Conditions: Asthma Chronic
Keywords: Asthma Azithromycin Microbiome Sputum
Allocation: RANDOMIZED | Intervention model: PARALLEL
Enrollment: 17
Healthy volunteers: yes

Brief summary:
The purpose of this study to determine whether the bacteria inside the lungs of people with asthma can be modified (changed) if they are given an antibiotic and if this change is associated with an improvement in asthma symptoms.

Detailed description:

Arms:
arm 1: 8 weeks of placebo capsule once daily by mouth arm 2: 8 weeks of Azithromycin (250 mg) capsule once daily by mouth arm 3: Non-asthmatic controls to assess variability of microbiome composition and diversity over time in a normal population. No intervention given.

Interventions: intervention 1: Azithromycin intervention 2: Placebo
Intervention descriptions: intervention 1: 8 weeks of Azithromycin (250 mg) once daily by mouth intervention 2: Placebo

Protocol document:
Prot_SAP_000.pdf: 
 
 
1 
Version:31Oct2018 
 
The AZITRAMBA trial: Azithromycin treatment for the airway microbiome in asthma 
 
Principal Investigator: Steven R. White, MD (University of Chicago) 
 
Principal Investigator at Northwestern University: Lewis J. Smith, MD 
 
Co-Investigators: University of Chicago: Jack Gilbert, PhD, Ted Naureckas, MD,  
Theodore Karrison, PhD, Mihai Giurcanu, MD.   
 
Co- Investigator: Northwestern University: Sharon Rosenberg,MD 
 
Background  
 
Asthma is a common, complex, heterogeneous disease with increasing prevalence and morbidi-
ty that results from interactions between genetic and environmental factors (1-4). A modern, 
Western lifestyle, exposures to pollutants and diesel exhaust, key viral and bacterial infections 
in early life, and increased contact with select allergens, all promote asthma risk and over time 
lead to persistent airway inflammation and remodeling (5-16). Important investigations are fo-
cused appropriately on the origins and early-life development of asthma, yet there are tens of 
millions of adults with chronic asthma. Associations between bacterial colonization of infant air-
ways and subsequent development of asthma (17), presence of specific bronchial bacterial 
pathogens in adults with asthma (18), efficacy of macrolide antibiotic treatment in selected 
asthmatic subjects (19,20), and data from culture-independent studies (21-28) suggest the tan-
talizing concept of a dysbiotic microbiome in chronic asthma. If that is true, if we modify that 
dysbiotic microbiome, can we improve asthma control? 
 
Why study macrolides as a potential therapy for asthma? One enticing idea is to modify the air-
way microbiota using antibiotics such as azithromycin. Macrolides have both anti-inflammatory 
and antibiotic activity (29-32), and have been used in the treatment of bronchiectasis, diffuse 
pan-bronchiolitis, cystic fibrosis and COPD, particularly to decrease exacerbation rates (33-40). 
Several trials have evaluated the use of macrolides as adjunct therapy in adult asthma. Two 
small trials suggested that macrolides alter bronchial responsiveness (19,41). The AZISAST trial 
from Belgium in 2013, a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial of azithromycin, 250 
mg daily, as add-on therapy to combined inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta agonists 
over 6 months in 110 adult subjects, demonstrated a significant reduction in exacerbations in 
patients with non-eosinophilic, severe asthma (20). This particular sub-group responds poorly to 
other anti-inflammatory therapies (42,43). However, Cameron et al suggested a lack of efficacy 
of azithromycin in a 3 month trial in adult asthmatic smokers (44). Two studies examined adult 
patients with asthma who had serological evidence of infection with ‘atypical’ organisms: Black 
et al, demonstrated no improvement after treatment with roxithromycin over 6 weeks in patients 
with C pneumoniae (45), whereas Kraft et al, demonstrated improvement in FEV1 in patients 
with evidence for either C pneumoniae or M pneumoniae treated with clarithromycin for 6 weeks 
(46). The most recent randomized clinical trial in Australia and New Zealand, the AMAZES trial 
published in 2017, demonstrated that azithromycin added to combination controller therapy re-
duces asthma exacerbations over a 48 week period (47).  
 
Why are these studies in conflict? The several studies above noted the mixed and sometimes 
negative results with macrolides. However, these studies were non-selective, and there is clear 
evidence that for some asthma therapies (as one example, the experience with anti-IL-5 anti-
bodies) selecting the right patient population is of paramount importance. Asthma is a heteroge-
neous disease with multiple phenotypes (e.g., Th2-high versus Th2-low). The recent AsthmaNet 


 
 
2 
Version:31Oct2018 
 
Microbiome study (26) suggested that patients with Th2-low asthma, the same group that re-
sponded in the AZISAST study, have a higher microbial burden than patients with the Th2-high 
phenotype. The AMAZES trial, in contrast, did not distinguish a difference in Th2-high versus 
Th2-low asthma in the efficacy of azithromycin on exacerbations. Differences in bacterial bio-
mass or composition, all of which may reflect a dysbiotic microbiome, may be one key factor: 
azithromycin may work in these patients. None of the above-cited studies examined the micro-
biome, and so a key link to understand how macrolides might benefit patients with poorly-
controlled asthma is missing. Neutrophilic asthma, one key Th2-low subtype, is associated with 
increased bacterial load and pathogens (identified by culture) such as Hemophilus, Pseudomo-
nas, and Moraxella (48). Identifying the correct patient group may be the key to resolving the 
conflict of whether azithromycin is useful in asthma. 
 
Why would a new study succeed where past, non-selective studies have failed? We hypothe-
size that in the right asthma phenotype – neutrophil dominant, Th2-low – modifying the dysbiotic 
microbiome in turn improves clinical control. Our trial will focus on the relation of asthma control 
to changes in the microbiome induced by azithromycin and understanding the influence of Th2-
based phenotypes on this response. By careful examination of the dysbiotic microbiome, careful 
focus on Th2-low asthmatic patients, and focusing on patients with poor control in which the po-
tential signal is substantial, we will answer the question definitively. 
 
Purpose  
 
The purpose of this protocol is to perform a short-term pilot study so as to acquire data critical to 
the proper design of a full-scale RCT. The primary objectives of the pilot study are to: 
 
a) Estimate variability of microbiome composition and diversity over time in control and 
asthmatic subjects to provide a baseline for the future RCT 
b) Estimate the response of the airway microbiome to azithromycin over time, so that we 
can generate appropriate power calculations and sample size estimates for the future 
RCT 
c) Refine our microbial informatics pipeline for the future RCT 
d) Refine our sputum gene expression and cytokine array testing 
e) Test the feasibility of our intervention in a small cohort of subjects with poorly-controlled 
asthma 
 
Study Design 
 
This pilot protocol examines the change in the airway microbiome after azithromycin over an 8 
week period. 40 subjects with poorly controlled asthma and 10 control subjects with no known 
lung disease will undergo clinical data collection including ACT score, lung function, exhaled 
nitric oxide (FeNO), methacholine challenge, and induced sputum and blood collection. Partici-
pants with asthma then are randomized 1:1 to receive azithromycin, 250 mg, or placebo, daily 
for 8 weeks. Clinical parameters including ACT,  oral wash, adherence, side-effect profile, spi-
rometry, and biological specimens (sputum, blood, FeNO) are collected again at 4 and 8 weeks.  
Control subjects undergo the same measurements, but do not receive any intervention. 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
 
