Conditions: Pouchitis Ileal Pouchitis Ileal Pouch
Keywords: chronic pouchitis tofacitinib antibiotic-refractory pouchitis antibiotic-dependent pouchitis
Allocation: NA | Intervention model: SINGLE_GROUP
Enrollment: 6
Healthy volunteers: no

Brief summary:
A phase 2 pilot study to evaluate the effectiveness of tofacitinib in subjects with chronic pouchitis

Detailed description:
The proposed study is a phase 2, open-label study of tofactinib in treatment of patients with chronic pouchitis. Subjects with chronic active pouchitis will be screened and recruited if they meet eligibility criteria. Eligible subjects will undergo baseline clinical evaluation, laboratory testing and a pouch endoscopy. They will then receive oral tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily for 8 weeks. Clinical and laboratory data will be collected at week 4 and week 8, and all subjects will undergo a end of treatment pouch endoscopy at 8 weeks. Clinical, laboratory and endoscopic data at 8 weeks will be compared to the baseline data to evaluate study outcomes.

Arms:
arm 1: This arm will include subjects with chronic pouchitis and will receive tofactinib 10 mg twice daily for 8 weeks

Interventions: intervention 1: Tofacitinib 10 mg
Intervention descriptions: intervention 1: Subjects in this arm will receive tofactinib 10 mg twice daily for 8 weeks

Protocol document:
Prot_SAP_001.pdf: 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
A SINGLE CENTER OPEN LABEL PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF ORAL TOFACITINIB IN 
PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC POUCHITIS 
 
 
Gil Y. Melmed, MD, MS 
 
 
F. Widjaja Foundation Inflammatory Bowel and Immunobiology Research Institute 
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center 
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center 
Los Angeles, CA 90048 
 
 
NCT: NCT04580277 
Document Date: 02 August 2022 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
Contents 
BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES .......................................................................................................................................... 2 
PROJECT DESIGN AND METHODS ........................................................................................................................... 3 
OVERVIEW OF STUDY DESIGN .......................................................................................................................................... 3 
STUDY POPULATION ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 
Inclusion criteria ................................................................................................................................................... 3 
Exclusion criteria .................................................................................................................................................. 4 
Concomitant medications .................................................................................................................................... 5 
Treatment with Tofacitinib ................................................................................................................................... 5 
STUDY VISITS AND PROCEDURES ....................................................................................................................................... 6 
Screening Period (Week -4 to Day 0) .................................................................................................................... 6 
Baseline Visit (Week 0) ......................................................................................................................................... 6 
Week 4 and Week 8 Visit (±3 days) ...................................................................................................................... 6 
Week 12 (±3 days) or Early Termination Visit ...................................................................................................... 6 
EVALUATION AND OUTCOMES .......................................................................................................................................... 7 
Primary Endpoint .................................................................................................................................................. 8 
Secondary Endpoints ............................................................................................................................................ 8 
Efficacy Assessments ............................................................................................................................................ 8 
Safety Assessment ................................................................................................................................................ 9 
STATISTICAL METHODS ................................................................................................................................................... 9 
Sample Size Estimation......................................................................................................................................... 9 
Data Analysis ........................................................................................................................................................ 9 
PUBLICATION PLAN ...................................................................................................................................................... 10 
ANTICIPATED PROJECT TIMELINE ......................................................................................................................... 10 
REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................................................... 11 


  
 
