Conditions: Stage I Mantle Cell Lymphoma Stage II Contiguous Mantle Cell Lymphoma Stage II Non-Contiguous Mantle Cell Lymphoma Stage III Mantle Cell Lymphoma Stage IV Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Allocation: NA | Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Enrollment: 37
Healthy volunteers: no

Brief summary:
This phase II trial studies how well ofatumumab in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin hydrochloride, vincristine sulfate, and dexamethasone alternating with ofatumumab in combination with cytarabine and methotrexate works in treating patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Monoclonal antibodies, such as ofatumumab, may interfere with the ability of cancer cells to grow and spread. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin hydrochloride, vincristine sulfate, dexamethasone, cytarabine, and methotrexate, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Giving ofatumumab together with alternating regimens of combination chemotherapy may kill more cancer cells.

Detailed description:
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine the overall response rate (ORR), and in particular, the complete remission rate (CRR) in previously untreated MCL treated with ofatumumab in combination with aggressive chemo-immunotherapy.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine the high sensitivity flow cytometry (HSFCM) complete remission rate (HSFCM-CRR) in previously untreated MCL treated with ofatumumab in combination with aggressive chemo-immunotherapy +/- high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (HDC-ASCT).

II. To determine the time-to-progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with previously untreated MCL treated with ofatumumab and aggressive chemoimmunotherapy +/- HDC-ASCT.

III. To determine the toxicity profiles of ofatumumab in combination with high dose cytarabine chemoimmunotherapy +/- HDC-ASCT.

IV. To correlate minimal residual disease (MRD) at different time intervals with TTP, PFS, and OS.

V. To correlate surface cluster of differentiation (CD)20 levels, Ki67, and additional cytogenetic abnormalities in pretreatment tumor biopsies with respect to ORR, CRR, TTP, PFS, or OS.

VI. To determine the relationship between proliferation signature and clinical outcome using quantitative real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

VII. To determine changes in surface CD20 levels, Ki67, or gain of additional cytogenetic abnormalities in relapsed/refractory tumor specimens.

VIII. To correlate serum component (C)3, C4, and hemolytic complement (CH)50 levels measured at baseline and at the end of first ofatumumab infusion with ORR, CRR, median response rate (MRR), TTP, PFS and OS.

IX. Evaluate the ability of the induction and consolidation therapy to get 70% of patients to autologous stem cell transplantation.

X. Evaluate the tolerability and CD34+ cell yield following therapy with patient and hyper-fractionated cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin hydrochloride, vincristine sulfate, and dexamethasone (HyperCVAD)/high-dose cytarabine and methotrexate (HD-MA).

XI. To compare differences in response rate in patients with MCL treated with ofatumumab + HyperCVAD/HD-MA according Cheson and Modified Cheson Criteria.

OUTLINE:

COURSES 1, 3, and 5 (O-HyperCVAD): Patients receive ofatumumab intravenously (IV) on day 1, cyclophosphamide IV over 2 hours every 12 hours for 6 doses on days 3-5, doxorubicin hydrochloride IV continuously over 72 hours on days 6-8, vincristine sulfate IV on days 6 and 13, and dexamethasone IV or orally (PO) on days 3-6 and 13-16.

COURSES 2, 4, and 6 (O-HD-MA): Patients receive ofatumumab IV on day 1, methotrexate IV continuously over 24 hours on day 3, and cytarabine IV over 2 hours every 12 hours on days 4-5.

Treatment repeats every 21 days for 6\* courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Eligible patients then undergo standard high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (HDC-ASCT). Patients achieving a high sensitivity flow cytometry complete remission (HSFCM-CR) after 2 courses may proceed to HDC-ASCT after completing 4 courses of treatment.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 4 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then as clinically instructed.

Arms:
arm 1: COURSES 1, 3, and 5 (O-HyperCVAD): Patients receive ofatumumab IV on day 1, cyclophosphamide IV over 2 hours every 12 hours for 6 doses on days 3-5, doxorubicin hydrochloride IV continuously over 72 hours on days 6-8, vincristine sulfate IV on days 6 and 13, and dexamethasone IV or PO on days 3-6 and 13-16.

COURSES 2, 4, and 6 (O-HD-MA): Patients receive ofatumumab IV on day 1, methotrexate IV continuously over 24 hours on day 3, and cytarabine IV over 2 hours every 12 hours on days 4-5.

All courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Eligible patients then undergo standard HDC-ASCT.

Interventions: intervention 1: Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation intervention 2: Cyclophosphamide intervention 3: Cytarabine intervention 4: Dexamethasone intervention 5: Doxorubicin Hydrochloride intervention 6: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis intervention 7: Methotrexate intervention 8: Ofatumumab intervention 9: Vincristine Sulfate
Intervention descriptions: intervention 1: Undergo autologous HDC-ASCT intervention 2: Given IV intervention 3: Given IV intervention 4: Given IV or PO intervention 5: Given IV intervention 6: Correlative studies intervention 7: Given IV intervention 8: Given IV intervention 9: Given IV

Protocol document:
Prot_SAP_000.pdf: 
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 1 of 109
TITLE: Ofatumumab (O) in Combination With Chemotherapy: Hyper-Fractionated 
Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine and Dexamethasone (O-HyperCVAD) 
Alternating With Ofatumumab High-Dose Cytarabine and Methotrexate (O-MA) for 
Patients With Newly Diagnosed Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Study Number:
I 201611
Initial Date:
Amendment #1:
Amendment #2:
Amendment #3:
Amendment #4:
Amendment #5:
Amendment #6:
Amendment #7:
Amendment #8:
Amendment#9:
Amendment #10:
Amendment #11:
Amendment #12
July 8, 2011
December 1, 2011
August 1, 2012
October 19, 2012
January 22, 2013
August 7, 2013
February 4, 2014
March 9, 2015
August 11, 2015
July 27, 2016
March 2, 2017
July 17, 2017
March 19, 2018
IND Number/Holder:
Exempt
Principal Investigator:
Francisco J Hernandez-Ilizaliturri, MD
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Elm and Carlton Streets
Buffalo, New York 14263
716-845-1359
Francisco.Hernandez@roswellpark.org
Network Site(s):
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018
/$5