3 
Version:31Oct2018 
 
Schedule of Events 
 
 
Asthma 
(A) or 
Control 
(C) 
Visit 
1/Week 0 
(Screening) 
(+/- 3 
days) 
Visit 
2/Week 
4 
(+/- 3 
days) 
Week 6 
(+/- 3 
days) 
Visit 
3/Week 
8 
(+/- 3 
days) 
Week 
10 
(+/- 3 
days) 
Visit 
4/Week 
12 
(+/- 3 
days) 
Week 
14 
(+/- 3 
days) 
Informed Consent 
A,C 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Site Visit 
A,C 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
Phone Call 
A 
 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
Confirmation of Eligibility 
A,C 
X 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
Randomization 
A 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
Drug Dispensation 
A 
X1,2 
X1,2,3 
 
X1,2,3 
 
X1,2 
 
Demographics 
A,C 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Medical History Review 
A,C 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asthma History 
A 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Smoking History 
A,C 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Concomitant Medication 
Review 
A,C 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
Physical Exam/Vital Signs 
A,C 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
Asthma Control 
Test 
A 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Demographics 
Questionnaire 
A,C 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Family History 
Questionnaire 
A,C 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Work Exposures 
Questionnaire 
A,C 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Home Exposures 
Questionnaire 
A,C 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Physical Activity 
Questionnaire 
A,C 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Secondhand Smoke 
Exposure Questionaire 
A,C 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Peak Flow Meter Read-
ings5 
A 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Electronic Diary 4 
A 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
ECG 
A,C 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
Spirometry with 
Reversibility6 
A,C 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
Exhaled NO 
A,C 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
Urine Pregnancy Test7 
A,C 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Methacholine Challenge8 
A,C 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
Sputum Induction 
A,C 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
Oral Wash 
A,C 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
Complete Blood Count 
with Platelet Count and 
Differential Blood Sample 
A,C 
X 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
Serum IgE Blood Sample 
A,C 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RAST Blood Analysis 
A,C 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Research Blood Samples 
A,C 
X 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
Adverse Events Review 
A,C 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Compliance/Adherence to 
Diary and  Study Drugs 
A 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 


 
 
4 
Version:31Oct2018 
 
 
1. Dispensation of albuterol to asthmatic subjects (if required at Visit 2 and Visit 3) 
2. Dispensation of ICS/LABA to asthmatic subjects 
3. Dispensation of azithyromycin/placebo to asthmatic subjects 
4. Diary is completed twice daily by asthmatic subjects at home.  Compliance will be reviewed at every visit 
(clinic or telephone).  
5. Peak flow meter readings are done twice daily. Compliance will be reviewed at every visit (clinic or tele-
phone). 
6. Reversibility only conducted on those subjects with an FEV1% < 60% predicted. 
7. Only required for females of child-bearing potential 
8. Methacholine challenge only conducted on subjects whose FEV1% > 60% predicted. 
 
 
Inclusion criteria (All participants): 
 
1. 
Age 18 - 55 years 
2. 
Able to provide informed consent 
3. 
QTc < 440 ms on ECG 
4. 
Smoking history < 10 pack-years 
 
For subjects with poorly controlled asthma 
 
1. 
Methacholine PC20 < 16 mg/ml  
2. 
Albuterol response > 12% on FEV1 after 4 puffs of albuterol 
3. 
Ability to use combination ICS + LABA 
4. 
Meet definition for Th2-low asthma: peripheral blood eosinophil count < 300 and exhaled 
nitric oxide level < 30 ppb. 
 
Exclusion criteria: 
 
1. 
History of allergy or intolerance to any medications used in this study 
2. 
Medication exclusions: 
a. Current use of medications that prolong QTc interval 
b. Current use of omalizumab or other ant-IgE therapies 
c. Current use of anti IL 5 therapies 
d. Current use of anticoagulants 
e. Prednsione or other oral steroids within past 3 months 
3. 
Pregnancy or lactation 
4. 
Other respiratory or inflammatory disorders (e.g., sarcoidosis, emphysema) 
5. 
Pre-existing liver disease (AST or ALT >10% above the upper limit of normal) 
6. 
Smoking within the last 6 months 
7. 
Exacerbation of asthma in past 3 months 
8. 
Affected by a hearing disorder 
9. 
Clinically significant medical condition (e.g., heart failure, seizure disorder) which may in-
crease risk as determined by study investigator  
10. Corrected QT interval > 450 msec. Patients with known cardiac history or prolonged QT 
interval on a screening EKG are excluded given the small but real potential for macrolide-
related side effects (49-54). 
 
Recruitment  


 
 
5 
Version:31Oct2018 
 
 
Subjects will be recruited from the Pulmonary and General Medicine clinics at the University of 
Chicago and at Northwestern University. We will also use advertisements including online, flyer 
and posters. 
 
Duration of protocol 
 
Participation may be up to 14 weeks.  
 
Location where research is to be conducted  
 
For subjects recruited at the University of Chicago, research is conducted in the Clinical Re-
search Center (CRC) on W5 of the Gilman-Smith building. Some methods (e.g., methacholine) 
may be done in the Pulmonary Function Lab on the 5th floor of the DCAM building. For subjects 
recruited at Northwestern University, research is conducted at the Clinical Research Unit on the 
11th floor of the Galter Pavilion.  Samples and data collected at Northwestern will be sent to the 
University of Chicago. 
 
Explanation of Tests and Procedures  
 
1. Physical examination: Includes vital signs and examination of the cardiorespiratory system.  
2. Asthma control test (ACT). This is a series of six questions (appended) that allow a patient 
to provide a numeric rating to key asthma symptoms. This is a research- and clinically-
validated tool (61,62) and is a standard in the asthma research community. 
3. Questionnaires.  Subjects will be asked to complete six questionnaires.  These question-
naires address subjects’ home exposures, work exposures, family history, etc.  These ques-
tionnaires should be completed by subjects at the visit 1. 
4. Spirometry. The patient will be instructed at the time their visit is scheduled to hold beta ag-
onist therapy and avoid caffeinated beverages for 12 hours prior to their study visit. If the 
subject’s baseline FEV1 is below 60% of predicted value, the subject will receive 4 puffs of 
albuterol delivered by a metered dose inhaler. Spirometry will be repeated after 15 minutes 
in order to assess reversibility of obstruction.  
5. Exhaled nitric oxide measurement. Subjects inhale deeply and then exhale slowly through 
the mouth into a tube. The exhaled gas is sampled and eNO measured. 
6. Methacholine aerosol challenge test. Subjects whose baseline FEV1>60% will inhale in-
creasing concentrations of methacholine starting with saline diluent followed by: 0.025 
mg/ml, 0.1 mg/ml, 0.25 mg/ml, 1.0 mg/ml, 2.5 mg/ml, 10 mg/ml and 25 mg/ml. Spirometry 
will be performed after each dose until a ≥ 20% fall in the forced expiratory volume in one 
second is achieved or the highest dose of methacholine is administered. No further doses of 
methacholine will be administered once this threshold has been reached. The patient will 
then receive two puffs of albuterol via a metered dose inhaler and spirometry reassessed to 
ensure that the FEV1 has returned to within 10% of baseline. Participants will not be allowed 
to leave the center unless their FEV1 is within 10% of that visit’s baseline. 
7. Venipuncture to obtain 85ml of blood for safety and research samples.  
a. RAST:  The test is used to check for allergic sensitivity to specific substances. In the test, 
the sample of blood is mixed with substances known to trigger allergies. The test measures 
the level of allergy antibodies (specific IgE antibodies) in the blood which are present if there 
is an allergic reaction.  
8. Electrocardiogram (ECG). This is done to obtain a corrected QT interval (QTc). If the QTc is 
longer than 450 ms, patients will not be eligible for study given the very small but real risk of 
azithromycin-related cardiac events (54,55). 


