Conditions: Dental Caries
Keywords: sodium fluoride povidone iodine varnish
Allocation: RANDOMIZED | Intervention model: PARALLEL
Enrollment: 284
Healthy volunteers: no

Brief summary:
The purpose of the study is to determine the efficacy of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish. Single-center, double-blind, controlled Phase 2 study with parallel groups of children. Subjects will be stratified by early childhood education center and then randomized to receive either test varnish or control varnish topically to the teeth. Treatment will be administered quarterly for up to 24 months. The primary outcome is surface-level primary molar caries increment (d2-4mfs) at 24- months post baseline.

Detailed description:
Objectives:

Primary

\- To determine if Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish (test varnish) is superior to a control varnish containing only fluoride in the prevention of new caries lesions.

Secondary

* To establish that the response of child participants to the test varnish was not inferior to the control varnish

Arms:
arm 1: Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish. The active ingredients are Povidone Iodine and Sodium Fluoride . arm 2: The active control varnish will be the same fluoride varnish without iodine with an appropriate FDA approved food dye added to match the color of the test agent. There will be no difference in the treatment and control varnishes except for the povidone iodine.

Interventions: intervention 1: Test varnish intervention 2: Standard varnish
Intervention descriptions: intervention 1: Topical application of test varnish to the teeth 4 times per year. intervention 2: Topical application of test varnish to the teeth 4 times per year

Protocol document:
Prot_SAP_000.pdf: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PHASE 2 EFFICACY EVALUATION OF ADVANTAGE ANTI-CARIES VARNISH 
 
 
Study Acronym: Kouruhr Masamwahu (Beautiful Smiles and Smiley Teeth and Face) 
 
Advantage Protocol Number: 2016-12-02 
 
IND #128835 
 
IND Sponsor: Advantage Silver Dental Arrest, LLLC 
442 SW Umatilla Ave, Suite 200, 
Redmond, OR 97756 
 
Sponsor Contact: Peter Milgrom, DDS 
 
Principal Investigator: Ohnmar Tut, BDS MPhil 
 
Medical Monitor: John Hedson, MD 
 
Regulatory Monitor:  William Cooley, PhD 
 
Version Number: 2.5   
 
Version Date: 01/10/2017  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
ii 
PROTOCOL APPROVAL 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish 
 
STUDY ACRONYM: Kouruhr Masamwahu 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
     1/10/2017 
 
Ohnmar K. Tut, BDS MPhil 
        
 
          Date 
Principal Investigator 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      1/13/2017 
 
Peter Milgrom, DDS 
 
 
 
 
Date 
Sub-Investigator 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
iii 
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE 
The study will be carried out in accordance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) as required by the 
following: 
 
• 
United States (US) Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) applicable to clinical 
studies (45 CFR Part 46, 21 CFR Part 50, 21 CFR Part 56, and 21 CFR Part 312)  
 
• 
ICH E6; 62 Federal Register 25691 (May 9, 1997)  
 
All key personnel (all individuals responsible for the design and conduct of this study) have 
completed Human Subjects Protection Training. 
 
 
 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
iv 
SIGNATURE PAGE 
 
The signature below constitutes the approval of this protocol and the attachments, and provides 
the necessary assurances that this trial will be conducted according to all stipulations of the 
protocol, including all statements regarding confidentiality, and according to local legal and 
regulatory requirements and applicable US federal regulations and ICH guidelines. 
 
I have carefully read this protocol, and agree that it contains all the necessary information for 
conducting the study safely. 
 
I will conduct this study in strict accordance with this protocol and according to the current Good 
Clinical Practice (GCP) regulations and guidelines [21 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) Parts 11, 
50, 54 and 56 and ICH (International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for 
Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use) Topic E6 (R1)], and local regulatory requirements. 
Any changes in procedure will only be made if necessary to eliminate immediate hazards and/or to 
protect the safety, rights or welfare of subjects.  
 
I will provide copies of the protocol and all other information relating to the pre-clinical and prior 
clinical experience, which were furnished to me, to all physicians and other study personnel 
responsible to me who participate in this study. I will discuss this information with them to assure 
that they are adequately informed regarding the study drug and conduct of the study. 
 
I will ensure that the drugs supplied to me for this study will be used only for administration to 
subjects enrolled in this study protocol and for no other purpose. 
 
I agree to keep records on all subject information (case report forms, informed consent statements, 
drug accountability records, and all other information collected during the study) in accordance with 
the current GCP, local and national regulations. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ohnmar Tut 
 
Printed Principal Investigator Name  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1/10/2017 
Principal Investigator Signature 
Date 
 
 
 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
v 
SUMMARY OF CHANGES 
 
Protocol Amendment 001 
 
The age range for enrollment was clarified to include subjects 48 – 84 months of age. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
vi 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 
PROTOCOL APPROVAL 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ii 
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
iii 
SIGNATURE PAGE  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
iv 
SUMMARY OF CHANGES 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
v 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
vi 
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ix 
PROTOCOL SUMMARY 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
x 
SCHEMATIC OF STUDY DESIGN  
 
 
 
 
 
 
xii 
1.  Key Roles  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
13 
2.  Introduction: Background Information 
 
 
 
 
 
 
14 
2.1 
Background Information 
 
 
 
 
 
 
14 
 
2.2 
Potential Risks and Benefits  
 
 
 
 
 
15 
2.2.1  Potential Risks 
 
 
 
 
 
 
15 
2.2.2  Known Potential Benefits 
 
 
 
 
 
15 
3.  Objectives  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
16 
3.1 
Study Objectives 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
16 
3.2 
Study Outcome Measures 
 
 
 
 
 
 
16 
3.2.1  Primary Outcome Measure 
 
 
 
 
 
16 
3.2.2. Secondary Outcome Measures 
 
 
 
 
16 
4.  Study Design 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
17 
4.1 
Rationale for Study Design 
 
 
 
 
 
 
17 
4.2  
Rationale for Dosage  
 
 
 
 
 
 
17 
5.  Study Enrollment and Withdrawal  
 
 
 
 
 
 
17 
5.1   
Subject Numbers 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
17 
5.2 
Subject Inclusion Criteria 
 
 
 
 
 
 
17 
5.3 
Subject Exclusion Criteria 
 
 
 
 
 
 
18 
5.4    Discussion of Subject Characteristics 
 
 
 
 
18 
5.5    Strategies for Recruitment and Retention 
 
 
 
 
18 
5.6 
Treatment Assignment Procedures  
 
 
 
 
19 
5.6.1   Subject Identification Numbers 
 
 
 
 
19 
5.6.2  Randomization Procedures  
 
 
 
 
19 
5.7  
Masking Procedures  
 
 
 
 
 
 
20 
5.8  
Reasons for Withdrawal 
 
 
 
 
 
 
20 
5.8.1  Handling of Withdrawals 
 
 
 
 
 
21 
5.9  
Termination of Study  
 
 
 
 
 
 
21 
6.  Investigational Product 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
21 
6.1 
Investigational Product Description  
 
 
 
 
21 
6.1.1  Acquisition 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
22 
6.1.2  Formulation, Packaging, and Labeling 
 
 
 
22 
6.1.3  Product Storage and Stability  
 
 
 
 
22 
6.2 
Dosage, Preparation and Administration of Study Investigational Products 23 
6.3 
Accountability Procedures for the Investigational Product(s) 
 
23 
6.4 
Assessment of Subject Compliance with Investigational Product 
 
23 
6.5 
Coding/Emergency Treatment Disclosure 
 
 
 
 
23 
6.6 
Concomitant Medications/Treatments 
 
 
 
 
24 
7.  Study Schedule/Procedures and Evaluations 
 
 
 
 
 
24 
 
7.1 
Baseline Visit  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
25 
 
7.2  
First Treatment Visit  
 
 
 
 
 
 
25 
 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
vii 
 
7.3 
Visits 2 – 8 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
25 
 
7.4 
Follow-up Contacts 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
25 
 
7.5 
Premature Withdrawal 
 
 
 
 
 
 
25 
 
7.6 
Unscheduled Visit  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
26 
8.  Assessments 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
26 
8.1  
Primary and Secondary Outcome Variables  
 
 
 
26 
8.2  
Efficacy Assessments 
 
 
 
 
 
 
27 
8.2.1 Caries Examination 
 
 
 
 
 
 
27 
8.3  
Safety Assessments  
 
 
 
 
 
 
27 
9.  Assessment of Safety 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
28 
9.1 
Specification of Safety Parameters  
 
 
 
 
28 
9.2 
Methods and Timing for Safety Parameters  
 
 
 
28 
9.3 
Adverse Events 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
28 
9.4 
Expected Adverse Reactions  
 
 
 
 
 
29 
9.5 
Serious Adverse Events 
 
 
 
 
 
 
29 
9.5.1 Unanticipated Problems 
 
 
 
 
 
30 
9.5.2 Procedures to be Followed in the Event of Abnormal Clinical Findings 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
30 
9.6 
Reporting Procedures 
 
 
 
 
 
 
30 
9.6.1  Reportable Events 
 
 
 
 
 
 
30 
9.6.2 Serious Adverse Events 
 
 
 
 
 
31 
9.6.3 Adverse Event Causality Definitions  
 
 
 
31 
9.6.4 Adverse Event Severity Definitions  
 
 
 
33 
9.7  
Responsibilities of Investigator/Sponsor/ for Reporting Serious Adverse Events 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
33 
9.7.1 Regulatory Reporting for Studies Conducted Under an IND  
33 
9.7.2 Other Unanticipated Problems 
 
 
 
 
33 
9.8 
Type and Duration of Follow-up of Subjects after Adverse Events  
34 
9.9 
Halting Rules  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
34 
10.  Site Monitoring 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
34 
10.1 
 Clinical Site Monitoring 
 
 
 
 
 
 
34 
10.2   Regulatory Inspections 
 
 
 
 
 
 
35 
11.  Statistical Considerations 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
35 
11.1  Study Hypotheses 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
35 
11.2  Sample Size Considerations  
 
 
 
 
 
35 
11.3  Planned Interim Analyses 
 
 
 
 
 
 
36 
11.4  Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
 
 
 
 
 
36 
11.4.1  Primary Statistical Analysis.  
 
