Conditions: Fragile X Syndrome
Allocation: RANDOMIZED | Intervention model: PARALLEL
Enrollment: 110
Healthy volunteers: no

Brief summary:
The purpose of this clinical trial is to investigate the impact of AFQ056 on language learning in 3-6 year old children with Fragile X Syndrome (FXS).

Detailed description:
This study will enroll 100 participants with Fragile X syndrome (FXS) between the ages of 32 months and 6 years.

After being informed about the study and its potential risks, patients with Fragile X Syndrome will be screened for eligibility. Participants who meet entry criteria and agree to participate will then enter a single-blind 4-month placebo lead-in during which study participants will continue therapy treatments as usual to allow for placebo effects to stabilize. At the end of the 4-month placebo lead-in, all participants will have a repeat battery of AFQ056 baseline assessments and will enter the placebo-controlled phase, where they will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to AFQ056 or placebo. All subjects will begin at a dose of 25 mg of AFQ056 or placebo, taken orally twice per day. Over 7 weeks, they will titrate up to their maximum tolerated dose (MTD), up to 100 mg. Once they have reached their MTD, both participant groups will initiate an intensive language intervention designed to maximize the extent to which parents engage in types of verbally responsive interactions that have been well documented as facilitating language learning. The entire language intervention will be delivered to the parent in the home or at scheduled study visits through the use of a laptop computer equipped with distance video-teleconferencing software and will include coaching, homework, and feedback sessions. Subjects will be treated with their MTD in combination with the language intervention for 6 months.

After 8 months of treatment in the placebo-controlled phase (including 6 months of language intervention), all participants will have final assessments and will be given the opportunity to enter the open label extension (OLE) period. In the OLE, all participants will be treated with active drug according to the same schedule as in the placebo-controlled phase with 2 months of flexible dose titration to the MTD followed by a period of stable treatment, and will continue the language intervention throughout. A post-intervention follow-up visit will be conducted one month after the final assessment visit of the trial.

Researchers will compare overall weighted communication score in the AFQ056 and placebo groups, after 6 months of treatment in combination with an intensive standardized parent-implemented language learning intervention. This is meant to serve as a marker of drug effect on neural plasticity, the core problem in the disorder. Further assessments will also be compared between groups to determine changes in language, cognitive, and adaptive functioning.

Arms:
arm 1: After a 4-month single-blind placebo lead-in period, subjects with FXS were randomized to receive AFQ056 suspension by mouth twice per day in an 8 month double-blind treatment period.

During the double-blind treatment period, subjects in the AFQ056 treatment group began with a dose of 25 mg AFQ056 twice per day and titrated to their maximum tolerated dose over the course of 7 weeks. After 7 weeks the dose was fixed, and at the 2 month visit, the intensive language intervention was initiated. Subjects continued the language intervention while remaining on a stable dose of AFQ056 (ranging from 12.5 mg BID to 100 mg BID), for the next 6 months.

Safety and efficacy assessments were performed throughout. arm 2: After a 4-month single-blind placebo lead-in period, subjects with FXS were randomized to receive a placebo suspension by mouth twice per day in an 8 month double-blind treatment period.

During the double-blind treatment period, dose titration to maximum tolerated dose of matching placebo occurred over 7 weeks. After 7 weeks, the dose was fixed, and at the 2 month visit, the intensive language intervention was initiated. Subjects continued the language intervention while remaining on placebo for the next 6 months.

Safety and efficacy assessments were performed throughout. arm 3: After 8 months of treatment in the placebo-controlled phase, all subjects had assessments completed and were given the opportunity to enter the open-label extension (OLE) in which all subjects received AFQ056. The OLE began with 2 months of flexible dose titration to each subject's maximum tolerated dose followed by a period of stable treatment. Subjects also continued the language intervention through the extension phase.

The duration of the stable treatment depended on when the subject was enrolled into the study. Those enrolled prior to June 15-30, 2019 received a 6-month period of stable treatment. Those enrolled after June 15, 2019 had their period of stable treatment shortened on a sliding scale, such that their treatment including weaning, if necessary, ended before August 31, 2021 (study drug expiration).

Interventions: intervention 1: AFQ056 intervention 2: Placebo intervention 3: Language Intervention
Intervention descriptions: intervention 1: 12.5 mg - 100 mg oral suspension (liquid) intervention 2: Placebo oral suspension (liquid) intervention 3: All subjects will begin an intensive language intervention 2 months after starting treatment with AFQ056 or placebo and will continue the intervention through the end of the study.

The language intervention will be administered by a trained language specialist through a combination of in clinic visits and at home synchronous video conferencing sessions. The intervention will subsequently be delivered to the parent by a speech-language clinician through weekly clinician coaching, homework, and feedback sessions.

The language intervention is designed to help parents learn and use verbally responsive interactional strategies more frequently and effectively throughout the course of their daily interactions with their children.

Protocol document:
Prot_SAP_000.pdf: 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 1 of 121 
 
 
FULL PROTOCOL TITLE: 
Effects of AFQ056 on Language Learning in Young Children with Fragile X Syndrome 
(FXS) 
 
Protocol Version: v15.0 
Amended Protocol Date: 02/03/2021 
 
SHORT PROTOCOL TITLE: 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS  
(FX-LEARN) 
 
Protocol Principal Investigator (PPI); 
Elizabeth Berry-Kravis MD PhD, Professor of Pediatrics, Neurological Sciences, 
Biochemistry, Rush University Medical Center 
 
Supported by: 
The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) 
1U01NS096767-01 
 
Study Intervention Provided by: 
Novartis Pharmaceuticals 
 
Sponsor of IND/IDE: 
Elizabeth Berry-Kravis MD PhD 
IND 127136 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The information contained herein is confidential and proprietary in nature, and will not be 
disclosed to any third party without written approval of authorized designee.  This document may 
be disclosed to the appropriate institutional review boards or to duly authorized representatives 
of the US Food and Drug Administration or a national regulatory authority under the condition that 
they maintain confidentiality. 
 
 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 2 of 121 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 
 
INVESTIGATOR AGREEMENT ...................................................................................... 5 
1 
STUDY OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................... 13 
1.1 
Primary Objectives ........................................................................................ 13 
1.2 
Key Secondary Objectives ............................................................................. 13 
1.2.1 
Functional .............................................................................................. 13 
1.3 
Other Secondary Objectives .......................................................................... 14 
1.3.1 
Safety .................................................................................................... 14 
1.3.2 
Functional .............................................................................................. 14 
1.3.3 
Biomarkers............................................................................................. 14 
1.4 
Exploratory Objectives ................................................................................... 14 
1.4.1 
Blood Biomarkers ................................................................................... 14 
1.4.2 
Other Biomarkers ................................................................................... 14 
1.4.3 
Pharmacokinetics ................................................................................... 15 
1.4.4 
Longitudinal Analaysis of Effects of Language Intervention and AFQ05615 
2 
BACKGROUND .................................................................................................... 15 
2.1 
Rationale ....................................................................................................... 15 
2.2 
Supporting Data ............................................................................................. 24 
3 
STUDY DESIGN ................................................................................................... 34 
4 
SELECTION AND ENROLLMENT OF SUBJECTS ............................................... 38 
4.1 
Inclusion Criteria ............................................................................................ 38 
4.2 
Exclusion Criteria ........................................................................................... 38 
4.3 
Subject Withdrawal Criteria............................................................................ 39 
4.4 
Study Enrollment Procedures ........................................................................ 41 
4.4.1 
Subject Recruitment and Retention ........................................................ 41 
4.4.2 
Screening Logs ...................................................................................... 42 
4.4.3 
Informed Consent .................................................................................. 43 
4.4.4 
Assent .................................................................................................... 43 
4.4.5 
Global Unique Identifier (GUID and Data Sharing .................................. 43 
4.4.6 
Randomization/Treatment Assignment .................................................. 44 
5 
STUDY INTERVENTIONS/STUDY MEDICATION/STUDY DRUG OR DEVICE ... 44 
5.1 
Study Medications/Interventions, Administration, and Duration ...................... 44 
5.2 
Handling of Study Medications/Interventions ................................................. 50 
5.3 
Concomitant Interventions ............................................................................. 51 
5.3.1 
Required Concomitant Medications/Interventions .................................. 52 
5.3.2 
Prohibited Medications/Interventions ...................................................... 52 
5.3.3 
Precautionary Medications/Interventions ................................................ 53 
5.4 
Subject compliance ....................................................................................... 53 
6 
CLINICAL AND LABORATORY EVALUATIONS/STUDY PROCEDURES ............ 56 
6.1 
Schedule of Activities ..................................................................................... 56 
6.2 
Timing of Study Activities ............................................................................... 60 
6.2.1 
Screening/Pre-Randomization Evaluations/procedures.......................... 60 
6.2.2 
On-Study/On-Interventions Evaluations/procedures ............................... 61 
6.2.3 
Study Medication/Intervention Discontinuation Evaluations/procedures . 61 
6.2.4 
On Study/Off-Intervention Evaluations ................................................... 62 
6.2.5 
Final On-Study Evaluations .................................................................... 62 
6.2.6 
Off-Study Requirements ......................................................................... 62 
6.2.7 
Pregnancy (Optional) ............................................................................. 63 
6.3 
Special Instructions and Definitions of Evalutions .......................................... 63 
6.3.1 
Informed Consent .................................................................................. 63 
6.3.2 
Protocol Violations ................................................................................. 63 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 3 of 121 
6.3.3 
Documentation of Fragile X Syndrome ................................................... 64 
6.3.4 
Demographics ........................................................................................ 64 
6.3.5 
Medical History ...................................................................................... 64 
6.3.6 
Treatment History .................................................................................. 64 
6.3.7 
Concomitant Medications/Treatments .................................................... 65 
6.3.8 
Protocol Amendments and Study Termination ....................................... 65 
6.3.9 
Clinical Assessments ............................................................................. 65 
6.3.10 
Laboratory Evaluations .......................................................................... 71 
6.3.11 
Pharmacokinetic Studies ........................................................................ 72 
6.3.12 
Other Laboratory Studies ....................................................................... 73 
6.3.13 
Questionnaires ....................................................................................... 74 
6.3.14 
Subject Adherence Assessments and Drug Dispensing ......................... 76 
6.3.15 
Additional Evaluations ............................................................................ 78 
7 
MANAGEMENT OF ADVERSE EXPERIENCES ................................................... 81 
8 
CRITERIA FOR INTERVENTION DISCONTINUATION ........................................ 82 
9 
STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS ....................................................................... 83 
9.1 
General Design Issues .................................................................................. 83 
9.2 
Factors Influencing Choice of Study Design .................................................. 84 
9.3 
Rationale for Specific Design Features .......................................................... 85 
9.4 
Randomization............................................................................................... 88 
9.5 
Outcomes ...................................................................................................... 88 
9.5.1 
Primary Outcome (Including Definition) .................................................. 88 
9.5.2 
Key Secondary Outcomes(s) ................................................................. 89 
9.5.3 
Other Secondary & Exploratory Outcomes............................................. 90 
9.6 
Statistical Analysis Plan ................................................................................. 93 
9.6.1 
Primary Hypothesis ................................................................................ 93 
9.6.2 
Key Secondary Hypotheses ................................................................... 94 
9.6.3 
Exploratory Hypotheses ......................................................................... 95 
9.7 
Safety Analysis .............................................................................................. 96 
9.8 
Sample Size and Accrual ............................................................................... 96 
9.9 
Data Monitoring ............................................................................................. 97 
10 
DATA COLLECTION, SITE MONITORING, AND ADVERSE 
EXPERIENCEREPORTING  ......................................................................................... 99 
10.1 
Data Management ......................................................................................... 99 
10.1.1 
Registration ............................................................................................ 99 
10.1.2 
Data Entry .............................................................................................. 99 
10.2 
Role of Data Management ............................................................................. 99 
10.3 
Quality Assurance ....................................................................................... 100 
10.3.1 
Development of Monitoring Plan .......................................................... 100 
10.3.2 
Site Monitoring Visits ........................................................................... 100 
10.3.3 
Laboratory Data Flow ........................................................................... 101 
10.4 
Adverse Experience Reporting .................................................................... 101 
10.4.1 
Definitions of Adverse Events, Suspected Adverse Drug Reactions &                      
Serious Adverse Events ...................................................................................... 103 
 
10.4.1.1 Adverse Event and Suspected Adverse Druge Reactions .............. 103 
            10.4.1.2 Serious Adverse Events ................................................................ 104 
            10.4.1.3 Assessment and Recording Adverse Events ................................. 104 
11 HUMAN SUBJECTS ........................................................................................... 107 
11.1 
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Review and Informed Consent .................. 107 
11.2 
Subject Confidentiality ................................................................................. 107 
11.3 
Study Modification/Discontinuation .............................................................. 108 
12 
PUBLICATION OF RESEARCH FINDINGS .................................................... 108 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 4 of 121 
13 
REFERENCES ................................................................................................ 108 
Appendix A: PET Study Data with AFQ056............................................................115 
Appendix B:  Prohibited Medications.....................................................................121  
 
 
 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 5 of 121 
INVESTIGATOR AGREEMENT 
 
I have read the foregoing protocol Version 15.0 dated 02/03/2021 and agree to conduct the study 
as described herein. 
 
By signing the protocol, the Investigator agrees to keep all information provided by the 
NeuroNEXT Network in strict confidence and to request the same from his/her staff and the 
Institutional Review Board. Study documents provided by the NeuroNEXT Network will be stored 
appropriately to ensure their confidentiality. The Investigator should not disclose such information 
to others without authorization, except to the extent necessary to conduct the study.  
 
 
 
 
 
______________________________________ 
_______________________ 
Investigator Signature 
Date 
 
______________________________________ 
Print Investigator’s Name 




AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 7 of 121 
LIST OF ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND DEFINITIONS OF TERMS  
 
ABC-FX 
 
Aberrant Behavior Checklist – Community Edition – Factored for FXS 
AE 
 
 
Adverse Event 
AKT 
 
 
serine/threonine-specific protein kinase (also PKB – protein kinase B) 
APP 
 
 
Amyloid Precursor Protein 
CBC   
 
Complete blood count 
CCC 
 
 
Clinical Coordination Center 
CDE 
 
 
Common Data Elements 
CFR 
 
 
Code of Federal Regulations 
CGI-I  
 
Clinical Global Impression – Improvement 
CGI-S  
 
Clinical Global Impression - Severity 
CIRB   
 
Central Institutional Review Board 
CMP  
 
Comprehensive metabolic profile 
CRF 
 
 
Case report form 
CS 
 
 
Clinically Significant 
CSS PI 
 
Clinical Study Site PI 
DCC 
 
 
Data Coordination Center 
DM 
 
 
Data Management 
DSMB  
 
Data Safety Monitoring Board 
DQ 
 
 
Developmental quotient 
eCRF  
 
Electronic Case Report Form 
EDC 
 
 
Electronic data capture 
EKG 
 
 
Electrocardiogram 
ELC 
 
 
Early Learning Composite 
ERK 
 
 
Extracellular signal-related kinase 
ERP 
 
 
Event related potentials 
FDA      
 
Food and Drug Administration 
FMR1  
 
Fragile X Mental Retardation-1 gene 
FMRP  
 
Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein 
FXS 
 
 
Fragile X syndrome 
GCP 
 
 
Good Clinical Practice 
HBsAg  
 
Hepatitis B surface antigen 
HIV 
 
 
Human Immunodeficiency Virus 
HIPAA  
 
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act 
ICH 
 
 
International Conference on Harmonization  
IMM 
 
 
Independent Medical Monitor 
mGluR5 
 
Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor – Type 5 
MedDRA 
 
Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities 
MMP9  
 
Matrix Metalloprotein 9 
MSEL  
 
Mullen Scales of Early Learning 
MTD 
 
 
Maximum tolerated dose 
NINDS  
 
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke 
PK 
 
 
Pharmacokinetics 
PLS-5  
 
Preschool Language Scale Version 5 
PPI 
 
 
Protocol Principal Investigator 
PSC 
 
 
Protocol Steering Committee 
SAE 
 
 
Serious adverse event 
SOA   
 
Schedule of Activities 
TSH 
 
 
Thyroid stimulating hormone 
VAS 
 
 
Visual analog scale 
VABS  
 
Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 8 of 121 
SYNOPSIS 
 
Study Title: Effects of AFQ056 on Language Learning in Young Children with Fragile X 
Syndrome (FXS) 
 
Short Title: AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
 
Objectives 
 
The overall goals are to change the paradigm for development of mechanism targeted 
pharmacotherapy in neurodevelopmental disorders and provide a definitive test of the mGluR 
theory in humans by determining whether AFQ056, an mGluR5 negative modulator, can enhance 
neural plasticity in the form of language learning during an intensive language intervention in very 
young children with fragile X syndrome. This trial therefore will use an innovative but exploratory 
new trial design to develop a different way to examine efficacy of an agent with substantial support 
as a drug targeting CNS plasticity in preclinical models of a developmental disorder. If the design 
is successful, this trial can serve as a model for future trials of mechanistically-targeted treatments 
operating on neural plasticity in other neurodevelopmental disorders.  
 
Primary objective: To demonstrate greater improvement in language in young children with FXS 
treated with AFQ056, using an overall weighted communication score, in combination with an 
intensive standardized parent-implemented language learning intervention, relative to those 
treated with the language learning intervention and placebo, after 6 months of intervention, as a 
marker of drug effect on neural plasticity, the core problem in the disorder. 
 
Key Secondary Objective: To show greater improvement in specific language, cognitive, and 
adaptive measures in the combination AFQ056/language intervention group relative to the 
language intervention/placebo group.  
 
Other Secondary and Exploratory Objectives: (1) To show improvement in specific measures 
from ERP and eye tracking biomarkers in the combination AFQ056/language intervention group 
relative to the language intervention/placebo group.  (2) Examine long-term safety and tolerability 
of AFQ056 in young children with FXS; (3) To explore whether greater improvement occurs in 
additional language, cognitive,  adaptive and behavioral measures in the combination 
AFQ056/language intervention group relative to the language intervention/placebo group; (4) To 
explore improvement in multiple additional measures from the ERP and eye tracking in the 
combination AFQ056/language intervention group relative to the language intervention/placebo 
group; (5) To explore whether the normalization of eye tracking/pupillometry biomarkers is 
correlated with improvement in clinical outcome markers including language; (6) To explore 
whether normalization of blood biomarkers of translational pathways regulated by FMRP and 
mGluR5 receptors is associated with language, functional  and/or biomarker improvements from 
AFQ056 treatment; (7) To examine if blood levels of AFQ056 correlate with improvement in 
language, functional or biomarker measures, (8) To examine if longitudinal analysis shows an 
improvement in the rate of change of language, functional or biomarker responses with the 
language intervention alone, and further improvement in rate of change when AFQ056 Is added 
to the language intervention 
 
Design and Outcomes 
 
Trial Design: The trial will be a phase II double blind placebo-controlled parallel-group flexible-
dose forced-titration study that will use a novel design to address the impact of AFQ056 on 
language learning in 3-6 year old children with FXS. The flexible dose design will mimic practice, 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 9 of 121 
take into account differential responsiveness and the known inter-child variability in drug levels 
with AFQ056, and allow use of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) where MTD is defined as the 
maximum tolerated dose of the available dose levels in the protocol, which is felt likely to be most 
effective. There will be a 4-month single-blind placebo lead in after screening assessments during 
which subjects will have therapy treatments as usual to control for the effects of the language 
intervention. The placebo lead-in will also control for placebo effects which are prominent in 
clinical trials in FXS. This will be followed by an 8-month placebo-controlled phase in which 100 
subjects with FXS will have AFQ056 baseline assessments and be randomized 1:1 to AFQ056 
or placebo. Dose titration to MTD starting at 25 mg AFQ056/matching placebo will occur over 2 
months and then subjects will have language intervention baseline assessments and initiate the 
language intervention, remaining on a stable AFQ056/placebo dose for the next 6 months. After 
8 months of treatment in the placebo-controlled phase (6 months of language intervention), all 
subjects will have final assessments and will enter the open label extension and be treated with 
active drug according to the same schedule as in the placebo-controlled phase with 2 months of 
flexible dose titration to the MTD followed by a period of stable treatment. The duration of the 
stable treatment will depend on when the subject was enrolled into the study; those enrolled prior 
to June 15-30, 2019 will receive a 6-month period of stable treatment, and the open label 
extension may be shortened on a sliding scale for those enrolled after June 15, 2019, such that 
their treatment including weaning, if necessary, will end before August 31, 2021, with the exact 
length of the stable treatment period in the extension being determined by how long after June 15 
they enroll and what dose of drug they are receiving in the open label treatment period (higher 
doses will have a longer weaning period of maximally 2 weeks for those on 75-100 mg BID, but 
1 week for 50 mg BID, and no weaning period for lower doses). The total duration of the stable 
treatment for those enrolled after June 15, 2019 will range from 6 months to no open label 
extension, depending on the number of months after June 15, 2019 the subject is enrolled into 
the study.   As such, some subjects will have an acute dose decrease if they were on a dose of 
50-100 mg BID of active drug in the initial phase but experience from the Pediatric PK study 
conducted previously suggests that children can stop AFQ056 without withdrawal symptoms and 
the dose decrease and titration in the open label extension are unavoidable to maintain the blind 
of the study through the completion of the placebo-controlled period by the final participant. The 
open-label extension will allow all children a period of active drug exposure to make recruitment 
feasible, despite the long placebo period, and will allow additional collection of long-term safety 
data. Subjects will continue the language intervention through the extension phase to gain 
additional data on long-term effects of the combination of AFQ056 and the language intervention 
on developmental trajectory and the ERP biomarker. 
 
Interventions and Duration 
 
AFQ056: AFQ056 is a highly selective mGluR5 negative allosteric modulator shown to be 
effective in reversing dendritic spine and behavioral phenotypes in the mouse model of FXS. It is 
administered orally as a suspension at a concentration of   mg/ml. Dosing range is expected to 
be 25-100 mg BID. 
 
Language Intervention: The language intervention, which was developed by Dr. Leonard 
Abbeduto and colleagues, showed benefit for language development over 6 months (the period 
assessed in the placebo-controlled phase of this trial) in a pilot study of young children with FXS, 
can be taught to families with standardized delivery across sites, and implemented in the home 
through video-conferencing with families. 
 
Time of Study Participation: Subjects will be in the study a total of 21 months (Screening and 
placebo run-in 4 months prior to randomization, 8 months placebo-controlled treatment, 8 months 
open-label extension, 1 month follow up after final assessment visit/visit 14).  


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 10 of 121 
**Note: Due to study drug expiration, the duration of the open label extension may be shortened 
on a sliding scale for those enrolled after June 15, 2019, such that their treatment including 
weaning, if necessary, will end before August 31, 2021, with the exact length of the stable 
treatment period in the extension being determined by how long after June 15 they enroll and 
what dose of drug they are receiving in the open label treatment period. The total duration of the 
stable treatment for those enrolled after June 15, 2019 will range from 6 months to no open label 
extension, depending on the number of months after June 15, 2019 the subject is enrolled into 
the study.  
 
Duration of Enrollment: It is expected enrollment will occur over 18 months. Enrollment must 
end at the end of February 2020 due to study drug expiration at the end of August 2021.  
 
Schedule and Type of Evaluations: The Language primary outcome assessment (weighted 
communication scale, WCS) will be obtained at screening, randomization (AFQ baseline), 2 
(language intervention baseline), 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16 months and post-intervention follow up at 17 
months. Cognition, language and behavioral assessments including the, MacArthur Bates 
Communicative Development Inventory, Preschool Language Scale – 5th Edition (PLS-5), Visual 
Analog Scale (VAS) of language, Clinician Global Impression-Improvement and Severity (CGI-I, 
CGI-S) for language and overall function, Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) Composite and 
Subscales, Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale-Version 3 (Vineland-3); Aberrant Behavior 
Checklist-fragile X validated version (ABC–FX), and a VAS of behavior will be performed regularly 
throughout the protocol according to the Schedule of Assessments (below, Section 6.1, Table 7) 
; Biomarkers including ERP, eye tracking/pupillometry, and blood biomarkers (ERK, AKT, S6 
kinase, APP, MMP9, RNA, FMRP, DNA) will also be obtained throughout the protocol according 
to the Schedule of Assessments. Safety measures will include CBC, CMP, TSH, EKG, adverse 
events, suicidality.  
 
Endpoints Derived from Evaluations: 
Primary endpoints: Language - Weighted child intentional communication score coded from a 22-
minute structured task which is an examiner/child dyadic play session, including a structured play 
session and an unstructured play session. 
 
Key secondary endpoints: 
 
Functional (all raw scores) 
o Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) 
 
Developmental Quotient (DQ) 
 
Expressive Language Subscore 
o Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale – Version 3 
 
Composite Score 
 
Communication Subscore 
o Preschool Language Scale – 5th Edition (PLS-5) 
 
Expressive Communication Score 
o McArthur Communicative Development Inventory 
 
Number of spoken words 
o Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) 
 
Overall Function 
 
Other Secondary endpoints:  
Safety measures including clinically significant laboratory values and adverse events will be 
tabulated for descriptive comparison between the placebo and active drug groups 
 
 
Functional 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 11 of 121 
o Weighted Communication 
 
Structured play score 
 
Nonstructured play score 
o Preschool Language Scale – 5th Edition (PLS-5) 
 
Auditory Comprehension Subscore 
 
Total Language Score  
o Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) 
 
Receptive Language Subscore 
 
Visual Reception Subscore 
 
Gross Motor Subscore 
 
Fine Motor Subscore 
o Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale – Version 3 
 
Communication 
 
Daily Living Skills 
 
Socialization 
 
Motor 
o Aberrant Behavior Checklist – Fragile X Validated Version (ABC-FX) 
 
Irritability Subscore 
 
Stereotyped Behavior Subscore 
 
Abnormal Speech Subscore 
 
Hyperactivity Subscore 
 
Social Avoidance Subscore 
 
Lethargy Subscore 
o Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of Target Behavior (1, 2, & 3 sum) 
o Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of Language 
o Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) 
 
Language 
o Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) 
 
Overall Function 
 
Language 
 
A number of additional exploratory endpoints will be considered as well. 
 
Sample Size and Population 
 
100 subjects with FXS age 32 months to 6 years will be studied. In order to prevent age 
imbalance, randomization will be stratified by age with two strata, 3-4 years and 5-6 years.  
 
