Conditions: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Allocation: NA | Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Enrollment: 104
Healthy volunteers: no

Brief summary:
This study is testing the safety and tolerability of subcutaneous semaglutide in participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Chile. Participants will get a once-weekly subcutaneous injection of semaglutide in doses decided by the study doctor's criteria, according to participant's personal needs. The study will last for about 24 weeks. Participants will have 4 clinic visits and 2 phone calls. Participants will have 3 laboratory tests during the study (blood and urine samples).

Detailed description:

Arms:
arm 1: Participants will receive semaglutide subcutaneous (s.c.) injection once weekly in a dose escalation manner for 24 weeks: 0.25 milligrams (mg) (weeks 1 to 4), 0.5 mg (weeks 5 to 12) and 0.5 mg or 1.0 mg (weeks 13 to 24).

Interventions: intervention 1: Semaglutide
Intervention descriptions: intervention 1: Participants will receive semaglutide s.c. injection once weekly in a dose escalation manner for 24 weeks.

Protocol document:
Prot_000.pdf: 
Cover Page for Protocol 
Sponsor name: 
Novo Nordisk A/S 
NCT number 
NCT05533632 
Sponsor trial ID: 
NN9535-4844 
Official title of study: 
Safety and tolerability of weekly Semaglutide 0.5 mg or 1.0 
mg in Chilean subjects with type 2 diabetes 
Document date*: 
24 February 2022 
 
*Document date refers to the date on which the document was most recently updated. 
 


Protocol Study ID:  
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final 
1 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
Protocol 
 
 
Protocol title: Safety and tolerability of weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg or 1.0 mg in 
Chilean subjects with type 2 diabetes 
A 6-months prospective, open-label, non-controlled study in the Chilean public health care system study 
 
Substance/Semaglutide: NN9535 
 
Universal Trial Number: NN9535-4844 
 
EudraCT Number: 
 
IND Number 
 
Study phase: 4 
 
In the following, Novo Nordisk A/S and its affiliates will be stated as “Novo Nordisk”. 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
This confidential document is the property of Novo Nordisk. No unpublished information contained herein may be 
disclosed without prior written approval from Novo Nordisk. Access to this document must be restricted to relevant 
parties.
CONFIDENTIAL
 
 
 
Redacted protocol 
Includes redaction of personal identifiable information only. 
. 


Protocol Study ID:  
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final 
2 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
 
Table of Contents 
 
 
Page 
Table of Contents .............................................................................................................................................. 2 
1 Protocol summary ....................................................................................................................................... 6 
1.1 
Synopsis .............................................................................................................................................. 6 
1.2 
Flowchart .......................................................................................................................................... 10 
2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 13 
2.1 
Study rationale .................................................................................................................................. 13 
2.2 
Background ....................................................................................................................................... 13 
2.3 
Benefit-risk assessment ..................................................................................................................... 14 
2.3.1 
Risk assessment ................................................................................................................. 14 
2.3.2 
Benefit assessment ............................................................................................................. 16 
2.3.3 
Overall benefit-risk conclusion ......................................................................................... 17 
3 Objectives and endpoints .......................................................................................................................... 18 
4 Study design ............................................................................................................................................... 19 
4.1 
Overall design ................................................................................................................................... 19 
4.2 
Scientific rationale for study design .................................................................................................. 20 
4.2.1 
Patient input into design .................................................................................................... 21 
4.3 
Justification for dose ......................................................................................................................... 21 
4.4 
End of study definition ...................................................................................................................... 21 
5 Study population ....................................................................................................................................... 22 
5.1 
Inclusion criteria ............................................................................................................................... 22 
5.2 
Exclusion criteria .............................................................................................................................. 22 
5.3 
Lifestyle considerations .................................................................................................................... 23 
5.4 
Screen failures ................................................................................................................................... 24 
5.5 
Run-in criteria and/or randomisation criteria and/or dosing day criteria .......................................... 24 
5.5.1 
Run-in Criteria .................................................................................................................. 24 
5.5.2 
Dosing day criteria ............................................................................................................ 24 
6 Study intervention(s) and concomitant therapy ..................................................................................... 25 
6.1 
Study intervention(s) administered ................................................................................................... 25 
6.2 
Preparation, handling, storage and accountability ............................................................................ 26 
6.3 
Study intervention compliance.......................................................................................................... 27 
6.4 
Dose modification ............................................................................................................................. 27 
6.5 
Continued access to study intervention after end of study ................................................................ 28 
6.6 
Treatment of overdose ...................................................................................................................... 28 
6.7 
Concomitant therapy ......................................................................................................................... 28 
6.7.1 
Rescue medicine ................................................................................................................ 28 
7 Discontinuation of study intervention and participant discontinuation/withdrawal .......................... 29 
7.1 
Discontinuation of study intervention ............................................................................................... 29 
7.1.1 
Handling of missing dose .................................................................................................. 29 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID:  
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final 
3 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
7.1.2 
Rescue criteria ................................................................................................................... 30 
7.2 
Participant discontinuation/withdrawal from the study .................................................................... 30 
7.3 
Lost to follow-up ............................................................................................................................... 30 
8 Study assessments and procedures .......................................................................................................... 31 
8.1 
Efficacy assessments ......................................................................................................................... 31 
8.1.1 
Self-measured glucose or Plasma glucose measurements ................................................. 31 
8.1.2 
Clinical efficacy laboratory assessments ........................................................................... 31 
8.2 
Safety assessments ............................................................................................................................ 32 
8.2.1 
Physical examinations ....................................................................................................... 32 
8.2.2 
Vital signs .......................................................................................................................... 33 
8.2.3 
Clinical safety laboratory assessments .............................................................................. 34 
8.2.4 
Pregnancy testing .............................................................................................................. 34 
8.3 
Adverse events and other safety reporting ........................................................................................ 34 
8.3.1 
Time period and frequency for collecting AE information ............................................... 35 
8.3.2 
Method of detecting AEs ................................................................................................... 35 
8.3.3 
Follow-up of AEs .............................................................................................................. 35 
8.3.4 
Regulatory reporting requirements for SAEs .................................................................... 35 
8.3.5 
Pregnancy .......................................................................................................................... 36 
8.3.6 
Disease-related events and/or disease-related outcomes not qualifying as AEs or 
SAEs ................................................................................................................................... 36 
8.3.7 
Technical complaints 
9 Statistical considerations .......................................................................................................................... 38 
9.1 
Statistical hypotheses ........................................................................................................................ 38 
9.2 
Analysis sets. ..................................................................................................................................... 38 
9.3 
Statistical analyses ............................................................................................................................ 39 
9.3.1 
General considerations ...................................................................................................... 39 
9.3.2 
Primary endpoints .............................................................................................................. 39 
9.3.3 
Secondary endpoints analysis. ........................................................................................... 39 
9.4 
Sample size determination ................................................................................................................ 40 
10 Supporting documentation and operational considerations .................................................................. 41 
10.1 Appendix 1: Regulatory, ethical, and study oversight considerations .............................................. 41 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID:  
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final 
4 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
10.1.1 
Regulatory and ethical considerations ............................................................................... 41 
10.1.2 
Financial disclosure ........................................................................................................... 44 
10.1.3 
Informed consent process .................................................................................................. 42 
10.1.4 
Information to participants during the study...................................................................... 42 
10.1.5 
Data protection .................................................................................................................. 43 
10.1.6 
Committees structure ......................................................................................................... 43 
10.1.6.1 
Novo Nordisk safety committee ..................................................................... 43 
10.1.7 
Dissemination of clinical study data……………………………………………………...44 
10.1.8 
Data quality assurance ....................................................................................................... 44 
10.1.8.1 
Case report forms ........................................................................................... 44 
10.1.8.2 
Monitoring ..................................................................................................... 45 
10.1.8.3 
Protocol compliance ....................................................................................... 46 
10.1.9 
Source documents .............................................................................................................. 46 
10.1.10 Retention of clinical study documentation ........................................................................ 47 
10.1.11 Study and site closure ........................................................................................................ 47 
10.1.12 Responsibilities .................................................................................................................. 47 
10.1.13 Indemnity statement .......................................................................................................... 48 
10.1.14 Publication policy .............................................................................................................. 49 
10.1.14.1 
Communication of results .............................................................................. 50 
10.1.14.2 
Authorship ...................................................................................................... 50 
10.1.14.3 
Site-specific publication(s) by investigator(s)................................................ 50 
10.1.14.4 
Investigator access to data and review of results ........................................... 51 
10.2 Appendix 2: Clinical laboratory tests ................................................................................................ 52 
10.3 Appendix 3: Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events: Definitions and procedures for 
recording, evaluating, follow-up, and reporting ................................................................................ 55 
10.3.1 
Definition of AE ................................................................................................................ 55 
10.3.2 
Definition of an SAE ......................................................................................................... 56 
10.3.3 
Description of AEs requiring additional data collection and other events 
requiring collection of additional information .................................................................. 57 
10.3.4 
Recording and follow-up of AE and/or SAE ..................................................................... 58 
10.3.4.1 
AE and SAE recording ................................................................................... 58 
10.3.4.2 
Assessment of severity ................................................................................... 59 
10.3.4.3 
Assessment of causality ................................................................................. 59 
10.3.4.4 
Final outcome ................................................................................................. 60 
10.3.4.5 
Follow-up of AE and SAE ............................................................................. 60 
10.3.5 
Reporting of SAEs ............................................................................................................. 60 
 
10.4 Appendix 4: Contraceptive guidance and collection of pregnancy information ............................... 63 
10.4.1 
Definitions ......................................................................................................................... 63 
10.4.2 
Contraceptive guidance ..................................................................................................... 64 
10.4.3 
Collection of pregnancy information ................................................................................. 65 
 
10.5 Appendix 5: Technical complaints: Definition and procedures for recording, evaluation, 
follow-up and reporting .................................................................................................................... 67 
10.5.1 
Definition of technical complaint ...................................................................................... 67 
10.5.2 
Recording and follow-up of technical complaints ............................................................. 67 
 
10.6 Appendix 6: Hypoglycaemic episodes ............................................................................................. 68 
10.7 Appendix 7: Hyperglycaemic episodes ........................................................................................... 70 
10.8 Appendix 8: Mitigations to ensure participant safety and data integrity during an emergency 
situation........................................................................................................................................... 70 
10.8.1 
Definition and scope of appendix .................................................................................... 70 
10.8.2 
Visits ................................................................................................................................ 71 
10.8.3 
Assessments ..................................................................................................................... 71 
10.8.4 
Study intervention ............................................................................................................ 71 
10.9 Appendix 9: Detailed instructions for Adverse Events and Technical complaints reporting ......... 72 
10.10 Appendix 10: Abbreviations ............................................................................................................ 74 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID:  
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final 
5 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
10.11 Appendix 11: Protocol amendment history ..................................................................................... 76 
11 References ................................................................................................................................................ 77 
 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID:  
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final 
6 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
1 
Protocol summary 
1.1 
Synopsis 
 
 
This is an interventional, single-country, multi-centre, one -arm, open-label, phase 4 study. 
 
Rationale: 
 
In Chile, 85% of the death causes correspond to Chronic Noncommunicable Diseases (NTDs), of which 
5% are caused by diabetes.1  
 
Semaglutide is the latest GLP-1 RA to be available for the treatment of adults with T2D in Chile, with 
proven efficacy and safety data, and additional benefits, such as weight loss, and cardiovascular and 
renal protection.2 
 
Currently, there is no locally generated evidence to evaluate safety outcomes) and to replicate the 
benefits proven in the semaglutide trials2 (SUSTAIN programme) in local subjects with T2D. Although 
international data is well received, there is a constant need to assess new drugs in local patients. 
 
Objectives and endpoints: 
 
Primary objective:  
To evaluate the short-term safety and tolerability (very common and common treatment-emergent 
adverse events) of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide in subjects with T2D who do not achieve their 
HbA1c goal added to available standard of the Chilean public health setting. 
 
Secondary objective: 
To evaluate the effect on glycaemic control, body weight, and other secondary safety and efficacy 
laboratory outcomes associated with once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide in subjects with type 2 
diabetes mellitus added to available standard of care in Chilean public health care setting.  
 
Primary endpoints 
- 
Number of treatment-emergent adverse events from day 1 to week 24 of treatment. 
 
Secondary endpoints 
- 
Change from baseline in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) after 24 weeks of treatment. 
- 
Subject achieving HbA1c < 7,0% after 24 weeks of treatment (yes/no). 
- 
Change from baseline of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) after 24 weeks of treatment. 
- 
Change from baseline of body weight after 24 weeks of treatment. 
- 
Change from baseline of waist circumference after 24 weeks of treatment 
- 
Subjects achieving ≥ 5% and ≥ 10% weight reduction after 24 weeks of treatment (yes/no) 
- 
Change from baseline in laboratory tests after 24 weeks of treatment. 
- 
Subject discontinued due to adverse events (yes/no) 
- 
Number of severe hypoglycaemic episodes per subject 
- 
Number of severe or blood glucose confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes per subject 
- 
Number of serious adverse events (SAEs) per subject 
- 
Change from baseline in heart rate (pulse) after 24 weeks of treatment 
 
Overall design: 
This is an interventional, single-country, multi-centre, open-label, non-controlled and one-arm, 
phase 4 study, evaluating the safety and tolerability of once-weekly 0.5 mg or 1.0 mg dosing of 
subcutaneous semaglutide, according to clinical need, in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus 
added to available standard of care in a Chilean public health care setting 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID:  
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final 
7 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
100 subjects will be enrolled according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria to receive 0.5 mg 
or 1.0 mg subcutaneous once weekly semaglutide according to label. 
 
The study includes a 2-week screening period, followed by a 24-week treatment period and a 5-
week follow up period after end of treatment. The maximum individual study duration will be up 
to 34 weeks. 
 
 
Study intervention groups and duration: 
 
The study duration for the individual subjects will 24 weeks and up to 34 weeks (see flowchart). The 
study includes a 2-week screening period, followed by a 24 week treatment period and a 5-week 
follow up period after end of treatment.  
 
Participants will receive semaglutide in an escalating dose according to label and clinical individual 
needs for 24 weeks: 0.25 mg (weeks 1 to 4), 0.5 mg (week 5 and onwards). In week 12 control visit, 
subjects can escalate from 0.5 mg to 1.0 mg according to the investigator criteria if the HbA1c is above 
the individual target. 
 
The maintenance dose of 0.5 mg will be reached after 4 doses (4 weeks) of 0.25 mg.  
The maintenance dose of 1.0 mg will be reached after the week 12 visit (see above) if the participant 
requires to improve his/her glycaemic control (HbA1c not in target). 
 
Number of participants: 
 
Due to the broad safety objective of this study, no formal sample size calculation was performed. 
Around 90 subjects are considered appropriate to generate local experience regarding the outcomes for 
Semaglutide in local subjects. Considering a potential 10% treatment discontinuation, 100 subjects are 
planned to be included in the treatment period. 
 
Participant characteristics: 
 
Inclusion criteria: 
Participants are eligible to be included in the study only if all the following criteria apply: 
 
1. Informed consent obtained before any study-related activities. Study-related activities are any 
procedures that are carried out as part of the study, including activities to determine suitability 
for the study. 
2. Male or female. 
3. Age above or equal to 18 years at the time of signing informed consent. 
4. Subjects diagnosed (clinically) with type 2 diabetes ≥ 90 days prior to the screening visit. 
5. Stable daily dose of OAD and/or insulin treatment for ≥ 60 days prior to the screening visit. 
6. HbA1c 7.5-10% (59-86 mmol/mol) (both inclusive) in V1. 
7. Subjects in which Ozempic® is indicated according to approved local label. 
8. Fundoscopy/Fundus photography record ≤ 12 months. 
 
 
 
 
Exclusion criteria 
Participants are excluded from the study if any of the following criteria apply: 
 
1. Known or suspected hypersensitivity to study intervention(s) or related products.  
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID:  
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final 
8 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
2. Previous participation in this study. Participation is defined as signed informed consent. 
3. Female who is pregnant, breast-feeding or intends to become pregnant or is of childbearing 
potential and not using adequate contraceptive method, as defined in Appendix 4. 
4. Participation in any clinical trial of an approved or non-approved investigational medicinal 
product within 30 days before the screening visit, except COVID-19 related trials (this is 
allowed) 
5. Treatment with any GLP-1 RA medication prior to the screening visit. 
6. Any disorder which in the investigator’s opinion might jeopardise subject’s safety or 
compliance with the protocol. 
7. Family or personal history of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2 or Medullary Thyroid 
Carcinoma  
8. History of pancreatitis (acute or chronic). 
9. Renal impairment defined as eGFR below 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 as per MDRD-4 (Modification 
of Diet in Renal Disease). 
10. Myocardial infarction, stroke or hospitalisation for unstable angina or transient ischaemic 
attack within the past 180 days prior to the day of screening. 
11. Subjects presently classified as being in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV Heart 
failure. 
12. Planned coronary, carotid or peripheral artery revascularisation known on the day of screening 
13. Subjects with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 2.5 x upper normal limit (UNL). 
14. Use of systemic immunosuppressive treatment within 90 days prior to screening. 
15. Treatment with any medication for the indication of diabetes or obesity other than stated in the 
inclusion criteria in a period of 90 days before the day of screening. An exception is short-term 
insulin treatment for acute illness for a total of ≤ 14 days. 
16. Known hypoglycaemic unawareness and/or recurrent severe hypoglycaemic episodes as judged 
by the investigator. 
17. Proliferative retinopathy or maculopathy requiring acute treatment. Verified by fundus 
photography or dilated fundoscopy performed within 12 months prior to screening. 
18. History or presence of malignant neoplasms within the last 5 years (except basal and squamous 
cell skin cancer and carcinoma in situ).  
 
