Conditions: Endometriosis
Keywords: Dysmenorrhea Dyspareunia Dyschezia Non-menstrual pelvic pain
Allocation: RANDOMIZED | Intervention model: PARALLEL
Enrollment: 356
Healthy volunteers: no

Brief summary:
The primary objective of this extension study is to assess the maintenance of efficacy of linzagolix administered orally once daily for up to an additional 6 months (for up to 12 months of treatment in total) in women who have already completed 6 months of linzagolix treatment at a dose of 75 mg alone or of 200 mg in combination with ABT (E2 1 mg / NETA 0.5 mg), in the management of moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain (EAP) in women with surgically confirmed endometriosis.

Detailed description:
This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Subjects who have completed the 6-month Treatment Period in 18-OBE2109-003 - Edelweiss 3 study (herein referred to as main study) will be invited to enter the present extension study. Month 6 visit of the main study is a decision point for Subjects to either end treatment and enter a post-treatment follow up (part of the main study), or to opt for a 6-month treatment extension.

All subjects will receive once daily either linzagolix 75 mg alone (with ABT placebo) or 200 mg combined with ABT for 6 months. Subjects who received placebo during the main study will be randomized to either linzagolix 75 mg alone (with ABT placebo) or linzagolix 200 mg with ABT. Subjects who received active treatment during the main study will continue with the same treatment. Double-dummy design will be used in order to maintain the blinding of the study.

After end of treatment in the extension study (6-month treatment period: from Month 6 to Month 12), subjects will enter a post-treatment Follow-Up Period of 6 months with no investigational medicinal product (IMP) or - for subjects willing to continue treatment - a second extension study will be proposed.

Arms:
arm 1: None arm 2: None

Interventions: intervention 1: 75 mg linzagolix tablet intervention 2: 200 mg linzagolix tablet intervention 3: Placebo tablet to match 75 mg linzagolix tablet intervention 4: Placebo tablet to match 200 mg linzagolix tablet intervention 5: Add-back capsule (E2 1 mg / NETA 0.5 mg) intervention 6: Placebo capsule to match Add-back capsule
Intervention descriptions: intervention 1: For oral administration once daily intervention 2: For oral administration once daily intervention 3: For oral administration once daily intervention 4: For oral administration once daily intervention 5: For oral administration once daily intervention 6: For oral administration once daily

Protocol document:
Prot_002.pdf: 
19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 1 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
CLINICAL STUDY PROTOCOL 
 
Protocol Number: 
19-OBE2109-006 
EudraCT Number: 
2019-002410-39 
Investigational Medicinal 
Product: 
Linzagolix (OBE2109) 
Study Title: 
A double-blind randomized extension study to assess the 
long-term efficacy and safety of linzagolix in subjects with 
endometriosis-associated pain. 
Short Study Title: 
A phase 3 extension study to assess the efficacy and safety of 
linzagolix to treat endometriosis-associated pain 
Study Name: 
Edelweiss 3 extension 
Version number: 
Version 2.0 
Date: 
25 August 2020 
Replacing:  
Version 1.0 – 11 October 2019 
Study Sponsor: 
 
ObsEva S.A. 
  
 
Clinical Trial Director: 
 
 
 
 
Medical Responsible: 
 
  
 
CRO 
 
 
CRO Project Director: 
  
  
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 2 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
 
VERSION HISTORY 
Amendment 
Number 
Amendment 
Date 
General / Country-Specific/ 
Site-Specific 
Amended Protocol 
version and date 
01 
25 Aug 2020 
General 
V2.0 – August 25, 2020 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 3 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
 
 
CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY 
This protocol contains confidential and proprietary information about an investigational drug and is 
provided by ObsEva S.A., Plan-les-Ouates, Geneva, Switzerland, for the exclusive use of the 
Investigators of this clinical study and their Health Authorities/IRBs/IECs. This confidential 
information may not be disclosed to any other person without prior written consent of ObsEva S.A. 
Note: Other ObsEva or delegate personnel who may be contacted by study site personnel for this study 
are listed in a separate document, which will be updated on a regular basis when necessary. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 4 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
SPONSOR 
AND 
CONTRACT 
RESEARCH 
ORGANIZATION(S) 
SIGNATORY APPROVAL PAGE 
The below signatories have read this trial protocol and agree with its principles. They agree to carry out 
the clinical trial in compliance with this protocol, with ICH Good Clinical Practice (ICH GCP) and the 
applicable regulatory requirements. 
Sponsor: 
ObsEva S.A., 
 
 
Signature 
te of signature 
 
(Clinical Trial Director) 
 
Signature 
ature 
 
(Medical Responsible) 
 
 
Contract Research Organization(s): 
 
 
 
 
Signature 
 
Date of signature 
 
 
 
(Project Director) 
 
 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 5 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
INVESTIGATOR ENDORSEMENT PAGE 
I, the undersigned, am responsible for the conduct of the study at this site and agree to the following: 
 
I understand and will conduct the study according to the protocol, any approved protocol 
amendments, ICH GCP and all applicable regulatory authority requirements and national laws. 
 
I will not deviate from the protocol without prior written permission from the Sponsor and prior 
review and written approval from the Institutional Review Board or Independent Ethics 
Committee, except where necessary to prevent any immediate danger to the subject. 
 
I have read and understand fully the Investigator Brochure (IB) for linzagolix, and I am familiar 
with the Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) and its use according to this protocol. 
 
I have sufficient time to properly conduct and complete the trial within the agreed trial period, 
and I have available an adequate number of qualified staff and adequate facilities for the 
foreseen duration of the trial to conduct the trial properly and safely. 
 
I will ensure that any staff at my site(s) who are involved in the study conduct are adequately 
trained regarding the IMP, the protocol and their responsibilities. In the case of delegating any 
of my study responsibilities I will provide the Sponsor with a Delegation of Activities 
certificate. 
 
I understand that some regulatory authorities require sponsors of clinical studies to obtain and 
supply, when required, details about the Investigators’ ownership interests in the Sponsor or the 
Investigational Medicinal Product and information regarding any financial ties with the 
Sponsor. The Sponsor will use any such information that is collected solely for the purpose of 
complying with regulatory requirements. I therefore agree to supply the Sponsor with any 
necessary information regarding ownership interest and financial ties (including those of my 
spouse and dependent children), and to provide updates as necessary. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Signature 
 
Date of signature 
PI Name: 
Institution: 
 
 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 6 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 
1 
TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................ 6 
2 
LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................. 13 
3 
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................. 14 
4 
SYNOPSIS ....................................................................................................................... 19 
5 
BACKGROUND INFORMATION........................................................................................ 27 
5.1 
INTRODUCTION TO LINZAGOLIX ................................................................................ 27 
5.2 
ENDOMETRIOSIS ............................................................................................................. 27 
5.3 
CONVENTIONAL TREATMENT OF ENDOMETRIOSIS .............................................. 27 
5.4 
SUMMARY OF NON-CLINICAL STUDIES .................................................................... 27 
5.5 
SUMMARY OF CLINICAL STUDIES .............................................................................. 28 
5.5.1 
Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics ................................................................................ 28 
5.5.2 
Efficacy ................................................................................................................................. 30 
5.5.3 
Safety  .................................................................................................................................. 30 
5.6 
RATIONALE FOR THE CURRENT STUDY ................................................................... 33 
5.7 
SUMMARY OF OVERALL RISKS AND BENEFITS ...................................................... 33 
6 
OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................... 34 
6.1 
EFFICACY OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................. 34 
6.1.1 
Primary ................................................................................................................................. 34 
6.1.2 
Secondary ............................................................................................................................ 34 
6.2 
SAFETY OBJECTIVES ...................................................................................................... 35 
6.3 
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................ 35 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 7 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
7 
ENDPOINTS .................................................................................................................... 35 
7.1 
EFFICACY ENDPOINTS ................................................................................................... 35 
7.1.1 
Primary ................................................................................................................................. 35 
7.1.2 
Secondary ............................................................................................................................ 35 
7.2 
SAFETY ENDPOINTS ....................................................................................................... 37 
7.3 
EXPLORATORY ENDPOINTS ......................................................................................... 37 
8 
STUDY DESIGN................................................................................................................ 37 
9 
STUDY POPULATION ....................................................................................................... 39 
9.1 
SUBJECTS .......................................................................................................................... 39 
9.1.1 
Description of the target population ................................................................................... 39 
9.1.2 
Number of subjects .............................................................................................................. 39 
9.1.3 
Study region/location .......................................................................................................... 39 
9.2 
ENTRY CRITERIA ............................................................................................................. 39 
9.2.1 
Inclusion Criteria .................................................................................................................. 39 
9.2.2 
Exclusion Criteria.................................................................................................................. 40 
10 
STUDY PROCEDURES AND ASSESSMENTS ....................................................................... 41 
10.1 
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS ............................................................................................. 41 
10.2 
OUTLINE OF STUDY PROCEDURES AND ASSESSMENTS ....................................... 42 
10.2.1 
Treatment Period ................................................................................................................. 43 
10.2.2 
Post-treatment Follow-Up Period ........................................................................................ 48 
10.3 
EFFICACY OBSERVATIONS AND MEASUREMENTS ................................................ 51 
10.3.1 
Daily eDiary .......................................................................................................................... 51 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 8 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
10.3.2 
Outcome rating scales assessed at site visits ....................................................................... 54 
10.4 
SAFETY OBSERVATIONS AND MEASUREMENTS .................................................... 55 
10.4.1 
Adverse Events ..................................................................................................................... 55 
10.4.2 
Physical Examination ........................................................................................................... 56 
10.4.3 
Vital signs ............................................................................................................................. 56 
10.4.4 
Transvaginal ultrasound ....................................................................................................... 56 
10.4.5 
Endometrial biopsies ........................................................................................................... 56 
10.4.6 
Bone mineral density and DXA ............................................................................................ 58 
10.4.7 
Bone markers ....................................................................................................................... 58 
10.4.8 
Laboratory parameters ........................................................................................................ 58 
10.4.9 
Electrocardiogram ................................................................................................................ 59 
10.4.10 
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) ................................................................. 59 
10.5 
LINZAGOLIX AND KP017 PLASMA LEVELS ............................................................... 59 
10.6 
CONCOMITANT MEDICATIONS AND THERAPIES .................................................... 60 
10.6.1 
Permitted Medicines ............................................................................................................ 60 
10.6.2 
Prohibited Medicines ........................................................................................................... 61 
10.6.3 
Non-Drug Therapies ............................................................................................................. 61 
10.7 
SUBJECT COMPLETION AND WITHDRAWAL ............................................................ 61 
10.7.1 
Subject Completion .............................................................................................................. 61 
10.7.2 
Subject Withdrawal .............................................................................................................. 61 
10.7.3 
Subject Replacement ........................................................................................................... 63 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 9 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
11 
INVESTIGATIONAL MEDICINAL PRODUCT ....................................................................... 64 
11.1 
DESCRIPTION OF INVESTIGATIONAL MEDICINAL PRODUCTS............................ 64 
11.2 
DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION ................................................................................ 65 
11.3 
PACKAGING AND LABELLING ..................................................................................... 65 
11.4 
PREPARATION, HANDLING AND STORAGE .............................................................. 67 
11.5 
IMP ACCOUNTABILITY .................................................................................................. 67 
11.6 
ASSIGNMENT TO TREATMENT GROUPS .................................................................... 68 
11.7 
ASSESSMENT OF INVESTIGATIONAL MEDICINAL PRODUCT COMPLIANCE ... 68 
11.8 
METHOD OF BLINDING .................................................................................................. 68 
11.9 
EMERGENCY UNBLINDING ........................................................................................... 69 
11.10 
TREATMENT OF OVERDOSE AND MISUSE ................................................................ 69 
11.11 
OTHER SUPPLIES TO BE USED IN THE STUDY ......................................................... 69 
12 
ADVERSE EVENTS AND SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS ........................................................ 69 
12.1 
ADVERSE EVENTS ........................................................................................................... 70 
12.1.1 
Definitions ............................................................................................................................ 70 
12.1.2 
Abnormal laboratory findings and other objective measurements..................................... 72 
12.1.3 
Baseline Medical Conditions ................................................................................................ 72 
12.1.4 
Exacerbation of endometriosis ............................................................................................ 72 
12.1.5 
Adverse Events of Special Interest ....................................................................................... 72 
12.2 
PROCEDURES FOR ELICITING, RECORDING AND REPORTING ADVERSE 
EVENTS .............................................................................................................................. 73 
12.2.1 
Eliciting Adverse Events ....................................................................................................... 73 
12.2.2 
Recording of Adverse Events in the eCRF ............................................................................ 73 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 10 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
12.2.3 
Reporting of Adverse Events ................................................................................................ 73 
12.3 
SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS ......................................................................................... 74 
12.3.1 
Definitions ............................................................................................................................ 74 
12.3.2 
SAE Urgent Reporting Procedure ......................................................................................... 75 
12.4 
REPORTING TO THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS/INDEPENDENT ETHICS 
COMMITTEES AND REGULATORY AUTHORITIES ................................................... 76 
12.5 
REPORTING PERIOD ........................................................................................................ 76 
12.6 
PREGNANCY AND IN UTERO DRUG EXPOSURE ...................................................... 76 
13 
DATA ANALYSIS AND STATISTICS .................................................................................... 78 
13.1 
TEST OF HYPOTHESES ................................................................................................... 78 
13.2 
SAMPLE SIZE .................................................................................................................... 78 
13.3 
RANDOMIZATION ............................................................................................................ 78 
13.4 
ANALYSIS SETS ............................................................................................................... 78 
13.5 
DATA ANALYSIS .............................................................................................................. 79 
13.5.1 
Baseline Assessment ............................................................................................................ 79 
13.5.2 
Efficacy Analysis ................................................................................................................... 79 
13.5.3 
Safety Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 80 
13.5.4 
Pharmacokinetic analysis methodology .............................................................................. 80 
13.5.5 
Pharmacodynamic analysis methodology ........................................................................... 80 
13.5.6 
Missing Data......................................................................................................................... 80 
13.6 
STUDY SPECIFIC DATA ANALYSIS ............................................................................. 80 
13.6.1 
End-of-Treatment Period Analysis ....................................................................................... 80 
13.6.2 
Post-Treatment Follow-Up Period Analysis ......................................................................... 81 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 11 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
14 
STUDY ADMINISTRATION ............................................................................................... 81 
14.1 
REGULATORY AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS ................................................... 81 
14.1.1 
Informed Consent ................................................................................................................ 81 
14.1.2 
Regulatory Authority Approval ............................................................................................ 81 
14.1.3 
Institutional Review Board Requirements / Independent Ethics Committee ...................... 81 
14.1.4 
End of the study ................................................................................................................... 81 
14.2 
INVESTIGATOR RESPONSIBILITIES ............................................................................ 82 
14.3 
DATA MANAGEMENT ..................................................................................................... 82 
14.4 
STUDY MONITORING ..................................................................................................... 82 
14.5 
DATA MONITORING COMMITTEE ............................................................................... 82 
14.6 
SUBJECT CONFIDENTIALITY ........................................................................................ 83 
14.7 
QUALITY ASSURANCE ................................................................................................... 83 
14.8 
PROTOCOL DEVIATIONS ............................................................................................... 83 
14.9 
STUDY OR SITE DISCONTINUATION ........................................................................... 83 
14.10 
RETENTION OF ESSENTIAL STUDY DOCUMENTS ................................................... 84 
14.11 
PUBLICATION POLICY.................................................................................................... 84 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 12 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
15 
APPENDICES ................................................................................................................... 85 
APPENDIX A. SCHEDULE OF STUDY ASSESSMENTS – TREATMENT PERIOD........................................... 86 
APPENDIX B. SCHEDULE OF STUDY ASSESSMENTS – FOLLOW-UP PERIOD ........................................... 88 
APPENDIX C. ENDOMETRIOSIS HEALTH PROFILE QUESTIONNAIRE (EHP-30) ....................................... 89 
APPENDIX D. PROMIS FATIGUE – SHORT FORM 6A ............................................................................. 94 
APPENDIX E. HEALTH-RELATED PRODUCTIVITY QUESTIONNAIRE (HRPQ) ........................................... 95 
APPENDIX F. HEALTH RESOURCE UTILIZATION QUESTIONNAIRE (HRUQ) ............................................ 97 
APPENDIX G. PATIENT GLOBAL IMPRESSION OF CHANGE (PGIC) ....................................................... 102 
APPENDIX H. POST-TREATMENT PATIENT GLOBAL IMPRESSION OF CHANGE (PPGIC) ....................... 103 
APPENDIX I. PATIENT GLOBAL IMPRESSION OF SEVERITY (PGIS) ...................................................... 104 
APPENDIX J. SUBJECT SURGERY INTENTION QUESTIONNAIRE (SSIQ) ................................................ 105 
APPENDIX K. PHYSICIAN SURGERY INTENTION QUESTIONNAIRE (PSIQ) ............................................ 106 
APPENDIX L. EQ-5D-5L ...................................................................................................................... 107 
APPENDIX M. LABORATORY PARAMETERS ......................................................................................... 109 
APPENDIX N. NARCOTIC ANALGESICS AVAILABLE IN THE EU COUNTRIES .......................................... 110 
APPENDIX O. PROHIBITED MEDICINES ............................................................................................... 111 
APPENDIX P. STRONG CYP3A4 INDUCERS AND INHIBITORS .............................................................. 112 
APPENDIX Q. ANALGESIC CHANGE DURING TREATMENT PERIOD ...................................................... 114 
APPENDIX R. REFERENCE LIST ............................................................................................................ 116 
APPENDIX S. C-SSRS ALREADY ENROLLED SUBJECTS ......................................................................... 117 
APPENDIX T. C-SSRS SINCE LAST VISIT ............................................................................................... 120 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 13 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
2 LIST OF FIGURES 
FIGURE 1 : STUDY DESIGN ............................................................................................................................................ 38 
FIGURE 2 : SCHEDULE OF VISITS .................................................................................................................................... 42 
FIGURE 3 : BIOPSY PROCESS FOR MONTH 12 VISIT ............................................................................................................ 57 
FIGURE 4 : BIOPSY PROCESS FOR THE FOLLOW-UP PERIOD VISITS ........................................................................................ 57 
FIGURE 5 : LINZAGOLIX KIT DESIGN ................................................................................................................................ 66 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 14 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
3 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 
ABT 
Add-Back Therapy 
AE 
Adverse Event 
ALT 
ALanine amino Transferase 
APTT 
Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time 
AST 
ASpartate amino Transferase 
AUC 
Area Under the Curve 
B-ALP 
Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase 
BMD 
Bone Mineral Density 
BMI 
Body Mass Index 
BP 
Blood Pressure 
bpm 
Beats Per minute 
°C 
Degree Celsius 
CK 
Creatine Kinase 
ClinRO 
Clinician Reported Outcome 
COC 
Combined Oral Contraceptive 
CRA 
Clinical Research Associate 
CRO 
Contract Research Organization 
C-SSRS 
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale 
CTx 
C-terminal telopeptide  
CV 
Coefficient of Variation 
CYP 
Cytochrome P 
DMC 
Data Monitoring Committee 
dPGIS 
Patient Global Impression of Severity – daily recall  
DXA 
Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry 
DYS 
Dysmenorrhea 
E2 
Estradiol 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 15 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
EAP 
Endometriosis-Associated Pain 
ECG 
ElectroCardioGram 
eCRF 
Electronic Case Report Form 
eDiary 
Electronic Diary 
EHP-30 
Endometriosis Health Profile – 30 
ePRO 
Electronic Patient Reported Outcome 
EQ-5D-5L 
EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level questionnaire 
EU 
European Union 
ExFU 
Extension Follow-Up 
FD 
Fixed Dose 
FDA 
Food and Drug Administration 
FSH 
Follicle-Stimulating Hormone 
GCP 
Good Clinical Practice 
γGT 
Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase 
GMP 
Good Manufacturing Practice 
HDL 
High Density Lipoprotein 
HIV 
Human Immunodeficiency Virus 
HRPQ 
Health-Related Productivity Questionnaire 
HRUQ 
Health Resource Utilization Questionnaire 
IB 
Investigator Brochure 
ICF 
Informed Consent Form 
ICH 
International Conference on Harmonization 
IEC 
Independent Ethics Committee 
IMP 
Investigational Medicinal Product 
INN 
International Nonproprietary Name 
INR 
International Normalized Ratio 
IRB 
Institutional Review Board 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 16 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
IUD 
Intra-Uterine Device 
IWRS 
Interactive Web Response System 
LDH 
Lactate DeHydrogenase 
LDL 
Low Density Lipoprotein 
LFT 
Liver Function Test 
LH 
Luteinizing Hormone 
LOQ 
Limit Of Quantification 
MCH 
Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin 
MCHC 
Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration 
MCV 
Mean Corpuscular Volume 
mg 
Milligram 
min 
Minute 
MME 
Morphine Milligram Equivalent 
mPGIS 
Patient Global Impression of Severity – monthly recall  
mmHg 
millimeter of mercury 
msec 
Millisecond 
NETA 
NorEThisterone Acetate 
NMPP 
Non-Menstrual Pelvic Pain 
NRS 
Numeric Rating Scale 
NSAID 
Non Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug 
OAT3 
Organic Anion Transporter 3 
OBE2109 
(2-Hydroxyethyl)trimethylammonium-3-[2-fluoro-5-(2,3-difluoro-6-
methoxybenzyloxy)-4-methoxyphenyl]-2,4-dioxo-1,2,3,4-
tetrahydrothieno[3,4-d]pyrimidine-5-carboxylate 
P1NP 
Procollagen type 1 N-terminal Propeptide  
P4 
Progesterone 
PAP 
PAPanikolaou test 
PD 
PharmacoDynamic 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 17 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
PGIC 
Patient Global Impression of Change 
PPGIC 
Post-treatment Patient Global Impression of Change 
PGIS 
Patient Global Impression of Severity 
PK 
PharmacoKinetic 
PSF 
Pregnancy Surveillance Form 
PSIQ 
Pysician Surgery Intention Question 
PVC/Al 
PolyVinyl Chloride/Aluminum 
QC 
Quality Control 
QD 
Once daily (from the Latin Quaque Die)  
QoL 
Quality of Life 
QTc 
QT interval corrected for heart rate  
QTcF 
QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) using Fridericia's correction 
formula 
RBC 
Red Blood Cell 
SAE 
Serious Adverse Event 
SAP 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
SERM 
Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator 
SHBG 
Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin 
SIN 
Subject Identification Number 
SPRM 
Selective Progesterone Receptor Modulator 
SSIQ 
Subject Surgery Intention Question 
SUSAR 
Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction  
TD 
Titrated Dose 
TEAE(s) 
Treatment Emergent Adverse Event(s) 
TVUS 
TransVaginal UltraSound 
ULN 
Upper Limit of Normal 
US/USA 
United States/United States of America 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 18 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
VAS 
Visual Analogue Scale 
VRS 
Verbal Rating Scale 
WBC 
White Blood Cell 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 19 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
4 SYNOPSIS 
Study Title: A double-blind randomized extension study to assess the long-term efficacy and safety 
of linzagolix in subjects with endometriosis-associated pain 
Code/Name ObsEva Investigational Drug: linzagolix (OBE2109) Phase of Development: 3 
Objectives: 
The primary objective of this extension study is to assess the maintenance of efficacy of linzagolix 
administered orally once daily for up to an additional 6 months (for up to 12 months of treatment in 
total) in women who have already completed 6 months of linzagolix treatment at a dose of 75 mg 
alone or of 200 mg in combination with add-back therapy (estradiol (E2) 1 mg / norethisterone acetate 
(NETA) 0.5 mg) in the management of moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain (EAP) in 
women with surgically confirmed endometriosis. The two co-primary efficacy endpoints will be 
clinically meaningful reduction over the last 28 days of randomized treatment up to the Month 12 
visit, along with a stable or decreased use of analgesics for EAP, for 1) dysmenorrhea (DYS) and for 
2) non menstrual pelvic pain (NMPP).  
Secondary objectives include evaluation of efficacy over the last 28 days of randomized treatment 
up to the Month 12 visit  based on the following parameters: evaluation of pain associated with sexual 
intercourse (dyspareunia) and defecation (dyschezia), difficulty of doing daily activities, analgesic 
use, assessment of subject perception of severity, change in uterine bleeding, Quality of Life (QoL) 
questionnaires, pharmacoeconomic burden of endometriosis by assessing changes in patient 
productivity, assessment of endometriosis-related number of non-study health visits, number of days 
in hospital and type of medical procedures performed during the Treatment Period. 
Safety and tolerability objectives include assessment of bone mineral density (BMD), endometrial 
health, cardiac safety including QT interval prolongation, standard laboratory safety parameters, 
gynecological assessments and adverse event (AE) frequency including specific hypoestrogenic AEs. 
Exploratory objectives include assessment of bone turnover markers and collection of 
pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) related data of linzagolix for a separate modelling 
exercise. 
Endpoints: 
Efficacy endpoints  
 
Primary efficacy endpoints:  
The two co-primary, composite, efficacy endpoints are clinically meaningful reduction from 
baseline to the last 28 days preceding the Month 12 visit (the 4-week period preceding Month 12 
visit), along with a stable or decreased use of analgesics for EAP, in the mean daily assessment 
of 1) DYS and of 2) NMPP, both measured on a Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) using an electronic 
diary (eDiary). 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 20 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
 
Secondary efficacy endpoints:  
 
Change from baseline to Month 12 in DYS (VRS) 
 
Change from baseline to Month 12 in NMPP (VRS) 
 
Change from baseline to Month 12 in dyschezia (Numeric Rating Scale - NRS) 
 
Change from baseline to Month 12 in overall pelvic pain (NRS) 
 
Change from baseline to Month 12 in the interference of pain with the ability to perform 
daily activities, measured using the pain dimension of the Endometriosis Health Profile-
30 (EHP-30)  
 
Change from baseline to Month 12 in dyspareunia (VRS) 
 
No analgesics use for EAP during the preceding 4-week period at each scheduled 
assessment 
 
No opiate use for EAP during the preceding 4-week period at each scheduled assessment 
 
Responder rate at scheduled visit other than Month 12 visit, for DYS and NMPP (VRS) 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the mean pelvic pain scores for 
DYS, NMPP and overall pelvic pain, during the previous 4-week period assessed on the 
NRS and VRS 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days with 
moderate to severe pelvic pain during the previous 4-week period assessed on the VRS 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the mean worst pelvic pain score 
defined as the mean of the 5 highest daily pain scores reported during the previous 4-
week period assessed on the NRS 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the mean of daily dyspareunia 
scores reported during the previous 4-week period on the dyspareunia VRS  
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the mean of daily dyschezia 
scores reported during the previous 4-week period assessed on the dyschezia NRS 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in non-opioid, opioid and combined 
analgesic use for EAP during the previous 4-week period based on pill count in the 
eDiary 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in opioid analgesic use for EAP as 
reported in the eDiary during the previous 4-week period based on morphine milligram 
equivalent (MME) 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days of analgesic 
use (including any class) for EAP during the previous 4-week period as assessed in the 
eDiary 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 21 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days of opioid 
analgesic use for EAP during the previous 4-week period as assessed in the eDiary 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of pelvic pain-free 
days (assessed on the VRS) during the previous 4-week period  
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in ability to perform daily activities 
during the previous 4-week period, as assessed in the eDiary (daily function NRS) 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days with no 
difficulty in doing daily activities due to EAP during the previous 4-week period as 
assessed in the eDiary (daily function NRS) 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days when 
dyspareunia was a problem during the previous 4-week period (including days when 
sexual intercourse was avoided because of anticipation of pain) as assessed on the 
dyspareunia VRS 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days when sexual 
intercourse was avoided because of anticipation of pain during the previous 4-week 
period as assessed on the dyspareunia VRS 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days with uterine 
bleeding (including spotting) during the previous 4-week period measured by eDiary 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days when school 
or work was missed due to EAP in the previous 4-week period as reported in the eDiary 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days when the 
subject had to go to bed or lie down due to EAP in the previous 4-week period as 
reported in the eDiary 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the Pain, Control and 
powerlessness, Emotional well-being, Social support, Self-image dimensions and the 
Modular sexual relationship questionnaire of EHP-30 scores 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the Health-Related Productivity 
Questionnaire (HRPQ) scores 
 
Number of non-study endometriosis related health visits, number of days in hospital and 
type of procedures performed based on Health Resource Utilization Questionnaire 
(HRUQ) at each scheduled assessment 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the Physician/Subject Surgery 
Intention Question (PSIQ/SSIQ) 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the PROMIS Fatigue – Short 
Form 6a 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-
Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 22 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
 
Response at each scheduled assessment according to Patient Global Impression of 
Change (PGIC) (and Post-treatment Patient Global Impression of Change, PPGIC) 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the monthly PGIS (mPGIS) score 
Safety endpoints 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in BMD measured by Dual-energy 
X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) of lumbar spine (L1-L4), femoral neck, and total hip 
 
Incidence and severity of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) 
 
Incidence and severity of hypoestrogenic TEAEs (hot flush) 
 
Time to the first post-treatment menses 
 
Changes in clinical laboratory assessments (hematology, biochemistry, coagulation 
parameters, hormones, lipids and urinalysis) from baseline to each scheduled assessment 
 
Any pathological changes from baseline in the endometrium as assessed by histology 
from endometrial biopsies 
 
Changes from baseline to each scheduled assessment in any other safety parameter 
including weight, vital signs, electrocardiogram (ECG), gynecological assessments and 
endometrial thickness 
Exploratory endpoints 
 
Change from baseline in bone turnover markers at each scheduled assessment 
 
PK and PD of linzagolix 
Study Design: This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Subjects who have completed 
the 6-month Treatment Period in the main study (18-OBE2109-003 - Edelweiss 3) will be invited to 
enter the present extension study. Month 6 visit of the main study is a decision point for Subjects to 
either end treatment and enter a post-treatment follow up (part of the main study), or to opt for a 6-
month treatment extension. 
The extension study starts at the Month 6 visit of the main study. Subjects will be required to sign a 
specific informed consent form (ICF) for this extension study. Only subjects who have completed the 
full 6-month Treatment Period in the main study and meet the inclusion criteria will be eligible for 
entry in the extension study. 
All subjects will receive once daily either linzagolix 75 mg alone (with ABT placebo) or 200 mg 
combined with ABT for 6 months. Subjects who received placebo during the main study will be 
randomized to either linzagolix 75 mg alone (with ABT placebo) or linzagolix 200 mg with ABT. 
Subjects who received active treatment during the main study will continue with the same treatment. 
Linzagolix/placebo tablets will be provided in monthly treatment kits, packaged, labelled and 
administered in the same manner to protect the blinded nature of the trial. 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 23 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
ABT/placebo treatments will be supplied as 3-monthly kits, packaged, labelled and administered in 
the same manner to protect the blinded nature of the trial. 
After end of treatment in the extension study (6-month Treatment Period: from Month 6 to Month 12), 
subjects will enter a post-treatment Follow-Up Period of 6 months with no investigational medicinal 
product (IMP).  
The total duration of the present extension study will be 12 months. 
 
Study Population: All subjects who have completed the full 6-month Treatment Period in the main 
study and who meet the inclusion criteria will be invited to enter the extension study. 
It is estimated that up to 288 subjects will enter the extension study, assuming that 80% of the patients 
randomized in the main study will complete the study (namely 360 subjects) and that up to 80 % 
thereof will enter the extension study. 
The study will be conducted in the Unites States (US) and Europe, at the same investigational sites as 
in the main study. 
Eligibility Criteria:  
Inclusion Criteria 
To be eligible for inclusion into this extension study, the subjects must fulfil all of the following 
criteria: 
1. The subject must provide written informed consent specific to this study prior to starting the 
extension study treatment. 
2. The subject has completed the 6-month treatment in the main study. 
3. The subject is willing and able to continue to comply with the requirements of the study protocol 
for the duration of the extension study. 
4. The subject agrees to continue to use only the analgesic rescue medication permitted by the 
protocol during the Treatment and Follow-up Periods. 
5. If of childbearing potential, the subject agrees to continue to use one of the following birth 
control methods during the entire Treatment Period of the study and until 3 months after the 
end of treatment: 
a. Sexual abstinence, if this is the subject's habitual practice and/or the subject is routinely 
abstinent from heterosexual intercourse, 
b. Partner with a vasectomy with confirmed azoospermia, 
c. Double non-hormonal barrier contraception such as condom or diaphragm each 
combined with spermicide. 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 24 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
 
Exclusion Criteria 
To be eligible for inclusion in this extension study the subject must not meet any of the following 
criteria: 
1. The subject is pregnant or is planning a pregnancy within the duration of the study (including 
the Follow-up Period). 
2. The subject is likely to require treatment during the study with any of the medications listed 
below: 
a. GnRH antagonists 
b. GnRH agonist injections/3-month depot injections 
c. Danazol 
d. Oral contraceptives and other sex hormones 
e. Depot contraceptives 
f. Selective Progesterone Receptor Modulators (SPRMs), Selective Estrogen Receptor 
Modulators (SERMs) and aromatase inhibitors 
g. Long acting narcotics (i.e. requiring less than once daily dosing) 
h. Systemic glucocorticoid treatments for acute diseases (not depot) 
i. 
In situ copper intra-uterine device (IUD) 
j. 
In situ IUD with progestogen 
3. The subject is likely to use cannabinoids during the study. 
4.  The subject has any other clinically significant gynecologic condition identified during the main 
study on transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS), on endometrial biopsy or at the manual breast 
examination, which might interfere with the study efficacy and safety objectives. 
5.  The subject has met any of the main study discontinuation criteria including: 
a. Serum calcium level confirmed on a repeated fasting test above 2.9 mmol/L 
b. BMD decrease from baseline > 8% or a Z-score ≤ -2.5 at either femoral neck, hip or spine 
on the Month 6 DXA scan during the main study. 
c. QTcF > 500 ms or increase > 60 ms from the highest value prior to first dose during the 
main study. 
d. Any of the following elevation of hepatic enzymes: 
• ALT or AST >8xULN  
• ALT or AST >5xULN for more than 2 weeks  
• ALT or AST >3xULN and (TBL >2xULN or INR >1.5)  