 
1 
  
Background 
Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is currently the standard 
surgical treatment for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), with approximately 30% of patients 
with UC requiring IPAA for medically refractory disease or colorectal neoplasia. Pouchitis is an 
idiopathic inflammatory disease of the ileal pouch and is the most common long-term 
complication in subjects with IPAA, resulting in patient morbidity, missed work and school, and 
diminished quality of life. Studies with long follow up duration suggest that up to 80% of 
patients with IPAA will experience at least one episode of pouchitis in their lifetime1,2. While 
most patients with pouchitis respond well to short courses of antibiotic therapy, about 10-20% 
of patients develop a chronic antibiotic-dependent or antibiotic-refractory course of pouchitis 
3,4. Chronic pouchitis is associated with significant morbidity, poor quality of life and is a risk 
factor for pouch failure5,6.  
There are currently no licensed treatments for chronic pouchitis and the current treatment is 
largely empiric or guided by low-quality evidence from case series and small observational 
studies. Chronic antibiotic therapy is a potential treatment option only for patients with chronic 
antibiotic dependent pouchitis (CADP) though it is associated with risk of antibiotic related side 
effects and emergence of multi-drug resistant organisms7,8. Other commonly used treatments 
for chronic pouchitis are ileal release budesonide and biologic drugs. Ileal release budesonide is 
effective in 58-75% patients with chronic pouchitis but its chronic use is associated with long-
term corticosteroid-associated side effects and is generally discouraged9,10. Anti-tumor necrosis 
factor (anti-TNF) agents are widely used for treatment of chronic pouchitis though a recent 
meta-analysis found these medications to be only modestly effective with remission rates of 
10% and 37% in short-term and long-term, respectively, in patients with chronic antibiotic-
refractory pouchitis (CARP)11.  A few recent observational studies suggest that vedolizumab and 
ustekinumab could also be effective in chronic pouchitis but the remission rates with these 
drugs also remain low12,13. Hence, given the availability of limited treatment options in chronic 
pouchitis and their modest efficacy, there is a significant unmet need for additional effective 
medical therapies in these patients. This treatment gap is likely to worsen in the future as the 
population of patients who undergo IPAA surgery for UC increases with time.   
Janus kinases (JAKs) play a central role in transmitting the pro-inflammatory effects of multiple 
cytokines that result in chronic inflammation in inflammatory bowel diseases14. Targeting the 
JAK-STAT pathway is an effective therapeutic approach in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). 
Tofacitinib, an oral small molecule JAK inhibitor is effective and safe for treatment of ulcerative 
colitis15.  JAK-STAT pathway might also have a potential role in the pathogenesis of chronic 
pouchitis. In a study of thirty-six patients who underwent IPAA surgery for UC, patients who 


 
 
2 
 
develop pouchitis were noted to have increased levels of STAT1alpha as well as STAT1beta 
expression and activation in comparison with both normal pouch and normal ileal mucosa. In 
addition, improvement of pouchitis after treatment with antibiotics was associated with 
normalization of STAT1 expression and activation16. These findings suggest that activation of 
STAT1 correlates with pouchitis disease activity. Currently, there is no data on the efficacy of 
JAK inhibitors in treatment of chronic pouchitis. However, similarities in the pattern of 
activation of STAT1 in pouchitis and ulcerative colitis may suggest a common pathway in the 
immunobiology of both diseases and a potential role for JAK inhibitors like tofacitinib in 
treatment of chronic pouchitis. 
Aims and Objectives 
This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral tofacitinib in subjects with 
chronic pouchitis and its impact in health-related quality of life. Chronic pouchitis is defined by 
a modified pouchitis disease activity index (mPDAI) score ≥5 and a minimum endoscopic sub-
score of 2 (outside the staple or suture line) AND one of the following: 
• ≥3 recurrent episodes of pouchitis within 1 year prior to the screening visit treated with ≥2 
weeks of antibiotic or other prescription therapy. 
• Requiring maintenance antibiotic therapy taken continuously for ≥4 weeks immediately 
prior to the baseline study visit. 
• No response to >=4 weeks of antibiotic therapy. 
Objective 1: Assess the efficacy of tofacitinib in patients with chronic pouchitis. 
Hypothesis: Tofacitinib is effective in reducing clinical symptoms (modified pouchitis disease 
activity index), inflammatory biomarkers (fecal calprotectin), and endoscopic appearance 
among patients with chronic pouchitis. 
Objective 2: Assess the safety of tofacitinib in patients with chronic pouchitis 
Hypothesis: Tofacitinib is safe and well tolerated in patients with chronic pouchitis 
Objective 3: Determine the effect of oral tofacitinib on health-related quality of life in patients 
with chronic pouchitis.  
Hypothesis: Tofacitinib treatment is associated with improved HRQOL in patients with chronic 
pouchitis 


