reported in writing to Loyola University Medical Center within 48 hours of 
discovery of the incident.   
 
(3) Data Accuracy and Protocol Compliance:  Evaluating records for the training of personnel and other 
protocol documents as needed.  All staff personnel will be required to have human subjects training, HIPPA 
training, and training on all study protocols (Appendix).   Dr. Penckofer will have weekly meetings with the project 
staff and co-investigators. She will also train the staff personnel regarding all procedures (phone as well as in-
person protocol), and meet with them as they facilitate the recruitment of study participants and schedule them 
for data collection. Training will also be provided for the research nurse on the use of the C-DIS. Dr. Penckofer 
will observe phone as well as on-site screening to ensure that the protocol is being followed, and provide 
feedback. At baseline, three and six month data collection points, the following will be done by Dr. Penckofer 
and the staff to ensure protocol compliance: 1) reviewing the informed consent and HIPPA documents; 2) 
checking questionnaire booklets for missing data prior to study subjects leaving the data collection site; 3) 
running standards for the hemoglobin A1c prior to subject testing in order to ensure the accuracy of the lab test. 
Dr. Penckofer will obtain reproducibility data from off-site labs during the times that study specimens are 
processed.  
 
D. Potential Benefits of the Proposed Research to the Subjects and Others.  
At this time, preliminary data from the pilot study suggests that vitamin D may be beneficial for improvement of 
depressive symptoms.  However, given the need for a randomized clinical trial to determine whether the pilot 
data will substantiate these findings, at this time it is unknown if women will benefit from participating in the 
study.   To our knowledge, there are no studies that have examined whether treating persons with diabetes for 
depressive symptoms using vitamin D supplementation.  Therefore, our study will serve as a new and 
important contribution to our understanding of whether improvement of their nutritional state by vitamin D 
supplementation can be effective in improving both mental and physical outcomes.  Practice initiated 
interventions to improve the quality of care for depression management in patients with diabetes may also   
substantially increase the welfare of these patients, particularly as it relates to their own self-management, 
however, this has not been well studied either. 
  
E. Importance of the Knowledge to be Gained. Given the high cost of treating depression, its prevalence in 
persons with diabetes, particularly women, studying the benefit of vitamin D supplementation for this group has 
significant impact.  With an improvement in depression, there may be an improvement in self-care behaviors 
which is also being examined and has not been well studied relative to depression. Finally, studying vitamin D 
supplementation for the effects on blood pressure also has important clinical implications as research 
examining this outcome is limited.    In clinical studies that have explored vitamin D and mood outcomes (other 
than Jorde et al.) the amount of vitamin D has been low, the duration of supplementation short, and blood 
levels were not measured (23).  The proposed study is unique in that the amount of vitamin D to be 
administered is currently what is recommended for obese individuals (34), thus the translation of study findings 
to practice is significant.   The most important benefit of vitamin D supplementation if effective, is its low cost 
(as low as $3 per month) and affordability to the general public. Given its low cost, association with minimal 
side effects (36), that 1 in 10 Americans now take antidepressants which can have negative effects on weight 
and metabolic control (100), that depression is higher in women than men (7) especially in diabetes, this study 
can benefit the general public.    
 
Inclusion of Women and Minorities  Depression occurs more often in women with diabetes than men with 
diabetes, and over 25% of women with diabetes have depression (7). It has been reported that depression is 
associated with poorer diet, physical activity and medication adherence for women with diabetes (6, 72-76).   
Having both diabetes and depression is associated with a significantly increased risk for complications, 
including cardiac mortality which occurs more often in women with type 2 diabetes (53).  The Women’s Health 
Initiative (WHI) reported that low vitamin D intake was associated with significant depressive symptoms (27).  
Preliminary data has suggested it has s potential benefit for depression treatment for women (33).  The 
Nurses’ Health Study reported that women were twice as likely to develop hypertension if vitamin D levels were 
less than 15 ng/ml   (83).  Pfeifer and colleagues (91) reported a 7% decrease in systolic blood pressure in 


27 
 
vitamin D deficient women following 800 IUs of D3 after 6 weeks. Thus, there is evidence to suggest that 
targeting women at this time is justified.  
 
Since women with diabetes have low vitamin D and high levels of depression, this group is being studied as 
efficacy is more likely to be demonstrated.  If results are significant, men could also be examined (although 
they don’t have as high risk for depression or the same body fat content as women which contributes to their 
low vitamin D)  to assess for gender differences on dosing and impact on health outcomes.  The investigator 
will recruit almost half minority (40%), which is consistent with the proportion that currently seeks care at the 
primary sites of data collection.    
 
Inclusion of Children 
It would not be reasonable to include children (less than 21) since the dose proposed for this study has only 
been tested in several adult populations.  Given the recent increase in childhood obesity and type 2 diabetes, it 
may be possible to develop a study for vitamin D supplementation in the future for this age group.  
  
VII.  References.  (ADDITIONAL REFERENCES WITH RESPECTIVE AMENDMENT) 
1.Boyle, JDP. Projection of the Year 2050 Burden of Diabetes in the US Adult Population:  Dynamic modeling 
of incidence, mortality and pre-diabetes prevalence.  Population Health Metrics 2010, 8: 29.  
2. Institute for Alternative Futures.  United States’ Diabetes Crisis: Today and Future Trends.  Diabetes 
Forecasts, 2011. 
3. National Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.  Prevent Diabetes 2011.  
http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/consumer/prevent.htm 
4.Penckofer S, Ferrans C, Velsor-Friedrich B, Savoy S.  The psychological impact of living with diabetes: 
Women’s Day to Day Experiences.  The Diabetes Educator 2007; 33: 680-690.  
 
5.Chyun D.A., Melkus G.D., Katten D.M., Price W.J., Davey J.A., Grey N., Heller G., Wackers F.J. The 
association of psychological factors, physical activity, neuropathy and quality of life in type 2 diabetes. Biological 
Research for Nursing 2006; 7: 279-288.  
 
6.Whittemore, R., Melkus, G., Grey, M.  Self-report of depressed mood and depression in women with type 2 
diabetes.  Issues in Mental Health Nursing 2004: 25: 243-260.  
 
7.Anderson, R.J., Freedland, K.E., Clouse, R.E., & Lustman, P.J.  The prevalence of comorbid depression in 
adults with diabetes:  a metanalyses.  Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 1069-1078.  
 
8. Katon W, Russo J, Lin EH, Heckbert SR, Karter AJ, Williams LH, Ciechanowski P, Ludman E. VonKorff M.  
Diabetes and poor disease control:  Is comorbid depression associated with poor medication adherence or lack 
of treatment intensification.  Psychosomatic Medicine 2009; 71: 965-972. 
 
9.McCollum M, Hansen LB, Lu L, Sullivan P. Gender differences in diabetes mellitus and effects on self-care 
activity.  Gender Medicine 2005; 2(4): 246-254.  
 
10.Gonzalez, JS, Safren SA, Cagliero E, Wexler DJ, Delahanty L, Wittenberg E, Blais MA, Meigs JB, Grant 
RW. Depression, self-care, and medication adherence in type 2 diabetes: relationships across the full range of 
symptom severity.  Diabetes Care 2007; 30(9): 2222-2227. 
 
11. Ali S, Stone M, Skinner TC, Robertson N, Davies M, Khunti K.  The association between depression and 
health-related quality of life in people with diabetes:  A systematic literature review.  Diabetes Metab Res Rev 
2010; 26(2): 75-89.  
 


28 
 
12. Chiu CJ, Wray  LA.  Gender differences in functional limitations in adults living with type 2 diabetes: 
biobehavioral and psychosocial mediators. Ann Behav Med 2011; 41: 71-82.  
 
13. Lustman P.J., Williams, M.M., Sayuk G.S., Nix B.D., Clouse R.E. Factors influencing 
 glycemic control in type 2 diabetes during acute and maintenance phase treatment of major 
 depressive disorder with bupropion. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 459-466.  
 
14.Katon WJ, Von Korff M, Lin EHB, Simon G, Ludman E, Russo J, Ciechanowski P, Walker E, Bush T.  The 
Pathways study:  A randomized trial of collaborative care in patients with diabetes and depression.  Arch Gen 
Psychiatry 2004, 61: 1042-1049.  
 
15.Gonzalez JS, McCarl LA, Wexler DJ, Cagliero E, Delahanty L, Soper TD, Goldman V, Knauz R, Safren SA.  
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for adherence and depression (CBT-AD) in type 2 diabetes.  Journal of 
Cognitive Psychotherapy:  An International Quarterly 2010; 24(4): 329-343.   
 
16.  Lustman P.J., Clouse R.E., Nix B.D., Freedland K.E., Rubin E.H., McGill J.B., Williams 
 M.M., Gelenberg A.J., Ciechanowski P.S., Hirsch I.B. Sertraline for Prevention of Depression 
 Recurrence in Diabetes Mellitus. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006; 63: 521-529.  
 
