Conditions: Breast Cancer Breast Cancer Stage IV HER2-negative Breast Cancer Solid Carcinoma MEK1 Gene Mutation MEK2 Gene Mutation Metastatic Breast Cancer
Keywords: Advanced solid cancers Metastatic Breast Cancer Breast cancer Breast cancer stage IV HER2-negative Breast Cancer MEK1 Gene Mutation MEK2 Gene Mutation Solid Carcinoma 21-288 mirdametinib fulvestrant postmenopausal estrogen receptor positive metastatic breast cancer estrogen receptor positive Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED | Intervention model: PARALLEL
Enrollment: 6
Healthy volunteers: no

Brief summary:
The purpose of this study to find out whether mirdametinib is a safe treatment for people with advanced solid tumor cancer that has certain mutations. Researchers will look at whether mirdametinib on its own or in combination with the drug fulvestrant is a safe treatment that causes few or mild side effects in people with advanced solid tumor cancer.

Detailed description:

Arms:
arm 1: Postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor positive metastatic breast cancer harboring NF1 loss of function or another alteration of the MAPK pathway.

Part 1: safety run-in (confirmation of the RP2D for mirdametinib in combination with the standard recommended dose of fulvestrant). This part may include the mirdametinib dose de-escalation according to the 3+3 design if necessary arm 2: Postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor positive metastatic breast cancer harboring NF1 loss of function or another alteration of the MAPK pathway.

Part 2: dose expansion cohorts where the mirdametinib RP2D will be administered in combination with the standard recommended dose of fulvestrant arm 3: Adult patients with advanced solid cancers driven by the alteration of the MAPK pathway

Part 1: mirdametinib dose escalation to MTD or RP2D according to the 3+3 design arm 4: Adult patients with advanced solid cancers driven by the alteration of the MAPK pathway

Part 2: dose expansion cohorts

Interventions: intervention 1: Mirdametinib intervention 2: Fulvestrant
Intervention descriptions: intervention 1: Dose Level -2INT: 2mg PO BID, 3 weeks on/1 week off Dose Level -2: 2mg PO BID given continuously Dose Level -1INT: 3mg PO BID, 3 weeks on/1 week off Dose Level -1: 3mg PO BID given continuously Dose Level 1: 4mg PO BID given continuously Dose Level 2: 6mg PO BID given continuously Dose Level 3: 8mg PO BID given continuously intervention 2: The starting dose of mirdametinib in combination with fulvestrant in each Dose Level will be as follows:

* Dose Level 1: mirdametinib 4 mg BID PO + fulvestrant
* (Only to be triggered pending DLTs on higher Dose Levels as described below)

  * Dose Level -2: mirdametinib 2 mg BID PO continuous + fulvestrant, and Dose Level -2INT: mirdametinib 2 mg BID PO on 3 weeks on, 1 week off + fulvestrant

Protocol document:
Prot_SAP_000.pdf: 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 1 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
   
MSK PROTOCOL COVER SHEET 
 
A Phase 1b / 2a, Open-label Platform Study to Evaluate Mirdametinib as Monotherapy or 
in Combination with Other Anticancer Agents in Patients with Advanced Solid Cancers 
Harboring MAPK-activating Mutations 
 
 
Principal Investigator/Department: 
Ezra Rosen, MD PhD 
Early Drug Development, Department of Medicine 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 2 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
Table of Contents 
1.0 
PROTOCOL SUMMARY AND/OR SCHEMA ............................................................. 4 
1.1 Targeting the MAPK Pathway in Hormone Resistant ER+ Breast Cancer .................... 4 
1.2 Utilizing MEK Inhibitor Monotherapy with Mirdametinib in all solid tumor types ............ 5 
2.0 
OBJECTIVES AND SCIENTIFIC AIMS ...................................................................... 6 
3.0 
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE ........................................................................... 7 
3.1 Mirdametinib ................................................................................................................ 7 
3.2 Additional Background on Mirdametinib ....................................................................... 9 
3.3 Fulvestrant ..................................................................................................................12 
3.4 Benefit/Risk Assessment ............................................................................................12 
3.5 MAPK Pathway and Estrogen Receptor Signaling in Breast Cancer ...........................13 
3.6 MAPK Pathway and MEK mutations as oncogenic drivers ..........................................15 
3.7 Study Rationale ..........................................................................................................17 
4.0 
OVERVIEW OF STUDY DESIGN/INTERVENTION ...................................................18 
4.1 
Design ....................................................................................................................18 
4.2 
Intervention ............................................................................................................19 
5.0 
THERAPEUTIC/DIAGNOSTIC AGENTS & NON-THERAPEUTIC ASSESSMENTS 26 
5.1 Mirdametinib ...............................................................................................................26 
5.2 Fulvestrant (Faslodex) ................................................................................................28 
5.3 FDA Application ..........................................................................................................28 
6.0 
CRITERIA FOR PARTICIPANT ELIGIBILITY ...........................................................28 
6.1 
Participant Inclusion Criteria ...................................................................................28 
6.2 
Participant Exclusion Criteria ..................................................................................32 
7.0 
RECRUITMENT PLAN ..............................................................................................34 
7.1 
Research Participant Registration ..........................................................................35 
7.2 
Randomization .......................................................................................................35 
8.0     INFORMED CONSENT PROCEDURES ....................................................................35 
9.0 
PRE-TREATMENT/INTERVENTION  ........................................................................36 
10.0 TREATMENT/INTERVENTION PLAN .......................................................................37 
10.1 Mirdametinib Study Treatment  .................................................................................37 
10.2 Study Treatment Errors ............................................................................................. 38 
10.3 Study Treatment Compliance ....................................................................................39 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 3 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
10.4 Concomitant Therapy ................................................................................................39 
11.0 EVALUATION DURING TREATMENT/INTERVENTION ..........................................40 
11.1  Clinical Safety Laboratory Analytes ..........................................................................40 
11.2 Physical Examinations and Vital Sign Measurements ...............................................41 
11.3 ECOG Performance Status .......................................................................................41 
11.4 Electrocardiograms (ECGs) ......................................................................................41 
11.5 Pregnancy Testing ....................................................................................................42 
11.6 Demographics and Baseline Characteristics .............................................................43 
11.7 Concomitant Medications and Procedures ................................................................44 
11.8 Additional Anticancer Treatment and Radiotherapy ..................................................44 
11.9 Correlatives ...............................................................................................................44 
11.10 Post-study Follow-up...............................................................................................46 
12.0 CRITERIA FOR REMOVAL FROM STUDY ..............................................................51 
13.0    CRITERIA FOR OUTCOME ASSESSMENT AND ENDPOINT EVALUABILITY ......51 
13.1 Safety Endpoints .......................................................................................................51 
13.2 Efficacy Endpoints ....................................................................................................52 
13.3 Evaluable subjects ....................................................................................................52 
14.0 BIOSTATISTICS .......................................................................................................53 
14.1 Analysis Populations .................................................................................................53 
14.2 General Principles .................................................................................................. 56 
14.3 Safety Analysis ....................................................................................................... 56 
14.4 QTc Analyses ......................................................................................................... 56 
14.5 Efficacy Analyses ................................................................................................... 56 
14.6 Demographics, Medical History, Baseline Characteristics and Concomitant 
Medications ...................................................................................................................... 59 
14.7 Pharmacokinetic Analyses ..................................................................................... 59 
14.8 Biomarker Analyses ..................................................................................................60 
15.0 TOXICITIES/RISKS/SIDE EFFECTS .........................................................................60 
15.1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Reporting ................................................................62 
15.2 External SAE Reporting ............................................................................................63 
15.3 Dose Limiting Toxicities ............................................................................................64 
15.4 Dose Modification .....................................................................................................65 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 4 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
15.5  Side Effects of Fulvestrant .......................................................................................70 
15.6 Side Effects of Mirdametinib .....................................................................................71 
16.0 PROTECTION OF HUMAN PARTICIPANTS ............................................................73 
16.1 Privacy ...................................................................................................................73 
16.3 Quality Assurance ..................................................................................................74 
16.4 Data and Safety Monitoring ....................................................................................74 
17.0    REFERENCES ..........................................................................................................75 
18.0    APPENDICES ...........................................................................................................77 
 
 
1.0 
PROTOCOL SUMMARY AND/OR SCHEMA 
1.1 Targeting the MAPK Pathway in Hormone Resistant ER+ Breast Cancer 
Approximately 70% of all metastatic breast cancers (MBCs) are dependent on the estrogen 
receptor.  Hormonal therapies targeting ER are highly active in this group of cancers and 
have been remarkably successful in dramatically improving outcomes in this group of 
patients.  Unfortunately, resistance to targeted therapy is a nearly universal phenomenon, 
and over 90% of patients eventually develop resistance to this class of therapy.  Therefore, a 
molecular map of resistance and strategies designed specifically against these mechanisms 
are necessary to prolong clinical benefit in this group of patients. 
To determine the cause of this resistance, an MSK-led study (under IRB#06-107 and 
IRB#12-245) sequenced a total of 1,918 patients with MSK-IMPACT, including 1,501 
hormone positive tumors, 692 of which had previously been exposed to hormonal therapy1. 
This study identified mutations in three non-overlapping gene sets that associated with the 
hormone-resistant phenotype: (1) ESR1, (2) MAPK pathway, and (3) Transcription Factors.  
The finding of mutations that might serve to activate MAPK signaling was particularly striking 
given the known oncogenic function of this pathway in other cancers and the potential to 
target this pathway with selective and potent inhibitors of the MEK or ERK kinases.   
Indeed, in preclinical models, loss of NF1 function was associated with reduced sensitivity to 
fulvestrant, and this phenotype was reversed with treatment with an ERK inhibitor1.  
Moreover, this finding implicating the MAPK pathway in endocrine resistant MBC has been 
validated by other groups in independent patient cohorts, and the combination of the MEK 
inhibitor selumetinib and the ER antagonist fulvestrant was sufficient to rescue the phenotype 
conferred by NF1 loss2,3.  In our genomic analysis of patients with ER+ MBC, we find that 
over 15% of cases of hormone resistance are associated with alterations whose principal 
effector pathway is likely to be the ERK pathway – but no single mutation predominates.  
Instead, we have identified genomic alterations which by class may be implicated:  
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 5 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
(1) RAS modulators: NF1 loss (6%) and KRAS + HRAS (3%) mutations.  Work by multiple 
groups have demonstrated that these genomic alterations can promote hormone 
independent tumor growth in laboratory models. We have also observed these to be 
sensitive to MEK kinase inhibition. 
(2) Receptor tyrosine kinase: EGFR amplification (2%) and HER2 somatic mutations (7%). 
We have previously demonstrated that these specific alterations can promote ERK activation 
and hormone resistant tumor growth in laboratory models. We have also observed these to 
be sensitive to MEK kinase inhibition.   
(3) RAF/MEK kinase cascade: BRAF mutation (1%) and MEK1 (1%) mutation are both 
observed in our series.  
We hypothesize that alterations in the MAPK pathway promote resistance to ER targeted 
therapies in ER+ MBC, and that this resistance can be overcome through the use of MAPK 
targeted therapies in combination with hormonal therapy.  We will therefore propose an 
integrated clinical and translational research plan centered around the following clinical trial:  
We will perform a phase IB/IIA clinical trial of the selective estrogen receptor degrader 
(SERD) fulvestrant with the allosteric MEK1/2 inhibitor mirdametinib.  Responders will 
be stratified based on their enrolling alteration.  Primary endpoints will be safety and toxicity, 
and secondary endpoints will focus on efficacy, including progression free survival.  
Responses to therapy will be based on RECIST assessment.  As secondary, exploratory 
endpoints, we will additionally explore longitudinally collected MSK-ACCESS samples to 
chart treatment response and to identify potential mechanisms of resistance to therapy.  We 
will utilize these biomarkers to investigate the way in which MAPK pathway alteration type, 
heterogeneity, clonality, baseline MAPK and ER transcriptional output, and co-mutational 
pattern condition pre-treatment sensitivity to the drug combination.  Further, pre-treatment 
biopsies from the patients on this study will be used to make PDX and cell culture models, 
and these will be utilized to assess whether measures of MAPK pathway output or MAPK 
pathway effectors can stratify likely responders.  Exploiting the mechanisms of acquired 
resistance in solid tumors has facilitated the development of multiple therapeutic strategies 
that can dramatically extend clinical benefit, and we propose this combination therapy as a 
novel therapeutic drug combination in this genomically selected population of ER+ MBC 
patients.   
1.2 Utilizing MEK Inhibitor Monotherapy with Mirdametinib in all solid tumor 
types 
The MAPK pathway is one of the most commonly mutated pathways in human cancer and 
this pathway has been targeted at multiple nodes along this pathway, including RAF, MEK, 
and ERK, and MEK1 and MEK2 have been validated as oncogenic targets.  However, the 
RTK dependent feedback mechanisms to kinase inhibition and the allele-specific 
dependence of MEK mutants to upstream pathway effectors has only been elucidated. 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 6 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
In particular, MEK mutants have recently been characterized and divided into three distinct 
classes4,5.  Class 1 MEK alterations are RAF dependent and they increase ERK activation 
only in the setting of activated RAF.  These mutants are most sensitive to RAF feedback 
inhibition, and thus almost always occur with additional alterations in upstream MAPK 
alterations. Class 2 RAF MEK alterations are RAF regulated and have some ERK activation 
at baseline, but with activated RAF the pathway output is activated further.  Class 3 MEK 
alterations activate the pathway in the absence of any upstream pathway activation.  These 
alterations share an in-frame deletion in which a potent negative regulatory segment of MEK 
is removed.  These can drive MAPK pathway activation in RAF-less cells, and these strongly 
activate this pathway.   
This classification is elucidated in a series of preclinical experiments utilizing mirdametinib4.  
They show that class 1 MEK1 mutants (D67N, P124L, P124S) and class 2 MEK1 mutants 
(K57N, C121S, F53L, and Q56P) were sensitive to mirdametinib with severely reduced IC50 
of pERK, however class 3 MEK1 mutants (L98-I103, I99-K104, E102-I103) were not 
affected.  This result was replicated using an alternative MEK inhibitor, trametinib.  Based on 
these data, we propose to investigate the utility of MEK inhibitor monotherapy utilizing 
mirdametinib in class 1 and class 2 MEK1/2 mutant tumors in this Phase 1/2 study.    
    
2.0 
OBJECTIVES AND SCIENTIFIC AIMS 
Table 1 
Study Objectives and Endpoints 
Objectives 
Endpoints 
Primary 
 
Arm 1: 
 
To evaluate the safety and tolerability 
of mirdametinib in combination with 
fulvestrant in postmenopausal patients 
with estrogen receptor positive 
metastatic breast cancer harboring 
NF1 loss of function mutation or 
another alteration of the MAPK 
pathway 
Arm 2: 
 
To evaluate the safety and tolerability 
of mirdametinib as single agent in 
adult patients with advanced solid 
cancers driven by the alteration of the 
MAPK pathway 
All arms: 
 
Type, incidence and severity of 
adverse events (including the dose 
limiting toxicities in Cycle 1) 
 
Abnormal results of laboratory safety 
assessments, vital signs, ECGs, LVEF 
assessments, and physical and 
ophthalmological exams 
Secondary 
 
Arm 1: 
All arms: 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 7 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
 
To evaluate the efficacy of 
mirdametinib in combination with 
fulvestrant in postmenopausal patients 
with estrogen receptor positive 
metastatic breast cancer harboring 
NF1 loss of function mutation or 
another alteration of the MAPK 
pathway 
 
To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of 
mirdametinib in combination with 
fulvestrant in the eligible population 
Arm 2: 
 
To evaluate the efficacy of 
mirdametinib as single agent in adult 
patients with advanced solid cancers 
driven by alterations of the MAPK 
pathway 
 
To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of 
mirdametinib as the single agent in the 
eligible population 
 
Efficacy endpoints will be the best 
objective response (BOR) by RECIST 
1.1, disease control rate (DCR), 
duration of response (DOR), and 
progression-free survival (PFS) 
 
Pharmacokinetic endpoints will be 
Plasma concentration-time profiles 
and derived PK parameters of PD-
0325901 and PD-0315209, including 
but not limited to AUC0-last, Cmax, 
and Tmax, and other PK parameters if 
deemed appropriate 
Exploratory 
 
All arms: 
 
To evaluate the changes from baseline 
in the biomarkers of tumor biology and 
anti-tumor activity 
All arms: 
 
The biomarker endpoints will be: 
 
Genomic molecular profile (NGS 
by MSK-IMPACT) on the fresh 
tumor biopsy of metastatic tumor 
 
RNA sequencing on the fresh 
tumor biopsy of metastatic tumor 
 
Cell-free DNA in serial plasma 
samples (NGS by MSK-ACCESS) 
 
pMEK and pERK changes in the 
cytoplasm and nucleus  
 
3.0 
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE 
3.1 Mirdametinib 
Mirdametinib is a highly selective and potent, non-ATP-competitive oral inhibitor of MEK1 
and MEK2 kinases. It significantly inhibits the phosphorylation of the MAP kinases ERK1 and 
ERK2, leading to impaired tumor cell growth in vitro and in vivo with an IC50 of 
approximately 0.3 nM based on in vitro cellular assays and PK/PD of mouse xenograft 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 8 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
tumor models. Mirdametinib has exhibited anti-tumor activity against a broad spectrum of 
human tumors in cell lines and animal xenograft models.  
 
The plasma PK profile of mirdametinib is characterized by rapid absorption with the Cmax 
achieved by approximately 1-hour post-dose and bi-phasic elimination with a terminal 
elimination half-life ranging from 22 to 30 hours.  Mirdametinib (PD-0325901) is largely 
eliminated by conversion to a primary active metabolite (PD-0315209) which has a half-life 
ranging from 30 to 40 hours.  Generally, exposure of mirdametinib (both Cmax and AUCtau) 
increases proportionally with increases in dose from 1 to 30 mg QD or BID.  Mirdametinib 
exposure following multiple doses exhibited a small degree of accumulation exhibiting 
accumulation ratios for AUCtau ranging from 1.3 to 1.9 after 21 days of BID dosing.  
Accumulation of the primary metabolite, PD-0315209, was higher at approximately 3-fold.   
 
Mirdametinib is a substrate of CYP3A4, CYP1A2, CYP2C9 and CYP2C19, however, 
conversion of mirdametinib to the primary metabolite PD-0315209 is largely mediated by 
non-CYP enzymes.  Therefore, inhibition of CYP enzymes is unlikely to significantly alter the 
pharmacokinetics of mirdametinib.  Mirdametinib is a substrate of both P-gp and BCRP.  
Inhibition of P-gp may increase the absorption of mirdametinib.  However, in the absence of 
P-gp inhibitors, mirdametinib is extensively and rapidly absorbed due to its high permeability 
and solubility.  Only small amounts of mirdametinib are eliminated in urine and feces 
unchanged.  Therefore, inhibition of P-gp is not likely to have a significant impact on the 
systemic exposure of mirdametinib.  Mirdametinib is not a significant inhibitor of CYP 
enzymes or major drug transporters with the exception of OAT1 which may be inhibited at 
clinically relevant concentrations. 
 
Mirdametinib at the dose of 2.0 mg/m2 BID (up to the total of 4 mg BID) given 3 weeks on / 1 
week off is being explored as a monotherapy in Phase IIB clinical trial for the treatment of 
adult and pediatric patients with plexiform neurofibromas associated with neurofibromatosis 
Type 1 (NF1-PN) [NCT03962543]. In addition, mirdametinib in combination with lifirafenib is 
in a Phase IB clinical study for the treatment of advanced solid cancers driven by the 
KRAS/NRAS mutations or other MAPK pathway alterations [NCT03905148]. In this study 
mirdametinib is being explored in combination with this RAF dimer inhibitor at doses ranging 
from 2 mg to 8 mg QD.  
 
A detailed description of the chemistry, pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of mirdametinib 
(PD-0325901) is provided in the Investigator’s Brochure.  
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 9 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
3.2 Additional Background on Mirdametinib 
Clinical Experience with mirdametinib  
Phase 1/2 Trial A4501001 in Advanced Solid Cancers 
A4581001 is a completed Phase 1/2 trial conducted by Pfizer to evaluate the safety and anti-
tumor efficacy of mirdametinib in 79 patients with advanced, refractory breast cancer, 
colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer or non-ocular melanoma. The maximum 
administered dose (MAD) was 30 mg twice daily (BID) for the intermittent (3 weeks on/1 
week off or 3/1) schedule and 20 mg BID for the continuous schedule. Initially, 20 mg BID 
administered on a 3/1 schedule was selected for further investigation in the Phase 2 
component of this study. However, this dose was not well tolerated and was therefore 
reduced to 15 mg BID. The Phase 2 component of this study was terminated prematurely 
because of an unexpectedly high incidence of musculoskeletal and neurological adverse 
events. 
 
For the continuous dosing schedule, the MTD was found to be 15 mg BID. However, 10 mg 
BID administered on a 5 days on/2 days off schedule that was selected as the recommended 
Phase 2 dose to mitigate the safety risk. This was based on the observation of significant 
ocular toxicities that occurred after Cycle 1 (retinal vein occlusion [RVO]) at 15 mg BID and 
10 mg BID on the continuous schedule. 
 
Mirdametinib exhibited dose-limiting toxicities at dose levels ≥ 20 mg BID administered on 
the 3/1 schedule and ≥ 10 mg BID on both the continuous and 5/2 schedules. The main 
adverse events at mirdametinib doses ≥10 mg BID on both the intermittent (3/1) and 
continuous dosing schedules were Grade 3-4 neurologic and neuromuscular disorders (most 
notably, muscle weakness, confusion, slurred speech, seizure / convulsions) and ocular 
disorders (most notably, RVO). Other frequently reported treatment-related AEs included 
diarrhea, acneiform skin rash, edema, nausea, and fatigue. These toxicities resulted in 
frequent treatment interruptions, dose reductions and treatment discontinuations in individual 
patients and eventually led to the study termination. 
 
The RVO occurred after Cycle 1 at the 15 mg BID and 10 mg BID dose levels administered 
on the continuous dosing schedule. Of note, 1 subject presented with RVO after 9 cycles of 
therapy. This subject was initially treated at 10 mg BID administered 5 days on/2 days off 
but had a dose-decrease to 5 mg BID in Cycle 2 after experiencing binocular diplopia post 
oral prednisone therapy for a Grade 2 rash. At lower doses of 5-8 mg BID, one patient 
experienced a case of grade 2 iridocyclitis and grade 1 subfoveal retinal detachment. Based 
on the review of ocular data, these events occurred after escalation to > 15mg BID. From 1 
to 8 mg BID, 1 patient experienced a G1 visual disturbance definitely not related and 1 
patient experienced G1 scleral disorder and G1 eye disorder at least possibly related to 
mirdametinib. A subsequent analysis found predisposing factors for retinopathy in all 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 10 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
subjects with RVO and no correlation with cumulative dose. Other visual disturbances 
included blurred vision, reduced acuity, halos, floaters, colored spots, or flashes of light. 
 