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 25 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
• ALT or AST >3xULN with the appearance of fatigue, nausea, vomiting, right upper 
quadrant pain or tenderness, fever, rash, and/or eosinophilia (>5%)  
6. The subject has any condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, constitutes a risk or a 
contraindication to the participation of the subject in this extension study, or that could interfere 
with the study objectives, conduct or assessments.  
Investigational Medicinal Product(s) (IMP): the term “Investigational Medicinal Product” (IMP) 
will refer to the ObsEva investigational drug linzagolix 75 mg tablets and 200 mg tablets, the ABT 
(E2 1 mg/NETA 0.5 mg) capsules or their matching placebos.  
Data Analysis and Statistics 
The primary objective of this extension study is to assess the maintenance of efficacy of linzagolix 
administered orally once daily for up to an additional 6 months (for up to 12 months of treatment in 
total) in the subset of subjects who are treated with linzagolix up to the time point of interest. As such, 
the focus will be on subjects who received active treatment in the main study. The assessment of 
subjects who switched from placebo in the main study to active treatment in the extension study will 
be conducted as a secondary objective. 
No formal hypothesis tests are planned for this extension study. Data will be summarized by timepoint 
for each treatment group. Subjects will be analyzed according to actual treatment received. The 
following four treatment groups will be analyzed: linzagolix 75 mg and linzagolix 200 mg with ABT 
fixed dose groups, linzagolix 75 mg and linzagolix 200 mg with ABT after 6 months of placebo 
treatment. Only subjects with assessments at both baseline and the given time points will be included 
in the summaries. Baseline values are the same as in the main study (18-OBE2109-003 - Edelweiss 3), 
i.e. data collected prior to the treatment administration in the main study. 
Efficacy analysis methodology 
Summaries will be performed using the Treatment Extension Analysis Set and the Follow-up 
Extension Analysis Set. Data from both the main study and the extension study will be summarized. 
Efficacy endpoints will be derived in the same way as in the main study. The same criterion for 
defining a subject as being a responder by having a clinically meaningful reduction in DYS and in 
NMPP, along with a stable or decreased use of analgesics for EAP, will be used as per the criteria in 
the main study. 
Safety analysis methodology 
Summaries will be performed using the Extension Safety Analysis Set and the Follow-up Extension 
Analysis Set.  
Data from both the main study and the extension study will be summarized. 
Pharmacokinetic analysis methodology 
Descriptive statistics of plasma concentrations will include mean (arithmetic and geometric) and 
standard deviation, median, 1st and 3rd quartiles, minimum, maximum, coefficient of variation (CV%) 
and number of observations. Concentrations below the limit of quantification (LOQ) will be assigned 
a value of zero. Explorative analyses of correlations between plasma concentrations and intrinsic PK 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 26 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
factors such as e.g. body weight/body mass index (BMI), race, age may be performed, as appropriate, 
and will be reported separately. 
PK analyses will be based on the Extension PK Set. 
Pharmacodynamic (and other) analysis methodology 
Pharmacodynamic parameters, such as for example estradiol and other hormones, will be summarized 
by time point for each treatment group, and listed for each subject by visit day and dose regimen. 
Where appropriate, changes from baseline will be presented. Potential PK-PD relationships may be 
investigated graphically and through statistical modeling, whilst also exploring possible covariates, 
and will be reported separately. 
Study Specific Data Analyses 
End-of-Treatment Period Analysis 
After all subjects have completed the Treatment Period, a complete analysis will be performed. This 
analysis will include all data up to the end of treatment visit. A database lock will be performed, with 
any discrepant data clarified before the lock. 
Post-Treatment Follow-up Period Analysis 
After all subjects have completed the Post-Treatment Follow-up Period, a final database lock will be 
performed followed by a second analysis. This analysis will include all data collected during the Post-
Treatment Follow-up Period. 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 27 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
5 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 
5.1 INTRODUCTION TO LINZAGOLIX 
Linzagolix is a new, orally active, non-peptide gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist. It 
has been shown to significantly reduce endometriosis-associated pain (EAP) in women with surgically 
confirmed endometriosis at once daily doses between 50 and 200 mg with a good safety and tolerability 
profile. It is being developed for the long-term treatment of moderate to severe EAP. 
5.2 ENDOMETRIOSIS 
Endometriosis is a chronic disease with debilitating pelvic pain symptoms (such as dysmenorrhea, 
dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, dyschezia) affecting quality of life and requiring long-term 
management.  
5.3 CONVENTIONAL TREATMENT OF ENDOMETRIOSIS 
First-line medical therapies for EAP such as combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and progestins, have 
limited long-term efficacy, and second-line therapies (eg, high-dose progestins, injectable depot 
formulations of GnRH receptor agonists) are effective but associated with troublesome side effects 
including progressive bone loss and severe vasomotor symptoms (1, 2). 
GnRH receptor antagonists are a new potential treatment option allowing dose-dependent reduction of 
estradiol (E2) levels alleviating EAP (3) whilst reducing the negative impact on bone mineral density 
(BMD).  
For long term use of GnRH-analogues, concurrent treatment with add-back (progestin and/or estrogen) 
hormone replacement therapy (ABT) has been shown to be effective in reducing associated BMD loss 
(4,5) and is generally recommended as part of long-term treatment with GnRH receptor agonists to 
minimize side effects.  
Linzagolix is a new, orally active, GnRH receptor antagonist. In Phase 1 and 2 studies, it was shown to 
dose-dependently suppress luteinizing hormone (LH) and E2 and to significantly reduce EAP in women 
with moderate to severe EAP, with a good safety and tolerability profile (see section 5.5.2 and 5.5.3).  
The purpose of the present study is to collect long-term (up to 12 months) data on the safety and efficacy 
of linzagolix in subjects with EAP. This is a 6-month active treatment extension study offered to all 
subjects who have completed 6-months of active or non-active treatment in study 18-OBE2109-003 
(Edelweiss 3). 
5.4 SUMMARY OF NON-CLINICAL STUDIES 
The data in the nonclinical package have shown linzagolix to be an orally available, potent, selective 
GnRH receptor antagonist. Anti-GnRH effects have been demonstrated in a range of pharmacology 
studies, both in vitro and in vivo, and these also dominate the findings in the toxicology studies. 
Toxicology evaluation in mice, rats, dogs and monkeys confirmed exaggerated pharmacological activity 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 28 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
but no overt toxicity. No genotoxicity or unexpected reproduction toxicology findings in rats and rabbits 
were seen.  
In conclusion, the nonclinical package supports clinical long-term dosing regimens up to 200 mg per 
day. 
5.5 SUMMARY OF CLINICAL STUDIES 
The efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of linzagolix were investigated by the originator 
company (Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., LTD. from Japan) in two Phase 1 studies (Study KLH1101 and 
KLH1103) in Japanese and/or Caucasian volunteers in single and multiple doses up to 400 mg, and in 
three Phase 2a studies (Studies KLH1201, KLH1202 and KLH1203) in Japanese endometriosis patients 
at doses up to 200 mg daily for up to 12 weeks. An additional Phase 2b study (KLH1204) has been 
performed in Japan. Its objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of daily doses of linzagolix 25 
mg, 50 mg, 75 mg and 100 mg for up to 24 weeks in Japanese subjects with EAP. Overall, 455 subjects 
were randomized. 
The PK and pharmacodynamics (PD) of linzagolix have been further investigated in eight Phase 1 
studies investigating the use of estrogen/progestin ABT, potential drug-drug interactions, 
bioequivalence of forumulations and the effect of linzagolix on the QT interval.  
The efficacy and safety of linzagolix have been investigated in US and European patients with moderate 
to severe EAP in a dose-ranging Phase 2b study at doses from 50 to 200 mg daily for up to 12 months 
(study 15-OBE2109-001, also known as Edelweiss).  
The efficacy and safety of linzagolix in moderate to severe EAP are also being investigated in two 
ongoing Phase 3 placebo-controlled studies: 18-OBE2109-002 (Edelweiss 2) and 18-OBE2109-003 
(Edelweiss 3). A total of 450 subjects per study are planned to be enrolled in the USA, Canada and 
Europe. Daily doses of 75 mg alone and 200 mg in combination with low dose ABT (E2 1 mg/ 
norethisterone acetate (NETA) 0.5 mg) are administered for up to 6 months. The study described herein 
is the extension of 18-OBE2109-003 (Edelweiss 3) study. The extension of 18-OBE2109-002 
(Edelweiss 2) study is described in a separate protocol. 
In addition to the endometriosis indication, two placebo-controlled Phase 3 studies (16-OBE2109-008 
and 16-OBE2109-009) assessing the efficacy and safety of linzagolix in subjects with heavy menstrual 
bleeding associated with uterine fibroids are on going. Approximately 500 subjects per study are planned 
to be enrolled in the USA and Europe. Daily doses of 100 and 200 mg of linzagolix are administered 
with or without ABT (E2 1mg/NETA 0.5mg) for up to 52 weeks.  
5.5.1 
Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics 
Linzagolix was evaluated in a Phase 1 single/repeated-dose study (Study KLH1101) in which Japanese 
and Caucasian pre- and post-menopausal women received single doses of linzagolix from 12.5 to 700 
mg and repeated once daily doses of 100 to 400 mg once daily for 7 days under fed and fasted conditions. 
Linzagolix was safe and well-tolerated, showed linear PK, a half-life of about 15–20 hours, and little 
difference between pre- and post-menopausal women or between Japanese and Caucasian women. There 
was a dose-dependent suppression of E2, LH and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 29 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
Study 17-OBE2109-001 evaluated the tolerability and PK of a single supra-therapeutic dose of 700 mg 
linzagolix, and effects of therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses of linzagolix on the QTc interval (QT 
interval corrected for heart rate). Subjects received a 200 mg dose of linzagolix (therapeutic target 
exposure), a 700 mg dose of linzagolix (supratherapeutic target exposure), a 400 mg dose of 
moxifloxacin (positive control), and placebo with an appropriate washout. Linzagolix at 700 mg was 
well tolerated. A borderline effect of linzagolix on the QTc interval was identified with prolongations 
exceeding the threshold of concern by less than 2 msec. The categorical data for QTc showed no values 
greater than 480 msec and no changes greater than 30 msec following administration of the 
supratherapeutic and therapeutic doses. Thus, based on the magnitude of the QTc prolongation, the 
observed effects are not considered to be clinically significant. 
The open-label study, KLH1103, assessed the absorption, metabolism, and excretion of linzagolix in 6 
women of non-childbearing potential. Linzagolix was the predominant component in plasma and all 
plasma metabolites were present at less than 10% of the total drug related exposure. Similarly, 
unchanged linzagolix was also a major component in urine and feces. Linzagolix was eliminated in urine 
(52%) and, to a lesser extent, in feces (38%). 
Study 16-OBE2109-011 assessed the PD and safety of linzagolix alone and combined with E2/ NETA 
ABT on E2 levels and vaginal bleeding. In this single-center, open-label, randomized, parallel-group 
study, 76 healthy premenopausal women were randomized to linzagolix (100 mg), linzagolix/ E2/ 
NETA (100 mg/0.5 mg/0.1 mg), linzagolix/ E2/ NETA (100 mg/1 mg/0.5 mg), linzagolix (200 mg) or 
linzagolix/E2/NETA (200 mg/1 mg/0.5 mg) once daily for 6 weeks. The study showed that ABT may 
be needed to prevent adverse bone impact in subjects treated at 200 mg. 
A single-center, open-label, randomized, parallel-group study (study 17-OBE2109-008) in 32 healthy 
pre-menopausal women was performed to assess whether co-administration of ABT following 4 weeks 
of high-dose linzagolix administration alone would result in improved bleeding patterns compared to 
combined linzagolix/ABT administration. Subjects were randomized to once daily linzagolix 
(200 mg)/ABT for 10 weeks or linzagolix (200 mg) for 4 weeks followed by once daily linzagolix 
(200 mg)/ABT for 6 weeks. Starting the administration of linzagolix and hormonal ABT together 
provided better bleeding control than delaying the ABT treatment start for 4 weeks. 
In a drug-drug interaction study with women of child bearing potential (Study 16-OBE2109-005), 
linzagolix did not induce CYP3A4 and there was no clinically significant food effect. In another drug-
drug interaction study (Study 17-OBE2109-006) the OATP1B1/1B3 inhibitor rifampicin (600 mg single 
dose) had no clinically relevant effects on the PK of linzagolix. Studies 18-OBE2109-006 and 18-
OBE2109-007 assessed the effect of linzagolix on the PK of CYP2C8 and OAT3 substrates. Linzagolix 
had no clinically relevant effects on the PK of OAT3 substrates and was shown to be a weak inhibitor 
of the CYP2C8 enzyme. 
A single-center, open-label, randomized, two-period cross-over study in 20 healthy pre-menopausal 
women (Study 17-OBE2109-004) aimed to demonstrate the bioequivalence of linzagolix formulation A 
(reference formulation), used in Phase 2b Edelweiss study 15-OBE2109-001, and formulation B (test 
formulation) planned to be used in the current Phase 3 extension study. After single oral administration 
of linzagolix, the test formulation was found to be bioequivalent to the reference formulation for Cmax 
and area under the curves (AUCs) of linzagolix and KP017 (metabolite). A single administration of 
linzagolix formulations A and B to healthy female participants was safe and well tolerated. 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 30 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
5.5.2 
Efficacy 
The clinical efficacy of linzagolix has been investigated in five Phase 2 studies. 
In a Phase 2 clinical study (Study KLH1201) conducted in Japan in patients with endometriosis, 50 or 
200 mg linzagolix was orally administered once daily for 8 weeks. Linzagolix improved endometriosis 
symptoms and continuously suppressed E2 in a dose-dependent manner. 
In a Phase 2 clinical study (Study KLH1202) conducted in Japan in patients with endometriosis, 50, 
100, or 200 mg linzagolix or placebo was orally administered once daily for 12 weeks. Linzagolix 
significantly reduced endometriosis pain symptoms compared with placebo. 
In a Phase 2 clinical study (Study KLH1203) conducted in Japan in patients with endometriosis, 75 or 
150 mg linzagolix was orally administered once daily for 8 weeks. Linzagolix improved endometriosis 
symptoms and continuously suppressed E2 in a dose-dependent manner. 
A Phase 2b study (KLH1204) conducted in Japan assessed the efficacy and safety of once daily doses 
of linzagolix 25 mg, 50 mg, 75 mg and 100 mg for up to 24 weeks in subjects with EAP. There was a 
dose-dependent improvement of EAP, with significant improvement compared to placebo at the 75 and 
100 mg doses. 
In a Phase 2b study (Study 15-OBE2109-001, also known as Edelweiss) conducted in US and Europe 
in patients with endometriosis, doses of 50, 75, 100, 200 mg linzagolix or placebo were administered 
orally, once daily for up to 52 weeks. Linzagolix significantly decreased EAP after 12 weeks at doses 
of 75, 100 and 200 mg and the effects were maintained or increased at Week 24. For those subjects 
continuing treatment up to Week 52, the obtained treatment effects were generally maintained until 
Week 52. Overall, the greatest improvements on all efficacy endpoints were reported at dose levels of 
75 mg and above during the main study (75 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg), as well as treatment extension (75 
mg, 100 mg).  
The 75 mg group demonstrated the ability for long-term treatment (52 weeks of continuous dosing with 
linzagolix) of a dose combining significant treatment benefit with a good safety profile and without the 
need for hormonal ABT; the 200/100 mg group is considered as a benchmark group to characterize 
efficacy and safety of a high-dose linzagolix regimen following 52 weeks of continuous dosing.   
5.5.3 
Safety 
More than 1,500 subjects were exposed to a range of doses (25, 50, 75, 100, 200, 400 mg) of linzagolix 
from 13 completed and two ongoing clinical studies. Ongoing studies include two Phase 3 studies for 
the indication of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids. 
Repeated once daily dosing at up to 700 mg linzagolix was safe and well-tolerated by premenopausal 
healthy volunteers. In endometriosis patients, doses up to 200 mg once daily for up to 24 weeks of 
treatment were well tolerated. 
Hepatic impairment had no relevant effect on total plasma linzagolix exposure. In women with severe 
hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh C), 2- to 3-fold unbound mean exposures were recorded. In hepatic 
impaired subjects, a single dose of 200 mg was well tolerated. 
Renal impairment had no relevant effect on total plasma linzagolix exposure. In women with severe 
renal impairment (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2) or end-stage renal disease, approximately 2-fold 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 31 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
unbound mean exposures were recorded. In renal impaired subjects, a single dose of 200 mg was well 
tolerated. 
The expected side effects of linzagolix are disturbances of the menstrual cycle and hypoestrogenic 
adverse events (AEs) (e.g., metrorrhagia and hot flush). 
In multiple-dose studies, a dose-dependent occurrence of hot flush was observed (14.63%, 27.27%, 
27.8%, 30% and 40.7% at 50 mg, 75 mg, 100 mg, 150 mg and 200 mg linzagolix, respectively). In the 
Phase 2b Edelweiss trial (15-OBE2109-001), a moderate proportion of patients reported a dose-
dependent increase in hot flushes (at week 12, placebo: 10.9% reporting at least one hot flush; 75mg: 
18.4%; 200 mg: 42.1% - at week 24, 75 mg: 19.0%; 200 mg: 45.6%).  
Anticipated AEs are events that were not necessarily observed with linzagolix but can be anticipated 
based on the drug’s pharmacological action and/or class effects, such as: increase in liver function test 
(LFT) parameters, headache, dizziness, nausea, hyperhidrosis, blood cholesterol increased, low density 
lipoprotein increased and BMD loss. 
In few subjects, an increase in transaminase values exceeding 3>ULN (Upper Limit of Normal) was 
observed under treatment. Most often the increase in transaminase values was reversible and decreased 
spontaneously back to normal levels under treatment. Increases in transaminase values were not 
associated with increased bilirubin values. 
A borderline effect of linzagolix on the QTc interval was identified with prolongations exceeding the 
threshold of concern by less then 2 msec. The categorical data for QTc showed no values greater than 
480 msec and no changes greater than 30 msec following the supratherapeutic and therapeutic doses. 
Thus, based on the magnitude of the QTc prolongation, the observed effects are not considered to be 
clinically significant. 
The vast majority of related AEs were reported as being of “mild” or “moderate” intensity; very few 
related events were reported as being of “severe” intensity. 
In the Phase 2b Edelweiss trial (15-OBE2109-001), changes from baseline to week 24 in BMD were 
measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan, using central reading. Partial E2 
suppression achieved with linzagolix 75 mg was associated with a mean percent change from baseline 
in spine BMD (the site of greatest bone loss) of ‐0.8% (95% CI ‐1.57, ‐0.03) after 6 months of treatment, 
while achieving improvement in symptoms in the majority of patients. As expected, full E2 suppression 
with linzagolix 200 mg lowers BMD by more than 2.5% after 6 months of treatment, which indicates 
the need for hormonal ABT for use beyond 6 months. 
In the Phase 2b Edelweiss trial (15-OBE2109-001), following the main study, subjects willing to 
continue treatment were entered into an extension study for an additional 28 weeks of treatment, 
followed by 24 weeks of post-treatment follow-up. Subjects received either 50 mg, 75 mg, or 100 mg 
of linzagolix, once daily in accordance with the treatment received in Part B, except for those subjects 
who had been randomized to 200 mg dose, which was reduced during the extension phase to 100 mg 
daily. AEs were collected throughout the study. BMD of femoral neck, total hip, and lumbar spine were 
assessed by DXA at week 52.  
Of the 253 subjects who completed the 24 weeks of treatment in the main study, 176 subjects received 
treatment in the extension. A summary of the safety findings is below: 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 32 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
At Week 52, BMD loss was seen in the lumbar spine in all treatment groups, except for the 50 mg group. 
Mean BMD loss in the lumbar spine was below 1.5% in the 75 mg fixed dose (FD) and 100 mg groups, 
with mean percent decreases (and lower 95% CI) from baseline of -1.139% (-2.21%), and -1.399% (-
3.35%), respectively. The greatest reductions were observed in the 75 mg titrated dose (TD), 
placebo/100 mg, and 200/100 mg groups with mean percent decreases (and lower 95% CI) from baseline 
of -2.646% (-4.46%), -2.503% (-4.04%), and -2.188% (-3.59%), respectively. 
At Week 52, BMD loss was detected in the femoral neck in all treatment groups, except for the 75 mg 
FD group. Mean BMD loss was similar in the 50 mg,75 mg TD, and 100 mg groups, with mean percent 
decreases (and lower 95% CI) from baseline of -0.992% (- 1.84%), -0.843% (-2.58%), and -1.102% (-
3.10%), respectively. The greatest reduction was observed in the 200/100 mg group with a mean percent 
decrease (and lower 95% CI) from baseline of -2.592% (-4.49%). 
At Week 52, BMD loss was detected in the total hip in all treatment groups. Mean BMD loss in the total 
hip was below 1% in the placebo/100 mg, 50 mg,75 mg FD, and 100 mg groups, with mean percent 
decreases (and lower 95% CI) from baseline of -0.807% (- 1.82%), -0.411% (-1.22%), -0.297% (-
1.36%), and -0.597% (-1.61%), respectively. The greatest reductions were observed in the 200/100 mg 
and 75 mg TD groups with mean percent decreases (and lower 95% CI) from baseline of -2.025% (-
3.58%) and - 1.363% (-3.23%), respectively. 
For the lumbar spine, the site most sensitive to BMD loss, an increase in the proportion of subjects >3% 
BMD loss was reported in a dose-dependent manner across linzagolix groups at Week 52: 4.8%, 18.2%, 
23.1% and 50% for the 50 mg, 75 mg FD, 100 mg, and 200/100 mg groups.  
At Week 24, the greatest mean BMD loss was in the 200/100 mg group for the lumbar spine: -2.887% 
(-4.07%). At Week 52, after receiving 28 weeks of 100 mg linzagolix, there appeared to be no additional 
BMD loss: mean percent change from baseline of - 2.188% (-3.59%). This observation may be due to 
increased E2 levels observed after the dose was lowered from 200 mg to 100 mg at Week 24. Of note, 
a similar proportion of subjects had a decrease >3% in the 200/100 mg group at Week 24 (51.9%) and 
Week 52 (50.0%). 
Median Z scores, interquartile ranges and total ranges for femoral neck, total hip and lumbar spine at 
baseline, Week 24 and Week 52 did not change importantly over time: medians remained within the 
range of -0.20 to 0.30, 0 to 0.40, and -0.25 to 0.35 in all treatment groups for the femoral neck, total hip 
and lumbar spine, respectively. Median absolute change from baseline to Week 52 ranged from -0.10 to 
0.00, -0.10 to 0.00 and -0.20 to -0.10, respectively. 
Over the 52-week treatment period, 154/176 (87.5%) of subjects reported treatment emergent adverse 
events (TEAEs). The incidence of TEAEs was not dose-dependent across treatment groups, ranging 
from 81.8% in the 100 mg group to 93.3% in the 200/100 mg group. The majority of the TEAEs 
(616/846; 72.8%) were reported during the first 24 weeks of treatment. 
The most commonly reported TEAEs were headache (32.4%) and hot flush (28.4%). The majority of 
these events occurred during the first 24 weeks of treatment. Headaches were reported with a similar 
frequency across treatment groups, ranging from 22.2% in the 75 mg FD group to 44.8% in the 
placebo/100 mg group, with no apparent dose relationship. Conversely, the incidence of hot flushes was 
dose-dependent and increased with increasing exposure to linzagolix: 16.7% (50 mg), 20.7% (75 mg 
FD), 22.2% (75 mg TD), 24.1% (placebo/100 mg), 27.3% (100 mg), and 60.0% (200/100 mg). Of note, 
there was no worsening in the incidence of hot flushes during the treatment extension; only 2/61 hot 
flush events were reported. 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 33 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
Ten serious AEs (SAEs) were reported in nine subjects. None of the SAEs were considered as related 
to study treatment. The SAEs of ruptured ectopic pregnancy (50 mg), pelvic pain (50 mg), pneumonia 
(75 mg TD), and anxiety disorder (200/100 mg) led to subject withdrawal from treatment during the 
extension phase of the study. 
During treatment extension, 12 subjects (6.8%) reported 17 TEAEs leading to treatment withdrawal. In 
the 200/100 mg group, one subject discontinued treatment due to bone loss and one subject due to bone 
pain. In the 75 mg FD group, one subject discontinued treatment due to bone density decreased. 
There were no subjects with AST and/or ALT values >2×ULN during the treatment extension. 
Overall, there were no clinically meaningful changes from baseline in laboratory parameters, vital signs, 
physical examination, or lipid measurements including HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and 
triglycerides in any group. 
Gynecological examinations showed a small number of abnormal clinically significant results, but with 
a higher frequency noted for uterus and ovaries. At Week 24, reductions from baseline in endometrial 
thickness and uterus volume were more notable at the higher doses of linzagolix (100 mg and 200 mg) 
compared to the lower doses. This pattern was not observed at Week 52. Endometrial biopsy did not 
raise any safety concern. 
Overalll, the safety findings at the end of 52 weeks of treatment revealed no new safety issues.  Patterns 
of BMD loss were similar to the main study.  
5.6 RATIONALE FOR THE CURRENT STUDY 
Endometriosis is a chronic disease requiring long-term continuous treatment. The results of the Phase 
2b, Edelweiss study (study 15-OBE2109-001) supported the sustained efficacy and overall safety of 12-
month treatment with linzagolix in symptomatic endometriosis (see sections 5.5.2 and 5.5.3). 
In the present study, we will collect long-term (up to 12 months) data on the safety and efficacy of 
linzagolix in subjects with EAP who have completed 6 months of treatment in study 18-OBE2109-003 
(Edelweiss 3). 
5.7 SUMMARY OF OVERALL RISKS AND BENEFITS 
Linzagolix efficacy compared to placebo was demonstrated at daily doses of 75–200 mg for 3 months 
and maintenance of effect has been shown up to 6 months. 
Linzagolix was well-tolerated at these doses. The most commonly reported AEs in the Phase 2 studies 
were headache and hot flush which are related to the biological activity of linzagolix.  
Eleven pregnancies were in the Phase 2 studies. No fetal or newborn abnormalities were reported in any 
of the pregnancies. 
There were no clinically relevant findings in laboratory measurements, vital signs or electrocardiogram 
(ECG) recordings. The administration of linzagolix results in infrequent, transient, moderate and non- 
dose-related increases in transaminase levels which were not associated with changes in bilirubin levels. 
A borderline increase in QTc interval was observed in healthy volunteers which was not considered 
clinically significant. Nevertheless, all subjects in the current study will be monitored monthly with 
ECG. 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 34 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
A modest degree of BMD loss has been seen in linzagolix-treated subjects with doses below 100 mg 
QD. Clinically significant BMD loss was observed with a dose of 200 mg QD at 6 months of treatment 
and requires combined use of hormonal ABT to mitigate BMD loss. As linzagolix 200mg will be 
combined with ABT in this extension study, no major impact on BMD is expected. In addition, the 
BMD loss will be monitored during the study and subjects who experience more than 8% confirmed 
BMD loss or a Z-score ≤ -2.5 will be discontinued from treatment. Moreover, subjects will be provided 
with vitamin D and calcium supplements which they will be recommended to take. 
In addition, an independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) will oversee the safety of study 
subjects, including a regular review of transaminase levels, BMD values and ECG parameters. 
In conclusion, linzagolix has a favorable benefit/risk ratio and represents a potential therapy for treating 
EAP.  
The overall benefit/risk of this study was re-evaluated by ObsEva in light of the COVID-19 pandemic 
and evolving regulatory guidance. 
For subjects who could not attend their visits due to quarantine, travel restrictions, site closure or other 
unforeseen reasons, remote study visits and shipment of materials and study drugs from site to subject 
were setup, whenever feasible, based on local restrictions related to the pandemic. Sites scheduled 
telephone calls to subjects as replacement for on-site visits, to ensure continuity in patient’s safety 
monitoring, treatment and study data collection.  
6 OBJECTIVES 
6.1 EFFICACY OBJECTIVES 
6.1.1 
Primary 
The primary objective of this extension study is to assess the maintenance of efficacy of linzagolix 
administered orally once daily for up to an additional 6 months (for up to 12 months of treatment in 
total) in women who have already completed 6 months of linzagolix treatment at a dose of 75 mg alone 
or 200 mg in combination with ABT (E2 1 mg / NETA 0.5 mg) in the management of moderate to 
severe EAP in women with surgically confirmed endometriosis. The two co-primary efficacy endpoints 
will be clinically meaningful reduction over the last 28 days of randomized treatment up to the Month 
12 visit, along with a stable or decreased use of analgesics for EAP for 1) dysmenorrhea (DYS) and for 
2) non menstrual pelvic pain (NMPP). 
6.1.2 
Secondary 
Secondary objectives include evaluation of efficacy over the last 28 days of randomized treatment up to 
the Month 12 visit based on the following parameters: evaluation of pain associated with sexual 
intercourse (dyspareunia) and defecation (dyschezia), difficulty of doing daily activities, analgesic use, 
assessment of subject perception of severity, change in uterine bleeding, Quality of Life (QoL) 
questionnaires, pharmacoeconomic burden of endometriosis by assessing changes in patient 
productivity, assessment of endometriosis-related number of non-study health visits, number of days in 
hospital and type of medical procedures performed during the Treatment Period. 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 35 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
6.2 SAFETY OBJECTIVES 
Safety and tolerability objectives include assessment of BMD, endometrial health, cardiac safety 
including QT interval prolongation, standard laboratory safety parameters, gynecological assessments 
and AE frequency including specific hypoestrogenic AEs. 
6.3 EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES 
Exploratory objectives include assessment of bone turnover markers and collection of PK and PD related 
data of linzagolix for a separate modelling exercise. 
7 ENDPOINTS 
7.1 EFFICACY ENDPOINTS 
7.1.1 
Primary 
The two co-primary, composite efficacy endpoints are clinically meaningful reduction from baseline to 
the last 28 days preceding the Month 12 visit (the 4-week period preceding Month 12 visit) along with 
a stable or decreased use of analgesics for EAP, in the mean daily assessment of 1) DYS and of 2) 
NMPP measured on a Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) using an electronic diary (eDiary).  
7.1.2 
Secondary 
The secondary endpoints include: 
 
Change from baseline to Month 12 in DYS (VRS) 
 
Change from baseline to Month 12 in NMPP (VRS) 
 
Change from baseline to Month 12 in dyschezia (Numeric Rating Scale - NRS) 
 
Change from baseline to Month 12 in overall pelvic pain (NRS) 
 
Change from baseline to Month 12 in the interference of pain with the ability to perform daily 
activities, measured using the pain dimension of the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30)  
 
Change from baseline to Month 12 in dyspareunia (VRS) 
 
No analgesics use for EAP during the preceding 4-week period at each scheduled assessment 
 
No opiate use for EAP during the preceding 4-week period at each scheduled assessment 
 
Responder rate at scheduled visit other than Month 12 visit, for DYS and NMPP (VRS) 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the mean pelvic pain scores for DYS, 
NMPP and overall pelvic pain, during the previous 4-week period assessed on the NRS and VRS 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days with moderate to severe 
pelvic pain during the previous 4-week period assessed on the VRS 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 36 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the mean worst pelvic pain score defined 
as the mean of the 5 highest daily pain scores reported during the previous 4-week period assessed 
on the NRS 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the mean of daily dyspareunia scores 
reported during the previous 4-week period on the dyspareunia VRS  
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the mean of daily dyschezia scores reported 
during the previous 4-week period assessed on the dyschezia NRS 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in non-opioid, opioid and combined analgesic 
use for EAP during the previous 4-week period based on pill count in the eDiary 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in opioid analgesic use for EAP as reported 
in the eDiary during the previous 4-week period based on morphine milligram equivalent (MME) 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days of analgesic use 
(including any class) for EAP during the previous 4-week period as assessed in the eDiary 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days of opioid analgesic use 
for EAP during the previous 4-week period as assessed in the eDiary 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of pelvic pain-free days 
(assessed on the VRS) during the previous 4-week period  
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in ability to perform daily activities during 
the previous 4-week period, as assessed in the eDiary (daily function NRS) 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days with no difficulty in 
doing daily activities due to EAP during the previous 4-week period as assessed in the eDiary 
(daily function NRS) 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days when dyspareunia was 
a problem during the previous 4-week period (including days when sexual intercourse was avoided 
because of anticipation of pain) as assessed on the dyspareunia VRS 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days when sexual intercourse 
was avoided because of anticipation of pain during the previous 4-week period as assessed on the 
dyspareunia VRS 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days with uterine bleeding 
(including spotting) during the previous 4-week period measured by eDiary 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days when school or work 
was missed due to EAP in the previous 4-week period as reported in the eDiary 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days when the subject had 
to go to bed or lie down due to EAP in the previous 4-week period as reported in the eDiary 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the Pain, Control and powerlessness, 
Emotional well-being, Social support, Self-image dimensions and the Modular sexual relationship 
questionnaire of EHP-30 scores 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 37 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the Health Related Productivity 
Questionnaire (HRPQ) scores 
 
Number of non-study endometriosis related health visits, number of days in hospital and type of 
procedures performed based on Health Resource Utilization Questionnaire (HRUQ) at each 
scheduled assessment 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the Physician/Subject Surgery Intention 
Question (PSIQ/SSIQ) 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the PROMIS Fatigue – Short Form 6a 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-
5D-5L) questionnaire 
 
Response at each scheduled assessment according to Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) 
(and Post-treatment Patient Global Impression of Change, PPGIC) 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the monthly PGIS (mPGIS) score 
7.2 SAFETY ENDPOINTS 
 
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in BMD measured by DXA of lumbar spine 
(L1-L4), femoral neck, and total hip 
 
Incidence and severity of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) 
 
Incidence and severity of hypoestrogenic TEAEs (hot flush) 
 
Time to the first post-treatment menses 
 
Changes in clinical laboratory assessments (hematology, biochemistry, coagulation parameters, 
hormones, lipids and urinalysis) from baseline to each scheduled assessment 
 
Any pathological changes from baseline in the endometrium as assessed by histology from 
endometrial biopsies 
 
Changes from baseline to each scheduled assessment in any other safety parameter including 
weight, vital signs, ECG, gynecological assessments and endometrial thickness 
7.3 EXPLORATORY ENDPOINTS 
 
Change from baseline in bone turnover markers at each scheduled assessment 
 
PK and PD of linzagolix 
8 STUDY DESIGN 
This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. 
Subjects who have completed the 6-month Treatment Period in 18-OBE2109-003 - Edelweiss 3 study 
(herein referred to as main study) will be invited to enter the present extension study. Month 6 visit of 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 38 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
the main study is a decision point for Subjects to either end treatment and enter a post-treatment follow 
up (part of the main study), or to opt for a 6-month treatment extension. 
The extension study starts at the Month 6 visit of the main study. Subjects will be required to sign a 
specific informed consent form (ICF) for this extension study. Only subjects who have completed the 
full 6-month Treatment Period in the main study and meet the inclusion criteria will be eligible for entry 
in the extension study.  
All subjects will receive once daily either linzagolix 75 mg alone (with ABT placebo) or 200 mg 
combined with ABT for 6 months. Subjects who received placebo during the main study will be 
randomized to either linzagolix 75 mg alone (with ABT placebo) or linzagolix 200 mg with ABT. 
Subjects who received active treatment during the main study will continue with the same treatment. 
After end of treatment in the extension study (6-month treatment period: from Month 6 to Month 12), 
subjects will enter a post-treatment Follow-Up Period of 6 months with no investigational medicinal 
product (IMP).  
The total duration of the present extension study will be 12 months. 
  
A schematic of the study design is shown in Figure 1. 
 
 
Figure 1 : Study design 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 39 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
All subjects will receive once daily either linzagolix 75 mg alone (with ABT placebo) or linzagolix 200 
mg combined with low dose ABT for 6 months. ABT is a combination of estradiol (E2) 1 mg and 
norethisterone acetate (NETA) 0.5 mg. 
Since linzagolix 75 mg and 200 mg tablets have a different appearance, a double-dummy design will be 
used in order to maintain the blinding of the study. 
Linzagolix/placebo tablets will be provided in monthly treatment kits, packaged, labelled and 
administered in the same manner to protect the blinded nature of the trial. 
ABT/placebo treatments will be supplied as 3-monthly kits, packaged, labelled and administered in the 
same manner to protect the blinded nature of the trial. 
Each treatment kit will be labelled with a unique kit number. Treatment kit numbers will be provided 
through IWRS.  
9 STUDY POPULATION 
9.1 SUBJECTS 
9.1.1 
Description of the target population 
All subjects who have completed the full 6-month Treatment Period in the main study and who meet 
the inclusion criteria will be offered to enter the extension study. 
9.1.2 
Number of subjects 
It is estimated that up to 288 subjects will enter the extension study, assuming that 80% of the patients 
randomized in the main study will complete the study (namely 360 subjects) and that up to 80 % thereof 
will enter the extension study. 
9.1.3 
Study region/location 
The study will be conducted in the Unites States (US) and Europe, at the same investigational sites as 
in the main study. 
9.2 ENTRY CRITERIA 
9.2.1 
Inclusion Criteria 
To be eligible for inclusion into this extension study, the subjects must fulfil all of the following 
criteria: 
1. The subject must provide a written informed consent specific to this study prior to starting the 
extension study treatment. 
2. The subject has completed the 6-month treatment in the main study. 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 40 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
3. The subject is willing and able to continue to comply with the requirements of the study 
protocol for the duration of the extension study. 
4. The subject agrees to continue to use only the analgesic rescue medication permitted by the 
protocol during the Treatment and Follow-up Periods. 
5. If of childbearing potential, the subject agrees to continue to use one of the following birth 
control methods during the entire Treatment Period of the study and until 3 months after the 
end of treatment: 
a. Sexual abstinence, if this is the subject's habitual practice and/or the subject is 
routinely abstinent from heterosexual intercourse, 
b. Partner with a vasectomy with confirmed azoospermia, 
c. Double non-hormonal barrier contraception such as condom or diaphragm each 
combined with spermicide. 
9.2.2 
Exclusion Criteria 
To be eligible for inclusion in this extension study the subject must not meet any of the following 
criteria: 
1. The subject is pregnant or is planning a pregnancy within the duration of the study (including 
the Follow-up Period). 
2. The subject is likely to require treatment during the study with any of the medications listed 
below: 
a. GnRH antagonists 
b. GnRH agonist injections/3-month depot injections 
c. Danazol 
d. Oral contraceptives and other sex hormones 
e. Depot contraceptives 
f. Selective Progesterone Receptor Modulators (SPRMs), Selective Estrogen Receptor 
Modulators (SERMs) and aromatase inhibitors 
g. Long acting narcotics (i.e. requiring less than once daily dosing) 
h. Systemic glucocorticoid treatments for acute diseases (not depot) 
i. 
In situ copper intra-uterine device (IUD) 
j. 
In situ IUD with progestogen 
3. The subject is likely to use cannabinoids during the study. 
4.  The subject has any other clinically significant gynecologic condition identified during the 
main study on transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS), on endometrial biopsy or at the manual breast 
examination, which might interfere with the study efficacy and safety objectives. 
5.  The subject has met any of the main study discontinuation criteria including: 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 41 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
a. Serum calcium level confirmed on a repeated test above 2.9 mmol/L 
b. BMD decrease from baseline > 8% or a Z-score ≤ -2.5 at either femoral neck, hip or spine 
on the Month 6 DXA scan during the main study. 
c. QTcF > 500 ms or increase > 60 ms from the highest value prior to first dose during the 
main study. 
d. Any of the following elevation of hepatic enzymes: 
 
ALT or AST >8xULN  
 
ALT or AST >5xULN for more than 2 weeks  
 
ALT or AST >3xULN and (TBL >2xULN or INR >1.5)  
 
ALT or AST >3xULN with the appearance of fatigue, nausea, vomiting, right upper 
quadrant pain or tenderness, fever, rash, and/or eosinophilia (>5%) 
6. The subject has any condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, constitutes a risk or a 
contraindication to the participation of the subject in this extension study or that could interfere 
with the study objectives, conduct or assessments.  
10 STUDY PROCEDURES AND ASSESSMENTS 
10.1 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS 
The extension study starts at the Month 6 visit of 18-OBE2109-003 - Edelweiss 3 study (herein referred 
to as the main study). At Month 5 visit of the main study, the subject will have been informed of the 
possibility to enter the extension study at Month 6 (if eligible) and will have been provided with a copy 
of the subject information sheet, specific to the extension study, to read prior to the Month 6 visit. 
After all Month 6 assessments have been made, if the subject is eligible, one original copy of the 
extension-specific ICF will be signed and personally dated by both the subject and the Investigator or 
legally acceptable designee. The original signed copy will be kept in the confidential investigator file 
and a copy will be given to the subject. Once the ICF is signed, the subject will be dispensed new 
treatment kits. She will take her daily dose of study medication at the study site from these newly 
dispensed kits. 
During the whole study, the subject will be identified using a Subject Identification Number (SIN) for 
all documentation and discussion. The subjects will be identified with the same SIN than in the main 
study. SINs will be made of 6 digits, as follows: 
 
1st, 2nd and 3rd digits: site identifier (100 to 999) 
 
4th, 5th and 6th digits: subject number (001 to 999) 
An electronic Case Report Form (eCRF) will be completed for all subjects who signed the ICF.  
Subjects who previously received placebo in the main study will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either 
linzagolix 75 mg alone (with ABT placebo) or linzagolix 200 mg with ABT. 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 42 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
Subjects who received active treatment in the main study will continue with the same treatment 
(linzagolix 75 mg alone with ABT placebo or linzagolix 200 mg with ABT). 
In order to maintain the blind, the site will not be required to perform any randomization activities. The 
kits will be automatically allocated to the corresponding patients in the IWRS upon confirmation of their 
eligibility. 
Treatment kits will be dispensed to the subjects as follows: 
- 
on Month 6 and Month 9 visits, subject will receive two kits, one for linzagolix/placebo 
(monthly kit) and one for the ABT/ABT placebo (3-monthly kit).  
- 
On Month 7, Month 8, Month 10 and Month 11 visits, subject will receive one kit only, for 
linzagolix/placebo.  
The treatment kit numbers for linzagolix/placebo and for ABT will refer to unique kits present at site 
and corresponding to the randomization allocation.  
10.2 OUTLINE OF STUDY PROCEDURES AND ASSESSMENTS 
The first visit for this extension study is combined with the Month 6 visit of the main study. Therefore, 
the Month 6 assessments from the main study will not have to be duplicated at the start of the extension 
study. The study visit schedule is depicted in Figure 2 and the schedule of assessments is detailed in 
Appendix A and Appendix B. 
 
 
Figure 2 : Schedule of Visits 
 
All visits should take place at the end of the defined period (i.e. Month 7 visit should be scheduled at 
the end of Month 7, Month 8 visit should be scheduled at the end of Month 8, etc.). One month is defined 
as 28 days/4 weeks. All visit dates are calculated from the date the patient started treatment in the main 
study (Day 1 visit of 18-OBE2109-003 Edelweiss 3):  
 
Month 7 (Day 197), Month 8 (Day 225), Month 9 (Day 253), Month 10 (Day 281), Month 11 
(Day 309) and Month 12 (Day 337) for the Treatment Period,  
 
Month 1 Extension FU (Day 365), Month 3 Extension FU (Day 421) and Month 6 Extension 
FU (Day 505) for the Follow-up Period. 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 43 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
A window of -3/+2 days is allowed for Month 7 visit, and of ± 3 days for each of the following visits 
during the Treatment Period. A window of ± 7 days/1 week is allowed for each visit scheduled during 
the Follow-Up Period. 
The timing of events is shown in the Schedule of Assessments (Appendix A and Appendix B). 
10.2.1 Treatment Period  
During the entire Treatment Period: 
 
the subject will use the same eDiary as during the main study. The eDiary should be completed 
daily, in the evening at approximately the same time, for use of provided/prescribed analgesics, 
uterine bleeding, pelvic pain, dyspareunia, dyschezia and daily function.  
 
the subject will take her daily dose of study medication at home except on the day of study visits 
where she will take her daily dose at site. There will be no IMP intake at the Month 12 visit. The 
last dose of study medication in this extension study will be the dose taken the day before Month 12 
visit. 
 
the subject will be asked to bring her eDiary and her IMP kits at each visit to the site.  
 
the subject will receive contraception counselling at each visit. 
 
the subject will be provided/prescribed a limited quantity (as per Investigator’s judgement) of 
standard doses of permitted analgesics as rescue medication for EAP for the duration of the study. 
 
the subject will receive calcium 500 to 1000 mg and vitamin D 400 IU supplementation which she 
will be advised to take daily (at least 4 hours from the intake of the study drug) until the end of the 
study. Intake should be recorded at each study visit in eCRF. 
 