 
 
 
36 
11.4.2  Analysis of Safety Data 
 
 
 
 
 
36 
11.4.3  Participant Disposition 
 
 
 
 
 
37 
12.  Source Documents and Access to Source Data/Documents 
 
 
 
37 
12.1  Primary Source Documents  
 
 
 
 
 
37 
12.2  CRF Worksheets 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
37 
13.  Ethics/Protection of Human Subjects 
 
 
 
 
 
 
37 
13.1  Ethical Standard 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
37 
13.2  Institutional Review Board 
 
 
 
 
 
 
38 
13.3  Amendments  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
38 
13.4  Informed Consent Process 
 
 
 
 
 
 
38 
13.5  Exclusion of Women, Minorities, and Children (Special Populations) 
39 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
viii 
13.6  Subject Confidentiality 
 
 
 
 
 
 
39 
13.7  Study Discontinuation  
 
 
 
 
 
 
39 
14.  Data Handling and Record Keeping 
 
 
 
 
 
 
39 
14.1  Data Management Responsibilities  
 
 
 
 
39 
14.2  Data Capture Methods 
 
 
 
 
 
 
40 
14.3  Types of Data  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
40 
14.4  Timing/Reports 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
41 
14.5  Study Records 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
41 
14.5.1  Study File and Site Documents 
 
 
 
 
41 
14.5.2  Maintenance and Retention of Records 
 
 
 
43 
14.6  Protocol Deviations 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
43 
14.7  Protocol Violations 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
44 
15.  Publication Policy 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
44 
16.  Literature References 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
45 
17. Addendum 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
46 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
ix 
 
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 
 
AE 
Adverse Event/Adverse Experience 
ADA 
American Dental Association 
CFR 
Code of Federal Regulations 
CRF 
Case Report Form 
FDA 
Food and Drug Administration 
GCP 
Good Clinical Practice 
HIPAA 
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act 
ICF 
Informed Consent Form 
ICH 
International Conference on Harmonization 
ICMJE 
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors 
IND 
Investigational New Drug Application 
IRB 
Institutional Review Board 
MedDRAÒ 
Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities 
MOP 
Manual of Procedures 
NDA 
New Drug Application 
OHRP 
Office for Human Research Protections 
PCP 
Primary Care Physician 
PHI 
Protected Health Information 
PI 
Principal Investigator 
10% PVPI 
10% Povidone/1.0% Iodine 
SAE 
Serious Adverse Event 
S-ECC 
Severe Early Childhood Caries 
SOP 
Standard Operating Procedure 
 WIRB  
         Western Institutional Review Board 
 
 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
x 
 
PROTOCOL SUMMARY 
 
Title 
Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish 
Acronym Title: Kouruhr Masamwahu 
Précis 
The purpose of the study is to determine the efficacy of Advantage 
Anti-Caries Varnish 
Objectives 
Primary 
Ø To determine if Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish (test varnish) is 
superior to a control varnish containing only fluoride in the 
prevention of new caries lesions. 
Secondary 
Ø To establish that the response of child participants to the test varnish 
was not inferior to the control varnish 
Study Population  
Children 60 to 84 months at time of entry 
Phase 
2 
Number of Sites 
One, Pohnpei State, Federated States of Micronesia 
Study Duration 
27 months (includes 3-month enrollment period followed by 24 
months of follow up) 
Subject 
Participation 
Duration 
The total duration of subject participation is 24 months. 
Description of 
Agent or 
Intervention 
Single-center, double-blind, controlled Phase 2 study with parallel 
groups of children. Subjects will be stratified by EEC/school and then 
randomized to receive either test varnish or control varnish topically to 
the teeth. Treatment will be administered quarterly for up to 24 months. 
Estimated Time to 
Complete 
Enrollment 
3 months 
Number of Subjects Total number of subjects planned is: up to 600 
Inclusion Criteria 
1. The subject’s parent or legal guardian must provide signed and 
dated informed consent (parent permission form). 
2. The subject’s parent or legal guardian of the subject must be willing 
and able to comply with study requirements. 
3. The subject is aged 60-84 months at the time of the screening visit. 
4. The subject must be in good general health as evidenced by 
medical history. 
 
Exclusion Criteria 
 
1. Known allergy to iodine 
2. Known allergy to seafood  
3. Known hypersensitivity to fluoride varnish 
4. Diagnosis of thyroid disease 
5. Chronic, prophylactic use of antibiotics   


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
xi 
6. Treatment with another investigational drug or other intervention 
within 30 days preceding the Baseline Visit.  
 
Route and Dosage 
Form 
Treatment applied to teeth topically (0.2 mL or control) 
 
Primary Outcome 
Measures 
Efficacy: 
Surface-level primary molar caries increment (d2mfs) at 24- months 
post baseline 
Secondary 
Outcome Measures 
1. Safety: 
a. Adverse event occurrence 
2.  Child response (Facial Image Scale 1-5) 
 
The proposed sample size of 600 subjects will provide >90% power to 
demonstrate a 30% or greater reduction in caries in the test group as 
compared to the control varnish group. 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
xii 
Schematic of Study Design: 
 
 
 
600 Subjects 
Obtain informed consent (parent/guardian)  
Screen subjects by clinical criteria 
Screening 
Review eligibility 
Stratification/Randomization 
Baseline 
April 2018, 2019 
Visit 1 
 
Oral soft tissue exam, caries exam, FIS 
300 Subjects 
Arm 1 
300 Subjects 
Arm 2 
Application of varnish 
Visit 2-8 
Follow-up dental examinations 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
13 
1.  Key Roles 
Individuals: 
Principal Investigator:  
 
Dr. Ohnmar Tut 
Department of Oral Health Sciences 
University of Washington, Seattle 
Email: Ohnmar@uw.edu 
Sponsor/Investigator: 
Peter Milgrom, DDS 
Professor of Oral Health Sciences 
University of Washington, Seattle 
Email: dfrc@uw.edu 
Medical Monitor 
Johnny Hedson, MD 
Pohnpei State Hospital 
Pohnpei, FSM 
Regulatory Monitor:  
 
 
William Cooley, PhD 
Cooley Consulting, Inc. 
531 Chisholm Trail 
Wyoming OH 45215 
Site Director 
Marcelle Gallen, BDS 
Chief of Dental Division 
Pohnpei State Department of Health Services 
Pohnpei, FSM 
Institution and Locations: 
Pohnpei State Department of Health Services 
Pohnpei, FSM 
Biostatistician 
Lloyd Mancl, PhD 
Research Associate Professor of Oral Health Sciences 
University of Washington 
Seattle, WA 
Email: llman@uw.edu 
Coordination Center 
Regional Clinical Dental Research Center & 
Research Coordination Center 
Institute of Translational Health Sciences 
 1959 NE Pacific St., Box 357480, Seattle, WA 98195 
206-685-8132 / FAX: 206-685-9654 
 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
14 
2.  Introduction: Background Information and Scientific Rationale 
 
2.1 Background Information 
 
Background: Topical fluorides have been the mainstay in the prevention of dental caries for decades. There is abundant 
data on sodium fluoride’s (NaF) ability to foster remineralization of tooth enamel (Gao et al., 2016).  Dental NaF varnish 
preparations are the recommended vehicle for delivering topical NaF for dental caries prevention and arrest in young children 
under 6 years of age according to guidelines from the American Dental Association (ADA), the American Academy of Pediatric 
Dentistry and the US Preventive Services Task Force (Weyant et al., 2013; American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, 2013; 
Moyer VA 2014).  In children, less than 6 years of age, at high risk for dental caries, the recommendation is application of NaF 
varnish every three months (Weyant et al., 2013).  Fluoride varnishes have been shown to be safe in very young children 
(Milgrom et al., 2014). 
 