 
 
3 
 
Study Design and Methods 
Overview of Study Design 
The proposed study is a phase 2, open-label study of tofactinib in treatment of patients with 
chronic pouchitis. Patients with chronic active pouchitis will be recruited from the Cedars-Sinai 
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center. The total expected duration of participation is 16 weeks 
including a 4-week screening period, 8 weeks of tofacitinib therapy and an end of study visit 4 
weeks after completion of 8-week tofacitinib treatment. Subjects experiencing early withdrawal 
from study will be scheduled for a safety follow-up visit 4 weeks after the date of withdrawal.  
The primary outcome is a reduction in the mPDAI score ≥2 at week 8 compared to baseline. We 
will also assess secondary outcomes including changes in clinical symptoms, fecal calprotectin, 
HRQOL, and mucosal appearance.  
Figure 1: Study Design 
 
Study Population 
The study will be open to adult patients (ages 18-80 years) seen at the Cedars-Sinai 
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center who meet eligibility criteria.  
 Inclusion criteria 
1. Male or female subjects ages 18 to 80 


 
 
4 
 
2. Subjects with a history of proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) for UC 
at least 6 months prior to screening. 
3. Subjects with pouchitis that is chronic, defined by a mPDAI score ≥5 assessed as the average 
from 3 days immediately prior to the baseline study visit and a minimum endoscopic sub-
score of 2 (outside the staple or suture line) with either (a) ≥ 3 recurrent episodes within 1 
year prior to the screening treated with ≥2 weeks of antibiotic or other prescription 
therapy, (b) requiring maintenance antibiotic therapy taken continuously for ≥4 weeks 
immediately prior to the baseline study visit, or (c) not responding to >=4 weeks 
of antibiotic therapy. 
4. Women of childbearing potential must have documentation of a negative pregnancy test at 
screening and must agree to use two highly effective methods of birth control during the 
study and for at least 1 month after completion of study drug dosing.  
5. Subjects willing and able to give informed consent. 
 Exclusion criteria 
1. Subjects with IPAA surgery done for Crohn’s disease (CD) or familial adenomatous polyposis 
(FAP) indications.  
2. Subjects with CD-like complications including non-anastomotic strictures and active perianal 
fistulae, isolated or predominant cuffitis or mechanical complications of the ileal pouch.  
3. Surgical complications such as anal stenosis, anastomotic leak, or fistula. 
4. Subjects with prior exposure to tofacitinib.  
5. Subjects with impending need for surgery. 
6. Subjects with a diverting stoma.  
7. Subjects with a prior history or risk factors for venous thromboembolism. 
8. Subjects with active bacterial, parasitic, fungal, mycobacterial, or viral infection (including C. 
difficile and GI infections observed upon stool testing at screening), any infection requiring 
hospitalization or intravenous antibiotics within 3 months prior to screening, any infection 
requiring oral antimicrobial treatment within 2 weeks prior to screening. 
9. Subjects with a history of latent or active tuberculosis or a positive QuantiFERON®-TB Gold 
result. 
10. Subjects positive for hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen, hepatitis B virus core antibody 
with a negative hepatitis B surface antibody or with detectable serum hepatitis B DNA. 
11. Female subjects who are pregnant, lactating, breastfeeding or planning to become pregnant 
during the study or within 1 month after the last dose of study drug. 
12. Female subjects of childbearing potential who are sexually active with non-sterilized male 
partners and do not agree to using two highly effective methods of contraception from 
signing of informed consent throughout the duration of the study and for 4 weeks after the 
last dose. 
13. Subjects with clinically significant laboratory abnormalities at study screening including: AST 
or ALT ≥ 3x the upper limit of normal, alkaline phosphatase ≥ 2x the upper limit of normal, 


 
 