Phase 2 Trial A4581002 in Advanced NSCLC 
A4581002 is a terminated Phase 2 trial conducted by Pfizer that evaluated the safety and 
anti-tumor efficacy of mirdametinib in 34 patients with advanced non-small cell lung 
cancer. A mirdametinib dose of 20 mg BID on the continuous schedule was originally chosen 
as the starting dose. However, later experience gained with this dose in an ongoing study 
(Protocol A4581001, Phase 1 portion) revealed that this dosing regimen was not 
well tolerated without regular treatment breaks. Consequently, this study was amended to 
change the starting dose to 15 mg BID on an intermittent dosing schedule consisting of 3 
weeks on/1 week off in 28-day cycles (Schedule 1). Mirdametinib was initially administered at 
15 mg twice daily (BID) on the 3/1 intermittent dosing schedule (Schedule 1); no subjects 
were dosed on a continuous dosing regimen. Schedule 1 however was not well 
tolerated. Thirteen subjects were treated according to Schedule 1 and significant AEs were 
experienced (fatigue and myalgia which occurred in a single subject, and 1 case each of 
blurred vision and hallucinations). Consequently, this study was again amended to change 
the dose to 15 mg BID administered on a different intermittent schedule (5 days on/2 days off 
for 3 weeks, followed by 1 week off) in 28-day cycles (Schedule 2). The 13 subjects dosed 
according to Schedule 1 were replaced. Twenty-one subjects were dosed according to 
Schedule 2, but on 31 July 2006 additional enrollment into this study was suspended 
following the finding of a second case of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in the Phase 1 trial 
A4581001.  The most frequently reported treatment-related AEs included diarrhea, rash, 
fatigue, reversible visual disturbances (primarily on the 3/1 schedule), nausea, and vomiting.  
 
Phase 1 Trial A4581004 in Healthy Subjects  
A4581004 is a completed Phase 1 trial conducted by Pfizer to evaluate the effect of food on 
the safety and pharmacokinetics of a single 20 mg dose of mirdametinib in healthy Asian 
subjects. No notable adverse events have been reported from this trial. 
 
Phase Trial 2a NF106 Trial in Plexiform Neurofibroma 
NF106 is a completed investigator-initiated single-arm Phase 2a trial NF106 (NCT02096471) 
supported by the Neurofibromatosis Clinical Trials Consortium (NFCTC) that evaluated 
mirdametinib in 19 patients with growing or symptomatic NF1-PN. This trial showed an 
objective response rate (ORR) of 42% using MRI volumetric response criteria after 1 year of 
therapy. Patients received mirdametinib at a dose of 2 mg/m2 BID (maximum dose = 4.0 mg 
BID).  The results of the NF106 NFCTC study have been presented6. 
   
The most common AEs of any grade were acneiform rash (94.7%), fatigue (57.9%), and 
nausea (52.6%).  One subject developed two treatment-related grade 3 adverse events 
(back and abdominal pain) simultaneously during course 1; the pain resolved upon drug 
interruption and did not recur at the reduced dose of 2mg BID, or 1.4mg/m2/dose (notably 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 11 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
pain is a common disease related adverse event given nerve sheath growth). There were no 
grade 4 AEs and no subjects died during the study. Five subjects (26.3%) required dose 
reductions while on study: for grade 3 abdominal/back pain (as described above), grade 1 
rash (n=2), grade 2 nausea (n=1) and grade 2 fatigue (n=1).  A total of five subjects withdrew 
from protocol therapy; four due to low grade rash perceived to be intolerable and one who 
felt the study commitments were too challenging. Overall, mirdametinib had 
good tolerability at the dose of 2 mg/m2 BID in the study NF106. 
 
This trial showed an objective response rate (ORR) of 42% after 1 year of therapy using MRI 
volumetric response criteria. Patients received mirdametinib at a dose of 2 mg/m2 BID 
(maximum dose = 4 mg BID). However, the ORR results in this study may have been 
confounded by the inclusion of a provision in the protocol which removed patients from 
treatment if they did not achieve at least a 15% reduction in tumor volume by Cycle 8 or 20% 
by Cycle 12. Some patients may have been removed from the Weiss study prior to 
achievement of their maximum tumor response and therefore, some patients may have 
achieved a PR had they been allowed to remain on study beyond Cycle 8.  
 
Phase 2b MEK-NF-201 (ReNeu) Trial in Plexiform Neurofibroma 
The original proposal for Study MEK-NF-201 was a single arm study of mirdametinib in 
approximately 50 patients ≥12 years of age with NF1-PN. At the pre-IND meeting for IND# 
139883 in August 2018, the FDA recommended expanding the age eligibility criteria to 
include patients less than 12 years of age who can swallow capsules, considering the growth 
patterns of NF1-PN (i.e., decreased growth rate after adolescence). In January 2019, the 
FDA agreed that the trial may include 50 pediatric patients ≥2 years of age) with NF1-PN.   
 
The modified MEK-NF-201 trial is ongoing as a non-randomized, open-label, multi-
center, Phase 2b trial in 100 patients with NF1-PN (50 patients ≥2 and ≤17 years of 
age and 50 patients ≥18 years of age). Eligible patients must have NF1-PN that is causing 
significant morbidity, such as head and neck lesions that are compromising the airway or 
great vessels, brachial or lumbar plexus lesions that are causing nerve compression and loss 
of function, lesions causing major deformity or are significantly disfiguring, lesions of the 
extremity that cause limb hypertrophy or loss of function, and painful lesions.  
Interim data from the ReNeu trial were disclosed in February 2021, which were comprised of 
data from the first 20 adult patients enrolled and which utilized a January 22, 2021 data 
cutoff. Objective responses were defined as a ≥ 20% reduction in target tumor volume 
measured by MRI and were assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR). 
Patients received mirdametinib at a dose of 2 mg/m2 twice daily (maximum dose: 4 mg twice 
daily) without regard to food on a three weeks-on, one week-off intermittent schedule, with 
patients being allowed to stay on treatment for up to 24 cycles (approximately two years). 
The median time on treatment for the 20 adult patients evaluated for this analysis was 10.1 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 12 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
cycles (approximately 10 months), with an initial efficacy assessment performed following 
cycle five and then every four cycles thereafter. 
The preliminary efficacy and safety analysis showed 10/20 (50%) of patients had achieved 
an objective response by BICR. For seven of the 10 patients who achieved an initial 
objective response, subsequent scheduled scans were available, and six of these seven 
patients had confirmed responses. Sixteen (16/20, 80%) of these patients remain on study 
and only one patient required a dose reduction due to an AE. Reasons for discontinuation 
included one each of progressive disease, participant decision, AE (Grade 1 diarrhea), and a 
patient being unable to undergo required MRI imaging due to a titanium rod implant from 
non-treatment-related worsening of scoliosis. Lastly, mirdametinib displayed a generally well-
tolerated safety profile. The majority of TRAEs were Grade 1 or 2 with only one Grade 3 
TRAE reported. No Grade 4 or 5 AEs have been reported. The most common TRAEs were 
rash, nausea and diarrhea. 
3.3 Fulvestrant 
Fulvestrant has a long history of use in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer as a 
selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) that blocks the action of 
estrogen.35  Fulvestrant is currently standard of care for women with metastatic breast 
cancer.  It can be used as monotherapy, where time to progression at a dose of 250mg was 
shown to be comparable to anastrazole (5.5 months vs 5.1 months).36  Additionally, 
fulvestrant is now standard of care when used in combination with other agents for this group 
of patients, such as in the Solar-1 trial where alpelisib was combined with fulvestrant for 
PIK3CA mutant ER+ breast cancers, yielding a PFS of 11 months.  As described in section 
1.1, there are preclinical data suggesting that blocking the estrogen receptor in combination 
with blocking the MAPK pathway causes regression of these MAPK-altered ER+ breast 
cancers.  Therefore, as has been performed with CDK4/6 inhibitors and PIK3CA inhibitors 
previously, in this trial we will combine fulvestrant with the MEK inhibitor mirdametinib to 
concurrently block both pathways. 
3.4 Benefit/Risk Assessment 
To date, the safety profile of single-agent mirdametinib (PD-0325901) in patients with 
advanced cancer (doses < 10 mg BID, intermittent schedule) has been characterized by 
mostly manageable and reversible toxicities. The most frequently reported adverse events 
have been rash, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fatigue. The majority of the events were 
mild-to-moderate intensity. Other events that have been reported in lesser frequency include 
ocular disorders (visual disturbances, blurred vision, retinal vein occlusion), nervous system 
disorders (including confusion, slowed ideation, slurred speech, and hallucinations), 
musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (general weakness, as well as neck muscle 
weakness associated with mild and moderate elevations in creatine kinase [CK]), and 
cardiac disorders (decreased left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF], congestive heart 
failure). These events primarily occurred in patients receiving doses ≥ 10 mg (up to 30 mg) 
BID. 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 13 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
In order to minimize potential risk during study participation, subjects will be carefully 
monitored for the development of toxicities throughout the study and guidelines for dose 
modification/discontinuation for selected adverse events are provided. 
Based on the available nonclinical and clinical trial data, the benefit-risk balance is 
considered favorable for further development in patients with NF. 
More detailed information about the known and expected benefits and risks and reasonably 
expected adverse events of mirdametinib (PD-0325901) may be found in the Investigator’s 
Brochure. 
3.5 MAPK Pathway and Estrogen Receptor Signaling in Breast Cancer 
70% of all invasive breast cancers are dependent on the estrogen receptor.  Hormonal 
therapies targeting ER are highly active in this group of cancers and has been remarkably 
successful in dramatically improving outcomes in this group of patients.  Unfortunately, 
resistance to targeted therapy is a universal phenomenon, and over 90% of patients 
eventually develop resistance to this class of therapy.  These patients with hormone-resistant 
metastatic breast cancer (MBC) suffer significant morbidity and mortality from their disease 
as their cancer spread becomes more recalcitrant to therapy, all while physicians are forced 
to use less effective and more toxic chemotherapies. Therefore, effective strategies and 
novel or new combinations of drugs are necessary to prolong clinical benefit in this group of 
patients.    
We have pioneered efforts to understand the molecular underpinnings to the development of 
resistance to ER targeted therapies7–9.  Additionally, the breast medicine group at MSKCC 
has been at the forefront of developing rational approaches to overcoming hormone 
resistance10–12. More specifically, we have utilized genomic sequencing to characterize the 
molecular basis by which breast cancers evolve from primary, hormone-responsive tumors 
into metastatic, hormone-refractory tumors. We first identified mutations in the gene for ER 
(ESR1) in 35-40% of patients with ER+ MBC and prior progression on an aromatase 
inhibitor. The role of these mutations in promoting resistance to estrogen deprivation therapy 
in the form of aromatase inhibitors has since been validated mechanistically and clinically by 
us and others. 
More recently we have conducted a study of a total of 1,918 patients utilizing MSK Impact, 
including 1,501 hormone positive tumors, 692 of which had previously been exposed to 
hormonal therapy1. This study identified mutations in three non-overlapping gene sets that 
associated with the hormone-resistant phenotype: (1) ESR1, (2) MAPK pathway, and (3) 
Transcription Factors. Strikingly, the aggregate group of tumors with MAPK alterations was 
nearly as large as the group of patients with ESR1 mutation in this cohort and the alterations 
appeared to be mutually exclusive. The finding of mutations that might serve to activate 
MAPK signaling was particularly striking given the known oncogenic functions of this 
pathway in other cancers and the potential to target this pathway with selective and potent 
inhibitors of the MEK or ERK kinases.   
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 14 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
Indeed, in their preclinical model, loss of NF1 function was associated with reduced 
sensitivity to fulvestrant, and this phenotype was reversed with treatment with an ERK 
inhibitor1.  Moreover, this finding implicating the MAPK pathway in endocrine resistant MBC 
has been validated by other groups in independent patient cohorts3, and the combination of 
the MEK inhibitor selumetinib and fulvestrant was sufficient to rescue the phenotype 
conferred by NF1 loss2.  This finding of mutations that might serve to activate MAPK 
signaling was particularly striking given the known oncogenic functions of this pathway in 
other cancers and the potential to target this pathway with selective and potent inhibitors of 
MEK.  
The MAPK pathway has been previously implicated in both modulating ER signaling and 
cooperating with ER to potentially drive breast cancer growth13–17; however targeting this 
pathway has not been investigated in part due to the lack of patient selection markers. In our 
genomic analysis of patients with ER+ MBC, we have identified a number of alterations 
whose principal effector pathway is likely to be the ERK pathway – but no single mutation 
predominates. Instead, we have identified genomic alterations which by class may be 
implicated:  
(1) RAS modulators – NF1 loss (6%) and KRAS + HRAS (3%) mutation are both commonly 
observed in our series. Work by our group as well as the lab of Matthew Ellis has 
demonstrated that these genomic alterations can promote hormone independent tumor 
growth in laboratory models. We have also observed these to be sensitive to MEK kinase 
inhibition. 
(2) Receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) – EGFR amplification (2%) and HER2 somatic mutation 
(7%) are both commonly observed in our series. We have previously demonstrated that 
these specific alterations can promote ERK activation and hormone resistant tumor growth in 
laboratory models. We have also observed these to be sensitive to MEK kinase inhibition. 
(3) RAF/MEK kinase cascade – BRAF mutation (1%) and MEK1 (1%) mutation are both 
observed in our series. We are currently modeling the impact of these alterations on 
hormone sensitivity but by virtue of their canonical effects, hypothesize they may be similar 
to the other groups. 
Beyond these relatively common alterations that promote ERK activity, there are some other 
genomic alterations (rare or common) that may be relevant in this disease and may be 
considerations including FGFR1, MET, ERBB3, ERBB4 in the RTK group; RASAL1, NRAS in 
the RAS group; and CRAF, PAK in the kinase cascade group. 
Beyond the association of this group of tumors with resistance to aromatase inhibitors, we 
have also observed this group to have shortened response to SERM/SERD therapies as 
well. By contrast, the group of patients with ESR1 mutations has comparable outcomes to 
the group of patients with wild type ESR1. Moreover, mechanistic studies conducted by our 
group and others have demonstrated that mutant estrogen receptors can be potently 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 15 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
inhibited by SERMs and SERDs that have reasonably good pharmacokinetic properties. 
However, preclinical research has found that MAPK-altered ER+ tumors only have partial 
sensitivity to SERM/SERD compounds and combined inhibition of MEK or ERK with ER is 
superior to either alone in this group. This data along with older data on cooperativity of ER 
and MAPK in breast cancers is the basis for our consideration for combination therapy rather 
than single agent anti-estrogen or MEKi/ERKi in this population. 
Taken together, the emerging data on genomic alterations in hormone-resistant ER+ MBC 
point to a large population of patients with mutations leading to activation of the MAPK 
pathway and potentially causal of hormone resistance. Preclinical studies support the 
concept that targeting MEK or ERK kinase can synergize with antiestrogens in these cancers 
in blocking tumor proliferation. We do note the failure of a fulvestrant and selumetinib 
combination in postmenopausal patients18, however in an unselected population, MEK 
inhibition may predominantly have the effect of causing feedback induction of the PI3K 
pathway that is often activated in breast cancer.  Indeed, our preliminary data demonstrates 
a lack of activity for MEK inhibition in most breast cancers but markedly increased activity in 
those cancers that have activating mutations such as NF1 loss (Chandarlapaty lab, 
manuscript in prep). 
Given the wealth of clinical experience of safely combining antiestrogens with targeted 
therapies including many ATP competitive kinase inhibitors, untoward effects of combining 
fulvestrant and MEK inhibitors is not anticipated. At our institution, we have pioneered basket 
studies19–21 in which genomically or histologically selected vulnerable subpopulations are 
treated with selective targeted agents.  As we have identified a number of different genomic 
alterations promoting MAPK activation, we propose to study the effect of combined MEK 
inhibition with fulvestrant in three different classes of MAPK-altered tumors (RAS, RTK, and 
RAF/MEK) in a Phase 1/2 study. 
3.6 MAPK Pathway and MEK mutations as oncogenic drivers 
The activated, GTP-bound RAS (RAS–GTP) drives the formation of high-activity homodimers 
or heterodimers of the RAF protein kinases (ARAF, BRAF or CRAF), which directly 
phosphorylate and activate MEK1 and MEK2 (also known as MAPKK1 and MAPKK2). MEK1 
and MEK2 are dual-specificity kinases that activate ERK1 and ERK2 by phosphorylating 
them.  
 
Many human cancers harbor gain-of-function mutations in the genes encoding RAS, BRAF, 
CRAF, MEK1 or MEK2, which act as oncogenes driving deregulated activation of ERK1 and 
ERK2 signaling. In this way, MEK1 or MEK2 mutations can lead to inappropriate cell 
proliferation and survival in multiple cancers. In addition, MEK1 and MEK2 mutations have 
also been associated with the acquired resistance of BRAF V600E mutant tumors to 
RAF/MEK inhibitors. MEK1 and MEK2 have been validated as drug targets in cancer 
treatment.  
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 16 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
At the current time, MEK inhibitors are famously used in conjunction with RAF inhibitors, for 
example in BRAF mutant melanoma22 and in BRAF V600E mutated colorectal cancer23.  
Further, it is well-known that MEK1 mutations are sufficient to  cause resistance to MEK and 
BRAF inhibition in melanoma, showcasing that these tumors are MEK dependent24.  In 
addition to MEK1 mutations, additional upstream alterations in the MAPK pathway, including 
KRAS and NRAS mutations and amplification of BRAF V600E allele, are sufficient to cause 
activation of MEK and reduced efficacy of MEK inhibitors in these tumors25.   
While the groundwork for the use of MEK inhibitors in RAF driven tumors is now well 
established, the therapeutic potential of this class of drugs in treating solid tumors with 
MEK1/2 gain of function mutations is currently not known.  This clinical study seeks to utilize 
and study the utility of an ATP-dependent MEK inhibitor mirdametinib (PD-0325901) in the 
treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors harboring MEK1/2 mutations.  In the past 
two years, gain of function mutations in MEK1 and MEK2 have been categorized and divided 
into three classes based on their dependence on RAF activation and their sensitivity to MEK 
inhibition.  The use of MEK inhibition as monotherapy in these MEK1/2 mutant tumors 
remains an open question. 
 
There is a growing body of data showing that different MEK mutants are differentially 
sensitive to MEK inhibitors, and this sensitivity varies by class of MEK mutant4,25.  Class I 
MEK mutants, or RAF dependent MEK mutants, can be repressed either with MEK or ERK 
inhibitors.  These MEK mutants almost always coexist with upstream additional activating 
alterations in the MAPK pathway.  Strategies to target these alterations may lie in MEK 
inhibitor monotherapy or in dual therapy with MEK inhibitor with additional inhibition of the 
upstream activating node in the pathway.  Class II MEK mutants are RAF regulated, and 
these are sensitive to MEK inhibitors as well4.  There is additionally patient-level evidence of 
the above, in a colorectal cancer patient who developed resistance to cetuximab who 
developed a MEK1 K57T mutation, treatment with the MEK inhibitor trametinib led to a 
clinical response and a reduction in the allele frequency of MEK1 K57T26.  The delineation of 
these MEK alleles which are sensitive to MEK inhibition has now allowed for the rational 
design of a clinical trial only enrolling patients with sensitizing MEK1/2 alleles to be treated 
with an allosteric MEK inhibitor, mirdametinib. 
 
Notably, class III MEK mutant alleles are not sensitive to allosteric MEK inhibitors.  These 
alterations (typically in-frame deletions) constrain the MEK kinase in the “αC-in” 
conformation, reducing the binding affinity of allosteric MEK inhibitors.  This resistance to 
allosteric MEK inhibitors has been shown clinically, for example in a BRAF V601E colorectal 
cancer patient treated with the MEK inhibitor binimetinib and the EGFR anti-EGFR antibody 
panitumumab27.  This patient developed resistance to therapy after development of a MEK1 
V211D mutation, however this mutant remains sensitive to newer ATP-competitive MEK 
inhibitors.   
 
A deep understanding of the biology and the unique properties of this pathway is necessary 
to design and develop a well-reasoned clinical trial in this space.  Given the preclinical data 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 17 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
above, a significant fraction of which was developed at Memorial Sloan Kettering, we are well 
positioned to spearhead this trial using mirdametinib as monotherapy in advanced solid 
tumors harboring MEK1/2 mutations.  Further, we will simultaneously perform an integrated 
translational research plan in which we will focus on identifying mechanisms of primary and 
acquired resistance in mirdametinib in these oncogene-addicted tumors. In our experience, 
this has facilitated the development of multiple therapeutic strategies that can (1) 
dramatically extend clinical benefit and can (2) further elucidate the underlying biology of 
these tumors. We propose to leverage our clinical leadership of targeted therapies in the 
MAPK pathway to the development of mirdametinib in this clinical space.  Moreover, our 
expertise in cell biology, translational genomics, and principled computational analysis to 
define these mechanisms in future correlative work. 
3.7 Study Rationale 
This is an open-label, parallel-design platform study to evaluate mirdametinib (PD-0325901) 
as monotherapy or in combination with other anticancer agents in patients with advanced 
solid cancers that express the genomic alterations of the MAPK pathway. The first arm will 
enroll patients with the estrogen receptor (ER) positive metastatic breast cancer harboring 
the NF1 loss of function or other MAPK-activating mutations. The second arm will enroll 
patients with advanced solid cancers expressing MEK1 or MEK2 mutations. CRC, small 
bowel, biliary and ampullary cancers will be excluded from both arms.  
Rationale for Arm 1    
The current treatment paradigm in the management of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) 
typically offers endocrine therapy in conjunction with a CDK4/6 inhibitor as standard of care 
in the first-line setting. These patients inevitably progress and at this point in their disease 
trajectory, fulvestrant is commonly used as a second-line agent.  The second-line setting in 
this genomically selected population is an ideal fit for the combination of fulvestrant with 
mirdametinib in that we anticipate an acceptable side effect profile of the addition of 
mirdametinib to fulvestrant.  We will also recruit MBC patients further in their disease course 
who have received multiple previous lines of therapy. 
Taken together, the emerging data on genomic alterations in hormone-resistant ER+ MBC 
point to a large population of patients with mutations leading to activation of the MAPK 
pathway and potentially causal of hormone resistance. Preclinical studies support the 
concept that targeting MEK or ERK kinase can synergize with antiestrogens in these cancers 
in blocking tumor proliferation. We do note the failure of a fulvestrant and selumetinib 
combination in postmenopausal patients18, however in an unselected population, MEK 
inhibition may predominantly have the effect of causing feedback induction of the PI3K 
pathway that is often activated in breast cancer.  Indeed, our preliminary data demonstrates 
a lack of activity for MEK inhibition in most breast cancers but markedly increased activity in 
those cancers that have activating mutations such as NF1 loss (Chandarlapaty lab, 
manuscript in prep). 
 
Given the wealth of clinical experience of safely combining antiestrogens with targeted 
therapies including many ATP competitive kinase inhibitors, untoward effects of combining 
fulvestrant and MEK inhibitors is not anticipated. At our institution, we have pioneered 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 18 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
basket studies19–21 in which genomically or histologically selected vulnerable subpopulations 
are treated with selective targeted agents.  As we have identified a number of different 
genomic alterations promoting MAPK activation, we propose to study the effect of combined 
MEK inhibition with fulvestrant in three different classes of MAPK-altered tumors (RAS, RTK, 
and RAF/MEK) in a Phase 1/2 study. 
Rationale for Arm 2 
Downstream effectors of the MAPK pathway including MEK1 and MEK2 are targetable 
oncogenes that are mutated across a wide range of human cancers.  MEK mutants have 
recently been characterized and divided into three distinct classes.  Class 1 MEK alterations 
are RAF dependent and they increase ERK activation only in the setting of activated RAF.  
Class 2 RAF MEK alterations are RAF regulated and have some ERK activation at baseline, 
but with activated RAF the pathway output is activated further.  Class 3 MEK alterations 
activate the pathway in the absence of any upstream pathway activation.  We propose to 
investigate the utility of MEK inhibitor monotherapy utilizing mirdametinib in class 1 and class 
2 MEK1/2 mutant tumors in a Phase 1/2 study. 
We hypothesize that these MEK1 and MEK2 mutants may be targetable in a variety of solid 
tumors, therefore this arm of the protocol is designed as a basket study for any patient 
harboring a class 1 or class 2 MEK1 or MEK2 alteration regardless of computational pattern.  
Indeed, preclinical data suggests that class 1 mutations with additional upstream mutations 
are a hallmark of the RAF dependence of this class of MEK mutants.  Gastrointestinal 
malignancies will be largely excluded from this study given the prevalence of high levels of 
EGFR activation, and our prediction that adaptive feedback reactivation of EGFR-mediated 
reactivation of MAPK signaling will render monotherapy with a MEK inhibitor ineffective, as 
has been previously observed with BRAF V600E colorectal cancers28,29.  
 
