Conditions: Covid19
Allocation: RANDOMIZED | Intervention model: PARALLEL
Enrollment: 41
Healthy volunteers: yes

Brief summary:
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of external evacuation units and mouth rinses during aerosol generating procedures in a dental clinic and to determine the risk level to the dental practitioners during aerosol generating procedures.

Detailed description:

Arms:
arm 1: None arm 2: None arm 3: None arm 4: None

Interventions: intervention 1: High volume evacuation (HVE) intervention 2: Extraoral vacuum aspirator (EVA) intervention 3: Hydrogen Peroxide intervention 4: Placebo
Intervention descriptions: intervention 1: Intra oral suction will be done and during the procedure,bacterial colony forming units (cfus) will be captured during dental care by placing large format petri dishes containing bacterial culture media in the dental operatory with open lids. Once aerosol capture is complete, petri dishes will be incubated and quantified under BSL-2 safety conditions in the lab. Patient will be given a mouth rinse. intervention 2: Extraoral suction connected to dental suction will be used and bacterial colony forming units (cfus) will be captured during dental care by placing large format petri dishes containing bacterial culture media in the dental operatory with open lids. Once aerosol capture is complete, petri dishes will be incubated and quantified under BSL-2 safety conditions in the lab. Patient will be given mouth rinse. intervention 3: Subjects will be given 1.5 % Oral Solution of hydrogen peroxide mouth rinse intervention 4: Subjects will be given a placebo (plain water) mouth rinse

Protocol document:
Prot_SAP_000.pdf: 
IRB NUMBER: HSC-DB-20-1017 
IRB APPROVAL DATE: 04/04/2025 
1 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Evaluation of Aerosol in a Dental Clinic 
 
NCT04659928 
 
Version Date: 04/04/2025 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


IRB NUMBER: HSC-DB-20-1017 
IRB APPROVAL DATE: 04/04/2025 
2 
 
Protocol Title: 
Evaluation of Aerosol in a Dental Clinic 
 
Principal Investigator: 
Claudia Ruiz Brisuela, DDS, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department 
of Restorative Dentistry and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, 
UTHealth, Houston, TX. 
 
Co-Investigators: 
Maria A. Loza, DMD, MS, Professor and Chair, Department of 
Restorative Dentistry and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, 
UTHealth, Houston, TX. 
Aaron Glick, DDS, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of General 
Practice and Dental Public Health, School of Dentistry, UTHealth, 
Houston, TX. 
Gena Tribble, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Periodontics 
and Dental Hygiene, School of Dentistry, UTHealth, Houston, TX. 
PhanThanh Saint John, Certified Dental Assistant, Department of 
Restorative Dentistry and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, 
UTHealth, Houston, TX. 
 
Population: 
Approximately 40 participants, 18 years of older, patients of the 
Advanced Education in Prosthodontics Program Clinic, UTHealth 
School of Dentistry, Houston, TX. 
 
Number of Sites: 
1 UTHealth, School of Dentistry, Houston, TX. 
 
Study Duration: 
4 Years 
 
Subject Duration: 
1 Appointment 
 
 
 
General Information 
 
- This research project will evaluate aerosols in a dental clinic. We will investigate safety measures that can 
be used to potentially minimize the risk to the dental practitioners during patient encounters. 
 
Background Information 
 
SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic, has a particle size of .25µm to 2.5 µm (Liu 
2020). At such a small particle size the virus has the potential to remain in the air for long periods, have 
increased pathogenicity (can penetrate lower airways), and travel further from the infection source 
(Anderson 2020). Infection with SARS-CoV-2 can be serious and fatal with a mortality rate of 2-4.4% 
reported in a recent meta-analysis (Hu 2020). 
 
Routine dental procedures produce splatter and aerosols that can contain bacteria, viruses, and other 
potentially harmful pathogens to the provider and others within the operating environment. Individuals 
with active COVID-19 can remain asymptomatic and potentially spread the virus to dental workers and 
others within the dental office through aerosols. New products exist claiming to 
Objectives 


IRB NUMBER: HSC-DB-20-1017 
IRB APPROVAL DATE: 04/04/2025 
3 
 
− The primary objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of hydrogen peroxide mouth rinse and evacuation 
units during aerosol generating procedures in a dental clinic. 
− The secondary objective is to determine the risk level for dental practitioners during aerosol generating 
procedures. 
Study Design 
− The study will be a randomized control trial. Groups will be compared as follows: 
1. Hydrogen Peroxide + High volume evacuation (HP-HVE) 
2. Hydrogen Peroxide + HVE + Extraoral vacuum aspirator (HP- EVA) 
3. No Hydrogen Peroxide + High volume evacuation (No HP- HVE) 
4. No Hydrogen Peroxide + HVE + Extraoral vacuum aspirator (No HP- EVA) 
− Bacterial aerosols generated during dental procedures will serve as a proxy for viral aerosols. Bacterial 
colony forming units (CFUs) will be captured before and during the dental treatment by placing large format 
petri dishes containing bacterial culture media in the dental operatory with open lids at four specific 
positions from the patient's head. Once aerosol capture is complete, the petri dishes will be incubated and 
quantified after the 72 hours, under BSL-2 safety conditions in the microbiology laboratory. 
− The patients will randomly receive a 1.5 % hydrogen peroxide mouth rinse or a placebo (plain water). This 
part will be blind, neither the patient nor the dentist will know if the participant is receiving hydrogen 
peroxide mouth rinse or placebo, as both will look the same. 
− The expected duration of the study is 4 years with approximately 40 patients aged 18 years or older. The 
duration of the study is 4 years to accommodate for enrollment of an adequate number of subjects. Study 
will be conducted concurrently with their routine care and the study will take place on one visit. 
− Aim 1: Primary aim is to quantify the effectiveness of hydrogen peroxide mouthwash and evacuation units 
during a natural tooth preparation procedure in the dental clinic to reduce potentially harmful aerosols. 
Primary outcomes will be the number of bacterial colonies forming units (CFUs) during the procedure 
compared to the baseline results. 
− Aim 2: Secondary aim is to quantify the risk to the dental providers during a tooth preparation procedure 
on natural teeth in the dental clinic. Secondary outcomes will be based on the CFUs changes (baseline vs. 
procedure) of the five different positions of the collecting tools. 
Study Population 
Forty participants will be randomly selected from the Advanced Education Prosthodontic Program clinic 
EHR scheduler. 
− Inclusion criteria: 18 years or older, prepping natural teeth at the appointment, at least an hour-long 
procedure, the procedure will be the first one in the morning. 
 