5 
 
total bilirubin ≥ 2 mg/dL (unless confirmed diagnosis of Gilbert’s), estimated creatinine 
clearance < 60 mL/min , total white blood cell count (WBC) < 3 x 109/L, absolute neutrophil 
count < 1.3 x 109/L, absolute lymphocyte count < 0.5 x 109/L, hemoglobin < 8 g/dL, or 
platelet count < 100 x 109/L. 
14. Subjects with evidence of active or history of clinically significant endocrine, pulmonary, 
cardiovascular (including uncontrolled hyperlipidemia [defined as LDL > 200 mg/dL, total 
cholesterol > 300 mg/dL, triglyceride > 500 mg/dL]), hepatic, GI, psychiatric, oncologic or 
neurological disease as determined by the investigator at screening. 
15. Subjects with an active solid organ or hematological malignancy (except non-melanoma skin 
cancers), or a history of a solid organ or hematological malignancy within the last 5 years.  
16. Subjects with an organ transplant.  
17. Subjects who received a live vaccine within 4 weeks of screening visit.  
18. Subjects with condition(s) that in the opinion of the study investigators, may interfere with 
the participants ability to comply with the study procedures.   
 Concomitant medications 
Study subjects will be allowed to remain on permitted concomitant medications provided the 
patient is on a stable dose for ≥2 weeks prior to starting tofactinib. Patient will need to stay on 
stable doses of these medications for the study duration of 8 weeks.  
1. Antibiotics   
2. Antidiarrheal agents  
3. Oral corticosteroids including budesonide, up to doses of prednisone 20mg daily (or 
equivalent), or budesonide 9mg daily.  
4. Probiotics  
 
The following medications will not be allowed during the study:  
1. Azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, or methotrexate within the 28 days prior to dosing visit. 
2. Adalimumab, infliximab, golimumab, etanercept, certolizumab or vedolizumab within the 
60 days prior to the first study visit or with negative drug concentration 
3. Ustekinumab within 120 days prior to the first dosing visit or with negative drug 
concentration. 
4. Intravenous corticosteroids within the 14 days prior to the first dosing visit. 
5. Topical mesalamine or topical steroid within the 14 days prior to the first dosing visit. 
6. Mycophenolic acid, tacrolimus, or cyclosporine within 60 days prior to the first dosing visit. 
 
 Treatment with Tofacitinib 
Eligible subjects will be given tofacitinib 10mg twice daily for an 8-week duration. Study drug 
will be supplied for 4 weeks each at the baseline and week 4 visits.  
 


 
 
6 
 
Study Visits and Procedures  
There are 5 study visits and 2 pouch endoscopic procedures during this 12-week study.  
Screening Period (Week -4 to Day 0) 
After giving informed consent, subjects will undergo up to a 4-week screening period to provide 
baseline data and be assessed for eligibility. The subjects will have a screening visit during 
which they will undergo an assessment of their medical history, symptom assessment and a 
complete physical examination with vital signs, height and weight measurement. They will also 
undergo complete blood count with automated differential, serum chemistries, serum C-
reactive protein (CRP), lipid panel, QuantiFERON®-TB Gold test, urinalysis, fecal calprotectin, 
infectious stool studies, electrocardiogram (ECG), and chest X-ray. Subjects who satisfy the 
inclusion criteria and do not meet any exclusion criteria will proceed with pouch endoscopy 
with biopsies to confirm endoscopic eligibility and assess a baseline mPDAI endoscopic sub-
score. The pouch endoscopy will be scored by a central reader to reduce the risk of bias.  If the 
subject meets all the eligibility criteria, he/she may be enrolled into the study. The subjects will 
be required to maintain a daily paper-based symptom diary starting immediately after the 
screening visit, although only symptoms during the 3 days preceding the study visits will be 
used for the calculation of the mPDAI score for the appropriate study visits. 
Baseline Visit (Week 0) 
At the baseline visit, subjects’ eligibility for the study will be confirmed. Vital signs will be 
recorded, and a targeted physical examination will be performed. The symptom diary will be 
reviewed for calculation of the mPDAI score, and subjects will complete the CGQL 
questionnaire. At the end of the visit, the subjects will be given a 4-week supply of tofacitinib to 
be taken at a dose of 10 mg twice daily.  
Week 4 and Week 8 Visit (±3 days) 
At the week 4 and week 8 visit, the subjects will undergo assessment for concomitant 
medication use, adverse effects and compliance with the study drug. Physical assessment will 
include vital signs and a symptom driven targeted physical examination. Blood, urine and stool 
will be collected for hematology, chemistry, CRP, urinalysis and fecal calprotectin 
measurement. Symptom diary will be reviewed, and subjects will complete the CGQL 
questionnaire. At the end of week 4 visit, the second 4-week supply of the study drug will be 
dispensed to the subjects. At the end of 8 weeks, the subjects will stop taking the study drug 
and undergo a pouch endoscopy with biopsies for calculation of mPDAI score to assess 
treatment response.  The pouch endoscopy will be scored by a central reader to reduce the risk 
of bias.   
Week 12 (±3 days) or Early Termination Visit 
The week 12 visit will be the final visit. Subjects who are withdrawn earlier from the study (per 
study rules and subjects who withdraw consent) after receiving study medication will complete 


