Conditions: Aortic Valve Stenosis Cardiovascular Diseases Heart Valve Diseases Ventricular Outflow Obstruction Thrombosis
Keywords: Heart Valve Disease Randomized Controlled Trial Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement TAVR Valve Thrombosis
Allocation: RANDOMIZED | Intervention model: PARALLEL
Enrollment: 231
Healthy volunteers: no

Brief summary:
The aortic valve is located between the left ventricle and the aorta. Patients with symptomatic, severe aortic valve stenosis conventionally have it surgically replaced requiring direct access to the heart through the chest. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is now a well-established alternative for treating severe aortic valve stenosis. Both types of intervention improve prognosis and alleviate symptoms.

The optimal choice of blood thinning therapy after TAVR is unknown. It has been reported that leaflet thrombosis with reduced leaflet motion can occur and this phenomenon has been suggested to be potentially related with neurological events. In addition, the occurence of this phenomenon can be reduced with anticoagulation blood thinning therapy.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate if anticoagulation compared to the usual double platelet inhibitor therapy after TAVR can reduce the risk of leaflet thrombosis.

Detailed description:
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become an established therapeutic option for patients with symptomatic, severe aortic valve stenosis, who are ineligible or at high risk for conventional surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). It was recently reported that leaflet thickening and reduced leaflet motion, verified by four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT), was not uncommon after both TAVR and SAVR. It has been emphasized that this phenomenon should be further investigated for its effect on clinical outcomes (e.g. stroke) and valve durability. As this valve leaflet thickening and reduced motion could be reversed by oral anticoagulant (OAC) treatment and was not observed in patients on chronic OAC therapy, it has been hypothesized that this phenomenon could be related to possible leaflet thrombosis or a "thrombotic film" on the leaflets.

AIM: To evaluate whether a rivaroxaban-based strategy, following successful TAVR, compared to an antiplatelet-based strategy, is superior in reducing subclinical valve leaflet thickening and motion abnormalities - as detected by 4DCT-scan.

POPULATION: All patients undergoing successful TAVR by ileofemoral or subclavian access with an approved TAVR device will be screened for eligibility. Included subjects must provide written informed consent. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are listed below.

DESIGN: The GALILEO-4D trial will be conducted as a substudy of the multicenter, open-label, randomized, event-driven, active-controlled GALILEO trial. Patients will be 1:1 randomized to an antiplatelet-based strategy vs. rivaroxaban-based strategy - the randomization will adopt the same 1:1 randomization of the main GALILEO trial. In case the GALILEO-4D trial should still be continued after completion of the main GALILEO trial, this 1:1 randomization will be continued until inclusion of 150 patients in both treatment groups. In total, 300 patients will be randomized in the GALILEO-4D trial.

INTERVENTION: Subjects in the GALILEO-4D substudy will receive the same intervention as in the main GALILEO study. In addition, a 4DCT-scan and echocardiography will be performed at 90 days after randomization.

END POINTS: The primary endpoint constitutes the rate of patients with at least one prosthetic leaflet with \> 50% motion reduction as assessed by cardiac 4DCT-scan (total N = 300). The secondary endpoints are listed below.

Arms:
arm 1: ASA (Acetylsalicylic acid) 75-100mg + Clopidogrel 75mg for 90 days, followed by ASA 75-100mg monotherapy arm 2: Rivaroxaban 10mg + ASA 75-100mg for 90 days, followed by rivaroxaban 10mg monotherapy

Interventions: intervention 1: Acetylsalicylic acid intervention 2: Clopidogrel intervention 3: Rivaroxaban
Intervention descriptions: intervention 1: Drug: Acetylsalicylic acid:

75 - 100 mg OD (for first 90 days only in arm 1) intervention 2: Drug: Clopidogrel 75 mg OD for first 90 days intervention 3: Drug: Rivaroxaban (Xarelto):

10 mg OD (once-daily)

Protocol document:
Prot_SAP_000.pdf: 
GALILEO-4D trial 
 
 
 
 
 
A randomized comparison of a rivaroxaban-based 
strategy with an antiplatelet-based strategy following 
successful TAVR for the prevention of leaflet 
thickening and reduced leaflet motion as evaluated 
by four-dimensional, volume-rendered  
computed tomography (4DCT) 
 
 
 
GALILEO-4D TRIAL 
 
Substudy of the GALILEO trial 
 
 
 
PROTOCOL 
Version 3.0, dated May 29th, 2017 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