However, topical fluoride alone is not enough to thwart tooth decay in high-risk populations.  Caries researchers for some 
time have suggested strategies that combine an antiseptic with topical fluoride to reduce or eliminate the oral cariogenic bacteria 
reservoir in addition to topical fluoride which primarily remineralizes enamel (Milgrom et al 2009). Povidone iodine is an FDA-
approved and widely used bactericidal antiseptic. For the oral flora, iodine has preferential activities against streptococcal 
species, pathogens implicated in the causation of dental caries (Tam et al., 2006; Furiga et al., 2008). Moreover, iodine's 
effectiveness may last as long as 6 months (Caufield et al., 1979).   
 
Studies have examined the chemotherapeutic suppression of oral Streptococcus mutans (Sm) by povidone iodine (10%) in 
children with Severe Early Childhood Caries (S-ECC).  In one study, the teeth of children two to six years of age were treated 
topically with povidone iodine (10%) or saline following dental treatment under general anesthesia for S-ECC (Zhan et al, 2006).  
Levels of Sm were significantly reduced up to three months in the povidone iodine group.  A second study demonstrated 
suppression of Sm up to 90 days in children with S-ECC who received a single application of povidone iodine (10%) followed by a 
topical application of 1.23% acidulated phosphate fluoride foam after surgical elimination of active caries lesions (Berkowitz et al 
2009).  
 
Other studies have assessed the effect of povidone iodine (10%) on dental caries. A clinical study involving babies in Puerto 
Rico who were at high risk for S-ECC as they were all colonized by Sm and had decay-promoting feeding behaviors, 
demonstrated that povidone iodine (10%) applied bimonthly was successful in preventing the development of early tooth decay 
lesions in the maxillary primary incisors (Lopez et al., 2002). In a randomized clinical trial, povidone iodine (10%) applied bi-
monthly significantly reduced the rate of recurrent dental decay at six months following treatment of children under general 
anesthesia for S-ECC (Amin et al., 2004).  


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
15 
 
Two cohort studies have tested the effect of combining these two anti-caries agents by sequentially applying povidone iodine 
(10%) followed 5% NaF varnish. The first study assessed the effect of protecting erupting 1st permanent molars from developing 
dental caries in children five to six years old (Tut & Milgrom, 2010). The second studied the effect in the primary dentition of 
children 12 to 30 months (Milgrom, Tut & Mancl, 2011).  They demonstrated that treatment with povidone iodine reduced the rate 
of new decay significantly over the standard of care alone. Yet, to date, such combination products have not been brought to the 
market. Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish was developed to combine the antiseptic povidone iodine and sodium fluoride varnish into 
a single product for ease of application, particularly in high caries risk, pre-school age children.    
 
A phase 1 study of the safety of the new varnish was conducted in 12 healthy children with an average age of 47.6 months 
(WIRB PRO NUM: 20160539). No child evidenced any intra oral erythema or secondary changes as a consequence of the 
varnish application either immediately or within 24-48 hours post application. Neither were there any adverse effects. The FDA 
has reviewed the previous safety work and this protocol and issued IND 128835 for this work. The basic dental varnish formula 
was previously cleared by the FDA as a medical device and is currently on the market. To our knowledge there have been no 
adverse event reports on this varnish and it has never been withdrawn from the market. Povidone iodine is widely used in 
children in medicine.  It has been used for intraoral application for many years without problems. Dental NaF varnish and 
povidone iodine have been applied sequentially at the same patient visit by clinicians for some time and two cohort studies have 
been published with no reports of harms. 
 
 
2.2 Potential Risks and Benefits 
 
2.2.1  Potential Risks 
 
None of the proposed methods pose any serious risks to the study subjects.  
 
The FDA approves the topical use of 10% PVPI to the skin of children. 
 
Risks from povidone iodine include rash and swelling at the site of application. Iodine can cause thyroid gland 
problems, but this is rare and is very unlikely at the amount used in this study.  
 
2.2.2  Known Potential Benefits 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
16 
 
There are direct benefits to the human subjects participating in this proposal. These include the early detection of 
caries, its timely management and the possibility of its prevention. All subjects will also receive standard-of-care 
treatment. 
 
3.  Objectives 
 
3.1 Study Objectives 
 
Primary Objective: 
 
To determine if Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish (test varnish) is superior to a control varnish containing only fluoride in the 
prevention of new caries lesions. 
 
Secondary objectives: 
 
a) To establish that the response of child participants to the test varnish was not inferior to the control varnish 
b) To document the safety of the test varnish. 
 
3.2 Study Outcome Measures 
 
3.2.1  Primary Outcome Measure 
 
Surface-level primary molar caries increment (d2mfs) at 24 months post baseline 
 
3.2.2  Secondary Outcome Measures 
 
• 
Adverse event occurrence 
 
• 
Facial Image Scale score (1-5)  
 
 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
17 
4.  Study Design 
 
This is a single center randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial. 
 
4.1 Rationale for Study Design 
 
The hypothesis is that the test varnish will be superior to the control varnish and will not be inferior in patient response than the 
control varnish. There will be no difference in the frequency of adverse events. 
 
4.2  Rationale for Dosage  
 
The treatment group will be exposed at baseline and once every three to four months after baseline for a maximum period of 
24 months. The control group will be exposed to the control varnish in the same manner. The decision for dosing every three 
to four months with the test varnish was based on earlier work (Berkowitz, Koo et al. 2009) and the AAPD Standard of Care for 
children at high risk for dental caries.   
 
5.  Study Enrollment and Withdrawal 
 
5.1 Subject Numbers 
 
Up to 600 subjects will be enrolled. Half will be randomized to each arm. If a family has more than one eligible child, each will 
be allowed to enroll. 
 
In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the following criteria: 
 
5.2 Subject Inclusion Criteria 
 
1. The subject’s parent or legal guardian must provide signed and dated informed consent (parent permission form). 
2. The subject’s parent or legal guardian of the subject must be willing and able to comply with study requirements. 
3. The subject is aged 48-84 months at the time of enrollment. 
4. The subject must be in good general health as evidenced by parent report. 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
18 
 
 
 
 
5.3 Subject Exclusion Criteria 
 
A subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study: 
 
1. Known allergy to iodine 
2. Known allergy to seafood  
3. Known hypersensitivity to fluoride varnish 
4. Diagnosis of thyroid disease 
5.   Chronic, prophylactic use of antibiotics   
6.   Treatment with another investigational drug or other intervention within 30 days preceding the Baseline Visit.  
 
In the event of unique circumstances permitting waiver of any of the above eligibility criteria, documentation of such a 
waiver must be generated by the Principal Investigator prior to randomization into the study. Enrollment of an otherwise 
ineligible subject into the study without prior approval of a waiver will be considered a protocol violation. 
 
5.4   Discussion of Subject Characteristics 
 
The study population is high risk for dental caries because of their poverty status and lack of access to fluoridated water. The 
subject population will largely consist of children who are 60 to 84 months of age at the time of enrollment. The study site is 
Pohnpei State, Federated States of Micronesia (FSM). Under US law and the Compact of Free Association between the US 
and FSM, this site is considered to be part of the US.  There are no intrinsic (genetic or physiologic) or extrinsic (cultural or 
environmental) characteristics of the population that would influence the safety, efficacy, dosage or dose regiment of the drug. 
Children consume a diet largely of processed foods from the US mainland and the main pathogenic organism in the etiology of 
tooth decay is has been shown to be Streptococcus mutans, as it is among children in the US proper. These children also use 
toothpastes produced in the US and regulated by FDA. In addition, this trial will be supervised by a regulatory monitor based in 
the US and familiar with US regulations. The consent documents will be in English.  
 
5.5   Strategies for Recruitment and Retention  
 
Children attending Early Childhood Education programs in Pohnpei State will be enrolled. In 2015 there were 9 centers 
enrolling 597 children. Maximum enrollment will be children. We expect to be able to enroll the entire sample from Nett, 
Kolonia, Saladak, Awak, ESDM, Pohnpei Catholic, UCCP, Calvary Christian and St. Paul centers but will recruit from other 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
19 
centers as required. Based on our previous work in Micronesian schools in the US affiliated states we expect nearly every 
parent to consent and thus for us to enroll the entire sample within two months (Milgrom et al., 2009; Tut et al., 2010; Milgrom 
et al., 2011). 
 
The parent (or legal guardian) of the potential subject will be approached by a study assistant who will confirm eligibility of the 
subject. The proposed study will be explained. Written informed consent will be obtained. Up to 600 families will be enrolled.  
 
The Micronesian islands are quite isolated and children do not change schools or move from the islands readily. We will 
regularly provide healthy snacks at the centers and hold end of year study parties for parents and children at the centers to 
reduce dropouts. Families whose children complete the first treatment visit will receive a $35 gift card as an incentive. Families 
whose children complete a year in the study will receive another $35 gift card; families whose children complete two years in 
the study will receive a third $35 gift card. In addition, the children will receive a study backpack including a set of school 
supplies.  To be more inclusive, all children in the programs will receive a free study t-shirt, irrespective of whether they are 
enrolled in the study. The incentive levels were determined based on advice from Department of Health. We have conducted 
two prospective cohort studies with a similar population in the islands. The one-year attrition rate was 1/172 (less than 1%) in 
one study and no child was lost to follow-up in the other study (Tut & Milgrom, 2010; Milgrom, Tut & Mancl, 2011).  
 