17. Williams M.M., Clouse R.E., Nix B.D., Rubin E.H., Sayuk, G.S., McGill, J.B., Gelenberg, 
A.J., Ciechanowski P.S., Hirsch I.B., Lustman P.J. Efficacy of sertraline in prevention of 
 depression recurrence in older versus younger adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 
 801-806.  
 
18.Lustman, PJ, Griffith, LS, Clouse, RE, Freedland, KE, Eisen, SA, Rubin, EH, Carney, RM, & McGill, JB.  
Effects of nortriptyline on depression and glycemic control in diabetes: Results of a double-blind, placebo-
controlled trial. Psychosom Med 1997; 59:241-250. 
19.Lisi DM.  Diabetes and the psychiatric patient.  US Pharmacist 2010, 35: 62-79. 
20.Derijks HJ, Meyboom RH, Heerdink ER, DeKoning FH, Jankneqt R, Lindquist M, Egberts AC.  The association 
between antidepressant use and the disturbance in glucose homeostasis: Evidence from spontaneous reports.  
Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2008; 64(5): 531-538 
21.Bai YM, Lin CC, Chen JY, Chen TT, Su TP, Chou P.  Association of weight gain and metabolic syndrome in 
patients taking clozapine:  An 8-year cohort.  J Clin Psychiatry 2011; 72(6): 751-756. 
22.Schwartz TL, Nihalani N, Virk S, Jindal S, Chilton M.  Psychiatric medication-induced obesity:  Treatment 
options.  Obesity Reviews 2004; 5: 233-238. 
 
23. Jorde R., Sneve, M., Figenschau, Y., Svartberg, J., Waterloo, K.  Effects of vitamin D supplementation on 
symptoms of depression in overweight and obese subjects: randomized double blind trial.  Journal of Internal 
Medicine 2008; 264: 599-609. 
24.Kjaergaard M, Waterloo K, Wang CE, Almas B, Figenschau Y, Hutchinson MS, Svartberg J, Jorde R.  
Effect of vitamin D supplement on depression scores in people with low levels of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D: 
Nested care control study and randomized clinical trial.  Br J Psychiatry 2012; July 12 [Epub ahead of print]. 
25.Penckofer, S., Kouba, J., Byrn, M., Ferrans, C.  Vitamin D and depression:  Where is all the sunshine?  
Issues in Mental Health Nursing 2010; 31: 385-393.  
26.Bertone-Johnson.  Vitamin D and the occurrence of depression: causal association of circumstantial evidence?  
Nutr Rev 2009; 67:481-492 


29 
 
27. Bertone-Johnson ER, Powers SI, Spangler L, Brunner RL, Michael YL, Larson JC, Millen AE, Bueche MN, 
Salmoirago-Blothcer E, Liu S, Wassertheil-Smoller S, Ockene JK, Ockene I, Manson JE. Vitamin D intake from 
foods and supplements and depressive symptoms in a diverse population of older women.  Am J Clin Nutr 
2011; 94: 1104-1112. 
28. Stewart R, Hirani V.  Relationship between vitamin D levels and depressive symptoms in older residents 
from a National Survey Population.  Psychosomatic Medicine 2010; 72: 608-612 
29. Hoang MT, DeFina LF, Willis BL, Leonard DS, Weiner MF, Brown S. Association between low serum 25-
hydroxyvitamin D and depression in a large sample of healthy adults:  The Cooper Center Longitudinal Study.  
Mayo Clin Proc 2011; 11: 1050-1055. 
30. Hoogendijk, W.J.G., Lips, P., Dik, M.G., Deeg, D.J.H., Beekman, A.T.F., & Penninx B.W.J.H.  Depression 
is associated with decreased 25-hydroxyvitamin D and increased parathyroid hormone levels in older adults.  
Archives of General Psychiatry 2008; 65: 508-512. 
31. Vieth, R., Kimball, S., Hu, A., & Walfish, P.G. Randomized comparison of the effects of the vitamin D3 
adequate intake versus 100 mcg (4000 IU) per day on biochemical responses and the wellbeing of patients.  
Nutrition Journal 2004; 3(8), doi:10.1186/1475-2891-3-8. 
32. Shipowick CD, Moore CB, Corbett C, Bindler R. Vitamin D and depressive symptoms in women during the 
winter. Appl Nursing Res 2009; 22: 221-225.  
33..Penckofer, S., Emanuele, M., Mumby, P., Byrn, M., Kouba, J., Wallis, D. Depression and Metabolic Control in 
Women with Diabetes:  Can the Sunshine Vitamin Make a Difference?  Diabetes 2011, 60, (S1), A-220.  
34. Holck MF,  Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Gordon CM, Hanley DA, Heany RP, Murad MH, Weaver CM.  
Evaluation, Treatment, and Prevention of Vitamin D Deficiency: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice 
Guideline.  J Clin Endocrinol Meta 2011; 96: 1911-1930. 
35. Holick, M.F. Vitamin D deficiency. The New England Journal of Medicine 2007; 357:266- 
281.  
 
36.Grant WB.  An estimate of the global reduction in mortality rates through doubling vitamin D levels.  European 
Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2011; 65: 1016-1026. 
37. Bruce JS, Lando JF.  Negative affect as a prospective risk factor for hypertension.  Psychosomatic 
Medicine 2000; 62: 188-196. 
38. Pan A, Sun Q, Okereke OI, Rexrode KM, Hu FB,  Depression and risk of stroke morbidity and mortality: a 
meta-analysis and systematic review.  JAMA 2011; 306: 1241-1249. 
39. Pan A, Okereke OI, Sun Q, Logroscino G, Manson JE, Willett WC, Ascherio A, Hu FE,  Rexrode KM.  
Depression and incident stroke in women.  Stroke 2011; 42: 2770-2775.  
40..Burgaz A, Orsini N, Larsson SC, Wolk A.  Blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration and hypertension:  A 
metanalysis.  Journal of Hypertension 2011: 29: 636-645. 
41.Vaidya A & Forman JP. Vitamin D and hypertension:  Current evidence and future directions.  Hypertension 
2010; 56: 774-779.  
42.Ertek S, Akgul E, Cicero AF, Kutuk U Demirtas S, Cehrell S, Erdogan G. 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels and 
endothelial vasodilator function in normotensive women.  Arch Med Sci 2012; 8: 47-52.  


30 
 
43.Sun Q, Pan A, Hu F, Manson JE, Rexrode KM. 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and the risk of stroke: A 
prospective study and meta-analysis.  Stroke 2012; 43: 1470-1477.  
44. Wallis, D., Penckofer, S., Sizemore, G.  Contemporary Issues in Cardiovascular Medicine: The Sunshine 
Deficit and Cardiovascular Disease.  Circulation 2008; 118: 1476-1485.   
45. Matheny ME, Miller RR, Shardell MD, Hawkes WG, Lenze EJ, Magaziner J, Orwig DL.  Inflammatory 
cytokine levels and depressive symptoms in older women in the year after hip fracture:  Findings from the 
Baltimore Hip Studies.  J Am Geriatric Soc 2011; 59: 2249-2255.  
46. Raedler TJ. Inflammatory mechanisms in major depressive disorder.  Curr Opin Psychiatry 2011; 24: 519-
525. 
47. Howren MB, Lamkin DM, Suls F.  Association of depression with C - reactive protein, IL-1, and IL-6: A 
meta-analysis.  Psychosomatic Medicine 2009; 71: 171-186. 
48. Stuart MJ & Baune BT.  Depression and type 2 diabetes: Inflammatory mechanisms of 
psychoneuroendocrine co-morbidity.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2012; 36: 658-676. 
49. Burton JM, Kimball S, Vieth R, Bar-Or A, Dosch H-M, Cheung R, Gagne D, D’ Souza C, Ursell M, 
O’Connor P. A phase I/II dose-escalation trial of vitamin D3 and calcium in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2010; 
74: 1852-1859.  
50. Hopkins MH, Owen J, Ahearn, Fedirko V, Flanders D, Jones DP, Bostick RM.  Effects of supplemental 
vitamin D and calcium on biomarkers of inflammation in colorectal adenoma patients: A randomized controlled 
clinical trial.  Cancer Prev Res 2011; 4: 1645-54 
51. Guillot X, Semerano L, Saidenberg-Kermanac’h N, Falgarone G, Boisser MC.  Vitamin D and inflammation.  
Joint Bone Spine 2010; 77:552-557. 
52. Lu  FP, Chan DC, Kuo HK, Wu SC.  Sex differences in the impact of diabetes on the risk of geriatric 
conditions. Geriatric Gerontology International 2012; June 10 [Epub ahead of print].  
53. Pan A, Lucas M, Sun Q, van Dam RM, Franco OH, Willett WC, Manson JE, Rexrode KM, Aschierio A, Hu 
F. Increased mortality risk in women with depression and diabetes mellitus.  Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011; 68: 42-
50.  
54. Edege LE, Zheng D, Simpson K.  Comorbid depression is associated with increased health care use and 
expenditures in individuals with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 464-470. 
 