 
 
 
Study Procedures 
− The participant will be only seen once, and the appointment should last at least an hour to allow enough 
time to collect the samples. It must be the first appointment in the morning to avoid cross contamination 


IRB NUMBER: HSC-DB-20-1017 
IRB APPROVAL DATE: 04/04/2025 
4 
 
from other procedures. There will be no direct intervention with the participant besides the assignment of 
the evacuation device and/or the mouth rinse (either a solution of peroxide and water or a placebo). A 
consent form will be discussed and signed by the patient before proceeding with the aerosol collection. 
- The participants will be randomly assigned to one of the experimental groups: 
1. Hydrogen Peroxide + High volume evacuation (HP-HVE) 
2. Hydrogen Peroxide + HVE + Extraoral vacuum aspirator (HP- EVA) 
3. No Hydrogen Peroxide + High volume evacuation (No HP- HVE) 
4. No Hydrogen Peroxide + HVE + Extraoral vacuum aspirator (No HP- EVA) 
− Four (4) agar-petri dishes will be placed by the investigator. The petri dishes will be placed at four 
standardized locations (1', 2', 3' & 6' from the patient’s head) in the dental operating room at: baseline (during 
1 hour before the patient enters the chair side) and treatment (during 1 hour from the start of the 
procedure). An Impinger (REF) will be placed at each interval, 1' from the patient’s head. Ten (10) petri 
dishes will be needed per patient, including two extras to collect solution from impingers. 
− The petri dishes will be incubated at 37 degrees Celsius for 72 hours. Storage of bacterial specimens will 
be consistent with previously approved protocol IBC-16-059. 
− CFUs will be counted, type of mouthwash given, type of intervention (evacuation devices used), the time 
and location of the petri dish will be recorded on an Excel spreadsheet 
− CFUs will be quantified and compared among the four groups and between baseline and treatment. 
− A separate linking log will be used and kept separate from the data collection spreadsheet. No PHI will be 
stored or collected. 
Data and Safety Monitoring 
− Adverse events are not expected. 
− Plans to report unanticipated problems include the routine standard of care informing patients if they 
develop COVID-19 within 2 weeks of the dental visit, for the patient to contact the school. In addition, CFUs 
data will be continually monitored to assess the safety of dental providers in all conditions. Should an 
adverse event occur, the event will be documented and sent to PI. 
− No patient information will be gathered for the study except for the procedures performed. 
Statistics 
− Based on power calculations, the number of subjects planned to be enrolled is 40. 
− The level of significance to be used is p = 0.05. 
− Descriptive analysis and nonparametric statistics will be used to compare between the colony forming 
units (CFUs) at the petri dishes from the four different groups of evacuation devices and mouth 
rinses will be evaluated and analyzed. 
Ethics 
− IRB approval will be sought from the Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects of The University 
of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. 


IRB NUMBER: HSC-DB-20-1017 
IRB APPROVAL DATE: 04/04/2025 
5 
 
− Patients who are eligible and willing to participate in the study will be provided with informed consent 
forms which explain the possible adverse events of treatment and the use of patient data for research. 
Data handling and record keeping 
− No information will be collected from the patient except the procedure performed. Therefore, no health 
protected information will be involved in this study. 
Quality control and assurance 
− The PIs will provide oversight and monitoring to ensure the validity and integrity of the data. 
− All the data will be stored in two different password-protected computers. 
Publication Plan 
− We plan to publish the results in a peer-reviewed journal in dentistry or health fields that would be 
available for dental and/or medical providers. In addition, these data could be presented at dental/medical 
meetings to allow health providers to transfer the results of our study to aid in protecting other healthcare 
workers. We could also present this research at table clinics to provide student involvement. 
− Results will not be returned to research subjects. 
 
 
ATTACHMENTS 
1. Consent Document 
2. Data Collection Form 
3. Linking Log 
4. Data Sheet NovelClear Tubing 
References 
Liu Y, Ning Z, Chen Y, Guo M, Liu Y, Gali NK, Sun L, Duan Y, Cai J, Westerdahl D, Liu X. Aerodynamic 
characteristics and RNA concentration of SARS-CoV-2 aerosol in Wuhan hospitals during COVID-19 
outbreak. BioRxiv. 2020. 
Anderson EL, Turnham P, Griffin JR, Clarke CC. Consideration of the Aerosol Transmission for COVID‐19 
and Public Health. Risk Analysis. 2020. 
Hu Y, Sun J, Dai Z, Deng H, Li X, Huang Q, Wu Y, Sun L, Xu Y. Prevalence and severity of corona virus 
disease 2019 (COVID-19): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Virology. 2020 Apr 
14:104371.