Inclusion Criteria 
1. Age 32 months to 6 years inclusive at Screening (visit 1). 
2. Has a documented FMR1 full mutation. 
**Note** Presence of mosaicism is allowed. 
3. DQ<75 calculated from the Mullen Scales of Early Learning at time of screening. 
4. Parent or legal guardian is available and able to communicate well with the investigator, 
comply with study requirements and provide written informed consent. 
**Note**The parent or legal guardian who will be signing consent form, should be the 
individual administering the language intervention. 
5. English is the primary language spoken in the home and the subject’s first language is English. 
6. Meet criteria indicating evidence of intentional communication based on parent interview via 
a communication eligibility screening tool.  
**Note** On the Eligibility Screening Tool – Communication, the child must have at time of 
screening: 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 12 of 121 
a) Section 1: Answer of YES; the child uses at least 5 spoken words to label items on a 
daily basis. 
 
OR 
b) Section 2: At least 3 YES answers to items 1-10 if child does not have at least 5 spoken 
words. 
7. Produces 3 or more intentional acts of communication on the structured portion of the 
Weighted Communication play sample at time of screening. 
**Note** Subjects are permitted to use augmentative communication devices throughout the 
study if the device is the subject’s primary form of communication and the device has been 
prescribed for the subject by an SLP.  
8. Stable behavioral and other therapy regimen for 30 days prior to screening. 
**Note** Patients will be allowed to continue their standard-of–care therapies throughout the 
trial but these will not be changed during the placebo lead-in or placebo-controlled portion of 
the trial, outside of standard changes occurring from school schedules. 
9. Stable dosing of all concurrent psychotropic medications except stimulants for at least 60 days 
prior to screening. Due to the very short half-life of stimulants (specifically methylphenidate 
and amphetamine variants), a stable regimen of these medications is required for 2 weeks 
only.  
**Note** Medications impacting GABA, glutamate and/or mGluR5 pathway receptors are 
exclusionary and not permitted during study participation. Additionally, stimulant regimens 
may include combinations of short- and long-acting forms and may be taken with different 
timing or dosing on different days of the week (e.g. Doses may be skipped on weekends or 
days off school and extra doses may be given some days for therapy sessions later in the 
day). The intent is to keep the doses and regimen being used at the time of screening 
consistent during the trial even if there is some variation in how the medication is taken on 
different days.  Use of CBD oil or hemp based substances legal for sale over the internet are 
allowed provided that the dosing regimen has been consistent for at least 60 days prior to 
screening and will remain the same throughout the trial. 
 
Exclusion Criteria 
1. Use of medications impacting GABA, glutamate and/or mGluR5 pathway receptors or 
transmission. 
**Note** Treatment with acamprosate, amantadine, budipine, carbetocin, cycloserine, 
dextromethorphan, felbamate, ketamine, lithium*, minocycline, memantine, oxytocin, 
remacemide, racemic baclofen, riluzole, fycampa, investigational mGluR5 medications, 
and/or statins are exclusionary. 
**Note** Lithium taken as a dietary supplement is permitted if the dose is less than 5mg/day. 
A 5mg/day dose is the recommended dietary intake level, and is therefore not considered to 
be therapeutic. Lithium dosage must remain the same throughout the duration of the trial, 
and documented in the concomitant medication log.   
2. Unstable seizure disorder as defined by any seizure in the 6 months prior to the screening 
visit, and/or any change in anti-convulsant drug dosing in the 60 days prior to screening. 
**Note** Use of levetiracetam and oxcarbazepine are among permitted anticonvulsants. 
3. Use of any other investigational drug at the time of enrollment or within 30 days or 5 half-lives 
(whichever is longer) of the investigational drug prior to screening until end of study visits (or 
longer if required by local regulations). 
4. History of hypersensitivity to AFQ056 or any mGluR antagonist. 
5. History or presence of any clinically significant disease of any major system organ class, within 
the past 2 years prior to screening including but not limited to neurological, cardiovascular, 
endocrine, metabolic, renal, or gastrointestinal disorders. This does not include typical 
features of FXS such as psychological symptoms or history of epileptic seizures. 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 13 of 121 
6. Significant acute illness that did not completely resolve at least four weeks prior to the 
Screening visit. 
7. Abnormal laboratory values at screening that are in the opinion of the investigator are clinically 
significant and may jeopardize the safety of the study subject. 
8. Use of (or use within at least 5 half-lives before dosing) concomitant medications that are 
strong/moderate inhibitors or inducers of CYP1A1/2, CYP2C9/19 or CYP3A4 (see Appendix 
B). 
9. Subjects who are, in the opinion of the investigator, unable to comply with the requirements 
of the study. 
10. Presence of immunodeficiency diseases at the time of screening, based on medical history, 
including a positive HIV test result.  
11. History of a positive Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or Hepatitis C result at time of 
screening. 
12. History or presence of suicidal thoughts and/or suicide attempts. 
 
 
 
1 
STUDY OBJECTIVES 
 
The overall goals are to change the paradigm for development of mechanism targeted 
pharmacotherapy in neurodevelopmental disorders and provide a definitive test of the mGluR 
theory in humans by determining whether AFQ056, an mGluR5 negative modulator, can enhance 
neural plasticity in the form of language learning during an intensive language intervention in very 
young children with fragile X syndrome. This trial therefore will use an innovative but exploratory 
new trial design to develop a different way to examine efficacy of an agent with substantial support 
as a drug targeting CNS plasticity in preclinical models of a developmental disorder. If the design 
is successful, this trial can serve as a model for future trials of mechanistically-targeted treatments 
operating on neural plasticity in other neurodevelopmental disorders.  
 
1.1 
Primary Objective 
 
Efficacy 
(1) To demonstrate greater improvement in language in young children with FXS treated with 
AFQ056, using an overall weighted communication score, in combination with an intensive 
standardized parent-implemented language intervention, relative to those treated with the 
language intervention and placebo, after 6 months of intervention, as a marker of drug effect on 
neural plasticity, the core problem in the disorder.  
 
The Hypothesis is that the children treated with AFQ056 will show greater improvement in 
language and its nonverbal precursors as reflected in the change in a weighted communication 
score designed to assess both the proclivity to engage in communication and the sophistication 
of the means employed for communication from baseline (visit 3 assessment) to 8 months (visit 
9 assessment) than those treated with placebo. 
 
1.2. 
Key Secondary Objectives 
 
1.2.1 Functional 
To show greater improvement in specific standardized language, cognitive, and adaptive 
measures (see Endpoints Derived From Evaluations Section) from the Mullen Scales of Early 
Learning (MSEL), Preschool Language Scale – Version 5 (PLS-5), The MacArthur-Bates 
Communicative Development Inventory, the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale- 3RD Edition 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 14 of 121 
(Vineland-3), and Clinician Global Impression for improvement (CGI-I) in the combination 
AFQ056/language intervention group relative to the language intervention/placebo group; 
 
The Hypothesis is that the children treated with AFQ056 will show greater normalization of specific 
measures of language and one or more other domains (including cognitive, adaptive behavior, 
global functioning based on change from baseline (visit 3 assessment) to 8 months (visit 9 
assessment) than those treated with placebo. 
 
 
1.3 
Other Secondary Objectives 
 
1.3.1 Safety 
To demonstrate long-term safety and tolerability of AFQ056 in young children with FXS. 
 
The Hypothesis is that AFQ056 will be safe and well tolerated for periods up to 16 months and 
that children treated with AFQ056 will have a similar side effect profile relative to placebo-treated 
children as that seen in previous studies with AFQ056 in FXS.  
 
The following Other Secondary Objectives will be explored using the data from this study. 
 
 
1.3.2 Functional 
To show greater improvement in additional cognitive, language, adaptive and behavioral (see 
Endpoints Derived from Evaluations Section) standardized measures including the MSEL, PLS-
5, MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory, Vineland-3, Aberrant Behavior 
Checklist – fragile X validated version (ABC-FX), CGI-I and Visual Analog Scales (VAS) for 
language and behavior, in the combination AFQ056/language intervention group relative to the 
language intervention/placebo group  
 
 
1.4 
Exploratory Objectives 
 
The following Exploratory Objectives will be evaluated using the data from the study. 
 
1.4.1 Blood Biomarkers 
To explore whether normalization of blood biomarkers of translational pathways regulated by 
FMRP and mGluR5 receptors, including ERK, AKT, S6 kinase, APP, and MMP9, is associated 
with language and/or developmental improvements from AFQ056 treatment.  
 
1.4.2. Other Biomarkers 
To show improvement in specific measures from ERP (auditory habituation first 15% versus last 
15% of pediatric p50/N1 (P1) peak occurring at approximately 100 ms post-stimulus and 
amplitude of auditory response – pediatric p50/N1, N2, P2), and eye tracking (looking time and 
fixations to the eyes) biomarkers in the combination AFQ056/language intervention group relative 
to the language intervention/placebo group.  
 
The Hypothesis is that the children treated with AFQ056 will show greater improvement of these 
specific ERP and eye tracking measures based on change from baseline (visit 3 assessment) to 
8 months (Visit 9 assessment) than those treated with placebo.  
 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 15 of 121 
Additionally, to show improvement in multiple additional measures from the ERP and eye tracking 
(see Endpoints Derived from Evaluations Section) in the combination AFQ056/language 
intervention group relative to the language intervention/placebo group. 
 
An additional exploratory hypothesis will examine whether the improvement in biomarkers listed 
as key secondary outcomes will be correlated with improvement in the weighted communication 
score, and potentially with scores on the key and other secondary measures throughout the study. 
 
1.4.3 Pharmacokinetics 
To determine if blood levels of AFQ056 correlate with improvement in language, functional or 
biomarker measures. 
 
1.4.4 Longitudinal Analysis of Effects of Language Intervention and AFQ056 
To determine if longitudinal analysis shows an improvement in the rate of change of language, 
functional or biomarker responses with the language intervention alone, and further improvement 
in rate of change when AFQ056 Is added to the language intervention. 
 
 
2 
BACKGROUND  
 
2.1 
Rationale 
 
This trial is being proposed as a model trial for a paradigm shift to change the process for 
development of drugs targeted to correct specific dysfunctional pathways contributing to 
neurobiological and synaptic dysfunction in genetic neurodevelopmental disorders, based on 
animal model work. Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the ideal disorder in which to conduct such a 
model trial, given the tremendous progress in understanding the basic neuroscience of synaptic 
dysfunction and the extensive background of preclinical studies in FXS models. Treatment of FXS 
animal models (both Drosophila and mouse) with drugs targeted to synaptic dysfunction has been 
massively successful. The body of translational pre-clinical research in FXS has been more 
consistent and convincing than any other model of disease correction for a single gene 
developmental disorder in neuroscience, with over 60 different research publications showing 
either genetic or pharmacological reversal of phenotypes associated with absence of FMRP in 
cellular models and animal models from two different species.  
 
Yet over the past decade of work, it has been challenging to translate this extremely promising 
large body of work to benefit humans with FXS. Positive behavioral results in early proof of 
concept trials have been difficult to reproduce in larger phase 2b and phase 3 trials, leading to 
questions about the best way to design the trials and conduct the translational work itself. Sub-
optimal outcome measures (placebo effects, floor effects, variability in parent ratings), lack of 
good biomarkers, population variability, and variability in the nature of responses have been 
problems. But the largest issue with work done to date is the concern that what is being measured 
in trials in humans with FXS is simply not the same as what is being demonstrated in the animal 
models. Human trials to date have been largely focused on behavior in adolescent or adult 
populations with FXS, and after years of development and shaping of behavior by the environment 
and exposures, it is unclear that adult behavior can be viewed as a surrogate marker for effects 
on neural plasticity seen in the FXS animal models. Given the prolonged prior development time, 
it is also unclear that changes of sufficient effect size (especially given the variability in the 
population) can be seen at all in adolescents and adults with FXS treated with mechanistically 
targeted agents. At this juncture, it is important for the translational effort in the FXS field to 
undergo a paradigm shift and begin to design trials to look for the cognitive and learning outcomes 
that might be predicted from the preclinical work. It will be important for this shift to focus on 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 16 of 121 
moving these studies to very young children, to maximize the possible plasticity and avoid 
contamination of outcomes from “wiring” present in the mature brain that reflects accumulation of 
decades of environmental exposure. It stands to reason that treatments for a developmental 
disorder would best be studied in young children when the minimum amount of aberrant 
development has had time to take place.  
 
As such this protocol proposes a trial in which the drug to be studied will target the best studied 
and most successfully reversed synaptic pathway dysfunction in preclinical work in FXS models, 
but, unlike other trials, the group of patients to be studied will be very young children (age 3-6 
years), use of the drug will be coupled with an intensive language learning intervention, and the 
primary outcome to be measured will be progress in language skills and their nonverbal 
precursors resulting from the intervention. It is expected that the learning outcome in this trial will 
be a much better surrogate for the plasticity and synaptic effects in the FXS models than non-
specific behavioral effects studied previously in older patients.  
 
The following pages present the “story” of FXS and translation of progress in basic science 
research to humans, which has brought the field to the point of needing a paradigm shift to move 
toward targeted treatment trials aimed at studying “plasticity” as outlined in this protocol. FXS is 
the most common known single gene cause of intellectual disability and ASD, with an estimated 
frequency of about 1:4000-5000. The disorder affects all ethnic groups worldwide. FXS is one of 
the fragile X-associated disorders (FXDs), all of which arise from a trinucleotide repeat (CGG) 
expansion mutation in the promoter region of FMR1 (Fragile X mental retardation 1 gene). The 
CGG sequence is transcribed into the 5’ untranslated region of the FMR1 mRNA and thus length 
of the repeat sequence does not affect the sequence of the protein product of FMR1 (fragile X 
mental retardation protein, or FMRP) 1. Large expansions in FMR1 (>200 CGG repeats), termed 
the “full mutation,” cause FXS, which results from methylation and transcriptional silencing of 
FMR1 with consequent loss or significant reduction in expression of FMRP.1 Males with FXS 
typically present with developmental delay, particularly language delay, and ultimately display 
intellectual disability that can range from mild to severe.2 Hypotonia is often seen early in life and 
evolves into coordination and praxis problems in older children and adults. Physical features 
include macroorchidism in most adult males, and variable presence of craniofacial characteristics 
including prominent ears, macrocephaly, long face, prominent jaw and forehead, midfacial 
hypoplasia, and high arched palate. Loose connective tissue leads to hyperextensible joints, flat 
feet, and soft redundant skin on the palms.2 Females with a full mutation are more variably and 
usually more mildly affected than males because of production of FMRP in cells that express the 
normal X chromosome with the non-mutated FMR1 allele. Severity of cognitive impairment in 
females with a full mutation is inversely related to the activation ratio for the normal FMR1 allele 
and levels of expressed FMRP.3 Males with size (full and premutation) or methylation (partially 
unmethylated full mutation) mosaicism may be more mildly affected, with severity related to the 
percent of unmethylated FMR1 alleles and FMRP levels. A number of medical problems appear 
to be more prevalent in FXS than in the general population, including seizures, strabismus, 
frequent otitis media, gastroesophageal reflux, and sleep apnea and other sleep disorders  4. 
 
The majority of males with FXS will meet criteria for mild to severe intellectual disability.5 Average 
IQ in adult males with FXS is 40-50. Females with FXS are often less affected than males with 
about 25% having cognitive impairment and others frequently being diagnosed with learning 
disabilities6. Average IQ in females is about 80, with a range from severe impairment to normal 
or even superior ability. Multiple studies have shown a decrease in full-scale IQ scores and 
adaptive behavior with age as children with FXS become older.7-10. Decline in standard scores for 
intelligence and adaptive function is not the results of loss of skills or regression but rather failure 
to keep pace with the normal rate of intellectual development. Behavioral dysfunction is very 
commonly seen in FXS and includes attention deficits/hyperactivity, hyperarousal, anxiety, 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 17 of 121 
perseverative behavior and aggression. About a 50-67% of males and about 20% of females with 
FXS meet criteria for ASD.11 Although psychopharmacologic treatment for behavioral symptoms 
(with stimulants, SSRIs, antipsychotics depending on most problematic symptoms) is often 
employed in FXS 12, these medications are incompletely effective13 likely due to the environmental 
contingencies maintaining the behaviors, and there are no treatments for the underlying cognitive 
disorder. Thus, treatment of both behavior and cognition/development in FXS represent 
areas of high need. 
 
Language development is globally delayed for most individuals with FXS. It is not uncommon for 
individuals with FXS to remain prelinguistic communicators until much later in life than is seen in 
typical development 14. The average age of a first word in FXS is about 25 months and many boys 
with FXS do not develop phrase speech until after age 4. However, the majority of males and 
females with FXS will obtain spoken language at some point, and they will continue to gain 
language skills throughout the lifespan, albeit at a slower pace than typically developing 
individuals 15; 16. In general, individuals with FXS have stronger receptive than expressive 
language skills. Pragmatic language (communication in social interactions) is delayed very early 
in development. Young children with FXS have been shown to have difficulty with joint attention, 
reciprocating positive facial expressions, eye gaze, and turn-taking 16; 17. Even when verbally 
fluent, males with FXS demonstrate high rates of tangential (off-topic) language, overly literal 
interpretation of language, as well as decreased topic initiation and maintenance 18; 19.  
Perseverative language is a hallmark of FXS and causes significant social difficulty.  Thus, 
treatment of language deficits in FXS as a subsection of development is an area of high 
need, especially in young children with FXS.  
 
Recent dramatic progress in understanding the neurobiology and synaptic mechanisms resulting 
from absence of FMRP in FXS has become an important window to future targeted treatments 
for FXS, ASD and related neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs).11,20 The Fmr1 knockout mouse 
model of FXS, which makes no functional FMRP, has been a critical resource to understand the 
role of FMRP in neurons, identify cellular targets for treatment and explore effects of potential 
disease-modifying agents. FMRP is an mRNA binding protein involved in the transport and 
translational regulation of a subset of dendritic mRNAs.20 FMRP regulates (inhibits) dendritic 
protein translation in response to synaptic activation by Group 1 metabotropic glutamate receptors 
(mGluR1 and mGluR5),21 muscarinic (M1) acetylcholine receptors and probably multiple Gq-
linked receptors. Activation of these receptors results in signaling through ERK- and mTOR-
dependent signaling pathways, ultimately resulting in loss of FMRP repressor function at the 
ribosome, and a pulse of new protein synthesis. Translation of multiple synaptic proteins is 
regulated by FMRP, for example STEP and Arc, which are linked to AMPA receptor 
internalization.22 FMRP also regulates activity of some pre- and postsynaptic ion channels such 
as BK and SLACK channels through direct protein-protein interactions.23 These regulatory 
functions of FMRP appear to be critical for synaptic maturation and strength, as in the absence 
of FMRP (Figure 4), there is elevation of levels of synaptic proteins usually controlled by FMRP, 
immature elongated dendritic spines,24 abnormal spine density, abnormal synaptic plasticity 
including enhanced mGluR-activated hippocampal and cerebellar LTD, and impaired LTP in 
hippocampus, cortex and amygdala, and proneness to abnormal epileptiform discharges.20,23 The 
morphological abnormalities and synaptic plasticity deficits found in the fmr1 knockout mouse and 
the Drosophila model of FXS, in which there is loss of dfmr1 (homolog of the FMR1 gene in the 
Drosophila 
genome), 
are 
associated 
with 
numerous 
cognitive, 
behavioral 
and 
electrophysiological phenotypes 20,23. 
 
The abnormalities observed in the absence of FMRP in the mouse model of FXS has led to 
identification of treatment targets for potential clinical development and directed at (1) reduction 
of excess activity in signal transduction pathways connecting group 1 mGluRs or other Gq-linked 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 18 of 121 
receptors to the dendritic translational machinery, either through (1A) receptor modulation at the 
cell surface or (1B) through modulation of the intracellular signaling pathway (2) reduction of 
excessive activity of proteins normally regulated by FMRP, (3) increasing expression and 
activation of surface AMPA receptors, (4) modification of activity of GABA and other 
receptors/proteins that regulate glutamate signaling or translational signaling pathways, (5) using 
miRNAs to block excessive translation of mRNAs normally regulated by FMRP, and (6) correction 
of abnormal channel activities normally directly regulated by FMRP Treatments aimed at all of 
these types of targets have shown success in reversing phenotypes in the Fmr1 knockout mouse 
25-27 and dfxr fly28 models, however the most extensive body of research surrounds the use of 
mGluR5 negative allosteric modulators (NAMs) and genetic receptor reduction to reduce 
excessive translational pathway signaling through mGluR5 receptors.  
 
Reduction of mGluR5 receptor activity with mGluR5 NAMs has resulted over 30 publications 
documenting correction of abnormalities or deficits in dendritic spine morphology, ocular 
dominance plasticity, olfactory learning, synaptic plasticity (LTP and LTD), motor learning, open-
field hyperactivity, marble burying, social behaviors, prepulse inhibition (PPI), epileptiform bursts, 
neuronal network activity states, audiogenic seizures, growth patterns, cellular signaling and 
protein synthesis in the fmr1 knockout mouse (see Table 1 for a summary of studies in the FXS 
mouse), and synaptic branching, courtship behavior, and learning phenotypes (ref) in the 
Drosophila model of FXS. Although not every phenotype studied has been corrected, it is clear 
that more phenotypes have been corrected than not corrected. The majority of the studies in the 
FXS mouse have been done with examiners measuring outcome blinded to treatment status, 
although formal randomization in animal studies has not been done. Phenotypes have been 
corrected in adulthood 29, however several studies in which age groups were compared suggest 
better effectiveness in young animals.30,31  Numerous mGluR5 NAMs have been used to produce 
these effects. 
 
This solid foundation of pre-clinical work has led to attempts to translate findings to humans with 
FXS. A phase 1 open label proof-of-concept (POC) trial of fenobam, a very short-acting mGluR5 
NAM, showed reversal of abnormal sensorimotor gating in humans with FXS, despite high 
interpersonal variability in PK curves. Subsequently, development of highly selective longer acting 
mGluR5 NAMs with improved PK profiles for treatment of FXS was initiated at both Roche 
(RO4917523) and Novartis (AFQ056). At Novartis, AFQ056 was originally developed for levo-
Dopa induced dyskinesia in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD-LID). PET scan data were 
generated at Novartis, demonstrating the AFQ056 binds to and is highly selective for mGluR5 
receptors in brain the brain (PET).  
 
Table 1. Studies Documenting Reversal of Phenotypes in FXS Mouse Model 
Specific 
Target 
Rescue 
Type 
Rescued/Improved Phenotypes 
Phenotypes tested but not 
rescued 
mGlu5 
Genetic 
(mGluR5 
hetorozyg
ote – 50% 
receptor 
reduction) 
 
Molecular & Cellular: protein synthesis, 
dendritic spine density, body weight 32  
Plasticity & Hyperexcitability: ocular 
dominance, AGS*, LTD 32  
Behavior: social interactions 33; partial 
rescue of social dominance 34 
Cognition: inhibitory avoidance memory 32 
macroorchidism 32,33; locomotor 
activity, AGS, PPI*, startle 
response, OFA, MB 33 
*The protocols used for AGS 
induction were slightly 
different, but still do not fully 
explain these contradictory 
results, method for PPI was 
very different from 210, 211 
and human studies 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 19 of 121 
Pharmacol
ogical 
(mGluR5 
negative 
modulator
s) 
Molecular & Cellular: mTOR 29,35 and 
ERK1/2 signaling  29; GSK3β 
phosphorylation 27,36; synaptic protein 
composition 37; PSD-95 38, mRNA granule 
levels 39, protein synthesis 29,40,41; AMPA 
receptor internalization 42; dendritic spine 
length and density (in vitro: 31,43,44, in vivo: 
29,31,45; partial rescue of macroorchidism 29 
Plasticity & Hyperexcitability: LTD (after 
in vivo administration) 29; mEPSC 
frequency (amygdala) 46; spontaneous 
EPSC amplitude and charge 
(hippocampus)30; UP states 47 neuronal 
network activity 48; synaptic and network 
potentiation 49, OFA 35,50,51; AGS [149, 152, 
214], prolonged spike discharges 52, limbic 
epileptogenesis 53, startle response* 29, 
PPI 43,44  
Behavior: social dominance 34; sociability 
54, open field hyperactivity 
Cognition: object recognition (chronic, not 
acute) 35; fear conditioning 29; associative 
motor learning (acute)55, inhibitory 
avoidance (chronic and acute) 50,55 
extinction memory (chronic) 50; maze 
learning 38 
LTP deficits in the amygdala 
and hippocampus (bath 
application) 56,57; LTD (bath 
application) 46 startle 
response*, rotarod 
performance 58; object 
recognition (acute) 56, 
coordinate and categorical 
tasks (acute) 56, analgesic 
response 35 
mGlu5 NAMs used: 
MPEP:27,30,31,38-43,48,49,51,52,56-58 
MTEP: 35 
Fenobam: 37,43,55 
AFQ056: 34,44,45,54 
CTEP: 29,50 
 
*Two different mGlu5 NAMs 
were used for these studies. 
AGS: audiogenic seizure, EPSC: excitatory post-synaptic current, LTD: long-term depression, 
LTP: long-term potentiation, MB: marble burying, OFA: open field activity, PPI: prepulse inhibition 
data in Appendix A).  
 