 
4.0 
OVERVIEW OF STUDY DESIGN/INTERVENTION 
4.1 
Design 
This will be a Phase 1b / 2a open label, parallel design, platform study to evaluate the 
safety and tolerability, efficacy, PK and biomarkers of mirdametinib in two arms, 
where each arm will include two parts: 
 
 
Arm 1: mirdametinib in combination with fulvestrant in postmenopausal patients 
with estrogen receptor positive metastatic breast cancer harboring NF1 loss of 
function or another alteration of the MAPK pathway 
o Part 1: safety run-in (confirmation of the RP2D for mirdametinib in 
combination with the standard recommended dose of fulvestrant). This 
part may include the mirdametinib dose de-escalation according to the 3+3 
design if necessary 
o Part 2: dose expansion cohorts where the mirdametinib RP2D will be 
administered in combination with the standard recommended dose of 
fulvestrant 
 
Arm 2: mirdametinib as single agent in adult patients with advanced solid cancers 
driven by the alteration of the MAPK pathway 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 19 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
o Part 1: mirdametinib dose escalation to MTD or RP2D according to the 
3+3 design 
o Part 2: dose expansion cohorts  
 
4.2 
Intervention 
Study Periods 
Each subject will undergo 3 periods (screening, treatment, and post-study follow-up). 
Screening 
The screening period will be from the signing of the informed consent until the first dose of 
the first study drug on Day 1 of Cycle 1 (C1D1). The screening period should not exceed 28 
calendar days before C1D1. 
Treatment 
A treatment cycle lasts 28 days. The treatment period will be from the first dose of the first 
study drug until the last dose of the last study drug. 
The treatment will continue until the disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, 
withdrawal of consent, or another reason for permanent discontinuation of treatment.  
Patients with documented progression of disease may be allowed to continue on study if the 
patient is tolerating treatment, and in the opinion of the investigator, the patient is deriving 
clinical benefit from continuing study treatment and continuation of treatment is approved by 
the principal investigator. If said patient continues treatment post progression, they will 
require reconsent. 
Dose levels of mirdametinib are summarized in section 10.2.  
Post-study Follow-up 
The post-study follow-up will include the end of treatment (EoT) visit, the safety follow-up 
visit, and the long-term follow-up.  
An End of Treatment (EoT) visit will be performed within 7-14 days after the administration of 
the last dose of the last study drug.   
The safety follow-up (FU) visit will be performed 30 days after the last dose of the last study 
drug treatment (except for subjects who died, withdrew consent, and objected to further data 
collection or were lost to follow up). The safety FU assessment can be done via the clinic 
visit (recommended) or via a phone call (if subject cannot attend the clinic visit or has started 
a new anti-cancer treatment). The investigator may order unscheduled FU visits after the 30-
day safety FU visit if the adverse events ongoing at the safety FU are deemed to be clinically 
significant and related to the study drug(s).  
The long-term follow-up will aim to obtain the information necessary for the duration of 
response (DOR) and the progression-free survival (PFS) endpoints. The long-term follow-up 
visits will be performed via clinic visit or phone call about every 3 months for 12 months 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 20 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
after the last dose of the last study drug (except for subjects who died, withdrew consent and 
objected to further data collection or were lost to follow up).   
There will be no formal assessment of the overall survival in this study. 
Arm 1 - Part 1 (Safety Run-in of Mirdametinib in Combination with Fulvestrant) 
If permitted by the acceptable safety profile of mirdametinib 4 mg BID in combination with the 
standard recommended dose of fulvestrant, the Part 1 in Arm 1 of the study will be 
conducted as a single dose level.  Patients with any MAPK pathway activating alteration as 
listed in section 6.1 will be included in this safety run-in, however patients harboring NF1 loss 
of function mutations will be prioritized, at the discretion of the principal investigator.    
If mirdametinib 4 mg BID in combination with the standard recommended dose of fulvestrant 
is not tolerated well in the initial Dose Level, then a Dose Level de-escalation will be 
evaluated with mirdametinib 2 mg BID in combination with the standard recommended dose 
of fulvestrant. The Dose Level de-escalation will be evaluated according to the 3+3 design 
based on the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and the overall safety profile of the 
study treatments. The DLT definitions are listed in Section 15.3.  
At each step of the 3+3 design, the investigators will review all available safety and PK data 
at the current dose level and decide about the appropriate next step. The subjects will 
become evaluable for the 3+3 decisions if they complete Cycle 1 and receive at least 80% of 
doses at their assigned mirdametinib doses and all of their fulvestrant doses, or if they exhibit 
a DLT in Cycle 1.   
Dose Selection: We note that the dosing of mirdametinib in the most recent phase II trial6 is 
2 mg/m2 twice daily, which translates to 4 mg twice daily in an adult population. However, the 
aforementioned study used an intermittent 3 weeks on / 1 week off schedule. This protocol is 
slightly different in that we are initiating a continuous dosing schedule of mirdametinib rather 
than intermittent. We believe that this schedule remains quite safe given that this dose is far 
below the MTD (15 mg BID) at which intermittent dosing was necessary to avoid toxicity.  
More specifically, continuous dosing of mirdametinib was utilized at doses ranging from 10 
mg BID to 20 mg BID in advanced cancer but transitioned to alternative intermittent 
schedules following the occurrence of 2 events of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) at 10 mg BID 
and 15 mg BID on the continuous schedule. Subsequent analysis of relevant visual adverse 
events found predisposing risk factors for retinopathy in both subjects experiencing an RVO. 
Notably, as mentioned previously, the next dose and schedule evaluated was both 
significantly dose reduced (2 mg/m2 BID; maximum dose 4 mg BID) and given on an 
intermittent schedule (3 weeks on, 1 week off). As a result, an evaluation of mirdametinib at 
doses between 2 mg/m2 – 10 mg/m2 on a continuous basis has not been performed leaving a 
wide gap in the safety and tolerability information of this agent. Further, on the 
aforementioned study above (4 mg BID dosing) showed general good tolerability (see 
section 3) with no RVOs reported.  
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 21 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
Last, we also note the low likelihood of interaction between fulvestrant and mirdametinib as 
their toxicity profiles are orthogonal, and fulvestrant is generally extremely well tolerated.  
Due to the knowledge gained in this retrospective review, the implementation of screening for 
RVO risk factors prior to the initiation of mirdametinib therapy and the class experience of 
other MEK inhibitors administered on a continuous schedule, we propose the evaluation of 
mirdametinib beginning at 4 mg BID, on a continuous schedule in a controlled clinical trial 
setting. To ensure that the dose selected is feasible, tolerable, and beneficial, we are 
planning a phase 1 dose escalation in standard 3+3 design. However, to be conservative 
with this clinical trial design, in addition to dose de-escalation, we additionally have added 
intermittent dose dosing levels on mirdametinib de-escalation, in the case that continuous 
dosing is poorly tolerated.    
The starting dose of mirdametinib in combination with fulvestrant in each Dose Level will be 
as follows: 
 
Dose Level 1: mirdametinib 4 mg BID PO + fulvestrant 
 
(Only to be triggered pending DLTs on higher Dose Levels as described below)  
o Dose Level -2: mirdametinib 2 mg BID PO continuous + fulvestrant, and Dose 
Level -2INT: mirdametinib 2 mg BID PO on 3 weeks on, 1 week off + 
fulvestrant 
The 3+3 decisions in Part 1 of Arm 1 will be made as follows. 
1. Mirdametinib starting dose Dose Level 1 (4 mg BID PO given continuously) 
a. Up to 3 subjects will be treated with mirdametinib 4 mg BID PO given 
continuously in combination with the recommended dose of fulvestrant.  
b. If ≤1 of the first 3 evaluable subjects in Dose Level 1 exhibit a DLT in Cycle 1, 
then Dose Level 1 will be expanded (see #2 below). 
c. Mirdametinib dose in combination with fulvestrant will not be escalated above 
the 4 mg BID dose level. 
2. Dose Level 1 expansion: 
a. A sufficient number of subjects will be treated with mirdametinib 4 mg BID PO 
given continuously in combination with the recommended dose of fulvestrant 
to accrue 6 evaluable subjects. 
b. If ≤1 of 6 evaluable subjects in the starting Dose Level exhibit a DLT in Cycle 
1, then mirdametinib 4 mg BID PO given continuously will be declared as the 
recommended dose for Part 2 (RP2D) in combination with fulvestrant. 
c. If ≥2 of the first 3 evaluable subjects or ≥2 of the 6 evaluable subjects in Dose 
Level 1 exhibit a DLT in Cycle 1, then the mirdametinib dose will be de-
escalated (see #3 below, Dose Level -2).  
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 22 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
3. Mirdametinib Dose Level -2 (de-escalation Dose Level at 2 mg BID PO given 
continuously) 
a. Up to 3 subjects will be treated with mirdametinib 2 mg BID PO given 
continuously in combination with the recommended dose of fulvestrant in 
Dose Level -2   
b. If 1 of the first 3 evaluable subjects in Dose Level -2 exhibit a DLT in Cycle 1, 
then a sufficient number of subjects will be treated with mirdametinib 2 mg BID 
PO given continuously in combination with the recommended dose of 
fulvestrant to accrue 6 evaluable subjects. 
c. If ≤1 of 6 evaluable subjects in Dose Level -2 exhibit a DLT in Cycle 1, then 
mirdametinib 2 mg BID PO given continuously will be declared as the 
recommended dose for Part 2 (RP2D) in combination with fulvestrant. 
d. If ≥2 of the first 3 evaluable subjects or ≥2 of the 6 evaluable subjects in Dose 
Level -2 exhibit a DLT in Cycle 1, then the Arm 1 will be further de-escalated 
(see #4 below).  
4. Mirdametinib Dose Level -2INT (de-escalation Dose Level at 2 mg BID PO on a 3 
weeks on, 1 week off schedule) 
a. Up to 3 subjects will be treated with mirdametinib 2 mg BID PO given 
intermittently in combination with the recommended dose of fulvestrant in 
Dose Level -2INT   
b. If 1 of the first 3 evaluable subjects in Dose Level -2INT exhibit a DLT in Cycle 
1, then a sufficient number of subjects will be treated with mirdametinib 2 mg 
BID PO, intermittently dosed, in combination with the recommended dose of 
fulvestrant to accrue 6 evaluable subjects. 
c. If ≤1 of 6 evaluable subjects in Dose Level -2INT exhibit a DLT in Cycle 1, 
then mirdametinib 2 mg BID PO, intermittently dosed, will be declared as the 
recommended dose for Part 2 (RP2D) in combination with fulvestrant. 
d. If ≥2 of the first 3 evaluable subjects or ≥2 of the 6 evaluable subjects in Dose 
Level -2 exhibit a DLT in Cycle 1, then the Arm 1 will be discontinued. The 
reason for discontinuation of Arm 1 will be that 2 mg BID PO, dosed 
intermittently, is deemed to be the minimum dose required for sufficient clinical 
benefit from mirdametinib in combination with fulvestrant in the refractory 
metastatic breast cancer.  
Arm 1 - Part 2 (Expansion Cohorts) 
The following expansion treatment groups (up to 28 subjects each). Both cohorts are 
planned and the rationale for sample size is included in section 14.5. These will initially be 
started, either in parallel or sequentially depending on the results of Part 1: 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 23 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
1. Subjects with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer 
exhibiting NF1 loss defined as homozygous deletion of NF1 by NGS assay; 
truncating or nonsense mutations in NF1; OncoKB defined pathogenic missense 
mutation; OncoKB defined activating mutation in KRAS or HRAS. 
2. Subjects with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer 
exhibiting EGFR amplification defined as >1.9 copies of EGFR by NGS assay; 
ERBB2 hotspot somatic mutation defined as activating by OncoKB. 
The above expansion treatment groups are prioritized for this study, however as an 
exploratory treatment group to be considered in the future is the following cohort:  
1. Subjects with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast       
cancer exhibiting OncoKB defined activating mutations in BRAF, CRAF, or 
MEK1/2 
Arm 2 – Part 1 (Dose escalation of mirdametinib as single agent) 
Part 1 will be conducted in three sequential Dose Level escalations according to the 3+3 
design based on the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and the overall safety profile 
of the study treatments. The DLT definitions are listed in Section 15.3.  
At each step of the 3+3 design, the investigators will review all available safety and PK data 
in the current Dose Level and decide about the appropriate next step. The subjects will 
become evaluable for the 3+3 decisions if they complete Cycle 1 and receive at least 80% of 
assigned drug doses, or if they exhibit a DLT in Cycle 1.   
The starting dose of mirdametinib as single agent in each Dose Level escalation will be as 
follows: 
 
Dose Level 1: mirdametinib 4 mg BID PO, given continuously 
 
Dose Level 2: mirdametinib 6 mg BID PO, given continuously 
 
Dose Level 3: mirdametinib 8 mg BID PO, given continuously 
 
The de-escalation (Dose Level -1) may evaluate mirdametinib 3 mg BID given 
continuously, and (Dose Level -1INT) may evaluate mirdametinib 3 mg BID given 
on a 3 weeks on, 1 week off schedule. These de-escalation Dose Levels will be 
evaluated at investigator’s discretion after the higher dose of mirdametinib is not 
tolerated. The de-escalation Dose Levels will be started only if the benefit-risk ratio is 
acceptable at the investigator’s opinion.    
The 3+3 decisions in Part 1 of Arm 2 will be made as follows. 
1. Dose Level 1 (mirdametinib 4 mg BID PO given continuously) 
a. Up to 3 subjects will be treated with mirdametinib as single agent at the dose 
of 4 mg BID PO given continuously.  
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 24 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
b. If 1 of the first 3 evaluable subjects in Dose Level 1 exhibit a DLT in Cycle 1, 
then Dose Level 1 will be expanded (see #2 below) 
c. If 0 of the first 3 evaluable subjects in Dose Level 1 exhibit a DLT in Cycle 1, 
then the dose of mirdametinib as single agent will be escalated to Dose Level 
2 (6 mg BID given continuously) (see #4 below) 
2. Dose Level 1 expansion: 
a. A sufficient number of subjects will be treated with mirdametinib as single 
agent at the dose of 4 mg BID PO given continuously to accrue 6 evaluable 
subjects. 
b. If ≤1 of 6 evaluable subjects in the starting Dose Level exhibit a DLT in Cycle 
1, then then the dose of mirdametinib as single agent will be escalated to 
Dose Level 2 (6 mg BID given continuously) (see #5 below). 
c. If ≥2 of the first 3 evaluable subjects or ≥2 of the 6 evaluable subjects in Dose 
Level 1 exhibit a DLT in Cycle 1, then the mirdametinib dose will be de-
escalated (see #3 below). 
3. Dose Level -1 (de-escalation Dose Level 3 mg BID PO given continuously) 
a. Up to 3 subjects will be treated with mirdametinib as a single agent at the 
dose of 3 mg BID PO in Dose Level -1   
b. If ≤1 of the first 3 evaluable subjects in Dose Level -1 exhibit a DLT in Cycle 1, 
then a sufficient number of subjects will be treated with mirdametinib 3 mg 
BID PO given continuously to accrue 6 evaluable subjects. 
c. If ≤1 of 6 evaluable subjects in Dose Level -1 exhibit a DLT in Cycle 1, then 
mirdametinib 3 mg BID PO given continuously will be declared as the 
recommended dose for Part 2 (RP2D). 
d. If ≥2 of the first 3 evaluable subjects or ≥2 of the 6 evaluable subjects in the 
de-escalation Dose Level exhibit a DLT in Cycle 1, then the Arm 2 will be 
further de-escalated (see #4 below).  
4. Dose Level -1INT (de-escalation Dose Level 3 mg BID PO on a 3 weeks on, 1 week 
off schedule) 
a. Up to 3 subjects will be treated with mirdametinib as a single agent at the 
dose of 3 mg BID PO intermittently in Dose Level -1INT   
b. If ≤1 of the first 3 evaluable subjects in Dose Level -1INT exhibit a DLT in 
Cycle 1, then a sufficient number of subjects will be treated with mirdametinib 
3 mg BID PO intermittently to accrue 6 evaluable subjects. 
c. If ≤1 of 6 evaluable subjects in Dose Level -1INT exhibit a DLT in Cycle 1, 
then mirdametinib 3 mg BID PO intermittently will be declared as the 
recommended dose for Part 2 (RP2D). 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 25 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
d. If ≥2 of the first 3 evaluable subjects or ≥2 of the 6 evaluable subjects in the 
de-escalation Dose Level exhibit a DLT in Cycle 1, then the Arm 2 will be 
discontinued. The reason for discontinuation of Arm 2 would be that 3 mg BID 
PO intermittently is deemed to be the minimum dose required for sufficient 
clinical benefit from mirdametinib as single agent in the refractory advanced 
cancer.   
5. Dose Level 2 (Dose Level escalation 6 mg BID PO given continuously) 
a. Up to 3 subjects will be treated with mirdametinib as a single agent at the 
dose of 6 mg BID PO given continuously in Dose Level 2   
b. If ≤1 of the first 3 evaluable subjects in Dose Level 2 exhibit a DLT in Cycle 1, 
then a sufficient number of subjects will be treated with mirdametinib 6 mg BID 
PO given continuously to accrue 6 evaluable subjects. 
c. If ≤1 of 6 evaluable subjects in Dose Level 2 exhibit a DLT in Cycle 1, then the 
dose of mirdametinib as single agent will be escalated to Dose Level 3 (8 mg 
BID given continuously) (see #6 below). 
d. If ≥2 of the first 3 evaluable subjects or ≥2 of the 6 evaluable subjects in Dose 
Level 2 exhibit a DLT in Cycle 1, then mirdametinib 4 mg BID PO given 
continuously will be declared as the recommended dose for Part 2 (RP2D).   
6. Dose Level 3 (Dose Level escalation 8 mg BID PO given continuously) 
a. Up to 3 subjects will be treated with mirdametinib as a single agent at the 
dose of 8 mg BID PO in Dose Level 3   
b. If ≤1 of the first 3 evaluable subjects in Dose Level 3 exhibit a DLT in Cycle 1, 
then a sufficient number of subjects will be treated with mirdametinib 8 mg BID 
PO given continuously to accrue 6 evaluable subjects. 
c. If ≤1 of 6 evaluable subjects in Dose Level 3 exhibit a DLT in Cycle 1, then 
mirdametinib 8 mg BID PO given continuously will be declared as the 
recommended dose for Part 2 (RP2D). 
d. If ≥2 of the first 3 evaluable subjects or ≥2 of the 6 evaluable subjects in Dose 
Level 3 exhibit a DLT in Cycle 1, then mirdametinib 6 mg BID PO given 
continuously will be declared as the recommended dose for Part 2 (RP2D).   
e. The dose of mirdametinib as single agent will not be escalated above 8 mg 
BID PO given continuously. 
Arm 2 – Part 2 (expansion cohorts for mirdametinib as single agent) 
One or more expansion cohorts (up to 30 subjects each) will be started, either in parallel or 
sequentially depending on the results of Part 1. The purpose will be to evaluate the efficacy 
and safety of the RP2D of mirdametinib as single agent (as determined in Part 1 of Arm 2) in 
the subjects with advanced solid cancers (with the exception of colorectal, small bowel, 
biliary and ampullary cancers) harboring activating mutations in MEK1/2.   
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 26 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
 
In the dose escalation portion of part 2, we anticipate accruing both class 1 and class 2 MEK 
alterations.  Both of these MEK alteration types are seen commonly and when mature, this 
dose escalation cohort will comprise patients harboring both mutation types.  However, we 
cannot anticipate the order of accrual on this cohort.  If a clear preponderance of one MEK 
alteration type is accrued first and promising activity is seen, then that expansion cohort will 
be opened initially, and the other expansion cohort will be opened later, pending clinical 
activity.  If, on the other hand, both class 1 and class 2 MEK alterations accrue at equal rates 
and promising clinical activity is observed for both alteration types, these will expansion 
cohorts will open in parallel. 
 
The following expansion treatment groups (up to 30 subjects each) will initially be started, 
either in parallel or sequentially depending on the efficacy and safety results of Part 1: 
1. Class 1 MEK1/2 alterations. 
2. Class 2 MEK1/2 alterations. 
 
5.0 
THERAPEUTIC/DIAGNOSTIC AGENTS & NON-THERAPEUTIC 
ASSESSMENTS 
5.1 Mirdametinib 
This study utilizes the investigational agent PD-0325901 (mirdametinib) to be supplied by 
SpringWorks.  The IND # for PD-0325901 (mirdametinib) is 139883 (Neurofibromatosis Type 
1).  
 
On January 19, 2018, SpringWorks Subsidiary 3, PBC (SpringWorks) accepted an IND 
transfer and agreed to assume all sponsor and regulatory responsibilities for IND 066809 
(Cancer) and drug product, PD-0325901, previously held by Pfizer. 
 
Only subjects enrolled in the study, who meet study entry criteria (Sections 6.1 and 6.2) may 
receive study treatment. Only authorized Site personnel may supply or administer study 
treatment.  
Treatment Name 
Mirdametinib (PD-0325901)  
Type  
Drug  
Dose Formulation 
Capsule 
Unit Dose Strength(s) 
1 mg and 2 mg 
Dosage Level(s) 
See the planned doses for each Dose Level escalation (Section 
4.2) 
Route of 
Administration 
Oral 
Frequency of 
Administration 
Twice daily (BID) 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 27 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
Sourcing 
SpringWorks will provide MSK with mirdametinib for individual 
subject distribution. 
Packaging and 
Labeling 
Mirdametinib will be provided in 75 count bottles. Each bottle will 
be labeled as required per country requirement. 
Former Names 
PD-0325901-00, PD-0325901-0000, PF-00192513-00 
 
Preparation: 
 
Mirdametinib does not require special preparation by pharmacy personnel prior to 
dispensing to subjects. 
 
Mirdametinib will be supplied as hard gelatin capsules (1- and 2-mg) for oral 
administration. 
 
Mirdametinib will be packaged in high-density polyethylene bottles.  
 
Subjects will be instructed to keep their mirdametinib in the original bottles and not 
transfer it to any secondary containers. 
 
Handling: 
 
No special handling of mirdametinib is required. 
 
Storage: 
 
Mirdametinib must be stored at 15°C to 25°C (59°F to 77°F).  
 
The Investigator must confirm appropriate temperature conditions have been 
maintained during transit for all mirdametinib received and any discrepancies are 
reported and resolved before use of the study treatment. 
 
All mirdametinib must be stored in a secure, environmentally controlled, and 
monitored (manual or automated) area in accordance with the labeled storage 
conditions with access limited to the investigator and authorized site staff. 
 
Accountability: 
 
The Investigator or designee is responsible for mirdametinib accountability, 
reconciliation, and record maintenance (i.e., receipt, reconciliation, and final 
disposition records). 
 
Subjects will be instructed not to dispose of any mirdametinib treatment bottles, and 
to bring all bottles (used and unused) back to the site at every visit. 
 
Accountability will be performed by site personnel at each dispensing visit as 
described in the SoA (Section 11). If issues with the subject’s compliance with 
mirdametinib are detected, subjects will be re-educated about the importance of 
following the prescribed dosing regimen. 
 