 
 
7 
 
an early termination visit. At this visit, subjects will undergo a physical assessment, review of 
medications, adverse event assessment and blood, urine and stool collection for hematology, 
chemistry, CRP, urinalysis and fecal calprotectin measurement. Symptom assessment and CGQL 
questionnaire completion will also be performed.  
Table 1 - Schedule of Study Procedures and Visits 
Study visit 
Screening 
(Week -4 
to day 0) 
Baseline 
(Day 1) 
Week 4 
Week 8 
Week 12 
General 
Informed consent  
x 
 
 
 
 
Medication/Medical History 
x 
 
 
 
 
Smoking Status 
x 
 
 
 
 
Height, weight, BMI 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
Vital Signs 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
12-lead ECG  
x 
 
 
 
 
Physical Examination 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
Chest X-ray 
x 
 
 
 
 
Tuberculosis and HBV testing 
x 
 
 
 
 
Study Drug Dispensing 
 
x 
x 
 
 
Clinical, laboratory, endoscopic and safety assessments 
Pregnancy Test (females only) 
x 
 
 
 
 
Urine pregnancy test 
 
X 
X 
 
 
Chemistry, Hematology, Urinalysis 
x 
 
x 
x 
x 
Stool C. difficile test 
x 
 
 
 
 
Fasting Lipid Panel 
x 
 
x 
x 
x 
C-Reactive Protein 
x 
 
x 
x 
x 
Pouch endoscopy and biopsies 
x 
 
 
x 
 
Fecal calprotectin 
x 
 
x 
x 
x 
Symptom Assessments 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
Concomitant medications 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
mPDAI 
 
x 
 
x 
 
Adverse event assessment 
 
 
x 
x 
x 
CGQL 
 
x 
x 
x 
x 
 
Evaluation and Outcomes  
The primary outcome of the study is clinical response at 8 weeks (defined below) as a measure 
of treatment efficacy. Other efficacy endpoints will include individual clinical, biochemical, and 
endoscopic assessments. Key secondary outcomes include assessment for safety and health-
related quality of life. 


 
 
