Conditions: Alzheimer's Disease
Keywords: Alzheimer's disease Cerebrospinal fluid brain blood flow cognition icosapent ethyl Vascepa omega-3 fatty acids eicosapentaenoic acid
Allocation: RANDOMIZED | Intervention model: PARALLEL
Enrollment: 131
Healthy volunteers: yes

Brief summary:
The number of Americans diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease (AD) is expected to triple by 2050. Compared to the general population, Veterans have a greater risk of AD, likely in part due to their increased incidence of traumatic brain injury, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, and other vascular-related health issues. Based on available data, 423,000 new cases of AD are anticipated in Veterans by 2020. Thus, the discovery of effective therapies to prevent or delay the onset of AD in Veterans is critical. The goal of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a purified form of the omega-3 fatty acid eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) called icosapent ethyl (IPE), on improving brain blood flow, spinal fluid markers of AD pathology, and cognitive performance in middle-aged, cognitively-healthy Veterans with increased risk of AD. If IPE delays the onset of AD by even 5 years, the incidence of AD would be reduced by 50% in this population and could have a profound effect on Veteran quality of life and healthcare costs.

Detailed description:
The proposed study is a proof-of-concept, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial assessing the efficacy of 18 months of icosapent ethyl (IPE) therapy on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and cognitive biomarkers for AD in 150 cognitively-healthy Veterans ages 50-75 years. The overarching goal of this trial is to assess whether icosapent ethyl beneficially affects intermediate physiological measures associated with onset of AD in order to evaluate whether larger, multi-site, longer-duration Alzheimer's prevention trials are warranted to assess more definitive clinical outcomes. The proposed study aims to: 1) investigate the effects of 18 months of IPE vs. placebo on regional cerebral blood flow as measured by arterial spin-labeling MRI; 2) determine the impact of 18 months of IPE vs. placebo on CSF biomarkers of AD pathology; and 3) evaluate the effects of 18 months of IPE vs. placebo on cognitive performance.

Arms:
arm 1: Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive icosapent ethyl 4 g daily vs. matching gel cap placebo arm 2: Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive icosapent ethyl 4 g daily vs. matching gel cap placebo

Interventions: intervention 1: icosapent ethyl (IPE) intervention 2: gel cap placebo
Intervention descriptions: intervention 1: Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive icosapent ethyl 4 g daily vs. matching gel cap placebo intervention 2: Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive icosapent ethyl 4 g daily vs. matching gel cap placebo

Protocol document:
Prot_SAP_000.pdf: 
Version 9 
Page 1 of 22 
07/16/2024 
 
Protocol:  
Impact of Icosapent Ethyl on Alzheimers Disease Biomarkers 
in Preclinical Adults: “Brain Amyloid and Vascular Effects of 
Eicosapentaenoic Acid (BRAVE-EPA)” Study 
 
Principal Investigator and Institutional Affiliation:  
 
Cynthia M. Carlsson, MD, MS 
Staff Physician, William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital 
Madison VA Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC) 
Associate Professor of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology 
University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health 
Wisconsin Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (ADRC) 
Wisconsin Alzheimer’s Institute (WAI) 
VA GRECC (D4211) 
2500 Overlook Terrace 
Madison, WI 53705 
 
9/13/2024 
 
Funding Sponsor: Department of Veterans Affairs CSR&D Merit Review Award for 
Clinical Trials (I01) (1I01CX001261-01A1) 
 
 


Version 9 
Page 2 of 22 
07/16/2024 
 
Contents 
A) PROJECT SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................. 3 
B) BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE ........................................................................................................... 3 
Hypothesis: ............................................................................................................................................... 4 
Specific Aims: ............................................................................................................................................ 4 
C) RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS .......................................................................................................... 5 
Trial Design Summary ............................................................................................................................... 5 
Recruitment .............................................................................................................................................. 8 
Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria....................................................................................................................... 9 
Study Protocol ......................................................................................................................................... 10 
COVID-19 ............................................................................................................................................. 12 
MRI Acquisition ....................................................................................................................................... 13 
MRI Quality Control ............................................................................................................................ 14 
MRI Data Backup ................................................................................................................................. 14 
Image Processing ................................................................................................................................ 14 
Study Visit Procedures ............................................................................................................................ 14 
Lumbar Puncture (LP) Procedure (Cerebrospinal Fluid [CSF] Collection) ........................................... 15 
Laboratory Evaluation ......................................................................................................................... 15 
ADCS-PACC Battery Tests .................................................................................................................... 16 
Questionnaires .................................................................................................................................... 16 
D) REPORTING STUDY FINDINGS ................................................................................................................. 17 
Potential Risks: Physical .......................................................................................................................... 18 
Study Drug Formulation, Packaging, Labeling, and Storage ................................................................... 18 
D) DATA MANAGEMENT, ANALYSIS, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS ................................................ 19 
Data Management .................................................................................................................................. 19 
Randomization ........................................................................................................................................ 20 
Analysis Population ................................................................................................................................. 20 
Analyses .................................................................................................................................................. 20 
Covariates ............................................................................................................................................... 21 
Power Calculations .................................................................................................................................. 21 
E) REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................ 22 
 


Version 9 
Page 3 of 22 
07/16/2024 
 
 
A) PROJECT SUMMARY 
Over five million Americans have Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and this number is expected 
to triple by 2050 unless effective preventive strategies are identified. Veterans are at an even 
higher risk for AD than the general population, possibly due to their increased exposure to factors 
that accelerate AD pathology, including vascular risk factors, traumatic brain injury, and post-
traumatic stress disorder. AD pathology occurs decades before cognitive symptoms occur and is 
characterized by amyloid plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, and reduced regional cerebral blood 
flow in areas of the brain related to memory and learning. While cerebral arterial dysfunction 
occurs early in the development of AD pathology and decades before symptoms begin, the effects 
of treating such early vascular dysfunction in the brain are poorly understood. The omega-3 fatty 
acid eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) improves arterial function and cerebral blood flow, attenuates 
adverse brain changes related to β-amyloid protein, and improves cognition in animals – changes 
that could all potentially protect against AD. However, it is not clear whether EPA beneficially 
affects these processes or cognitive performance in cognitively-healthy adults at increased risk 
for AD. In 2012, the Food and Drug Administration approved the first high-dose prescription EPA-
only medication to treat hypertriglyceridemia, called icosapent ethyl (available as Vascepa® in 
the United States). This agent is readily available for use and has a good safety profile, making it 
a favorable agent to consider for AD prevention.  
 
The proposed study is a proof-of-concept, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, 
parallel-group clinical trial assessing the efficacy of 18 months of icosapent ethyl (IPE) therapy on 
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and cognitive biomarkers for AD 
in 150 cognitively-healthy Veterans ages 50–75 years. Since Vascepa® has a daily dose 
recommendation of 4 grams daily, participants will be randomized to either 4 gram daily IPE 
(Vascepa®) or matching placebo. The overarching goal of this trial is to assess whether IPE 
beneficially affects intermediate physiological measures associated with the onset of AD in order 
to evaluate whether larger, multi-site, longer-duration Alzheimer’s prevention trials are warranted 
to assess more definitive clinical outcomes.  
 
B) BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE 
AD is a devastating illness leading to progressive neurodegenerative changes and 
cognitive decline. Current therapies to treat AD are limited in their efficacy and work primarily to 
delay the inevitable decline in function. Disease-modifying and preventive therapies have not yet 
been identified. The projected tripling of the number of persons with AD in the United States in 
the next 40 years has led to an urgent need to rapidly identify AD preventive strategies. Veterans 
are at even higher risk of developing AD than the general population due to a variety of factors 
including increased prevalence of vascular risk factors, traumatic brain injury (TBI), post-traumatic 
stress disorder (PTSD), and depression. While longitudinal studies such as the groundbreaking 
Department of Defense Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (DOD-ADNI) are seeking to 
better understand how TBI, PTSD, and depression contribute to AD pathology in Vietnam 
Veterans, some earlier data suggest that these conditions may mediate AD risk in part through 
vascular mechanisms. Depression and AD both share common vascular risk factors and Veterans 
treated for PTSD are more than twice as likely to have dyslipidemia or hypertension compared to 
Veterans without PTSD. Within the Veteran population, persons who are eligible for and use care 
through the Veterans Affairs (VA) system have an even greater risk for AD than non-VA Veterans 
due to their aggregation of risk factors related to VA eligibility – on average, they have lower 
income, are less likely to be employed, have fewer years of education, and are more likely to have 


Version 9 
Page 4 of 22 
07/16/2024 
 
service-related medical or psychiatric conditions. In addition, compared to non-VA Veterans, VA 
Veterans are more likely to be African American – a population with increased incidence rates of 
vascular risk factors and twice the prevalence of AD compared to white adults. Based on available 
data, experts anticipate 423,000 new cases of AD in Veterans by 2020, including 140,000 cases 
directly attributable to military service. Thus, finding effective therapies to prevent or delay the 
onset of AD in Veterans is critical. The VA is poised to lead cutting-edge AD prevention research 
that includes Americans with a high likelihood of developing AD – namely Veterans within the VA 
healthcare system.   
 