Based on the extensive and promising pre-clinical and early clinical work with mGluR5 NAMs in 
FXS, studies in FXS were initiated with AFQ056 at Novartis. A small (N=30) phase 2a POC 
placebo-controlled crossover study suggested benefit of AFQ056 treatment of behavior on the 
Aberrant Behavior Checklist – Community Edition (ABC-C) in fully methylated adult males with 
FXS (N=7). A small phase 2a placebo controlled PK and safety study was conducted by Roche 
with RO4917523 demonstrating a favorable safety profile. These phase 2a studies prompted two 
larger (N=160 each) phase 2b placebo-controlled, methylation stratified trials examining effects 
of 3 months of treatment with AFQ056 on behavior in adolescents (AFQ056B2214 or “2214”) and 
adults (AFQ056A2212 or “2212”) with FXS (Novartis, clinicaltrials.gov), and a large (N=200) 
placebo-controlled trial of RO4917523 for anxiety in FXS (Roche, clinicaltrials.gov), none of which 
ultimately showed efficacy of drug for behavioral outcomes. Despite the early results in the 
Novartis POC trial suggesting behavior might be a surrogate endpoint for disease modification 
that could be used for drug registration in adult/adolescent studies, at the time of design of phase 
2b studies, uncertainty remained surrounding whether 1) behavior is an adequate surrogate for 
disease state in FXS, 2) deficits in a developmental disorder such as FXS can be expected to be 
sensitive to any form of reversal over short time frames in adults or adolescents, and 3) disease 
modification in the form of enhanced learning capability  can be detected at any age in a time 
frame assessable by traditional short-term placebo-controlled study, and (4) trials might require a 
learning intervention to see the proposed effects on synaptic plasticity observed in the animal 
models.  
 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 20 of 121 
Thus, early in the discussion of the AFQ056 and RO4917523 development strategy (before any 
trials were conducted), it was proposed that: 1) measurement of developmental skills, cognition 
or function would be needed to demonstrate disease modification, 2) disease reversal might be 
detectable only in young children and thus trials in adults could not predict response in children 
given the developmental nature of FXS and higher level of plasticity at younger ages, and 3) 
implementation of a learning intervention within the trial design to capture putative drug effects on 
neural plasticity and accelerate progress would likely be necessary to show a functional or 
cognitive response in the time frame of even the longest possible placebo-controlled trial. Plans 
to address these issues were proposed by a team of academic researchers specializing in FXS 
and Novartis program scientists, and included a 6-month placebo-controlled study evaluating 
AFQ056 effects on intensive reading training in children and adolescents with FXS, and a 
separate placebo-controlled study evaluating AFQ056 effects on behavior, cognition and 
development in children potentially as young as age 3 years. To meet FDA requirements to 
implement these two studies and determine appropriate drug doses for children, a phase 2a PK 
study was conducted in children with FXS, age 3-11 (clinicaltrials.gov). Concomitantly open label 
extension studies (“2278” and “2279”) were conducted, in which participants from 2212 and 2214 
were treated with AFQ056 for over 2 years, to evaluate long-term safety (clinicaltrials.gov). It was 
not expected that conduct of either of the trials in children would depend on results of the 
adult/adolescent studies, given the above concerns. However, when recent analysis of results 
from 2212 and 2214 showed no 3-month behavioral efficacy on the ABC total score or subscores 
for AFQ056, and the Roche adult study showed no benefit of RO4917523 for anxiety and 
behavior, the additional Novartis studies were cancelled. Roche also discontinued their FXS 
studies based on their “negative” adult study. Although Roche ran a Pediatric PK study that was 
not powered for efficacy, they decided not to pursue the effects of RO4917523 in children with an 
efficacy trial. 
 
The combined Novartis studies completed to date have generated a large amount of safety data 
suggesting no major concerns. None of the “negative” studies, however, for the reasons 
noted above, have really answered the question of whether mGluR5 NAMs can modify the 
core features and course of FXS because they have not studied the core deficit: cognition 
and learning in sufficiently young populations with this developmental disorder.  Although 
all the pieces are now in place to run the trial(s) that would actually begin to address the question 
of whether the extensive basic science and animal model work predicts disease modification in 
humans by mGluR5 negative modulators, these trials will not be done though the Novartis 
program or through industry in general due to lack of precedent for the type of trial that needs to 
be done. Novartis will however provide AFQ056 and perform PK studies should the FXS scientific 
community obtain funding to explore this question by conducting a trial utilizing a learning 
intervention in young children. Thus, this NeuroNEXT protocol represents the next step for the 
FXS research community to be able to study the effects of mGluR5 negative modulation on 
plasticity in the youngest (age 3-6 years) children possible. At the same time, the protocol will 
result in generation of more information on language learning through intensive language 
intervention without pharmaceutical intervention; and will seek to develop a badly needed brain-
based outcome measure of treatment effects in FXS.  
 
Thus, far all mGluR5 NAMs appear to rescue phenotypes in the FXS mouse and in pre-clinical 
studies in which two different drugs were compared, results were similar (refs). AFQ056 
(Mavoglurant, Novartis) has been chosen for this study because: 1) it is the only mGluR5 NAM 
that has been studied in children down to age 3; 2) PK data exists for children age 3-11; 3) there 
were no significant safety issues and the drug was well-tolerated in children age 3-11; 4) there is 
PET data at Novartis that shows the drug crosses the blood-brain barrier and is hitting the desired 
target (mGluR5 receptor) in brain; 5) Novartis is willing to provide the drug, help with obtaining an 
IND and perform PK studies for the study. Specifically, four pre-clinical studies have shown 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 21 of 121 
reversal of phenotypes in the FXS mouse with AFQ056, including dendritic spine length and 
density in vitro and in vivo, motor learning, PPI, and several social behaviors. AFQ056 will be 
dosed orally as a suspension that was used in the prior Novartis PK study for children age 3-11 
with FXS (clinicaltrials.gov). In this study, the investigational drug (AFQ056) was prepared by 
Novartis and provided to the Investigator as open label medication in a form of a powder for an 
oral suspension, resulting after reconstitution with water in a 10 mg/mL oral suspension. This 
suspension was well-tolerated and PK data is available documenting the oral bioavailability of the 
drug. Use of the suspension will eliminate the need for young children to swallow pills or capsules. 
The dosage range to achieve blood levels expected to produce over 50% mGluR5 receptor 
occupancy in brain will be 25 to 100 mg which is a higher oral dose relative to weight than that 
used in the adult and adolescent studies (up to 100 mg), however in the pediatric PK study 
metabolism of the drug in children appeared to be enhanced relative to the adult population and 
thus similar doses were needed for equivalent blood levels, despite smaller body weight. Because 
PK showed interperson variation in blood levels for a given dose of AFQ056 in children, the 
flexible dose forced-titration to the maximum tolerated dose has been employed to maximize the 
chances that a stable dose that will be tolerated will be employed during the 6 months of the 
language intervention. 
 
The language learning intervention to be coupled with the AFQ056 targeted pharmaceutical 
treatment and employed in the treated and placebo groups was chosen because to be appropriate 
for very young children with FXS the intervention must support child participation and engagement 
and must target a skill still emerging in the age group to be studied. Both males and females will 
be studied and although females on average are higher functioning, those enrolled in the study 
will have a DQ<75 and thus will represent the lower end of functioning for females with FXS and 
will be more comparable to the males and will have sufficient developmental impairment to 
evaluate improvement from the interventions. On average children with FXS say their first word 
at just over 2 years of age 59 and gradually work toward speech in multiword phrases by around 
age 4-6 years. Thus, at age 3-6 years, children with FXS are often in a period of transition in 
language skills suggesting language should be an area of development particularly sensitive to 
intervention at this age, and that if the mGluR5 NAM can make it easier to learn, the potential rate 
of change at this age should make both the effects of the language intervention alone and in 
combination with the drug effects easier to observe. If the drug works on synaptic plasticity the 
effects of the drug should be best seen during the period of maximum plasticity for the function 
being studied and age 3-6 should be the period of maximum plasticity for language learning for 
the majority of children with FXS. Given that language is the best domain of learning to study at 
this age range, the particular language intervention to be employed was chosen because: 1) it 
has been studied in FXS and has been shown to accelerate language progress in young children 
with FXS on a background of standard therapy 60; 2) it relies on training of parents or caregivers 
to maximize the total amount of time during which the intervention can be delivered in the home; 
3) it has been successfully delivered in a standardized fashion by a combination of in person visits 
at the clinic or research center and in-home sessions conducted via video-conferencing thereby 
reducing the number of physical study visits needed to implement and monitor parental mastery 
and delivery of the intervention, reducing family burden and making compliance more likely. 
 
The language intervention within the placebo-controlled period for this study will be 6 months. 
Even though the study population will be young, in general it is expected that effects on learning 
resulting from either the language intervention or AFQ056 will only be measurable over time. The 
language intervention has shown effects after 6 months of treatment and due to the problematic 
nature of maintaining placebo treatment for more extended time periods, 6 months was chosen 
as the period of time over which to examine the effects of AFQ056 on language learning in 
conjunction with the language intervention. Although virtually all children with FXS receive some 
speech and other therapies as well as special education, the specific amounts and intensity of 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 22 of 121 
therapy vary quite widely and thus the language intervention in this study will be more intensely 
focused on very specific areas (promoting more frequent expressive communication, as well as 
building skills in expressive vocabulary and grammar) relative to background therapy allowing us 
to look at amplification of progress in this specific area during the trial. 
 
Because it will be critical to have the AFQ056 dose titrated to the maximum dose tolerated before 
initiating the language intervention, there will be a two-month flexible dose titration period before 
initiating the language intervention to make sure the dose is optimized before the language 
intervention starts. Thus, the total placebo-controlled period will be 8 months. After the end of the 
placebo-controlled period, all subjects will initiate titration of AFQ056 as per the titration protocol 
in the placebo-controlled period, starting with 25 mg BID to the maximum tolerated dose (up to 
100 mg BID) over 2 months and then will be treated with AFQ056 through an open label extension. 
All subjects, families and investigators will remain blinded to treatment status during the placebo-
controlled period during the extension period until the final subject has completed the placebo-
controlled period and all data from this period is entered in the DCC database and locked. As 
such, some subjects will have an acute dose decrease if they were on a dose of 50-100 mg BID 
of active drug in the initial phase but experience from the Pediatric PK study conducted previously 
suggests that children can stop AFQ056 without withdrawal symptoms and the dose decrease 
and titration in the open label extension are unavoidable to maintain the blind of the study through 
the completion of the placebo-controlled period by the final subject.  
 
The purpose of the extension period will be the following: 
1. To systematically establish safety of AFQ056 in a larger cohort of subjects (which will 
include all those treated with placebo in the first period of the trial) and over a longer 
period of time (up to 16 months in those treated with drug during the first period) in the 3-
6 year age group. If AFQ056 were ever to be used for treatment of FXS based on this 
and other subsequent studies, patients would be treated for life or at least for many years 
until something better is developed. Although there is safety data over long periods in 
older patients, there is no extended safety data for young children.  Even though we are 
not predicting specific safety issues, this extended treatment of up to 16 months will help 
build an important chronic safety profile for future use in very young children.  
2. To examine the trajectory of effects of AFQ056 on language development with the 
language intervention over a longer period of time (14 months) relative to the 6 months in 
the placebo-controlled period. 
3. To examine whether a change in trajectory of language development can be seen after 
the placebo group goes on AFQ056in the open label extension period. 
4. In the absence of drug effect, to examine the trajectory of the effects of the language 
intervention over a longer time period (14 months). 
5. To examine the trajectory of the ERP biomarker performance across a longer time period 
of development, and sensitivity to both the drug and language intervention. 
 
Due to study drug expiration in August 2021, the length of the open label extension may be 
shortened depending upon the date the subject is consented. For subjects consented prior to 
June 2019, the open label extension period will be 8 months allowing the entire 21-month protocol 
to be completed. For any subject that is consented in or after June 2019 the open label extension 
period may be shortened on a sliding scale for those enrolled after June 15, 2019, such that their 
treatment including weaning, if necessary, will end before August 31, 2021, with the exact length 
of the stable treatment period in the extension being determined by how long after June 15 they 
enroll and what dose of drug they are receiving in the open label treatment period. The total 
duration of the stable treatment for those enrolled after June 15, 2019 will range from 6 months 
to no open label extension, depending on the number of months after June 15, 2019 the subject 
is enrolled into the study.   


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 23 of 121 
 
Auditory event-related potentials (ERP), is a CNS measure that is significantly abnormal (both 
amplitude and habituation) in FXS, has shown improvement in habituation in an oddball paradigm 
in a prior pilot trial of minocycline in FXS, and would be expected to relate to language processing 
and learning. The ERP biomarker will be utilized in this protocol as an assay of direct effects of 
AFQ056 and/or language intervention on CNS activity. The prolonged time course of the study 
should allow the biomarker to be linked to developmental parameters over time so that its value 
as a predictive marker for long-term clinical effects of interventions in FXS can be determined. A 
marker of CNS activity that is linked to clinical outcomes is badly needed in the field and would 
be a tremendous resource for future interventions research. 
 
In order to be able to relate the primary outcomes of improved language and communication as 
measured in a structured and coded play-based assay and normalization of auditory ERP to 
general development and behavior in FXS over the relatively long time course of the study, 
secondary outcomes will track domains of 1) cognitive development (Mullen Scales of Early 
Learning), adaptive development (Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale), behavioral development 
(Aberrant Behavior Checklist – FX Version) eye tracking (biomarker of social engagement), 
language development (MacArthur Bates Communicative Development Inventory, Expressive 
Vocabulary Test, Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, Visual Analog Scale for Language), and 
global function (CGI-I, CGI-S). The study will explore molecular measures of the translational 
pathway regulated by FMRP, including ERK61, AKT62, S6 kinase63, APP64, and MMP965 activities 
and phosphorylation (when applicable) state, to see if a molecular biomarker linked to clinical 
improvement can be identified. 
 
This trial will not only address the impact of AFQ056 on language learning in young children 
with FXS, hence providing the first true test of the mGluR theory of intellectual disability in FXS 
by using a learning/plasticity model, but it will also test formally the effects of the language 
intervention itself in the largest group than has been studied to date, and will test whether 
abnormal auditory ERP can be a readout for improvement in language and speech sound 
processing and development related to either the language intervention itself, or the 
combination of the language intervention and AFQ056. Thus, important information will be 
generated even in the absence of a drug effect.  
 
This trial protocol will serve as a model for a new generation of similar trials that need to 
incorporate a learning paradigm to translate targeted treatments from animal models to other 
genetic neurodevelopmental disorders. Hence, even in the absence of a drug effect for AFQ056 
valuable knowledge will still be gained about how to conduct this type of novel trial. If 
successful, this trial is expected to create a template for a paradigm shift that will change clinical 
practice and change the process of translation of mechanistically targeted, animal model-based 
treatments for FXS and for other neurodevelopmental disorders, so as to move the focus of 
initial efficacy studies from behavior in adults and adolescents to learning and cognition in 
young children. Without such a paradigm shift, it is entirely possible the benefits of the advances 
in basic neuroscience and the promise of reversal of disease in animal models will never be 
realized in humans due to a flawed process of human testing and inability to detect change in 
adult populations with developmental disorders. This study is the highest priority in translational 
medicine in the FXS field right now, as it will allow an understanding of whether the animal 
model data (even when very extensive and reproducible) does not translate directly to humans 
or whether we have been doing the wrong clinical trials in humans. It is imperative we do this 
study soon so as not to continue to waste millions of dollars in the FXS and other highly similar 
genetic neurodevelopmental disability fields doing clinical trials using translational models that 
are doomed to failure.  Whatever the result of this study, it will illuminate the relevance of animal 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 24 of 121 
model data to human translation, and guide the steps in the process of moving from bench to 
bedside. 
 
2.2 
Supporting Data 
 
Pharmacokinetics of AFQ056 in Pre-Clinical Studies 
AFQ056 is a structurally novel, subtype-selective, non-competitive inhibitor of the metabotropic 
glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5). The details of the pharmacokinetic profiles in the preclinical 
species can be found in the current Investigator’s Brochure of AFQ056.  
 
In vitro blood distribution of AFQ056 was different across species with fractions in plasma of 
0.56 (rat), 0.76 (dog), and 0.92 (human). The unbound fractions in plasma were 6.5% (rat), 
0.3% (dog), and 2.8% (human). Blood distribution as well as protein binding were independent 
of the AFQ056 concentration within the range of 10 to 10000 ng/mL. In human hepatocytes, 
liver microsomes, liver S9 fraction, and recombinant CYP enzymes, the in vitro hepatic 
metabolism of AFQ056 was via CYP3A4, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19. Results from 
recombinant CYP1A1 suggested a possible contribution of extrahepatic metabolism. Inhibitors 
and/or inducers of CYP3A4, CYP2Cs and/or CYP1A1 will likely influence the hepatic clearance 
of AFQ056 in humans. AFQ056 could not be identified as a substrate of active hepatic or 
intestinal uptake and efflux transport processes in primary cultures of rat and human 
hepatocytes and Caco-2 cells. In human hepatocytes, AFQ056 did not induce expression or 
activity of CYP enzymes at the therapeutically relevant concentration of 2 μM. AFQ056 showed 
weak inhibition of CYP2C19 and CYP3A4. Weak time-dependent, irreversible inhibition of 
CYP3A4-mediated midazolam 1’-hydroxylation by AFQ056 was also observed. AFQ056 was 
found to be a weak inhibitor of MDR1 (multidrug-resistant protein 1), MXR (mitoxantrone 
resistant protein), OAT3 (organic anion transporter 3), OCT1, OCT2 (organic cation transporter 
1 and 2), OATP1B1 and OATP1B3 (organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1 and 1B3). 
AFQ056 does not inhibit MRP2 (multidrug resistant-associated protein 2) and OAT1 (organic 
anion transporter 1). The weak inhibition potential of AFQ056 towards these enzymes and 
transporters is unlikely to be of clinical significance, as the IC 50 values were much higher than 
the mean Cmax values of AFQ056 in subjects treated with twice daily oral doses of 150 mg (in 
CSF form) was approximately 2.0 μM (concentration in the therapeutic relevant range, 
CAFQ056A2102). 
 
Pharmacodynamics of AFQ056 in Pre-Clinical Studies 
In-vitro data 
AFQ056 is a highly selective inhibitor of mGluR5 indicated by its lack of in-vitro inhibition of 
human recombinant mGluR1/2/4/7 and GABAB1/2 (gamma-Aminobutyric acid) receptors (up to 
10 μM). 
 
In-vivo data 
Animal studies assessing the pharmacodynamic effects of AFQ056 have been conducted with 
respect to treatment of the following indications: anxiety, drug abuse, gastro-esophageal reflux 
disease (GERD), dyskinesia/Parkinson’s disease. 
 
In several animal models, anxiolytic-like effects of AFQ056 were determined in a dose range of 
0.03-30 mg/kg. AFQ056 decreased the extent of intravenous nicotine self-administration in a 
dose range of 0.03-10 mg/kg. In terms of GERD, AFQ056 was generally active at doses 
≥1mg/kg (and comparable with the active comparator baclofen). In a monkey model of 
parkinsonism, AFQ056 potentiated the anti-parkinsonian locomotor activity of low-dose L-Dopa 
and decreased the severity of L-Dopa induced dyskinesia. 
 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 25 of 121 
Safety, Pharmacology and Toxicology in Pre-Clinical Studies 
Cardiovascular safety pharmacology investigations showed a weak inhibition of the human 
ether-a-go-go related gene (hERG) channel that did, however, not translate into effects on the 
QT-interval in dog telemetry studies. Dose-related increases in heart rate and respiratory rate 
seen in dog studies (at a dose range of 12.5 – 625 mg/kg) were not reproduced in human 
clinical studies. 
 
Single dose toxicity studies with AFQ056 revealed non-lethal intravenous doses of 50/80 mg/kg 
(female/male) in mice and 40/60 mg/kg (female/male) in rats. Repeated oral dose toxicity 
studies with AFQ056 were conducted for up to 13 weeks in mice, 26 weeks inrats and 52 weeks 
in dogs. Target organs of toxicity were the CNS (all species as evidenced by adverse clinical 
signs), liver (rat and dog), thyroid and pituitary gland (rats), ovaries and the mammary gland 
(female rats). In mice, the No-observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) was 400 mg/kg/day. In 
rats, target organs of toxicity at the maximum dose level included the thyroid and pituitary gland 
suggesting a stimulation of hypothalamic- pituitary-thyroid axis. These observations are 
considered to be secondary to a liver weight increase and enhanced clearance of thyroxin that 
is commonly observed in rat toxicity studies. In dogs, a NOAEL of 60 mg/kg was determined in 
a 52-week chronic toxicity study. In the same study, no significant neuromotor effects were seen 
at the top dose of 180 mg/kg. A common finding in all repeated-dose dog studies was increased 
excretion of protoporphyrin into the bile duct canaliculi. However, this finding was not 
considered adverse as it was not associated with any functional or histopathological findings in 
studies up to 26 weeks in duration. However, the data for AFQ056 indicates that this compound 
has a low likelihood to cause drug-induced porphyria in humans by inhibition of ferrochelatase. 
At the no-effect-level for increased protoporphyrin excretion after 52 weeks of dosing (60 
mg/kg), the AUC-based safety margin relative to the exposure at a human dose of 150 mg b.i.d. 
is 7.4 and 9.45 for females and males, respectively. AFQ056 does not appear to have a 
genotoxic potential and is not phototoxic. 
 
Teratogenicity and Reproductive Toxicity Data in Pre-Clinical Studies 
No effects on male or female fertility were observed in rats up to the top dose level of 500 
mg/kg. A rat embryo-fetal development study indicated that AFQ056 has a potential to induce 
fetal toxicity. No overt toxicity was observed in a pre- and postnatal development study in rats. 
In conclusion, AFQ056 is not considered to have a teratogenic potential. A juvenile toxicity study 
was conducted in the rat since this species is well accepted for such studies and showed 
pharmacodynamic responses to AFQ056. In this study AFQ056 was administered at 0, 10, 30, 
200 mg/kg/day (from day 7-70 post-partum) followed by 6-weeks recovery period. No mortality 
was observed. The top dose induced transient adverse clinical signs (reduced body weight gain; 
lower body weights). Other findings included non-adverse hepatic hypertrophy and thyroid 
follicular cellular hypertrophy which are considered an adaptive response to high drug load. 
Hence, the NOAEL was set at 30 mg/kg/day corresponding to the following exposure data: 
Cmax of 2.6-3.0 μg/mL and AUC0-24hr: 20-23.5 μg*hr/mL) for males and females, respectively. 
In conclusion, juvenile animals were not more sensitive compared to adult rats and no new 
target organs of toxicity were determined. The therapeutic index at the NOAEL relative to the 
maximum recommended human therapeutic dose of 150 mg b.i.d. (CSF formulation) is 6.1 vs. 
7.0 (Cmax) and 3.4 vs. 4.0 (AUC0-24hr) for males and females, respectively. 
 
Pharmacokinetics of AFQ056 in Human Studies 
Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism and Elimination 
After a single oral dose of 100 mg (MF) in adult healthy volunteers the absolute bioavailability of 
AFQ056 was 40%, and the time (Tmax) to reach maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) was 
about 2 hours (median). AFQ056 demonstrated to be highly bound to proteins in plasma with an 
unbound fraction of 2.8%. AFQ056 demonstrates dose proportional PK properties up to the 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 26 of 121 
maximum therapeutic dose range of 150 mg with CSF. After repeat dosing, the steady state 
was achieved in 48-96 hours with accumulation ratio of 1.78 to 1.94; there was no evidence of 
time-dependent change in the PK. After an intravenous infusion of AFQ056 (25 mg over 10 
min), total clearance (CL) was 33.2 L/h and the mean volume of distribution (Vd) was 281 L. 
The mean apparent elimination half-life (T1/2) was approximately 8 to 9 hours. 
 
The elimination of AFQ056 occurred primarily via CYP-enzyme mediated metabolism by 
CYP1A1, CYP2Cs and CYP3A4. The excretion of AFQ056 and its metabolites was shown to 
occur mainly via the fecal route (58.6% of dose) and to a smaller extent by the renal route 
(31.4% of dose). In feces, 41.8% of the dose was eliminated as unchanged AFQ056 and 
15.0% of the dose in the form of metabolites. No parent drug was detected in urine. Co- 
administration of AFQ056 with ketoconazole (400 mg qd) increased Cmax and AUCinf of 
AFQ056 by approximately 2.5-fold and 3-fold respectively. No PK interaction was observed 
when AFQ056 was co-administered with Sinemet® (levodopa/carbidopa). Cigarette smoking 
appears to lower the exposure of AFQ056 as cessation of cigarette smoking resulted in 2.7-fold 
increase in trough concentrations of AFQ056. The development of the CYP450 enzymes 
(CYP2Cs and CYP3A4) involved in the AFQ056 metabolism in the pediatric group aged 3 years 
upwards is expected to be similar to adults (Benedetti, Whomsley and Baltes 2005) whereas the 
activity of the CYP1A1 enzyme in the intestine is low (<50 % compared to adult) during early life 
but attains the same activity level as the adults by the age of 5 years (Kearns and Winter 2003). 
Similar exposure levels observed in the adolescent study (CAFQ056B2131) compared to the 
adults also imply that the CYP450 enzyme activity were similar in adolescents (12 to 18 years) 
compared to the adults. Little or no effect on the exposure levels due to the difference in 
CYP450 maturation compared to the adults is also expected in the age group (3 to 11 years) 
involved in this study. Additionally, in previous studies, the pharmacokinetic properties of 
AFQ056 were not significantly altered as a function of age or body-weight. 
 
The extent of increase of AFQ056 exposure (represented by higher Cmax and AUCinf values) 
upon intake of a high fat meal before oral administration of AFQ056 appears to be formulation 
dependent. In studies CAFQ056A2102 (CSF), CAFQ056A2113 (MF), and CAFQ056A2115 
(FMI1 and FMI2) respectively, the increase in Cmax under fed condition was 79%, 4% and 52% 
while the increase in AUCinf was 22%, 21% and 13%. In contrast, both oral suspension 
formulations suited for pediatric studies termed POS-1 and POS-2 showed a 23 – 33% lower 
Cmax and a delayed Tmax under fed compared to fasted conditions, while comparable AUC 
data was obtained.  
 
PK of AFQ056 in Adolescents with FXS 
In the adolescent PK study (CAFQ056B2131), a terminal elimination half-life (T1/2) of 
approximately 7 hr and slightly lower dose-normalized exposure levels were observed in male 
patients with FXS patients after single oral AFQ056 doses of 25 mg, 50 mg or 100 mg (MF) 
compared to historical adult PK data. Hence, the same absolute doses of AFQ056 were 
recommended in adolescent patients with FXS as in adult patients with FXS. There was no 
maximum tolerated dose (MTD) determined due to the excellent tolerability of AFQ056 in this 
study (single subject with two abnormal laboratory values). The PK profile of AFQ056 after 
single-dose administration was also assessed in Japanese subjects. Based on comparison with 
previous studies in Caucasian subjects, exposure levels of AFQ056 appear to be comparable 
between the Japanese and Caucasian populations in the relevant dose range (up to 100 mg) 
(CAFQ056A1103), indicating that there was no influence of race on the PK of AFQ056. 
 
PK of AFQ056 in Children with FXS 
The child PK study (CAFQ056B2154) was a sequential, two-period, open-label study to assess 
the PK and S&T of AFQ056 in children with FXS. The study population was patients with FXS 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 27 of 121 
aged 3-11 yrs (Cohort 1: 5-11 yrs (n=12) was enrolled first and then Cohort 2: 3-4 yrs (n=9). 
Dosing was individualized for the multiple dosing during Period 2 based on pre-defined PK 
criteria from Period 1 during which sunjects recieved a single dose of 15mg. Based on PK 
measurements following the single dose, and indiviualized dose was calculated for Period 2 
which consisted of 1.25mg/kg, 50mg or 100mg bid for 1 week. 
 