GALILEO-4D trial, v. 3.0, dated May 29th, 2017 
2
CONTENT 
 
1. TIME SCHEDULE 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2. BACKGROUND 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
3. PURPOSE 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                    
4. STUDY DESIGN 
 
5. STUDY POPULATION  
     5.1. Inclusion & exclusion criteria    
     5.2. Definition – successful TAVR  
6. STUDY PROCEDURES 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     6.1. Patient information 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
     6.2. Randomization  
 
 
 
     6.3. Antithrombotic/anticoagulant treatment 
 
 
     6.4. Adverse event reporting 
 
 
 
7. STUDY ENDPOINTS  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     7.1. Primary endpoint 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     7.2. Secondary endpoints  
 
8. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS 
9. PARTICIPATING CENTERS 
10. CLINTRIALS.GOV AND DATATILSYNET  
 
 
 
 
 
11. ECONOMICS 
12. ETHICAL ASPECTS 
13. REFERENCES 
14. 4DCT-SCAN REQUIREMENTS & PROTOCOL  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


GALILEO-4D trial, v. 3.0, dated May 29th, 2017 
3
 
1. TIME SCHEDULE 
 
 
 
Visit number (a) 
 
 
 
 
#1 
 
 
#3 
 
Period 
 
 
Screening 
 
 
Planned treatment 
 
Visit 
 
Screening 
 
Baseline / 
Randomization (c) 
 
 
On-site visit 
 
Day 
 
1-7 days (b) prior to 
randomization 
 
0 
 
90 
Window {day[s]) 
 
 
± 15 d 
 
Study assessments 
 
Informed consent (IC) (d) 
(X) 
 
 
Demographics (e) 
(X) 
 
 
Medical history 
(X) 
 
 
Functional NYHA class 
(X) 
 
X 
Prior medication 
(X) 
 
 
TAVR assessment 
(X) 
 
 
Inclusion / exclusion criteria 
(X) 
(X) 
 
Concomittant medication 
 
(X) 
(X) 
Physical exam 
 
(X) 
(X) 
Vital signs (f) 
 
(X) 
(X) 
Echocardiogram (TTE or TEE) (g) 
(X) 
 
X 
12-lead ECG 
 
(X) 
(X) 
4D-computed tomography 
 
 
X 
 
Study medication 
 
 
 
 
Prescribing/dispensing  
assigned therapy 
 
(X) (h) 
(X) 
NOAF assessment and 
adjustment of treatment (i) 
 
(X) 
(X) 
(Serious) adverse events (j) 
(X) 
(X) 
(X) 
 
Laboratory assessments (local labs) 
 
Hematology (k) 
(X) 
 
 
Liver tests (l) 
(X) 
 
 
Renal function (m) 
(X) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(X) Items assessed in the main GALILEO study 
 
 
 X   Items assessed in the GALILEO-4D substudy only 
 
 
(a) Visit number #2 at 30 days after randomization is only mandatory in the main GALILEO trial. 
(b) Consenting subjects must be randomized within 1-7 days post-TAVR and before hospital discharge.  
(c) Once randomized, a subject has entered the study and all randomized subjects will be followed for 
this substudy until the 4DCT-scan has been performed, even if they did not take assigned study 
medication or prematurely discontinued study medication. In case of early permanent discontinuation 
of study medication, all relevant information must be captured in the eCRF as soon as possible after 
stopping the assigned study medication. The timing of the on-site visit must be kept unchanged. 


GALILEO-4D trial, v. 3.0, dated May 29th, 2017 
4
(d) A separate informed consent form will need to be signed for the GALILEO-4D substudy. 
(e) Demographics: year of birth, sex and race/ethnicity, if allowed per local regulations. 
(f) Vital signs: blood pressure, heart rate, weight, and height. Note that height only needs to be 
determined at screening. 
(g) The mean transaortic valve pressure gradient should be determined from either routine 
transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) or transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) recordings before 
discharge and at 90 ± 15 days after randomization.  
(h) The first study drug administration. 
(i) In case of NOAF after randomization, sujects in: (a) the rivaroxaban-based treatment strategy will be 
switched to rivaroxaban 15 or 20 mg once-daily, based on kidney function. eGFR will be used as 
reported in lab printouts or calculated from serum creatinine levels using the MDRD formula. Subjects 
with moderate renal impairment and eGFR < 50 and ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 will receive an adjusted 
dose of rivaroxaban of 15 mg once-daily. Both of these doses must be taken with food. (b) Subjects in 
the antiplatelet-based treatment strategy will switch to vitamin K antagonist after INR assessment (INR 
target 2-3). 
(j) Only serious adverse events (SAE) and adverse events (AE) that lead to permanent discontinuation 
of the assigned study medication are to be reported. The investigator must report immediately (within 
24 hours of the investigator’s awareness) all (serious) adverse events. (S)AE reporting will be done via 
the main GALILEO study. 
(k) Hematology tests include hemoglobin, platelet count and white cell count. 
(l) Liver tests include AST/ALT, total bilirubin and its components, and alkaline phosphatase 
(m) Renal function will be estimated by creatinine clearance (Cr-Cl; MDRD formula using serum 
creatinine levels). 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