5.6 Treatment Assignment Procedures 
 
5.6.1   Subject Identification Numbers  
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two inventions with a 1:1 allocation as per a computer-
generated randomization schedule with stratification on school and with randomly permuted blocks of sizes 2 and 4.  
Stratification and blocking will ensure the two interventions are equally balanced within school and randomly 
permuted blocks sizes will ensure concealment.  The study biostatistician will create the randomization lists using 
the “sample” function of the R statistical software (Version 3.3.0; The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2016). 
 
   
5.6.2  Randomization Procedures 
 
The study biostatistician will create the randomization lists using the “sample” function of the R statistical software 
(Version 3.3.0; The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2016). 
 
The biostatistician will generate an assignment list. Individual envelopes will be prepared and the clinician will open 
the envelope to reveal the instruction for which coded drug (A or B) to apply. The envelopes and the drug containers 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
20 
will be color coded to minimize error. In each case a second staff member will verify on site that the child received 
the correct coded treatment. 
 
5.7  Masking Procedures 
 
All study personnel except for designated personnel in the data center will be blinded to the participant treatment 
assignment. In order to maintain blinding, the caries scoring examinations will precede the application of test varnishes at 
baseline. The staff member applying these varnishes will not perform the caries scoring exams in order to eliminate 
examiner bias and ensure blinding to treatment assignment.  
 
5.8  Reasons for Withdrawal 
 
Subjects’ parents or legal guardians will be advised in the written consent that they have the right to withdraw from the 
study at any time without prejudice, and may be withdrawn at the Principal Investigator’s discretion at any time.  
 
 A subject may be withdrawn from the study for the following reasons: 
 
Examples of non-adverse-event related reasons for withdrawal 
 
1. Withdrawal of consent by parent/guardian 
2. Principal Investigator-initiated withdrawal 
3. Request of primary care physician  
4. Failure to meet entry criteria (either newly developed or not previously recognized) 
5. Lost to follow-up/failure to return  
6. Early termination of study  
 
Examples of adverse event-related reasons for withdrawal 
 
1.  New illness that in the opinion of the Principal Investigator warrants withdrawal 
2.  Death 
3.  Other adverse event 
 
 
 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
21 
5.8.1  Handling of Withdrawals 
 
In the event of voluntary withdrawal from the study, a Premature Withdrawal (PW) Visit will be conducted to obtain a 
final caries exam and ensure that appropriate care under medical supervision is provided until the symptoms of any 
AE resolve or the subject’s condition becomes stable or deemed chronic. 
 
Reasonable effort should be made to contact any subject lost to follow up during the course of the study in order to 
complete study-related assessments and collect safety data.  
 
Subjects who are withdrawn from the study will not be replaced. 
 
5.9  Termination of Study  
 
The study may be discontinued at the discretion of the Sponsor or the Principal Investigator if there is sufficient reasonable 
cause.  
 
Circumstances that may warrant termination include, but are not limited to: 
• 
Determination of unexpected, significant, or unacceptable risk to subjects.  
• 
Insufficient rate of subject accrual. 
• 
Insufficient adherence to protocol requirements.  
• 
Data which are not sufficiently complete and/or evaluable.  
Written notification, documenting the reason for study termination, will be provided to the Principal Investigator and regulatory 
authorities. In the event of early termination of the study, all subjects will be seen for a final visit for safety purposes. The study 
site will notify the Western IRB and the Pohnpei State Department of Health Services of the study termination and provide the 
reason(s). 
 
6.  Investigational Product 
 
6.1 Investigational Product Description 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
22 
 
6.1.1  Acquisition 
Test and control varnishes will be obtained from Cascade Custom Chemistry, Eugene, OR 
 
6.1.2  Formulation, Packaging, and Labeling 
 
Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish. The active ingredients are 10% (w/v) Povidone Iodine CAS RN 25655-41-8 and 5% 
(w/v) Sodium Fluoride CAS RN 7681-49-4 in Ethanol 200 Proof. The formulation of the dosage form includes 10% 
Nt-2 Premium Shellac, 1% sodium phosphate, dibasic anhydrous, 0.5% ammonium phosphate, monobasic, and 1% 
caramel cream flavor (Bell 29.26303) as inactive ingredients. One and two-year shelf life of the varnish has been 
established according to Guidance for Industry Q1A(R2) Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products 
(Revision 2, November 2003).  
 
The active control varnish will be the same fluoride varnish without iodine with an appropriate FDA approved food 
dye added to match the color of the test agent. There will be no difference in the treatment and control varnishes 
except for the povidone iodine.  
 
The varnishes will be packaged in 12 mL multi use bottles with the following labeling. 
 
Advantage Anti Cavity Varnish or Control Varnish 
 
• 
Apply as per protocol 
• 
For Investigational Use Only 
• 
Drug Code A or B 
• 
Contact: Dr. Peter Milgrom, +1206-251-6831 (24 hours) 
 
 
6.1.3  Product Storage and Stability 
 
All investigational products will be kept in a secure, safe area under recommended storage conditions with access 
limited in the study office. Expiration or use-by dates, as applicable, for all products will be documented by staff.  
 
 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
23 
6.2 Dosage, Preparation and Administration of Study Investigational Products 
 
Advantage Anti-Cavity Varnish and Control Varnish 
 
A maximum of 0.2 mL will be applied to the teeth with a dental brush.  
Test or control varnish will be applied topically following baseline examination and at each 3 to 4-month intervals.   
 
6.3 Accountability Procedures for the Investigational Product(s) 
 
The Principal Investigator (Tut) and Site Director (Gallen) must maintain accurate records (including dates) of all supplies 
received from Advantage. All treatment applications (A or B) will be recorded on a Drug Accountability Log completed by the 
Study Director. All remaining drug will be returned to the sponsor and documented on the Drug Disposal Log.  
 
6.4 Assessment of Subject Compliance with Investigational Product  
 
As test drug and control drug will be administered by the study personnel, is not anticipated that subject compliance with 
treatment will be an issue. In the event a dose is missed; the missed dose will be captured as a protocol deviation and 
documented in the source documents.  
 
6.5 Coding/Emergency Treatment Disclosure  
 
The Principal Investigator will be given a sealed envelope containing the randomized treatment assignment code for each subject 
to be opened only in the event of a medical emergency.  
 
Neither premature withdrawal from the study nor most clinical emergencies necessitate disclosure of treatment assignment. 
Most emergency situations can be handled by withdrawing study treatment without disclosure of treatment assignment. However, 
in rare circumstances under which knowledge of the drug assignment is necessary for the treatment of a serious adverse event, 
the Principal Investigator (Tut) must discuss the situation with the Site Director (Gallen) and Dr. Milgrom, if circumstances permit, 
before deciding whether or not to disclose treatment assignment. If disclosure of individual treatment assignment is undertaken, 
it must be made by the Principal Investigator responsible for the care of the involved subject in consultation with the Medical 
Monitor (Hedson). The subject will be withdrawn from further exposure to study drug.  
 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
24 
Emergency treatment disclosure is a reportable event, requiring notification to the Principal Investigator within 24 hours of the 
disclosure. The assigned treatment must not be revealed to other study staff or to individuals who are not involved directly in the 
clinical care of the subject, unless disclosure to the individual is critical to the care of the subject. 
 
 
6.6 Concomitant Medications/Treatments 
 
Subjects may not be receiving treatment with another investigational drug within 30 days preceding the baseline visit and 
throughout participation in this study. 
 
Chronic prophylactic use of antibiotics at enrollment is an exclusion criterion; however, if during the course of the study, the 
subject’s PCP prescribes antibiotics (e.g., for treatment of otitis media), the Study Coordinator will record the medication on the 
Concomitant Medications Log. The study subject will receive the study drug application regardless of prescribed antibiotics by 
subject’s PCP. 
 
Concomitant medication use, including all prescription, over-the-counter medications, vitamins, and nutritional supplementation, 
will be recorded commencing with the screening visit and at each visit through completion of the study. All concomitant 
medications must be used according to the prescriber’s instructions.  
 
Fluoridated toothpaste will be provided under this protocol to all subjects. 
 
 
7.  Study Schedule/Procedures and Evaluations  
 
Subject recruitment procedures:  
 
• 
The study assistant or supervisor will make contact with the parent/caregiver through the Early Childhood Education 
Center (ECE) or at home. This individual will explain the study and obtain informed consent.  
• 
The assistant will record the subject’s age and sex and medical history based on parent/guardian report.  
• 
The assistant will record concomitant medication use over the past 90 days. 
• 
The informed consent packet will carry a pre-assigned subject number. If a parent does not consent, the reason will be 
recorded and the study number will not be used. If the family has a second child who is eligible, the study number shall 
be the same as the first child in the family enrolled, followed by the notation –2.  
 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
25 
7.1   Baseline Visit  
 
• 
The visit will be at the Center 
• 
The examiner will conduct the baseline dental and oral examination. 
• 
After the baseline visit, the study staff will record on lists of the subjects, the treatment code assigned by the statistician.  
 