AEs and concomitant medications will be recorded in the eCRF (excluding any provided/prescribed 
analgesics used for EAP will be recorded daily in the eDiary only). 
10.2.1.1 
Study visit: Month 6 (Day 169 ± 3 days) 
After all Month 6 assessments pertaining to the main study have been made and the subject has been 
confirmed to be eligible to proceed in the extension study (see section 9.2), the subject will be requested 
to sign the extension-specific ICF that she was given at the Month 5 visit. 
Note: inclusion in the extension study will not be postponed if the results of any Month 6 assessment 
are not available on the day of Month 6 visit. Subjects will be required to stop the treatment if the results 
obtained after enrollment meet the discontinuation criteria defined in Section 10.7.2.1. 
After signature of the extension-specific ICF, the subject will be dispensed new treatment kits. The 
subject will take her daily dose of study medication at the study site from these newly dispensed kits.  
The exact time of dosing (hour/minute) will be recorded in eCRF. 
In addition, the subject will: 
 
receive contraception counselling and will be given double barrier contraception (condoms with 
spermicide), if requested, to be used until 3 months after treatment end. If the subject is at risk for 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 44 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
acquiring HIV, she must be reminded to use double non-hormonal barrier contraception without 
spermicides (eg: condoms and diaphragms). 
 
be provided/prescribed a limited quantity (as per Investigator’s judgement) of standard doses of 
permitted analgesics as rescue medication for EAP for the duration of the study. 
 
receive calcium 500 to 1000 mg and vitamin D 400 IU supplementation 
Upon completion of the visit, the subject will be provided with emergency contact phone numbers and 
will be scheduled for her next visits.  
10.2.1.2 
Study visits: Month 7 (Day 197 -3/+2 days) and Month 8 (Day 225 ± 3 days) 
The following tests and evaluations will be performed : 
- 
eDiary completion compliance check  
- 
ePRO and ClinRO completion, ideally before any other procedures or assessments:  
 
at Month 7 visit: EHP-30, EQ-5D-5L, PROMIS, mPGIS, PGIC, HRUQ, HRPQ with 
mPGIS and PGIC completed last 
 
at Month 8 visit: mPGIS, PGIC, HRUQ and HRPQ with mPGIS and PGIC completed last. 
- 
Concomitant treatments recording 
- 
AE recording 
- 
Completion of the paper C-SSRS questionnaire (version for “already enrolled subjects” (see 
Appendix S) for patients responding to the C-SSRS for the first time during the study, or 
version “since last study visit” (see Appendix T) for patients for whom the C-SSRS was 
completed at the previous study visit) 
- 
IMP accountability based on blisters 
- 
ECG (at about the same time as but before the PK sample) 
- 
Vital signs (blood pressure (BP) and heart rate) 
- 
Urine pregnancy test 
- 
Urinary protein dipstick 
- 
Blood samples for haematology, coagulation parameters, chemistry, hormones (E2, LH and 
progesterone (P4))  
- 
Pre-dose PK sample (the time of study medication administration on previous 4 days and time 
of PK sampling will be recorded) 
- 
Contraception dispensing (if applicable) and counselling 
- 
Prescribe/dispense permitted analgesics as rescue medication 
- 
Dispense calcium and vitamin D supplementation 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 45 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
- 
Dispensing via IWRS of one new kit of linzagolix 
The subject will take her daily dose of study medication at the study site from the newly dispensed 
linzagolix/placebo kit, and from the ABT/placebo kit dispensed at the Month 6 visit. 
10.2.1.3 
Study visit: Month 9 (Day 253 ± 3 days) 
The following tests and evaluations will be performed: 
- 
eDiary completion compliance check 
- 
ePRO and ClinRO completion, ideally before any other procedures or assessments: EHP-30, 
EQ-5D-5L, PROMIS, mPGIS, PGIC, HRUQ, HRPQ (mPGIS and PGIC must be completed 
last) 
- 
Concomitant treatments recording 
- 
AE recording 
- 
Completion of the paper C-SSRS questionnaire (version for “already enrolled subjects” (see 
Appendix S) for patients responding to the C-SSRS for the first time during the study, or version 
“since last study visit” (see Appendix T) for patients for whom the C-SSRS was completed at 
the previous study visit) 
- 
IMP accountability based on blisters 
- 
ECG (at about the same time as but before the PK sample) 
- 
Physical examination, including weight recording 
- 
Vital signs (BP and heart rate) 
- 
Urine pregnancy test 
- 
Gynecological examination 
- 
TVUS of the uterus 
- 
Urinary protein dipstick 
- 
Fasting (overnight) blood samples for haematology, coagulation parameters, chemistry, lipids, 
hormones (E2, LH, P4 and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG)) and bone biomarkers 
- 
Pre-dose PK sample (the time of dose administration on previous 4 days and time of PK 
sampling will be recorded) 
- 
BMD assessed by DXA for femoral neck, hip and spine for subjects who met the following 
criterion at any site on the Month 6 DXA scan: -2.5 < Z-score ≤ -1.5 
- 
Contraception dispensing (if applicable) and counselling 
- 
Prescribe/dispense permitted analgesics as rescue medication 
- 
Dispense calcium and vitamin D supplementation 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 46 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
- 
Dispensing via IWRS of one new kit of linzagolix/placebo and one new kit of ABT/placebo 
The subject will take her daily dose of study medication at the study site from the newly dispensed kits. 
10.2.1.4 
Study visits: Month 10 (Day 281 ± 3 days) and Month 11 (Day 309 ± 3 days) 
The following tests and evaluations will be performed : 
- 
eDiary completion compliance check  
- 
ePRO and ClinRO completion, ideally before any other procedures or assessments:  mPGIS, 
PGIC, HRUQ, HRPQ with mPGIS and PGIC completed last 
- 
Concomitant treatments recording 
- 
AE recording 
- 
Completion of the paper C-SSRS questionnaire (version for “already enrolled subjects” (see 
Appendix S) for patients responding to the C-SSRS for the first time during the study, or version 
“since last study visit” (see Appendix T) for patients for whom the C-SSRS was completed at 
the previous study visit) 
- 
IMP accountability based on blisters 
- 
ECG (at about the same time as but before the PK sample) 
- 
Vital signs (BP and heart rate) 
- 
Urine pregnancy test 
- 
Urinary protein dipstick 
- 
Blood samples (fasting not required) for haematology, coagulation parameters, chemistry, 
hormones (E2, LH and P4) 
- 
Pre-dose PK sample (the time of study medication administration on previous 4 days and time 
of PK sampling will be recorded) 
- 
Contraception dispensing (if applicable) and counselling 
- 
Prescribe/dispense permitted analgesics as rescue medication 
- 
Dispense calcium and vitamin D supplementation 
- 
Dispensing via IWRS of one new kit of linzagolix/placebo 
The subject will take her daily dose of study medication at the study site from the newly dispensed 
linzagolix/placebo kit, and from the ABT/placebo kit dispensed at the Month 9 visit. 
10.2.1.5 
Study visit: Month 12 (Day 337 ± 3 days) 
The following tests and evaluations will be performed : 
- 
eDiary completion compliance check  


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 47 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
- 
ePRO and ClinRO completion, ideally before any other procedures or assessments: EHP-30, 
EQ-5D-5L, PROMIS, mPGIS, PGIC, HRUQ, HRPQ, SSIQ andd PSIQ (mPGIS and PGIC must 
be completed last) 
- 
Concomitant treatments recording 
- 
AE recording 
- 
Completion of the paper C-SSRS questionnaire (version for “already enrolled subjects” (see 
Appendix S) for patients responding to the C-SSRS for the first time during the study, or version 
“since last study visit” (see Appendix T) for patients for whom the C-SSRS was completed at 
the previous study visit) 
- 
Final IMP accountability based on blisters 
- 
ECG (at about the same time as but before the PK sample) 
- 
Physical examination, including weight recording 
- 
Vital signs (BP and heart rate) 
- 
Urine pregnancy test  
- 
Gynecological examination 
- 
Manual breast examination (by palpation) 
- 
TVUS of uterus  
- 
Urinary protein dipstick 
- 
Fasting (overnight) blood samples for haematology, coagulation parameters, chemistry, lipids, 
hormones (E2, LH, P4 and SHBG) and bone biomarkers 
- 
PK sample (the time of dose administration on previous 4 days and time of PK sampling will 
be recorded) 
- 
Endometrial biopsy, unless the endometrium thickness in TVUS is ≤ 5 mm, in which case no 
endometrial biopsy will be necessary (see section 10.4.5). Appropriate photo documentation of 
the endometrium thickness is mandatory.  
- 
BMD assessed by DXA for femoral neck, hip and spine. DXA can be performed up to 10 days 
prior to the study visit which allows to get the DXA results ideally at the time of the Month 12 
study visit at the latest. 
- 
The subject will be verbally asked which treatment she believed she received during the 
Treatment Period in the extension study. The answer will be recorded in the eCRF. 
- 
Contraception dispensing (if applicable) and counselling 
- 
Prescribe/dispense permitted analgesics as rescue medication 
- 
Dispense calcium and vitamin D supplementation 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 48 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
An additional question will be asked to the subject about the burden of filling in the eDiary (0 = not at 
all a burden, 10 = very much a burden). The answer will be recorded in the eCRF. 
The Month 12 study visit constitutes the end of the Treatment Period pertaining to this extension study. 
The subject will continue in the post-treatment 6-month Follow-Up (FU) Period. 
10.2.2 Post-treatment Follow-Up Period  
Up to Month 6 Extension FU visit, the subject will continue to record on her eDiary, daily at 
approximately the same time each evening, her use of provided/prescribed analgesics, uterine bleeding, 
pelvic pain, dyspareunia, dyschezia and daily function.  
The subject will be asked to bring her eDiary at each visit to the site during the entire Follow-Up Period. 
10.2.2.1 
Study visit: Month 1 Extension FU (Month 1 ExFU)  
Month 1 ExFU visit should be scheduled on Day 365 ± 7 days after main study Day 1 (or 28 days ± 7 
days after last IMP intake for early discontinued subjects). 
The following tests and evaluations will be performed at Month 1 ExFU visit: 
- 
eDiary completion compliance check  
- 
ePRO completion, ideally before any other procedures or assessments: mPGIS and PPGIC 
(must be completed last) 
- 
Concomitant treatments recording 
- 
AE recording 
- 
Completion of the paper C-SSRS questionnaire (version for “already enrolled subjects” (see 
Appendix S) for patients responding to the C-SSRS for the first time during the study, or version 
“since last study visit” (see Appendix T) for patients for whom the C-SSRS was completed at 
the previous study visit) 
- 
ECG 
- 
Vital signs (BP and heart rate) 
- 
Urine pregnancy test and contraception dispensing and counselling 
- 
Urinary protein dipstick 
- 
Blood samples for haematology, coagulation parameters, chemistry, hormones (E2, LH and P4) 
- 
Endometrial biopsy only if diagnosis at Month 12 was different than “benign endometrium” or 
if no endometrial biopsy was done at Month 12 (see section 10.4.5).  
- 
Prescribe/dispense permitted analgesics as rescue medication 
- 
Dispense calcium and vitamin D supplementation 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 49 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
10.2.2.2 
Study visit: Month 3 Extension FU (Month 3 ExFU) 
Month 3 ExFU visit should be scheduled on Day 421 ± 7 days after Day 1 (or 84 days ± 7 days after 
last IMP intake for early discontinued subjects). 
The following tests and evaluations will be performed at Month 3 ExFU Visit: 
- 
eDiary completion compliance check 
- 
ePRO and ClinRO completion, ideally before any other procedures or assessments: EHP-30, 
EQ-5D-5L, PROMIS, mPGIS, PPGIC, HRUQ, HRPQ (mPGIS and PPGIC must be completed 
last) 
- 
Concomitant treatments recording 
- 
AE recording 
- 
Completion of the paper C-SSRS questionnaire (version for “already enrolled subjects” (see 
Appendix S) for patients responding to the C-SSRS for the first time during the study, or version 
“since last study visit” (see Appendix T) for patients for whom the C-SSRS was completed at 
the previous study visit) 
- 
ECG 
- 
Physical examination, including weight recording 
- 
Vital signs (BP and heart rate) 
- 
Urine pregnancy test and contraception counselling 
- 
Gynecological examination 
- 
Manual breast examination (by palpation) 
- 
TVUS of uterus 
- 
Urinary protein dipstick 
- 
Fasting (overnight) blood samples for haematology, coagulation parameters, chemistry, lipids, 
hormones (E2, LH and P4) and bone markers. For subjects who do not resume menses by the 
Month 3 ExFU visit, an FSH test should be performed at a local laboratory and the subject 
should be advised to consult for gynaecological evaluation. 
- 
Endometrial biopsy only if diagnosis at preceding biopsy was different than “benign 
endometrium” or if no endometrial biopsy was done at Month 12 nor at any visit after Month 
12 (see section 10.4.5).  
- 
Prescribe/dispense permitted analgesics as rescue medication 
- 
Dispense calcium and vitamin D supplementation 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 50 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
10.2.2.3 
Study visit: Month 6 Extension FU (Month 6 ExFU) – End of Follow-up visit 
Month 6 ExFU visit should be scheduled on Day 505 ± 7 days after Day 1 (or 168 days ± 7 days after 
last IMP intake for early discontinued subjects). 
The following evaluations and tests will be performed at Month 6 ExFU Visit: 
- 
eDiary completion compliance check 
- 
ePRO and ClinRO completion, ideally before any other procedures or assessments: EHP-30, 
EQ-5D-5L, PROMIS, mPGIS, PPGIC, HRUQ, HRPQ (mPGIS and PPGIC must be completed 
last) 
- 
Collection and deactivation of eDiary 
- 
Concomitant treatments recording 
- 
AE recording 
- 
Completion of the paper C-SSRS questionnaire version “since last study visit” (see Appendix 
T) for patients for whom the C-SSRS was completed at the previous study visit. 
- 
ECG 
- 
Physical examination, including weight recording 
- 
Vital signs (BP and heart rate) 
- 
Urine pregnancy test 
- 
TVUS of uterus 
- 
Endometrial biopsy if no endometrial biopsy was obtained at Month 12 nor at any visit since 
Month 12 (see section 10.4.5). If inadequate/no tissue is available for pathology evaluation, the 
biopsy should be repeated as soon as possible in the following days. 
- 
BMD assessed by DXA for femoral neck, hip and spine. This DXA can be performed ± 10 days 
from the Month 6 ExFU study visit. 
This visit constitutes the end of study participation except for subjects with a BMD decrease > 1.5% 
from the main study baseline for lumbar spine and/or > 2.5% for total hip. These subjects should have 
a repeat DXA scan 6 months later for BMD follow-up assessment.  
10.2.2.4 
Study visit: BMD Follow-up visit 
BMD Follow-up visit should be scheduled on Day 674 ± 10 days after main study Day 1 (or 168 days 
± 10 days after Month 6 ExFU visit). 
This visit is applicable only to subjects with a BMD decrease of > 1.5% from the main study baseline 
for lumbar spine and/or > 2.5% for total hip at the Month 6 ExFU visit. 
BMD of the femoral neck, hip and spine will be assessed by DXA.  


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 51 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
Subjects who have ≥ 3% BMD decrease from their main study baseline at any site (femoral neck, hip or 
spine) at this visit should be referred to a bone specialist for evaluation. 
10.3 EFFICACY OBSERVATIONS AND MEASUREMENTS 
All the questionnaires described below will be completed in the eDiary by the subject and/or the site 
staff. If the subject forgets to bring her eDiary to one site visit, the completion of ePRO and ClinRO will 
be done on a site back-up device. 
10.3.1 Daily eDiary 
The subject will use the same eDiary as in the main study. If needed, she will be re-trained at Month 6 
visit by the Investigator or delegate on how to use and complete it correctly.  
The eDiary should be completed daily, in the evening at approximately the same time, during the entire 
extension study (including the Treatment and Follow-Up Periods). A daily alarm will be set up in the 
eDiary to remind the patient to complete her daily questions. In addition, appropriate email alerts will 
be sent to the site staff and to the operational team in case of missed diary entries. eDiary compliance 
will be checked remotely on an ongoing basis by a dedicated data management team and by the CRO 
and the Sponsor’s clinical operations teams. 
10.3.1.1 
Pelvic pain 
The subject’s assessment of pelvic pain will be collected daily via the eDiary using an NRS and a VRS. 
NRS: The subject will be asked to rate her worst endometriosis-associated pelvic pain in the last 24 
hours on a 0–10 scale with 0 representing no pelvic pain and 10 representing the worst pelvic pain 
imaginable. 
VRS: The subject will be asked to choose the category that best describes her endometriosis-associated 
pelvic pain in the last 24 hours: 
0  
No pain. 
1  
Mild pain but I was easily able to do the things I usually do. 
2  
Moderate pain. I had some difficulty doing the things I usually do.  
3  
Severe pain. I had great difficulty doing the things I usually do.  
10.3.1.2 
Daily function (difficulty of doing daily activities) 
The subject will complete a daily questionnaire in the eDiary if she had any difficulty doing her daily 
activities in the last 24 hours on a 0–10 scale (NRS) with 0 representing no difficulty doing daily 
activities and 10 representing inability to do daily activities. 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 52 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
10.3.1.3 
Uterine bleeding 
The subject will complete a daily questionnaire in the eDiary assessing strength of uterine/vaginal 
bleeding in the last 24 hours. The strength of uterine bleeding will be assessed using the following scale: 
Please choose the category that best describes your vaginal bleeding or spotting in the last 24 hours 
None 
No bleeding nor spotting 
Spotting 
Blood loss not requiring sanitary protection (except for panty liners) 
Bleeding 
Blood loss requiring sanitary protection (tampons or pads) 
Heavy 
Bleeding 
Heavy blood loss requiring sanitary protection (tampons or pads) for example: 
• 
Need for double protection to manage menstrual bleeding 
• 
Menstrual bleeding accompanied by sensation of “gushing” or “flooding” 
• 
Soaking one pad and/or tampon or more per hour for three or more 
consecutive hours 
• 
Needing to change the tampon or pad at night or soiling bedclothes 
10.3.1.4 
Analgesic use 
The subject will report daily in the eDiary whether she has taken any provided/prescribed analgesic 
(including the dose) for her EAP during the last 24-hour period.  
Analgesic use for any other reason will be reported by the subject to the site staff and recorded in the 
eCRF. 
10.3.1.5 
Dyspareunia (pain associated with sexual intercourse) 
The subject will be asked daily about dyspareunia via the eDiary using a VRS. 
She will be asked to rate how her EAP interfered with sexual intercourse in the last 24 hours, with the 
following response options: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
0 
No pain during sexual intercourse. 
1 
I was able to tolerate the pain during sexual intercourse. 
2 
Intercourse was interrupted due to pain.  
3 
I avoided sexual intercourse because of anticipation of pain. 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 53 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
She will also be given the option to answer that she was not sexually active for reasons other than her 
endometriosis, in which case no score would be allocated. 
10.3.1.6 
Dyschezia (pain associated with defecation) 
Dyschezia will be assessed daily via the eDiary and will be scored by the subject using a 0–10 NRS, 
where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst pain imaginable. 
10.3.1.7 
School or work missed 
The subject will be asked whether she missed school or work in the last 24 hours due to EAP. 
10.3.1.8 
Event cancelled 
The subject will be asked if she had to cancel an event in the last 24 hours due to EAP. 
Following a request from the FDA, this question was removed in protocol version 2.0 to reduce 
respondent burden and maximize the quality and completeness of clinical outcome assessment data. 
This question has been asked only to subjects who were enrolled prior to implementation of protocol 
version 2.0. 
10.3.1.9 
Sleeping or lying down during the day 
The subject will be asked whether she slept or laid down during the day in the last 24 hours due to EAP.  
10.3.1.10  Difficulty sleeping 
The subject will be asked whether she had difficulty sleeping in the last 24 hours due to EAP. 
Following a request from the FDA, this question was removed in protocol version 2.0 to reduce 
respondent burden and maximize the quality and completeness of clinical outcome assessment data. 
This question has been asked only to subjects who were enrolled prior to implementation of protocol 
version 2.0. 
10.3.1.11  Patient Global Impression of Severity – daily recall (dPGIS) 
The subject will record on a daily basis in the eDiary the severity of her endometriosis symptoms 
assessed on a 5-point scale with the following possible answers: no symptoms, very mild, mild, 
moderate, severe (see Appendix I). 
Following a request from the FDA, this assessment was removed in protocol version 2.0 to reduce 
respondent burden and maximize the quality and completeness of clinical outcome assessment data. 
This assessment has been collected only for subjects who were enrolled prior to implementation of 
protocol version 2.0. 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 54 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
10.3.2 Outcome rating scales assessed at site visits 
ePROs are self-administered questionnaires completed by the subject. ePROs completed by the subject 
during the site visits include: EHP-30, HRPQ, SSIQ, PROMIS, EQ-5D-5L, mPGIS and PGIC/PPGIC. 
ClinROs are questionnaires administered by the site staff to the subject during the site visits and 
completed by the site staff in the eDiary. ClinROs include HRUQ and PSIQ. 
During site visits, ePRO and ClinRO should be completed ideally prior to any other study procedures, 
with the mPGIS and PGIC/PPGIC being completed last (in this order). Assessments will be performed 
according to the schedule indicated in Appendix A and Appendix B.  
If needed, site personnel will be re-trained on all rating scales (ePROs, ClinROs and scales of daily 
diary) used in this study.  
10.3.2.1 
Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) 
The EHP-30 is a disease-specific self-administered questionnaire used to measure health related quality 
of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-30 is composed of two parts: a core questionnaire 
containing five scales that are applicable to all women with endometriosis and a modular part containing 
six scales which do not necessarily apply to all women with endometriosis. This study will employ the 
Core EHP-30 and modular section C (Part 2) as outlined in Appendix C. 
10.3.2.2 
PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 6a14 
This questionnaire is composed of six questions to evaluate the severity of fatigue (see Appendix D). 
10.3.2.3 
Health Related Productivity Questionnaire (HRPQ) 
The HRPQ consists of nine questions measuring the impact of EAP and its treatment on work 
productivity and daily activities at home (see Appendix E). 
10.3.2.4 
Health Resource Utilization Questionnaire (HRUQ) 
The HRUQ records use of health resources (emergency room, physician visit, hospitalization, etc.) 
during the study. This includes the number of non-study health visits – the total, the reason, primary 
reason, and type of clinician for the visit; Diagnostic/therapeutic procedures performed (Hysteroscopy, 
SIS, Colposcopy, Biopsy, Ultrasound or Other) and Emergency Room/Outpatient Procedures (see 
Appendix F). 
10.3.2.5 
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) 
The PGIC is used by the subject to evaluate the change in her endometriosis symptoms since initiation 
of study drug on a 7-point scale with following possible answers: very much improved, much improved, 
minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse (see Appendix G). 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 55 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
10.3.2.6 
Post-treatment Patient Global Impression of Change (PPGIC) 
Subjects will evaluate the change in their endometriosis symptoms after discontinuation of study drug 
on a 7-point scale with the following possible answers: very much improved, much improved, minimally 
improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, very much worse (see Appendix H).  
10.3.2.7 
Patient Global Impression of Severity - monthly recall (mPGIS) 
At each study visit and up to the end of the Follow-Up Period, the subject will be asked to evaluate the 
severity of her endometriosis symptoms over the past 28 days using a 5-point scale with the following 
possible answers: no symptoms, very mild, mild, moderate, severe (see Appendix I). 
10.3.2.8 
Subject Surgery Intention Question (SSIQ) 
The SSIQ evaluates subject willingness to opt for endometriosis-related surgery if current symptoms 
continue (see Appendix J). 
10.3.2.9 
Physician Surgery Intention Question (PSIQ) 
The PSIQ evaluates physician likelihood of recommending endometriosis-related surgery(s) to the 
subject if current symptoms continue (see Appendix K). 
10.3.2.10 EQ-5D-5L 
Subjects’ health related quality of life will be measured using the EQ-5D-5L (see Appendix L). The EQ-
5D-5L essentially consists of two pages: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale 
(EQ VAS). 
The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort 
and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate 
problems, severe problems and extreme problems.  
The EQ VAS records the subject’s self-rated health on a vertical VAS, where the endpoints are labelled 
‘The best health you can imagine’ and ‘The worst health you can imagine’.  
10.4 SAFETY OBSERVATIONS AND MEASUREMENTS 
10.4.1 Adverse Events 
AE data will be collected continuously during the study as described in Section 12.2. 
AE data will be obtained at scheduled study visits based on physical examination, vital signs, ECG and 
biological laboratory assessments (see flowchart in Appendix A and Appendix B). In addition, subjects 
will report AEs spontaneously and/or through questioning. 
Complete appropriate data on all AEs experienced for the duration of the reporting period will be 
reported on an ongoing basis in the AE pages of the eCRF. 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 56 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
10.4.2 Physical Examination 
A complete physical examination, i.e. examination of organ systems, including thyroid gland, lungs, 
heart, abdomen, liver, kidneys and peripheral pulses (by palpation, auscultation or percussion), eyes, 
ears, nose, throat and skin (by inspection) and neurological reflexes will be performed every three 
months (i.e. at Month 9, Month 12, Month 3 ExFU and Month 6 ExFU visits). 
In addition, a manual breast examination (by palpation) will be performed at Month 12 and at Month 3 
ExFU visits. Results of the examinations will be recorded on source data files and in the eCRF. Baseline 
medical conditions (see section 12.1.3) that worsen in severity and/or frequency during the study and 
that are considered as clinically significant by the Investigator will be reported as AEs in the 
corresponding eCRF page. 
The physical examination should be performed after the ECG. 
10.4.3 Vital signs 
BP and heart rate will be measured in sitting position. In case of abnormal vital signs (i.e. BP ≥ 150/100 
mmHg or ≤ 90/50 mmHg and/or heart rate ≥ 100 bpm or ≤ 40 bpm) and if abnormality was not pre-
existing, a repeat assessment after 5 min should be taken. In case of confirmed abnormality, which was 
not pre-existing or worsened in severity and/or frequency during the study and is considered as clinically 
significant by the Investigator, an AE must systematically be reported by the Investigator in the eCRF 
AE page. The Investigator is to provide a diagnosis rather than reporting individual vital signs 
parameters whenever possible. 
BP and heart rate should be measured after performing the 12-lead ECG. 
10.4.4 Transvaginal ultrasound 
Endometrial thickness, uterus volume and abnormality (fibroids, adenomyosis, etc…) and left/right 
ovary abnormality status will be assessed by TVUS. If TVUS is not possible, abdominal ultrasound can 
be used. The printouts of the ultrasound will be interpreted and commented by the gynecologist and kept 
as source data. Results of the examination will be recorded on source data forms and in the eCRF. 
TVUS should be recommended (for cause) for subjects with heavy/suspicious bleeding. 
10.4.5 Endometrial biopsies 
At the end of the Treatment Period (i.e. at Month 12 visit), endometrial biopsy for histological 
assessment will have to be obtained for each subject  unless the endometrium thickness in TVUS is ≤ 5 
mm, in which case no endometrium biopsy will be necessary ( 
Figure 3). 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 57 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
 
Figure 3 : Biopsy process for Month 12 visit 
During the Follow-Up Period, the schedule for endometrial biospy is as described in Figure 4 below.  
 
Figure 4 : Biopsy process for the Follow-Up Period visits 
 
The endometrial biopsies will be analyzed by a central laboratory blinded to treatment group. 
Endometrial biopsies of hyperplasia of any type will be submitted for assessment by three independent 
expert pathologists who are blinded to the treatment and to one another’s assessment. 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 58 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
At any time during the study, in case of endometrial biopsy diagnosis being hyperplasia of any type 
(with or without atypia) or worse (neoplasm) for patient on treatment, the laboratory will send an alert 
to the site and the Sponsor. The medical monitor will contact the sites to discuss the proceeding in line 
with local practice. The subject will be discontinued from the treatment, will enter the follow-up period 
and will be advised to consult for gynecological evaluation and treatment. 
Biopsy should be recommended (for cause) for subjects with heavy/suspicious bleeding. Results from 
these procedures should be documented in the eCRF. 
Endometrial biopsy samples will be performed with the Pipelle de Cornier® (or equivalent), as 
described in the manual provided by the central laboratory. 
10.4.6 Bone mineral density and DXA 
BMD of the femoral neck, total hip and lumbar spine will be assessed by DXA at the end of the 
Treatment Period (i.e. at Month 12 visit) and at the end of the Follow-Up Period (i.e. at Month 6 ExFU 
visit), under the supervision of a nominated primary technologist at the site. BMD for femoral neck, hip 
and spine will also be assessed at Month 9 for subjects who met the following criterion at any site on 
the Month 6 DXA scan: -2.5 < Z-score ≤ -1.5. 
A repeat DXA scan will be performed 6 months after the Follow-Up Period DXA for subjects with a 
BMD decrease from main study baseline > 1.5% for lumbar spine and/or > 2.5% for total hip. 
For each subject, the same DXA machine must be used for all scan acquisitions.  
All DXA scans will be read by a central imaging laboratory blinded to treatment group. There will also 
be centralized monitoring of DXA scan quality for each site including a pre-qualification phantom scan 
and a monthly review of daily quality control (QC) data.  
In the event a scan does not meet quality standards, the site will be asked to repeat the scan. A repeated 
scan will be required for each scan showing 5% or more BMD loss from baseline. 
Instructions to measure the BMD, detailed information on the centralized reading and QC and the 
stopping rules for subjects will be included in a specific imaging manual. 
10.4.7 Bone markers 
Blood samples for exploratory bone biomarkers such as, but not limited to, collagen type 1 β-carboxy-
telopeptide (CTx), procollagen 1 Intact N-Terminal (P1NP), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (B-
ALP) and osteocalcin will be collected as part of clinical chemistry at Month 9 and Month 12 visits as 
well as at Month 3 ExFU visit. These exploratory data will not be communicated to keep the operational 
team and the sites blinded to treatment administration. 
10.4.8 Laboratory parameters 
Haematology, coagulation parameters and chemistry will be assessed at each visit during the Treatment 
Period, as well as at Month 1 ExFU and Month 3 ExFU visits. Fasting lipids will be assessed at Month 
9, Month 12 and Month 3 ExFU visits.  


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 59 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
E2, P4 and LH will be assessed at each visit during the treatment period, as well as at M1 ExFU and M3 
ExFU visits. Serum levels of SHBG will be assessed at Month 9 and Month 12 visits.  
Overnight fasting is required for Months 9, 12 and Month 3 ExFU visits. 
Blood samples will be analyzed by the central laboratory. Details of blood sampling process, sample 
handling and shipment are described separately in a laboratory manual provided by the central 
laboratory. Central laboratory reference ranges will be filed in the investigator site file and in the trial 
master file. All laboratory results except E2, P4, LH and SHBG levels will be assessed by the 
Investigator/sub-Investigator. Clinically significant abnormalities compared to main study baseline 
status will be reported as AEs in the eCRF. E2, P4, LH and SHBG levels will not be communicated to 
keep the operational team and the sites blinded to treatment administration. 
The laboratory parameters are listed in Appendix M. 
There may be some additional laboratory parameters to be analysed as requested by the medical monitor 
in order to follow-up on existing abnormalities. 
10.4.9 Electrocardiogram 
Local 12-lead ECG readings of QTcF will be performed at each visit during the entire duration of the 
study.  
ECGs should be performed prior to blood sampling, physical examination and vital signs. 
10.4.10 Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) 
The C-SSRS questionnaire prospectively assesses the occurrence of treatment-emergent suicidal 
ideation and behavior. The questions will be administered by the site staff to the subject and completed 
by the site staff, using one of the following paper versions: 
- either the “already enrolled subjects” C-SSRS version, dedicated to subjects who are providing answers 
to the C-SSRS for the first time during the study (see Appendix S). 
- or the “since last study visit” C-SSRS version (see Appendix T), dedicated to subjects for whom the 
C-SSRS was completed at the previous study visit, for use at all remaining study visits. 
10.5 LINZAGOLIX AND KP017 PLASMA LEVELS 
PK blood samples will be collected from each subject at each study visit during the Treatment Period 
for determining linzagolix and KP017 plasma levels.  
At the visits where IMP intake is at site, i.e. at Months 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 visits, PK sampling will be 
performed before IMP intake. The approximate time of dose administration on the four previous days 
and time of PK sampling will be recorded in the eCRF. 
In case of early discontinuation visit, PK sampling is not required at the withdrawal visit if the subject 
had no IMP administration the day prior to the withdrawal visit. 
Details of the blood sampling process, sample handling and shipment are described separately in a 
laboratory manual provided by the central laboratory.  


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 60 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
10.6 CONCOMITANT MEDICATIONS AND THERAPIES 
The Investigator will record in the appropriate section of the eCRF all concomitant medications taken 
by the subject during the entire study duration. 
However, the use of provided/prescribed analgesics for EAP will be recorded solely in the eDiary. 
10.6.1 Permitted Medicines 
Any medications other than those excluded by the protocol (see section 10.6.2), which are considered 
necessary for the subject’s welfare and/or which will not interfere with the study medication, may be 
given at the discretion of the Investigator. 
Analgesics: 
Only the analgesics provided/prescribed by Sponsor will be allowed during the study (Treatment and 
Follow-up Periods). Other analgesics will be prohibited. Provided/prescribed analgesics should be taken 
only when required for treatment of pain. Prophylactic use of analgesics will be prohibited. 
Permitted opioid analgesics will be prescribed and dispensed as required according to local practice. 
Subjects will be required to restrict the use of analgesics to those permitted by the protocol as listed in 
Table 1.  
 
Table 1: Permitted rescue analgesics 
Analgesic class 
Name and dose* 
NSAID 
ibuprofen 200 mg 
Narcotic Analgesic 
5 mg hydrocodone + 300 mg acetaminophen** 
* Use of these analgesic medications should be according to the product prescribing 
information. 
** Or local equivalent (list provided in Appendix N as reference) 
 
 
Other:  
In order to prevent or minimize possible impact on BMD, subjects will receive calcium 500 to 1000 mg 
and vitamin D 400 IU supplementation which they will be advised to take daily until the end of study. 
Intake should be recorded at each study visit in eCRF. As the interaction potential is unknown, the intake 
should be separated of at least 4 hours from the intake of the study drug. 
If necessary, the dose of calcium or vitamin D supplementation may be reduced or discontinued at the 
discretion of the Investigator. 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 61 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
10.6.2 Prohibited Medicines 
Medication listed in Appendix O will be prohibited up to Month 12.  
Strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers are prohibited up to end of treatment in view of the ABT 
(Appendix P). 
Linzagolix is considered to be a weak inhibitor of CYP2C8. Substrates to CYP2C8 with a narrow 
therapeutic index should be administered with caution. 
Hormonal contraception, including use of hormonal IUDs, must not be taken until 3 months after end 
of treatment.  
When a prohibited medication or treatment is necessary for the subject’s well-being, the Sponsor must 
be notified, and possible alternatives are to be discussed before administration of the prohibited 
medication or treatment whenever possible. 
10.6.3 Non-Drug Therapies 
Contraceptive use: 
For subjects of childbearing potential and requiring contraception, non-hormonal contraception is 
required until 3 months after the end of treatment. Two forms of non-hormonal contraception will be 
required e.g. condom with spermicide (if in the opinion of the Investigator a woman is at risk of 
acquiring HIV, spermicide should be avoided; condom with diaphragm may be used). Suitable condoms 
with spermicide will be provided free of charge to subjects over the duration of the study. 
Contraception is still required from 3 months after the end of the Treatment Period until the end of the 
post-treatment Follow-up Period; hormonal contraception is allowed. 
10.7 SUBJECT COMPLETION AND WITHDRAWAL 
10.7.1 Subject Completion 
A subject will be considered as a “completer” when she has completed all study procedures/visits 
according to the protocol. 
10.7.2 Subject Withdrawal  
Subjects will be informed that they have the right to withdraw from the study at any time, without 
prejudice to their medical care, and that they are not obliged to state the reason(s). Any withdrawal must 
be fully documented in the eCRF exit form.  
The Investigator may withdraw a subject at any time if this is considered to be in the subject’s best 
interest.  
In addition, the Sponsor could make a decision to temporarily or permanently discontinue the study for 
safety, ethical, compliance or other reasons. In this case, the subject’s participation may be ended 
prematurely without asking for her consent. 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 62 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
In case of early discontinuation, the subject will be instructed to complete the relevant eDiary 
questionnaires as soon as possible upon treatment discontinuation. 
 
Withdrawal during Treatment Period: 
Subjects discontinuing participation in the study during the Treatment Period should undergo the 
procedures required at Month 12, except the DXA in case of discontinuation before Month 9 visit. These 
subjects will enter the 6-month Follow-Up Period and will continue daily eDiary recording for 6 months 
and up to Month 6 ExFU visit in order to continue to collect efficacy and safety data. 
PK sampling is not required if the subject had no IMP administration the day prior to the withdrawal 
visit. 
 
Withdrawal during Follow-Up Period: 
Subjects discontinuing participation in the study during the Follow-Up Period should undergo the 
procedures required at Month 6 ExFU visit, which includes completion of all ClinRO and ePRO 
questionnaires, except the DXA in case of discontinuation before Month 3 ExFU visit. 
10.7.2.1 
Discontinuation criteria 
During the course of the study, the subject may be discontinued for the following reasons: 
- 
Adverse Event: 
Includes clinically significant new or worsening existing condition as judged 
by the Investigator. Document in the AE form. 
- 
Subject’s Request: Consent withdrawal, subject moved, schedule conflicts, etc. Specify the 
reason in the comment section of the eCRF Exit Form. 
- 
Protocol Violation: Major protocol violation which may affect the subject’s safety. Specify the 
protocol violation in the comment section of the eCRF Exit Form. 
- 
Lost to Follow-up: 
Document with at least two phone calls and a certified letter requesting return 
receipt without response. Document in the comment section of the eCRF Exit 
Form. 
- 
Pregnancy: 
Subjects who have been exposed to study treatment and who become 
pregnant during the Treatment Period will be immediately withdrawn from 
treatment. Pregnancies that have been exposed to study treatment and 
occurred up to Month 3 ExFU visit, or started up to 4 weeks after treatment 
discontinuation in case of early withdrawal will be followed up for pregnancy 
and neonatal outcomes at birth. Any pregnancy must be reported with the 
Pregnancy Surveillance Form (see section 12.6). 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 63 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
- 
Other: 
Specify in the Comments section in the eCRF Exit Form. This reason should 
only be used if the reason for discontinuation is not better accounted for by 
another category. 
 
Discontinuation Rules: 
Endometrial biopsies: in case of endometrial biopsy diagnosis being an endometrial hyperplasia of 
any type or worse, the subject will have to discontinue  treatment and will be advised to consult for 
gynecological evaluation and treatment. 
Serum calcium: Subjects who have a serum calcium level on treatment above 2.9 mmol/L should 
have calcium supplements interrupted. If serum calcium level on treatment is above 3.1 mmol/L 
calcium supplements and study treatment are to be interrupted.  A repeat test of this parameter 
within 2 weeks under fasting conditions is to be performed. If the results of the repeat remain above 
2.9 mmol/L, study treatment should definitively be discontinued and the subject should be advised 
to consult an endocrinologist for further evaluation. 
BMD loss: subjects who experience more than 8% BMD loss or a Z-score ≤ -2.5 at any site (femoral 
neck, hip or spine) will be discontinued from study treatment and will enter the Follow-Up Period. 
Liver function tests: following the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance on drug-induced 
liver injury (8), subjects who have an elevation of hepatic enzymes are to be withdrawn immediately 
from treatment if: 
• ALT or AST >8xULN  
• ALT or AST >5xULN for more than 2 weeks  
• ALT or AST >3xULN and (TBL >2xULN or INR >1.5)  
• ALT or AST >3xULN with the appearance of fatigue, nausea, vomiting, right upper quadrant 
pain or tenderness, fever, rash, and/or eosinophilia (>5%)  
Withdrawn subjects will be followed up until hepatic parameters return to normal. 
ECG : subjects who have a QTcF > 500 ms or increase > 60 ms from the highest value prior to the 
first dose in the main study will have to be withdrawn from study treatment and followed up until 
return to QTcF < 480 ms or – if not reached after 3 months of treatment cessation- be referred to a 
cardiologist. They will enter the 6-month Follow-Up Period and undergo the follow-up ECGs 
according to the schedule of events. 
 
10.7.3 Subject Replacement 
Not applicable. 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 64 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
11 INVESTIGATIONAL MEDICINAL PRODUCT  
11.1 DESCRIPTION OF INVESTIGATIONAL MEDICINAL PRODUCTS 
The term “Investigational Medicinal Product” (IMP) will refer to the ObsEva investigational drug 
linzagolix, the ABT (E2 1 mg/NETA 0.5 mg) or their matching placebos.  
 
 
Investigational 
drug 
Investigational drug 
placebo 
ABT 
ABT 
placebo 
International 
nonproprietary name 
(INN) 
Linzagolix 
NA 
E2 and NETA 
NA 
Name of active 
ingredient 
Linzagolix 
NA 
E2 and NETA 
NA 
Form 
Film-coated 
tablet 
Film-coated  
tablet 
Capsule 
Capsule 
Strength 
75 mg and  
200 mg 
placebo for 75 mg and 
placebo for 200 mg 
1.0 mg/0.5 mg 
Placebo 
Dose or 
concentration of 
active treatment 
75 mg  
and 200 mg 
0 mg 
1.0 mg/0.5 mg 
0 mg 
Frequency and 
duration of 
administration 
Once daily for up to 6 months 
Route of 
administration 
Oral 
Manufacturer 
(Name and address) 
Patheon, Canada 
Sharp Clinical Services Inc. 
2400 Baglyos Cir, Bethlehem, 
PA 18020, United States 
Primary packaging  
PVC-PVdC/Al blister containing 
15 tablets 
PVC/Al blister containing 
7 capsules 
Secondary 
packaging (1 kit) 
4 blisters attached into a child-resistant 
wallet card* 
14 blisters in a carton box 
Storage 
Requirements 
As indicated on the study drug kit label 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 65 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
*The blisters being linked together inside the wallet card, the kit is considered as a single unit and 
therefore labelling on the wallet is sufficient (individual blisters are not labelled). 
11.2 DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION 
Linzagolix treatments and matching placebo will be supplied as film-coated tablets for oral 
administration and given as monthly treatment kits (Figure 5). 
ABT and corresponding placebo will be supplied as red capsules and given as 3-monthly treatment kits. 
IMP treatment will be administered once daily up to Month 12 inclusive. The subjects will have to 
swallow one tablet of linzagolix, one tablet of linzagolix placebo and one capsule of ABT or ABT 
placebo, ideally at the same time each day. 
On the day of a study visit, the subject must take the study medication at site. The site staff will record 
in the eCRF the time of study medication intake. The linzagolix/placebo tablets must be taken from the 
kits dispensed on that visit (and not from the previously dispensed kits). On Month 6 and Month 9 visits, 
ABT/placebo capsules must be taken from the kits dispensed during these visits. On Month 7, 8, 10 and 
11 visits, ABT/placebo capsules must be taken from the previously dispensed kits. 
The treatment groups are described below: 
Treatment 
group 
Daily dose Month 6 to Month 12 
Linzagolix 
active tablets 
Linzagolix 
placebo tablets 
ABT 
active capsules 
ABT 
placebo capsules 
75 mg 
1  75 mg 
1  placebo 200 mg  
None 
1 capsule 
200 mg + ABT 
1  200 mg 
1  placebo 75 mg 
1 capsule 
None 
11.3 PACKAGING AND LABELLING 
Linzagolix/placebo will be provided by the Sponsor (or delegate) as monthly kits.  
On Month 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 visits, the subject will be given a wallet card containing four blisters in 
total: 
- 
Two blisters of 15 tablets each of 200 mg linzagolix or matching placebo (corresponding to the 
grey card on Figure 5), 
- 
Two blisters of 15 tablets each of 75 mg linzagolix or matching placebo (corresponding to the 
pink card on Figure 5). 
This kit covers 30 days of treatment.  
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 66 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
 
Figure 5 : Linzagolix kit design 
Each linzagolix/placebo kit will be labeled with a unique kit number from K50001 to K60000 (6-
characters). The blisters being attached into the wallet card, linzagolix/placebo kit is considered as a 
single unit and therefore labelling on the wallet is sufficient (individual blisters are not labelled). 
ABT and matching placebo will be provided by the Sponsor (or delegate) as 3-monthly kits.  
On Month 6 and 9 visits, the subject will be given a carton box containing 14 blisters of seven capsules 
each of ABT or matching placebo. This kit covers 98 days of treatment. 
Each ABT kit will be labeled with a unique kit number (different from the linzagolix kit number), from 
A50001 to A70001. 
Each kit of linzagolix/placebo or ABT/placebo will have a label including a tear-off part. The tear-off 
part containing the study number and the kit number will be placed into a drug accountability form at 
site.  
Labels will be printed in the local language of the countries where the study will take place in accordance 
with applicable local regulations, the recommendations of GMP guideline (Annex 13) and FDA 21 CFR 
312.6 part. 
The kit label, i.e. on the secondary packaging, will indicate at least the following items: 
 Protocol number 
 Kit number 
 Batch number 
 Expiry date (for Europe only) 
 Storage conditions 
 Sponsor name and address 
Label examples are filed in the study file at the Investigator’s site and in the trial master file.  