Assessments:  
 
Laboratory tests and investigator controls: 
 
Laboratory tests prior to semaglutide initiation, at week 12 and at week 24: 
 
1. Fasting plasma glucose 
2. HbA1c 
3. Lipid profile: total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL cholesterol), high-
density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL cholesterol) and triglycerides 
4. Hepatic profile: bilirubin (total and direct), alkaline-phosphatase (ALP), aspartate-
aminotransferase (AST), alanine-aminotransferase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) 
5. Serum creatinine, including eGFR (MDRD) 
6. UACR 
 
Safety assessments:  
 
1. Treatment-emergent adverse events registration (described later) 
2. Subject discontinued due to adverse events registration 
 
Clinical assessments:  
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID:  
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final 
9 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
1. Height 
2. Body weight 
3. Waist circumference 
4. Blood pressure 
5. Pulse rate  
 
Contacts with subjects (V for face-to-face visits and P for phone visit, either call or video-call): 
 
- 
V0*: screening visit, week -2 
- 
V1*: treatment period, week 1 ± 10 days 
- 
P2*: treatment period, week 4 ± 10 days 
- 
V3*: treatment period, week 12 ± 10 days 
- 
V4*: end-of-treatment, week 24 ± 10 days 
- 
P5*: follow-up and end-of-treatment, week 29 ± 10 days 
- 
V4A*: anytime, follow-up and end-of-treatment premature discontinuation 
 
* To see details for each visit, see the flowchart. 
 
Subjects will receive a reminder (call or text) by the nurse around 10 days prior to V1, V3, V4 and 
V4A if applicable, to take laboratory tests samples between 7 and 3 days before those visits. 
 
The local laboratories will report the results to the investigator team directly. 
 
Subjects have optional calls anytime they need (via telephone) with the nurse. 
 
Hypoglycaemia suspicion: subjects are encouraged to take a capillary glucose test, act accordingly to 
local clinical guidance, and register the result. Semaglutide and other antidiabetic treatments doses can 
be adjusted at any time according to the subjects’ need. 
 
Any medication for acute or chronic disease can be added, adjusted or discontinued according to the 
subject´s need. This must be registered in the next visit. 
 
Data monitoring committee: No 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protoc
Study I
 
1.2 
Flowchart 
 
 
 
 
Study Periods  
Screening  
Treatment period 
End-of-treatment1 
Follow-up and End-of-
Study1 
Follow-up and End-of-
treatment premature 
discontinuation2 
Visit (V) or Phone (P) number  
V0  
V1  
P2  
V3 
V4 
P5 
V4A 
Time of visit                                            Weeks  
-2 
1 
4 
12 
24 
29 
  
Visit window                                           Days  
  
±10 
±10 
±10 
±10 
±10 
  
Informed consent  
X 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Laboratory test order 
X 
X 
  
X 
  
  
  
SUBJECT RELATED INFO/ASSESSMENTS 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Inclusion criteria 
X 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Exclusion criteria  
X 
X 
  
  
  
  
  
Concomitant illness and medical history  
X 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Concomitant medication and dose adjustment3 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Demography  
X 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Diabetes history  
X 
  
  
  
  
  
  
History of CV disease  
X 
  
  
  
  
  
  
History of gallbladder disease  
X 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Smoking habits  
X 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Fundoscopy/Fundus photography record ≤ 12 months4 
X 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Height  
  
X 
  
  
  
  
  
SAFETY 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Adverse events  
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
X 
Hypoglycaemic episodes  
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
X 
Physical examination  
X 
 x 
  
x 
x 
  
X 
Pulse rate 
x 
  
x 
x 
  
X 
Biochemistry (detailed list refer to protocol)  
  
x 
  
x 
x 
  
X 
Serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)  
x 
  
  
  
  
  
Creatinine (including eGFR)  
x 
  
x 
x 
  
X 
CONFIDENTIAL


P otoc
Study I
 
Urine Albumin to creatinine ratio 
x 
  
x 
x 
  
X 
EFFICACY (SECONDARY ENDPOINTS) 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Body weight  
  
x 
  
x 
x 
  
X 
Waist circumference  
  
x 
  
x 
x 
  
X 
Blood pressure  
  
x 
  
x 
x 
  
X 
HbA1c  
  
x 
  
x 
x 
  
X 
Fasting plasma glucose  
  
x 
  
x 
x 
  
X 
Lipidic profile 
  
x 
  
x 
x 
  
X 
STUDY MATERIAL 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Drug accountability  
  
  
  
x 
x 
  
X 
Dispensing visit  
  
x 
  
x 
  
  
  
Hand out directions for study product use  
  
x 
  
x 
  
  
  
Instructions to register in the PSP programme (optional for 
the subject)
  
x 
  
  
  
  
  
CONFIDENTIAL


Protoc
Study I
 
Notes:  
1 V4 (End-of-Treatment) and P5 (Follow-Up and End-of-
Study) are applicable for all study subjects. 
2 Subjects discontinuing study product prematurely were to 
be asked to attend one additional visit to undergo end of 
study assessments. The visit should include the End-of-
Treatment-premature discontinuation (V4A) combined with 
Follow-up -premature discontinuation visit (V4A). Visit 
should be scheduled as soon as possible after treatment 
discontinuation and laboratory tests should be taken and 
controlled later by the study team.  
3 In case of insulin or sulphonylureas, dose adjustment 
according to protocol 
4 Fundoscopy/fundus photography is not part of the study 
procedure, but it is requested as part of the medical history 
within 12 months prior to study inclusion.  
5 ECG is not part of the study procedure, but it is requested 
as part of the medical history within 12 months prior to 
study inclusion. 
  
Abbreviations:  V: visit, P: phone or videocall visit, CV: 
cardiovascular, ECG: electrocardiogram, eGFR: estimated 
glomerular filtration rate, eCRF: electronic case report form 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
13 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
2 
Introduction 
 
2.1 
Study rationale 
 
The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) in people aged 15 years or older in Chile is estimated 
to be 12,3%, as of 2017, according to data from the 2016-2017 National Health Survey.3 
 
Semaglutide is the latest GLP-1 RAs to be available for the treatment of adult subjects with T2D in Chile. 
As a family, GLP-1 RAs are recognized as a treatment with an acceptable safety profile.4,5 Nevertheless, 
there is a constant need to have local data regarding the safety of this drug family in local subjects. There 
is previous experience with other GLP-1 RAs, and new efficacy and safety data emerging from recent 
trials is well incorporated in the medical knowledge, especially the cardiovascular benefit of some GLP-
1 RAs, such as liraglutide6, dulaglutide7 and semaglutide2.  
 
Despite this, no hospital or other public entity have semaglutide (or other GLP-1 RAs) in their drug 
arsenal. Physicians in Chile are constantly asking to have local data generated in local subjects and clinical 
centres. Having local experiences create opportunities for public subjects to count on new medication 
options and it is key to inform the national guideline updates to be aligned with the global 
recommendations and to reduce the gap of local subjects with the international standards. 
 
2.2 
Background 
 
GLP-1 RAs are a relatively new therapeutic option for patients with T2D, with proven efficacy and an 
adequate safety profile. Semaglutide is the latest GLP-1 RA available in Chile. It has a strong clinical 
programme (SUSTAIN) showing not only a high efficacy in the reduction of HbA1c and weight, but also 
proven cardiovascular benefits2. It has shown an acceptable safety profile, with a similar rate of adverse 
events compared to the other GLP-1 RAs, being in a majority gastrointestinal adverse events, mostly mild 
or moderate and with a tendency to improve through the continued weeks of treatment.  
 
There is a proportion of secondary care patients (treated at public hospital out-patient clinics), in need of 
glycaemic optimization despite the use of different available antidiabetic drugs, including insulins. These 
patients have limited options to intensify their therapy (DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 
receptor agonists are not part of the public hospital drug arsenal), mainly increasing insulin doses or 
adding prandial insulin, with secondary hypoglycaemia risk increase. Also, it is well known that a 
secondary side-effect of insulins is weight gain, in patients that generally already have obesity or 
overweight as a comorbidity. Considering the safety profile and the potential expected adverse events, 
we propose the benefits will surpass the risks. Semaglutide has proven not only to have a very high 
efficacy in reducing HbA1c, but also, it has an important effect in comorbidities, generating weight loss, 
cardiovascular protection and it has also shown to improve the quality of life.2 
 
The indication and use of semaglutide in this study will always be on-label, according to the local 
regulatory authority approved prescribing information8,9 and thus will provide valuable data in the 
relevant setting and within the expected use in clinical practice. 
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
14 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
 
2.3 
Benefit-risk assessment 
 
2.3.1 Risk assessment 
 
The main benefits and risks related to participating in the study are described in the below sections. 
More detailed information about the known and expected benefits and risks and reasonably 
expected adverse events of semaglutide can be found in the summary of product characteristics.  
 
Risks and precautions 
The nonclinical safety programme of semaglutide has not revealed any safety issues precluding use  
in humans.  
The sections below describe the important identified and potential risks and precautions associated  
with semaglutide treatment. These are based on findings in nonclinical studies and clinical trials  
with semaglutide as well as other GLP-1 RAs. For each of these risks and precautions, mitigating  
actions have been implemented to minimise the risks for subjects enrolled in this study. 
 
Identified risks: 
 
Gastrointestinal adverse events  
Consistent with findings with other GLP-1 RAs, the most frequently reported AEs in clinical trials  
with semaglutide have been gastrointestinal disorders (nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, dyspepsia and  
constipation). Clinical trials have indicated that a low starting dose and gradual dose escalation  
mitigates the risk of gastrointestinal AEs. Consequently, a low starting dose and dose escalation  
with 4-week dose-escalation steps have been implemented in the study. 
 
Potential risks 
Medullary thyroid cancer  
The human relevance of the proliferative C-cell changes found in rodents treated with GLP-1 RAs  
is unknown, but data suggest that rodents are more sensitive to the mode of action of GLP-1 RAs  
for induction of C-cell tumours. However, as a precaution, subjects with a family or personal  
history of MEN 2 or MTC will not be enrolled in the study.  
 
Acute pancreatitis 
Acute pancreatitis has been reported in subjects treated with GLP-1 RAs including semaglutide. As  
a precaution, subjects with a history of acute or chronic pancreatitis will not be enrolled in the 
study.  
Also, subjects will be informed about the symptoms of acute pancreatitis. 
. 
Pancreatic cancer 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
15 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
Subjects with T2D have an increased risk of certain types of cancer such as pancreatic cancer. 
There is currently no support from nonclinical studies or clinical trials or post marketing data that 
GLP-1-based therapies increase the risk of pancreatic cancer. However, pancreatic cancer has been  
included as a separate potential risk due to the scientific debate surrounding a potential association  
to GLP-1-based therapies and the unknown long-term effects of stimulation of β-cells and 
suppression of α-cells. Pancreatic cancer has been classified as a potential class risk of GLP-1 RAs  
by EMA.  
 
Allergic reactions and injection site reaction 
As in the case with all protein-based pharmaceuticals, treatment with semaglutide may evoke  
allergic reactions. These may include localized injection site reactions or generalized reactions,  
including urticaria, rash, pruritus as well as anaphylactic reactions. As a precaution, subjects with  
known or suspected hypersensitivity to trial product(s) or related products will not be enrolled in 
the study. In addition, subjects will be instructed to contact the site staff as soon as possible for 
further guidance if suspicion of a hypersensitivity reaction to the study product occurs. 
 
Hypoglycaemia 
Based on current knowledge about the GLP-1 RA drug class, there is a risk of hypoglycaemic  
episodes. Hypoglycaemic episodes have mainly been observed when semaglutide is combined with  
SU or insulin.  
 
Acute renal impairment 
In subjects treated with GLP-1 RAs, including semaglutide, gastrointestinal AEs such as nausea,  
vomiting and diarrhoea may lead to significant dehydration and secondary acute renal impairment.  
Subjects with gastrointestinal AEs are recommended to drink plenty of fluids to avoid volume  
depletion. Also, serum creatinine and other markers of kidney function will be monitored  
throughout the study. 
Impaired renal function may increase the risk of metformin associated lactic acidosis when GLP-1  
RAs are co-administered with metformin. As a precaution, serum creatinine will be measured  
regularly. In subjects treated with metformin who experience prolonged or severe nausea and  
vomiting, the investigator should monitor serum creatinine, and if clinically indicated, withhold  
metformin until resolution of renal dysfunction. The use of the background medication should be 
in accordance with the current, approved labels. 
 
Other safety considerations 
Teratogenicity (embryo-foetal development toxicity) 
Semaglutide caused embryo-foetal malformations in the rat through a GLP-1 receptor mediated  
effect on the inverted yolk sac placenta leading to impaired nutrient supply to the developing  
embryo. Primates do not have an inverted yolk sac placenta which makes this mechanism unlikely  
to be of relevance to humans. However, as a precaution, females who are pregnant, breast-feeding  
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
16 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
or intend to become pregnant or are of childbearing potential and not using an adequate  
contraceptive method will not be enrolled in the study. In addition, pregnancy tests will be 
performed according to flowchart and at any time during the study if a menstrual period is missed,  
or as required by local law. 
 
Diabetic retinopathy 
A transient worsening of diabetic retinopathy is a recognised complication in selected patients with  
diabetes after initiation of intensive anti-diabetic treatment. Risk factors for these events include  
long-standing poor glycaemic control and presence of proliferative retinopathy, and initial large  
improvements in BG may be an additional aggravating factor. Several studies have, however,  
documented long-term beneficial effects of intensive glycaemic treatment in reducing retinopathy  
progression even in intensively treated patients who experienced early worsening. In a  
cardiovascular outcomes trial with s.c. semaglutide, results indicate an increased risk of events  
related to diabetic retinopathy in subjects treated with semaglutide compared to placebo. As a  
precaution in this study, all subjects are required to have a fundus photography or dilated 
fundoscopy performed 12 months before screening into the study; moreover, subjects with 
proliferative retinopathy or maculopathy requiring acute treatment will be excluded.  
 
General precautions  
All subjects will be included after a thorough evaluation regarding in- and exclusion criteria  
defined to ensure that subjects are eligible for study enrolment.  
There are also strict glycaemic rescue criteria in place to ensure acceptable glycaemic control  
during the study, see Section 6.7. If rescue medication is required, it should be in accordance with  
ADA/European Association for the Study of Diabetes (excluding GLP-1 RAs, DPP-4 inhibitors  
and amylin analogues) and local guidelines.  
It is the responsibility of the investigator to ensure the best possible care according to the principles  
outlined in Diabetes Care 2021 Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes. 
Further details with regards to safety of study product are described in the current edition of the 
professional leaflet.  
for semaglutide (NN9535), or any updates thereto. 
 
2.3.2 
Benefit assessment 
 
In this study, participants will receive semaglutide as add-on to their current background medication (at 
least 1 antidiabetic drug: metformin, sulphonylureas, meglitinides, DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT-2 inhibitors, 
thiazolidinediones, basal or bolus insulin). Subjects will therefore, for most of the study period, be 
treated with a regimen anticipated to be better than or equal to the treatment they receive at the time of 
entry into the study. Based on the results of the phase 3 trials, semaglutide is expected to provide 
clinically relevant improvements in glycaemic control and body weight, plus the beneficial effect of the 
drug on cardiovascular outcomes when added to standard of care in subjects with T2D.  
 
In addition, it is expected that all participants will benefit from participation through close contact with 
the study site, with close follow-up of their T2D and a careful medical examination, all of which will 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
17 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
most likely result in an intensified management of their T2D.  
 
Finally, all subjects in this study will receive study products and auxiliary supplies free of charge. 
 
 
2.3.3 
Overall benefit-risk conclusion 
 
The safety profile for semaglutide generated from the clinical and nonclinical development programme 
has not revealed any safety issues that would prohibit administration of semaglutide in accordance with 
the planned clinical study. The phase 3 results indicate that semaglutide will provide an adequate safety 
profile with clinically relevant improvements in glycaemic control and body weight. Safety and efficacy 
will be monitored regularly, and acceptable glycaemic control will be reinforced at all times during the 
study. In conclusion, the potential risk to the subjects in this study is considered low and acceptable in 
view of the anticipated safety profile and benefits semaglutide will likely provide to subjects with T2D 
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
18 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
3 
Objectives, and endpoints. 
 