GALILEO-4D trial, v. 3.0, dated May 29th, 2017 
5
2.  BACKGROUND 
 
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become an established therapeutic option for 
patients with symptomatic, severe aortic valve stenosis, who are ineligible or at high risk for 
conventional surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).1-4 Results from the NOTION (Nordic Aortic 
Valve Intervention Trial) randomized clinical trial showed that TAVR may also be a viable option for 
patients with a lower risk profile.5 
Very recently, Makkar et al. (2015) reported that leaflet thickening and reduced leaflet motion is not 
uncommon after both TAVR and SAVR – with an incidence of ~ 20%. Although reduced leaflet motion 
did not result in higher transvalvular gradients, the authors emphasized that this phenomenon should 
be further investigated for its effect on clinical outcomes (e.g. stroke) and valve durability. As this valve 
leaflet thickening and reduced motion could be reversed by oral anticoagulant (OAC) treatment and 
was not observed in patients on chronic OAC therapy, the authors hypothesized that this phenomenon 
could be related to possible leaflet thrombosis or a “thrombotic film” on the leaflets.6 
In the most recent ESC guidelines, the need for a 3-month period of postoperative OAC therapy has 
been challenged in patients with aortic bioprostheses (class IIb, level of evidence C), with the use of 
low-dose aspirin now favoured as an alternative.7 Although the rates of thrombo-embolic events 
among patients given OAC after surgical bioprosthetic aortic valve implantation appear to be lower 
than the event rates among patients given aspirin alone, OAC treatment is associated with more 
bleeding.8 With the limited evidence to date based primarily on observational studies, the trade-off 
between reduced thromboembolic events with OAC and increased bleeding remains uncertain. 
Currently, treatment of TAVR patients with dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT; aspirin and clopidogrel) 
for 3-6 months is widely accepted and recommended9 – however, this recommendation is not based 
on hard evidence and the usefulness of DAPT is questioned. Two small studies revealed that the risk 
for cardiovascular events was not reduced, while the risk for bleeding increased in the DAPT group 
compared to single antiplatelet therapy.10,11 However, antiplatelet-based therapy alone might not be 
the optimal treatment for TAVR patients.  
As to date, the optimal therapy for TAVR patients is not known and only based on consensus, there is 
an unmet need to identify the best medical treatment in patients undergoing TAVR. As novel oral anti-
coagulants (NOACs) such as rivaroxaban may reduce the risk for TAVR-related thrombotic events, 
without increasing the bleeding risk, this study aims to evaluate whether a rivaroxaban-based strategy, 
following successful TAVR, compared to an antiplatelet-based strategy, is superior in reducing 
subclinical valve leaflet thickening and motion abnormalities – as detected by four-dimensional, 
volume-rendered computed tomography (4DCT). 
 
3. PURPOSE 
 
The purpose of this project is to evaluate whether a rivaroxaban-based strategy, following successful 
TAVR, compared to an antiplatelet-based strategy, is superior in reducing subclinical valve leaflet 
thickening and motion abnormalities – as evaluated by 4DCT imaging at three months following TAVR.  
 
 
 


GALILEO-4D trial, v. 3.0, dated May 29th, 2017 
6
4. STUDY DESIGN 
 
The GALILEO-4D trial will be conducted as a substudy of the multicenter, open-label, randomized, 
event-driven, active-controlled GALILEO trial. Patients will be 1:1 randomized to an antiplatelet-based 
strategy vs. rivaroxaban-based strategy – the randomization will adopt the same 1:1 randomization of 
the main GALILEO trial. In total, 300 patients will be randomized in the GALILEO-4D trial. 
 
The 4DCT-scan should be performed 90days ± 15 days after randomization. The 4DCT-scan should 
preferentially be performed at the same day of Visit #3 or some days before Visit#3, but should – if 
possible – NOT be performed after Visit #3. 
 
            Study design of the GALILEO trial: 
 
Successful transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) as defined in the main GALILEO study protocol. 
R, randomization; ASA, acetylsalicylic acid; OD, once-daily. 
 