Evidence supports that AD neurodegenerative changes likely begin decades before 
clinically-apparent disease. The NIA-Alzheimer’s Association (AA)-sponsored workgroup defined 
research criteria for the preclinical stages of AD and identified factors that best predict risk of 
progression from "normal" cognition to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD. Our investigative 
team at the NIH-funded, jointly-sponsored University of Wisconsin (UW)/ Madison VA Wisconsin 
Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (ADRC) has focused our studies on early identification and 
treatment of such preclinical, high-risk individuals – in particular, asymptomatic middle-aged 
adults with parental history of AD. While previous studies have demonstrated that having a first-
degree relative with AD increases the risk of developing AD, independent of the risk conveyed 
through the genetic risk factor apolipoprotein E ε4 (APOE4) allele, more recent research supports 
that biomarker elevations, but not APOE or parental history status, are associated with risk of 
cognitive decline in cognitively unimpaired adults.1 Our Wisconsin ADRC investigators have found 
that asymptomatic middle-aged adults with parental history of AD show early neurobiological 
changes on CSF biomarkers, MRI biomarkers including measures of regional cerebral blood flow 
(rCBF), and cognitive biomarkers for AD while demonstrating normal global cognitive and clinical 
function. In a group of 218 cognitively healthy adults ages 40-65 years with parental history of AD 
in our Wisconsin ADRC-related studies, we found that 129 (60%) are either carriers of the APOE4 
allele or have CSF β-amyloid-42 (Aβ42) or tau biomarker levels suggesting preclinical disease 
(preliminary data, unpublished). Thus, these high-risk individuals are ideal to study in that they 
are clinically asymptomatic, yet have neurobiological evidence supporting preclinical AD-related 
changes in their brains. For the proposed clinical trial, we will focus on cognitively healthy 
Veterans ages 50-75 years with or without parental history of AD. Participants will have Veteran-
specific risk factors related to increased prevalence of atherogenic vascular risk profiles, TBI, 
PTSD, and depression. In addition, we will gather information on their parental history of AD to 
account for potential risk variation given the conflicting findings on the importance of parental 
history of AD in the development of this common form of dementia. 
 
Hypothesis: 
In middle-aged and older cognitively-healthy Veterans (ages 50–75), 18 months of treatment with 
icosapent ethyl (IPE) will beneficially modify preclinical AD biomarkers, including regional cerebral 
blood flow (rCBF), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) markers of AD pathology, and cognitive performance.  
 
Specific Aims: 
(a) To investigate the effects of 18 months of IPE 4 g daily vs. placebo on arterial spin-labeling 
(ASL) MRI regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in a pre-defined statistically-identified region of 
interest (ROI) affected early in preclinical AD. 
 
(b) To determine the impact of 18 months of IPE vs. placebo on CSF biomarkers of preclinical 
AD pathology (CSF β-amyloid-42, total tau, and phosphorylated tau181). 
 


Version 9 
Page 5 of 22 
07/16/2024 
 
(c) To evaluate the effects of 18 months of icosapent ethyl vs. placebo on a composite measure 
designed to assess preclinical cognitive changes — the Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study 
(ADCS) Preclinical Alzheimer’s Cognitive Composite (PACC).  
 
Description of the primary endpoint: The primary endpoint will be the change in rCBF in a pre-
defined statistical ROI at 18 months in participants randomized to IPE vs. placebo. Animal and 
human studies show that regionally reduced CBF (related to both neuronal hypometabolism and 
systemic vascular disease) in areas of the brain important for memory and learning is a very early 
change in AD pathogenesis and, thus, therapies known to beneficially modify arterial function may 
improve CBF and lead to early neuroprotection and maintenance of cognitive function. The pre-
defined statistical ROI that will be used for the proposed trial was developed using longitudinal 
ASL-MRI CBF data from 133 adults (ages 43–73) in the NIH-funded Wisconsin Registry for 
Alzheimer’s Prevention (WRAP) cohort, which is enriched for parental history of AD. Areas of the 
brain with greatest CBF decline over two years were identified using the Alzheimer’s Disease 
Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI)-derived analytic method developed by Chen et al. The statistically-
defined region is consistent with those affected early by AD pathology. Using anatomical ROIs 
that aligned with the statistically-defined ROI, treatment effect on 18 month rCBF was examined 
hierarchically in a priori selected regions of interest in the following order: bilateral posterior 
cingulate, bilateral precuneus, bilateral medial temporal lobe. Analyses of ROIs were discontinued 
if the group difference in 18 month rCBF in the previous ROI was not significant. Secondary 
endpoints will be 18-month changes in CSF biomarkers of AD pathology (Aβ42, t-tau, p-tau) and 
changes in ADCS-PACC cognitive score. 
 
If IPE beneficially modifies AD biomarkers in at-risk Veterans, the results from the 
proposed trial would be used to develop multi-site, longer-duration clinical trials using the VA 
Cooperative Studies Program to assess the efficacy of icosapent ethyl on not only AD biomarkers, 
but also on more clinically definitive outcomes, such as rate of cognitive decline and conversion 
to mild cognitive impairment (MCI). If future studies show that icosapent ethyl delays the onset of 
AD by even an average of 5 years, estimates suggest that this could reduce the prevalence of 
AD by about 50%. 
 
 
C) RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS 
 
Trial Design Summary 
The proposed proof-of-concept study will use an 18-month randomized, placebo-
controlled, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial design to investigate the effects of IPE 
(available as Vascepa® in the United States) on rCBF, CSF AD biomarkers, and cognition in 150 
cognitively-healthy Veterans ages 50-75 years at increased risk for AD due to their Veteran-
related risk factors including high vascular risk profiles, TBI, and PTSD. The primary aim of the 
trial (Specific Aim 1) is to assess whether IPE increases 18-month rCBF in a statistically-defined 
region of interest (sROI) in a population of middle-aged veterans compared to placebo. Key 
secondary aims within this proof-of-concept pilot RCT are: (Specific Aim 2) to assess whether 
IPE decreases CSF Aβ42; and (Specific Aim 3) to assess whether IPE improves cognitive 
performance on the ADCS-PACC battery compared to placebo. Data collected within this clinical 
trial will also allow exploratory analyses of the effects of IPE on measures of axonal and neuronal 
health, including CSF biomarkers (total tau, phosphorylated tau [p-tau], neurofilament light [NFL] 
protein, soluble amyloid precursor protein α and β [sAPP-α and sAPP-β], monocyte chemotactic 
protein 1 [MCP1], YKL-40, and other CSF measures) and neuroimaging biomarkers (diffusion 


Version 9 
Page 6 of 22 
07/16/2024 
 
weighted imaging, volumetric changes, 4D flow measures, and white matter hyperintensity 
measures among others). In addition, data collection from this trial will allow for exploration of the 
impact of previous TBI and/or PTSD on response to therapy. We hypothesize that in this 
population, IPE will beneficially affect mechanisms central to AD pathology by: 1) increasing rCBF 
within the sROI; 2) reducing CSF Aβ42; and that these neurobiological changes will be associated 
with 3) an increased ADCS-PACC cognitive composite score. While recognizing that the 
proposed trial is not addressing all potential effects of IPE, such as changes in measures of 
inflammation or oxidative stress, we will store neuroimages and blood and CSF samples for future 
analyses of other potential mechanisms. 
 
Table 2. Study Design 
 
VA BRAVE-EPA STUDY 
Visit Number/Month (+/- 8 weeks) 
Pre-
Study 
V0 
M-1 
Bse 
V1 
M0 
V2 
M1 
V3 
M3* 
V4 
M6* 
V5 
M9 
V6 
M12* 
V7 
M15* 
Final (Or 
Early 
Termination) 
Visit V8 M18 
Eligibility review 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Informed consent 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Past medical history & medication review 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Side effect review 
 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Randomization 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Medication dispensing 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Pill count 
 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Participant honorarium given 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
X 
Screening cognitive tests 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
MoCA, CERAD List Learning 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dietary Food Frequency Questionnaire 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
X 
Screening questions 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deployment history, TBI, PTSD 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 
 
X 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
 
X 
 
MINI International Neuropsychiatric 
Interview (subset) 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Vitals, anthropometrics 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
 
X 
Physical and neurologic exam 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
X 
ADCS-PACC cognitive test battery 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
X 
Lumbar puncture 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
X 
MRI (ASL, VIPR, FLAIR, DWI) 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
X 
Screening/safety labs 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fasting lipid profile (TC, TG, HDL, LDL) 
X 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
X 
 
glucose 
X 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
X 
 
High sensitivity c-reactive protein 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
X 
 
AST, ALT 
X 
X 
X 
(X)** 
(X)** 
X 
(X)** 
(X)** 
X 
 
creatinine 
X 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
X 
 
Urine pregnancy (if of childbearing 
potential) 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
Complete blood count 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CSF cell count with differential 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
X 
APOE genotyping*** 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Version 9 
Page 7 of 22 
07/16/2024 
 
CSF Aβ42, tau, p-tau-181, Aβ40, NFL 
(Zetterberg lab) 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
X 
*Month 3, 6, 12, and 15 visits may be done remotely over the phone with labs drawn and a 
pregnancy test completed locally if participant travels from a distance or as required/requested 
during COVID. Medications will be shipped to participants and any remaining pills returned at 
their next in-person visit for pill counts.  
 