Returned mirdametinib will not be re-dispensed to the subjects.  
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 28 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
5.2 Fulvestrant (Faslodex) 
Fulvestrant will be administered in Arm 1 by intramuscular (IM) injection at the dose and 
regimen approved by the FDA for the treatment of ER-positive metastatic breast cancer 
(500mg on Day 1 and Day 15 of Cycle 1 and on Day 1 of all subsequent cycles).  
Fulvestrant is supplied as two 5 mL clear neutral glass (Type 1) barrels, each containing 250 
mg/5 mL of Fulvestrant solution for intramuscular injection and fitted with a tamper evident 
closure. The single-dose prefilled syringes are presented in a tray with polystyrene plunger 
rod and safety needles (SafetyGlide™) for connection to the barrel. Discard each syringe 
after use. If a patient dose requires only one syringe, unused syringe should be stored as 
directed below.  
Storage: REFRIGERATE, 2°-8°C (36°-46°F). TO PROTECT FROM LIGHT, STORE IN THE 
ORIGINAL CARTON UNTIL TIME OF USE. 
Refer to the package insert for additional details regarding Fulvestrant administration. 
5.3 FDA Application 
This study utilizes the investigational agent PD-0325901 (mirdametinib) to be supplied by 
SpringWorks.  The IND # for PD-0325901 (mirdametinib) is 139883 (Neurofibromatosis Type 
1) and 066809 (Cancer). Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center will submit a Cross 
Reference Application to the FDA for the investigational use of PD-0325901 (mirdametinib) 
as monotherapy and in combination with fulvestrant.  
 
6.0 
CRITERIA FOR PARTICIPANT ELIGIBILITY 
Eligible patients must meet all of the inclusion criteria and cannot meet any of the exclusion 
criteria before the start of treatment.  
Where applicable, the CTCAE V.5.0 classification should be used to interpret the severity 
grades used as limits for eligibility. 
6.1 
Participant Inclusion Criteria 
Subjects are eligible to start the treatment in the study only if all of the following criteria apply: 
Arm 1 (metastatic breast cancer): 
 
Female adults (≥18 years of age on the date of informed consent) 
 
Postmenopausal or receiving ovarian suppression (including GnRH agonists such as 
goserelin) 
 
Histologically confirmed hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer with 
evidence of progression on at least 1 prior line of therapy for metastatic disease 
which should have included a CDK4/6 inhibitor in combination with endocrine 
therapy. Prior chemotherapy is permitted. 
 
ER+ as defined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) ≥1% by local laboratory testing (as 
per the ASCO-CAP guidelines) 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 29 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
 
HER2-negative, as defined by the negative in situ hybridization test (FISH, CISH, or 
SISH) or an IHC status of 0, 1+ or 2+ by local laboratory testing. If IHC is 2+ (i.e. 
indeterminate), then a negative in situ hybridization test (FISH, CISH, or SISH) is 
required (as per the ASCO-CAP guidelines). 
 
NF1 loss of function or another MAPK-activating genomic alteration documented by a 
CLIA-certified NGS assay at any time before the start of treatment. Note: archival 
tissue, if available and collected within 6 months of enrollment, may be used for this 
testing in lieu of fresh tissue. 
 
Arm 2 (advanced solid cancers): 
 
Male or female adults (≥18 years of age on the date of informed consent) 
 
Histologically confirmed advanced, metastatic solid tumor cancer for which there is no 
available therapy known to confer clinical benefit. Colorectal, anal, small bowel, biliary 
or ampullary cancers are not eligible. 
 
Class 1 or class 2 MEK1 or MEK2 mutations, as described below, documented by a 
CLIA-certified NGS assay at any time before the start of treatment.  Class 3 MEK1 or 
MEK2 mutations as described in that paper are excluded.  A complete list of the 
mutations allowed based on that paper can be found below, however, rare mutations 
not listed in this table may be permitted at the discretion of the principal investigator 
of the study. Note: archival tissue, if available and collected within 6 months of 
enrollment, may be used for this testing in lieu of fresh tissue.  
 
Class 1 – Permitted 
Class 2 – Permitted 
Class 3 - Excluded 
MEK1 D67N 
MEK1 K57N 
MEK1 L98-I103 
MEK1 P124L 
MEK1 C121S 
MEK1 I99-K104 
MEK1 P124S 
MEK1 F53L 
MEK1 E102-I103 
 
MEK1 Q56P 
 
 
The permitted mutations shown above are for MEK1.  MEK1 and MEK2 are closely related, 
are structurally similar, share 79% amino acid identity, and they share equal ability to 
phosphylate their ERK substrates30.  While the experiments performed above classify 
individual MEK1 mutations only, the class 3 mutations in MEK1 all share in-frame deletions 
that remove a potent negative regulatory element of MEK1.  These are easily distinguishable 
from other mutations in MEK1.  Therefore, the identification of exclusionary class 3 MEK2 
alterations will be straightforward as well, with paralogous mutant residues in MEK1 and 
MEK2 defined in the manuscript above.  A table showing the permitted enrolling paralogous 
class 1 and class 2 residues are shown in the table below, again with the caveat that rare 
mutations in MEK2 not listed in the table below may be eligible at the discretion of the 
principal investigator. 
 
MEK1 
MEK2 
F53 
F57 
Q56 
Q60 
K57 
K61 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 30 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
V60 
V64 
D67 
D71 
C121 
C125 
P124 
P128 
Y130 
Y134 
E203 
E207 
 
All Arms: 
 
Patient (or Legally Authorized Representative [LAR]) must sign written informed 
consent form before any study-specific procedure is performed 
 
ECOG performance score of 0 or 1 
 
Life expectancy of ≥3 months 
 
At least one tumor lesion measurable by RECIST 1.1. A lesion in a previously 
irradiated area may be considered as measurable disease if there is objective 
evidence of progression of the lesion by RECIST 1.1 (Eisenhauer EA et al, 2009) 
between the prior radiotherapy and the screening CT or MRI scan.  
 
Adequate bone marrow function at screening, as determined by: 
o Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >1,500/mm3 (CTCAE Grade ≤1) 
o Platelet count >100,000 mm³ 
o Hemoglobin >9.0 mg/dL  
 
Adequate kidney function at screening, as determined by 
o Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >60 mL/min/1.73 m2 calculated by 
the CKD-EPI equation (CTCAE Grade ≤ 1). 
 
Adequate hepatic function at screening, as determined by: 
o Total bilirubin ≤1.5 x ULN if baseline was normal or ≤1.5 x baseline if baseline 
was abnormal (CTCAE Grade ≤1). Patients with previously documented 
Gilbert’s Syndrome may have total bilirubin ≤3 x ULN.  
o AST ≤3.0 x ULN if baseline was normal or ≤3.0 x baseline if baseline was 
abnormal (CTCAE Grade ≤1). 
o ALT ≤3.0 x ULN if baseline was normal or ≤3.0 x baseline if baseline was 
abnormal (CTCAE Grade ≤1). 
 
Adequate coagulation function at screening, as determined by: 
o INR ≤1.5 x ULN if not on anticoagulant therapy or >1.5 x baseline if on 
anticoagulant therapy (CTCAE Grade ≤1). If the patient receives anticoagulant 
therapy, the dose must be stable for at least 2 weeks before the start of 
treatment. 
o PTT ≤1.5 x ULN 
 
Adequate cardiac function at screening, as determined by: 
o Systolic blood pressure <150 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure <90 mmHg 
(CTCAE Grade ≤1). 
Note: Anti-hypertensive medications are permitted, and if a patient does not 
meet these eligibility criteria at time of screening, treatment with additional 
anti-hypertensive agents is permissible at the discretion of the investigator, 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 31 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
and blood pressure can be rechecked at a subsequent visit.  Measured blood 
pressures that fall out of this range after screening do not render patients 
ineligible, however every effort should be made to medically manage these 
elevated blood pressures at the investigator’s discretion. 
o LVEF ≥50% by MUGA or ECHO. 
o No clinically significant ECG waveform abnormalities at the investigator’s 
discretion 
o QTcF ≤470 ms  
 
Adequate serum lipid profile at screening, as determined by 
o Serum cholesterol <300 mg/dL 
o Serum triglycerides <300 mg/dL 
 
Adequate glycemic control at screening, as determined by 
o Fasting blood glucose <140 mg/dL or 
o Random blood glucose <250 mg/dL 
Note: Anti-hyperglycemic medications are permitted if a patient does not meet 
these eligibility criteria at time of screening.  Blood glucose measurements that fall 
out of this range do not render patients ineligible, and appropriate glycemic 
control at subsequent visits is at the discretion of the investigator.   
 
Blood calcium and phosphate levels within normal levels per institutional lab standard 
at screening (calcium level may be corrected for albumin at the investigator’s 
discretion) 
 
Adequate ophthalmological exam in both eyes at screening, as determined by 
o Intraocular pressure ≤21 mmHg 
o No clinically significant abnormalities on the ocular tomography (OCT), 
including no evidence of ocular abnormality that would be considered a 
significant risk factor for central serous retinopathy, retinal vein occlusion 
(RVO), or neovascular macular degeneration (mild and controlled / stable age-
related macular degeneration may be acceptable at the investigator’s 
discretion). 
 
Able and willing to comply with all aspects of the protocol 
Contraception and Pregnancy Testing 
Arm 1 (ER-positive metastatic breast cancer): 
 
Not applicable (subjects must be female and postmenopausal or receiving ovarian 
suppression) 
Arm 2 (advanced solid cancers with MEK1 or MEK2 mutations): 
 
Male subjects must agree to the following during the treatment period and for at least 
6 months after the last dose of study treatment:  
o 
Refrain from donating sperm 
AND either: 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 32 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
o 
Be abstinent from heterosexual intercourse as their preferred and usual 
lifestyle (abstinent on a long term and persistent basis) and agree to remain 
abstinent  
OR 
o Must agree to use a male condom when having sexual intercourse with a 
woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP).  
 
Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must  
o Have a negative pregnancy test at screening and within 72 hours before the 
start of treatment 
AND 
o 
Must agree to use a contraceptive method that is highly effective during the 
treatment period and for at least 6 months after the last dose of study 
treatment. Suitable methods of contraception are described in Section 11.5 
AND 
o 
Must agree not to donate eggs (ova, oocytes) for the purpose of reproduction 
during the study and for a period of 6 months after last dose of study 
treatment. 
6.2 
Participant Exclusion Criteria 
Subjects are excluded from the study if any of the following criteria apply: 
Medical and surgical history 
 
History of HIV with the following exceptions: 
o Patients with CD4+ T-cell (CD4+) counts ≥ 350 cells/uL  
 
History of AIDS-defining opportunistic infection with the following exceptions:  
o Patients without opportunistic infection within the past 12 months 
o Patients on prophylactic antimicrobials unless the specific antimicrobial 
drug(s) has an interaction or overlapping toxicity with the proposed treatment 
as determined by the investigator   
 
History of active Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C infection at screening with the following 
exceptions: 
o Patients with Hepatitis B on a suppressive antiviral therapy 
o Patients with Hepatitis C who have completed curative antiviral treatment and 
have an undetectable viral load 
 
History (within 5 years) or current evidence of neoplastic disease other than the 
cancer under study, except cervical carcinoma in situ, superficial noninvasive bladder 
tumors, curatively treated Stage I-II non-melanoma skin cancer, or any other previous 
cancer curatively treated <5 years before the start of treatment. 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 33 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
 
Current evidence of untreated/unstable symptomatic primary CNS tumor, 
metastases, leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, or spinal cord compression. Exception: 
Patients are eligible if neurological symptoms are stable for 14 days prior to the first 
treatment dose and no CNS surgery or radiation has been performed for 28 days, or 
14 days of SRS.    
 
Current evidence of CTCAE Grade >1 toxicity before the start of treatment, except for 
hair loss.  
o Subjects with Grade 2 neuropathy may be eligible at the investigator’s 
discretion. 
 
History or current evidence of ocular abnormalities on ophthalmologic examination 
that would be considered a risk factor for central serous retinopathy, RVO or 
neovascular macular degeneration (mild and controlled age-related macular 
degeneration may be acceptable at the investigator’s discretion) 
 
Current evidence of incomplete recovery from surgery or radiotherapy at screening or 
planned major surgery or radiotherapy during the treatment. Minor elective surgery 
may be acceptable at the investigator’s discretion.  
 
History or current evidence of significant (CTCAE Grade ≥2) infection or wound within 
2 weeks before the start of treatment. 
 
History or current evidence of significant cardiovascular disease within 6 months 
before the start of treatment. This includes, but may not be  limited to: unstable 
angina, new-onset angina, myocardial infarction, arterial thrombosis, pulmonary 
embolism, CVI/TIA/stroke, pericarditis (any CTCAE grade), pericardial effusion 
(CTCAE Grade ≥2), non-malignant pleural effusion (CTCAE Grade ≥2), malignant 
pleural effusion (CTCAE Grade ≥3), congestive heart failure (NYHA Class II - IV) or 
cardiac arrhythmia requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy, except the following  
o Subjects receiving digoxin, calcium channel blockers, or beta-adrenergic 
blockers may be eligible at the investigator’s discretion if the dose has been 
stable for ≥2 weeks before the start of treatment.  
o Subjects with sinus arrhythmia and infrequent premature ventricular 
contractions may be eligible at the investigator’s discretion. 
 
History or current evidence of malabsorption syndrome, major surgical GI resection or 
other GI conditions that may impair absorption of mirdametinib 
 
Known or suspected hypersensitivity or allergy to any of the study drugs or excipients 
contained in the study drug formulations. In addition, allergy to other medications or 
other type of hypersensitivity may warrant exclusion at the investigator’s discretion. 
 
Female subjects who are pregnant or breastfeeding. 
 
History or current evidence of any other medical or psychiatric condition or addictive 
disorder, or laboratory abnormality that, in the opinion of the investigator, may 
increase the risks associated with study participation, or require treatments that may 
interfere with the conduct of the study or the interpretation of study results.  
 
Prior or concomitant treatments 
 
Prior therapy with mirdametinib or any other MEK1/2 inhibitor (e.g., selumetinib, 
trametinib, cobimetinib, binimetinib) at any time before the start of treatment 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 34 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
 
Prior systemic any anti-cancer therapy within five half-lives or two weeks (whichever 
is shorter), excluding hormonal therapy for metastatic breast cancer, before the start 
of treatment. 
 
Prior radiotherapy to the orbital region at any time before the start of treatment 
 
Prior radiotherapy to tumor lesion(s) that will be chosen as target lesions within 4 
weeks before the start of treatment, unless the lesion(s) exhibited objective 
progression between the prior radiotherapy and the screening CT or MRI scan.  
o Prior palliative radiotherapy to non-target lesions may be allowed at the 
investigator’s discretion at any time before the start of treatment. 
 
Prior therapy with a live vaccine(s) within 4 weeks before the start of treatment or 
likely to require live vaccine(s) at any time during the treatment. 
o Injectable flu vaccine (inactivated or recombinant) may be permitted at the 
investigator’s discretion at any time before or during the treatment. 
o Covid-19 vaccination (any type) is permitted either before or during this 
protocol and does not preclude trial enrollment, at the discretion of the 
investigator.    
 
Prior antibiotic therapy for active infection ≤2 weeks before the start of treatment 
 
Prior therapy with platelet or blood transfusion for the treatment of thrombocytopenia 
within 2 weeks before the start of treatment.  
o Blood transfusion for the treatment of anemia within 2 weeks before the start 
of treatment may be acceptable at the investigator’s discretion. 
o EPO for the treatment of anemia within 2 weeks before the start of treatment 
may be acceptable at the investigator’s discretion  
 
Prior therapy with G-CSF or GM-CSF for the treatment of leukopenia within 2 weeks 
before the start of treatment 
 
Prior therapy with systemic or topical ophthalmic glucocorticosteroids within 2 weeks 
before the start of treatment (except for subjects who receive glucocorticosteroid 
replacement therapy at physiologic doses and / or inhaled or non-ophthalmic topical 
corticosteroids) 
 
7.0 
RECRUITMENT PLAN 
This is an investigator initiated trial run at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.  Cancer 
patients at Memorial Sloan Kettering harboring the mutations listed in the inclusion criteria 
will be screened and recruited utilizing automated Darwin queries and through consults 
placed to the Early Drug Development Service.  
Potential research subjects will be identified by a member of the patient’s treatment team, the 
protocol investigator, or research team at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 
(MSKCC). If the investigator is a member of the treatment team, s/he will screen their 
patient’s medical records for suitable research study participants and discuss the study and 
their potential for enrolling in the research study. Potential subjects contacted by their 
treating physician will be referred to the investigator/research staff of the study.  
The principal investigator may also screen the medical records of patients with whom they do 
not have a treatment relationship for the limited purpose of identifying patients who would 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 35 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
be eligible to enroll in the study and to record appropriate contact information in order to 
approach these patients regarding the possibility of enrolling in the study. 
During the initial conversation between the investigator/research staff and the patient, the 
patient may be asked to provide certain health information that is necessary to the 
recruitment and enrollment process. The investigator/research staff may also review portions 
of their medical records at MSKCC in order to further assess eligibility. They will use the 
information provided by the patient and/or medical record to confirm that the patient is 
eligible and to contact the patient regarding study enrollment. If the patient turns out to be 
ineligible for the research study, the research staff will destroy all information collected on the 
patient during the initial conversation and medical records review, except for any information 
that must be maintained for screening log purposes. 
In most cases, the initial contact with the prospective subject will be conducted either by the 
treatment team, investigator or the research staff working in consultation with the treatment 
team. The recruitment process outlined presents no more than minimal risk to the privacy of 
the patients who are screened and minimal PHI will be maintained as part of a screening log. 
For these reasons, we seek a (partial) limited waiver of authorization for the purposes of (1) 
reviewing medical records to identify potential research subjects and obtain information 
relevant to the enrollment process; (2) conversing with patients regarding possible 
enrollment; (3) handling of PHI contained within those records and provided by the potential 
subjects; and (4) maintaining information in a screening log of patients approached (if 
applicable).  
7.1 
Research Participant Registration  
 
Confirm eligibility as defined in the section entitled Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria. Obtain 
informed consent, by following procedures defined in section entitled Informed 
Consent Procedures. During the registration process registering individuals will be 
required to complete a protocol specific Eligibility Checklist. The individual signing the 
Eligibility Checklist is confirming whether the participant is eligible to enroll in the 
study. Study staff are responsible for ensuring that all institutional requirements 
necessary to enroll a participant to the study have been completed. See related 
Clinical Research Policy and Procedure #401 (Protocol Participant Registration). 
 
7.2 
Randomization 
Study treatment blinding and randomization are not applicable in this open-label 
study. 
 
8.0     INFORMED CONSENT PROCEDURES 
Before protocol-specified procedures are carried out, consenting professionals will 
explain full details of the protocol and study procedures as well as the risks involved 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 36 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
to participants prior to their inclusion in the study. Participants/LAR will also be 
informed that they are free to withdraw from the study at any time. All 
participants/LAR must sign an IRB/PB-approved consent form indicating their consent 
to participate. This consent form meets the requirements of the Code of Federal 
Regulations and the Institutional Review Board/Privacy Board of this Center. The 
consent form will include the following:  
1. The nature and objectives, potential risks and benefits of the intended study.  
2. The length of study and the likely follow-up required. 
3. Alternatives to the proposed study. (This will include available standard and 
investigational therapies. In addition, patients will be offered an option of 
supportive care for therapeutic studies.) 
4. The name of the investigator(s) responsible for the protocol. 
5. The right of the participant to accept or refuse study interventions/interactions 
and to withdraw from participation at any time.  
Before any protocol-specific procedures can be carried out, the consenting 
professional will fully explain the aspects of patient privacy concerning research 
specific information.  In addition to signing the IRB Informed Consent, all patients 
must agree to the Research Authorization component of the informed consent form. 
Each participant and consenting professional will sign the consent form. The 
participant must receive a copy of the signed informed consent form. 
 
9.0 
PRE-TREATMENT/INTERVENTION  
Patients must have a screening  tumor assessment by computed tomography (CT) (preferred 
to assess target lesions) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of known sites of 
disease as clinically indicated. If the patient has had appropriate imaging scans (e.g., routine 
clinical management) performed within 28 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1, then the results of 
those scans may be used if they are of diagnostic quality. Subsequent post-screening tumor 
assessments will be done following RECIST v1.1 guideline. Response will be assessed as 
per RECIST v1.1 by the investigator. 
 
Prior to enrollment, tumor tissue samples with sufficient tumor cell content must be provided 
during the Screening Period. Patients without satisfactory archival tumor samples, or with an 
archival tumor sample older than 6 months, will be required (pending the safety of obtaining 
this additional biopsy) to consent to a tumor biopsy prior to dosing with study drug. If the 
biopsy is deemed unsafe, the patient may be eligible at the discretion of the principal 
investigator.    
 
Each potential research patient will provide written informed consent ≤45 days prior to 
initiation of treatment and prior to starting any study-specific procedures. Upon signature of 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 37 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
the ICF, patients will be assigned a unique patient number as enrollment (Screening) occurs.  
All screening procedures are listed in Table 3.  
 
10.0 TREATMENT/INTERVENTION PLAN 
In all arms of this study, mirdametinib is defined as investigational product (IP) and refers to 
1 mg and 2 mg capsules of mirdametinib (PD-0325901). Mirdametinib will be administered 
by mouth twice daily at the doses specified below. 
For Arm 1 of this study, fulvestrant (Faslodex) will be administered by intramuscular (IM) 
injection at the dose and regimen approved by the FDA for the treatment of ER-positive 
metastatic breast cancer (500mg on Day 1 and Day 15 of Cycle 1 and on Day 1 of all 
subsequent cycles).  
10.1 Mirdametinib Study Treatment  
 
Subjects will be instructed to take mirdametinib at home and record the time of intake 
for both daily doses in the patient dosing diary. Missed doses will also be recorded in 
the dosing diary. Subjects will be instructed to not take their planned morning dose of 
mirdametinib prior to each study visit during the treatment period. Instead, the 
morning dose will be taken following the pre-dose PK blood draw or any other 
assessment scheduled to be obtained at pre-dose during the visit.  
 
Mirdametinib treatment will be dispensed to subjects every two Cycles during 
scheduled study visits as described in the SoA or at an unscheduled visit if 
mirdametinib treatment is damaged/lost.  
 
Throughout the treatment period, subjects will self-administer study treatment BID 
utilizing a continuous dosing schedule in 28-day Cycles. 
 
Subjects will be instructed to swallow capsules whole and not to open or chew them 
prior to swallowing. 
 
No capsule should be ingested if it is broken, cracked, or otherwise not intact. 
 
Subjects should be encouraged to take their dose approximately every 12 hours  
 
Subjects can take mirdametinib capsules without regard to food intake. 
 
Delivery of mirdametinib via nasogastric tube or gastrostomy tube is not allowed. 
 
If a subject misses a scheduled dose of study treatment, and it is within 6 hours of the 
scheduled dose, the subject should immediately administer the missed dose and 
resume study treatment in accordance with the normal administration schedule. If 
more than 6 hours has elapsed since the time of scheduled administration, the 
subject will not be instructed to administer the missed dose and to resume study 
treatment as prescribed. 
 
Subjects should not take 2 doses together to “make-up” for a missed dose. 
 