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 2 of 109
Funding Organization:
National Comprehensive Cancer Network
Industry/Other Supporter:
Novartis
Confidentiality Statement
Any and all information presented in this document shall be treated as confidential
and shall remain the exclusive property of the parties mentioned above. The use of
such confidential information must be restricted to the recipient for the agreed
purpose and must not be disclosed, published, or otherwise communicated to any
unauthorized persons, for any reason, in any form whatsoever  without the prior written consent of 
the parties above.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 3 of 109
RPCI Study Contacts 
Study personnel outside of RPCI’s-CRS Team who will be 
housing essential study documents or receiving, analyzing or storing biological samples. 
This contact list is to include all internal and external RPCI laboratories and their primary laboratory contacts.
NOTE: 
Personnel from any potential network site 
are NOT to be included on this contact page.
FOR NETWORK SITES: 
Please contact the RPCI Network Monitor for any study-related questions regarding 
sample handling, processing or shipping.
Name
Institution
Email
Role
Cory Mavis
Department of 
Medicine 
Lymphoma/Myeloma 
Laboratory
CCC Bldg. 3rd Floor, 
Rm 304
Roswell Park Cancer 
Institute
Cory.mavis@roswellpark.org
Senior Research 
Specialist
Cytogenetics Lab
GBSB Room S-509
Roswell Park Cancer 
Institute
Clinical Flow 
Cytometry Laboratory
Roswell Park Cancer 
Institute
Joseph.Tario@roswellpark.org
Supervisor for 
Clinical Flow Lab
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 4 of 109
SYNOPSIS
Title / Phase
Ofatumumab (O) in Combination With Chemotherapy: Hyper-Fractionated Cyclophosphamide, 
Doxorubicin, Vincristine and Dexamethasone (O-HyperCVAD) Alternating With Ofatumumab 
High-Dose Cytarabine and Methotrexate (O-MA) for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Mantle Cell 
Lymphoma
Roswell Park 
Cancer 
Institute 
Study 
Number:
I 201611
Roswell Park 
Cancer 
Institute 
Investigator
Francisco J. Hernandez-Ilizaliturri, MD
Funding 
Organization
National Comprehensive Cancer Network
Study 
Drug(S)
Ofatumumab
Objectives
Primary:
•
To determine the overall response rate (ORR), and in particular, the complete remission 
rate (CRR) in previously untreated MCL treated with ofatumumab in combination with 
aggressive chemo-immunotherapy.
Secondary:
•
To determine the High Sensitivity Flow Cytometry (HSFCM) complete remission rate 
(HSFCM-CRR) in previously untreated MCL treated with ofatumumab in combination 
with aggressive chemo-immunotherapy +/- high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem 
cell transplant (HDC-ASCT).
•
To determine the time-to-progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall 
survival (OS) of patients with previously untreated MCL treated with ofatumumab and 
aggressive chemoimmunotherapy +/- HDC-ASCT.
•
To determine the toxicity profiles of ofatumumab in combination with high dose 
cytarabine chemoimmunotherapy +/- HDC-ASCT.
•
To correlate minimal residual disease (MRD) at different time intervals with TTP, PFS, 
and OS.
•
To correlate surface CD20 levels, Ki67, and additional cytogenetic abnormalities in 
pretreatment tumor biopsies with respect to ORR, CRR, TTP, PFS, or OS.
•
To determine the relationship between proliferation signature and clinical outcome using 
quantitative real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).
•
To determine changes in surface CD20 levels, Ki67, or gain of additional cytogenetic 
abnormalities in relapsed/refractory tumor specimens.
•
To correlate serum C3, C4, and CH50 levels measured at baseline and at the end of first 
ofatumumab infusion with ORR, CRR, MRR, TTP, PFS and OS.
•
Evaluate the ability of the induction and consolidation therapy to get 70% of patients to 
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 5 of 109
autologous stem cell transplantation.
•
Evaluate the tolerability and CD34+ cell yield following therapy with patient and 
HyperCVAD/HD-MA.
•
To compare differences in response rate in patients with MCL treated with 
ofatumumab + HyperCVAD/HD-MA according to the Cheson and Modified Cheson 
Criteria.45,46
Study Design
This open-label, single-arm, multi-center Phase  II study evaluating efficacy, the safety, and 
tolerability of ofatumumab antibody in combination alternating doses of HyperCVAD and MA in 
previously untreated MCL administered at every 3 week intervals for 6 cycles followed by 
HDC-ASCT in eligible patients. 
Patients achieving a high sensitivity flow cytometry complete remission (HSFCM-CR) after 2 
cycles can proceed to autologous stem cell transplant after completing 4 cycles. 
Target 
Accrual and 
Study 
Duration
A maximum of 37 patients at 2 sites (RPCI and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center) will be enrolled. 
Accrual is expected to take up to 7 years.
It is expected that patients will be receiving treatment on this study for approximately 6 months, 
after which if eligible, patients will receive an autologous stem cell transplant.
Study 
Procedures
All chemotherapy and immunotherapy drug doses are based on a corrected body weight as follows: 
ideal + 25% of the difference between ideal and actual weight. If the actual weight is less than 
ideal, use actual weight. For patients whose actual weight is >150% of ideal weight, use 150% of 
ideal weight as the "actual" weight (i.e., the corrected weight is 112.5% of ideal).
Cycles 1, 3, and 5
Allopurinol 600 mg/day PO on Day 0, then 300 mg/day for Days 1 - 10 only for Cycle 1
Day
0
Day
1
Day
2
Day
3
Day
4
Day
5
Day
6
Day
7
Day
8
Day
9-12
Day
13
Day
14
Day
15
Day
16
OFA
CTX
CTX
CTX
DOX
DOX
DOX
VCR
VCR
DEX
DEX
DEX
DEX
DEX
DEX
DEX
DEX
MES
MES
MES
Growth factor support→
Levo→
Fluc→
Acv→
OFA: Ofatumumab will be administered every 21 days at a 1000 mg dose 48 hours prior to each cycle of chemotherapy. 
In patients with high risk for tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) (e.g. patients with high tumor burden, malignant 
pleural effusion, ascites, or patients in leukemic phase), the first dose of ofatumumab may be given for a “split 
dose”: (300 mg day 1 and 700 mg Day 2) at discretion of the investigator.
CTX: Cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours every 12 hours for 6 doses on Days 3 – 5.
DOX: Doxorubicin 16.6 mg/m2 daily for 3 days administered as a continuous intravenous infusion (CIVI) on Days 6-8
VCR: Vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 (maximum dose 2 mg) IV on Day 6 and Day 13.
DEX: Dexamethasone 40 mg IV or orally on Days 3 - 6 and Days 13 - 16.
MES: Mesna, to be started 1 hour before the start of CTX. Mesna will be started at 600 mg/m2 per dose IV over 
24 hours daily on days 3 - 5 and completed 12 hours after the administration of the last dose of CTX
Levo: Levofloxacin 500 mg/day PO or other IV or oral antibiotic of institutional preference beginning on Day 9 until 
ANC ≥ 1500/μL.
Fluc: Fluconazole 400 mg/day PO or other IV or oral antifungal of institutional preference beginning on Day 9 until 
ANC ≥ 1500/μL.
Acv: Acyclovir 400 mg/bid PO beginning on Day 9 until ANC ≥ 1500/μL.
Growth Factor Support: G-CSF (Dose will be rounded according to Section 8.3.8 guidelines) SQ administered within 
48 hours after the last dose of chemotherapy until post nadir ANC > 10,000/μL x 1 or ANC > 5000/μL twice or 
Peg-G-CSF 6 mg sq within 48 hours after the last dose of chemotherapy (See Section 8.3.8).
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 6 of 109
Cycles 2, 4, and 6
Day
0
Day
1
Day
2
Day
3
Day
4
Day
5
Day
6
Day
7
Day
8
Day
9-12
Day
13
Day
14
Day
15
Day
16
OFA
MTX
ARAC
ARAC
Dopt*
Dopt*
Dopt*
Dopt**
Dopt*
Dopt*
Leuc*
Leuc*
Leuc*
Growth factor support→
Levo→
Fluc→
Acv→
OFA: Ofatumumab will be administered every 21 days at a 1000 mg dose 48 hours prior to each cycle of chemotherapy.
MTX: Methotrexate 1,000 mg/m2 CIVI over 24 hours on Day 3. Alkalinization of the urine is mandatory (See 
Section 8.4.2). Serum methotrexate levels will be monitored at 24, 48, and 72 hours after the end of the infusion. 
If the patient meets the institutional standard levels for MTX serum, subsequent MTX serum levels need not be 
performed.
ARAC: Cytarabine at 3,000 mg/m2 (≤ 60 years) or 1,000 mg/m2 (> 60 years) IV over 2 hours every 12 hours for 4 doses 
on Days 4 – 5.
Leuc*: Leucovorin (Folinic acid) rescue therapy (50 mg loading dose) will be administered IV  x1 dose beginning 
12 hours after the infusion of methotrexate is completed, followed by 15mg  IV/PO Q 6 hours for 8 doses or 
continuing until the serum methotrexate level is < 0.1 μM.  In the event leucovorin is not available due to 
national shortage, levoleucovorin may be substituted at 50% of the leucovorin dose.   MTX serum levels can be 
+/- 2 hours from the end of infusion. Folinic acid doses may be adjusted according to methotrexate levels (see 
Sections 8.4.2 and 8.4.5)
Dopt*: Dexamethasone 0.1% ophthalmic solution (Dopt) or equivalent, two drops in each eye four times daily, will be 
started on the day of cytarabine and will continued for 7 days to prevent chemical conjunctivitis.
Levo: Levofloxacin 500 mg/day PO or other IV or oral antibiotic of institutional preference beginning on Day 8 until 
ANC ≥ 1500/μL.
Fluc: Fluconazole 400 mg/day PO or other IV or oral antifungal of institutional preference beginning on Day 8 until 
ANC ≥ 1500/μL.
Acv: Acyclovir 400 mg/bid PO beginning on Day 8 until ANC ≥ 1500/μL.
Growth Factor support: G-CSF (Dose will be rounded according to Section 8.4.7 guidelines) SQ administered within 48  
hours after the last dose of chemotherapy until post nadir ANC > 10,000/μL x 1 or ANC > 5000/μL twice or Peg-
G-CSF 6 mg sq administered within 48  hours after the last dose of chemotherapy (See Section 8.4.7)
NOTE: Prophylactic central nervous system (CNS) prophylactic should be considered for MCL patients with blastoid or 
pleomorphic variants only (See Section 8.5)
Statistical 
Analysis
Sample Size Justification: The sample size calculation is based on testing the hypotheses 
concerning the proportion of the population with a response to the treatment:
0 :
50%,
:
50%.
a
H
p
H
p
≤
>
This two-stage design requires a potential total of 37 patients in order to achieve approximately 
80% power to detect differences of 20 percentage points (50% versus 70%).
Analysis:
Stage 1: If 12 or less of the first 23 evaluable patients achieves a complete response as measured 
by standard response criteria reported by Cheson et al in 199945, it will be concluded that the 
therapy is not promising and the study will end. Otherwise, the study will progress to the second 
stage. Depending on the current complete response rate at the time the last patient in Stage 1 is 
enrolled, study enrollment may be halted until complete response status is evaluated in all 
23 patients.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 7 of 109
Stage 2: This study will accrue 14 additional evaluable patients. If 24 or more of the total of 
37 evaluable patients achieve a complete response, it will be concluded that 
 exceeds 50% and 
p
that the therapy is efficacious and worthy of further study; otherwise, it will be concluded that there 
is no evidence to suggest that the therapy is associated with acceptable efficacy and is not 
promising.
With this design, the probability is 4.8% of falsely concluding that the proportion of objective 
responders exceeds 50% and 80% is the probability of correctly concluding efficacy when the true 
proportion of objective responders is 70% or higher.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 8 of 109
 INVESTIGATOR STUDY ELIGIBILITY VERIFICATION FORM
Patient Name: ________________________________________________________________
Medical Record No.: ___________________________________________________________
Title: Ofatumumab in Combination With Chemotherapy: Hyper-Fractionated Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, 
Vincristine and Dexamethasone (O-HyperCVAD) Alternating With Ofatumumab High-Dose Cytarabine and 
Methotrexate (O-MA) for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Mantle Cell Lymphoma
INCLUSION CRITERIA
Y
N
N/A
All answers must be “YES or “N/A” for patient enrollment.
DATE
1.
Histologically documented mantle cell lymphoma with co-expression of 
CD20 and CD5 and lack of CD23 expression by immunophenotyping and at 
least one of the following confirmatory tests: 1.) Positive immunostaining for 
cyclin D1; 2.) The presence of t(11;14) on cytogenetic analysis; OR 3) 
Molecular evidence of bcl-1/IgH rearrangement.
•
Cases that are CD5-negative and/or CD23-positive will be eligible provided 
that the histopathology is consistent with mantle cell lymphoma AND 
positive for cyclin D1, t(11;14), or bcl-1/IgH rearrangement.
•
A tissue block or unstained slides (10 - 20 slides) will be submitted to the 
RPCI Pathology Department for central pathology review.
•
A diagnosis based on peripheral blood or bone marrow is allowed. 
•
If the diagnosis is based only on blood, in addition to the immunophenotype 
and molecular confirmation above, a peripheral blood smear must be 
available for central pathology review. 
•
If the diagnosis is based on a bone marrow, the bone marrow core biopsy or 
aspirate clot tissue block will be submitted to the RPCI Pathology 
Department; if the tissue block is not available please submit the diagnostic 
smears for review.
2.
Extent of Disease
•
Stage I - IV. Patients with nodular histology mantle cell lymphoma must have 
Ann Arbor Stage III or IV disease to be eligible.
•
Patients with mantle zone type histology will not be eligible because of their 
relatively favorable prognosis.
•
Patients with other mantle cell histologies are eligible regardless of stage.
•
Measurable or assessable disease is required. Measurable tumor size (at least 
one node measuring 2.25 cm2 in bidimensional measurement).
•
No active CNS disease defined as symptomatic meningeal lymphoma or 
known CNS parenchymal lymphoma. A lumbar puncture demonstrating 
mantle cell lymphoma at the time of registration to this study is not an 
exclusion for study enrollment.
3.
Age ≥ 18 years and < 70 years.
4.
Prior Treatment
•
Patients must be previously untreated.
•
No prior radiation therapy for mantle cell lymphoma.
•
≥ 2 weeks since major surgery.
5.
No known hypersensitivity to murine products.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 9 of 109
INCLUSION CRITERIA
Y
N
N/A
All answers must be “YES or “N/A” for patient enrollment.
DATE
6.
No medical condition requiring chronic use of high dose systemic 
corticosteroids (i.e., doses of prednisone higher than 10 mg/day or 
equivalent).
7.
No HIV infection. Patients with a history of intravenous drug abuse or any 
behavior associated with an increased risk of HIV infection should be tested 
for exposure to the HIV virus. Patients who test positive or who are known to 
be infected are not eligible. An HIV test is not required for entry on this 
protocol, but is required if the patient is perceived to be at risk.
8.
Non-pregnant and non-nursing. Treatment under this protocol would expose 
an unborn child to significant risks. Women and men of reproductive 
potential should agree to use an effective means of birth control. Refer to 
Appendix G for definition of women of childbearing potential.
9.
Patients who test positive for Hepatitis C Ab are eligible provided all of the 
following criteria are met: 1) total bilirubin ≤ 2 x upper limit of normal; 2) 
AND AST ≤ 3 x upper limit of normal; AND 3) liver biopsy (pathology) 
demonstrates ≤ Grade 2 fibrosis and no cirrhosis.
10. Specific guidelines will be followed regarding inclusion of MCL based on 
Hepatitis B serological testing as follow:
•
HBsAg negative, HBcAb negative, HBsAb positive MCL patients are 
eligible.
o
Positive serology for Hepatitis B (HB) defined as a positive test for 
HBsAg.  In addition, if negative for HBsAg but HBcAb positive, a 
HB DNA test will be performed and if positive the subject will be 
excluded.
•
Patients who test positive for HBsAg are ineligible (regardless of other 
Hepatitis B serologies).
•
For MCL patients with HBsAg negative, but HBcAb positive (regardless of 
HBsAb status) should have a HBV DNA testing done and protocol eligibility 
determined as follows:
o
If HBV DNA is positive the patient is excluded.
o
If HBV DNA is negative, patient may be included but must undergo 
at least every 2 months HBV DNA PCR testing from the start of 
treatment throughout the duration the study.
o
Monitoring during the study is required at least every 2 months and 
during follow-up at a minimum of every 2 - 3 months up to 6 
months after the last dose.
o
Prophylactic antiviral therapy with lamivudine (3TC) or 
investigator’s preferred antiviral regimen throughout protocol 
therapy and for 6 – 12 months thereafter may be initiated at the 
discretion of the investigator.
o
If the patients’ HBV DNA becomes positive during the study, the 
investigator should manage the clinical situation as per the standard 
of care of participating institution. The investigator should weigh the 
r risks and benefits of continuing ofatumumab or discontinuing 
ofatumumab before appropriate treatment decisions are made for 
that individual patient.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 10 of 109
INCLUSION CRITERIA
Y
N
N/A
All answers must be “YES or “N/A” for patient enrollment.
DATE
11. Patients must not have a history of cardiac disease, defined as New York 
Heart Association Class II or greater or clinical evidence of congestive heart 
failure.
12. No known hypersensitivity to ofatumumab, humanized antibodies or 
chemotherapy agents throughout the protocol.
13. Initial Required Laboratory/Test Values:
•
LVEF by MUGA or ECHO ≥ 45%.
•
Neutrophils > 1000/μL platelets > 75,000/μL (Unless significant bone 
marrow involvement with MCL).
•
Creatinine ≤ 2.0 mg/dL.
•
Total Bilirubin ≤ 2.0 mg/dL (Unless MCL related or attributable to Gilbert’s 
disease). If Total bilirubin is > 5 mg/dL. See Table 8.
•
Urine or serum β-HCG or serum HCG = Negative (If female patient of 
childbearing potential).
14. Patient or legal representative must understand the investigational nature of 
this study and sign an Independent Ethics Committee/Institutional Review 
Board approved written informed consent form prior to receiving any study 
related procedure.
15. Consult with a physician experienced in care and management of subjects 
with hepatitis B to manage/treat subjects who are anti-HBc positive.
Investigator Signature: ___________________________________
Date: ____________
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 11 of 109
INVESTIGATOR STUDY ELIGIBILITY VERIFICATION FORM
Patient Name: ________________________________________________________________
Medical Record No.: ___________________________________________________________
Title: Ofatumumab (O) in Combination With Chemotherapy: Hyper-Fractionated Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, 
Vincristine and Dexamethasone (O-HyperCVAD) Alternating With Ofatumumab High-Dose Cytarabine and 
Methotrexate (O-MA) for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Mantle Cell Lymphoma
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
Y
N
N/A
All answers must be “NO” or “N/A” for patient enrollment
DATE
1.
Prior history of HIV-positivity (Routine HIV testing is not required 
pretreatment).
2.
Positive serology for Hepatitis B (HB) defined as a positive test for HBsAg. In 
addition, if negative for HBsAg but HBcAb positive (regardless of HBsAb 
status), a Hepatitis B DNA test will be performed and if positive the patient 
will be excluded.
3.
Serious non-malignant disease (e.g., active uncontrolled bacterial, viral, or 
fungal infections) or other medical conditions (including psychiatric) which, in 
the opinion of the Principal Investigator would compromise other protocol 
objectives.
4.
Presence of symptomatic CNS lymphoma.
5.
Pregnant or lactating females.
6.
Prior history of radiation or chemotherapy for MCL.
7.
History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or 
biologic composition to ofatumumab or other agents used in study.
8.
Patients with a “currently active” second malignancy, other than non-
melanoma skin cancer or in situ carcinoma of the cervix or breast. Patients are 
not considered to have a “currently active” malignancy if they have completed 
anti-cancer therapy, are considered by their physician to be at less than 30% 
risk of relapse and at least 2 – 5 years have lapsed.
9.
Major surgery, other than diagnostic surgery, within 2 weeks.
10. Patients with NHL other than MCL.
11. Patients must not have a history of cardiac disease, defined as New York Heart 
Association Class II or greater or clinical evidence of congestive heart failure. 
All patients must have a MUGA scan or 2-D echocardiogram indicating an 
ejection fraction of ≥ 45% within 42 days prior to registration. The method 
used at baseline must be used for later monitoring.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 12 of 109
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
Y
N
N/A
All answers must be “NO” or “N/A” for patient enrollment
DATE
12. Unwilling or unable to follow protocol requirements.
13. Any condition which in the Investigator’s opinion deems the patient an 
unsuitable candidate to receive study drug.
14. Received an investigational agent within 30 days prior to enrollment.
Study participant meets all entry criteria:
 Yes         
No
Investigator Signature: ___________________________________
Date: ____________
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 13 of 109
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SYNOPSIS ......................................................................................................................................4
1
Introduction.........................................................................................................................22
1.1
Biology of Mantle Cell Lymphoma....................................................................................22
1.2
Clinical Behavior and Management of Mantle Cell Lymphoma........................................22
1.2.1 The Use of Rituximab in the Management of Mantle Cell Lymphoma.............................23
1.2.2 The Role of High Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplant 
(HDC-ASCT).....................................................................................................................23
1.2.3 The Role of High Dose Cytarabine in the Management of HDC-ASCT Eligible MCL 
Patients...............................................................................................................................24
1.3
Predictors of Clinical Outcome in Mantle Cell Lymphoma: The Importance of Achieving 
a Complete Remission .......................................................................................................25
1.3.1 Clinical Markers of Response.............................................................................................25
1.3.2 Biological Poor Prognostic Features ..................................................................................26
1.3.3 Kinetics of Response to Therapy as a Surrogate Marker of Clinical Outcome in Mantle 
Cell Lymphoma .................................................................................................................26
1.4
Pre-Clinical Development of Ofatumumab in B-Cell Lymphoma.....................................27
1.5
Clinical Experience with Ofatumumab in B-Cell Malignancies ........................................30
2
Rationale.............................................................................................................................31
3
Objectives ...........................................................................................................................31
3.1
Primary Objective...............................................................................................................31
3.2
Secondary Objectives .........................................................................................................31
4
Methodology.......................................................................................................................32
4.1
Study Design.......................................................................................................................32
4.2
Target Accrual and Study Duration....................................................................................33
5
Patient Selection .................................................................................................................33
5.1
Inclusion Criteria ................................................................................................................33
5.2
Exclusion Criteria ...............................................................................................................36
5.3
Inclusion of Women and Minorities...................................................................................37
6
Investigational Product .......................................................................................................37
6.1
Ofatumumab .......................................................................................................................37
6.1.1 Availability .........................................................................................................................37
6.1.2 Storage and Stability...........................................................................................................37
6.1.3 Formulation / Composition of Ofatumumab Injection 20 mg/mL .....................................37
6.1.4 Drug Shipment....................................................................................................................38
6.1.5 Preparation..........................................................................................................................38
6.1.6 Materials for Preparation and Administration of Infusion .................................................39
6.1.7 Dilution of Ofatumumab.....................................................................................................39
6.1.8 Ofatumumab Infusion Set-Up.............................................................................................41
6.1.9 Toxicity...............................................................................................................................43
6.2
Cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan®, CTX) ...............................................................................44
6.2.1 Availability .........................................................................................................................44
6.2.2 Storage and Stability...........................................................................................................44
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 14 of 109
6.2.3 Preparation..........................................................................................................................44
6.2.4 Administration ....................................................................................................................44
6.2.5 Toxicity...............................................................................................................................44
6.3
Mesna (Mesnex®) ..............................................................................................................44
6.3.1 Availability .........................................................................................................................44
6.3.2 Storage and Stability...........................................................................................................45
6.3.3 Preparation..........................................................................................................................45
6.3.4 Administration ....................................................................................................................45
6.3.5 Toxicity...............................................................................................................................45
6.4
Doxorubicin (Adriamycin®, Rubex®, Adriamycin RDF™, Adriamycin PFS™) ............45
6.4.1 Availability .........................................................................................................................45
6.4.2 Storage and Stability...........................................................................................................45
6.4.3 Preparation..........................................................................................................................45
6.4.4 Administration ....................................................................................................................45
6.4.5 Toxicity...............................................................................................................................46
6.5
Vincristine (Oncovin®) ......................................................................................................46
6.5.1 Availability .........................................................................................................................46
6.5.2 Storage and Stability...........................................................................................................46
6.5.3 Administration ....................................................................................................................46
6.5.4 Toxicity...............................................................................................................................46
6.6
Dexamethasone...................................................................................................................46
6.6.1 Availability .........................................................................................................................46
6.6.2 Storage and Stability...........................................................................................................46
6.6.3 Administration ....................................................................................................................46
6.6.4 Toxicity...............................................................................................................................47
6.7
Methotrexate (Folex®; Mexate®) ......................................................................................47
6.7.1 Availability .........................................................................................................................47
6.7.2 Storage and Stability...........................................................................................................47
6.7.3 Preparation..........................................................................................................................47
6.7.4 Administration ....................................................................................................................47
6.7.5 Toxicity...............................................................................................................................47
6.8
Leucovorin (Citrovorum factor; Folinic Acid; Wellcovorin).............................................47
6.8.1 Availability .........................................................................................................................47
6.8.2 Storage and Stability...........................................................................................................48
6.8.3 Preparation..........................................................................................................................48
6.8.4 Administration ....................................................................................................................48
6.8.5 Toxicity...............................................................................................................................48
6.9
Cytarabine (Cytosar-U®; Ara-C; Cytosine Arabinoside) ..................................................48
6.9.1 Availability .........................................................................................................................48
6.9.2 Storage and Stability...........................................................................................................48
6.9.3 Preparation..........................................................................................................................48
6.9.4 Administration ....................................................................................................................48
6.9.5 Toxicity...............................................................................................................................48
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 15 of 109
6.10
Filgrastim (G-CSF; r-met HuG-CSF; Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor; 
Neupogen®).......................................................................................................................49
6.10.1 Availability .........................................................................................................................49
6.10.2 Storage and Stability...........................................................................................................49
6.10.3 Administration ....................................................................................................................49
6.10.4 Toxicity...............................................................................................................................49
6.11
Pegfilgrastim (Neulasta) .....................................................................................................49
6.11.1 Availability .........................................................................................................................49
6.11.2 Storage and Stability...........................................................................................................50
6.11.3 Administration ....................................................................................................................50
6.11.4 Toxicity...............................................................................................................................50
6.11.5 Laboratory Abnormalities...................................................................................................50
6.11.6 Toxicity/Warnings ..............................................................................................................50
7
Study Procedures ................................................................................................................51
7.1
Patient Registration.............................................................................................................51
7.2
Schedule of Procedures and Observations..........................................................................52
7.3
Histologic Review ..............................................................................................................56
7.4
Correlative Science Sample Submission ............................................................................56
7.4.1 Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) by Flow Cytometric Analysis (Mandatory)................56
7.4.2 Cytogenetic Abnormalities in the Prognosis of Mantle Cell Lymphoma...........................56
7.4.3 Surface CD20 Density Analysis by ImageStream..............................................................57
7.4.4 Ex vivo Activity of Ofatumumab in Primary Mantle Cell Lymphoma Cells.....................57
7.4.5 Degree of In Vivo Complement Activation and Clinical or Molecular Responses to 
Ofatumumab-Based Therapy in Mantle Cell Lymphoma .................................................57
7.4.6 Sample Procurement (At Each Time Interval Required)....................................................57
7.4.7 Sample Shipment Instructions (Network Site Only) ..........................................................58
8
Treatment Plan....................................................................................................................59
8.1
Dosing and Administration.................................................................................................59
8.2