 


GALILEO-4D trial, v. 3.0, dated May 29th, 2017 
7
5.   STUDY POPULATION 
 
5.1. Inclusion & exclusion criteria 
 
 Inclusion criteria 
1. Patient included in the randomized GALILEO trial 
2. Written informed consent 
 
 Exclusion criteria 
 
1. Severe renal insufficiency (eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2) or on dialysis, or post-TAVR 
unresolved acute kidney injury with renal dysfunction ≥ stage 2 
2. Iodinate contrast media allergy or other conditions that prohibit CT imaging (i.e. 
multiple myeloma, etc.) 
 
6.   STUDY PROCEDURES 
 
6.1. Patient information 
The patient is informed orally and in writing by an investigator about the GALILEO-4D 
substudy and written informed consent is obtained before study inclusion. Patients will have to 
give written informed consent for the GALILEO and GALILEO-4D substudy before study entry, 
preferably in parallel. The patient will also receive a copy of the patient information and, if 
requested, of the informed consent. 
 
6.2. Randomization 
All criteria of the GALILEO-4D trial have to be fulfilled in order to make a patient suitable for 
randomization in the GALILEO-4D trial. In order to obtain 1:1 randomization in the GALILEO 
and GALILEO-4D trial, a stratified randomization will be foreseen for those patients included in 
both studies.  
 
 
 6.3. Antithrombotic/anticoagulant treatment 
 
 
 
 
 


GALILEO-4D trial, v. 3.0, dated May 29th, 2017 
8
 
 
 
Additional information 
 
The route of administration of all medication is oral. 
 
Clopidogrel 75 mg once-daily and ASA 75-100 mg once-daily are to be continued 
unchanged, or to be started at the time of randomization if not already being taken. In 
subjects that are clopidogrel naïve at randomization, a loading dose of at least 300 mg 
clopidogrel should be administered.  
 
The first dose of rivaroxaban (10mg once-daily) is given either immediately after 
randomization or within 1-3 days after the last intake of clopidogrel. Rivaroxaban 10 mg 
once-daily can be taken with or without food; rivaroxaban 20 mg once-daily should always 
be taken with food. Rivaroxaban is continued until the end-of-treatment period visit of the 
main GALILEO trial. 
 
 
IN THE EVENT OF NEW-ONSET ATRIAL FIBRILLATION (NOAF): 
 
 
 
 


GALILEO-4D trial, v. 3.0, dated May 29th, 2017 
9
Additional information 
 
 
In the event of NOAF, the antiplatelet-based strategy will be stopped and a vitamin K 
antagonist (VKA) with a target INR 2-3 started. ASA 75-100 mg once-daily is to be 
continued in combination with VKA until 90 days after randomization. 
 
In the event of NOAF, the dose of rivaroxaban is switched from 10 mg once-daily to 20 or 
15 mg once-daily – depending on renal function – for those patients in the rivaroxaban 
group. Rivaroxaban 20 and 15 mg once-daily should be taken with food. ASA 75-100 mg 
once-daily is to be continued until 90 days after randomization. 
 
In order to preserve the 1:1 randomization in the main GALILEO trial and avoid excessive and 
unfounded ’cross-over’ from the antiplatelet group to the rivaroxaban group, results of the 
4DCT-scan will be kept blinded for the treating physician and patient until the end oft he main 
GALILEO study. 
 
Only in case of a clinical overt ischemic stroke or non-CNS systemic embolism within three 
months after randomization, an additional cardiac 4DCT-scan within 8 days of this thrombo-
embolic event could be considered. The result of this additional cardiac 4DCT-scan could be 
made available to the treating physician. 
 
 
6.4. Adverse event reporting 
Adverse Event (AE) reporting will be done via the main GALILEO trial as described in the main 
GALILEO protocol. As the GALILEO-4D study will be a diagnostic sub-study (involving only a 
single 4DCT-scan and transthoracic echocardiography), no treatment related Serious Adverse 
Event (SAE)-reporting should be anticipated.  
 
 
7. STUDY ENDPOINTS 
 
All endpoints will be assessed at three months after TAVR. 
 
7.1. Primary endpoint 
 
o 
The rate of patients with at least one prosthetic leaflet with > 50% motion reduction as 
assessed by cardiac 4DCT-scan (total N = 300). 
 
7.2. Secondary endpoints  
 
o 
The rate of prosthetic leaflets with > 50% motion reduction as assessed by cardiac 
4DCT-scan (total N = 900). 
o 
The rate of patients with at least one prosthetic leaflet with thickening as assessed by 
cardiac 4DCT-scan (total N = 300). 