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 67 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
11.4 PREPARATION, HANDLING AND STORAGE 
The investigational site will store the IMP according to the specifications of the Sponsor. The IMP 
storage conditions will be indicated on each kit label. 
The storage facility at site should be locked and temperature-controlled. 
Linzagolix and ABT must be stored at 68°F to 77°F (20°C to 25°C), excursions permitted between 59°F 
and 77°F (between 15°C and 25°C). The storage temperature at the clinical site must be recorded by 
using a minimum/maximum thermometer or electronically 24 hours a day with printouts available on 
request. 
The IMP may be dispensed only by the pharmacist or by a member of staff specifically authorized by 
the Investigator. 
Any deviations from the recommended storage conditions at the site should be immediately reported to 
the Sponsor (or delegate), and the IMP should not be used until authorization has been given by the 
Sponsor (or delegate).  
11.5 IMP ACCOUNTABILITY 
The Investigator is responsible for ensuring IMP accountability, including reconciliation and 
maintenance of drug records. 
 
Upon receipt of the IMP, the Investigator (or delegate) will check for accurate delivery and 
acknowledge receipt in IWRS. A copy of acknowledgement of receipt will be retained in the 
investigator file. In case the IMP received is damaged upon delivery (including temperature 
excursion), this should be immediately reported to the Sponsor (or delegate), and the IMP 
should not be used until authorization has been given by the Sponsor (or delegate). 
 
The dispensing of the IMP will be carefully recorded on the appropriate drug accountability 
form provided by the Sponsor (or delegate) and in eCRF, and an accurate accounting will be 
available for verification by the study monitor at each monitoring visit. 
 
IMP accountability records will include: 
o Confirmation of IMP delivery to the trial site 
o The inventory at the site of IMP delivered 
o The use of each dose by each subject (accountability to be done at each visit) 
o Dates, quantities, batch numbers and kit numbers assigned to the subject. 
o The return to the Sponsor (or delegate) or alternative disposition of used and unused 
IMP 
 
The Investigator should maintain records that adequately document: 
o The subjects were provided with the doses specified by the protocol/amendment(s). 
o All IMP provided were fully reconciled. 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 68 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
Unused IMP must not be discarded or used for any purpose other than the present study. IMP that has 
been partially dispensed to a subject must not be re-dispensed to a different subject. 
The Study monitor will check on an ongoing basis the IMP accountability form and verify all IMP 
dispensations and returns (both unused and used treatments) during the entire study period and prior to 
making arrangements for their return to the Sponsor (or delegate) or authorizing their destruction by the 
study site in agreement with the Sponsor. 
11.6 ASSIGNMENT TO TREATMENT GROUPS 
Subjects who received placebo in the main study will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either linzagolix 
75 mg alone (with ABT placebo) or linzagolix 200 mg with ABT, as per the main study randomization 
schedule. 
Subjects who received active treatment will continue with the same treatment (linzagolix 75 mg alone 
or linzagolix 200 mg with ABT). 
In order to maintain the blind, the site will not be required to perform any randomization activities. The 
kits will be automatically allocated in the IWRS to the corresponding patients upon confirmation of their 
eligibility. 
11.7 ASSESSMENT OF INVESTIGATIONAL MEDICINAL PRODUCT 
COMPLIANCE 
The subject will record her IMP intake daily in the eDiary. 
Each subject must be instructed to bring with her to each visit both opened and unopened IMP packages, 
in order to allow the assessment of compliance with study treatment.  
The decision to withdraw a non-compliant subject from the study will be discussed between the 
Investigator and the Sponsor.  
During the entire study period, the study monitor will perform drug accountability and the assessment 
of compliance with study treatment by checking both opened and unopened IMP packages, as well as 
empty blisters.  
11.8 METHOD OF BLINDING 
The study design is double-blind for the subject, the site and the operational team. The Sponsor will be 
unblinded to active treatment groups, following analysis of Month 6 visit data of the main study (18-
OBE2109-003 - Edelweiss 3 study), but will be blinded to the treatment allocated to patients who 
previously received placebo. 
Linzagolix 75 mg and 200 mg tablets having a different appearance, a double-dummy design will be 
used in order to maintain the blinding of the study. 
The randomization list will be secured in a computer file with restricted access to only the designated 
personnel including those responsible for labelling and handling the study medication until the study 
database is locked and ready to be unblinded. 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 69 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
Every effort will be done to keep the Investigator, the site personnel and the subject fully blinded.  
11.9 EMERGENCY UNBLINDING 
The study blind may be broken for an individual subject only in the case of an emergency when 
knowledge of the IMP is essential for the clinical management of the subject. The Investigator can break 
the blind for a subject by using the IWRS that permits immediate unblinding. In case of doubt as to 
whether emergency unblinding is necessary, the Investigator should contact the Sponsor prior to 
breaking the study blind. 
In the case of a code break, the Investigator must inform the Sponsor immediately without revealing the 
code to the Sponsor study personnel nor the complete Study Team. 
11.10 TREATMENT OF OVERDOSE AND MISUSE  
An overdose is defined as any dose (i.e. quantity of drug given per administration or per day) above the 
maximum dosage defined in the protocol (200 mg per day).  
Misuse is the term used if more precise information is not available and additional information is needed 
to determine if there was a “medication error”, “drug abuse” or “overdose”. 
Any details of overdose or misuse must be recorded in the eCRF.  
Any case of overdose or misuse associated with an AE or a SAE must be reported as per the instructions 
detailed in Sections 12.2.3 for AEs or 12.3.2 for SAEs. 
The effects of an overdose of linzagolix are unknown, but repeated once daily dosing at up to 700 mg 
linzagolix was safe and well-tolerated by premenopausal healthy volunteers, and doses up to 200 mg 
daily for 3 months were safe in endometriosis subjects (see Section 5.5.3). 
11.11 OTHER SUPPLIES TO BE USED IN THE STUDY 
A limited quantity (as per Investigator’s judgement) of standard doses of permitted analgesics will be 
provided/prescribed to the subject as rescue medication for EAP (see Section 10.6.1). These will be 
provided by the Sponsor free of charge to the subject or reimbursed.  
Electronic diaries will be provided for subjects to use. These remain the property of the Sponsor. 
Calcium 500 to 1000 mg and vitamin D 400 IU supplements will also be provided by the Sponsor free 
of charge to the subject. Intake should be separated by at least 4 hours from the intake of the study drug. 
Condoms with spermicide will also be supplied by the Sponsor free of charge to the subject. If required, 
spermicide-free condoms, latex-free condoms and diaphragms may be reimbursed to the subject. 
12 ADVERSE EVENTS AND SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS 
Comprehensive assessments of any apparent toxicity experienced by the subject will be performed 
throughout the course of the study from the time of subject’s signature of informed consent. Study site 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 70 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
personnel will report any AE, whether observed by the Investigator or reported by the subject (see 
section 12.2.1). 
The safety profile of linzagolix will be assessed through the recording, reporting and analysis of baseline 
medical conditions, AEs, physical examination findings, ECGs, vital signs, laboratory tests, BMD 
assessments. 
The reporting period for AEs is described in section 12.5. 
 
12.1 ADVERSE EVENTS 
12.1.1 Definitions 
Adverse Event: 
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial subject 
administered an investigational medicinal product (IMP) and which does not necessarily have a causal 
relationship with this treatment. It can therefore be any unfavourable sign (including an abnormal 
laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of an IMP, whether or not 
considered related to the IMP. 
Any event occurring after signature of the informed consent form should be reported on an AE form or 
an SAE form, as appropriate. 
Severity: 
The severity of AEs must be assessed by the Investigator according to the following definitions. The 
term “severity” is used to describe the intensity of a specific event. This has to be distinguished from 
the term “serious”. 
Mild: 
The subject is aware of the event or symptom, but the event or symptom is 
easily tolerated (e.g. no reduction in daily activities is required). 
Moderate: 
The subject experiences sufficient discomfort to interfere with or reduce her 
usual level of activity. 
Severe: 
 
Significant impairment of functioning: the subject is unable to carry out usual 
activities and/or the subject’s life is at risk from the event.  
Causality assessment: 
The causality assessment of an AE to the linzagolix and/or ABT will be rated as follows by the 
Investigator: 
Not related: 
There is no reasonable possibility of causal relationship between an AE and IMP. 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 71 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
Related: 
There is at least a reasonable possibility of a causal relationship between an AE and 
an IMP. This means that there are facts (evidence) or arguments to suggest a causal 
relationship. 
Unexpected Adverse Event: 
Any AE which is not consistent in specificity or severity with the current Investigator’s Brochure 
(section 6.7.1), including all amendments, is considered unexpected. 
 
Outcome: 
Outcome describes the status of the AE. The Investigator will provide information regarding the subject 
outcome of each AE, and the options include: 
Fatal 
Termination of life as a result of an AE. 
Not recovered/not resolved 
Subject has not recuperated or the AE has not improved. 
Recovering/resolving 
Subject is recuperating or the AE is improving. 
Recovered/resolved 
Subject has recuperated or the AE has resolved. 
Recovered with sequelae/resolved 
with sequelae 
AE has resolved, but the subject has symptoms or pathology. 
Unknown 
Unknown, not observed, not recorded, or refused. 
Action taken regarding study drug: 
The Investigator will provide the action taken regarding study drug in response to each AE, and the 
options include: 
Dose not changed 
No change in the administration of study drug. 
Drug (study drug) interrupted 
Study drug is being temporarily interrupted due to AE. 
Drug (study drug) withdrawn 
Decision was made to withdraw the study drug due to AE. 
Unknown 
Unknown, not observed or not recorded. 
Not applicable 
AE started before dosing or after dosing finalized. 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 72 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
12.1.2 Abnormal laboratory findings and other objective measurements 
Abnormal laboratory findings and other objective measurements (e.g. vital signs) must be reported as 
an AE only if assessed by the Investigator as “clinically significant” e.g. meeting at least one of the 
following conditions: 
1. The abnormality suggests a disease and/or organ toxicity AND this abnormality was not present 
at the main study screening visit or is assessed as having evolved since this visit. 
2. The abnormality is a Serious Adverse Event. 
3. The abnormality results in discontinuation of the IMP. 
4. The abnormality requires medical intervention or concomitant therapy. 
The Investigator must initial and date each laboratory report/eCRF page and note directly on the 
report/eCRF page whether or not each out-of-range laboratory result is clinically significant. The 
outcome of this assessment will be reported using an AE or SAE form, as appropriate. 
When reporting an abnormal finding for laboratory parameters or other objective measurements on the 
AE page of the eCRF, a clinical diagnosis should be recorded rather than the abnormal value itself, if 
available (for example, “anaemia” rather than “decreased red blood cell count”). 
For all of these AEs, whether or not related to the treatment, the laboratory test(s) will be followed-up 
as appropriate. 
12.1.3 Baseline Medical Conditions 
Medical conditions present at the Screening visit(s) in the main study, including results of the study 
screening assessments, are defined as Baseline Medical Conditions. These medical conditions should 
have been adequately documented on the “medical history page of the eCRF”. Baseline Medical 
Conditions that worsen in severity or frequency during the study should be recorded and reported as 
AEs. 
12.1.4 Exacerbation of endometriosis 
In this protocol, symptoms and signs of exacerbation or worsening of endometriosis will usually be 
captured in the context of efficacy assessment. Therefore, symptoms, exacerbation or worsening of 
endometriosis will NOT be considered as AEs nor captured on the AE page of the eCRF unless clinically 
significant AND not consistent with the anticipated natural progression of the disease.  
Lack of efficacy of the study drug is NOT considered as an AE. 
12.1.5 Adverse Events of Special Interest 
Not Applicable. 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 73 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
12.2 PROCEDURES FOR ELICITING, RECORDING AND REPORTING 
ADVERSE EVENTS 
12.2.1 Eliciting Adverse Events 
Data on AEs will be obtained at scheduled or unscheduled study visits, based on information 
spontaneously provided by the subject and/or through questioning of the subject. 
To elicit AEs, questioning at each study visit should begin with simple non-leading questions. For 
example: 
 
How have you felt since your last visit? 
 
Have you had any health problems since you were here last?  
If a subject is seen by a physician not involved with the study in relation to an AE, the Investigator 
should make every effort to contact the treating physician in a timely manner in order to obtain all 
information necessary for the appropriate reporting of the event. 
12.2.2 Recording of Adverse Events in the eCRF 
As the quality and precision of acquired AE data are critical, Investigators should use the AE definitions 
provided in the above sections and should follow this guideline when completing the AE pages of the 
eCRF: 
 
Whenever possible, recognized medical terms should be used to describe AEs rather than 
colloquialisms (for example, ‘influenza’ rather than ‘flu’), and abbreviations should be avoided 
in provided AE term. 
 
AEs should be described using a specific clinical diagnosis, if this is available, rather than a list 
of component signs or symptoms (for example, ‘congestive heart failure’ rather than ‘dyspnoea, 
rales and cyanosis’).  
 
However, signs and symptoms that are not linked (as "co-manifestations”) to an identified 
disease or syndrome, or for which an overall diagnosis is not available, should be reported as 
individual AEs in separate eCRF AE page(s).  
 
Provisional diagnosis (e.g. “suspected Myocardial Infarction”) are acceptable but should be 
followed up to a definite diagnosis, if finally available. 
 
AEs occurring secondary to other events (e.g. sequelae or complications) should be identified 
by the primary cause. A primary AE, if clearly identifiable, generally represents the most 
accurate clinical term to record in the eCRF. The Investigator should be invited to provide 
his/her opinion of which is the primary AE. 
12.2.3 Reporting of Adverse Events 
Complete and accurate data on all AEs experienced for the duration of the reporting period, as defined 
in section 12.5, will be reported on an ongoing basis in the AE pages of the eCRF. 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 74 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
It is important that each AE report includes a description of the event, whether it is considered serious 
(and if so the criterion satisfied), its duration (onset and resolution dates), its severity, its relationship to 
the IMP(s), any other potential causality factors, any treatment given or other action taken (including 
dose modification or discontinuation of the IMP) and its outcome. 
12.3 SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS 
12.3.1 Definitions 
A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence or effect that at any 
dose: 
 
 
results in death, 
i.e. the AE causes or contributes to the death. 
 
is life-threatening, 
i.e. the AE places the subject at immediate risk of death; it does not refer to AE which 
hypothetically might have caused death if it were more severe. 
 
requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, 
i.e. the AE requires at least an overnight admission or prolongs a hospitalization beyond the 
expected length of stay. Hospital admissions for surgery planned before study entry, for social 
reasons, for any elective surgery (i.e. plastic surgery) or for normal disease management 
(including treatment adjustment) are NOT to be considered as SAEs according to this criterion. 
 
results in persistent or significant disability / incapacity, 
i.e. the AE resulted in a substantial disruption of the subject’s ability to conduct normal 
activities. 
 
is a congenital anomaly / birth defect, 
i.e. an adverse outcome in a child or fetus of a subject exposed to the IMP before conception or 
during pregnancy. 
 
is an important medical event, i.e. is medically significant ; 
Medical and scientific judgment should be exercized in deciding whether an AE is serious in 
other situation. Important medical events that may not be immediately life-threatening or result 
in death or hospitalization but may jeopardise the subject or may require intervention to prevent 
one of the other outcomes listed in the definition above should also be considered serious. 
Examples of such events are intensive treatment in an emergency room, or at home for allergic 
bronchospasm, blood dyscrasias or convulsions that do not result in hospitalization, or 
development of drug dependency or drug abuse. 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 75 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
12.3.2 SAE Urgent Reporting Procedure 
If a SAE occurs from subject consent up to the end of the Follow-Up Period, or in case of study 
discontinuation, if the site becomes aware of an SAE up to four weeks post study treatment 
discontinuation, regardless of relationship and expectedness, the Investigator is to take prompt and 
appropriate therapeutic action, if necessary, to protect the safety of study subjects and report such SAE 
as following. 
For blinded studies, refer to section 11.9. for instructions related to emergency unblinding. 
The Investigator must notify VOISIN CONSULTING (acting on behalf of ObsEva 
Pharmacovigilance) WITHIN 24 HOURS of awareness of a new SAE or of new information on a 
previously reported SAE (= follow-up). 
To do so, the Investigator must complete a SAE report and any specific eCRF pages if justified by the 
protocol e.g. AE, medical history, concomitant medication eCRF pages and blinded and anonymized 
copies of any other supporting source documents such as lab reports, hospital discharge letter/report, 
etc.), sign it and send it directly to Voisin Consulting by e-mail using the dedicated e-mail address 
specified below: 
 
Name/Title:  
Voisin Consulting Life Sciences / ObsEva Pharmacovigilance 
 
E-mail:  
obsevasafety@voisinconsulting.com 
VOISIN CONSULTING will notify ObsEva Pharmacovigilance within one working day after the 
receipt of the SAE report or follow-up information, using the same reporting forms. 
The SAE follow-up observation period, for the concerned subjects, will be jointly decided by the 
Investigator or one of the co-Investigators (in case of Investigator’s absence) and the Sponsor.  
In addition, the Investigator must respond to any request for follow-up information or questions 
regarding the SAE the Sponsor may have, within one working day for urgent queries or five working 
days for normal queries. SAE will be followed until the Investigator and ObsEva agree that the event is 
satisfactorily documented and resolved/stabilized. 
For any new SAE, the following minimum information is required as initial notification: 
 
Clear identification of the Investigator/Reporter with full contact information or site number, 
 
Subject identification details (study number, site number, subject’s unique study identification 
number and date of birth), 
 
IMP(s) administration details (dose and dates), 
 
Diagnosis of the event (or a brief description of signs/symptoms/clinical course if the diagnosis 
is not available) and the date of onset,  
 
Seriousness criteria (see Section 12.3.1), 
 
Causal relationship (Investigator’s opinion) of the event with the IMP(s) or with the trial 
procedure (e.g. the causality according to the Investigator during screening). 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 76 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
12.4 REPORTING TO THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW 
BOARDS/INDEPENDENT ETHICS COMMITTEES AND 
REGULATORY AUTHORITIES 
The Investigator must comply with any applicable requirements related to the reporting of SAEs 
involving the study subjects to the Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Independent Ethics Committee 
(IEC) that approved the study.  
ObsEva will comply with the applicable regulatory requirements related to the expedited reporting of 
suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions (SUSARs) to the regulatory authorities (e.g. Health 
Authority, Central IRB/IEC). The Sponsor will be responsible, through their US Agent, for notifying 
the FDA of any SUSAR, and the Sponsor or designee is responsible for notifying the Central IRB/IEC. 
In regions/countries other than the US, reporting of events to local authorities will be performed by the 
Investigator/Sponsor or designee and in accordance with local procedures/regulations. 
In accordance with ICH GCP guidelines, the Sponsor will inform the Investigator of “findings that could 
affect adversely the safety of subjects, impact the conduct of the trial or alter the IRB/IEC’s 
approval/favourable opinion to continue the trial”. In particular and in line with respective regulations, 
the Sponsor will inform the Investigator of AEs that are both serious and unexpected (i.e. as per the 
linzagolix Investigator Brochure, and SmPC for the ABT) and are considered by the Investigator or the 
Sponsor, to have a reasonably possibility of causal relationship between the administered IMP and the 
AE (i.e. SUSAR). The Investigator will keep copies of these safety reports in the investigator’s file. 
National regulations with regards to safety reports notifications to Investigators will be taken into 
account. 
Unless clearly defined otherwise by national or site-specific regulations, and duly documented, the 
responsible Investigator will promptly notify the concerned IRB/IEC of any safety reports provided by 
the Sponsor and provide copies of all related correspondence to the Sponsor. Only when specifically 
required by regulations, the Sponsor (or delegate) will provide appropriate safety reports directly to the 
concerned IRB/IEC and maintain records of these notifications. 
12.5 REPORTING PERIOD 
AEs are collected on an ongoing basis from the day of signed informed consent. All new AEs and 
updates on all ongoing AEs or AEs with an unknown outcome, must be recorded up to the Month 6 
ExFU visit. 
A last batch of queries will be sent after last study visit if remaining ongoing/unknown outcomes of 
reported AEs are pending. After the last batch of queries with all collected data has been fully processed, 
eCRF and database will no longer be updated. Only SAEs and medically relevant ongoing/unknown 
outcome AEs will be followed-up until resolution or stabilization, under Voisin Consulting 
responsibility. 
12.6 PREGNANCY AND IN UTERO DRUG EXPOSURE 
All pregnancies that are diagnosed up to Month 3 ExFU visit or up to 4 weeks after the last IMP 
administration for subjects prematurely terminating the study must be recorded using the Pregnancy 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 77 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
Surveillance Form (PSF) – Part I (History and Start of Pregnancy; PSF-part I), provided by the 
Sponsor (or delegate) at the beginning of the study.  
Initial reporting of pregnancies: 
Subjects who become pregnant during the study Treatment Period will be immediately withdrawn from 
the IMP treatment. 
The Investigator must notify the Sponsor in an expedited manner (same as SAE reporting) of any 
pregnancy occurring during the above-mentioned period, by completing the PSF-part I. 
This form should be sent to ObsEva’s Representative for Pharmacovigilance as per the same procedures 
and timelines described for SAE Urgent Reporting in section 12.3.2. This form should be accompanied, 
as needed, by copies of the eCRF Medical History, Previous and Concomitant Therapy and the Exit 
Form. 
 
Follow-up of pregnancies: 
The Investigator must actively follow-up, document and report to ObsEva’s Representative for 
Pharmacovigilance the progress by tri-monthly updates up to the final outcome of the pregnancy 
using the Pregnancy Surveillance Form – Part II: (Course of Pregnancy; PSF-part II). If the subject 
can no longer be reached (lost to follow-up), documentation of the non-response/contact with two phone 
calls and a letter (certified with return receipt) are required. 
Pregnancy outcomes are not recorded in the eCRF unless considered AEs. 
Pregnancy outcomes must be reported to ObsEva’s Representative for Pharmacovigilance by 
completing the Pregnancy Surveillance Form – Part III: (Course and Outcome of Pregnancy; PSF-
part III). Timelines vary according to the nature of the pregnancy outcome: 
- 
For normal outcomes, ObsEva’s Representative for Pharmacovigilance should be notified within 
45 days of birth/delivery. 
- 
For abnormal outcomes, the fully completed form must be sent to ObsEva’s Representative for 
Pharmacovigilance according to the same procedures and timelines described for expedited AE 
reporting in section 12.3.2 (within 24 hours of awareness of this outcome). An SAE Report form 
should be completed in addition to the PSF-part III if the subject sustains an event meeting 
seriousness criterion (e.g. abnormality for the pregnancy (spontaneous abortion, stillbirth) or 
abnormality for the birth itself (e.g. prolongation of hospitalization due to caesarean section 
complications)). In case of congenital malformation or birth defect of the child, a SAE Report 
form for the child should be completed in addition to the PSF-part III (Subject identifier = Subject 
ID – 1 for a singleton neonate). 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 78 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
13 DATA ANALYSIS AND STATISTICS 
13.1 TEST OF HYPOTHESES 
No formal hypothesis tests are planned for this extension study. Data will be summarized by timepoint 
for each treatment group.   
13.2 SAMPLE SIZE 
With 150 subjects per each of the three treatment groups in the main study (450 subjects in total), the 
power was greater than 95% to reject the null hypothesis for both co-primary endpoints and 85% to 
reject all the null hypothesis for the ranked secondary endpoints. All subjects who have completed the 
full 6-month Treatment Period in the main study and who meet the inclusion criteria will be offered to 
enter the extension study. It is estimated that up to 288 subjects will enter the extension study, assuming 
that 80% of the patients randomized in the main study will complete the study (namely 360 subjects) 
and that up to 80 % thereof will enter the extension study. 
13.3 RANDOMIZATION 
Subjects who previously received placebo will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either linzagolix 75 mg 
alone (with ABT placebo) or linzagolix 200 mg with ABT), as per the main study randomization 
schedule. Subjects will be randomized into permutated blocks of a pre-determined length. 
Subjects who received active treatment will continue with the same treatment (linzagolix 75 mg alone 
or linzagolix 200 mg with ABT). 
In order to maintain the blind, the site will not be required to perform any randomization activities. The 
kits will be automatically allocated to the corresponding patients in the IWRS upon confirmation of their 
eligibility. 
13.4 ANALYSIS SETS 
The following data sets will be used for the statistical analysis: 
1. Treatment Extension Analysis Set: All subjects from the main study who entered the extension 
study and received at least one dose of study drug with the exception of subjects whose Month 6 
assessments subsequently met any of the discontinuation criteria listed in section 10.7.2.1. These 
subjects will be withdrawn from study treatment and will enter the Follow-Up Period. Subjects will 
be analyzed according to randomized treatment. 
 
2. Follow-up Extension Analysis Set: All subjects from the main study who completed the 6 months 
of treatment in the extension study and who entered the Post-Treatment Follow-Up Period. Subjects 
will be analyzed according to randomized treatment. 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 79 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
3. Extension Safety Analysis Set: All subjects randomized into the extension study who received at 
least one dose of study drug irrespective of the treatment received. Subjects will be analyzed 
according to treatment received. 
 
4. Extension Pharmacokinetic (PK) Set: all subjects who were randomized and received active study 
medication in the main study, had no major protocol deviations impacting PK throughout the main 
study or extension and with available PK data. 
 
5.  Extension Pharmacodynamic (PD) Set: all subjects who were randomized and received active 
study medication in the main study, had no major protocol deviations impacting PD throughout the 
main study or extension and with available PD data. 
 
Individual data points may also be excluded from the analysis sets. Rules for such exclusions will be 
described in the statistical analysis plan (SAP). 
13.5 DATA ANALYSIS 
The primary objective of this extension study is to assess the maintenance of efficacy of linzagolix 
administered orally once daily for up to an additional 6 months (for up to 12 months of treatment in 
total) in the subset of subjects who are treated with linzagolix up to the time point of interest. As such, 
the focus will be on subjects who received active treatment in the main study. The assessment of subjects 
who switched from placebo in the main study to active treatment in the extension study will be 
conducted as a secondary objective. 
Subjects will be analyzed according to actual treatment received. The following four treatment groups 
will be analyzed: linzagolix 75 mg and linzagolix 200 mg with ABT fixed dose groups, linzagolix 75 
mg and linzagolix 200 mg with ABT after 6 months placebo treatment. Only subjects with assessments 
at both baseline and the given time points will be included in the summaries. Baseline values are the 
same as in the main study (18-OBE2109-003 - Edelweiss 3), i.e. data collected prior to the treatment 
administration in the main study. 
More details of the proposed statisical analyses will be described in the SAP, which will be written 
following finalization of the protocol and prior to database lock. 
13.5.1 Baseline Assessment 
Descriptive statistics will be performed on relevant baseline data and on demographic characteristics for 
each treatment group and overall. Baseline is defined as the data collected prior to the treatment 
administration in the main study. A second baseline is defined as the data collected prior to the treatment 
administration in the extension study for subjects who were in the placebo arm in the main study. There 
will be no formal comparison of baseline data, that is, no statistical hypothesis testing. 
13.5.2 Efficacy Analysis 
Summaries will be performed using the Treatment Extension Analysis Set and the Follow-up Extension 
Analysis Set. Data from both the main study and the extension study will be summarized. 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 80 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
Efficacy endpoints will be derived in the same way as in the main study. The same criterion for defining 
a subject as being a responder by having a clinically meaningful reduction in DYS and in NMPP, along 
with a stable or decreased use of analgesics for EAP, will be used as per the criteria used in the main 
study. The evaluation of a stable or decreased use of analgesics will be done per the specification in 
Appendix Q. 
All secondary efficacy endpoints will be summarized by descriptive statistics for each treatment group, 
for each time point, including summaries of change from baseline when applicable. 
13.5.3 Safety Analysis 
Summaries will be performed using the Extension Safety Analysis Set and the Follow-up Extension 
Analysis Set.  
Data from both the main study and the extension study will be summarized. 
13.5.4 Pharmacokinetic analysis methodology 
Descriptive statistics of plasma concentrations will include mean (arithmetic and geometric) and 
standard deviation, median, 1st and 3rd quartiles, minimum, maximum, coefficient of variation (CV%) 
and number of observations. Concentrations below the limit of quantification (LOQ) will be assigned a 
value of zero. Explorative analyses of correlations between plasma concentrations and intrinsic PK 
factors such as e.g. body weight/BMI, race, age may be performed, as appropriate, and will be reported 
separately. 
PK analyses will be based on the Extension PK Set.  
13.5.5 Pharmacodynamic analysis methodology 
Pharmacodynamic parameters, such as for example estradiol and other hormones, will be summarized 
by time point for each treatment group, and listed for each subject by visit day and dose regimen. Where 
appropriate, changes from baseline will be presented. Potential PK-PD relationships may be investigated 
graphically and through statistical modeling, whilst also exploring possible covariates, and will be 
reported separately. 
PD analyses will be based on the Extension PD Set.  
13.5.6 Missing Data 
Summary statistics will be based on non-missing values. 
13.6 STUDY SPECIFIC DATA ANALYSIS 
13.6.1 End-of-Treatment Period Analysis 
After all subjects have completed the Treatment Period, a complete analysis will be performed. This 
analysis will include all data up to the end of treatment visit. A database lock will be performed, with 
any discrepant data clarified before the lock. 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 81 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
13.6.2 Post-Treatment Follow-Up Period Analysis 
After all subjects have completed the Post-Treatment Follow-up Period, a final database lock will be 
performed, followed by a second analysis. This analysis will include all data collected during the Post-
Treatment Follow-up Period. 
14 STUDY ADMINISTRATION 
14.1 REGULATORY AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS 
This study is to be performed in accordance with the protocol, with the ethical principles that have their 
origin in the Declaration of Helsinki (9), the ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline for GCP and all 
applicable local regulatory requirements. 
14.1.1 Informed Consent 
Before a subject can participate in the study, she must give a written informed consent specific to the 
extension study. The informed consent process will be in accordance with ICH GCP and local regulatory 
requirements. 
14.1.2 Regulatory Authority Approval 
Before the study is initiated at a site, the Sponsor (or its delegate) will obtain approval to conduct the 
study from the appropriate regulatory authority in accordance with any applicable country-specific 
regulatory requirements. 
14.1.3 Institutional Review Board Requirements / Independent Ethics Committee  
Before initiation of the study at a given site, written approval of the protocol, ICF and any information 
presented to potential subjects must be obtained from the appropriate IRB/IEC. If any amendments to 
any of these documents occur during the study, notification or written approval as appropriate must be 
obtained prior to their implementation. The Investigator is responsible for ensuring that these actions 
occur.  
Where required by local regulations, the Sponsor (or its delegate) is responsible for ensuring IRB/IEC 
approval of the study. 
14.1.4 End of the study 
For administrative and safety reporting purposes, the end of the study will be defined as the date of the 
final clinical database lock after the last subject has completed the Post-Treatment Follow-Up Period. 
This provides a single and conservative definition across all study sites. 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 82 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
14.2 INVESTIGATOR RESPONSIBILITIES 
The Investigator must be familiar with and conduct the study according to ICH GCP guidelines, the 
FDA Code of Regulation or the EU Clinical Trial Directive and applicable local laws and regulations. 
Where required by local regulations, national level coordinating Investigators may be appointed. Their 
responsibilities are outlined in a separate agreement with the Sponsor. 
14.3 DATA MANAGEMENT 
The Investigator or designee will be responsible for recording study data in the eCRF provided by the 
Sponsor. It is the Investigator’s responsibility to ensure the accuracy of the data entered in the eCRFs. 
The data will be entered into a validated database. The Sponsor or delegate will be responsible for data 
processing, in accordance with the Sponsor (or delegate) data management procedures. Database lock 
will occur once quality assurance procedures have been completed. The database will not be locked 
before all data clarifications have been resolved and monitored and the decision on subject evaluation 
has been completed. PDF files of the eCRFs will be sent to the Investigator at the completion of the 
study. 
14.4 STUDY MONITORING 
The Investigator must ensure that eCRFs are completed in a timely manner and must allow a Sponsor 
representative (e.g. Clinical Research Associate (CRA) or study monitor) periodical access to subject 
records and all study-related materials. The frequency of monitoring visits will be determined by factors 
such as the design of the study, the frequency of subject visits and the site enrolment rate. In order to 
verify that the study is conducted in accordance with ICH GCP, regulatory requirements, and the study 
protocol and that the data are authentic, accurate and complete, the study monitor will review eCRFs 
and other study documents and will conduct source data verification. 
Upon study completion, the Sponsor representative (e.g. CRA or study monitor) will visit the site to 
conduct a Study termination visit. This will involve collection of any outstanding documentation and 
study material if applicable. 
14.5 DATA MONITORING COMMITTEE 
The Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) is a group of independent experts external to the study that, 
collectively, has experience in the management of subjects with endometriosis and in the conduct and 
oversight of randomized clinical trials. 
Composition, responsibilities, rules for decision and procedures of the DMC will be described in more 
details in the DMC charter. 
The DMC will be responsible for: 
 
 
safeguarding the interests of trial participants, 
 
assessing the safety of the IMP during the trial (reviewing unblinded safety data and AEs and 
SAEs, on a regular basis, as per charter prepared for the study). 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 83 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
The DMC will provide advisory support to the Study Director, the trial team and any other Sponsor 
representative. The Study Director will be responsible for promptly reviewing the DMC 
recommendations and determine whether expedited reporting of any safety issues, amendments to the 
protocol or changes in study conduct are required. 
14.6 SUBJECT CONFIDENTIALITY 
The Investigator and the CRA (or study monitor) representing the Sponsor must ensure that the subject’s 
anonymity is maintained. In the eCRFs or other documents submitted to the Sponsor, the subject should 
not be identified by her name, but by her assigned SIN. If a subject’s name is included on copies of 
documents to be submitted to the Sponsor, the name (except for initials) must be obliterated and the 
assigned SIN added to the documents. 
The Investigator should keep a separate log of SINs, names, addresses, telephone numbers and hospital 
numbers (if applicable). Documents not for submission to the Sponsor, such as signed ICFs, should be 
maintained in strict confidentiality by the Investigator. 
14.7 QUALITY ASSURANCE 
In compliance with ICH GCP and regulatory requirements, the Sponsor, a third party acting on behalf 
of the Sponsor, regulatory agencies or IRB/IEC may conduct quality assurance audits at any time during 
or following a study. The Investigator must agree to allow auditors direct access to all study-related 
documents including source documents, and must agree to allocate his or her time and the time of his or 
her study staff to the auditors in order to discuss findings and issues. 
14.8 PROTOCOL DEVIATIONS 
A protocol deviation is any noncompliance with the clinical trial protocol or ICH GCP requirements. It 
is the responsibility of the site Investigator to use continuous vigilance to identify and report deviations. 
All deviations must be addressed in study source documents and reported to the reviewing IRB/IEC per 
their policies. The site Investigator is responsible for knowing and adhering to the reviewing IRB/IEC 
requirements. 
All Protocol Deviations will be reported to the Sponsor and documented in the monitoring report. These 
will be classified as minor or major based on their effect on the right, safety or well-being of the subjects 
and/or the quality and integrity of the data, and the final rating of all deviations will be confirmed prior 
to database lock. 
14.9 STUDY OR SITE DISCONTINUATION 
The Sponsor may temporarily or permanently discontinue the study for safety, ethical, compliance or 
other reasons. If this is necessary, the Sponsor will endeavour to provide advance notification to the site. 
If the site or study is suspended or discontinued, the Investigator will be responsible for promptly 
informing the IRB/IEC.  