55. Edege LE.  Major depression in individuals with chronic medical disorders:  prevalence, correlates and 
association with health resource utilization, less productivity, and functional disability.  General Hospital 
Psychiatry 2007; 29: 409-416.  
 
56. Rubin, RR, Ma, Y, Marrero, DG, Peyrot, M, Barrett-Connor-E., Kahn, SE, Haffner SM. Price, DW, Knowler 
WC for the Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group.  Elevated depression symptoms, antidepressant 
medicine use, and risk of developing diabetes during the diabetes prevention program.  Diabetes Care 2008; 31, 
420-426. 
 
57. Lustman, P.J., Freedland, K.E., Griffith, L.S., & Clouse, R.E.  Predicting response to cognitive behavioral 
therapy of depression in type 2 diabetes.  Gen Hosp Psychiatry 1998; 20: 302-06. 


31 
 
58. Markowitz SM, Gonzalez JS, Wilkinson JL, Safren SA.  A review of treating depression in diabetes:  
Emerging findings. Psychosomatics 2011; 52: 1-18.  
59. Penckofer  S, Ferrans C, Byrn M, Mumby P, Ferrans C, Harrison P, Durazo R  & Lustman P. The Impact of a 
Psychoeducational Program for Depressed Women with Type 2 Diabetes.  Annals of Behavioral Medicine 2012 
(E- Pub ahead of print, July 10).   PMID: 22777878  [DOI 10.1007/S2160-012-9377-2]   
60. US Department of Health and Humans Services.  Results from the 2010 National Survey on  Drug Use and 
Health:  Mental Health Findings. 2010.  USDHHS: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration 
and Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. 
61. Collins PY, Patel V, Josetl S, March D, Insel TR, Daar AS on behalf of the Scientific Advisory  Board and 
Executive Committee of the Grand Challenges of Global Mental Health.  Nature 2011; 475: 27-30.  
62. Eyles DW, Smith S, Kinobe R, Hewlson M, McGrath JJ.  Distribution of the vitamin D receptor and 1 alpha- 
hydroxylase in human brain.  J Chem Neuroanat. 2005; 29: 21-30.   
 
63. O’Loan J, Eyles DW, Kesby J, Ko P, McGrath JJ, Burne TH.  Vitamin D deficiency during various stages of 
pregnancy in the rat: its impact on the development and behavior in adult offspring.  Psychoneuroimmunology 
2007; 32:227-234. 
 
64. Harms LR, Burne THJ, Eyles DW, McGrath JJ.  Vitamin D and the Brain.  Best Practice & Research 
Clinical Endocrinology 2011; 25: 657-669 
65. Partonen, T. Vitamin D and serotonin in winter. Medical Hypotheses 1998; 51: 267-268. 
 
66. Feron F, Burne THJ, Brown J, Smith E, McGrath JJ, Mackay-Sim A, Eyles DW. Developmental vitamin D3 
deficiency alters the adult rat brain. Brain Research Bulletin 2005; 65: 141-148. 
67. Kenny, A.M., Biskup, B., Robbins, B., Marcella, G., & Burleson, J.A. Effects of vitamin D supplementation 
on strength, physical function, and health perception in older, community-welling men. Journal of the American 
Geriatrics Society 2003; 51, 1762-1767.   
68. Landsdowne, A.T. G., & Provost, S.C. Vitamin D3 enhances mood in healthy subjects during winter.  
Psychopharmacology 1998; 135, 319-323.    
69. Harris, S. & Dawson-Hughes, B. Seasonal mood changes in 250 normal women. Psychiatry Research 
1993; 49, 77-87.   
 
70. Manson JE, Bassuk SS, Lee IM, Cook NR, Albert MA, Gordon D, Zaharris E, Macfadyen JG, Danielson E, 
Lin J, Zhang SM, Buring JE.  The VITamin D and OmegA-3 TrialL (VITAL): Rationale and design of a large 
randomized controlled trial of vitamin D and marine omega-3 fatty acid supplements for the primary prevention 
of cancer and cardiovascular disease.  Contem Clin Trials 2012; 33: 159-171. 
71. Okereke OI, Manson JE. Chapter 105. Vitamin D and Omega-3 Trial (VITAL): Rationale and design of a 
large-scale randomized controlled trial.  Vitamin D.  Third Edition, 2011, pgs 2043-2055.    
 
72. Ciechanowski, P., Katon, W., Russo, J., Hirsch, I.B. The relationship of depressive symptoms to symptom 
reporting, self-care, and glucose control in diabetes. General Hospital Psychiatry 2003; 25: 246-252.  
 
73. Lin EHB, Katon W, Rutter, C, Ludman EJ, Von Korff M, Young B, Oliver M, Ciechanowski PC, Kinder L, 
Walker E.  Effects of enhanced depression treatment on diabetes self-care.  Annals of Family Medicine 2006; 4: 
46-53 


32 
 
74.  Lin, E., Katon, W., Von Korff, M., Rutter, C., Simon, G., Oliver, M., Ciechanowski, P., Ludman, E., Bush, 
T., Young, B. Relationship of depression and diabetes, self-care, medication adherence, and preventive care. 
Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 2154-2160.  
 
75. Park H, Hong Y, Lee H, Ha E, Sung Y.  Individuals with type 2 diabetes and depressive symptoms exhibited 
lower adherence with self-care.  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2004; 57: 978-984. 
 
76. McKellar, J.D., Humphreys, K., Piette, J.D. Depression increases diabetes symptoms by complicating 
patients’ self-care adherence. Diabetes Educator 2004; 30: 485-492.  
 
77. Schulman-Green D, Jaser S, Martin F, Alonzo A, Grey M, McCorkle R, Redeker NS, Reynolds, N, Whittemore.  
Processes of self-management in chronic illness.  Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2012; 44: 136-144.  
 
78.Linde JA, Jeffrey RW, Levy RL, Sherwood NE, Utter J, Pronk NP, Boyle RG.  Binge eating disorder, weight 
control, self-efficacy, and depression in overweight men and women.  International Journal of Obesity & 
Related Metabolic Disorders:  Journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity 2004; 28: 418-
425.   
 
79. Chiu CJ, Wray LA.  Gender differences in functional limitations in adults living with type 2 diabetes: 
Biobehavioral and psychosocial mediators.  Annals of Behavioral Medicine 2011, 41: 71-82.  
 
80. Fisher L, Skaff MM, Mullan JT, Arean P, Glasgow R, Masharani U. A longitudinal study of affective and 
anxiety disorders, depressive affect and diabetes distress in adults with type 2 diabetes.  Diabetic Medicine 
2008; 25: 1096-1101. 
81.Hosoya T, Matushima M, Nukariya K, Utsunomiya K. The relationship between the severity of depressive 
symptoms and diabetes-related emotional distress in patients with type 2 diabetes.  Intern Med 2012; 51: 263-
269. 
82. Peyrot M & Rubin RR. Behavioral and psychosocial interventions in diabetes: A conceptual review.  
Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 2433-2440. 
83. Forman JP, Giovannucci E, Holmes MD, Bischoff-Ferrar HA, Tworoger SS, Willett WC, Curhan GC. 
Plasma 25-hydoxyvitamin D concentrations and risk of incident hypertension.  Hypertension 2007; 49: 1063-
1069.  
84. Tangpricha, V., Pearce, E.N., Chen, T.C., Holick, M.F. Vitamin D deficiency among free 
living healthy young adults. American Journal Medicine 2002; 112: 659-662.  
 
85. Nesby-O’Dell, S., Scanlon, K., Cogswell, M., Gillespie, C., Hollis, B., Looker, A., Allen, 
 C.,  Dougherty, C., Gunter, E., Bowman, B. Hypovitaminonsis D prevalence and determinants 
 among African American and white women of reproductive age: Third National Health and 
 Nutrition Examination Survey, 1989-1994. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2002; 76:  
187-192.  
 
86. Gianocarlo I, Ruben G, Silvano A.  High prevalence of hypovitaminosis D in female type 2 diabetic population.  
Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 1496.  
 
87. Vaidya A, Forman JP. Vitamin D and hypertension:  Current evidence and future directions:  Hypertension 
2010; 56: 774-779. 
88. Burgas Z, Orsini N, Larsson SC, Wolk A.   Blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration and hypertension: A 
meta-analysis.  Journal of Hypertension 2011; 29: 636-645. 