If a subject vomits any time after taking a dose, then they must be instructed not to 
take another dose to “make up” for vomiting, but rather, to resume subsequent doses 
as prescribed.  
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 38 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
 
If a subject inadvertently takes 1 extra dose, then the subject should not take the next 
scheduled dose of study treatment. Only one dose should be skipped in this context. 
The dose levels for mirdametinib are summarized as follows: 
Dose Level -2INT 
2mg PO BID, 3 weeks on/1 week off 
Dose Level -2 
2mg PO BID given continuously 
Dose Level -1INT 
3mg PO BID, 3 weeks on/1 week off 
Dose Level -1 
3mg PO BID given continuously 
Dose Level 1 
4mg PO BID given continuously 
Dose Level 2 
6mg PO BID given continuously 
Dose Level 3 
8mg PO BID given continuously 
 
In arm 1, dose level 1 of mirdametinib will be used in the safety run-in with fulvestrant and 
this dose will be used as the RP2D, otherwise dose de-escalation will be carried out.  In 
this arm if that dose is not tolerated, this will proceed to dose level -2 with fulvestrant. If 
dose level -2 is not tolerated, dose level -2INT will be initiated.  Arm 2 will follow a dose 
escalation 3+3 standard design, in which dose level 1 is the initial dose of mirdametinib, 
with additional dose levels 2 and 3. Pending DLTs in dose levels 1-3, this arm will 
proceed to dose level -1 using mirdametinib as monotherapy. If dose level -1 is not 
tolerated, dose level -1INT will be initiated.   
10.2 Study Treatment Errors 
 
Mirdametinib treatment errors may result in this study from the administration or 
consumption of the study treatment by the wrong subject or at the wrong dosage 
strength. Subjects will be instructed to call their treating physician or nurse 
immediately in the event of such a treatment error. If this happens, the treating 
physician or nurse will re-review the dose instructions with the subject to ensure 
compliance. If the subject is experiencing any side effects from the treatment error, 
they will be treated as clinically indicated based on symptoms. Treatment errors 
occurring to a study subject are to be captured in the electronic case report form 
(eCRF) when appropriate.  
 
Study treatment errors are reportable irrespective of the presence of an associated 
AE/SAE, including errors involving subject exposure to the mirdametinib product.  
 
If the study treatment error is accompanied by an AE (as determined by the 
Investigator), the study treatment error (if applicable), and any AE(s), must be 
captured on an AE eCRF page. 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 39 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
10.3 Study Treatment Compliance 
Subject compliance with mirdametinib treatment will be assessed at each visit where study 
treatment is dispensed. Compliance will be assessed by counting returned 
capsules/dispersible tablets in addition to reviewing the dosing diary entries. At each study 
visit, any discrepancies or deviations will be discussed with the subject and will be recorded 
in the source documentation. The number of capsules/dispersible tablets dispensed, and the 
number of capsules/dispersible tablets returned will be recorded in the eCRF, as well as any 
deviations.  
10.4 Concomitant Therapy 
Prior/Concomitant Medications and/or Procedures 
Any medication or vaccine (including over-the-counter or prescription medicines, vitamins, 
and/or herbal supplements) that the subject is receiving at the time of signing informed 
consent/assent or receives during the study must be recorded along with: 
 
Reason for use 
 
Dates of administration including start and end dates 
 
Dosage information including dose and frequency 
The subject should contact their doctor if they have any questions regarding concomitant or 
prior therapy. 
Prohibited or Restricted Concomitant Medications/Treatments 
 
Prior therapy with mirdametinib or any other MEK1/2 inhibitor (e.g., selumetinib, 
trametinib, cobimetinib, binimetinib) at any time before the start of treatment 
o Any other MEK 1 / 2 inhibitors are prohibited during the treatment until the 
EOT visit. 
 
Systemic anti-cancer therapy within 5 half-lives or two weeks (whichever is shorter), 
excluding hormonal therapy for metastatic breast cancer, before the start of treatment 
and during the treatment until the EOT visit. 
 
Radiotherapy to the orbital region at any time before the start of treatment and during 
the treatment until the EOT visit. 
 
Radiotherapy to tumor lesion(s) that will be chosen as target lesions within 4 weeks 
before the start of treatment, unless the lesion(s) exhibited objective progression 
between the prior radiotherapy and the screening CT or MRI scan.  
o Radiotherapy to tumor lesion(s) chosen as target lesions is further prohibited 
during the treatment until the EOT visit 
o Palliative radiotherapy to non-target lesions may be allowed at the 
investigator’s discretion at any time before the start of treatment and during 
the treatment until the EOT visit. 
 
Live vaccine(s) within 4 weeks before the start of treatment and during the treatment 
until the EOT visit. 
o Injectable flu vaccine (inactivated or recombinant) may be permitted at the 
investigator’s discretion at any time before or during the treatment until the 
EOT visit. 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 40 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
o Inactivated, protein-based, RNA-based or DNA-based COVID vaccines may 
be permitted at the investigator’s discretion. 
 
Antibiotic therapy for active infection within 2 weeks before the start of treatment  
 
Platelet or blood transfusion for the treatment of thrombocytopenia within 2 weeks 
before the start of treatment and during the DLT assessment period (Cycle 1), except 
when the thrombocytopenia has been identified DLT.  
o RBC or blood transfusion for the treatment of anemia within 2 weeks before 
the start of treatment and during the treatment may be acceptable at the 
investigator’s discretion if the chronic anemia has been persistent within 4 
weeks before the start of treatment. 
o EPO for the treatment of anemia within 2 weeks before the start of treatment 
may be acceptable at the investigator’s discretion if the dose has been stable 
within 4 weeks before the start of treatment  
 
G-CSF or GM-CSF for the treatment of leukopenia within 2 weeks before the start of 
treatment and during the DLT assessment period (Cycle 1) 
 
Systemic or topical ophthalmic glucocorticosteroids within 2 weeks before the start of 
treatment and during the treatment until the EOT visit 
 
Systemic glucocorticosteroids are permissible are permitted during the 
screening and treatment for blood product transfusions, or as pulse treatment 
for an acute allergic reaction or bronchospasm, or as replacement therapy at 
physiologic doses 
 
Topical inhaled or non-ophthalmic glucocorticosteroids are permitted during 
the screening and treatment.  
Supportive Care 
Supportive / symptomatic therapy for management of adverse events or co-morbidities is 
permitted at the investigator’s discretion as long as the therapy is not listed among the 
prohibited medications. 
 
11.0 EVALUATION DURING TREATMENT/INTERVENTION 
11.1  Clinical Safety Laboratory Analytes  
Table 2 
Hematology 
Serum or Plasma Chemistry 
Urinalysis 
 
White blood cell count with 
differential (including at 
minimum: neutrophils, 
basophils, eosinophils, 
lymphocytes, monocytes) 
 
Red blood cell count 
 
Hemoglobin 
 
Hematocrit 
 
Platelet count 
 
Reticulocyte count 
 
Albumin 
 
Alkaline phosphatase 
 
ALT 
 
AST 
 
Bicarbonate 
 
BUN or urea 
 
Calcium 
 
Chloride 
 
Creatinine 
 
Specific gravity 
 
Leukocyte esterase 
 
Ketones 
 
Protein 
 
Glucose 
 
Nitrite 
 
Occult blood 
 
Microscopy (if clinically 
indicated)  
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 41 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
Table 2 
Hematology 
Serum or Plasma Chemistry 
Urinalysis 
 
 
Creatine kinase 
 
Glucose 
 
Lactate dehydrogenase 
 
Phosphate 
 
Potassium 
 
Sodium 
 
Total bilirubin 
 
Total protein 
 
Triglycerides 
 
Total cholesterol 
 
LDL 
 
Uric acid 
Coagulation 
Virology (screening only) 
 
PT/INR 
 
aPTT 
 
HBV: HBsAg and HBV-
DNA 
 
HCV: anti-HCV antibody 
and HCV-DNA 
 
Abbreviations: ALT = alanine aminotransferase; AST = aspartate aminotransferase; BUN = blood 
urea nitrogen 
11.2 Physical Examinations and Vital Sign Measurements 
Physical examinations, including height (required at screening only), weight, and vital signs 
(blood pressure [BP], heart rate, pulse, and temperature), will be performed in accordance 
with the Schedule of Assessments. 
Any physical examination or vital signs assessed as clinically significant should be recorded 
as an AE or SAE. If SAE criteria are met the event should be recorded and reported 
according to the SAE reporting process. 
All on treatment visits have a +/-3 day window.  
11.3 ECOG Performance Status 
Performance status will be assessed using the ECOG scale in accordance with the Schedule 
of Assessments.  
11.4 Electrocardiograms (ECGs)   
To evaluate the QT/QTc interval in patients treated with mirdametinib, either with or without 
fulvestrant, will be monitored with a standard 12-lead ECG performed in triplicate (≥1 minute 
apart) at different timepoints. Patients should be in supine position and resting for at least 10 
minutes before study-related ECGs. ECG monitoring should be performed prior to PK blood 
draws. Details can be found in the Schedule of Assessments.  
The ECG parameters (heart rate, PR interval, QRS interval, QT interval, and corrected QT 
[QTc] interval) at each time recorded, as well as the change from screening will be listed and 
summarized. These parameters will be determined electronically by the ECG machine at 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 42 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
the clinical site. The QT interval will be corrected by both the Bazett and Frederica methods 
as follows: 
 
Bazett: QTcB = QT/(RR)1/2 
 
Fridericia: QTcF = QT/(RR)1/3 
The overall ECG assessment will be reported as “Normal” or “Abnormal” with respect to 
relevant abnormalities by the investigator. A shift table comparing the ECG assessment 
over the study drug administration period to screening will be presented. 
The QTc data obtained by using the Bazett and Frederician corrections will be categorized 
separately into the following classifications and summarized by time after study drug 
dosing: 
 
QTc interval >450 msec and ≤480 msec 
 
QTc interval >480 msec and ≤500 msec 
 
QTc interval >500 msec 
The change of the QTc values obtained by using the Bazett’s and Frederica’s correction will 
also be categorized separately as follows: 
 
QTc interval increases from baseline by >30 msec and ≤60 msec 
 
QTc interval increases from baseline by >60 msec 
The calculated QTc average of the 3 ECGs must be <480 msec for eligibility. 
The average of triplicate 12-lead ECG results will be summarized by treatment at each time 
point using descriptive statistics (number of subjects, mean, SD, median, minimum, and 
maximum). 
11.5 Pregnancy Testing 
For females of childbearing potential, negative serum pregnancy test is required at screening 
and within 72 hours of starting treatment. Serum pregnancy testing will be performed on Day 
1 of each cycle and at EOT for females of childbearing potential. If the clinic standard is to do 
a serum pregnancy test more frequently, that is acceptable with the protocol as written.  
Male and female patients should start using birth control from screening throughout the study 
period up to 6 months after the last dose of study drug. If there is any question that a patient 
will not reliably comply with the contraception requirements, they should not be enrolled in 
the study, and any patient who becomes pregnant should be withdrawn from the study. Any 
pregnancies that occur within 6 months post-treatment discontinuation are to be reported. 
Patients of childbearing potential, who are sexually active, and their partners must agree to 
the use of a highly effective form of contraception throughout their participation during the 
study treatment and for 6 months after the last dose of study drug(s):  
 
Combined (estrogen- and progestogen-containing) hormonal contraception 
associated with inhibition of ovulation:  
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 43 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
 
Progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation 
 
Intrauterine device (either copper or hormone-based) 
 
Bilateral tubal occlusion  
 
Vasectomized partner  
 
Sexual abstinence if it is the preferred and usual lifestyle of the patient 
11.6 Demographics and Baseline Characteristics 
Patient demography consists of age, race, ethnicity, and gender at screening. In addition, 
history of smoking and alcohol consumption will be collected and documented in the medical 
record.  
For disease history the following will be documented: 
 
Date of first diagnosis  
 
Tumor type 
 
Stage at time of initial diagnosis 
 
Histology and grade of disease at diagnosis and most recent biopsy if additional biopsy 
performed  
 
Information on first anticancer treatment, if applicable: 
 
Intent (adjuvant, neoadjuvant, curative, palliative) 
 
Date of start of first treatment 
 
Agents used in first treatment 
 
Date of last dose of first treatment 
 
Information on second and subsequent anticancer treatments, if applicable: 
 
Intent (adjuvant, neoadjuvant, curative, palliative) 
 
Dates of start of all subsequent treatments 
 
Agents in all subsequent treatments 
 
Dates of last dose of all subsequent treatments 
 
Best response and toxicities for each prior anticancer treatment 
 
Date of recurrence for each prior anticancer treatment 
For medical and surgical history, the following will be documented: 
Major medical and surgical history (including medication history), including history of 
thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, leukopenia, or anemia will be collected. Details of any prior 
invasive malignancy will be collected. Medical and surgical history will be obtained by 
interviewing the patient or by reviewing the patient’s medical records. 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 44 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
11.7 Concomitant Medications and Procedures 
Concomitant treatment and medication information will be collected from the Screening Visit 
until 30 days after their last dose of study drug. Medications will be coded using World Health 
Organization (WHO) Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification. The generic name of 
the drug (or trade name for combination drugs) must be specified along with the reason for 
use, and duration of treatment.  
All concomitant procedures (including transfusions) will be recorded from the Screening Visit 
through the EOT Visit (occurring 7-14 days after the last dose of study drug). 
Any changes in documented, permitted concomitant treatments already being taken at the 
beginning of the clinical study must be recorded in the eCRF.   
11.8 Additional Anticancer Treatment and Radiotherapy 
Subjects should not receive additional therapeutic anticancer treatment until after PD has 
been documented on study per RECIST v1.1.  If a subject requires additional anticancer 
treatment, study drug will be discontinued, and the subject will enter the Post-Treatment 
Period and followed by clinic visit or phone call every 12 weeks for up to 1 year.  
Palliative radiotherapy for pre-existing non-target lesions and bone metastases may be 
allowed during the study with the approval of the principal investigator. However, if the 
indication for palliative radiation is the appearance of a new lesion, the subject will be 
declared to have progressive disease and study drug will be discontinued and subject have 
an End of Treatment visit and will enter the Post-Treatment Period and be followed monthly 
by clinic visit or phone call every 12 weeks. 
11.9 Correlatives  
11.9.1 Pharmacokinetics  
Blood samples for PK assessment for mirdametinib will be drawn per the Schedule of 
Assessments. Instructions for the collection and processing of PK samples are provided 
below.  Collection time of previous dose, time of dose on the sample day and sample time 
will be entered in the eCRF. 
Whole blood samples of approximately 4 mL will be collected in K2EDTA tube (purple top) 
for measurement of plasma concentrations of Mirdametinib and the active metabolite PD-
0315209.  Whole blood samples will be processed to plasma and each plasma sample will 
be divided into 2 aliquots (1 each for PK and a back-up sample).  Samples should be 
processed and stored as described in Appendix I and II.  
Mirdametinib and PD-0315209 will be analyzed in plasma using validated liquid 
chromatography- mass spectrometry bioanalytical methods.  
PK parameters of interest will be estimated by non-compartmental analysis (NCA) as 
described in Section 14.7 and may include AUClast, AUClast, ss Cmax, Cmax, ss and Ctrough, ss. 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 45 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
Plasma concentrations and PK parameter estimates will be presented using descriptive 
statistics by dose level and by arm. 
Additional blood PK samples may be drawn at any time during the study, at the discretion of 
the investigator, if knowledge of plasma drug concentrations for mirdametinib is considered 
to be helpful in interpretation of AEs that may affect the safety of study subjects. 
11.9.2 Biomarkers  
11.9.2.1 Biomarker Sample Collection 
The following patient samples are required for biomarker assessment: 
 
To meet primary and secondary objectives, a tumor tissue sample must be provided 
during the Screening Period. Patients without archival material or tumor tissue that 
does not meet minimum requirements (< 12 months old from time of enrollment, 
tumor block or 20 slides, will undergo a tumor biopsy before beginning treatment to 
obtain the sufficient tumor material.  
 
Paired biopsies (collected at screening and on treatment) are suggested but not 
mandatory for a subset of consenting patients with accessible tumors. To minimize 
the risk, investigators will preferably choose patients who have easily accessible 
tumors and in whom an outpatient procedure without general anesthesia is possible.  
 
Blood samples for the analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) will be obtained at 
screening, during treatment and at EOT.  
Details on blood and tissue sample collection, processing, storage, shipping, and handling 
instructions can be found in Appendix I. 
11.9.2.2 Biomarker Analysis based on Tumor Tissue 
Baseline tumor tissue will be collected prior to initiating treatment. Sensitizing biomarkers 
(genomic and protein) will be measured and correlated with clinical efficacy. Nucleic acids 
will be extracted for exploratory biomarker analysis to determine if genomic features 
associate with sensitivity or resistance to mirdametinib. 
During screening, the investigator will assess the feasibility of obtaining pre-treatment and 
on-treatment tumor tissue biopsies from the patient. As described above, pre-treatment 
tissue is obligatory as long as this tissue can be obtained safely (and archival tissue from 
within 6 months is not available).  On-treatment tumor biopsies are encouraged whenever 
possible but are optional.  In all cases this will typically require that the tumor lesions be 
superficially accessible. Details on collection are provided in Appendix I.  Biopsies are an 
integral component of this study. Patients will be approached to sign IRB#06-107.  This will 
allow for tumor tissue samples and tumor derived samples including but not limited to DNA, 
RNA, protein lysates, and tumor cells to be collected and stored for the purpose of potential 
testing and study, including but not limited to the future diagnostic development of 
biomarkers and the future development of cancer models.   
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 46 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
11.9.2.3 Biomarker Analysis from Blood Samples 
Baseline blood samples may be used to evaluate a liquid biopsy approach for patient 
selection and diagnostic methods. Longitudinal blood will be collected for ctDNA monitoring 
and correlation with clinical response. Blood samples collected at time of progression or after 
end of treatment may be used to evaluate genomic profiles associated with resistance. Any 
remaining blood samples may be stored via 06-107 and  may be utilized for future research 
and diagnostic development related to mirdametinib.   
In the course of this research it is possible that some patients whose tumors are analyzed 
through investigational “next-generation” profiling in a research (non-CLIA) 
environment will be found to have somatic or germline mutations in genes that are known 
to be associated with an increased risk of cancer or other diseases. It will be stated in the 
consent that the participants will not receive any specific results from research tests. The 
consent will tell participants that if they wish to have genetic testing done for personal 
reasons than they should make an appointment with the MSK Clinical Genetics Service. 
 
If in the course of this research a research finding is obtained that, in the opinion of the 
investigator, may be critical to the preventive care of the participant or their family, the 
investigator can communicate that finding to the IRB Genomic Advisory Panel (GAP). 
The finding will be reviewed by the GAP to determine whether the incidental finding 
should be discussed with the participant. For MSK, in the event that the GAP determines 
that the finding should be discussed with the participant, and the participant has 
consented to be re-contacted, then the treating/consenting physician shall be contacted by 
the panel and asked to refer the participant to the Clinical Genetics Service for further 
discussion of the research finding. 
The following information must be provided to GAP for review: 
 
Participant Name/MRN # 
 
Type of Biospecimen (tissue, blood, saliva) 
 
Incidental Finding 
 
Collection Protocol # 
 
Contact: rtmgapirb@mskcc.org 
11.10 Post-study Follow-up 
The post-study follow-up will include the end of treatment (EoT) visit, the safety follow-up 
visit, and the long-term follow-up.  The purpose of these additional visits post follow-up is for 
safety.  No additional biomarkers will be collected for study purposes after the EoT visit.   
An End of Treatment (EoT) visit will be performed within 7-14 days after the administration of 
the last dose of the last study drug.   
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 47 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
The safety follow-up (FU) visit will be performed 30 days after the last dose of the study drug 
(except for subjects who died, withdrew consent, and objected to further data collection or 
were lost to follow up). The safety FU assessment can be done via the clinic visit 
(recommended) or via a phone call (if subject cannot attend the clinic visit or has started a 
new anti-cancer treatment). The investigator may order unscheduled FU visits after the 30-
day safety FU visit if the adverse events ongoing at the safety FU are deemed to be clinically 
significant and related to the study drug(s).  
The long-term follow-up visits will be performed via clinic visit or phone call every 3 months 
for 12 months after the last dose of the study drug (except for subjects who died, withdrew 
consent and objected to further data collection or were lost to follow up).   
 
 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 48 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
Schedule of Assessments (SOA) Table 3 
Treatment Visits (+/- 3 day window) 
Follow-up 
Study Procedures 
Screening 
(within 28 days 
of C1D1) 
 
Cycle 114 
Cycle 2 
 
Cycle 3+ 
 
EOT 
+/- 3 
days 
Safety 
Follow-
up 
+/- 3 days 
Long term 
follow-up 
+/- 14 days 
 
Day 1 
 
Day 15 
 
Day 1 
 
Day 15 
 
Day 1 
 
7-14 
days of 
last 
dose 
30 days 
of last 
dose 
Q3 months 
for 1 year 
after last 
dose 
Informed Consent 
Within 45 days 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Demographics 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Complete medical 
history 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pre-Treatment Core 
Biopsy or Archival tissue 
X4 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Genomic molecular 
profile (historic report) 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Abbreviated medical 
history 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Concomitant 
medications 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
Toxicities 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X14 
Physical exam 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
ECOG performance 
status 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
Vital signs1 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
12-lead ECG, in 
triplicate12 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
Cycle 5 and every odd Cycle 
thereafter  
X 
 
 
NYHA classification 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
Cycle 5 and every odd Cycle 
thereafter  
X 
 
 
Hematology15 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
Chemistry15 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
Urinalysis (Dipstick) 15 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
 
 
Total cholesterol, LDL, 
Triglycerides15 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 49 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
1. 
Vital signs should include body temperature, height (required at screening, only) and weight, blood pressure, heart rate, and pulse oximetry.  
2. 
Virology at screening will include the following assessments: 
 
HBV: HBsAg and HBV-DNA 
 
HCV: anti-HCV antibody and HCV-DNA 
3. 
Archival tumor: Sufficient if within 6 months of trial enrollment. If archival tissue is not available a core needle biopsy is mandatory, as long as the investigator deems the 
procedure to be safe and accessible. A sample of the archival tumor tissue from the primary or metastatic tumor (block preferred, or at least 5 FFPE slides) will be 
Coagulation (aPTT and 
PT or INR)15 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
Cycle 5 and every odd Cycle 
thereafter  
X 
X 
 
Thyroid function (TSH, 
FT3, FT4)15 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
Cycle 5 and every odd Cycle 
thereafter  
X 
X 
 
Virology2 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pregnancy test (only 
WOCBP)4 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
 
Mirdametinib dosing5 
 
Twice daily (Morning dose will be taken in the clinic on Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15, and Cycle 2 Day 1) 
 
 
 
Fulvestrant IM injection 
 
X 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
 
 
PK sampling for 
mirdametinib6 
 
X 
X 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
Ophthalmological 
examination7 
X 
 
 
 
 
Cycle 3 and every odd Cycle 
thereafter (+/- 7 days) 
X 
 
 
Echocardiogram8 
X 
 
 
 
 
Cycle 3 and every odd Cycle 
thereafter (+/- 7 days) 
X 
 
 
Tumor assessment by 
RECIST 1.19 
X 
 
 
 
 
C3, then every 8 weeks (+/- 5 days) 
until cycle 11, then every 12 weeks 
(+/- 7 days) on cycles 12 and above  
 
X 
 
 
On-Treatment Tumor 
biopsy – Core Needle 
(Optional)10 
 
 
 
Within 7 days 
of C2D1 
 
 
 
 
 
Tumor markers 
 
X 
 
X 
 
Day 1 of every cycle until the first 
scan, and then coinciding with 
imaging time points  
X 
 
 
MSK-Access cfDNA 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
cfDNA collection 
 
 
 
X 
 
X 
 
 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 50 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
collected at screening.  
4. 
Pregnancy test: women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test within 3 days before dosing on Day 1 in each cycle 
5. 
Study drug administration: 
a. 
Mirdametinib dosing at home: twice daily by mouth on every day of each 28-day cycle except for the morning dose on Day 1 and Day 15 in each cycle.  
b. 
Mirdametinib dosing in the clinic: the clinic staff will administer the morning dose of mirdametinib on Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15 and Cycle 2 Day 1.  
6. 
PK sampling: Blood samples for mirdametinib concentration in plasma will be drawn at the following time points: 
a. 
Day 1 and Day 15 of Cycle 1: pre-dose and at 0.5h, 1.0h, 2.0h and 4.0h after the mirdametinib dose 
b. 
Day 1 of Cycle 2: pre-dose 
7. 
Ophthalmological exam: must include visual acuity, tonometry, slit lamp exam and optical coherence tomography (OCT); fundoscopy with pupil dilation is not 
mandatory but may be performed at the discretion of the ophthalmologist. For cycles that do not have a scheduled ophthalmological exam, the treating physician will 
evaluate the participant for ocular toxicity and refer them to an ophthalmologist if clinically indicated.   
8. 
LVEF assessment by echocardiogram (Echo), where the exam may be limited only on the measurement of LVEF without other aspects (global and regional 
contractility, stroke volume etc.), unless requested at the investigator’s discretion. Results from a MUGA scan can also be used if it is performed as part of the patient’s 
routine care.  
9. 
Imaging to be performed within five-day window up to cycle 12, then within 7-day window for cycles 12 and above  
10. Paired tumor on-treatment biopsy – Core Biopsy (Optional). If tumor lesion is accessible at acceptable risk and the patient has consented, the core biopsy will be 
obtained from the primary or metastatic tumor within 7 days before C2D1.     
11. Clinical/local lab tests are listed in Table 2 
12. The triplicate ECG will be done pre-dose and at 4 hours post-dose on C1D1 and C2D1. All other triplicate ECGs will be obtained pre-dose. 
13. The long-term follow-up visits may be done in clinic or via telehealth 
14. Baseline characteristics of these patients will utilize laboratory and clinical studies performed on C1D1.   
15. Laboratory Assessments and Urinalysis: must be completed within 3 days before dosing on Day 1 of each cycle except for on Cycle 1 Day 1 (which must be completed  
on same day) 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 51 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
12.0 CRITERIA FOR REMOVAL FROM STUDY 
Patients will begin dosing on Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1) according to assigned dose level 
and arm with cycle length of 28 days.  Individual patients will continue on mirdametinib 
or mirdametinib with fulvestrant until progression of disease, unacceptable toxicity, or 
other reason for treatment discontinuation.  Patients with documented progression of 
disease may be allowed to continue on study if the patient is tolerating treatment, and in 
the opinion of the investigator, the patient is deriving clinical benefit from continuing 
study treatment and continuation of treatment is approved by the investigator.  If said 
patient continues treatment post progression, they will require reconsent. 
Patients may be removed from study for the following reasons, including but not limited 
to: 
 
Progression of Disease (with exception as above) 
 
Unacceptable toxicity, with attention to DLT as described in Section 15.3 
 
Noncompliance with protocol 
 
Concurrent illness compromising ability to fulfill protocol requirements 
 
Requirement for alternative treatment in the opinion of the investigator 
 
Pregnancy 
 
Loss to Follow up 
 
Withdrawal of Consent 
 
Death 
 
Study Termination 
The clinical trial may be discontinued or terminated in case of an unacceptable risk, any 
relevant toxicity, or a negative change in the risk/benefit assessment. This might include 
the occurrence of AEs which character, severity or frequency is new in comparison to 
the existing risk profile. In addition, any data deriving from other clinical trials or 
toxicological studies which negatively influence the risk/benefit assessment might cause 
discontinuation or termination of the study. 
 