7.2   First Treatment Visit  
 
• 
A study assistant will consult the student list and apply the assigned treatment. 
• 
The study assistant will administer the Facial Images Scale, immediately following the varnish treatment. 
 
7.3 Visits 2-8 
 
• 
The visit will be at the Center 
• 
The examiner will conduct the dental and oral examination at visits 4 and 8. 
• 
A study assistant will retrieve the drug assignment and will apply the assigned agent 
• 
The assistant will review and record concomitant medications 
• 
The assistant will review and record adverse events  
 
7.4 Follow-Up Contacts 
 
The subject’s teacher will be contacted 48 hours following treatment. If the child is not attending or the teacher knows of a 
problem, the parent will be contacted to determine if there is a reportable AE. The medical monitor will assign causality. No 
treatments will be done on Fridays to avoid having to make home visits in order to obtain the basic AE information on the 
weekend. 
 
7.5 Premature Withdrawal  
 
In the event of premature withdrawal from the study, the Premature Withdrawal (PW) visit procedures and evaluations should 
be completed whether or not the decision to withdraw is determined at a routine or unscheduled visit.  If it is determined via 
telephone contact that a premature withdrawal will occur, the parent/guardian should be asked to bring the child in for a PW 
visit.  


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
26 
 
Activities to be completed include: 
 
• 
The Examiner will conduct the Oral Soft Tissue exam 
• 
The Examiner will conduct the caries exam  
• 
The assistant will record concomitant medication use. 
• 
The assistant will review and record on the AE Follow-Up Log the status of adverse events that are unresolved at the 
time of the premature withdrawal visit.  
 
Premature withdrawal (including reports of subjects who are lost to follow up) should be reported to the Site Director within 24 
hours of the site’s knowledge of the event. 
 
7.6 Unscheduled Visit  
 
An unscheduled visit may be performed at any time during the study at the subject’s request or as deemed necessary by the 
Principal Investigator. The date and reason for the unscheduled visit will be recorded in the subject’s source documentation.  
 
Activities to be completed include: 
• 
The Examiner will conduct the Oral Soft Tissue exam 
• 
The Examiner will conduct the caries exam  
• 
The assistant will record concomitant medication use. 
• 
The assistant will review and record on the AE Follow-Up Log the status of adverse events that are unresolved at the 
time of the unscheduled visit.  
 
8.  Assessments 
 
 
 
 
 
8.1  Primary and Secondary Outcome Variables 
 
 
 
 
 
Primary Outcome Variable 
 
The primary outcome will be the surface-level primary molar caries increment (d2-3mfs/DMFS) at two years post baseline, 
but the incremental dental caries at one year will also be compared between the two interventions.  Only the statistician 
and sponsor will know of the one-year finding. 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
27 
 
Secondary Outcome Variable: 
 
Child response on the depicted Facial Image Scale (Buchanan & Niven, 2002) to the treatment will be recorded immediately 
after the initial treatment visit and after the fourth treatment visit. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8.2  Efficacy Assessments 
 
 
 
 
8.2.1 Caries Examination 
Two examiners will be trained and calibrated according to National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research 
Early Childhood Caries Collaborative criteria, which are based on the World Health Organization caries classification 
system. The children will be visually examined using a mouth mirror and artificial light. No explorers will be used. 
The outcome will be assessed by visual examination by two trained and calibrated examiners.  
 
 
 
8.3  Safety Assessments 
 
Adverse events, including frequency and severity, and perceived relationship to the investigational product, will be compared 
between the treatment groups.  
 
 
8.3.1. General Health (Medical History and Physical Examination) 
 
 
The subject’s general health status at enrollment will be assessed by medical history using the parent or legal guardian 
as the informant.  
 
The Study Site Coordinator will rule out a history of thyroid disease and iodine allergy (e.g., allergy to seafood). 
 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
28 
All concomitant medications taken by the subject will be recorded at the time of consent and updated at each follow-
up study visit (including all prescription and over-the-counter medications, vitamins, and nutritional supplements taken 
within the past three months).  
 
 
 
 
9.  Assessment of Safety 
 
9.1 Specification of Safety Parameters 
 
• 
Adverse events 
 
 
9.2 Methods and Timing for Assessing, Recording, and Analyzing Safety Parameters 
 
Adverse events will be recorded at each contact with the teacher or parent. 
 
Adverse events will be reviewed on a monthly basis by the Medical Monitor (Hedson); serious adverse events and other 
protocol-specified reportable events will be assessed in real time by the Principal Investigator (Tut) and Site Director (Gallen). 
 
 
9.3  Adverse Events 
 
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not 
considered drug related.  An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally 
associated with any use of a drug, whether or not related to the drug. An adverse event can arise from any use of the drug (e.g., 
off-label use, use in combination with another drug) and from any route of administration, formulation, or dose. This excludes 
minor fluctuations in signs or symptoms of the disease under study, but includes significant worsening of the disease. It also 
includes any apparently unrelated illness and any accident that occurs during participation in the study.  
 
Some examples of adverse events are: 
 
• 
Development of an illness during the study. 
• 
Development of symptoms which may or may not be related to the use of a concomitant medication or investigational product. 
 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
29 
All adverse events, whether observed by the Principal Investigator, elicited from or volunteered by the subject, subject’s 
teacher or parent/guardian, should be recorded on the Adverse Event Log. This reporting will include a brief description of the 
event, the date of onset, the date of resolution, the duration and type of event, the severity, contributing factors, and any action 
taken with respect to the investigational product. 
 
AEs occurring after informed consent is obtained but prior to randomization will be recorded as medical history, unless 
possibly related to a study procedure, in which case they will be recorded as adverse events in the case report form. New 
adverse events will be captured and reported on the AE log until 30 days following the last treatment or premature withdrawal, 
whichever comes first. 
 
9.4    Expected Adverse Reactions 
 
Risks from povidone iodine include rash and swelling at the site of application. Iodine can cause thyroid gland problems.  
 
9.5   Serious Adverse Events 
 
A serious adverse drug event is defined as any adverse event that results in any of the following outcomes:  
 
• 
death 
• 
a life-threatening adverse event 
• 
inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization 
• 
a persistent or significant incapacity; or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions 
• 
[a congenital anomaly/birth defect – noted as not applicable in this population] 
 
An important medical event that may not result in death, be life-threatening, or require hospitalization may be considered 
serious when, based upon appropriate medical judgment, the event may jeopardize the subject and may require medical 
or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed in this definition. Examples of such medical events include 
(but are not limited to) allergic bronchospasm requiring intensive treatment in an emergency room or at home, or blood 
dyscrasias or convulsions that do not result in inpatient hospitalization. 
 
This category also includes any event the Principal Investigator judges to be serious or that would suggest a significant 
hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution. Any adverse event or suspected adverse reaction is considered “life 
threatening” if, in the view of either the Principal Investigator or sponsor, its occurrence places the patient or subject at 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
30 
immediate risk of death. It does not include an adverse event or suspected adverse reaction that, had it occurred in a 
more severe form, might have caused death. 
 
Reports of serious adverse events require immediate notification (within 24 hours of the site’s awareness) to the Principal 
Investigator and Sponsor whether or not the Study Site Coordinator believes that the event is related to investigational 
product or is expected.  
 
9.5.1 Unanticipated Problems 
 
The Principal Investigator must conform to the adverse event reporting timelines, formats and requirements of the 
various entities to which he is responsible, but at a minimum those events that must be reported are those that are: 
• related to study participation, 
• unexpected, and  
• serious or involve risks to subjects or others  
 
9.5.2 Procedures to be Followed in the Event of Abnormal Clinical Findings 
 
At each parent or teacher contact the site study staff will assess adverse events by recording all reports by the 
subject’s parent/guardian or teacher and by assessment of clinical features.  
 
An unscheduled visit may be performed at any time during the study as deemed necessary by the Principal 
Investigator. The Site Director will inform the subject’s parent/guardian when medical care is needed for adverse 
events of which the Principal Investigator becomes aware (e.g., illness) and may refer the subject back to the PCP 
for further work-up. The Principal Investigator may determine that the subject should be withdrawn from the study 
treatment.  
 
9.6 Reporting Procedures 
 
9.6.1  Reportable Events 
 
The following incidents will be considered reportable events and will be reported to the Principal Investigator within 24 
hours of the site’s awareness of the event. 
 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
31 
• 
Serious Adverse Event 
• 
Emergency Treatment Disclosure 
• 
Post-Treatment Adverse Events*, including 
o Nausea  
o Not eating 
o Vomiting  
o Difficulty swallowing or breathing 
o Swelling around the lips or skin on the face 
o Itchiness around the lips or skin of the face 
o Hives or rash 
 
 
9.6.2 Serious Adverse Events 
 
Within 24 hours of the site’s awareness of the serious adverse event (SAE), the site will report the SAE to the 
Principal Investigator and provide subject identification and a brief description of the event, including the Medical 
Monitor’s assessment of causality (unrelated, unlikely related, possibly related, probably related, or definitely related 
to the study drug).   
 