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 84 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
Where required by local regulations, the Sponsor (or delegate) will be responsible for informing the 
IRB/IEC of study or site discontinuation. In such cases, all study data and unused IMP must be returned 
to the Sponsor. 
14.10 RETENTION OF ESSENTIAL STUDY DOCUMENTS 
Essential documents as defined by ICH GCP include the signed protocol and any amendment(s), copies 
of the completed eCRFs, signed ICFs from all subjects who consented, hospital records, diary cards and 
other source documents, IRB/IEC approvals and all related correspondence including approved 
documents, drug accountability records, study correspondence and a list of the subjects’ names and 
addresses.  
The Investigator must retain copies of the essential documents for the period specified by ICH GCP and 
by applicable regulatory requirements. 
The Investigator will inform the Sponsor of the storage location of the essential documents, and must 
contact the Sponsor for approval before disposing of any. The Investigator should take measures to 
prevent accidental or premature destruction of these documents. 
14.11 PUBLICATION POLICY 
ObsEva registers clinical trials (Phase I – IV) wherever and whenever mandatory on publicly accessible 
websites (e.g.: www.clinicaltrials.gov ; www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu), including posting the trial design, 
population, and study details as required. 
ObsEva posts the outcome of clinical trials on the required medium(a), within required timelines, 
regardless of the nature of the outcome. 
ObsEva shares information on the outcome of clinical trials with the Principal/Coordinating 
Investigators of trials in the form of a final report synopsis, regardless of the trial outcome. 
ObsEva duly communicates to stakeholders all relevant information arising from research activities 
related to products developed by the company, at any point and during any phase of the development of 
a product and the entire life-cycle of an ObsEva product. 
Registration, reporting and communication of clinical trial results, results and/or outcome of non-clinical 
research are subject to mandatory preliminary review and authorization by the relevant ObsEva 
functions, prior to disclosure. 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
Page 85 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
15 APPENDICES 
APPENDIX A. SCHEDULE OF STUDY ASSESSMENTS – TREATMENT PERIOD........................................... 86 
APPENDIX B. SCHEDULE OF STUDY ASSESSMENTS – FOLLOW-UP PERIOD ........................................... 88 
APPENDIX C. ENDOMETRIOSIS HEALTH PROFILE QUESTIONNAIRE (EHP-30) ....................................... 89 
APPENDIX D. PROMIS FATIGUE – SHORT FORM 6A ............................................................................. 94 
APPENDIX E. HEALTH-RELATED PRODUCTIVITY QUESTIONNAIRE (HRPQ) ........................................... 95 
APPENDIX F. HEALTH RESOURCE UTILIZATION QUESTIONNAIRE (HRUQ) ............................................ 97 
APPENDIX G. PATIENT GLOBAL IMPRESSION OF CHANGE (PGIC) ....................................................... 102 
APPENDIX H. POST-TREATMENT PATIENT GLOBAL IMPRESSION OF CHANGE (PPGIC) ....................... 103 
APPENDIX I. PATIENT GLOBAL IMPRESSION OF SEVERITY (PGIS) ...................................................... 104 
APPENDIX J. SUBJECT SURGERY INTENTION QUESTIONNAIRE (SSIQ) ................................................ 105 
APPENDIX K. PHYSICIAN SURGERY INTENTION QUESTIONNAIRE (PSIQ) ............................................ 106 
APPENDIX L. EQ-5D-5L ...................................................................................................................... 107 
APPENDIX M. LABORATORY PARAMETERS ......................................................................................... 109 
APPENDIX N. NARCOTIC ANALGESICS AVAILABLE IN THE EU COUNTRIES .......................................... 110 
APPENDIX O. PROHIBITED MEDICINES ............................................................................................... 111 
APPENDIX P. STRONG CYP3A4 INDUCERS AND INHIBITORS .............................................................. 112 
APPENDIX Q. ANALGESIC CHANGE DURING TREATMENT PERIOD ...................................................... 114 
APPENDIX R. REFERENCE LIST ............................................................................................................ 116 
APPENDIX S. C-SSRS ALREADY ENROLLED SUBJECTS ......................................................................... 117 
APPENDIX T. C-SSRS SINCE LAST VISIT ............................................................................................... 120 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 86 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
Appendix A. Schedule of study assessments – Treatment Period 
 
Schedule of study assessments – Treatment Period 
Timing1  
Treatment Period 
M62  
M7 
M8 
M9 
M10 
M11 
M12 
Informed Consent 
x 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Inclusion-Exclusion criteria 
x 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Physical examination (including weight) 
x 
 
 
x 
 
 
x 
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
ECG3  
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
Vital signs 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
Urine pregnancy test 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
Endometrium TVUS 
x 
 
 
x 
 
 
x 
Gynecological examination 
x 
 
 
x 
 
 
x 
Endometrial biopsy 
x4  
 
 
 
 
 
 x4  
Manual breast examination 
x 
 
 
 
 
 
x 
Clinical laboratory & urinary protein dipstick 
x5  
x 
x 
x5  
x 
x 
x5  
BMD by DXA 
x 
 
 
x6  
 
 
x 
Adverse events 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
Concomitant medication 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
Contraceptive dispensing and counselling 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
Permitted analgesic prescribing/dispensing 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
Vitamin D and calcium dispensing 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
Subject eDiary completion check 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
 
1  All visits should take place at the end of the defined period (i.e. M7 visit should be scheduled at the end of Month 7, M8 visit should be 
scheduled at the end of Month 8, etc.). All visit dates should be calculated from the date of Day 1 visit (in the main study). A month is 
defined as 28 days/4 weeks. Visits should be scheduled ± 3 days (-3/+ 2 days for Month 7 visit) from the calculated date. 
2  All Month 6 assessments except informed consent and inclusion/exclusion criteria would have been performed as part of the main study 
(18-OBE2109-003 - Edelweiss 3). 
3  ECG should be performed at about the same time but before the PK sample  
4  If endometrium thickness in TVUS is ≤ 5 mm, no endometrial biopsy will be necessary. 
5  Overnight fasting is required. 
6  Only for subjects who met the following criterion at any site on the M6 DXA scan: -2.5 < Z-score ≤ -1.5 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 87 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
Schedule of study assessments – Treatment Period (cont’d) 
 
Schedule of study assessments – Treatment Period 
Timing1  
Treatment Period 
M62  
M7 
M8 
M9 
M10 
M11 
M12 
IMP accountability 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
Dispense linzagolix/placebo kit 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
 
Dispense ABT/placebo kit 
x 
 
 
x 
 
 
 
EHP-30, EQ-5D-5L and PROMIS3  
x 
x 
 
x 
 
 
x 
mPGIS, PGIC, HRUQ and HRPQ3  
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
SSIQ and PSIQ3  
x 
 
 
 
 
 
x 
Blood sample for PK4  
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
E2, LH, P4 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
x 
SHBG 
x 
 
 
x 
 
 
x 
Bone biomarkers 
x 
 
 
x 
 
 
x 
 
1  All visits should take place at the end of the defined period (i.e. M7 visit should be scheduled at the end of Month 7, M8 visit should be 
scheduled at the end of Month 8, etc.). All visit dates should be calculated from the date of Day 1 visit (in the main study). A month is 
defined as 28 days/4 weeks. Visits should be scheduled ± 3 days from the calculated date. 
2  All Month 6 assessments except informed consent and inclusion/exclusion criteria would have been performed as part of the main study. 
3  ClinROs (PSIQ and HRUQ) will be administered to the subject by the site staff and the responses will be filled in the eDiary. ePROs (EHP-30, 
EQ-5D-5L, PROMIS, PGIS, PGIC, HRPQ and SSIQ) will be filled in by the subject in the eDiary. 
4  PK samples should be taken after the ECG and before the daily dose of IMP. 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 88 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
Appendix B. Schedule of study assessments – Follow-up Period 
 
Schedule of study assessments – Extension Follow-up Period 
Timing1  
M1 
ExFU 
M3 
ExFU 
M6 
ExFU 
Concomitant medication 
x 
x 
x 
Adverse events 
x 
x 
x 
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale 
x 
x 
x 
ECG 
x 
x 
x 
Physical examination (including weight) 
 
x 
x 
Vital signs 
x 
x 
x 
Gynecological examination 
 
x 
 
Manual breast examination 
 
x 
 
Endometrium TVUS 
 
x 
x 
Endometrial biopsy 
x2  
x2  
x2  
Clinical laboratory & urinary protein dipstick 
x 
x4  
 
Subject eDiary completion check 
x 
x 
x 
Subject eDiary collection and deactivation 
 
 
x 
EHP-30, EQ-5D-5L, PROMIS, HRUQ, HRPQ 
 
x 
x 
mPGIS and PPGIC  
x 
x 
x 
BMD by DXA 
 
 
x5  
E2, LH, P4 
x 
x 
 
FSH at local laboratory for subjects that do not resume menses at M3 
ExFU visit 
 
x 
 
Bone biomarkers 
 
x 
 
Permitted analgesic prescribing/dispensing 
x 
x 
 
Vitamin D and calcium dispensing 
x 
x 
 
Urine pregnancy test and contraceptive dispensing and counselling 
x 
x 
x 
 
1  All follow-up study visits should take place at the end of the defined period (i.e. M1 ExFU visit should be scheduled at the end of the first 
month of follow-up, M3 ExFU visit should be scheduled at the end of the third month of follow-up, etc.). A month is defined as 28 days/4 
weeks. Visits should be scheduled ± 7 days from the calculated date. 
2  Endometrium biopsy will be taken only if diagnosis at preceding visit was different than “benign endometrium” or if no endometrial 
biopsy was done at M12 nor at any visit since M12. 
3  An end-of-study biopsy is mandatory if no endometrium biopsy was obtained at M12 nor at any of the subsequent visits. 
4  Overnight fasting is required. 
5  Subjects with a BMD decrease from main study baseline of > 1.5% for lumbar spine and/or > 2.5% for total hip at M6 ExFU visit will have 
an additional DXA scan 6 months later. 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 89 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
Appendix C. Endometriosis Health Profile questionnaire (EHP-30) 
 
Final English (US) EHP-30 + Section C 
© Copyright, Oxford University Innovation Limited 2001. All Rights Reserved. 
The authors, being Professor Crispin Jenkinson, Professor Stephen Kennedy and Dr. Georgina Jones, 
have asserted their moral rights. 
 
PART 1: CORE QUESTIONNAIRE 
 
DURING THE LAST 4 WEEKS,  
BECAUSE OF YOUR ENDOMETRIOSIS, HOW OFTEN HAVE YOU... 
 
Never 
Rarely 
Sometimes 
Often 
Always 
1. 
Been unable to go to social events 
because of the pain?  
 
 
 
 
 
 
2. 
Been unable to do jobs around the 
house because of the pain?  
 
 
 
 
 
 
3. 
Found it difficult to stand because of 
the pain? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4. 
Found it difficult to sit because of the 
pain? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5. 
Found it difficult to walk because of 
the pain? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
6. 
Found it difficult to exercise or do the 
leisure activities you would like to do 
because of the pain? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 90 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
 
DURING THE LAST 4 WEEKS,  
BECAUSE OF YOUR ENDOMETRIOSIS, HOW OFTEN HAVE YOU... 
 
Never 
Rarely 
Sometimes 
Often 
Always 
7. 
Lost your appetite and/or been unable 
to eat because of the pain? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8. 
Been unable to sleep properly because 
of the pain? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
9. 
Had to go to bed/lie down because of 
the pain? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10. 
Been unable to do the things you want 
because of the pain? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
11. 
Felt unable to cope with the pain? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12. 
Generally felt unwell? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
13. 
Felt frustrated because your symptoms 
are not getting better? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
14. 
Felt frustrated because you are not 
able to control your symptoms? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 91 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
 
DURING THE LAST 4 WEEKS,  
BECAUSE OF YOUR ENDOMETRIOSIS, HOW OFTEN HAVE YOU... 
 
Never 
Rarely 
Sometimes 
Often 
Always 
15. 
Felt unable to forget your symptoms? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
16. 
Felt as though your symptoms are 
ruling your life? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
17. 
Felt your symptoms are taking away 
your life? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
18. 
Felt depressed? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
19. 
Felt weepy/tearful? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
20. 
Felt miserable? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
21. 
Had mood swings? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
22. 
Felt bad-tempered or short-tempered? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 92 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
 
DURING THE LAST 4 WEEKS,  
BECAUSE OF YOUR ENDOMETRIOSIS, HOW OFTEN HAVE YOU... 
 
Never 
Rarely 
Sometimes 
Often 
Always 
23. 
Felt violent or aggressive? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
24. 
Felt unable to tell others how you feel?  
 
 
 
 
 
25. 
Felt others do not understand what you 
are going through? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
26. 
Felt as though others think you are 
whining? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
27. 
Felt alone? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
28. 
Felt frustrated that you cannot always 
wear the clothes you would choose? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
29. 
Felt your appearance has been 
affected? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
30. 
Lacked confidence? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 93 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
 
PART 2: MODULAR QUESTIONNAIRE CORRESPONDING TO SEXUAL RELATIONSHIPS  
 
DURING THE LAST 4 WEEKS,  
BECAUSE OF YOUR ENDOMETRIOSIS, HOW OFTEN HAVE YOU... 
 
Never 
Rarely Sometimes 
Often 
Always 
1. 
Experienced pain during or 
after intercourse? 
If not applicable,  
please check here 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2. 
Felt worried about having 
intercourse because of the 
pain? 
If not applicable,  
please check here 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3. 
Avoided intercourse because of 
the pain? 
If not applicable,  
please check here 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4. 
Felt guilty about not wanting to 
have intercourse? 
If not applicable,  
please check here 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5. 
Felt frustrated because you 
cannot enjoy intercourse? 
If not applicable,  
please check here 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 94 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
 
Appendix D. PROMIS Fatigue – Short Form 6a 
 
This scale is formally known as PROMIS Item Bank v1.0 – Fatigue – Short Form 6a. The questions 
and the response categories included in this scale are presented below. 
 
 
Please respond to each question or statement by marking one box per row. 
 
 
During the past 7 
days… 
Not at all 
A little bit 
Somewhat 
Quite a bit 
Very much 
1 
I feel fatigued 
□ 
□ 
□ 
□ 
□ 
2 
I have trouble starting 
things because I am 
tired 
□ 
□ 
□ 
□ 
□ 
 
In the past 7 days… 
 
 
 
 
 
3 
How run-down did you 
feel on average? 
□ 
□ 
□ 
□ 
□ 
4 
How fatigued were you 
on average? 
□ 
□ 
□ 
□ 
□ 
5 
How much were you 
bothered by your fatigue 
on average? 
□ 
□ 
□ 
□ 
□ 
6 
To what degree did your 
fatigue interfere with 
your physical 
functioning? 
□ 
□ 
□ 
□ 
□ 
 
Scoring Rules: 
The mapping of the response categories is as follows: 
1 = Not at all; 2 = A little bit; 3 = Somewhat; 4 = Quite a bit; 5 = Very much 
Assessment will be based on the sum of the individual scores across the six questions (possible scores 6 to 30, 6 = not at all, 
30 = very much). Missing data will not be imputed. 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 95 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
Appendix E. Health-Related Productivity Questionnaire (HRPQ) 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 96 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 97 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
Appendix F. Health Resource Utilization Questionnaire (HRUQ) 
 (To be completed by Site Staff) 
Subject number: ___________________________ 
Study Visit (please ensure to tick 1 visit only):  
Treatment period 
☐ Month 7 
☐ Month 8 
☐ Month 9  
☐ Month 10  
☐ Month 11 
☐ Month 12 
Follow-up period 
☐ Month 3 ExFU  
☐ Month 6 ExFU  
Date of Assessment:  __________________________________________ 
 
Instructions to complete:  
At each scheduled on-site visit in the Treatment Period (Month 6 through Month 12) and at Month 3 
ExFU and Month 6 ExFU visits in the Follow-up period, please ask if the subject saw a non-study 
health care practitioner since her last scheduled on-site visit for a routine/general health care visit that 
is not associated with an adverse event. 
Only record below the health care visits with non-study health care practitioners. Any visits associated 
with Adverse Events should be recorded on the AE eCRF form only (do not record below). 
 
*********** 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 98 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
Question 1 
Since the subject's last scheduled study on-site visit, has she seen a non-study health care practitioner 
(e.g., physician, nurse practitioner, physician assistant, dentist, physical therapist) for a 
routine/general health care visit that is not associated with an adverse event? 
☐ No  
☐ Yes   
If Yes, please complete the questions 2 and 3 below. 
Question 2 
a. Select the type of non-study health care practitioner who saw the subject.  
b. Indicate if it was at an office or a clinic (includes a hospital outpatient visit) 
c. Indicate the number of times the subject was seen by each practitioner. 
Types of non-study health care 
practitioner who saw the subject 
(check all that apply) 
Type of facility  
Number of times 
subject was seen by 
this non-study health 
care practitioner 
 
Office 
Clinic 
Office 
Clinic 
☐ AUDIOLOGIST 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ ALLERGIST 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ CARDIOLOGIST 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ DENTIST 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ DERMATOLOGIST 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ ENDOCRINOLOGIST 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ ENT 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ FAMILY PHYSICIAN 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ GASTROENTEROLOGIST 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ GYNECOLOGIST 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ HEMATOLOGIST 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ HEPATOLOGIST 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ IMMUNOLOGIST 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ INFECTIOUS DISEASE SPECIALIST 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 99 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
☐ INTERNAL MEDICINE SPECIALIST 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ INTERNIST 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ MEDICAL GENETICIST 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ NEPHROLOGIST 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ NEUROSURGEON 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ NURSE 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ NURSE PRACTITIONER 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ OCCUPATIONAL THERAPIST 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ OPHTHALMOLOGIST 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ ORTHOPEDIC SURGEON 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ OPTOMETRIST 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ PHYSIATRIST 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ PHYSICAL THERAPIST 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ PLASTIC SURGEON 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ PODIATRIST 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ PSYCHOLOGIST 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ PULMONOLOGIST 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ RADIOLOGIST  
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ REPRODUCTIVE ENDOCRINOLOGIST  
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ RHEUMATOLOGIST 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ SURGEON 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ UROLOGIST 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ UNKNOWN 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
☐ OTHER HEALTH CARE PRACTITIONER 
(specify type): 
☐ 
☐ 
 
 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 100 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
Question 3 
Did the Subject have any diagnostic or therapeutic procedures performed by a non-study health care 
practitioner since the last scheduled study on-site visit? 
☐ No  
 
☐ Yes   
If Yes, complete question 4 below. 
Question 4 
a. Select the type of diagnosis/therapeutic procedures performed by non-study health care 
practitioner who saw the subject.  
b. Indicate the number of times the diagnosis/therapeutic procedures were performed. 
Diagnostic/Therapeutic Procedure  
(check all that apply) 
Number of times the procedure was 
performed 
Ultrasound Scan 
☐ 
 
Physical Examination 
☐ 
 
Vital Signs 
☐ 
 
MRI 
☐ 
 
CT Scan 
☐ 
 
X-Ray 
☐ 
 
Biopsy and Histologic Examination 
☐ 
 
Pelvic Exam 
☐ 
 
Urine Test 
☐ 
 
Blood Test 
☐ 
 
Hysteroscopy 
☐ 
 
SIS ( Saline infusion Sonohysterography) 
☐ 
 
Colposcopy 
☐ 
 
Other (specify): 
 
☐ 
 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 101 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
Question 5 
Has the patient spent any nights as a hospital in-patient since the last visit? 
☐ No  
 
☐ Yes  
If Yes, how many nights did they spend in hospital? 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 102 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
 
Appendix G. Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) 
 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 103 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
 
Appendix H. Post-treatment Patient Global Impression of Change 
(PPGIC) 
 
 
“Overall, how have your endometriosis symptoms 
changed since you stopped taking the study drug?” 
 
 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 104 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
Appendix I. Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) 
 
Daily recall (dPGIS) 
 
Monthly recall (mPGIS) 
Overall, how would you describe your 
endometriosis symptoms in the last 24 hours? 
 
Overall, how would you describe your 
endometriosis symptoms over the past 28 
days? 
 
 
 
 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 105 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
 
Appendix J. Subject Surgery Intention Questionnaire (SSIQ) 
 
1. How likely are you to consider having laparoscopic surgery to treat your endometriosis if your 
symptoms continue as they are now? 
The SSIQ evaluates subject likelihood of considering endometriosis-related surgeries if current 
symptoms continue, with possible scores from 0 to 10, 
0 = not at all, 10 = very likely. 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 106 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
Appendix K. Physician Surgery Intention Questionnaire (PSIQ) 
 
1. How likely are you to recommend laparoscopic surgery to treat this patient's endometriosis if her 
symptoms continue as they are now? 
The PSIQ evaluates physician likelihood of recommending endometriosis-related surgeries to the 
subject if current symptoms continue, with possible scores from 0 to 10, 
0 = not at all, 10 = very likely. 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 107 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
Appendix L. EQ-5D-5L 
EQ-5D-5L English US version 
© EuroQol Research Foundation. EQ-5D™ is a trade mark of the EuroQol Research Foundation 
 
Please tap the ONE box that best describes your health TODAY. 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 108 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
 
 
 
Please tap on the scale to indicate how your health is TODAY. 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 109 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
Appendix M.  Laboratory parameters 
Routine Haematology  
 
Blood Chemistry 
Haemoglobin  
 
 
Sodium  
Haematocrit 
 
 
 
Potassium 
RBC count 
 
 
 
Calcium 
WBC count 
 
 
 
Phosphate 
Neutrophils 
 
 
 
Creatinine 
Lymphocytes  
 
 
Bilirubin total 
Monocytes 
 
 
 
Indirect Bilirubin 
Eosinophils 
 
 
 
Total protein 
Basophils 
 
 
 
Albumin 
Thrombocytes  
 
 
AST 
MCV  
 
 
 
ALT 
MCH  
 
 
 
γGT 
MCHC  
 
 
 
Alkaline phosphatase 
APTT  
 
 
 
Creatine Kinase 
INR 
 
 
 
 
LDH 
PT 
 
 
 
 
HDL, LDL, total cholesterol, and LDL/HDL ratio,  
 
 
 
 
 
triglycerides 
 
 
 
 
 
Glucose 
 
 
 
 
 
Urea and uric acid 
Urinary protein dipstick 
Hormones 
E2, LH, P4, SHBG 
All the above listed tests are to be performed at the frequencies indicated in Appendix A and Appendix 
B. All above listed blood tests will be performed by a central laboratory. Please consult the central 
laboratory instructions manual for the preparation and handling of the blood samples to be drawn to 
perform these tests. 
Bone markers 
Blood samples for exploratory bone biomarkers such as, but not limited to, collagen type 1 β-carboxy-
telopeptide (CTx), procollagen 1 Intact N-Terminal (P1NP), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (B-
ALP) and osteocalcin will be collected as part of clinical chemistry.  
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 110 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
Appendix N. Narcotic analgesics available in the EU countries 
 
Austria 
tramadol 37.5mg + paracetamol 325mg  
Bulgaria 
tramadol 37.5mg + paracetamol 325mg 
Czech Republic 
codeine 30mg 
paracetamol 500 mg+ codeine 30 mg 
tramadol 37.5mg + paracetamol 325mg 
France 
paracetamol 500 mg+ codeine 30 mg 
tramadol 37.5mg + paracetamol 325mg 
Hungary 
paracetamol 500 mg+ codeine 30 mg 
codeine 30mg 
tramadol 37.5mg + paracetamol 325mg 
Poland 
tramadol 37.5mg + paracetamol 325mg 
Romania 
codeine 30mg 
paracetamol 500 mg+ codeine 30 mg 
Spain 
paracetamol 500 mg+ codeine 30 mg  
tramadol 37.5mg + paracetamol 325mg 
Ukraine 
N/A – will not be used 
 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 111 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
 
Appendix O. Prohibited medicines 
 
 
GnRH antagonists 
 
GnRH agonist injections/3-month depot injections 
 
Danazol 
 
Oral contraceptives and other sex hormones 
 
Depot contraceptives 
 
Selective Progesterone Receptor Modulators (SPRMs), Selective Estrogen Receptor 
Modulators (SERMs) and aromatase inhibitors 
 
Long acting narcotics (i.e. requiring less than once daily dosing) 
 
Systemic glucocorticoid treatments for acute diseases (not depot) 
 
Medical (prescribed) marijuana 
 
In situ copper intra-uterine device (IUD) 
 
In situ IUD with progestogen 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 112 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
Appendix P. Strong CYP3A4 Inducers and Inhibitors 
 
The presented lists are indicative and should not be considered exhaustive. 
 
Strong CYP3A4 inducers prohibited up to end of treatment in view of the add-back treatment: 
 
Carbamazepine 
Enzalutamide 
Mitotane 
Phenytoin 
Rifampin 
St. John’s Wort 
 
Strong CYP3A4 inhibitors prohibited up to end of treatment in view of the add-back treatment: 
 
Boceprevir 
clarithromycin 
Cobicistat 
Conivaptan 
danoprevir and ritonavir 
diltiazem 
elvitegravir and ritonavir 
grapefruit juice 
idelalisib 
indinavir and ritonavir 
itraconazole 
ketoconazole 
lopinavir and ritonavir 
nefazodone 
nelfinavir 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 113 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
paritaprevir and ritonavir and (ombitasvir and/or dasabuvir) 
posaconazole 
ritonavir 
saquinavir and ritonavir 
telaprevir 
tipranavir and ritonavir 
troleandomycin 
voriconazole 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 114 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
Appendix Q. Analgesic change during Treatment Period 
Use of No Analgesics at Baseline* 
Analgesic used during 
Screening* 
Analgesic dose status at end of 
study 
Assessment of Change  
None 
None 
Stable/Decrease  
Narcotic analgesic and/or 
ibuprofen is started 
Increase 
Use of Only Ibuprofen at Baseline* 
Analgesic uses at Baseline* 
Analgesic dose status at end of 
study 
Assessment of Change 
ibuprofen 
Dose stopped, decreases, or is 
stable 
Stable/Decrease 
Dose increases by 15% or more 
Increase 
Narcotic analgesic is 
substituted or added 
Increase 
Use of Only Narcotic Analgesic at Baseline* 
Analgesic uses at Baseline* 
Analgesic dose status at end of 
study 
Assessment of Change  
Narcotic analgesic 
Dose stopped, decreases, or is 
stable 
Stable/Decrease  
Dose stopped and ibuprofen 
substituted (any dose) 
Stable/Decrease 
Dose decreases and ibuprofen 
added (any dose) 
Stable/Decrease 
 
Dose stable and ibuprofen 
added (any dose) 
Increase 
Dose increases by 15% or more 
Increase 
Use of Ibuprofen and Narcotic Analgesic at Baseline* 
Analgesic uses at Baseline* 
Analgesic dose status at end of 
study 
Assessment of Change  
ibuprofen + narcotic analgesic 
Ibuprofen dose stops + narcotic 
analgesic use stops, decreases, 
or is stable** 
Stable/Decrease 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 115 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
Ibuprofen use stops + narcotic 
analgesic dose increases by 
more than 15% 
Increase 
Ibuprofen dose decreases + 
narcotic analgesic use stops, 
decreases, or is stable** 
Stable/Decrease 
Ibuprofen dose decreases + 
narcotic analgesic dose 
increases by more than 15% 
Increase 
Ibuprofen dose stable + 
narcotic analgesic use 
stops, decreases, or is stable** 
Stable/Decrease 
Ibuprofen dose stable + 
narcotic analgesic dose 
increases by more than 15% 
Increase 
 
Ibuprofen dose increases by 
more than 15% + narcotic 
analgesic use stops 
Stable/Decrease 
 
Ibuprofen dose increases by 
more than 15% + narcotic 
analgesic dose decreases 
Stable/Decrease 
Ibuprofen dose increases by 
more than 15% + narcotic 
analgesic dose is stable** 
Increase 
Ibuprofen dose increases by 
more than 15% + narcotic 
analgesic dose increases by 
15% or more 
Increase 
 
*Screening and Baseline are defined as the screening and baseline visits in the main study. 
**Stable =Dose is the same as the screening dose or increases by less than 15% of the screening dose. 
In addition, a subject can increase the monthly total dose of analgesics by one pill of analgesic (either 
ibuprofen or narcotic) and still be considered stable. 
 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 116 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
 
Appendix R. Reference List  
1. 
Dunselman GA, Vermeulen N, Becker C, Calhaz-Jorge C, D'Hooghe T, De Bie B, et al. 
ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(3):400-
12. 
2. 
Ferrero S, Barra F, Leone Roberti Maggiore U. Current and Emerging Therapeutics for the 
Management of Endometriosis. Drugs. 2018 Jul;78(10):995-1012. 
3. 
Ezzati M, Carr BR. Elagolix, a novel, orally bioavailable GnRH antagonist under investigation 
for the treatment of endometriosis-related pain. Womens Health (Lond Engl ). 2015;11(1):19-
28. 
4. 
Lee DY, Park HG, Yoon BK, Choi D. Effects of different add-back regimens on 
hypoestrogenic problems by postoperative gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment 
in endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2016;59(1):32-8. 
5. 
Farmer JE, Prentice A, Breeze A. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues for 
endometriosis: bone mineral density. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(4):CD001297. 
6. 
Surrey E, Taylor HS, Giudice L, Lessey BA, Abrao MS, Archer DF, et al. Long-Term 
Outcomes of Elagolix in Women With Endometriosis: Results From Two Extension Studies. 
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;132(1):147-160. 
7. 
AbbVie. Orilissa: Prescribing information. 2018. 
8. 
FDA. Guidance for Industry - Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Premarketing Clinical Evaluation. 
2009. 
9. 
World Medical A. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for 
medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191-4. 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 117 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
 
Appendix S. C-SSRS Already Enrolled Subjects 
 
 
 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 118 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
 
 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 119 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
 
 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 120 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
 
Appendix T. C-SSRS Since Last Visit 
 
 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 121 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
 
 
 


19-OBE2109-006 PROTOCOL V2.0 DATED 25 AUGUST 2020 
 
Page 122 of 122 
 
OBSEVA CONFIDENTIAL 
 

SAP_003.pdf: 
CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 1 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
Protocol 19-OBE2109-006
A double-blind randomized extension study to assess the long-term efficacy and safety 
of linzagolix in subjects with endometriosis-associated pain
Protocol Number:
(Version Date)
19-OBE2109-006
25 August 2020
Name of Test Drug:
Linzagolix (OBE2109)
Phase:
Phase 3 Extension
Methodology:
Randomized, Double Blind
Sponsor:
Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Sponsor Representative:
 
Document Date:
28-AUG-2023
Document Version:
3.0


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 2 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
SIGNATURE PAGE
Protocol Title:
A double-blind randomized extension study to assess 
the long-term efficacy and safety of linzagolix in 
subjects with endometriosis-associated pain
Sponsor:
Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Protocol Number:
19-OBE2109-006
Document Date/Version:
28-AUG-2023, 3.0
Cytel, Inc. Author:
Sponsor Approval
By signing this document, I acknowledge that I have read the document and approve of the 
planned statistical analyses described herein.  I agree that the planned statistical analyses are 
appropriate for this study, are in accordance with the study objectives, and are consistent with 
the statistical methodology described in the protocol, clinical development plan, and all 
I have discussed any questions I have regarding the contents of this document with the 
biostatistical author.
I also understand that any subsequent changes to the planned pharmacokinetic analyses, as 
described herein, may have a regulatory impact and/or result in timeline adjustments.  All 
changes to the planned analyses will be described in the clinical study report (CSR).


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 3 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
Sponsor Signatory:
MODIFICATION HISTORY
Current 
Version
Date
Amended 
by
Summary of Changes from 
previous version
Reason
1.0
Original document 
2.0
13-
JUN-
2022
Marie Boff
See section 7.
See section 7.
3.0
28-
AUG-
2023
Holly Ge
See section 7.
See section 7.


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 4 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
Table of Contents
1.
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES OF ANALYSIS................................................... 11
1.1.
INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................ 11
1.2.
OBJECTIVES.............................................................................................................................. 11
2.
STUDY DESIGN.............................................................................................................. 13
2.1.
INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................ 13
2.2.
SAMPLE SIZE AND POWER................................................................................................... 14
2.3.
RANDOMIZATION METHODOLOGY..................................................................................... 14
2.4.
STOPPING RULES ................................................................................................................... 15
2.5.
BLINDING ................................................................................................................................... 17
2.6.
INTERIM ANALYSES................................................................................................................ 17
3.
STUDY ENDPOINTS....................................................................................................... 18
3.1.
EFFICACY VARIABLES ........................................................................................................... 18
3.2.
PHARMACOKINETIC VARIABLES ........................................................................................ 20
3.3.
SAFETY VARIABLES................................................................................................................ 20
3.4.
EXPLORATORY VARIABLES ................................................................................................. 21
4.
ANALYSIS SETS ............................................................................................................ 22
4.1.
ANALYSIS SET DEFINITIONS................................................................................................ 22
4.2.
PROTOCOL DEVIATIONS....................................................................................................... 25
5.
DATA HANDLING........................................................................................................... 26
5.1.
COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT................................................................................................ 26
5.2.
DATA CONVENTIONS ............................................................................................................. 26
5.2.1.
LAST EXTENSION TREATMENT ADMINISTRATION DATE, END OF 
EXTENSION STUDY DATE AND PERIOD DEFINITIONS.................................................. 26
5.3.
METHODS OF POOLING DATA............................................................................................. 27
5.4.
WITHDRAWALS, DROPOUTS, LOSS TO FOLLOW-UP.................................................... 27
5.5.
VISIT WINDOWS ....................................................................................................................... 28
6.
STATISTICAL METHODS .............................................................................................. 31
6.1.
SAMPLE SIZE JUSTIFICATION.............................................................................................. 31
6.2.
GENERAL STATISTICAL METHODS .................................................................................... 31


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 5 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
6.2.1.
GENERAL METHODS.................................................................................................... 31
6.2.2.
DEFINITION OF BASELINE............................................................................................ 32
6.2.3.
ADJUSTMENTS FOR COVARIATES ............................................................................... 32
6.2.4.
MULTIPLE COMPARISONS/MULTIPLICITY................................................................... 32
6.2.5.
SUBGROUPS................................................................................................................ 32
6.2.6.
MISSING, UNUSED, AND SPURIOUS DATA.................................................................. 32
6.3.
STUDY POPULATION .............................................................................................................. 38
6.3.1.
SUBJECT DISPOSITION................................................................................................. 38
6.3.2.
DEMOGRAPHIC AND BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS..................................................... 39
6.3.3.
DEMOGRAPHICS ......................................................................................................... 39
6.3.4.
BASELINE DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS......................................................................... 39
6.3.5.
MEDICAL HISTORY....................................................................................................... 40
6.3.6.
ENDOMETRIOSIS HISTORY .......................................................................................... 40
6.3.7.
PRIOR MEDICATION.................................................................................................... 41
6.3.8.
EXPOSURE AND COMPLIANCE .................................................................................... 41
6.4.
EFFICACY EVALUATION ........................................................................................................ 42
6.4.1.
MEANINGFUL CHANGE THRESHOLD ESTIMATION ..................................................... 42
6.4.2.
PRIMARY EFFICACY ANALYSIS..................................................................................... 42
6.4.3.
SECONDARY/OTHER/EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS .......................................................... 44
6.5.
PHARMACOKINETIC EVALUATIONS................................................................................... 60
6.6.
SAFETY EVALUATIONS.......................................................................................................... 60
6.6.1.
ADVERSE EVENTS........................................................................................................ 61
6.6.2.
BONE MINERAL DENSITY (BMD) BY DXA..................................................................... 64
6.6.3.
LABORATORY DATA..................................................................................................... 65
6.6.4.
VITAL SIGNS AND PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS.............................................................. 68
6.6.5.
ELECTROCARDIOGRAM............................................................................................... 68
6.6.6.
CONCOMITANT MEDICATIONS................................................................................... 69
6.6.7.
TRANSVAGINAL ULTRASOUND (TVUS)........................................................................ 69
6.6.8.
OTHER EXAMINATIONS............................................................................................... 69
6.7.
UNBLINDING OF SUBJECTS ................................................................................................. 73


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 6 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
6.8.
EXPLORATORY ANALYSES .................................................................................................. 73
7.
CHANGES TO PLANNED ANALYSES ......................................................................... 75
8.
REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 78
9.
APPENDICES.................................................................................................................. 79
9.1.
APPENDIX A: ANALGESIC CHANGE DURING TREATMENT PERIOD ......................... 79
9.2.
APPENDIX B: EHP-30 SCORING........................................................................................... 81
9.3.
APPENDIX C: HRPQ SCORING............................................................................................. 82
9.4.
APPENDIX D: EQ-5D TTO SCORING ................................................................................... 85
9.5.
APPENDIX E: MAPPING RULES FOR EDIARY DATA....................................................... 87
9.6.
APPENDIX F: SCHEDULE OF ASSESSMENTS ................................................................. 94


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 7 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
LIST OF IN-TEXT TABLES
Table                                                                          
               Page
Table 1 Theoretical Visit Dates in Extension Treatment Period................................................29
Table 2 Theoretical Visit Dates in Extension Follow-up Period ................................................30
Table 3 List of ATC codes for analgesics and opioids..............................................................48
Table 4 Morphine Milligram Equivalents for Narcotic Analgesics .............................................51
Table 5 Mapping Rules for 
 Device ............................................................................87
Table 6 Mapping Rules for Signant Health Device...................................................................91
Table 7 Schedule of Assessments 
Extension Treatment Period...........................................94
Table 8 Schedule of study assessments - Extension Follow-up Period....................................97


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 8 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
ABBREVIATIONS
Abbreviation
Definition
ABT
Add-back therapy
AE
Adverse events
ALP
Alkaline Phosphatase
ALT
Alanine Aminotransferase
AST
Aspartate Aminotransferase
ATC
Anatomic Therapeutic class
AUC
Area under the concentration versus time curve
AUC0-24
Area under the concentration versus time curve from time 0 to the end 
of the dosing interval 24 hours later, calculated using linear trapezoid 
rule
BMD
Bone Mineral Density
BMI
Body Mass Index
CDF
Cumulative Distribution Function
CI
Confidence Interval
ClinRO
Clinician Reported Outcome
CM
Concomitant Medication
CSR
Clinical study report
C-SSRS
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale
CV
Coefficient of Variation
DXA
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
DYS
Dysmenorrhea
E2
Estradiol
EAP
Endometriosis Associated Pain
ECG
Electrocardiogram
eCRF
Electronic Case Report Form
EHP-30
30-Item Endometriosis Health Profile
ePRO
Electronic Patient Reported Outcome
EQ-5D-5L
EuroQOL 5-Dimension 5-Level
FU
Follow-up
GCP
Good Clinical Practice


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 9 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
Abbreviation
Definition
GGT
Gamma Glutamyl Transferase
Gnrh
Gonadotropin releasing hormone
HDL
High-density lipoprotein
HRPQ
Health Related Productivity Questionnaire
HRUQ
HealthCare Resource Utilization Questionnaire
ICH
International Conference on Harmonisation
IDMC
Independent Data Monitoring Committee
IMP
Investigational Medicinal Product
INR
International Normalized Ratio
IRB
Investigational Review Board
ITT
Intent-to-treat
IWRS
Interactive Web Response System
LDL
Low density lipoprotein
LH
Luteinizing hormone
LOQ
Limit of Quantification
MedDRA
Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities
MME
Morphine Milligram Equivalent
mmHg
Millimeters of mercury
mPGIS
Monthly Patient Global Impression of Severity
Ms
Millisecond
NETA
Norethisterone acetate
NMPP
Non-Menstrual Pelvic Pain
NRS
Numeric Rating Scale
NSAIDS
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
OR
Odds-ratio
P4
Progesterone
PD
Pharmacodynamic
PGIS
Patient Global Impression of Severity
PGIC
Patient Global Impression of Change
PK
Pharmacokinetic
PP
Per Protocol Set
PPGIC
Post-treatment Global Impression of Change
PPV
Pelvic Pain Verbal Rating Scale
PROMIS
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 10 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
Abbreviation
Definition
PSIQ
Physician Surgery Intention Question
QOL
Quality of Life
Qt
Qt interval
Qtc
Corrected Qt interval
Qtcf
Corrected Qt interval Fridericia
REB
Research Ethics Board
ROC
Receiver operating characteristic
SAP
Statistical analysis plan
SHBG
Sex hormone-binding globulin
SOC
System Organ Class
SSIQ
Subject Surgery Intention Question
TBL
Total Bilirubin
TVUS 
TransVaginal UltraSound
ULN
Upper Limit of Normal
VRS
Verbal Rating Scale


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 11 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
1.
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES OF ANALYSIS
1.1.
Introduction
This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
Subjects who had completed the 6-month Treatment Period in 18-OBE2109-003 - Edelweiss 3 
study (herein referred to as main study) were invited to enter the present extension study. 
Month 6 visit of the main study was a decision point for Subjects to either end treatment and 
enter a post-treatment follow up (part of the main study), or to opt for a 6-month treatment 
extension.
The purpose of this SAP is to describe the statistical analyses for the Edelweiss 3 Extension 
Treatment and Extension Follow-up Periods.
1.2.
Objectives 
The primary objective of this extension study was to assess the maintenance of efficacy of 
linzagolix administered orally once daily for up to an additional 6 months (for up to 12 months of 
treatment in total) in women who had already completed 6 months of linzagolix treatment at a 
dose of 75 mg alone or of 200 mg in combination with add-back therapy (estradiol (E2) 1 mg / 
norethisterone acetate (NETA) 0.5 mg) in the management of moderate to severe 
endometriosis-associated pain (EAP) in women with surgically confirmed endometriosis. The 
two co-primary efficacy endpoints were clinically meaningful reduction over the last 28 days of 
randomized treatment up to the Month 12 visit, along with a stable or decreased use of 
analgesics for EAP, for 1) dysmenorrhea (DYS) and for 2) non menstrual pelvic pain (NMPP).
Secondary objectives included evaluation of efficacy over the last 28 days of randomized 
treatment up to the Month 12 visit based on the following parameters: evaluation of pain 
associated with sexual intercourse (dyspareunia) and defecation (dyschezia), difficulty of doing 
daily activities, analgesic use, assessment of subject perception of severity, change in uterine 
bleeding, Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaires, pharmacoeconomic burden of endometriosis by 
assessing changes in patient productivity, assessment of endometriosis-related number of non-
study health visits, number of days in hospital and type of medical procedures performed 
during the Treatment Period.
Safety and tolerability objectives included assessment of bone mineral density (BMD), 
endometrial health, cardiac safety including QT interval prolongation, standard laboratory 
safety parameters, gynecological assessments and adverse event (AE) frequency including 
specific hypoestrogenic AEs.
Exploratory objectives included assessment of bone turnover markers and collection of 
pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) related data of linzagolix for a separate 
modelling exercise.


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 12 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
Populations for analysis, data handling rules, statistical methods, and formats for data 
presentation are provided.  The statistical analyses and summary tabulations described in this 
SAP will provide the basis for the results sections of the clinical study report (CSR) for this trial.
This SAP will also outline any differences in the currently planned analytical objectives relative 
to those planned in the study protocol.


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 13 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
2.
STUDY DESIGN 
2.1.
Introduction
This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Subjects who completed the 6-month 
Treatment Period in the main study (18-OBE2109-003 - Edelweiss 3) were invited to enter the 
present extension study. Month 6 visit of the main study was a decision point for Subjects to 
either end treatment and enter a post-treatment follow up (part of the main study), or to opt for 
a 6-month treatment extension. 
The extension study started at the Month 6 visit of the main study. Subjects were required to 
sign a specific informed consent form (ICF) for this extension study. Only subjects who 
completed the full 6-month Treatment Period in the main study and met the inclusion criteria 
were eligible for entry in the extension study.
All subjects received once daily linzagolix 75 mg alone (with ABT placebo) or 200 mg 
combined with ABT for 6 months. Subjects who received placebo during the main study were 
randomized to either linzagolix 75 mg alone (with ABT placebo) or linzagolix 200 mg with ABT. 
Subjects who received active treatment during the main study continued with the same 
treatment. 
Linzagolix/placebo tablets were provided in monthly treatment kits, packaged, labelled and 
administered in the same manner to protect the blinded nature of the trial. 
ABT/placebo treatments were supplied as 3-monthly kits, packaged, labelled and administered 
in the same manner to protect the blinded nature of the trial.
After end of treatment in the extension study (6-month Treatment Period: from Month 6 to 
Month 12), subjects entered a post-treatment Follow-Up Period of 6 months with no 
investigational medicinal product (IMP). 
The total duration of the present extension study was to be 12 months.
A schematic of the study design is shown in Figure 1.


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 14 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
Figure 1: Study design
The schedule of assessments is in Appendix 9.6, further details available in the study protocol.
2.2.
Sample Size and Power
With 150 subjects per each of the three treatment groups in the main study (450 subjects in 
total), the power was greater than 95% to reject the null hypothesis for both co-primary 
endpoints and 85% to reject all the null hypothesis for the ranked secondary endpoints. All 
subjects who had completed the full 6-month Treatment Period in the main study and who met 
the inclusion criteria were to be offered to enter the extension study. It was estimated that up to 
288 subjects would enter the extension study, assuming that 80% of the patients randomized in 
the main study would complete the study (namely 360 subjects) and that up to 80 % thereof 
would enter the extension study.
2.3.
Randomization Methodology
Subjects who previously received placebo were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either linzagolix 75 
mg alone (with ABT placebo) or linzagolix 200 mg with ABT), as per the main study 
randomization schedule. 