13.0    CRITERIA FOR OUTCOME ASSESSMENT AND ENDPOINT EVALUABILITY 
13.1 Safety Endpoints 
Tolerability and safety of mirdametinib and mirdametinib plus fulvestrant combination, endpoints 
of the study, will be evaluated by assessment of AEs, TEAEs, SAEs, DLTs, concomitant 
medications, PEs, vital sign measurements, clinical safety laboratory evaluations (hematology, 
serum chemistry, and urinalysis), ECOG scores, electrocardiograms (ECGs), and other 
assessments. 
All safety parameters will be performed in accordance with the Schedules of Assessments 
presented in each arm. 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 52 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
13.2 Efficacy Endpoints 
Efficacy will be assessed by confirmed ORR, DOR, clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + SD 
≥4 months), and PFS.  Tumor response will be evaluated by the investigator using RECIST 
version 1.1.  OS is not an endpoint of this study.  Arms 1 and 2 we be analyzed completely 
separately.  
13.3 Evaluable subjects 
Patients who achieve sufficient compliance with the study drug intake in Cycle 1 (received at 
least 45 of 56 [greater than 80%] doses of mirdametinib (in Arm 1 only, also both doses of 
fulvestrant) or experience a DLT will be considered as evaluable for the assessment of the DLT 
rate for the particular dose level.  
Additional patients should be enrolled at the same dose level as necessary to ensure an 
adequate number of DLT-evaluable patients. 
13.4 Evaluation of Tumor Response 
13.4.1 Overview 
The efficacy of both study arms will be evaluated by assessment of tumor response to treatment 
according to RECIST v1.1 [Eisenhauer 2009] per investigator assessment.  
Response to treatment will be based on investigator evaluation of radiographic images. All 
radiographic images/scans at the time points specified as well as any unscheduled 
images/scans should be archived for potential future evaluation. 
CT or MRI scans will be performed on each patient. Baseline images should encompass all 
areas of known predilection for metastasis of the disease under evaluation and should 
additionally investigate areas that may be involved based on signs and symptoms of individual 
patients. The imaging method used for the patient at screening will be used at each subsequent 
visit. 
Any other sites at which new disease is suspected should also be appropriately imaged. If an 
unscheduled assessment is performed and the patient has not progressed, every attempt 
should be made to perform subsequent assessments at the scheduled visits while the patient 
remains on study drug. 
13.4.2 Timing of Radiographic Evaluations 
All patients will undergo serial radiographic assessments to assess tumor response. Initial tumor 
imaging at screening must be performed within 28 days prior to the date of the first dose of 
study drug. Scans performed prior to the signing of the ICF as part of routine clinical 
management are acceptable for use as initial tumor imaging if they are of diagnostic quality and 
performed within 28 days prior to the date of first dose.  
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 53 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
Radiographic evaluations to assess extent of disease will be conducted at screening and every 
8 weeks (56 ± 5 days) from Cycle 1 Day 1 for the first 12 cycles on study (or sooner if clinically 
indicated). Thereafter tumor assessments will be performed every 12 weeks (84 ± 7 days). Per 
RECIST v1.1, CR or PR should be confirmed; tumor imaging for confirmation of response must 
be performed at least 4 weeks after the first indication of response. 
Imaging should not be delayed for delays in cycle starts or extension of combination treatment 
cycle intervals. 
Radiographic evaluations will continue until PD, start of alternate anticancer therapy, withdrawal 
of consent to study participation, becoming lost to follow-up or death. If a patient discontinues 
treatment for a reason other than radiographic disease progression, withdrawal of consent to 
study, lost to follow-up, or death, scans should continue at the specified intervals until 
progression is confirmed or until the start of subsequent anticancer treatment.  
If a patient discontinues treatment for clinical progression and does not meet RECIST v1.1 
criteria for progression, scans should continue at the specified intervals until progression is 
confirmed or until the start of subsequent anticancer treatment.  
13.4.3 Assessment of Response by RECIST  
RECIST v1.1 will be used by the investigator as the primary measure for assessment of tumor 
response, date of disease progression, and as a basis for all protocol guidelines related to 
disease status.  
14.0 BIOSTATISTICS 
14.1 Analysis Populations 
The following analysis populations will be used: 
 
DLT Evaluable Population consists of patients who receive at least 80% of planned 
total doses of mirdametinib in cycle 1 (in Arm 1 only, also both doses of fulvestrant) and 
are observed within 28 days following the first dose of mirdametinib or patients who 
experience a DLT. 
 
Efficacy Population, used for the assessment of efficacy for each arm, will consist of all 
patients in Part 2 who received at least 1 dose of study drug and who have at least 1 
post-baseline tumor assessment.  Arms 1 and 2 will be analyzed separately.  In addition, 
patients treated at the MTD in the dose escalation portion of the protocol (both arms 1 
and 2) will be included in the efficacy analyses for the expansion cohorts in part 2 if they 
meet the requirements for efficacy population as defined above.  Additionally, the RP2D 
will be determined pending the clinical data obtained in the dose escalation portion of the 
protocol.  If the RP2D is less than the MTD, then patients treated at the RP2D in the 
dose escalation portion of the protocol (both arms 1 and 2) will be included in the 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 54 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
efficacy analyses for the expansion cohorts in part 2 if they meet the requirements for 
efficacy population as defined above. 
 
Pharmacokinetic Population, used for the assessment of pharmacokinetic endpoints, 
will consist of all patients who have sufficient pharmacokinetic concentration data 
recorded to derive pharmacokinetic endpoints. 
 
All treated population or safety population: consisting of all patients who receive any 
amount of drug 
Arms 1 and 2 will be analyzed separately throughout the study.   
Arm 1 
The study will follow a standard 3+3 dose escalation schema. As described previously in section 
4.2, the 3+3 decisions in Part 1 of Arm 1 will be made starting with a mirdametinib starting dose 
level (4 mg BID PO), where subjects will be treated with mirdametinib 4 mg BID PO given 
continuously in combination with the recommended dose of fulvestrant.  If ≤1 of the first 3 DLT 
evaluable subjects in Dose Level 1 exhibit a DLT in Cycle 1, then Dose Level 1 will be 
expanded.  Mirdametinib dose in combination with fulvestrant will not be escalated above the 4 
mg BID given continuously dose level. 
A sufficient number of subjects will be treated with mirdametinib 4 mg BID PO given 
continuously in combination with the recommended dose of fulvestrant to accrue at least 6 
evaluable subjects.  If ≤1 of 6 evaluable subjects in the starting dose level exhibit a DLT in Cycle 
1, then mirdametinib 4 mg BID PO given continuously will be declared as the recommended 
dose for Part 2 (RP2D) in combination with fulvestrant.  If ≥2 of the first 3 evaluable subjects or 
≥2 of the 6 evaluable subjects in Dose Level 1 exhibit a DLT in Cycle 1, then the mirdametinib 
dose will be de-escalated (Dose Level -2).  If dose de-escalation is not required there will be six 
evaluable patients total.  
In the case of de-escalation, Mirdametinib Dose Level -2 (de-escalation dose level 2 mg BID 
PO) will be given to up to 3 subjects, treated with mirdametinib 2 mg BID PO given continuously 
in combination with the recommended dose of fulvestrant.  If 1 of the first 3 evaluable subjects 
in Dose Level -2 exhibit a DLT in Cycle 1, then a sufficient number of subjects will be treated 
with mirdametinib 2 mg BID PO given continuously in combination with the recommended dose 
of fulvestrant to accrue 6 evaluable subjects. If 1 of 6 evaluable subjects in Dose Level -2 exhibit 
a DLT in Cycle 1, then mirdametinib 2 mg BID PO given continuously will be declared as the 
recommended dose for Part 2 (RP2D) in combination with fulvestrant.  If ≥2 of the first 3 
evaluable subjects or ≥2 of the 6 evaluable subjects in Dose Level -2 exhibit a DLT in Cycle 1, 
then the Arm 1 will be further de-escalated.  
In this case, Mirdametinib Dose Level -2INT (de-escalation dose level at 2 mg BID PO on a 3 
weeks on, 1 week off schedule) will be given to up to 3 subjects, treated with mirdametinib 2 mg 
BID PO on a 3 weeks on 1 week off schedule, in combination with the recommended dose of 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 55 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
fulvestrant. If 1 of the first 3 evaluable subjects in Dose Level -2INT exhibit a DLT in Cycle 1, 
then a sufficient number of subjects will be treated with mirdametinib 2 mg BID PO on a 3 
weeks on, 1 week off schedule, in combination with the recommended dose of fulvestrant to 
accrue 6 evaluable subjects. If 1 of 6 evaluable subjects in Dose Level -2INT exhibit a DLT in 
Cycle 1, then mirdametinib 2 mg BID PO on a 3 weeks on, 1 week off schedule, will be 
declared as the recommended dose for Part 2 (RP2D) in combination with fulvestrant. If ≥2 of 
the first 3 evaluable subjects or ≥2 of the 6 evaluable subjects in Dose Level -2INT exhibit a 
DLT in Cycle 1, then Arm 1 will be discontinued. In the case of de-escalation there will be at 
least 18 evaluable patients (6 from dose level 0, and 6 on two separate dose levels of de-
escalation). 
Arm 2 
Part 1 will be conducted in three sequential Dose Level escalations according to the 3+3 design 
based on the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and the overall safety profile of the study 
treatments. At each step of the 3+3 design, the investigators will review all available safety and 
PK data in the current Dose Level and decide about the appropriate next step. The subjects will 
become evaluable for the 3+3 decisions if they complete Cycle 1 and receive at least 80% of 
assigned drug doses, or if they exhibit a DLT in Cycle 1. The starting dose of mirdametinib as 
single agent in each dose escalation dose level will be as follows: mirdametinib 4 mg BID PO 
given continuously, mirdametinib 6 mg BID PO given continuously, mirdametinib 8 mg BID PO 
given continuously. The de-escalation Dose Levels (Dose Level -1) may evaluate mirdametinib 
3 mg BID given continuously and (Dose Level -1INT) may evaluate mirdametinib 3 mg BID 
given on. 3 weeks on, 1 week off schedule.  
The 3+3 decisions in Part 1 of Arm 2 will be made similar to the above. Up to 3 subjects will be 
treated with mirdametinib as single agent at the dose of 4 mg BID PO given continuously. If ≤1 
of the first 3 evaluable subjects in Dose Level 1 exhibit a DLT in Cycle 1, then Dose Level 1 will 
be expanded. If 0 of the first 3 evaluable subjects in Dose Level 1 exhibit a DLT in Cycle 1, then 
the dose of mirdametinib as single agent will be escalated to Dose Levels 2 and 3 (6 mg BID 
given continuously and 8 mg BID given continuously) following the same rules as above.  There 
will thus be as many as 18 evaluable patients on this arm. 
The following table shows the corresponding probability of escalating given five hypothetical 
true risk for DLT. 
 
True risk of DLT 
0.1 
0.2 
0.3 
0.4 
0.5 
Probability of 
escalation 
0.9 
0.7 
0.5 
0.3 
0.2 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 56 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
14.2  General Principles 
The majority of the analysis will be descriptive in nature. Unless stated otherwise, continuous 
variables will be summarized using descriptive statistics (number of patients, mean, standard 
deviation, median, lower and upper quartile, minimum and maximum values) and the number 
and percentage of patients will be used for categorical variables.   
14.3  Safety Analysis 
All AEs will be listed, including the verbatim description per CTCAE v5.0. This analysis will be 
done on the safety population. 
TEAEs are defined as those occurring after the first dose of study drug and within 30 days 
following the cessation of treatment, whether or not they are considered related to the study 
medication. 
The following key safety parameters will be evaluated: 
 
Incidence of TEAEs, treatment-related TEAE, TEAEs leading to death, SAE, 
treatment-related SAE, TEAE leading to study drug discontinuation, TEAE leading to 
dose modifications (e.g., dose reduction) and TEAE leading to study discontinuation 
 
TEAEs will be further summarized by severity (according to NCI CTCAE Version 5.0) 
 
Changes in clinical laboratory parameters (hematology, chemistry, urinalysis), CTCAE 
graded laboratory toxicities, vital signs, ECOG performance status, ECG parameters, 
physical examinations, ophthalmology examinations, and usage of concomitant 
medications 
14.4 QTc Analyses 
Descriptive statistics and categorical analyses of ECG variables will be provided. 
14.5 
 Efficacy Analyses 
The primary efficacy analyses will be performed using the Efficacy Population.   
Efficacy endpoints will be based on RECIST v1.1 by investigator’s assessment:   
 
Objective Response Rate (ORR) is defined as the proportion of patients with confirmed 
CR or PR (i.e., 2 visit responses of either CR or PR at least 4 weeks apart) according to 
RECIST v1.1 criteria. 
- The maximum percent reduction in tumor size will also be presented as a 
waterfall plot. 
 
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) is defined as the proportion of patients with a confirmed 
best response of CR or PR, or SD that is sustained for at least 4 months after the first 
dose of mirdametinib according to RECIST v1.1 criteria.    
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 57 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
 
Duration of Response (DOR) (applicable only to patients with confirmed CR or PR) is 
defined as the time interval between the date of the earliest qualifying response (CR or 
PR) and the date of disease progression or death for any cause, whichever occurs 
earlier.  
- For patients who are alive without disease progression following response, DOR 
will be censored on the date of last evaluable tumor assessment or last follow-up 
for disease progression. 
 
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the first day of study drug 
administration (Day 1) to disease progression as defined by RECIST v1.1 criteria, or 
death from any cause.   
- Patients who are alive and free from disease progression will be censored at the 
date of their last tumor assessment.    
For ORR and CBR, patients without a post-baseline tumor assessment will be excluded as they 
are not efficacy evaluable.  The ORR and CBR calculation will include only efficacy evaluable 
patients.   
An exact binomial 95% confidence interval for CBR and ORR will be calculated in each 
treatment group using the Clopper-Pearson method.   
For PFS, Kaplan-Meier curves will be generated, and the median time-to-event and the 
associated 95% CIs will be provided.  In addition, the rate of PFS at 6 months will be derived 
from the corresponding Kaplan-Meier curves and the associated 95% CIs calculated using 
Greenwood’s formula on the ln[-ln(survival scale)] and back transformed.  This analysis will 
include the patients in the efficacy population.   
Depending on responses seen, a central review of all images may also be performed by an 
independent reviewer as a sensitivity analysis. 
Sample size justification and patient numbers. 
For the initial parts of both arms, these utilize 3+3 design with arm 1 utilizing dose de-escalation 
as necessary, and arm 2 utilizing this design to escalate to MTD or RP2D.  In the dose 
expansion cohorts of arm 1, the mirdametinib RP2D will be administered in combination with the 
standard recommended dose of fulvestrant with the primarily efficacy endpoint, and in dose 
expansion cohorts of arm 2, the mirdametinib will be given as monotherapy at the RP2D.  Per 
MSKCC clinical research guidelines in CR426, “Expansion Cohorts in Phase I Clinical Trials”, 
for expansion cohorts of size less than 30, a sample size justification is not required.  Further, 
requirements for stopping rules for lack of efficacy (futility) are also not required for cohorts of 
less than 30 patients.  Assuming a 10% low unpromising response rate (null hypothesis), and a 
response rate >= 25% as a promising rate of response (alternative hypothesis), and n = 28 in 
each expansion cohort, this will provide 86% power to reject the null hypothesis if at the end of 
the trial at least 5 / 28 responses are observed in each cohort. Type I error is 14% for each 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 58 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
expansion cohort. The 10% null response rate is justified as an approximation of the standard 
historical rate in breast tumors treated with fulvestrant.  For example, the null response rate in 
Solar-1 trial was 12.8%33 and the null response rate in the Paloma-3 trial was 6.3%.34 
The two arms of the study will be statistically analyzed separately. Given the type I error above 
of 14% for any one expansion cohort, each arm (with at most two cohorts) yields a family wise 
error rate of 1-(1-0.14)^2 = 26%.  If one chooses to consider the (at most) four expansion 
cohorts simultaneously, this yields an overall family wise error rate of 1-(1-0.14)^4 = 45%. While 
we acknowledge that this is high when all expansion cohorts are considered, first these cohorts 
are exploratory and second the two arms are clearly biologically different and are being treated 
with differing drug regimens, therefore they will be analyzed separately, thus the appropriate 
family wise error rate to consider for this study is that of 2 expansion cohorts, or 26%. 
In the safety run in of arm 1, a minimum of six and as many as 12 DLT-evaluable patients are 
required. In the dose expansion cohorts of arm 1, the mirdametinib RP2D will be administered in 
combination with the standard recommended dose of fulvestrant with the primarily efficacy 
endpoint, and in dose expansion cohorts of arm 2, the mirdametinib will be given as 
monotherapy at the RP2D.  For these expansion cohorts, as explained above, each will be 
deemed promising if at the end of the study at least 5 / 28 responses (CR or PR) are observed. 
This part of the study will enroll 2 * 28 = 56 efficacy evaluable patients (28 patients on each of 
two expansion cohorts). Exploratory future cohorts, such as subjects with hormone receptor-
positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer exhibiting OncoKB defined activating 
mutations in BRAF, CRAF, or MEK1/2 (section 4.2) are not included in this analysis. To account 
for non-evaluable patients, we will have a goal total enrollment of 60 patients. This part of the 
study is planned to accrue approximately 2 patients per month and it is expected to complete 
accrual in 3 years. 
In the dose escalation part of arm 2 (mirdametinib monotherapy in MEK1/2 mutant patients), we 
anticipate as few as 6 DLT-evaluable patients and as many as 18 DLT-evaluable evaluable 
patients will be required, the precise number of patients enrolled in this arm is pending the 
observed toxicity of mirdametinib monotherapy in dose escalation.  This part of the study will 
take approximately nine months to complete accrual, assuming two patients per month are 
accrued. The specific expansion cohorts for this arm of the trial are pending the observed 
responses by genotype and cancer lineage in this arm of the protocol.  However, as with arm 1, 
as explained above, each expansion cohort will be deemed promising if at the end of the study 
at least 5 / 28 responses (CR or PR) are observed.  As we also anticipate as many as two 
expansion cohorts of patients on this arm of the study, this arm will also require as many as 2 * 
28 = 56 efficacy evaluable patients with a goal total enrollment of 60 patients which will take 3 
years to accrue.           
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 59 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
14.6 Demographics, Medical History, Baseline Characteristics and Concomitant 
Medications 
Demographics, baseline disease characteristics and medical history information will be 
summarized for the safety population by dose level in order to assess the comparability of the 
treatment groups descriptively.  Data to be tabulated will include demographic features such as 
age, sex and race, as well as disease-specific characteristics. 
The number and percentages of patients screened, treated, completed the treatment/study, and 
withdrawn from treatment/study for any reasons will be presented overall and by treatment 
group/dose level. 
14.7 Pharmacokinetic Analyses 
PK parameters for mirdametinib and PD-0315209 will be calculated using non-compartmental 
analysis with appropriate software such as Phoenix WinNonlin (Version 8.1 or higher, Certara, 
Inc.). Only plasma concentrations greater than or equal to the validated lower limit of 
quantitation (LLQ) will be used in the PK analyses. Actual blood sampling times will be used in 
all PK analyses. Per-protocol times will be used to calculate mean plasma concentrations for 
graphical displays. 
The following PK parameters will be determined as appropriate: 
Cmax 
Maximum concentration, determined directly from individual 
concentration-time data (Cycle 1, Day 1 only) 
Cmax, ss 
Maximum concentration at steady-state, determined directly from 
individual concentration-time data (Cycle 1, Day 15 only) 
Ctrough, ss 
Minimum concentration at steady-state, determined directly from 
individual concentration-time data (Cycle 1, Day 15 and Cycle 2, Day 1 
only) 
Tmax 
Time to reach maximum concentration, determined directly from individual 
concentration-time data. 
AUClast 
Area under the concentration-time curve from time-zero to the time of the 
last quantifiable concentration; calculated using the linear-up/log-down 
trapezoidal rule (Cycle 1, Day 1 only) 
AUClast, ss 
Area under the concentration-time curve from time-zero to the time of the 
last quantifiable concentration at steady-state; calculated using the linear-
up/log-down trapezoidal rule (Cycle 1, Day 15 only) 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 60 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
Additional PK parameters may be calculated if data allows. Population PK modeling may be 
performed on the mirdametinib concentration-time data collected from this study to 
quantitatively describe the PK, explore the PK variability, and identify any covariate effects such 
as demographic, intrinsic or extrinsic factors, or co-medication on the PK. The exposure-
response relationship between measures of mirdametinib exposure and measures of efficacy, 
including, but not limited to, ORR, PFS, and DOR may also be explored. The relationship 
between mirdametinib exposure and key safety variables, including EKG, may be explored. In 
addition, tumor biopsy biomarkers may be explored in the exposure / response analyses.  
14.8 Biomarker Analyses 
For each patient in the study, blood and tumor tissue samples will be collected, evaluated and 
archived to support exploratory biomarker analysis. Gene mutations and other genomic 
features, and other exploratory biomarkers will be correlated with response.  
As data warrants, exploratory analysis may be performed on each exploratory endpoint listed. In 
addition, exploratory analyses may be performed to examine the relationship between exposure 
to mirdametinib and clinical and safety endpoints (including tumor size or change in tumor size 
from baseline). 
These translational endpoints will include biomarkers associated with response, such as pre-
treatment and on-treatment MSK-IMPACT, and cell free DNA dynamics using MSK-ACCESS.  
MSK-IMPACT will be performed on all solid tumor biopsies, and MSK-ACCESS will be 
performed serially at timepoints specified in the Schedule of Assessments. These samples will 
be banked. Any prioritized findings arising clonally in tissue will be cross-validated in cfDNA 
from the same patient. In addition to confirming tissue findings, cfDNA sequencing will allow for 
(1) the assessment of response prior to imaging, (2) an analysis of the differential response of 
heterogenous subclones to treatment, and (3) the acquisition of sequencing data where tissue 
collection was not possible.  
In parallel with the above, the solid tumor biopsies will be utilized for additional translational 
work, and this line of inquiry includes the generation of PDX models and/or tumor derived cell 
lines and transcriptomic and protein analyses.  
    