3.1 
Primary and secondary objectives 
 
Primary objective:  
To evaluate the short-term safety and tolerability (very common and common treatment-emergent 
adverse events) of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide subjects with T2D, added to available 
standard of care in Chilean public health setting 
 
Secondary objective: 
To evaluate the effect on glycaemic control, body weight, and other secondary safety and laboratory 
outcomes associated with once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide in subjects with type 2 diabetes 
(T2D) added to available standard of care in a Chilean public health care setting (which includes 
medical, nurse and nutritionist care and available drugs in the public system, metformin, SUs and 
insulins) 
 
3.2 
Endpoints 
 
3.2.1 
Primary endpoint 
 
 
Tolerability of semaglutide in GLP-1 naïve subjects in need of treatment optimization, despite 
available treatments: 
 
 
Number of adverse events 
From baseline to 24 week 
Count of subject 
 
3.2.2 
Secondary endpoints 
 
 
Change in glycosylated 
haemoglobin (HbA1c)
From baseline to 24 week 
%-point 
Subject achieving HbA1c < 7,0% 
From baseline to 24 week
Yes/No
Change of fasting plasma glucose 
(FPG) 
From baseline to 24 week 
mg/dL 
Change of body weight 
From baseline to 24 week
kg
Change of waist circumference 
From baseline to 24 week
cm
Subjects achieving ≥ 5% and ≥ 10% 
weight reduction 
From baseline to 24 week 
Yes/No 
Change in laboratory tests 
From baseline to 24 week
Lab test unit correspondent
Subject discontinued due to adverse 
events (treatment discontinuation) 
From baseline to 24 week 
Yes/No 
Number of severe hypoglycaemic 
episodes per subject
From baseline to 24 week 
Count per subject 
Number of severe or blood glucose 
From baseline to 24 week
Count per subject
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
19 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
confirmed symptomatic 
hypoglycaemic episodes per subject
Number of serious adverse events 
(SAEs) per subject
From baseline to 24 week 
Count per subject 
Number of adverse reactions (ARs) 
per subject
From baseline to 24 week 
Count per subject 
Number of serious adverse 
reactions (SARs) per subject
From baseline to 24 week 
Count per subject 
Number of suspected unexpected 
serious adverse reactions (SUSARs) 
per subject
From baseline to 24 week 
Count per subject 
Change from baseline in heart rate 
(pulse) after 24 weeks of treatment
From baseline to 24 week 
bpm 
 
 
4 
Study design 
4.1 
Overall design 
 
This is an interventional, single-country, multi-centre, one-arm, open-label, study. 
 
According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, investigators will select 34, 33 and 33 subjects after 
screening their local subjects, in each hospital. 
The selected 100 subjects will be ≥18 years-old with T2D diagnosed ≥ 90 days prior to the screening 
visit, in need of treatment optimization with at least 1 antidiabetic drug: metformin, sulphonylureas, 
meglitinides, DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT-2 inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, basal or bolus insulin, whose 
T2D is not well controlled as defined by HbA1C (<7.0%). Subjects using GLP-1 RAs will not be 
permitted in this study. 
Subject eligibility is based on the subjects’ medical history, including HbA1c as part of their routine 
laboratory tests. 
The study will be conducted in the secondary care setting (outpatient), in 3 public hospitals in Chile. 
The maximum study duration for the individual subjects will be up to 34 weeks, +/- 10 days (see 
flowchart).  
The study includes an up to 2-week screening period, followed by a 24-week treatment period and a 5-
week follow up period after end of treatment.  
 
The interventions will be providing the study treatment (Ozempic® pens) and laboratory tests required 
by the protocol, on top of standard of care. GLP-1 RAs are not part of the public hospitals´drug arsenal, 
which is the reason Novo Nordisk is providing the medication. 
 
Please see Figure 1 for a schematic overview of the study 
 
 
 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
20 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
 
Figure 1 
Study design 
 
 
4.2 
Scientific rationale for study design 
 
The study has been designed as a one-arm study. Due to the objectives of this study, 100 
subjects is considered to be an acceptable number to start the treatment.  
 
The 24-week treatment duration is considered enough to ensure adequate time to evaluate the 
safety and tolerability, including dose escalation, of once-weekly dosing of 0.5 mg or 1.0 mg 
subcutaneous semaglutide in people with T2D added to available standard of care in Chilean 
public health care.  
 
The 5-week follow-up period is included to find any adverse event associated with the treatment, 
considering the long medication half-life. 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
21 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
 
4.2.1 
Patient input into design 
 
N/A  
 
4.3 
Justification for dose 
 
Semaglutide will be administered once weekly in a subcutaneous (s.c.) injection, as in the indication 
approved in Chile.  
 
Participants will receive semaglutide in a dosing escalation manner for 24 weeks: 0.25 mg (weeks 1 to 
4), 0.5 mg (weeks 5 to 12) and 0.5mg or 1.0 mg (weeks 13 to 24).  
 
The maintenance dose of 0.5 mg will be reached after 4 doses (4 weeks) of 0.25 mg.  
 
After the maintenance dose of 0.5 mg is reached, the dose can be changed to 1.0 mg at V3 (week 12), 
according to the investigator choice. 
Should the subject present AE after dose escalation to 1 mg per week, the investigator may reduce the 
dose to 0.5 mg at any time. 
Both doses are currently approved in Chile. 
 
4.4 
End of study definition 
The end of the study is defined as the date of the last visit of the last participant in the study in 
the 3 research centres. 
 
A participant is considered to have completed the study if he/she has completed all periods of the 
study including the last visit shown in the flowchart.  
 
The primary endpoint is evaluated from visit V1 to V4. The primary completion date (PCD) is 
defined as the date of visit P5 (week 29) on which the last participant in the clinical study has an 
assessment for the primary endpoint. If the last participant is withdrawn early, the PCD is 
considered the date when the last participant would have completed visit V4A. 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
22 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
5 
Study population 
Prospective approval of protocol deviations to recruitment and enrolment criteria, also known as 
protocol waivers or exemptions, is not permitted. 
 
Pre-screening is defined as review of the subject medical records, including handing out 
participant information, as well as database review. Any pre-screening activities must be 
documented on site by the investigator. 
 
Number of subjects 
 
Number of subjects planned to be enrolled: 100 
Number of subjects expected to complete the study (defined as treated with trial product for 24 
weeks): 90 
 
5.1 
Inclusion criteria 
Participants are eligible to be included in the study only if all the following criteria apply: 
 
1. Informed consent obtained before any study-related activities. Study-related activities are any 
procedures that are carried out as part of the study, including activities to determine suitability 
for the study. 
2. Male or female. 
3. Age above or equal to 18 years at the time of signing informed consent. 
4. Subjects diagnosed (clinically) with type 2 diabetes ≥ 90 days prior to the screening visit. 
5. Stable daily dose of OAD and/or insulin treatment for ≥ 60 days prior to the screening visit. 
6. HbA1c 7.5-10% (59-86 mmol/mol) (both inclusive) in V1. 
7. Subjects in which Ozempic® is indicated according to approved local label. 
8. Fundoscopy/Fundus photography record ≤ 12 months. 
 
 
5.2 
Exclusion criteria 
Participants are excluded from the study if any of the following criteria apply: 
 
1. Known or suspected hypersensitivity to study intervention(s) or related products. 
2. Previous participation in this study. Participation is defined as signed informed 
consent. 
3. Female who is pregnant, breast-feeding or intends to become pregnant or is of 
childbearing potential and not using adequate contraceptive method. 
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
23 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
 
4. Participation in any clinical trial of an approved or non-approved investigational medicinal 
product within 30 days before the screening visit, except COVID-19 related trials (this is 
allowed) 
5. Treatment with any GLP-1 RA medication prior to the screening visit. 
6. Any disorder which in the investigator’s opinion might jeopardise subject’s safety or 
compliance with the protocol. 
7. Family or personal history of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2 or Medullary Thyroid 
Carcinoma  
8. History of pancreatitis (acute or chronic). 
9. Renal impairment defined as eGFR below 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 as per MDRD-4  (Modification 
of Diet in Renal Disease). 
10. Myocardial infarction, stroke or hospitalisation for unstable angina or transient ischaemic 
attack within the past 180 days prior to the day of screening. 
11. Subjects presently classified as being in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV Heart 
failure. 
12. Planned coronary, carotid or peripheral artery revascularisation known on the day of screening 
13. Subjects with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 2.5 x upper normal limit (UNL). 
14. Use of systemic immunosuppressive treatment within 90 days prior to screening. 
15. Treatment with any medication for the indication of diabetes or obesity other than stated in the 
inclusion criteria in a period of 90 days before the day of screening. An exception is short-term 
insulin treatment for acute illness for a total of ≤ 14 days. 
16. Known hypoglycaemic unawareness and/or recurrent severe hypoglycaemic episodes as 
judged by the investigator. 
17. Proliferative retinopathy or maculopathy requiring acute treatment. Verified by fundus 
photography or dilated fundoscopy performed within 12 months prior to screening. 
18. History or presence of malignant neoplasms within the last 5 years (except basal and squamous 
cell skin cancer and carcinoma in situ).  
 
5.3 
Lifestyle considerations 
 
No specific restrictions during the study. Subjects should be indicated to follow the local protocol for 
each clinical centre, regarding lifestyle recommendations. 
 
Lifestyle considerations aligned to the local guidelines, and any specific consideration, in example, 
related to the management of adverse events will be according to the investigator´s decision. 
 
Subjects can be derived to the local Novo Nordisk patient support programme, according to the 
investigator´s criteria for nurse, nutritional or physical activity support. This is an available benefit for 
all the local subjects to whom semaglutide is prescribed.  
 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
24 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
5.4 
Screen failures 
A screen failure occurs when a participant who consents to participate in the clinical study is not 
subsequently eligible for participation according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria. A minimal set of 
screen failure information is required to ensure transparent reporting of screen failure participants to 
meet requirements from regulatory authorities. Minimal information includes informed consent date, 
demography, screen failure details, eligibility criteria, and any serious adverse event (SAE). 
 
Individuals who do not meet the criteria for participation in this study may not be rescreened, 
except for completion of missing information. 
 
5.5 
Run-in criteria and dosing day criteria 
First dose must only be administered after assessments related to primary and/or secondary 
endpoints are completed. 
Re-sampling is not allowed if the subject has failed any of the run-in/dosing day criteria 
related to laboratory parameters. However, in case of technical issues (e.g. haemolysed or 
lost), re-sampling is allowed for the affected parameters. 
 
5.5.1 
Run-in Criteria 
 
If the subject meets all the clinically available inclusion criteria and has no exclusion criteria and has 
signed the informed consent, then he/she can be scheduled for V1. During this visit, exclusion criteria 
will be reconfirmed and study medication will be dispensed. 
 
 
5.5.2 
Dosing day criteria 
 
During V1, the investigator will explain how to start and titrate semaglutide, how to use the device and 
self-applicate the drug. 
Dose adjustment of concomitant medication, in particular s sulphonylureas and insulins will be done 
to avoid hypoglycaemic risk. 
 
Dose adjusting recommendations (on day 1of trial medication): 
 
 Insulin dose reduction of at least 20% (subjects will be asked to report any hypoglycaemia 
suspicion that may require further dose adjustment).  
 Sulphonylureas: discontinuation or half dose reduction.  
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
25 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
6 
Study intervention(s) and concomitant therapy 
Study intervention is defined as any investigational intervention(s), marketed product(s), placebo, or 
medical device(s) intended to be administered to a study participant according to the study protocol. 
 
Trial product comprise investigational medicinal products (IMPs), including placebo and 
comparators, non-investigational medicinal products (NIMPs) and/or investigational medical 
devices. 
 
6.1 
Study intervention(s) administered 
 
 Semaglutide is to be administered by once weekly s.c. injections. 
 Injections may be administered in the thigh, abdomen, or upper arm, at any time of day 
irrespective of meals. The injections are to be administered on the same day of the week during 
the study.  
 Subjects will follow a fixed dose-escalation. The maintenance dose of the 0.5 mg treatment will 
be reached after four doses (four weeks) of 0.25 mg.  
 Maintenance dosage may be escalated to 1.0 mg treatment according to investigator criteria of 
diabetes control and tolerability group at V3.  If not tolerated, maintenance dose may be reduced 
back to 0.5 mg. 
 Total treatment duration is planned to be 24 weeks. 
 
 If a semaglutide dose is missed, it should be administered as soon as noticed, provided that the 
time to the next scheduled dose is at least two days ahead. If a dose is missed and the next 
scheduled dose is less than two days away, the subject should not administer a dose until the 
next scheduled dose. A missed dose will not affect the scheduled dosing day of the week. 
 
 When discontinuing treatment after the end of the treatment (V4), subjects should be switched to 
a suitable available product at the discretion of the investigator, according to available standard 
of care. 
 
 The investigator must document that directions for treatment use are given to the subject 
verbally and in writing as directions for use (DFU) document, summary of product 
characteristics (SmPC) at the first dispensing visit as specified in the flowchart.  
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
26 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
Investigational medicinal products (IMP) 
 
Commercially available Ozempic ® presentations will be used in this study. 
 
 Ozempic®: solution for injection, 2 mg/ 1,5 mL 
 
 Ozempic®: solution for injection, 4 mg/ 3 mL  
 
 
Non-investigational medicinal products (NIMP) 
 
Metformin adjustment, Insulin (all kinds) adjustment or addition, iSGLT-2 adjustment, or addition 
and/or other OADs addition or adjustment.  
 
 
6.2 
Preparation, handling, storage and accountability 
Only participants enrolled in the study may use study intervention and only delegated site staff may 
supply study intervention. 
 
Semaglutide preparations (not in-use and in-use) are not to be exposed to excessive heat or direct 
sunlight and are not to be used if they had been frozen. The IMP is only to be used if it appeared clear 
and colourless. 
The investigator should take appropriate action to ensure correct storage of the IMP. The storage 
conditions for semaglutide are summarised in Table 1 
 
Table 1 
Storage conditions of the investigational medicinal product 
Trial product 
Shipping conditions 
Storage conditions 
Not in-use 
Storage condition 
In-use 
Semaglutide  
2°C to 8°C 
 
Store in a 
refrigerator (2°C to 
8°C) 
 
Do not freeze 
 
Protect from light
 
Store below 30°C/86°F 
 
Use within 6 weeks) 
 
Do not freeze 
 
Protect from light 
 
 Each site will be supplied with sufficient trial products for the study on an ongoing basis. Trial 
product will be distributed to the sites according to number of subjects in screening. 
 
 The investigator or designee must confirm that appropriate temperature conditions have been 
maintained during transit for all trial products received, and that any discrepancies are reported 
and resolved before use of the trial products. 
 
 All trial products must be stored in a secure, controlled, and monitored (manual or automated) 
area in accordance with the labelled storage conditions with access limited to the investigator 
and delegated site staff. 
 
 The investigator must inform Novo Nordisk immediately if any trial product has been stored 
outside specified conditions (e.g., outside temperature range) and the investigator was to take 
appropriate action to avoid recurrence of the detected deviation. Storage outside of the indicated 
temperature range for up to 15 minutes is considered negligible and was not recorded as a 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
27 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
deviation. The trial product must not be dispensed to any subject before it has been evaluated 
and approved for further use by Novo Nordisk. 
 
 The investigator or designee is responsible for drug accountability and record maintenance (i.e. 
receipt, accountability and final disposition records). 
 
 The investigator or designee must instruct the subject in what to return at next visit. 
 
 All returned (used or un-used), expired or damaged trial products (for technical complaint 
samples, see Appendix 5 [Section 10.5]) must be stored separately from non-allocated trial 
products. No temperature monitoring is required 
 
 Non-allocated trial products including expired or damaged products must be accounted as 
unused, at the latest at closure of the site. 
 
 Destruction of trial products can be performed on an ongoing basis and will be done according 
to local procedures after accountability is finalised by the site and reconciled by the monitor. 
 
6.3 
Study intervention compliance 
Drug treatment compliance 
 
Throughout the study, the investigator will remind the subjects to follow the study procedures and 
requirements to encourage subject compliance. 
Subject compliance is assessed by monitoring of drug accountability. Prior to visits where drug 
accountability is performed (V3 and V4) the subject is asked to return all used, partly used, and 
unused IMP including empty packaging material. The investigator should assess the amount of IMP 
returned compared to what was dispensed at the last dispensing visit and, in case of discrepancies, to 
question the subject. 
If any suspicion of non-compliance arises, apart from occasionally or missed doses, the site must enter 
into a dialogue with the subject, re-emphasizing the importance of compliance and uncover barriers to 
compliance. This dialogue must be documented. Compliance will be assessed by cross checking the 
following sources and comparing these to the expected use: 
 Drug accountability information; counting returned trial product, visual inspection of pens  
 Questioning of subjects 
 
Treatment start and stop dates will be recorded in the eCRF. 
 
6.4 
Dose modification 
 
Participants will receive once weekly semaglutide s.c. injection in a dose escalation manner for 24 
weeks: 0.25 mg (weeks 1 to 4), 0.5 mg (weeks 5 to 12) and 0.5mg or 1.0 mg (weeks 13 to 24).  
 
The maintenance dose of 0.5 mg will be reached after 4 doses (4 weeks) of 0.25 mg.  
 