GALILEO-4D trial, v. 3.0, dated May 29th, 2017 
10
o 
The rate of prosthetic leaflets with thickening as assessed by cardiac 4DCT-scan 
(total N = 900). 
o 
Aortic transvalvular mean pressure gradient and effective orifice area (cm2) as 
determined by transthoracic echocardiography. 
o 
Functional NYHA class. 
o 
Death, first thromboembolic event (DTE), and safety endpoints (see GALILEO trial) 
will be assessed in the main GALILEO study and analyzed in the GALILEO-4D 
substudy with regards to occurence of the leaflet abnormalities – as exploratory 
analysis. 
 
Definitions:  
 
Leaflet thickening: Hypoattentuating leaflet thickening or focal hypoattenuating 
abnormality attached to the prosthetic leaflet or diffuse thickening of the prosthetic 
valve leaflet identifiable on at least two reconstructed planes (typically double-
oblique axial and multiplanar reformatted reconstructions). 
 
Reduced motion: Reduced systolic leaflet excursion is classified as: (I) normal, (II) 
mildly reduced (<50%), (III) moderate to severely reduced (>50%), and (IV) 
immobile.  Reduced systolic leaflet excursion is considered significant when it is  > 
50% or immobile. Quantitative assessment of leaflet motion is performed with a 
blood pool inversion volume rendered cine reconstruction throughout the cardiac 
cycle evaluating the bioprosthetic leaflets. 
 
The 4DCT CoreLab evaluation will be performed at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (Denmark) 
under supervision of Prof. Dr. Klaus Fuglsang Kofoed and at St. Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, 
BC (Canada) under supervision of Dr. Jonathon A. Leipsic. The readers of the 4DCT-scan will 
be blinded from the treatment arm. 
 
8. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS 
 
The primary endpoint of reduced prosthetic leaflet motion is expected to occur in 20% of patients.6 
Equal number of patients are warranted in both treatment groups. A 65% reduction of the GALILEO-
4D primary endpoint requires inclusion of 246 patients in order to demonstrate superiority. Taking into 
account an estimated loss at follow-up of 18% of patients, the total sample size (N) needed to 
demonstrate superiority will be 300 randomized patients. The primary endpoint will be analysed using 
an exact Fisher test or a Χ2 test, as required. 
 
SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATION  (Power 0.8, Alpha 0.05) 
 
o 
Probability of event in Group A: 0.20 
o 
Probability of event in Group B: 0.07 
o 
Proportion of sample in Group A: 0.50 
o 
Evaluable subjects needed in Group A: 123 
o 
Drop-out: 0.18 


GALILEO-4D trial, v. 3.0, dated May 29th, 2017 
11
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
N = 300 
 
Estimation of drop-out rate: 
o 
A 10% loss at follow-up or death at 3 months is expected in this elderly patient population. 
o 
In approx. 8% of cases, an inconclusive cardiac 4DCT can be expected. 
 
9. PARTICIPATING CENTERS 
 
The GALILEO-4D trial is a multicenter, open-label, randomized, active-controlled trial and will be 
conducted as a substudy of the international GALILEO trial. Some selected centers participating at the 
GALILEO trial – and having the possibility to perform cardiac 4DCT-scans – will be offered the 
possibility to include patients in the GALILEO-4D trial. Inclusion will be by competitive enrollment until 
inclusion of 150 patients in both treatment groups of the GALILEO-4D trial 
 
Coordinating center: Rigshospitalet - University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark 
 
Principal Investigator:  
 
 
 
Co-Principal Investigator: 
Lars Søndergaard, MD, DMSc  
 
 
Ole De Backer, MD, PhD 
Professor of Cardiology  
 
 
 
Consultant Interventional Cardiology 
The Heart Center, section 2011  
 
 
The Heart Center, section 2011 
Rigshospitalet  
 
 
 
 
Rigshospitalet 
Blegdamsvej 9  
 
 
 
 
Blegdamsvej 9  
 
2100 Copenhagen, Denmark 
 
 
 
2100 Copenhagen, Denmark 
E-mail: Lars.Soendergaard.01@regionh.dk 
 
E-mail: ole.debacker@gmail.com 
Phone: +45-35458693  
 
 
 
Phone: +45-35457086 
 
 
10. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV AND DATATILSYNET 
 
The GALILEO-4D trial will be registered at ClinicalTrials.Gov and will be conducted according to 
guidelines of the Danish Datatilsynet (Danish Data Protection Agency – The act implements the 
European Directive 95/46/EC on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal 
data and on the free movement of such data). The study results will be published regardless of the 
outcomes and conclusions that can be extracted. 
 