Within 24 hours of the telephone report, the site will update the AE log to ensure that the concomitant medication log 
is current, and enter the SAE report. This report will include: documentation that serious adverse event criteria have 
been met; a detailed description of the event and other relevant information; the current status of the experience; if 
the subject has died, the date of death and autopsy report, if available; and the Medical Monitor’s current opinion of 
the relationship between the event and the investigational treatment.  
 
 
 
 
9.6.3 Adverse Event Causality Definitions 
 
For each adverse event, the relationship to the study drug (Medical Monitor’s attribution of causality) must be recorded 
as one of the following on the Adverse Event Log: 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
32 
TERM 
DEFINITION 
CLARIFICATION 
Unrelated No possible relationship  The temporal relationship between drug 
exposure and the adverse event onset/course 
is unreasonable or incompatible, or a causal 
relationship to study drug is implausible. 
    
Not reasonably related, 
although a causal 
relationship cannot be 
ruled out 
While the temporal relationship between drug 
exposure and the adverse event onset/course 
does not preclude causality, there is a clear 
alternate cause that is more likely to have 
caused the adverse event than the study 
drug. 
Possible 
Causal relationship is 
uncertain 
The temporal relationship between drug 
exposure and the adverse event onset/course 
is reasonable or unknown, dechallenge or 
rechallenge information is either unknown or 
equivocal, and while other potential causes 
may not exist, a causal relationship to the 
study drug does not appear probable. 
Probable 
High degree of certainty 
for causal relationship 
The temporal relationship between drug 
exposure and the adverse event onset/course 
is reasonable. There is a clinically compatible 
response to dechallenge (rechallenge is not 
required), and other causes have been 
eliminated or are unlikely. 
Definite 
Causal relationship is 
certain 
The temporal relationship between drug 
exposure and the adverse event onset/course 
is reasonable, there is a clinically compatible 
response to dechallenge, other causes have 
been eliminated, and the event must be 
definitive pharmacologically or 
phenomenologically, using a satisfactory 
rechallenge procedure if necessary. 
 
 
 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
33 
9.6.4 Adverse Event Severity Definitions 
 
 
 
 
 
The severity of each adverse event must be recorded as one of the following on the Adverse Event Log: 
 
MILD 
 
No limitation of usual activities 
MODERATE 
 
Some limitation of usual activities 
SEVERE 
 
Inability to carry out usual activities 
 
 
9.7  Responsibilities of Investigator/Sponsor/ for Reporting Serious Adverse Events 
 
Serious adverse events occurring after informed consent is obtained but prior to randomization will be recorded as medical 
history, unless possibly related to a study procedure, in which case they will be reported as SAEs to the Medical Monitor 
within 24 hours of the site’s awareness.   
 
 
9.7.1 Regulatory Reporting for Studies Conducted Under an IND 
 
The Principal Investigator will comply with the Western IRB regulations regarding the reporting of adverse events.  
 
The Sponsor will report events that are serious, unexpected and that are associated with the study drug (SUSAR) to 
the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) within the required timelines as specified in 21 CFR Part 312.32; fatal and 
life-threatening events within 7 calendar days (by phone or fax) and all other SAEs in writing within 15 calendar 
days. All serious events designated as “not associated” with study product(s) will be reported to the FDA at least 
annually in a summary format. 
 
9.7.2 Other Unanticipated Problems 
 
Unanticipated problems are those involving risks to subjects or others and include any incident, experience, or 
outcome that meets all of the following criteria: 
• 
Unexpected (in terms of nature, severity, or frequency) given (a) the research procedures that are described in 
the protocol-related documents, such as the WIRB-approved research protocol; and (b) the characteristics of the 
subject population being studied;  


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
34 
•    Related or possibly related to participation in the research (in the guidance document, possibly related means 
there is a reasonable possibility that the incident, experience, or outcome may have been caused by the 
procedures involved in the research); and  
• 
Suggests that the research places subjects or others at a greater risk of harm (including physical, psychological, 
economic, or social harm) than was previously known or recognized. 
 
An incident, experience, or outcome that meets any of the three criteria above generally will warrant consideration of 
substantive changes or corrective actions in order to protect the safety, welfare, or rights of subjects or others.  
 
Unanticipated problems noted by the site will be recorded and reported to the Principal Investigator within 24 hours 
of the site’s awareness and to the WIRB per local reporting requirements. 
 
9.8 Type and Duration of Follow-up of Subjects after Adverse Events 
 
All adverse events will be followed until resolution or an appropriate endpoint is reached (e.g., the Medical Monitor attributes 
the adverse event to a cause other than the study drug or assesses it to be chronic or stable). 
 
9.9 Halting Rules 
 
Adverse events, particularly serious adverse events such as deaths and hospitalizations, will be carefully considered by the 
Sponsor. If necessary, the Sponsor will halt the study. 
 
10.  Site Monitoring 
 
10.1 Clinical Site Monitoring 
 
To ensure compliance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and other applicable regulatory requirements, the Regulatory Monitor 
(Cooley) is responsible for monitoring to ensure the site is conducting the study according to the protocol, Standard Operating 
Procedures (SOPs), and other written instructions and regulatory guidelines. Monitoring visits by a Regulatory Monitor will be 
arranged in advance, at a mutually-acceptable time, with site personnel.  
 
The site personnel must allow sufficient time for the Regulatory Monitor to review CRFs and relevant source documents, 
including access to electronic medical records, and address data queries. 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
35 
 
The Investigators should be available to answer questions or resolve data clarifications. The monitoring plan will include 
written procedures for periodic and closeout monitoring visit activities, documentation and communication of visit findings, and 
maintenance of the record of on-site visits. The monitoring plan will serve as a guide to ensure standardization of study-
specific procedures for the Regulatory Monitor who is responsible for ongoing quality review.  
 
10.2 Regulatory Inspections 
 
During the course of the study and after it has been completed, it is possible that one or more study site visits will be 
undertaken by authorized representatives of the Sponsor, WIRB, or regulatory agencies, such as the Food and Drug 
Administration (FDA). These audits may take place at any time during or after the study and are based on the local 
regulations, as well as ICH guidelines.  
 
The purpose of the audit is to determine whether or not the study is being, or has been, conducted and monitored in 
compliance with the protocol as well as recognized GCP guidelines and regulations. These audits will also increase the 
likelihood that the study data and all other study documentation can withstand a subsequent regulatory authority inspection.  
 
If such audits are to occur, they will be arranged for a reasonable and agreed-upon time.  
 
 
11.  Statistical Considerations 
 
11.1 Study Hypotheses 
 
The hypothesis is that the test varnish will be superior to the control varnish and will not be inferior in patient response to the 
control varnish. Also, there will be no difference in the frequency of adverse events. 
 
11.2 Sample Size Considerations 
 
The primary outcome will be the surface-level primary molar caries increment (d2-3mfs/DMFS) at two years post baseline, 
but the incremental dental caries at one year will also be compared between the two interventions.  Based on the caries 
levels reported by Tut et al. (2010) and Chi et al. (2016) a conservative estimate for the coefficient of variation (100 x 
standard deviation/mean) is 75%.  Using a two-sided 0.025 significance level to control the type I error for testing at 1 and 2 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
36 
years post baseline, 120 participants per intervention are required to demonstrate a 30% or greater reduction in caries in the 
test group as compared to the NaF varnish group with 90% power (van Belle and Martin, 1993; Champley, 2015). A 30% 
reduction by PVP-I + F- versus NaF varnish alone was reported by Milgrom et al (2011) for any new caries (%), and a greater 
reduction would be expected in the amount of new caries in a high-risk caries population. To accommodate for attrition (up to 
15%), although it is expected to be very low in the study population, a total of 280 participants will be enrolled. 
 
 
11.3 Statistical Analysis Plan 
11.3.1 Primary Statistical Analysis.   
The primary analysis will be conducted in accordance with the intention-to-treat principle, and multiple imputation procedures 
will be used to account for missing caries information (Schafer, 1997). For the primary outcome, incremental dental caries 
based on d2-3mfs/DMFS, the unit of analysis will be the child and the mean dental caries increment will be compared between 
the two interventions separately at 1 and 2 years post baseline using a two-sample t test assuming unequal variances.  This 
approach assumes the distribution of dental caries increment is approximately symmetrical, which is often true in high-risk 
caries populations.  In this case, non-symmetry, log-linear regression using robust standard errors, which can accommodate 
count outcomes with skewed distribution, will be used to compare the caries rates between the two interventions (Hardin & 
Hilbe, 2003). Covariate-adjusted linear (or log-linear) regression models using robust standard errors will be used to compare 
dental caries increment, adjusting for baseline dental caries, stratification variables (education center and school), gender and 
age of the participant (Hardin and Hilbe, 2003). Analyses will be performed using R (The R Foundation for Statistical 
Computing, 2016; Version 3.3.0) and SAS (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, Version 9.4). 
11.3.2 Analysis of Safety Data.   
Adverse events (AEs) will be tabulated by treatment group, severity, and perceived relationship to investigational 
product.  For each AE, treatment group comparisons regarding the occurrence of at least one event will be made 
using Fisher’s exact tests. The comparisons will be repeated excluding all mild symptoms.  Similar analyses will be 
performed after grouping AEs by body system using standard Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) 
coding.  Individual AEs will be listed, with particular attention paid to serious AEs. 
 