 
 
6 
Version:31Oct2018 
 
9. Sputum induction. The subject will be asked to breathe in a salty mist for up to 12 minutes. 
Every two minutes the subject will be asked to cough deeply and strongly in order to bring 
up mucus. Subjects may clear their saliva at any time during the procedure. If the subject 
produces an adequate specimen in the first four minutes the procedure may be terminated 
early. Subjects are advised that their active participation is important and that they should 
provide us with a vigorous, deep cough to produce sputum. Sputum samples will be sent to 
either University of Chicago or Northwestern for cell counts. 
10. Oral wash. Subjects will be asked to rinse saline around in their mouth and spit it into a cup. 
11. Electronic Diary.  Asthmatic subjects will be asked to complete twice daily diaries in RED-
Cap, a HIPAA-compliant, research oriented database (56). Subjects will receive a hyperlink 
via email at 7AM and 7PM. The hyperlink directs the subject to the electronic diary con-
tained within REDCap. The diary is designed to require less than 2 minutes of the subjects’ 
time and addresses the following: 
a.Symptoms from the night before and from the day of 
b.Physical limitations from the night before and from the day of 
c.Confirmation of study product dosing 
d.Peak flow value 
12. Peak Flow Meter Readings. Asthmatic subjects will be asked to exhale forcefully into a peak 
flow meter once in the morning and once in the evening every day. The subject will record 
the value from the device into the electronic diary.   
 
Asthma medications during the study (Asthma Subjects Only) 
 
Before we begin, we will go over current asthma medications. During this study, we will be 
providing two asthma medications in a single inhaler, which is guideline-based treatment for the 
disease severity of the participants in this study. This may be a change from the asthma medi-
cines the subject takes.  We will take care that the subjects tolerate the change-over to the new 
medications. After their participation in this study is finished, we will ask them to see their prima-
ry care doctor who, with the subject, will decide which asthma medicines they should be taking 
at that point. 
 
Starting on the day of visit 1 and continuing through the end of the study, subjects with asthma 
will receive a standard dosing of two asthma medications in a single inhaler as noted above. 
 
Controller therapy. This will be done using a standard combined single inhaler that contains 
both an inhaled corticosteroid (fluticasone, 250 mcg) and a long-acting beta-adrenergic agonist 
(salmeterol, 50 mcg). This is provided in the Advair disk inhaler device and is a device that is 
familiar to most asthmatic subjects. Subjects use this medication twice daily, generally at about 
8 am and 8 pm. The Advair disk has a counter which demonstrates the number of inhalations 
used by the patient; this number will be recorded by research staff at each in-person visit. 
 
Rescue therapy. This will be done using a standard preparation of albuterol, 90 mcg per inhala-
tion, per the device ProAir or equivalent metered dose inhaler. This device is familiar to most 
asthmatic subjects. Subjects use this medication when required for relief of acute asthma symp-
toms. Subjects will keep a diary card of the use of albuterol and provide this card to research 
staff at each visit. 
 


 
 
7 
Version:31Oct2018 
 
Initial, thorough training in the use of each device is done during visit #1 by research staff using 
the Teach To Goal method implemented by the Asthma and COPD research team at the Uni-
versity of Chicago (63-65). Adherence to and proper technique in the use of each medication 
will be assessed at each visit, and will be recorded on forms by research staff. Subjects have a 
24/7 access to one of the study physicians or other member of the research team  for any prob-
lems associated with the use of these medications. 
 
Subjects are instructed not to use other asthma medications during the study without informing 
research staff. The research lead physicians (Dr. White, Dr. Smith) or other member of the re-
search team will contact primary care providers when necessary to ensure appropriate asthma 
care throughout the study. Subjects return to their prescribed asthma medication use at the end 
of the trial. 
 
Study Drug  
 
Azithromycin. We have received an exemption from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration 
(FDA) for the use of azithromycin in this protocol. The dose, 250 mg daily for 8 weeks, is a dose 
and regimen used in other lung diseases such as bronchiectasis, COPD, and cystic fibrosis (33-
40). 
 
Participants with asthma who complete the four week run-in phase (visit 1 to visit 2) will enroll at 
visit 2 into the study drug phase. They will receive the study drug, azithromycin (250 mg once a 
day for 8 weeks) or blinded placebo through the end of visit 4. They will be provided with a study 
drug diary. When they return at Visit 4 the study staff will collect the study drug bottle and count 
drug remaining. At the time of the telephone review (visit 5) subjects with asthma will be asked 
about any side-effects from azithromycin/placebo use. 
 
Subjects are cautioned about potential side-effects of the drug and reminded about how to con-
tact a study physician or other member of the research team.  
 
Payment  
 
Subjects will receive $100 at the end of each visit for a total of $400. This will come in a form of 
a check which will be mailed to their home. 
 
Risks 
 
Azithromycin  
 
The use of azithromycin is contraindicated in patients with known hypersensitivity to any macro-
lide or ketolide, or in patients with a history of cholestatic jaundice or hepatic dysfunction asso-
ciated with prior use of azithromycin. 
 
Common: 
 
-Mild Diarrhea  
-Nausea  
-Abdominal pain  
-Vomiting  
-Mild rash 
-Nervous feeling 


 
 
8 
Version:31Oct2018 
 
-Sleep problems 
 
Very Uncommon: 
 
-Diarrhea that is watery or bloody 
-Headache with chest pain and severe dizziness 
-Ototoxicity (hearing loss) 
-Fainting 
-Fast or pounding heartbeats 
-Nausea 
-Upper stomach pain 
-Itching 
-Loss of appetite 
-Dark urine 
-Clay-colored stool 
-Jaundice (yellowing of the skin or eyes); or 
-Severe skin reaction -- fever, sore throat, swelling in face or tongue, burning in eyes, skin pain, 
followed by a red or purple skin rash that spreads (especially in the face or upper body) and 
causes blistering and peeling 
 
Rare: 
 
Azithromycin is an antibiotic. Like with any other antibiotic, bacteria in the body may develop 
resistance to the medicine over time. Because of this the body may not fight off these bacteria 
as well as it should fight them off if these bacteria were to cause an infection. While the practical 
risk of this is very low, given what we know about azithromycin and resistant bacteria, if the sub-
ject were to develop an infection during or immediately after this study such as a bronchitis (in-
fection of the breathing tubes), ear infection, throat infection, or sinus infection, the doctors 
should treat them with an antibiotic other than azithromycin. 
 
There are known drug interactions with nelfinavir and with warfarin. Previous asthma-related 
studies using azithromycin have demonstrated few severe adverse events (20,41,44,57,58).  
 
Spirometry:  
 
The spirometry test may cause some study subjects to feel short of breath, lightheaded or dizzy. 
Treatment will be available if this occurs. 
 