8 
 
 Primary Endpoint  
1. Proportion of subjects with clinical response defined as reduction in mPDAI score ≥2 from 
baseline at 8 weeks. 
 Secondary Endpoints 
1. The proportion of subjects with clinical response, defined as an mPDAI score of ≥5 at 8 
weeks with ≥2-point decrease from the baseline score at 8 weeks. 
2. The proportion of subjects with clinical remission at 8 weeks, defined as mPDAI score of <5 
with a ≥2-point decrease from the baseline mPDAI score. 
3. Change in mPDAI score at 8 weeks compared to baseline.  
4. Change in mPDAI clinical sub-score at week 4 and week 8 compared to baseline. 
5. Change in mPDAI endoscopic sub-score at week 8 compared to baseline. 
6. Change in IBD-related quality of life as measured by Cleveland Global Quality of Life (CGQL) 
at week 4 and week 8 compared to baseline. 
7. Safety, as determined by incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events. Adverse events 
of interest will include thromboembolic events and herpes zoster.  
Efficacy Assessments 
Efficacy measurement 
The following will be used for definitions of clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic efficacy: 
1. Clinical response defined as an mPDAI score of ≥5 at 8 weeks with a 2-point decrease from 
the baseline mPDAI score. 
2. Clinical remission defined as mPDAI score <5 after 8 weeks of treatment. 
3. Change in mPDAI score from baseline to week 8. 
4. Change in clinical and endoscopic mPDAI sub-scores from baseline to week 8. 
5. Change in fecal calprotectin from baseline to week 8. 
6. Change in serum C-reactive protein from baseline to week 8. 
Symptom Diary 
The subjects will be required to maintain a paper-based symptom diary to be completed daily 
starting after the initial screening visit. The symptoms recorded will include frequency of bowel 
movements, fecal urgency, abdominal pain/cramps, fever and blood in stools. The symptoms 
during the 3 days preceding the study visits will be used for the calculation of the mPDAI score 
for each study visits. 
Pouch disease activity 
Pouch disease activity assessment will be done using mPDAI, which is a combination of 6-point 
clinical and 6-point endoscopic scores. It has been shown to have excellent accuracy for 
pouchitis disease activity assessment with an area under the receiver operative characteristic 
curve of 0.995 and a sensitivity and specificity of 97% and 100%, respectively, compared to the 
pouch disease activity (PDAI) score, which is more complex as it includes histological activity 


 
 
9 
 
score in addition to clinical and endoscopic scores17.  mPDAI score will be calculated at each 
study visit.  
Health-related quality of life 
Health related quality of life will be measured using the validated CGQL. The CGQL is a 3-
question patient-reported assessment, which asks to rate the following questions on a 0-10 
scale, with 0 being worst and 10 being best: 
1. Current Quality of Life? 
2. Current Quality of Health? 
3. Current Energy Level? 
Patients will be asked to complete the CGQL questionnaire at each study visit. 
Laboratory markers 
Serum CRP and fecal calprotectin will be used as laboratory markers of pouchitis activity. These 
will be assessed during the screening period and at week 4, 8 and 12 visits. 
Safety Assessment 
Subject safety will be assessed on all study visits using standard measures, including vital signs, 
symptom history, concomitant medication usage history, physical examinations, and blood and 
urine laboratory tests. Specifically, subjects will be assessed for the known potential adverse 
events to tofacitinib including anemia, peripheral cytopenias, lipid panel derangements, 
elevation of liver aminotransferases, thromboembolic events and infections.  
Statistical Methods 
Sample Size Estimation 
Since this is a pilot study, no sample statistical sample size estimation was performed.   
Data Analysis 
Study subject demographics (age, gender, race), baseline characteristics (height, weight, and 
BMI), IBD history, prior IBD-related medication use, concomitant medications and baseline 
laboratory tests will be reported using descriptive statistics. All subjects in the study who 
received at least one dose of the study drug will be included for analysis. Missing data or early 
termination will be handled by non-responder imputation. Remission and response rate will be 
assessed using descriptive statistics. Change in mPDAI, CGQL scores, serum CRP and fecal 
calprotectin compared to baseline will be assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Adverse 
events will also be reported using descriptive statistics. Data will be considered significant at 
the two-sided p vale of <0.05 where applicable. 
 


 
 
10 
 
Publication Plan 
After the completion of the study and analysis of the data, we will submit the results of this 
study to national gastroenterology meetings (ie. Digestive Disease Week or American College of 
Gastroenterology Annual Meeting) followed by manuscript submission for publication in a high 
impact peer-reviewed journal. 
Anticipated Project Timeline 
Based on the clinical volume at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, we anticipate enrolling 12 subjects 
in this research study over a period of 28 months.  Last patient study visit will be 12 weeks later. 
This will be followed by data analysis and writeup/submission of study abstract and manuscript.  
 