After the maintenance dose of 0.5 mg is reached, the dose can be changed to 1.0 mg during the week 
12 control if there is clinical need for the change according to investigator criteria. 
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
28 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
6.5 
Continued access to study intervention after end of study 
 
When discontinuing study intervention after the end of treatment (V4), the participants should be 
transferred to a suitable marketed product at the discretion of the investigator or treating physician. 
 
6.6 
Treatment of overdose 
 
Scarce previous experience related to accidental overdose exists from the semaglutide clinical 
development programme.  
Events of nausea, vomiting and headache have been reported in connection with accidental 
administration of up to 4 mg semaglutide. No symptoms of hypoglycaemia have been reported 
in connection with overdose of semaglutide.  
In the event of overdosage, appropriate supportive treatment must be initiated according to the 
subject’s clinical signs and symptoms. 
For more information on overdose, also consult the current version of the Semaglutide 
investigator’s brochure (IB). 
 
6.7 
Concomitant therapy 
Concomitant medication is defined as any medication, other than the IMP, taken during the study, 
including the screening and follow-up periods. Details of all concomitant medications will be 
recorded in the eCRF at study entry (i.e., at V0). The information collected for each concomitant 
medication included, as a minimum, the trade name or generic name of the concomitant medication, 
the indication, the start and stop dates. 
Any changes in concomitant medications, including rescue medication, will be recorded at each visit 
as they occurred. If a change is due to an AE, then this must be reported according to Section 8.3. 
 
6.7.1 
Rescue medicine 
Subjects with unacceptable hyperglycaemia should be evaluated according to standard of care and 
treatment should be adjusted accordingly (see Appendix 7). 
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
29 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
7 
Discontinuation of study intervention and participant 
discontinuation/withdrawal 
Discontinuation of specific sites or of the study as a whole is detailed in Appendix 1 
(Section 10.1.11). 
 
7.1 
Discontinuation of study intervention 
Study intervention may be discontinued at any time during the study at the discretion of the 
participant or at the discretion of the investigator for safety, behavioural, compliance or 
administrative reasons. 
 
Efforts must be made to have participants attend and complete all scheduled visit procedures, and to 
have the subjects who discontinue trial product attend premature discontinuation visit (V4A) to collect 
the required data for the analysis of the primary (and confirmatory secondary) endpoint. Only 
participants who withdraw consent will be considered as withdrawn from the study. Participants must 
be educated about the continued scientific importance of their data, even if they discontinue study 
intervention. 
 
The study intervention must be discontinued, if any of the following applies for the participant: 
 
1. Violation of any of the inclusion or exclusion criteria. 
2. Pregnancy. 
3. Intention of becoming pregnant. 
4. Suspicion of acute pancreatitis. 
5. Simultaneous use of an approved or non-approved investigational medicinal product in another 
clinical study. 
6. Withdrawal of informed consent. 
 
Note: Simultaneous participation in a study with the primary objective of evaluating an 
approved or non-approved investigational medicinal product for prevention or treatment of 
COVID-19 disease or post-infectious conditions is allowed at the investigator’s discretion 
without discontinuation of study intervention.  
 
Subjects discontinued from trial product should be prescribed alternative therapy at the investigator’s 
discretion. 
 
See the flowchart for data to be collected at the time of premature discontinuation visit and for any 
further evaluations that need to be completed. 
 
The primary reason for discontinuation of study intervention must be specified in the eCRF, and 
final trial product accountability must be performed. 
 
 
7.1.1 
Handling of missing dose 
If any participant missed a dose, they must administer study treatment as soon as possible within 5 
days after the missed dose, as on-label. If more than 5 days have passed, they will have to skip the 
missed dose and administer the next dose on the regularly scheduled day. In each case, subjects can 
then resume their regular once weekly dosing schedule 
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
30 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
7.1.2 
Rescue criteria 
Refer to Section 6.7.1 for description of rescue medication 
 
7.2 
Participant discontinuation/withdrawal from the study 
A participant may be discontinued from the study at any time at the discretion of the 
investigator for safety, behavioural, compliance or administrative reasons 
 
A participant may withdraw consent at any time at his/her own request. 
 
If a participant withdraws consent or is withdrawn by the investigator prior to run-in/receipt of 
study intervention, he/she will not be asked to have any follow-up assessments performed. The 
following data must be collected: Demography, eligibility criteria, date of informed consent, date of 
screening and the date when participant’s participation ended. The end of study form must be 
completed. 
 
If a participant withdraws consent or is withdrawn by the investigator after run-in/receipt of study 
intervention, the investigator must ask the participant if he/she is willing, as soon as possible, to 
have assessments performed according to visit V4A. See the flowchart for data to be collected. 
 
Final trial product accountability must be performed even if the participant is not able to come to 
the site. 
 
If the participant withdraws consent, Novo Nordisk may retain and continue to use any data 
collected before such a withdrawal of consent for the purpose of the study or scientific research. 
 
If a participant withdraws from the study, he/she may request destruction of any samples taken and 
not tested, and the investigator must document this in the medical record. 
 
Although a participant is not obliged to give his/her reason(s) for withdrawing, the investigator 
must make a reasonable effort to ascertain the reason(s), while fully respecting the participant’s 
rights. Where the reasons are obtained, the primary reason for withdrawal must be specified in the 
eCRF. 
 
7.3 
Lost to follow-up 
A participant will be considered lost to follow-up if he/she repeatedly fails to return for scheduled 
visits and is unable to be contacted by the site. 
 
The following actions must be taken if a participant fails to return to the site for a required visit: 
 The site must attempt to contact the participant and reschedule the missed visit as soon as 
possible and counsel the participant on the importance of maintaining the assigned visit 
schedule and ascertain whether the participant wishes to and/or should continue in the study.
 Before a participant is deemed lost to follow-up, the investigator or designee must make every 
effort to regain contact with the participant. These contact attempts should be documented in 
the participant’s source document.
 Should the participant continue to be unreachable, he/she will be considered to have withdrawn 
from the study with a primary reason of ‘lost to follow-up’.
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
31 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
8 
Study assessments and procedures 
 
The following sections describe the assessments and procedures, while their timing is summarised 
in the flowchart. 
 
Informed consent must be obtained before any study-related activity, see Appendix 1 
(Section 10.1.3). 
 
All screening evaluations must be completed and reviewed to confirm that potential participants 
meet all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria. 
 
The investigator will maintain a screening log to record details of all participants screened and 
to confirm eligibility or record reason for screen failure, as applicable. 
 
At screening, participants will be provided with a card stating that they are participating in a study 
and giving contact details of relevant site staff that can be contacted in case of emergency. 
 
Adherence to the study design requirements, including those specified in the flowchart, is essential 
and required for study conduct. 
Please refer to Section 6.3 for drug treatment compliance. 
Review of laboratory reports must be documented either on the documents or in the subject's 
source documents.  
 
The maximum amount of blood collected from each participant over the duration of the study will 
not exceed 80 mL. 
 
Repeat samples may be taken for technical issues and unscheduled samples or assessments may be 
taken for safety reasons. Please refer to Appendix 2 (Section 10.2) for further details on laboratory 
samples. 
 
8.1 
Efficacy assessments 
 
Planned time points for all efficacy assessments are provided in the flowchart. 
 
8.1.1 
Plasma glucose measurements 
 
Blood samples 
 
Blood samples will be taken according to the flowchart and analysed at the site´s local laboratory 
to determine levels of the following glycaemia-related parameters: 
 
 HbA1c % 
 FPG (mg/dL)  
 
8.1.2 
Clinical efficacy laboratory assessments 
All protocol-required laboratory assessments, as defined in Appendix 2 (Section 10.2), must be 
conducted in accordance with the flowchart and the laboratory manual. 
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
32 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
8.2 
Safety assessments 
 
1. Treatment-emergent adverse events registration (described later) 
2. Subject discontinued due to adverse events registration 
 
Planned time points for all safety assessments are provided in the flowchart.  
 
Medical history is a medical event that the participant experienced prior to the time point from 
which AEs are collected.  
A concomitant illness is any illness that is already present at the time point from which AEs are 
collected or found as a result of a screening procedure or other study procedures performed before 
exposure to study intervention under clinical investigation. 
 
In case of an abnormal and clinically significant finding fulfilling the definition of medical history 
or concomitant illness, the investigator must record the finding on the medical history/concomitant 
illness form. 
 
Information on hypoglycaemia unawareness will be recorded according to Clarke's questionnaire, 
question 8.10 The investigator must ask the participant in the following way: "To what extent can 
you tell by your symptoms that your blood glucose is low?" Participants answering ‘never, rarely or 
sometimes’ are considered to have impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia, whereas those answering 
‘often or always’ are not. 
 
8.2.1 
Physical examinations 
A physical examination will be performed by the investigator at the screening visit (V0), V1, V3, 
V4 and V4A if applicable according to local procedures.  
The physical examination includes the following items: 
 
 General appearance 
 Head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck 
 Thyroid gland 
 Respiratory system 
 CV system 
 Gastrointestinal system including mouth 
 Musculoskeletal system 
 Central and peripheral nervous system 
 Skin 
 Lymph node palpation 
 
Review of the physical examination will be documented either on the front page of 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
33 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
the documents or in the subject's medical record.  
 
The physical examinations have to follow these categories: 
 Normal 
 Abnormal 
- Was the result clinically significant? (No/Yes) 
In case of an abnormal clinically significant finding pertaining to the screening visit, the 
investigator have to provide a comment in the subject’s medical record and record this on the 
concomitant illness form in the eCRF. At subsequent visits, any clinically significant changes or 
new clinically significant findings has to be reported as an AE according to Section 8.3. 
 
Body measurements will also be measured and recorded as specified in the flowchart. 
 
 Body weight will be measured and recorded in the eCRF in kg with one decimal (without 
shoes and only wearing light clothing). 
 
 Height will be measured without shoes in cm and recorded in the eCRF to nearest ½ cm. 
 
 Waist circumference is defined as the minimal abdominal circumference located midway 
between the lower rib margin and the iliac crest. Three consecutive measurements of waist 
circumference will be performed and recorded in the eCRF. The waist circumference will be 
was measured in cm to the nearest ½ cm using a non-stretchable measuring tape. Waist 
circumference will be measured while the subject is in a standing position with an empty 
bladder and wearing light clothing with accessible waist. The subject has to be standing with 
arms down their side and feet together. The tape has to touch the skin but not compress soft 
tissue and twists in the tape are to be avoided. The subject will be asked to breathe normally 
and the measurement will be taken when the subject is breathing out gently. 
 
 Body mass index (BMI) will be calculated in the eCRF using the equation: 
BMI kg/m2 = body weight (kg)/(height (m) x height (m)) or (kg/m2 = [lb/in2 x 703]) 
 
Investigators should pay special attention to clinical signs related to previous serious illnesses. 
 
8.2.2 
Vital signs 
 
 Blood pressure 
 
The method for measuring systolic and diastolic blood pressure will follow the standard clinical 
practice at individual sites, but as a minimum the following guideline has to be adhered to: 
 
 Caffeine, smoking and exercise should be avoided for at least 30 minutes prior to measuring the 
blood pressure. 
 The blood pressure should be measured in a sitting position, with the legs uncrossed and the back 
and arms supported. 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
34 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 Subjects should be sitting for at least five minutes before the measurement was taken and the data 
should be recorded in the eCRF. 
 The subject should not talk during the measurement. 
 
 Pulse rate 
 
Pulse rate will be measured in connection to the blood pressure measurements. Record the pulse rate 
for the last 2 blood pressure measurements in the eCRF. The pulse rate is to be recorded as the mean 
of the last 2 measurements. 
 
8.2.3 
Clinical safety laboratory assessments 
All protocol-required laboratory assessments, as defined in Appendix 2 (Section 10.2), must be 
conducted in accordance with the laboratory manual and the protocol flowchart. 
 
8.2.4 
Pregnancy testing 
 
 
Woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) should only be included after a negative, 
highly sensitive serum pregnancy test (refer to Appendix 2). 
 
Pregnancy testing should be performed whenever a menstruation is missed or when pregnancy is 
otherwise suspected. 
 
8.3 
Adverse events and other safety reporting 
 
The investigator is responsible for detecting, documenting, recording and following up on events 
listed below: 
 AEs and SAEs 
 AEs leading to discontinuation of study intervention under clinical investigation 
 Selected types of AEs requiring additional data collection and other events requiring collection 
of additional information (Table 5) 
 Other events as applicable 
 
The definition of AEs and SAEs can be found in Appendix 3 (Section 10.3), along with AEs 
requiring additional data collection.  
 
Some AEs require additional data collection on a specific event form. The relevant event(s) are 
listed below in Table 5, together with other events requiring collection of additional information. 
 
Table 5         AEs requiring additional data collection and other events requiring additional    
data collection 
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
35 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
Definitions and reporting timelines for the events mentioned in the above table can be found in 
Appendix 3 (Section 10.3) and Appendix 6 (Section 10.6) for hypoglycaemic episodes. 
 
8.3.1 
Time period and frequency for collecting AE information 
 
All AEs and SAEs specified in Section 8.3 must be collected and reported. The events must be 
collected from the first administration of study intervention under clinical investigation and until 
the follow-up visit/end of study visit, in accordance with the flowchart (1.2) or whenever, within 
the above time period, the site becomes aware of an AE or SAE. 
 
Conditions present prior to the timepoint from which AEs are collected and anticipated day-to-day 
fluctuations of these conditions, including those identified during screening or during other study- 
related procedures performed before exposure to study intervention under clinical investigation, will 
be recorded as medical history/concomitant illness. 
 
AE and SAE reporting timelines can be found in Appendix 3 (Section 10.3). All SAEs must be 
recorded and reported to Novo Nordisk within 24 hours, and the investigator must submit any 
updated SAE data to Novo Nordisk or designee within 24 hours of it being available. 
 
Investigators are not obligated to actively seek for AE or SAE in former study participants. 
However, if the investigator learns of any SAE, including a death, at any time after a participant has 
been discontinued from/completed the study, and the investigator considers the event to be related 
to the IMP or related to study participation, the investigator must promptly notify Novo Nordisk. 
 
8.3.2 
Method of detecting AEs 
The method of recording, evaluating, and assessing causality of AE and SAE and the procedures for 
completing and transmitting SAE reports are provided in Appendix 3 (Section 10.3) 
 
Care should be taken not to introduce bias when detecting AEs and/or SAEs. Open-ended and non- 
leading verbal questioning of the participant is the preferred method to inquire about events. 
 
8.3.3 
Follow-up of AEs 
After the initial AE/SAE report, the investigator is required to proactively follow each participant at 
subsequent visits/contacts. All SAEs should be followed until final outcome of the event or until the 
participant is lost to follow-up as described in Section 7.3. Further information on follow-up and 
final outcome of events is given in Appendix 3 (Section 10.3) 
8.3.4 
Regulatory reporting requirements for SAEs 
Prompt notification by the investigator to Novo Nordisk of an SAE is essential so that legal 
obligations and ethical responsibilities towards the safety of participants and the safety of a study 
intervention under clinical investigation are met. 
 
Event type 
AE requiring 
additional data 
collection 
Other event requiring 
collection of additional 
information 
Medication error 
X 
 
Misuse and abuse 
X 
 
Hypoglycaemic episodes 
 
X 
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
36 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
Novo Nordisk has a legal responsibility to notify both the local regulatory authority and other 
regulatory agencies about the safety of a study intervention under clinical investigation. Novo 
Nordisk will comply with country-specific regulatory requirements relating to safety reporting to 
the regulatory authority, IRB/IEC, and investigators. This also includes suspected unexpected 
serious adverse reactions (SUSAR) 
 
An investigator who receives an investigator safety report describing an SAE or other specific 
safety information (e.g., summary or listing of SAEs) from Novo Nordisk will review and then file 
it along with the investigator’s brochure and will notify the IRB/IEC, if appropriate according to 
local requirements. 
 
8.3.5 
Pregnancy 
 
A blood pregnancy test will be performed at the local laboratory for women of childbearing potential 
if a menstrual period is missed or if pregnancy is suspected any time during the study. 
 
Pregnancy testing is not required for women not of child bearing potential defined as women who had 
undergone a hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy or bilateral tubal ligation, or who are 
postmenopausal (e.g., above the age of 45, who had been without menstrual period for at least one 
year). 
 
Female subjects will be instructed to notify the investigator immediately if they became pregnant 
during the study.  
 
The trial product will be discontinued in case of pregnancy and will be specified in the eCRF as the 
primary reason for the discontinuation of treatment.  
 
For subjects who discontinue treatment prematurely, the premature discontinuation visit should be 
scheduled as soon as possible. 
 
Subjects discontinued from trial product should be prescribed alternative therapy at the investigator’s 
discretion. 
 
See the flowchart for data to be collected at the time of premature discontinuation visit and for any 
further evaluations that need to be completed. 
 
The investigator must report any pregnancy in subjects who had received trial product. 
 
The investigator must follow the pregnancy until the pregnancy outcome was determined. If the 
pregnancy resulted in a live birth, the newborn infant will be followed until one month of age. 
 
The investigator must report information about the pregnancy, pregnancy outcome, health of the 
newborn infant(s), AEs in connection with the pregnancy, and AEs in the foetus and newborn infant. 
 