**Participants with baseline or month 1 AST or ALT between 1.5 upper limit of normal (ULN) 
and ≤2 x ULN at the preceding visit will have repeat AST and ALT values drawn at 3-, 6-, 12- 
and 15-month visits as well.  
 
***After final visit, whole blood collected at the Pre-Study visit will be used for APOE 
genotyping. 
 
To test this hypothesis, we will enroll 150 cognitively healthy male and female Veterans 
and randomize them in a 1:1 ratio to IPE 4 g daily or matching placebo. All participants will 
undergo informed consent and will be screened for eligibility via a pre-study screening visit (Table 
2). At baseline and months 9 and 18, all participants will undergo MRI, lumbar puncture (LP) for 
CSF collection, a blood draw, cognitive testing, vascular risk assessment, and will complete 
questionnaires including a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) targeting omega-3 fatty acid intake 
and screening questions assessing prior combat and non-combat deployment, TBI, PTSD, and 
related sequelae. At months 1, 3, 6, 12, and 15, participants will have an assessment of 
medical/medication changes and potential side effects, interim lab assessments as indicated 
(aspartate transaminase [AST], alanine transaminase [ALT], urine pregnancy as needed) (Table 
2), have vitals and body measurements collected, and be evaluated for depression using the 
Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) test. As detailed in the Statistical Analysis section, 
using a two-sided test at the 0.05 level and anticipating a conservative 90% retention rate, a 
sample size of 150 participants will provide 90% power to detect significant changes in our primary 
and key secondary outcomes. Specifics of the above procedures are outlined below. 
 
We will aim to schedule study visits within 8 weeks of the target visit time, but it is possible 
that the actual visit will be outside of this window. If the final visit is delayed, we may ask the 
participant to remain on the study medication for no more than 6 additional months based on 
statistical analysis, resources, funding, or other factors. This will ensure the study team to collect 
accurate results at the participant’s final biomarker visit.  
 
If the participant does not bring their remaining study medication to their final visit, we will 
provide them with a postage-paid envelope to return the medication to the study team for disposal. 
If this envelope was not provided at the visit, it will be sent with a letter requesting the return of 
the study medication. If we do not receive the remaining study medication, the study team will 
create a note to file documenting that the participant completed the study, but any remaining study 
medication was not returned.  
 
If we are having trouble contacting the participant to schedule their visit within the window, 
we will send a follow-up letter asking them to call us by a certain date if they wish to continue 
participating. If we do not hear from the participant by the end of the day on the date specified in 
the letter, we will assume they are no longer interested and withdraw them from the study. The 
letter will include a request that the participant return any remaining study medication in the 
enclosed postage-paid envelope. The study team will properly dispose of any remaining 
medication after completing a final pill count. If we do not receive the remaining study medication, 


Version 9 
Page 8 of 22 
07/16/2024 
 
the study team will create a note to file documenting that the participant was withdrawn from the 
study, but any remaining study medication was not returned. 
Recruitment  
Potential subjects will be recruited from the William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans 
Hospital (Madison VA), surrounding VA Community-based Outpatient Clinics (CBOCs) (Baraboo, 
Beaver Dam, Janesville, WI and Rockford and Freeport, IL) through VA primary care and specialty 
care clinics, physician referrals, electronic message boards in VA waiting rooms, letters, 
brochures, emails, newsletters, newspaper and web-based advertisements, educational and 
outreach events, including our Madison VA’s Annual Research Day, and from the ADRC Clinical 
Core or other ADRC-affiliated studies through similar methods. Our partners and affiliates may 
use their websites, newsletters, and emails to announce open enrollment into our study or 
educational and outreach events being led by us. Veterans’ records will be flagged in the VA’s 
VistA and Computerized Patient Record System to obtain release of information from participants 
to 1) review their medical records for eligibility in the study and 2) safety measures to place a note 
in Veterans’ records to indicate the Veteran is in our study and to clarify the participant is on 
medication that could be a contraindication for medical procedures or other health care 
procedures the patient may have to undergo. Additionally, clinic providers will provide descriptive 
study materials to potential enrollees.  
 
The first steps for screening potential participants will be to 1) provide an explanation of 
the goals, scope and nature of the study, 2) complete a Screening Checklist, 3) obtain permission 
for study personnel to keep their contact information and Screening Checklist for the duration of 
the screening process, and 4) to exclude individuals who fall into the exclusion criterion. If the 
potential participant does not desire or is ineligible to be part of this study, any information 
collected during the screening interview, including contact information will be retained in order to 
avoid re-contact in the future. During the telephone screening process, participants will be asked 
a series of questions to screen out people who do not meet the inclusion criteria (age (50-75 
years), and Veteran status criteria). We will also ask if they have a parental history of AD to include 
in final analyses.  In addition, we will exclude participants who meet any of our exclusion criteria 
which include being allergic to fish and/or shellfish, currently using anticoagulants or are taking 
medications that adversely interfere with IPE, are not MRI compatible, pregnant, etc. The reason 
for this telephone screening is to prevent the inconvenience to potential subjects of attending a 
screening visit who are unable to participate in the study because they are not eligible for MRI, 
LP, or randomization to IPE study medication. If no exclusions arise and the patient indicates 
desire to participate in the study, they will be scheduled for a screening visit. Some potential 
participants may have the screening occur in person, if they are at the Madison VA Hospital as 
part of their normal health care routine and express interest in participating in the study. In general, 
the study team will resort to phone screening participants. The study team will attempt to reach 
the participant at varying times of the day up to three times then will leave a voicemail message 
for the participant, stating that "This is [research team member's name] from the Madison VA 
leaving a message for [participant name] regarding their interest in our VA Research Study. I 
would be happy to discuss this study in more detail with you. I may be reached at [phone number]. 
I look forward to talking to you soon and answering what questions you may have." If someone 
other than the participant answers the phone, our team will make the same comment and 
emphasize that we cannot disclose the type of study without permission of the potential 
participant. Contact information will be left with the household member for the potential participant 
to call our team. If no response from the potential participant is received after leaving a message 
with another family member, another attempt will be made just in case the participant's family 
member forgot to relay the message. If no response is received following that contact, a follow-
up letter with contact information will be mailed as a final contact initiation. After that, it will be 
assumed the potential participant is no longer interested in the study. In accordance with VA rules, 


Version 9 
Page 9 of 22 
07/16/2024 
 
the participant's contact information will be kept in a file in a locked drawer, in a locked office, of 
a restricted-access section (the VA GRECC) of the VA. 
 
Wisconsin has 436,630 total living Veterans (93% non-Hispanic white, 3.6% African 
American, 1.3% Hispanic or Latino, 8.6% women) and there are 191,500 Wisconsin Veterans 
between the study eligibility ages of 50-75 years (44% of total Wisconsin Veterans). The Madison 
VA Hospital serves 130,000 Veterans living in 15 counties in south-central Wisconsin and in five 
counties in northwestern Illinois. Assuming that approximately 44% of these Veterans are in the 
50-75 year age range (57,200) and that approximately 13% will have a parent with AD (based on 
AD prevalence estimates for Wisconsin), we estimate that we will have a recruitment pool of 
approximately 7500 Veterans between the ages of 50-75 years with a parent with AD. Based on 
the gender and race/ethnicity of Veterans in Wisconsin, we assume that approximately 580 (7.8%) 
will be women, 270 (3.6%) African American, and 98 (1.3%) Hispanic/Latino. 
 