 
 
 
Task 
Month 
1-
2 
3-4 
5-6 
7- 10  
 
11 - 
14 
 
15 - 
18 
 
19 - 
22 
 
23 – 
26  
 
27 - 
30 
 
31 -
34 
 
35 - 
36  
 
37 - 
39 
 
Obtain IRB 
approval 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Enrollment 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Final study 
visit 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Data analysis 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Prepare / 
submit 
abstract  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Prepare / 
submit 
manuscript 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
11 
 
References 
1. 
Peyrin-Biroulet L, Germain A, Patel AS, Lindsay JO. Systematic review: outcomes and 
post-operative complications following colectomy for ulcerative colitis. Aliment 
Pharmacol Ther. 2016;44(8):807-816. 
2. 
Lightner AL, Mathis KL, Dozois EJ, et al. Results at Up to 30 Years After Ileal Pouch-Anal 
Anastomosis for Chronic Ulcerative Colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017;23(5):781-790. 
3. 
Fazio VW, Kiran RP, Remzi FH, et al. Ileal pouch anal anastomosis: analysis of outcome 
and quality of life in 3707 patients. Ann Surg. 2013;257(4):679-685. 
4. 
Madiba TE, Bartolo DC. Pouchitis following restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative 
colitis: incidence and therapeutic outcome. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 2001;46(6):334-337. 
5. 
Koerdt S, Jehle EC, Kreis ME, Kasparek MS. Quality of life after proctocolectomy and ileal 
pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 
2014;29(5):545-554. 
6. 
Körsgen S, Keighley MR. Causes of failure and life expectancy of the ileoanal pouch. Int J 
Colorectal Dis. 1997;12(1):4-8. 
7. 
Segal JP, Poo SX, McLaughlin SD, Faiz OD, Clark SK, Hart AL. Long-term follow-up of the 
use of maintenance antibiotic therapy for chronic antibiotic-dependent pouchitis. 
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2018;9(2):154-158. 
8. 
McLaughlin SD, Clark SK, Tekkis PP, Ciclitira PJ, Nicholls RJ. An open study of 
maintenance antibiotic therapy for chronic antibiotic-dependent pouchitis: efficacy, 
complications and outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13(4):438-444. 
9. 
Gionchetti P, Rizzello F, Poggioli G, et al. Oral budesonide in the treatment of chronic 
refractory pouchitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;25(10):1231-1236. 
10. 
Navaneethan U, Venkatesh PG, Bennett AE, et al. Impact of budesonide on liver function 
tests and gut inflammation in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and ileal 
pouch anal anastomosis. J Crohns Colitis. 2012;6(5):536-542. 
11. 
Huguet M, Pereira B, Goutte M, et al. Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis: Anti-TNF 
Therapy in Refractory Pouchitis and Crohn's Disease-Like Complications of the Pouch 
After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis Following Colectomy for Ulcerative Colitis. Inflamm 
Bowel Dis. 2018;24(2):261-268. 
12. 
Gregory M, Weaver KN, Hoversten P, et al. Efficacy of Vedolizumab for Refractory 
Pouchitis of the Ileo-anal Pouch: Results From a Multicenter US Cohort. Inflamm Bowel 
Dis. 2019;25(9):1569-1576. 
13. 
Weaver KN, Gregory M, Syal G, et al. Ustekinumab Is Effective for the Treatment of 
Crohn's Disease of the Pouch in a Multicenter Cohort. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 
2019;25(4):767-774. 
14. 
Olivera P, Danese S, Peyrin-Biroulet L. JAK inhibition in inflammatory bowel disease. 
Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2017;13(7):693-703. 
15. 
Sandborn WJ, Su C, Sands BE, et al. Tofacitinib as Induction and Maintenance Therapy 
for Ulcerative Colitis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(18):1723-1736. 
16. 
Kühbacher T, Gionchetti P, Hampe J, et al. Activation of signal-transducer and activator 
of transcription 1 (STAT1) in pouchitis. Clin Exp Immunol. 2001;123(3):395-401. 


 
 
12 
 
17. 
Shen B, Achkar JP, Connor JT, et al. Modified pouchitis disease activity index: a simplified 
approach to the diagnosis of pouchitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46(6):748-753. 
18. 
Athayde J, Davies SC, Parker CE, et al. Placebo Rates in Randomized Controlled Trials of 
Pouchitis Therapy. Dig Dis Sci. 2018;63(10):2519-2528.