Details of pregnancies in female participants will be collected after first exposure to IMP and until the 
new-born infant is one month of age. For details regarding collection and reporting of pregnancy 
information, please refer to Appendix 4 (Section 10.4). 
 
8.3.6 
Disease-related events and/or disease-related outcomes not qualifying as AEs or SAEs 
 
 
The following disease-related events  (DREs) are common in participants with disease, condition 
under study and can be serious/life threatening: 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
37 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
 Hyperglycaemic episodes
 
Hyperglycaemia 
 
Because hyperglycaemic episodes are typically associated with the disease under study, non-serious 
hyperglycaemic episodes will not be reported according to the standard process for reporting of 
AEs, even though the episodes meet the definition of an AE. 
 
Definitions, classification and reporting requirements for hyperglycaemic episodes are described in 
Appendix 7 (Section 10.7). 
 
If the hyperglycaemic episode fulfils the criteria for an SAE, then in addition to the above, an 
AE form and a safety information form must also be filled in. 
 
8.3.7 
Technical complaints 
Technical complaints on Ozempic® which occur  from the first time of usage until the last time 
of usage of the product and which is considered related to an SAE must be reported to Novo 
Nordisk via trial specific technical complaint form in the CRF and according to instructions 
found in Appendix 5 (Section 10.5). 
 
For Novo Nordisk to perform a complete investigation of reported SAEs, Novo Nordisk might 
ask the investigator to complete a technical complaint form. 
Technical complaints on Ozempic® not related to an SAE, may be reported to Novo Nordisk 
Affiliate via the spontaneous reporting system. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
38 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
 
 
 
9 
Statistical considerations 
 
This section is a summary of the planned statistical analyses of the endpoints including primary 
and key secondary endpoints. 
 
9.1 
Statistical hypotheses 
 
No confirmatory hypotheses are planned to be tested. 
 
 
9.2 
Analysis sets 
Data selection for statistical analyses will be a two-step process, first selecting subjects based on 
the analysis population and subsequently events/data for those subjects based on the observation 
period. 
 
Participant Analysis Set 
Description 
Full analysis set 
All participants exposed to the study product.  
 
 
In-trial observation period: This observation period is defined as the period from date of 
initiation to the first date of any of the following, both inclusive: 
 date of end-of-trial follow-up visit 
 date of death 
 date when subject withdrew consent 
 date of last contact for subjects lost to follow-up 
 
On-treatment observation period: This observation period is a sub-set of the ‘in-trial’ observation 
period and represents the time period where subjects are considered exposed to study product. The 
observation period starts at the date of first dose of study product and ends at an endpoint-specific 
end-date according to the flow chart. For adverse events, (excluding hypoglycaemic events), the 
observation period ends at the first date of any of the following: 
 
 The follow-up visit (P5) 
 The premature discontinuation follow-up visit (V4A) 
 The last date on study product + 42 days for safety and +7 days for efficacy 
 The end-date for the ‘in-trial’ observation period 
 
The follow-up visit is scheduled to take place 5 weeks after the last date on study product 
corresponding to approximately five half-lives of semaglutide s.c.  
 
Data points collected outside an observation period will be treated as missing in the analysis. 
Baseline (week 1) data will always be included in an observation period. 
 
Before data are locked for statistical analysis, a review of all data will take place. Neither subjects 
nor observations should be excluded. If subjects or observations are excluded, the reasons 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
39 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
for their exclusion must be documented before database lock and described in the clinical trial 
report. Any decision to exclude either a subject or single observation from the statistical analysis is 
the joint responsibility of the members of the Novo Nordisk study group. 
 
 
9.3 
Statistical analyses 
 
If needed, the statistical analysis plan (SAP) will be finalised prior to first participant first visit (FPFV), 
to provide a more technical and detailed description of the statistical analyses. This section is a 
summary of the planned statistical analyses. 
 
 
9.3.1 
General considerations 
 
Baseline will be defined at week 1 prior to or at first exposure of treatment. 
 
All the primary and secondary safety endpoint will be summarised as described in the section 9.3.2 and 
9.3.3. Secondary efficacy endpoints will be summarised and analysed as described section 9.3.3. 
 
 
9.3.2 
Primary endpoints 
 
The primary endpoint will be evaluated in the full analysis set (FAS) using the on-treatment period. 
 
A treatment-emergent AE is an event that has onset date (or increase in severity) during the on-
treatment observation period. These will therefore be referred to as ‘on-treatment AEs’ hereafter.  
 
TEAEs will be reported in terms of the number of subjects with at least one event (N), the percentage of 
subjects with at least one event (%), the number of events (E) and the event rate per 100 years (R) for 
on-treatment period.  
 
 
9.3.3 
Secondary endpoints analysis 
Safety endpoints 
 
The safety endpoints will be evaluated based on FAS using the on-treatment observation period and 
the in-trial observation period unless otherwise stated. 
Adverse Events: 
 
All AEs and hypoglycemic episodes are summarised descriptively in terms of the number of subjects 
with at least one event (N), the percentage of subjects with at least one event (%), the number of events 
(E) and the event rate per 100 years (R) for on-treatment period. These summaries are replicated by 
outputs including all ‘in-trial’ AEs (i.e., AEs with onset date [or increase in severity] during the ‘in-
trial’ observation period). AEs with onset after the end of the ‘in-trial’ observation period will be 
reported in a listing. 
 
All AEs will be coded using the most recent version of the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory 
Activities (MedDRA) coding. 
 
Classification of Hypoglycaemia: 
 
Treatment emergent: Hypoglycaemic episodes will be defined as treatment emergent if the onset is 
in the on-treatment observation period (see Section 9.2). 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
40 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
Hypoglycaemic episodes are classified based on the newest adapted guidelines approved internally in 
2019 (refer to section 10-6). 
 
 
 
 
 
Efficacy Endpoints: 
 
The secondary efficacy endpoints and assessments at scheduled timepoints will be summarised 
descriptively based on FAS using the on-treatment observation period and the in-trial observation 
period. Descriptive statistics (mean, Standard Deviation (SD), median, and range for continuous 
variables and proportion for categorical variables) will be used.  
 
The following continuous secondary endpoints will be analysed statistically based on FAS and the on-
treatment observation period: 
 HbA1c (%-point) 
 Fasting plasma glucose (mg/dL) 
 Body weight (Kg, %) 
 Waist circumference (cm) 
 Fasting blood lipids (total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides) (mg/dL) 
 
For this purpose, a mixed model for repeated measurements (MMRM) will use all assessments in the 
specific observation period. The dependent variable (response) is change from baseline in HbA1c at all 
scheduled visits. This model will include time (visits) as fixed factor and baseline HbA1c as covariate. 
Interactions between visit and baseline HbA1c will also be included in the model. An unstructured 
covariance matrix will be used to describe the variability for the repeated measurements for a patient (if 
the model will not converge a compound symmetry covariance matrix will be considered as the simpler 
alternative). Patients without post-baseline measurements for HbA1c will not be included in the analysis. 
Least-square means estimates for change from baseline in HbA1c at week 24 for an average patient in 
FAS (i.e. a reference patient with a mean baseline HbA1c) will be reported and include associated 
95%CI and p-value that tests the null-hypothesis of no change from baseline at week 24. The MMRM is 
a well-established method that appropriately accounts for the uncertainty pertaining to missing data. 
This analysis assumes that missing data are missing at random (i.e. missing values may be dependent on 
observed, but not unobserved data). 
 
Fasting blood lipid endpoints will be log-transformed prior to analysis with the associated log-
transformed baseline value as a covariate. 
 
 
9.4 
Sample size determination 
 
Due to the broad safety objective of this study, no formal sample size calculation is performed. The 
sample size of 90 participants are expected to complete the study out of 100 enrolled. 
This is considered appropriate to generate appropriate experience regarding the safety primary 
outcome and efficacy secondary outcomes of semaglutide in local subjects. 
 
 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
41 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
10 Supporting documentation and operational considerations 
 
10.1 
Appendix 1: Regulatory, ethical, and study oversight considerations 
 
10.1.1 
Regulatory and ethical considerations 
This study will be conducted in accordance with the protocol and with the following: 
 Consensus ethical principles derived from international guidelines including the Declaration of 
Helsinki11 and applicable ICH Good Clinical Practice (GCP) Guideline12
 Applicable laws and regulations
 
 
The protocol, informed consent form, investigator’s brochure (as applicable) and other relevant 
documents (e.g., advertisements) must be submitted to an IRB/IEC and reviewed and approved by 
the IRB/IEC before the study is initiated. 
 
Any amendments to the protocol will require IRB/IEC approval before implementation of changes 
made to the study design, except for changes necessary to eliminate an immediate safety hazard to 
study participants. 
 
Before a site is allowed to start screening participants, written notification from Novo Nordisk must 
be received. 
 
The investigator will be responsible for: 
 providing written summaries of the status of the study annually or more frequently in 
accordance with the requirements, policies, and procedures established by the IRB/IEC and/or 
regulatory authorities
 notifying the IRB/IEC of SAEs or other significant safety findings as required by IRB/IEC 
procedures
 providing oversight of the conduct of the study at the site and adherence to requirements of ICH 
guidelines, the IRB/IEC, and all other applicable local regulations
 ensuring submission of the CSR synopsis to the IRB/IEC
 reporting any potential serious breaches to the sponsor immediately after discovery
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
42 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
10.1.2 
Financial disclosure 
Investigators and sub-investigators will provide Novo Nordisk with sufficient, accurate financial 
information as requested to allow Novo Nordisk to submit complete and accurate financial 
certification or disclosure statements to the appropriate regulatory authorities. Investigators are 
responsible for providing information on financial interests during the course of the study and one 
year after completion of the study. 
 
 
10.1.3 
Informed consent process 
 
 
The investigator or his/her representative will explain the nature of the study, including the risks 
and benefits, to the participant and answer all questions regarding the study. This includes the 
use of an impartial witness where required according to local requirements. 
 
The investigator must ensure the participant ample time to come to a decision whether or not to 
participate in the study. 
 
Participants must be informed that their participation is voluntary. Participants will be required to 
sign and date a statement of informed consent that meets the requirements of local regulations, ICH 
GCP12 guidelines,  Declaration of Helsinki,11 privacy and data protection requirements, where 
applicable, and the IRB/IEC or site. 
 
The medical record must include a statement that written informed consent was obtained before any 
study-related activity and the date when the written consent was obtained. The authorised person 
obtaining the informed consent must also sign and date the informed consent form before any study-
related activity. 
 
The responsibility of seeking informed consent must remain with the investigator, but the 
investigator may delegate the task to a medically qualified person, in accordance with local 
requirements. 
 
Participants must be re-consented to the most current version of the informed consent form(s) 
during their participation in the study. 
 
A copy of the informed consent form(s) must be provided to the participant. 
 
 
 
10.1.4 
Information to participants during the study
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
43 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
Subjects can be derived to the local Novo Nordisk patient support programme, according to the 
investigator´s criteria for nurse, nutritional or physical activity support. This is an available 
benefit for all the local subjects to whom semaglutide is prescribed (see flowchart). It is the 
subject´s decision to join the programme at any time or not. 
 
10.1.5 
Data protection 
Participants will be assigned a unique identifier (CL + centre number (1, 2 or 3) + patient 
number (000 onwards per centre), a subject ID, i.e., CL1001. Any participant records or datasets 
that are transferred to Novo Nordisk will contain the identifier only. No direct identifiers from the 
participant are transferred to Novo Nordisk. 
 
The participant and any biological material obtained from the participant will be identified by 
subject ID, visit number and study ID. Appropriate measures such as encryption or leaving out 
certain identifiers will be enforced to protect the identity of participants as required by local, 
regional and national requirements. 
 
The participant must be informed about his/her privacy rights, including that his/her personal study- 
related data will be used by Novo Nordisk in accordance with local data protection law. The 
disclosure of the data must also be explained to the participant. 
 
The participant must be informed that his/her medical records may be examined by auditors or other 
authorised personnel appointed by Novo Nordisk, by appropriate IRB/IEC members, and by 
inspectors from regulatory authorities. 
 
Personal data may be collected from participants due to process requirements from Novo Nordisk’s 
suppliers. This data is needed to ensure that the relevant data analysis for the study can be 
performed, but will not be part of the data transferred to Novo Nordisk, the assessment of the study 
endpoints or the clinical study report. A list of any such data values must be kept as part of the 
study documentation along with an explanation of why it was required. 
 
10.1.6 
Committees structure 
 
10.1.6.1 
Novo Nordisk safety committee 
Novo Nordisk will perform ongoing safety surveillance. If new safety signals are identified, these 
will be evaluated by an internal safety committee.  
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
44 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.1.7 
Dissemination of clinical study data 
 
Study information will be disclosed at clinicaltrials.gov and novonordisk-trials.com and, if 
applicable, also on other national or regional study registries. It will be disclosed according to 
applicable requirements, relevant recommendations or regulations, such as the Declaration of 
Helsinki,11 the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE),13 the Food and Drug 
Administration Amendment Act (FDAAA),14 European Commission Requirements15, 16, 17and in 
accordance with Novo Nordisk commitment to clinical transparency. If a participant requests to be 
included in the study via the Novo Nordisk e-mail contact at these web sites, Novo Nordisk may 
disclose the investigator’s contact details to the participant. As a result of increasing requirements 
for transparency, some countries require public disclosure of investigator names and their 
affiliations. 
 
10.1.8 
Data quality assurance 
 
10.1.8.1 
Case report forms 
Novo Nordisk is responsible for the data management of this study including quality checking of 
the data. 
 
To demonstrate his/her oversight of the collected data, the investigator should sign the CRF on a 
regular basis during the conduct of the study as well as at the end of the study, as described in the 
CRF completion guideline. 
 
All participant data relating to the study will be recorded on CRFs unless transmitted electronically 
to Novo Nordisk (e.g., laboratory data). The investigator is responsible for verifying that data 
entries are accurate and correct by physically or electronically signing the CRF. 
 
The following will be provided as paper CRFs and eCRF to be used:  
 AE forms
 Pregnancy forms
 Safety information forms
 Technical complaint forms
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
45 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
 
Corrections to the CRF data may be made by the investigator or the investigator’s delegated staff. 
An audit trail will be maintained in the CRF application containing as a minimum: the old and the 
new data, identification of the person entering the data, date and time of the entry and reason for 
the correction. If corrections are made by the investigator’s delegated staff after the date when the 
investigator signed the CRF, the CRF must be signed and dated again by the investigator. 
 
The investigator must ensure that data is recorded in the CRF as soon as possible, preferably 
within 5 working days after the visit. Once data has been entered, it will be available to Novo 
Nordisk for data verification and validation purposes. 
 
10.1.8.2 
Monitoring 
The investigator must permit study-related monitoring, audits, IRB/IEC review, and regulatory 
agency inspections and provide direct access to source data documents (original documents, data 
and records). Direct access includes permission to examine, analyse, verify and reproduce any 
record(s) and report(s) that are important to the evaluation of the study. If the electronic source data 
does not have a visible audit trail, the investigator must provide the monitor with signed and dated 
printouts. In addition, the relevant site staff should be available for discussions at monitoring visits 
and between monitoring visits (e.g., by telephone). 
 
Study monitors will perform ongoing source data verification of critical data points to confirm that 
data entered into the CRF by authorised site personnel are accurate, complete and verifiable from 
source documents. Study monitors will perform ongoing source data review to ensure that the study 
is being conducted in accordance with the current approved protocol and any other study 
agreements, ICH GCP12, and all applicable regulatory requirements, evaluating the adequacy of 
critical processes at site for the execution of the protocol, collection of study data, to ensure that the 
safety and rights of participants are being protected. 
 
Monitoring will be conducted using a risk-based approach including risk assessment, monitoring 
plans, centralised monitoring (remote assessment of data by Novo Nordisk) and visits to sites. 
 
Quality tolerance limits (QTLs) will be predefined in the relevant monitoring plan to identify 
systematic issues that can impact participant safety and/or reliability of study results. These 
predefined parameters will be monitored during the study, and important deviations from the QTLs 
and remedial actions taken will be summarised in the clinical study report. 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
46 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
10.1.8.3 
Protocol compliance 
Deviations from the protocol should be avoided. If deviations do occur, the investigator must 
inform the monitor without delay and the implications of the deviation must be reviewed and 
discussed. 
 
Deviations must be documented and explained in a protocol deviation by stating the reason, date, 
and the action(s) taken.  
 
10.1.9 
Source documents 
All data entered in the eCRF must be verifiable in source documentation other than the eCRF. 
 
Source documents provide evidence for the existence of the participant and substantiate the 
integrity of the data collected. Source documents are filed at the site. Any source data generated by 
investigator’s subcontractors must be archived and accessible by the site. 
Data that is transcribed into the eCRF from source documents must be consistent with the source 
documents, or the discrepancies must be explained. The investigator may need to request previous 
medical records or transfer records. Also, current medical records must be available. 
 
It must be possible to verify participant’s medical history in source documents, such as 
participant’s medical record. 
 
The investigator must document any attempt to obtain external medical information by noting the 
date(s) when information was requested, and who was contacted. 
 