11.3.3 Participant Disposition.  
The frequency and reasons for withdrawal will be summarized by treatment group, as will the number of missed visits 
and missed treatment applications (compliance). 
 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
37 
12.  Source Documents and Access to Source Data/Documents 
 
The site will maintain appropriate medical and research records for this trial, in compliance with ICH E6, Section 4.9 and 
regulatory and institutional requirements for the protection of confidentiality of subjects.  
 
12.1 Primary Source Documents  
 
 
 
 
 
The Principal Investigator must maintain primary source documents supporting significant data for each subject in the subject’s 
notes. During monitoring visits, the clinical site monitor will validate data in the CRF against these source data. 
 
 
12.2 CRF Worksheets 
 
The site will be supplied with a set of forms-based schedule of activities and corresponding source document worksheets (SDW) 
that correspond to the case report form (CRF) for this study. The worksheets will serve as source documents for study 
observations. Additional source documentation for information not specifically included on the source document may be recorded 
on a separate document. 
 
Access to the source documents should be limited to those working on the study. Access to the database will be restricted. 
 
 
13.  Ethics/Protection of Human Subjects 
 
13.1 Ethical Standard 
 
This study will be conducted in accordance with the Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines promulgated by the 
International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and any applicable 
national and local regulations including FDA regulations under 21 CFR Parts 11, 50, 54, 56, 312 and 314. 
 
The Principal Investigator will ensure that this study is conducted in full conformity with the principles set forth in The 
Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research, as drafted by the 
US National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (April 18, 1979) 
and codified in 45 CFR Part 46 and/or the ICH E6; 62 Federal Regulations 25691 (1997). 
 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
38 
13.2 Institutional Review Board 
The Western IRB will review and approve the submission activities for the conduct of this protocol. The trial will not begin until 
the study has been approved by the WIRB, all required regulatory documentation is on file at both the site and the Principal 
Investigator and staff are trained on the protocol and data capture procedures.  
 
13.3 Amendments 
 
The Principal Investigator will discuss any proposed protocol changes with the Sponsor and no modifications will be made 
without prior written approval and WIRB approval of the amended protocol, except where clinical judgment requires an 
immediate change for reasons of subject welfare. The WIRB will be informed of any amendments to the protocol or consent 
form, and approval (where and when appropriate) will be obtained before implementation. 
 
 
 
 
 
13.4 Informed Consent Process  
This study will be conducted in accordance with the provisions of 21 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 50.  
In accordance with relevant regulations, a parent informed consent agreement explaining the procedures and requirements of 
the study, together with any potential hazards/risks must be read and/or explained to each parent/guardian. Each subject’s 
parent or legal guardian will sign such an informed consent form. The subject’s parent/guardian must be assured of the 
freedom to withdraw from participation in the study at any time. 
 
It is the Principal Investigator’s responsibility to make sure that the subject’s parent/guardian understands what he or she is 
agreeing to and that written informed consent is obtained before the subject is involved in any protocol-defined procedures, 
including screening procedures. It is also the Principal Investigator’s responsibility to retain the original signed consent forms 
and provide each subject’s parent/guardian with a copy of the signed consent form. 
 
As children will be enrolled in this study, the informed consent process will be documented in the form of permission from the 
parent or legal guardian in the parent permission form; child assent (affirmative agreement by a child to participate in 
research) will not be employed in this study. 
 
13.5 Exclusion of Women, Minorities, and Children (Special Populations) 
 
This study will enroll children aged 60 to 84 months. There will be no exclusion due to gender, race or ethnicity. 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
39 
 
13.6 Subject Confidentiality 
The Principal Investigator must assure that the privacy of subjects, including their personal identity and personal medical 
information, will be maintained at all times. Personal medical information will always be treated as confidential. The 
parent/guardian’s Authorization allows the Sponsor-Investigator to receive and review the subjects’ protected health information 
that may be re-disclosed to any authorized representative of the Sponsor for review of subject medical records in the context 
of the study. 
 
13.7 Study Discontinuation 
 
At the completion of the study, study closeout procedures will be implemented.  
 
 
 
14.  Data Handling and Record Keeping 
 
The Principal Investigator is responsible for ensuring the accuracy, completeness, legibility, and timeliness of the data reported.  
 
14.1 Data Management Responsibilities 
The Biostatistician will be responsible for all data collection procedures. The Data Management Plan includes, but is not limited 
to: 
• 
Overview of data management processes utilized for study 
• 
Universal data handling conventions 
• 
Study-specific data handling conventions 
• 
Coding dictionaries and practices 
• 
Specifications for logic and edit checks 
• 
External data handling practices 
• 
Final study closeout activities 
• 
Audit plans 
• 
Sample CRF annotation 
• 
Biostatistician contact information 
• 
Section for tracking revisions to the plan 
• 
Administrative report specifications 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
40 
 
The Data Management Plan serves to document the practices and procedures deployed to promote consistent, efficient, and 
effective data management practices leading to the creation of a high-quality database ready for analysis. The plan serves as 
the authoritative source, documenting data management practices, and decisions that are agreed to with the Principal 
Investigator at the start of the study and as necessary updates are made during the conduct of the study. 
 
Data will be transferred periodically from the study site to the University of Washington to prepare reports. At the close of the 
study, the locked database will be transferred to the Biostatistician for analysis.  
 
The Biostatistician will be responsible for design of the randomization scheme, creation of analytical databases, and the 
statistical analysis plan. 
 
 
14.2 Data Capture Methods 
 
Clinical data (including AEs, concomitant medications, and expected adverse reactions data) will be entered into the study 
database by the Data Manager. This system is protected by 128-bit server certificates and utilizes authenticated, password-
protected accounts for each site. The system is compliant with relevant FDA regulatory requirements per 21 CFR Part 11.   
 
 
14.3 Types of Data 
 
Data for this study will include clinical assessments, safety, and outcome measures (e.g., expected adverse reactions). Safety 
data are contained in the clinical data set.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
41 
14.4 Timing/Reports 
 
Enrollments and study activity (protocol-specified reportable events, as described in Section 9.6.1) reports will be 
generated as they occur to a pre-determined distribution list that includes the Principal Investigator and team. 
 
Clinical monitoring reports will be generated periodically with electronic distribution to the PI and team. Per the Clinical 
Monitoring Plan, the clinical monitor reports include routine reports of aggregate, blinded adverse event data for ongoing review 
by for potential trends, and adverse event and concomitant medication reports for the PI to review for standardization of coding. 
 
Safety monitoring reports will be provided by the Biostatistician per the safety monitoring plan.  
 
Missing data, missing electronic signatures of the Principal Investigator, and requests for data clarification reports will be 
generated to the site on a regular basis. 
 
Monitoring Visit Reports will be generated after each clinical site monitoring visit, per the monitoring plan. 
 
At the completion of the study, data will be securely transferred to the Biostatistician.  Once the Biostatistician and the PI agree 
that all queries have been adequately resolved and the database has been deemed “clean”, the database will be officially 
signed off and deemed locked.  All permissions to make changes (append, delete, modify or update) the database are removed 
at this time.   
 
All site personnel, Sponsor and staff will remain blinded as to treatment assignments until the conclusion of the entire study. A 
designated unblinded biostatistician will have access to the treatment assignments, and this individual will not communicate 
about study-related matters to any other staff involved in the study.  The study code will be broken by the study-responsible 
statistician after all outstanding substantive data queries have been resolved. 
 