11. ECONOMICS 
The study is being economically supported by Bayer AG (Germany) to cover study costs – this 
financial support will be used primarily for research staff as well as for financial compensation of 
participating centers for additional study costs (such as 4DCT scan, echocardiography). None of the 
study investigators or members of Study Committees has a financial interest in the study. None of the 
supporters will have any conflict of interest with regard to the results of the study. Insurance and any 
legal requirements of the trial follow local legislation. 
 
 


GALILEO-4D trial, v. 3.0, dated May 29th, 2017 
12
12. ETHICAL ASPECTS 
 
There are some ethical issues involved in the treatment and follow-up part of this study. Anti-
coagulation treatment in TAVR patients has proven to be safe in previous studies and in our 
experience with TAVR patients with previously known AF. There might be a slightly increased bleeding 
risk, however, this bleeding risk is kept to a minimum due to the exclusion of patients with an a priori 
increased bleeding risk (see exclusion criteria). We can consider this risk well counterbalanced by the 
advantage of reducing the risk of reduced valve leaflet motion as well as the risk of stroke. The risk 
related to the 4DCT-scan is low – patients with a renal insufficiency, iodine contrast allergy and/or 
contraindications for CT are excluded (see exclusion criteria) Concerning the radiation dose of the 
4DCT-scan, we can report that patients will receive a radiation dose of 5-20mSievert, depending on 
weight and heart frequency/rhythym. It can be calculated that lifetime risk to die from cancer, hereby, 
theoretically increases with maximally 0,06%. Thus, the patients’ lifetime risk to die from cancer 
increases from 25,0% to 25,06%. Furthermore, more than 95% of all study patients are expected to be 
more than 70 years of age. The patients are informed orally and in writing and are only included in 
case of written consent. Results of the study are expected to be of value for future patients undergoing 
TAVR. 
 
13. REFERENCES 
 
(1) 
Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG, Tuzcu EM, Webb JG, 
Fontana GP, Makkar RR, Brown DL, Block PC, Guyton RA, Pichard AD, Bavaria JE, 
Herrmann HC, Douglas PS, Petersen JL, Akin JJ, Anderson WN, Wang D, Pocock S; 
PARTNER Trial Investigators. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in 
patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1597-607. 
(2) 
Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG, Tuzcu EM, Webb JG, 
Fontana GP, Makkar RR, Williams M, Dewey T, Kapadia S, Babaliaros V, Thourani VH, 
Corso P, Pichard AD, Bavaria JE, Herrmann HC, Akin JJ, Anderson WN, Wang D, Pocock 
SJ; PARTNER Trial Investigators. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in 
high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2011;364:2187-98. 
(3) 
Adams DH, Popma JJ, Reardon MJ, Yakubov SJ, Coselli JS, Deeb GM, Gleason TG, 
Buchbinder M, Hermiller J Jr, Kleiman NS, Chetcuti S, Heiser J, Merhi W, Zorn G, Tadros P, 
Robinson N, Petrossian G, Hughes GC, Harrison JK, Conte J, Maini B, Mumtaz M, 
Chenoweth S, Oh JK; U.S. CoreValve Clinical Investigators. Transcatheter aortic-valve 
replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1790-8.  
(4) 
Reardon MJ, Adams DH, Kleiman NS, Yakubov SJ, Coselli JS, Deeb GM, Gleason TG, Lee 
JS, Hermiller JB Jr, Chetcuti S, Heiser J, Merhi W, Zorn GL 3rd, Tadros P, Robinson N, 
Petrossian G, Hughes GC, Harrison JK, Maini B, Mumtaz M, Conte JV, Resar JR, Aharonian 
V, Pfeffer T, Oh JK, Qiao H, Popma JJ. 2-Year Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Surgical or 
Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;66:113-21. 
(5) 
Thyregod HG, Steinbrüchel DA, Ihlemann N, Nissen H, Kjeldsen BJ, Petursson P, Chang Y, 
Franzen OW, Engstrøm T, Clemmensen P, Hansen PB, Andersen LW, Olsen PS, 
Søndergaard L. Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With 
Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis: 1-Year Results From the All-Comers NOTION Randomized 
Clinical Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;65:2184-94. 
(6) 
Makkar RR, Fontana G, Jilaihawi H, Chakravarty T, Kofoed KF, De Backer O, Asch F, Ruiz 
C, Olsen NT, Trento A, Friedman J, Berman D, Cheng W, Kashif M, Jelnin V, Kliger CA, Guo 
H, Pichard AD, Weissman NJ, Kapadia S, Manasse E, Bhatt DL, Leon MB, Sondergaard L. 
Possible Leaflet Thrombosis in Bioprosthetic Valves. N Engl J Med – published online. 