Definition of what constitutes source data can be found in a source document agreement at each site. 
There will only be one source document defined at any time for any data element. 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
47 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
10.1.10 Retention of clinical study documentation 
Records and documents, including signed informed consent forms, pertaining to the conduct of this 
study must be retained by the investigator for 15 years after end of study unless local regulations or 
institutional policies require a longer retention period. No records may be destroyed during the 
retention period without the written approval of Novo Nordisk. No records may be transferred to 
another location or party without written notification to Novo Nordisk. 
 
The investigator must be able to access his/her study documents without involving Novo Nordisk in 
any way. If applicable, electronic CRF and other participant data will be provided in an electronic 
readable format to the investigator before access is revoked to the systems supplied by Novo 
Nordisk. Site-specific CRFs and other participant data (in an electronic readable format or as paper 
copies or prints) must be retained by the site. A copy of all data will be stored by Novo Nordisk. 
 
Participant’s medical records must be kept for the maximum period permitted by the hospital, 
institution or private practice. 
 
10.1.11 Study and site closure 
Novo Nordisk reserves the right to close the site or terminate the study at any time for any reason at 
the sole discretion of Novo Nordisk. If the study is suspended or terminated, the investigator must 
inform the participants promptly and ensure appropriate therapy and follow-up. The investigator 
and/or Novo Nordisk must also promptly inform the regulatory authorities and IRBs/IECs and 
provide a detailed written explanation. 
 
Sites will be closed upon study completion. A site is considered closed when all required documents 
and study supplies have been collected and a site closure visit has been performed. 
 
The investigator may initiate site closure at any time, provided there is reasonable cause and 
sufficient notice is given in advance of the intended termination. 
 
Reasons for the early closure of a site by Novo Nordisk or investigator may include but are not 
limited to: 
 failure of the investigator to comply with the protocol, the requirements of the IRB/IEC or local 
health authorities, Novo Nordisk procedures or GCP guidelines
 inadequate recruitment of participants by the investigator
 discontinuation of further study intervention development.
 
 
10.1.12 Responsibilities 
 
The investigator is accountable for the conduct of the study at his/her site and must ensure adequate 
supervision of the conduct of the study at the site. If any tasks are delegated, the investigator must 
maintain a log of appropriately qualified persons to whom he/she has delegated specified study- 
related duties. The investigator must ensure that there is adequate and documented training for all 
staff participating in the conduct of the study. It is the investigator’s responsibility to supervise the 
conduct of the study and to protect the rights, safety, and well-being of the participants. 
 
A qualified physician, who is an investigator or a sub investigator for the study, must be responsible 
for all study-related medical decisions. 
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
48 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
The investigator is responsible for filing essential documents (i.e., those documents which 
individually and collectively permit evaluation of the conduct of a study and the quality of the data 
produced) in the investigator trial master file. The documents, including the participant 
identification code list must be kept in a secure locked facility so that no unauthorised persons can 
get access to the data. 
 
The investigator will take all necessary technical and organisational safety measures to prevent 
accidental or wrongful destruction, loss or deterioration of data. The investigator will prevent any 
unauthorised access to data or any other processing of data against applicable law. This also 
includes ensuring that no indirect sharing of user credentials for IT systems used in this study takes 
place (e.g., by not sharing IT equipment with others in a way where user credentials have the 
possibility of being shared). The investigator must be able to provide the necessary information or 
otherwise demonstrate to Novo Nordisk that such technical and organisational safety measures have 
been taken. 
 
During any period of unavailability, the investigator must delegate responsibility for medical care of 
participants to a specific qualified physician who will be readily available to participants during that 
time. 
 
If the investigator is no longer able to fulfil the role as investigator (e.g., if he/she moves or retires), 
a new investigator will be appointed in consultation with Novo Nordisk. 
 
The investigator and other site personnel must have sufficient English skills according to their 
assigned task(s). 
 
10.1.13 Indemnity statement 
 
 
Novo Nordisk carries product liability for its products, and liability as assumed under the special 
laws, acts and/or guidelines for conducting clinical studies in any country, unless others have shown 
negligence. 
 
Novo Nordisk assumes no liability in the event of negligence or any other liability of the sites or 
investigators conducting the study or by persons for whom the said site or investigator are 
responsible. 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
49 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
 
 
 
 
10.1.14 Publication policy 
 
The information obtained during the conduct of this study is considered confidential and may be 
used by or on behalf of Novo Nordisk for regulatory purposes as well as for the general 
development of the study intervention. All information supplied by Novo Nordisk in connection 
with this study shall remain the sole property of Novo Nordisk and is to be considered confidential 
information. 
 
No confidential information shall be disclosed to others without prior written consent from Novo 
Nordisk. Such information shall not be used except in the performance of this study. 
 
The information obtained during this study may be made available to other investigators who are 
conducting other clinical studies with the study intervention, if deemed necessary by Novo Nordisk. 
Provided that certain conditions are fulfilled, Novo Nordisk may grant access to information 
obtained during this study to researchers who require access for research projects studying the same 
or related diseases and/or study intervention studied in this study. 
 
Novo Nordisk may publish on its clinical studies website a redacted CSR for this study. 
 
One investigator will be appointed by Novo Nordisk to review and sign the CSR 
(signatory investigator) on behalf of all participating investigators. 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
50 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
10.1.14.1 
Communication of results 
Novo Nordisk commits to communicate and disclose results of studies regardless of outcome. 
Disclosure includes publication of a manuscript in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, abstract 
submission with a poster or oral presentation at a scientific meeting or disclosure by other means. 
 
The results of this study will be subject to public disclosure on external web sites according to 
international and national regulations. Novo Nordisk reserves the right to defer the release of data 
until specified milestones are reached, for example when the CSR is available. This includes the 
right not to release the results of interim analyses, because the release of such information may 
influence the results of the entire study. 
 
At the end of the study, one or more scientific publications may be prepared collaboratively by the 
investigator(s) and Novo Nordisk. Novo Nordisk reserves the right to postpone publication and/or 
communication for up to 60 days to protect intellectual property. 
 
In all cases, the study results will be reported in an objective, accurate, balanced and complete 
manner, with a discussion of the strengths and limitations. In the event of any disagreement on the 
content of any publication, both the investigators’ and Novo Nordisk opinions will be fairly and 
sufficiently represented in the publication. 
 
10.1.14.2 
Authorship 
Novo Nordisk will work with one or more investigator(s) and other experts who have contributed to 
the study concept or design, acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data to report the results in one 
or more publications. 
 
Authorship of publications should be in accordance with the Recommendations for the Conduct, 
Reporting, Editing and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals by the International 
Committee of Medical Journal Editors.18 
 
All authors will be provided with the relevant statistical tables, figures, and reports needed to 
evaluate the planned publication. 
 
Where required by the journal, the investigator from each site will be named in an 
acknowledgement or in the supplementary material, as specified by the journal. 
 
10.1.14.3 
Site-specific publication(s) by investigator(s) 
 
 
For a multicentre clinical study, analyses based on single-site data usually have significant 
statistical limitations and frequently do not provide meaningful information for healthcare 
professionals or participants, and therefore may not be supported by Novo Nordisk. Thus, Novo 
Nordisk may deny a request or ask for deferment of the publication of individual site results until 
the primary manuscript is accepted for publication. In line with Good Publication Practice, such 
individual reports should not precede the primary manuscript and should always reference the 
primary manuscript of the study. 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
51 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
10.1.14.4 
Investigator access to data and review of results 
As owner of the study database, Novo Nordisk has the discretion to determine who will have access 
to the database. 
 
Individual investigators will have their own research participants’ data.
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
52 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
10.2 
Appendix 2: Clinical laboratory tests 
 
The laboratory analyses will be performed by the local laboratories. 
 
Laboratory samples include both urine (first morning urine) and blood samples. The specific clinical 
laboratory tests performed during the study are summarised in Table 6 and Table 7. For details 
regarding specific timing of each sample, refer to the study flowchart in section 1.2. 
  
Review of the laboratory reports will be documented either on the front page of the documents or in the 
subject's medical record. The signed documents will be retained at the site as source documentation. 
 
For laboratory report values outside the reference range, the investigator has to specify whether the 
value was clinically significant or clinically non-significant. All laboratory printouts has to be signed 
and dated by the investigator on the day of evaluation. The signed laboratory report will be retained at 
the site as source documentation. 
 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
53 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
 
Table 6 
Protocol-required efficacy laboratory assessments 
 
Laboratory assessments 
Parameters 
Glucose metabolism 
 
HbA1c (%) 
 
Fasting plasma glucosea (mg/dL) 
Lipids 
 
Cholesterol (mg/dL) 
 
High density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (mg/dL) 
 
Low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (mg/dL) 
 
Triglycerides (mg/dL) 
NOTES: 
aAn FPG result </≤ 3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) in relation to planned fasting visits should not be reported as a 
hypoglycaemic episode but as an AE at the discretion of the investigator (Appendix 3, Section 10.3). 
 
A FPG result >16.7 mmol/L (300 mg/dL) should not be reported as a hyperglycaemic episode but as an AE at the 
discretion of the investigator (Appendix 3, Section 10.3). 
Table 7 
Protocol-required safety laboratory assessments 
 
Laboratory 
assessments 
Parameters 
Biochemistrya 
 
Alanine Aminotransferase/ALT (U/L) 
 
Alkaline phosphatase/AP(U/L) 
 
Aspartate Aminotransferase/AST (U/L) 
 
Gamma Glutamyl Transferase/GGT (U/L) 
 
Bilirubin (mg/dL) 
 
Calcium (mg/dL) 
 
Urea (mg/dL) 
 
Albumin (g/dL) 
 
Total protein (g/dL) 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
54 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
Pregnancy Testingc 
 
Highly sensitive serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) pregnancy 
test 
Other tests 
 
 
Creatinine (mg/dL) (including eGFR using MDRD formula) 
 
Urine Albumin to creatinine ratio (mg/g)  
Notes: 
aDetails of required actions and follow-up assessments for increased liver parameters including any discontinuation 
criteria are given in Appendix 3 (Section 10.3) (Hy’s Law) and Section 7.1. 
cFor women of childbearing potential, as needed, serum testing is required. 
 
 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
55 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
10.3 
Appendix 3: Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events: Definitions and procedures 
for recording, evaluating, follow-up, and reporting 
 
10.3.1 
Definition of AE 
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant that is temporally 
associated with the use of IMP, whether or not considered related to the IMP.  
An AE can therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory 
finding), symptom or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a IMP. 
 
Events to be reported as AEs: 
 Any abnormal laboratory test results or safety assessments considered clinically significant in 
the medical and scientific judgment of the investigator, including events that have worsened 
from prior to the time point from which AEs are collected
 Conditions detected or diagnosed after IMP administration even though it may have been 
present prior to the time point from which AEs are collected
 Exacerbation/worsening of a chronic or intermittent condition including either an increase in 
frequency and/or intensity of the condition
 Signs, symptoms or the clinical sequelae of a suspected drug-drug interaction
 Signs, symptoms or the clinical sequelae of a suspected overdose of IMP regardless of intent
 A ‘lack of efficacy’ or ‘failure of expected pharmacological action’ constitutes an AE or SAE. 
Also, the signs, symptoms and/or clinical sequelae resulting from lack of efficacy will be reported 
as AE or SAE if they fulfil the definition.
 
Events NOT to be reported as AEs: 
 Conditions present prior to the time point from which AEs are collected and anticipated day-to- 
day fluctuations of these conditions. This includes those conditions identified during screening 
or identified during other study procedures performed before exposure to IMP.
Note: Conditions present or occurring prior to the time point from which AEs are collected 
should be recorded as concomitant illness/medical history. 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
56 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
 Medical or surgical procedures (e.g., endoscopy, appendectomy). The condition that leads to the 
procedure is the AE.
 Medical or surgical procedures not preceded by an AE or worsening of a known condition.
 
10.3.2 
Definition of an SAE 
An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that fulfils at least one of the following criteria: 
 Results in death
 Is life-threatening
 The term ‘life-threatening’ refers to an event in which the participant was at risk of death at 
the time of the event. It does not refer to an event which hypothetically might have caused 
death, if it were more severe. 
 Requires inpatient hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation
 Hospitalisation signifies that the participant has been admitted at the hospital or emergency 
ward for observation and/or treatment that would not have been appropriate in the 
physician’s office or outpatient setting. Complications that occur during hospitalisation are 
AEs. If a complication prolongs hospitalisation or fulfils any other seriousness criteria, the 
event is serious. When in doubt as to whether ‘hospitalisation’ occurred or was necessary, 
the AE should be considered serious. 
 Hospitalisation for elective treatment (e.g., elective medical or surgical procedures) of a 
condition that was present prior to the time point from which AEs are collected, and that did 
not worsen, is not considered an AE. 
Note: Hospitalisations for administrative, study-related, social and convenience reasons do 
not constitute AEs and should therefore not be reported as AEs or SAEs. Hospital admissions 
for medical or surgical procedures, planned before study inclusion, are not considered AEs 
or SAEs 
 Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity
 The term ‘disability’ means a substantial disruption of a person’s ability to conduct normal 
life functions. This definition is not intended to include experience of relatively minor 
medical significance, such as uncomplicated headache, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, 
influenza, and accidental trauma (e.g., sprained ankle), that may interfere with or prevent 
everyday life functions but do not constitute a substantial disruption. 
 Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect
 Important medical event:
 Medical or scientific judgment should be exercised by the investigator in deciding whether 
SAE reporting is appropriate in other situations. This includes important medical events that 
may not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalisation but may 
jeopardise the participant or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of 
the other outcomes listed in the above definition. These events should usually be considered 
serious and reported as SAEs using the important medical event criterion. 
 The following must be reported as an SAE using the important medical event criterion if no 
other seriousness criteria are applicable: 
o Suspicion of transmission of infectious agents via IMP 
o Risk of liver injury defined as alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or asparate 
aminotransferase (AST) >3x UNL and total bilirubin >2x UNL where no alternative 
aetiology exists (Hy’s law) 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
57 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
 
 
 
10.3.3 
Description of AEs requiring additional data collection and other events 
requiring collection of additional information 
 
Adverse events requiring additional data collection 
 
An AE requiring additional data collection is an AE where Novo Nordisk has evaluated that 
additional data is needed in the evaluation of safety. 
 
Medication error: 
 A medication error is an unintended failure in the IMP treatment process that leads to, or has the 
potential to lead to, harm to the participant, such as:
 administration of wrong drug 
 wrong route of administration, such as intramuscular instead of subcutaneous
 accidental administration of a lower or higher dose than intended. The administered dose 
must deviate from the intended dose to an extent where clinical consequences for the study 
participant were likely to happen as judged by the investigator, although they did not 
necessarily occur.
 
 
Misuse and abuse: 
 Situations where the IMP is intentionally and inappropriately used not in accordance with the 
protocol (e.g., overdose to maximise effect)
 Persistent or sporadic, intentional excessive use of an IMP which is accompanied by harmful 
physical or psychological effects (e.g., overdose with the intention to cause harm)
 
 
Note: Medication error, misuse and abuse must always be reported on an AE form and a specific 
event form must be completed. The AE diagnosis on the AE form must reflect what occurred (e.g., 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
58 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
accidental overdose, intentional overdose or other). If the medication error and/or misuse and abuse 
resulted in a clinical consequence, this must be reported on an additional AE form. 
 
Other events requiring collection of additional information 
 
Hypoglycaemic episodes 
 
All hypoglycaemic episodes must be recorded on a hypoglycaemic episode form. If the 
hypoglycaemic episode fulfills the criteria for an SAE, then in addition to the hypoglycaemic 
episode form, an AE form and a safety information form must be filled in. One AE form and safety 
information form can cover several hypoglycaemic episode forms, if the participant  has not 
recovered between the episodes. 
 
10.3.4 
Recording and follow-up of AE and/or SAE 
 
10.3.4.1 
AE and SAE recording 
The investigator will record all relevant AE/SAE information in the CRF. 
 
The investigator will attempt to establish a diagnosis of the event based on signs, symptoms, and/or 
other clinical information. In such cases, the diagnosis (not the individual signs/symptoms) will be 
documented as the AE/SAE. 
 
When an AE/SAE occurs, it is the responsibility of the investigator to review all documentation 
(e.g., hospital progress notes, laboratory and diagnostics reports) related to the event. 
 
There may be instances when copies of source documents (e.g., medical records) for certain cases 
are requested by Novo Nordisk. In such cases, all participant identifiers, with the exception of the 
subject ID, must be redacted on the copies of the source documents before submission to Novo 
Nordisk. 
 
For all non-serious AEs, the applicable forms should be signed when the event is resolved or at the 
end of the study at the latest. For sign-off of SAE-related forms, refer to “AE and SAE reporting via 
paper CRF” later in this section. 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
59 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
Novo Nordisk products used as concomitant medication: if an AE is considered to have a causal 
relationship with a Novo Nordisk marketed product used as concomitant medication in the study, it 
is important that the suspected relationship is reported to Novo Nordisk, e.g., in the alternative 
aetiology section on the safety information form. Novo Nordisk may need to report this adverse 
event to relevant regulatory authorities 
 
10.3.4.2 
Assessment of severity 
The investigator will assess severity for each event reported during the study and assign it to one of 
the following categories: 
 Mild: An event that is easily tolerated by the participant, causing minimal discomfort and not 
interfering with everyday activities.
 Moderate: An event that causes sufficient discomfort and interferes with normal everyday 
activities.
 Severe: An event that prevents normal everyday activities.
Note: An AE that is assessed as severe should not be confused with an SAE. Both AEs and 
SAEs can be assessed as severe. 
 