As our ADRC is jointly sponsored by the University of Wisconsin and our VA, many of our 
ADRC-related outreach events include Veterans and occur within our VA hospital. While the pool 
of participants from whom we draw for the proposed VA study is somewhat different than our 
ADRC participant pool, our ADRC team has a strong track record of outreach and recruitment 
and has established networks and infrastructure on which to build for the proposed VA-based 
study. As of September 1, 2014, the Wisconsin ADRC had enrolled 251 cognitively-healthy 
participants with parental history of AD who fall within the proposed age range (50-75 years). 
Each month, the ADRC recruits on average 10 new participants and has a high number of 
cognitively-healthy middle-aged and older adults interested in study participation. Thus, we 
anticipate a high level of interest in this age group for the proposed study as well. In addition, the 
PI and her colleagues have successfully recruited participants from the community prior to the 
funding of the Wisconsin ADRC in 2009. As Leader of the ADRC Clinical Core, Dr. Carlsson is 
integrally involved in the recruitment and retention of participants, including persons from 
communities of color. The Wisconsin ADRC has a Minority Recruitment Satellite Program which 
works closely with African American communities in south central Wisconsin and northern Illinois. 
While Wisconsin is approximately 6.5% African American, 11% of Wisconsin ADRC participants 
are African American. Adult children of persons with AD are very motivated to participate in 
research and have had a very high retention rate (94-97%) in our prior trials. Thus, a recruitment 
rate of 4-5 new participants per month for the proposed trial is very feasible and should allow us 
to successfully complete recruitment over a 38-month period. Retention efforts will include post-
visit feedback forms, interim safety telephone calls, and birthday and thank-you cards, newsletters 
from our VA GRECC and ADRC, and invitations to our ADRC’s Annual November Lecture on 
Alzheimer’s disease.  
 
Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria 
Study inclusion and exclusion criteria are outlined in Table 3. Participants must be 50-75 years 
old, and have served in the active military, naval, or air service. Veterans with dementia or MCI 
will be excluded as will those with contraindication to IPE therapy, LP, or MRI. Individuals lacking 
consent capacity, constituting prisoners, or those unable to read consent materials will also be 
prohibited from inclusion in this study. Veterans with ethical contraindication to placebo therapy 
(i.e. persons who should be on lipid-lowering therapy, such as Veterans with diabetes mellitus or 
high atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease [ASCVD] risk) will be encouraged to discuss lipid-
lowering therapy with their primary care provider. These people may enroll if their primary care 
provider decides not to put them on a cholesterol-lowering medication. The person may also re-
screen after taking a stable statin dose for 3 months. Persons with significant medical or 
psychiatric conditions or medications that may affect interpretation of study results will also be 
excluded at the discretion of the PI. Those who enroll in the study and start an anticoagulant 


Version 9 
Page 10 of 22 
07/16/2024 
 
medication following enrollment will be given the option to continue in the study for observation 
purposes. They will not have any further LP’s completed, and they will immediately stop study 
medication for safety purposes. All other study procedures will remain constant. Participants who 
attempt baseline MRI, but cannot complete the procedure due to claustrophobia may continue in 
the study if they are able to successfully complete baseline lumbar puncture with CSF obtained. 
No further MRIs will be attempted if the participant has claustrophobia. Participants who attempt 
baseline lumbar puncture, but our clinician team cannot successfully obtain CSF, will be allowed 
to continue with the study if they successfully complete the baseline MRI procedures. No further 
lumbar punctures will be attempted if baseline CSF is not obtained for comparison.  
 
Study Protocol (Table 2) 
Following review of eligibility criteria with potential participants over the phone, all participants will 
undergo a pre-study visit where trained study personnel will obtain informed consent, review 
medical and medication history, and collect a fasting blood sample to assess lipid profile, glucose, 
AST/ALT levels, creatinine, and a complete blood count (Tables 2 and 3).  
One vial of the fasting blood sample will be stored and sent at the end of the study to 
assess APOE genotype. Individuals who are diabetic or have questions or concerns with fasting 
will be identified through the screening process and contacted by a clinician. All individuals who 
consent to the pre-study fasting visit will receive a fasting tip sheet in the mail with visit reminder 
letters, and instructed to stop the fast if they experience any of the symptoms listed on the sheet.  
All women of childbearing potential will complete a urine pregnancy test at pre-study and 
all subsequent visits until are considered no longer of childbearing potential. They will be asked 
to sign a separate consent section outlining the risk of IPE use in pregnancy (Pregnancy Category 
C) and agreeing to use of birth control (as appropriate) or another method of contraception during 
the course of the study. Women will be considered past childbearing potential if they have had a 
hysterectomy or are 1 year postmenopausal.  
All 
potential 
participants will be screened 
for a cognitive disorder such 
as MCI through questioning 
about 
memory 
concerns 
and administration of the 
Montreal 
Cognitive 
Assessment (MoCA) and 
CERAD List Learning task. 
Scores falling 1.5 SD below 
the mean will trigger a 
referral for a detailed clinical 
evaluation. Trial enrollment 
will be deferred until a 
cognitive disorder can be 
ruled out. As has been done 
for the Wisconsin ADRC, 
the Wisconsin Registry for 
Alzheimer’s Prevention cohort, and Dr. Carlsson’s prior clinical trials, parental history of AD will 
be confirmed by chart review and/or through use of the validated Dementia Questionnaire67 using 
NIA-AA criteria at the weekly ADRC Consensus Conference for the purpose of analysis.  
At baseline (month 0), participants will be asked to complete a short questionnaire about 
their past medical history, prescription and non-prescription medication/supplement use, lifestyle 
practices (e.g. exercise, tobacco use), combat and non-combat deployment history, exposure to 


Version 9 
Page 11 of 22 
07/16/2024 
 
blast-related and other injuries, associated short-term and long-term symptoms following any 
injury,68 and PTSD symptoms with updates reviewed at each visit.   
At baseline and months 9 and 18, all participants will undergo MRI, LP for CSF collection, 
cognitive testing with the ADCS-PACC battery (with the alternate version given at month 9), 
fasting serum lipid profiles, and will complete a FFQ targeting omega-3 fatty acid intake.69  
At every visit (depending on previous lab results), participants will have interim drug safety 
assessments 
(AST, ALT, 
urine 
pregnancy 
as 
indicated) 
and 
an 
assessment 
of 
medical/medication changes and potential drug or procedural side effects. Participants with 
baseline or month 1 AST or ALT between 1.5 upper limit of normal (ULN) and ≤2 x ULN at the 
preceding visit will have repeat AST and ALT values drawn at 3-, 6-, 12- and 15-month visits as 
well. The proposed study drug monitoring plan exceeds that required by the FDA for IPE 
(Vascepa) which states that patients with hepatic impairment should have ALT and AST levels 
monitored periodically during therapy.  
All research visits will occur at the William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital in 
Madison, Wisconsin with the exception of visits that can occur remotely over the phone (3-, 6-, 
12- and 15-). These remote phone visits will depend on AST and ALT values as noted above and 
if they need a urine pregnancy test. If baseline or month 1 AST or ALT do not fall between 1.5 
upper limit of normal (ULN) and ≤2 xULN and they are not of childbearing potential, these visits 
can occur by phone. In this case, the phone visit will be scheduled at the preceding in-person 
visit, or by a coordinator 1 – 3 weeks prior to phone visit date. The study team will attempt contact 
with the participant 5 times, at different times of the day/evening over a 2-week period, as well as 
leave at least two voicemails. If contact for phone visit is still unsuccessful at this point, the visit 
will be marked as incomplete.  
All neuroimaging will occur in the UW Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research (WIMR) 
(a 10-minute walk from the physically-adjacent Madison VA Hospital). All MR images will be 
reviewed before participants begin treatment to ensure high quality data were obtained.  
Subjects who successfully complete the baseline visit will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to 
IPE 4 g (four 1-g gel caps) daily or matching IPE gel cap placebos (four 1-g mineral oil gel caps). 
Vascepa (IPE) 1 g gel caps will have logos de-inked to match the mineral oil placebo gel caps. 
Participants will be randomized to either four 1-g Vascepa gel caps daily or four matching 1-g 
mineral oil gel caps daily. The participant will take 2 capsules (2-g) by mouth twice daily. Amarin 
will provide all study medication and matching mineral oil gel cap placebos and is responsible for 
all study drug quality testing, packaging, and distribution of study drugs to the Madison VA 
Pharmacy research team. Randomization will be conducted by the Madison VA Pharmacy using 
a forced block design and will be stratified based on gender. Participants, investigators, and other 
study personnel will be blinded to the identity of the study medications and to lipid-lowering effects 
of the study drugs.  
A clinician not directly involved in data analysis and interpretation will review possible side 
effects related to IPE at each visit, including liver enzyme monitoring. If adverse lab changes 
occur, participants will have appropriate safety interventions performed (see Protection of Human 
Subjects). The VA Psychiatric, Behavioral Health and Neurologic Disorders (PBN) Central Data 
Monitoring Committee (DMC), VA Hines Hospital, Hines, IL will oversee participant safety 
monitoring. Potential study drug adverse effects will be collected at each study visit via a 
questionnaire.  
Lumbar puncture adverse effects include post-lumbar puncture (LP) headache at a rate 
of 5-10% based on clinical data from the literature. Our team has a post-LP headache rate at 
around 2%. Data on rates of post-LP headaches will be collected to ensure our rates are within 
the expected range.  
Incidental abnormal MRI findings have occurred in our prior studies; thus, a 
neuroradiologist will review all baseline and month 18 MRI scans for incidental findings of clinical 
significance. MRI scans will be reviewed by the neuroradiologist within 1 month of the scan.  