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 15 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
Subjects who received active treatment continued with the same treatment (linzagolix 75 mg 
alone or linzagolix 200 mg with ABT). 
In order to maintain the blind, the sites were not required to perform any randomization 
activities. The kits were automatically allocated to the corresponding patients in the IWRS upon 
confirmation of their eligibility.
2.4.
Stopping Rules 
Subjects were informed that they had the right to withdraw from the study at any time, without 
prejudice to their medical care, and that they were not obliged to state the reason(s). Any 
withdrawal must be fully documented in the eCRF exit form. 
The Investigator may have withdrawn a subject at any time if this was considered to be in the 
In addition, the sponsor could make a decision to temporarily or permanently discontinue the 
was to be ended prematurely without asking for her consent. 
In addition, an Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) regularly reviewed safety data 
and made recommendations concerning the continuation, modification or termination of the 
study.
Withdrawal during Treatment Period: 
Subjects discontinuing participation in the study during the Treatment Period were to undergo 
the procedures required at Month 12, except the DXA in case of discontinuation before Month 9 
visit. These subjects would enter the 6-month Follow-Up Period and would continue daily 
eDiary recording for 6 months and up to Month 6 ExFU visit in order to continue to collect 
efficacy and safety data. 
PK sampling is not required if the subject had no IMP administration the day prior to the 
withdrawal visit. 
Withdrawal during Follow-Up Period: 
Subjects discontinuing participation in the study during the Follow-Up Period were to undergo 
the procedures required at Month 6 ExFU visit, which included completion of all ClinRO and 
ePRO questionnaires, except the DXA in case of discontinuation before Month 3 ExFU visit.
Discontinuation criteria 
During the course of the study, the subject may have been discontinued for the following reasons:
During the course of the study, the subject may have been discontinued for the following reasons:
-  Adverse Event
-
- Protocol Violation


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 16 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
- Lost to Follow-up
- Pregnancy
- Other
Details are provided in the Protocol.
Discontinuation Rules during the Treatment Period: 
Endometrial biopsies: in case of an endometrial biopsy diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia of 
any type or worse, the subject was to discontinue study treatment (and was not eligible to enter 
the extension study) and was to be advised to undergo gynecological evaluation and treatment.
Serum calcium: Subjects with a serum calcium level on treatment above 2.9 mmol/L was to 
have calcium supplements interrupted. If serum calcium level on treatment was above 3.1 
mmol/L, calcium supplements and study treatment were to be interrupted.  A repeat test of this 
parameter within 2 weeks under fasting conditions was to be performed. If the results of the 
repeat remained above 2.9 mmol/L, study treatment was to be discontinued and the subject was 
to be advised to consult an endocrinologist for further evaluation.
BMD loss: subjects who experienced more than 8% BMD loss or a Z-
-2.5 at any site 
(femoral neck, hip or spine) were to be discontinued from study treatment and were to enter the 
follow-up period (they were not eligible to enter the extension study).
Liver function tests: following the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance on drug-induced 
liver injury, subjects who had an elevation of hepatic enzymes were to be withdrawn immediately 
from treatment if:
ALT or AST >8xULN 
ALT or AST >5xULN for more than 2 weeks 
ALT or AST >3xULN and (TBL >2xULN or INR >1.5) 
ALT or AST >3xULN with the appearance of fatigue, nausea, vomiting, right upper 
quadrant pain or tenderness, fever, rash, and/or eosinophilia (>5%) 
Withdrawn subjects were to be followed up until hepatic parameters returned to normal.
ECG : subjects with a QTcF > 500 ms or increase > 60 ms from the highest value prior to first 
dose were to be withdrawn from study treatment and followed up until return to QTcF < 480 ms 
or if not reached after 3 months of treatment cessation- be referred to a cardiologist. They were 
to enter the 6-month Follow-Up Period and undergo follow-up ECGs according to the schedule 
of events.


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 17 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
2.5.
Blinding
The study design was double-blind for the subject, the clinical site and the operational team. The 
Sponsor was planned to be unblinded to active treatment groups, following the analysis of Month 
6 visit data from the main study (18-OBE2109-003 - Edelweiss 3 study), but was to be blinded to 
the treatment allocated to patients who had previously received placebo. 
A database lock was to be performed prior to unblinding of treatment.
2.6.
Interim Analyses
Not applicable.


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 18 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
3.
STUDY ENDPOINTS
3.1.
Efficacy Variables
Primary efficacy endpoints:
The two co-primary, composite, efficacy endpoints are clinically meaningful reduction from 
baseline to the last 28 days preceding the Month 12 visit (the 4-week period preceding Month 
12 visit), along with a stable or decreased use of analgesics for EAP, in the mean daily 
assessment of 1) DYS and of 2) NMPP, both measured on a Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) using 
an electronic diary (eDiary). 
Secondary efficacy endpoints:
Change from baseline to Month 12 in DYS (VRS)
Change from baseline to Month 12 in NMPP (VRS)
Change from baseline to Month 12 in dyschezia (Numeric Rating Scale - NRS)
Change from baseline to Month 12 in overall pelvic pain (NRS)
Change from baseline to Month 12 in the interference of pain with the ability to perform 
daily activities, measured using the pain dimension of the Endometriosis Health Profile-
30 (EHP-30)
Change from baseline to Month 12 in dyspareunia (VRS)
No analgesics use for EAP during the preceding 4-week period at each scheduled 
assessment
No opiate use for EAP during the preceding 4-week period at each scheduled 
assessment
Responder rate at scheduled visit other than Month 12 visit, for DYS and NMPP (VRS)
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the mean pelvic pain scores 
for DYS, NMPP and overall pelvic pain, during the previous 4-week period assessed on 
the NRS and VRS
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days with 
moderate to severe pelvic pain during the previous 4-week period assessed on the VRS
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the mean worst pelvic pain 
score defined as the mean of the 5 highest daily pain scores reported during the 
previous 4-week period assessed on the NRS
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the mean of daily dyspareunia 
scores reported during the previous 4-week period on the dyspareunia VRS
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the mean of daily dyschezia 
scores reported during the previous 4-week period assessed on the dyschezia NRS


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 19 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in non-opioid, opioid and 
combined analgesic use for EAP during the previous 4-week period based on pill count 
in the eDiary
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in opioid analgesic use for EAP 
as reported in the eDiary during the previous 4-week period based on morphine 
milligram equivalent (MME)
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days of 
analgesic use (including any class) for EAP during the previous 4-week period as 
assessed in the eDiary
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days of opioid 
analgesic use for EAP during the previous 4-week period as assessed in the eDiary
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of pelvic pain-free 
days (assessed on the VRS) during the previous 4-week period
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in ability to perform daily 
activities during the previous 4-week period, as assessed in the eDiary (daily function 
NRS)
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days with no 
difficulty in doing daily activities due to EAP during the previous 4-week period as 
assessed in the eDiary (daily function NRS)
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days when 
dyspareunia was a problem during the previous 4-week period (including days when 
sexual intercourse was avoided because of anticipation of pain) as assessed on the 
dyspareunia VRS
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days when 
sexual intercourse was avoided because of anticipation of pain during the previous 4-
week period as assessed on the dyspareunia VRS
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days with 
uterine bleeding (including spotting) during the previous 4-week period measured by 
eDiary
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days when 
school or work was missed due to EAP in the previous 4-week period as reported in the 
eDiary
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days when the 
subject had to go to bed or lie down due to EAP in the previous 4-week period as 
reported in the eDiary
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the Pain, Control and 
powerlessness, Emotional well-being, Social support, Self-image dimensions and the 
Modular sexual relationship questionnaire of EHP-30 scores


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 20 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the Health-Related Productivity 
Questionnaire (HRPQ) scores
Number of non-study endometriosis related health visits, number of days in hospital and 
type of procedures performed based on Health Resource Utilization Questionnaire 
(HRUQ) at each scheduled assessment
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the Physician/Subject Surgery 
Intention Question (PSIQ/SSIQ)
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the PROMIS Fatigue 
Short 
Form 6a
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-
Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire
Response at each scheduled assessment according to Patient Global Impression of 
Change (PGIC) (and Post-treatment Patient Global Impression of Change, PPGIC)
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the monthly PGIS (mPGIS) 
score
3.2.
Pharmacokinetic Variables
PK blood samples will be collected from each subject at each study visit during the Treatment 
Period for determining linzagolix and KP017 plasma levels. 
At the visits where IMP intake is at site, i.e. at Months 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 visits, PK sampling 
will be performed before IMP intake. The approximate time of dose administration on the four 
previous days and time of PK sampling will be recorded in the eCRF. 
In case of early discontinuation visit, PK sampling is not required at the withdrawal visit if the 
subject had no IMP administration the day prior to the withdrawal visit. 
Pharmacokinetic analyses will be considered exploratory. Analyses are described in Section 
6.4.3.33.
3.3.
Safety Variables
Safety endpoints include: 
-
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in BMD measured by DXA of 
lumbar spine (L1-L4), femoral neck, and total hip
-
Incidence and severity of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs)
-
Incidence and severity of hypoestrogenic TEAEs (hot flush)


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 21 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
-
Time to the first post-treatment menses
-
Changes in clinical laboratory assessments (hematology, biochemistry, coagulation 
parameters, hormones, lipids and urinalysis) from baseline to each scheduled 
assessment
-
Any pathological changes from baseline in the endometrium as assessed by histology 
from endometrial biopsies
-
Changes from baseline to each scheduled assessment in any other safety parameter 
including weight, vital signs, ECG, gynecological assessments and endometrial thickness
Safety analyses are described in Section 6.6.
3.4.
Exploratory Variables
Exploratory endpoints include:
-
Change from baseline in bone turnover markers at each scheduled assessment
-
PK and PD of linzagolix
Exploratory analyses are detailed in Section 6.8 (and Section 6.4.3.33.for PK).


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 22 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
4.
ANALYSIS SETS
4.1.
Analysis Set Definitions
The following data sets will be used for the statistical analysis: 
1. Treatment Extension Analysis Set (TEAS): All subjects from the main study who entered 
the extension study and received at least one dose of study drug with the exception of subjects 
whose Month 6 assessments subsequently met any of the discontinuation criteria. These 
subjects will be withdrawn from study treatment and will enter the Follow-Up Period. Subjects 
will be analyzed according to randomized treatment. 
Discontinuation criteria at Month 6 are the following and will programmatically identified for the 
analyses sets derivations purpose, based on the Month 6 locked database from the main study, 
and applying Month 6 analysis visit windows from the main study SAP:
-
Endometrial Biopsy: in case of endometrial biopsy diagnosis being an endometrial 
hyperplasia of any type or worse (malignant endometrial neoplasm) at the Month 6 
assessment.
-
Serum calcium: Subjects who have a serum calcium level on treatment at the Month 6
assessment above 3.1 mmol/L study treatment are to be interrupted. A repeat test of 
this parameter within 2 weeks under fasting conditions is to be performed. If the results 
of the repeat remain above 2.9 mmol/L, study treatment should definitively be 
discontinued
-
BMD loss: subjects who experience more than 8% BMD loss or a Z-
-2.5 at any 
site (femoral neck, hip or spine) at the Month 6 assessment.
Per protocol, assessments with BMD loss >5% should be confirmed with a second 
scan. For 
used to check the discontinuation criteria. The repeated confirmatory scan will be used 
otherwise. Only confirmatory scans within the +/-28 days window of theoretical Month 6 
date will be included.
-
Liver function tests: subjects who have an elevation of hepatic enzymes at the Month 6 
assessment are to be withdrawn immediately from treatment if:
ALT or AST >8xULN
ALT or AST >5xULN for more than 2 weeks. Repeats assessments within 2 
weeks after the initial assessment will be checked for this criteria.
ALT or AST >3xULN and (TBL >2xULN or INR >1.5)
ALT or AST >3xULN with the appearance of fatigue, nausea, vomiting, right 
upper quadrant pain or tenderness, fever, rash, and/or eosinophilia (>5%)
-
ECG: subjects who have a QTcF > 500 ms at the Month 6 assessment or increase > 60 
ms from the highest value prior to the first dose in the main study


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 23 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
2. Per Protocol Extension Analysis Set (PP EAS): All subjects from Treatment Extension 
Analysis Set, excluding those identified as having major protocol deviations that could 
potentially affect the efficacy assessments up to Month 12. Subjects will be analyzed according 
to randomized treatment. 
3. Follow-up Extension Analysis Set (FU EAS): All subjects from the main study who entered  
the extension study and received at least one dose of study drug with the exception of subjects 
whose Month 6 assessment subsequently met any of the discontinuation criteria, and who 
entered the Post-Treatment Follow-Up Period. Subjects will be analyzed according to 
randomized treatment. 
4. Extension Safety Analysis Set (ESAF): All subjects randomized into the extension study 
who received at least one dose of study drug irrespective of the treatment received. Subjects 
will be analyzed according to treatment received. 
5. Follow Up Safety Analysis Set (FU SAF): All subjects randomized into the extension study 
who received at least one dose of study drug irrespective of the treatment received, and who 
entered the Post-Treatment Follow-Up Period. Subjects will be analyzed according to treatment 
received.
6. Extension Pharmacokinetic (PK) Set: all subjects who were randomized and received 
active study medication in the main study, had no major protocol deviations impacting PK 
throughout the main study or extension and with available PK data. Subjects will be analyzed 
according to treatment received.
7. Extension Pharmacodynamic (PD) Set: all subjects who were randomized and received 
active study medication in the main study, had no major protocol deviations impacting PD 
throughout the main study or extension and with available PD data. Subjects will be analyzed 
according to treatment received.
In general, analyses of efficacy will be conducted using the TEAS, PP EAS (when specified)
and FU EAS sets, analyses of safety will be conducted using the ESAF and FU SAF, and 
analyses of PK and PD will be conducted using the PK and PD Sets accordingly.
The actual treatment will be derived as follows, based on daily e-diary IMP intake data:
Treatment kits will be dispensed to the subjects as follows:
- on Month 6 and Month 9 visits, subject will receive two kits, one for linzagolix/placebo 
(monthly kit) and one for the ABT/ABT placebo (3-monthly kit).
- On Month 7, Month 8, Month 10 and Month 11 visits, subject will receive one kit only, for 
linzagolix/placebo. The number of days with one pink tablet, one grey tablet and one red 
capsule taken based on e-diary IMP intake data for each treatment will be computed. Data from 


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 24 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
following day will be considered. If the e-
d that no intake of drug was taken on that day.
Further rules are as follows:
-
Treatment administration errors:
If a subject received placebo with placebo ABT on more than 50% of days (even 
if it is not planned), then the actual treatment group will be placebo with placebo 
ABT for the extension period.
Otherwise, the active treatment (combined with add-back or placebo add-back) 
with the most days taken will be assigned for the extension period.
If the number of days is equal for two treatments groups containing active 
treatment, then LGX 200 mg with ABT will be assigned for the extension period. 
-
If a subject discontinued, only data received up to discontinuation will be used.
All analyses for the extension study will be described according to the combined treatment 
group based on the treatment on the main study and the extension study.
For the combined actual treatment groups, the actual treatment during the main study and the 
actual treatment during the extension study comprise the following four combined actual 
treatment groups. It is possible that the derived actual treatment group will not correspond to 
any of the combined planned treatment groups; thus the combined actual treatment group will 
be derived as follows:
Actual treatment 
Main study
Actual treatment
Extension study
Combined actual treatment 
group
Combination planned in the protocol
Placebo  
LGX 75 mg 
Placebo / LGX 75 mg 
Placebo  
LGX 200 mg + ABT
Placebo / LGX 200 mg + ABT
LGX 75 mg 
LGX 75 mg 
LGX 75 mg 
LGX 200 mg + ABT
LGX 200 mg + ABT
LGX 200 mg + ABT
Combination not planned in the protocol (but possible with treatment administration errors)
Placebo
Placebo
Placebo / LGX 75 mg 
LGX 75 mg 
Placebo
LGX 75 mg 


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 25 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
LGX 200 mg + ABT
Placebo
LGX 200 mg + ABT
LGX 75 mg 
LGX 200 mg + ABT
LGX 75 mg 
LGX 200 mg + ABT
LGX 75 mg 
LGX 200 mg + ABT
4.2.
Protocol Deviations
A protocol deviation is any noncompliance with the clinical trial protocol or International 
Conference on Harmonization Good Clinical Practice (ICH GCP) requirements. It was the 
responsibility of the site investigator to use continuous vigilance to identify and report deviations. 
All deviations were to be addressed in study source documents and reported to the reviewing 
IRB/IEC per their policies. The site investigator was responsible for knowing and adhering to the 
reviewing IRB/IEC requirements. 
All Protocol Deviations were to be reported to the Sponsor and documented in the monitoring 
report. These will be classified as minor or major based on their effect on the right, safety or well-
being of the subjects and/or the quality and integrity of the data. Major deviations that could 
potentially affect the efficacy assessments up to Month 12 and thus may exclude subjects from 
the PP Extension Analysis Set may include:
Non-compliance with inclusion criteria 2
Non-compliance with exclusion criteria 2; 3; 4;  6
IP Dispensing error;
Randomisation code broken
Subjects with a gap of at least 28 days between end of treatment in main study and 
treatment start in Extension
Non-compliance with study treatment: threshold to be defined during blinded data 
review meeting (e.g. IMP compliance in tablets <60% for Month 6-Month 12)
Unauthorised prior or concomitant therapy;
M12 Visit performed outside the +/-14 days of the theoretical visit date;
The final rating of all deviations will be confirmed prior database lock. The final protocol deviation 
file (formatted as a Microsoft Excel file) will be provided to Cytel.
Major protocol deviations will be summarized by category and by treatment group on the 
Treatment Extension Analysis Set.
All protocol deviations will be presented in the data listing. Protocol deviation records with missing 
subject ID and thus not related to any particular subject will be excluded in the listings.


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 26 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
5.
DATA HANDLING
5.1.
Computing Environment
All descriptive statistical analyses will be performed using SAS statistical software (Version 9.4 
OR HIGHER), unless otherwise noted.  Medical History and adverse events will be coded using 
MedDRA available version.  Concomitant medications will be coded using World Health 
Organization (WHO) Drug Dictionary available version.
5.2.
Data Conventions
5.2.1.
Last extension treatment administration date, End of extension Study date and 
Period definitions
The last extension treatment administration date will be defined as the date from the treatment 
termination reported in the extension period eCRF page. If this date is missing, the last date 
with a drug intake in the eDiary that is inferior or equal to Month 12 visit or the last available 
date with a drug intake in the eDiary if the subject discontinued the extension treatment will be 
used.
For subjects who entered the extension, the end of the extension study date will be the last 
assessment date in the extension study defined as last assessment recorded in the eCRF 
(excluding end date of adverse events and concomitant medications) or ediary date (excluding 
drug intakes recorded after last extension treatment administration date). This will not 
necessarily be the same date as last assessment date as recorded in the eCRF.
For each 28-day period prior to Month X (except Month 12), the end of the period will be defined 
as the Month X visit date. If subject discontinued prior to Month X, the end of the period will be 
the date from the treatment termination of extension period eCRF page or the last date with a 
drug intake in the eDiary if missing. If the subject missed the Month X visit (but did not 
discontinue), the subject might still have filled the diary during that time: the theoretical Month X 
date will be used to define the end of the 28-day period. The theoretical Month X is defined with 
respect to Day 1 as Month X= Day 1+ 28*X. 
For the 28-day period prior to Month 12, the end of the period will be defined as the last extension 
treatment administration date.
Note: 
For Adverse Events, Concomitant Medications and Daily diaries data collected on the Month 6 
date will be part of the extension for subjects entering the extension study.


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 27 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
For Adverse Events, Concomitant Medications and Daily diaries, data collected on the Month 
12 date will be part of the Extension Follow-up period for subjects entering the Extension 
follow-up period.
The extension treatment period will be defined as Month 6 up to (Month 12 date -1) or 
treatment discontinuation date.
The extension follow-up period will be defined as the Month 12 date or (treatment 
discontinuation date+1) up to the extension follow-up end date (for subjects who entered the 
extension follow-up).
5.3.
Methods of Pooling Data
Not Applicable
5.4.
Withdrawals, Dropouts, Loss to Follow-up
In general, there will be no substitutions made to accommodate missing data points due to 
withdrawals, dropouts and loss to follow-up.  All data recorded in the CRF will be included in data 
listings that will accompany the clinical study report.  
In case of early discontinuation, the subject was to be instructed to complete the relevant eDiary 
questionnaires as soon as possible upon treatment discontinuation. 
Withdrawal during treatment period: 
Subjects discontinuing participation in the study during the Extension Treatment Period were to 
undergo the procedures required at Month 12, except the DXA in case of discontinuation before 
Month 9 visit. These subjects were to enter the 6-month Extension Follow-Up Period and were 
to continue daily eDiary recording for 6 months and up to the Month 6 ExFU visit in order to 
continue to collect efficacy and safety data. 
PK sampling was not required if the subject had no IMP administration the day prior to the
withdrawal visit. 
Withdrawal during follow-up period:
Subjects discontinuing participation in the study during the Extension Follow-Up Period were to 
undergo the procedures required at the Month 6 ExFU visit, which included completion of all 
ClinRO and ePRO questionnaires, except for DXA scans in subjects who discontinued before 
the Month 3 ExFU visit. 


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 28 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
5.5.
Visit Windows
For all analyses except for the DXA assessments and the diary questionnaires, the visits as 
collected in the eCRF will be used. 
The rules for visit day calculations are listed in Table 1 below.
E-diary questionnaires:
For diary questionnaires (EHP-30, EQ-5D-5L, HRPQ, HRUQ, PGIC, PPGIC, PGIS, PROMIS, 
SSIQ) except for the PSIQ, the e-diary dates of assessment of each visit will be checked 
versus the dates of same visit in eCRF to handle for e-diary visit errors. Only assessments 
within the window of the date of eCRF+/-14 days will be used in analyses. In case of multiple 
assessments falling within the same window of an eCRF date, the non-empty record with 
completion date closest to the eCRF date will be used. 
Due to the war situation in Ukraine, some subjects from Ukraine sites may have completed 
visits and e-diary questionnaires but not collected the data in the eCRF. For all ediary 
questionnaires data of subjects from Ukraine sites with a later questionnaire date of 
24FEB2022, the e-diary dates will be compared to theoretical visits dates instead of eCRF 
visits dates if eCRF dates are missing.
For data from discontinued visits, the discontinuation visit date should be compared to 
theoretical visit dates. Only assessments within the window of theoretical date +/-14 days will 
be used for analyses, if it is planned to have a such assessment at this visit and no other 
assessment is in the window. If a subject discontinued in the extension treatment period, date 
will be compared to the theoretical visit dates in the extension treatment period as described in 
Table 1. If a subject discontinued in the extension follow-up period, date will be compared to 
the theoretical visit dates in extension Follow-up period from Table 2.
Note that assessments from discontinued visits in 
 eDiary device are entered under 
Month 12 (Month 6 Extension FU in follow-up). They will be recoded as discontinued visits before 
applying the windowing rules.
Pharmacokinetics data
Visit windows rules for PK data will be the following:
-
PK assessments will be included in analysis if: 
Assessment is Pre-dose (or PK time = dose time), or IMP intake is not done on 
the day of PK sampling (i.e. considered as pre-dose), and,
PK assessment date is within +/-10 days of the theoretical visit and up to 2 days 
after last IMP intake for Month 12 visit.
If the PK sampling time is missing, or the IMP intake on the same day is done and the IMP 
intake time is missing then assessments will not be included.
IMP intake status (done/not done) and IMP intake time from the Pharmacokinetics eCRF page 
will be used.


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 29 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
PK samples analysed after the period of long term stability will be excluded.
DXA data
Visit windows rules for DXA assessments will be the following:
-
The DXA assessment at Month 9 will be derived as the first non-missing DXA assessment 
9 theoretical date 
(=Day 253) -28 days and Month 9 theoretical date + 28 days.
-
The DXA assessment at Month 12 will be derived as the first non-missing DXA 
12 
theoretical date (=Day 337 in the main study) -28 days and Month 12 theoretical date + 
28 days.
-
The DXA assessment at Month 6 Extension Follow-Up will be derived in the same way 
as the DXA assessment at Month 12. Theoretical date of Month 6 Extension Follow-up is 
168 days after Month 12 theoretical date or after treatment discontinuation.
Other safety data:
For other safety data, data from early discontinuation should be compared to theoretical visits 
dates. Only assessments within the window of theoretical date +/-14 days will be used for 
analyses, if it is planned to have a such assessment at this visit and no other assessment is in 
the window. If a subject discontinued in the extension treatment period, date will be compared to 
the theoretical visit dates in extension treatment period as described in Table 1. If a subject 
discontinued in the extension follow-up period, date will be compared to the theoretical visit dates 
in extension Follow-up period from Table 2. 
For unscheduled safety assessments, if the assessment occurs within a window of theoretical 
date +/- 14 days for a planned eCRF visit for which it was planned per protocol to have such 
assessment, and no assessment was done for that visit, the assessment will be assigned to that 
visit. If the assessment is equally distant from two eCRF visits with no corresponding safety 
assessment, the assessment will be assigned to the next visit.
For biopsy, DXA assessment or laboratory assessment, if an assessment has been assigned in 
external data to a follow-up visit of the main study for subjects who entered in the extension 
study, the visit of assessment should be reassigned with the same rules described above for 
unscheduled safety assessment.
Table 1 Theoretical Visit Dates in Extension Treatment Period
Visit
Theoretical Date
Month 6
Day 169
Month 7
Day 197


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 30 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
Month 8
Day 225
Month 9
Day 253
Month 10
Day 281
Month 11
Day 309
Month 12
Day 337
Table 2 Theoretical Visit Dates in Extension Follow-up Period
Visit
Theoretical Date
Month 1 ExFU
Month 12 or treatment discontinuation date + 
28
Month 3 ExFU
Month 12 date or treatment discontinuation 
date + 84
Month 6 ExFU
Month 12 date or treatment discontinuation 
date + 168


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 31 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
6.
STATISTICAL METHODS
6.1.
Sample Size Justification
With a planned sample size of 150 subjects per each of the three treatment groups in the main 
study (450 subjects in total), the power was to be greater than 95% to reject the null hypothesis 
for both co-primary endpoints and 85% to reject all the null hypothesis for the ranked 
secondary endpoints. All subjects who completed the full 6-month Treatment Period in the main 
study and who met the inclusion criteria were to be offered to enter the extension study. It was 
estimated that up to 288 subjects would enter the extension study, assuming that 80% of the 
patients randomized in the main study would complete the study (namely 360 subjects) and 
that up to 80 % thereof would enter the extension study.
6.2.
General Statistical Methods 
6.2.1.
General Methods
All output will be incorporated into Microsoft Excel or Word files, sorted and labeled according to 
the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) recommendations, and formatted to the 
appropriate page size(s).
Tabulations will be produced for appropriate demographic, baseline, efficacy, pharmacokinetic 
and safety parameters.  
The analyses will be performed on 4 treatment groups (taking into account the treatment taken 
in the main study):
linzagolix 75 mg / linzagolix 75 mg
linzagolix 200 mg with ABT / linzagolix 200 mg with ABT
Placebo / linzagolix 75 mg (subject receiving placebo in main study and treated with 
linzagolix 75 mg in extension study)
Placebo / linzagolix 200 mg with ABT (subject receiving placebo in main study and treated 
with linzagolix 200 mg with ABT in extension study)
For continuous data and for ordered categorical data, if appropriate, the number of non-missing 
observations, mean, standard deviation, median, first and third quartiles, minimum and maximum 
will be calculated, including for change from baseline when applicable. 
The baseline mean will be calculated for all subjects based on the Extension Safety Analysis Set
For efficacy endpoints and BMD, a baseline mean will also be calculated for each visit using the 
baseline data for the subset of subjects who attended that visit, such that the same subjects 
contribute to the mean for the visit and the mean for the corresponding baseline values. Summary 


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 32 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
statistics will be based primarily on non-missing values. For ordered categorical data and nominal 
data, absolute counts and relative frequencies (in %) will be calculated.
Raw and derived data will be listed.
6.2.2.
Definition of Baseline
The baseline will be described in two ways:
Main Baseline (named Baseline), defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan of the main study 
and calculated according to first dose of IMP taken during the main Study.
Second Baseline (named Baseline 2), defined as the last assessment before the first 
active dose of IMP during the extension study. For efficacy endpoints based on daily diary 
data, the Baseline 2 will be based on the last 28 days prior to and including last treatment 
administration in main study.
The baseline 2 will be calculated only for the subjects who are in the placebo arm (actual 
arm) in the main study.
6.2.3.
Adjustments for Covariates
Not Applicable
6.2.4.
Multiple Comparisons/Multiplicity
No formal hypothesis tests are planned for this extension study. Data will be summarized by 
timepoint for each treatment group.
6.2.5.
Subgroups
Not Applicable
6.2.6.
Missing, Unused, and Spurious Data
6.2.6.1.
Efficacy Endpoints Missing Data
Summary statistics will be based primarily on non-missing values. The planned statistical 
analyses aim to estimate the efficacy of linzagolix versus placebo while under randomized 
treatment and therefore lack of data after treatment discontinuation will not be considered as 
missing for these analyses. 
There may be missing data during the screening period (from the main study) and whilst under 
treatment, for example, missed days of completing the eDiary. The primary analyses will use 
observed data only in such cases provided that a minimum number of completed daily eDiary 


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 33 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
entries are available. This effectively assumes that the individual values such as daily eDiary 
assessments (observed or not) are independent of being missing.
6.2.6.2.
Adverse events and Concomitant Medication Missing Dates
Imputation of missing/partial AE and CM dates will be done only to identify treatment-emergent 
AEs.
AE onset dates:
-
Partially missing AE onset dates will be imputed as follows:
When only Day is missing: 
If Month & Year of the onset date are the same as Month & Year of the 
first administration date, the imputed onset date will be imputed as the 
minimum of the first administration date and the AE resolution date 
(imputed if needed).
Else if the subject entered the Extension Study and Month & Year is the 
same as Month & Year of the first administration date in Extension, the 
imputed onset date will be imputed as the minimum of the first 
administration date in Extension and the AE resolution date (imputed if 
needed).
When Day & Month are missing: 
If the subject entered the Extension Study and if Year of the onset date is 
the same as Year of the first administration date in Extension, the imputed 
onset date will be imputed as the minimum of the first administration date 
in Extension and the AE end date (imputed if needed).
Else if Year of the onset date is the same as Year of the first administration 
date, the imputed onset date will be imputed as the minimum of the first 
administration date and the AE end date (imputed if needed).
, unless 
other information provides evidence that the event should not be defined
as treatment-emergent AE.  
-
Completely missing AE onset dates will be imputed as follows:
If the subject entered the Extension, the AE onset date will be imputed by the first 
administration date in Extension and the AE will be considered as treatment-
emergent, unless the end date of the AE (imputed if needed) or the end year of 
the AE (if day and month are missing) is entered and is before the first 
administration date in Extension. 


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 34 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
If the subject did not enter the Extension, or if the end of the AE is before the first 
administration date in Extension, the AE onset date will be imputed by the first 
administration date and the AE will be considered as treatment-emergent, unless 
the end date of the AE (imputed if needed) or the end year of the AE (if day and 
month are missing) is entered and is before the first administration date. If the end 
date is before the first administration date, the AE will not be considered as 
treatment-emergent.
AE end dates
-
If Day only is missing, incomplete end dates will be replaced by the last day of the month, 
if not resulting in a date later than the date of the subject's death or date of study 
discontinuation. In the latter case, the date of death/date of study discontinuation will be 
used to impute the incomplete end date.
-
If Day & Month are missing, Day & Month will be replaced by 31DEC, if not resulting in a 
date later than the date of the subject's death or date of study discontinuation. In the latter 
case, the date of death/ date of study discontinuation will be used to impute the 
incomplete end date.
-
In all other cases the incomplete end date will not be imputed.
Concomitant Medications dates
Partially missing dates for prior and concomitant medications and procedures will be imputed. Of 
note, imputation of missing/partial dates will be done only to identify the treatment period 
assignment.
-
End date: Missing day will be imputed as the last day of the month, and missing month 
will be imputed by December, if not resulting in a date later than the date of the subject's 
death or date of study discontinuation. In the latter case, the date of death/date of study 
discontinuation will be used to impute the incomplete end date.
-
Start date: Missing day will be imputed as the first day of the month, and missing month 
will be imputed by January. 
-
If the start date is completely missing, then:
If the end date is prior to the date of first administration of the study drug, then the 
medication is considered as prior
If the end date is prior to the date of last administration of the study drug, then the 
medication is considered as prior and concomitant
If the end date is completely missing or after the date of last administration of the 
study drug, then the medication is considered as prior, concomitant and post.


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 35 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
Following imputation of the dates, the concomitant medications will be assigned to the main study 
and/or the extension study according to imputed start and end dates. Note that a concomitant 
medication starts before the first IMP administration in the main study and stops during the 
extension study will be assigned to both studies.
6.2.6.3.
eDiary Devices Data Cleaning
To handle eDiary system issues, mapping rules are defined for data analysis, as described in 
Appendix E in Section 9.1
In addition, the following rules are defined.
Diary completed in English language for Subjects from non-US sites
Due to a system error in Signant Health device, some subjects from non-US sites wrongly 
completed diaries in the Extension study in English language instead of a specific language. Data 
with English language (when evaluation is done by subject, i.e. QSEVAL=SUBJECT) for such 
subjects should not be considered in analysis.
Handling of duplicate records
-
A change of eDiary device vendor (
 vendor to Signant Health vendor) occurred 
during the study. 
-
Some subjects may have entered data in the two different devices during the transition 
period. In case of duplicates results on the same day for daily diaries or on the same visit 
for monthly questionnaires, data from the new vendor (Signant Health) will be used for 
analysis. 
-
In case of duplicates within the same device (same date, same name), the first non-empty 
record (with earliest date/time) should be used for analysis.
Daily Records entered after 00:00
For daily diaries, records entered with a time between 00:00 (midnight) and 02:00 AM should be 
considered for the previous day. 
Additional rules to specific eDiary domains:
Analgesic use data:
-
IMP Intake Data:
-
 device specific rules
NOTE: by design, when a subject is completing a questionnaire (daily or monthly) on a 
 device, the device automatically saves all answers provided by the subject as soon as 


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 36 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
swered 
question(s) within the questionnaire and changes her answer(s) prior to finishing the 
questionnaire. 
There are several triggering questions in the study questionnaires: the next question(s) 
presented to the subject will depend on the answer chosen by the subject to the current 
question.
Due to device design issue, when an answer to a triggering question has been changed by the 
subject (using previous button), the device keeps subsequent answer(s) to the previously 
triggered question(s), even if this/these question(s) is/are no longer relevant considering the new 
answer to the triggering question.
The agreed rules consider the last entry made by the subject i.e. the entry that would have not 
allowed her to provide additional data if it had been her initial answer (in Signant Health device, 
the intermediate answers are not saved and will not be present in the database; the agreed rules 
are aligned with this functioning). 
Analgesic use data:
-
nalgesic for your 
narcotic analgesics intakes are both 0, it will be considered that no analgesic was used 
on that day.
-
prescribed analgesic for your 
and the number of ibuprofen intakes is not zero, it will be considered that no ibuprofen 
was used on that day. The same rule will be applied for narcotic analgesics.
-
analgesics intakes are not 0, it will be considered that no analgesic was used on that day 
and following answers will be ignored.
-
of Ibuprofen intakes is 0, it will be considered that no ibuprofen was used on that day. 
The same rule will be applied for narcotic analgesics.
Dyspareunia VRS Data:
-
sexually active for reason
will be considered. 


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 37 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
-
HRUQ Data:
-
(any answer different from 0) is present, ignore answer 2-6 in the analysis
-
8 to 9 
(any answer different from 0) is present, ignore answers 8-9 in the analysis
-
For questions 8-9, consider the number of times whatever the answer provided for 
HRPQ Data:
-
wh
forced me to work part-time when I wanted to work full-
than 0, ignore answer 9bis in the analysis.
-
when answer to question 9 is diffe
kept me from having a job when I wanted to work full-
than 0, ignore answer 9ter in the analysis.
-
or its treatment(s) 
kept me from having a job when I wanted to work part-
different than 0, ignore answer 9quater in the analysis
6.2.6.4.
Transvaginal Ultrasound
If the depth recorded for a TVUS of uterus is 0 mm, the depth and the volume should be 
considered as missing (i.e., this means that the assessment was done in 2 dimensions instead 
of 3 dimensions).
6.2.6.5.
Partial and Missing Dates of diagnosis
For partial date of first medical diagnosis/treatment, first surgical diagnosis and most recent 
surgical diagnosis the following rules of imputation will be applied:
-
If only Day is missing, Day will be imputed to 01.
-
If Day and Month are missing: 
if Year is the same as the screening date, Date will be imputed to Screening Date. 
Otherwise, Day will be imputed to 01 and Month will be imputed to 07. 
-
If Date is completely missing, no imputation will be done.


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 38 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
6.3.
Study Population
6.3.1.
Subject Disposition
A tabulation of subject disposition will be presented by treatment group and overall, for 
randomized subjects in the main study, including:
Number of subjects randomized in the main study,
Number of subjects who completed the main treatment period until Month 6
Number of subjects who signed consent form for the extension study, 
Number of subjects who discontinued the study between informed consent for extension 
study and the first day of study drug in extension study, 
Number of subjects who received at least one dose of study drug in the extension study, 
Number of subjects who met discontinuation criteria at Month 6
Number of subjects who completed the extension treatment period until Month 12
Number of subjects who discontinued the extension treatment period prior to Month 12
(excluding those who met discontinuation criteria at Month 6), and reasons for extension 
treatment discontinuation
Number of subjects who entered the extension follow-up period
Number of subjects who discontinued the extension follow-up period, and reasons for the 
extension follow-up period discontinuation
Number of subjects who completed the extension study (complete the extension 
treatment period and the extension follow-up period)
The number of subjects included in the extension study by country and by site will be also 
provided.
The number of subjects who completed each visit of the extension study will be summarized by 
treatment group and overall, for the Treatment Extension Analysis Set.
The following listings will be presented:
-
Study completion information, including the reason for premature study withdrawal, if 
applicable;
-
Inclusion/exclusion criteria;
-
Subject inclusion in each of the analysis sets (Treatment Extension Analysis Set, Follow-up 
Extension Analysis Set, Extension Safety Analysis Set, Follow-up Extension Safety Set, 
Extension PD and Extension PK Analysis Sets) and reasons for exclusion for Treatment 
Extension Analysis Set and Per Protocol Extension Analysis Set.


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 39 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
6.3.2.
Demographic and Baseline Characteristics
Baseline, demographic and medical history information will be analyzed by treatment group and 
overall, for the Treatment Extension Analysis Set and Extension Safety Analysis Set. 
No formal statistical comparisons will be performed.
6.3.3.
Demographics
Demographics and baseline characteristics recorded at baseline in the main study will be 
summarized by treatment group and overall using descriptive statistics.  
Demographics and baseline data include Age (years), Gender, Ethnicity, Race, Height (cm), 
Weight (kg), Body Mass Index (kg/m2), Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg), Diastolic Blood 
Pressure (mmHg), Heart Rate (beats/minute), QTc interval (Fridericia) (ms).
BMI is auto-calculated, defined as: Weight (kg)/(Height(m)*Height(m)).
Demographic and Baseline data will be provided in data listings.
6.3.4.
Baseline Disease Characteristics
For the 4 treatment groups (as detailed in section 6.2.1), the following parameters, recorded at 
baseline in the main study, will be calculated as described in section 4.5.2 of the SAP of the main 
study.
Baseline Dysmenorrhea (DYS)
Baseline Non-Menstrual Pelvic Pain (NMPP)
Baseline analgesic use.
The average duration of the two baseline menstrual cycles (days) 
The number and percentage of subjects with Normal, Abnormal, Abnormal clinically 
significant (or Not Assessable) results for Physical Examination, Gynecological 
Examination, Breast Examination, Mammography, Endometrial Biopsy and PAP Smear 
assessments at baseline.
Transvaginal ultrasound data (i.e., presence of ovarian endometrioma with a diameter of 
7 cm or greater, uterus length, width, and depth in mm and corresponding calculated 
uterine volume in cm3 (using the prolate ellipsoid formula [L x H x W x 0.523]), 
endometrium thickness in mm, and presence of any uterus, left ovary or right ovary 
abnormality).
Only for subjects receiving Placebo in the main study, these baseline characteristics will be 
described as the definition of the second baseline (section 4.2.11 of this SAP):
Dysmenorrhea (DYS)
Non-Menstrual Pelvic Pain (NMPP)


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 40 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
Analgesic use.
The number and percentage of subjects with Normal, Abnormal, Abnormal clinically 
significant (or Not Assessable) results for Physical Examination, Gynecological 
Examination, Breast Examination, Mammography (if required), Endometrial Biopsy (if 
required), for baseline 2.
Baseline 2 Transvaginal ultrasound data (i.e., presence of ovarian endometrioma with a 
diameter of 7 cm or greater, uterus length, width, and depth in mm and corresponding 
calculated uterine volume in cm3 (using the prolate ellipsoid formula [L x H x W x 0.523]), 
endometrium thickness in mm, and presence of any uterus, left ovary or right ovary 
abnormality).
Baseline Disease Characteristics will be reported in listings.
6.3.5.
Medical History
Medical history, recorded at baseline in the main study, will be summarized by System Organ 
Class and Preferred Term using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA), by 
treatment group and overall.
Medical history will be summarized by subject incidence rates; therefore, a subject contributes 
only once to the count for a given medical history (SOC or preferred term).
Medical history will be reported in a listing. 
6.3.6.
Endometriosis History
For the 4 treatment groups (as detailed in Section 6.2.1), the following parameters, recorded at 
baseline in the main study, will be calculated as described in section 4.5.4 of the SAP of the main 
study.
Time since first medical diagnosis/treatment, first surgical diagnosis and most recent surgical 
diagnosis in years defined as (randomization date 
date of diagnosis)/365.25 will be 
summarized.
Presence within 2 months before screening and ongoing symptoms at baseline of the main study 
for the following symptoms will be summarized, by treatment group and overall: Dyspareunia, 
Dyschezia, Dysuria, Adenomyosis, Rectovaginal endometriosis nodes.
Endometriosis History will be reported in a listing.