Methacholine challenge testing:  
 
This involves the intentional narrowing of the airways by breathing the drug methacholine. This 
is likely to occur in subjects with asthma, but much less so in non-asthma controls. As a result of 
airway narrowing, participants may experience chest tightness, shortness of breath and/or 
coughing. It is possible that excessive airway narrowing may occur. However, this is unlikely 
because methacholine is delivered in incremental steps starting from very low doses. Spirome-
try is conducted between each dose-step and no more methacholine is delivered if the FEV1 is 
reduced by more than 20% from the post-saline baseline. In addition, bronchodilator medica-
tions that reverse airway narrowing will be immediately available. Participants will not be al-
lowed to leave the center unless their FEV1 is within 10% of that visit’s baseline. 
 
Exhaled nitric oxide testing:  


 
 
9 
Version:31Oct2018 
 
 
There is no significant risk to performing this test. 
 
Sputum induction:  
 
Breathing in a salty mist may cause an unpleasant salty taste after the procedure. Coughing 
hard to produce sputum can cause a sore throat. Other risks that rarely occur include: shortness 
of breath, wheeze, chest tightness, lightheadedness, nausea and headache. Extremely rarely, a 
subject may have a significant episode of shortness of breath and wheezing. These symptoms 
are usually prevented by the albuterol nebulizer treatment given as part of the spirometry shortly 
before sputum induction.  
 
Blood Draw:  
 
Includes momentary discomfort, bruising, bleeding, inflammation, or (rarely) infection at the site 
of needle insertion. On rare occasion fainting can occur as well. Both discomfort and bruising 
should disappear in a few days. A qualified member of the study team will draw the subject’s 
blood to avoid or reduce these risks. 
 
Electrocardiogram (ECG):  
 
Includes momentary discomfort from application and removal of the pads used for testing. 
 
Oral wash:  
 
There are no risks with this test. 
 
Azithromycin  and Pregnancy / breastfeeding:  
 
There are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women. It is considered FDA 
category B. Azithromycin’suse in pregnant or breast-feeding women is not recommended unless 
clearly needed. 
 
Asthma exacerbation: This is covered in substantial detail in the DSMP, provided in the Appen-
dix.  
 
Inhaled corticosteroid therapy (fluticasone): Common: headache, back pain, sore throat 
sneezing, cough  and nausea. 
 
Long-acting beta agonist therapy (salmeterol): Common: headache, dizziness, lightheadness 
insomnia, nausea, dry mouth and throat irritation. 
 
Short-acting beta agonist therapy (albuterol): Common: nervousness, shaking of a part of the 
body, headache, irritation of the throat, cough, and muscle, bone or back pain. 
 
 
Pregnancy 
 
Women of childbearing potential will undergo a pregnancy test on the day of study entry and at 
each visit. They must have a negative urine pregnancy test to be eligible for study entry. If the 


 
 
10 
Version:31Oct2018 
 
test is positive, the study physician will discuss the matter with the participant. If a participant 
becomes pregnant before completing the study, they will be asked to notify one of the study 
doctors immediately. The investigator shall counsel the subject and discuss the risks of continu-
ing with the pregnancy and the possible effects on the fetus. Monitoring of the pregnant subject 
shall continue until the conclusion of the pregnancy. Pregnancies will be reported to the data 
and safety monitoring board (DSMB) within one day of the site’s awareness. Should the preg-
nancy result in a congenital abnormality or birth defect, a SAE will be submitted to the IRB, 
DSMB and NHLBI using the SAE reporting procedures described below. 
 
Confidentiality  
 
Each subject will be assigned a sequential identification number. This number will be linked to 
the subjects name and data.  
 
We maintain strict confidentiality of all data to minimize the risk of inappropriate access or dis-
semination of such information. All protected health information including genotype data is 
saved on a password-protected computer or CRI server in a locked office with limited access. 
Only staff listed on this protocol will have access to the subjects name and data.  
 
Data sent outside the University of Chicago or Northwestern University, will be sent using an 
identification number and not the participant’s name. 
 
Outcome Measures 
 
Primary: 
 
 ACT score change from 0 (baseline) to 8 weeks 
 
Secondary: 
 
 Change in FEV1 from 0 (baseline) to 8 weeks 
 Sputum eosinophils change from 0 (baseline) to 8 weeks 
 Sputum neutrophils change from 0 (baseline) to 8 weeks 
 COMPEX score of asthma severity (from daily diary) 
 Microbiome Shannon alpha-diversity score change from 0 (baseline) to 8 weeks 
 Microbiome beta-diversity score change from 0 (baseline) to 8 weeks 
 Microbiome change in relative proportion of top 10 genera from 0 (baseline) to 8 weeks 
 
Data management 
 
For demographic and clinical data we use a HIPAA compliant, web-based REDCap data man-
agement system residing on a password-protected network. REDCap is a web based, metada-
ta-driven software application developed at Vanderbilt University (Harris et al, 2009) that is 
maintained by the Center for Research Informatics (CRI) at the University of Chicago.  North-
western University uses the same REDCap system. It allows for range and consistency checks 
during initial data entry to detect errors, and has built-in features for exporting data into Excel, 
SAS, STATA, or R files. Files exported from REDCap will be linked to the microbiome data us-
ing a unique patient ID number. Double-entry systems will be used to minimize coding error: our 
experience with our U19 AADCRC and with AsthmaNet has found that such double-entry re-
duces significantly the error-rate in getting information into accessible web forms, and retention 


 
 
11 
Version:31Oct2018 
 
of the paper CRFs ensures proper audit procedures. For biospecimen tracking, we use a web 
based application with a MYSQL database and a robust security model. 
 
Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) 
 
The Board will consist of three members at the University of Chicago and at Northwestern Uni-
versity who are not part of this study. Members are Dr. Robert Guzy, Dr. Manu Jain (Chair), and 
Dr. Borko Javonavich (biostatistician). The DSMB will meet every 6 months to review all safety 
data and make recommendations to the NHLBI regarding continuation of the trial. A copy of the 
Data Safety and Monitoring Plan (DSMP) is located in Appendix 1. 
 
Statistical analysis 
Effect of treatment on clinical outcomes. Descriptive statistics will be generated to summarize 
the demographic and clinical characteristics of the asthma patients at baseline stratified by 
treatment arm. To compare changes in clinical parameters of interest, we will perform two-
sample t-tests comparing the mean within-subject changes from baseline to 8 weeks. The pri-
mary and secondary outcomes measures are listed above.   
 
For the COMPEX scores, we will determine the time to deterioration as defined in Fuhlbrigge et 
al (2017).  This criteria defines a “diary event” as reaching a predefined change from baseline 
(threshold) for at least 2 consecutive days, or deterioration in all six variables comprising the 
COMPEX score over at least a 5-day period plus at least one variable reaching a threshold cri-
terion for at least 2 consecutive days.  A “CompEx event” is then defined as the first occurrence 
of either a diary event or a severe asthma exacerbation (deterioration of asthma leading to oral 
corticosteroid use, emergency room admission, or hospital admission).  Patients who do not ex-
perience a CompEx event will be censored as of the last negative assessment. The time from 
baseline to a CompEx event in days will be compared in the two treatment arms using a logrank 
test. 
 