In cohort 1, period 2, three subjects received 50 mg b.i.d., six subjects received 100 mg b.i.d. 
and the other three subjects received individualized doses of 1.25 mg/kg which was equivalent 
to 20 mg b.i.d., 25 mg b.i.d. and 60 mg b.i.d. respectively. When administered in Cohort 1 FXS 
subjects, AFQ056 was rapidly absorbed. Median Tmax was 0.542 h with the range of 0.467-
2.15 h for the dosing group 100 mg b.i.d. on Day 7. Geometric mean of Cmax,ss of AFQ056 
was 196, 113, 229, 234 and 286 ng/mL for the patients dosed at 20, 25, 50, 60 and 100 mg of 
AFQ056 (b.i.d. regimen), respectively on Day 7.  Geometric mean exposure of AFQ056 was 
510, 419, 843, 1210, and 1050 ng.h/mL for AUClast in the patients dosed at 20, 25, 50, 60 and 
100 mg of AFQ056 (b.i.d. regimen), respectively on Day 7, The summary statistics of PK 
parameters such as Cmax, AUC0-12h, AUClast and Tmax of AFQ056 are shown in Figure 1 
and Table 2 (source: Novartis CSR for study CAFQ056B2154). 
 
In cohort 2, period 2, four subjects received 50 mg b.i.d. and one subject received 100 mg b.i.d. 
and other four subjects received individualized doses of 1.25 mg/kg which was equivalent to 15 
(n=1), 20 (n=1) and 25 mg (n=2) b.i.d. respectively. When administered in FXS patients aged 
between 3-4 years, AFQ056 was rapidly absorbed. Median Tmax was 1.310 h for the dosing 
group 50 mg b.i.d. on Day 8. Geometric mean of Cmax,ss of AFQ056 was 177, 75.4, 144, 161 
and 96 ng/mL for the patients dosed at 15, 20, 25, 50 and 100 mg of AFQ056 (b.i.d. regimen), 
respectively on Day 8. Geometric mean exposure of AFQ056 (AUClast) was 457, 293, 493, 711 
and 267 ng.h/mL for AUClast in the patients dosed at 15, 20, 25, 50 and 100 mg of AFQ056 
(b.i.d. regimen), respectively on Day 8, The summary statistics of PK parameters such as 
Cmax, AUC0-12h, AUClast and Tmax of AFQ056 are shown in Figure 1 and Table 3 (source: 
Novartis CSR for study CAFQ056B2154). 
 
 
 
Figure 1. Cmax and AUC Plots from Pediatric PK Study with AFQ056 (Source: Novartis 
CSR for study CAFQ056B2154) 
 
 
 
Table 2. Summary statistics for PK parameters after multiple oral doses of  
AFQ056 on Day 7 in patients with FXS aged 5-11 years  


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 28 of 121 
Treatment 
Statistic 
Cmax 
(ng/mL) 
AUC0-12h 
(hr*ng/mL) 
AUClast 
(hr*ng/mL)  
Tmax 
(hr) 
AFQ056 20mg 
b.i.d. 
N 
1 
- 
1 
1 
Mean (SD) 
196 (-) 
- 
510 (-) 
2.00 (-) 
CV% mean 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Geo-mean 
196 
- 
510 
2.00 
CV% geo-mean 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Median 
196 
- 
510 
2.00 
[Min; Max] 
[196;196] 
- 
[510;510] 
[2.00;2.00] 
AFQ056 25mg 
b.i.d. 
N 
1 
1 
1 
1 
Mean (SD) 
113 (-) 
461 (-) 
419 (-) 
0.500 (-) 
CV% mean 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Geo-mean 
113 
461 
419 
0.500 
CV% geo-mean 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Median 
113 
461 
419 
0.500 
[Min; Max] 
[113;113] 
[461;461] 
[419;419] 
[0.500;0.500] 
AFQ056 50mg 
b.i.d. 
N 
3 
1 
3 
3 
Mean (SD) 
229 (101) 
585 (-) 
913 (451) 
1.57 (0.823) 
CV% mean 
43.8 
- 
49.4 
52.6 
Geo-mean 
215 
585 
843 
1.37 
CV% geo-mean 
44.9 
- 
51.8 
78.2 
Median 
201 
585 
790 
2.00 
[Min; Max] 
[146;341] 
[585;585] 
[536;1410] 
[0.617;2.08] 
AFQO56 60mg 
b.i.d. 
N 
1 
- 
1 
1 
Mean (SD) 
234 (-) 
- 
1210 (-) 
2.00 (-) 
CV% mean 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Geo-mean 
234 
- 
1210 
2.00 
CV% geo-mean 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Median 
234 
- 
1210 
2.00 
[Min; Max] 
[234;234] 
- 
[1210;1210] [2.00;2.00] 
AFQ056 100 mg 
b.i.d. 
N 
6 
3 
6 
6 
Mean (SD) 
286 (107) 
1210 (114) 
1110 (375) 
1.03 (0.809) 
CV% mean 
37.5 
9.4 
33.9 
78.3 
Geo-mean 
272 
1210 
1050 
0.815 
CV% geo-mean 
35.0 
9.4 
36.7 
83.5 
Median 
271 
1200 
1060 
0.542 
[Min; Max] 
[189;484] 
[1100;1330] 
[608;1660] 
[0.467;2.15] 
Source: Table 14.2-2.2, Novartis CSR for study CAFQ056B2154 
 
Pharmacodynamics of AFQ056 in Human Studies 
The degree of mGlu5 receptor occupancy has been investigated in six healthy volunteers 
following oral administration of radio-labeled AFQ056 using [11C]-ABP688 radioligand – 
positron emission tomography (PET) (CAFQ056A2104). After single, oral doses of the CSF 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 29 of 121 
ranging from 25 mg to 400 mg the degree of mGlu5 receptor occupancy dose-dependently 
increased. The degree of receptor occupancy amounted to approximately 55% at the 
therapeutic dose of 100 mg and 85% at the maximum tolerated single dose of 400 mg. PET 
data is shown in Appendix A. 
 
Table 3. Summary statistics for PK parameters after multiple oral doses  
 
administration of AFQ056 on Day 8 in patients with FXS aged between 
 
3-4 years 
Treatment 
Statistic 
Cmax 
(ng/mL) 
AUC0-12h 
(hr*ng/mL) 
AUClast 
(hr*ng/mL)  
Tmax 
(hr) 
AFQ056 15mg 
b.i.d. 
N 
1 
- 
1 
1 
Mean (SD) 
177 
- 
457 
0.500 
CV% mean 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Geo-mean 
177 
- 
457 
0.500 
CV% geo-
mean 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Median 
177 
- 
457 
0.500 
[Min; Max] 
[177;177] 
- 
[457;457] 
[0.500;0.500] 
AFQ056 20mg 
b.i.d. 
N 
1 
- 
1 
1 
Mean (SD) 
75.4 
- 
293 
2.15 
CV% mean 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Geo-mean 
75.4 
- 
293 
2.15 
CV% geo-
mean 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Median 
75.4 
- 
293 
2.15 
[Min; Max] 
[75.4;75.4] - 
[293;293] 
[2.15;2.15] 
AFQ056 25mg 
b.i.d. 
N 
2 
2 
2 
2 
Mean (SD) 
149 (50.2) 
689 (435) 
541 (315) 
0.684 (0.260) 
CV% mean 
33.8 
63.1 
58.2 
38.0 
Geo-mean 
144 
617 
493 
0.658 
CV% geo-
mean 
35.5 
76.5 
68.2 
40.4 
Median 
149 
689 
541 
0.684 
[Min; Max] 
[113;184] 
[381;997] 
[318;763] 
[0.500;0.867] 
AFQO56 50mg 
b.i.d. 
N 
4 
2 
4 
4 
Mean (SD) 
179 (102) 
768 (14.2) 
726 (176) 
1.32 (0.879) 
CV% mean 
57.0 
1.9 
24.3 
66.8 
Geo-mean 
161 
768 
711 
1.07 
CV% geo-
mean 
54.4 
1.9 
23.4 
89.3 
Median 
144 
768 
685 
1.31 
[Min; Max] 
[99.4;328] 
[758;778] 
[559;975] 
[0.500;2.15] 
AFQ056 100 mg 
b.i.d. 
N 
1 
- 
1 
1 
Mean (SD) 
96.0 
- 
267 
2.00 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 30 of 121 
CV% mean 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Geo-mean 
96.0 
- 
267 
2.00 
CV% geo-
mean 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Median 
96.0 
- 
267 
2.00 
[Min; Max] 
[96.0;96.0] - 
[267;267] 
[2.00;2.00] 
Source: Table 14.2-2.2, Novartis CSR for study CAFQ056B2154 
 
Human Safety and Tolerability Data 
Over 1100 study subjects have been enrolled in a total of 25 completed human studies, of which 
17 were phase I studies (single-dose: n=11; multiple-dose: n=6), six were phase II studies and 
two were open-label extensions. In these studies, a total of approximately 800 study subjects 
were exposed to AFQ056 while the remaining subjects received either placebo or an active 
comparator [AFQ056 Investigator Brochure]. Seven of these studies were in patients with FXS, 
resulting in exposure to AFQ056 in approximately 300 patients with FXS.  
 
Overall, AFQ056 was safe and well tolerated and the AEs observed throughout the clinical 
development program of AFQ056 were mostly of mild or moderate intensity and resolved 
spontaneously. There was only a single serious adverse event (SAE) of psychosis reported in 
healthy volunteer studies that was suspected to be study drug-related. An additional 13 patients 
with PD-LID were reported with a drug-related SAE, while none of the patients with FXS 
developed any SAE (for details see below under SAEs). In two single-ascending 
CAFQ056A1103, CAFQ056A2101) and two multiple ascending dose studies (CAFQ056A2102, 
CAFQ056A2120) in healthy volunteers, AFQ056 has been administered up to a maximum 
single dose of 800 mg (clinical service formulation (CSF)) and multiple dose of 450 mg b.i.d. 
(CSF) for 10 days preceded by 4 days of up-titration. Based on these four safety and tolerability 
studies a single maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 400 mg and multiple MTD of 150 mg b.i.d. 
has been determined. Single doses of >400 mg or multiple doses of >150 mg b.i.d. resulted in 
drug-related adverse events (AEs) that were considered to be dose-limiting (e.g. hallucinations, 
psychosis-like symptoms, dyskinesia). Visual hallucinations or illusions were also reported at 
the multiple MTD of 150 mg b.i.d. (CSF) in chronic smokers (CAFQ056A2109), but not in non-
smoking subjects at this dose level (CAFQ056A2102) suggesting that smokers exhibit reduced 
tolerability to AFQ056 compared to non-smokers. In patients with FXS, AFQ056 has been 
administered up to 100 mg b.i.d. over duration of over 2 years. 
 
In the 6 studies conducted in adolescents and adults with FXS, CAFQ056A2204 (phase 2 
POC), CAFQ056A2131 (adolescent PK), CAFQ056A2212 (phase 2b placebo-controlled adults), 
CAFQ056B2214 (phase 2b placebo-controlled adolescents), CAFQ056B2278 (open label 
extension adolescents), CAFQ056B2279 (open label extension adults) safety and tolerability 
profiles were in general benign. A summary of adverse events seen in the treated and placebo 
groups from the combined placebo-controlled studies in adults and adolescents is given in 
Table 4. There was an increased rate of dizziness, insomnia, headache, decreased appetite 
and vomiting, although all side effects were mild-moderate in degree. There were no clinically 
significant changes in laboratory parameters, EKGs, or vital signs during these studies. Side 
effects led to discontinuation in 5 subjects in the adult study (all in the 100 mg BID group and all 
due to insomnia) and in 2 subjects in the adolescent study (also at 100 mg BID and due to 
psychomotor agitation). In the open label extension studies 2278 and 2279, side effect patterns 
were similar and over the course of 2 or more years of treatment with AFQ056, only 9 of 103 
and 12 of 148 subjects discontinued from the extension studies, largely due to behavioral side 
effects consistent with activation (irritability, aggression, hyperactivity, anxiety, and impulsive 
behavior). 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 31 of 121 
 
Table 4. Adverse events from baseline to Week 12, by treatment (safety population)  
Event 
Placebo 
N=86 
n (%) 
Mavoglurant 
25 mg bid 
N=75 
n (%) 
Mavoglurant 
50 mg bid 
N=69 
n (%) 
Mavoglurant 
100 mg bid 
N=84 
n (%) 
Patients with any adverse event  53 (61.6) 50 (66.7) 
43 (62.3) 
71 (84.5) 
Dizziness 
1 (1.1) 
1 (1.3) 
0 
10 (11.9) 
Insomnia 
0 
1 (1.3) 
4 (5.8) 
14 (16.7) 
Nasopharyngitis 
8 (9.3) 
11 (14.7) 
9 (13.4) 
11 (13.1) 
Decreased appetite 
1 (1.1) 
0 
2 (2.9) 
8 (9.5) 
Headache 
6 (7.0) 
5 (6.7) 
4 (5.8) 
14 (16.7) 
Nausea 
0 
0 
1 (1.4) 
4 (4.8) 
Upper respiratory tract infection 6 (7.0) 
5 (6.7) 
3 (4.3) 
9 (10.7) 
Vomiting 
2 (2.3) 
5 (6.7) 
6 (8.7) 
10 (11.9) 
Agitation 
0 
1 (1.3) 
2 (2.9) 
3 (3.6) 
Diarrhea 
3 (3.5) 
5 (6.7) 
1 (1.4) 
5 (6.0) 
Irritability 
0 
2 (2.7) 
2 (2.9) 
3 (3.6) 
Aggression 
1 (1.1) 
1 (1.3) 
3 (4.3) 
2 (2.4) 
Pyrexia 
1 (1.1) 
2 (2.7) 
1 (1.4) 
3 (3.6) 
Abdominal pain upper 
0  
2 (2.7) 
0 
2 (2.4) 
Anxiety 
1(1.1) 
0 
0 
2 (2.4) 
Oral herpes 
0 
2 (2.7) 
0 
2 (2.4) 
Self-injurious behavior 
0 
0 
0 
2 (2.4) 
Cough 
1 (1.1) 
3 (4.0) 
1 (1.4) 
1 (1.1) 
Nasal congestion 
0 
3 (4.0) 
0 
1 (1.1) 
Oropharyngeal pain 
1 (1.1) 
2 (2.7) 
2 (2.9) 
1 (1.1) 
Rhinitis 
0 
2 (2.7) 
1 (1.4) 
1 (1.1) 
Rash 
0 
2 (2.7) 
0 
0 
Influenza 
2 (2.3) 
2 (2.7) 
0 
2 (2.4) 
Fatigue 
0 
0 
1 (1.4) 
2 (2.4) 
Source: Compiled AE data from papers in press for CAFQ056A2212 and CAFQ056B2214 
 
In the Pediatric PK study (CAFQ056B2154) in cohort 1 (age 5-11), nine (75%) patients reported 
with at least a single AE. The most commonly affected system organ classes (SOC) were 
gastrointestinal disorders (n=8; 66.7%), followed by nervous system (n=5; 41.7%) and 
psychiatric disorders (n=4; 33.3%). AEs belonging to other SOCs occurred in 2 subjects only. 
AEs observed in cohort 1 (age 5-11) are provided in Table 5 (source: Novartis CSR for study 
CAFQ056B2154). The most commonly reported individual AE was vomiting (mild, without 
stomach contents, brief duration) with an overall incidence of 50.0 % (n=6) followed by diarrhea, 
dizziness, initial insomnia and psychomotor activity with an overall incidence of 16.7% (n=2), 
while all other AEs had an incidence of <10%. All AEs were of mild intensity. Most of these had 
an early onset and spontaneously resolved within <2 hours after last dosing. The AEs typically 
occurred on the first day of the multiple dosing period 2 and resolved despite continuous dosing 
at the target dose.  
 
In Cohort 2 (age 3-4 years), six (66.7%) patients reported at least a single AE. The most 
commonly affected system organ classes (SOC) were psychiatric disorders (n=3; 33.3%),  


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 32 of 121 
followed by infections and infestations (n=2; 22.2%). AEs belonging to other SOCs occurred in 
single subjects only. AEs observed in cohort 2 (age 3-4) are provided in Table 6 (source: 
Novartis CSR for study CAFQ056B2154). The most commonly reported individual AE was 
insomnia (n=2) or initial insomnia (n=1) reported in three of nine subjects. All other AEs 
occurred in single subjects only. All AEs were of mild intensity. These were not suspected to 
study-drug related except for four AEs of insomnia (n=2), initial insomnia (n=1) and somnolence 
(n=1). These AEs occurred on treatment days 2, 3 or 4 and spontaneously resolved despite 
continuous dosing at the target dose except for a single subject for which sleep disturbances 
were still present at the EOS visit. 
 
There were no SAEs or any AE-related study discontinuations in CAFQ056B2154. All AEs were 
of mild intensity. Moreover, there were no clinically relevant alterations of laboratory, EKG or 
vital sign data. Hence, each of the 21 children with FXS exposed to AFQ056 completed the 
study per protocol at the assigned target dose.  
 
Based on the PK and safety data presented above, the dose range of 15-100 mg has been 
chosen for this study as a dose range likely to give blood levels consistent with >50% receptor 
occupancy and which have generally shown a favorable safety profile in prior studies. Some 
behavioral activation and insomnia may be expected as potential relatively common side 
effects, but these are actually common side effects of standard psychopharmacology with 
stimulants and SSRIs often used in FXS, and these side effects may be managed by dose 
reduction in the 2 months of flexible dose titration and the beginning of dosing, The flexible dose 
design of this will allow for this kind of side effect to be minimized by allowing dose adjustment 
up or down to find the maximum tolerated dose before implementing the language intervention 
so that stable dosing can be maintained during the language intervention. Based on the 
allowance for flexible dose titration to manage the common side effects seen with AFQ056 and 
the discontinuation rates of less than 10% over up to 2 years of participation in the adult and 
adolescent open label extension studies CAFQ056B2278 and B2279, it is expected that there 
will be less than 10% attrition from this study over the course of the 14 months of participation. 
 
 
 
Table 5. Incidence of AEs by preferred term - n(percent) of patients (Safety  
analysis set) – Cohort 1 (age 5-11 years) 
 
-Period1- 
15mg 
AFQ056 
-Period 
2- 
20mg 
AFQ056 
 
25mg 
AFQ056 
 
50mg 
AFQ056 
 
60mg 
AFQ056 
 
100mg 
AFQ056 
 
 
Total 
 
N=12 
N=1 
N=1 
N=3 
N=1 
N=6 
N=12 
Preferred term 
n (%)  
n (%)  
n (%)  
n (%)  
n (%)  
n (%)  
n (%)  
Patients with AE(s)  
4(33.3)  
1(100)  
 
3(100)  1(100)  
4(66.7)  9(75.0)  
Preferred term 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Vomiting  
 
1(100)  
 
2(66.7)   
3(50.0)  6(50.0)  
Diarrhea  
1(8.3)  
 
 
1(33.3)   
 
2(16.7)  
Dizziness  
 
 
 
 
 
2(33.3)  2(16.7)  
Initial insomnia  
 
1(100)  
 
 
 
1(16.7)  2(16.7)  
Psychomotor 
hyperactivity  
 
1(100)  
 
1(33.3)   
 
2(16.7)  
Anticipatory anxiety  
1(8.3)  
 
 
 
 
1(16.7)  1(8.3)  
Anxiety  
 
 
 
 
1(100)  
 
1(8.3)  
Coordination 
abnormal  
 
 
 
 
 
1(16.7)  1(8.3)  


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 33 of 121 
Dyskinesia  
 
 
 
1(33.3)   
 
1(8.3)  
Eye pain  
 
 
 
 
 
1(16.7)  1(8.3)  
Feeling hot  
 
 
 
 
 
1(16.7)  1(8.3)  
Food poisoning  
1(8.3)  
 
 
 
 
 
1(8.3)  
Headache  
 
 
 
 
 
1(16.7)  1(8.3)  
Hordeolum  
1(8.3)  
 
 
 
 
 
1(8.3)  
Hot flush  
 
 
 
 
 
1(16.7)  1(8.3)  
Hyperhidrosis  
 
 
 
 
 
1(16.7)  1(8.3)  
Hypersomnia  
 
 
 
 
 
1(16.7)  1(8.3)  
Mydriasis  
 
 
 
 
 
1(16.7)  1(8.3)  
Nasopharyngitis  
 
 
 
1(33.3)   
 
1(8.3)  
Non-cardiac chest 
pain  
 
 
 
 
 
1(16.7)  1(8.3)  
Oropharyngeal pain  
 
 
 
 
 
1(16.7)  1(8.3)  
Pollakiuria  
 
 
 
1(33.3)   
 
1(8.3)  
Swelling face  
 
 
 
 
 
1(16.7)  1(8.3)  
Arranged in descending order of frequency by total column.  
Source: Table 14.3.1-1.1, Novartis CSR for study CAFQ056B2154 
 
Table 6. Incidence of AEs by preferred term - n(percent) of patients (Safety  
analysis set) – Cohort 2 (age 3-4 years) 
 
-Period1- 
15mg 
AFQ056 
-Period 
2- 
15mg 
AFQ056 
 
20mg 
AFQ056 
 
25mg 
AFQ056 
 
50mg 
AFQ056 
 
100mg 
AFQ056 
 
 
Total 
 
N=9 
N=1 
N=1 
N=2 
N=4 
N=1 
N=9 
Preferred term 
n (%)  
n (%)  
n (%)  
n (%)  
n (%)  
n (%)  
n (%)  
Patients with AE(s)  
2(22.2)  
1(100)  
1(100)   
3(75.0)  1(100)  6(66.7)  
Preferred term  
- 
- 
- 
 
 
 
 
Insomnia  
- 
- 
- 
 
2(50.0)   
2(22.2)  
Gastrointestinal viral 
infection  
- 
1(100)  
- 
 
 
 
1(11.1)  
Infected bites  
1(11.1)  
- 
- 
 
 
 
1(11.1)  
Initial insomnia  
- 
- 
1(100)   
 
 
1(11.1)  
Nasal congestion  
- 
- 
- 
 
 
1(100)  1(11.1)  
Pharyngitis  
1(11.1)  
- 
- 
 
 
 
1(11.1)  
Rash  
- 
- 
1(100)   
 
 
1(11.1)  
Somnolence  
- 
- 
- 
 
1(25.0)   
1(11.1)  
Urticaria 
- 
- 
1(100)   
 
 
1(11.1)  
Arranged in descending order of frequency by total column.  
Source: Table 14.3.1-1.1, Novartis CSR for study CAFQ056B2154 
 
3 
STUDY DESIGN 
 
The trial will use a double-blind placebo-controlled parallel-group flexible-dose forced titration 
design in which 100 subjects with FXS, age 32 months to 6 years of age will enter a single-blind 
4-month placebo lead-in, followed by an 8-month placebo-controlled phase in which they are 
randomized 1:1 to AFQ056 or placebo followed by an 8 month open label extension phase in 
which all participants enrolled by June 15, 2019 will be treated with active drug. For participants 
enrolled after June 15, 2019, the duration of the open label extension will be shorter and will 
depend upon when the subject is enrolled and what dose of AFQ056 the participant is taking for 
stable treatment in the open label extension. The total duration of the stable treatment for those 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 34 of 121 
enrolled after June 15, 2019 will range from 6 months to no open label extension, depending on 
the number of months after June 15, 2019 the subject is enrolled into the study. The flexible dose 
design will mimic practice, take into account differential responsiveness and the known inter-child 
variability in drug levels with AFQ056, and allow use of maximum tolerated dose (MTD) which is 
likely to be most effective.  
 
Participants will be seen for a screening visit during which they will have assessments (to include 
language, communication, cognitive, adaptive, behavioral measures, CGI, blood for safety labs 
and biomarkers, U/A, EKG, ERP and eye tracking) and if they meet entry criteria will start a single-
blind 4-month placebo lead-in to provide a control group with treatment as usual for the language 
intervention placebo group. Subjects will be seen for a study visit 2 months into the placebo lead 
in (-2 months). It should be noted that although 32 month old children can enter the placebo lead-
in, these children will be age 3 years before they are randomized and are potentially exposed to 
drug, thus the age of treatment will remain within the age range that has been studied in the prior 
pharmacokinetic study with AFQ056.  
 
At the end of 4 months in the placebo lead-in all subjects will have a repeat battery of assessments 
and be randomized to drug or placebo at an AFQ baseline visit. The initial dose will be 25 mg BID 
and dose titration will be done every week based on safety report and side effects alone (efficacy 
will not be a factor in dose titration due to known strong early placebo effects in prior FXS studies). 
If the subject has no side effects at each call, the dose will be force titrated (mandatory titration if 
no side effects) to the next level, 50 mg BID, 75 mg BID and 100 mg BID in order. If there is 
concern for side effects the dose may be left the same for an additional week or reduced. If there 
are side effects after the first week of treatment, the 25 mg dose will be allowed to be reduced to 
12.5 mg BID. Patients who cannot tolerate 12.5 mg BID will be withdrawn from the study. Subjects 
will be seen for a study visit for a safety check at 1 month from baseline, during the titration period. 
The dose can be adjusted weekly through week 7 after baseline. This will give extra weeks after 
the full titration schedule to ensure the final dose chosen is the optimal one for the given patient. 
After 7 weeks, the dose will be fixed and at the 2 month visit (language intervention baseline visit) 
all subjects will have the battery of assessments again and will initiate the language intervention, 
remaining on a stable AFQ056/placebo dose for the next 6 months.  
 
Families will have training for the language intervention at the 2 month visit, and subsequent 
instruction and monitoring of delivery of the intervention will occur by weekly video conferencing 
(per institutional policy) with the language therapist for the first 4 months of the intervention (6 
months from randomization), and then monthly for the duration of the study. 
 
Study visits will occur at the 3, 4, 6 and 8 month visits (v6 – 9) after implementation of the language 
intervention (occurs at 2 months).  
 
At 3 months: only VAS and CGI assessments will be done 
 
All baseline assessments except the Mullen, PLS-5, and Children’s Sleep Habits 
Questionnaire will be repeated at 4 and 6 months (visits 7 and 8). Auditory ERP and Eye 
Tracking will only be repeated at 4 months (visit 7) and not at 6 months (visit 8). 
 
All baseline assessments will be repeated at the 8 month visit (visit 9), in addition to the 
EKG and blood/urine tests.  
 