33 
 
89. Jorde R, Figenschau Y, Emaus N, Hutchinson M, Grimnes G.  Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels are 
strongly related to systolic blood pressure but do not predict future hypertension. Hypertension 2010; 53: 792-
798. 
90. Margolis KL, Martin LW, Ray RM, Kerby TJ, Allison MA, Curb JD, Kotche TA, Liu S, Wassertheil-Smoller S, 
Manson JE for the Women’s Health Initiative Investigators.  A prospective study of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D 
levels, blood pressure, and incident hypertension in postmenopausal women.  Am J Epidemiol 2012; 1: 22-32 
91. Pfeifer MK, Begerow B, Minne HW, Nachtigall D, Hansen C.  Effects of short-term vitamin D3 and calcium 
supplementation of blood pressure and parathyroid hormone concentrations in elderly women.  J Clin Endocrin 
Meta 2001; 86: 1633-1637.  
92. Schmidtz K, Skinner H, Bautista LE, Fingerlin TE, Langefeld CD, Hicks PJ, Haffner SM, Bryer-Ash M, 
Wagenknecht LE, Bowden DW, Norris JM, Engelman CD.  Association of 25-hydroxyvitamin D with blood 
pressure in predominantly 25-hydroxyvitamin D deficient Hispanic and African Americans.  Am J Hypertension 
2009; 22: 867-870. 
93. Pittas AG, Lau J, Hu FB, Dawson-Hughes B.  Review: The role of vitamin D and calcium in type 2 diabetes.  
A systematic review and meta-analysis.  The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 2007; 92: 2017-
2029.  
 
94. Penckofer, S., Kouba, J., Wallis, D., Emanuele, M.  Vitamin D and Diabetes:  Let the Sunshine In. Diabetes 
Educator 2008; 34: 939-954.  PMID: 19075078 
95. Mitri J, Dawson-Hughes B, Hu F, Pittas AG.  Effects of vitamin D and calcium supplementation on 
pancreatic beta cell function, insulin sensitivity, and glycemia in adults at high risk of diabetes: the Calcium and 
vitamin D for Diabetes Melllitud (CaDDM) randomized controlled trial.  Am J Clin Nutr 2011; 1-9. 
96. Nazarian S, St. Peter JV, Boston RC, Jones SA, Mariash CN. Vitamin D3 supplementation improves insulin 
sensitivity in subjects with impaired fasting glucose. Tranlational Research h 2011; 158: 276-281.  
97.Chacko SA, Song Y, Manson JE, van Horn L, Eaton C, Martin LW, McTiernan A, Curb JD, Wylie-Rosett J,  
Phillips LS, Plodkowski RA, Liu S.  Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations in relation to cardiometabolic 
risk factors and metabolic syndrome in postmenopausal women.  American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2011; 
94: 209-217. 
98. Gulseth H, Wium C, Birkeland KI.  Vitamin D and insuin action and secretion-An overview of current 
understanding an future perspectives.  European Endocrinology 2010; 6: 13-18. 
99. Grimnes G, Figenschau Y, Almas B, Jorde R.  Vitamin D, insulin secretion, sensitivity, and lipids: results 
from a case-control stuy and a randomized controlled trial using hyperglycemic clamp technique.  Diabetes 
2011; 60: 2748-57. 
100. Pratt LA, Brody DJ, Gu Q. Antidepressant use in persons aged 12 and over:  United States, 2005-2008.  
NCHS Data Brief. USDHHS, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, October 2011.  
101. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies.  Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D.  
National Academy of Sciences, 2011  
102. Lee P, Greenfield JR, Seibel MJ, Eisman JA, Center JR.  Adequacy of vitamin D replacement in severe 
deficiency is dependent on body mass index.  The American Journal of Medicine 2009; 122: 1056-1060.   
103. Smith RS. The macrophage theory of depression. Med Hypotheses 1991; 35: 298-306. 
 


34 
 
104. Capuron & Dantzer, Cytokines and depression: the need for a new paradigm. Brain, Behavior, and 
Immunity 2003; 17 (Suppl. 1) S119–S124. 
 
105. Dantzer R, JC O’Connor, GG Freund, RW Johnson, KW Kelley. From inflammation to sickness and 
depression: when the immune system subjugates the brain, Nature Reviews 2008; Neuroscience 9: 46–56.  
 
106. Myint AM & Kim YK. Cytokine-serotonin interaction through IDO: a neurodegeneration hypothesis of 
depression.  Medical Hypotheses 2003; 61: 519-525. 
107. Colditz GA, Willett WC, Rotnitzky A, Manson JE. Weight gain as a risk factor for clinical diabetes in 
women.  Ann Inter Med 1995; 122: 481-486.  
108. Luppino FS, de Wit LM, Bouvy PF, Stijnen T, Cuijpers P, Pennix BWJH, Zitman FG.  Overweight, obesity 
and depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.  Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010; 67: 
220-229. 
 109.Needham BL, Epel ES, Adler NE, Kiefe C. Trajectories of change in obesity and symptoms of depression: 
The CARDIA study.  American Journal of Public Health 2010; 100: 1040-1046.  
110.Boutelle KN, Hannan P, Fulkerson JA, Crow SJ, Stice E. Obesity as a prospective predictor of depression 
in adolescent females.  Health Psychology 2010; 29: 293-298.  
111. Jungert A, Roth HJ, Neuhauser-Berthold M.  Serum 25-hydrozyvitamin D3 and body composition in an 
elderly cohort from Germany:  A cross-sectional study.  Nutr Metab 2012; 9: (1): 42 [Epub ahead of print]. 
112.Steptoe A. Chapter 16.  Depression and physical activity.  In Ed. Steptoe A. Depression and Physical 
Illness. Cambridge University Press, 2006. 
113. Lustman, P., Penckofer, S., Clouse, R. Recent advances in understanding depression in adults with 
diabetes. Current Psychiatry Reports 2008; 7: 114-122.  PMID: 18980733  
114. Penckofer, S., Byrn, M., Mumby, P., Ferrans, C.  Improving Subject Recruitment, Retention, and 
Participation in Research Through Peplau’s Theory of Interpersonal Relations.  Nursing Science Quarterly 
2011; 24: 146-151 
115. Hollis, B.W., & Drezner, M.K. Low vitamin D status despite abundant sun exposure. 
 The Journal  of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 2007; 92: 2130-2135.  
 
116. Hanwell HEC, Vieth R, Cole DEC, Scillitani A, Modoni S, Frusciante V, Ritrovato G, 
 Chiodini I, Minisola S, Carnevale V.  Sun exposure questionnaire predicts circulating 
 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration in Caucasian hospital workers in southern Italy.  
 Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 2010; 334-337. 
 
117. Recker, R., Gallagher, R., MacCosbe, P. Effect of dosing frequency on biphosphonate medication 
adherence in a large longitudinal cohort of women. Mayo Clin Proc 2005; 80: 856-861.  
 
118. (112.Radloff, L.S. The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. 
Applied Psychological Measurement 1977; 1: 385-401. 
 
119. Piantadosi S. Clinical Trials:  A methodological perspective. New Jersey: Wiley-Interscience, 2005. 
 


35 
 
120.  Koutkia, P., Chen, T.C., Holick, M.F. Vitamin D intoxication associated with an over-the-counter 
supplement. New England Journal of Medicine 2001; 345: 66-67.  
 
121. Zich, J.M., Attkinsson, C.C., & Greenfield, T.K. Screening for depression in the primary clinics: the CES-D 
and the BDI. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine 1990; 20: 259-277. 
 
122. Koutkia, P., Lu, Z., Chen, T.C., Holick, M.F. Treatment of vitamin D deficiency due to Crohn’s disease with 
tanning bed ultraviolet light B radiation. Gastroenterology 2001; 121: 1485-1488.  
 
123. 
National 
Institutes 
of 
Health. 
Dietary 
Supplement 
Fact 
Sheet: 
Vitamin 
D. 
http://dietary-
supplements.info.nih.gov/factsheets/vitamind.asp   
 
124. Nahas R, Sheikh O.  Complementary and alternative medicine for the treatment of major depressive 
disorder.  Can Fam Physician 2011; 57: 659-663. 
 
125. Arean PA, Alvidrez J.  The prevalence of psychiatric disorders and subsyndromonal mental illness in low-
income, medically ill elderly.  International Journal of Psychiatry 2001; 31: 9-24.  
 
126. Aaron LA, Bradley LA, Alarcon GS, Alexander RW, Triana-Alexander M, Martin MY, Alberts KR.  Psychiatric 
diagnoses in patients with fibromyalgia are related to health care-seeking behavior rather than to illness.  Arthritis 
& Rheumatism 1996; 39: 436-445. 
 
127. Ross HE, Swinson R, Doumani S, Larkin EJ.  Diagnosing comorbidity in substance abusers:  A comparison 
of the test-retest reliability of two interviews.  American Journal of Drug & Alcohol Abuse 1995; 21: 167-185. 
 