Version 9 
Page 12 of 22 
07/16/2024 
 
Cognitive performance will also be evaluated. If participants test 1.5 standard deviations 
below the normal range, their results will be reviewed with a neuropsychologist to evaluate 
whether the findings are of clinical significance.  
Laboratory data including liver enzymes (AST, ALT), creatinine, complete blood count, 
glucose, hs-CRP, and urine pregnancy (as indicated) will also be collected and evaluated by the 
PI within a week of their collection (these data do not need to be blinded).  In addition, cholesterol 
results will be reviewed within a week of collection by the study clinician who will notify the 
participant of any clinically-important findings (PI will be kept blinded to cholesterol results). 
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cell counts will be done immediately after each lumbar puncture. The 
PI will review those results within a week. Any clinically relevant abnormalities on blood, CSF cell 
count, MRI, or cognition will be discussed with the participant via phone and a letter sent 
summarizing the clinically relevant abnormalities.  
Complete CSF biomarker levels (including CSF beta-amyloid and tau) will not be analyzed 
until study completion (to reduce laboratory variability). These biomarkers are for research 
purposes only, are not clinically useful, and so will not be shared with participants. The analyzing 
laboratory will not receive any identifiable information on the research participants as the CSF 
samples will be coded with their unique subject ID and date, and he will not have access to the 
key. Baseline analysis of CSF samples will be performed at the WI Alzheimer's Disease Research 
Center - Biospecimen Lab. This analysis will be for specific measures of beta-amyloid and tau. 
The UW Biospecimen laboratory will not receive any identifiable information on the research 
participants as the CSF samples will be coded with their unique subject ID and date, and they will 
not have access to the key.  
The VA PBN DMC will review all blood and CSF cell count lab abnormalities, side effect 
rates, post-LP headache rates, clinical follow-up of MRI abnormalities, and clinical follow-up of 
any cognitive concerns during their regularly-scheduled meetings. The VA PBN DMC will 
teleconference regularly to ensure subject safety, research integrity, and compliance with federal 
regulations. Adverse events will be monitored on a regular basis.  
Adverse events possibly associated with the study drug, IPE, including arthralgias, 
increased bleeding, jaundice, gastric upset, adverse liver effects and LDL-C changes, will be 
evaluated. All serious adverse events (SAEs) related and unrelated will be reported to the VA 
DMC.  Compliance will be assessed by pill count. 
 
Subjects who discontinue early from the study will be encouraged to have an early 
termination visit at the point of discontinuation, with procedures performed as shown in Table 2 
(Study Design) for Visit 8. 
We anticipate that the proposed trial will be successfully completed within the 5-year grant 
period. We anticipate a 6-month start-up period, recruitment at 4-5 participants per month over 
38 months, 18 months of intervention, plus 4 months of data cleaning and analyses. As IPE 
(Vascepa®) is already FDA-approved for treating hypertriglyceridemia, we do not anticipate 
delays in obtaining study drug.  
 
COVID-19 
 
In response to the COVID-19 outbreak, all in-person study visits were halted effective 
March 16, 2020. Because of this, study visits transitioned to phone visits temporarily while 
participants are unable to come into the Madison VA for regularly scheduled visits. This included 
all portions of visits that can be completed over the phone, and the rest of study visit activities 
were completed when in-person visits resumed. We continued to monitor study medication side 
effects and track compliancy, as well as have a clinician administer the Ham-D one-on-one over 
the phone with participants. Another consequence of halting the in-person study visit is that 
several participants missed their final in-person visit (V8) and the corresponding measure of 
outcomes including the MRI scan and lumbar puncture. These participants were sent additional 
study medication to last them until they can come to the Madison VA for their final measure of 


Version 9 
Page 13 of 22 
07/16/2024 
 
outcomes. This extension of study medication was only done after receiving verbal consent from 
each participant.   
 
MRI Acquisition 
All MRI acquisition and interpretation will be performed under the oversight of a VA- and 
NIH-funded expert in neuroimaging in preclinical AD. Participants will be screened for 
contraindications to MRI using standard questionnaires. Additionally, Veterans with a history of 
metal fragments in their body will have a plain radiographic scan performed on them as a safety 
measure, prior to MRI scans. At baseline and months 9 and 18, all participants will undergo ASL-
MRI to assess CBF within an MRI protocol that also includes sequences capturing ancillary data 
on volumetrics, white matter hyperintensities (FLAIR), white matter tract changes (DWI), and 
macrovascular CBF (VIPR). All images will be acquired after a 12-hour fast in the morning prior 
to administration of any medications, caffeine, or nicotine, and prior to LP. Although all images 
and scan results will be void of identifiable patient health information and will use the participant’s 
Study ID number to identify each individual, if there are any abnormal findings, the subject’s 
identity may be revealed to contact the subject about the safety concern and to inform them about 
any observed abnormalities. Baseline and month 18 MR images will be reviewed by a 
neuroradiologist and any clinically-relevant findings will be communicated to the PI for clinical 
follow-up. The MR scanning will take place on a 3T GE x750 scanner with echo planar and asset 
capability using an 32-channel head coil (GE, Milwaukee, WI). The protocol will include: 1) a 3-
plane localizer for slice selection; 2) a 3D T2-FLAIR (TR 6000, TE 120, TI 1870, 256 x 256 matrix, 
FOV 256 mm) acquired over 88 sections (2mm, no gap); 3) a 3D T1-weighted inversion-recovery 
prepared fast spin echo high resolution anatomic scan (TR 8.2, TE 4.0, TI 450, matrix 256 x 256, 
FOV 256 mm) acquired over 156 sections (1mm, no gap). For quantitative CBF assessment, ASL-
MRI will be performed using a technique developed by Alsop et al.70 with a background 
suppressed pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (pcASL) sequence. Scan parameters 
include TE/TR=10.5ms/4.9s, slice thickness=4mm (no gap) 128x128 matrix, FOV=240, NEX=3, 
and labeling RF amplitude=0.24mG. Multi-slice spin labeling will be implemented using a single 
coil that eliminates off-resonance errors. The post-labeling delay is 2025 ms. The sequence also 
includes a fluid-suppressed proton density (PD) acquisition, with the same imaging 
sequence/image slab location as the pcASL but without the RF labeling preparation, for CBF flow 
quantitation and image registration. The pcASL sequence (all 3 excitations plus PD scan) is 
acquired in 4.5 minutes. Sufficient time is allotted for each session that rescanning can occur if 
motion or other artifacts are observed. We have previously reported excellent test-retest reliability 
(intraclass correlation coefficient >.95) of this pcASL procedure.  
 
Examples of the images sequences we plan to collect are listed below.  
Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL-MRI) for computation of cerebral blood flow; network 
abnormalities can be measured using cerebral blood flow imaging. 
T2 fluid-sensitive inversion recovery (FLAIR) will be used for quantification of macro structural 
white matter hyperintensities. The volume or number of hyperintensities is an important 
covariate in the analysis of DTI. 
Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) will be used for analysis of white matter microstructural 
integrity with FLAIR. 
T1-weighted high-resolution images will be used to provide anatomic information for 
volumetric analysis, selection of regions of interest, and radiologist’s interpretation.   
 
VIPR will be used to measure cerebral blood velocity and cardiac-gate pulsatile flow. 
 
The MRI Scanner Utilizes Investigational Devices of Non-Significant Risk: 


Version 9 
Page 14 of 22 
07/16/2024 
 
The MRI scanner to be used in the study, which is being supplied by GE utilizes investigational 
software and hardware to determine MRI scan sequences. The sequences will help capture the 
MR images, assess cerebral blood flow, gather microstructural information and estimate white 
matter connections, and suppress signal from fluid. Although the MRI investigational software to 
be used is considered an “investigational device,” the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) device 
is a FDA cleared device for safely and non-invasively imaging the interior of the human body. The 
scanner restricts research software from exceeding FDA safety levels. Thus, the scanner with the 
investigational software and equipment fully engaged operates, from a technical design and 
functional standpoint, as a non-significant risk device in accordance with 21 CFR 812. Please see 
the attached Non-Significant Risk documents regarding the 32-channel headcoil, DWI, Cube T2 
FLAIR, MPnRAGE, and pcVIPR sequences and software packages for further information. 
 
MRI Quality Control 
The quality control of the scanner is done by the UW Department of Medical Physics in 
conjunction with GE field engineers. A MAGPHAN Quantitative Imaging phantom has been 
consistently scanned at least monthly since April 2009; the scanner has been highly stable over 
time. The imaging protocol is saved on the scanner and administered by trained and certified MR 
technologists in a standardized fashion. Scans are downloaded to the ADRC Neuroimaging Core 
lab immediately after the session and the post-processing procedures are implemented including 
an additional quality check by the study team. Based on our experience, we anticipate technical 
problems will be <2%. If it is determined that rescanning is necessary, subjects will wait 7-10 days 
after the LP procedure before returning for imaging. If re-imaging is necessary at baseline, 
initiation of study drug will be delayed until repeat images are obtained.  
 