At all visits, the following will be done: an interim history, vital signs, weight, height, a physical and 
neurological exam, adverse event review, suicidality review, dosing diary/compliance review, 
concomitant medication/therapy review, language intervention monitoring/review, 
and 
inclusion/exclusion criteria review will be done.  
 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 35 of 121 
 The 8 month (visit 9) assessments will serve to evaluate whether AFQ056 was able to amplify 
language and communication progress over 6 months in a language intervention.  
 The 4 and 6 month (visits 7 and 8) assessments will allow an evaluation of the trajectory over 
time of effects of the language intervention and any potential additional drug effect and 
whether it occurs early or there is a progressive building of the effect(s) over time.  
 The 4 month assessment will also allow some data to be collected in the case of families who 
are not able to sustain the language intervention with the same intensity in the later part of the 
6 months as opposed to the early months. It is not expected this will be a frequent problem, 
however.  
 
The 4 month placebo lead-in will allow for placebo effects to stabilize, and for the group ultimately 
randomized to placebo, there will be 6 months (4 month placebo lead-in + 2 months of placebo 
dose titration after randomization) of placebo treatment without the language intervention, which 
will allow this group to serve as a treatment-as usual/medication placebo control group for the 6 
month language intervention placebo group, thus allowing the effects of the language intervention 
alone in FXS to be quantified. 
 
After 8 month assessments in the placebo-controlled phase (including 6 months of language 
intervention), all subjects will enter the extension and be treated with active drug according to the 
same schedule as in the placebo-controlled phase. All subjects will be dosed with 25 mg BID of 
unblinded AFQ056 upon completion of the 8 month visit, followed by 2 months of flexible dose 
forced-titration to the MTD of the dose levels available in the protocol (dose adjustments to be 
done as described above for the placebo-controlled period for the flexible dose forced-titration). 
This will be followed by a period of stable treatment. The length of stable treatment will be 
dependent upon how long after June 15, 2019 the participant enrolls and what dose of drug they 
are receiving in the open label treatment period. The total duration of the stable treatment for 
those enrolled after June 15, 2019 will range from 6 months to no open label extension, depending 
on the number of months after June 15, 2019 the subject is enrolled into the study. 
 
Some subjects will have an acute dose decrease if they were on 50-100 mg BID of active drug in 
the initial phase but experience from the PK study suggests that children can come off AFQ 
without withdrawal symptoms and the dose decrease and titration in the open label extension are 
unavoidable to maintain the blind of the study through the completion of the placebo-controlled 
period by the final participant. Subjects will continue the language intervention through the 
extension phase. The open-label extension will allow all children a period of active drug exposure 
to make recruitment feasible, despite the long placebo period. It will also allow an assessment of 
more long term-effects of the language intervention and its impact on the ERP and eye tracking 
biomarker outcomes and other developmental and behavioral outcomes, will allow examination 
of the trajectory of the language intervention going from placebo to drug treatment in a blinded 
setting, and will furthermore allow additional long-term safety data to be collected on a larger 
cohort of children exposed to AFQ056. A diagram of the study design is provided below in Figure 
2. 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 36 of 121 
 
Figure 2. Effects of AFQ056 on Language Learning in Young Children with Fragile X Syndrome (FXS) – Protocol Design  
 
 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 37 of 121 
 
4 
SELECTION AND ENROLLMENT OF SUBJECTS 
 
4.1 
Inclusion Criteria 
 
1. Age 32 months to 6 years inclusive at Screening (visit 1). 
2. Has a documented FMR1 full mutation. 
**Note** Presence of mosaicism is allowed. 
3. DQ<75 calculated from the Mullen Scales of Early Learning at time of screening. 
4. Parent or legal guardian is available and able to communicate well with the investigator, 
comply with study requirements and provide written informed consent. 
**Note**The Parent or legal guardian who will be signing consent form, should be the 
individual administering the language intervention 
5. English is the primary language spoken in the home and the subject’s first language is English. 
6. Meet criteria indicating evidence of intentional communication based on parent interview via 
a communication eligibility screening tool at time of screening.  
**Note** On the Eligibility Screening Tool – Communication, the child must have: 
a. Section 1: Answer of YES; the child uses at least 5 spoken words to label items on a daily 
basis. 
OR 
b. Section 2: At least 3 YES answers to items 1-10 if child does not have at least 5 spoken 
words. 
7. Produces 3 or more intentional acts of communication on the structured portion of the 
Weighted Communication play sample at time of screening. 
**Note** Subjects are permitted to use augmentative communication devices throughout the 
duration of the study if the device is the subject’s primary form of communication and the 
device has been prescribed for the subject by an SLP. 
8. Stable behavioral and other therapy regimen for 30 days prior to screening. 
**Note** Patients will be allowed to continue their standard-of–care therapies throughout the 
trial but these will not be changed during the placebo lead-in or placebo-controlled portion of 
the trial, outside of standard changes occurring from school schedules. 
9. Stable dosing of all concurrent psychotropic medications except stimulants for at least 60 days 
prior to screening. Due to the very short half-life of stimulants (specifically methylphenidate 
and amphetamine variants), a stable regimen of these medications is required for 2 weeks 
only.  
**Note** Medications impacting GABA, glutamate and/or mGluR5 pathway receptors are 
exclusionary and not permitted during study participation. Additionally, stimulant regimens 
may include combinations of short- and long-acting forms and may be taken with different 
timing or dosing on different days of the week (e.g. Doses may be skipped on weekends or 
days off school and extra doses may be given some days for therapy sessions later in the 
day). The intent is to keep the doses and regimen being used at the time of screening 
consistent during the trial even if there is some variation in how the medication is taken on 
different days.  Use of CBD oil or hemp based substances legal for sale over the internet are 
allowed provided that the dosing regimen has been consistent for at least 60 days prior to 
screening and will remain the same throughout the trial. 
 
4.2 
Exclusion Criteria 
 
1. Use of medications impacting GABA, glutamate and/or mGluR5 pathway receptors or 
transmission. 
**Note** Treatment with acamprosate, amantadine, budipine, carbetocin, cycloserine, 
dextromethorphan, felbamate, ketamine, lithium*, minocycline, memantine, oxytocin, 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 38 of 121 
remacemide, racemic baclofen, riluzole, fycampa, investigational mGluR5 medications, 
and/or statins are exclusionary. 
**Note** Lithium taken as a dietary supplement is permitted if the dose is less than 5mg/day. 
A 5mg/day dose is the recommended dietary intake level, and is therefore not considered to 
be therapeutic. Lithium dosage must remain the same throughout the duration of the trial, 
and documented in the concomitant medication log.   
2. Unstable seizure disorder as defined by any seizure in the 6 months prior to the screening 
visit, and/or any change in anti-convulsant drug dosing in the 60 days prior to screening. 
**Note** Use of levetiracetam and oxcarbazepine are among permitted anticonvulsants. 
3. Use of any other investigational drug at the time of enrollment or within 30 days or 5 half-lives 
(whichever is longer) of the investigational drug prior to screening until end of study visits (or 
longer if required by local regulations). 
4. History of hypersensitivity to AFQ056 or any mGluR antagonist. 
5. History or presence of any clinically significant disease of any major system organ class, within 
the past 2 years prior to screening including but not limited to neurological, cardiovascular, 
endocrine, metabolic, renal, or gastrointestinal disorders. This does not include typical 
features of FXS such as psychological symptoms or history of epileptic seizures. 
6. Significant acute illness that did not completely resolve at least four weeks prior to the 
Screening visit. 
7. Abnormal laboratory values at screening that are in the opinion of the investigator are clinically 
significant and may jeopardize the safety of the study subject. 
8. Use of (or use within at least 5 half-lives before dosing) concomitant medications that are 
strong/moderate inhibitors or inducers of CYP1A1/2, CYP2C9/19 or CYP3A4 (see Appendix 
B). 
9. Subjects who are, in the opinion of the investigator, unable to comply with the requirements 
of the study. 
10. Presence of immunodeficiency diseases at the time of screening, based on medical history, 
including a positive HIV test result.  
11. History of a positive Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or Hepatitis C result at time of 
screening. 
12. History or presence of suicidal thoughts and/or suicide attempts. 
 
4.3 
Subject Withdrawal Criteria 
 
Any study subject/legal guardian has the right to voluntarily withdraw informed consent and 
discontinue study participation at any time without providing specific reasons. Subjects may be 
considered withdrawn if they state an intention to withdraw, fail to return for visits, or become 
lost to follow-up for any other reason. If premature withdrawal occurs for any reason, the 
investigator must make every effort to determine the primary reason for a subject’s premature 
withdrawal from the study and record this information on the Study Completion/Termination 
CRF. 
 
If a subject is withdrawn from the study during the placebo-lead in period or prior to 
randomization, they will be brought back in for an abbreviated follow-up/termination visit. At this 
visit, the following will be done: 
 
Drug accountability (family will be asked to return all drug kits and supplies) 
 
Adverse Event Review 
 
The above information will need to be entered into the EDC. If this takes place prior to Baseline, 
please contact the Study Team, and they will provide instructions on how to deem them 
ineligible to proceed to randomization in the system.  
 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 39 of 121 
A physical exam, psychiatric exam, vital signs, and any other assessment per PI discretion may 
be conducted, but is not required to be done or entered into the EDC. 
 
The investigator should discontinue study treatment for a given subject or withdraw the subject 
from study if he/she believes that continuation would be detrimental to the subject’s well-being. 
If a subject has intolerable side effects on the lowest dose of AFQ056 allowed in the study, 12.5 
mg BID, that subject will be discontinued from the study. 
 
Study treatment must be discontinued [and the subject withdrawn from the trial] under the 
following circumstances and according to Investigator discretion: 
 
Legal guardian withdraws informed consent. 
 
Serious AE occurs that is in the opinion of the investigator suspected to be related to the 
study medication. 
 
Severe CNS-related AE occurs that is in the opinion of the investigator suspected to be 
related to the study medication. 
 
The subject may be withdrawn from the study, if: 
 
Clinically significant changes of laboratory parameters and/or vital signs occur that are in 
the opinion of the investigator suspected to be related to the study medication. The 
clinical significance of laboratory abnormalities and other abnormal assessments will be 
assessed and interpreted by the investigator in the context of the overall clinical 
presentation. 
 
Subject is lost to follow-up. 
 
 ≥ 7 consecutive days of study medication are missed or a total of ≥ 14 days of study 
medication are omitted once the subject has begun dosing at any time during the study 
 
Protocol deviation occurs that in the opinion of the Site PI or Study Team may alter the 
study results (e.g. administration of concomitant medication). 
 
If a subject withdraws from the study after randomization, a Termination visit should be 
conducted as soon as possible. The assessments and procedures completed during the 
termination visit will depend upon whether the subject discontinued study drug prior to the 
termination visit. Assessments and procedures to be conducted as possible based on 
agreement of the caregiver at the termination visit(s) as follows: 
 
The subject is on study drug at the time of the visit  
o The termination visit will include all the assessments and procedures for the 16 
month visit (visit 14). 
o If possible, the patient will return for a follow up visit after weaning drug one month 
after the termination visit and do all the assessments for the 17 month visit (visit 15)  
 
The subject discontinued study drug prior to the visit 
o The termination visit will include the following safety assessments and procedures as 
possible 
 
AE review  
 
Blood draw 
 
Urine dipstick 
 
EKG 
 
Vitals 
 
Physical, neurological and psychological exams 
 
Suicidality assessment 
 
Fundoscopic exam 
 
Study drug accountability  
 
The subject discontinued study drug but had a full battery of tests within the past two 
months after being on study drug for at least two months 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 40 of 121 
o The termination visit will include all the assessments and procedures for 
the month 17 visit (visit 15) 
 
 
A follow up visit via phone or email after the Termination Visit with the subject off 
study drug should be conducted approximately 30 days after the termination visit.   
 
Subjects that are withdrawn after randomization will not specifically be replaced as it is expected 
that there will be less than a 10% withdrawal rate. If the rate exceeds 10% an amendment will 
be considered to replace subjects.  
 
4.4 
Study Enrollment Procedures 
 
Potentially eligible subjects making contact with the study site or recruited from a registry by 
phone will be scheduled for a screening visit. The Central IRB-approved consent document will 
be sent to families who wish to read the consent and have a chance to ask questions ahead of 
time at their leisure (during time when they are not directly managing their child with FXS), 
either by phone or email. The consent will not be signed until the family arrives at the site and 
meets with the study coordinator and the site PI. At the screening visit, the family will meet with 
the study coordinator and site PI, who will review the consent and answer any remaining 
questions. Only after the consent has been signed at the site at the beginning of the screening 
visit by the parent or legal guardian and individuals obtaining consent, will any study-specific 
procedures for the screening visit as outlined in the protocol be done. The process of obtaining 
informed consent including those present and their relationship to the subject and persons 
explaining the consent will be documented in the subject source documents for the screening 
visit. 
 
Each subject/patient entering the study for screening will be assigned a unique study number. 
The study number will be a combination of the NeuroNEXT center identifier and a four-digit 
number representing the subject number at the site. (e.g., If the site is 101, the first patient would 
be assigned 1001 and the subject study number would be 101-1001). Numbers will be used 
sequentially study-wide. If a subject screen fails (or withdraws during the placebo lead-in period), 
the study number will not be used again and that number will simply not advance into the list of 
randomized subjects. If a subject is deemed eligible for enrollment into the study and will 
commence dosing, that subject will be randomized through an interactive website, and will be 
stratified based on age (Ages 3-4, and 5-6). The DCC will generate a randomization table for each 
of the strata using a permuted block design with random block sizes.  At the time of randomization, 
the study coordinator logs into the study website and enters and confirms the potential subject’s 
eligibility criteria.  The subject will then be randomized to one of the two treatments.  The study 
ID must be added to all subsequent CRF’s and on the dispensed study medication. 
 
4.4.1 Subject Recruitment and Retention 
Participants will be recruited through participating FXS Clinics which exist at NeuroNEXT 
Network sites. All current FXS Clinics in the USA belong to the Fragile X Clinical and Research 
Consortium (FXCRC). These Clinics also participate in FORWARD which is a registry and 
database that captures the natural history of FXS through longitudinal follow up of patients at all 
the FXCRC FXS Clinics. All FXCRC Clinics can recruit patients through the FORWARD registry, 
both from their own clinic and other FXCRC Clinics not participating in the trial. The study will 
also be announced through information disseminated at FXCRC meetings, through the National 
Fragile X Foundation (NFXF) and through the FRAXA Research Foundation. Individual FXS 
Clinics will do mailings to their clinic population, and email blasts to families about the study will 
be sent out through local parent support groups in the NFXF Community Support Network 
(CSN). 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 41 of 121 
 
Postings will be placed on www.fragileX.org, https://fragilex.org/our-research/fragile-x-clinics/and 
www.fraxa.org websites. Flyers about the study will be sent to community neurologists at 
NeuroNEXT clinical sites. Webinars will be conducted for participant recruitment as needed.  
Interested participants will be contacted by the investigators or their staff and invited to participate. 
These recruitment strategies will include a mechanism by which the patients can provide their 
contact information. We will use the NeuroNEXT Recruitment and Retention Committee to identify 
recruitment strategies. Flyers can also be sent to community Geneticists, Genetic Counselors and 
Developmental Pediatricians if needed.  
 
Given the extensive information network in the FXS field, the pre-existing presence of a network 
of clinics in the FXCRC with opportunities to enlist up to 14 NeuroNEXT sites with FXCRC clinics, 
the fact that no other clinical trials of targeted treatments will be available to this age group, and 
the high level of interest in new treatments and research participation in newly diagnosed families 
with young children with FXS, it is not expected the recruitment will be a problem. Retention can 
be problematic in a 20-month trial such as this, however high retention rates were seen in the 
prior extension studies of AFQ056 for up to 36 months. Also, the close relationships between 
families with FXS and FXCRC clinics and staff, the frequent video-conferencing interactions with 
staff to monitor drug reconstitution and to monitor the language intervention, and the opportunity 
for a free ongoing intensive language intervention will help with retention, as will the promise of 
the open label extension at the end of the study when all participants will know they are going to 
receive the active drug AFQ056. Based on the above considerations it is estimated that retention 
will be 80-90% through the full 20 months of the study. Subjects withdrawing during the placebo 
lead-in before randomization will be replaced such that the full 100 subjects will be randomized. 
 
4.4.2 Screening Logs 
All clinical sites will keep these screening logs documenting demographic information including 
age, gender, race and ethnicity, how all subjects scheduled for screening learned of the trial 
(e.g., national foundation website or information blast, information from CSN groups, mailing 
from participating FXCRC/NeuroNEXT Clinic site, recruitment through FORWARD registry, 
study described at clinic visit, found trial at clinicaltrials.gov, heard about it from someone else, 
etc.), how subjects were referred to contact site about the trial, reasons for ineligibility at the 
screening visit, and reasons for non-participation if eligible.  
 
Screening logs to document demographic information and reasons for ineligibility and non-
participation will be stored centrally at the NeuroNEXT Clinical Coordination Center. Information 
about screening failures and successes will be compiled and reviewed on a periodic basis so 
that feedback can be provided to sites. 
 
Screening log data will be provided to the study team, de-identified and analyzed to determine 
the most successful routes for information dissemination and recruitment strategies for ongoing 
recruitment in this study and for future studies. The study team will work to identify any common 
reasons for screen failure that might be identified before a patient comes in for screening in 
order to prevent unnecessary burden for FXS families, and to consider amendments to the 
study to adjust inclusion/exclusion criteria if a large number of patients are screen failing for 
specific reasons that would not ultimately affect the study results if allowed. Likewise, reasons 
for non-enrollment will be tracked centrally. If there are recurring themes adjustments will be 
attempted to target this problem, as long as the adjustments do not affect the study conduct or 
data quality. 
 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 42 of 121 
4.4.3 Informed Consent 
Written informed consent will be obtained from the parent(s) or legal guardian of each study 
participant before any study-specific procedures or assessments are done and after the aims, 
methods, anticipated benefits, and potential hazards are explained. Both parents should be 
consented, if they are present at the Screening visit. The willingness of the parent(s) or legal 
guardian of the participant to participate in the study will be documented in writing in a consent 
form approved by the NeuroNEXT Central Institutional Review Board (CIRB), which will be signed 
by the parent(s) or legal guardian of the participant with the date of that signature indicated. The 
investigator will keep the original consent forms and a copy will be given to the parent or legal 
guardian of the participant. It will also be explained to the parent(s) or legal guardian of the 
participant that they are free to refuse entry into the study and free to withdraw from the study at 
any time without prejudice to future treatment. Written and/or oral information about the study in 
a language understandable by the parent(s) or legal guardian of the participant will be given to all 
participant families. 
 
Informed consent will be obtained by licensed physician investigators only, who are trained on 
the study and listed on delegation logs as being authorized to obtain consent. The site PI will 
typically be involved in explaining the study and will play a role during the consent process and 
answering any questions in conjunction with the coordinator, as well as overseeing that the 
process is carried out correctly. The consent in this study will always be signed by the parent or 
legal guardian due to the age and cognitive ability of the participants. Basic parts of the study 
the child is capable of understanding will be explained to the child as possible in very simple 
language. The consenting process will be documented on a screening visit source document 
that will list the steps of the consenting process and document those present at the consenting 
process and their relationship to the study participant or role as study staff. The signed consent 
form will be kept in the study subject files with the other source documents from the screening 
visit. 
 
Note: The parent or legal guardian signing the informed consent form must be the same 
individual who will administer the language intervention throughout the trial. If both parents sign 
the informed consent, the parent who is the primary care provider for the child must be the one 
who administers the language intervention throughout the trial. 
 
4.4.4 Assent 
Assent will not be done as subject with FXS age 32 months to 6 years of age with a DQ less 
than 75 (study entry criteria) are by definition functioning at less than the 5 year old level and 
are not capable of meaningful assent. 
 
4.4.5 Global Unique Identifier (GUID) and Data Sharing 
Data from this study may be submitted to the National Database for Autism Research 
(NDAR).  NDAR is a computer system run by the National Institutes of Health that allows 
researchers studying autism to collect and share information with each other.  With an easier 
way to share, researchers hope to learn new and important things about autism more quickly 
than before. During and after the study, the researchers will send health and behavioral 
information about the subject, in some cases, the subject’s genetic information, to 
NDAR.  However, before they send it to NDAR, names, addresses, phone numbers, and other 
identifiable information will be removed, and replaced that information with a code number 
called a Global Unique Identifier (GUID).  Other researchers nationwide can then file an 
application with the National Institutes of Health to obtain access to this study data for research 
purposes.   
  


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 43 of 121 
To obtain this number, information will need to be obtained from the subject’s parent/caregiver 
regarding the subject. Site staff must collect the child’s last name at birth, first name at birth, 
gender at birth, day of birth, month of birth, year of birth, city of birth, country of birth, and 
mother’s maiden name. The information will be entered into a secure website to create a 9-digit 
unique identification number called the Global Unique Identifier (GUID) that will be used for data 
sharing purposes. Some subjects may already have a GUID assigned to them. Details 
regarding this process can be found in the Manual of Operations. Information used to make the 
GUID will not be stored. More details regarding generating the GUID can be found in the 
Manual of Operations. 
 
4.4.6 Randomization/Treatment Assignment 
If a subject is deemed eligible for enrollment into the study at the screening visit, that subject will 
be entered into the placebo lead-in. When he/she returns for the baseline visit 4 months later, 
the subject will complete the baseline visit assessments, will be randomized if eligible and will 
commence dosing, with the first dose to be taken in the morning the day after all the Baseline 
visit (visit 3) procedures are completed. The subject must be at least 3 years old at the time of 
randomization. 
  
Randomization will be performed through an interactive website. In order to prevent age 
imbalance, randomization will be stratified by age with two strata, 3-4 years and 5-6 years. 
Block randomization will be used with random block sizes. Subjects will be assigned a study ID 
at the time of enrollment.  The study ID includes the identification of the center and a unique 
subject ID.  The DCC will generate a randomization table for each of the strata using a 
permuted block design with random block sizes. Kit numbers assigned at each local site 
pharmacy will be tracked at the NeuroNEXT Central Pharmacy through the interactive IWRS 
system.  For sites using a research pharmacy, a prescription for the study drug (AFQ056 or 
placebo) with subject number on the prescription may be written by a licensed physician 
investigator on the study and exchanged at the site research pharmacy for the packet to which 
the subject was randomized. 
 
5 
STUDY INTERVENTIONS/STUDY MEDICATION/STUDY DRUG OR DEVICE 
 
5.1 
Study Medications/Interventions, Administration, and Duration 
 
AFQ056 
Novartis will provide AFQ056 and matching placebo labeled for investigational use. The 
NeuroNEXT Central Pharmacy, the Clinical Materials Services Unit (CMSU) at the University of 
Rochester Medical Center (URMC) will create active and placebo study drug kits with unique 
identifiers not associated with the randomization ID. These kits, which will be used after 
Screening (placebo bottles) and after randomization will be provided to the local pharmacies 
from the CCC Central Pharmacy. 
 
An immediate-release oral suspension dosage form will be used (“powder for oral suspension” 
with flavoring to be re-constituted in water at 10 mg/ml and dosed in measured aliquots). The 
AFQ056/placebo powder in bottles, each bottle containing 500 mg of AFQ056 or matching 
placebo will be provided by Central Pharmacy. Central Pharmacy Kits will include 60 cc 
syringes for use for reconstitution of the powder as well as the study medication and all 
necessary items for the dosing process. During the blinded placebo–controlled period bottles 
will be assigned by the CCC Central Pharmacy and will be dispensed by the local pharmacy or 
other designated staff as applicable at study visits, with numbers of bottles dispensed based on 
the number of bottles needed depending on the subject’s dose.  
 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 44 of 121 
At screening, all subjects will be started on placebo suspension dosing at the same volume as 
the starting dose for the dose titration after randomization (2.5 cc BID) during the 4 months of 
placebo lead-in. The parent/caregiver will receive bottles containing placebo powder and the 60 
cc syringes, for use in reconstitution of the powder with bottled water. Because the active drug 
powder is only stable for approximately 10 days in suspension, the placebo powder will be 
resuspended in a new bottle every 10 days or less during the placebo lead in, so as not to 
unblind the parent/caregiver as to when they may be starting active drug.  
 
Parent/caregivers will be trained at the site in the procedure for reconstituting the drug each 
week, with the study coordinator demonstrating the reconstitution procedure and the families 
practicing the process with the coordinator at Screening. Please note that dosing will not begin 
until a few days after Screening, once subject eligibility is confirmed. The parent/caregiver will 
be given an Instruction Sheet for Preparation of the AFQ056/Placebo Study Medication to take 
home with them to reinforce the instructions for reconstitution. This will be made available in the 
Manual of Operations (Section I). The reconstitution procedure will involve the parent/caregiver 
pouring water from the bottle into a glass, withdrawing over 50 cc into the syringe by immersing 
the syringe in the water in the cup and pulling up to fill to past a 50 cc fill-line premarked on the 
syringe by the study coordinator at the site, inverting the syringe and pushing out air bubbles 
and extra water to bring the water level to the 50 cc fill line, and then adding the water in the 
syringe to a bottle containing the 500 mg drug or placebo powder and then mixing thoroughly by 
repeated inversion.  
 
Beginning at the start of the placebo run-in and occurring the first two weeks of dosing, video-
conferencing calls will be done each week with the parent/caregiver to watch them reconstitute 
the bottle(s) of powder to be used for the following week with bottled water, to make sure this is 
being done correctly at home. All efforts will be made to schedule the conference call on the 
same day and time every week. If this is not possible on a given week, the recommended 
window for the drug dilution calls is -1/+3 days. Bottles will be counted when the subject and 
parent/caregiver return for study visits to ensure the correct amount of drug has been removed 
to give to the subject, in order to carry out drug accountability. This process will allow 
identification of any problems parent/caregivers may be having with the reconstitution process 
and/or compliance and will allow correction before randomization with the reconstitution 
process. If after two weeks of video-conferencing calls for drug reconstitution, the coordinator 
believes the family is having trouble with the reconstitution process or is still requiring a lot of 
coaching from the coordinator, an additional two weeks of calls for bottle reconstitution can be 
done. More calls can be added after that if needed during the placebo lead-in period. After the 
family is no longer doing conference calls they can reconstitute bottles as needed as long as no 
bottle is used for over 10 days. 
 