 
14.5 Study Records  
14.5.1 Study File and Site Documents 
  
The Principal Investigator should have the following study documents accessible to the Clinical Site Monitor during 
the study. These records are kept in the study office in Pohnpei. 
 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
42 
1. 
Signed Form FDA 1572 
          This study will be conducted under the supervision and direction of the Principal Investigator listed in Section 1 
of the Form FDA 1572.  Sub-Investigators are listed in Section 6 of the Form FDA 1572.  The study will be 
conducted at the address(es) listed in Section 3 of the Form FDA 1572. 
2. 
Curriculum vitae for the Principal Investigator and all personnel listed on Form FDA 1572 
         The Principal Investigator is responsible for providing copies of the protocol and all other information relating to 
the preclinical and prior clinical experience, which were furnished to him/her, to all other study personnel who 
participate in this study.  The Principal Investigator will discuss this information with them to assure that they are 
adequately informed regarding the investigational product and conduct of the study.  The Principal Investigator 
must assure that all study staff members are qualified by education, experience and training to perform their 
specific responsibilities. 
3. 
The signed IRB form/letter stating IRB approval of protocol, consent forms, and any other study materials (e.g., 
patient instruction materials, advertisement notices), documentation of the IRB composition, and all IRB 
correspondence including notification/approval of protocol amendments, notification of serious, unexpected, 
suspect adverse drug reactions to the IRB, and IRB notification of study termination 
4. 
Training records 
         Records of protocol-specific training will be maintained. 
5. 
IRB-approved consent form 
6. 
Signed protocol (and amendments, where applicable) 
7. 
Signed parent/guardian permission forms 
8. 
Copies of the completed source document worksheets 
9. 
Delegation Log with names, signatures, initials, and functional role of all persons completing protocol 
assessments and providing back-up to the Principal Investigator. 
10. Accountability of investigational product 
11. Record of all monitoring visits by Clinical Site Monitor(s) 
12. Copies of correspondence 
13. Certificate for Human Subject Protection Program (HSPP) for each individual named on the Delegation Log who 
has direct subject contact 
14. Copy of professional licensure/registration, as applicable, for each individual named on the Delegation Log, who 
has direct subject contact, ensuring licensure is in the locality in which the study will be conducted 
15. The Principal Investigator must also retain adequate documentation, together with the subject’s hospital/medical 
records, as the subject’s source data for the study. 
 
 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
43 
14.5.2 Maintenance and Retention of Records 
It is the responsibility of the Principal Investigator to maintain a comprehensive and centralized filing system of all 
relevant documentation. The Principal Investigator will be instructed to retain all study records required by federal 
regulations in a secure and safe facility with limited access for one of the following time periods based on notification 
from the Monitor. 
The Principal Investigator will be instructed to consult with and provide advance written notice to the Monitor before 
disposal of any study records and to notify the Monitor of any change in the location, disposition, or custody of the 
study files. No study document or image should be destroyed without prior written agreement between the Sponsor 
and the Principal Investigator.  
Regulations require retention for: 
• 
A period of at least two years after notification from the Sponsor that a U.S. NDA (New Drug Application) has 
been approved for the indication that was investigated or 15 years according to International Conference on 
Harmonization (ICH) guidelines. 
• 
Or, if no NDA is filed or approved for such indication, a period of at least two years after the investigation is 
completed or discontinued, and the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) has been notified by the Sponsor. 
 
 
14.6 Protocol Deviations 
A protocol deviation is accidental or unintentional changes to, or non-compliance with the research protocol that do not increase 
risk or decrease benefit or; do not have a significant effect on the subject's rights, safety or welfare; and/or on the integrity of the 
data. Deviations may result from the action of the subject, researcher, or research staff.  
A deviation may be due to the research subject’s non-adherence, or an unintentional change to or non-compliance with the 
research protocol on the part of a researcher. Examples of a deviation include:  A rescheduled study visit; Failure to collect an 
ancillary self-report questionnaire; or Subject’s refusal to complete scheduled research activities.  
Protocol deviations will be recorded in the subject’s file and log. 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
44 
14.7  Protocol Violations 
 
A protocol violation is any accidental or unintentional noncompliance with the WIRB approved protocol without prior approval 
requirements that may increase risk or decrease benefit, affects subjects’ rights, safety, or welfare, or the integrity of the study 
data. The noncompliance may be either on the part of the subject, the Principal Investigator, or the study site staff. As a result 
of deviations, corrective actions are to be developed by the site and implemented promptly. These practices are consistent with 
ICH E6. 
 
It is the responsibility of the site to use continuous vigilance to identify and report deviations within 5 working days of identification 
of the protocol deviation, or within 5 working days of the scheduled protocol-required activity. All deviations must be promptly 
reported to the Principal Investigator. The Study will maintain a database of violations that are not already documented in the 
clinical database. Corrective and preventive action plans will be documented to minimize recurrence of protocol violations, 
where applicable.  
 
Protocol violations must be sent to the WIRB per WIRB guidelines. The Principal Investigator and staff are responsible for 
knowing and adhering to the WIRB requirements.  
 
15.  Publication Policy 
Following completion of the study, the Principal Investigator may submit for publication the results of this research in a scientific 
journal. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) member journals have adopted a trials-registration policy 
as a condition for publication. This policy requires that all clinical trials be registered in a public trials registry such as 
ClinicalTrials.gov, which is sponsored by the National Library of Medicine. Thus, the Sponsor will register this trial in the public trials 
registry, ClinicalTrials.gov. 
 
 
 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
45 
16.  Literature References 
 
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry.  Guideline on periodicity of examination, preventive dental services, anticipatory 
guidance/counseling, and oral treatment for infants, children, and adolescents. Pediatr Dent. 2013 Sep-Oct;35(5):E148-56. 
 
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guideline on fluoride therapy. Pediatr Dent. 2013 Sep-Oct;35(5):E165-8. 
 
Amin AS, Harrison RL, Benton TS, Roberts M, Weinstein P.  Effect of povidone-iodine in children with extensive dental caries. 
Pediatr Dent 2004; 26: 5-10.   
 
Berkowitz RJ, Koo H, McDermott M, Whelehan MT, Karp J, Billings RJ. Adjunctive chemotherapeutic suppression of mutans 
streptococci in the setting of severe early childhood caries. J Pub Health Dent 2009; 69(3): 163-167.   
 
Buchanan H, Niven N. Validation of a Facial Image Scale to assess child dental anxiety. Int J Paediatr Dent 2002; 12:47-52. 
 
Caufield PW, Gibbons RJ. Suppression of Streptococcus mutans in the mouths of humans by a dental prophylaxis and 
topically-applied iodine. J Dent Res. 1979 Apr;58(4):1317-26.  
 
Furiga A1, Dols-Lafargue M, Heyraud A, Chambat G, Lonvaud-Funel A, Badet C. Effect of antiplaque compounds and 
mouthrinses on the activity of glucosyltransferases from Streptococcus sobrinus and insoluble glucan production. Oral Microbiol 
Immunol. 2008 Oct;23(5):391-400.  
 
Gao SS, Zhang S, Mei ML, Lo EC, Chu CH. Caries remineralization and arresting effect in children by professionally applied 
fluoride treatment – systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2016 Feb 1;16(1):12.  
 
Lopez L, Berkowitz RJ, Spiekerman C, Weinstein P. Topical antimicrobial therapy in the prevention of early childhood caries: 
a follow-up report. Pediatric Dent 24 2002: 204-206.   
 
Milgrom P, Taves DM, Kim AS et al.  Pharmacokinetics of fluoride in toddlers after application of 5% sodium fluoride dental 
varnish. Pediatrics 2014;134:e870–e874 
 
Milgrom P, Tut OK, Mancl LA.  Topical iodine and fluoride varnish effectiveness in the primary dentition: A quasi-experimental 
study. J Dent Child (Chic). 2011 Sep-Dec;78(3):143-7. 
 


Phase 2 Efficacy Evaluation of Advantage Anti-Caries Varnish  
 
 
      
Protocol # 2016-12-02 
 
Version 2.5 / January 10, 2017 
 
 ________________________________________________________________________________________  
46 
Milgrom P, Zero DT, Tanzer JM. An examination of the advances in science and technology of prevention of tooth decay in 
young children since the Surgeon General's Report on Oral Health. Acad Pediatr. 2009 Nov-Dec;9(6):404-9. doi: 
10.1016/j.acap.2009.09.001.  
 
Moyer VA, US Preventive Services Task Force. Prevention of dental caries in children from birth through age 5 years: US 
Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Pediatrics. 2014 Jun;133(6):1102-11.  
 
Tam A1, Shemesh M, Wormser U, Sintov A, Steinberg D. Effect of different iodine formulations on the expression and activity 
of Streptococcus mutans glucosyltransferase and fructosyltransferase in biofilm and planktonic environments. J Antimicrob 
Chemother. 2006 May;57(5):865-71.  
 
Tut OK, Milgrom P. Topical iodine and fluoride varnish combined is more effective than fluoride varnish alone for protecting 
erupting first permanent molars: a retrospective cohort study. J Public Health Dent 2010; (1): 1-4.   
 
Weyant RJ, Tracy SL, Anselmo TT, Beltrán-Aguilar ED, Donly KJ, Frese WA, Hujoel PP, Iafolla T, Kohn W, Kumar J, Levy 
SM, Tinanoff N, Wright JT, Zero D, Aravamudhan K, Frantsve-Hawley J, Meyer DM; American Dental Association Council on 
Scientific Affairs Expert Panel on Topical Fluoride Caries Preventive Agents. Topical fluoride for caries prevention: executive 
summary of the updated clinical recommendations and supporting systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Nov;144(11):1279-
91.  
 
Zhan L, Featherstone JDB, Gansky SA, Hoover CI, Fujino T, Berkowitz RJ, DenBesten PK. Povidone iodine as an oral 
antiseptic in children with early childhood caries. J Pub Health Dent 2006 (3):174-179.   
 
 
 
17.  Addendum 
 
Addendum is protocol amendment 001. The age range for enrollment was clarified to include subjects 48 – 84 months of age.