MRI Data Backup 
Multiple backups are performed to prevent technical loss of data. At the scan console the 
exam is backed up to DVD and kept at the MR facility. The exam is also uploaded to a PACs 
server and permanently archived. A complete copy is downloaded to the ADRC to a 40TB RAID6 
server and weekly backups (to a separately located ADRC server) are made of processed and 
incremental data.  
 
Image Processing 
Images are pre-processed prior to statistical analysis using GE-specific 32-bit binary code 
and well established tools and pipelines including SPM8 and AFNI. The pipelines are scripted 
and extendable such that improved methods developed in the software or in our local methods 
can easily be applied/reapplied to all data in batch. The pipeline steps include: 1) conversion of 
ASL flow maps and respective perfusion density (PD) maps to NIFTI file format for broad 
compatibility between software packages; 2) transformation into Montreal Neurological Institute 
(MNI) canonical atlas space by first warping PD maps to the PD template in SPM8 and then 
applying the transformation matrix to the respective ASL flow map; 3) spatial smoothing of the 
data with a Gaussian kernel of 8mm FWHM to accommodate individual variability and comply 
with assumptions of random field theory necessary for statistical analysis of the images; 4) 
conversion of quantitative ASL-CBF values to relative ASL-CBF values by normalizing each map 
to its global CBF mean value, in effect controlling for inter-individual variations in global CBF; 5) 
insertion of the exam into the ADRC imaging SQL database.  
 
Study Visit Procedures 
 


Version 9 
Page 15 of 22 
07/16/2024 
 
Lumbar Puncture (LP) Procedure (Cerebrospinal Fluid [CSF] Collection) 
All CSF samples will be collected in the morning by a clinician after a 12-hour overnight 
fast by the participant. During the fast we will advise participants to drink plenty of water and avoid 
food and drink except water.  Subjects will also be asked to withhold taking their normally 
prescribed medications with food during the fast. Prescription medications should be taken with 
water only. Participants will receive a meal as soon as all procedures requiring a fast are complete 
and resume taking their prescribed medications as they would normally. Over the last 10 years, 
our team has successfully performed over 2000 LPs for research with a post-LP headache rate 
of <2%. For the LP, participants are positioned by sitting on the clinical hospital bed, and 
maximally flexing their knees, hips, back, and neck. The skin is then prepped and draped in a 
sterile manner over L3/4-L4/5. After positioning, prepping, and draping the participant, a Sprotte 
25- or 24-gauge needle is used to inject 1% lidocaine as a local anesthetic, followed by insertion 
of a Sprotte 25- or 24- gauge spinal needle with introducer into the L3/4-L4/5 interspace using 
sterile technique. CSF samples will be collected with a Sprotte 25- or 24-gauge spinal needle at 
L3/4 or L4/5 using gentle extraction into polypropylene collection syringes in a manner consistent 
with the updated 2014 “NIA Biospecimens Best Practice Guidelines for the Alzheimer’s Disease 
Centers.” Twenty-two mL of CSF will be collected into sterile 5-mL polypropylene syringes, then 
combined, gently mixed, and centrifuged at 2000g for 10 minutes. Supernatants will be frozen in 
0.5 mL aliquots in polypropylene tubes and stored in a −80° C freezer within the VA GRECC with 
backup alarm and emergency power. Participants will be contacted 24 hours after the LP to 
inquire about any adverse effects. All specimen collections will be coded and will include a study 
ID number, visit collection date, and visit number. A note will be placed in the participant’s VA 
chart indicating a lumbar puncture was performed. 
 
Laboratory Evaluation 
Blood samples will be collected after an overnight fast. At baseline and months 9 and 18 
(key outcome visits), fasting lipid profiles, glucose, AST, ALT, hs-CRP, and creatinine will be 
measured using standard enzymatic techniques at the Madison VA Clinical Laboratory. APOE 
genotyping will be determined from coded specimens by resources from the UW ADRC, the UW 
Biotechnology Center and/or LGC genomics for a fee for service. Genotyping will occur for all 
participants at the end of the study using blood samples collected and stored from the pre-study 
visit. This APOE genotype information will be used in analysis. Baseline analysis of CSF samples 
will be performed at the WI Alzheimer's Disease Research Center - Biospecimen Lab. This 
analysis will be for specific measures of beta-amyloid and tau. The UW Biospecimen laboratory 
will not receive any identifiable information on the research participants as the CSF samples will 
be coded with their unique subject ID and date, and they will not have access to the key.  Coded 
biospecimen data, including DNA samples will be analyzed to determine various SNP (single-
nucleotide polymorphism) sequences. CSF Aβ42, Aβ40, T-tau, and p-tau-181 will be measured 
with Roche elecsys in the UW ADRC Biomarker Laboratory. Pre- and post-therapy samples will 
all be run simultaneously at the conclusion of the study to reduce laboratory variability. All 
biospecimen data will be stored in a freezer, within the secured Madison VA’s Research Freezer 
until clinical analyses occur. Access to the freezer is protected by VA access control, and 
equipped with backup power and a telephone alarm system. The research freezer space can only 
be accessed by authorized personnel. Participants will be asked for permission to store their 
blood, DNA and CSF samples for future research purposes, this will be optional. Samples will be 
stored for banking purposes specified in the BRAVE Repository Protocol (IRB 2017-0013) and 
used with consistent approval of the banking repository protocol. Samples will be coded. 
Specifically, vials containing samples will be labeled with subject ID numbers (###).  The label 
will also include the study name, collection site number, study visit number, contents of each 
collection vial, and the date of collection. Participants will be made aware, through informed 
consent, that their samples will be stored for future use. 


Version 9 
Page 16 of 22 
07/16/2024 
 
 
Cognitive Battery (Table 4): At the pre-study visit, participants will be screened for 
cognitive dysfunction using the CERAD List Learning Task, questions regarding memory 
concerns, and an assessment of global cognitive function with the Montreal Cognitive 
Assessment (MoCA). CERAD scores falling 1.5 SD below the mean will trigger a referral for a 
detailed clinical evaluation and trial enrollment will be deferred until a cognitive disorder can be 
ruled out. At baseline and months 9 and 18, the ADCS-PACC battery will be administered to all 
participants following MRI, LP, blood tests, and a light breakfast. As is done in the A4 trial, the 
same battery will be used at baseline and month 18 and an alternate battery at month 9 to allow 
cognitive data collection at three time points while reducing practice effect. All cognitive testing 
will be recorded and stored on an audio recorder within the VA’s protected environment until tests 
are scored. Upon scoring tests, the recorded audio will be deleted. Participants will be screened 
for depression with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) at baseline 
and months 9 and 18. The cognitive test battery will be administered by a trained technician in 
accordance with the ADCS-PACC guidelines. All psychometricians will be trained by an 
experienced VA neuropsychologist. As the Wisconsin ADRC is a site for the A4 trial, several 
psychometricians have already been trained and certified in ADCS-PACC administration. Scoring 
will be completed strictly according to ADCS-PACC guidelines. Changes in the ADCS-PACC 
composite scores of the intervention group will be compared to changes in the placebo group 
after adjusting for practice effects, thus, maximizing internal validity and interpretability of 
cognitive performance across time. The ADCS-PACC includes: 1) the Total Recall score from the 
Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT) (0-48 words), 2) the Delayed Recall score on 
the Logical Memory IIa subtest from the Wechsler Memory Scale (0-25 story units), 3) the Digit 
Symbol Substitution Test score from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Revised (0-93 
symbols), and 4) the MMSE total score (0-30 points). The composite score is determined from its 
components using an established normalization method. Each of the four component change 
scores is divided by the baseline sample standard deviation of that component, to form 
standardized z scores. These z scores are summed to form the composite.74 
 
ADCS-PACC Battery Tests 
Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT): Verbal memory is being measured 
during this test. 
 
Immediate and Delayed Logical Memory Test: This test measures one’s ability to learn 
and recall verbal information. 
 
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised: During this test, executive function will be 
measured. 
 
Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE): This 30-point examiner-administered 
questionnaire measures global cognitive function and evaluates orientation, language, 
reading, attention/concentration, memory, and constructional ability. Although widely 
used, it is not sensitive to mild cognitive impairment. This test will be administered to 
evaluate and identify enrollees with significant cognitive impairment.  Subjects with 
significant cognitive impairment will not complete the remainder of the visits. 
 