Once a subject is randomized and a kit assigned, the parent/caregiver will continue to receive at 
every 2-month in-person study visit bottles containing 500 mg of active drug or matching 
placebo powder, as well as bottled water and premarked 60 cc syringes with 50 cc fill line to use 
for reconstitution of the AFQ056 powder. Subjects will start on 25 mg BID (2.5 cc BID) or 
matching placebo after randomization and the dose will be titrated weekly depending on 
tolerability. If the subject has no side effects at each call, the dose will be force titrated to the 
next level, 50 mg BID, 75 mg BID and 100 mg BID in order. If there is concern for side effects 
the dose may be left the same for an additional week or reduced. If there are side effects after 
the first week of treatment, the 25 mg dose will be allowed to be reduced to 12.5 mg BID. See 
section 9.1 also for dose adjustment considerations. Patients who cannot tolerate 12.5 mg BID 
will be withdrawn from the study. Subjects will be seen for a study visit for a safety check at 1 
month from baseline, during the titration period. The dose can be adjusted weekly through week 
7 after baseline. After randomization, monitoring procedures to ensure correct reconstitution 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 45 of 121 
with parent/caregivers will be identical to those described above for the placebo lead-in. Drug 
accountability/compliance will be assessed at every 2-month in-person visit after Baseline (i.e. 
when drug is dispensed).  Parents/legal guardians should be reminded to bring all study drug 
bottles with them to each 2-month visit when drug accountability is to be done. For more details, 
please refer to the Study Medications/Central Pharmacy section of the Manual of Operations. 
 
The following table provides recommendations and guidelines regarding dose titration. Please 
note the Site Investigators will have the opportunity to contact the Independent Medical Monitor 
(IMM) should they be unclear as to how to proceed, and need additional input and guidance. 
Details about how to contact the IMM can be found in the Manual of Operations. 
 
Please note, adverse events will be graded based on CTCAE version 4.0, with the exception of 
behavioral adverse events, including but not limited to the following behaviors commonly seen 
in FXS: 
 
Hyperactivity 
 
Attention 
 
Anxiety  
 
Perseverative behavior 
 
Irritability/tantrumming/aggressive behavior/self-injury 
AE 
Grade/Severity 
Relationship Most 
Likely 
Drug 
Action 
Possible Other Drug 
Actions 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Grade 1 (Mild) 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Unrelated 
Increase 
Unlikely 
Increase 
Possibly 
Increase 
Probably 
Increase 
Hold at physician discretion if AE non tolerable for patient/family 
and/or concern for worsening AE with increase 
Definitely 
Increase 
Hold at physician discretion if AE non tolerable for patient/family 
and/or concern for worsening AE with increase 
Grade 2 
(Moderate) 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Unrelated 
Increase 
Unlikely 
Increase 
 
Possibly 
Increase  
Hold at physician discretion if AE non tolerable for patient/family 
and/or concern for worsening AE with increase 
 
Probably 
Hold 
Increase at physician discretion if AE considered tolerable, Decrease if 
AE considered intolerable by family 
Definitely 
Hold  
Increase at physician discretion if AE considered tolerable, Decrease if 
AE considered intolerable by family 
Grade 3 or 
higher 
(severe) 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Unrelated  
Increase 
Increase at physician discretion, if AE not overly 
interfering with dose finding 
Unlikely 
Hold 
Increase at physician discretion, if AE not overly 
interfering with dose finding 
Possibly 
Hold 
Probably 
Decrease  
Definitely 
Decrease  


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 46 of 121 
 
Hypersensitivity 
 
The above behaviors will be noted as absent (none), mild, moderate or severe and captured on 
the Psychiatric/Behavioral exam CRF.  If worsening in any one of the above categories is 
determined to be a clinically significant change from baseline by the treating physician, it would 
then also be captured as an adverse event and recorded on the AE CRF accordingly. A 
“clinically significant” change from baseline is defined as behavior that is not just related to a 
single event or lack of cooperation in certain settings such as the study visit.  Rather, the 
change should be seen consistently.  Minor fluctuations in behavior typical to the individual 
should not be captured as clinically significant. 
 
For the purposes of the behavioral events being followed in this study, the following definitions 
of mild, moderate and severe will be utilized: 
 
 Mild: the behavior may be present in just one domain of functioning and may be confined to 
one setting, but results in a marginal worsening in quality of life.  
 Moderate: Behavior has been noted in multiple domains of functioning and is not confined 
to one setting. The behavior impacts quality of life in several areas and the child may be 
requiring implementation of more supports in at least one setting.  
 Severe: The behavior is seen in all settings and has a pervasive impact on quality of life and 
the child is requiring support across multiple settings.  
 
After the initial dosing calls in the placebo lead-in, the parent/caregiver will dilute bottles as 
needed, diluting a new bottle when they can no longer get drug suspension out of the prior 
bottle. A partial dose may be drawn up into the dosing syringe from one bottle and then filled the 
rest of the way from the next bottle diluted. The parent/caregiver will be encouraged to use as 
much of the suspension in each bottle as possible without going beyond 10 days of use for any 
bottle. The parent/caregiver will write the date on the bottle when diluted to ensure they know 
when the bottle is no longer good. Each bottle will typically allow dosing of about 40 ml of the 
diluted drug as the bottle adapter does not allow the syringe to pull out the last 10 ml of 
suspension. The following chart shows the volume of reconstituted AFQ056 to be used for each 
possible dose in the study and the resulting number of doses that can be obtained from a bottle 
and the number of days before a new bottle will need to be reconstituted. No other doses will be 
allowed. 
 
12.5 mg BID  
1.25 ml/dose   
32 doses/bottle 
 
10 days/bottle (bottle 
will not be empty when need to reconstitute based on time) 
25 mg BID 
 
2.5 ml/dose 
 
16 doses/bottle 
8 days/bottle 
50 mg BID 
 
5 ml/dose 
 
8 doses/bottle  
4 days/bottle 
75 mg BID 
 
7.5 ml/dose 
 
5 doses/bottle 2.5 days/bottles 
100 mg BID 
 
10 ml/dose 
 
4 doses/bottle  
2 days/bottle 
 
 
The suspension will be drawn up into a syringe fitted to the cap on the bottle in which the 
powder has been reconstituted and administered directly into the subject’s mouth at home and 
in the outpatient setting by the parent/caregiver. The subject should swallow after the 
suspension is administered, and the subject’s mouth should be checked to ensure that the 
suspension was swallowed. Approximately 8 oz. of fluid (e.g. water, juice, milk) will be 
administered with the drug administration. If the child does not tolerate having the suspension 
administered directly with the syringe, the suspension may be mixed with fluid (e.g. water, juice, 
milk) and then given to the child.  The parent/caregiver will fill out a medication diary to indicate 
every dose administered to the child. All dose changes during the study will be recorded on a 
Dose Titration CRF and captured in the EDC. 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 47 of 121 
 
Doses in the range of 1.25 ml (12.5 mg) to 10 ml (100mg) twice daily will be administered orally 
during the study. The dose will be given in the morning and early evening. The two doses 
should not be taken less than 4 hours apart. If insomnia is a side effect the second daily dose 
may be moved to early afternoon.  
 
Expected side effects would be those observed in the prior adult/adolescent studies in FXS and 
the pediatric PK study. These include dizziness, insomnia, headache, decreased appetite, 
vomiting, diarrhea, and behavioral “activation” with irritability, aggression, hyperactivity, anxiety, 
and impulsive behavior. These side effects are expected to be relatively infrequent, mild-
moderate in degree, and insomnia and behavioral side effects will in most cases be 
manageable by dose adjustments in the flexible dosing period. Insomnia may be managed by 
moving the dose earlier in the day as noted above. 
 
Medications required to treat acute intercurrent medical problems (e.g. antibiotics for ear 
infections) should be employed as per standard of care, as long as prohibited medications 
expected to interact with AFQ056 are avoided. The study site should be notified of any acute 
problems and medications to be used so that guidance can be given as to any drug interactions 
and prohibited specific medications can be avoided. Melatonin may be used to manage sleep 
problems. If surgery is required for a minor problem (e.g. myringotomy tube placement, 
tonsillectomy/adenoidectomy, dental work, strabismus surgery) the patient may continue in the 
study but the study site should be contacted to discuss use of anesthesia compatible with the 
study drug. Major surgery may require study discontinuation. 
 
Language Intervention 
The language intervention will be administered by a trained language specialist (training to be 
completed with videotapes and practice activities to reach fidelity at initiation of the study 
through at-home synchronous video conferencing sessions). Initial administration of the parent 
education session of the intervention will be done around the time of the 2 month visit using a 
didactic education session and delivery of the intervention will be started at that visit. The 
intervention will subsequently be delivered to the parent by a speech-language clinician through 
weekly clinician coaching, homework, and feedback sessions.  
 
The entire intervention will be delivered to the parent in the home or at scheduled study visits 
through the use of a laptop computer equipped with distance video-teleconferencing software.  
Coaching, homework, and feedback sessions will occur weekly for 4 months, then monthly for 
the remainder of the study through the final two months of the placebo-controlled portion and 
the subsequent open-label extension.  
The parent will be trained in stepwise fashion to administer the language intervention to the 
child over the entire subsequent course of participation in the study.  
 
SLPs will set up 1-2 distance technology training sessions with the subject family between 
month 1 and month 2 (visits 4 and 5). During the call, SLPs will review the technology 
procedures, work with the parent/primary caregiver to set up the intervention environment and 
work on setting up the equipment as necessary for the language intervention. These practice 
calls will need to be completed prior to visit 5 (month 2), after which the language intervention 
will begin. Please refer to the SLP Training Manual for more details. 
 
The didactic sessions will involve power point presentations with video examples of 
implementation. The coaching sessions will involve real-time instruction and feedback to the 
parent (via MacBook computers and Bluetooth “bug in the ear” technology both provided to the 
parent at the 1 month visit) while the parent interacts with the child in a play-based format. The 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 48 of 121 
parent will independently record and submit homework practice sessions assigned by the 
language therapist. These will be submitted to the clinical team via a file sharing system. The 
language clinician will then provide a feedback and joint problem-solving session related to 
implementation of targeted strategies and management of child challenging behaviors to ensure 
optimal levels of participation in the intervention.  
 
Parents will also report on how often and how much time they have used the language 
intervention between contacts with the SLP using the Language Intervention Diary, and will be 
graded on their ability to deliver the intervention during videotaped structured homework 
sessions.  
 
The intervention is designed to maximize the extent to which parents engage in the types of 
verbally responsive interactions that have been well documented as facilitating language 
learning and use in children with typical and atypical development. These interactions are 
characterized by frequent parent talk about the child’s focus of attention, contingent parental 
responses to child actions and communication, parental language to the child slightly in 
advance of child language levels, and affectively positive parental talk. These strategies are 
often difficult to arrive at naturally for parents of children with FXS because of the children’s 
developmental delays and comorbid challenging behaviors. 
 
The language intervention is designed to help parents learn and use verbally responsive 
interactional strategies more frequently and effectively throughout the course of their daily 
interactions with their children. Nevertheless, it is expected that there will be considerable 
variability in parental rate of mastery and frequency of use of the targeted strategies, which 
means that there will be variability in the effective dose received by the children enrolled. By 
examining clinician-rated parental fidelity of implementation during coaching and homework 
sessions and parent-reported mastery and frequency of use during feedback sessions in 
relation to child outcomes, we will be able to examine the effects of the language intervention 
separately from, and in combination with, the drug. 
 
During months 2 through 5 there will be four parent education sessions as well as weekly 
coaching, homework, and feedback sessions. During months 6 through 17 there will be once 
per month coaching, homework, and feedback sessions. 
 
The parent must complete: 
 All four parent education sessions; 
 41 of 48 (85%) combined coaching, homework, feedback sessions during months 2 through 
5 
 25 of 33 (76%) combined coaching, homework, feedback sessions during months 6 through 
17 
 
Sites must contact the Study Team if the parent is approaching the threshold for missed 
sessions. 
 
It is not expected there will be any side effects of the language intervention. Supportive standard 
of care speech, developmental, occupational, and physical therapy will be continued throughout 
the study as per standard treatment. Attendance at preschool, kindergarten or first grade school 
programs with special education programs per standard of care management will be continued 
throughout the study. New intensive therapy programs in addition to the language intervention 
should not be started during study participation. If the participant is receiving ABA at the time of 
study entry this may be continued as per the baseline therapy program but should not be 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 49 of 121 
intensified. Minor adjustments in the number of hours or time distribution of a therapy that a 
child is already receiving are allowed.  
 
5.2 
Handling of Study Medications/Interventions 
 
Study drug consisting of AFQ056 or matching placebo with identical flavoring will be shipped as 
powder in bottles (500 mg AFQ056 per bottle) from Novartis to the University of Rochester 
NeuroNEXT Central Pharmacy under the name of the PPI. Placebo powder in bottles will be 
dispensed to parent/caregiver during the placebo lead-in, AFQ056 (500 mg) or placebo powder 
in bottles will be dispensed to the parent/caregiver during the randomized placebo-controlled 
period, and AFQ056 (500 mg) in bottles will be dispensed to the parent/caregiver during the 
open label extension and will be dissolved in 50 cc of bottled water measured with a syringe (as 
described in Section 5.1) to give a 10mg/ml suspension. New bottles of AFQ056 powder will be 
dissolved every 10 days or as needed by the parent or caregiver at home (stability of the 
suspension is estimated at 10 days). Appropriate documentation of the reconstitution both at 
study visits and at home will be maintained at the study sites. Also, documentation of the 
subject specific dispensing process will be maintained by the site pharmacy or designated study 
staff.  
 
Labels for the study medication on the bottles dispensed during the placebo lead-in and 
placebo-controlled period, up to the 8 month visit (visit 9), will be provided by the University of 
Rochester Central Pharmacy on bottles in kits sent to the site pharmacy, will indicate 
AFQ056/placebo and will include the following information:   
 
 Study Name/Acronym 
 Unique Kit Identifier (sites will interact with the DCC's IWRS to determine the kit number that 
corresponds to the appropriate treatment arm at the time of dispensing). 
 Unique bottle identifiers within each kit. 
 Description of Contents 
 Storage conditions 
 Dosing instructions 
 Caution Statement (i.e. investigational use only and keep out of reach of children) 
 Space to record date dispensed, date reconstituted, subject initials 
 Name of manufacturer and name of distributor 
 
The study number for the subject and study visit number will be added to the label by the 
coordinator at each study visit when the study drug is given to the subject. Study drug will be 
dispensed to subjects at all study visits after screening, until the Follow Up visit, after which no 
more study drug will be provided. From the month 8 visit on, study drug will no longer be blinded 
and all subjects will receive active drug. Drug dispensed at the month 8 visit and after will be 
labeled as AFQ056 and will contain the same information as the AFQ056/placebo labels for 
bottles dispensed up to month 8. Amount of study drug dispensed during flexible dosing periods 
will be calculated to accommodate any possible dose increases that would occur prior to the 
next study visit. All bottles of study medication including empty, partially used and unused 
bottles will be returned to the study site at each visit, and a new set of bottles will be dispensed. 
 
Study drug will be received at the study site by a designated person, handled and stored safely 
and properly at the site pharmacy or other designated location, and kept in a secured location to 
which only the Study pharmacist and staff, site Investigator and designated staff have access. 
Upon receipt, the study drugs will be stored according to the instructions specified on the drug 
labels. Storage conditions will be adequately monitored and temperature in the area in which 
the study drug is stored will be controlled, monitored and recorded, at a minimum on a daily 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 50 of 121 
basis. Appropriate temperature logs will be maintained. For more details, please refer to the 
Study Medications/Central Pharmacy section of the Manual of Operations. 
 
In accordance with local regulatory requirements, the Investigator, designated site staff, or head 
of the medical institution (where applicable) at each site must document the amount of 
investigational product dispensed and/or administered to study subjects, the amount received 
from the Central Pharmacy, and the amount destroyed upon completion of the study. An 
investigator is responsible for ensuring product accountability records are maintained 
throughout the course of the study. The research pharmacist or designated study staff will be 
responsible for maintaining an accurate record of the shipment and dispensing of study drug in 
a drug accountability log. The inventory in the ledger will include details of AFQ056 or placebo 
bottles received and dispensed to subjects, batch, and ID numbers. All unused bottles and 
labels must be kept until reconciliation of delivery records with accountability logs by the 
monitor.  
 
After the monitor has performed accountability, the site will be instructed by the CCC or 
designee to destroy the used and unused bottles of study medication.  At the end of the study 
the CCC Central Pharmacy will communicate with Novartis and then destroy all unused bottles 
still on site. An accounting will be made of any drug deliberately or accidentally destroyed. 
Discrepancies between the amount of AFQ056 received and dispensed drug will be reconciled. 
A Drug Summary Log (Appendix C) will be used to track drug substance at all site pharmacies 
and the CCC Central Pharmacy and this will be provided to Novartis along with drug destruction 
certificates from all sites and from the CCC Central Pharmacy at the end of the study. 
 
All drug supplies will be used only for this protocol and not for any other purpose. Unless 
specifically instructed by the CCC, the Investigator or pharmacist must not destroy any drug 
labels, or any partly used or unused drug supply. At the conclusion of the study, the site 
pharmacies will provide a copy of the drug accountability logs and Drug Summary Log to the 
study monitor, the PPI and to the CCC and Central Pharmacy. Only after receiving a written 
authorization by the CCC, will the unused and partly used drug supplies as well as the empty 
containers be destroyed by the site’s pharmacist according to pharmacy SOPs at the study 
sites, subsequently providing a drug destruction certificate.  
 
Emergency unblinding will only be undertaken when it is essential to treat the patient safely and 
efficaciously. In most cases, study drug discontinuation and knowledge of the possible 
treatment assignments will be sufficient to treat a study patient who presents with an emergency 
condition. However, if unblinding is necessary, the DCC's IWRS system that will be used to 
track/dispense study drug, will also be used by authorized personnel (usually the site PI) to 
disclose treatment assignment in the event of an emergency situation. The system will 
automatically inform the monitor for the site and the PPI that the code has been broken. The site 
investigator will have a procedure in place to allow access to the emergency code break 
process at any time in case of an emergency. Parents/caregivers of all subjects will be informed 
how to contact the site investigator or his/her backup in cases of emergency when the site 
investigator is unavailable. An assessment will be done by the appropriate site personnel and 
the PPI after an unblinding to assess whether or not study drug should be discontinued for a 
given patient and if the patient may enter the open-label extension. 
 
5.3 
Concomitant Interventions 
 
All concomitant diseases and conditions will be treated in accordance with prevailing medical 
practice. Medications/significant non-drug therapies used within the 6 months prior to Screening 
(visit 1) and at any time during the study will be recorded on the Prior/Concomitant Medications 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 51 of 121 
and Significant Non-Drug Therapies source documents and CRF. The Investigator should 
instruct the patient/caregiver to notify the study site about any new medications the patient takes 
after the start of the study. All medications and significant non-drug therapies (including 
intensive developmental therapies) administered after the patient starts the study must be listed 
on the Prior/Concomitant Medications and Significant Non-Drug Therapies source document 
and CRF. 
 
Virtually all children with FXS are expected to receive at least some speech and other therapies 
as well as special education, the specific amounts and intensity of therapy vary quite widely and 
thus the language intervention in this study will be more intensely focused on very specific areas, 
increased expressive communication and enhanced expressive vocabulary and grammar, 
relative to background therapy. This will allow examination of amplification of progress in this 
specific area during the trial, in a setting where this specific language intervention is used to 
equalize differences between co-therapies children are receiving at baseline in the community. 
 
Despite inter-patient variability, amount of baseline therapy being used is expected to be roughly 
similar in the placebo and AFQ056 groups based on random group assignment, however if this 
is found to be different between groups, it will be added to the model for analysis of results as a 
co-variate. 
 
5.3.1 Required Concomitant Medications/Interventions 
There are no required concomitant medications or interventions outside of the language 
intervention which is an integral part of the study which must be carried out with all subjects. 
 
5.3.2 Prohibited Medications/Interventions 
Medications with GABA, glutamate or mGluR pathway activity are not allowed.   
Stimulants, antidepressants, antipsychotics, alpha-adrenergic agonists are permitted for 
management of behavioral symptoms. Alpha-agonists, trazodone, and melatonin are permitted 
for the treatment of sleep problems. If any of these medications are used, a comorbid diagnosis 
for which the drug is FDA approved must be documented (e.g. ADHD for stimulants or alpha-
agonists, anxiety disorder for SSRIs). If any of these medications are used, the dose must be 
stable for 60 days or 2 weeks for stimulants (see inclusion criteria #9) prior to screening and 
must remain stable during the placebo run-in and double-blind placebo-controlled treatment 
period. If the investigator feels that it is essential to add medications to manage behavior during 
the placebo-controlled treatment period, the patient will need to be withdrawn from the study. 
The reasons for the withdrawal should be carefully documented.  
 
Doses of the above medications may be adjusted if needed during the open label extension 
period, and medications for behavior can be added during this time if absolutely needed. 
Reasons why it was critical to add the behavioral medication and co-morbid diagnosis will be 
clearly documented. Data from subjects for whom behavioral medication was used will be used 
to evaluate safety of concomitant psychoactive treatments when used with AFQ056 in the age 
group being studied. 
 
Use of the following treatments is NOT allowed after randomization during either the placebo-
controlled period or the open-label extension period: 
 
Glutamatergic and GABAergic drugs due to potential mechanistic interactions with AFQ056 
include the following list. This list is by no means exhaustive and medical judgment should 
always prevail. The site Investigators must refer to the product information for any concomitant 
medication to ascertain potential drug interactions and contact the PPI when there are questions 
about whether a medication is allowed. 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 52 of 121 
 
Prohibited Agents:  
 Treatment with acamprosate, amantadine, budipine, carbetocin, cycloserine, 
dextromethorphan, felbamate, ketamine, memantine, remacemide, racemic baclofen, 
riluzole, fycampa or investigational medications interacting with mGluR5 receptors 
 Moderate or strong inhibitors or inducers of CYP1A1/2, CYP2C9/19 or CYP3A4 due to 
potential for increased or decreased metabolism of AFQ056. A list of these agents is given 
in Appendix B. This list is by no means exhaustive and medical judgment should always 
prevail. The site investigators must refer to the product information for any concomitant 
medication to ascertain potential drug interactions and contact the PPI when there are 
questions about whether a medication is allowed.  
 Lithium, warfarin and digoxin – narrow therapeutic windows and not enough data regarding 
potential interactions between AFQ056 and these compounds 
**Note** Lithium taken as a dietary supplement is permitted if the dose is less than 5mg/day. 
A 5mg/day dose is the recommended dietary intake level, and is therefore not considered to 
be therapeutic. Lithium dosage must remain the same throughout the duration of the trial, 
and documented in the concomitant medication log.  Isoflurane – potential interaction with 
AFQ056 
 Any investigational drugs – potential for confounding the safety and/or efficacy of AFQ056. 
In this study oxytocin, minocycline and lovastatin are considered to potentially confound 
efficacy due to potential effects in FMRP-regulated pathways and so they are prohibited. 
 
Parents/caregivers will be instructed to notify the study site about any new medications the 
subject takes after the start of the study. If a subject accidently uses a prohibited medication it 
must be stopped immediately as soon as this is discovered and will be listed as a protocol 
deviation with a statement about any potential effect on subject safety. Based on the 
assessment of the site investigator together with the PPI about how much the use of the 
medication may have confounded efficacy assessments, a decision will be made about whether 
the subject can stay in the trial. 
 
Any intensive behavioral, cognitive, or therapeutic intervention not utilized at the beginning of 
the study may not be added to the subject’s therapy regimen at any time during the study in 
either the placebo-controlled or the open-label extension periods (except the language 
intervention provided through the study). Adjustments of routine standard-of-care once to 
several times weekly therapies and those administered in preschool or school programs are 
allowed. Minor adjustments in the number of hours or time distribution of a therapy that a child is 
already receiving are allowed. The parent/caregiver should discuss with the study staff any new 
therapies to be added to the subject’s baseline regimen so that it can be determined whether 
these are sufficiently intensive to compromise the efficacy assessments for the language 
intervention in this trial. If a subject uses a prohibited therapy it must be stopped immediately as 
soon as this is discovered and will be listed as a protocol deviation. Based on the assessment of 
the site Investigator together with the PPI about how much the use of the therapy may have 
confounded efficacy assessments, a decision will be made about whether the subject can stay 
in the trial. 
 
5.3.3 Precautionary Medications/Interventions 
There are no precautionary medications or interventions. 
 
5.4 
Subject compliance 
 
To assess compliance with study medication, a dosing diary will be provided to all 
parents/caregivers of subjects at each visit from screening and the beginning of the placebo 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 53 of 121 
lead-in to the 16 month visit. The parent/caregivers will record all doses given and the time 
given in the dosing diary. To assess compliance the diary will be reviewed with the study 
coordinator at each visit and missed doses noted. Empty bottles will be counted and volume 
remaining in partially used and unused bottles approximated. Bottle counts and expected/actual 
bottle use will be recorded in source documents. Correspondence between study drug used and 
logs will be determined and discrepancies reconciled with the parents/caregivers at each study 
visit. If 7 or more consecutive days (14 consecutive doses) or 14 or more total days (28 total 
doses) are missed between any two study visits, the subject may be withdrawn from the study. 
If any doses are missed compliance will be reinforced with the family at the visit. 
 
 
Parental compliance with the language intervention will be assessed in three ways: 
 
First, clinicians will rate parent engagement and competence with the intervention during the 
coaching sessions. We will use a rating system adapted from that used successfully  by 
Kasari et al.66 in their research on parent-implemented interventions for children with autism.  
 
Second, clinicians will rate parent engagement and competence with the intervention during 
the parental homework sessions; again, using the adaptation of the Kasari et al.66 coding 
system.  
 
Finally, clinicians will query the parent about mastery and ease of use of the taught 
strategies and the frequency of use during the past week. These queries will occur during 
feedback sessions.  
 
These three quantitative measures will be analyzed separately and in combination to determine 
parental mastery and use of the targeted strategies and thus the effective “dose” of the 
language intervention actually received by the subject.  
 
Parents will have a worksheet (Language Intervention Diary) they can use as a tool to keep a 
chart of their use of the intervention strategies to include the number of times and the length of 
time each day the intervention was used. The time chart will be formatted like a daily planner 
with each day divided into blocks of time in columns on the chart and the family will color in the 
time period when the intervention was used. One week of time will be represented on each 
page of the time chart. Based on times filled in by the family, the number of times the 
intervention is used can be tracked by the family to help them report this information 
systematically to the SLP during ratings of caregiver fidelity. This Language Intervention Diary 
will be reviewed at study visits and kept in the source documents but not entered into CRFs. 
The CRFs will contain only the bulleted information above. The Language Intervention Diary 
may serve as a guide for site staff to review intervention compliance with the family and 
encourage additional use when needed.  
 