10.3.4.3 
Assessment of causality 
The investigator is obligated to assess the relationship between IMP and the occurrence of each 
AE/SAE. The investigator will use clinical judgment to determine the relationship. 
 
Relationship between an AE/SAE and the relevant IMP should be assessed as: 
 Probable - Good reason and sufficient documentation to assume a causal relationship.
 Possible - A causal relationship is conceivable and cannot be dismissed.
 Unlikely - The event is most likely related to aetiology other than the IMP.
 
 
Alternative aetiology, such as underlying disease(s), concomitant medication, and other risk factors, 
as well as the temporal relationship of the event to IMP administration, should be considered and 
investigated. 
 
The investigator should use the product information, for marketed  products, for the assessment. 
For each AE/SAE, the investigator must document in the medical records that he/she has 
reviewed the AE/SAE and has provided an assessment of causality. 
 
There may be situations in which an SAE has occurred, and the investigator has minimal 
information to include in the initial report. However, it is important that the investigator always 
makes an assessment of causality for every event before the initial transmission of the SAE 
data. 
 
The investigator may change his/her opinion of causality, in light of follow-up information, and 
update the causality assessment in the CRF. 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
60 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
The causality assessment is one of the criteria used when determining regulatory reporting 
requirements 
 
10.3.4.4 
Final outcome 
The investigator will select the most appropriate outcome: 
 Recovered/resolved: The participant has fully recovered, or by medical or surgical treatment 
the condition has returned to the level observed when first documented
 Recovering/resolving: The condition is improving, and the participant is expected to recover 
from the event. This term may also be applicable for AEs ongoing at the time of death (where 
death was due to another AE).
Note: For SAEs, this term is only applicable if the participant has completed the follow-up 
period and is expected to recover. 
 Recovered/resolved with sequelae: The participant has recovered from the condition but with 
lasting effect due to a disease, injury, treatment or procedure. If a sequela meets an SAE 
criterion, the AE must be reported as an SAE.
 Not recovered/not resolved: The condition of the participant has not improved, and the 
symptoms are unchanged, or the outcome is not known. This term may be applicable in cases of 
chronic conditions, cancer or AEs ongoing at time of death (where death is due to another AE).
 Fatal: This term is only applicable if the participant died from a condition related to the 
reported AE. Outcomes of other reported AEs in a participant before he/she died should be 
assessed as ‘recovered/resolved’, ‘recovering/resolving’, ‘recovered/resolved with sequelae’ or 
‘not recovered/not resolved’. An AE with a fatal outcome must be reported as an SAE.
 Unknown: This term is only applicable if the participant is lost to follow-up
 
10.3.4.5 
Follow-up of AE and SAE 
The investigator is obligated to perform or arrange for the conduct of supplemental measurements 
and/or evaluations as medically indicated or as requested by Novo Nordisk to elucidate the nature 
and/or causality of the AE or SAE as fully as possible (e.g., severe hypersensitivity reactions, Hy’s 
law). This may include additional laboratory tests or investigations, histopathological examinations, 
or consultation with other health care professionals. 
 
If a participant dies during participation in the study or during a recognised follow-up period, the 
investigator should, upon request, provide Novo Nordisk with a copy of the autopsy report 
including histopathology.  
 
In case an autopsy was not performed, the investigator should provide Novo Nordisk with a death 
certificate instead 
 
New or updated information should be recorded in the CRF. 
 
10.3.5 
Reporting of SAEs 
 
AE and SAE reporting via CRF 
Relevant forms must be completed in the eCRF and paper forms. 
 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
61 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
The relevant CRF forms (AE and safety information forms) must be forwarded to Novo Nordisk or 
to the corresponding CRO in accordance with Section 10.1.5. 
 
After the study is completed, the study database will be locked, and the CRF will be 
decommissioned to prevent the entry of new data or changes to existing data. If a site receives a 
report of a new SAE from a participant or receives updated information on a previously reported 
SAE after CRF decommission, the site can report this information on a paper AE and safety 
information form (see below). 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
62 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
Figure 2 
Decision tree for determining the event type and the respective forms to 
complete with associated timelines 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Serious 
Yes 
AE form ≤ 24 hours 
 
 
 
(For SAEs: 
≤ 14 calendar days) 
AE identified
Non-serious
 
   
 
Yes 
No 
AE Form    
action
non-serious? 
 
No 
 
 
action 
 
 
 
 
 
5 working days (see
Appendix 1) 
 
additional data 
collection? 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
63 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contact details for SAE reporting can be found in the investigator trial master file. 
 
10.4 
Appendix 4: Contraceptive guidance and collection of pregnancy information 
 
 
10.4.1 
Definitions 
 
Woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) 
A woman is considered fertile following menarche and until becoming postmenopausal unless 
permanently sterile. 
If fertility is unclear (e.g., amenorrhea in adolescents or athletes), and a menstrual cycle cannot be 
confirmed before first dose of study intervention, additional evaluation should be considered. 
 
Females in the following categories are not considered WOCBP 
1. Premenarcheal 
2. Females with one or more of the following: 
 
Documented total hysterectomy 
 
Documented bilateral salpingectomy 
 
Documented bilateral oophorectomy 
For females with permanent infertility due to an alternate medical cause other than the above 
(e.g., Müllerian agenesis, androgen insensitivity), investigator discretion should be applied in 
determining study enrolment. 
3. Postmenopausal female: 
 A postmenopausal state is defined as amenorrhoea for at least 12 months without an 
alternative medical cause in a female > 45 years of age. Alternative medical causes for 
amenorrhoea include, but are not limited to, hormonal contraception or hormonal 
replacement therapy. 
 Females ≥ 60 years of age can be considered postmenopausal. 
 
 
Females on HRT and whose menopausal status is in doubt are considered of childbearing potential 
and will be required to use one of the highly effective contraception methods. 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
64 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
Note: Documentation regarding categories 1-3 can come from the site staff’s review of 
participant’s medical records, medical examination or medical history interview. 
 
10.4.2 
Contraceptive guidance 
 
Male participants 
 
No  contraception measures are needed for male participants. 
 
 
Female participants 
Female participants of childbearing potential are eligible to participate if they agree to use 
methods of contraception consistently and correctly. Table 8 lists the highly effective 
methods of contraception allowed.  
 
Highly effective contraception should be utilised for a least 30 days after last dose of IMP 
(corresponding to time during treatment and until the end of relevant systemic exposure).  
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
65 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
Table 8 
Highly effective contraceptive methods allowed19 
 
Highly effective methodsa (Failure rate of <1% per year when used consistently and correctly): 
 Combined (estrogen- and progestogen-containing) hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulationb 
 oral 
 intravaginal 
 transdermal 
 Progestogen-only hormone contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation 
 oral 
 injectable 
 implantable 
 Intrauterine device (IUD) 
 Intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS) 
 Bilateral tubal occlusion 
 Vasectomized partner 
Vasectomized partner is a highly effective contraceptive method provided that the partner is the sole sexual partner 
of the woman of childbearing potential, and the absence of sperm has been confirmed. If not, an additional highly 
effective method of contraception should be used. Spermatogenesis cycle is approximately 90 days. 
 Sexual abstinence 
Sexual abstinence is considered a highly effective method only if defined as refraining from heterosexual 
intercourse during the entire period of risk associated with the study intervention. The reliability of sexual 
abstinence needs to be evaluated in relation to the duration of the study and the preferred and usual lifestyle of the 
participant. 
NOTES 
a. 
Contraceptive use by men or women should comply with local regulations regarding the use of contraceptive 
methods for those participating in clinical studies. 
 
The following methods are not acceptable methods of contraception: Periodic abstinence (calendar, 
symptothermal, post-ovulation methods), withdrawal (coitus interruptus), spermicides only, and 
lactational amenorrhoea method (LAM). 
 
10.4.3 
Collection of pregnancy information 
Female participants who become pregnant 
Investigator will collect pregnancy information on any female participant who becomes 
pregnant while participating in this study. 
 
Information will be recorded on the appropriate form and submitted to Novo Nordisk within 
14 calendar days of learning of a participant’s pregnancy (see Table 7). 
 
 
 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
66 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
The participant will be followed to determine the outcome of the pregnancy. The investigator will 
collect follow-up information on participant and neonate which will be forwarded to Novo 
Nordisk within 14 calendar days. Generally, follow-up will not be required for longer than 1 
month beyond the delivery date. 
 
Any termination of pregnancy will be reported, regardless of foetal status (presence or absence 
of anomalies) or indication for procedure. 
 
While pregnancy itself is not considered to be an AE or SAE, any adverse event in connection 
with pregnancy or elective termination of a pregnancy for medical reasons will be reported as an 
AE or SAE. If relevant, consider adding ‘gestational’, ‘pregnancy-related’ or a similar term when 
reporting the AE/SAE. 
 
Pregnancy outcome should be documented in the participant’s medical record. Abnormal 
pregnancy outcome (e.g., spontaneous abortion, foetal death, stillbirth, congenital anomalies and 
ectopic pregnancy) is considered an SAE. In case of abnormal pregnancy outcome, paternal 
information should be recorded in the appropriate form after obtaining the necessary signed 
paternal informed consent. 
 
If the investigator learns of an SAE occurring as a result of a post-study pregnancy which is 
considered related to the IMP by the investigator, the SAE should be reported to Novo Nordisk 
as described in Appendix 3 (Section 10.3.) 
 
Figure 3 
Decision tree for determining the forms to complete for collection of 
pregnancy information and timelines for reporting – For female participants 
 
 
 
 
Any female participant who becomes pregnant while participating in the study will 
discontinue study intervention. 
 
Generally, follow-up will be 1 month following the delivery date. 
 
 
 
≤ 14 calendar days 
 
For female participants 
Prior to 
birth or     
pregnancy 
termination 
≤ 14 calendar days after birth
Normal outcome
*1 Further information collected on Paternal form for male partners of 
female participants requires signing of specific informed consent. 
 
AE/SAEs in connection with the pregnancy and in the foetus/newborn 
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
67 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
10.5 
Appendix 5: Technical complaints: Definition and procedures for recording, evaluation, 
follow-up and reporting 
 
10.5.1 
Definition of technical complaint 
A technical complaint is any written, electronic or oral communication that alleges product (medicine 
or device) defects. The technical complaint may be associated with an AE but does not concern the AE 
itself. 
 
Examples of technical complaints: 
 Problems with the physical or chemical appearance of study interventions (e.g., discoloration, 
particles, or contamination) 
 Problems with packaging material including labelling 
 Problems related to devices (e.g., to the injection mechanism, dose setting mechanism, push button 
or interface between the pen-injector and the needle) 
 
Time period for detecting technical complaints 
All technical complaints which occur from the time of receipt of the product at site until the time of the 
last usage of the product must be collected for products predefined on the technical complaint form. 
 
10.5.2 
Recording and follow-up of technical complaints 
 
Reporting of technical complaints to Novo Nordisk 
Please refer to instruction page for technical complaint form. 
 
 
Timelines for reporting technical complaints to Novo Nordisk 
 
The investigator must complete the technical complaint form in the CRF within: 
 
 24 hours if related to an SAE 
 
 
 
Follow-up of technical complaints 
The investigator is responsible for ensuring that new or updated information will be recorded on the 
originally completed form. 
 
 
Collection, storage and shipment of technical complaint samples  
 
The investigator will collect the technical complaint sample and all associated parts available  and 
notify the monitor within five calendar days of obtaining the sample at trial site. Novo Nordisk Chile 
affiliate will ensure that the sample is sent  to Customer Complaint Center, Novo Nordisk A/S as soon 
as possible. A copy of the technical complaint form has to be sent with the sample for identification 
purpose. 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
68 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
If the technical complaint sample is unobtainable, the investigator has to specify on the technical 
complaint form why it was unobtainable. 
 
Storage of the technical complaint sample has to be done in accordance with the conditions prescribed 
for the product.  
 
 
10.6 
Appendix 6: Hypoglycaemic episodes 
 
Table 9 
Classification of hypoglycaemia 
 
Classification of hypoglycaemia 
Level 
Glycaemic criteria 
Description 
Hypoglycaemia alert 
value (level 1) 
< 3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) 
and 
≥ 3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL)
Sufficiently low for treatment with fast-acting 
carbohydrate and dose adjustment of glucose-
lowering therapy
Clinically significant 
hypoglycaemia (level 2)
< 3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL) Sufficiently low to indicate serious, clinically 
important hypoglycaemia 
Severe hypoglycaemia 
(level 3)1 
No specific glucose 
threshold 
1Hypoglycaemia associated with severe 
cognitive impairment requiring external 
assistance for recovery
Notes: The Novo Nordisk terms are adapted from IHSG,20 ADA,21 type 1 diabetes outcomes 
program,22 ATTD.23 Severe hypoglycaemia as defined by Seaquist24 . 
 
 
Severe hypoglycaemia 
 
Severe hypoglycaemia is an event requiring assistance of another person to actively administer 
carbohydrates, glucagon, or take other corrective actions. Plasma glucose concentrations may not be 
available during an event, but neurological recovery following the return of plasma glucose to normal 
is considered sufficient evidence that the event was induced by a low plasma glucose concentration.24 
 
Nocturnal hypoglycaemia 
 
Nocturnal hypoglycaemic episodes: episodes occurring between 00:01 and 05:59 both inclusive. 
 
Reporting of hypoglycaemic episodes 
 
All hypoglycaemic episodes must be recorded on a hypoglycaemic episode form. If the hypoglycaemic 
episode fulfils the criteria for an SAE, then in addition to the hypoglycaemic episode form, an AE form 
and a safety information form must be filled in. One AE form and safety information form can cover 
several hypoglycaemic episode forms, if the participant  has not recovered between the episodes. 
 
Reporting of hypoglycaemic episodes by BG meters: 
Plasma glucose (PG) should always be recorded in the eCRF when a hypoglycaemic   episode is 
suspected. 
 
When a participant experiences a hypoglycaemic episode, the participant should record the  
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
69 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
general information in relation to the hypoglycaemia (timing, PG measurements, symptoms, etc.) in 
the diary (paper notebook delivered to each participant for registers). The investigator should ensure 
correct reporting of the hypoglycaemic episode and report the hypoglycaemic episode to the CRF. In 
case a participant is not able to fill in the diary (e.g., in case of hospitalisation), the investigator should 
still report the hypoglycaemic episode on the hypoglycaemic episodes form. 
 
Upon onset of a hypoglycaemic episode the participant is recommended to measure PG every 15 
minutes until the PG value is ≥3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) and/or symptoms have been resolved in 
accordance with current guidelines.24 
 
Repeated PG measurements and/or symptoms will by default be considered as one hypoglycaemic 
episode until a succeeding PG value is ≥ 3.9 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) and/or symptoms have been resolved 
and should be reported as only one hypoglycaemic episode. In case of several low PG values within 
the hypoglycaemic episode, the lowest value is the one that will be reported as the PG value for the 
hypoglycaemic episode, but the start time of the episode will remain as the time for the first low PG 
value and/or symptom. The remaining values will be kept as source data. 
 
If the severity of a hypoglycaemic episode changes, only one hypoglycaemic episode will be reported, 
reflecting the most severe degree of hypoglycaemia. 
 
Regarding the question: “To feel better, did you need help to get a sugary drink, food, or medicine?” 
the investigator must instruct the participants to answer “Yes”, if the episode was an event that 
required assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or take other 
corrective actions. PG concentrations may not be available during an event, but neurological recovery 
following the return of PG to normal is considered sufficient evidence that the event was induced by a 
low PG concentration.24 
 
Additional information (e.g., description of symptoms, alleviation of symptoms, seizure or coma) in 
relation to severe hypoglycaemic episodes must be recorded in the  hypoglycaemic episode eCRF. 
 
Diary review 
 
At each contact the investigator must review the diary data for correct reporting of PG values and 
hypoglycaemic episodes. In case of incomplete or incorrect data in the diary, the participant must be 
questioned whether there have been any severe hypoglycaemic episodes since the last visit and report 
accordingly. 
 
For low PG values for hypoglycaemic episodes with incomplete reporting  information: 
1. If a hypoglycaemic episode form in the diary is not completed by the participant within 7 calendar 
days of the PG measurement, the episode should be described in the source documents and reported by 
the investigator on a hypoglycaemic episode eCRF with as much information as possible. If the 
participant did not need help to get a sugary drink, food, or medicine, Novo Nordisk will only ask for 
start date due to recall bias.25, 26 
 
 
Re-training of participants 
 
The participant must be re-trained in how to report hypoglycaemic episodes if the investigator 
identifies low PG values not reported as hypoglycaemic episodes. The training should be documented 
by the investigator in source documents. 
 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
70 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
 
10.7 
Appendix 7: Hyperglycaemic episodes 
Plasma glucose (PG) should always be measured and recorded when a hyperglycaemic episode is 
suspected. 
 