Data analysis will be performed using R and STATA software. Linear mixed effects models will 
be fit for continuous longitudinal outcomes and ordinal, logit, and Poisson mixed effects models 
will be employed for ordinal, binary, and count responses, respectively (59). 
 
Initial microbiome analysis. Microbiome analysis is done in collaboration with Jack Gilbert, PhD, 
who is Director of The Microbiome Center at the University of Chicago, which houses an ad-
vanced sample processing and sequencing core. Samples are partitioned into two aliquots: one  
for PCR amplification and analysis of the 16S rRNA V4-V5 hypervariable region using amplicon 
sequencing. We will independently do qPCR of total 16S rRNA of each sputum, oral and nasal 
sample to determine total load. We will use the Illumina MiSeq platform and barcoded primers to 
sequence PCR-libraries, and always include non-template and blank controls. The remarkable 
simplicity of airway microbiota allows a high level of multiplexing (>300 samples per MiSeq flow 
cell) and ensures 99.99% sequencing coverage after 10,000 reads. 
 
We will limit sources of and account for potential contamination in our data pipeline, such as in 
reagents and kits (60,61) and in processing MiSeq-generated sequences (62,63). We will han-
dle contamination issues by: 1) eliminating OTUs that are substantially increased when total 
16S is low, 2) randomize samples to different extraction kits and re-run with a different lot-
numbered kit to confirm findings, 3) do phenol-chloroform extractions instead of relying exclu-
sively on kits, 4) maintain consistency in kits and lots for each analysis, and 5) cycle bar codes 
between runs. 


 
 
12 
Version:31Oct2018 
 
 
We will use FASTX-Toolkit for quality trimming of Illumina files. The QIIME pipeline is used for 
primer trimming, chimera checking and sequence alignment, taxonomic classification and calcu-
lation of α and β diversity indices, and generation of rarefaction curves. We construct an abun-
dance matrix of reference OTUs and phylogenetic trees derived from the GreenGenes refer-
ence set (64). We will employ a suite of multivariate statistical tools to compare amplicon data 
between and within sample types by canonical correlation analysis, regression profiling, and 
visualization (e.g. non-metric multi-dimensional scaling [NMDS], Principal Coordinates of Analy-
sis, and Principal Components Analysis). We will also look at the species diversity of each sam-
ple and observe if there is any variation between the cohorts. In addition, we will use nonpara-
metric statistics (ANOSIM, ADONIS, ANOVAR, PERMNOVA, etc.) to determine the statistical 
significance of participant factors. Significance of differences in relative percentage and diversity 
indices between groups will be calculated using Student’s t-test. The Pearson correlation coeffi-
cient will be used to assess correlations among continuous variables.  
 
Microbial bioinformatics. We will employ a suite of multivariate statistical techniques, network 
modeling and machine learning approaches to characterize the composition and structure of the 
microbial community between and within the normal subjects and asthma experimental arms, 
and determine microbial biomarkers that correlate with ACT score, albuterol use, changes in 
FEV1, and markers of airway inflammation. All amplicon sequencing data will be quality filtered 
and de-multiplexed and then subjected to de novo operational taxonomic unit (OTU) picking, 
and sub-OTU characterization using DeBlur (https://github.com/biocore/deblur.) Microbial diver-
sity will be summarized using Chao1 estimator and Shannon index, and association with clinical 
and immune variables will be tested by regression analysis and generalized linear modeling. 
UniFrac distances (between-sample beta diversity) will be used to visualize and test the overall 
microbiota structure difference between study arms using multivariate methods such as princi-
pal coordinate analysis (PCoA) and permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PER-
MANOVA). DESeq2, which allows correction for multiple testing, will be used to perform differ-
ential abundance analysis to identify clinically relevant taxa (65). Based on these results, logit 
models will be generated using dichotomized clinical and immune variables as outcomes, and 
the microbiome data as independent variables. Variable selection methods will be integrated to 
avoid over-fitting. Since we expect that the number of genera will be approximately equal to 
300, a dimension reduction will be performed so that efficient statistical inference can be con-
ducted, using either the LASSO (66) or thresholding (67) methods within the context of high-
dimensional inference for generalized linear mixed effects models. Classification performance 
will be evaluated using ROC curve and the 0.632+ bootstrap method (68). The machine learn-
ing approach, Random Forest, will also be applied to determine whether the microbiome is pre-
dictive of clinical outcomes (69). We will also examine whether there are natural grouping pat-
terns in the microbial community data and, if so, how these grouping patterns relate to asthma 
phenotypes. To do this, we will compute Bray-Curtis dissimilarity measures between subjects 
and perform hierarchical cluster analysis and nonmetric multidimensional scaling to visualize if 
the groupings determined by the hierarchical clustering algorithm relate to asthma phenotypes. 
We will also fit multivariate analysis of variance (70) and ordination models for the relative 
abundance of the microbiome response against the treatment and time effects using the R 
package vegan (71). 
 
We will analyze changes from the pre- to post-azithromycin treatment, and between azithromy-
cin and placebo subjects, in 1) abundance of key microbial genera (e.g., Pseudomonas, on 
which our first power calculations are generated, as well as Streptococcus and Hemophilus), 2) 
change in alpha-diversity, richness and evenness indices, 3) principal coordinate analysis 
(PCoA) and non-metric multi-dimensional scaling (NMDS) of beta-diversity indices, and 4) com-


 
 
13 
Version:31Oct2018 
 
parisons of key changes to clinical parameters of most compelling interest: ACT score, meth-
acholine responsiveness, FEV1, markers of airway inflammation such as BAL eosinophils and 
neutrophils, BAL concentrations (measured by multiplex assay) of Th2 related cytokines such 
as IL-5 and IL-13, IL-17 related cytokines such as IL-17a, and TGF-β1. The measurement of 
Th17-related cytokines is particularly important as we anticipate that 70% of our subjects will 
have a blood eosinophil count < 300 per µl or BAL eosinophil proportion < 3%, and azithromycin 
may be more effective in patients with eosinophil-low asthma (20). 
 
Poisson modeling of relative abundance. To test for differences in relative abundance of key 
microbial genera between the placebo and azithromycin groups at each time point and over 
time, we will fit a Poisson regression model with treatment and time as fixed effects with offset 
(for the total abundance) and with subjects as random effects for the microbial genera of interest 
(72). Since missing data may be present in the data set, we will create a multiple imputation 
simulation function in R for generalized linear mixed effects models to improve efficiency of in-
ference and to assess sensitivity of the model over multiple imputations using the R package 
mice. We will use the specific Poisson regression model to impute the missing values to obtain 
further efficiency in the data analysis. Based on the Poisson regression model fit, we will make 
inference for alpha, beta, and gamma diversity measures. These measures will be calculated 
using either Shannon entropy or the inverse Simpson index (in this context, the habitats of the 
microbiome genera are the samples collected on the treatment groups over time). Power and 
sample size calculations for the U01 RCT will be performed based on the fitted Poisson and 
multivariate regression models. If a test statistic is not significant in the pilot study, we will use 
mathematical statistical properties of the test statistics (such as the likelihood-ratio, the Wald 
test, or the score test statistics) under the alternative hypothesis which will allow us to generate 
power as functions of the sample size. We will create an R package in which we implement all 
statistical methods in the data analysis work-flow and create R markdown files with fully repro-
ducible data analyses and description of statistical methods. In this way, the data analysis can 
be easily replicated. If new statistical methods are developed as a result of this complex multi-
facted data analysis, we will write a methodological paper for submission to a statistical journal.  
 