Clinician fidelity in implementing the didactic, coaching, and homework sessions will also be 
rated following a rubric developed previously. 60 It is expected that scores of 80-90% correct will 
be achieved. Clinician fidelity will be assessed for a subset of up to 10% of a clinician’s 
sessions. 
 
Months 2 through 5 will involve four parent education sessions as well as weekly coaching, 
homework, and feedback sessions. Months 6 through 17 will involve once per month coaching, 
homework and feedback sessions. 
 
We recommend that the parent must complete: 
 All four parent education sessions; 
 41 of 48 (85%) combined coaching, homework, feedback sessions during months 2 through 
5 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 54 of 121 
 25 of 33 (76%) combined coaching, homework, feedback sessions during months 6 through 
17 
 
Sites must contact the Study Team if the parent is approaching the threshold for missed 
sessions. 
 
 
 
 
 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 55 of 121 
 
6 
CLINICAL AND LABORATORY EVALUATIONS/STUDY PROCEDURES 
 
6.1 
Schedule of Activities - Table 7 
Evaluation 
Screening 
(Month -4, v1) 
Month3 
Random-
ization/ 
Baseline  
(Month 0, 
v3) 
Months (visit #)3 
Follow up  
(Month 
17, v15)16 
-2 
(v2) 
1 
(v4)
20 
2 
(v5) 
3 
(v6)
20 
4 
(v7) 
6 
(v8) 
8 
(v9) 
9 
(v10)
20 
10 
(v11) 
12 
(v12) 
14 
(v13) 
1616 
(v14) 
Written Informed Consent 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Inclusion/Exclusion Review 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Documentation of Disease/Disorder 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Medical History/Demographics 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Autism Diagnostic Observation Scale21 
 
X11 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Vital Signs: HR, BP (sitting) 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Weight 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Height 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Physical & Psychiatric Examination 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Neurological Examination 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Funduscopic Examination8 
X 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
X 
 
X 
X 
EKG 
X15 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
X 
 
 
X 
 
Concomitant Medication/Therapy Review  
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Safety Labs1 
X17 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
X 
 
 
X 
 
Research Labs for Biomarkers2 
X13 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
X 
 
 
X 
 
Blood PK Sampling 
X13 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
X 
 
 
X 
 
Urine dipstick  
X14 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
X 
 
 
X 
 
Randomization12  
 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 56 of 121 
 
 
Evaluation 
Screening 
(Month -4, v1) 
Month3 
Random-
ization/ 
Baseline  
(Month 0, 
v3) 
Months (visit #)3 
Follow up  
(Month 
17, v15) 
17 
-2 
(v2) 
1 
(v4)
20 
2 
(v5) 
3 
(v6)
20 
4 
(v7) 
6 
(v8) 
8 
(v9) 
9 
(v10)
20 
10 
(v11) 
12 
(v12) 
14 
(v13) 
1616, 
17 
(v14) 
Dispense Study Drug  
X 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
 
Dose Review/Titration4 
 
 
X 
X 
 
 
 
 
X 
X 
 
 
 
X5 
 
Drug Accountability/Compliance18 
 
X 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Adverse Event Review  
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Suicidality Screen 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Implement/Review Language 
Intervention/Compliance6 
 
 
 
X10 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
Weighted child intentional communication 
score 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
 
X 
X 
 
X 
X 
Auditory ERP7 
X15 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
X 
X 
Mullen Scales of Early Learning 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
X 
 
Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale-3 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
 
 
X 
 
X 
X 
Preschool Language Scale - 5 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
X 
 
MacArthur Vocabulary Scale 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
 
 
X 
 
X 
X 
VAS-Language 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
CGI-I9 
 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
CGI-S9 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
VAS-Behavior 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
X 
ABC-FX 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
 
X 
X 
 
X 
X 
Eye Tracking7 
X15 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
X 
 
 
 
 
X 
X 
Children’s Sleep Habits Questionnaire 
X 
 
X 
X 
X 
 
 
 
X 
X 
X 
 
 
X 
X 


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 57 of 121 
 
1. 
CBC, Comprehensive Metabolic Profile (CMP), TSH at screening, 2, 8, 10, 16 months.  
 
2. 
Cellular biomarkers: ERK, AKT, S6 kinase, APP, and MMP9 at screening, 2, 8, 10, 16 months, DNA banking at screening, RNA, protein, serum banking at 
screening, 2, 8, 10, 16 months.  
 
3. 
Visit windows are ±5 days for v2-v3 based on the date of Visit 1, and ±5 days for v4-v15 based on date of visit 3. 
 
4. 
Dose titration done weekly from the baseline visit (v3) to the 2 month visit (v5) and from the 8 month visit (v9) to the 10 month visit (v1). Please refer to the Manual 
of Operations for more details regarding how the dose titration reviews should be done.  
 
5. 
Wean over 1-2 weeks for dose >25 mg.   
 
6. 
The 2 month visit is the language intervention baseline assessment visit and in addition to monitoring of the language intervention at study visits, video-
conferencing calls will be done with the language therapist to monitor and for ongoing training with the language intervention weekly for 4 months with a ±2 day 
window between v5 –v8, then monthly with a ±7 day window for the duration of the trial.  
 
7. 
As possible (expected >50% of cohort).  
 
8. 
The PI (a fragile X specialist) will perform the funduscopic examination. Many of the study assessments depend on the child’s visual function and constitute 
functional vision assessments. All clinicians and assessors will be trained to observe for evidence of visual compromise during other routine visits and 
assessments. If any evidence of visual compromise is noted during any of these assessments, the patient will be sent for an ophthalmology exam for further 
evaluation.  
 
9. 
For this study two sets of CGI-S/CGI-I will be used. The Language/Communication CGI-S/CGI-I will be anchored to language development. The Overall Function 
CGI-I/CGI-S will take into account all areas of function including cognition, adaptive behavior, and maladaptive behavior and will be anchored to the child’s overall 
functioning in the home and environments outside the home relative to a typical child of the same age. 
 
10. SLPs will set up 1-2 distance technology training sessions with the subject family during the first month of the trial (after visit 4 – Month 1). During the call, SLPs 
will review the technology procedures, work with the parent/primary caregiver to set up the intervention environment and work on setting up the equipment as 
necessary for the language intervention. These practice calls will need to be completed prior to visit 5 (Month 2), after which the language intervention will begin. 
Please refer to the SLP Training Manual for more details. 
 
11. The ADOS can be administered at any point between Screening and Baseline (i.e. visits 1, 2 or 3), but must be done prior to randomization. 
 
12. Subjects must be at least 3 years old at the time of randomization. 
 
13. If the PK and biomarker blood samples cannot be collected at the screening visit, sites may collect them at the -2 month or baseline visits (v2 or v3) as long as it is 
prior to randomization. If the PK and biomarker samples cannot be obtained at a visit following randomization (v5, 9, 11 and 14), then the sample can be re-drawn 
at the next visit to the site. 
 
14. Urine dipstick testing should be completed during the screening visit when possible. If the urine dipstick testing cannot be completed at the screening visit, sites 
may collect them at the -2 month or baseline visits (v2 or v3) as long as it is prior to randomization. If the urine dipstick testing cannot be obtained at a visit 
following randomization (v5, 9, 11 and 14), then the sample can be collected at the next visit to the site. For more details please refer to the Manual of Operations.  
 
15. If the auditory ERP, eye tracking, and/or EKG cannot be administered at the screening visit, sites may administer them at the -2 month visit (v2).  
 
16. For subjects with an open label extension that is less than 6 months, a termination visit will occur prior to drug expiration), the length of the open label extension, 
and the number of months between Visit 11 and Visit 14, will be determined based on when the subject is consented and their dose in the open label extension. .  


AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 58 of 121 
For those for whom the open label extension is shortened, all study visits will occur at the usual times in the protocol, but an early termination visit will be 
conducted by  August 31, 2021 and if possible visit 15 occurring approximately 1 month later. 
 
17. If a subject is withdrawn from the study during the placebo-lead in period or prior to randomization, they will be brought back in for an abbreviated follow-
up/termination visit. Please refer to Section 4.3. Subject Withdrawal Criteria for more details. Subjects withdrawing early (after randomization has occurred) will 
complete an end of study visit at which assessments and procedures for the 16 month visit (v14) will be conducted, and then if possible will complete a follow up 
visit at which the same procedures as listed for the 17 month follow up visit (v15) will be conducted. If subjects discontinue study drug prior to the early termination 
visit, only safety outcomes are assessed during the termination visit (Blood draw, urine dipstick, EKG, vitals, physical, neurological and psychological exams, 
suicidality assessment, fundoscopic exam, AE review, study drug accountability) and a follow-up email or phone call to document adverse events will be 
completed 30 days later.  
 
18. If the safety sample obtained at screening visit cannot be analyzed, the sample can be re-drawn at visit 2. In this case dosing can begin, but the results from the 
repeat blood test must be obtained and acceptable before randomization can be done at Visit 3  If a lab result is abnormal and deemed not clinically significant by 
the Site Investigator, dosing may proceed. If the safety samples cannot be obtained at a visit following randomization (v5, 9, 11 and 14), then the sample can be 
re-drawn at the next visit to the site.  
 
19. Depending upon the timing of the visit, the evening/p.m. dose may be administered after the completion of the visit.  If the visit is done earlier in the day, the family 
will retain the current bottle being used in order to administer the evening dose on the day of visit 3. The bottle diluted at visit 3 will then be used staring with the 
morning dose the day after the visit. This bottle will be then be returned at visit 4 so that site study staff may complete accountability documentation.  Please see 
the NN107 FX LEARN MOP for details about data entry related to accountability.  
 
20. Visit 4 (Month 1), Visit 6 (Month 3) and Visit 10 (Month 9) can be completed remotely if travel to these visits is difficult for the family. All parent rated measures and 
questionnaires should be completed over the phone. Vitals are optional for these visits. Flexible assessments missed at a visit just prior to a remote visit can be 
completed after the remote visit, during the next visit to the site. See footnotes 13, 14, and 18 above. 
21. The ADOS can be administered using the alternative instructions found in section 6.3.9 “Autism Diagnostic Observation Scale – 2 (ADOS-2)” if the participant is 
using personal protective equipment which would prevent full completion of the ADOS. 
 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v0.1 
Version date 03/25/2015 
Page 59 of 121 
6.2 
Timing of Study Activities 
 
Visits are shown in the schedule of activities Table as:  
 
Screening (visit 1, when the subject will be evaluated to determine if he/she qualifies for the 
study, assessments will be done and subject will start placebo lead-in) 
 
 -2 months (visit 2) when subject will follow up to track progress 
 
Baseline (visit 3, when pre-intervention assessments are done and the patient is 
randomized to AFQ056 or placebo) 
 
Monthly and Bi-monthly visits after Baseline as well as assigned visit number, in order, from 
the 1 month (visit 4) to 16 month (visit 14) visits 
o The 2 month visit (visit 5) is the language intervention baseline visit when 
assessments will be obtained on the optimized dose of AFQ056/placebo, and then 
the language intervention will be implemented. 
 
Follow Up (the final visit when the subject returns for a safety check after the AFQ056 has 
been discontinued at the end of the study).  
 
Visit windows will be as follows:  
 
Month -2 (v2) and Baseline (v3) ±5 days based on the date of Screening (v1)  
 
Month 1 (v4) through Month 17 (v15) ±5 days based on the date of Baseline (v3) 
 
Visits may be split over two days if necessary to lessen the burden of the assessments on the 
parent(s)/legal guardian and child. The Screening visit may be split over 2 days within a week 
apart. If the visit will be split over two days more than a week apart, the site must contact the 
Study Team prior to proceeding. For all subsequent visits that are split over two days, both days 
must fall within the protocol-specified visit window. If one day should fall outside the window, 
please contact the Study Team prior to proceeding.  
 
6.2.1 Screening/Pre-Randomization Evaluations/procedures 
At the beginning of the Screening visit, informed consent to enable participation in the study will 
be obtained from a legally authorized representative, a parent or legal guardian, by licensed 
physician investigator delegated to obtain consent. Screening assessments will be completed 
after consent, after which the subject will receive bottles for placebo lead-in at the end of the 
visit. The purpose of the screening period is three-fold: to confirm eligibility before 
randomization, to stabilize placebo effect, and to allow a control group for the language 
intervention/placebo group. 
 
If the subject does not meet eligibility criteria he/she will be discontinued before the -2 month 
visits (visit 2) and neither visit 2 nor the baseline visit will be completed. If eligible, the patient 
will complete the -2 month visit for dispensing of placebo bottle and adverse event review. The 
subject will be randomized during the baseline visit but will not receive new study medication 
until all procedures at the baseline visit have been completed. In case a baseline visit needs to 
be split between multiple days, baseline visits may begin up to 48 hours before the first dosing 
day with the medication post-randomization. Typically, the Baseline visit will occur the day 
before the first day of post-randomization dosing. 
 
If a patient fails to meet an eligibility criterion that the investigator deems may change over time, 
such that the patient may qualify if screened again at a later date, the patient may be re-
screened for eligibility. The re-screening visit must occur at least 4 weeks after the initial 
screening visit occurred. If a patient is re-screened, all inclusion and exclusion criteria must be 
reassessed prior to final eligibility determination.   
 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 60 of 121 
6.2.2 On-Study/On-Interventions Evaluations/procedures 
Study visits after Baseline will occur at 1 (visit 4), 2 (visit 5), 3 (visit 6), 4 (visit 7), 6 (visit 8), 8 
(visit 9), 9 (visit 10), 10 (visit 11), 12 (visit 12), 14 (visit 13), and 16 (visit 14) months while the 
subject is taking study medication/placebo. Visit windows for visits 4 through 15 will be ±5 days 
base on the date of Baseline (v3).  
 
Dose titration reviews will be done weekly with a recommended ±1 day window to evaluate side 
effects and adjust study medication dose between Baseline (visit 3) and visit 5 in the placebo-
controlled period, and between visit 9 and 11 in the open-label extension. Video conference 
calls will be done with the language therapist to monitor and for ongoing training with the 
language intervention weekly for 4 months, then monthly with a ±7 day window for the duration 
of the trial (through the open label portion). 
 
The schedule of activities at each study visit will depend somewhat on subject cooperation and 
family perception of the best order of activities for the subject in question. In general, if the visit 
is being conducted on a single day, the play-based assessment and developmental and 
language testing will be done first, followed by the eye tracking and auditory ERP, as applicable, 
and formal medical exams. EKG and blood work, will typically be done last. If the visit is 
conducted over multiple days these events will be re-organized with the general principle of 
doing activities for which patient performance is important (play-based assessment, 
developmental and language testing, and ERP/eye tracking) will be given priority as initial 
assessments on each day, again with parent input as to the preferences and types of activities 
that will be difficult for the child. The parent completed measures, adverse event review, dosing 
diary review and dosing/compliance discussion and interim history can be done with the family 
while the subject is undergoing testing at visits that require subject testing. If the subject cannot 
complete testing without the parent present in the testing room, the parent will accompany the 
subject to testing and discussions with the parent will be done when the medical assessments 
are completed.  
 
6.2.3 Study Medication/Intervention Discontinuation Evaluations/procedures 
Study medication/intervention discontinuation will occur when subjects complete the study or 
withdraw from the study early (after randomization). At study completion, subjects will complete 
all the assessments and procedures for the 16 month visit (visit 14).  
 
If a subject withdraws from the study after randomization, a Termination visit should be 
conducted as soon as possible. The assessments and procedures completed during the 
termination visit will depend upon whether the subject discontinued study drug prior to the 
termination visit. Assessments and procedures are to be completed as possible based on 
agreement of the caregiver at the termination visit(s) as follows: 
 
The subject is on study drug at the time of the visit 
o The termination visit will include all the assessments and procedures for the 16 
month visit (visit 14).  
 
The subject discontinued study drug prior to the visit 
o The termination visit will include the following safety assessments and procedures 
 
Blood draw 
 
Urine dipstick 
 
EKG 
 
Vitals 
 
Physical, neurological and psychological exams 
 
Suicidality assessment 
 
Fundoscopic exam 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 61 of 121 
 
AE review  
 
Study drug accountability  
 
A follow up visit after the Termination Visit with the subject off study drug should be conducted 
30 days after the termination visit.  
 
Study medication will be weaned over 1-2 weeks for subjects on a dose of >25 mg BID AFQ056 
or placebo, and stopped without weaning for subjects on a dose of 12.5 or 25 mg BID. For 
participants on a dose of 50 mg BID, the dose will be weaned to 25 mg BID for a week and then 
stopped. For participants on 75 mg BID or 100 mg BID, the dose will be weaned to 50 mg BID 
for a week and then to 25 mg for a week, and then stopped.  
 
 
Discontinuation criteria for individual subjects are listed in section 4.3 of the protocol – please 
refer to that section for more details. 
 
The entire trial will be stopped if 3 serious adverse events considered probably or definitely due 
to drug occur or upon recommendation by the DSMB based on unblinded review of adverse 
events. 
 
Dosage reductions will be allowed down to 12.5 mg BID during dose titration periods. If a down 
titration is needed during the fixed dose period because of side effects, the subject will be 
withdrawn from the study. If a subject cannot tolerate even the 12.5 mg BID dose, that subject 
will be withdrawn from the study. Subjects may be withdrawn from the study if there is a 
temporary suspension of dosing for more than 7 consecutive days or for more than 14 days 
total. 
 
6.2.4 On-Study/Off-Intervention Evaluations 
If subjects come off of AFQ056/placebo study medication treatment they will be withdrawn from 
the study according to the procedures described above and will not be followed in the study 
after completing the follow up visit. 
 
6.2.5 Final On-Study Evaluations 
All subjects will complete the Follow Up visit (visit 15) as the final visit of the study. At that time, 
subjects will be off of study medication and will turn in all empty bottles of study medication. 
Parents/caregivers of subject will be instructed to call the site Investigator or study staff should 
there be any concerns after the follow up visit. Subjects may continue to receive the language 
intervention indefinitely as delivered by the parent, but this will no longer be monitored by the 
language therapist. Please refer to the SOA for the complete list of procedures and 
assessments done at this visit.  
 
If a subject withdraws from the study after randomization and stops taking study drug prior to 
the termination visit (Month 16, Visit 14), the follow up visit (visit 15) will consist of a phone call 
or email to check for adverse events that will occur 30 days after the termination visit.  
 
6.2.6 Off-Study Requirements 
There will be no specific requirements for subjects after completion of the study protocol. The 
subject will go back to being treated per best medical practice and standard of care. 
 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 62 of 121 
6.2.7 Pregnancy (Optional) 
Pregnancy guidance as not relevant to this study as pregnancy will not occur in children 3-6 
years of age. 
 
6.3 
Special Instructions and Definitions of Evaluations 
 
6.3.1 Informed Consent 
Informed consent will be obtained by licensed physician investigators who are specifically 
trained on the study and listed on delegation logs as being authorized to obtain consent. The 
site PI will typically be involved in explaining the study and will play a role during the consent 
process and answering any questions in conjunction with the coordinator, as well as overseeing 
that the process is carried out correctly. The consent in this study will always be signed by the 
parent or legal guardian due to the age and cognitive ability of the participants. Basic parts of 
the study the child is capable of understanding will be explained to the child as possible in very 
simple language. 
 
Written informed consent will be obtained from the parent(s) or legal guardian of each participant 
before any study-specific procedures or assessments are performed and after the aims, methods, 
anticipated benefits, and potential hazards are explained. Both parents should be consented, if 
they are present at the Screening visit. The willingness of the parent(s) or legal guardian to have 
the subject participate in the study will be documented in writing in a consent form, approved by 
the NeuroNEXT CIRB, which will be signed by the parent(s) or legal guardian of the participant 
with the date of that signature indicated. The investigator will keep the original consent forms and 
copies will be given to the parent or legal guardian of the participant. It will also be explained to 
the parent or legal guardian of the participants that they are free to refuse entry into the study and 
free to withdraw from the study at any time without prejudice to future treatment. Written and/or 
oral information about the study in a language understandable by the parent(s) or legal guardian 
of the participant will be given to all parents/legal guardians of the participants. HIPAA guidelines 
for confidentiality and the principles of medical ethics will be adhered to during the study. 
 
Note: The parent or legal guardian signing the informed consent form must be the same 
individual who will administer the language intervention throughout the trial. If both parents sign 
the informed consent, the parent who is the primary care provider for the child must be the one 
who administers the language intervention throughout the trial. 
 
6.3.2 Protocol Violations 
Deviations from the written protocol will be considered a protocol violation and reported to the 
Central IRB and the safety monitoring board.  A minor protocol deviation will be considered a 
departure from the protocol of relatively minor degree (such as study visit a day or two out of 
window due to child being sick). A major deviation will be considered any significant deviation 
from the protocol that could affect significantly the conduct of the study, compromise efficacy 
assessments or create a safety risk for the subject. The reason for the deviation for protocol 
deviations will be documented by the site PI in the source documents in CRFs, along with steps 
taken to avoid the deviation and future similar deviations.  
 
This study will be conducted as described in this protocol, except during an emergency situation 
in which the protection, safety and well-being of the subject requires immediate intervention, 
based on the judgment of the Investigator (or appropriately qualified designee). In the event of a 
significant deviation from the protocol (protocol violation), the Investigator or designee must 
contact the PPI and/or the Study Team at the earliest possible time by telephone. This will allow 
an early joint decision regarding the subject’s continuation in the study. The medical monitor 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 63 of 121 
may also be contacted for consultation regarding dosing deviations and input on how the 
subject should proceed. The Investigator will document the outcome, and the Study Team 
likewise will retain a documentary record of the decision. Protocol Deviations will be submitted 
to the Central IRB per NeuroNEXT policy.  
 
6.3.3 Documentation of fragile X syndrome 
Subjects will be evaluated for the diagnosis of Fragile X Syndrome and will have to have 
documentation of a full FMR1 mutation (CGG repeat length over 200 repeats). If the subject has 
been genotyped at any time in the past and has a report documenting this, DNA testing for FXS 
will not need to be repeated at Screening. Mutation testing is an absolute requirement prior to 
the screening visit for enrollment. A copy of the FMR1 DNA test result will be filed with the 
source documents and the mutation present will be entered on the Medical History CRF. 
 
6.3.4 Demographics 
Demographic information will be collected at the Screening visit including: date of birth, sex, 
ethnicity, and race. 
 
6.3.5 Medical History 
A medical history will be taken at the Screening visit and this will include developmental history 
with age milestones such as when walking and first word were achieved, as well as a general 
description of the child’s current developmental and language function. History of behavioral 
difficulties in typical areas of dysfunction in FXS (hyperactivity, distractibility, anxiety, 
perseverative behavior, irritability/tantrumming/aggressive behavior) and current levels of 
severity will also be obtained.  
 
History of any medical problems or surgeries will be obtained, with special attention to common 
medical problems in FXS including: 
 
Recurrent otitis media and need for myringotomy tube placement 
 
Strabismus and need for medical management (patching) or surgery 
 
Bowel dysregulation with constipation or diarrhea  
 
Gastroesophageal reflux 
 
Sleep dysregulation 
 
Insomnia or sleep apnea 
 
Need for tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy 
 
Seizures 
 
Orthopedic issues such as foot pronation  
 
Cardiac murmurs.  
 
History of prior diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) will be obtained along with 
information regarding what type of practitioner made this diagnosis. Previous medical records 
that are germane to the diagnosis of intellectual disabilities (e.g. IQ test scores and 
developmental assessments and dates of prior testing) will also be collected. All of the above 
medical history including specific prior medical diagnoses and surgeries and current medical 
conditions prior to initiating study treatment will be documented in the source documents and 
CRFs. 
 
6.3.6 Treatment History 
History of all prior treatment directed at the core features of FXS within the 6 months prior to 
screening will be obtained. This will include largely therapeutic interventions, such as when the 
child began therapy through early intervention, early childhood programs, or private therapies. A 
past history of all prior therapies (including speech, occupational, physical, developmental and 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 64 of 121 
behavioral therapies) within the 6 months prior to screening will be obtained, when these were 
started and stopped, in addition to how many hours per week of therapy were done over what 
time frames. This information will be documented in the source documents and CRFs. All 
ongoing therapy interventions at the time of screening will be documented also, including type of 
therapy, and number of hours per week. An educational history will be obtained and 
documented in the source documents and CRFs, with type of school programs attended, 
current school program, hours per day of school attended, and hours per day of special 
education services. 
 
The language intervention is being used to equalize difference between co-therapies. 
 
All medications used for over a month within the past 6 months and all medications used for 
control of behavioral symptoms related to FXS will be documented, along with the reason for 
their use and start and stop dates.  
 
6.3.7 Concomitant Medication/Therapy Review 
All current (concomitant) medications and non-prescription supplements, doses, frequency 
taken, reason for taking and start and stop dates will be reviewed at every study visit and 
recorded in the source documents and CRFs. All non-drug therapy interventions such as 
speech, OT, PT, and behavioral therapies including frequency and time of therapy sessions, 
reasons for implementation or discontinuation and start and stop dates will be reviewed and 
recorded on the source documents and CRFs. 
 
6.3.8 Protocol Amendments and Study Termination 
All revisions and/or amendments to this protocol must be approved in writing by the Sponsor and 
the CIRB. The Investigator will not make any changes to the conduct of the study or the protocol 
without first obtaining written approval from the Sponsor and the CIRB, except where necessary 
to eliminate an apparent immediate hazard to a study subject. 
 
The Sponsor and NeuroNEXT Network reserve the right to discontinue the study at a clinical study 
site(s) for safety or administrative reasons at any time. Should the study be terminated and/or the 
clinical study site closed for any reason, all documentation and study medication pertaining to the 
study must be returned to the Sponsor or its representative.  
 
If an amendment requires a change in the consent form because the amendment affects 
information provided to the parents or legal guardians of the participants in the original consent, 
all parent/legal guardians will be presented the amended consent once approved, new 
information will be explained and the parent/legal guardian will sign the amended consent if they 
agree that the subject should continue to participate given the new information. 
 
6.3.9 Clinical Assessments 
Appropriate qualified site staff will be qualified to administer standardized measures and will be 
trained on all assessments at an investigator meeting held before the study is initiated, or at the 
study site or by web -based training if the assessor is not able to attend the investigator 
meeting.  
 