Questionnaires 
At baseline and months 9 and 18, a 20-minute, validated 152-item FFQ will be 
administered to estimate omega-3 fatty acid intake from all food sources. The questionnaire was 
validated in a Midwestern population and included seafood items that were available in the 


Version 9 
Page 17 of 22 
07/16/2024 
 
Midwestern food supply and, thus, will be similar to food patterns in our population. The 
questionnaire asks participants about their usual dietary intake over the past month, breaking it 
down into eight frequency responses. This FFQ has a high reliability (alpha coefficient = 0.83), 
demonstrating that volunteers are able to estimate and give the same information on intake over 
time. To evaluate for depression, the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale will be assessed at 
baseline, 1, 3, 9, and 18 months in all participants. To assess TBI exposure, specific questions 
from the Department of Defense’s “Survey of Health Related Behaviors Among Active Duty 
Military Personnel” will be used to assess combat and noncombat deployments, exposure to 
blast-related and other injuries, and associated short-term and long-term symptoms following any 
injury (i.e. duration of loss of consciousness, amnesia, headache, etc.). In addition, PTSD 
symptoms will be evaluated using specific items from the same questionnaire assessing traumatic 
experiences during deployments and sequelae from those experiences. Additional information on 
depression, dysthymia, anxiety, PTSD, alcohol abuse, and other psychiatric symptoms will be 
assessed through administration of different portions of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric 
Interview (MINI) 6.0 at baseline. Drug dependence/abuse will not be assessed in this modified 
version of the MINI that will be administered to Veterans.  
 
D) REPORTING STUDY FINDINGS 
 
Reporting Findings 
 
If any abnormal clinically-relevant findings are noted on MRI, labs (blood and/or CSF), or 
cognitive testing, the participant will receive a phone call from the study team and the clinically-
relevant abnormal findings will be sent to them in a letter. If the participant has consented and 
signed a release of information form, then we will contact their primary care physician with these 
results and send them to the PCP as well. Baseline and month 18 MRI scans will be reviewed by 
a neuroradiologist within a month of the scan, labs within a week of their collection, and all 
cognitive tests within a month of evaluation. Cognitive test results 1.5 standard deviations below 
normal will be reviewed by a staff neuropsychologist. CSF and blood tests will not be placed in 
the participant's chart as it could affect the study blind. MRI scans are research scans and not 
meant for clinical interpretation, so will not be placed in the VA chart. Participants will be informed 
of any abnormal cognitive findings and referred for further clinical evaluation of cognitive changes. 
Thus, while we will not put the cognitive scores in their VA chart, with the participant's 
authorization we will notify their PCP of the clinical concerns raised by the research cognitive 
testing and that provider will likely put that in their VA-based note. The following results will be 
released to Veteran participants following their baseline visits: 1) Lipid panel (total cholesterol, 
triglycerides, high and low density lipoprotein cholesterol) 2) High-sensitivity c-reactive protein 3) 
basic metabolic profile (blood glucose, serum creatinine, AST, and ALT) 4) Spinal fluid red blood 
cell and white blood cell counts 5) Results from urine pregnancy tests.  These results will be 
summarized in a signed letter from one of our clinicians indicating participants’ baseline laboratory 
results and normal/abnormal ranges.  They will be instructed to contact their PCP if they have any 
concerns accompanied with the printed out results. Results for genetic tests will not be released 
to participants. If a participant is hospitalized or experiences adverse events, a VA clinician will 
place a note to the PI in the VA CPRS notification system. Study wide results (randomization arm, 
primary outcome analysis, complete study-wide laboratory values at each blood draw (if 
participant consented, if not these will be omitted), and any change in cognition over the course 
of the study) will be communicated with study participants through cover letters and newsletters. 
Participants will be directed to follow up with their primary care provider if they have any questions 
about their laboratory values or if they have noticed any memory concerns. 
 


Version 9 
Page 18 of 22 
07/16/2024 
 
Potential Risks: Physical 
 
Icosapent ethyl (IPE) or Vascepa (R) use: Individuals with known allergy to fish oil, fish, or 
shellfish may experience anaphylactic shock. The most common side effects of icosapent ethyl 
include constipation, gout, mouth, joint or muscle pain, and swelling of the hands, legs or feet. 
Some people also have an increased risk of heart rhythm problems, including atrial fibrillation or 
flutter, requiring hospitalization, especially if they have a history of these problems.  
 
Fasting (12 hours for blood draw and/or lumbar puncture): shakiness, nervousness, sweating, 
dizziness or light-headedness, sleepiness, confusion, difficulty speaking, anxiety, and 
weakness. 
 
Blood Draw: Phlebotomy can be associated with minor ecchymoses, pain, and a small risk of 
infection. Fainting or light-headedness may also occur. 
 
MRI: An MRI presents virtually no risk to healthy individuals without metallic implants. Some 
patients may experience claustrophobia. The MRI protocol used in the proposed study requires 
lying on a hard surface for 30 - 60 minutes, which may cause some discomfort. Moreover the 
scanner is loud. The radio frequency waves used in the MRI have produced burns in about one 
in a million exams (most of those minor). Other risks of injury due to MRI include damage to 
implanted electronic devices (such as pacemakers), bleeding if aneurysm clips are present, and 
trauma if iron-bearing objects are brought too close to the scanner. Risks posed to pregnant 
women and fetuses from MRI scans are at this time unknown. 
 
X-Ray Exam: If an x-ray is done prior to the MRI, the amount of radiation received is 
small(similar to the amount of background radiation received from living on this planet for about 
6 months). 
 
Lumbar Puncture: The most common complication of lumbar puncture is post-dural puncture 
headache. Bacterial meningitis is a very rare complication of lumbar puncture, occurring in 
fewer than 0.2% in one series. Uncal or tonsillar herniation is a very uncommon complication, 
occurring in <1% of very high-risk subjects with known primary or metastatic neoplasms who 
underwent a lumbar puncture. In rare cases, subjects may visit an emergency room after their 
visit to have a blood patch performed to alleviate the LP headache. A blood patch is an injection 
of some of the subject's blood into the LP site to patch a spinal fluid leak. This is only done in 
rare circumstances. As with the blood draw, there is a small risk of infection with a blood patch. 
There is also a risk of bleeding and lower back discomfort. Lidocaine is used to numb the lower 
back before the collection of CSF. In rare cases, allergic reactions to lidocaine may occur, which 
can cause redness and swelling of the skin. 
 
Cognitive Testing: Mental fatigue from the cognitive tests is the most common or frequent 
physical risk expected related to this procedure.  
 
Study Drug Formulation, Packaging, Labeling, and Storage  
The manufacturing of Vascepa® and matching placebo capsules, along with packaging, 
bottling, and all the technical and functional activities required at the level of integration to 
complete these activities will be performed by Amarin Pharma, Inc. under a Material Transfer 
Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (MT CRADA) established between Amarin 
Pharma, Inc. and the William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, in Bedminster, NJ and 
Madison, WI respectively. Under an active Investigational New Drug (IND) application all 
icosapent ethyl and mineral oil placebo capsules for this study have met stability and other product 


Version 9 
Page 19 of 22 
07/16/2024 
 
testing (including dimensional analysis, weight checks of capsules fill color and shell composition, 
shell characterization, microbial limits, disintegration, and appearance on all active and inactive 
study medications) sufficient to meet the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requirements. 
Amarin Pharma, Inc. the manufacturer of Vascepa®, will transfer all bottled and packaged clinical 
study medication to the William S. Middleton Memorial Veteran’s Hospital Pharmacy department; 
the latter entity will store the study medication until study medication distribution visits and will be 
responsible for the study drug randomization of participants. Since Amarin Pharma, Inc. will blind 
and code study medication bottles, Amarin Pharma, Inc. will provide this coded list to the Madison 
VA Pharmacy who will keep this information confidential from the PI and study team members 
until the end of the study when the code is finally disclosed to the study team. Using the code 
provided by Amarin Pharma Inc., the Madison VA Pharmacy will randomize enrolled participants 
to either active drug (icosapent ethyl) or placebo (inert mineral oil) medication and dispense study 
medication at distributed time points outlined in Table 1: Study Design. At the completion of the 
study, the Madison VA Hospital Pharmacy Department will destroy all unused and leftover 
medication from the study. 
 