Power calculations. Power calculations are difficult given the paucity of data about changes in 
the airway microbiome. This is explicitly an exploratory protocol to ascertain whether, in the 
short term, treatment of azithromycin in a small cohort of asthmatics changes the lower airway 
microbiome. We can generate potential power calculations based on the difference in (for ex-
ample) relative abundance of pathogens in lower airway samples. For this protocol, a key goal 
is to obtain a good estimate of just how much the microbiome changes in response to azithro-
mycin: if substantial, this trial will aid greatly our ability to make power calculations for larger tri-
als. If changes are small, we will have a clear answer at a modest cost. For example, based on 
our preliminary published data (25), Pseudomonas abundance among asthma patients using 
ICS was 10.4 ± 1.8%. Assuming 20 evaluable patients on azithromycin in a before and after 
analysis, we will have 80% power (two-sided α=0.05) to detect a change in abundance of Δ=0.9 
to Δ=1.2 if the within-patient correlation between pre- and post-treatment abundance is ρ=0.7 or 
ρ=0.5. The half-width of the 95% confidence interval for the change in abundance will be 0.7 to 
0.84 if ρ=0.7 or ρ=0.5. 
 
 


 
 
14 
Version:31Oct2018 
 
BIBLIOGRAPHY AND REFERENCES CITED 
1. 
(EPR3) EPR. Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. Bethesda: 
National Heart Lung and Blood Institute; 2007. 
2. 
Ober C, Vercelli D. Gene-environment interactions in human disease: nuisance or 
opportunity? Trends Genet. 2011; 27(3):107-15. PMCID: 3073697. 
3. 
Masoli M, Fabian D, Holt S, Beasley R. The global burden of asthma: executive 
summary of the GINA Dissemination Committee report. Allergy. 2004; 59(5):469-78. 
4. 
Braman SS. The global burden of asthma. Chest. 2006; 130(1 Suppl):4S-12S. 
5. 
Drake KA, Galanter JM, Burchard EG. Race, ethnicity and social class and the complex 
etiologies of asthma. Pharmacogenomics. 2008; 9(4):453-62. PMCID: 2746736. 
6. 
Ege MJ, Mayer M, Normand AC, Genuneit J, Cookson WO, Braun-Fahrlander C, 
Heederik D, Piarroux R, von Mutius E. Exposure to environmental microorganisms and 
childhood asthma. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364(8):701-9. 
7. 
Marra F, Marra CA, Richardson K, Lynd LD, Kozyrskyj A, Patrick DM, Bowie WR, 
Fitzgerald JM. Antibiotic use in children is associated with increased risk of asthma. 
Pediatrics. 2009; 123(3):1003-10. 
8. 
Noverr MC, Huffnagle GB. The 'microflora hypothesis' of allergic diseases. Clin Exp 
Allergy. 2005; 35(12):1511-20. 
9. 
Murk W, Risnes KR, Bracken MB. Prenatal or early-life exposure to antibiotics and risk 
of childhood asthma: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2011; 127(6):1125-38. 
10. 
Kohl J, Wills-Karp M. Complement regulates inhalation tolerance at the dendritic cell/T 
cell interface. Mol Immunol. 2007; 44(1-3):44-56. 
11. 
Daley D. The evolution of the hygiene hypothesis: the role of early-life exposures to 
viruses and microbes and their relationship to asthma and allergic diseases. Curr Opin 
Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014; 14(5):390-6. 
12. 
Ege MJ, Strachan DP, Cookson WO, Moffatt MF, Gut I, Lathrop M, Kabesch M, 
Genuneit J, Buchele G, Sozanska B, Boznanski A, Cullinan P, Horak E, Bieli C, Braun-
Fahrlander C, Heederik D, von Mutius E, Group GS. Gene-environment interaction for 
childhood asthma and exposure to farming in Central Europe. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 
2011; 127(1):138-44, 44 e1-4. 
13. 
Majkowska-Wojciechowska B, Pelka J, Korzon L, Kozlowska A, Kaczala M, Jarzebska 
M, Gwardys T, Kowalski ML. Prevalence of allergy, patterns of allergic sensitization and 
allergy risk factors in rural and urban children. Allergy. 2007; 62(9):1044-50. 
14. 
Stensballe LG, Simonsen J, Jensen SM, Bonnelykke K, Bisgaard H. Use of antibiotics 
during pregnancy increases the risk of asthma in early childhood. J Pediatr. 2013; 
162(4):832-8 e3. 
15. 
Fish JE, Peters SP. Airway remodeling and persistent airway obstruction in asthma. J 
Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999; 104(3 Pt 1):509-16. 
16. 
Gern JE, Rosenthal LA, Sorkness RL, Lemanske RF, Jr. Effects of viral respiratory 
infections on lung development and childhood asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005; 
115(4):668-74; quiz 75. 
17. 
Bisgaard H, Hermansen MN, Buchvald F, Loland L, Halkjaer LB, Bonnelykke K, Brasholt 
M, Heltberg A, Vissing NH, Thorsen SV, Stage M, Pipper CB. Childhood asthma after 
bacterial colonization of the airway in neonates. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(15):1487-95. 
18. 
Martin RJ, Kraft M, Chu HW, Berns EA, Cassell GH. A link between chronic asthma and 
chronic infection. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001; 107(4):595-601. 
19. 
Kostadima E, Tsiodras S, Alexopoulos EI, Kaditis AG, Mavrou I, Georgatou N, 
Papamichalopoulos 
A. 
Clarithromycin 
reduces 
the 
severity 
of 
bronchial 
hyperresponsiveness in patients with asthma. Eur Respir J. 2004; 23(5):714-7. 
20. 
Brusselle GG, Vanderstichele C, Jordens P, Deman R, Slabbynck H, Ringoet V, 
Verleden G, Demedts IK, Verhamme K, Delporte A, Demeyere B, Claeys G, Boelens J, 
Padalko E, Verschakelen J, Van Maele G, Deschepper E, Joos GF. Azithromycin for 


 
 