128. Levitan RD, Blouin AG, Navarro JR, Hill J.  Validity of the computerized DIS for diagnosing psychiatric 
inpatients.  Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 1991; 36: 728-731. 
 
129. Blouin AG, Perez EL, Blouin JH.  Computerized administration of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule.  
Psychiatry Research 1988; 23: 335-344.  
 
130. Lorig K, Stewart A, Ritter P, Gonzalez V, Laurent D, Lynch J.  Outcome Measures for Health Education 
and Other Health Care Interventions.  Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications, 1996. 
131. Stanford Patient Education Research Center.  Self-Efficacy for Diabetes. 
http://patienteducation.stanford.edu/research/sediabetes.html 
132. Lorig K, Ritter PL, Villa FJ, Armas J. Community-based peer-led diabetes self-management: a 
randomized trial. Diabetes Educator 2009; 35: 641-651. 
133. Lorig K, Ritter PL, Laurent DD, Plant K, Green M, Jernigan VB, Case S.  Online diabetes self-
management program.  Diabetes Care 2010; 33: 1275-1281.  
134. Polonsky, W.H., Anderson, B., Lohrer, P., Welch, G., Jacobson, A., Aponte, J., & Schwartz, C. Assessment 
of diabetes-related distress. Diabetes Care 1995; 18: 754-760.  
 
135. Welch, G., Jacobson, A., & Polonsky, W.H. T he Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale. Diabetes Care 1997; 
20: 760-766.  
 
136. Welch, G., Weinger, B., Anderson, B., & Polonsky, W.H. Responsiveness of the problem areas in diabetes 
(PAID) questionnaire. Diabetic Medicine 2003; 20: 69-72.  
 
137.  LaGreca AM. Brief Manual for the Self-Care Inventory.  1992. Miami, FL: LaGreca.  
 


36 
 
138. Greca P, LaGreca A, Ireland S, Wick P, Freeman C, Agramonte R, Gutt M, Skyler J.  Assessing adherence 
in IDDM: a comparison of two methods:  Diabetes 1990; 40 (Suppl. 1): A 165. 
 
139.  Weinger K, Butler HA, Welch GW, LaGreca AM.  Measuring diabetes self-care: A psychometric analysis 
of the Self-Care Inventory-revised with adults.  Diabetes Care 2005; 1346-1352. 
140. The Seventh Report of the Joint Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood 
Pressure (JNC 7 Express). National High Blood Pressure Education Program, National Institutes of Health.  
National Heart, Lung, & Blood Institute, NIH Publication 03-5233, 2003. 
 
141. Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, Falkner BE, Graves J, Hill MN, Jones DW, Kurtz T, Sheps SG, Roccella 
EJ. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: Part 1: Blood 
pressure measurement in Humans:  A statement for professionals from the subcommittee of professional and 
public education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research.  Hypertension 
2004; 45: 142-161. 
142. Kanellakis S. Manios Y.  Validation of five simple models estimating body fat in white postmenopausal 
women:  Use in clinical practice and research.  Obesity 2012; 20:6, 1329-1332.  
143. Arunabh S, Pollack S, Yeh J, Alioa JF. Body fat content in 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in healthy women.  
J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003; 88:1157-161. 
144. Kaul S, Rothney MP, Peters DM, Wacker WK, Davis CE, Shapiro MD, Ergun DL. Dual-energy x-ray 
absorptiometry for quantification of visceral fat.  Obesity 2012, 20:1313-1318.  
145. Manson C., Xiao L, Imayama I, Duggan CR, Bain C, Foster-Shubert KE, Kong A, Campbell KL, Wang CY, 
Neuhouser ML, Li L, Jeffrey RW, Robien K, Alfano CM, Blackburn GL, McTiernan A. Effects of weight loss on 
serum vitamin D postmenopausal women.  Am J Clin Nutr 2011; 94: 95-103.  
146. Moschonis G, Tanagra S, Koutsikas K, Nikolaidou A, Androutsos O, Manios Y.  Association between 
serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and body composition in postmenopausal women: the Postmenopausal 
Health Study.  Menopause 2009; 16:4: 701-707. 
147. Fitzgerald, J.T., Davis, W.K., Connell, C.M., Hess, G.E., Funnell, M.M., & Hiss, R.G. Development and 
validation of the diabetes care profile. Evaluation and the Health Professions 1996; 19: 209-231. 
(www.med.umich.edu/mdrtc; select survey instruments)  
 
148. Stewart AL, Mills KM, King AC, Haskell WL, Gillis D, Ritter PL.  CHAMPS physical activity questionnaire 
for older adults: Outcomes for interventions.  Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2001; 33: 1126-
1141. 
 
149. Stewart AL, Mills KM, Sepsis PG, King AC, McLellan BY, Roitz PL.  Evaluation of CHAMPS, a physical 
activity program for older adults.  Ann of Behav Med 1997, 19: 353-361 
150. Fisher L, Glasgow RE, Strycker LA. The relationship between diabetes distress and clinical depression 
with glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes.  Diabetes Care 2010; 33: 1034-1036.  
151. Block G, Hartman AM, Dresser CM, Carroll MD, Gannon J, Gardner L.  A data-based approach to diet 
questionnaire design and testing.  Am J Epidemiology 1986; 124: 453-469 
152. Block G, Hartman AM, Naughton D  A reduced dietary questionnaire: development and validation.. 
Epidemiology 1990; 1:58-64.  
 


37 
 
     153. Barger-Lux, MJ, Heaney, RP.  Effects of above average summer sun exposure on serum 25 hydroxyvitamin 
D and calcium absorption.  Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 2002, 87: 4952-4956.  
154. McCulloch CE, Searle SR, Neuhaus JM. Generalized, linear, and mixed models.  New Jersey: Wiley & 
Sons,  2008. 
155. Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF.  Assessing moderated mediation hypotheses:  Theory, methods, 
and prescriptions.  Multivariate Behavioral Research 2007; 42: 185-227.  
156. Preachers KJ & Hayes AF.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect 
effects in multiple mediator models.  Behavior Research Methods 2008; 40: 879-891.   
157. Little RJ  Pattern-mixture models for multivariate incomplete data Journal of the 
 American Statistical Association 1993, 88:125-134.  
 
158. Hedeker D., Gibbons RD, & Waternaux, C. Sample size estimation for  longitudinal 
 designs with attrition.  Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 1999, 24, 70-93.  
 
159. Rush, A.J., Trivdei, M.H., Wisniewski, S.R., Stewart, J.W., Nierenberg, A.A., Thase, M.E.,  Ritz, L., Biggs, 
M.M., Warden, D., Luther, J.F., Shores-Wilson, K., Niederehe, G., Fava, M. for 
 the STAR*D Study Team. Bupropion-SR, Sertraline, or Venlafaxine-XR after Failure of SSRIs 
 for Depression. The New England Journal of Medicine 2006; 354: 1231-1242.  
 
160. Cohen J. Statistical power for the behavioral sciences 2nd edition.   Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence 
Erlbaum Associates, 1988. 
Additional References: 
Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF, Monk TH, Berrman SR, Kupfer DJ.  The Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index: A new 
instrument for psychiatric practice and research.  Psychiatry Research 1998; 28: 193-213. 
Carey MP, Jorgensen RS, Weinstock RS, Sprafkin RP, Lantinga LJ, Baker MT, Meisler AW.  Appraisal of 
diabetes scale.  Journal of Behavioral Medicine 991; 14: 43-51. 
Ferrans, C.  Quality of Life Index Tools. www.uic.edu/orgs/qli 
Glanz K, Yaroch AL, Dancel M, Saraiya M, Crane LA, Buller DB, Manne S, O’Riordan DL, Heckman CJ, Hay J, 
Robinson JK.  Measures of sun exposure and sun protection practices for behavioral and epidemiologic 
research.  Arch Dematology 2008; 144(2): 217-222. 
Grootenhuis PA, Snoek FJ, Heine RJ, Bouter LM: Development of a type 2 diabetes symptom checklist: a 
measure of symptom severity. Diabet Med 1994; 11:253–261.  
 
Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW.  The PHQ-9:  Validity of a brief depression severity measure.  J Gen 
Intern Med 2001; 16: 606-613 
Speilberger, C., Gorsuch R.L., Lushene, R., Vass, P.R., Jacobs, G.A. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Adults. 
Redwood City, CA.: Mind Garden, 1983.  
 
Additional References 
Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R.  A global measure of perceived stress.  Journal of Health and Social 
Behavior 1983; 24(4): 385-396.  
 


38 
 
Sherbourne CD & Stewart AL.  The MOS Social Support Survey.   Soc Sci Med 1991; 32(6): 705-714. 
 