General Guidelines .............................................................................................................59
8.3
Cycles 1, 3 and 5 (Cycles Will Be Administered Every 21 Days).....................................60
8.3.1 Ofatumumab .......................................................................................................................60
8.3.2 Cyclophosphamide .............................................................................................................60
8.3.3 Doxorubicin ........................................................................................................................60
8.3.4 Vincristine...........................................................................................................................60
8.3.5 Dexamethasone...................................................................................................................60
8.3.6 MESNA ..............................................................................................................................60
8.3.7 Intravenous Hydration ........................................................................................................60
8.3.8 Prophylactic Granulocyte Growth Factor Use....................................................................61
8.3.9 Levofloxacin.......................................................................................................................61
8.3.10 Fluconazole.........................................................................................................................61
8.3.11 Acyclovir ............................................................................................................................61
8.4
Cycles 2, 4, and 6 (Cycles Will Be Administered Every 21 Days)....................................61
8.4.1 Ofatumumab .......................................................................................................................61
8.4.2 Methotrexate (MTX) ..........................................................................................................61
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 16 of 109
8.4.3 Cytarabine...........................................................................................................................62
8.4.4 Intravenous Hydration ........................................................................................................62
8.4.5 Leucovorin..........................................................................................................................62
8.4.6 Dexamethasone 0.1% Ophthalmic Solution (or equivalent) ..............................................62
8.4.7 Prophylactic Granulocyte Growth Factor Use....................................................................63
8.4.8 Levofloxacin.......................................................................................................................63
8.4.9 Fluconazole.........................................................................................................................63
8.4.10 Acyclovir ............................................................................................................................63
8.5
Treatment of CNS Disease (If Present at Diagnosis) and CNS Prophylaxis......................63
8.6
Stem Cell Collection and HDC-ASCT...............................................................................64
8.7
Dose Modifications and Management of Toxicity .............................................................64
8.7.1 Hematologic Toxicity .........................................................................................................64
8.7.2 Hepatic Dysfunction ...........................................................................................................65
8.7.3 Neurotoxicity ......................................................................................................................65
8.7.3.1 Vincristine - Associated Sensory and Motor Neuropathy .................................................65
8.7.3.2 Cytarabine Neurotoxicity...................................................................................................66
8.7.3.3 Dexamethasone Neurotoxicity...........................................................................................66
8.7.4 Gastrointestinal Toxicity ....................................................................................................66
8.7.5 Cardiotoxicity .....................................................................................................................66
8.7.6 Genitourinary/Renal Toxicity.............................................................................................66
8.7.6.1 Cystitis ...............................................................................................................................66
8.7.6.2 Renal Dysfunction/Cytarabine Dose Modifications..........................................................67
8.7.6.3 Renal Dysfunction / Methotrexate Dose Modifications ....................................................67
8.8
Ancillary Therapy...............................................................................................................67
8.9
Treatment Discontinuation .................................................................................................68
9
Efficacy Evaluations...........................................................................................................68
9.1
Objectives ...........................................................................................................................68
9.2
Imaging, Laboratory and Pathological Studies...................................................................68
9.3
International Working Group Response Criteria (Original Cheson Criteria).....................69
9.3.1 Complete Response (CR) ...................................................................................................69
9.3.2 Complete Response/Unconfirmed (CRu)...........................................................................69
9.3.3 Partial Response (PR).........................................................................................................69
9.3.4 Stable Disease (SD) ............................................................................................................70
9.3.5 Progression (PD) or Relapse...............................................................................................70
9.4
Modified Cheson Criteria ...................................................................................................70
9.4.1 Complete Response (CR) ...................................................................................................70
9.4.2 Partial Response (PR).........................................................................................................71
9.4.3 Stable Disease (SD) ............................................................................................................72
9.4.4 Progression (PD) or Relapse...............................................................................................72
9.4.5 Duration of Overall Response ............................................................................................72
9.4.6 Duration of Stable Disease .................................................................................................73
10
Safety Evaluation................................................................................................................73
10.1
Adverse Events ...................................................................................................................73
10.1.1 Definition............................................................................................................................73
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 17 of 109
10.1.1.1
Diagnosis Versus Signs and Symptoms ......................................................................74
10.1.1.2
Adverse Events Occurring Secondary to Other Events...............................................75
10.1.1.3
Abnormal Laboratory Values......................................................................................75
10.1.1.4
Preexisting Medical Conditions (Baseline Signs and Symptoms) ..............................75
10.1.2 Grading and Relationship to Drug......................................................................................75
10.1.3 Reporting Adverse Events ..................................................................................................76
10.2
Serious Adverse Events ......................................................................................................76
10.2.1 Definition............................................................................................................................76
10.2.2 Reporting Serious Adverse Events .....................................................................................77
10.2.3 Laboratory and Other Safety Assessment Abnormalities Reported as Adverse Events and 
Serious Adverse Events .....................................................................................................78
10.2.4 Disease-Related Events and/or Disease-Related Outcomes Not Qualifying as Serious 
Adverse Events ..................................................................................................................78
10.2.5 Adverse Event Characteristics............................................................................................78
10.3
Pregnancy ...........................................................................................................................79
10.4
Additional Instructions or Exclusions to Expedited Reporting Requirements...................80
10.5
Unanticipated Problems......................................................................................................80
10.5.1 Definition............................................................................................................................80
10.5.2 Reporting Unanticipated Problems.....................................................................................81
10.6
FDA Reporting ...................................................................................................................81
11
Data and Safety Monitoring................................................................................................82
12
Statistical Methodology......................................................................................................82
12.1
Primary Analysis ................................................................................................................82
12.2
Sample Size Justification....................................................................................................83
12.3
Secondary Analyses............................................................................................................83
13
Correlative studies ..............................................................................................................84
13.1
Central Hypothesis..............................................................................................................84
13.2
STUDY Material To Be Studied ........................................................................................84
13.3
Methodology.......................................................................................................................85
13.3.1 Correlation Between Baseline Surface CD20 in Mantle Cell Lymphoma Isolated From 
Patients Enrolled in the Clinical Trial and Ex Vivo Ofatumumab Anti-Tumor Activity and 
Clinical Endpoints .............................................................................................................85
13.3.2 Surface CD20 Density Analysis by ImageStream..............................................................85
13.3.3 Ex vivo Activity of Ofatumumab in Primary Mantle Cell Lymphoma Cells.....................85
13.3.4 Degree of In Vivo Complement Activation and Clinical or Molecular Responses to 
Ofatumumab-Based Therapy in Mantle Cell Lymphoma .................................................86
13.3.5 Measurement of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) by Eight-Color Flow Cytometric 
Analysis .............................................................................................................................86
13.3.6 Clonal Evolution in Mantle Cell Lymphoma .....................................................................86
14
Ethical and Regulatory Standards.......................................................................................87
14.1
Ethical Principles................................................................................................................87
14.2
Informed Consent ...............................................................................................................87
15
Study Responsibilities ........................................................................................................88
15.1
Data Collection ...................................................................................................................88
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 18 of 109
15.2
Maintenance of Study Documents......................................................................................88
16
Administrative Rules ..........................................................................................................89
16.1
Revisions to the Protocol....................................................................................................89
16.2
Termination of the Study....................................................................................................89
16.3
Confidentiality ....................................................................................................................89
17
References...........................................................................................................................90
18
Appendices .........................................................................................................................95
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 19 of 109
TABLES
Table 1.
Formulation / Composition of Ofatumumab Injection 20 mg/mL..............................38
Table 2.
Dosing Components for Ofatumumab in Clinical Studies..........................................39
Table 3.
Preparation of Ofatumumab Infusion: 100 mg Vials ..................................................40
Table 4.
Preparation of Ofatumumab Infusion: 1000 mg Vials ................................................40
Table 5.
Infusion Rate at First Ofatumumab Infusion (300 mg or 1000 mg) ...........................42
Table 6.
Infusion Rate at Subsequent Ofatumumab Infusion (700 mg or 1000 mg) ................42
Table 7
Schedule of Procedures and Observations ..................................................................53
Table 8.
Percent of Full Dose, Based on Laboratory Values Obtained Within 3 Days Prior to 
Cycles 2 - 6 ....................................................................................................................................65
Table 9.
Dose Adjustment for Dexamethasone.........................................................................66
Table 10.
Cytarabine Dose Adjustments Based on Renal Function........................................67
Table 11
Guidelines for Routine Adverse Event Reporting for Pilot, Phase 2, and Phase 3 
Studies (Regardless of Expectedness) ...........................................................................................76
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 20 of 109
FIGURES
Figure 1.
Ofatumumab Induced a Significantly Higher Level of Cell Lysis by CMC than 
Rituximab 28
Figure 2.
Ofatumumab Induced a Significantly Higher Level of Cell Lysis by CMC Than 
Rituximab in Mantle Cell Lymphoma Cell Lines .........................................................................29
Figure 3.
Ofatumumab Anti-Tumor Effects in RSCL and RRCL and Its relationship With 
CD20 Levels ..................................................................................................................................29
Figure 4.
Ofatumumab Was More Effective in Controlling Lymphoma Growth Than 
Rituximab in Lymphoma Xenographs...........................................................................................30
Figure 5.
Ofatumumab Infusion Set-Up Schema........................................................................41
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 21 of 109
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
INSTRUCTIONS FOR NETWORK SITE......................................................96
APPENDIX B
Screening for Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy During 
Ofatumumab Treatment in B-Cell Lymphoma Patients................................................................99
APPENDIX C
Ofatumumab Liver Interruption/Stopping Criteria for Oncology Studies 
(Updated May 2011)....................................................................................................................100
APPENDIX D
Schema of Pathology Tissue Processing........................................................103
APPENDIX E
Roswell Park Cancer Institute MCL-OFA-1 Form ........................................104
APPENDIX F
Serious Adverse Event Report Fax Coversheets............................................105
APPENDIX G
Reproductive Potential and Contraceptive Methods......................................107
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 22 of 109
1
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Biology of Mantle Cell Lymphoma
According to last year’s published cancer statistics, approximately 74,030 new cases were 
diagnosed and 21,530 patients died from lymphoma despite currently available treatment.1 
Lymphomas are a heterogeneous group of malignancies with diverse biology, clinical behavior, 
and prognosis. Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) were defined as a distinct biological and clinical 
entity in early 1990 and while MCL represents only 6% of the cases of non-Hodgkin lymphoma 
(NHL) diagnosed in the United States every year, it continues to be a therapeutic challenge for 
the practicing oncologist.2
Pathologically, MCL is a mature B-cell lymphoma originating from the mantle zone that 
surrounds the germinal centers in the lymph nodes.3 Morphologically, MCL are characterized by 
the monomorphic proliferation of small to medium-sized lymphoid cells with irregular nuclei 
and concealed nucleoli. Four pathological variants had been recognized: small cell variant, 
marginal-zone like, blastoid and pleomorphic.3 The histological diagnosis of MCL can be 
difficult and often requires the use of immunophenotyping and cytogenetic studies. MCL cell are 
characterized by the expression of mature B-cell markers. Immunophenotypically, MCL is 
characterized by expression of CD19, CD20, CD22, CD79a, CD5 and CD43; and the absence of 
CD10, CD23 and Bcl-6.4
At the molecular level, MCL is characterized by the deregulation of Bcl-2 family members 
(Mcl-1, BIM) altering apoptosis, as well as, cell cycle (cyclin D1) regulated in part by the 
ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). Mcl-1 or cyclin D1 upregulation is the result of the 
chromosomal translocation t(11:14)(q13:q32), the hallmark cytogenetic abnormality of MCL5,6. 
Deregulation of cyclin D1 is considered the primary molecular event involved in the 
pathogenesis of MCL progression. Recent studies using comparative genomic hybridization and 
array-based genomic studies had demonstrated additional chromosomal changes with genomic 
loses of tumor suppression genes (i.e., ATM, CDKN2A, TP53) or gains of oncogenic genes (i.e., 
MYC. SYK or BCL2). Such findings lead investigators to postulate a model of multistep genetic 
alterations which leads to molecular pathogenesis and progression (i.e., clonal evolution) in 
MCL.7
1.2
Clinical Behavior and Management of Mantle Cell Lymphoma
The median age at diagnosis of MCL patients is 63 years with a 2 - 3:1 predominance of males to 
females. Extranodal disease is common and frequently involves bone marrow and 
gastrointestinal tract.8 Overall, MCL is associated with a poor prognosis.8,9 MCL is typically 
characterized by an aggressive clinical course and inevitable development of refractory disease 
despite early intervention that often includes: immunotherapy (e.g., rituximab), multi-agent 
induction chemotherapy and consolidation with high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem 
cell transplant (HDC-ASCT) in first remission.10
Three therapeutic interventions have improved the clinical outcomes of patients with 
MCL: 1) the addition of rituximab to standard chemotherapy; 2) the use of HDC-ASCT for 
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 23 of 109
eligible patients; and recently; and 3) the incorporation of high dose cytarabine in the 
front-line treatment of MCL.10
1.2.1
The Use of Rituximab in the Management of Mantle Cell Lymphoma
In contrast to what has been observed in other subtypes of CD20+ B-cell lymphomas, rituximab 
has a somewhat less impressive activity in MCL. As a single agent, the response rate in both 
untreated and pretreated MCL patients is approximately 30% and the median duration of 
response was reported to be only 6 months.11,12 Lenz et al, demonstrated that the addition of 
rituximab to standard doses of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone 
(CHOP) prior to HDC-ASCT (< 65 years of age) or interferon maintenance (> 65 year of age) 
improved the (CRR) (34% vs. 7%), but did not translate into a longer PFS or OS.13 Other 
investigators have demonstrated higher response rates by adding rituximab to systemic 
chemotherapy in previously untreated MCL patients.14,15 A comprehensive systematic review 
and meta-analysis indicated that rituximab plus chemotherapy may be superior to chemotherapy 
alone with respect to OS in MCL (hazard ratio for mortality, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 
0.37 - 0.98)16. However, given significant differences between each clinical trial analyzed in the 
meta-analysis regarding the type of induction chemotherapy, consolidation with HD-ASCT 
and/or maintenance therapy with biological agents (e.g., interferon); the survival benefit 
observed by the addition of rituximab might be underestimated.16 Recently, a retrospective study 
suggested that the use of rituximab in combination with systemic chemotherapy prior to 
HDC-ASCT resulted in an improved PFS and OS.17
1.2.2
The Role of High Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplant 
(HDC-ASCT)
In an attempt to increase the clinical outcomes of younger MCL patients responding to first line 
chemotherapy/chemo-immunotherapy, consolidation with HDC-ASCT had been utilized by 
several academic Institutions. Higher event free survival (EFS) and OS had been observed in 
MCL patients treated with HDC-ASCT following induction therapy when compared to historical 
controls in prospective Phase II studies.18-20 The potential clinical benefit of HDC-ASCT 
consolidation following induction therapy in MCL patients was evaluated in a phase III clinical 
trial. Dreyling et al randomized 122 MCL patients to HDC-ASCT versus interferon maintenance 
following induction therapy with CHOP chemotherapy.21 The use of early consolidation with 
HDC-ASCT resulted in a higher PFS (39 months vs. 17 months) but minimal improvement in 
OS at 3 years of follow up (83% vs. 77%).21 Long-term follow-up of patients treated with 
chemotherapy and with/without rituximab follow by HDC-ASCT failed to show a disease-free 
plateau, suggesting that all patients will eventually relapse.
The Nordic group reported excellent outcomes in MCL patients treated with rituximab-maxi-
CHOP alternating with rituximab high dose cytarabine followed by HDC-ASCT. In this 
particular study, ex vivo purging of the stem cells were performed with rituximab.21,22 The 6-year 
OS, EFS, and PFS were 70%, 56%, and 66% respectively, with no patient relapsing after 
5 years.22 Of interest, correlative studies conducted in this particular trial demonstrated a higher 
number of patients achieving a complete remission by standard pathological and molecular 
studies (i.e., PCR) prior to HDC-ASCT. This study highlighted the importance of: 1) achieving a 
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 24 of 109
complete remission at the end of induction chemotherapy; 2) clearing stem cells of 
contamination by malignant B-cells by in vivo or ex vivo “purging”; and 3) incorporating high 
dose cytarabine in the induction therapy of MCL.22 Similar findings were observed in 63 patients 
transplanted in complete remission included in bone marrow transplantation registries.23
1.2.3
The Role of High Dose Cytarabine in the Management of HDC-ASCT Eligible 
MCL Patients
Various chemotherapy regimens had been used in the front-line management of patients with 
MCL. In general those regimens follow into 3 categories: 1) multi-agent anthracycline-based 
regimens (i.e., CHOP); 2) purine analog-based regimens (studied only in non-transplant eligible 
patients); or 3) dose-intense regimens alternating anthracycline- and cytarabine-based regimens. 
In general, non-dose-intense regimens had clinical outcomes with complete response rates (CRR) 
ranging from 7% to 48%, PFS/EFS ranging from 7 months – 21 months and 2 years OS ranging 
from 45% to 85%.10
Dose-intense regimens result in higher CRR and longer PFS/OS when compared to historical 
controls. One of the most highly studied dose-intense regimens is rituximab +/- hyper-
fractionated cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and dexamethasone (R-HyperCVAD) 
alternating with rituximab and high-dose cytarabine and methotrexate (R-MA). Prior to 
rituximab, Romaguera et al, demonstrated that 4 cycles of HyperCVAD/MA (without rituximab) 
therapy for in previously untreated (25 points) or relapsed/refractory MCL resulted in an CRR of 
38% prior to HDC-ASCT. More importantly, in the subset of previously untreated patients, the 
EFS following 4 cycles of HyperCVAD/MA and HDC-ASCT consolidation at 3 years was 
72%.18 Subsequently, the same group of investigators evaluated the efficacy and safety of 
rituximab in combination with HyperCVAD/R-MA in previously untreated MCL patients. 
Eligible patients received up to 8 cycles of R-HyperCVAD/R-MA. Early responder patients (i.e., 
those patients achieving a CR after 2 cycles) received a total of 6 cycles. The response rate to 
such intense regimen was remarkable, with 87% of the patients achieving a CR by standard 
Cheson criteria after 6 cycles of therapy and 64% of the patients were free of disease at 3-year 
follow up. On the other hand, hematological toxicity was significant including five deaths due to 
treatment-related toxicity. In addition, 29% of the patients did not completed the planned 
therapy, 80% of those patients were scheduled to receive 8 cycles of therapy based on response 
(This is one of the reasons, we propose to administer only 6 cycles of chemo-immunotherapy in 
this clinical protocol).14 An updated analysis after 10 years of follow up (median 8 years), 
demonstrated that the median OS for all patients had not been reached and the median time to 
treatment failure (TTF) for all patients was 4.6 years, without a plateau in the curves stressing the 
need for novel therapeutic strategies.24
The initial results from the Nordic group were validated in a randomized Phase III clinical study 
evaluating the role of high-dose cytarabine in MCL patients. Recently, Dr. Hermine on behalf of 
the EU-MCL network presented the updated results of a clinical trial that enrolled younger MCL 
patients. In this particular study, MCL patients randomized to receive a high-dose cytarabine-
containing induction and pre-ASCT conditioning chemo-immunotherapy regimen had a higher 
CRR (60% vs. 41%, P = 0.0003) and longer time to treatment failure (TTF; not reached vs. 
49 months) than patients treated with standard R-CHOP for 6 cycles followed by 
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 25 of 109
cyclophosphamide based pre-ASCT conditioning regimen. This data further supports the use of 
high-dose cytarabine in the treatment of MCL patients.25
In general, the addition of high dose cytarabine improves the rate and quality of remissions as 
well as the duration of response. Notably, this is usually associated with higher toxicity (5% of 
toxic deaths, 15% severe infections and 30% severe thrombocytopenia).
In summary, the incorporation of rituximab, HDCT-ASCT and/or high dose cytarabine in the 
management of MCL has prolonged the median overall survival from 3 – 4 years to 
5 - 6 years14,20,24,26,27. However despite dose intense regimens such as rituximab in combination 
with hyper fractionated cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and dexamethasone 
(R-HyperCVAD) alternating with rituximab and high dose cytarabine and methotrexate (R-MA) 
+/- HDC-ASCT used in the front-line setting, the median time to treatment failure is 4.6 years for 
all patients and 5.9 years for those younger than 65 years (without a plateau in the curves with 
the exception of those patients achieving a molecular remission).14,24
Relapsed/refractory MCL is usually associated with a significant degree of chemo-resistance, 
low response rate and/or short duration of response to salvage chemotherapy (including targeted 
agents). There is a clinical need to incorporate promising agents into the upfront therapy of MCL 
in an attempt to further improve clinical outcomes.
There is a growing need to further characterize MCL cells at the molecular level in an attempt to: 
identify biomarkers predictive of response to front-line and salvage therapies; better understand 
the mechanisms associated with acquired resistance to immunochemotherapy; and identify and 
develop therapeutic strategies against novel targets and/or pathways.
1.3
Predictors of Clinical Outcome in Mantle Cell Lymphoma: The Importance of 
Achieving a Complete Remission
Several clinical and biological factors predicting the clinical outcome of MCL patients have been 
studied and are included in Section 1.3.1, Section 1.3.2, and Section 1.3.3.
1.3.1
Clinical Markers of Response
A variety of important clinical prognostic features have been identified including poor 
performance status, splenomegaly, anemia and age at diagnosis. The international prognostic 
index score initially developed for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has 
been used to predict the clinical outcome in MCL patients with conflicting results. A specific 
MCL prognostic score (Mantle Cell International Prognostic Index = MIPI) has been proposed. 
This score, based on the study of 455 MCL patients, identified 4 independent prognostic factors 
of clinical outcome (age, performance status, lactic dehydrogenase levels, and leukocyte count). 
Based in this score, MCL patients can be stratified into 3 distinct risk groups with an OS of 
approximately 2 (high risk), 4 (intermediate) and 6 years (low risk).28
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 26 of 109
1.3.2
Biological Poor Prognostic Features
Biological Poor Prognostic Features include histological subtypes (blastoid variants), the 
presence of p53 mutations, and the proliferation rate as determined by Ki-67 staining 
(< 30% vs. > 30%).29-32
The importance of cell proliferation rate in the clinical outcome of MCL was recently confirmed 
by Rosenwald et al.33 In a retrospective analysis, this group of investigators identified, using 
gene expression profiling (GEP) studies, a “cell proliferation” gene signature as being the most 
powerful prognostic tool in MCL. Patients in the highest quartile for this gene expression 
signature had a median survival of 0.83 years while those in the lowest expression quartile had a 
median survival of 6.7 years.33
This study will study the prognostic significance of abnormalities of cell cycle regulatory 
members at the time of diagnosis in patients with MCL treated with ofatumumab 
chemoimmunotherapy with/without HDC-ASCT. In addition, if genetic abnormalities in 
regulators of the cell cycle occur at the time of relapse following aggressive chemo-
immunotherapy.
1.3.3
Kinetics of Response to Therapy as a Surrogate Marker of Clinical Outcome in 
Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Recent observations in clinical trials with dose-intense chemo-immunotherapy have suggested 
that achievement of a complete remission correlates with improve PFS and OS in MCL. 
Assessment of complete remission using ultrasensitive techniques had shown promising results 
in identifying patients who are now expected to sustain long term remission following induction 
and consolidation therapy for MCL.
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers directed to the breakpoint regions on 11q13 and 
14q32 was evaluated to detect and monitor MRD disease post-treatment in MCL.34 While 
detection of MRD by PCR in MCL had been associated with a poor clinical outcome; the high 
false-negative rate (40% - 60%), cost, and its labor-intensiveness are likely reasons explaining 
why this assay has not been incorporated into clinical practice.10
Immunophenotypically, MCL is characterized by expression of CD19, CD20, CD22, CD79a, 
CD5 and CD43; and the absence of CD10, CD23 and Bcl-6.4 Flow cytometry (FC) analysis had 
been used to detect and monitor MRD in MCL.35,36 Bottcher et al. developed and validated a 
four-color FC assay (also known as high sensitivity flow-cytometry = HSFCM) in MCL capable 
to detect MRD with similar sensitivity and specificity than IGH-PCR.35 Using this 4-color FC 
assay, Pott et al. demonstrated that a “molecular” complete remission (mCR) as determined by 
FC analysis (HSFCM), was an independent predictor of clinical outcomes in MCL patients 
treated with rituximab-chemotherapy regimens followed by either HDC-ASCT (< 65 years) or 
rituximab vs. interferon maintenance (> 65 years).36 Patients that achieved a mCR had a 
significantly improved duration of remission at 2 years (DR; 87% vs. 61%, P = 0.004). In a 
multivariate analysis, achievement of a mCR was found to be an independent factor predicting 
for prolonged DR regardless the type of induction, consolidation or maintenance therapy used. 
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 27 of 109
The overall response (ORR) or complete response (CRR) rates in elderly and younger MCL 
patients were similar (99% vs. 96% and 32% vs. 31%, respectively).
More importantly, at the end of the induction therapy, mCR was only achieved in 67% and 48% 
of the elderly and younger patients respectively.36 This finding suggests that sub-clinical disease 
persists in 43% to 52% of MCL patients at the end of induction chemo-immunotherapy and may 
play a significant role in treatment failure observed following HDC-ASCT. The use of new anti-
CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and/or novel targeted agents may lead to higher 
“molecular” remissions and higher cure rates in patients with MCL.
In summary, the incorporation of: 1) rituximab, 2) early HDC-ASCS, and 3) high-dose 
cytarabine in the management of MCL results in improved clinical outcomes (i.e., ORR, CRR, 
TTF, PFS or OS). But failure to eliminate MRD may be associated with relapses observed in 
long-term follow up of MCL treated in clinical trials and stresses the scientific need to evaluated 
promising novel agents (e.g., ofatumumab). These findings are the basis for the design of this 
clinical protocol.
1.4
Pre-Clinical Development of Ofatumumab in B-Cell Lymphoma
Ofatumumab, a novel monoclonal antibody targeting CD20, is a human IgG antibody that binds 
to an epitope including the smaller, more membrane proximal loop of the CD20 antigen.37,38 In 
addition to binding to a different epitope, ofatumumab appears to bind with a stronger affinity 
due to a slower off-rate.37 Pre-clinical studies have shown ofatumumab to have similar antibody-
dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and improved complement-mediated cytotoxicity 
(CMC) in comparison to rituximab37. Ofatumumab also prolongs B-cell depletion in comparison 
to rituximab and, slows lymphoma tumor cell growth in murine xenograft models.39