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 41 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
6.3.7.
Prior Medication
Not Applicable
6.3.8.
Exposure and Compliance
6.3.8.1.
Extent of treatment exposure in the extension study
Duration of treatment (in weeks and in days) will be summarized for each treatment group. 
Duration of treatment in Extension is defined as: [(date of last extension treatment administration 
as described in section 5.2.1) - (date of first administration in extension as collected in eCRF) 
+1] / 7 (weeks), [(date of last extension treatment administration as described in section 5.2.1) -
(date of first administration in extension as collected in eCRF) +1] (days) .
Duration of treatment overall is defined as: [(date of last extension treatment administration as 
described in section 5.2.1) - (date of first administration in mains study as collected in eCRF) +1] 
/ 7 (weeks), [(date of last extension treatment administration as described in section 5.2.1) - (date 
of first administration in main study as collected in eCRF) +1] (days) .
Time on extension study (in weeks and in days) will be summarized for each treatment group, 
defined as: [(end of extension study date as described in section 5.2.1) 
(date of first 
administration in extension as collected in eCRF) +1.]/7 (weeks), [(end of extension study date 
as described in section 5.2.1) 
(date of first administration in extension as collected in eCRF) 
+1.] (days).
Time on study overall (in weeks and in days) will be summarized for each treatment group, 
defined as: [(end of extension study date as described in section 5.2.1) 
(date of first 
administration in main study as collected in eCRF) +1.]/7 (weeks), [(end of extension study date 
as described in section 5.2.1) 
(date of first administration in main study as collected in eCRF) 
+1.] (days).
Exposure data will be reported in listings.
6.3.8.2.
Compliance in the extension study
Linzagolix/Placebo Grey blister (200 mg or matching placebo), Linzagolix/Placebo Pink blister 
(75 mg or matching placebo) and ABT/Placebo compliances from the study treatment 
accountability page will be summarized on the extension treatment period and overall (main and 
extension treatment period) by treatment group.
Compliance in extension is defined as the total used count of Grey blister/Pink blister/ABT from 
the Month 12 or Withdrawal Extension accountability pages divided by end of treatment date in 
Extension 
first dose date in Extension+1.


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 42 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
Compliance overall is defined as the sum of total used count of Grey blister/Pink blister/ABT from 
the Month 6 and Month 12 or Withdrawal Extension accountability pages divided by end of 
treatment date in Extension 
Day 1 date+1.
If Linzagolix/Placebo and ABT/Placebo compliances from accountability data are missing, 
compliance will be computed from daily diary data: 
Compliance will be computed as the number of days with pink tablet/grey tablet/red capsule 
taken *100 divided by the number of days in the period (end of treatment - first dose date in 
Extension+1 or end of treatment date
Day 1 +1 date for overall compliance
the e-
Yesterday), it will be assumed that 
no drug was taken on that day.
Study treatment overdose and misuse will be reported in a listing.
Compliance will be reported in a listing.
6.4.
Efficacy Evaluation
Efficacy analysis will be conducted using the Treatment Extension Analysis Set, the Follow-up 
Extension Analysis Set and the Per Protocol Extension Analysis Set when specified. Data from 
the main study, the extension study and the Month 6 Extension follow-up will be summarized and 
listed as relevant.
Efficacy endpoints will be derived in the same way as in the main study. The same criterion for 
defining a subject as being a responder by having a clinically meaningful reduction in DYS and 
in NMPP, along with a stable or decreased use of analgesics for EAP, will be used as per the 
criteria used in the main study.
6.4.1.
Meaningful Change Threshold Estimation
6.4.2.
Primary efficacy analysis
6.4.2.1.
Primary Endpoint Specifications
The primary efficacy analysis aims to estimate the effect of linzagolix versus placebo on DYS 
and NMPP over the last 28 days up to and including the Month 12 visit or, for subjects who 
discontinued randomized treatment prior to the Month 12 visit, over the last 28 days of 
randomized treatment (i.e. 28-day period before last treatment administration date in Extension). 
Use of analgesic medication for EAP will be included in the responder definitions. A responder 
for each of the co-primary endpoints needs to demonstrate both a reduction in pain (DYS or 
NMPP, depending on the endpoint) and a stable or decreased use of analgesics for EAP. Any 
subject who does not meet both of these criteria will be defined as a non-responder.


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 43 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
For each of the co-primary endpoints, the criterion for defining a subject as a responder over the 
last 28 days of randomized treatment up to the Month 12 visit will include a reduction of 1.10 or 
greater from baseline in Dysmenorrhea and reduction of 0.80 or greater from baseline in Non-
Menstrual Pelvic Pain, as well as stable or decreased use of analgesics for EAP, i.e. thresholds 
obtained at the Month 3 meaningful change threshold analysis. The thresholds obtained at the 
Month 6 meaningful change threshold analysis will also be used: reduction of 1.25 or greater for 
Dysmenorrhea and reduction of 0.85 for Non-Menstrual Pelvic Pain.
Mean pelvic pain scores for DYS and for NMPP will be calculated by averaging over the 
corresponding 28 calendar days immediately prior to and including the last treatment 
administration day. DYS will use days with uterine bleeding, defined as those days on which the 
subject records any uterine bleeding or spotting in the subject eDiary; NMPP will use days with 
no uterine bleeding. If a subject's mean score for DYS is undefined numerically because her daily 
eDiary reports indicate that she did not experience uterine bleeding on any days during the 28 
calendar day period, then the mean score for DYS will be set equal to zero (which reflects the 
absence of a
indicate that she only experienced days with uterine bleeding during the period, then the mean 
score for NMPP will be set equal to zero. For subjects who discontinue treatment prior to Month 
12 the last available observations prior to discontinuation will be used, in order to estimate the 
treatment effect while under treatment, that is the 28 calendar days immediately prior to and 
including the last dose date. The baseline mean overall pelvic pain scores for DYS and NMPP 
will be calculated by averaging over the two baseline menstrual cycles (as defined in section
6.2.2), which may not be exactly 28 days each. For both DYS and NMPP, responses of "None," 
"Mild," "Moderate," and "Severe" will be assigned a score of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively.
For the assessment of stable or decreased use of analgesics for EAP (assessed separately for 
DYS and NMPP), the analgesic use for any defined period will be based on the mean of the total 
pill count for each class of rescue analgesics (endometriosis-associated). The total pill count for 
each class of rescue analgesic is the sum of the pill count of the corresponding class of rescue 
analgesic, as reported in the eDiary during the time period of interest.  Baseline analgesic use 
will be calculated as the mean of the daily pill count of analgesics over the two baseline menstrual 
cycles (as defined in section 4.5.2 of main study SAP). For the purposes of determining a stable 
or decreased use of analgesics, the averaging will be done over the same calendar days as used 
for the pelvic pain scores (i.e. for DYS days with uterine bleeding, defined as those days on which 
the subject records any uterine bleeding or spotting in the subject eDiary; for NMPP days with 
no uterine bleeding). The evaluation of stable or decreased use of analgesics will be done per 
the specification in 9.1 9.1 Appendix A. 
6.4.2.1.1.
Primary Efficacy Analysis
The primary efficacy analysis will be conducted using the Treatment Extension Analysis Set.


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 44 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
The number and percentage of subjects with:
-
Reduction of X for DYS,
-
Reduction of X for NMPP,
-
Stable or decreased use of analgesics for EAP during bleeding days, during non-bleeding 
days, and overall, 
-
Reduction of X for DYS and stable or decreased use of analgesics for EAP,
-
Reduction of X for NMPP and stable or decreased use of analgesics for EAP,
will be presented.
There may be missing data during the screening period and whilst under treatment, for example, 
missed days of completing the eDiary. The primary analyses will use observed data only in such 
cases, provided that a minimum number of completed daily eDiary entries are available. This 
effectively assumes that the individual values such as daily eDiary assessments (observed or 
not) are independent of being missing.  Subjects who have less than the minimum number of 
days available will be excluded from the analysis. This is valid under the assumption that such 
data is MAR, conditional on the baseline value.
The required minimum number of completed daily eDiary entries will be set to 12 days of each 
28-day period (two Baseline menstrual cycles and the 28-day period prior to Month 12), i.e., 43% 
of non-missing assessments for the primary analysis,  consistent with the use of 3 days per week 
as the minimum number of completed diary entries as suggested in recent research ( (Griffiths 
& al, 2018), (Cappelleri & Bushmakin, Biopharmaceutical Report, 2020), (Cappelleri & 
Bushmakin, Biopharmaceutical Report, 2021)). The analysis will be repeated using subjects with 
at least 75% (21 days) and 35% (10 days) of completed daily eDiaries for DYS, NMPP and 
analgesic use.
The primary efficacy analysis will be repeated on the Per Protocol Extension Analysis Set.
6.4.2.2.
Sensitivity analysis
Due to the war situation in Ukraine, data from subjects in Ukraine sites may be incomplete, 
missing or uncleaned. A sensitivity analysis of the primary endpoint analysis will be performed, 
excluding data collected after 24FEB2022 for subjects from Ukraine sites. An additional listing 
including subjects from Ukraine only will be provided.
6.4.3.
Secondary/other/exploratory analysis
All secondary efficacy endpoints will be summarized by descriptive statistics for each treatment 
group, for each time point, including summaries of change from baseline when applicable. 


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 45 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
Values for all endpoints that are collected daily using the eDiary (from Section 6.4.3.1 to Section 
6.4.3.24) will be based on the 28 calendar days immediately prior to and including the day of the 
corresponding visit or prior to and including the last treatment administration date for Month 12, 
or the 28 calendar days immediately prior to and including the last dose date for subjects who 
discontinue treatment prior to the visit in question (or fewer if treatment is stopped less than 4 
weeks after first dose date), in order to estimate the treatment effect while under treatment. The 
last 28 days on treatment will be used at all subsequent scheduled visits for those discontinued 
subjects. Descriptive summaries for each 28-day period will be performed in two ways however: 
-
Once including only values of 28 days prior to Month X, i.e. using the last 28 days prior to 
Month X eCRF visit date for subjects who have not discontinued up to that month. If subjects 
discontinued prior to Month X the corresponding value will be missing from the summary at 
Month X;
-
Once applying the while on treatment strategy, i.e. using the last 28 days prior to Month X 
eCRF visit date for subjects who have not discontinued up to that month, and for subjects 
who discontinued prior to Month X, the last 28 days prior to treatment discontinuation will be 
used. For all subsequent timepoints (Month X+1, etc.) the same last 28 days prior to 
treatment discontinuation will be used. 
Corresponding baseline values will be calculated based on the two baseline menstrual cycles, 
which may not be exactly 28 days each.
The values for other endpoints (monthly and 3-monthly questionnaires from Section 6.4.3.25 to 
Section 6.4.3.32) are defined as the value at the corresponding visit or value falling into the 
corresponding visit window as described in section 5.5. For these other endpoints, descriptive 
summaries by visit will be performed in two ways, once including values at the corresponding 
visit or value falling into the corresponding visit window as described in section 5.5, and once 
applying the while on treatment strategy, i.e., including values from the discontinued visits at 
each next scheduled visit.
For endpoints based on daily ediary data, analyses will use observed data only in such cases, 
provided that a minimum number of 43% (at least 12 days of each 28-day period) completed 
daily eDiary entries are available. Subjects who have less than the minimum number of days 
available will be excluded from the analysis. This is valid under the assumption that such data is 
MAR, conditional on the baseline value.
6.4.3.1.
Change from baseline to Month 12 in DYS (VRS) and in NMPP (VRS)
Mean pelvic pain scores for DYS and for NMPP for each subject will be calculated in the same 
way as for the primary endpoints. The change from baseline to Month 12 (the last 28 days of 
randomized treatment up to the Month 12 visit, will be defined as the last 28 days prior to and 
including the last treatment administration date as defined in Section 5.2.1, or the 28 calendar 
days immediately prior to and including the last dose date for subjects who discontinue treatment 
prior to Month 12) in DYS using the VRS, and the change from baseline to Month 12 (the last 28 


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 46 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
days of randomized treatment up to the Month 12 visit, will be defined as the last 28 days prior 
to and including last treatment administration date as defined in Section 5.2.1 or the 28 calendar 
days immediately prior to and including the last dose date for subjects who discontinue treatment 
prior to Month 12) in NMPP using the VRS.The mean pelvic pain scores for DYS and NMPP and 
change from baseline will be descriptively summarized. Summary will be repeated on the Per 
Protocol Extension Analysis Set.
Cumulative distribution functions (CDF) for change from baseline at Month 12 for DYS and NMPP 
will be provided, with separate lines for each treatment group. The x-axis will present the different 
values for the DYS or NMPP change from baseline, and the y-axis will present the proportion of 
subjects reaching each value of change. Vertical lines of the relevant responder thresholds will 
be displayed on the plots. 
6.4.3.2.
Change from baseline to Month 12 in dyschezia (Numeric Rating Scale - NRS)
Mean dyschezia scores for each subject will be calculated by averaging over the corresponding 
28 calendar days immediately prior to and including the day of the last treatment administration 
as defined in Section 5.2.1 (or the 28 calendar days immediately prior to and including the last 
dose date for subjects who discontinue treatment prior to Month 12). The baseline mean 
dyschezia score will be calculated by averaging scores over the two baseline menstrual cycles. 
The mean dyschezia score and change from baseline will be descriptively summarized.
Summary will be repeated on the Per Protocol Extension Analysis Set.
The number and percentage of subjects with a reduction of 1.5 from baseline to Month 12 for 
dyschezia will be presented. The reduction will be defined in a similar way as for the primary 
endpoint but using dyschezia scores at the Month 12 timepoint. 
6.4.3.3.
Change from baseline to Month 12 in overall pelvic pain (NRS)
The change from baseline to Month 12 (the last 28 days of randomized treatment up to the Month 
12 visit, defined as the last 28 days prior to and including last treatment administration date as 
defined in Section 5.2.1 or the 28 calendar days immediately prior to and including the last dose 
date for subjects who discontinue treatment prior to Month 12) in overall pelvic pain using the 
NRS will be descriptively summarized. The baseline will be computed as the mean of the overall 
pelvic pain score over the two baseline menstrual cycles. Summary will be repeated on the Per 
Protocol Extension Analysis Set.
The number and percentage of subjects with a reduction of 2.7 from baseline to Month 12 for 
Overall Pelvic Pain will be presented. The reduction will be defined in a similar way as for the 
primary endpoint, but for Overall Pelvic Pain score at the Month 12 timepoint. 


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 47 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
6.4.3.4.
Change from baseline to Month 12 in the interference of pain with the ability to 
perform daily activities, measured using the pain dimension of the 
Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) 
The EHP-30 pain dimension consists of 11 items each addressing the effect of pain on various 
activities and each assessed on a 5-point scale (0=Never through to 4=Always). The EHP-30 
Pain Impact Domain comprises the following items:
During the last 4 weeks, because of your endometriosis, how often have you...
1.
Been unable to go to social events because of the pain? 
2.
Been unable to do jobs around the house because of the pain? 
3.
Found it difficult to stand because of the pain?
4.
Found it difficult to sit because of the pain?
5.
Found it difficult to walk because of the pain?
6.
Found it difficult to exercise or do the leisure activities you would like to do because of 
the pain?
7.
Lost your appetite and/or been unable to eat because of the pain?
8.
Been unable to sleep properly because of the pain?
9.
Had to go to bed/lie down because of the pain?
10. Been unable to do the things you want because of the pain?
11. Felt unable to cope with the pain?
This endpoint shall be scored as per the Appendix B in Section 9, resulting in a score on a scale 
from 0 (best possible health status) to 100 (worst possible health status). The score will be 
computed as the sum of raw scores of each item (ranging from 0 to 4) divided by the maximum 
possible raw score (11*4), multiplied by 100.  EHP-30 score at baseline and Month 12 and 
change from baseline will also be descriptively summarized. Summary will be repeated on the 
Per Protocol Extension Analysis Set.
The number and percentage of subjects with a reduction of 28 from baseline to Month 12 for the 
EHP-30 Pain Dimension score will be presented. 
6.4.3.5.
Change from baseline to Month 12 in dyspareunia (VRS)
Responses to the daily dyspareunia questions will be scored as follows. Responses on days 
where the subject was not sexually active for reasons other than their endometriosis will not be 
included in the analysis.
Response
Score
No pain during sexual intercourse.
0


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 48 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
I was able to tolerate the pain during sexual intercourse.
1
Intercourse was interrupted due to pain. 
2
I avoided sexual intercourse because of anticipation of 
pain. 
3
Mean dyspareunia scores for each subject will be calculated by averaging over the 
corresponding days during the 28 calendar days immediately prior to and including the last 
treatment administration date as defined in Section 5.2.1 (or the 28 calendar days immediately 
prior to and including the last dose date for subjects who discontinue treatment prior to Month 
12). The baseline mean dyspareunia score will be calculated by averaging scores over the two 
baseline menstrual cycles. 
Dyspareunia scores will be summarized using the TEAS, PP EAS and for the subgroup of 
subjects who have a mean dyspareunia score > 1 at baseline. 
The number and percentage of subjects with a reduction of 0.9 from baseline to Month 12 for 
Dyspareunia will be presented. The reduction will be defined in a similar way as for the primary 
endpoint, but for Dyspareunia score and for the Month 12. 
6.4.3.6.
No analgesic use / no opiate use for EAP during the preceding 4-week period 
at each scheduled assessment
The analysis of the proportion of subjects reporting no analgesic use for EAP, and the proportion 
of subjects reporting no opiate use for EAP during the preceding 4-week period at each 
scheduled assessment will be conducted using descriptive statistics. 
In addition to analgesic use for EAP as collected in the eDiary, concomitant medications in the 
study will be reviewed and medications to be considered as analgesic use for endometriosis 
associated pain will be confirmed by the Sponsor and be provided in an excel file prior to 
Database Lock. They may include any medication with the ATC codes from WHO drug dictionary 
version March 2016 as listed in Table 3
Table 3 List of ATC codes for analgesics and opioids
ATC code
Description
A03D 
Antispasmodics 
in 
combination 
with 
analgesics


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 49 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
A03EA 
Antispasmodics, 
psycholeptics
and 
analgesics in combination
C03AH
Thiazides, 
combinations 
with 
psycholeptics and/or analgesics
M01
Anti-inflammatory and anti-rheumatic 
products
M02
Topical products for joint and muscular 
pain
M03
Muscle relaxants
N02
Analgesics
N07BC
Drugs used in opioid dependence
S02DA 
Analgesics and anesthetics
Among those analgesic medications, all medications with Pharmacological Subgroup (3rd level 
medications. Other analgesic medications will be considered as non-opiate medications.
In addition to analyzing the absence of analgesic use for EAP, the amount of analgesics used 
for each 4-week period up to Month 12 will be summarized as a continuous variable, including 
the change from baseline. This analysis will be based on e-diary data only, as subjects did not 
record analgesic intake in the concomitant medication page on a tablet-by-tablet basis. 
Due to a low number of subjects using any opioids, opioids use will not be analyzed as a 
continuous variable, only a listing with by subject opioid use mean daily pill count will be provided.
The baseline amount of analgesic used will be computed by averaging the amount used during 
the two baseline menstrual cycles.
Summary will be repeated on the Per Protocol Extension Analysis Set.
6.4.3.7.
Responder rate at scheduled visit other than Month 12 visit, for DYS and NMPP 
(VRS)
The responder rate at each scheduled visits other than Month 12 visit, for DYS and NMPP will 
be analyzed the same way as described for the primary analysis endpoint in Section 6.4.2.


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 50 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
6.4.3.8.
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in mean pelvic pain 
scores for DYS, NMPP and overall pelvic pain, during the previous 4-week 
period assessed on the NRS and VRS
The change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in mean pelvic pain scores for DYS, 
NMPP and overall pelvic pain will be descriptively summarized.  
6.4.3.9.
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days 
with moderate to severe pelvic pain during the previous 4-week period 
assessed on the VRS
The actual value and change from baseline of number of days with moderate or severe pelvic 
pain collected in the e-diary on the VRS will be summarized for each 28-day period. The baseline 
value will be computed by averaging the number of days with moderate or severe pelvic pain of 
the two baseline menstrual cycles. 
6.4.3.10.
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the mean worst pelvic 
pain score defined as the mean of the 5 highest daily pain scores reported 
during the previous 4-week period assessed on the NRS
The actual value and change from baseline of the mean worst pelvic pain score, defined as the 
mean of the 5 highest daily pain scores reported during each 28-day period will be summarized 
for each 28-day period. The baseline mean worst pelvic pain score will be the average of the 
mean pelvic pain score of each of the two baseline menstrual cycles. 
If less than 5 days of pain score data is available, the mean worst pelvic pain will be defined as 
the mean of the available daily pain scores. 
6.4.3.11.
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in mean daily 
dyspareunia scores reported during the previous 4-week period on the 
dyspareunia VRS 
The actual value and change from baseline in mean daily dyspareunia scores will be 
summarized as a continuous variable for each 28-day period. 
Subjects not sexually active for reasons other than endometriosis will have missing values for 
the corresponding 4-week periods. Subjects not sexually active for reasons other than 
endometriosis at baseline will be excluded from the analysis.


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 51 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
6.4.3.12.
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in mean daily dyschezia 
scores reported during the previous 4-week period assessed on the dyschezia 
NRS
The actual value and change from baseline in mean daily dyschezia scores will be summarized 
as a continuous variable for each 28-day period. 
6.4.3.13.
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in non-opioid, opioid and 
combined analgesic use for EAP during the previous 4-week period based on 
pill count in the eDiary
Non-opioid, opioid and combined analgesic use for EAP will be measured using the mean of 
daily pill count collected in the eDiary over each 28-day period. For non-opioid and combined 
analgesic use, descriptive summary (actual values and changes from baseline) for each period 
will be performed. Due to a low number of subjects using any opioids, opioids use will not be 
analyzed as a continuous variable, only a listing with by subject opioid use mean daily pill count 
will be provided.
6.4.3.14.
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in opioid analgesic use 
for EAP as reported in the eDiary during the previous 4-week period based on 
morphine milligram equivalent (MME)
Opioid analgesic use for EAP will also be assessed based on morphine milligram equivalent 
(MME). The mean daily amount for each 28-day period reported in eDiary as pill count will be 
converted in MME.
Conversion to MME by country is described in Table 4.
Table 4 Morphine Milligram Equivalents for Narcotic Analgesics
Country
Permitted 
rescue 
analgesic: 
Narcotic 
analgesic 
local 
equivalent
Conversion 
in 
morphine
milligram equivalents
Austria
tramadol 37.5mg + paracetamol 
325mg 
3.75 MME
Bulgaria
tramadol 37.5mg + paracetamol 
325mg
3.75 MME
Czech 
Republic
codeine 30mg
4.125 MME


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 52 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
paracetamol 500 mg+ codeine 30 
mg
tramadol 37.5mg + paracetamol 
325mg
France
paracetamol 500 mg+ codeine 30 
mg
tramadol 37.5mg + paracetamol 
325mg
4.125 MME
Hungary
paracetamol 500 mg+ codeine 30 
mg
codeine 30mg
tramadol 37.5mg + paracetamol 
325mg
4.125 MME
Poland
tramadol 37.5mg + paracetamol 
325mg
3.75 MME
Romania
codeine 30mg
paracetamol 500 mg+ codeine 30 
mg
4.5 MME
Spain
paracetamol 500 mg+ codeine 30 
mg 
tramadol 37.5mg + paracetamol 
325mg
4.125 MME
Ukraine
No Narcotic Analgesic allowed
US
5 mg hydrocodone + 300 mg 
acetaminophen
5 MME


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 53 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
No opioids are allowed in Ukraine. Subjects from Ukraine will therefore be excluded from the 
analysis in MME. If some opioids are nevertheless recorded for subjects from Ukraine, they will 
not be considered, as the conversion in MME would be unknown. Those opioids records will 
however be considered for other analgesic use analyses not requiring conversion in MME.
Due to a low number of subjects using any opioids, opioids use will not be analyzed, only a listing 
with by subject mean daily opioid use in MME will be provided.
6.4.3.15.
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days of 
analgesic use (including any class) for EAP during the previous 4-week period 
as assessed in the eDiary
The actual value and change from baseline in the number of days with analgesic use for EAP 
collected in the e-diary will be summarized for each 28-day period. The baseline value will be 
computed by averaging the number of days with analgesic use of the two baseline menstrual 
cycles.
6.4.3.16.
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days of 
opioid analgesic use for EAP during the previous 4-week period as assessed 
in the eDiary
The actual value and change from baseline in the number of days with opioid analgesic use for 
EAP collected in the e-diary will be calculated for each 28-day period. The baseline value will be 
computed by averaging the number of days with opioid analgesic use of the two baseline 
menstrual cycles.
Due to a low number of subjects using any opioids, number of days with opioid analgesic use 
will not be analyzed, only a by subject listing will be provided.
6.4.3.17.
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of pelvic 
pain-free days (assessed on the VRS) during the previous 4-week period 
The actual value and change from baseline of number of pelvic pain-free days collected in the e-
diary will be summarized for each 28-day period. The baseline value will be computed by 
averaging the number of pelvic pain-free days of the two baseline menstrual cycles.
6.4.3.18.
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in ability to perform daily 
activities during the previous 4-week period, as assessed in the eDiary (daily 
function NRS)
Daily activities score for each subject will be calculated by averaging over the corresponding 28 
calendar days immediately prior to and including the day each visit (or the 28 calendar days 


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 54 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
immediately prior to and including the last dose date for subjects who discontinue treatment prior 
to Month 12). The baseline mean of daily activities score will be calculated by averaging over the 
two baseline menstrual cycles. The actual value and change from baseline of daily activities 
score will be summarized as a continuous variable.
6.4.3.19.
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days 
with no difficulty in doing daily activities due to EAP during the previous 4-
week period as assessed in the eDiary (daily function NRS)
The actual value and change from baseline of number of days with no difficulty in doing daily 
activities due to EAP collected in the e-diary will be summarized for each 28-day period. The 
baseline value will be computed by averaging the number of days of the two baseline menstrual 
cycles.
6.4.3.20.
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days 
when dyspareunia was a problem during the previous 4-week period (including 
days when sexual intercourse was avoided because of anticipation of pain) as 
assessed on the dyspareunia VRS
The actual value and change from baseline of number of days with answer to Sexual Intercourse 
-diary will be summarized for each 
28-day period. The baseline value will be computed by averaging the number of days of the two 
baseline menstrual cycles.
6.4.3.21.
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days 
when sexual intercourse was avoided because of anticipation of pain during 
the previous 4-week period as assessed on the dyspareunia VRS
The actual value and change from baseline in the number of days with answer to Sexual 
-diary will be summarized for each 28-day period. The 
baseline value will be computed by averaging the number of days of the two baseline menstrual 
cycles.
In addition, the proportion of days when sexual intercourse was avoided because of anticipation 
of pain will be also summarized for actual values and changes from baseline. 
The proportion is defined as: 


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 55 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
Number of days when sexual intercourse was avoided because of anticipation of pain/ 
(Number of days in period Number of days with missing data 
Number of days with no 
sexual intercourse for other reasons) 
The number of days in each period will be equal to 28, except at baseline, for which it will be the 
number of days in each baseline menstrual cycle.
6.4.3.22.
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days 
with uterine bleeding (including spotting) during the previous 4-week period 
measured by eDiary
The actual value and change from baseline in the number of days with uterine bleeding 
in the e-diary will be summarized for each 
28-day period. The baseline value will be computed by averaging the number of days with uterine 
bleeding during the two baseline menstrual cycles.
6.4.3.23.
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days 
when school or work was missed due to EAP in the previous 4-week period as 
reported in the eDiary
The actual value and change from baseline in the number of days when school or work was 
missed due to EAP as collected in the e-diary will be summarized for each 28-day period. The 
baseline value will be computed by averaging the number of days during the two baseline 
menstrual cycles when school or work was missed due to EAP.
6.4.3.24.
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the number of days 
when the subject had to go to bed or lie down due to EAP in the previous 4-
week period as reported in the eDiary
The actual value and change from baseline in the number of days when the subject had to go to 
bed or lie down due to EAP as collected in the e-diary will be summarized for each 28-day period. 
The baseline value will be computed by averaging the number of days during the two baseline 
menstrual cycles when the subject had to go to bed or lie down due to EAP.
6.4.3.25.
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the Pain, Control and 
powerlessness, Emotional well-being, Social support, Self-image dimensions 
and the Modular sexual relationship questionnaire of EHP-30 scores
The EHP-30 is a disease-specific self-administered questionnaire used to measure health-
related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-30 is composed of two parts: a core 
questionnaire containing five scales that are applicable to all women with endometriosis and a 


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 56 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
modular part containing six scales which do not necessarily apply to all women with 
endometriosis. This study will employ the Core EHP-30 and modular section C (Part 2) as 
outlined in Appendix D of protocol.
The questionnaire is composed of five scales and of the sexual relationship scale in the modular 
part:
-
Pain (Questions 1-11): See Section 6.4.3.4 for items included in Pain dimension
-
Control and powerlessness (Questions 12-17):
Generally felt unwell?
Felt frustrated because your symptoms are not getting better?
Felt frustrated because you are not able to control your symptoms?
Felt unable to forget your symptoms?
Felt as though your symptoms are ruling your life?
Felt your symptoms are taking away your life?
-
Social support (Questions 24-27):
Felt unable to tell others how you feel?
Felt others do not understand what you are going through?
Felt as though others think you are whining?
Felt alone?
-
Emotional well-being (Questions 18-23):
Felt depressed?
Felt weepy/tearful?
Felt miserable?
Had mood swings?
Felt bad-tempered or short-tempered?
Felt violent or aggressive?
-
Self-image (Questions 28-30):
Felt frustrated that you cannot always wear the clothes you would choose?
Felt your appearance has been affected?
Lacked confidence?
-
Modular sexual relationship questionnaire
Refer to Appendix B in Section 9.2 9.2 for scoring. Each scale is standardized on a scale of 0 
100, where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 the worst health status. Scale scores for 
each scale are calculated from the total of the raw scores of each item in the scale divided by 
the maximum possible raw score of all the items in the scale, multiplied by 100.
Each item of each scale will be summarized by category at each visit. The actual value and 
change from baseline of each scale score will be summarized as a continuous variable.


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 57 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
6.4.3.26.
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the Health-Related 
Productivity Questionnaire (HRPQ) scores
The Health-Related Productivity Questionnaire (HRPQ) is a validated, 9-item, self-reported 
questionnaire that has been used to evaluate health-related productivity.
The HRPQ includes items on employment status; effect of health issues or treatment on working 
scheduled hours (absenteeism); effect of health issues or their treatment on work output 
(presenteeism); effect of health issues or their treatment on planned hours of household chores; 
effect of health issues or their treatment impact work output for household chores actually 
performed; how long since health issues developed; and effect of health issues on life.
The questionnaire follows a skip pattern so that subjects can answer only the items applicable to 
them according to whether they work outside the home (eg, full- or part-time employment). Two 
subject groups are defined: employed and household (employed and not employed, combined).
See Appendix C in Section 9.3 9.3 for HRPQ Scoring.
At Day 1, the following will be summarized:
-
Employment status, 
-
Time since symptoms developed, 
-
Number of subjects and time for which Endometriosis symptoms or its treatment(s) forced to 
work part-time when wanted to work full-time,
-
Number of subjects and time for which Endometriosis symptoms or its treatment(s) kept from 
having a job when wanted to work full-time,
-
Number of subjects and time for which Endometriosis symptoms or its treatment(s) kept from 
having a job when wanted to work part-time.
The following scores (actual values and changes from baseline) will be summarized at each visit 
(from baseline to Month 6 Extension follow-up):
-
Number of hours of work lo
Total number of hours of work lost
Percent of scheduled work lost due to absenteeism (Number of hours lost/Number of 
scheduled hours*100)
Percent of scheduled work lost due to presenteeism (Number of hours lost/Number 
of scheduled hours*100)
Percent of scheduled work lost in total (Number of hours lost/Number of scheduled 
hours*100)
-


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 58 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
Number of 
household chores that you did during the past week, how did illnesses/treatments 
Total number of hours of household work lost
Percent of scheduled household work lost due to absenteeism (Number of hours 
lost/Number of scheduled hours*100)
Percent of scheduled household work lost due to presenteeism (Number of hours 
lost/Number of scheduled hours*100)
Percent of scheduled household work lost in total (Number of hours lost/Number of 
scheduled hours*100)
The HRPQ items at each visit will be presented in a by-subject listings, for both Treatment 
Extension Analysis Set and Follow-up Extension Analysis Set.
6.4.3.27.
Number of non-study endometriosis related health visits, number of days in 
hospital and type of procedures performed based on Health Resource 
Utilization Questionnaire (HRUQ) at each scheduled assessment
The number of non-study endometriosis related health visits, number of subjects by type of 
clinician/clinic visit, number of subjects by type of therapeutic procedures, and number of nights 
spent in hospital will be summarized at each visit (from baseline to Month 6 Extension follow-up). 
In case of many clinician/clinic types and therapeutic procedures, types may be regrouped for 
the descriptive summaries.
6.4.3.28.
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the Physician/Subject 
Surgery Intention Question (PSIQ/SSIQ)
The PSIQ/SSIQ answers will be summarized as continuous at Month 6 and Month 12. 
6.4.3.29.
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the PROMIS Fatigue 
Short Form 6a
The PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 6a is composed of 6 items on 5-point scales (1-5). The total 
score is measured as the sum of answers of each item and will range from 6 to 30. The higher 
the total score, the more severe the symptom. Missing data will not be imputed.
Each item will be summarized by category at each visit (from Month 6 to Month 12). The total 
score will be summarized as a continuous variable.


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 59 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
The PROMIS Fatigue items at each visit will be presented in a by-subject listings, for both 
Treatment Extension Analysis Set and Follow-up Extension Analysis Set.
6.4.3.30.
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the EuroQoL 5-
Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire
The EuroQoL 5-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) is a self-administered, generic utility 
instrument developed by the EuroQoL Group in 1990. The EQ-5D consists of 2 parts, a 
descriptive system of 5 dimensions and a 20-cm vertical visual analogue scale (VAS) with 
endpoints 0 and 100. It is collected by the subject in the eDiary from Month 6 to Month 12.
The descriptive system includes five single-item dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, 
pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Subjects must choose between five levels of difficulty 
(from 1 to 5) in accomplishing tasks in each dimension. The health states will be described in 
terms of five-digit numbers based on the answers to each of the five questions. The states will 
then be converted to a single index score using the TTO (Time Trade-Off) method. The TTO 
method has been chosen since this is the only one available for the United States (US) and also 
because for economic studies where cost utility analysis is anticipated, most health economists 
are recommending a value set that has been derived using a choice-based method. An index 
score based on the individual dimensions will be calculated using a scoring algorithm (see 
Reference document EQ-5D-5L_UserGuide_2015.pdf) and the US Index from Crosswalk value 
set downloaded from the EuroQol website. 
In the present study, the available US-specific scoring will be used (see Appendix D in Section
9. how to compute EQ-5D-5L crosswalk index values with SAS using the United States value set 
as an example). 
Answers to each dimension will be summarized by category at each visit. The index value and 
VAS Score will be summarized as continuous variables (actual values and changes from 
baseline). The EQ-5D-5L items, VSA score and index value at each visit will be presented in a 
by-subject listings, for both Treatment Extension Analysis Set and Follow-up Extension Analysis 
Set.
6.4.3.31.
Response at each scheduled assessment according to Patient Global 
Impression of Change (PGIC) (and Post-treatment Patient Global Impression of 
Change, PPGIC)
Responses to the Patient Global Impression of Change questionnaire range from 0- Very much 
worse to 6-Very much improved. Responses will be summarized by category at each visit (up to 
Month 6 Extension follow-up). 


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 60 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
6.4.3.32.
Change from baseline to each scheduled assessment in the monthly PGIS 
(mPGIS) score
Responses to the Patient Global Impression of Severity range from 0- No symptoms to 4-
Severe. Responses will be summarized by category at each visit (up to Month 6 Extension 
follow-up).
6.4.3.33.
Daily Patient Global Impression of Severity (dPGIS), Daily Event Cancelled, 
Daily Difficulty Sleeping
The dPGIS, Event Cancelled and Difficulty Sleeping daily diaries were collected for subjects 
enrolled prior to amended Protocol V4.0 only. 
The dPGIS mean scores and changes from baseline, the number of days with difficulty sleeping, 
the number of days for which events were cancelled and the number of days with no event 
planned will be computed for each 4-week period and reported in listings only.
The dPGIS scores will be calculated by averaging over the corresponding 28 calendar days 
immediately prior to and including the day of each scheduled assessment (or prior to and 
including the last dose date for subjects who discontinue treatment).
6.5.
Pharmacokinetic Evaluations
Pharmacokinetic analyses will be conducted using the Extensions Pharmacokinetic Set.
PK samples are collected at each monthly visit during the treatment extension period.
For descriptive statistics of plasma concentrations mean (arithmetic and geometric), standard 
deviation, median, 1st and 3rd quartiles, minimum, maximum, coefficient of variation (CV%) and 
number of observations will be provided. Concentrations below the limit of quantification (LOQ) 
will be assigned a value of zero. Missing values will not be imputed, and if sufficient data are 
missing for a given subject, that subject may be considered non-evaluable for pharmacokinetic 
analysis and would not be included in the PK Set.
All plasma concentration data will be displayed in listings. PK assessment day and time, IMP 
intake status and IMP intake time on the day of PK assessment and on the previous days will be 
included in the listings.
Explorative analyses of correlations between plasma concentrations and intrinsic PK factors such 
as body weight/BMI, race, age will be performed, as appropriate, and will be reported separately. 
6.6.
Safety Evaluations 
Summaries will be performed using the Extension Safety Analysis Set and the Follow-up 
Extension Safety Analysis Set.