15.0 TOXICITIES/RISKS/SIDE EFFECTS 
Adverse Events  
CTCAE Version 5 will be utilized for toxicity evaluation.  
An AE is the development of an undesirable medical condition or the deterioration of a pre-
existing medical condition following or during exposure to a pharmaceutical product, whether or 
not considered casually related to the product.  In clinical studies, an AE can include an 
undesirable medical condition occurring at any time, including baseline or washout periods, 
even if no study drug has been administered. 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 61 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
The intensity and causality of each AE will be assessed by the investigator as outlined in the 
following sections. 
Grade 1: 
Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; 
intervention not indicated; easily tolerated 
Grade 2: 
Moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting 
age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living (ADLs). (Instrumental ADL 
refer to preparing meals, shopping for groceries or clothes, using the 
telephone, or managing money.) 
Grade 3: 
Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; 
hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting 
self-care ADL. (Self-care ADL refer to bathing, dressing and undressing, 
feeding self, using the toilet, taking medications, and not bedridden.) 
Grade 4: 
Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. 
Grade 5: 
Death related to AE 
Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events  
A TEAE is any event that was not present prior to the initiation of study drug or any event that 
worsens in either intensity or frequency following exposure to study drug.   
Collecting and Recording Adverse Events 
AEs spontaneously reported by the patient and/or in response to an open question from the 
study personnel or revealed by observation will be recorded in the EDC.   
Information about AEs/SAEs will be collected from the first treatment through 30 days after the 
last dose of study drug or until alternate anticancer treatment has been initiated (whichever 
occurs earlier).   
The AE term should be reported in standard medical terminology when possible.  For each AE, 
the investigator will evaluate and report the onset (date and time), resolution (date and time), 
intensity, causality, action taken, serious outcome (if applicable), and whether or not it caused 
the patient to discontinue the study. 
Concomitant illnesses that existed before entry into the study will not be considered AEs unless 
the illness worsens during the Treatment Period. Pre-existing conditions will be recorded as 
medical history in the eCRF. 
Reporting Disease Progression 
The event of disease progression is an efficacy criterion and is therefore not considered an AE. 
Disease progression should be reported within the EDC. If AEs/SAEs occur in relation to 
disease progression, the AEs/SAEs must be reported per AE/SAE reporting requirements.  
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 62 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
Follow-Up of Adverse Events 
Investigators must follow subjects with AEs/SAEs until event resolution or stabilization, 
withdrawal of consent, subject loss to follow-up, or death, whichever occurs first. 
If an investigator becomes aware of an SAE after the specified follow up- period and considers 
the SAE related to the study drug, the investigator should report the SAE to SpringWorks 
according to timelines for reporting SAEs. 
Withdrawal due to Adverse Events  
Withdrawal due to AEs should be distinguished from withdrawal due to other causes, according 
to the definition of AE noted earlier, and recorded on the appropriate AE eCRF page. When a 
patient withdraws because of an SAE, the SAE must be reported in accordance with the 
reporting requirements. 
15.1 Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Reporting 
An adverse event is considered serious if it results in ANY of the following outcomes:  
 
Death  
 
A life-threatening adverse event  
 
An adverse event that results in inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing 
hospitalization 
 
A persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct 
normal life functions 
 
A congenital anomaly/birth defect 
 
Important Medical Events (IME) that may not result in death, be life threatening, or 
require hospitalization may be considered serious when, based upon medical 
judgment, they may jeopardize the patient or participant and may require medical or 
surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed in this definition 
 
List any additional events that require SAE reporting (pregnancy, AEs of special 
interest (AESI), secondary malignancies, etc.) 
 
Note: Hospital admission for a planned procedure/disease treatment is not considered 
an SAE.  
 
SAE reporting is required as soon as the participant starts investigational 
treatment/intervention.  SAE reporting is required for 30-days after the participant’s last 
investigational treatment/intervention. Any event that occur after the 30-day period that is 
unexpected and at least possibly related to protocol treatment must be reported. 
 
Please note: Any SAE that occurs prior to the start of investigational 
treatment/intervention and is related to a screening test or procedure (i.e., a screening 
biopsy) must be reported.  
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 63 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
All SAEs must be submitted in PIMS. If an SAE requires submission to the HRPP office 
per IRB SOP RR-408 ‘Reporting of Serious Adverse Events’, the SAE report must be 
submitted within 5 calendar days of the event.  All other SAEs must be submitted within 
30 calendar days of the event.   
 
The report should contain the following information: 
 
The date the adverse event occurred 
 
The adverse event 
 
The grade of the event  
 
Relationship of the adverse event to the treatment(s)  
 
If the AE was expected 
 
Detailed text that includes the following 
o An explanation of how the AE was handled 
o A description of the participant’s condition 
o Indication if the participant remains on the study 
 
If an amendment will need to be made to the protocol and/or consent form 
 
If the SAE is an Unanticipated Problem  
15.2 External SAE Reporting 
All SAEs/SUSARs (related and unrelated) will be recorded from the time of starting 
treatment until 30 days following the end-of-treatment exposure. Any SAEs/SUSAR 
considered possibly or probably related to the investigational product and discovered by 
the investigator at any time after the study should be reported.   
All SAEs/SUSARs must be reported to SpringWorks within 5 business day of the first 
awareness of the event. MSK will provide a copy of the redacted MSK SAE report by fax 
or email to the assigned drug safety vendor below: 
United BioSource Corporation 
920 Harvest Drive, Suite 200 
Blue Bell, PA 19442 
Fax: 866-750-4514 
PV@springworkstx.com 
Additional follow-up information, if required or available, should all be reported to the 
assigned drug safety vendor within 5 business day of receipt. This should be completed 
on a follow-up MSK SAE form and faxed or emailed to the drug safety vendor with the 
original SAE/SUSAR information and kept with the appropriate section of the CRF 
and/or study file. 
For IND/IDE protocols: 
The SAE report should be completed as per above instructions.  If appropriate, the 
report will be forwarded to the FDA by the IND Office. 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 64 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
15.3 Dose Limiting Toxicities 
The severity of adverse events (AEs) reviewed as potential dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) will be 
graded according to the CTCAE V.5.0. classification. 
The occurrence of any of the following AEs during Cycle 1 (Day 1 – Day 28) will be considered 
a DLT, except for those AEs clearly related to disease progression or intercurrent illness. 
Hematologic: 
1. Grade 4 or greater hematologic toxicity (neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, or anemia) 
2. Grade 3 febrile neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] < 1000/mm3 with a single 
temperature of > 38.3oC (101°F) or a sustained temperature of ≥ 38oC (100.4°F) for 
> 1 hour) 
3. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding 
Non-hematologic: 
1. Grade 2 or greater ocular toxicities leading to reduced visual acuity limiting ADL, 
glaucoma, retinal detachment, or retinal vascular disorder 
2. NYHA class III or IV left ventricular dysfunction 
3. Grade 3 or greater non-hematologic toxicity that is clinically significant with the following 
exceptions: 
a. Toxicity (other than rash) that starts to resolve within 3 days of initiating optimal 
supportive care 
b. Grade 3 rash that resolves to grade 1 or less within 7 days of initiating optimal 
supportive care 
c. Grade 3 laboratory abnormalities that are not associated with clinical sequelae 
(e.g., isolated lactose dehydrogenase elevation) and resolves to Grade ≤1 within 
3 days of initiating optimal supportive care 
d. Grade 3 or 4 electrolyte laboratory abnormalities that last up to 72 hours, are not 
clinically complicated, and resolve spontaneously or respond to conventional 
medical interventions 
e. Grade 3 or 4 amylase or lipase elevation that is not associated with symptoms or 
clinical manifestations of pancreatitis 
f. Alopecia 
4. Grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity, with the exception of those listed above, regardless of 
clinical significance or duration  
5. Hy’s law criteria (Grade ≥ 2 bilirubin in conjunction with grade ≥2 transaminase and 
without elevation of alkaline phosphatase) 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 65 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
In addition, clinically important or persistent toxicities not included above may also be 
considered a DLT at the discretion of the investigator after consultation with the SpringWorks 
physician. 
A DLT may require temporary interruption or permanent discontinuation of mirdametinib. 
Mirdametinib treatment may be restarted at the same or reduced dose after the DLT has 
resolved to Grade ≤1.  See the mirdametinib treatment modification guidelines in Table 4 below. 
15.4 Dose Modification 
The Investigator may temporarily interrupt, reduce the dose or permanently discontinue one or 
more study drugs at their discretion due to treatment-emergent adverse event that – in the 
Investigator’s opinion – warrants treatment modification.  
The treatment with fulvestrant in Arm 1 should be modified according to the USPI (where 
applicable) or at the investigator’s discretion. 
The treatment with mirdametinib in all arms should be modified according to the guidelines 
provided in Table 4 and Table 5below. 
Treatment should remain interrupted until the AE has resolved to Grade ≤1 (of Grade ≤2 in the 
event of rash).  In addition, the AE resolution to Grade 2 may be acceptable at the Investigator’s 
discretion if same toxicity was ongoing at Grade 2 since the pre-treatment baseline). The study 
treatment may be re-started at the same or lower dose (see Table 4 and Table 5) if the has 
reached satisfactory resolution in ≤21 days. If the AE has taken >21 to reach satisfactory 
resolution, then the study treatment should be permanently discontinued, unless the Investigator 
has determined that re-starting the treatment has acceptable benefit-risk ratio (e.g. continued 
objective response or stable disease after AE resolution).  
Once a dose of the study treatment has been reduced due to an AE, the subject must remain on 
the reduced dose for the duration of the study. One subject may have up to 2 dose reductions 
due to AE. Dose re-escalation after the AE resolution is not permitted.  
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 66 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
Table 4 
 Guideline for Mirdametinib Dose Modification for Related Adverse Events 
RELATED ADVERSE EVENTS  
(Worst Grade by CTCAE V. 5.0) 
INTERVENTION 
NEUTROPENIA (ANC DECREASE) 
Grade 3 (ANC <1.0x to 0.5x 109/L) 
Interrupt mirdametinib until resolution to Grade ≤1, then 
 
If resolved in ≤7 days, may re-start mirdametinib at the 
same dose at the Investigator’s discretion 
 
If resolved in >7 days, re-start mirdametinib at the next 
lower dose (seeTable 5). 
Grade 4 (ANC <0.5x 109/L)  
Interrupt mirdametinib until resolution to Grade ≤1, then 
 
If resolved in ≤7 days, may re-start mirdametinib at the 
next lower dose (see Table 5) at the Investigator’s 
discretion 
 
If resolved in >7 days, permanently discontinue 
mirdametinib. 
Grade 3 febrile neutropenia (ANC <1.0x 109/L 
with a single temperature of >38.3 degrees C 
[101 degrees F] or a sustained temperature of 
≥38 degrees C [100.4 degrees F] for more than 
one hour) 
Interrupt mirdametinib until complete resolution of fever and 
ANC resolution to Grade ≤1. 
After satisfactory resolution, re-start mirdametinib at the next 
lower dose (see Table 5). 
Grade 4 febrile neutropenia (ANC and 
temperature criteria as listed above PLUS life-
threatening signs or symptoms including septic 
shock, hypotension and/or acidosis) 
Permanently discontinue mirdametinib. 
THROMBOCYTOPENIA (PLATELET COUNT DECREASE) 
Grade 3 thrombocytopenia (Platelets <50x to 
≥25x 109/L) 
Interrupt mirdametinib until resolution to Grade ≤1, then 
 
If resolved in ≤7 days, may re-start mirdametinib at the 
same dose at the Investigator’s discretion 
 
If resolved in >7 days, re-start mirdametinib at the next 
lower dose (seeTable 5). 
Grade 4 thrombocytopenia (Platelets <25x 
109/L) 
Interrupt mirdametinib until resolution to Grade ≤1, then 
 
If resolved in ≤7 days, may re-start mirdametinib at the 
next lower dose (see Table 5) at the Investigator’s 
discretion 
 
If resolved in >7 days, permanently discontinue 
mirdametinib. 
OPHTHALMOLOGICAL 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 67 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
Any Grade ≤2 event not leading to reduced 
visual acuity limiting ADL. 
Continue mirdametinib at the same dose.  
Perform ophthalmologic exams at least monthly or more 
frequently at the Investigator’s discretion until resolution to 
Grade ≤1. 
Any Grade 2 event reduced visual acuity limiting 
ADL, or any Grade ≥3 event. 
For events different from RVO or retinal detachment, interrupt 
mirdametinib until resolution to Grade ≤1. Perform 
ophthalmologic exams at least biweekly or more frequently at 
the Investigator’s discretion until satisfactory resolution. 
After resolution to Grade ≤1, re-start mirdametinib treatment 
at the next lower dose (see Table 5).  
For Grade ≥3 RVO or retinal detachment, permanently 
discontinue mirdametinib. 
NEUROLOGICAL 
 
Grade ≤2 seizure / convulsion, hallucination, 
confusion or delirium or similar events lasting 
>24 hours AND after ruling out other possible 
causes. 
Interrupt mirdametinib until resolution to Grade ≤1. 
After resolution to Grade ≤1, re-start mirdametinib at the next 
lower dose (see Table 5). 
Any Grade ≥3 event 
Interrupt mirdametinib until resolution to Grade ≤1.  
After resolution to Grade ≤1, the Investigator may re-start 
mirdametinib at the next lower dose (see Table 5) or 
permanently discontinue mirdametinib, depending on the 
Investigator’s benefit-risk assessment. 
MUSCULOSKELETAL 
 
Grade ≥3 muscle weakness (symptomatic and 
interfering with ADL). 
Interrupt mirdametinib until resolution to Grade ≤1. 
After resolution to Grade ≤1, re-start mirdametinib at the next 
lower dose (see Table 5). 
DERMATOLOGICAL 
 
Grade ≥3 rash 
Interrupt mirdametinib until resolution to Grade ≤1. 
After resolution to Grade ≤1, re-start mirdametinib at the next 
lower dose (see Table 5). 
LVEF 
 
Grade 2 LVEF decrease (post-baseline LVEF of 
40-49%)  
If asymptomatic, interrupt mirdametinib until LVEF resolves to 
≥50%. Perform LVEF exams at least biweekly or more 
frequently at the Investigator’s discretion until satisfactory 
resolution After resolution to Grade ≤1, re-start mirdametinib 
at the next lower dose (see Table 5). 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 68 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
If symptomatic, permanently discontinue mirdametinib. 
Grade 3 LVEF decrease (post-baseline LVEF of 
20-39% or ≥20% difference between the post-
baseline vs. baseline LVEF) 
If asymptomatic, interrupt mirdametinib and repeat LVEF 
exam in one week. If repeat exam shows persistent Grade 3 
LVEF decrease, then permanently discontinue mirdametinib.  
If repeat exam shows Grade 2 LVEF decrease or better, then 
apply the guideline listed above for Grade 2 LVEF decrease. 
If symptomatic, permanently discontinue mirdametinib. 
Grade 4 LVEF decrease (post-baseline LVEF 
<20%) 
Permanently discontinue study treatment. 
QTcF 
Grade 3 QTcF prolongation (absolute QTcF 
>500 msec or QTcF change from baseline 
>60 msec) 
Repeat ECG in triplicate approximately 1 hour after the initial 
ECG and consult with a cardiologist. The three ECGs must 
be recorded in close succession and not more than 2 minutes 
apart, and after at least 5 minutes of quiet supine rest. 
Calculate the mean QTcF from the three ECGs. 
If the absolute QTcF is <480 msec or QTcF change from 
baseline is ≤30 msec on repeat ECG triplicate, and the 
cardiologist agrees, then mirdametinib may be re-started 
immediately at the same dose. 
If the absolute QTcF is >480 msec to ≤500 msec or QTcF 
change from baseline is >30 msec to ≤60 msec on repeat 
ECG triplicate, and the cardiologist confirms that the result is 
drug-related, then mirdametinib should be temporarily 
interrupted during the follow up by weekly repeat ECG 
triplicates. When the absolute QTcF is <480 msec or QTcF 
change from baseline is ≤30 msec on repeat ECG triplicate, 
then mirdametinib should be re-started at the next lower dose 
(see Table 5).  
If the absolute QTcF is >500 msec or QTcF change from 
baseline is >60 msec on repeat ECG triplicate, and the 
cardiologist confirms that the result is drug-related, then 
mirdametinib should be permanently discontinued. 
TOTAL BILIRUBIN  
 
Grade 2 total bilirubin increase (>1.5x to 3.0x 
ULN if baseline was normal; >1.5x to 3.0x 
baseline if baseline was abnormal) 
Interrupt mirdametinib until resolution to baseline, then 
 
If resolved in ≤7 days, re-start mirdametinib at the same 
dose 
 
If resolved >7 days, re-start mirdametinib at the next 
lower dose (see Table 5) 
Grade 3 total bilirubin increase (>3.0x to 10.0x 
ULN if baseline was normal; >3.0x to 10.0x 
baseline if baseline was abnormal) 
Interrupt mirdametinib until resolution to baseline, then 
 
If resolved in ≤7 days, may re-start mirdametinib at the 
next lower dose (see Table 5) at the Investigator’s 
discretion 
 
If resolved >7 days, permanently discontinue 
mirdametinib 
Grade 4 total bilirubin increase (>10.0x ULN if 
baseline was normal; >10.0x baseline if 
baseline was abnormal) 
Permanently discontinue mirdametinib 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 69 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
AST or ALT 
Grade 3 AST or ALT increase (>5.0x to 20.0x 
ULN if baseline was normal; >5.0x to 20.0x 
baseline if baseline was abnormal) 
Interrupt mirdametinib until resolution to Grade ≤1 (or Grade 
≤2 if the subject has liver metastases). 
After resolution to Grade ≤1, re-start mirdametinib at the next 
lower dose (see Table 5). 
Grade 4 AST or ALT increase (>20.0x ULN if 
baseline was normal; >20.0x baseline if 
baseline was abnormal) 
Permanently discontinue mirdametinib 
Potential DILI / Hy’s Law (pending clinical adjudication) 
Total bilirubin increase ≥2.0x ULN and ALT or 
AST increase ≥3.0x ULN 
Permanently discontinue mirdametinib. 
If clinical adjudication confirms DILI / Hy’s Law, then report 
DILI as SAE. 
OTHER 
Grade ≥ 3 hematologic toxicities or clinically 
significant Grade 2 hematologic abnormalities 
that do not resolve within 72 hours after 
initiation of medical management. 
Interrupt dosing, after resolution to Grade ≤ 1, restart study 
treatment at the next lower dose following Table 5. 
Grade ≥ 3 nonhematologic toxicity that is not 
controlled by optimal supportive medication. 
Interrupt dosing; after resolution to Grade ≤ 1 or baseline, 
restart study treatment at the next lower dose following Error! 
Reference source not found.. 
Other Grade 2 toxicity that is subjectively 
intolerable (except alopecia) and not controlled 
by optimal supportive medication. 
Interrupt dosing; after resolution to Grade ≤ 1 or baseline, re-
start study treatment at the same dose. 
Recurrent subjectively intolerable toxicity (at 
least a week interruption on 2 occasions) that is 
not controlled by optimal supportive medication. 
Interrupt dosing; after resolution to Grade ≤ 1 or baseline, 
restart study treatment at the next lower dose using Error! 
Reference source not found.. If toxicity is still intolerable, 
permanently discontinue study treatment (unless otherwise 
discussed with the Principal Investigator).  
ADL=activities of daily living; LVEF=left ventricular ejection fraction 
 
In the event a dose reduction is required, the study treatment total daily dose will be reduced as 
shown in Table 5: 
 
 
 
 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 70 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
Table 5 
Mirdametinib Dose Reduction 
Dose at the time of the event 
Reduced dose 
2 mg BID 
1 mg BID 
4 mg BID 
2 mg BID 
6 mg BID 
4 mg BID 
BID = twice daily 
15.5  Side Effects of Fulvestrant  
Fulvestrant (Faslodex) Injection is an estrogen receptor antagonist used to treat some hormone-
related breast cancer. Fulvestrant is also used in postmenopausal women whose breast cancer has 
progressed after treatment with other anti-estrogen medication. 
 
Per the package insert provided on the FDA website, the following adverse reactions (ARs) were 
calculated based on the safety analysis of the CONFIRM study comparing the administration of 
fulvestrant 500 mg intramuscularly once a month with fulvestrant 250 mg intramuscularly once a 
month31. The most frequently reported adverse reactions in the fulvestrant 500 mg group were 
injection site pain (11.6% of patients), nausea (9.7% of patients), and bone pain (9.4% of patients); 
the most frequently reported adverse reactions in the fulvestrant 250 mg group were nausea (13.6% 
of patients), back pain (10.7% of patients), and injection site pain (9.1% of patients). 
 
The safety of fulvestrant 500 mg versus anastrozole 1 mg was evaluated in the FALCON study32. 
The data described below reflect exposure to fulvestrant in 228 out of 460 patients with HR-positive 
advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women not previously treated with endocrine therapy 
who received at least one (1) dose of treatment in the FALCON study32. Permanent discontinuation 
associated with an adverse reaction occurred in 4 of 228 (1.8%) patients receiving fulvestrant and in 
3 of 232 (1.3%) patients receiving anastrozole. Adverse reactions leading to discontinuation for 
those patients receiving fulvestrant included drug hypersensitivity (0.9%), injection site 
hypersensitivity (0.4%), and elevated liver enzymes (0.4%). The most common adverse reactions 
occurring in ≥5% of patients receiving 500 mg fulvestrant were: injection site pain, nausea, bone 
pain, arthralgia, headache, back pain, fatigue, pain in extremity, hot flash, vomiting, anorexia, 
asthenia, musculoskeletal pain, cough, dyspnea, and constipation. 
 
Increased hepatic enzymes (ALT, AST, ALP) occurred in >15% of Fulvestrant users and were not 
dose-dependent. 
 