A hyperglycaemic episode is defined as PG values >16.7 mmol/L (300 mg/dL).  
All hyperglycaemic episodes should be reported according to instruction below. When a participant 
experiences a hyperglycaemic episode, participant/investigator should record the general information 
in relation to the hyperglycaemia (timing, PG measurements, symptoms, etc.). In case a participant is 
not able to fill in the diary (e.g., in case of hospitalisation or at the ‘follow-up phone contact’), then 
investigator should report the hyperglycaemic episode in the CRF. 
 
Repeated PG measurements occurring within a period of 24 hours after onset of a hyperglycaemic 
episode will per default be considered as one hyperglycaemic episode until a succeeding PG value is 
≤16.7 mmol/L (300 mg/dL) and should be reported on one hyperglycaemic episode form. PG 
measurements >16.7 mmol/L (300 mg/dL) after the 24 hours period shall trigger reporting of a new 
hyperglycaemia episode. One AE form and safety information form can cover several hyperglycaemic 
episode forms if the participant has not recovered between the episodes. 
 
In case of several high PG values within the 24 hours interval, the highest value for PG  is the one that 
will be reported as the PG value for the hyperglycaemic episode; but the start time of the episode will 
remain as the time for the first high PG value. 
 
The investigator must review the diary data for correct reporting of hyperglycaemic episodes. High PG 
values not having a hyperglycaemic episode form completed within 7 calendar days since the PG 
measurement should be reported on a hyperglycaemic episode form with as much information as 
possible. Novo Nordisk will not query for additional data, except for the date and PG value due to 
decreased validity of such data.25, 26  
 
The participant must be re-trained in how to report hyperglycaemic episodes if the investigator 
identifies high PG and/or ketone values not reported as part of a hyperglycaemic episode. 
 
 
 
 
10.8 
Appendix 8: Mitigations to ensure participant safety and data integrity during an 
emergency situation 
 
10.8.1 
Definition and scope of appendix 
 
 
A major emergency is defined as a situation that causes substantial restrictions to study site access for 
participants and/or sponsor representatives. 
 
In case local restrictions due to a major emergency lead to lock-down of a site, the site must contact 
Novo Nordisk to allow for implementation of mitigations mentioned in this appendix based on mutual 
agreement. 
 
According to local regulation, health authorities and independent ethics committees should be notified 
in case elements of the emergency appendix are activated. 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
71 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
Sites should always try to follow the assessments outlined in the original flowchart   (Section 1.2) to 
the extent possible. Implementation of specific mitigations should be based on assessment of 
feasibility at the individual site. 
 
Sites should comply with local regulations, requirements and/or guidelines if they are issued. 
 
10.8.2 
Visits 
 
 
Screening (V0) should always be performed as on-site visits. If a site is unable to perform these visits 
on-site, screening of new participants at that site should be on hold until on-site visits are possible. 
 
Visits 0,1,3,4 and 4A should be performed as on-site visits, if in any way possible.  
If the end of intervention visit cannot be performed on-site, the visit window for the assessment can be    
extended for up to 3 months. 
 
At each visit, the investigator must indicate in the CRF how the visit was performed and specify the      
reason for the preferred assessment method. 
 
10.8.3 
Assessments 
 
Assessments used for safety or the confirmatory endpoints should be prioritised. The preferred method 
of assessment is on-site or phone depending on the visit.  
 
Local laboratories or diagnostic facilities can be used for laboratory assesments at the investigator’s 
discretion if on-site visits are not possible or in case of temporary  lockdown of the central laboratory. 
Only findings meeting the definition for an AE (refer to Appendix 3 [Section 10.3]) should be reported 
in the CRF.  
 
10.8.4 
Study intervention 
Alternative dispensing methods of study intervention may be implemented, and details will be 
communicated and documented. The dispensing options will be provided by Novo Nordisk A/S and 
will be based on options and requirements at country level and if permitted by local regulations. 
 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
72 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
10.9 
Appendix 9: Detailed instructions for Adverse Events (AEs) and Technical complaints 
reporting 
Serious adverse events (SAE) 
All SAEs must be collected and reported from first administration of Ozempic® until follow-up 
visit/end of study visit, or whenever, within the mentioned time period the site becomes aware of the 
SAE. 
Sites will fill “NN9535-4844  Adverse Event Form Final” within 24 hours (and any updated SAE data 
within 24 hours of it being available  - on the AE or SIF) and send it to soclin@novonordisk.com 
(SOCLIN) – with cc io-balat-sas-safety@novonordisk.com (Affiliate Pharmacovigilance). Sent the 
paper form in an encrypted manner (via email using WinZip). The encryption password will be 
distributed to the sites.  
Within 5 calendar days of the initial aware date of the event, complete “NN9535-4844  SIF - Safety 
Information Form Final” and send it to soclin@novonordisk.com (SOCLIN) – with cc io-balat-sas-
safety@novonordisk.com (Affiliate Pharmacovigilance). Sent the paper form in an encrypted manner 
(via email using WinZip). 
Both forms (AE form and SIF Form) must be signed within 7 calendar days after first knowledge by 
the investigator and send it to soclin@novonordisk.com (SOCLIN) – with cc io-balat-sas-
safety@novonordisk.com (Affiliate Pharmacovigilance), encrypted using WinZip. 
Enter the information of the paper form in the eCRF as soon as possible. 
If the SAE fulfils the criteria of events which require additional data collection fill eCRF forms for 
Medication error/Misuse and Abuse or Hypoglycaemic episodes within 14 calendar days after first 
knowledge.  
 
Non Serious adverse events  
For all non serious adverse events in which it has been evaluated by the investigator that there is a 
probable or possible causality between the event and the Investigational medicinal product, fill 
“NN9535-4844  Adverse Event Form Final” and sent it within 5 calendar days after first knowledge, to 
io-balat-sas-safety@novonordisk.com (Affiliate Pharmacovigilance). Sent the paper form in an 
encrypted manner (via email using WinZip). 
Enter the information of the paper form in the eCRF as soon as possible. 
For all non serious adverse events in which it has been evaluated by the investigator that there is an 
unlikely causality between the event and the Investigational medicinal product complete Adverse event 
form directly in the eCRF. 
If the non serious adverse event fulfils the criteria of events which require additional data collection fill 
eCRF forms for Medication error/Misuse and Abuse or Hypoglycaemic episodes within 14 calendar 
days after first knowledge. 
 
 
 will send monthly reports of the non-serious adverse events coded to Novo Nordisk 
SafetySurveillance. 
 
Pregnancy information (female participants who become pregnant): 
Fill “NN9535-4844 Pregnancy Form Final” within 14 calendar days after first knowledge and sent it to 
soclin@novonordisk.com (SOCLIN) – with cc io-balat-sas-safety@novonordisk.com (Affiliate 
Pharmacovigilance). Sent the paper form in an encrypted manner (via email using WinZip). 
 
Technical complaints 
Technical complaints on Ozempic® which occur from the first time of usage until the last time of 
usage of the product and which is considered related to an SAE must be reported to Novo Nordisk 
specific technical complaint form (NN9535-4844 Technical Complaints Form Final) 
Fill “NN9535-4844 Technical Complaints Form Final” and sent it to CCC-
clinicaltrials@novonordisk.com  with cc io-balat-sas-safety@novonordisk.com (Affiliate 
Pharmacovigilance) within 24 hours after first knowledge. Sent the paper form in an encrypted manner  
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
73 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
(via email using WinZip).  
Enter the information of the paper form in the eCRF as soon as possible. 
 
Technical complaints on Ozempic® not related to an SAE, need to be reported to Novo Nordisk 
Affiliate via the spontaneous reporting system within 5 calendar days after first knowledge. Send a 
mail to io-balat-sas-safety@novonordisk.com (Affiliate Pharmacovigilance) with the description of the 
complaint, patient ID, product name and batch number. 
Separate the complaint´s sample from the other products and identify it with the code that the Novo 
Nordisk affiliate will give. 
Novo Nordisk affiliate will recollect and send complaints samples to Customer Complaint center. 
 
 
 
 
 
Signatures 
On behalf of Investigator´s Site 
 
 
 
Date: 
 
 
By:  
Title:  
Site:  
 
On behalf of NOVO NORDISK 
FARMACEUTICA LTDA.: 
 
 
Date: 
 
 
By:  
 
Title:  
 
 
 
 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
74 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
10.10 Appendix 10: Abbreviations 
 
ADA 
American Diabetes Association 
ADE 
adverse device effect 
AE 
adverse event 
AESI 
adverse event of special interest 
ALT 
alanine aminotransferase 
AST 
aspartate aminotransferase 
ATTD 
Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes 
BG 
blood glucose 
COA 
clinical outcome assessment 
CRF 
case report form 
CRO 
contract research organisation 
CSR 
clinical study report 
CTFG 
clinical trial facilitation group 
CVOT 
cardiovascular outcome trial 
DFU 
directions for use 
DMC 
Data Monitoring Committee 
DNA 
deoxyribonucleic acid 
DPS 
data points set 
DRE 
disease related event 
DUN 
dispensing unit number 
EAC 
Event Adjudication Committee 
EAS 
event adjudication system 
ECG 
electrocardiogram 
eCRF 
electronic case report form 
FAS 
full analysis set 
FDA 
U.S. Food and Drug Administration 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
75 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
FDAAA 
FDA Amendments Act 
FPG 
fasting plasma glucose 
FSH 
follicle-stimulating hormone 
GCP 
Good Clinical Practice 
HbA1c 
glycated haemoglobin 
HIV 
Human Immunodeficiency Virus 
HRT 
hormone replacement therapy 
IB 
investigator’s brochure 
ICE 
intercurrent event 
ICH 
International Council for Harmonisation 
IEC 
independent ethics committee 
IHSG 
The International Hypoglycaemia Study Group 
IMP 
investigational medicinal product 
IND 
investigational new drug 
IRB 
institutional review board 
ISO 
International Organization for Harmonization 
ISPAD 
International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes 
IWRS 
interactive web response system 
LAR 
legally acceptable representative 
LDL 
low-density lipoprotein 
MDR 
Medical Device Regulation 
NIMP 
non-investigational medicinal product 
PAS 
participant analysis set 
PCD 
primary completion date 
PG 
plasma glucose 
PRO 
patient reported outcome 
RNA 
ribonucleic acid 
SADE 
serious adverse device effect 
SAE 
serious adverse event 
SAP 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
SMPG 
self-measured plasma glucose 
SUSAR 
suspected unexpected serious adverse reaction 
TMM 
Trial Materials Manual 
USADE 
Unanticipated serious adverse device effect 
WOCBP 
woman of childbearing potential 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
76 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
10.11 Appendix 11: Protocol amendment history 
The Protocol amendment summary of changes table for the current protocol version is located 
directly before the table of contents. 
 
 
Protocol version X, including version(s) Y and Z: (date), global/country 
 
This amendment is considered to be substantial/non-substantial based on the criteria set forth in 
Article 10(a) of Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of the European 
Union, for non-substantial amendments, include: because it neither significantly impacts the safety 
or physical/mental integrity of participants nor the scientific value of the study. 
 
Overall rationale for preparing protocol version X 
 
Section # and name 
Description of change 
Brief rationale 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
77 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
11 References 
 
 
1. 
World Health Organization. (2018). Noncommunicable Diseases Country Proﬁles 2018. 
World Health Organization. 
2. 
Marso, Steven P et al. “Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 
Diabetes.” The New England journal of medicine vol. 375,19 (2016): 1834-1844. 
doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1607141 
3. 
Margozzini, P., & Passi, Álvaro. (2018). Encuesta Nacional de Salud, ENS 2016-2017: un 
aporte a la planificación sanitaria y políticas públicas en Chile. ARS MEDICA Revista De 
Ciencias Médicas, 43(1), 30–34. 
4. 
Jiang, Y., Liu, J., Chen, X. et al. Efficacy and Safety of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor 
Agonists for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Network Meta-analysis. Adv 
Ther 38, 1470–1482 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01637-6 
5. 
Trujillo, J. Safety and tolerability of once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonists in type 2 
diabetes. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2020; 45(Suppl 1): 43– 60. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.13225 
6. 
Marso SP, Daniels GH, Brown-Frandsen K, et al. Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes 
in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:311–322. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1603827. 
7. 
Gerstein, Hertzel C et al. “Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes 
(REWIND): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial.” Lancet (London, 
England) vol. 394,10193 (2019): 121-130. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31149-3 
8. 
Folleto de información al profesional Ozempic solución inyectable 2 mg/ 1,5 mL. Instituto 
de Salud Pública de Chile. Available at: 
http://www.ispch.cl/sites/default/files/monografias/octubre2019/B-2774-19.pdf. 
Last accessed august 2021 
9. 
Folleto de información al profesional Ozempic solución inyectable 4 mg/ 3 mL. Instituto de 
Salud Pública de Chile. Available at: 
https://www.ispch.cl/sites/default/files/monografias/octubre2019/B-2775-19.pdf. 
Last accessed august 2021 
10. 
Clarke WL, Cox DJ, Gonder-Frederick LA, Julian D, Schlundt D, Polonsky W. Reduced 
awareness of hypoglycemia in adults with IDDM. A prospective study of hypoglycemic 
frequency and associated symptoms. Diabetes Care. 1995;18(4):517-22. 
11. 
World Medical Association. WMA Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical Principles for Medical 
Research Involving Human Subjects. Last amended by the 64th WMA General Assembly, 
Fortaleza, Brazil. October 2013. 
12. 
ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Guideline for Good Clinical Practice E6(R2), 
Current step 4 version. 09 Nov 2016. 
13. 
De Angelis C, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA, Haug C, Hoey J, Horton R, et al. Clinical trial 
registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. N 
Engl J Med. 2004;351(12):1250-1. 
14. 
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center 
for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). Guidance for Industry. Handling and 
Retention of BA and BE Testing Samples. May 2004. 
15. 
The European Parliament and the Council of the European Council. Directive 
2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the 
approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the member states 
relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on 
medicinal products for human use. 2001. 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL


Protocol Study ID: 
NN 9535-4844 
Date: 
Version: 
Status: 
Page: 
24 February 2022
1.0
Final
78 of 78
Novo Nordisk
 
16. 
The European Parliament and the Council of the European Council. Regulation (EC) No 
726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 laying down 
Community procedures for the authorisation and supervision of medicinal products for 
human and veterinary use and establishing a European Medicines Agency, article 57. 30 
April 2004. 
17. 
The European Parliament and the Council of the European Council. Regulation (EC) No 
1901/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on 
medicinal products for paediatric use and amending Regulation (EEC) No 1768/92, 
Directive 2001/20/EC, Directive 2001/83/EC and Regulation (EC) No 726/2004, article 41. 
Official Journal of the European Communities. 27 Dec 2006. 
18. 
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Recommendations for the Conduct, 
Reporting, Editing and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals; current version 
available at www.icmje.org. 
19. 
Clinical Trial Facilitation Group (CTFG), Heads of Medicines Agency. Recommendations 
related to contraception and pregnancy testing in clinical trials. 21 Sep 2020. 
20. 
International Hypoglycaemia Study Group. Glucose Concentrations of Less Than 3.0 
mmol/L (54 mg/dL) Should Be Reported in Clinical Trials: A Joint Position Statement of 
the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of 
Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(1):155-7. 
21. 
American Diabetes Association. 6. Glycemic Targets: Standards of Medical Care in 
Diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(Suppl 1):S55-S64. 
22. 
Agiostratidou G, Anhalt H, Ball D, Blonde L, Gourgari E, Harriman KN, et al. 
Standardizing Clinically Meaningful Outcome Measures Beyond HbA1c for Type 1 
Diabetes: A Consensus Report of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, 
the American Association of Diabetes Educators, the American Diabetes Association, the 
Endocrine Society, JDRF International, The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable 
Trust, the Pediatric Endocrine Society, and the T1D Exchange. Diabetes Care. 
2017;40(12):1622-30. 
23. 
Danne T, Nimri R, Battelino T, Bergenstal RM, Close KL, DeVries JH, et al. International 
Consensus on Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(12):1631-
40. 
24. 
Seaquist ER, Anderson J, Childs B, Cryer P, Dagogo-Jack S, Fish L, et al. Hypoglycemia 
and diabetes: a report of a workgroup of the American Diabetes Association and the 
Endocrine Society. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(5):1384-95. 
25. 
US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry. Patient-Reported Outcome 
Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. December 
2009. 
26. 
Stull DE, Leidy NK, Parasuraman B, Chassany O. Optimal recall periods for patient- 
reported outcomes: challenges and potential solutions. Curr Med Res Opin. 
2009;25(4):929- 4 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL

SAP_001.pdf: 
Cover Page for Statistical Analysis Plan 
Sponsor name: 
Novo Nordisk A/S 
NCT number 
NCT05533632 
Sponsor trial ID: 
NN9535-4844  
Official title of study: 
Safety and Tolerability of weekly Semaglutide 0.5 mg or 1.0 
mg in Chilean Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes 
Document date*: 
29 June 2022 
*Document date refers to the date on which the document was most recently updated.
Note: The date in the footer on pages 2 to 83 is the template date and not of an update to content.