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 61 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
Data from the main study (i.e. before Month 6), the extension study and the Month 6 Extension 
follow-up will be summarized and listed as relevant
6.6.1.
Adverse Events
All AEs recorded during the course of the study will be coded according to the MedDRA 
dictionary (26.0) and assigned to a system organ class (SOC) and Preferred Term (PT). The 
NCI-CTCAE (version 4.3) will be used to grade the severity of AEs. 
The following definitions will be used for the analysis of adverse events (AEs). All analysis 
described below will be based on the Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), unless 
otherwise specified. 
Definition 
Treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE)
AEs with a start date on or after the first 
dose of extension study drug through 30 
days after discontinuation of study drug or 
Month 12 visit date, or any event that was 
present at Month 6 but worsened in intensity 
or was subsequently considered drug-
related by the investigator through the end of 
the extension study
Treatment Related TEAE/AEs
LGX-related AEs, defined as having 
to study drug
ABT-related AEs, defined as having 
onship 
to add-back therapy
Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Adverse Events Leading to Permanent 
Treatment Discontinuation 
Any AE action taken = Drug Withdrawn in 
Adverse Events Leading to Death
Any AE with fatal outcome 


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 62 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
Post-Treatment Adverse Events
Adverse events starting more than 30 days 
after end of treatment
TEAEs tables will be presented for the below periods/populations:
-
Extension treatment period on Extension Safety Analysis Set
-
Extension follow-up period on Follow-up Safety Analysis Set, 
-
Combined Extension treatment and follow-up period on Follow-up Safety Analysis Set
-
Combined Main treatment period and Extension treatment period on Extension Safety 
Analysis Set:
-
Combined Main treatment period and Extension treatment period on Safety Analysis Set
-
Day 1 (from main study) to end of Extension follow-up period, or end of Main follow-up period 
for subjects not entering extension, on Safety Analysis Set
Post-treatment AEs tables will be presented for below periods/populations:
-
Combined Extension treatment and follow-up period on Follow-up Safety Analysis Set 
-
Extension follow-up period on Follow-up Safety Analysis Set
-
Day 1 (from main study) to end of Extension follow-up period, or end of Main follow-up period 
for subjects not entering extension, on Safety Analysis Set
All AEs tables will be presented for the below periods/populations:
-
Day 1 (from main study) to end of Extension follow-up period, or end of Main follow-up period 
for subjects not entering extension, on Safety Analysis Set
Periods are defined in section 5.2
Tables based on Safety Analysis Set will use the following treatment groups, with the note that 
subjects can have a different time of treatment exposure (up to 6 months for subjects not in 
extension, up to 12 months for subjects entering extension):
linzagolix 75 mg / linzagolix 75 mg
linzagolix 200 mg with ABT / linzagolix 200 mg with ABT
Placebo / linzagolix 75 mg (subject receiving placebo in main study and treated with 
linzagolix 75 mg in extension study)
Placebo / linzagolix 200 mg with ABT (subject receiving placebo in main study and treated 
with linzagolix 200 mg with ABT in extension study)
Placebo


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 63 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
If, for a subject not entering the Extension follow-up period, an AE occurs after Month 12-1 or 
treatment discontinuation, then the AE will be counted in the Extension treatment period.
For all study periods, an overall summary table will be prepared presenting, by treatment group, 
the number and percentage of subjects with 
any AE,
any TEAE,  
any post-treatment AE (displayed only for the Extension follow-up period),
Severe TEAE,
any TEAE assessed by the Investigator as related to linzagolix ((definite, probable, or 
possible relationship), 
any TEAE assessed by the Investigator as related to add-back therapy ((definite, 
probable, or possible relationship), 
any TEAE leading to permanent discontinuation of IMP, 
any serious adverse event (SAE),
any serious treatment emergent adverse event (Serious TEAE),
any non-serious TEAE
any serious treatment emergent adverse event (SAE) related to linzagolix,
any serious treatment emergent adverse event (SAE) related to add-back therapy, 
In these tabulations, each subject will contribute only once (i.e., via the most related occurrence 
or the most intense occurrence) to each of the incidence rates in the descriptive analysis, 
regardless of the number of episodes experienced.
Adverse events are summarized by subject incidence rates, therefore, in any tabulation, a subject 
contributes only once to the count for a given adverse event (SOC or preferred term).
For the Extension treatment period, Extension follow-up period and combined Extension 
treatment and follow-up period, the number and percentage of subjects with any treatment-
emergent adverse event, with any treatment-emergent adverse events assessed by the 
Investigator as related to treatment (definite, probable, or possible relationship), and with any 
treatment-emergent serious adverse event and with any treatment-emergent non-serious 
adverse event will be summarized by treatment group and overall, by SOC and PT.  Tabulation 
by severity will also be made. In these tabulations, each subject will contribute only once (i.e., 
the most related occurrence or the most intense occurrence) to each of the incidence rates in 
the descriptive analysis, regardless of the number of episodes.


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 64 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
The number of events will be also displayed for summaries on TEAE and for analysis of TEAE 
and non-serious TEAE by SOC and PT.
The ongoing status of each Adverse Event will be derived based on Adverse Event Outcome as 
the following:
AE Outcome
AE Ongoing Status
Fatal
No
Not recovered/not resolved
Yes
Recovering/resolving
Yes
Recovered/resolved
No
Recovered/resolved with sequelae
No
Unknown
Unknown
Missing
Missing
The ongoing status collected in eCRF will be ignored.
No formal hypothesis-testing analysis of adverse events incidence rates will be performed.  
All adverse events occurring on study will be listed in subject data listings.
By-subject listings also will be provided for the following: Treatment Emergent Adverse event, 
serious Treatment Emergent adverse events; Treatment Emergent adverse events leading to 
permanent discontinuation of IMP and leading to permanent discontinuation of IMP leading to 
death.
6.6.2.
Bone Mineral Density (BMD) by DXA
BMD of femoral neck, total hip and lumbar spine will be assessed by DXA at Baseline, Month 9 
(if required) Month 12 and Month 6 of the extension follow-up (if required). Unacceptable DXA 
spine and femur considered 
separately).
Initial and repeated scan values will be reported in the listings.
Calibrated values will be used if available, otherwise initial values will be considered.
BMD, expressed as both absolute values and Z-scores will be summarized at each visit in terms 
of actual values, changes from baseline, changes from baseline 2 (only for the subjects who are 


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 65 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
in the placebo arm in the main study) for each anatomic location. For absolute values only, 
percent change from baseline, percent changes from baseline 2 (only for the subjects who are 
in the placebo arm in the main study) and 95% confidence interval for the mean percent change 
from baseline and for the mean percent change from baseline 2 within each group will be 
produced at each time point.
The definition of both baselines are described in section 6.2.2. 
Percent change from baseline and percent change from baseline 2 to Month 9, Month 12 and 
Month 6 extension follow-up will be described and will also be summarized in categories of 
percentage with the following classes:
No change or increase,
Decrease > 8%.
All data except unacceptable DXA measurements
will be listed.
Due to the war situation in Ukraine, data from subjects in Ukraine sites may be incomplete, 
missing or uncleaned. A sensitivity analysis of the BMD will be performed, excluding data 
collected after 24FEB2022 for subjects from Ukraine sites. An additional listing including 
subjects from Ukraine only will be provided.
6.6.3.
Laboratory Data
Clinical laboratory values will be expressed using conventional SI units.
Hematology, coagulation parameters, chemistry and lipids were assessed at screening and at 
each visit during the extension treatment period (from M7 to M12), as well as at the M1 ExtFU 
and M3 ExtFU visits. 
E2, progesterone (P4) and LH were assessed at each visit during the extension treatment period 
(from M6 to M12), as well as at M1 ExtFU and M3 ExtFU visits.
Serum levels of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) were assessed on Month 6, Month 9 and 
Month 12 visits. 
Blood samples were to be analyzed by the central laboratory. Due to the covid-19 situation, some 
samples may be collected by local laboratories. 
For Hematology, coagulation parameters, chemistry and lipids, the actual value, change from 
baseline and change from baseline 2 (only for the subjects who are in the placebo arm in the 


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 66 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
main study) will be summarized for each visit for each treatment group. In the event of repeated 
values, the last non-missing value per study day/time will be used.
Semi-
Evaluation of shifts for changes from baseline and for changes from baseline 2 (only for the 
subjects who are in the placebo arm in the main study) to all visits according to the normal ranges 
where available (for ALT, AST, ALP, Bilirubin, Albumin, 
Calcium, Creatine Kinase) and according to normal/abnormal/abnormal clinically significant 
information collected otherwise, will be provided. 
For Liver Function Test (LFT) parameters (ALT, AST, ALP, total bilirubin, albumin), evaluation of 
shifts for changes from baseline will be extended by the worst (highest) on-treatment value 
For the lipid panel (Triglycerides, HDL, LDL, Total Cholesterol, LDL/HDL ratio), the percent 
change from baseline and the percent change from baseline 2 (only for the subjects who are in 
the placebo arm in the main study) to each on-study visit will also be summarized.
Assessments from local laboratories will not be included in summaries and shift tables, as normal 
ranges may not be comparable.
For serum levels of E2, P4, SHBG and LH, only the actual values at each time point will be 
summarized. Note: in the event of repeated values, the last non-missing value per study 
day/time will be used.
In addition, for E2, the proportion of subjects with the following categories:
E2 <20 pg/mL, 
at each visit and for each treatment group will be provided in tables and graphically (bar charts). 
For E2, samples analysed after the period of long-term stability should be excluded from analysis.
The relationship between E2 serum levels and bone mineral density loss will be explored 
graphically in different ways:
First, the E2 serum level measured at Month 12 will be plotted on the x-axis against the 
percent BMD change from baseline measured at Month 12 on the left side y-axis and the 
percentage of subjects with clinically meaningful reduction of DYS (resp. NMPP) with 
stable or decreased use of analgesics for EAP on the right side y-axis. Thresholds from 
the Month 3 Meaningful Change Threshold analysis will be used for DYS and NMPP. A 
second plot showing the BMD percent change from baseline 2 (for subjects who are in 
placebo arm in the main study) and reduction of DYS and NMPP from baseline 2 will be 
produced. 


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 67 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
Second, bar charts will be produced at each visit from Month 6 to Month 12 and presented 
with the percent BMD change from baseline to Month 12 on the y-axis and the proportion 
of subjects with the E2 categories described above on the x-axis. Similar graphs will be 
produced for each of the BMD sites (femoral neck, hip, and spine), and for the BMD 
percent change from baseline 2 (for subjects who are in placebo arm in the main study). 
Lastly, bar charts of the proportion of subjects with the E2 categories described above on 
the x-axis will be plotted against the percentage of responders according to the primary 
endpoint, using DYS and NMPP thresholds from the Month 3 Meaningful Change 
Threshold analysis. Bar charts with percentage of responders from baseline 2 will be 
shown as well.
For P4, since P4 above 10 nMol/L may suggest luteal activity and hence ovulation, the proportion 
of subjects with P4 >10.0 nMol/L at least once from Month 6 to Month 12 will also be provided in 
tables.
The number and percentage of subjects with cholesterol values in the following categories
HDL < 40 mg/dL 
will be reported at each visit.
Shift tables from baseline and shift tables from baseline 2 (only for the subjects who are in the 
placebo arm in the main study) to each visit will be provided for the following LDL and 
Triglycerides categories (after rounding to integer values if necessary).
LDL:
1: 131 to 159 mg/dL
2: 160 to 189 mg/dL
Triglycerides:
1: 151 to 300 mg/dL
2: 301 to 500 mg/dL
3: 501 to 1000 mg/dL
4: >1000 mg/dL


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 68 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) at local laboratory for subjects that do not resume menses 
at M3 ExFU visit will be summarized and listed.
All laboratory data will be provided in data listings. Day 1 Serum levels of the anti-müllerian 
hormone (AMH) and fasting glucose will be included in the listings.
A subset listing will be presented for all abnormal clinically significant laboratory values.
6.6.4.
Vital Signs and Physical Examinations
Vital signs include: Height (cm), Weight (kg), Body Mass Index, Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg), 
Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg) and Heart Rate (beats/min).
Height is assessed at Screening (main study); Weight is assessed at Month 6, Month 9, Month 
12, as well as at M3 ExtFU and M6 ExtFU visits. Other Vital Signs are assessed at every monthly 
visit during the extension treatment period and at Month 1, 3 and 6 from the extension follow-up 
period.
Physical Examination was to be assessed Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, as well as at M3 ExtFU 
and M6 ExtFU visits. 
The actual value, change from baseline and change from baseline 2 (only for the subjects who 
are in the placebo arm in the main study) for each on-study evaluation will be summarized by 
treatment group for vital signs.  
By-subject listings of vital sign measurements will be presented in data listings.
Physical examination results at each time point will be summarized by treatment group; Shifts 
from Baseline and shift from baseline 2 (only for the subjects who are in the placebo arm in the 
main study) in physical examination findings to each on study visit will also be presented.  
All physical examination findings will be presented in a data listing.
6.6.5.
Electrocardiogram
Local 12-lead ECG readings of QTcF are performed at every monthly visit during the extension 
treatment period, as well as Months 1,3 and 6 from the extension follow-up period.
Baseline will be defined as the highest QTcF value prior to first dose of the main study.
Baseline 2 will be defined as the highest QTcF value prior to first active dose of the extension 
study from screening to Month 6 (only for subjects in the placebo arm of the main study).
The actual value, change from baseline and change from baseline 2 (only for the subjects who 
are in the placebo arm in the main study) of ECG results will be summarized descriptively, as 
well as the number and percent of subjects with normal, abnormal and clinically significant 
abnormal results at each study visit by treatment group.
All ECG data for each subject will be provided in data listings.


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 69 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
6.6.6.
Concomitant Medications
Concomitant medications will be coded using the WHO Drug dictionary. Frequencies and 
percentages will be presented for each treatment group and overall by the first level anatomical 
main (ATC 1) group and preferred name. Vitamin D and Calcium supplementation as collected 
in the eCRF at each visit will be summarized as well.
All medications administered between the date of the Month 6 visit and the date of the last dose 
of extension study drug, inclusive, (i.e., all medications starting or ongoing during the time 
interval) are concomitant to the extension treatment period. 
Concomitant medications tables will be presented for the following periods: Month 6 to Month 12 
(Extension treatment period) and Month 12 to Month 6 ExFU (Extension follow-up period) as 
defined in section 5.2.1.
The use of prior and concomitant medications will be included in a by-subject data listing.
6.6.7.
Transvaginal Ultrasound (TVUS)
TVUS was to be performed at Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, as well as Month 3 and Month 6 of 
Extension Follow-up period.
The actual value, change from baseline and change from baseline 2 (only for subjects in the 
placebo arm in the main study) will be summarized by treatment group for uterus length, width, 
and depth in mm and corresponding uterine volume in cm3, endometrium thickness in mm.
The number and percentage of subjects with ovarian endometrioma with a diameter of 7 cm or 
greater, and development of any uterus, left ovary or right ovary abnormality over time will be 
presented by treatment group.
All TVUS data for each subject will be provided in data listings.
6.6.8.
Other Examinations
6.6.8.1.
Endometrial biopsy
Biopsies for histological assessment were obtained for each subject at the following timepoints:  
-
Month 6 or one at Month 12 if endometrium thickness via TVUS is > 5 mm 
-
Month 1 ExtFU, 3 ExtFU, or 6 ExtFU if not obtained at Month 12 or if the preceding biopsy 
For b
at other visits than screening, a second read of the biopsy was to be performed. If the diagnosis 
of the two reads was different, then the sample was to be re-read a 3rd time. In case of multiple 
readings, the following rules will be applied for the statistical analysis:
-
If 2 readings out of 3 lead to the same diagnosis, one of these 2 records will be selected.


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 70 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
-
Otherwise, the record corresponding to the most severe diagnosis should be selected 
considering the following order, from less severe to more severe: simple without Atypia 
hyperplasia < complex without Atypia hyperplasia < simple with atypia hyperplasia < complex 
with Atypia hyperplasia < endometrial malignant neoplasm < other malignant neoplasm.
In addition, in order to perform a quality check of the readings, 15% of biopsies were sent blinded 
readings when the primary
will be used for the analysis.
A summary at each time point will be performed (number and percentage of subjects with normal, 
abnormal, not assessable). 
Biopsy assessment will be summarized by classification (primary diagnosis 1) and primary 
diagnoses (diagnoses 2, 3 and 4) at each visit. Subjects will be counted only once for 
classification (primary diagnosis 1) and a subject could be in several diagnoses (e.g. if for 
example diagnoses 2 and 3 are fulfilled). 
Possible results by classification (primary diagnosis 1) and primary diagnoses (diagnoses 2, 3 
and 4) are:
-
Benign Endometrium without Hyperplasia or Atypia: Proliferative, Atrophic, Metaplastic 
Changes, Secretory, Indeterminate, Inactive, Polyp, Endometritis, Menstrual phase, Other
-
Hyperplasia: Simple with Atypia, Simple without Atypia, Complex with Atypia, Complex 
without Atypia
-
Malignant Endometrial Neoplasm: Carcinoma, Sarcoma, Other Malignant.
If any diagnosis does not correspond to any on the list, the diagnosis will be coded as: Other 
Malignant if classification is Malignant Endometrial Neoplasm, and Other for any other 
classification.
Endometrial biopsy results, including multiple readings, will be reported in listings.
Due to the war situation in Ukraine, some biopsy samples may have been collected and analyzed 
by local laboratories. Those assessments will be flagged in the listings. Information about local 
biopsy assessment is reported in Data Management Close queries file. This file will be provided 
by data management department and reviewed by Sponsor. Biopsy assessments performed
locally can be identified in the queries list from Endometrial Biopsy page, by subject and visit and
6.6.8.2.
Gynecological and Breast examination
Gynecological Examination was to be assessed at Month 6, Month 9 and Month 12, as well as 
Month 3 of the extension Follow-Up period. 
Breast examination (by palpation) was to be performed at Month 6 and Month 12, as well as 
Month 3 of the extension Follow-Up period. 


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 71 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
A summary at each time point will be performed (number and percentage of subjects with normal, 
abnormal, abnormal significant) for Gynecological and Breast Examinations. 
Results will also be reported in listings.
6.6.8.3.
PAP Smear
PAP Smear is collected at Screening. A listing of abnormality information and a listing of 
diagnosis results will be provided, including possible unscheduled assessments.
6.6.8.4.
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
The C-SSRS questionnaire prospectively assess the occurrence of treatment-emergent suicidal 
ideation and behavior. 
Subjects completed:
-
-SSRS version, capturing lifetime history of suicidal ideation and 
behavior, for subjects who were still in screening period in the main study, 
-
-SSRS version, for subjects already enrolled in the main or 
in the Extension study, and who were providing answers to the C-SSRS for the first time during 
the study
- t
-SSRS version, dedicated to subjects for whom the C-SSRS was 
completed at the previous study visit, for use at all remaining study visits.
-SSRS version was to be completed during Screening, or at Day 1 if not done 
during Screening.
The number of subjects experiencing the following, at baseline and at any time post-baseline in 
the extension study, will be summarized for each month from Day 1 to Month 12 and from 
Month 6 up to Month 12. For Month 6 to Month 12 
already enrolled questionnaire will not be included, as it cannot be identify whether the event 
occurred between Day 1 and Month 6 or Month 6 and Month 12.
-
Any suicidal ideation or behavior
Wish to be dead.
Non-specific active suicidal thoughts.
Active suicidal ideation with any methods (not plan) without intent to act.
Active suicidal ideation with some intent to act, without specific plan.
Active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent.
-
Any Suicidal Behavior
Actual attempt.


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 72 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
Interrupted attempt.
Aborted attempt.
Preparatory acts or behavior.
Completed suicide (Actual attempt leading to death) (not at baseline)
-
Emergence of suicidal ideation.
-
Worsening of suicidal ideation.
-
Emergence of suicidal behavior.
for suicidal ideation or for at least one of five questions for suicidal behavior.
Emergence of suicidal ideation/behavior is defined as having no suicidal ideation/behavior at 
baseline and having reported any type of suicidal ideation/behavior at any time post-baseline 
Worsening of suicidal ideation is defined to occur when the most severe suicidal ideation rating 
since study start at any time post-baseline is more severe than its rating at baseline. The Suicidal 
ideation rating is defined as the following, as recommended in the C-SSRS scoring and analysis 
guide 
in 
https://cssrs.columbia.edu/wp-content/uploads/ScoringandDataAnalysisGuide-for-
Clinical-Trials-1.pdf:
Maximal suicidal ideation category during the period (baseline, post-baseline up to Month 
12 FU period) where categories range from 0 to 5:
0.
No ideation
1.
Wish to be dead
2.
Non-specific active suicidal thoughts.
3.
Active suicidal ideation with any methods (not plan) without intent to act.
4.
Active suicidal ideation with some intent to act, without specific plan.
5.
Active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent.
If data of suicidal ideation or behavior is missing at baseline then the subject will not be included 
-
randomized at the time of C-SSRS questionnaire implementation.
Same analysis will be repeated on the extension follow-up period (from Month 1 to Month 6 of 
the Extension FU Period).


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 73 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
6.6.8.5.
Time to the first post-treatment menses
The first post-treatment menses will be defined from the Vaginal Bleeding daily ediary, as the 
first day for which the subject recorded bleeding after the last treatment administration date of 
the extension study, i.e., the first da
treatment administration date of the extension study.
Time to first post-treatment menses is defined as:
Time to first post-treatment menses (days) = (day of first post-treatment menses last treatment 
administration date in extension) + 1
Only data from the follow-up extension period will be included, and the analysis will be provided 
on the Follow-up Extension Safety Analysis Set, by treatment group.
Subjects who have not recorded any bleeding up to the end of the follow-up extension period will 
be considered as right-censored data at the last ediary vaginal bleeding record date before the 
end of the extension follow-up period (as defined in section 5.2) with time of censoring = last non-
missing ediary vaginal bleeding record date 
last treatment administration date in extension +1. 
The probability of subjects having bleeding will be displayed by treatment group in the form of 
cumulative probability curves estimated using the non-parametric Kaplan-Meier method. Point 
estimates and corresponding 2-
provided at 28 days, 56 days, 84 days, 112 days, 140 days, 168 days, 196 days after the last 
treatment administration date in extension.  Percentiles (25th, 50th, and 75th) and corresponding 
2-
ny of the percentiles not 
reached.
Subjects with or without first post-treatment menses, time to first post-treatment menses, end of 
study status and end of study date will be presented in a by-subject listing.
6.7.
Unblinding of subjects
Subjects that were unblinded during the course of the study will be summarized and listed. The 
cumulative unblinding history report from IWRS will be provided by the Sponsor in an excel 
format. This file will only contain unblinding status but no treatment information.
6.8.
Exploratory Analyses
Bone turnover markers will be analyzed on the Extension Safety Analysis Set.  
Blood samples for exploratory bone biomarkers include, but may not be limited to, collagen type 
-carboxy-telopeptide (CTx), procollagen 1 Intact N-Terminal (P1NP), bone-specific alkaline 
phosphatase (B-ALP) and osteocalcin as part of clinical chemistry, and are collected at Month 6, 
Month 9 and Month 12 and Month 3 Extension Follow-up. These exploratory data will be kept 
blinded up to the unblinding of the database.


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 74 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
Actual values and changes from baseline will be summarized overtime by treatment group. Bone 
marker data will be reported in listings as well.


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 75 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
7.
CHANGES TO PLANNED ANALYSES
The Follow-up Extension Analysis Set, defined in protocol as:
All subjects from the main study who completed the 6 months of treatment in the extension 
study and who entered the Post-Treatment Follow-Up Period. Subjects will be analyzed 
according to randomized treatment.
Is changed to:
All subjects from the main study who entered the extension study and received at least one 
dose of study drug with the exception of subjects whose Month 6 assessment subsequently 
met any of the discontinuation criteria, and who entered the Post-Treatment Follow-Up Period. 
Subjects will be analyzed according to randomized treatment.
The rationale for this modification is that subjects that entered the Follow-up period, even if 
they did not complete the 6 months of extension treatment should be followed up for efficacy.
Updates from SAP Amendments since SAP V1.0 are summarized in the table below:
SAP Version
Update description
SAP Section
Reason
V2.0
Assessments from Local 
Laboratories (due to Covid-19 
situation) will be excluded 
from summary tables of 
laboratory data
Section 6.6.3
Local laboratories may 
not have comparable 
normal ranges, thus it 
does not make sense to 
pool them with central 
laboratory data in numeric 
summaries. 
V2.0
Biopsy assessments from 
Local Laboratories (due to 
war situation in Ukraine )
should be flagged in listings. 
Information is available in 
Data Management Closed 
Queries File. 
Section 6.6.8.1
Due to war situation in 
Ukraine, there were some 
Biopsies assessed locally. 
This information should 
be incorporated in listings.
V2.0
Addition of listings for PAP 
Smear for both abnormality 
and diagnosis information.
Section 6.6.8.3
PAP Smear listings were 
missing from original SAP 
Version.
V3.0
All protocol deviations related 
to a particular subject will be 
presented in the data listings.
Section 4.2
There were PD records 
which had missing subject 
ID and thus were not 


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 76 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
related to any particular 
subject. These records 
were excluded in the 
listings.
V3.0
Added additional condition 
when imputing missing date 
for AE onset: The missing 
Day & Month will be replaced 
information provides evidence 
that the event should not be 
defined as treatment-
emergent AE.
Section 6.2.6.2
When imputing the 
missing Day & Month for 
AE onset date, other 
information (time course 
and onset timing for 
events) may help provide 
evidence to define
treatment-emergent AE.
V3.0
Assessments from the main
study (i.e before Month 6) will 
be also displayed in the safety 
and efficacy tables and 
listings.
Section 6.4.
Section 6.6
To provide more 
efficacy/safety
information.
V3.0
The summary tables for 
HRPQ, HRUQ, PGIC, mPGIS 
will be summarized up to 
Month 6 Extension FU and 
not up to Month 12.
Section 6.4.3.26, 
Section 6.4.3.27, 
Section 6.4.3.31, 
Section 6.4.3.32
To provide more efficacy 
information.
V3.0
Added by-subject listings for 
HRPQ, PROMIS, EQ-5D-5L 
for follow-up extension 
analysis set. 
Section 6.4.3.26,
Section 6.4.3.29,
Section 6.4.3.30
To provide more efficacy 
information.
V3.0
For AEs and post-treatment 
AEs, summary tables and 
tables by SOC and PT are 
presented for selected 
periods/population, not all 
periods/populations.
Section 6.6.1
Only TAEAs summary 
tables and tables by SOC 
and PT will be presented 
for all periods/populations. 
V3.0
Not all measurements of 
Bone Mineral Density (BMD) 
by Dual-Energy X-ray 
Absorptiometry (DXA) will be
presented. Only those
Section 6.6.2
Only acceptable 
measurement will be 
presented. 


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 77 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
measurements with an 
acceptable DXA 
measurement will be listed.
V3.0
Added the summary table and 
listing for Follicle-Stimulating 
Hormone (FSH) at local 
laboratory for subjects that do 
not resume menses at M3 
ExFU visit.
Section 6.6.3
Added as part of safety 
analyses.


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 78 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
8.
REFERENCES
Not applicable


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 79 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
9.
APPENDICES
9.1.
Appendix A: Analgesic change during treatment period
Use of No Analgesics at Baseline
Analgesic 
used 
during 
Screening
Analgesic dose status at 
end of study
Assessment of Change
None
None**
Stable/Decrease
Narcotic analgesic and/or 
ibuprofen is started
Increase
Use of Only Ibuprofen at Baseline
Analgesic uses at Baseline
Analgesic dose status at 
end of study
Assessment of Change
ibuprofen
Dose stopped, decreases, or 
is stable**
Stable/Decrease
Dose increases by 15% or 
more
Increase
Narcotic 
analgesic 
is 
substituted or added
Increase
Use of Only Narcotic Analgesic at Baseline
Analgesic uses at Baseline
Analgesic dose status at 
end of study
Assessment of Change
Narcotic analgesic
Dose stopped, decreases, or 
is stable**
Stable/Decrease
Dose stopped and ibuprofen 
substituted (any dose)
Stable/Decrease
Dose 
decreases 
and 
ibuprofen added (any dose)
Stable/Decrease


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 80 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
Dose stable and ibuprofen 
added (any dose)**
Increase
Dose increases by 15% or 
more
Increase
Use of Ibuprofen and Narcotic Analgesic at Baseline
Analgesic uses at Baseline
Analgesic dose status at 
end of study
Assessment of Change
ibuprofen 
+ 
narcotic 
analgesic
Ibuprofen 
dose 
stops 
+ 
narcotic analgesic use stops, 
decreases, or is stable**
Stable/Decrease
Ibuprofen 
use 
stops 
+ 
narcotic 
analgesic 
dose 
increases by more than 15%
Increase
Ibuprofen dose decreases + 
narcotic analgesic use stops, 
decreases, or is stable**
Stable/Decrease
Ibuprofen dose decreases + 
narcotic 
analgesic 
dose 
increases by more than 15%
Increase
Ibuprofen dose stable + 
narcotic analgesic use
stops, 
decreases, 
or 
is 
stable**
Stable/Decrease
Ibuprofen dose stable + 
narcotic analgesic dose
increases by more than 15%
Increase


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 81 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
Ibuprofen dose increases by 
more than 15% + narcotic 
analgesic use stops
Stable/Decrease
Ibuprofen dose increases by 
more than 15% + narcotic 
analgesic dose decreases
Stable/Decrease
Ibuprofen dose increases by 
more than 15% + narcotic 
analgesic dose is stable**
Increase
Ibuprofen dose increases by 
more than 15% + narcotic 
analgesic dose increases by 
15% or more
Increase
**Stable =Dose is the same as the screening dose or increases by less than or equal to 15% of 
the screening dose. In addition, a subject can increase the monthly total dose of analgesics by 
one pill of analgesic (either ibuprofen or narcotic) and still be considered stable.
9.2.
Appendix B: EHP-30 Scoring
The mapping of the response categories for the EHP-30 core questionnaire and the
modular questionnaire is as follows:
0 = Never, 1 = Rarely, 2 = Sometimes, 3 = Often, 4 = Always
For the modular questionnaire, records indicating "Not Applicable" will be excluded from
summary/analysis.
Missing data will not be imputed.
The EHP-30 core questionnaire is structured into the following five dimensions.
1. Pain (Questions 1 
11)
2. Control and Powerlessness (Questions 12 
17)
3. Emotional Well-Being (Questions 18 
23)
4. Social Support (Questions 24 
27)
5. Self-Image (Questions 28 
30)
Each dimension for the core and modular questionnaire is calculated on a scale from 0 to
100.
0 = best possible health status as measured by the questionnaire; 100 = worst possible


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 82 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
health status as measured by the questionnaire. Within each dimension, assessment will
be based on the following equation: 
Sum of scores for each dimension / 4 (maximum score per item) * number of items in the 
dimension
Sum of the scores for each item in the dimension
Core questionnaire: Pain
((Ql + Q2 + Q3 + Q4 + Q5 + Q6 + Q7 + Q8 + Q9 + Q10 + Q11)/44) × 100
2. Core questionnaire: Control and Powerlessness
((Q12 + Q13 + Q14 + Q15 + Q16 + Q17)/24) × 100
3. Core questionnaire: Emotional well-being
((Q18 + Q19 + Q20 + Q21 + Q22 + Q23)/24) × 100
4. Core questionnaire: Social Support
((Q24 + Q25 + Q26 + Q27)/16) × 100
5. Core questionnaire: Self-Image
((Q28 + Q29 + Q30)/12) × 100
Modular questionnaire: Sexual intercourse
((C1 + C2 + C3 + C4 + C5)/(total or 20)) × 100
For Modular questionnaire: Sexual intercourse, if a "not applicable" box is
checked for one or more of the five items (Questions C1 
C5), the score is
calculated by omitting those "not applicable" items from the numerator and the
denominator.
If any of the components of a dimension on the core or modular questionnaire is
missing, no score will be calculated for that dimension. For example, if answer for
Q1 is missing, no score for Core questionnaire: Pain is calculated. If answer for
C1 is missing, no score for Modular questionnaire: Sexual intercourse will be calculated.
9.3.
Appendix C: HRPQ Scoring
Data Cleaning
1. No imputation of data should be conducted. Missing data fields should be treated
as missing.
2. For respondents indicating they are not currently employed (checking box 1c),
Responses 2 
4 should be coded as missing.
3. Code Response 3b to zero if Response 3c is checked. Code Response 6b to zero if
Response 6c is checked.
4. The hours of work missed at work or in the home cannot be greater than the hours
of work for which they were scheduled.


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 83 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
a. If Response 3b is > Response 2, Response 3b = Response 2
b. If Response 6b is > Response 5, Response 6b = Response 5
Note: Respondents with no reported scheduled hours (zero hours or missing
values) of paid work (Response 2) or planned hours of work in the household
(Response 5), should be excluded from the analyses regarding productivity in those
respective venues.
-
Calculation of hours of lost work due to absenteeism by class of work
5. Calculate the number of hours absent by class of work:
a. Workplace: Response 3b
b. Household: Response 6b
Calculation of hours of lost work due to presenteeism by class of work
6. Calculate the number of hours worked by class of work:
a. Workplace: Response 2 
Response 3b
b. Household: Response 5 
Response 6b
7. Calculate the hours of work lost due to presenteeism by class of work:
a. Workplace: Calc 6a × (Response 4/100)
b. Household: Calc 6b × (Response 7/100)
Calculation of total [absenteeism + presenteeism] hours of lost work by class of work
8. Calculate the sum by class of work:
a. Workplace: Calc 5a + Calc 7a
b. Household: Calc 5b + Calc 7b
Calculation of the % of scheduled work lost due to absenteeism, presenteeism, and
total productivity loss by class of work
9. Calculate the % of work lost due to absenteeism
a. Workplace: (Calc 5a/Response 2) × 100
b. Household: (Calc 5b/Response 5) × 100
10. Calculate the % of work lost due to presenteeism
a. Workplace: (Calc 7a/Response 2) × 100
b. Household: (Calc 7b/Response 5) × 100
11. Calculate the total % of work lost
a. Workplace: Calc 9a + Calc 10a
b. Household: Calc 9b + Calc 10b
Calculation of the workplace productivity impacts by current employment status
12. Subset subjects by their current employment status to report productivity impacts
among those employed full-time and those employed part-time


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 84 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
Calculation of hours of lifetime productivity lost until the time of measurement due
to illness impacts on workforce participation
Note: Calculations 13 and 14 should be made for only those respondents who have
non-zero non-missing responses to Question 2
13. Mean weekly hours of scheduled work in previous week for subjects full-time
employed
a. Mean of Response 2 among subjects selecting Response 1a at baseline
14. Mean weekly hours of scheduled work in previous week for subjects part-time
employed at baseline
a. Mean of Response 2 among subjects selecting Response 1b at baseline
Note: Calculations 15 through 17 should be made for only those respondents
indicating they have experienced that workforce participation impact
15. Hours of lifetime productivity lost due to illness induced part-time employment
when subject would have continued full-time employment
a. ((Response 9a × 4.33 wks/mo) + (Response 9b × 52 wks/yr)) × (Calc 13 
Calc 14)
16. Hours of lifetime productivity lost due to illness induced premature retirement
when subject would have continued full-time employment
a. ((Response 9c × 4.33 wks/mo) + (Response 9d × 52 wks/yr)) × Calc 13
17. Hours of lifetime productivity lost due to illness induced premature retirement
when subject would have continued part-time employment
a. ((Response 9e × 4.33 wks/mo) + (Response 9f × 52 wks/yr)) × Calc 14
18. Total hours of lifetime productivity lost due to illness impact on workforce
participation
a. Calc 15 + Calc 16 + Calc 17


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 85 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
9.4.
Appendix D: EQ-5D TTO Scoring
Computing EQ-5D-5L crosswalk index values with SAS using the United States (US) value set:
The variables for the 5 dimensions of the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system should be named 
'mobility', 'selfcare', 'activity', 'pain', and 'anxiety'. If they are given different names the syntax 
code below will not work properly. The 5 variables should contain the values for the different 
dimensions in the EQ-5D health profile (i.e. 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5). The variable 'EQindex' contains the 
values of the EQ-5D-5L crosswalk index values on the basis of the US set of weights. 
You can copy and paste the syntax below directly into a SAS syntax window.
******************************************************************
*SAS syntax code for the computation of index*
*values with the US TTO value set*
******************************************************************;
data Euroqol.US_tto;
set Euroqol.EQ5D_states;
EQindex = .;
if (mobility=1 and selfcare=1 and activity=1 and pain=1 and anxiety=1) then EQindex = 1.000;
if (mobility=1 and selfcare=1 and activity=1 and pain=1 and anxiety=2) then EQindex = 0.876;
if (mobility=1 and selfcare=1 and activity=1 and pain=1 and anxiety=3) then EQindex = 0.844;
if (mobility=1 and selfcare=1 and activity=1 and pain=1 and anxiety=4) then EQindex = 0.700;
if (mobility=1 and selfcare=1 and activity=1 and pain=1 and anxiety=5) then EQindex = 0.550;
if (mobility=1 and selfcare=1 and activity=1 and pain=2 and anxiety=1) then EQindex = 0.861;
if (mobility=1 and selfcare=1 and activity=1 and pain=2 and anxiety=2) then EQindex = 0.820;
if (mobility=1 and selfcare=1 and activity=1 and pain=2 and anxiety=3) then EQindex = 0.809;
if (mobility=1 and selfcare=1 and activity=1 and pain=2 and anxiety=4) then EQindex = 0.669;
if (mobility=1 and selfcare=1 and activity=1 and pain=2 and anxiety=5) then EQindex = 0.524;
if (mobility=1 and selfcare=1 and activity=1 and pain=3 and anxiety=1) then EQindex = 0.827;
if (mobility=1 and selfcare=1 and activity=1 and pain=3 and anxiety=2) then EQindex = 0.806;
if (mobility=1 and selfcare=1 and activity=1 and pain=3 and anxiety=3) then EQindex = 0.800;
if (mobility=1 and selfcare=1 and activity=1 and pain=3 and anxiety=4) then EQindex = 0.661;
if (mobility=1 and selfcare=1 and activity=1 and pain=3 and anxiety=5) then EQindex = 0.517;
if (mobility=1 and selfcare=1 and activity=1 and pain=4 and anxiety=1) then EQindex = 0.682;


CONFIDENTIAL 
Kissei
SAP version: 3.0, Date: 28-AUG-2023 
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 86 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.
if (mobility=1 and selfcare=1 and activity=1 and pain=4 and anxiety=2) then EQindex = 0.663;
if (mobility=1 and selfcare=1 and activity=1 and pain=4 and anxiety=3) then EQindex = 0.659;
if (mobility=1 and selfcare=1 and activity=1 and pain=4 and anxiety=4) then EQindex = 0.544;
if (mobility=1 and selfcare=1 and activity=1 and pain=4 and anxiety=5) then EQindex = 0.426;
if (mobility=1 and selfcare=1 and activity=1 and pain=5 and anxiety=1) then EQindex = 0.463;
if (mobility=1 and selfcare=1 and activity=1 and pain=5 and anxiety=2) then EQindex = 0.450;
if (mobility=1 and selfcare=1 and activity=1 and pain=5 and anxiety=3) then EQindex = 0.446;
if (mobility=1 and selfcare=1 and activity=1 and pain=5 and anxiety=4) then EQindex = 0.369;
if (mobility=1 and selfcare=1 and activity=1 and pain=5 and anxiety=5) then EQindex = 0.289;
if (mobility=5 and selfcare=5 and activity=5 and pain=1 and anxiety=1) then EQindex = 0.178;
if (mobility=5 and selfcare=5 and activity=5 and pain=1 and anxiety=2) then EQindex = 0.165;
if (mobility=5 and selfcare=5 and activity=5 and pain=1 and anxiety=3) then EQindex = 0.162;
if (mobility=5 and selfcare=5 and activity=5 and pain=1 and anxiety=4) then EQindex = 0.113;
if (mobility=5 and selfcare=5 and activity=5 and pain=1 and anxiety=5) then EQindex = 0.063;
if (mobility=5 and selfcare=5 and activity=5 and pain=2 and anxiety=1) then EQindex = 0.152;
if (mobility=5 and selfcare=5 and activity=5 and pain=2 and anxiety=2) then EQindex = 0.132;
if (mobility=5 and selfcare=5 and activity=5 and pain=2 and anxiety=3) then EQindex = 0.127;
if (mobility=5 and selfcare=5 and activity=5 and pain=2 and anxiety=4) then EQindex = 0.083;
if (mobility=5 and selfcare=5 and activity=5 and pain=2 and anxiety=5) then EQindex = 0.037;
if (mobility=5 and selfcare=5 and activity=5 and pain=3 and anxiety=1) then EQindex = 0.145;
if (mobility=5 and selfcare=5 and activity=5 and pain=3 and anxiety=2) then EQindex = 0.124;
if (mobility=5 and selfcare=5 and activity=5 and pain=3 and anxiety=3) then EQindex = 0.118;
if (mobility=5 and selfcare=5 and activity=5 and pain=3 and anxiety=4) then EQindex = 0.075;
if (mobility=5 and selfcare=5 and activity=5 and pain=3 and anxiety=5) then EQindex = 0.030;
if (mobility=5 and selfcare=5 and activity=5 and pain=4 and anxiety=1) then EQindex = 0.078;
if (mobility=5 and selfcare=5 and activity=5 and pain=4 and anxiety=2) then EQindex = 0.060;
if (mobility=5 and selfcare=5 and activity=5 and pain=4 and anxiety=3) then EQindex = 0.055;
if (mobility=5 and selfcare=5 and activity=5 and pain=4 and anxiety=4) then EQindex = 0.015;
if (mobility=5 and selfcare=5 and activity=5 and pain=4 and anxiety=5) then EQindex = -0.026;
if (mobility=5 and selfcare=5 and activity=5 and pain=5 and anxiety=1) then EQindex = -0.024;
if (mobility=5 and selfcare=5 and activity=5 and pain=5 and anxiety=2) then EQindex = -0.037;
if (mobility=5 and selfcare=5 and activity=5 and pain=5 and anxiety=3) then EQindex = -0.040;
if (mobility=5 and selfcare=5 and activity=5 and pain=5 and anxiety=4) then EQindex = -0.074;
if (mobility=5 and selfcare=5 and activity=5 and pain=5 and anxiety=5) then EQindex = -0.109;
if (mobility = .) or (selfcare = .) or (activity = .) or (pain = .) or (anxiety = .) then EQindex = . ;
output;
run;


























CONFIDENTIAL Kissei.
SAP version: 3.0,  Date:28-AUG-2023
CRS-BS-TP-000005 V 2.0
Page 99 of 99
Kissei / Cytel Confidential: This is a controlled document and shall not be changed, saved, copied or reproduced by 
any unauthorized person.