GALILEO-4D trial, v. 3.0, dated May 29th, 2017 
13
(7) 
Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F, Antunes MJ, Barón-Esquivias G, Baumgartner H, Borger 
MA, Carrel TP, De Bonis M, Evangelista A, Falk V, Iung B, Lancellotti P, Pierard L, Price S, 
Schäfers HJ, Schuler G, Stepinska J, Swedberg K, Takkenberg J, Von Oppell UO, 
Windecker S, Zamorano JL, Zembala M. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart 
disease (version 2012). Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of 
the European Society of Cardiology (ESC); European Association for Cardio-Thoracic 
Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 2012;33:2451-96. 
(8) 
Mérie C, Køber L, Skov Olsen P, Andersson C, Gislason G, Skov Jensen J, Torp-Pedersen 
C. Association of warfarin therapy duration after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement with 
risk of mortality, thromboembolic complications, and bleeding. JAMA 2012;308:2118-25.  
(9) 
Holmes DR Jr, Mack MJ, Kaul S, Agnihotri A, Alexander KP, Bailey SR, Calhoon JH, 
Carabello BA, Desai MY, Edwards FH, Francis GS, Gardner TJ, Kappetein AP, Linderbaum 
JA, Mukherjee C, Mukherjee D, Otto CM, Ruiz CE, Sacco RL, Smith D, Thomas JD. 2012 
ACCF/AATS/SCAI/STS expert consensus document on transcatheter aortic valve 
replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1200-54. 
(10) Poliacikova P, Cockburn J, de Belder A, Trivedi U, Hildick-Smith D. Antiplatelet and 
antithrombotic treatment after transcatheter aortic valve implantation - comparison of 
regimes. J Invasive Cardiol 2013;25:544-8. 
(11) Durand E, Blanchard D, Chassaing S, Gilard M, Laskar M, Borz B, Lafont A, Barbey C, 
Godin M, Tron C, Zegdi R, Chatel D, Le Page O, Litzler PY, Bessou JP, Danchin N, Cribier 
A, Eltchaninoff H. Comparison of two antiplatelet therapy strategies in patients undergoing 
transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am J Cardiol 2014;113:355-60. 
 
 
 
 


GALILEO-4D trial, v. 3.0, dated May 29th, 2017 
14
14. 4DCT-SCAN – TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS & PROTOCOL  
 
4DCT-scan – technical requirements 
 
It is essential to have optimal CT image quality for accurate assessment of TAVR leaflet morphology 
and motion. The highest degree of image quality is needed especially during the systolic phase of the 
cardiac cycle, whereas late-diastolic images are less important. High performance in terms of temporal 
and spacial resolution of the CT technology used is mandatory. Each participating site are requested 
to forward pilot data-sets to the Corelab at Rigshospitalet for image quality assessment, prior to study 
initiation.   Accordingly, a list of minimal requirements in terms of CT methodology is tabulated below. 
MDCT scanner type: High-end CT scanners with >64 detector technology are required. Any CT 
vendor will be allowed, provided that the site has comprehensive experience in cardiac CT imaging 
using the specific CT tomograph. Each site is requested to specify CT-scanner type and number of 
performed ECG-gated cardiac CT scans yearly. 
Patient preparation pre-MDCT: To achieve the highest possible temporal resolution and 
hemodynamic standardization of valve function - regardless of CT scanner used – all patients will be 
required to undergo pre-treatment with betablocker or ivabradine for heart-rate control. Target heart 
rate is less than 65 bpm. Each site is requested to specify if heart-rate control is part of the current 
routine of the CT unit. 
MDCT-contrast: Contrast injection system (single vs dual-phase) and contrast type are according to 
local preference. Each site is requested to specify injection protocol and contrast type routinely used. 
MDCT-acquisition: Arterial phase (LV or descending aortic triggering), retrospective image acquisition 
with recordings of the entire R-R interval is needed. Both dose-modulation, reducing dose during 
diastole or without dose-modulation is allowed. Scan-field of view (Z-axis) should be 1 cm above and 1 
cm below the TAVR stent frame. In centers, where radiation dose and scanner specifications allow it, 
a Z-axis 1 cm above the TAVR stent frame and below the caudal boundary of the left ventricle should 
be recorded. Vendor specific scan protocols will be provided to each individual site. In addition to scan 
parameters, heart rate and blood pressure during the scan should be recorded. 
MDCT-reconstruction: Recorded image data should be reconstructed using appropriate filtering and 
iterative reconstruction according to a vendor specific protocol provided. Data sets of lowest possible 
slice thickness (0-5-0-9 mm) at each 5% intervals of the R-R cycle (0-95%) should be reconstructed 
including the TAVR. In addition, at site where the whole heart may be included in the image, data sets 
of 2 mm slice thickness at each 5% interval of the R-R cycle should be reconstructed including the 
heart chambers. These images will be used to assess LV cardiac volumes and specifically LV stroke 
volume. 
MDCT-images: All recorded MDCT image data should be saved in DICOM format and forwarded to 
the Corelab at Righospitalet. 
 