15 
Version:31Oct2018 
 
prevention of exacerbations in severe asthma (AZISAST): a multicentre randomised 
double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Thorax. 2013; 68(4):322-9. 
21. 
Hilty M, Burke C, Pedro H, Cardenas P, Bush A, Bossley C, Davies J, Ervine A, Poulter 
L, Pachter L, Moffatt MF, Cookson WO. Disordered microbial communities in asthmatic 
airways. PLoS One. 2010; 5(1):e8578. PMCID: 2798952. 
22. 
Marri PR, Stern DA, Wright AL, Billheimer D, Martinez FD. Asthma-associated 
differences in microbial composition of induced sputum. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013; 
131(2):346-52 e1-3. 
23. 
Goleva E, Jackson LP, Harris JK, Robertson CE, Sutherland ER, Hall CF, Good JT, Jr., 
Gelfand EW, Martin RJ, Leung DY. The effects of airway microbiome on corticosteroid 
responsiveness in asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013; 188(10):1193-201. 
PMCID: 3863730. 
24. 
Huang YJ, Nelson CE, Brodie EL, Desantis TZ, Baek MS, Liu J, Woyke T, Allgaier M, 
Bristow J, Wiener-Kronish JP, Sutherland ER, King TS, Icitovic N, Martin RJ, Calhoun 
WJ, Castro M, Denlinger LC, Dimango E, Kraft M, Peters SP, Wasserman SI, Wechsler 
ME, Boushey HA, Lynch SV, National Heart L, Blood Institute's Asthma Clinical 
Research N. Airway microbiota and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with 
suboptimally controlled asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011; 127(2):372-81 e1-3. 
PMCID: 3037020. 
25. 
Denner DR, Sangwan N, Becker JB, Hogarth DK, Oldham J, Castillo J, Sperling AI, 
Solway J, Naureckas ET, Gilbert JA, White SR. Corticosteroid therapy and airflow 
obstruction influence the bronchial microbiome, which is distinct from that of 
bronchoalveolar lavage in asthmatic airways. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016; 137(5):1398-
405 e3. PMCID: PMC4860110. 
26. 
Durack J, Lynch SV, Nariya S, Bhakta NR, Beigelman A, Castro M, Dyer AM, Israel E, 
Kraft M, Martin RJ, Mauger DT, Rosenberg SR, Sharp-King T, White SR, Woodruff PG, 
Avila PC, Denlinger LC, Holguin F, Lazarus SC, Lugogo N, Moore WC, Peters SP, Que 
L, Smith LJ, Sorkness CA, Wechsler ME, Wenzel SE, Boushey HA, Huang YJ. Features 
of the bronchial bacterial microbiome associated with atopy, asthma, and 
responsiveness to inhaled corticosteroid treatment. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016. 
27. 
Huang YJ, Nariya S, Harris JM, Lynch SV, Choy DF, Arron JR, Boushey H. The airway 
microbiome in patients with severe asthma: Associations with disease features and 
severity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015; 136(4):874-84. PMCID: 4600429. 
28. 
Zhang Q, Cox M, Liang Z, Brinkmann F, Cardenas PA, Duff R, Bhavsar P, Cookson W, 
Moffatt M, Chung KF. Airway Microbiota in Severe Asthma and Relationship to Asthma 
Severity and Phenotypes. PLoS One. 2016; 11(4):e0152724. PMCID: 4831690. 
29. 
Crosbie PA, Woodhead MA. Long-term macrolide therapy in chronic inflammatory 
airway diseases. Eur Respir J. 2009; 33(1):171-81. 
30. 
Cameron EJ, McSharry C, Chaudhuri R, Farrow S, Thomson NC. Long-term macrolide 
treatment of chronic inflammatory airway diseases: risks, benefits and future 
developments. Clin Exp Allergy. 2012; 42(9):1302-12. 
31. 
Altenburg J, de Graaff CS, van der Werf TS, Boersma WG. Immunomodulatory effects 
of macrolide antibiotics - part 2: advantages and disadvantages of long-term, low-dose 
macrolide therapy. Respiration. 2011; 81(1):75-87. 
32. 
Altenburg J, de Graaff CS, van der Werf TS, Boersma WG. Immunomodulatory effects 
of macrolide antibiotics - part 1: biological mechanisms. Respiration. 2011; 81(1):67-74. 
33. 
Wong C, Jayaram L, Karalus N, Eaton T, Tong C, Hockey H, Milne D, Fergusson W, 
Tuffery C, Sexton P, Storey L, Ashton T. Azithromycin for prevention of exacerbations in 
non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (EMBRACE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-
controlled trial. Lancet. 2012; 380(9842):660-7. 
34. 
Davies G, Wilson R. Prophylactic antibiotic treatment of bronchiectasis with 
azithromycin. Thorax. 2004; 59(6):540-1. PMCID: 1747020. 
35. 
Koyama H, Geddes DM. Erythromycin and diffuse panbronchiolitis. Thorax. 1997; 
52(10):915-8. PMCID: 1758435. 


 
 
16 
Version:31Oct2018 
 
36. 
Serisier DJ, Martin ML, McGuckin MA, Lourie R, Chen AC, Brain B, Biga S, Schlebusch 
S, Dash P, Bowler SD. Effect of long-term, low-dose erythromycin on pulmonary 
exacerbations among patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis: the BLESS 
randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2013; 309(12):1260-7. 
37. 
Albert RK, Connett J, Bailey WC, Casaburi R, Cooper JA, Jr., Criner GJ, Curtis JL, 
Dransfield MT, Han MK, Lazarus SC, Make B, Marchetti N, Martinez FJ, Madinger NE, 
McEvoy C, Niewoehner DE, Porsasz J, Price CS, Reilly J, Scanlon PD, Sciurba FC, 
Scharf SM, Washko GR, Woodruff PG, Anthonisen NR, Network CCR. Azithromycin for 
prevention of exacerbations of COPD. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365(8):689-98. PMCID: 
3220999. 
38. 
Uzun S, Djamin RS, Kluytmans JA, Mulder PG, van't Veer NE, Ermens AA, Pelle AJ, 
Hoogsteden HC, Aerts JG, van der Eerden MM. Azithromycin maintenance treatment in 
patients with frequent exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 
(COLUMBUS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 
2014; 2(5):361-8. 
39. 
Clement A, Tamalet A, Leroux E, Ravilly S, Fauroux B, Jais JP. Long term effects of 
azithromycin in patients with cystic fibrosis: A double blind, placebo controlled trial. 
Thorax. 2006; 61(10):895-902. PMCID: 2104771. 
40. 
Saiman L, Marshall BC, Mayer-Hamblett N, Burns JL, Quittner AL, Cibene DA, 
Coquillette S, Fieberg AY, Accurso FJ, Campbell PW, 3rd, Macrolide Study G. 
Azithromycin in patients with cystic fibrosis chronically infected with Pseudomonas 
aeruginosa: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003; 290(13):1749-56. 
41. 
Ekici A, Ekici M, Erdemoglu AK. Effect of azithromycin on the severity of bronchial 
hyperresponsiveness in patients with mild asthma. J Asthma. 2002; 39(2):181-5. 
42. 
Green RH, Brightling CE, Woltmann G, Parker D, Wardlaw AJ, Pavord ID. Analysis of 
induced sputum in adults with asthma: identification of subgroup with isolated sputum 
neutrophilia and poor response to inhaled corticosteroids. Thorax. 2002; 57(10):875-9. 
PMCID: 1746199. 
43. 
McGrath KW, Icitovic N, Boushey HA, Lazarus SC, Sutherland ER, Chinchilli VM, Fahy 
JV, Asthma Clinical Research Network of the National Heart L, Blood I. A large subgroup 
of mild-to-moderate asthma is persistently noneosinophilic. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 
2012; 185(6):612-9. PMCID: 3326288. 
44. 
Cameron EJ, Chaudhuri R, Mair F, McSharry C, Greenlaw N, Weir CJ, Jolly L, Donnelly 
I, Gallacher K, Morrison D, Spears M, Evans TJ, Anderson K, Thomson NC. 
Randomised controlled trial of azithromycin in smokers with asthma. Eur Respir J. 2013; 
42(5):1412-5. PMCID: 3814414. 
45. 
Black PN, Blasi F, Jenkins CR, Scicchitano R, Mills GD, Rubinfeld AR, Ruffin RE, 
Mullins PR, Dangain J, Cooper BC, David DB, Allegra L. Trial of roxithromycin in 
subjects with asthma and serological evidence of infection with Chlamydia pneumoniae. 
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001; 164(4):536-41. 
46. 
Kraft M, Cassell GH, Pak J, Martin RJ. Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia 
pneumoniae in asthma: effect of clarithromycin. Chest. 2002; 121(6):1782-8. 
47. 
Gibson PG, Yang IA, Upham JW, Reynolds PN, Hodge S, James AL, Jenkins C, Peters 
MJ, Marks GB, Baraket M, Powell H, Taylor SL, Leong LEX, Rogers GB, Simpson JL. 
Effect of azithromycin on asthma exacerbations and quality of life in adults with 
persistent uncontrolled asthma (AMAZES): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-
controlled trial. Lancet. 2017; 390(10095):659-68. 
48. 
Wood LG, Simpson JL, Hansbro PM, Gibson PG. Potentially pathogenic bacteria 
cultured from the sputum of stable asthmatics are associated with increased 8-
isoprostane and airway neutrophilia. Free Radic Res. 2010; 44(2):146-54. 
49. 
Owens RC, Jr., Nolin TD. Antimicrobial-associated QT interval prolongation: pointes of 
interest. Clin Infect Dis. 2006; 43(12):1603-11. 
50. 
Howard PA. Azithromycin-induced proarrhythmia and cardiovascular death. Ann 
Pharmacother. 2013; 47(11):1547-51. 