Additional References (Amendment 20) 
Family Component 
McCubbin, M. A, & McCubbin, H. I. (1987). Family stress theory and assessment, the T-Double ABCX Model 
of Family Adjustment and Adaptation. In H. I. McCubbin & A. I. Thompson (Eds.), Family assessment 
inventories for research and practice. (pp. 2-32). Madison: University of Wisconsin. 
 
Sawin, K. J., Buran, C. F., Brei, T. J., & Fastenau, P. S. (2003). Correlates of functional status, self-
management, and developmental competence outcomes in adolescents with spina bifida. SCI Nursing, 
20(2), 72-85.  
 
Ridosh, M, Sawin, KJ, & Brei, TJ. (2013). Risk and protective factors associated with adaptation in parents of 
adolescents and young adults with spina bifida. Paper presented at the MNRS 37th Annual Research 
Conference, Chicago, IL.  
 
Ridosh, M., Sawin, K., Brei, T., Schiffman, R. (2015, April). A global family quality of life scale: preliminary 
psychometric evidence. MNRS 39th Annual Research Conference, Indianapolis, Indiana.  
 
Urinary Microbiome Component:  
Barber M, Chen Z, Lukacz E, et al. Further validation of the short form versions of the pelvic floor distress 
inventory (PFDI) and pelvic floor impact questionnaire (PFIQ).  Neurourology and  Urodynamics 2011; 30(4): 
541-546. 
 
Barber M, Kuchibhatla M, Pieper C, et al. Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive condition-specific 
quality of life instruments for women with pelvic floor disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol  2001; 185: 1388-1395. 
 
Burton JM, Kimball S, Vieth R, et al.  A phase I/II dose-escalation trial of vitamin D3 and calcium in multiple 
sclerosis. Neurology 2010; 74: 1852-1859. 
 
Digesu GA, Verdi E, Cardozo, L, et al. Phase IIb, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 
parallel-group study to determine effects of elocalcitol in women with overactive bladder and idiopathic detrusor 
overactivity.  Urology 2012; 80: 48-54. 
Hertting O, Holm A, Luthje P, et al.  Vitamin D induction of the human antimicrobial peptide cathelicidin in the 
urinary bladder.  PLOS One 2010; 5 (12), e15580. 
 
Hopkins MH, Owen J, Ahearn, et al. Effects of supplemental vitamin D and calcium on biomarkers of 
inflammation in colorectal adenoma patients: A randomized controlled clinical trial.  Cancer Prev Res 2011; 4: 
1645-54 
 
James R & Hijaz A. Lower urinary tract symptoms in women with diabetes mellitus:  A current review.  Curr 
Urol Res 2014; 15: 440. 
 
Nseir W, Taha M, Nemarny H, et al. The association between serum levels of vitamin D and 
recurrent urinary tract infections in premenopausal women.  International Journal of Infectious 
Disease 2013; 17: e1121-e1124 


39 
 
 
Palleschi G, Pastore A, Maggioni C, et al. Overactive bladder in diabetes mellitus patients:  
a questionnare-based observational investigation.  World J Urol 2014; 32: 1021-1025. 
 
Shapiro B, Redman TL, Zvara P.  Effects of vitamin D analog on bladder function and sensory signaling in 
animal models of cystitis.  Urology 2013; 81: 466e1-466e7. 
Wobke TK, Sorg BL, Steinhilber D. Vitamin D in inflammatory diseases. Front Physiol 2014; 5: 244. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


40 
 
Appendix 1 for Recruitment  
RECRUITMENT UPDATES 1/07/2014   
a. Distribution of approved flyers and information at professional meetings (e.g., Diabetes Nurse Educator 
meets January 16th and Dr. Penckofer is speaker). 
  
b. Presentation by our Loyola approved research volunteer Sana Rizvi to the Illinois Institute of Technology 
IIT) Muslim Student Association (MSA) about the Sunshine 2 study with flyer distribution to attendees.  
Sana has contacted the MSA president (Adnan Qureshi) and has gotten approval to inform attendees 
about the study.  There has been little to no research on vitamin D in this population.   
 
c. Meetings with churches in area to distribute approved materials.  Dr. Penckofer had pervious support 
from Nurse Carolyn Johnson from Health Ministry group at Broadview Baptist Church for the pilot study.  
We also request to use our approved flyer and information for recruitment, meetings or 
communications with other churches in the community. 
 
d. Facebook site to inform subjects about Sunshine Study which will be monitored by study nurse (sample 
attached).  Potential subjects will be directed to contact study personnel.  
 
e. Creation of Loyola Website for SUNSHINE 2 study through the offices of Ron Price and Greg Klitz.  This 
office has built in shell templates available for use.  For our study, we will follow the  www.D2Dstudy.org  
where our consultant, Dr. Pittas who is the PI has given us permission.  Participants will be provided 
information about the study and informed to contact study personnel.     Content for the proposed site 
is attached.  
 
f. 
Linking Sunshine 2 study to other websites (e.g., the American Diabetes Association of Chicago, 
American Association of Diabetes Nurse Educators, etc...).  
RECRUITMENT UPDATES 2/3/14 
This is for the flyer (which has been approved by marketing) 
1. Major community events (e.g., health fairs) 
2. Schools with approval of principal (e.g., we have a school based health center at Proviso and are seeking 
approval to leave at health center since parents come into site) 
3. Grocery bulletin boards (with approval of store manager, e.g., Whole Foods is checking to see if we can post on 
their  community bulletin board) 
4. Social service agencies (e.g., Lawndale community health center and other centers such as WIC where dietetics 
students do their internships) 
5. Diabetes clinics (e.g., private clinics from MD offices if approved). 
6. Community restaurants (e.g., Panera has agreed to post flyer on community bulletin board)   
 
RECRUITMENT UPDATES 5/7/2014 
The addition of 3 family medicine physicians (Tony Pangan, Norma Lopez and Jessica McIntyre) who have agreed to have 
their diabetes patients sent recruitment letter using EPIC database (Attached).  


41 
 
Appendix 2 Protocal for Putonti Lab at Lakeshore Campus: 
 
Nanosep Tube Preparation  
 
Materials Required: Nanosep Tube, molecular grade Water, 70% Ethanol, 1% BSA in PBS, microcentrifuge 
 
1. Pipet into the Nanosep Tube 500 μL of 70% Ethanol and centrifuge the Column at 14,000g for 10 
minutes 
a. Discard the flow-through - May need to use a pipet to remove all of it 
b. When centrifuging during any of these steps be sure not to over-centrifuge as this will cause the 
membrane to dry out 
2. Pipet in 500 μL of PCR Water and centrifuge at 14,000g for 7 minutes 
a. Remove the flow-through - May need to use a pipet to remove all of it 
3. Pipet in 500 μL of Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) and leave for at least an hour at room temperature 
a. The BSA serves as the passivation step so that the membrane is not overly sticky and prevent the 
capture of non-phage materials 
b. Do not centrifuge the BSA 
c. This is a potential pause point if one cannot do the whole preparation in one day - Can be left 
overnight at room temperature 
4. Pipet out BSA from the membrane 
a. Be sure not to scratch the membrane when pipetting (can tilt to limit contact) 
5. Wash the membrane with PCR Water 
a. When washing use approximately 50 μL of PCR water 
b. Hold the column at an angle and dispense the water at the top of the membrane and remove at 
the bottom - Repeat until the water begins to appear cloudy 
c. Be careful not to scratch the membrane 
6. Add another 500 μL of PCR Water to the Column and centrifuge at 14,000g for 5 minutes 
a. Remove the flow-through - May need to use a pipet to remove all of it 
7. If not using the column within 20 minutes, add 100 μL of PCR Water to the Column and store at 4° C. 
Try to use refrigerated columns within 1 week. 
a. This layer of water will prevent the membrane from drying out before use 
 
Concentration Protocol 
 
Materials Required: Prepared Nanosep Spin Column, urine sample, PBS, microcentrifuge  
 
1. Add 1 mL of the Urine Sample to a microcentrifuge tube and centrifuge at 10,000g for 10 minutes 
a. This will cause a pellet to form at the bottom of the tube - The pellet includes the bacteria and 
eukaryotic cells that were in the urine sample 
2. Transfer the supernatant to a new microcentrifuge tube 
a. Discard the tube with the pellet 
3. Remove the 100 μL of water from the membrane of the Nanosep Spin Column and add 500 μL of the 
Urine sample supernatant to the membrane 
4. Centrifuge the Nanosep Tube initially at 1,000g for 7 minutes 
a. Continue to spin the Nanosep tube at 1,000g for decreasing amounts of time until approximately 
50 μL remain above the membrane 
i. 50 μL above the membrane appears almost as if there is no liquid left 
ii. It is difficult to determine 50 μL by eye so the use of a 50 μL pipet is recommended in 
order to keep track of how much liquid is left above the membrane 