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 28 of 109
Figure 1.
Ofatumumab Induced a Significantly Higher Level of Cell Lysis by CMC 
than Rituximab
Figure 1.  Ofatumumab induced a significantly higher level of cell lysis by 
CMC than rituximab. NHL tumor cell lines were tested for CMC cell lysis 
using a 51Cr release assay. In lymphoma cell lines Raji (Rituximab sensitive), 
and Raji 4RH (Rituximab resistant), ofatumumab was more effective than 
rituximab at inducing CMC lysis at doses of 10 μg/mL and 1 μg/mL. 
(^: P < 0.05, *: P < 0.006).
To better define ofatumumab’s activity, pre-clinical studies were conducted in rituximab-
sensitive (RSCL) including MCL cell lines, rituximab-resistant (RRCL), ofatumumab-resistant 
cells (ORCL), primary lymphoma cells, and in a lymphoma xenograft model. Rituximab or 
ofatumumab resistant cell lines were generated as previously described.40
Ofatumumab was more potent than rituximab in elucidating effective complement mediated 
cytotoxicity (CMC) in RSCL, RRCL, MCL (Figure 1 and Figure 2) and primary tumor cells 
derived from patients with de novo or relapsed B-cell lymphoma (data not shown).
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 29 of 109
Figure 2.
Ofatumumab Induced a Significantly Higher Level of Cell Lysis by CMC 
Than Rituximab in Mantle Cell Lymphoma Cell Lines
Figure 2.  Ofatumumab induced a significantly higher level of cell lysis by 
CMC than rituximab in mantle cell lymphoma cell lines.
Of interest, the repeated exposure of lymphoma cells to ofatumumab resulted in rituximab but 
not ofatumumab resistance. While the activity of rituximab diminished with CD20 down-
regulation in RRCL passages, ofatumumab activity was preserved even at low CD20 levels 
(Figure 3).
Figure 3.
Ofatumumab Anti-Tumor Effects in RSCL and RRCL and Its relationship 
With CD20 Levels
Figure 3.  Single cells were isolated from Raji and Raji 2R cell lines. After 
expanding individual cell clones, surface CD20 density determined by 
ImageStream Technology and cell lysis by CMC determined by 51Cr release 
assay were measured.
Using quantitative flow cytometry studies, we found that the CD20 threshold to elucidate mAb-
associated CMC in RSCLs and RRCLs was two-fold lower for ofatumumab than rituximab. The 
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 30 of 109
slope of a best-fit line shows a higher rate of decrease for rituximab (R2 = 0.5514) compared to 
ofatumumab (R2 = 0.2525). In the RRCL Raji 2R, the best-fit line for rituximab is essentially a 
flat slope (R2 = 0.0002) demonstrating resistance to rituximab-induced CMC lysis in all cell 
clones at the lowest levels of CD20 density while ofatumumab maintained higher levels of CMC 
lysis even at the lowest CD20 density with a continued decrease in CMC as CD20 diminished 
(R2 = 0.48). Together, this data suggests that in both RSCLs and RRCLs ofatumumab is capable 
of killing lymphoma cells at lower CD20 levels more effectively than rituximab. 
Finally, ofatumumab was more effective in controlling in vivo lymphoma growth than rituximab 
in a SCID mouse xenograft model. The median survival for animals treated with ofatumumab 
(10mg/kg/dose) [77 days] was longer than those treated with rituximab [50 days] (Figure 4).
Figure 4.
Ofatumumab Was More Effective in Controlling Lymphoma Growth Than 
Rituximab in Lymphoma Xenographs
Figure 4.  Ofatumumab was more effective in controlling lymphoma growth 
than rituximab in lymphoma xenographs. SCID mice were inoculated via tail 
vein with 1 x 106 Raji cells on Day 0 and treated via tail vein injection with 
either ofatumumab or rituximab at a dose of 10 mg/kg on Days 3, 7, 10 and 
14. Mice were observed for up to 90 days.
Similar findings were observed when ofatumumab was compared to rituximab at 1 mg/kg/dose 
(data not shown).
Our data suggest that ofatumumab is more potent than rituximab in rituximab-sensitive 
(including MCL cell lines) or rituximab-resistant models and is less likely to induce biologic 
resistance to mAbs targeting CD20.
1.5
Clinical Experience with Ofatumumab in B-Cell Malignancies
Ofatumumab had been evaluated in several clinical trials enrolling CD20+ B-cell 
lymphoproliferative disorders. In a Phase I/II dose escalation study in CLL, ofatumumab 
demonstrated a relatively high objective response rate of up to 50% in a heavily pretreated 
population and was well tolerated.41 Similar response rates were noted in a Phase II trial in CLL 
patients when combined with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide.42 Results of a Phase III trial in 
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 31 of 109
CLL patients refractory to fludarabine and alemtuzumab were promising at an interim analysis, 
and the FDA approved ofatumumab for use in this population based on these results 43. In NHL, 
early phase clinical trials are currently underway. A Phase I/II trial of ofatumumab in FL patients 
showed an ORR of 43% and evidence of a dose response relationship with the highest dose 
group achieving an ORR up to 60%.39 However, a Phase II trial of ofatumumab in a heavily pre-
treated rituximab-refractory follicular lymphoma patient population was associated with limited 
anti-tumor activity.44 Additional Phase II trials of ofatumumab in combination with CHOP and 
other agents in various histologies of B-cell NHL and CLL have been completed or are ongoing.
2
RATIONALE
Up to date clinical data suggests that the clinical outcome of MCL continues to be poor despite 
aggressive therapeutic intervention. TTF, PFS and OS curves do not demonstrate plateaus with 
currently available treatment (including rituximab and HDC-ASCT). Residual disease at the time 
of stem cell collection is an important cause for treatment failure. On the other hand, 
achievement of complete remission, and in particular, complete remission by high sensitivity 
flow cytometric analysis has been associated with sustained remissions beyond 5 years in a 
prospective clinical trial. This suggests that achievement of complete remission by HS-FCM may 
be a surrogate marker for long term survival. Rituximab-based therapy results in a HS-FCM 
CRR of 48%, therefore, stressing the need to test novel and more potent monoclonal antibodies 
targeting CD20 (i.e., ofatumumab).
In pre-clinical studies we have demonstrated that ofatumumab was more potent than rituximab in 
eliciting complement-mediated cytotoxicity (CMC) at the doses tested in RSCLs, RRCLs and 
MCL cell lines. In addition, we have shown that ofatumumab was more active than rituximab in 
killing primary tumor cells derived from patients with B-cell lymphoma and was more effective 
in controlling in vivo lymphoma growth in a murine xenograft model. This clinical trial will test 
if ofatumumab when combined with the most potent chemotherapy regimen available for MCL 
(i.e., HyperCVAD/alternating with HD-MA) leads to higher CRR, HS-FCM CRR and better 
clinical outcome post-HDC-ASCT in MCL patients. Ofatumumab will be used at the standard 
dose/schedule used in prior clinical trials as single agent or in combination with systemic 
chemotherapy in various subtypes of hematological malignancies.
3
OBJECTIVES
3.1
Primary Objective
•
To determine the overall response rate (ORR), and in particular, the complete remission 
rate (CRR) in previously untreated MCL treated with ofatumumab in combination with 
aggressive chemo-immunotherapy.
3.2
Secondary Objectives
•
To determine the High Sensitivity Flow Cytometry (HSFCM) complete remission rate 
(HSFCM-CRR) in previously untreated MCL treated with ofatumumab in combination 
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 32 of 109
with aggressive chemo-immunotherapy +/- high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem 
cell transplant (HDC-ASCT).
•
To determine the time-to-progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall 
survival (OS) of patients with previously untreated MCL treated with ofatumumab and 
aggressive chemoimmunotherapy +/- HDC-ASCT.
•
To determine the toxicity profiles of ofatumumab in combination with high dose 
cytarabine chemoimmunotherapy +/- HDC-ASCT.
•
To correlate minimal residual disease (MRD) at different time intervals with TTP, PFS, 
and OS.
•
To correlate surface CD20 levels, Ki67, and additional cytogenetic abnormalities in pre-
treatment tumor biopsies with respect to ORR, CRR, TTP, PFS, or OS.
•
To determine the relationship between proliferation signature and clinical outcome using 
quantitative real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).
•
To determine changes in surface CD20 levels, Ki67, or gain of additional cytogenetic 
abnormalities in relapsed/refractory tumor specimens.
•
To correlate serum C3, C4, and CH50 levels measured at baseline and at the end of first 
ofatumumab infusion with ORR, CRR, MRR, TTP, PFS and OS.
•
Evaluate the ability of the induction and consolidation therapy to get 70% of patients to 
autologous stem cell transplantation.
•
Evaluate the tolerability and CD34+ cell yield following therapy with patient and 
HyperCVAD/HD-MA.
•
To compare differences in response rate in patients with MCL treated with 
ofatumumab + HyperCVAD/HD-MA according to Cheson and Modified Cheson 
Criteria.45,46
4
METHODOLOGY
4.1
Study Design
This open-label, single-arm, multi-center Phase  II study evaluating efficacy, the safety, and 
tolerability of ofatumumab antibody in combination alternating doses of HyperCVAD and MA 
in previously untreated MCL administered at every 3 week intervals for 6 cycles followed by 
HDC-ASCT in eligible patients.
Patients achieving a high sensitivity flow cytometry complete remission (HSFCM-CR) after 2 
cycles can proceed to autologous stem cell transplant after completing 4 cycles.
All participants will sign an informed consent prior to study related tests. All patients will meet 
the inclusion and exclusion criteria summarized in Section 5.1 and Section 5.2 prior to 
treatment.
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 33 of 109
4.2
Target Accrual and Study Duration
A maximum of 37 patients at 2 sites (RPCI and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center) will be 
enrolled. Accrual is expected to take up to 7 years.
It is expected that patients will be receiving treatment on this study for approximately 6 months, 
after which if eligible, patients will receive an autologous stem cell transplant.
5
PATIENT SELECTION
This clinical trial can fulfill its objectives only if patients appropriate for the trial are enrolled. 
All relevant medical and other considerations should be taken into account when deciding 
whether this protocol is appropriate for a particular patient. To maximize eligibility for study 
entry patient safety, patients will be treated on this protocol only at NCCN-members/approved 
autologous transplant centers. Physicians should consider the risks and benefits of any therapy 
and, therefore, only enroll patients for which the agents administered are appropriate. Although 
they will not be considered as formal eligibility criteria, as part of this decision-making process, 
physicians should recognize that the following might increase the risk to the patient entering this 
protocol:
•
Other serious illnesses which would limit survival to less than 2 years, or psychiatric 
condition which would prevent compliance with treatment or informed consent.
•
Uncontrolled or severe cardiovascular disease, pulmonary disease, or infection, which in 
the opinion of the treating physician would make this protocol unreasonably hazardous 
for the patient.
•
Known peripheral or autonomic neuropathy which, in the opinion of the treating 
physician, would make the administration of vincristine unreasonably hazardous for the 
patient.
All patients must be screened for hepatitis B infection before starting treatment Those patients 
who test negative for hepatitis B surface antigen, but HepBc antibody positive + HBV DNA 
negative should be closely monitored for evidence of active HBV infection and hepatitis during 
and for several months after ofatumumab treatment, and should be managed as clinically 
indicated (see Section 5.1: bullet 5.1.10.3, and Error! Reference source not found.).
5.1
Inclusion Criteria
To be included in this study, patients must meet the following criteria:
5.1.1
Histologically documented mantle cell lymphoma with co-expression of CD20 and 
CD5 and lack of CD23 expression by immunophenotyping and at least one of the 
following confirmatory tests: 1.) Positive immunostaining for cyclin D1; 2.) The 
presence of t(11;14) on cytogenetic analysis; OR 3.) Molecular evidence of bcl-1/IgH 
rearrangement.
5.1.1.1
Cases that are CD5-negative and/or CD23-positive will be eligible provided 
that the histopathology is consistent with mantle cell lymphoma AND positive 
for cyclin D1, t(11;14), or bcl-1/IgH rearrangement.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 34 of 109
5.1.1.2
A tissue block or unstained slides (10 – 20 slides) will be submitted to the 
RPCI Pathology Department for central pathology review.
5.1.1.3
A diagnosis based on peripheral blood or bone marrow is allowed. If the 
diagnosis is based only on blood, in addition to the immunophenotype and 
molecular confirmation above, a peripheral blood smear must be available for 
central pathology review. If the diagnosis is based on a bone marrow, the bone 
marrow core biopsy or aspirate clot tissue block will be submitted to the RPCI 
Pathology Department; if the tissue block is not available please submit the 
diagnostic smears for review.
5.1.2
Extent of Disease:
5.1.2.1
Stage I - IV. Patients with nodular histology mantle cell lymphoma must have 
Ann Arbor Stage III or IV disease to be eligible.
5.1.2.2
Patients with mantle zone type histology will not be eligible because of their 
relatively favorable prognosis.
5.1.2.3
Patients with other mantle cell histologies are eligible regardless of stage.
5.1.2.4
Measurable or assessable disease is required. Measurable tumor size (at least 
one node measuring 2.25 cm2 in bidimensional measurement).
5.1.2.5
No active CNS disease defined as symptomatic meningeal lymphoma or 
known CNS parenchymal lymphoma. A lumbar puncture demonstrating 
mantle cell lymphoma at the time of registration to this study is not an 
exclusion for study enrollment.
5.1.3
Age ≥ 18 years and ≤70 years.
5.1.4
Prior Treatment:
5.1.4.1
Patients must be previously untreated.
5.1.4.2
No prior radiation therapy for mantle cell lymphoma.
5.1.4.3.
≥ 2 weeks since major surgery.
5.1.5
No known hypersensitivity to murine products.
5.1.6
No medical condition requiring chronic use of high dose systemic corticosteroids 
(i.e., doses of prednisone higher than 10 mg/day or equivalent).
5.1.7
No HIV infection. Patients with a history of intravenous drug abuse or any behavior 
associated with an increased risk of HIV infection should be tested for exposure to 
the HIV virus. Patients who test positive or who are known to be infected are not 
eligible. An HIV test is not required for entry on this protocol, but is required if the 
patient is perceived to be at risk.
5.1.8
Non-pregnant and non-nursing. Treatment under this protocol would expose an 
unborn child to significant risks. Women and men of reproductive potential should 
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 35 of 109
agree to use an effective means of birth control. Refer to Appendix G for definition 
of women of childbearing potential. 
5.1.9
Patients who test positive for Hepatitis C Ab are eligible provided all of the 
following criteria are met: 1.) total bilirubin ≤ 2 x upper limit of normal; 2.) AND 
AST ≤ 3 x upper limit of normal; AND 3.) liver biopsy (pathology) demonstrates 
≤ Grade 2 fibrosis and no cirrhosis.
5.1.10
Specific guidelines will be followed regarding inclusion of MCL based on 
Hepatitis B serological testing as follow:
5.1.10.1
HBsAg negative, HBcAb negative, HBsAb positive MCL patients are eligible.
5.1.10.2
Patients who test positive for HBsAg are ineligible (regardless of other 
Hepatitis B serologies).
5.1.10.3
For MCL patients with HBsAg negative, but HBcAb positive (regardless of 
HBsAb status) should have a HBV DNA testing done and protocol 
eligibility determined as follows:
•
If HBV DNA is positive the subject is excluded.
•
If HBV DNA is negative, patient may be included but must undergo at 
least every 2 months HBV DNA PCR testing from the start of treatment 
throughout the duration the study.
•
Monitoring during the study is required at least every 2 months and during 
follow-up at a minimum of every 2 - 3 months up to 6 months after the last 
dose.
•
Prophylactic antiviral therapy with lamivudine (3TC) or investigator’s 
preferred antiviral regimen throughout protocol therapy and for 
6 - 12 months thereafter may be initiated at the discretion of the 
investigator.
•
If the patients’ HBV DNA becomes positive during the study, the 
investigator should manage the clinical situation as per the standard of 
care of participating institution. The investigator should weigh the risks 
and benefits of continuing ofatumumab or discontinuing ofatumumab 
before appropriate treatment decisions are made for that individual patient.
5.1.11
Patients must not have a history of cardiac disease, defined as New York Heart 
Association Class II or greater or clinical evidence of congestive heart failure.
5.1.12
No known hypersensitivity to ofatumumab, humanized antibodies or chemotherapy 
agents throughout the protocol.
5.1.13
Initial Required Laboratory/Test Values:
5.1.13.1
LVEF by MUGA or ECHO ≥ 45%.
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 36 of 109
5.1.13.2
Neutrophils > 1000/μL platelets > 75,000/μL (Unless significant bone marrow 
involvement with MCL).
5.1.13.3
Creatinine ≤ 2.0 mg/dL.
5.1.13.4
Total bilirubin ≤ 2.0 mg/dL (Unless MCL related or attributable to Gilbert’s 
disease). If Total bilirubin is > 5 mg/dL see Table 8.
5.1.13.5
Urine or serum β-HCG or serum HCG = Negative (If female patient of 
childbearing potential).
5.1.14
Patient or legal representative must understand the investigational nature of this 
study and sign an Independent Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board 
approved written informed consent form prior to receiving any study related 
procedure. 
5.1.15
Consult with a physician experienced in care and management of subjects with 
hepatitis B to manage / treat subjects who are anti-HBc positive.
5.2
Exclusion Criteria
Patients will be excluded from this study for the following:
5.2.1
Prior history of HIV-positivity (Routine HIV testing is not required pre-treatment).
5.2.2
Positive serology for Hepatitis B (HB) defined as a positive test for HBsAg. In 
addition, if negative for HBsAg but HBcAb positive (regardless of HBsAb status), a 
Hepatitis B DNA test will be performed and if positive the patient will be excluded.
5.2.3
Serious non-malignant disease (e.g., active uncontrolled bacterial, viral, or fungal 
infections) or other medical conditions (including psychiatric) which, in the opinion 
of the Principal Investigator would compromise other protocol objectives.
5.2.4
Presence of symptomatic CNS lymphoma.
5.2.5
Pregnant or lactating females.
5.2.6
Prior history of radiation or chemotherapy for MCL.
5.2.7
History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic 
composition to ofatumumab or other agents used in study.
5.2.8
Patients with a “currently active” second malignancy, other than non-melanoma skin 
cancer or in situ carcinoma of the cervix or breast. Patients are not considered to have 
a “currently active” malignancy if they have completed anti-cancer therapy, are 
considered by their physician to be at less than 30% risk of relapse and at least 
2 - 5 years have lapsed.
5.2.9
     Major surgery, other than diagnostic surgery, within 2 weeks.
5.2.10
Patients with NHL other than MCL
5.2.11
Patients must not have a history of cardiac disease, defined as New York Heart 
Association Class II or greater or clinical evidence of congestive heart failure. All 
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 37 of 109
patients must have a MUGA scan or 2-D echocardiogram indicating an ejection 
fraction of ≥ 45% within 42 days prior to registration. The method used at baseline 
must be used for later monitoring.
5.2.12
Unwilling or unable to follow protocol requirements
5.2.13
Any condition which in the Investigator’s opinion deems the patient an unsuitable 
candidate to receive study drug.
5.2.14
Received an investigational agent within 30 days prior to enrollment
5.3
Inclusion of Women and Minorities
Both men and women and members of all races and ethnic groups are eligible for this study.
For Network Sites refer to Error! Reference source not found. for site specific instructions.
6
INVESTIGATIONAL PRODUCT
6.1
Ofatumumab
6.1.1
Availability
Novartis will supply ofatumumab to the investigator as content-labeled ofatumumab vials 
presented as either 100 mg acetate formulation, 20 mg/mL, 5 mL fill vials, or 1000 mg acetate 
formulation, 20 mg/mL, 50 mL fill vials.
The investigational medical product, ofatumumab, is a liquid concentrate for solution for 
infusion presented in glass vials. Ofatumumab will be infused intravenously.
Ofatumumab open-labeled product will be for intravenous infusion. The site is responsible for 
labeling individual vials for investigational use.
All items required for administration of study medication (e.g., infusion bags, filters, etc.) are to 
be provided by the site.
6.1.2
Storage and Stability
Ofatumumab vials must be stored at 2°C - 8°C. Protect from light and do not freeze. No special 
packaging components, other than the outer white cardboard carton in which the vials are placed, 
will be used to afford light protection.
6.1.3
Formulation / Composition of Ofatumumab Injection 20 mg/mL
The quantitative composition of acetate formulation 20 mg/mL: this is available in 2 fill 
volumes, 5 mL/vial (100 mg/vial) and 50 mL/vial (1000 mg/vial).
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 38 of 109
Table 1.
Formulation / Composition of Ofatumumab Injection 20 mg/mL
Ingredient
Quantity/mL
Ofatumumab
20.0 mg
Sodium Acetate, Trihydrate
6.80 mg
Edetate Disodium, Dihydrate (EDTA)
0.019 mg
Polysorbate 80
0.20 mg
L-Arginine
10.0 mg
Sodium Chloride
2.98 mg
Hydrochloric Acid
to give pH 5.5
Water for Injection
q.s. to 1.0 mL
6.1.4
Drug Shipment
Ofatumumab will be provided by NOVARTIS and shipped to the participating sites.
The date of receipt and the amount of drug received will be documented. Drug shipment records 
will be retained by the investigational pharmacist or designee.
6.1.5
Preparation
Ofatumumab will be prepared as 1000 mL dilution of ofatumumab in sterile, pyrogen-free 0.9% 
NaCl to yield a 0.3 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL, or 2 mg/mL ofatumumab concentration for infusions of 
300 mg, 1000 mg, or 2000 mg, respectively.
Once diluted into saline, the product is stable for up to 24 hours at ambient temperature. 
However, the product contains no preservative and should be used as soon as possible after 
dilution. Preparation of drug solution for intravenous injection by the site pharmacist or designee 
will be done in accordance with the protocol, and in these dilution instructions. Ofatumumab 
intravenous solution will be prepared using standard dilution methods and following general 
aseptic practice standard to preparation of IV medications. Eyes and hands should be protected 
when handling ofatumumab. For intravenous administration, compatibility of the following 
components for ofatumumab in clinical studies (i.e., not for commercial product) has been 
established (Refer to Table 2).
Used vials will be disposed of per Institute policy. Unused vials will be disposed of at the end of 
the study as directed by the study sponsor.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 39 of 109
Table 2.
Dosing Components for Ofatumumab in Clinical Studies
6.1.6
Materials for Preparation and Administration of Infusion
The following materials are needed when preparing and administering the infusion:
•
1000 mL sterile pyrogen-free 0.9% saline (NaCl) infusion bag(s). The solution can be kept at 
ambient temperature for a maximum of 48 hours after preparation; however, the product does 
not contain a preservative and dosing should begin as soon as possible after dose preparation.
•
Ofatumumab 100 mg and 1000 mg vials, supplied by NOVARTIS.
•
Needles and syringes (50 mL sterile syringe), not supplied by NOVARTIS.
•
Intravenous (IV) cannula not required if patient has central venous access. Not supplied by 
NOVARTIS.
•
Infusion pump and infusion tubing set, not supplied by NOVARTIS.
•
In-line low protein binding, polyether sulfone filter 0.2 μm (Note that a spare filter is 
available in case the filter needs to be changed), not supplied by NOVARTIS. Note that the 
commercial filters are sterilizing-grade (0.22 μm) hydrophilic Durapore by Millipore.
6.1.7
Dilution of Ofatumumab
•
Ensure the correct container number is used.
•
Take a 1000 mL infusion bag (sterile pyrogen-free 0.9% saline), remove and dispose of the 
appropriate amount of saline according to Table 3 or Table 4 below.
•
Draw the required amount of ofatumumab according to Table 3 (100 mg vials) or Table 4 
(1000 mg vials) below.
•
Inject ofatumumab into the saline bag.
Dosing Component
Material of Construction
Suggested Vendor
Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC)
Baxter
1L Saline Bags
Polyolefin [polyethylene* (PE)/polypropylene (PP)]
Baxter, B. Braun
PVC
Baxter
Administration Set
PVC lined with Polyethylene.
B. Braun
Sterilizing-grade (0.22 μm) hydrophilic filter.
Durapore brand by 
Millipore
Lines made of PVC, filter membrane material polyether 
sulfone.
Baxter
Filter Extension Set
Lines made of PVC lined with Polyethylene, filter 
membrane material polyether sulfone.
Alaris/Cardinal Health
Preparation of the 1000 mL infusion bags should be done on the day of planned infusion.
*Polyethylene (IUPAC name: polyethene).
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 40 of 109
•
Invert the infusion bag slowly 3 times, avoiding formation of any foam.
•
Label the infusion bag with the completed label.
Table 3.
Preparation of Ofatumumab Infusion: 100 mg Vials
Dose of 
Ofatumumab
Infusion Bag Size
Volume of NaCl to Be 
Removed From Infusion 
Bag
Volume Ofatumumab
(Number of Ofatumumab Vials)
300 mg
1000 mL
15 mL
15 mL
(3 vials, 5 mL/vial)
700 mg
1000 mL
35 mL
35 mL
(7 vials, 5 mL/vial)
1000 mg
1000 mL
50 mL
50 mL
(10 vials, 5 mL/vial)
Table 4.
Preparation of Ofatumumab Infusion: 1000 mg Vials
Dose of 
Ofatumumab
Infusion Bag Size
Volume of NaCl to Be 
Removed From Infusion 
Bag
Volume Ofatumumab
(Number of Ofatumumab Vials)
1000 mg
1000 mL
50 mL
50 mL
(1 vial, 50 mL/vial)
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 41 of 109
6.1.8
Ofatumumab Infusion Set-Up
Figure 5.
Ofatumumab Infusion Set-Up Schema
•
Ofatumumab must be administered by IV infusion through an in-line filter and through a 
well-functioning IV catheter (IV cannula) into a vein in the arm (or other venous access) by 
an infusion pump.
•
NOTE: It is mandatory to use an in-line low protein binding 0.2 micron polyether sulfone 
filter for all IV dosing of ofatumumab drug product.
•
DO NOT ADMINISTER AS AN INTRAVENOUS PUSH OR BOLUS.
•
Ofatumumab should not be mixed with any other medication. If ofatumumab is to be dosed 
through an in-dwelling catheter, then, any previous medication should be removed by 
flushing with normal saline prior to dosing with ofatumumab.
•
NOTE: The infusion site can be used for blood sampling only if there is no risk of 
contamination of the infusion needle with the saline, infusion solutions, or any other fluid(s). 
Only a newly inserted needle can be used for the pre-dose blood samples.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 42 of 109
•
Check patient ID against the label on the infusion bag and ensure the expiry of the solution. 
The solution must be administered in its entirety to the patient within 48 hours from time of 
preparation.
•
Attach the 1000 mL infusion bag to the infusion set (if not done at the pharmacy).
•
Attach the in-line filter to the infusion set. NOTE: The in-line filter must be used during the 
entire infusion.
•
Prime the infusion set and filter with ofatumumab (if not done at the pharmacy).
•
In case of a problem with the filter (i.e., clogging/blockage), please change, re-prime the new 
filter, and continue the infusion.
•
In case of problem with infusion set, follow local procedures.
•
Collect the pre-dose blood samples, if required.
•
Check the backflow from the IV cannula according to routine practice at site
•
Set the pump at the initial infusion rate 12 mL/hr for the first infusion and 25 mL/hr for the 
subsequent infusions (if no Grade ≥ 3 infusion-associated AEs were observed in the previous 
infusion).
•
Start the infusion using the following infusion rates (as study applicable).
Table 5.
Infusion Rate at First Ofatumumab Infusion (300 mg or 1000 mg)
Time
Infusion Rate
0 - 30 minutes
12 mL/hr
31 - 60 minutes
25 mL/hr
61 - 90 minutes
50 mL/hr
91 - 120 minutes
100 mL/hr
121 - 150 minutes
200 mL/hr
151 - 180 minutes
300 mL/hr
181 + minutes
400 mL/hr
Table 6.
Infusion Rate at Subsequent Ofatumumab Infusion (700 mg or 1000 mg)
No ofatumumab dose modifications are permitted.
Time
Infusion Rate
0 - 30 minutes
25 mL/hr
31 – 60 minutes
50 mL/hr
61 – 90 minutes
100 mL/hr
91 – 120 minutes
200 mL/hr
121 + minutes
400 mL/hr
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 43 of 109
6.1.9
Toxicity
The most common or serious adverse events associated with ofatumumab include:
•
Infusion Reactions: Infusion reactions occurred in 44% of patients on the day of the first 
infusion (300 mg), 29% on the day of the second infusion (2,000 mg), and less frequently 
during subsequent infusions. Ofatumumab can cause serious infusion reactions manifesting 
as bronchospasm, dyspnea, laryngeal edema, pulmonary edema, flushing, hypertension, 
hypotension, syncope, cardiac ischemia/infarction, back pain, abdominal pain, pyrexia, rash, 
urticaria, and angioedema. Infusion reactions occur more frequently with the first 2 infusions.
•
Tumor Lysis Syndrome: Tumor lysis syndrome resulting in renal failure has been 
described, and occasional fatalities noted. Tumor lysis syndrome is more likely in patients 
with high numbers of circulating malignant cells. In patients with circulating mantle 
cells ≥ 10,000/μL, the first ofatumumab infusion should be reduced or omitted.
•
Cytopenias: Neutropenia: Of 108 patients with normal neutrophil counts at baseline, 
45 (42%) developed ≥ Grade 3 neutropenia. Nineteen (18%) developed Grade 4 neutropenia. 
Some patients experienced new onset Grade 4 neutropenia > 2 weeks in duration.
•
Intestinal Obstruction: Obstruction of the small intestine can occur in patients receiving 
ofatumumab. Perform a diagnostic evaluation if obstruction is suspected.
•
Infections: A total of 108 patients (70%) experienced bacterial, viral, or fungal infections. A 
total of 45 patients (29%) experienced ≥ Grade 3 infections, of which 19 (12%) were fatal. 
The proportion of fatal infections in the fludarabine- and alemtuzumab-refractory group was 
17%.
•
Fulminant and Fatal Hepatitis B Virus (HBV): Fulminant and fatal hepatitis B virus 
(HBV) infection can occur in patients newly exposed to HBV following treatment with 
ofatumumab. In addition, hepatitis B reactivation, including fulminant hepatitis and death, 
occurs with other monoclonal antibodies directed against CD20. Screen patients at high risk 
of HBV infection before initiation of ofatumumab. Closely monitor carriers of hepatitis B for 
clinical and laboratory signs of active HBV infection during treatment with ofatumumab and 
for 6 months to 12 months following the last infusion of ofatumumab. Discontinue 
ofatumumab in patients who develop viral hepatitis or reactivation of viral hepatitis, and 
institute appropriate treatment. Insufficient data exist regarding the safety of administration 
of ofatumumab in patients with active hepatitis.
•
Exacerbation or reactivation of other viral infections has also been reported with 
ofatumumab. Recent reports describe JC virus reactivation leading to progressive multifocal 
leukoencephalopathy (PML) in patients who were receiving ofatumumab. Patients presenting 
with new neurologic findings (e.g., major changes in vision, unusual eye movements, loss of 
balance or coordination, confusion) should be evaluated for PML (see APPENDIX B).
•
A report in the literature described an increase in fatal infection in HIV-related lymphoma 
patients when rituximab was used in combination with CHOP chemotherapy, as compared to 
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 44 of 109
CHOP alone. Similar effects could be seen with ofatumumab. Patients with HIV infection are 
not eligible for entry on this research study.
Other rare serious adverse events are:
•
Brain damage (possible headache, confusion, seizures, weakness on one side and/or 
vision loss), also called PRES or posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome.
•
Very severe blistering skin disease; loss of large portions of skin, also called toxic 
epidermal necrolysis (TENS).
•
Another antibody treatment similar to ofatumumab has caused severe skin rashes, 
including the lining of the mouth, gut and lungs. In some cases this was fatal. Severe skin 
reactions may also be observed in association with ofatumumab, particularly in the 
setting of cancer.
6.2
Cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan®, CTX)
6.2.1
Availability
Commercially available as a powder in 100 mg, 200 mg, 500 mg, 1000 mg, and 2000 mg vials.
6.2.2
Storage and Stability
Reconstituted solutions are stable for 6 days in a refrigerator.
6.2.3
Preparation
Reconstitute 100 mg, 200 mg, 500 mg, 1 g and 2 g vials with 5 mL, 10 mL, 25 mL, 50 mL, or 
100 mL of NS to give a final concentration of 20 mg/mL. Vigorous shaking, gentle warming 
may be necessary for non-lyophilized preparation.
6.2.4
Administration
Infuse IV over 2 hours.
6.2.5
Toxicity
Hemorrhagic cystitis, nausea, vomiting, alopecia, bone marrow suppression, stomatitis/enteritis, 
skin darkening, abnormal nails, SIADH, cardiac necrosis (usually doses > 200 mg/kg ideal body 
weight).
6.3
Mesna (Mesnex®)
6.3.1
Availability
Mesna is commercially available in 2 mL, 4 mL, and 10 mL ampoules containing 200 mg, 
400 mg, and 1000 mg, respectively (100 mg/mL).
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 45 of 109
6.3.2
Storage and Stability
Mesna is stable at room temperature, but should be administered within 6 hours of opening the 
vial to assure sterility. Diluted solutions are stable for 24 hours at 25°C.
6.3.3
Preparation
Dilute dose in 100 mL - 1000 mL D5W of NS to a final concentration of 1 mg/mL – 20 mg/mL.
6.3.4
Administration
Give as an IV bolus or as a continuous IV infusion diluted in D5W, D5NS, NR, or LR.
6.3.5
Toxicity
Skin rash or hives, pruritus, nausea, vomiting, dysgeusia, fatigue, headache, hematuria, 
hypotension, and diarrhea.
6.4
Doxorubicin (Adriamycin®, Rubex®, Adriamycin RDF™, Adriamycin PFS™)
6.4.1
Availability
Commercially available in 10 mg, 20 mg, and 50 mg vials as a red-orange, lyophilized powder 
which has a storage stability of at least 2 years. Refer to the expiration date on vial.
6.4.2
Storage and Stability
Reconstituted doxorubicin is stable for 7 days if stored at room temperature and under normal 
room light and 5 days under refrigeration (2°C - 8°C). It should be protected from exposure to 
sunlight. To prevent bacterial growth, however, the solution should be used within eight hours. 
Discard any unused solution from the 10 mg, 20 mg, and 50 mg vials. Bacteriostatic diluents 
with preservatives are NOT recommended as they might possibly worsen the reaction to 
extravasated drug.
6.4.3
Preparation
The 10 mg, 20 mg and 50 mg vials should be reconstituted with 5 mL, 10 mL, and 25 mL, 
respectively, of sodium chloride injection, USP (0.9%) to give a final concentration of 2 mg/mL.
6.4.4
Administration
Intravenous infusions should be diluted in NS. If the solution is not to be used within 8 hours, it 
should be protected from light. Push or bolus administration should be done over 5 – 10 minutes 
through the side arm of a free flowing IV line. Care must be taken not to infiltrate doxorubicin as 
it is a tissue vesicant. If extravasation occurs: stop the infusion; aspirate blood/solution from the 
injection site; disconnect the syringe/IV infusion bag from the catheter; inject 0.5 mL of 