 
 
17 
Version:31Oct2018 
 
51. 
Svanstrom H, Pasternak B, Hviid A. Use of azithromycin and death from cardiovascular 
causes. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368(18):1704-12. 
52. 
Ray WA, Murray KT, Hall K, Arbogast PG, Stein CM. Azithromycin and the risk of 
cardiovascular death. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366(20):1881-90. PMCID: PMC3374857. 
53. 
Mosholder AD, Mathew J, Alexander JJ, Smith H, Nambiar S. Cardiovascular risks with 
azithromycin and other antibacterial drugs. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368(18):1665-8. 
54. 
Drew BJ, Ackerman MJ, Funk M, Gibler WB, Kligfield P, Menon V, Philippides GJ, 
Roden DM, Zareba W. Prevention of torsade de pointes in hospital settings: a scientific 
statement from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology 
Foundation. Circulation. 2010; 121(8):1047-60. PMCID: PMC3056123. 
55. 
Bacharier LB, Guilbert TW, Mauger DT, Boehmer S, Beigelman A, Fitzpatrick AM, 
Jackson DJ, Baxi SN, Benson M, Burnham CD, Cabana M, Castro M, Chmiel JF, Covar 
R, Daines M, Gaffin JM, Gentile DA, Holguin F, Israel E, Kelly HW, Lazarus SC, 
Lemanske RF, Jr., Ly N, Meade K, Morgan W, Moy J, Olin T, Peters SP, Phipatanakul 
W, Pongracic JA, Raissy HH, Ross K, Sheehan WJ, Sorkness C, Szefler SJ, Teague 
WG, Thyne S, Martinez FD. Early Administration of Azithromycin and Prevention of 
Severe Lower Respiratory Tract Illnesses in Preschool Children With a History of Such 
Illnesses: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015; 314(19):2034-44. PMCID: 
PMC4757487. 
56. 
Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic 
data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for 
providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009; 42(2):377-
81. PMCID: PMC2700030. 
57. 
Bacharier LB, Guilbert TW, Mauger DT, Boehmer S, Beigelman A, Fitzpatrick AM, 
Jackson DJ, Baxi SN, Benson M, Burnham CA, Cabana M, Castro M, Chmiel JF, Covar 
R, Daines M, Gaffin JM, Gentile DA, Holguin F, Israel E, Kelly HW, Lazarus SC, 
Lemanske RF, Jr., Ly N, Meade K, Morgan W, Moy J, Olin T, Peters SP, Phipatanakul 
W, Pongracic JA, Raissy HH, Ross K, Sheehan WJ, Sorkness C, Szefler SJ, Teague 
WG, Thyne S, Martinez FD, National Heart L, Blood Institute's A. Early Administration of 
Azithromycin and Prevention of Severe Lower Respiratory Tract Illnesses in Preschool 
Children With a History of Such Illnesses: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015; 
314(19):2034-44. PMCID: PMC4757487. 
58. 
Hahn DL, Grasmick M, Hetzel S, Yale S, Group AS. Azithromycin for bronchial asthma 
in adults: an effectiveness trial. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012; 25(4):442-59. 
59. 
Gibbons RD, Hedeker D. Applications of mixed-effects models in biostatistics. Sankhyā: 
The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series B. 2000:70-103. 
60. 
Salter SJ, Cox MJ, Turek EM, Calus ST, Cookson WO, Moffatt MF, Turner P, Parkhill J, 
Loman NJ, Walker AW. Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact 
sequence-based microbiome analyses. BMC Biol. 2014; 12:87. PMCID: PMC4228153. 
61. 
Kennedy NA, Walker AW, Berry SH, Duncan SH, Farquarson FM, Louis P, Thomson 
JM, Satsangi J, Flint HJ, Parkhill J, Lees CW, Hold GL. The impact of different DNA 
extraction kits and laboratories upon the assessment of human gut microbiota 
composition by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. PLoS One. 2014; 9(2):e88982. PMCID: 
PMC3933346. 
62. 
Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Huntley J, Fierer N, Owens SM, 
Betley J, Fraser L, Bauer M, Gormley N, Gilbert JA, Smith G, Knight R. Ultra-high-
throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. 
ISME J. 2012; 6(8):1621-4. PMCID: 3400413. 
63. 
Nelson MC, Morrison HG, Benjamino J, Grim SL, Graf J. Analysis, optimization and 
verification of Illumina-generated 16S rRNA gene amplicon surveys. PLoS One. 2014; 
9(4):e94249. PMCID: PMC3983156. 
64. 
DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie EL, Keller K, Huber T, Dalevi D, 
Hu P, Andersen GL. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and 


 
 
18 
Version:31Oct2018 
 
workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006; 72(7):5069-72. PMCID: 
PMC1489311. 
65. 
Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for 
RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014; 15(12):550. PMCID: PMC4302049. 
66. 
Tibshirani R. Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso. Journal of the Royal 
Statistical Society Series B (Methodological). 1996; 58(1):267-88. 
67. 
Giurcanu M. Thresholding least-squares inference in high-dimensional regression 
models. 2016:2124-56. 
68. 
Efron B, Tibshirani R. Improvements on Cross-Validation: The 632+ Bootstrap Method. 
Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1997; 92(438):548-60. 
69. 
Statnikov A, Henaff M, Narendra V, Konganti K, Li Z, Yang L, Pei Z, Blaser MJ, Aliferis 
CF, Alekseyenko AV. A comprehensive evaluation of multicategory classification 
methods for microbiomic data. Microbiome. 2013; 1(1):11. PMCID: PMC3960509. 
70. 
Johnson RA, Wichern DW. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. 6th ed. Upper 
Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2007. 
71. 
Oksanen J, Guillaume Blanchet F, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin 
PR, O'Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H. vegan: 
Community Ecology Package. 2017 [updated 2017; cited]; R package version 2.4-
2:[Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/package=vegan. 
72. 
Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using 
lme4. J Stat Softw. 2015; 67(1):1-48.