42 
 
iii. If processing multiple samples at once, some will finish before others. Have additional 
tubes and sterile media available to prepare blanks for re-balancing the centrifuge. 
5. After the 50 μL have been collected, transfer it to a new microcentrifuge tube and add the remaining 500 
μL of the Urine Sample Supernatant to the Nanosep Tube 
a. Be sure to remove the flow-through  
6. Repeat Step 4 for the second volume of the Urine Sample Supernatant 
7. Discard the flow-through 
Optional Steps 8-10: 
8. Add the 50 μL from the first round of spinning to the 50 μL from the second round of spinning in the 
Nanosep tube 
a. After this step you should have approximately 100 μL of concentrated phage in the Nanosep tube 
9. Add 400 μL PBS to the 100 μL of concentrated phage 
10. Spin the PBS and phage at 1,000g for 5 minutes 
a. Keep spinning at 1,000g for shorter amounts of time until approximately 50 μL of liquid remain 
above the membrane 
11. Add 1 mL of PBS to the pellet that was kept from Step 1 and spin at 10,000g for ten minutes 
12. Discard the supernatant and add the 50 μL from Step 10 to the pellet 
13. Use 20 μL of PBS to wash the Nanosep membrane 
a. Use the same washing technique shown in Step 5 of the Nanosep Preparation  
14. After washing the membrane, add the 20 μL to the pellet 
 
 
 
 

ICF_001.pdf: 
1 
Document ID#:204197ar5.051717 
Version Date: 05/17/2017  
IRB NUMBER:   204197081512 
 
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO 
HEALTH SCIENCES DIVISION 
MAYWOOD, ILLINOIS 
MARCELLA NIEHOFF SCHOOL OF NURSING  
 
INFORMED CONSENT 
 
Participant’s Name: _________________________________________________________ 
 
Medical Record Number: _____________________________________________________ 
 
PROJECT TITLE:  Sunshine 2 Study for Women with Diabetes 
 
THE APPROVAL FOR THIS PROJECT EXPIRES ON 05/17/2018. 
 
Participant Information 
 
PRINCIPLES CONCERNING RESEARCH:  You are being asked to take part in a research 
project.  It is important that you read and understand the principles that apply to all individuals 
who agree to participate in the research project described below: 
 
1. Taking part in the research is entirely voluntary. 
 
2. We do not know if you will benefit from taking part in the research but the knowledge 
obtained may help others. 
 
3. You may withdraw from the study at any time without anyone objecting and without 
penalty or loss of any benefits to which you are otherwise entitled. 
 
4. If during your participation in the research project new information becomes available 
which would affect your being in the research project (such as better treatments or the 
side effects of the treatments), your doctor will discuss this new information with you and 
will help you make a decision about your continuing in the research. 
 
The purpose of the research, how it is to be done, and what your part in the research will be is 
described below.  Also described are the risks, inconveniences, discomforts and other important 
information which you need to make a decision about whether or not you wish to participate.  
You are urged to discuss any questions you have about this research with the staff members. 
 
PURPOSE OF RESEARCH:  You are being asked to participate in this study because you 
have diabetes.  There is evidence to indicate that women with diabetes are more likely to have 
symptoms of depression.   Depression can impact the manner in which you are able to manage 
your diabetes.  There is evidence to suggest that vitamin D supplementation in healthy persons is 
associated with an improvement in mood.   


2 
Document ID#:204197ar5.051717 
Version Date: 05/17/2017  
 
Because women with diabetes who have depressive symptoms are at risk for poor self-management, 
this study will examine whether vitamin D supplementation improves mood and whether this change 
in mood can help you to better care for your diabetes.    
 
Some observational studies have suggested that vitamin D may help to lower systolic blood pressure. 
As a result, blood pressure is also being examined.   
 
Finally, since evidence suggests that depression is associated with inflammation, and vitamin D 
supplementation may help to decrease inflammation, we will study inflammatory and vascular 
markers in your blood.  We will also study inflammatory markers and  potential bacteria in your 
urine to see if they improve when taking vitamin D.   
 
This purpose of this study is to find out if vitamin D supplementation will improve depressive 
symptoms, self-management, and blood pressure.   If vitamin D supplementation decreases 
inflammation and subsequently improves depression is also being explored.   
 
This research is sponsored by National Institute of Nursing Research 
 
Approximately 180 people will participate in this research.   
 
DESCRIPTION AND EXPLANATION OF PROCEDURES:  If you agree to participate in 
this study, you will be randomly assigned, like the flip of a coin, to receive either 50,000 IUs of 
vitamin D3 weekly or 5000 IUs of vitamin D3 weekly.  You will not be told which dose of 
vitamin D you will receive and you will not be able to choose which group you will be assigned 
to.   The 50,000 IUs of vitamin D3 weekly is the study dose and 5000 IUs approximates the 
standard dose of vitamin D currently recommended by the Institute of Medicine in a given week. 
 Bio Tech Pharmacal, Inc. will be supplying the study supplements. 
 
Your chances of being assigned to either or any of the treatments are equal. 
 
If you agree to participate, you will be asked to come to Loyola for four visits to collect 
information needed for the study.  The first visit will be for screening and data collection.  The 
second visit will be for having a body composition scan and receiving the study supplement with 
instructions on how to take it. The last 2 visits will be follow-up visits (3 and 6 months) after 
starting your supplement.    
 
When comprehensive data is collected (baseline screenings, 3 and 6 months follow-ups), the 
baseline visit will last between 2 and 3 hours and subsequent visits will last between 1 to 2 hours. 
 At these visits, you will be asked to:    
 
(1)  complete questionnaire booklets that ask questions about your feelings, management of your 
diabetes which includes how your family may impact on your ability to manage your diabetes 
and mood as well as symptoms related to diabetes  (e.g., urinary, sleep).  We will also study 
factors that can impact your vitamin D level like sun exposure and diet.  
(2) have physical measurements taken such as height, weight, and blood pressure,  


3 
Document ID#:204197ar5.051717 
Version Date: 05/17/2017  
(3) have blood drawn (about 6 teaspoons) for tests that will tell us about your vitamin D 
 and factors that impact on your vitamin D (parathyroid hormone, calcium).  We will  
 
also assess your diabetes (HBA1c, blood sugar), inflammatory and vascular factors, and a 
metabolic profile (e.g., kidney function-creatinine). 
(4) have urine collected (about 8 tablespoons) for examination of potential bacteria and 
inflammatory markers. 
 
(5) complete a verbal interview that asks specific questions about your emotional well being at 
baseline, 3 and 6 months follow-up.  
(6) have a physical exam upon entry into study and at completion of the study 
(7) complete a body composition scan (which includes bone, lean, and fat mass) to assess  after 
your baseline visit and before you begin your weekly vitamin D.   
(8) phone calls during and following the study as needed.   
 
 
You will be asked to take a capsule (either 50,000 IUs D3 or 5000IUs D3) once a week for six 
months.  Once a week you will receive a message to remind you to take your capsule (preferred 
method of text, e-mail or phone) and to call us if any questions or concerns at 708-216-9303.     
 
Your HBA1c will be measured by a fingerstick in our office.  Your blood sugar, vitamin D, 
parathyroid hormone, calcium, and metabolic profile will be sent to a laboratory.     
Inflammatory and vascular factors will be measured in a research laboratory.  The vitamin D and 
blood sugar test results will be given to you after the study has ended.    
 
Optional Biobanking:  You may optionally agree to allow us to collect and store approximately 
two tablespoons of blood collected and eight tablespoons of urine from you at the  study visits. 
This blood will be coded and paired with coded clinical data for future research purposes.  We 
will ask you to sign a second, separate informed consent document if you agree to bank samples 
for future research.  You do not need to agree to the collection and storage of your blood in order 
to participate in this study. 
 
RISKS/DISCOMFORTS:   It will be important that you do not take other vitamin D 
supplements while in this study as you may be taking 50,000 IU weekly of D3.  Published reports 
suggest that 50,000 IUs per day of vitamin D (note that the proposed study dose is 50,000 IU per 
week) can increase vitamin D and cause high calcium levels, this is called hypercalcemia.  We 
will be checking your calcium level at the blood draw visits to evaluate if you have 
hypercalcemia.  The current dose for this study is one capsule of 50,000 IU per week which 
equates to about 7000 IU per day.  
 
The dose at which the Vitamin D is being administered has minimal side effects.  Side effects 
most commonly reported include: bone pain, constipation, dry mouth, headache, nausea, and 
vomiting.  Since vitamin D may increase serum calcium, there is the potential to develop kidney 
stones.  If you are unsure if you should participate in the study, you should speak with your 
doctor first.  We will be monitoring for side effects upon your study visits and with phone calls.  
  