hydrocortisone phosphate mixed in 2 mL NS into the catheter; remove the catheter/needle; apply 
ice packs 30 minutes QID to the area for one day. Doxorubicin is not compatible with heparin so 
it should not be administered through a heparin-lock.
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 46 of 109
6.4.5
Toxicity
Myelosuppression, soft tissue vesicant, cardiomyopathy (dose-related), darkening of the skin and 
nail beds, nausea, emesis, stomatitis, alopecia, red urine.
6.5
Vincristine (Oncovin®)
6.5.1
Availability
Vincristine is commercially available in 1 mg, 2 mg, and 5 mg vials (1 mg/mL).
6.5.2
Storage and Stability
Vials should be refrigerated.
6.5.3
Administration
Administer without further dilution by rapid IV bolus in the side arm of a newly started IV line 
or rapid IV bolus or continuous infusion through a central venous catheter. Care must be taken 
not to infiltrate vincristine as it is a tissue vesicant. If extravasation occurs: stop the infusion; 
aspirate blood/solution from the injection site; disconnect the syringe/IV infusion bag from the 
catheter; inject 1 mL of hyaluronidase (150 units/mL) into the catheter; remove the 
catheter/needle; apply dry heat 30 minutes QID to the area for 1 day.
6.5.4
Toxicity
Abdominal pain, agitation, alopecia, anorexia, blurred vision, constipation, cranial nerve palsies, 
depression, diplopia, dysuria, erythema, fatigue, fever, hallucinations, hypertension, ileus, 
injection site reaction, nausea/vomiting, neuropathic pain, night blindness, ocular irritation, optic 
atrophy, orthostatic hypotension, peripheral neuropathy, phlebitis, polyuria, ptosis, rash, seizures, 
SIADH, skin ulcer, thrombocytopenia, tissue necrosis, urinary incontinence, urinary retention. 
Avoid extravasation as VCR is irritating to tissues.
6.6
Dexamethasone
6.6.1
Availability
Commercially available in 0.25 mg, 0.5 mg, 0.75 mg, 1 mg, 1.5 mg, 4 mg, and 6 mg scored 
tablets and in an intravenous solution containing 0.5 mg/5 mL or 1 mL of dexamethasone.
6.6.2
Storage and Stability
All forms are stable at room temperature.
6.6.3
Administration
Administer orally with meals to minimize indigestion or GI irritation.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 47 of 109
6.6.4
Toxicity
Abdominal pain, acne vulgaris, adrenocortical insufficiency, amenorrhea, angioedema, anorexia, 
anxiety, appetite stimulation, arthralgia, avascular necrosis, bone fractures, cataracts, 
constipation, Cushing’s syndrome, depression, diabetes mellitus, diaphoresis, diarrhea, 
dysmenorrhea, ecchymosis, edema, EEG changes, emotional liability, erythema, esophageal 
ulceration, euphoria, exfoliative dermatitis, exophthalmos, fever, fluid retention, gastritis, 
headache, heart failure, hirsutism, hypercholesterolemia, hyperglycemia, hypernatremia, 
hypertension, hypocalcemia, hypokalemia, hypotension, immunosuppression, infection, 
insomnia, lethargy, menstrual irregularity, mood lability, myalgia, myopathy, nausea/vomiting, 
ocular hypertension, optic neuritis, osteoporosis, palpitations, pancreatitis, papilledema, peptic 
ulcer, peripheral neuropathy, petechiae, phlebitis, pseudotumor cerebri, psychosis, restlessness, 
retinopathy, seizures, sinus tachycardia, skin atrophy, thrombocytopenia, thrombosis, urinary 
incontinence, urinary urgency, urticaria, vertigo, visual impairment, weakness, weight gain or 
loss.
6.7
Methotrexate (Folex®; Mexate®)
6.7.1
Availability
Commercially available as powder in single use vials of 20 mg and 1000 mg or as liquid vials of 
50 mg and 250 mg.
6.7.2
Storage and Stability
Once diluted, methotrexate is stable for 24 hours at 21°C - 25°C.
6.7.3
Preparation
Reconstitute in D5W or NS to a concentration of 50 mg/mL.
6.7.4
Administration
Intravenous administration is permitted. This protocol will use IV high dose methotrexate over 
24 hours.
6.7.5
Toxicity
Bone marrow suppression, stomatitis/enteritis, transaminitis, cutaneous reaction, renal failure, 
and pneumonitis.
6.8
Leucovorin (Citrovorum factor; Folinic Acid; Wellcovorin)
6.8.1
Availability
Leucovorin is commercially available in 1 mL vials containing 3 mg/mL (Lederle); 5 mL vials 
containing 5 mg/mL; and in 50 mg, 100 mg, and 350 mg vials of lyophilized powder for 
reconstitution. Follow the manufacturer’s labeling for reconstitution of vials containing powders. 
Leucovorin is also available in 5 mg, 10 mg, 15 mg, and 25 mg tablets.
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 48 of 109
6.8.2
Storage and Stability
Store vials between 15°C - 25°C (59°F - 77°F). Protect from light and moisture.
6.8.3
Preparation
Reconstitute the 50 mg or 100 mg vial with 5 mL or 10 mL, respectively, of bacteriostatic or 
sterile water for injection. The resultant injection solution has a concentration of 10 mg/mL. 
Reconstitute the 350 mg vial with 17 mL of bacteriostatic or sterile water for injection. The 
resultant injection solution has a concentration of 20 mg/mL. If reconstituted with sterile water 
for injection, use immediately. If bacteriostatic water for injection was used, the solution is stable 
for 7 days. Visually inspect parenteral products for particulate matter and discoloration prior to 
administration whenever solution and container permit.
6.8.4
Administration
Administration route for leucovorin is IV injection by bolus or short infusion. Oral 
administration allowed for 10 mg/m2 doses.
6.8.5
Toxicity
Toxicities include anaphylactoid reactions, nausea, vomiting, seizures, syncope, and urticaria.
6.9
Cytarabine (Cytosar-U®; Ara-C; Cytosine Arabinoside)
6.9.1
Availability
Commercially available as 100 mg, 500 mg, 1,000 mg, and 2,000 mg vials.
6.9.2
Storage and Stability
Diluted solutions are stable for at least 192 hours at room temperature.
6.9.3
Preparation
Dilute with 0.9% benzyl alcohol (5 mL for 100 mg – 1000 mg cytarabine; 20 mL for 2000 mg 
cytarabine) plus 50-100 mL D5W or NS for 1-2 hour IV infusions or in 500 mL - 1000 mL D5W 
or NS for longer IV infusions. May be given SQ (10 mg – 30 mg) in 1 mL NS.
6.9.4
Administration
Infuse IV over 2 hours.
6.9.5
Toxicity
Myelosuppression, central nervous system toxicity (doses ≥ 500 mg/m2, especially when 
creatinine clearance is < 60 cc/min; (see Section 8.7), stomatitis, nausea, emesis, non-
cardiogenic pulmonary edema, keratoconjunctivitis, cutaneous toxicity, alopecia, hepatic 
dysfunction.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 49 of 109
6.10 Filgrastim (G-CSF; r-met HuG-CSF; Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor; 
Neupogen®)
6.10.1 Availability
Filgrastim is commercially available in 1 mL and 1.6 mL vials at a concentration of 
300 mcg/mL. Discard unused portions. Use only 1 dose per vial; do not reenter the vial. Do not 
save unused drug for later administration. Filgrastim is also available as single-dose, 
preservative-free, prefilled syringes with 26 gauge, 5/8 inch needles containing 300 mcg 
(0.5 mL) or 480 mcg (0.8 mL) of filgrastim (600 mcg/mL).
6.10.2 Storage and Stability
Filgrastim should be stored in the refrigerator at 2°C - 8°C (36°F - 46°F). Do not freeze. Avoid 
shaking. Prior to injection, filgrastim may be allowed to reach room temperature for a maximum 
of 24 hours. Any vial left at room temperature for greater than 24 hours should be discarded.
6.10.3 Administration
Only SQ administration is permitted. Use only one dose per vial; do not re-enter the vial. Do not 
save unused drug for later administration. Filgrastim is contraindicated in patients with known 
hypersensitivity to E. Coli-derived products, filgrastim, or any component of the product. 
Rounding of doses is appropriate; follow the dose rounding instructions below:
If actual weight is < 60 kg use 300 mcg/dose; if actual weight is 60 kg – 99 kg, use 
480 mcg/dose; if actual weight is 100 kg – 130 kg use 600 mcg/dose; if actual weight is > 130 kg 
use 780 mcg/dose.
6.10.4 Toxicity
The only consistently observed clinical toxicity described with filgrastim is medullary bone pain. 
Other clinical toxicities that have been described include skin rash, and cutaneous vasculitis. 
Since commercial introduction of filgrastim, there have been rare reports of allergic-type 
reactions. Biochemical abnormalities that may occur include increases in alkaline phosphatase, 
uric acid, and lactate dehydrogenase.
6.11 Pegfilgrastim (Neulasta)
6.11.1 Availability
Pegfilgrastim is manufactured and packaged and distributed by Amgen Inc. Pegfilgrastim is 
supplied as a preservative-free solution containing 6 mg (0.6 mL) of pegfilgrastim (10 mg/mL) 
in a single-dose syringe with a 27 gauge, ½ inch needle with an UltraSafe® Needle Guard. 
Pegfilgrastim is supplied in 0.6 mL prefilled syringes for subcutaneous injection. Each syringe 
contains 6 mg pegfilgrastim (based on protein weight), in a sterile, clear, colorless, preservative-
free solution (pH 4.0) containing acetate (0.35 mg), sorbitol (30.0 mg), polysorbate 20 (0.02 mg), 
and sodium (0.02 mg) in water for injection, USP.
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 50 of 109
6.11.2 Storage and Stability
Peg-filgrastim should be stored refrigerated at 2°C to 8°C (36°F to 46°F); syringes should be 
kept in their carton to protect from light until time of use. Shaking should be avoided. Before 
injection, pegfilgrastim may be allowed to reach room temperature for a maximum of 48 hours 
but should be protected from light. Pegfilgrastim left at room temperature for more than 48 hours 
should be discarded. Freezing should be avoided; however, if accidentally frozen, pegfilgrastim 
should be allowed to thaw in the refrigerator before administration. If frozen a second time, 
pegfilgrastim should be discarded. Pegfilgrastim should be visually inspected for discoloration 
and particulate matter before administration. Pegfilgrastim should not be administered if 
discoloration or particulates are observed.
6.11.3 Administration
Each patient will receive a fixed dose of 6 mg of pegfilgrastim. The entire contents of the 0.6 mL 
prefilled syringe should be administered irrespective of the patient’s actual weight.
6.11.4 Toxicity
In a placebo-controlled trial, bone pain occurred at a higher incidence in pegfilgrastim-treated 
patients as compared to placebo-treated patients (pegfilgrastim, n = 467; placebo, n = 461). The 
incidence of other commonly reported adverse events were similar in the pegfilgrastim and 
placebo-treated patients, and were consistent with the underlying cancer diagnosis and its 
treatment with chemotherapy. Those adverse events occurred at rates between 48% and 10% in 
the pegfilgrastim treated patients and included: alopecia, bone pain, diarrhea, pyrexia (not 
including febrile neutropenia), myalgia, headache, arthralgia, vomiting, asthenia, edema 
peripheral, and constipation.
In the active controlled studies, common adverse events occurred at similar rates and severities 
in both treatment arms (pegfilgrastim, n = 465; filgrastim, n = 331). These adverse experiences 
occurred at rates between 72% and 15% and included: nausea, fatigue, alopecia, diarrhea, 
vomiting, constipation, fever, anorexia, skeletal pain, headache, taste perversion, dyspepsia, 
myalgia, insomnia, abdominal pain, arthralgia, generalized weakness, peripheral edema, 
dizziness, granulocytopenia, stomatitis, mucositis, and neutropenic fever.
6.11.5 Laboratory Abnormalities
In clinical studies, leukocytosis (WBC counts > 100 x 109/L) was observed in less than 1% of 
932 patients with non-myeloid malignancies receiving pegfilgrastim. Leukocytosis was not 
associated with any adverse effects. In the placebo-controlled study, reversible elevations in 
LDH, alkaline phosphatase, and uric acid that did not require treatment occurred at similar rates 
in pegfilgrastim- and placebo-treated patients.
6.11.6 Toxicity/Warnings
Pegfilgrastim is contraindicated in patients with known hypersensitivity to E. coli-derived 
proteins, pegfilgrastim, Filgrastim, or any other component of the product.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 51 of 109
Rare cases of splenic rupture have been reported following the administration of pegfilgrastim. 
Splenic rupture, in some cases resulting in death, has also been associated with filgrastim, the 
parent compound of pegfilgrastim. Patients receiving pegfilgrastim who report left upper 
abdominal and/or shoulder tip pain should be evaluated for an enlarged spleen or splenic rupture.
Adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been reported in neutropenic patients with 
sepsis receiving Filgrastim, the parent compound of pegfilgrastim, and is postulated to be 
secondary to an influx of neutrophils to sites of inflammation in the lungs. Neutropenic patients 
receiving pegfilgrastim who develop fever, lung infiltrates, or respiratory distress should be 
evaluated for the possibility of ARDS. In the event that ARDS occurs, pegfilgrastim should be 
discontinued and/or withheld until resolution of ARDS and patients should receive appropriate 
medical management for this condition.
Severe sickle cell crises have been associated with the use of pegfilgrastim in patients with sickle 
cell disease. Severe sickle cell crises, in some cases resulting in death, have also been associated 
with Filgrastim, the parent compound of pegfilgrastim. Only physicians qualified by specialized 
training or experience in the treatment of patients with sickle cell disease should prescribe 
pegfilgrastim for such patients, and only after careful consideration of the potential risks and 
benefits.
7
STUDY PROCEDURES
7.1
Patient Registration
All data management will be conducted at RPCI. For information on Network Site patient 
registration, refer to Appendix A. 
Informed consent MUST be completed prior to receiving any study related procedures.
Following registration, patients should begin protocol treatment within 10 days or sooner if 
clinically necessary. Issues that would cause treatment delays should be discussed with the 
Principal Investigator. 
The following will be completed within 10 DAYS prior to registration:
•
Medical history 
•
Physical examination
•
Vital signs (i.e., temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure, body weight, and 
height)
•
Hematology (complete blood count (CBC) with automated differentials): WBC, RBC, 
HGB, HCT, platelet, MCV, MCH, MCHC, % neutrophils, absolute neutrophils,  % 
monocytes, absolute monocytes, % eosinophils, absolute eosinophils, % basophils, 
absolute basophils, % lymphocyte (designated as % lymphocyte total in RPCI lab 
system), absolute lymphocyte (designated as absolute lymphocyte total in RPCI lab 
system), platelet confirmation (as clinically indicated), and differential confirmation (as 
clinically indicated).
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 52 of 109
•
Chemistry (i.e., complete metabolic panel (CMP): chloride, CO2, potassium, sodium, 
BUN, glucose, calcium, creatinine, total protein, albumin, total bilirubin, alkaline 
phosphatase, AST, ALT, A/G ratio, BUN/creatinine ratio, osmol (Calc), anion gap).
•
Pregnancy test (serum) in females of childbearing potential
•
Concomitant Medications: List any medications that are ongoing, or that will be 
discontinued, within 1 week prior to first dose of study drug.
The following will be completed within 28 DAYS prior to registration:
•
Blood work other than CBC with auto diff and CMP, and any X-ray, scans of any type or 
ultrasound, lumbar puncture, and bone marrow biopsy which is utilized for tumor 
measurement.
7.2
Schedule of Procedures and Observations
The schedule of procedures and observations for this study is summarized in below. Unless 
otherwise defined in the written protocol text, all procedures/assessments will be conducted in 
accordance with RPCI Clinical Research Services Standard Operating Procedures.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 53 of 109
Table 7
Schedule of Procedures and Observations
Evaluations
Prior
to 
Study
Day 1*
of Each 
Cycle
At Time of 
Restaging**
Prior to 
Stem Cell 
Collection 
HDC-
ASCS
Day 100
(±1  week)
If 
HDC-SCT 
Eligible
Post 
Treatment 
Follow-Up‡
Test and Observations
History and Physical Exam6
X
X
X
X
X
X
Pulse, Blood Pressure
X
X
X
X
Height/Weight/Body Surface 
Area†
X
X
X
Performance Status
X
X
X
X
X
X
Tumor Measurements
X
X
X
X
PRN
Drug Toxicity Assessment
X
X
PRN
Laboratory Studies
CBC, Differential, Platelets
X
XΩ
X
X
X
X
Serum Creatinine, BUN
X
X
X
X
X
X
Creatinine Clearance
X
X
Serum Electrolytes
X
X
X
X
X
X
Ca++
X
X
X
X
X
PRN
AST, Alk.Phos., Bilirubin
X
X
X
X
X
PRN
LDH
X
X
X
X
X
X
EKG
X
X
PFTs
X
X
MUGA or ECHO
X
X
Hepatitis BSAg, 
Hepatitis BcAb 
X
XΔ
XΔ
XΔ
XΔ
Hepatitis B DNA
XΔ
Hepatitis C Ab
XΦ
HIV (If risk factors present)
X
X
Beta-2-microglobuline 
(B2M)
X
X
X
Albumin
X
X
X
X
X
X
Urine or serumβHCG 
(female patients)
Xϖ
Xϖ
Concomitant Medications
Xa
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 54 of 109
Evaluations
Prior
to 
Study
Day 1*
of Each 
Cycle
At Time of 
Restaging**
Prior to 
Stem Cell 
Collection 
HDC-
ASCS
Day 100
(±1  week)
If 
HDC-SCT 
Eligible
Post 
Treatment 
Follow-Up‡
Staging
Chest X-ray, PA, and 
Lateral
X
X
Lumbar Puncture***
X
A
PRN
F
CT Scan 
Neck/Chest/Abdomen/Pelvis
X
J
J
J
J
PET
X
X
X
X
K
Bone Marrow Aspirate
D
Bone Marrow Biopsy and 
Aspirate
X
F
X
X
GI endoscopic evaluation 
(i.e., upper GI endoscopy 
and colonoscopy)****
X
B
B
D
Histologic Review
X
D
Cytogenetics
X
D
D
D
D
Sample Submission and Correlative Studies
Lymph Node Biopsy (Repeat)
E
D
Bone Marrow Aspirate (for 
MRD)
G
G
G
G
G
Peripheral Stem Cells
X
Peripheral Blood (for MRD)
H
H
H
H
H
Complement Activation 
Studies
I
*
Within 72 hours prior to Day 1 of each induction treatment cycle.
**
Prior to Cycles 3 and 5
***
Base-line lumbar puncture will only be required in patients with unexplained neurological symptoms to 
rule out lymphomatous meningitis.
****      GI evaluation at baseline may be waived in emergent situations per PI discretion.
†
Although doses are recalculated prior to each treatment; actual dose to be given need not change unless the 
difference in BSA from baseline is ≥ 10%.
‡
As long as the patient remains on study, after the Day 100 post stem cell visit date, follow-up will occur every 
4 months for 2 years(± 2 weeks), then every 6 months per 3 years(± 2 weeks), then as clinically instructed.  
If the patient does not proceed to transplant they will be followed annually for survival. 
A
Within 2 weeks of starting Cycle 3 and Cycle 5 only if positive at baseline.
B
Prior to HDC-SCT and on Day 100 only if positive at baseline.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study No.: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 55 of 109
C            Footnote “C” was removed from table and not replaced.
D
At the time of relapsed/refractory disease diagnosis.
E
Repeat diagnostic lymph node/tumor biopsy if initial biopsy was not diagnostic.
F            Document absence of disease at least once in CR if previously involved.
G
Bone marrow biopsy/aspiration will be submitted for flow cytometry analysis for minimal residual disease 
(MRD) analysis (see Section 7.4) at baseline, before Cycle 3, before Cycle 5, end of therapy/prior to stem 
cell collection (if transplant eligible), and on Day 100 (if HDC-ASCT eligible).
H
Peripheral blood will be submitted for flow cytometry analysis for minimal residual disease (MRD) 
analysis (see Section 7.4) at baseline, before Cycle 3, before Cycle 5, end of therapy/prior to stem cell 
collection (if transplant eligible), on Day 100 (if HDC-ASCT eligible) and then every 6 months for 3 years 
or until disease progression.
I
Refer to Section 7.4.5.
J             CT of the neck as clinically indicated. 
K            In follow up, PET scan should be performed as clinically indicated. 
6
Neurological exams need to be performed prior to each dose of high dose cytarabine during Cycle 2, 
Cycle 4 and Cycle 6.
Ω
CBC with differential and platelet counts will be monitored three times per week in between cycles of 
Ofatumumab-HyperCVAD/Ofatumumab-HD-MA and during the first post 30 days after HDC-ASCT for 
eligible patients.
Φ
All patients must be screened for hepatitis C infection before starting treatment. Patients who test positive 
for Hepatitis C antibody (Ab) must have a liver biopsy performed and other evaluations prior to enrollment 
(See Section 5.1.9).
Δ
All patients must be screened for hepatitis B infection (Hepatitis Bs Ag/Hepatitis Bc Ab) before starting 
treatment. Patients tested positive for Hepatitis B surface antigen are ineligible. Patients tested Hepatitis Bs 
Ag negative/Hepatitis Bc Ab positive should have Hepatitis B DNA PCR testing (see Section 5.1, 
Bullet 5.1.10.3). If HBV DNA is positive the patient is excluded. If HBV DNA is negative, patient may be 
included but must undergo at least every 2 months HBV DNA PCR testing from the start of treatment 
throughout the duration the study. Monitoring during the study is required at least every 2 months and 
during follow-up at a minimum of every 2 - 3 months up to 6 months after the last dose. Prophylactic 
antiviral may be initiated at the discretion of the investigator (see Section 5.1, Bullet 5.1.10.3).
ϖ
Pregnancy testing prior to first dose if last test was more than 30 days prior and at 6 months post-therapy.
PRN
When clinically appropriate
a               Medications ongoing, or discontinued, within 1 week prior to first dose of study drug.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 56 of 109
7.3
Histologic Review
Submission of a tissue block is critical for MCL diagnosis confirmation. High quality hematoxylin and 
eosin-stained sections and any required confirmatory studies (i.e., immunohistochemistry and in situ 
hybridization) may be done most efficiently from the tissue block in laboratories of the RPCI pathology 
and cytogenetic departments. In this study, additional analysis will include baseline Ki-67, cyclin D1 
expression as well as the existence or acquisition of additional cytogenetic abnormalities besides the 
t(11;14)(q13;q32) (i.e., as P53 deletion, 13q (RB1 and D13S25), 9p (CDKN2A)(p16) loss, ATM 
deletion, MYC rearrangement).Within 30 days of registration, send a formalin-fixed, paraffin-
embedded block of well-fixed lymphoma tissue containing adequate material for histologic 
confirmation of MCL and for additional studies described above. A block at least 1 cm x 1 cm x 2 cm 
is preferable, although smaller is acceptable if no other block is suitable. If only 1 block exists, and the 
tissue is sufficiently large, it is acceptable to split the block into 2 blocks and submit 1 block. Failure to 
submit pathology materials within 30 days of patient registration will be considered a major protocol 
violation.
7.4
Correlative Science Sample Submission
All investigator- or analyzing-research laboratories housing research samples are required to maintain 
current Temperature Logs and study-specific Sample Tracking and Shipping Logs.  The Principal 
Investigator/Laboratory Manager must ensure that the stated lab(s) have a process in place which 
documents the receipt/processing/storage/shipping of study-related sample/specimens.
See also section 13 and Appendix D
7.4.1
Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) by Flow Cytometric Analysis (Mandatory)
Samples will be required at the following time points:
Peripheral blood in heparin will be evaluated for MRD and collected at baseline, prior to Cycle 3, 
Cycle 5, prior to HDC-ASCT in transplant-eligible patients, and during the post-transplant/therapy 
surveillance period (on Day 100 and every 6 months for 3 additional years or until disease 
progression).
Bone marrow aspiration in heparin will be submitted for flow cytometry analysis for minimal residual 
disease (MRD) analysis (see Section 7.4) at baseline, before Cycle 3, Cycle 5, end of therapy/prior to 
stem cell collection (if transplant eligible), and on Day 100 (if HDC-ASCT eligible).
For RPCI patients, peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirate MRD samples will be performed as 
standard of care at baseline, prior to HDC-ASCT and on Day 100.
7.4.2
Cytogenetic Abnormalities in the Prognosis of Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Cytogenetic Abnormalities in the Prognosis of Mantle Cell Lymphoma at initial diagnosis and/or at 
time of relapse (when applicable for relapsing/primary refractory patients):
The prognostic significance of pre-treatment cytogenetic abnormalities in MCL treated with 
ofatumumab + HyperCVAD/HD-MA will be studied. In addition, the gain or loss of cytogenetic 
abnormalities in those MCL patients with refractory/relapsed disease will be studied. Tissue and/or 
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 57 of 109
bone marrow aspirate specimens will be submitted for cytogenetic studies to the RPCI Cytogenetics 
Department.
This study will do a cytogenetic study at the time of diagnosis, as well as at the time of relapse utilizing 
the fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) technique to determine the presence and/or acquisition of 
abnormalities involving P53, ATM, CDKN2A (p16), del(13q), and MYC. This study will subsequently 
correlate the cytogenetic findings with clinical outcomes.
7.4.3
Surface CD20 Density Analysis by ImageStream
Surface CD20 Density will be analyzed by the ImageStream Technology from Amnis Inc., which 
combines the quantitative power of flow cytometry with high content image analysis, giving the visual 
information obtained from a microscope integrated with population statistics. Fresh primary tumor cells 
(if patients are undergoing initial or repeat lymph node biopsy/tumor biopsy for diagnostic 
purposes at participating Institutions) will be collected prior to therapy and submitted for staining 
and fixation. Flow cytometric analysis will be performed at RPCI Flow Cytometry Department.
7.4.4
Ex vivo Activity of Ofatumumab in Primary Mantle Cell Lymphoma Cells
The capacity of ofatumumab to elucidate complement-mediated cytotoxicity (CMC) will be measured 
by standard Chromium-51 (51Cr) release assay as previously described.47 MCL cell isolated from 
baseline tumor biopsy if patients are undergoing initial or repeat lymph node biopsy/tumor biopsy for 
diagnostic purposes at participating Institutions. Material will be processed in the RPCI Department of 
Medicine Lymphoma/Myeloma Laboratory. 
7.4.5
Degree of In Vivo Complement Activation and Clinical or Molecular Responses to 
Ofatumumab-Based Therapy in Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Ofatumumab has been demonstrated to elucidate better complement activation and cell lysis when 
compared to rituximab in pre-clinical studies. Complement activation will be measured by: a) Total 
hemolytic complement (CH50), and b) serum C3 and C4 levels prior to the first ofatumumab infusion 
and at the end of the first ofatumumab infusion. CH50 and C3/C4 levels will be performed locally per 
institute standards.
7.4.6
Sample Procurement (At Each Time Interval Required)
•
MRD
o
10 mL of peripheral or central venous blood in sodium heparin green top tube.
o
5 mL of bone marrow aspirate in a sodium heparin green top tube.
•
Diagnosis 
o Diagnostic or refractory/relapsed (when applicable) fresh lymph node biopsy is strongly 
encouraged if available. If a diagnostic lymph node specimen/tumor specimen is available, it 
should be submitted fresh in RPMI-10%. A minimum of 1 mm3 is required for analysis.
•
Cytogenetic Studies
o 5 mL of bone marrow aspirate in a sodium heparin green top tube.
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 58 of 109
•
CD20 Surface Antigen Quantification and Ex Vivo Testing
o Fresh lymph node biopsy/tumor biopsy (when available) submitted fresh in sterile RPMI-10%.
•
Complement Activation Studies will be performed locally per institute standards prior to first 
ofatumumab infusion and at the end of the first ofatumumab infusion.
7.4.7
Sample Shipment Instructions (Network Site Only)
•
Samples should be logged and shipped via FedEx. 
•
Label the tubes with the RPCI study number, patient initials, the subject’s study number, the 
date of collection, source and intended use of material (e.g., blood for MRD, etc.) and the 
sample collection period (i.e., prior to initiation of therapy, etc.). 
•
Required blood and bone marrow samples will be obtained, as indicated below. 
•
Submit the fresh tumor specimen prior to initiation of therapy as indicated below.
Complete the RPCI-MCL-OFA-1 form (Error! Reference source not found. –
the form that is to accompany the specimens); and fax the
form to notify the technician of the impending sample arrival.
•
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 59 of 109
8
TREATMENT PLAN
8.1
Dosing and Administration
Treatment will be administered in an inpatient/outpatient basis. Reported adverse events (AEs) 
and potential risks are described in Section 6. Appropriate dose modifications are described in 
Section 8.7. No other investigational or commercial drugs or therapies other that those described 
below may be administered with the intent to treat the patient.
8.2
General Guidelines
Prior to initiating therapy, placement of a mediport or a multi-lumen indwelling Silastic catheter 
is required.
All patients will be given allopurinol 600 mg/day PO the day prior to Treatment 1 (Day 0) and 
then 300 mg/day PO for Day 1 through Day 10 of the first cycle. Allopurinol length of therapy 
may be extended at discretion of the investigator in the presence of tumor lysis syndrome.
All chemotherapy drug doses in Treatments 1 - 6 are based on a corrected body weight as 
follows: ideal + 25% of the difference between ide al and actual weight. If the actual weight is 
less than ideal, use actual weight. For patients whose actual weight is > 150% of ideal weight, 
use 150% of ideal weight as the “actual” weight (i.e., the corrected weight is 112.5% of ideal). 
Ofatumumab will be administered at a fix dose of 1000 mg unless the patient is at risk for tumor 
lysis syndrome (first cycle only).
Ofatumumab + HyperCVAD (Cycles 1, 3 and 5) alternating with ofatumumab + HD-MA 
(Cycles 2, 4 and 6) will be administered every 21 days.
The following laboratory parameters must be met before starting Cycles 2 to 6:
•
Begin subsequent cycles no sooner than Day 22 but no later than Day 29. If treatment is 
delayed for more than 7 days, please contact the Principal Investigator at RPCI.
•
ANC ≥ 1000/μL without G-CSF
•
Platelets ≥ 75,000/μL or investigator discretion
•
Serum creatinine ≤ 2.0 mg/dL
•
Total bilirubin ≤ 2.0 mg/dL (unless due to disease involvement with MCL or Gilbert’s 
syndrome). If total bilirubin is > 5 mg/dL (see Table 8).
•
If there is a greater than 7 day delay because of these starting rules, please contact the 
Principal Investigator at RPCI.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 60 of 109
8.3
Cycles 1, 3 and 5 (Cycles Will Be Administered Every 21 Days)
8.3.1
Ofatumumab
Pre-medications should include acetaminophen 650 mg PO and diphenhydramine 25 mg IV; 
40 mg of methylprednisolone (or equivalent) should be given pre-ofatumumab and when 
clinically appropriate...
Administer in an outpatient setting on Day 1 of each cycle, will be administered at a fixed dose 
of 1000 mg IV on Day 1, titrated to a maximum infusion rate of 400 mg/hr, provided the number 
of circulating mantle cells ≤ 10,000/μL, otherwise split the first ofatumumab dose during Cycle 1 
as described in the following sentence. Other patients at high risk for TLS as determined by the 
investigator may also have the first dose of ofatumumab divided as following: 300 mg Day 1 and 
700 mg on Day 2.
Guidelines regarding preparation of ofatumumab and infusion protocol are described in Section 
6.1.5and Section 6.1.8.
8.3.2
Cyclophosphamide
Administer in an inpatient setting, dosed at 300 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours every 12 hours for 
6 doses on Days 3 – 5.
8.3.3
Doxorubicin
Administer in an inpatient setting, dosed at 16.6 mg/m2 daily for 3 days administered as a 
continuous intravenous infusion (CIVI) on Days 6-8.
8.3.4
Vincristine
Administer in an inpatient setting, dosed at 1.4 mg/m2 (maximum dose 2 mg) IV on Day 6. 
Administer in an outpatient setting, dosed at 1.4 mg/m2 (maximum dose 2 mg) IV on Day 13.
8.3.5
Dexamethasone
Administer in an inpatient setting, dosed at 40 mg IV or orally on Days 3 – 6. Administer in an 
outpatient setting, dosed at 40 mg IV or orally on Days 13 - 16.
8.3.6
MESNA
Administered 1 hour before the start of cyclophosphamide, MESNA will be started at 600 mg/m2 
per dose IV over 24 hours daily on Days 3 - 5 and completed 12 hours after the administration of 
the last dose of cyclophosphamide.
8.3.7
Intravenous Hydration
For Cycle 1, administer hydration with D5W + 100mEq sodium bicarbonate per liter at 150 cc/hr 
on Day 3. Chemotherapy infusion should not begin until urine pH is ≥ 7. Continue adequate 
hydration until Day 9. Check urine pH with every void and adjust bicarbonate to maintain urine 
pH ≥ 7.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 61 of 109
For Cycles 3 and 5, administer hydration with normal saline at 150cc/hr. 
8.3.8
Prophylactic Granulocyte Growth Factor Use
Selection of agent is at investigator discretion.
•
G-CSF: SQ beginning within 48 hours after the last dose of chemotherapy until post nadir 
ANC ≥ 10,000/μL x 1 or ANC ≥ 5000/μL twice (as per ASCO guidelines). Dose reduction 
for bone pain is allowed. If actual weight is < 60 kg use 300 mcg/dose; if actual weight is 
60 kg – 99 kg, use 480 mcg/dose; if actual weight is 100 kg - 130 kg, use 600 mcg/dose; if 
actual weight is > 130 kg, use 780 mcg/dose.
•
Pegfilgrastim (Neulasta): may be used instead of G-CSF, but will be administered within 48 
hours after the last dose of chemotherapy.
8.3.9
Levofloxacin
Administer 500 mg PO daily or other IV or oral antibiotic institutional preference beginning on 
Day 9 until ANC ≥ 1,500/μL.
8.3.10 Fluconazole
Administer 400 mg/day PO or other IV or oral antifungal of institutional preference beginning on 
Day 9 until ANC ≥ 1500/μL.
8.3.11 Acyclovir
Administer 400 mg/bid PO beginning on Day 9 until ANC ≥ 1500/μL.
8.4
Cycles 2, 4, and 6 (Cycles Will Be Administered Every 21 Days)
8.4.1
Ofatumumab
Pre-medications should include acetaminophen 650 mg PO and diphenhydramine 25 mg IV; 
40 mg of methylprednisolone (or equivalent) should be given pre-patient and when clinically 
appropriate.
Administer in an outpatient setting on Day 1 of each cycle), will be administered at a dose of 
1000 mg IV on Day 1 (titrated to a maximum infusion rate of 400 mg/hr).
Guidelines regarding preparation of ofatumumab and infusion protocol are described in 
Section 6.1.
8.4.2
Methotrexate (MTX)
Administer in inpatient setting at 1000 mg/m2 CIVI over 24 hours on Day 3.
Monitor MTX serum levels at the end of the MTX infusion and every 24, 48 and 72 hours after 
the completion of MTX infusion. If the patient meets the institutional standard levels for MTX 
serum, subsequent serum levels need not be performed. MTX serum levels can be +/- 2 hours 
from the end of infusion.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 62 of 109
Continue adequate hydration until methotrexate serum level is < 0.1 μM. Check urine pH with 
every void and adjust bicarbonate to maintain urine pH ≥ 7.
For patients with an estimated creatinine clearance between 10 to 50ml/min, the dose of 
methotrexate should be decreased by 50%. 
In patients with evidence of third spacing of fluids (i.e., pleural effusion or ascites), the fluid 
should be tapped completely prior to the administration of systemic methotrexate.
8.4.3
Cytarabine
Administer in an inpatient setting at 3,000 mg/m2 (≤ 60 years) or 1,000 mg/m2 (> 60 years) IV 
over 2 hours every 12 hours for 4 doses on Days 4 - 5.
The serum creatinine should be checked on Day 3 of Cycles 2, 4 and 6. If serum 
creatinine ≥ 1.5 mg/dL, then reduce the cytarabine dose by 50%.
If cytarabine neurotoxicity develops or is suspected during administration in Treatment 3 
(dysmetria, dysdiadochokinesis, truncal/gait ataxia, dysarthria, and/or cerebral/psychiatric 
abnormalities not explainable by other medications), stop cytarabine immediately (see 
Section 8.7.3.) 
8.4.4
Intravenous Hydration 
For Cycles 2, 4 and 6, administer hydrate with D5W + 100mEq sodium bicarbonate per liter at 
150 cc/hr on Day 3. MTX infusion should not begin until urine pH is ≥ 7. Continue adequate 
hydration until Day 9. Check urine pH with every void and adjust bicarbonate to maintain urine 
pH ≥ 7.
8.4.5
Leucovorin