D) DATA MANAGEMENT, ANALYSIS, AND STATISTICAL 
CONSIDERATIONS 
 
Data Management  
Personnel will be trained to monitor adherence to the study protocol. All CSF, blood, MRI, and 
cognitive data will be double entered into a password-protected database on a secure VA server 
by trained study personnel.  Extreme or inconsistent values or data discrepancies will be 
reviewed by a study biostatistician and an investigator and data will be verified accordingly. 
Subjects’ identifiable information will be stored on paper and in electronic format.  The mature, 
secure web application, known as REDCap will be used as our electronic data management 
system. This database will be configured by the UW DOM IT to match the VA’s version and then 
transferred to the VA server where some study data will be stored. Therefore, data entered into 
REDCap will be on a VA server and under VA purview. Database support for REDCap will be 
provided by the VA IRMS with appropriate cybersecurity measures adhered to. In the event that 
VA sensitive data is transmitted electronically, information will only be transmitted using VA 
approved solutions such as FIPS 140-2 or PKI encryption. 
Participant contact activity will be recorded in the Contact Registry for Recruitment, 
Innovation and Education (CoRRIE) database and will be utilized by the study team throughout 
the course of time that a participant is actively enrolled in the study. CoRRIE is a University of 
Wisconsin Department of Medicine web-based application based on the Ruby on Rails web 
development framework. For licensing details see :  https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/master/MIT-
LICENSE. Access to CoRRIE is further limited to individuals both approved by the CoRRIE dataset 
custodians (or delegated authorities), and having completed all applicable SMPH HIPAA 
training. All communication between web clients (internet browsers) and the CoRRIE application 
takes place via Hypertext Transfer Protocol over Secure Socket Layer (SSL) or HTTPS. HTTPS 
provide the ability for normal web based communication over an encrypted SSL connection. 
This ensures that data passing between the client and CoRRIE is protected. The server hosting 
CoRRIE is located behind the UW-Madison SMPH firewall. The SMPH firewall does not allow 
outside (of SMPH network) access to the server itself. Outside access to the CoRRIE 
application is allowed through a combination of firewall rules, reverse proxy access, and 
directory level user authentication.  BRAVE identifications will be further coded in CoRRIE and 
the key to re-identify participants will be stored on the VA server. No PHI/PII will be added to 
CoRRIE for BRAVE participants. 


Version 9 
Page 20 of 22 
07/16/2024 
 
All participant paper documents will be filed in a locked storage cabinet, inside the 
secured VA GRECC office, a VA protected environment. Participants will be identified by their 
study ID numbers and only study team members will have access to the source document 
linking participants to their personal health information. All specimen collected during the course 
of this study will be labeled with coded study ID numbers unique for each participant. Only 
coded data will be transmitted securely to others as part of the study process. Coded data will 
be disclosed to the WI Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center – Biospecimen Lab for CSF 
analyses, the Wisconsin Institute for Medical Research (WIMR) and UW Biotech. In the event of 
a suspected or actual data breach, the ISO and PO and ACOS for Research will be notified 
within one hour of any actual or suspected data breach.  This includes the unauthorized use, 
disclosure, transmission, removal, theft, loss or destruction of VA research-related PHI, 
individually identifiable private information, or confidential information. Research data is not 
intended to be removed from the VA protected environment. Additionally, data access will be 
terminated for study personnel when they are no longer part of the research team. Lastly, if 
research data or information is transmitted electronically, it will be encrypted with FIPS 140-2 
validated encryption. 
 
Randomization 
Subjects who successfully complete all baseline data collection will be randomized by 
the Madison VA Pharmacy in a 1:1 ratio as previously described, using a forced block design 
and stratifying based on sex to force balance in this factor. 
 
Analysis Population 
All analyses will be performed on an intent-to-treat basis as far as follow-up allows. All 
randomized patients will be encouraged to continue to be assessed and, if they consent, included 
in the analysis regardless of compliance with study medication. Follow-up rates in similar studies 
conducted by the PI are between 94-97% (see Preliminary Studies). We therefore 
conservatively predict 90% follow-up in this 18-month trial. For patients missing final values 
(month 18) but having intermediate measurements of outcomes (month 9), final outcomes will be 
imputed using expectations from longitudinal data analyses conditional on available data, with 
random noise added using standard errors taken from the residuals of these analyses. Patients 
missing all post-baseline values will be omitted. Sensitivity analyses will be conducted to quantify 
potential biasing effects of dropout on estimated treatment effects and multiple imputation used 
to quantify the additional variation. There will be no formal interim analyses for efficacy as this is 
a proof-of-concept study and the rCBF and CSF biomarker changes do not have any clearly 
known clinical consequences at this time. 
 
Analyses 
For imaging analyses, the statistical models prescribed by our ADRC biostatistician can 
be effected in SPM (including SPM5, SPM8, and SPM12) or AFNI. Analyses will use an 
empirically predefined statistical region of interest (sROI) to characterize the treatment effect with 
optimal power and freedom from multiple comparisons as described by Chen and Reiman. The 
sROI was defined using a training dataset, i.e., an independent longitudinal dataset (baseline and 
follow-up without treatment) of ASL-CBF maps collected in asymptomatic, middle-aged adults 
with a parental history of AD. Using a paired-samples voxel-wise t-test in SPM, the training dataset 
was analyzed for regions of statistically significant CBF declines. The candidate regions for the 
sROI were selected based on those that best characterized CBF declines in this group in regions 
implicated in AD pathology. The sROI will then be applied to ASL-CBF maps in the current study, 
and averaged values from the sROI will be extracted for statistical analysis. The predefined sROI 
facilitates correction for multiple comparisons and reduces our exposure to Type 1 error by greatly 


Version 9 
Page 21 of 22 
07/16/2024 
 
reducing the number of voxels in the search region that are evaluated. Anatomical ROIs that 
aligned with the statistically-defined ROI will be examined hierarchically in a priori selected 
regions of interest in the following order: bilateral posterior cingulate, bilateral precuneus, bilateral 
medial temporal lobe. Analyses of ROIs will be discontinued if the group difference in 18 month 
rCBF in the previous ROI is not significant. 
 
The outcomes - rCBF and CSF Aβ42 – were seen to be right skewed based on pilot data; 
thus, analyses for each specific aim will be conducted on the logarithmic scale so that “mean” 
refers to the geometric mean outcome. Specific Aim 1 (IPE effects on rCBF) will be addressed 
with an analysis of covariance on all subjects with 18 month rCBF of the sROI as the outcome, 
IPE use as a factor, and baseline rCBF as a continuous predictor, with the main hypothesis tested 
using the coefficient of IPE's effect on mean rCBF. Baseline rCBF is included as a flexible 
generalization of modeling change in rCBF. The models for Aim 2 (IPE effects on CSF) will take 
the same form as in Aim 1 except that the endpoints will be CSF Aβ42 and that we expect the 
coefficients of IPE to be negative if the alternative hypotheses are true. For exploratory and 
descriptive purposes, joint longitudinal analyses of baseline, 9, and 18-month outcomes will be 
conducted using the same model formulations as above and the method of Laird and Ware. Aim 
3 is exploratory and will investigate the impact of IPE on 18-month cognitive performance using 
the constructs proposed for CBF and CSF analyses. The composite ADCS-PACC scores allow 
for assessment of overall cognitive functioning and a higher level of reliability than is possible with 
any given individual measure. A linear regression model will be fitted to the raw scores using age, 
gender, and education as covariates. Using the regression coefficients from this analysis we will 
calculate predicted scores for each experimental and control subject. The difference between the 
predicted and observed scores will then be determined for each subject. Relevant statistical 
graphics will be used to examine all scientific questions. 
 
Covariates  
Important potential confounding factors for changes in outcome measures will be 
assessed, including age, sex, APOE4 carrier status (positive/negative), parental  history of AD, 
systolic blood pressure, use of antihypertensive agents, plasma LDL-C and HDL-C levels, body-
mass index, waist-hip ratio, exercise frequency, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score, history 
of moderate or severe TBI, PTSD, and DHA/EPA intake. In addition, all analyses for cognitive 
effects will be adjusted for age, sex, and education. 
 
Power Calculations  
For Aim 1, using ASL-MRI CBF data from our team’s longitudinal WRAP cohort of adults 
at risk for AD (n=133, ages 43–73) and an interventional statin pilot study of similarly aged 
adults,16 we anticipate that CBF in the statistical ROI will decline by 15% in the placebo group 
and 5% in the treatment group over 18 months. With an effect size of 0.57 and a two-tailed α=0.05, 
134 participants (67 per arm) will provide 90% power (1-β) to detect a difference between the two 
treatment groups. With a conservative 10% drop-out rate (our prior 9-18-month studies with n=88–
100 had 94–95% retention rates), 150 participants (presumed 134 [90%] retained at month 18) 
should provide 90% power to detect a statistically significant difference. Using our team’s 
preliminary baseline data from the SHARP study (Table 1), for Aim 2 we use a baseline CSF 
Aβ42 mean ± SD of 778.2±173.2 ng/L (INNOTEST) and a projected IPE-induced decline of 
approximately 13% in the treatment group and 0% in the placebo group over 18 months. With an 
effect size of 0.59 and a two-tailed α=0.05, 124 participants (62 per arm) will provide 90% power 
(1-β) to detect group differences in CSF biomarkers. As the ADCS-PACC battery (Aim 3) has 
been principally used in cognitively-healthy, preclinical older adults in their 70s-80s, Aim 3 will be 
used to understand the performance of this established preclinical cognitive battery in a middle-


Version 9 
Page 22 of 22 
07/16/2024 
 
aged cohort and to correlate cognitive changes with those noted in primary MRI and CSF 
biomarker changes. 
 
E) REFERENCES 
 
1. 
Johnson SC, Koscik RL, Jonaitis EM, Clark LR, Mueller KD, Berman SE, et al. The 
Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention: A review of findings and current directions. 
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2018;10:130-42. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2017.11.007. PubMed PMID: 
29322089; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5755749.