Because Fulvestrant is administered intramuscularly, it should be given with caution in patients with 
bleeding diathesis, thrombocytopenia, or anticoagulant use. For further details regarding the safety 
profile of fulvestrant, refer to the fulvestrant package insert. 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 71 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
COMMON, SOME MAY BE SERIOUS 
In 100 people receiving Fulvestrant, more than 20 and up to 100 may have: 
 Cough 
 Infection, especially when white blood cell count is low 
 Anemia which may require transfusion 
 Bruising, bleeding 
 Constipation 
 Diarrhea 
 Nausea 
 Vomiting 
 Loss of appetite 
 Pain 
 Tiredness 
 Flushing 
 Headache 
 
OCCASIONAL, SOME MAY BE SERIOUS 
In 100 people receiving Fulvestrant, from 4 to 20 may have: 
 Change in the heart rhythm 
 Swelling of the body 
 Shortness of breath 
 Blood clot which may cause swelling, pain 
 Liver damage which may cause yellow eyes and skin, swelling 
 Allergic reaction which may cause rash, low blood pressure, wheezing, shortness of 
breath, swelling of the face or throat 
 
15.6 Side Effects of Mirdametinib 
As described in section 3.2, the ReNeu study (MEK-NF-201) utilized mirdametinib at a dose of 
2 mg/m2 BID (maximum dose = 4.0 mg BID).  This is the dose of mirdametinib that we are using in 
this study.   
Per the Investigator’s Brochure for Mirdametinib, NF Study 106 was a Phase 2 study with 
mirdametinib conducted patients with a NF1-associated plexiform neurofibroma6. This Phase 2, 
open-label study evaluated 19 patients (range 16-39 years) with symptomatic or growing plexiform 
neurofibromas. Quantitative radiographic response in a target lesion after administration of 
mirdametinib at a dose of 2mg/m2 twice daily (maximum dose of 4 mg twice daily) on a 3 weeks on / 
1 week off schedule was assessed. Mirdametinib was well tolerated with the most common dose 
limiting toxicity being acneiform rash in 3/19 patients (16%). Five subjects (26.3%) developed Grade 
3 toxicities, with four of those subjects (21%) reporting a Grade 3 toxicity of pain. No subjects 
developed Grade 4 or higher toxicities and 1 subject experienced an SAE. This subject experienced 
Grade 2 Constipation, Abdominal distention, Cyst and Grade 3 Abdominal pain and Back pain. The 
Grade 2 Constipation, Grade 3 Abdominal pain, and Grade 3 Back pain were all considered possibly 
related to drug. No deaths were reported in this study.  
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 72 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
The intermittent dosing schedule along with the maximum daily dose of 4 mg abrogated the ocular 
toxicities that have been reported with this compound. In addition, there were no reports of cardiac 
toxicities reported. 
The table below contains a list of adverse reactions considered to be expected for regulatory 
reporting purposes for mirdametinib in advanced cancer studies. 
System Organ Class  
Adverse Reaction  
Eye disorders  
Retinal vein occlusion  
Retinal hemorrhage  
Optic ischemic neuropathy  
Nervous system disorders  
Dizziness  
Paraesthesia  
Gastrointestinal disorders  
Diarrhea  
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders  
Rash  
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders  Muscle disorder (neck drop)  
Muscular weakness  
Psychiatric disorders  
Confusional state  
 
15.6.1 Known Drug Class Effects and Other Human Experience 
In addition to side effects common to small-molecule kinase inhibitors such as rash, fatigue, and 
diarrhea, events unique to MEK inhibitors as a class have also been identified. 
 
Ocular toxicity has been associated with MEK inhibitors. Although retinal vein occlusion has been 
reported, the more frequent underlying pathology for visual changes is central serous retinopathy. 
Unlike retinal vein occlusion, which can result in permanent loss of vision, central serous retinopathy 
usually resolves spontaneously after interruption of treatment and does not preclude retreatment. 
 
Peripheral edema, particularly periorbital edema, and markedly elevated serum levels of CPK 
without underlying pathology have also been observed after MEK-inhibitor therapy. Dropped-head 
syndrome, an uncommon progressive weakness of neck extensor muscles that is characterized by 
focal non-inflammatory myopathy, moderately elevated serum CPK levels, lack of response to 
corticosteroids, and resolution after discontinuation of the agent, has been reported in patients 
exposed to MEK inhibitors. Cases of left ventricular dysfunction have also been reported after 
therapy with MEK inhibitors, as have CNS effects, including hallucinations and confusion, 
presumably attributable to a subset of MEK-targeted agents with good CNS penetration. 
 
The drug manufacturer SpringWorks considers the available safety data from clinical studies of 
mirdametinib in patients with advanced cancer to be consistent with the known safety profile of other 
MEK inhibitors. The available data supports the continued assessment of the benefit/risk profile of 
mirdametinib in indications where an overactivation of the MAPK pathway exists. Reference the 
investigators brochure for more information.  
 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 73 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
16.0 PROTECTION OF HUMAN PARTICIPANTS 
16.1 Privacy 
MSK’s Privacy Office may allow the use and disclosure of protected health information 
pursuant to a completed and signed Research Authorization form. The use and disclosure of 
protected health information will be limited to the individuals/entities described in the 
Research Authorization form. A Research Authorization form must be approved by the IRB 
and Privacy Board (IRB/PB).  
The consent indicates that individualized de identified information collected for the purposes 
of this study may be shared with other qualified researchers. Only researchers who have 
received approval from MSK will be allowed to access this information which will not include 
protected health information, such as the participant’s name, except for dates. It is also 
stated in the Research Authorization that their research data may be shared with others at 
the time of study publication. 
The study will be performed in accordance with ethical principles that have their origin in the 
Declaration of Helsinki and are consistent with ICH/Good Clinical Practice and applicable 
regulatory requirements. 
Patient confidentiality is strictly held in trust by the sponsor and/or their designee(s), 
participating investigators, and any staff. This confidentiality includes the clinical information 
relating to patients, as well as any genetic or biological testing. 
The principal investigator(s) at each center will ensure that the patient is given full and 
adequate oral and written information about the nature, purpose, possible risk and benefit of 
the study.  Patients must also be notified that they are free to discontinue from the study at 
any time.  The patient should be given the opportunity to ask questions and allowed time to 
consider the information provided. 
The patient’s signed and dated informed consent must be obtained before conducting any 
study procedures.  The principal investigator(s) must maintain the original signed ICF.  
16.2 Data Management  
Source documents will be maintained by MSK and used to enter data and complete the 
eCRFs in the clinical database. Medidata will be the Electronic Database Captures (EDC) for 
this study.   Any entered, changed, and final data will be available with a validated audit trail 
report or data extract report.  The eCRFs will be considered complete when all expected data 
has been entered and all discrepancies have been resolved or documented.  The 
investigator must sign all eCRFs according the requirements of the EDC.   
Patient records, source documents, IP inventory, regulatory documents, and other 
correspondence must be maintained in the appropriate study files according the ICH GCP, 
and these records will be retained for the period required by institution.   
 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 74 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
16.3 Quality Assurance 
Before the start of the study, the study personnel will meet to discuss the protocol and data 
collection procedures, and applicable training of site personnel will be conducted.  During the 
conduct of the study, site monitoring will occur (which will include on-site visits) in 
accordance with applicable regulations and Good Clinical Practices (GCP). During these 
contacts, the monitoring activities will include the following: 
 
Checking and assessing the progress of the study 
 
Reviewing study data collected to date for completeness and accuracy 
 
Conducting source document verifications by reviewing each patient’s eCRF against 
source documents 
 
Identifying any issues and addressing resolutions 
 
Recording and reporting protocol deviations to the IRB 
 
Confirming that SAEs have been properly reported to the drug manufacturer 
(SpringWorks) and submitted to the IRB if appropriate 
Upon completion of the study, the principal investigator will ensure all data and IP 
reconciliation is complete. 
16.4 Data and Safety Monitoring 
The Data and Safety Monitoring Plan utilized for this study will be aligned with the MSK DSM 
Plan, where applicable.  
The Data and Safety Monitoring (DSM) Plans at Memorial Sloan Kettering were approved by 
the National Cancer Institute in August 2018. The plans address the new policies set forth by 
the NCI in the document entitled “Policy of the National Cancer Institute for Data and Safety 
Monitoring of Clinical Trials.”  
There are several different mechanisms by which clinical studies are monitored for data, 
safety and quality. At a departmental/PI level there exists procedures for quality control by 
the research team(s). Institutional processes in place for quality assurance include protocol 
monitoring, compliance and data verification audits, staff education on clinical research QA 
and two institutional committees that are responsible for monitoring the activities of our 
clinical trials programs. The committees: Data and Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC) for 
Phase I and II clinical trials, and the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) for Phase III 
clinical trials, report to the Deputy Physician-in-Chief, Clinical Research. 
The degree of monitoring required will be determined based on level of risk and documented.  
The MSK DSMB monitors phase III trials and the DSMC monitors non-phase III trials. The 
DSMB/C have oversight over the following trials: 
 
MSK Investigator Initiated Trials (IITs; MSK as sponsor) 
 
External studies where MSK is the data coordinating center 
 
Low risk studies identified as requiring DSMB/C review  
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 75 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
This clinical trial falls under the oversight of the DSMC.   
The DSMC will initiate review following the enrollment of the first participant/or by the end of 
the year one if no accruals and will continue for the study lifecycle until there are no 
participants under active therapy and the protocol has closed to accrual. The DSMB will 
initiate review once the protocol is open to accrual. 
 
17.0    REFERENCES 
1. 
Razavi, P. et al. The Genomic Landscape of Endocrine-Resistant Advanced Breast Cancers. 
Cancer Cell (2018). doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2018.08.008 
2. 
Zheng, Z. Y. et al. Neurofibromin Is an Estrogen Receptor-α Transcriptional Co-repressor in 
Breast Cancer. Cancer Cell (2020). doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2020.02.003 
3. 
Pearson, A. et al. Inactivating NF1 mutations are enriched in advanced breast cancer and 
contribute to endocrine therapy resistance. Clin. Cancer Res. (2020). doi:10.1158/1078-
0432.CCR-18-4044 
4. 
Gao, Y. et al. Allele-specific mechanisms of activation of mek1 mutants determine their 
properties. Cancer Discov. (2018). doi:10.1158/2159-8290.CD-17-1452 
5. 
Hanrahan, A. J. et al.  Leveraging Systematic Functional Analysis to Benchmark an In Silico 
Framework Distinguishes Driver from Passenger MEK Mutants in Cancer . Cancer Res. 
(2020). doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-20-0865 
6. 
Weiss, B. D. et al. NF106: A Neurofibromatosis Clinical Trials Consortium Phase II Trial of the 
MEK Inhibitor Mirdametinib (PD-0325901) in Adolescents and Adults With NF1-Related 
Plexiform Neurofibromas. J. Clin. Oncol. (2021). doi:10.1200/jco.20.02220 
7. 
Toy, W. et al. ESR1 ligand-binding domain mutations in hormone-resistant breast cancer. Nat. 
Genet. (2013). doi:10.1038/ng.2822 
8. 
Chandarlapaty, S. et al.  Prevalence of ESR1 Mutations in Cell-Free DNA and Outcomes in 
Metastatic Breast Cancer . JAMA Oncol. (2016). doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.1279 
9. 
Toy, W. et al. Activating ESR1 mutations differentially affect the efficacy of ER antagonists. 
Cancer Discov. (2017). doi:10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-1523 
10. 
Baselga, J. et al. Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel for metastatic breast cancer. 
N. Engl. J. Med. (2012). doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1113216 
11. 
Bosch, A. et al. PI3K inhibition results in enhanced estrogen receptor function and 
dependence in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Sci. Transl. Med. (2015). 
doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa4442 
12. 
Dickler, M. N. et al. MONARCH 1, a phase II study of abemaciclib, a CDK4 and CDK6 
inhibitor, as a single agent, n patients with refractory HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer. 
Clin. Cancer Res. (2017). doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0754 
13. 
Nelson, K. G., Takahashi, T., Bossert, N. L., Walmer, D. K. & McLachlan, J. A. Epidermal 
growth factor replaces estrogen in the stimulation of female genital-tract growth and 
differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. (1991). doi:10.1073/pnas.88.1.21 
14. 
Ignar-Trowbridge, D. M. et al. Coupling of dual signaling pathways: Epidermal growth factor 
action involves the estrogen receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. (1992). 
doi:10.1073/pnas.89.10.4658 
15. 
Kato, S. et al. Activation of the estrogen receptor through phosphorylation by mitogen-
activated protein kinase. Science (80-. ). (1995). doi:10.1126/science.270.5241.1491 
16. 
Bunone, G., Briand, P. A., Miksicek, R. J. & Picard, D. Activation of the unliganded estrogen 
receptor by EGF involves the MAP kinase pathway and direct phosphorylation. EMBO J. 
(1996). doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00571.x 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 76 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
17. 
Tremblay, A., Tremblay, G. B., Labrie, F. & Giguère, V. Ligand-Independent recruitment of 
SRC-1 to estrogen receptor β through phosphorylation of activation function AF-1. Mol. Cell 
(1999). doi:10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80479-7 
18. 
Zaman, K. et al. Fulvestrant with or without selumetinib, a MEK 1/2 inhibitor, in breast cancer 
progressing after aromatase inhibitor therapy: A multicentre randomised placebo-controlled 
double-blind phase II trial, SAKK 21/08. Eur. J. Cancer (2015). doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2015.03.016 
19. 
Hyman, D. M. et al. Vemurafenib in Multiple Nonmelanoma Cancers with BRAF V600 
Mutations. N. Engl. J. Med. (2015). doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1502309 
20. 
Hyman, D. M. et al. HER kinase inhibition in patients with HER2-and HER3-mutant cancers. 
Nature (2018). doi:10.1038/nature25475 
21. 
Hyman, D. M. et al. AKT inhibition in solid tumors with AKT1 mutations. J. Clin. Oncol. (2017). 
doi:10.1200/JCO.2017.73.0143 
22. 
Long, G. V. et al. Combined BRAF and MEK Inhibition versus BRAF Inhibition Alone in 
Melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. (2014). doi:10.1056/nejmoa1406037 
23. 
Kopetz, S. et al.  Encorafenib, Binimetinib, and Cetuximab in BRAF V600E–Mutated 
Colorectal Cancer . N. Engl. J. Med. (2019). doi:10.1056/nejmoa1908075 
24. 
Emery, C. M. et al. MEK1 mutations confer resistance to MEK and B-RAF inhibition. Proc. 
Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. (2009). doi:10.1073/pnas.0905833106 
25. 
Yaeger, R. & Corcoran, R. B. Targeting alterations in the RAF–MEK pathway. Cancer 
Discovery (2019). doi:10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-1321 
26. 
Russo, M. et al. Tumor heterogeneity and Lesion-Specific response to targeted therapy in 
colorectal cancer. Cancer Discov. (2016). doi:10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-1283 
27. 
Gao, Y. et al. V211D mutation in MEK1 causes resistance to MEK inhibitors in colon cancer. 
Cancer Discov. (2019). doi:10.1158/2159-8290.CD-19-0356 
28. 
Corcoran, R. B. et al. Research article combined BRAF, EGFR, and MEK inhibition in patients 
with BRAF V600E -mutant colorectal cancer. Cancer Discov. (2018). doi:10.1158/2159-
8290.CD-17-1226 
29. 
Prahallad, A. et al. Unresponsiveness of colon cancer to BRAF(V600E) inhibition through 
feedback activation of EGFR. Nature (2012). doi:10.1038/nature10868 
30. 
Ohren, J. F. et al. Structures of human MAP kinase kinase 1 (MEK1) and MEK2 describe 
novel noncompetitive kinase inhibition. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. (2004). doi:10.1038/nsmb859 
31. 
Di Leo, A. et al. Results of the CONFIRM phase III trial comparing fulvestrant 250 mg with 
fulvestrant 500 mg in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive advanced 
breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. (2010). doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.28.8415 
32. 
Robertson, J. F. R. et al. Fulvestrant 500 mg versus anastrozole 1 mg for hormone receptor-
positive advanced breast cancer (FALCON): an international, randomised, double-blind, 
phase 3 trial. Lancet (2016). doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32389-3 
33. 
André, Fabrice et al. Alpelisib for PIK3CA-Mutated, Hormone Receptor–Positive Advanced 
Breast Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. (2019). doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1813904 
34. 
Turner, Nicholas et al. Overall Survival with Palbociclib and Fulvestrant in Advanced Breast 
Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. (2018). doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1810527 
35. 
Nathan, Mark et al. A Review of Fulvestrant in Breast Cancer. Oncology and Therapy (2017). 
doi: 10.1007/s40487-017-0046-2 
36. 
Howell, A. et al. Fulvestrant, formerly ICI 182,780, is as effective as anastrozole in 
postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer progressing after prior endocrine 
treatment. J. Clin. Oncol. (2002). doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.10.057. 
 
 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 77 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
18.0    APPENDICES 
I. Summary of Biospecimens  
II. PK sample collection and shipping 
III. Investigational Scan Considerations 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 78 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
Appendix I: Summary of Biospecimens  
 
Specimen 
Collectio
n Time 
Points 
Mandatory 
or 
Optional? 
SOC or 
Research? 
Collection 
Amount 
Specimen Processing 
Location 
Shipping Details 
Analysis 
(reason for 
specimen 
collection) 
Tumor tissue 
SCR, On-
Treatment  
Screening 
(Mandatory), 
On 
Treatment 
(optional) 
Research 
TISSUE 
SECTIONING 
REQUESTS 
ARE TO BE 
MADE IN 
BATCH 
ONLY 
 
One core for 
FFPE, 
Diagnosis 
and MSK-
Impact 
 
Two fresh 
cores for PDX 
generation (1 
required and 
1 optional) 
 
Three frozen 
cores for 
RNA-seq (1), 
protein 
lysates (1), 
and further 
sequencing 
(1 in reserve) 
 
Diagnosis and MSK-Impact: 
MSK Pathology Lab 
 
PDX Generation: PDX Core 
 
Frozen cores: Chandarlapaty 
lab and Solit lab 
 
 
 
N/A  
Diagnosis 
Confirmatio
n 
 
MSK-Impact 
 
PDX 
Generation 
 
Frozen 
tissue for 
assessment 
of RNA, 
protein, and 
further 
sequencing 
Blood for SOC 
labs 
 
SCR, all 
D1, EOT 
Mandatory 
SOC 
Variable 
MSK 
N/A 
CBC, 
chemistry, 
thyroid 
function, 
pregnancy 
test (as 
required) 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 79 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
Specimen 
Collectio
n Time 
Points 
Mandatory 
or 
Optional? 
SOC or 
Research? 
Collection 
Amount 
Specimen Processing 
Location 
Shipping Details 
Analysis 
(reason for 
specimen 
collection) 
Plasma for ctDNA 
 
C1D1, 
C2D1, 
imaging 
timepoint, 
EOT, 
Follow-up 
Mandatory 
Research 
4x 10mL cell 
free DNA 
BCT tubes 
(screening) 
 
 
2x 10mL cell 
free DNA 
BCT tubes 
(all other time 
points) 
 
Department of Molecular 
Pathology at MSK 
Ambient, shipped immediately by courier to 
Department of Molecular Pathology at MSK 
ctDNA 
Plasma for 
Pharmacokinetics 
Refer to 
SOA 
(Table 3) 
Mandatory 
Research 
1x 4 mL 
blood 
processed for 
plasma in 
K2EDTA tube 
MSK; 
 
Process and store in freezer 
within 60 min of blood 
collection. Invert 8-10 times 
gently and immediately place 
on wet ice. Maintain samples on 
wet ice throughout processing. 
Centrifuge appx 3000 rpm for 
10 min at 4deg C. Transfer 2 
aliquots into 2- or 3-mL 
polypropylene screw-cap tubes 
for storage (-20deg C) and 
shipping (dry ice). 
 
Q2 Solutions 
ATTN: Kimberly Norwood 
19 Brown Rd 
Ithaca, NY 14850 
T: +1 607.330.9871 
Kimberly.Norwood@Q2LabSolutions.com 
Dry Ice shipment on Monday, Tuesday, or 
Wednesday. 
PK analysis 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 80 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
Appendix II: PK sample collection and shipping 
 
Plasma/Serum Collection for the PD-0325901 assay: 
- 
Collection tube type needed for PK sample tubes with K2EDTA anticoagulant for blood 
collection. If possible, >4 mL of blood would be sufficient for analysis (we need at least 600 
uL of plasma/sample). 
- 
Preferred tube type for plasma is Sarstedt order number 72.694.406 (2.0 mL SC Micro 
Tube PCR-PT, polypropylene, 10.8 mm diameter, 44 mm 
length). https://www.sarstedt.com/en/products/laboratory/screw-cap-micro-tubes-reaction-
tubes/screw-cap-micro-tubes/product/72.694.406/ 
- 
temperature for storage and shipping: -20°c  
- 
processing instructions: collect plasma within 1 hour after draw blood. Samples should 
be stored on wet ice during processing.  
- 
flash freeze samples in an upright position and then transfer to a -20°c freezer as 
appropriate. 
- 
shipment and storage temperature: storage temperature is 20°c freezer, samples should be 
shipped on dry ice 
Some notes on shipping samples 
Labeling 
 
Tube labels must be of a laminated, durable material 
 
Tube labels must include: 
o 
Barcode ID 
o 
Protocol/ Study # 
o 
Cycle/ Treatment # 
o 
Subject # 
o 
Day and timepoint 
o 
Matrix 
Packaging: whenever possible, samples should be shipped in tube size appropriate white 9 x 9 
storage boxes (VWR: Part Number 89214-766 (2 inch) or Part Number 89214-770 (3 inch) 
An electronic manifest in an excel file format with the following data should be provided to Q2 labs: 
o 
Protocol 
o 
Site Number 
o 
Subject Number 
o 
Timepoint 
o 
Collection Date 
o 
Sample Type, i.e. Matrix 
A paper manifest must be included in each sample shipment. 
All samples must be frozen prior to packaging and during shipment. 
Ship the plasma/serum sample aliquots per the shipment schedule on dry ice to: 
Q-SQUARED SOLUTIONS 
ATTN: Kimberly Norwood-Colwell 
19 BROWN RD 
ITHACA, NY 14850 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 81 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
  
Phone: +1 607.330.9871 
Fax: +1 607.266.0749 
Email: Kimberly.Norwood@Q2LabSolutions.com 
 
Email manifest and shipment tracking information to the following: 
Kimberly.Norwood@Q2LabSolutions.com and Jorge.Benitez@Q2LabSolutions.com  
Shipment schedule: 
o 
Domestic: Ship Monday, Tuesday, or Wednesday only to ensure arrival by 
Thursday/Friday 
o 
The lab is not typically staffed on weekends (Saturday or Sunday) or holidays. 
Special arrangements must be made at least 2 weeks in advance if a 
weekend/holiday receipt is necessary. A weekend/holiday receipt fee may be 
charged. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022


 
 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 
1275 York Avenue 
New York, New York 10065 
 
Page 82 of 82 
 
 
Template Version: 9/14/20 
Appendix III: Investigational Scan Considerations 
 
Patients on study may have biopsies performed at screening and during treatment (within 7 days of  
C2D1). Patients may also have an investigational CT scan of the chest, abdomen and pelvis at 
screening (if performed sooner than clinically indicated). In addition, one of the CT scans performed 
prior to Cycle 11 (at a schedule of every 8 weeks), may be considered investigational depending on 
the patient's status. Patients undergoing investigational CT guided biopsies are exposed to an 
additional 0.626 Gy (+/- 0.132) dermatologically, an additional 29.9 mSv in for scan done in helical 
mode and an additional 18.9 mSv for scans done in axial mode. Patients undergoing investigational 
CT scans of the chest/abdomen/pelvis are exposed to an additional 1.5 rem. 
 
It is estimated that each patient will have up to 2 additional scans for CT-guided biopsies and up to 2 
additional diagnostic CT scans of the chest/abdomen/pelvis.  
 
The informed consent will include the necessary risk language on contrast use and low-level 
radiation.  
 
 
 
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IRB Number: 21-288 A(5)
Approval date: 29-Aug-2022