 
It is important that you understand that if you need assistance with the management of your 


4 
Document ID#:204197ar5.051717 
Version Date: 05/17/2017  
emotions such as medication or counseling, you should talk to your health care provider about 
this.  If we assess that you have thoughts of harming yourself during the study, our study staff. 
Angelos Halaris or Dr. Patricia Mumby will be contacted as well as your health care provider.  
Signing this consent document will give us permission to contact your health care provider if that 
situation should arise. If you do not have a health care provider, we can provide a list for you.   
 
DXA will be used to measure body composition.  There is radiation exposure with a DXA scan 
which is about 12microSieverts.  The amount is less than the radiation absorbed by a passenger 
on a roundtrip transcontinental flight (about 60 microSieverts).  
 
You may experience a slight discomfort when the blood is drawn for lab tests.  
 
Because the urine is being examined for bacteria in a research laboratory, we will not be able to 
provide you results of this test.  However, if you have symptoms of a urinary tract infection, you 
should speak to your healthcare provider.  
 
In addition to the risks mentioned above, there may be unknown or unanticipated risks associated 
with participating in this study. 
 
REPRODUCTIVE AND SEXUAL ACTIVITY INFORMATION: The intervention in this 
study could affect a developing baby. Therefore, you cannot participate in this research project if 
you are pregnant or breast feeding.  
 
If you are a woman of childbearing potential, a pregnancy test will be done to make certain that 
you are not pregnant before beginning the study because of the vitamin D supplementation and 
the test for body composition. 
 
Women who are able to have children must use an effective method of preventing pregnancy 
while participating in this study.  
 
In addition, as study medications may remain in the body for a period beyond their 
administration, you will be asked to continue to employ an effective method of preventing 
pregnancy for six months after you have finished taking the study medication.    
You are encouraged to discuss your preferred method with your doctor. Your doctor will answer 
any questions you have regarding effective methods of preventing pregnancy. It is important that 
you consult with your physician because some study medications may affect the effectiveness of 
various methods of preventing pregnancy. 
 
You must notify the study staff you become pregnant or suspect that you have become pregnant 
during your participation in this study. 
 
BENEFITS:  We do not know if you will benefit from participating in this study. The 
information we learn may help others in the future. 
 
ALTERNATIVE TREATMENTS:  You do not have to participate in this research project. 
 


5 
Document ID#:204197ar5.051717 
Version Date: 05/17/2017  
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:   Neither you nor your insurance provider will be billed for 
any procedures that are performed exclusively for this research study. The vitamin D3 
supplementation will be provided free of charge.   
 
You will be compensated for your time.  There will be a maximum of $115 for your 
participation. This will be $25 for the baseline visit 1, $25 for baseline visit 2, $30 for the 3 
month visit and $35 for the 6 month visit.  Your parking will be paid at every visit. 
 
RESEARCH RELATED INJURY: In the event that you are injured or have side effects as a 
result of participating in this research project, you will be referred to your doctor to take the 
necessary steps to treat the problem.  There are no funds available from Loyola University 
Medical Center, Loyola University Health System or Loyola University Chicago to pay for the 
cost of care of the problem. You will be financially responsible for the cost of care of any 
problems.  By signing this form, you are not giving up any legal rights to seek to obtain 
compensation of injury. 
 
INFORMATION COLLECTED AND WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO IT:  In order to meet the 
goals of the research study (see Purpose of Research section of this consent), we will collect 
information on you, your test results, and how you do from you and your Loyola University 
Medical Center (LUMC) medical records. The information will be collected by the study 
physician(s), the research nurses, data administrators and secretaries.   
 
Information about you will be provided to Loyola University Chicago; the research sponsor; data 
collection and study verification agencies; and/or government regulatory agencies such as the 
Food and Drug Administration. 
 
In this way, we will learn about Vitamin D and its relationship to depression, diabetes, and self-
management.   
 
The information we will collect and send includes:  
 
X 
DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION (e.g., name, address, phone number, Social Security 
Number) 
X  
BLOOD AND URINE SAMPLES 
X  
SURVEYS 
X 
BODY COMPOSITION 
 
We will collect and provide this information about you for as long as you are in the study. 
 
Once the information is disclosed outside of LUMC, it may no longer be protected by federal 
privacy laws. 
 
It is possible that the sponsor, National Institute of Nursing Research, research nurses, data 
collection and/or study verification agencies, data administrators or staff,   or the Food and Drug 
Administration will come to LUMC and view the medical record (see above for description of 


6 
Document ID#:204197ar5.051717 
Version Date: 05/17/2017  
content) and the research records.  They may take notes or copy pages of the medical record.  
This is done to verify the accuracy of the information LUMC is sending to them. 
 
The results of this research study may be published in a journal for the purpose of advancing 
medical knowledge.  You will not be identified by name or by any other identifying information 
in any publication or report about this research. 
 
Consent for LUMC to use and disclose your medical information is required in order for you to 
participate in the study.   
 
WITHDRAWAL OF CONSENT: Your consent to use and disclose your medical information 
for the purpose of this research study is completely voluntary.  You can withdraw your consent 
for LUMC to use and disclose your information and your consent to participate in this study at 
any time without affecting your ability to receive care and treatment at LUMC unrelated to the 
research study.  Withdrawal means that all study procedures and follow-up will stop and we will 
not send any more information about you to the sponsor of this research or its designees.  
However, information already used and disclosed to the research sponsor prior to the time of 
your withdrawal from this study may continue to be used and disclosed by LUMC and the 
sponsor. 
 
For your safety, we may ask that you return to clinic one more time for laboratory tests if the 
supplement is discontinued by the study physician.  We will also ask that you return any unused 
study medication.   
 
If you withdraw from the study, we will ask that you sign the form attached to this consent and 
send it to  Sue Penckofer, PhD, RN or give it to the study staff. Your withdrawal from the study 
will not have any affect on any actions by LUMC taken before the attached form is received by 
LUMC. 
 
Your study doctor, the Institutional Review Board, the regulatory authorities, or the sponsor, 
National Institute of Nursing Research, may terminate the study at any time with or without your 
consent. 
 
 
CONSENT 
 
I have fully explained to ____________________________ the nature and purpose of the above- 
described procedure and the risks that are involved in its performance.  I have answered and will 
answer all questions to the best of my ability.  I may be reached at 708-216-9303.  
 
________________________________________________Date:____/_____/____ 
Signature 
 
Sue Penckofer, PhD, RN, the principal investigator for this study, or associates will be available 
to answer any questions you may have.  Sue Penckofer can be reached at:  708-216-9303. 
 


7 
Document ID#:204197ar5.051717 
Version Date: 05/17/2017  
If you ever feel that you have been injured by participating in this study or if you have any 
questions concerning your rights as a research participant, you may contact either Kenneth 
Micetich, MD, Chair of the Institutional Review Board for the Protection of Human Subjects-
Loyola University Chicago Health Sciences Division, at 708-216-2633 or the Director of the 
Human Research Subjects Protection Program at 708-216-4608.   
 
Although you have the right to revoke this authorization, you accept that such revocation will not 
apply to any uses and disclosures of your information that are described in the Loyola University 
Health System Notice of Privacy Practices or otherwise allowable under any Federal or State 
laws.   
 
You will receive a signed copy of this informed consent document. 
 
You have been fully informed of the above-described research program with its possible benefits 
and risks.  Your signature below indicates that you are willing to participate in this research 
study and agree to the use and disclosure of information about you as described above.  You do 
not give up any of your legal rights by signing this consent document.   
 
 
________________________________________________Date:____/_____/____ 
Signature:   Participant 
 
________________________________________________Date:____/_____/____ 
Signature:   Witness 


8 
Document ID#:204197ar5.051717 
Version Date: 05/17/2017  
 
PROJECT TITLE:  Sunshine 2 Study for Women with Diabetes 
 
 
REVOCATION OF AUTHORIZATION TO 
RELEASE PROTECTED HEALTH INFORMATION (PHI) 
 
 
I, _____________________________________, hereby revoke my consent to participate 
in the study titled, “Sunshine 2 Study for Women with Diabetes”, at Loyola University Medical 
Center (“LUMC”).  I also revoke my consent to release information I provided to LUMC that 
allowed LUMC to use and disclose my medical information as outlined on the consent form, 
which I signed on ____/_____/____ (INSERT DATE CONSENT WAS SIGNED 
ORIGINALLY).  I understand that this revocation does not apply to any action LUMC has taken 
in reliance on the consent I signed earlier.   
 
 
________________________________________________Date:____/_____/____ 
Signature:  Participant 
 
 
 
 
 
Please return this form to: 
 
Sue Penckofer, PhD, RN 
School of Nursing 
Loyola University Chicago 
Building 105, Room 4529 
2160 South First Avenue 
Maywood, Illinois 60153