Administer at 50 mg IV x 1 dose beginning 12 hours after completing the methotrexate infusion 
and then 15 mg IV/PO q6 hours for 8 doses or continuing until the serum methotrexate level is 
< 0.1 μM.  In the event leucovorin is not available due to national shortage, levoleucovorin may 
be substituted at 50% of the leucovorin dose.
Additionally, leucovorin doses may be adjusted at treating physician clinical judgment for the 
following MTX levels at different time periods:
•
Immediate end of infusion MTX level > 20 μM
•
24 hour post MTX level > 1 μM
•
48 hour post MTX level > 0.1 μM
8.4.6
Dexamethasone 0.1% Ophthalmic Solution (or equivalent)
Administer 2 drops in each eye 4 times daily, will be started on the day of cytarabine and will 
continued for 7 days to prevent chemical conjunctivitis.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 63 of 109
8.4.7
Prophylactic Granulocyte Growth Factor Use
Selection of agent is at investigator discretion.
•
G-CSF: SQ beginning within 48 hours after the last dose of chemotherapy until post nadir 
ANC > 10,000/μL x 1 or ANC > 5000/μL twice (as per ASCO guidelines). Dose reduction 
for bone pain as follow: Dose reduction for bone pain is allowed. If actual weight is < 60 kg 
use 300 mcg/dose; if actual weight is 60 kg - 99 kg, use 480 mcg/dose; if actual weight is 
100 kg – 130 kg, use 600 mcg/dose; if actual weight is > 130 kg, use 780 mcg/dose.
•
Pegfilgrastim (Neulasta): may be used instead of G-CSF, but will be administered within 48 
hours after the last dose of chemotherapy.
8.4.8
Levofloxacin
Administer 500 mg PO daily or other IV or oral antibiotic institutional preference beginning on 
Day 8 until ANC ≥ 1,500/μL.
8.4.9
Fluconazole
Administer 400 mg/day PO or other IV or oral antifungal of institutional preference beginning on 
Day 8 until ANC ≥ 1500/μL.
8.4.10 Acyclovir
Administer 400 mg/bid PO beginning on Day 8 until ANC ≥ 1500/μL.
8.5
Treatment of CNS Disease (If Present at Diagnosis) and CNS Prophylaxis
•
Patients with symptomatic CNS involvement are not eligible.
•
A lumbar puncture demonstrating lymphoma at the time of initial staging in a neurologically 
asymptomatic patient should be treated with 10 doses of intrathecal (IT) methotrexate (12 mg 
in non-preserved NS) spread over Cycles 1 - 6.
o
Do not give IT methotrexate until leucovorin rescue is completed or during the days of 
high-dose cytarabine administration in Cycle 2.
o
If the patient’s platelet count is < 50,000/μL on the day of a planned IT methotrexate, 
transfuse platelets just before the procedure. All blood products should be leukofiltered 
and irradiated to reduce/prevent alloimmunization and transfusion graft-vs-host disease.
•
CNS prophylaxis: The administration of IT prophylactic chemotherapy should be 
performed according to the individual institution’s standard of care guidelines. It should be 
considered in all MCL patients with blastoid or pleomorphic variants. The following  
prophylactic regimens are suggested, but not required:
o
IT methotrexate 12 mg in non-preserved NS on Day 3 of 4 or more cycles.
o
IT methotrexate 12 mg in non-preserved NS on Day 3 and cytarabine 100 mg in non-
reserved NS on Day 7 of 4 or more cycles.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 64 of 109
8.6
Stem Cell Collection and HDC-ASCT and Rituximab Maintenance.
•
In eligible patients, HDC-ASCT will be performed at the participating NCCN institution 
following the individual institution’s standard of care guidelines.
•
Eligibility for HDC-ASCT will be assessed according to the Individual Institution’s 
guidelines.
•
The following information will be collected for each patient undergoing HDC-ASCT:
o
Stem cell mobilization agent utilized.
o
Feasibility of stem cell collection following ofatumumab-based chemoimmunotherapy 
(i.e., total of number of stem cell collected and length of time to successful stem cell 
collection).
o
Detection of MCL cells in the final stem cell product by HS-FCM and molecular 
diagnostics.
o
Disease status following HDC-ASCT at Day 100.
•
Timeline for stem cell collection and HDC-ASCT
o
Stem cell collection should be attempted within 4 – 6 weeks after the last dose of 
ofatumumab-chemotherapy (after Cycle 6; or, after Cycle 4 for patients who achieve an 
HSFCM-CR after 2 cycles). Delayed stem cell collections beyond 6 weeks are allowed 
in those patients experiencing significant treatment related toxicities and/or 
unsuccessful stem cell collection attempts.
o
HDC-ASCT should be performed within 2 – 6 weeks following stem cell collection.
•
Recently, the use of rituximab maintenance following HDC-ASCT was found to improve 
not only the progression free survival (PFS) but also the overall survival (OS) of patients 
with Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).[1]. Because of that, the standard of care for patients 
with MCL changed recently. The protocol has been modified to reflect changes in clinical 
practice. 
o
Lymphoma Study Association group reported last year the results of an important 
randomized phase III study.  A total of 299 MCL patients younger than 66 years 
of age were randomly assigned rituximab maintenance therapy (N=240) or to 
undergo observation (N=120) after autologous stem-cell transplantation; 59 
patients did not undergo randomization. All patients received the same front line 
therapy and the same conditioning regimen prior to the autologous stem cell 
support.  Rituximab maintenance was started 3 months after HDC-ASCT. The 
primary end point was event-free survival (with an event defined as disease 
progression, relapse, death, allergy to rituximab, or severe infection) after 
transplantation among patients who underwent randomization. The median 
follow-up from randomization after HDC-ASCT was 50.2 months (range, 46.4 to 
54.2). The rate of event-free survival at 4 years was 79% (95% confidence 
interval [CI], 70 to 86) in the rituximab maintenance group versus 61% (95% CI, 
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 65 of 109
51 to 70) in the observation group (P=0.001). The rate of PFS at 4 years was 
83% (95% CI, 73 to 88) in the rituximab maintenance group versus 64% (95% 
CI, 55 to 73) in the observation group (P<0.001). The rate of overall survival was 
89% (95% CI, 81 to 94) in the rituximab maintenance group versus 80% (95% 
CI, 72 to 88) in the observation group (P=0.04). This study confirmed 
prospectively the clinical benefit of rituximab maintenance.[1] 
•
Rituximab maintenance will be offered to those patients on active treatment after these 
changes in clinical practice. It will be offered as standard of care for patients who 
completed their day 100 workup or are on active therapy on 12/01/2017 and beyond. 
•
Rituximab maintenance will be administered at the standard dose-schedule of 375mg/m2 
every 2 months for 3 years. [1]
8.7
Dose Modifications and Management of Toxicity
8.7.1
Hematologic Toxicity
Febrile 
Neutropenia: 
is 
expected 
with 
Cycles 1 - 6. 
Prophylactic 
antibiotics 
and 
G-CSF/Peg-GCSF are utilized during these cycles. No dose modifications are made in 
subsequent cycles following an episode of febrile neutropenia.
Monitoring Blood Counts During Cycles 1 - 6: Anemia and thrombocytopenia are expected 
from the agents utilized in this regimen. The use of erythrocyte growth factors (i.e., epogen) is 
not allowed. Routine blood counts will be performed 3 times per week between Day 9 and 
Day 20 of each cycle. Blood product support will be provided at discretion of the primary 
investigator. All blood products should be leukofiltered and irradiated to reduce/prevent 
alloimmunization and transfusion graft-vs-host disease.
Blood Counts on Day 1 of Cycles 2 - 6: The following modification will be made based on 
blood counts obtained within 3 days prior to each subsequent cycle (Cycles 2 - 6). Delay 
treatment until ANC count ≥ 1000/μL and platelet count ≥ 75,000/μL, then begin treatment at 
full dose. If treatment is delayed for more than 7 days, please contact the Principal Investigator at 
RPCI.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 66 of 109
8.7.2
Hepatic Dysfunction
Table 8.
Percent of Full Dose, Based on Laboratory Values Obtained Within 3 Days 
Prior to Cycles 2 - 6
Bilirubin (mg/dL)
Vincristine
Doxorubicin
Methotrexate
< 1.5
100
100
100
≥ 1.5 but < 3.0
50
50
75
≥ 3.0 but < 5.0
25
25
50
> 5*
0
0
0
*If bilirubin is ≥ 5.0 mg/dL due to any cause other than disease (i.e., hepatic obstruction due to tumor), all therapy 
(including ofatumumab) should be held until bilirubin < 5.0 mg/dL. If ≥ 5.0 mg/dL is due to disease, full dose 
cyclophosphamide should be given along with ofatumumab and dexamethasone (Cycles 1, 3, and 5) or ofatumumab 
along with cytarabine (Cycles 2, 4, and 6) according to the treatment plan.
Ofatumumab stopping criteria for liver dysfunction (see Error! Reference source not found.).
If liver toxicity develops during therapy with Ofatumumab + HyperCVAD/HD-MA that is not 
due to disease progression, stopping criteria (any of 3) had been formulated as below:
CRITERIA 1: ALT > 3 x upper limit of normal (ULN) and bilirubin > 2 x ULN (> 35% direct 
bilirubin; bilirubin fractionation required‡).
CRITERIA 2: ALT > 8 x ULN.
CRITERIA 3: ALT > 5 x ULN for more than 2 weeks.
8.7.3
Neurotoxicity
8.7.3.1
Vincristine - Associated Sensory and Motor Neuropathy
The dose of vincristine should only be reduced if the patient develops neuropathy that interferes 
with activities of daily living (see below). Most vincristine associated neuropathy resolves after 
completion of treatment.
•
Sensory Neuropathy: If Grade 3 toxicity develops, reduce vincristine 25%. If symptoms 
improve to < Grade 2, doses may be increased to previous levels (i.e., 25% for Grade 2 and 
full dose for < Grade 1). If a patient experiences Grade 4 toxicity, discontinue vincristine.
•
Motor Neuropathy: If Grade 2 toxicity develops, reduce vincristine 25%. If a patient 
experiences Grade 3 toxicity, reduce vincristine 50%. If symptoms improve, doses may be 
increased to previous levels. If a patient experiences Grade 4 toxicity, discontinue vincristine.
•
Vincristine May Produce GI Hypomotility with Constipation or Ileus: Prophylactic 
laxatives according to institutional policies are recommended. Decrease vincristine dose 50% 
for Grade 3, severe constipation with ileus despite aggressive medical management. 
Discontinue vincristine for severe persistent GI hypomotility following dose adjustment.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 67 of 109
8.7.3.2
Cytarabine Neurotoxicity
If cytarabine neurotoxicity develops or is suspected during Cycles 2, 4 or 6 (dysmetria, 
dysdiadochokinesis, truncal/gait ataxia, dysarthria, and/or cerebral/psychiatric abnormalities not 
explainable by other medications), stop cytarabine immediately.
8.7.3.3
Dexamethasone Neurotoxicity
Table 9.
Dose Adjustment for Dexamethasone
Toxicity
Percent of Dexamethasone Dose
Slowed ability to think, depression, insomnia.
100%*
Confusion, severe depression, difficulty functioning.
50%
Delirium, suicidal.
0%
*If the disability persists or worsens, hold and re-institute at 50% dose once toxicity clears.
8.7.4
Gastrointestinal Toxicity
Mucositis, Dysphagia, and Diarrhea: For severe oral ulceration or diarrhea (Grade 3) occurring 
during chemo-immunotherapy, delay subsequent cycle until mucositis or diarrhea clears 
(≤ Grade 1).
Activation of peptic ulcer will warrant discontinuation of corticosteroid treatment.
8.7.5
Cardiotoxicity
Anthracyclines may result in congestive heart failure (CHF) with fluid retention and shortness of 
breath that may be controllable with medications. Discontinue anthracycline if:
•
Persistent arrhythmia Grade > 3 (including, sinus tachycardia with no demonstrable cause).
•
CHF appears.
•
Decrease in ejection fraction (by > 15% from baseline) as measured by MUGA scan or 2D-
echo.
8.7.6
Genitourinary/Renal Toxicity
8.7.6.1
Cystitis
Cyclophosphamide-related gross or microscopic hematuria correlates with the concentration of 
drug metabolites in the bladder. Adequately hydrate patients and ensure frequent voiding. Should 
hemorrhagic cystitis occur following Cycle 1, delay subsequent therapy until macroscopic 
hematuria has completely cleared. Then give cyclophosphamide for the next patient-
HyperCVAD (Cycle 3) cycle at full dose and also administer MESNA (2400 mg/m2 IV over 
24 hours). If hemorrhagic cystitis occurs with Cycle 1 and Cycle 3 then also add bladder 
irrigation to the cyclophosphamide given during Cycle 5 (500 cc/hour sterile urologic saline via a 
3-way Foley catheter during and for 48 hours after cyclophosphamide administration).
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 68 of 109
8.7.6.2
Renal Dysfunction/Cytarabine Dose Modifications
Give the following cytarabine dose for renal dysfunction based on serum creatinine and/or 
creatinine clearance (CrCl) within 3 days prior to Cycles 2, 4 and 6 and on any day of high-dose 
cytarabine administration (Refer to Table 10).
Table 10.
Cytarabine Dose Adjustments Based on Renal Function
Serum Creatinine
Cytarabine Dose
< 1.5 mg/dL and/or CrCl ≥ 60 cc/min
Full dose according to age
1.5 mg/dL - 1.9 mg/dL or an increase of 0.5 mg/dL - 1.2 mg/dL 
and/or CrCl 20 - 59 cc/min
50% reduction
≥ 2.0 mg/dL or an increase of ≥ 1.3 mg/dL and/or 
CrCl < 20 cc/min
Hold and call Chair study
8.7.6.3
Renal Dysfunction / Methotrexate Dose Modifications
If the estimated creatinine clearance is between 10 to 50ml/min, the methotrexate dose should be 
modified to be 50% of the full dose (500 mg/m2). Please contact the Principal Investigator at 
RPCI with any questions regarding dose modifications.
8.8
Ancillary Therapy
Patients should receive full supportive care, including transfusions of blood and blood products, 
some growth factors (see below), antibiotics, antiemetics, etc., when appropriate. The reason(s) 
for treatment, dosage, and the dates of treatment should be recorded on the flow sheets.
Treatment with hormones or other chemotherapeutic agents may not be administered except for 
corticosteroids given for adrenal failure, as an antiemetic or part of a pre-medication for 
ofatumumab. Other hormones administered for non-lymphoma-related conditions (e.g., insulin 
for diabetes) are allowed.
Use of growth factors. 
The following guidelines are applicable unless otherwise specified in the protocol:
•
The use of EPO is not permitted in this protocol.
•
Prophylactic G-CSF or peg-G-CSF is required by this protocol due to the intense nature 
of protocol treatments.
Subjects who are HBAg negative, anti-HBc positive and HVB DNA negative may be included in 
the study but must undergo HVB DNA monitoring.  Consult with a physician experienced in 
care and management of subjects with hepatitis B to manage/treat subjects who are anti-HBc 
positive. Initiate anti-viral therapy if required.  If a subject’s HVB DNA becomes positive during 
the study, notify the NOVARTIS medical monitor.  For subjects who have not completed 
planned ofatumumab therapy, discuss with the medical monitor the risks and benefits of 
continuing or discontinuing ofatumumab before appropriate treatment decisions are made for 
that individual subject.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 69 of 109
8.9
Treatment Discontinuation
•
Duration of Treatment: Remove from protocol therapy any patient with rapid disease 
progression. Because protocol-designated, complete restaging is not performed until three 
months post-stem cell transplant, patients should proceed with all protocol treatment 
unless clinical events warrant an investigation and subsequent unequivocal 
documentation of progression. When in doubt as to whether progression has occurred, 
evaluate with appropriate scans and biopsies and consult the Principal Investigator at 
RPCI. Document details, including tumor measurements, on flow sheets.
•
Extraordinary Medical Circumstances: If, at any time the constraints of this protocol 
are detrimental to the patient’s health and/or the patient no longer wishes to continue 
protocol therapy, protocol therapy shall be discontinued. In this event:
o
Notify the Principal Investigator at RPCI.
o
Document the reason(s) for discontinuation of therapy on flow sheets.
o
Follow the patient for survival, progression, late toxicity, and secondary 
malignancies.
9
EFFICACY EVALUATIONS
9.1
Objectives
The primary objective of this clinical study is to evaluate the overall response rate and complete 
response rate to ofatumumab+HyperCVAD/HD-MA in MCL. It is important to evaluate 
response to therapy using standardized response criteria utilized in previous clinical studies in 
MCL patients so direct comparisons can be performed with historical controls (i.e., 
rituximab+HyperCVAD/HD-MA). For this reason response to therapy will be evaluated using 
the response criteria reported by Cheson et al in 1999 (see Section 9.3).45 However, as medical 
imaging technology advances it is imperative to evaluate prospective differences in response 
rates when patients treated with a given regimen are evaluated using criteria incorporating novel 
imaging studies (i.e., PET scan). For this reason this study will also assess response to 
ofatumumab+HyperCVAD/HD-MA using the modified Cheson criteria published in 2007 
(Section 3.2, last bullet) (see Section 9.4).46
9.2
Imaging, Laboratory and Pathological Studies
Imaging, laboratory and pathological studies will be conducted for staging and response 
evaluation at baseline, before Cycle 3, and Cycle 5, within 3 weeks after Cycle 6 (or within 3 
weeks after Cycle 4 for patients who achieve an HSFCM-CR after 2 cycles), and in those 
eligible, on Day 100 post HDC-ASCT. Response to treatment will be evaluated according to: the 
International Working Group Response criteria as reported by Cheson et al. and the revised 
Cheson criteria (Section 3.2, last bullet).
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 70 of 109
Each investigator- or analyzing-research laboratory housing research samples will maintain 
current Temperature Logs and study-specific Sample Tracking and Shipping Logs.  Each such 
laboratory will have a process in place to document the receipt, storage, shipping and handling of 
study-related samples and specimens.
9.3
International Working Group Response Criteria (Original Cheson Criteria)
9.3.1
Complete Response (CR)
Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical and radiographic evidence of target lesions and 
disappearance of all disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy, as well as 
normalization of those biochemical abnormalities (e.g., LDH, etc.) definitely assignable to MCL.
All lymph nodes and nodal masses must have regressed to normal size (≤ 1.5 cm in their greatest 
transverse diameter for nodes > 1.5 cm prior to therapy). Previously involved nodes that were 
1.1 cm to 1.5 cm in their greatest transverse diameter prior to treatment must have decreased to 
≤ 1 cm in their greatest transverse diameter after treatment, or by more than 75% in the sum of 
the products of their greatest transverse diameters (SPD).
The spleen, if considered to be enlarged before therapy on the basis of a CT scan, must have 
regressed in size and must not be palpable on physical examination. (No normal size can be 
specified, however, because of the difficulties in evaluating splenic and hepatic size.) Any 
macroscopic nodules in any organs detectable on imaging studies should no longer be present. 
Similarly, other organs considered to be enlarged prior to therapy due to involvement of 
lymphoma (i.e., kidneys, liver, etc.) must have decreased in size.
If the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma prior to treatment, the infiltrate must be cleared 
on repeat bone marrow aspirate and biopsy of same site.
9.3.2
Complete Response/Unconfirmed (CRu)
Complete response/unconfirmed will include those patients who have met the criteria in 
Section 9.3 (complete response, paragraphs 1 and 3), but with 1 or more of the following:
A residual node > 1.5 cm in greatest transverse diameter that has regressed more than 75% in the 
product of its diameters. Individual nodes that were previously confluent must have regressed 
more than 75% in the product of their diameters compared with the size of the original mass.
Indeterminate bone marrow (increased number or size of aggregates without cytologic or 
architectural atypia).
9.3.3
Partial Response (PR)
A decrease of ≥ 50% in the SPD of the six largest dominant nodes or nodal masses. These nodes 
or masses should be selected according to the following features: a) they should be clearly 
measurable in at least two perpendicular measurements; b) they should be from as disparate 
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 71 of 109
regions of the body as possible; and c) they should include mediastinal and retroperitoneal areas 
of disease whenever these sites are involved.
No increase in the size of other nodes, liver, or spleen.
Splenic and hepatic nodules must regress by at least 50% in SPD. With the exception of splenic 
and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is considered assessable and not measurable 
disease.
Bone marrow assessment is irrelevant for determination of a PR because it is assessable and not 
measurable disease; however, if positive the cell type should be specified in the report (e.g., 
large-cell lymphoma).
No new sites of disease.
9.3.4
Stable Disease (SD)
Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD taking as 
reference the smallest SPD since the treatment started.
9.3.5
Progression (PD) or Relapse
≥ 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously identified abnormal node for PRs or 
non-responders.
Appearance of any new lesion during or after completion of therapy.
9.4
Modified Cheson Criteria
9.4.1
Complete Response (CR)
Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related 
symptoms if present before therapy.
Typically FDG-avid lymphoma: in patients with PET scan positive before therapy, a post-
treatment residual mass of any size is permitted as long as it is PET negative.
Variably FDG-avid lymphomas/FDG avidity unknown: in patients with a negative pretreatment 
PET scan, all lymph nodes and nodal masses must have regressed on CT to normal size (1.5 cm 
in their greatest transverse diameter for nodes 1.5 cm before therapy). Previously involved nodes 
that were 1.1 cm to 1.5 cm in their long axis and more than 1.0 cm in their short axis before 
treatment must have decreased to 1.0 cm in their short axis after treatment.
The spleen and/or liver, if considered enlarged before therapy on the basis of a physical 
examination or CT scan, should not be palpable on physical examination and should be 
considered normal size by imaging studies, and nodules related to lymphoma should disappear. 
However, determination of splenic involvement is not always reliable because a spleen 
considered normal in size may still contain lymphoma, whereas an enlarged spleen may reflect 
variations in anatomy, blood volume, the use of hematopoietic growth factors, or causes other 
than lymphoma.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 72 of 109
If the bone marrow was involved by lymphoma before treatment the infiltrate must have cleared 
on repeat bone marrow biopsy.
The biopsy sample on which this determination is made must be adequate (with a goal of 20 mm 
unilateral core). If the sample is indeterminate by morphology, it should be negative by 
immunohistochemistry. A sample that is negative by immunohistochemistry but that 
demonstrates a small population of clonal lymphocytes by flow cytometry will be considered a 
CR until data become available demonstrating a clear difference in patient outcome.
HIGH SENSITIVITY FLOW CYTOMETRY (HSFCM) COMPLETE REMISSION 
(HSFCM-CR)
All CR criteria are met and negative flow cytometry examination of peripheral blood and bone 
marrow biopsy/aspiration.
9.4.2
Partial Response (PR)
A decrease of ≥ 50% in the in the sum of the products of their greatest transverse diameters 
(SPD) of the 6 largest dominant nodes or nodal masses. These nodes or masses should be 
selected according to the following features: a) they should be clearly measurable in at least two 
perpendicular measurements; b) they should be from as disparate regions of the body as possible; 
and c) they should include mediastinal and retroperitoneal areas of disease whenever these sites 
are involved.
No increase in the size of other nodes, liver, or spleen.
Spleen and hepatic nodules must regress by at least 50% in SPD.
With the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is considered 
assessable and not measurable disease.
Bone marrow assessment is irrelevant for determination of a PR because it is assessable and not 
measurable disease; however, if positive the cell type should be specified in the report (e.g., 
large-cell lymphoma).
Patients who achieve a CR by the above criteria, but who have persistent morphologic bone 
marrow involvement will be considered partial responders.
When the bone marrow was involved before therapy and a clinical CR was achieved, but with no 
bone marrow assessment after treatment, patients should be considered partial responders.
No new sites of disease should be observed.
Typically FDG-avid lymphoma: for patients with no pretreatment PET scan or if the PET scan 
was positive before therapy, the post-treatment PET should be positive in at least one previously 
involved site.
Variably FDG-avid lymphomas/FDG-avidity unknown: for patients without a pretreatment PET 
scan, or if a pretreatment PET scan was negative, CT criteria should be used.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 73 of 109
9.4.3
Stable Disease (SD)
A patient is considered to have SD when he or she fails to attain the criteria needed for a CR or 
PR, but does not fulfill those for progressive disease (see Relapsed Disease [after 
CR]/Progressive Disease [after PR, SD]).
Typically FGD-avid lymphomas: the PET should be positive at prior sites of disease with no new 
areas of involvement on the post-treatment CT or PET.
Variably FDG-avid lymphomas/FDG-avidity unknown: for patients without a pretreatment PET 
scan or if the pretreatment PET was negative, there must be no change in the size of the previous 
lesions on the post-treatment CT scan.
9.4.4
Progression (PD) or Relapse
Lymph nodes should be considered abnormal if the long axis in more than 1.5 cm regardless of 
the short axis. If a lymph node has a long axis of 1.1 cm to 1.5 cm, it should only be considered 
abnormal if its short axis is more than 1 cm. Lymph nodes 1 cm x 1 cm will not be considered as 
abnormal for relapse or progressive disease.
Appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, even 
if other lesions are decreasing in size. Increased FDG uptake in a previously unaffected site 
should only be considered relapsed or progressive disease after confirmation with other 
modalities. In patients with no prior history of pulmonary lymphoma, new lung nodules 
identified by CT are mostly benign. Thus, a therapeutic decision should not be made solely on 
the basis of the PET without histologic confirmation.
At least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes, or in a single 
involved node, or the size of other lesions (e.g., splenic or hepatic nodules). To be considered 
progressive disease, a lymph node with a diameter of the short axis of less than 1 cm must 
increase by 50% and to a size of 1.5 cm or more than 1.5 cm in the long axis.
At least a 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node more 
than 1 cm in its short axis.
Lesions should be PET positive if observed in a typical FDG avid
Lymphoma or the lesion was PET positive before therapy unless the lesion is too small to be 
detected with current PET systems (1.5 cm in its long axis by CT).
9.4.5
Duration of Overall Response
The duration of overall response is measured from the time measurement criteria are met for 
CR/PR (whichever is first recorded) until the first date that recurrent or progressive disease is 
objectively documented (taking as reference for progressive disease the smallest measurements 
recorded since the treatment started).
The duration of overall complete response is measured from the time measurement criteria are 
first met for CR until the first date that recurrent disease is objectively documented.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 74 of 109
9.4.6
Duration of Stable Disease
Stable disease is measured from the start of the treatment until the criteria for progression are 
met, taking as reference the smallest measurements recorded since the treatment started.
10
SAFETY EVALUATION
Given the expected hematological and non-hematological toxicities from rituximab-HyperCVAD 
alternating with rituximab and high dose Methotrexate/Cytarabine (MA) regimen, close 
monitoring will be conducted for this proposed ofatumumab-HyperCVAD alternating with 
ofatumumab-Methotrexate/Cytarabine regimen.
The description and grading scales found in the revised NCI Common Terminology Criteria for 
Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 will be utilized for adverse events (AE) evaluation and 
reporting. All appropriate treatment areas should have access to a copy of the CTCAE version 
4.0. A copy of the CTCAE version 4.0 can be downloaded from the CTEP website 
(http://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/About.html ). All reactions determined to be “reportable" in 
an expedited manner must be reported to the local Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the 
participating Institution, the Principal Investigator at RPCI, RPCI CRS, and to the funding 
organization (National Comprehensive Cancer Network) and agent provider Novartis. (Reporting 
of cases of secondary acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome (AML/MDS) should 
also be done as described above.
10.1 Adverse Events
10.1.1 Definition
An adverse event or adverse experience (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence associated 
with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related. Therefore, an AE can 
be ANY unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, 
or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or 
not considered related to the medicinal (investigational) product (attribution of ‘unrelated’, 
‘unlikely’, ‘possible’, ‘probable’, or ‘definite’).
An AE is considered “unexpected” if it is not listed in the investigator brochure or is not listed at 
the specificity or severity that has been observed; or if an investigator brochure is not required or 
available, is not consistent with the risk information described in the general investigational plan 
in other study-related documents. 
Events meeting the definition of an AE include:
•
Any abnormal laboratory test results (e.g., hematology, clinical chemistry, or urinalysis) 
or other safety assessments (e.g., EKGs, radiological scans, vital signs measurements), 
including those that worsen from baseline, and felt to be clinically significant in the 
medical and scientific judgment of the investigator.
•
Exacerbation of a chronic or intermittent pre-existing condition including either an 
increase in frequency and/or intensity of the condition.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 75 of 109
•
New conditions detected or diagnosed after investigational product administration even 
though it may have been present prior to the start of the study.
•
Signs, symptoms, or the clinical sequelae of a suspected interaction.
•
Signs, symptoms, or the clinical sequelae of a suspected overdose of either 
investigational product or a concomitant medication (overdose per se will not be reported 
as an AE/SAE).
•
“Lack of efficacy” or “failure of expected pharmacological action” per se will not be 
reported as an AE or SAE. However, the signs and symptoms and/or clinical sequelae 
resulting from lack of efficacy will be reported if they fulfill the definition of an AE or 
SAE.
Events that do not meet the definition of an AE include:
•
Any clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding or other abnormal safety 
assessments that is associated with the underlying disease, unless judged by the 
investigator to be more severe than expected for the subject’s condition.
•
The disease/disorder being studied, or expected progression, signs, or symptoms of the 
disease/disorder being studied, unless more severe than expected for the subject’s 
condition.
•
Medical or surgical procedure (e.g., endoscopy, appendectomy). The condition that leads 
to a procedure is an AE.
•
Situations where an untoward medical occurrence did not occur (social and/or 
convenience admission to a hospital).
•
Anticipated day-to-day fluctuations of pre-existing disease(s) or condition(s) present or 
detected at the start of the study that do not worsen.
•
B-cell depletion and hypogammaglobulinemia due to ofatumumab treatment
For the purpose of this study, AE reporting will not be required during the HFC-ASCT portion 
that will follow after the completion of chemo-immunotherapy in eligible patients. After the 
completion of all therapy, including HDC-ASCT for those eligible, subjects will be followed for 
disease response, progression and survival only, and research samples and re-staging studies will 
be done at the defined time points.
10.1.1.1 Diagnosis Versus Signs and Symptoms
If known, a diagnosis should be recorded on the CRF rather than individual signs and symptoms 
(e.g., record only liver failure or hepatitis rather than jaundice, asterixis, and elevated 
transaminases). However, if a constellation of signs and/or symptoms cannot be clinically 
characterized as a single diagnosis or syndrome at the time of reporting, each individual event 
should be recorded as an AE or SAE on the CRF. If a diagnosis is subsequently established, it 
should be reported as follow-up information.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 76 of 109
10.1.1.2 Adverse Events Occurring Secondary to Other Events
In general, AEs occurring secondary to other events (e.g., cascade events or clinical sequelae) 
should be identified by their primary cause. For example, if severe diarrhea is known to have 
resulted in dehydration, it is sufficient to record only diarrhea as an AE or SAE on the CRF.
However, clinically significant AEs occurring secondary to an initiating event that are separated 
in time should be recorded as independent events on the CRF. For example, if a severe 
gastrointestinal hemorrhage leads to renal failure, both events should be recorded separately on 
the CRF.
10.1.1.3 Abnormal Laboratory Values
Only clinically significant laboratory abnormalities that require active management will be 
recorded as AEs or SAEs on the CRF (e.g., abnormalities that require study drug dose 
modification, discontinuation of study treatment, more frequent follow-up assessments, further 
diagnostic investigation, etc.).
If the clinically significant laboratory abnormality is a sign of a disease or syndrome 
(e.g., alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin 5 x the upper limit of normal associated with 
cholecystitis), only the diagnosis (e.g., cholecystitis) needs to be recorded on the Adverse Event 
CRF.
If the clinically significant laboratory abnormality is not a sign of a disease or syndrome, the 
abnormality itself should be recorded as an AE or SAE on the CRF. If the laboratory abnormality 
can be characterized by a precise clinical term, the clinical term should be recorded as the AE or 
SAE. For example, an elevated serum potassium level of 7 mEq/L should be recorded as 
“hyperkalemia”
Observations of the same clinically significant laboratory abnormality from visit to visit should 
not be repeatedly recorded as AEs or SAEs on the CRF, unless their severity, seriousness, or 
etiology changes.
10.1.1.4 Preexisting Medical Conditions (Baseline Signs and Symptoms)
A preexisting medical condition should be recorded as an AE or SAE only if the frequency, 
severity, or character of the condition worsens during the study. When recording such events on 
an Adverse Event CRF, it is important to convey the concept that the preexisting condition has 
changed by including applicable descriptors (e.g., “more frequent headaches”).
10.1.2 Grading and Relationship to Drug
The descriptions and grading scales found in the CTEP Version 4 of the NCI Common 
Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) will be utilized for AE reporting. CTEP
Version 4 of the CTCAE is identified and located at:
http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.html.