 
 
 
 


GALILEO-4D trial, v. 3.0, dated May 29th, 2017 
15
4DCT-scan – protocol 
 
Scan protocol: Prior to imaging, patients are required to abstain from caffeine intake 16 hours before 
the scan. Baseline ECG, heart rate and blood pressure are recorded and reviewed before the scan. A 
single dosage of oral metoprolol (50 to 150 mg) is administered 1.5-2 hours before the scan, according 
to the heart rate, blood pressure and weight. In patients with a heart rate more than 60 bpm at the time 
of CT scan, additional metoprolol i.v. should be given for heart rate control. In patients with metoprolol 
contraindications (allergic asthma or left ventricular ejection fraction below 30%) a single dose of oral 
ivabradin (15 mg) is given 2 hours prior to the scan. 
Patients should be scanned using a 320-row multidetector CT (MDCT) scanner, using a dedicated 4D 
CT volume image protocol. An image noise standard deviation level of 30 is predefined, which results 
in a variable kV and mA per patient. The kV is set to 120 by default; if this results in a maximal mA the 
kV is raised, until a sub-maximal mA is reached. The start- and end-position of the scan is determined 
by the initial scanogram. Start-position is defined as 20 mm cranial to the metal stent frame of the 
valve and end-position 16 mm (maximal Z-axis coverage) caudally by retro-spective volume imaging. 
To minimize radiation exposure, a dose-modulation approach can be used, reducing dose in the 55-
100% RR-range (diastole). The contrast images are recorded by one rotation of the gantry at a heart 
rate of less than 75 bpm, by two rotations at a heart rate of 75 to 100 bpm, and by three rotations at a 
heart rate above 100 bpm. A total volume of 70-110 ml contrast agent (Visipaque, GE Healthcare) – 
depending on the weight of the patient – is infused at a rate of 5-6 ml/sec. The scans are initiated by 
real time bolus tracking in the left ventricle. Images are reconstructed at 0.5 mm slices with 0.25 mm 
overlap with an FC03 filter and an iterative reconstruction algorithm (AIDR) for valve evaluation at 5% 
intervals within the 0-95% RR range. 
CT Image reading: The valve leaflets will be assessed systematically using 2D and 3D-VR (volume 
rendered) imaging. The 3D-VR images are generated throughout the cardiac cycle and provide an 
animated movie of the valve (4D VR-CT), with an emphasis on assessment of systolic leaflet opening. 
Leaflet motion is defined as normal, mildly reduced (<50% reduction), moderately reduced (50 to 70% 
reduction), severely reduced (>70% reduction), or immobile (lack of motion in at least one valve 
leaflet). Hypo-attenuating leaflet lesions are also studied on maximal intensity projection (MIP) 2D CT 
and correlated to reduced leaflet motion.  
Inter-observer variability: 4DCT-scans performed in the SAVORY trial were analyzed by a local site 
reader (K.K.) and the CT Core Lab (H.J.). There was concordance between both readers in 61 out of 
62 patients included in the SAVORY cohort. The presence of reduced leaflet motion on 4D VR-CT was 
compared with independent observations between different CT software (3mensio and Vitrea) by two 
different groups of specialists (H.J. and J.F./D.B.) – in 20 consecutive patients, there was a 100% 
concordance for assessment of leaflet motion (Makkar et al., NEJM 2015). 
 
N.B. In case of questions regarding the 4DCT protocol or need for support in order to set-up the 4DCT 
protocol at your institution, please contact Prof Dr Klaus Kofoed, Rigshospitalet, Non-Invasive Imaging 
Specialist, Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen, Denmark.