AEs not covered by specific terminology listed should be reported with common medical 
terminology, and documented according to the grading scales provided in the CTCAE Version 4.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 77 of 109
The relationship of event to study drug will be documented by the Investigator as follows:
•
Unrelated: The event is clearly related to other factors such as the participant’s clinical 
state, other therapeutic interventions or concomitant drugs administered to the participant.
•
Unlikely: The event is doubtfully related to investigational agent(s). The event was most 
likely related to other factors such as the participant’s clinical state, other therapeutic 
interventions, or concomitant drugs.
•
Possible: The event follows a reasonable temporal sequence from the time of drug 
administration, but could have been produced by other factors such as the participant’s 
clinical state, other therapeutic interventions or concomitant drugs.
•
Probable: The event follows a reasonable temporal sequence from the time of drug 
administration, and follows a known response pattern to the study drug. The event cannot 
be reasonably explained by other factors such as the participant’s clinical state, 
therapeutic interventions or concomitant drugs.
•
Definite: The event follows a reasonable temporal sequence from the time of drug 
administration, follows a known response pattern to the study drug, cannot be reasonably 
explained by other factors such as the participant’s condition, therapeutic interventions or 
concomitant drugs; AND occurs immediately following study drug administration, 
improves upon stopping the drug, or reappears on re-exposure.
10.1.3 Reporting Adverse Events
Table 11
Guidelines for Routine Adverse Event Reporting for Pilot, Phase 2, and 
Phase 3 Studies (Regardless of Expectedness)
Attribution
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Unrelated
X
X
Unlikely
X
X
Possible
X
X
X
X
Probable
X
X
X
X
Definite
X
X
X
X
Routine AEs occurring between the start date of intervention until 30 days after the last 
intervention or until the event has resolved, the study participant is lost to follow-up, the start of 
a new treatment, or until the study investigator assesses the event(s) as stable or irreversible, will 
be reported. New information will be reported after it is received.
10.2 Serious Adverse Events 
10.2.1 Definition
A serious adverse event (SAE) is any adverse event (experience) that in the opinion of either the 
investigator or sponsor results in ANY of the following:
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 78 of 109
•
Death.
•
A life-threatening adverse event (experience). Any AE that places a participant or 
participant, in the view of the Investigator or sponsor, at immediate risk of death from the 
reaction as it occurred. It does NOT include an AE that, had it occurred in a more severe 
form, might have caused death.
•
Inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization (for > 24 hours).
•
A persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct 
normal life functions.
•
A congenital anomaly or birth defect.
•
Important Medical Event (IME) that, based upon medical judgment, may jeopardize the 
participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the 
outcomes listed above.
10.2.2 Reporting Serious Adverse Events
All new SAEs occurring from the date the participant signs the study consent until 2 months after 
the last intervention or a new treatment is started, whichever comes first, will be reported. The 
RPCI SAE Source Form is to be completed with all available information, including a brief 
narrative describing the SAE and any other relevant information. All SAE’s assessed as related 
to study participation (e.g., protocol-mandated procedures, invasive tests, or change in existing 
therapy) or related to Novartis concomitant medication, will be reported promptly to the Local 
IRB, NCCN, and Novartis.
SAEs occurring after the 2 month  follow-up period that the investigator determines to be 
possibly, probably or definitely related to the study intervention should be reported to NCCN and 
Novartis. All related SAEs should be followed to their resolution, until the study participant is 
lost to follow-up, the start of a new treatment, or until the study investigator assesses the event(s) 
as stable or irreversible. New information will be reported when it is received.
SAEs identified as an Unanticipated Problem by the Investigator must be reported. Please refer 
to Section 10.5 for details on reporting Unanticipated Problems.
•
For this study, myelosuppression and its associated complications due to this protocol 
therapy are expected events during treatment. Hospitalizations for the treatment of the 
following events do not require reporting for SAE’s but should be documented as AEs:
o
Fatigue, weakness and/or shortness of breath associated with anemia.
o
Febrile neutropenia.
o
Bleeding due to thrombocytopenia.
o
Neutropenic colitis.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 79 of 109
10.2.3 Laboratory and Other Safety Assessment Abnormalities Reported as Adverse 
Events and Serious Adverse Events
•
Any abnormal laboratory test results (e.g., hematology, clinical chemistry, or urinalysis) or 
other safety assessments (e.g., EKGs, radiological scans, vital signs measurements), 
including those that worsen from baseline, and felt to be clinically significant (> Grade 3) in 
the medical and scientific judgment of the investigator are to be recorded as AEs or SAEs.
•
All events meeting liver stopping criteria must be recorded as an SAE.
•
However, any clinically significant safety assessments that are associated with the underlying 
disease, unless judged by the investigator to be more severe than expected for the subject’s 
condition, are not to be reported as AEs or SAEs.
•
B-cell 
depletion, 
lymphopenia, 
IgG 
below 
LLN, 
low 
CD19+ 
count, 
and 
hypogammaglobulinemia due to treatment with ofatumumab are not to be reported as AEs or 
SAEs.
•
Infusion related AEs may lead to a prolonged infusion time. Overnight stay at the hospital 
due to slow infusion rate is not to be reported as a SAE.
•
Reactivation of hepatitis B or PML (see APPENDIX B and Error! Reference source not 
found.).
10.2.4
Disease-Related Events and/or Disease-Related Outcomes Not Qualifying as 
Serious Adverse Events
An event which is part of the natural course of the disease under study (i.e., disease progression) 
does not need to be reported as an SAE. However, if the progression of the underlying disease is 
greater than that which would normally be expected for the subject, or if the investigator 
considers that there was a causal relationship between treatment with investigational product or 
protocol design/procedures and the disease progression, then this must be reported as an SAE.
10.2.5 Adverse Event Characteristics
•
CTCAE term (AE description) and grade:  The descriptions and grading scales found in the 
revised NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 will be 
utilized for AE reporting. All appropriate treatment areas should have access to a copy of the 
CTCAE version 4.0. 
(http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm).
•
‘Expectedness’: AEs can be ‘Unexpected’ or ‘Expected’ for expedited reporting purposes 
only.
•
Attribution of the AE:
o
Definite – The AE is clearly related to the study treatment.
o
Probable – The AE is likely related to the study treatment.
o
Possible – The AE may be related to the study treatment.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 80 of 109
o
Unlikely – The AE is doubtfully related to the study treatment.
o
Unrelated – The AE is clearly NOT related to the study treatment.
10.3 Pregnancy
Any pregnancy that occurs during study participation must be reported to NCCN and Novartis. 
To ensure subject safety, each pregnancy must be reported to NCCN and Novartis within 
2 weeks of learning of its occurrence. The pregnancy must be followed up to determine outcome 
(including premature termination) and status of mother and child.  Pregnancy complications and 
elective terminations for medical reasons must be reported as an AE or SAE. Spontaneous 
abortions must be reported as an SAE.
Any SAE occurring in association with a pregnancy brought to the investigator’s attention after 
the subject has completed the study and considered by the investigator as possibly related to the 
investigational product, must be promptly reported to NCCN and Novartis representative. 
(Appendix G).
In addition, the investigator must attempt to collect pregnancy information on any female 
partners of male study subjects who become pregnant while the subject is enrolled in the study. 
Pregnancy information must be reported to NCCN and Novartis as described above.
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 81 of 109
10.4 Additional Instructions or Exclusions to Expedited Reporting Requirements.
•
Deaths occurring greater than 30 days after the last dose of treatment that are due to disease 
progression do not require expedited reporting.
•
All Grade 4 events that are unexpected and that are at least possibly related to treatment must 
be reported within 24 hours of learning of the event, followed by a complete report within 5 
calendar days of the initial 24-hour report. Grade 4 events that are expected do not require 
expedited reporting.
•
Any unexpected medical event equivalent to CTCAE Grade 4 that precipitates 
hospitalization (or prolongation of existing hospitalization) and that is at least possibly due to 
treatment must be reported.
•
A list of specific expected adverse events can be found in Section 6.1.9 (Toxicity).
•
For the purposes of expedited adverse event reporting, the CAEPR for ofatumumab will be 
similar to what has been used in rituximab-clinical studies
•
Exacerbation or reactivation of serious viral infections (e.g., hepatitis, JC) as described in 
Section 5.1 (bullet 5.1.10.3), APPENDIX B, and Error! Reference source not found. 
should be reported within 10 calendar days of the investigator learning of the event.
•
Grade 3 or Grade 4 myelosuppression and hospitalization resulting from Grade 3 or Grade 4 
myelosuppression do not require reporting, but should be submitted as part of study results.
•
Grade 4 neurotoxicity and hospitalization from Grade 3 or Grade 4 neurotoxicity do not 
require reporting, but should be submitted as part of study results.
10.5 Unanticipated Problems
10.5.1 Definition
An Unanticipated Problem (UP) is any incident, experience, or outcome that meets all of the 
following criteria:
•
Unexpected (in terms of nature, severity, or frequency) given:
a) The research procedures that are described in the study-related documents, including 
study deviations, as well as issues related to compromise of participant privacy or 
confidentiality of data.
b) The characteristics of the participant population being studied.
•
Related or possibly related to participation in the research (possibly related means there is 
a reasonable possibility that the incident, experience, or outcome may have been caused 
by the procedures involved in the research).
•
Suggests that the research places participants or others at a greater risk of harm (including 
physical, psychological, economic, or social harm) than was previously known or 
recognized and if in relation to an AE is also deemed Serious per Section 10.2.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 82 of 109
10.5.2 Reporting Unanticipated Problems
Unanticipated problem reporting will begin at the time of participant consent. 
An Unanticipated Problem shall be submitted to the CRS Compliance Office as “Reportable 
New Information” in the Click system within 1 business day of becoming aware of the 
Unanticipated Problem. After review, CRS Compliance will submit the UP to the IRB. 
When becoming aware of new information about an Unanticipated Problem, submit the updated 
information to CRS Compliance as “Reportable New Information” in the Click system.
10.6 FDA Reporting
If the protocol is being conducted under a RPCI IND it is the responsibility of the study IND 
holder to report certain AEs or Unanticipated Problems to the FDA.
RPCI’s Compliance Office will report Network Site reports to the FDA.
The following describes the FDA reporting requirements by timeline for AEs and new safety 
findings that meet the criteria outlined below:
Within 7 Calendar Days
Any adverse event that meets ALL the following criteria:
•
Related or possibly related to the use of the study drug;
•
Unexpected; and
•
Fatal or life-threatening.
Within 15 Calendar Days
Any adverse event that meets ALL the following criteria:
•
Related or possibly related to the use of the study drug;
•
Unexpected; and
•
Serious but not fatal or life-threatening.
Or meets ANY of the following criteria:
•
A previous adverse event that is not initially deemed reportable but is later found to fit the 
criteria for reporting (report within 15 days from when event was deemed reportable).
•
Any findings from other studies, including epidemiological studies, pooled analysis of 
multiple studies, or other clinical studies conducted with the study drug that suggest a 
significant risk in humans exposed to the drug.
•
Any findings from animal or in vitro testing that suggest a significant risk for human patients 
including reports of mutagenicity, teratogenicity, or carcinogenicity or reports of significant 
organ toxicity at or near the expected human exposure.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 83 of 109
•
Any clinically important increase in the rate of occurrence of a serious, related or possibly 
related adverse event over that listed in the protocol or investigator brochure.
Sponsors are also required to identify in IND safety reports, all previous reports concerning 
similar adverse events and to analyze the significance of the current event in the light of the 
previous reports.
Reporting Process
The principal investigator or designee will complete and submit a FDA Form 3500A for any 
event that meets the above criteria. Forms will be submitted to the CRS Compliance Office via 
email to CRS Compliance@Roswellpark.org. The Compliance office will send the form to the 
FDA.
11 DATA AND SAFETY MONITORING
The RPCI Data and Safety Monitoring Board will assess the progress of the study, the safety 
data, and critical efficacy endpoints. The DSMB will review the study annually and will make 
recommendations that include but not limited to; (a) continuation of the study, (b) modifications 
to the design (c) or termination of the study.
12 STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY
The primary objective of this one-arm Phase II trial is to assess the efficacy of the study 
treatment as compared to historical control. Let 
 represent the proportion of the evaluable 
p
population of interest who experience a complete response within 18 – 22 weeks of the 
beginning of treatment. A true complete response rate of less than 50% is considered 
unacceptable. A complete response rate of more than 70% is considered promising and evidence 
of such will deem the treatment worthy of further study. The null and alternative hypotheses 
corresponding to the design are
0 :
50%,
:
50%.
a
H
p
H
p
≤
>
A total of up to 37 evaluable patients will be accrued. The evaluable population is defined as 
patients who meet eligibility requirements and complete at least once cycle of treatment. 
Unevaluable patients will be replaced.  The study design will be a Simon (1989) minimax design 
that proceeds in two stages and stops early only for futility. At the end of the first stage of 
accrual (23 evaluable patients), data will be reviewed to decide if the study should be terminated 
due to inactivity of therapy.
12.1 Primary Analysis
Stage 1: If 12 or less of the first 23 evaluable patients achieves a complete response as measured 
by standard response criteria reported by Cheson et al in 199945, it will be concluded that the 
therapy is not promising and the study will end. Otherwise, the study will progress to the second 
stage. Depending on the current complete response rate at the time the last patient in Stage 1 is 
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 84 of 109
enrolled, study enrollment may be halted until complete response status is evaluated in all 
23 patients.
Stage 2: This study will accrue 14 additional evaluable patients. If 24 or more of the total of 
37evaluable patients achieve a complete response, it will be concluded that 
 exceeds 50% and 
p
that the therapy is efficacious and worthy of further study; otherwise, it will be concluded that 
there is no evidence to suggest that the therapy is associated with acceptable efficacy and is not 
promising.
With this design, the probability is 4.8% of falsely concluding that the proportion of objective 
responders exceeds 50% and 80% is the probability of correctly concluding efficacy when the 
true proportion of objective responders is 70% or higher.
12.2 Sample Size Justification
The sample size calculation is based on testing the hypotheses concerning the proportion of the 
population with a response to the treatment:
0 :
50%,
:
50%.
a
H
p
H
p
≤
>
This two-stage design requires a potential total of 37 patients in order to achieve approximately 
80% power to detect differences of 20 percentage points (50% versus 70%).
12.3 Secondary Analyses
Both activity and toxicity rates will be estimated using simple relative frequencies. The 
corresponding 95% confidence intervals for the estimated probabilities will be computed using 
the method proposed in Clopper and Pearson.48 The association between the endpoints and 
collected predictors, such as surface CD20 levels, Ki67, and additional cytogenetic 
abnormalities, will be statistically assessed using logistic regression. Wald tests of the model 
effects will be performed to assess statistical significance. See Hosmer and Lemeshow (2000) for 
a discussion of such techniques.49 Alternative parametric models will be considered if model fit 
is found to be inadequate.
The estimated distributions of TTP, PFS, and OS will be obtained using the Kaplan-Meier 
method. Estimates of quantities such as median survival will be obtained. Corresponding 
confidence intervals using the methodology of Brookmeyer and Crowley will be computed.50  It 
is assumed a priori that any drop out times will be non-informative in terms of the censoring 
mechanism. Groups defined by levels of categorical or dichotomized predictors, ex. minimal 
residual disease, will be compared in regards to time-to-event distributions using the log-rank 
test. Cox proportional hazards model regression will be utilized for multivariate analyses.
Longitudinal analyses such as those used to determine changes in surface CD20 levels, Ki67, or 
gain of additional cytogenetic abnormalities in relapsed/refractory tumor specimens, will be 
based on standard techniques. A series of graphical analyses will initially take place including 
individual subject-level profile plots and overall mean plots used to examining the mean 
structure. Formal statistical examination of longitudinal patterns will be done through the use of 
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 85 of 109
a mixed model. Each endpoint will be fit as a function of the fixed effect of time treated as a 
categorical variable. Since repeated measurements will be obtained from each patient, a random 
subject effect will be added to the model to incorporate the subject-specific dependence, which 
may exist. Restricted maximum likelihood estimation will be utilized in the model fitting 
procedures as implemented by SAS PROC MIXED (version 9.2). Once the model is fit, specific 
linear contrasts based on the estimated model parameters will be constructed and used to test 
hypotheses concerning between time point comparisons.
All tests performed during the secondary analyses will be two-sided and tested at a 0.05 nominal 
significance level. Standard diagnostic plots will be used to assess model fit and transformations 
of variables may be considered in order to meet statistical assumptions.
13 CORRELATIVE STUDIES
13.1 Central Hypothesis
Based on pre-clinical data, we postulate that the incorporation of ofatumumab into aggressive 
induction chemotherapy in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) will yield higher 
complete and HSFCM remission rates at the end of induction chemotherapy and prior to stem 
cell collection in those patients scheduled to undergo HDC-ASCT. This study will determine if 
achievement of HSFCM remission translates into improved clinical outcomes. In addition, we 
propose to study biomarkers that may predict clinical response and/or biological response to 
ofatumumab.
Specifically, this study will study: 1) the relationship between surface CD20 antigen density in 
MCL and the ex vivo activity of ofatumumab vs. rituximab; 2) if complement activation in vivo 
can be used as a surrogate marker for the activity of ofatumumab in combination with 
chemotherapy in patients with MCL; and 3) finally, as complementary data, this study will 
determine at diagnosis and at relapse, whether changes occur in known predictors of clinical 
outcome of MCL (i.e., Ki67 proliferation index and the acquisition of additional cytogenetic 
abnormalities besides the t(11:14) (i.e. as P53, 13q (RB and D13S25), 9p (CDKN2A), ATM, 
MYC).
13.2 STUDY Material To Be Studied
Correlative samples will be collected for patients enrolled into the clinical trial. Tissue, bone 
marrow (BM), and peripheral blood (PB) will be collected at different time intervals 
(Section 7.4).
•
Tissue: Pretreatment and at the time of disease progression excisional (preferable) or core 
biopsy material from either lymph node or any accessible extranodal mass will be submitted 
for pathological confirmation of MCL, cytogenetic studies, quantification of CD20 levels, ex 
vivo testing and measurement of biomarkers. Central review of MCL will be performed at 
RPCI. 
•
Bone Marrow Aspirate at Diagnosis and if Positive for Involvement By Lymphoma: 
Before Cycle 3, before Cycle 5 and prior to stem cell collection or at the end or therapy for 
non-transplant eligible will be evaluated by standard pathological evaluation, cytogenetic 
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 86 of 109
analysis for the t(11:14) or additional genetic abnormalities, and flow cytometry analysis for 
MRD detection.
•
Peripheral blood will be evaluated for MRD and collected at baseline, prior to Cycle 3, 
Cycle 5, prior to HDC-ASCT in transplant-eligible patients, and during the post-
transplant/therapy surveillance period (on Day 100 and every 6 months for 3 additional 
years).
13.3 Methodology
13.3.1
Correlation Between Baseline Surface CD20 in Mantle Cell Lymphoma Isolated 
From Patients Enrolled in the Clinical Trial and Ex Vivo Ofatumumab 
Anti-Tumor Activity and Clinical Endpoints
Isolation of Malignant Cells: Malignant B-cells will be isolated by MACS sorting (negative 
selection) from pretreatment biopsy tissue and bone marrow biopsy obtained from enrolled 
patients with MCL. Samples from patient biopsy specimens will be procured under Institutional 
Review Board (IRB) RPCI protocols I42804 and I42904 Tissue biopsies will be disrupted by 
mechanical disruption. Samples will be then diluted with RPMI 1640-containing 10% fetal 
bovine serum (FBS) and the cell suspension filtered through a 100 μm cell strainer to remove 
large clumps. Mononuclear cells (lymphocytes) will be isolated from either tumor cell 
suspension or bone marrow aspirates by Histopaque-1077 density centrifugation. MCL cells will 
be then isolated from normal lymphocytes by MACS separation using a human B-cell Isolation 
Kit II (Miltenyi Biotec, Gladbach, Germany). B-cell purity was assessed by flow cytometry 
using antibodies to CD19, CD5 and CD20 (Becton Dickenson, San Jose, CA). Collected cells re-
suspended in media and used in corresponding experiments.
13.3.2 Surface CD20 Density Analysis by ImageStream
Surface CD20 density analysis by ImageStream will be analyzed by the ImageStream 
Technology from Amnis Inc., which combines the quantitative power of flow cytometry with 
high content image analysis, giving the visual information obtained from microscope integrated 
with population statistics. In brief, 2 x 106 cells will be stained with a mouse anti-human CD19 
fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) labeled monoclonal antibody (mAb), a mouse an anti-human 
CD20 allophycocyanin (APC) labeled mAb, or proper isotype control(s) and then fixed by 2% 
paraformaldehyde. Cells will be then illuminated in the ImageStream system by a bright field 
lamp and the proper wavelength excitation laser for APC. Data will be analyzed by ImageStream 
IDEAS image analysis software. Cells will be gated for single, focused populations, which will 
then analyzed for the mean cell size (by mean surface area) and mean surface CD20 expression 
(by mean CD20-FITC intensity). Mean surface CD20 density will be calculated based on the 
following formula: Surface CD20 density = mean surface CD20-APC intensity/mean surface 
area (CD20-APC per μm2).
13.3.3 Ex vivo Activity of Ofatumumab in Primary Mantle Cell Lymphoma Cells
The capacity of ofatumumab to elucidate complement-mediated cytotoxicity (CMC) will be 
measured by standard by Chromium-51 (51Cr) release assay as previously described.47 MCL cell 
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 87 of 109
isolated from baseline tumor biopsy will be labeled with 51Cr at 37°C, 5% CO2 for 2 hours. 
51Cr-labeled cells will be then placed in 96-well plates at a cell concentration of 1 x 105 
cells/well and then exposed to ofatumumab (10 μg/mL), rituximab (10 μg/mL) or isotype 
(10 μg/mL) and human serum (1:4 dilution) for 6 hours at 37°C and 5% CO2 (final volume 
adjusted to 200 μL/well). 51Cr release will be measured from the supernatant by standard gamma 
counter and the percentage of lysis will be calculated as following:
%Lysis = [Test cpm – Background cpm] / [Maximumcpm – Background cpm]
Individual human serum from each patient will be used as source of complement for CMC 
assays.
13.3.4
Degree of In Vivo Complement Activation and Clinical or Molecular Responses to 
Ofatumumab-Based Therapy in Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Ofatumumab has been demonstrated to elucidate better complement activation and cell lysis 
when compared to rituximab in pre-clinical studies. Complement activation will be measured by 
a) Total hemolytic complement (CH50); and b) serum C3 and C4 levels at different time 
intervals (before and after the first and last ofatumumab infusion) as previously described by 
Byrd et al.51 CH50, and C3/C4 levels will be performed locally per institute standards.
13.3.5
Measurement of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) by Eight-Color Flow 
Cytometric Analysis
Peripheral blood and/or bone marrow aspirate specimens will be collected at different time 
intervals to measure MRD as previously described.35 Briefly, washed samples will be adjusted to 
10,000 leukocytes/μL, incubated with mouse IgG to block Fc receptors and stained with the a 
panel of directly conjugated monoclonal antibodies against κ, λ, CD5, CD19, CD20, CD23, 
CD22, and CD79b for 30 minutes followed by incubation with ammonium chloride lysing 
solution and 2 washing steps. After an incubation with fixable live dead yellow to exclude dead 
cells the cells will be fixed in 2% formaldehyde and analyzed within 24 hours. Isotope and 
autofluorescent controls will be included. Data will be collected by a FACSCanto II using DivA 
software v4.6. Instrument sensitivity and intensity settings will be standardized daily with 
Cytometer Setup and Tracking beads (CS&T) and compensations will be adjusted using single 
color controls with automated DiVa routines.
13.3.6
Clonal Evolution in Mantle Cell Lymphoma
The spectrum of clinical behavior observed in MCL patients suggests differences exist at the 
molecular level that impact clinical outcomes. Mantle cell lymphoma histologically has a 
spectrum of variants, including blastoid and pleomorphic variants with high proliferation rates 
and more aggressive clinical behavior. Aberrant over expression of cyclin D1 is characteristic of 
MCL and is the result of the t(11;14) (q13;q32). Cyclin D1 binds with CDK4, CDK6 and 
phosphorylates RB1 ultimately leading to cell cycle dysregulation at G1-S phase transition.52
Apart from this hallmark translocation few other lymphogenesis phenomena have been described 
to be responsible for MCL including ATM, CHK2 and p53, which are important in cellular DNA 
damage response. On the other hand, it is unclear if emergence of resistant disease is associated 
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 88 of 109
with cytogenetic abnormalities or loss or gain of cell surface receptors. The most common loci 
previously reported that are genetically altered in MCL are P53, ATM, CDKN2A (p16), 
del(q13), MYC, among the others.53 This study will do a cytogenetic/FISH study at the time of 
diagnosis, as well as at the time of relapse utilizing the fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) 
technique to determine the presence and/or acquisition of the above listed cytogenetic 
abnormalities. This study will subsequently correlate the cytogenetic findings with clinical 
outcomes.
14 ETHICAL AND REGULATORY STANDARDS
14.1 Ethical Principles
This study will not be initiated until the protocol and informed consent document(s) have been 
reviewed and approved by a properly constituted Institutional Review Board (IRB) or 
Independent Ethics Committee (IEC). Each patient (or legal guardian) shall read, understand, 
and sign an instrument of informed consent prior to performance of any study-specific 
procedure. It is the responsibility of the investigator to ensure that the patient is made aware of 
the investigational nature of the treatment and that informed consent is given.
The Investigator is responsible for the retention of the patient log and patient records; although 
personal information may be reviewed by authorized persons, that information will be treated as 
strictly confidential and will not be made publicly available. The investigator is also responsible 
for obtaining patient authorization to access medical records and other applicable study specific 
information according to Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act regulations (where 
applicable).
This study will be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations of the state 
and/or country and institution where the patient is treated, in accordance with the Declaration of 
Helsinki, Good Clinical Practice, and according to the guidelines in this protocol, including 
attached appendices.
14.2 Informed Consent
The Investigator (or IRB specified designee) is responsible for obtaining written consent from 
each patient or the patient's legally authorized representative in accordance with ICH-GCP 
guidelines using the approved informed consent form, before any study specific procedures 
(including screening procedures) are performed. The informed consent form acknowledges all 
information that must be given to the patient according to ICH-GCP, including the purpose and 
nature of the study, the expected efficacy and possible side effects of the treatment(s), and 
specifying that refusal to participate will not influence further options for therapy. Any additional 
information that is applicable to the study must also be included. Additional national or 
institutionally mandated requirements for informed consent must also be adhered to. The patient 
should also be made aware that by signing the consent form, processing of sensitive clinical trial 
data and transfer to other countries for further processing is allowed.
The Investigator shall provide a copy of the information sheet and of the signed consent form to 
the patient and the signed original shall be maintained in the Investigator File. A copy of the 
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 89 of 109
signed consent form must be filed in the patient file. At any stage, the patient may withdraw 
from the study and such a decision will not affect any further treatment options.
15 STUDY RESPONSIBILITIES
15.1 Data Collection
Data entry into the database is to be completed in a timely fashion (within 30 days) after the 
patient’s clinic visit. If an AE is considered serious it is captured on both the Adverse Event page 
and the Serious Adverse Event Form, which is handled in an expedited fashion (see Section 10).
Data management activities will be performed using eClinical. eClinical is a suite of software 
tools that enables the collection, cleaning and viewing of clinical trial data. CRS data 
management will design the study-specific database and facilitate its development by the 
eClinical Information Technology team. Once the database design is approved by the 
Investigator, Statistician, and Clinical Research Coordinator, the database will be put into 
production and data entry can begin. Data can be entered and changed only by those with the 
rights to do so into the eCRFs via the EXPeRT Module). eClinical is compliant with all relevant 
technical aspects of relevant GCP guidelines.
•
The system can generate accurate copies of stored data and audit trail information in 
human readable form.
•
System access is limited to authorized individuals through the controlled assignment of 
unique ID and password combinations.
•
The system is designed to periodically force users to change their passwords and verifies 
that user ID and password combinations remain unique.
•
The system automatically generates a permanent time-stamped audit trail of all user 
interactions.
When data entry is complete, data management will review the data and will query any missing, 
incomplete, or invalid data points for resolution by the Clinical Research Coordinator and 
Investigator. Once all queries have been resolved, the data can be released to the statistician for 
analysis.
15.2 Maintenance of Study Documents
Essential documents should be retained per RPCI’s policy for 6 years from the study termination 
date. These documents could be retained for a longer period, however, if required by the 
applicable local regulatory requirements or by an agreement with RPCI. 
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 90 of 109
16 ADMINISTRATIVE RULES
16.1 Revisions to the Protocol
RPCI may make such changes to the protocol as it deems necessary for safety reasons or as may 
be required by the U.S. FDA or other regulatory agencies. Revisions will be submitted to the 
IRB/ERC for written approval before implementation.
16.2 Termination of the Study
It is agreed that, for reasonable cause, either the RPCI Investigators or the Sponsor may 
terminate this study, provided a written notice is submitted within the time period provided for in 
the Clinical Trial Agreement. In addition, RPCI may terminate the study at any time upon 
immediate notice if it believes termination is necessary for the safety of patients enrolled in the 
study.
16.3 Confidentiality
Any data, specimens, forms, reports, video recordings, and other records that leave the site will 
be identified only by a participant identification number (Participant ID, PID) to maintain 
confidentiality. All records will be kept in a limited access environment. All computer entry and 
networking programs will be done using PIDs only. Information will not be released without 
written authorization of the participant.
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 91 of 109
17
REFERENCES
1.
Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, et al: Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 60:277-300
2.
Herrmann A, Hoster E, Zwingers T, et al: Improvement of overall survival in advanced 
stage mantle cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 27:511-8, 2009
3.
Jaffe ES: The 2008 WHO classification of lymphomas: implications for clinical practice 
and translational research. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program:523-31, 2009
4.
Goy A, Kahl B: Mantle cell lymphoma: The promise of new treatment options. Crit Rev 
Oncol Hematol
5.
Bertoni F, Rinaldi A, Zucca E, et al: Update on the molecular biology of mantle cell 
lymphoma. Hematol Oncol 24:22-7, 2006
6.
Dreyling M, Hoster E, Bea S, et al: Update on the molecular pathogenesis and clinical 
treatment of Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL): minutes of the 9th European MCL Network 
conference. Leuk Lymphoma 51:1612-22
7.
Jares P, Colomer D, Campo E: Genetic and molecular pathogenesis of mantle cell 
lymphoma: perspectives for new targeted therapeutics. Nat Rev Cancer 7:750-62, 2007
8.
Lenz G, Dreyling M, Hiddemann W: Mantle cell lymphoma: established therapeutic 
options and future directions. Ann Hematol 83:71-7, 2004
9.
Weisenburger DD, Vose JM, Greiner TC, et al: Mantle cell lymphoma. A 
clinicopathologic study of 68 cases from the Nebraska Lymphoma Study Group. Am J 
Hematol 64:190-6, 2000
10.
Ghielmini M, Zucca E: How I treat mantle cell lymphoma. Blood 114:1469-76, 2009
11.
Ghielmini M, Schmitz SF, Cogliatti S, et al: Effect of single-agent rituximab given at the 
standard schedule or as prolonged treatment in patients with mantle cell lymphoma: a 
study of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK). J Clin Oncol 23:705-11, 
2005
12.
Foran JM, Cunningham D, Coiffier B, et al: Treatment of mantle-cell lymphoma with 
Rituximab (chimeric monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody): analysis of factors associated 
with response. Ann Oncol 11 Suppl 1:117-21, 2000
13.
Lenz G, Dreyling M, Hoster E, et al: Immunochemotherapy with rituximab and 
cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone significantly improves 
response and time to treatment failure, but not long-term outcome in patients with 
previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma: results of a prospective randomized trial of 
the German Low Grade Lymphoma Study Group (GLSG). J Clin Oncol 23:1984-92, 
2005
14.
Romaguera JE, Fayad L, Rodriguez MA, et al: High rate of durable remissions after 
treatment of newly diagnosed aggressive mantle-cell lymphoma with rituximab plus 
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 92 of 109
hyper-CVAD alternating with rituximab plus high-dose methotrexate and cytarabine. J 
Clin Oncol 23:7013-23, 2005
15.
Herold M, Dolken G, Fiedler F, et al: Randomized phase III study for the treatment of 
advanced indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL) and mantle cell lymphoma: 
chemotherapy versus chemotherapy plus rituximab. Ann Hematol 82:77-9, 2003
16.
Schulz H, Bohlius JF, Trelle S, et al: Immunochemotherapy with rituximab and overall 
survival in patients with indolent or mantle cell lymphoma: a systematic review and 
meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:706-14, 2007
17.
Fenske TS, Hari PN, Carreras J, et al: Impact of pre-transplant rituximab on survival after 
autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for diffuse large B cell lymphoma. 
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 15:1455-64, 2009
18.
Khouri IF, Romaguera J, Kantarjian H, et al: Hyper-CVAD and high-dose 
methotrexate/cytarabine followed by stem-cell transplantation: an active regimen for 
aggressive mantle-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 16:3803-9, 1998
19.
Lefrere F, Delmer A, Levy V, et al: Sequential chemotherapy regimens followed by high-
dose therapy with stem cell transplantation in mantle cell lymphoma: an update of a 
prospective study. Haematologica 89:1275-6, 2004
20.
van 't Veer MB, de Jong D, MacKenzie M, et al: High-dose Ara-C and beam with 
autograft rescue in R-CHOP responsive mantle cell lymphoma patients. Br J Haematol 
144:524-30, 2009
21.
Dreyling M, Lenz G, Hoster E, et al: Early consolidation by myeloablative 
radiochemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in first remission 
significantly prolongs progression-free survival in mantle-cell lymphoma: results of a 
prospective randomized trial of the European MCL Network. Blood 105:2677-84, 2005
22.
Geisler CH, Kolstad A, Laurell A, et al: Long-term progression-free survival of mantle 
cell lymphoma after intensive front-line immunochemotherapy with in vivo-purged stem 
cell rescue: a nonrandomized phase 2 multicenter study by the Nordic Lymphoma Group. 
Blood 112:2687-93, 2008
23.
Vandenberghe E, Ruiz de Elvira C, Loberiza FR, et al: Outcome of autologous 
transplantation for mantle cell lymphoma: a study by the European Blood and Bone 
Marrow Transplant and Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplant Registries. Br J 
Haematol 120:793-800, 2003
24.
Romaguera JE, Fayad LE, Feng L, et al: Ten-year follow-up after intense 
chemoimmunotherapy with Rituximab-HyperCVAD alternating with Rituximab-high 
dose methotrexate/cytarabine (R-MA) and without stem cell transplantation in patients 
with untreated aggressive mantle cell lymphoma. Br J Haematol 150:200-8
25.
Pott C, Hoster E, Beldjord K, et al: R-CHOP/R-DHAP Compared to R-CHOP Induction 
Followed by High Dose Therapy with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Induces 
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 93 of 109
Higher Rates of Molecular Remission In MCL: Results of the MCL Younger Intergroup 
Trial of the European MCL Network. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts 116:965, 2010
26.
Lefrere F, Delmer A, Suzan F, et al: Sequential chemotherapy by CHOP and DHAP 
regimens followed by high-dose therapy with stem cell transplantation induces a high rate 
of complete response and improves event-free survival in mantle cell lymphoma: a 
prospective study. Leukemia 16:587-93, 2002
27.
Delarue R, Haioun C, Ribrag V, et al: RCHOP and RDHAP Followed by Autologous 
Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) in Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) : Final Results of a 
Phase II Study from the GELA. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts 112:581, 2008
28.
Hoster E, Dreyling M, Klapper W, et al: A new prognostic index (MIPI) for patients with 
advanced-stage mantle cell lymphoma. Blood 111:558-65, 2008
29.
Tiemann M, Schrader C, Klapper W, et al: Histopathology, cell proliferation indices and 
clinical outcome in 304 patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL): a clinicopathological 
study from the European MCL Network. Br J Haematol 131:29-38, 2005
30.
Determann O, Hoster E, Ott G, et al: Ki-67 predicts outcome in advanced-stage mantle 
cell lymphoma patients treated with anti-CD20 immunochemotherapy: results from 
randomized trials of the European MCL Network and the German Low Grade 
Lymphoma Study Group. Blood 111:2385-7, 2008
31.
Bernard M, Gressin R, Lefrere F, et al: Blastic variant of mantle cell lymphoma: a rare 
but highly aggressive subtype. Leukemia 15:1785-91, 2001
32.
Hernandez L, Fest T, Cazorla M, et al: p53 gene mutations and protein overexpression 
are associated with aggressive variants of mantle cell lymphomas. Blood 87:3351-9, 1996
33.
Rosenwald A, Wright G, Wiestner A, et al: The proliferation gene expression signature is 
a quantitative integrator of oncogenic events that predicts survival in mantle cell 
lymphoma. Cancer Cell 3:185-97, 2003
34.
Pott C, Schrader C, Gesk S, et al: Quantitative assessment of molecular remission after 
high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation predicts long-term remission 
in mantle cell lymphoma. Blood 107:2271-8, 2006
35.
Bottcher S, Ritgen M, Buske S, et al: Minimal residual disease detection in mantle cell 
lymphoma: methods and significance of four-color flow cytometry compared to 
consensus IGH-polymerase chain reaction at initial staging and for follow-up 
examinations. Haematologica 93:551-9, 2008
36.
Pott C, Hoster E, Delfau-Larue MH, et al: Molecular remission is an independent 
predictor of clinical outcome in patients with mantle cell lymphoma after combined 
immunochemotherapy: a European MCL intergroup study. Blood 115:3215-23
37.
Teeling JL, Mackus WJ, Wiegman LJ, et al: The biological activity of human CD20 
monoclonal antibodies is linked to unique epitopes on CD20. J Immunol 177:362-71, 
2006
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 94 of 109
38.
Teeling JL, French RR, Cragg MS, et al: Characterization of new human CD20 
monoclonal antibodies with potent cytolytic activity against non-Hodgkin lymphomas. 
Blood 104:1793-800, 2004
39.
Hagenbeek A, Gadeberg O, Johnson P, et al: First clinical use of ofatumumab, a novel 
fully human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody in relapsed or refractory follicular 
lymphoma: results of a phase 1/2 trial. Blood 111:5486-95, 2008
40.
Czuczman MS, Olejniczak S, Gowda A, et al: Acquirement of rituximab resistance in 
lymphoma cell lines is associated with both global CD20 gene and protein down-
regulation regulated at the pretranscriptional and posttranscriptional levels. Clin Cancer 
Res 14:1561-70, 2008
41.
Coiffier 
B, 
Losic 
N, 
Rønn 
B, 
et 
al: 
Pharmacokinetics 
and 
pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic associations of ofatumumab, a human monoclonal 
CD20 antibody, in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a 
phase 1-2 study. Br J Haematol, 2010
42.
Wierda WG, Kipps TJ, Durig J, et al: Ofatumumab Combined with Fludarabine and 
Cyclophosphamide (O-FC) Shows High Activity in Patients with Previously Untreated 
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): Results From a Randomized, Multicenter, 
International, Two-Dose, Parallel Group, Phase II Trial. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts 
114:207-, 2009
43.
Wierda W, Kipps T, Mayer J, et al: Ofatumumab as single-agent CD20 immunotherapy 
in fludarabine-refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 28:1749-55, 2010
44.
Hagenbeek A, Fayad L, Delwail V, et al: Evaluation of Ofatumumab, a Novel Human 
CD20 Monoclonal Antibody, as Single Agent Therapy in Rituximab-Refractory 
Follicular Lymphoma. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts 114:935-, 2009
45.
Cheson BD, Horning SJ, Coiffier B, et al: Report of an international workshop to 
standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. NCI Sponsored International 
Working Group. J Clin Oncol 17:1244, 1999
46.
Cheson BD, Pfistner B, Juweid ME, et al: Revised response criteria for malignant 
lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 25:579-86, 2007
47.
Hernandez-Ilizaliturri FJ, Jupudy V, Ostberg J, et al: Neutrophils contribute to the 
biological antitumor activity of rituximab in a non-Hodgkin's lymphoma severe 
combined immunodeficiency mouse model. Clin Cancer Res 9:5866-73, 2003
48.
Clopper CJ, Pearson ES: The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of 
the binomial. Biometrika 26:404-413, 1934
49.
Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S: Applied Logistic Regression (ed First). New York, Wiley 
and Sons, 2000 
50.
Brookmeyer R, Crowley JJ: A confidence interval for the median survival time. . 
Biometrics 38:29-41, 1982
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 95 of 109
51.
Byrd JC, Murphy T, Howard RS, et al: Rituximab using a thrice weekly dosing schedule 
in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma demonstrates 
clinical activity and acceptable toxicity. J Clin Oncol 19:2153-64, 2001
52.
Martinez N, Camacho FI, Algara P, et al: The molecular signature of mantle cell 
lymphoma reveals multiple signals favoring cell survival. Cancer Res 63:8226-32, 2003
53.
Hartmann E, Fernandez V, Moreno V, et al: Five-gene model to predict survival in 
mantle-cell lymphoma using frozen or formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. J Clin 
Oncol 26:4966-72, 2008
54.
Le Gouill, S., et al., Rituximab after Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation in Mantle-
Cell Lymphoma. N Engl J Med, 2017. 377(13): p. 1250-1260.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 96 of 109
18 APPENDICES
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 97 of 109
APPENDIX A
INSTRUCTIONS FOR NETWORK SITE
1. CONTACT INFORMATION
All questions related to the protocol or study implementation should be directed to:
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
CRS Network Office
ASB K 104
Buffalo, New York 14263
Telephone:
Monday-Friday; 8:00 AM to 5:30 PM EST
716-845-3155 or 716-845-1203 
After hours, weekends, and holidays request the RPCI Investigator 716-845-2300
Fax:  716-845-8743
2. INFORMED CONSENT
•
Informed Consent must be obtained by the Site Investigator/designee from any patients 
wishing to participate, prior to any procedures or change in their treatment.
•
An informed consent template is provided by RPCI and can be amended to reflect 
institutional requirements.
•
All consent changes must be reviewed by RPCI Network Office prior to submission to 
the site IRB.
•
The informed consent must be IRB approved.
•
Always check that you are using the correct date and version of the IRB approved 
consent.
•
Within 5 business days, notify the RPCI Network Office of all participant withdrawals or 
consent to limited study participation and appropriately document the discontinuation and 
the reason(s) why.
3. SUBJECT REGISTRATION
The patient completes the Gender, Race, and Ethnicity Form and this is placed in the study 
binder.
RPCI does not grant exceptions to eligibility criteria.
Phase 2 Protocol Registration Instructions
The Subject Screening and Enrollment Log must be faxed to the RPCI Network Office within 
1 business day of the date the participant is consented. Once the Investigator has determined that 
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 98 of 109
eligibility has been met, complete the eligibility check list and fax the Subject Registration form 
to the RPCI Network Monitor at 716-845-8743.
4. STUDY DEVIATIONS
•
If a deviation has occurred to eliminate hazard, this should be reported to the RPCI 
Network, site IRB and any other regulatory authority involved in the trial.
•
ALL study deviations will be recorded on the Study Deviation Log.
5. STUDY DOCUMENTATION
•
Study documents must be filled out completely and correctly. Ditto marks are not 
allowed.
•
If an entry has been documented in error put a single line through the entry and initial and 
date the change. The RPCI Network Monitor must be able to read what has been deleted.
•
Do NOT use white-out, magic marker, scratch-outs.
•
Do NOT erase entries.
•
Use only black ink for documentation on the accountability form and any other study 
forms.
•
It is the responsibility of RPCI to inform the Investigator/ institution as to when these 
documents no longer need to be retained. If, for any reason, the Investigator desires to no 
longer maintain the study records, they may be transferred to another institution, another 
investigator, or to RPCI upon written agreement between the Investigator and RPCI.
6. DRUG ACCOUNTABILITY
Drug accountability must be strictly maintained. 
•
Responsibility rests solely with the Investigator but can be delegated as appropriate (e.g., 
to pharmacy personnel).
•
A drug accountability record form (DARF) will record quantities of study drug received, 
dispensed to subjects and wasted, lot number, date dispensed, subject ID number and 
initials, quantity returned, balance remaining, manufacturer, expiration date, and the 
initials of the person dispensing the medication.
•
Study drug supply should only be used in accordance with the IRB approved study.
•
Drug accountability forms are protocol and agent specific, they are study source 
documents and will be used to verify compliance with the study.
•
An inventory count must be performed with each transaction. Any discrepancies shall be 
documented and explained.
•
An inventory count should be performed with each transaction. Any discrepancies shall 
be documented and explained.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 99 of 109
•
Drug accountability forms shall be stored with study related documents.
•
Each medication provided for this study and each dosage form and strength must have its 
own DARF.
•
Dispensing the wrong study supply is considered a medication error.
o
Never replace investigational agents with commercial product.
o
Do NOT “transfer”, “borrow” or “replace” supplies between studies.
7. SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING
The site Investigator or designated research personnel will report all SAEs whether related or 
unrelated to the investigational agent(s) to the site’s IRB in accordance with their local 
institutional guidelines. 
The site will notify the RPCI Network Monitor within 1 business day of being made aware of the 
SAE. Follow protocol Section 10.2.2 Reporting Serious Adverse Event. Report promptly to local 
IRB, NCCN, and Novartis
A preliminary written report must follow within 1 business day of the first notification using the 
following forms:
o
RPCI SAE Source form
o
MedWatch 3500A
SAEs and pregnancies should also be reported to Novartis representative (Appendix F)
SAE reports are to be submitted to the NCCN: Email ORPReports@NCCN.org or fax SAEs to: 
215-358-7699
A complete follow-up report must be filed within 10 working days.
A complete follow-up report must be sent to the RPCI Network Monitor when new information 
becomes available.
8. UNANTICIPATED PROBLEM REPORTING
An unanticipated problem (UP) is any incident, experience, or outcome that meets all of the 
criteria in Section 10.5.
For all adverse events occurring that are unanticipated and related or possibly related to the 
research drug, biologic or intervention, the participating physician or delegated research staff 
from each site will notify their local IRB in accordance with their local institutional 
guidelines. The site must also notify the RPCI Network Monitor within 1 business day of being 
made aware of the Unanticipated Problem by completing the RPCI Unanticipated Problem 
Report Form and faxing it to the RPCI CRS  Network  Office  FAX # 716-845-8743
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 100 of 109
APPENDIX B
Screening for Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy During 
Ofatumumab Treatment in B-Cell Lymphoma Patients
Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a viral-induced demyelinating disease of 
the central nervous system usually occurring in the immunocompromised individual. JC virus 
infection resulting in PML and death has been reported in rituximab-treated patients with 
hematologic malignancies or with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), an indication for which 
rituximab has not been approved. In the literature, PML has been reported to occur in 0.52% of 
CLL patients and in approximately 5% of fludarabine-treated B-CLL patients. One case of PML 
was reported in a very ill CLL patient treated with ofatumumab, previously treated with 
alemtuzumab and fludarabine and with very low CD4 cell count.
Investigators and nurses should pay careful attention for signs and symptoms consistent with a 
diagnosis of PML. Signs and symptoms of PML include visual disturbances, ocular movements, 
ataxia, and changes in mental status such as disorientation or confusion. These symptoms are not 
an exhaustive list and the investigator should exercise judgment in deciding to report signs and 
symptoms to sponsor promptly.
If a patient develops neurological signs or symptoms consistent with PML treatment should be 
halted and the patient referred to a neurologist for evaluation. At a minimum, blood JCV PCR 
and/or MRI will be performed and if either is positive perform Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) JCV 
PCR. If blood JCV PCR and MRI are negative, the investigator will contact the NCCN for 
appropriate action to be taken. If blood JCV PCR and/or MRI are positive, the patient should 
proceed to the Follow-Up Period. All such patients will be followed until resolution.  Any patient 
with a diagnosis of PML will be withdrawn from ofatumumab. There are no known tests that can 
reliably determine who is at increased risk for developing PML. There are no known 
interventions that can reliably prevent PML or adequately treat PML if it occurs.
Neurological Symptoms Questions
YES
NO
1.
Does the patient report any new weakness?
2.
Does the patient report any new difficulty with coordination or walking?
3.
Does the patient report any new signs of confusion, impaired memory or attention?
4.
Does the patient appear apathetic compared to previous contacts?
5.
Does the patient report any new visual disturbances?
6.
Has the patient had any new trouble speaking, either slurring speech, difficulty 
getting out words, difficulty understanding words, or difficulty comprehending 
spoken language?
7.
Does the patient have any other new neurological symptoms, including but not 
limited to:
New onset seizure.
New sensory loss.
New emotional liability.
If any of the above are answered “Yes” at any visit, the investigator will refer the patient to a neurologist.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 101 of 109
APPENDIX C
Ofatumumab Liver Interruption/Stopping Criteria for Oncology 
Studies (Updated May 2011)
Based upon SRT discussion and agreement on 16 February 2011 and 03 March 2011, the 
following Liver Interruption/Stopping criteria were established for use in all ofatumumab 
oncology trials including CRTs. These criteria were initially discussed with Novartis for 
OMB110911. The criteria are required for all future ofatumumab oncology protocols (including 
this clinical trial).
CRITERIA 1: ALT > 3 x upper limit of normal (ULN) and bilirubin > 2 x ULN (> 35% direct 
bilirubin; bilirubin fractionation required‡). ‡ NOTE: If serum bilirubin fractionation not 
immediately available, study drug should be discontinued if ALT > 3 x ULN and 
bilirubin > 2 x ULN. Serum bilirubin fractionation should be performed if testing is available. If 
testing unavailable, record presence of detectable urinary bilirubin on dipstick, indicating direct 
bilirubin elevations and suggesting liver injury.
CRITERIA 2: ALT > 8 x ULN.
CRITERIA 3: ALT > 5 x ULN for more than 2 weeks.
Liver Chemistry Interruption/Stopping and Follow- up Criteria have been designed to 
assure patient safety and evaluate liver event etiology. The site investigator in conjunction 
with the Principal Investigator at RPCI will review all events which meet liver chemistry 
stopping criteria to determine if the event was due to tumor lysis, disease related liver 
involvement, concomitant chemotherapy or other identified cause and to exclude drug induced 
liver injury (DILI) due to ofatumumab. If the event is determined to be due to causes other than 
ofatumumab DILI and improvement is observed after withdrawal of ofatumumab, rechallenge 
may be attempted if deemed appropriate by the principal investigator and in addition to consent 
of the patient. 
When any of the liver chemistry stopping criteria is met, do the following:
Immediately stop study treatment.
Report the event to NCCN within 24 hours of learning its occurrence.
Hold ofatumumab for 2 weeks, repeat liver chemistry testing at least twice weekly, and call the 
Principal Investigator at RPCI to discuss the possibility of re-challenging with ofatumumab. 
Note: The 2 week time point for stopping medication was chosen because it will distinguish from 
LFT elevations due to tumor lysis, which should have resolved within this time period.  
Medication is interrupted and it is a clinical and patient decision if ofatumumab may be re-
started.  The risk:benefit ratio is different in an oncology setting and an efficacious therapy may 
be life-saving.
Report SAE to NOVARTIS within 24 hours.
All events of ALT > 3 x ULN and bilirubin > 2 x ULN (> 35% direct bilirubin) (or 
ALT > 3 x ULN and INR > 1.5, if INR measured; INR measurement is not required and the 
threshold value stated will not apply to patients receiving anticoagulants), termed ‘Hy’s Law’, 
must be reported as an SAE (excluding studies of hepatic impairment or cirrhosis).
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 102 of 109
NOTE: if serum bilirubin fractionation is not immediately available, study treatment should be 
discontinued if ALT > 3 x ULN and bilirubin > 2 x ULN. Serum bilirubin fractionation should 
be performed if testing is available. If testing is unavailable, record presence of detectable 
urinary bilirubin on dipstick, indicating direct bilirubin elevations and suggesting liver injury.
Liver chemistry follow-up assessments are to be followed until liver chemistries resolve, 
stabilize or return to baseline values.
Liver Chemistry Follow-up Assessments: (these chemistry tests/ assessments below are to be 
performed at the time of the event and then continued and/or discontinued at the 
discretion/judgment of the sponsor-investigator; please refer to stopping criteria within this 
document below).
Viral hepatitis serology including:
Hepatitis A IgM antibody
Hepatitis B surface antigen and Hepatitis B Core Antibody (IgM)
Hepatitis C RNA
Cytomegalovirus IgM antibody
Epstein-Barr viral capsid antigen IgM antibody (or if unavailable, obtain heterophile antibody or 
monospot testing)
Hepatitis E IgM antibody
Serum creatine phosphokinase (CPK) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH).
Fractionate bilirubin, if total bilirubin > 2 x ULN.
Obtain complete blood count with differential to assess eosinophilia.
Record the appearance or worsening clinical symptoms of hepatitis, or hypersensitivity, fatigue, 
decreased appetite, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, jaundice, fever, or rash.
Record use of concomitant medications, acetaminophen, herbal remedies, other over the counter 
medications, or putative hepatotoxins.
Increased alcohol use.
The following assessments are required for patients with ALT > 3 x ULN and 
bilirubin > 2 x ULN (35% direct) but are optional for other abnormal liver chemistries:
Anti-nuclear antibody, anti-smooth muscle antibody, and Type 1 anti-liver kidney microsomal 
antibodies.
Liver imaging (ultrasound, magnetic resonance, or computerized tomography) to evaluate liver 
disease.
Stopping Criteria:
For patients meeting liver Criteria 1: 
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 103 of 109
A repeat of liver chemistries within 24 hours, liver event follow-up assessments and close 
monitoring.
A specialist or hepatology consultation is recommended.
Monitor patients twice weekly until liver chemistries (ALT, AST, alkaline phosphatase, 
bilirubin) resolve, stabilize or return to within baseline values.
For patients meeting Criteria 2 or 3:
A repeat of liver chemistries within 24 hours to 72 hours for repeat liver chemistries and liver 
event follow-up assessments.
Monitor patients weekly until liver chemistries (ALT, AST, alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin) 
resolve, stabilize or return to within baseline values.
After holding ofatumumab for 2 weeks:
If the treatment is exhibiting efficacy and the patient wants to continue therapy after being 
informed of the results of liver chemistry testing, then the ofatumumab may be re-started.
Liver chemistries and follow-up assessments should be monitored at a minimum of every 2 
weeks until resolution, stabilization, or a return to baseline values, at which point monitoring 
should be continued per protocol.
Patients with ALT > 3 x ULN but ALT < 5 x ULN and bilirubin < 2 x ULN without hepatitis 
symptoms or rash, and who may be monitored weekly for at least 4 weeks, then the following 
actions should be taken:
Patients can continue ofatumumab.
Weekly repeat of liver chemistries until they resolve, stabilize, or return to baseline values, then 
monitor liver chemistries as per protocol assessment schedule.
If at any time the patient meets any of the liver chemistry stopping criteria, then proceed as 
described above.
If after 4 weeks of monitoring, ALT < 3 x ULN and bilirubin < 2 x ULN monitor twice monthly 
until liver chemistries normalize or return to within baseline values.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 104 of 109
APPENDIX D
Schema of Pathology Tissue Processing
A3.1 For processing a fresh lymph node or extra-nodal mass biopsy material for pathological 
diagnosis and correlative science experiments.
A3.1.1 Applicable to:
•
To be performed in patients that the original biopsy was not sufficient for complete diagnosis or 
patients with accessible lymph nodes consenting for a repeat biopsy to complete correlative studies 
(i.e. ex vivo testing, as all other studies can be performed from archived material).
•
To be performed in all patients with suspected relapsed/refractory disease after ofatumumab-hyper-
CVAD/ofatumumab-HD-MA or during the follow up period (including after HDC-ASCT if 
eligible).
A3.2.1 Procedure(s):
The pathologist will first make 6 touch preparations to confirm the presence of representative tissue 
adequate for evaluation. Tissue will then be divided as follows:
1. Sufficient tissue to clinical pathology to be formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded 
for morphology and immunohistochemistry
2. Fresh tissue in RPMI 10%FCS for ex vivo studies to the RPCI 
Lymphoma/Myeloma Laboratory CCC Bldg. 3rd Floor, Rm 304 [RPCI patients 
only]
3. If sufficient tissue remains, submit fresh in % RPMI 10%FCS to the RPCI 
Cytogenetics Lab.
To isolate B-cells by negative 
selection for
 ex vivo studies 
(RPCI patients only) 
Fresh tissue in RPMI-10% to 
Lymphoma/Myeloma Lab
Clinical Pathology
Cytogenetics studies 
If tissue remains,             
submit fresh in RPMI-10% to 
RPCI Cytogenetics Lab
A3.2 For processing archived lymph node or extra-nodal mass biopsy material for pathological 
diagnosis and correlative science experiments 
A3.2.2 Applicable to:
•
To be performed in all patients during the registration period (See Section 7.1).
•
Material to be submitted: tissue block (preferable) or 10 – 20 unstained slides cut at 4 μm on 
positively charged slides for pathological examination.
•
If nodal/extranodal fresh tissue is not available, but involved bone marrow at diagnosis with MCL 
specimen had been procured, cytogenetic studies can be performed from such material and must be 
submitted. FISH can also be performed on unstained FFPE sections from diagnostic sample, cut at 
4 μm and placed on positively charged slides.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 105 of 109
APPENDIX E
Roswell Park Cancer Institute MCL-OFA-1 Form
Specimen Shipment Form    MCL-OFA-1
Study Number:  I 201611
Patient ID: 2016VU_ _
Date Collected: 
Sex:
Age:
Specimen Type: 
Specimen Site:
Fax a copy to:
Cory Mavis
716-845-7188
Note: Specimen must be shipped between Mondays to Thursdays 
Please schedule surgical procedures accordingly to adhere to shipment days.
Ship via overnight mail (check AM delivery)
FedEx the Original form with the specimen to:
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Department of Medicine Lymphoma/Myeloma Laboratory
CCC Bldg. 3rd Floor, Rm 304
Attn: Study Number – I  201611
Elm & Carlton Streets
Buffalo, NY 14263
Tel: 716-845--3464
Fax: 716-845-7188
Contact:  cory.mavis@RoswellPark.org 
PLEASE CIRCLE THE APPROPRIATE SAMPLE BEING SHIPPED
Baseline:
A mandatory tissue block or unstained slides (10-20) are to be submitted to Cory Mavis who will 
deliver to RPCI Pathology Department for central pathology review
10mL green top – Blood (MRD)
  5mL green top -  Bone marrow aspirate (MRD)
  5mL green top – Bone marrow aspirate (cyto)
Restaging Visits (prior to C3, prior to C5, prior to transplant) and D100 post-transplant:
10mL green top – Blood (MRD)
  5mL green top – Bone marrow aspirate (MRD)
Follow-up Visits – every 6 months for 3 yrs. or until PD:
10mL green top – Blood (MRD)
At relapse or diagnosed refractory disease:
 5mL green top – Bone marrow aspirate (cyto)
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 106 of 109
APPENDIX F
Serious Adverse Event Report Fax Coversheets
Interventional Clinical Trial SAE Fax Cover Sheet
To: Local Novartis Patient Safety via 1-877-778-9739
If you experience difficulty faxing this form, please email the SAE & Cover Sheet to 
clinicalsafetyop.phuseh@novartis.com
Investigator contact details:
Fax number: ______________________________
Phone number: ____________________________
Study Name
I 201611: Ofatumumab (O) in Combination With 
Chemotherapy: Hyper-Fractionated Cyclophosphamide, 
Doxorubicin, Vincristine and Dexamethasone (O-
HyperCVAD) Alternating With Ofatumumab High-Dose 
Cytarabine and Methotrexate (O-MA) for Patients With 
Newly Diagnosed Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Centre Number
Patient Number
NVS STUDY #: COMB157DUS12T
Relationship between study treatment and event(s) is:
Suspected/Unknown
This document contains important safety information.
If fax is received in error, please forward to 1-877-778-9739
Version 3.0, 14 Mar 2017
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 107 of 109
Interventional Clinical Trial SAE Fax Cover Sheet
To: Local Novartis Patient Safety via 1-877-778-9739
If you experience difficulty faxing this form, please email the SAE & Cover Sheet to 
clinicalsafetyop.phuseh@novartis.com
Investigator contact details:
Fax number: ______________________________
Phone number: ____________________________
Study Name
I 201611: Ofatumumab (O) in Combination With 
Chemotherapy: Hyper-Fractionated Cyclophosphamide, 
Doxorubicin, Vincristine and Dexamethasone (O-
HyperCVAD) Alternating With Ofatumumab High-Dose 
Cytarabine and Methotrexate (O-MA) for Patients With 
Newly Diagnosed Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Centre Number
Patient Number
NVS STUDY #: COMB157DUS12T
Relationship between study treatment and event(s) is:
Not Suspected
This document contains important safety information.
If fax is received in error, please forward to 1-877-778-9739
Version 3.0_14 Mar 2017
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 108 of 109
APPENDIX G
Reproductive Potential and Contraceptive Methods
Women of child-bearing potential (WOCBP) is defined as all women physiologically 
capable of becoming pregnant, unless they are using highly effective methods of 
contraception throughout the study and for 6 months after study drug discontinuation. 
Highly effective contraception methods include:
•
Total abstinence when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of 
the patient. Periodic abstinence (e.g., calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, 
post-ovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of 
contraception.
•
Female sterilization (have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy with or 
without hysterectomy) or tubal ligation at least six weeks before taking study 
treatment. In case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status 
of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment.
•
Male sterilization (at least 6 months prior to screening). For female patients 
on the study, the vasectomized male partner should be the sole partner for that 
patient.
•
Combination of any of the two following (a+b or a+c or b+c)
a.
Use of oral, injected or implanted hormonal methods of contraception or 
other forms of hormonal contraception that have comparable efficacy 
(failure rate <1%), for example hormone vaginal ring or transdermal 
hormone contraception
b. Placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS)
c.
Barrier methods of contraception: Condom or Occlusive cap (diaphragm 
or cervical/vault caps) with spermicidal foam/gel/film/cream/ vaginal 
suppository
 In case of use of oral contraception, women should have been stable on the same 
pill before taking study treatment.
5/14/2018


Roswell Park Cancer Institute Study Number: I 201611
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE
03/19/18
Page 109 of 109
Note: Oral contraceptives are allowed but should be used in conjunction with a 
barrier method of contraception due to unknown effect of drug-drug interaction.
Women are considered post-menopausal and not of child bearing potential if they 
have had 12 months of natural (spontaneous) amenorrhea with an appropriate 
clinical profile (e.g. age appropriate, history of vasomotor symptoms) or have had 
surgical bilateral oophorectomy (with or without hysterectomy) or tubal ligation 
at least six weeks ago. In the case of oophorectomy alone, only when the 
reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone level 
assessment is she considered not of child bearing potential.
Sexually active males should not father a child unless they use a condom during 
intercourse while taking the drug and 3 months after stopping treatment. A condom is 
required to be used also by vasectomized men in order to prevent delivery of the drug via 
seminal fluid.  Sexually active mails should not donate sperm while taking the drug and 3 
months after stopping treatment.
APPROVED RPCI IRB
5/14/2018