Vital Signs - Height (cm), weight (kg) and vital signs, including blood pressure (SBP and DBP 
in mmHg), heart rate (bpm), and body temperature (°C) will be assessed at all study visits. 
These will be recorded in the source documents and CRFs. 
 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 65 of 121 
Physical and Neurological Examination will be performed at all study visits. It will include the 
examination of general appearance, skin, neck (including thyroid), eyes, ears, nose, throat, 
lungs, heart, abdomen, back, lymph nodes, and extremities. The neurological exam will include 
examination of cranial nerves, strength, deep tendon reflexes, sensory exam, cerebellar 
functions, and gait. Results of all physical and neurological examinations will be documented in 
the source documents and the CRFs. Significant abnormalities of the physical and neurological 
exam (not expected based on the diagnosis of FXS itself) that are present prior to the start of 
the study drug will be listed as a prior diagnosis in the medical history as current medical 
conditions in the source documents and CRFs. Significant findings identified after the start of 
study drug which meet the definition of an adverse event must be recorded as an adverse event 
in the source documents and CRFs.  
 
Funduscopic Examination will be performed at Screening, -2 month visits, AFQ Baseline and 
2, 4, 8, 10, 12, and 16 month and follow up visits (visits 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 12, 14 and 15) by the 
PI (fragile X specialist). This will be done to screen for retinal abnormalities based on retinal 
degeneration findings observed in a 2-year rat carcinogenicity study conducted by Novartis. If 
any abnormal findings not previously documented in the history or any significant changes in the 
exam occur at any time during the study, the patient will be referred for evaluation and care in 
Ophthalmology.  
 
Many of the study assessments depend on the child’s visual function and constitute functional 
vision assessments. All clinicians and assessors will be trained to observe for evidence of visual 
compromise during other routine visits and assessments. If any evidence of visual compromise 
is noted during any of these assessments, the patient will be sent for an Ophthalmology exam 
for further evaluation. Results of all funduscopic examinations will be documented in the source 
documents and the CRFs. Significant abnormalities of the funduscopic exam (not expected 
based on the diagnosis of FXS itself) that are present prior to the start of the study drug will be 
listed as a prior diagnosis in the medical history as current medical condition in the source 
documents and CRFs. Significant findings identified after the start of study drug which meet the 
definition of an adverse event must be recorded as an adverse event in the source documents 
and CRFs.  
 
Autism Diagnostic Observation Scale – 2 (ADOS-2) will be performed at any point between 
Screening and Baseline (i.e. visits 1, 2 or 3), but must be done prior to randomization to classify 
children formally as having a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) or not, for the 
purposes of cohort description, and for analyses designed to determine if ASD co-diagnosis has 
an impact on response either to the language intervention or AFQ056.  
 
The ADOS-267 is an instrument for diagnosing and assessing ASD, with the 2nd Edition (ADOS-
2) updated so that scoring of the instrument will produce ASD diagnoses consistent with the 
revised definition of ASD in DSM-5. The ADOS-2 consists of a series of structured and semi-
structured tasks that involve social interaction between the examiner and the subject. The 
examiner observes and identifies segments of the subject's behavior and assigns these to 
predetermined observational categories. Categorized observations are subsequently combined 
to produce quantitative scores for analysis. Research-determined cut-offs identify the potential 
diagnosis of ASD, allowing a standardized assessment of autistic symptoms. Scores on the 
ADOS stereotypic behavior/restricted interest and social interaction subscales and overall 
scores as well as ASD classification based on these scores will be recorded in the source 
documents and CRFs. 
 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 66 of 121 
Alternatively, if the subject is using personal protective equipment resulting in the inability to 
perform the ADOS-2, the following procedure may be followed: 
 
The ADOS-2 rater will complete the following evaluation to establish ASD diagnosis:  
1) Clinical interview with parent 
2) Review of available records 
3) Semi-structured observation of child in clinic with institutional requirements for personal 
protective equipment or via telehealth (using ASD-DIAL) 
a. The site must submit a post-observation provider survey for QI 
4) Score the CARS 
5) Attempt hypothetical ADOS-2 scores 
a. This is optional, and scores will not be recorded in the database. If decide to 
score hypothetical ADOS-2 scores, sites must indicate on the DSM-5 checklist 
that these scores were used to inform diagnosis.  
6) Complete the DSM-5 checklist  
 
 
Administration time: 45 minutes with subject 
 
Adverse Event Review will be done at all study visits and during dose titration reviews. Safety 
monitoring will be based on close observation of the child by the family. Children in the age 
range proposed who will, based on inclusion criteria, have developmental delay with a mental 
age of approximately 1-5 years, will not be able to spontaneously communicate all (if any) side 
effects. Parents will be queried about any differences in the child’s behavior or wellbeing.  
 
Other studies in children have to rely on parent report and based on prior experience in the 
Pediatric PK study with AFQ056, families were quite vigilant about reporting any changes in the 
child and this was not felt to be problematic. The parent/caregiver of the subject will be queried 
and interviewed about any illnesses, medical problems, unusual behaviors, sleep problems, 
potential side effects or any other problems that have occurred since the last study visit or call. 
All new symptoms or medical problems will be documented in an adverse event CRF containing 
information on the type of problem, severity (mild, moderate, severe), potential relationship to 
study medication (not related, possibly related, probably related, definitely related), date on 
onset, date of resolution, whether problem is ongoing and any intervention needed to treat the 
problem.  
 
Suicidality Review will be done at all study visits. Children with a mental age of 1-5 do not 
understand the concept of suicide and are often not even clear on the concept and permanence 
of death. They thus cannot be asked questions about suicide. Suicidality monitoring will be 
completed by asking the caregivers two questions: whether the child has said anything about 
harming him- or herself and whether the child has done anything to harm his- or herself, with 
intent to cause injury.  
 
Young children with FXS frequently have self-injurious behaviors that are reactions to being 
upset, such as hand biting or head banging and these would not be considered suicidal 
behaviors, and frequency and severity of these behaviors will simply be tracked during the 
study, and will not be considered adverse events if present at enrollment and if they do not 
worsen substantially from past levels of severity. Answers to the questions to the family about 
self-harm will be recorded in the CRF. 
 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 67 of 121 
Administration time: 5 minutes with caregiver. 
 
Inclusion/Exclusion Review will be done at all study visits. The investigator will review the 
inclusion/exclusion criteria and determine if there are any new problems such that the patient 
would no longer meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria and would require that the patient be 
withdrawn from the study. 
 
Standard 12-lead EKG will be performed at Screening, 2, 8, 10, and 16 month visits (visit 1, 5, 
9, 11, and 14). EKGs will be obtained at the study site through the EKG department and will be 
read by a Cardiologist, Internist or qualified physician at the site as per standard clinical EKG 
testing.   
 
Clinically significant abnormalities prior to study medication dosing that are not exclusionary will 
be recorded as part of the medical history as current medical conditions in the source 
documents and CRFs. New significant abnormalities identified after the start of study medication 
will be recorded as adverse events in the source documents and CRFs.  
 
The CTCAE (version 4.0) grading system for clinically significant abnormal EKG findings 
(laboratory adverse events) will be used.  Clinically significant findings at screening will be 
confirmed with the Cardiologist at the site and then discussed with the PPI prior to enrolling the 
patient in the study. Clinically significant findings after starting study medication will be 
confirmed with the Cardiologist at the site and then discussed with the PPI determine whether 
the subject should continue in the study. 
 
Clinical Global Impression – Improvement68 (CGI-I) will be rated by the designated 
investigator (licensed physician investigator or nurse practitioner) at all study visits after 
Screening. After the AFQ baseline visit, it will be rated relative to performance at the AFQ 
baseline visit (visit 3). Completion of this scale requires the clinician to rate how much the 
patient’s illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state.  
 
Two sets of CGI-I will be administered at each applicable visit – one associated with 
Language/Communication, and the other to Overall Function. The Language/Communication 
CGI-I will be anchored to language development, i.e. to the amount of improvement in language 
function and milestones and nonverbal communication seen relative to baseline language ND 
communication abilities. The Overall Function CGI-I will be anchored to the amount of 
improvement or worsening in age-related functioning including behavior relative to baseline. The 
Overall Function CGI-I will take into account all areas of function including cognition, adaptive 
behavior, and maladaptive behavior and will be anchored to the child’s overall functioning in the 
home and environments outside the home relative to a typical child of the same age.   
The CGI-I is a 7-point scale is used that includes the following ratings: 1 = very much improved, 
2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much 
worse, 7 = very much worse. The CGI-I (and CGI-S) are gold standard global measures of 
severity and change with treatment in placebo-controlled pharmacotherapy trials in developmental 
disabilities and have been used extensively in prior clinical trials in FXS. 69-72 CGI-I scores will be 
recorded in the CRFs. 
 
The CGI-I should be administered by the same rater for a given subject at all applicable visits 
throughout the trial. If the same rater cannot administer the assessment, the site must contact 
the Study Team prior to proceeding and/or scheduling. The CGI-I may be administered via 
phone if needed.  
 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 68 of 121 
Administration time: 15 minutes with caregiver. 
 
Clinical Global Impression – Severity (CGI-S) will be rated by the designated investigator 
(licensed physician investigator or nurse practitioner) at all study visits. The CGI-S is a 7-point 
scale that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the patient's illness at the time of 
assessment, relative to the clinician's past experience with subjects who have the same 
diagnosis. Considering the rater’s total clinical experience, a patient is assessed on severity of 
illness using the following classifications: 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline ill; 3 = mildly ill; 
4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; or 7 = extremely ill. CGI-S scores will be 
recorded in the CRFs. 
 
Two sets of CGI-S will be administered at each applicable visit – one associated with 
Language/Communication, and the other to Overall Function. The Language/Communication 
CGI-S will be anchored to language development, i.e. language and communication skills 
present at baseline and achieved during the study. The Overall Function CGI-S will be anchored 
to the child’s functional level and behavior at baseline and ongoing functional level including 
behavior throughout the study. The Overall Function CGI-S will take into account all areas of 
function including cognition, adaptive behavior, and maladaptive behavior and will be anchored 
to the child’s overall functioning in the home and environments outside the home relative to a 
typical child of the same age.  
 
The CGI-S should be administered by the same rater for a given subject at all applicable visits 
throughout the trial. If the same rater cannot administer the assessment, the site must contact 
the Study Team prior to proceeding and/or scheduling. The CGI-S may be administered via 
phone if needed. 
 
Administration time: 15 minutes with caregiver (same 15 minutes as for CGI-I, not additional 
time). 
 
Weighted Child Intentional Communication Score (the primary outcome measure) will be 
derived from a 22- minute semi-structured examiner/child play session administered at 
Screening, AFQ Baseline and 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 month and Follow Up visits (visit 1, 3, 
5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14 and 15). The play session will be administered by designated staff (Speech 
and Language Pathologists and Psychologists preferred) trained to fidelity on administration of 
the measure. The sessions involve 12 minutes of structured play prompts designed to elicit a 
range of communicative behaviors (e.g., requesting, sharing of affect) and 10 minutes of free 
play with a standard set of toys.  The weighted child intentional communication score will be 
coded from digital videos of the sessions centrally, according to standard coding methods by 
coders trained to reliability. The weighted communication score reflects child initiated 
communication that involves the child’s use of gestures, eye contact, vocalizations, and/or 
words and word combinations to communicate a message to a listener. This measure has been 
shown to grow in a linear fashion across the stages of development that will be displayed by the 
children enrolled in this study.73 
 
Coding of child intentional communication will be based on the occurrence of three classes of 
behavior:  
1. Gestures or nonword vocalizations during which the child coordinated attention between the 
message recipient and an object or salient event. 
2. Conventional gestures (e.g., distal points, head nods, pantomime) with attention to an adult 
3. Symbols (i.e., spoken words or signs) that were used in a non-imitative manner.  
 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 69 of 121 
The Weighted Frequency of Intentional Communication will be obtained by multiplying each 
intentional communication act by the following weights: nonverbal = 1; single symbol = 2; and 
multiple symbols = 3. Previous research has indicated that the weighted variable is more 
sensitive to change over time than the unweighted variable and that growth in the weighted 
variable (but not the unweighted variable) was related to later level of social impairment in 
younger siblings of children with ASD 74 and to communication development in FXS. Thus, this 
measure is objective and expected to be very sensitive to changes in communication ability as 
the result of the intervention. 
 
There is no maximum score except as artificially constrained by the 22-minute duration of 
dyadic play session; however, in previous studies with children with autism between the ages of 
15 to 25 months75 the range of the score was 5.55 (SD 6.29) at the preintervention visit and 
18.91 (SD 20.50) 9 months later at the post-intervention visit. Similarly, Yoder et al.74 examined 
growth over time in weighted communication scores for younger siblings of children with autism. 
Weighted communication scores ranged from 14.4 (SD 10.2) at the initial visit at 14 months to 
22.1 (SD 17.9) at the Time 4 visit at 30 months.  
 
The overall weighted communication score will be recorded centrally in the source documents 
and in the CRFs. 10% of all sessions will be coded by a second independent, blinded coder to 
determine inter-rater agreement, with agreement above 90% expected as per previous 
research.  
 
The Weighted Child Intentional Communication Score should be administered by the same rater 
(SLP or Psychologist) for a given subject at all applicable visits throughout the trial. If the same 
rater cannot administer the assessment, the site must contact the Study Team prior to 
proceeding and/or scheduling. 
 
If the subject uses an augmentative communication device, he/she will be permitted to use it if 
the device serves as the primary form of communication and a SLP has prescribed it.  If the 
subject brings their augmentative communication device to the visit they will be permitted to use 
it. The scoring of the WCS has been adapted to allow the inclusion of communication acts 
generated by the child through the use of an augmentative communication device.  
 
Administration time: 22 minutes with subject. 
 
Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL)76 will be administered to all subjects at Screening, 
AFQ Baseline, 2, 8, and 16 month visits (visits 1, 3, 5, 9, 14). This assessment can be 
administered by designated and trained staff (Psychologists, and Speech and Language 
Pathologists preferred).  
 
The MSEL includes five subscales: gross motor, fine motor, visual reception, expressive 
language, and receptive language, and an early learning composite (ELC). The subscales yield 
alpha coefficients between 0.75 and 0.83. Test-retest values range from 0.76 to 0.96 across 
ages and scales, and inter-rater reliability from 0.91 to 0.96. The MSEL was standardized for 
children ages 3 months to 68 months but in addition to standard scores also gives age levels of 
function.  
 
In this study, raw scores and age equivalent scores will be used. Instead of using the ELC, 
which is not valid in children over age 68 months and not necessarily accurate in populations 
with intellectual disability, DQ will be calculated from age equivalent scores. Subjects must have 
a DQ lower than 75% of their chronological age at Screening to be eligible for the study. The 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 70 of 121 
MSEL has been utilized in studies with young children with FXS for many years to track 
developmental progress 77-79. It can be used in children with FXS over 68 months as long as age 
equivalent scores are used because most children with FXS have significant developmental 
delays that result in an age equivalency of less than 68 months even when several years older 
than 68 months. Test booklets with scores will be maintained with the source documents. Raw 
and age equivalent subscale scores will be entered in the CRFs.  
 
The MSEL should be administered by the same rater for a given subject at all applicable visits 
throughout the trial. If the same rater cannot administer the assessment, the site must contact 
the Study Team prior to proceeding and/or scheduling. 
 
Administration time: 60 minutes with subject. 
 
Preschool Language Scales – 5th Edition – the PLS-580 will be administered to all subjects at 
Screening, AFQ Baseline, 2, 8, and 16 month and Follow Up visits (visits 1, 3, 5, 9, 14).  This 
assessment can be administered by designated and trained staff (Psychologists and Speech 
and Language Pathologists preferred). This is a comprehensive developmental language 
assessment that is normed for use with children from birth to 7 years, 11 months of age.  
 
The test requires pointing to or verbally responding to items and yields raw scores, percentile 
ranks and standard scores for auditory comprehension and expressive communication as well 
as a total language scores. The PLS-5 was standardized on 1,400 children in 45 states in the 
U.S. and matches the U.S. Census figures for region, race, ethnicity, and level of caregiver 
education. Norms are reported for 6-month intervals for children aged 12-months to 7 years, 11 
months. Split half reliabilities range from .80 to .97. Sensitivity and specificity for the Total 
Language score is .83 and .80, respectively. Test booklets with scores will be maintained in the 
source documents. Raw scores for expressive and receptive language subscales and total 
language will be recorded in the source documents and entered in the CRFs. 
 
The PLS–5 should be administered by the same rater for a given subject at all applicable visits 
throughout the trial. If the same rater cannot administer the assessment, the site must contact 
the Study Team prior to proceeding and/or scheduling. 
 
Administration time: 30-45 minutes with subject. 
 
6.3.10 Laboratory Evaluations 
Standard of care laboratory assessments for safety will be done at Screening, 2, 8, 10, and 16 
month visits (visits 1, 5, 9, 11, and 14). All laboratory assessments will include: a TSH CBC with 
Hgb, Hct, RBC, WBC, MCV, MCH, MCHC, PLT, RDW-CV, neutrophils, lymphocytes, 
monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils, comprehensive metabolic profile (CMP) including 
sodium, glucose, potassium, BUN, creatinine, bicarbonate, chloride, total calcium, total bilirubin, 
ALP, AST, ALT, total protein, albumin, and cholesterol, and urine dipstick testing to test for 
glucose, bilirubin, ketones, specific gravity, blood, pH, protein, urobilinogen, nitrite, and 
leucocytes. If the safety blood samples cannot be collected at the screening visit, sites may 
collect them at the -2 month or baseline visits (v2 or v3) as long as it is prior to randomization. If 
the safety blood samples cannot be obtained at a visit occurring post-randomization (v5, 9, 11 
and 14), then the sample may be collected at the next visit to the site. 
 
When blood is drawn at the above visits the safety testing will be done first, followed by PK, 
followed by biomarkers in order of importance to subject protection and study conduct. Drawing 
of the blood tests will be ordered in this way because it may be challenging to get enough 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 71 of 121 
volume for all the blood samples from children this age and the order will ensure the most 
important samples for patient safety are collected first. 
 
Urine dipstick testing will be done by the coordinator or designated staff at the site. Urine 
dipstick testing will be done rather than a full urinalysis because there were no significant 
abnormalities in U/A values in any of the other Novartis studies in FXS, children tend to have 
less issues with kidney functions than the adults studied previously, and the children in this 
study will mostly not be toilet trained (larger volumes of urine which has to be collected in a 
urine bag may be challenging to obtain). If the urine dipstick indicates there may be a urinary 
infection, a full U/A and urine culture may be sent to the local lab at the site at the discretion of 
the investigator based on clinical assessment. In the event that a urinalysis is done by the local 
lab, it would be considered a clinical assessment, and not a study procedure. Urine dipstick 
supplies will be provided to sites by the PPI site as needed.  
Urine dipstick testing should be completed during the screening visit when possible. If the urine 
dipstick testing cannot be completed at the screening visit, sites may collect them at the -2 
month or baseline visits (v2 or v3) as long as it is prior to randomization. If the urine dipstick 
testing cannot be obtained at a visit occurring post-randomization (v5, 9, 11 and 14), then the 
sample may be collected at the next visit to the site. For more details please refer to the Manual 
of Operations.  
 
Laboratory assessments will be drawn in standard specified tubes in the Study Lab Manual and 
samples shipped to the CLIA-certified CCC Central Laboratory at the University of Rochester 
where assays will be performed as per standard clinical testing. The CCC Central Laboratory will 
provide the specimen collection kits for safety tests (phlebotomy supplies, collection tubes, aliquot 
tubes, barcoded labels) and IATA compliant shipping materials for the sites to ship to the CCC 
Central lab. Study specific test requisitions with instructions for collecting, documenting, 
processing, and shipping will also be provided by the CCC Central lab. Fed Ex labels for shipping 
on a CCC Central lab account number will be provided to sites, and will allow tracking of 
shipments by the CCC Central lab to ensure timely delivery of samples and reporting of results. 
Instructions for obtaining, processing and sending safety labs to the CCC Central Laboratory will 
be provided in the manual from the CCC Central Laboratory at study initiation. All safety lab result 
reports will be sent to the sites where these will be maintained with the source documents.  
 
The DCC will provide all relevant laboratories with online forms and/or electronic data exchange 
mechanisms - depending on their capabilities and needs - to enter, update and obtain relevant 
data. When a blood sample has been obtained, the clinical study site study coordinator will send 
the sample (participant ID, site ID, and protocol ID numbers will be used) to the University of 
Rochester Central Laboratory. Results will be sent via a secure system to University of Rochester 
laboratory with no individual-identifying information on the report. The laboratory will electronically 
communicate the test results to the respective clinical study sites in a secure manner.  The 
laboratory will also transfer test results electronically to the DCC via an established data transfer 
mechanism. 
 
The site investigator or an authorized sub-investigator must sign and date all laboratory results, 
indicating whether any out of range lab values are clinically significant (CS) or not clinically 
significant (NCS) on the lab report. The CTCAE (version 4.0) grading system for clinically 
significant abnormal lab values (laboratory adverse events) will be used. Clinically significant 
findings at screening will be discussed with the PPI and Study Team prior to enrolling the 
patient in the study. Clinically significant findings after starting study medication will be 
discussed with the PPI and Study Team to determine whether the subject should continue in the 
study. 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 72 of 121 
 
6.3.11 Pharmacokinetic Studies 
Pharmacokinetic assessment will be done for AFQ056 for all patients at screening, 2, 8, 10, and 
16 month visits (visits 1, 5, 9, 11, and 14) by collecting blood for PK after safety labs are drawn. 
Blood samples will be drawn prior to dosing of the PM AFQ056 dose. The date and time of 
blood collection will be recorded on the PK blood collection page in the source documents and 
CRF, together with the date and time for the past three doses and the time of the last meal 
immediately preceding the PK sampling time.  
 
If the PK blood samples cannot be collected at the screening visit, sites may collect them at the 
-2 month or baseline visits (v2 or v3) as long as it is prior to randomization. If the PK blood 
samples cannot be obtained at a visit occurring post-randomization (v5, 9, 11 and 14), then the 
samples may be collected at the next visit to the site. 
 
PK Samples from all sites will be batched and shipped twice, in shipments midway through the 
study, and at the end of the study. The study sites will be notified by the Study Team site when 
to prepare and ship samples. The CCC Central Lab will provide tubes and materials for PK 
collection from subjects, shipping materials, labels, and a Fed Ex account number for shipping 
PK tubes from sites to the CCC Central lab. One batch of tubes will be shipped to the CCC 
Central Laboratory at University of Rochester in batches from each study site midway through 
the study and at the end of the study. The second batch of tubes will be held at the site until the 
CCC Central Laboratory notifies the site that the first batch of tubes have arrived and been 
inventoried and stored. After the notification, the sites will then ship the corresponding second 
batch of tubes to the CCC Central Laboratory.  
 
After all samples have been collected and received from the sites, the CCC Central Laboratory 
will ship them internationally to Veeda lab analysis of AFQ056 levels. Veeda was identified by 
Novartis and has been used for PK measurements to quantify AFQ056 in plasma samples for 
previous Novartis studies.  
 
All samples will be given a unique sample number (NeuroNEXT Subject ID) as listed in a PK 
log. Documentation of PK sample logs and shipping will be maintained in the source documents 
at study sites and in the lab records for the study at the CCC Central Laboratory. After assay, 
PK values will be sent directly from Veeda Laboratory to the NeuroNEXT DCC via an 
established data transfer mechanism. These values will not be visible to the sites to avoid 
unblinding. 
 
6.3.12 Other Laboratory Studies 
Blood will be collected for cellular biomarkers at Screening, 2, 8, 10, and 16 month visits (visit 1, 
5, 9, 11, and 14). Biomarkers to be analyzed will include ERK, AKT, S6 kinase, APP, and 
MMP9.  DNA and plasma leftover from the 3 ml samples noted above will be banked for future 
studies related to FXS.  
 
If the biomarker blood samples cannot be collected at the screening visit, sites may collect them 
at the -2 month or baseline visits (v2 or v3) as long as it is prior to randomization. If the 
biomarker blood samples cannot be obtained at a visit occurring post-randomization (v5, 9, 11 
and 14), then the samples may be collected at the next visit to the site. 
 
 
Blood will also be obtained (as possible) for RNA and protein banking at Screening, 2, 6, 10, 16 
month visits (visit 1, 5, 9, 11, and 14). Every attempt will be made to get blood for biomarkers 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 73 of 121 
from all subjects, however this will be challenging due to the volume of blood to be obtained. 
Biomarker samples are expected to be able to be obtained from at least 75% of subjects. 
Processing and shipping of blood samples for biomarkers and banking will be done according to 
procedures described in the Study Lab Manual. Materials for sample collection, processing and 
shipping (not including Fed Ex labels and account number) for the biomarkers will be provided 
to the study sites by the PPI site. 
 
ELISA will be utilized for measuring APP levels. The sandwich ELISA for APP will use 
antibodies immobilized in a microtiter plate that bind to target antigens consisting of total APP, 
APP alpha or APP beta, after an overnight incubation with plasma samples from participants. A 
specific detection antibody against a different epitope of either of the APP proteins is used 
to form a complex that will be detected after addition of a chromogen reagent. The fluorescence 
signal will be detected at 450 nm immediately after addition of a stop solution. An Iluminex 
assay will be used for measuring MMP9 levels The Iluminex assay will use a mixture of specific 
antibodies, each bound to a magnetic microsphere or bead that will allow the simultaneous 
measurement of MMP9 and MMP2 in the samples from participants. The unbound beads will be 
washed out and a labeled secondary antibody added. The complex will be detected by addition 
of a Streptavidin-PE conjugate that acts as a reporter molecule when the microspheres are 
exited using lasers. The fluorescent signal will be digitally recorded for each MMP9 and MMP2. 
Expression levels of ERK-S6K and AKT (total and phosphorylated forms) will be measured by 
Western Blot analysis as described in Hoeffer e al.62. Biomarker data will be sent to the 
NeuroNEXT DCC via an established data transfer mechanism. These values will not be visible 
to the sites to avoid potential unblinding. 
 
6.3.13 Questionnaires 
 
MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory The MacArthur-Bates 
Communicative Development Inventory (Words and Sentences version) will be administered at 
Screening, AFQ Baseline and 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 month and Follow Up visits (visit 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 
12, 14, and 15) to follow language development. This assessment can be administered by a 
Coordinator, Psychologist or Speech and Language Pathologist. The assessment consists of 
two parts: a) Part 1 (Words Children Use) is a 680-word vocabulary checklist in which the parent 
indicates those vocabulary words the child regularly produces in spoken language; and, b) Part 
2 (Sentences and Grammar) assesses several aspects of grammar and word endings. This 
parent-report measure has been well-validated against direct observation and assessment 
measures of child language status and growth. Test booklets with scores will be maintained with 
the source documents. Parents will use the same test protocol at each time point using different 
color ink to indicate newly acquired words or grammatical constructions. Raw scores for each 
time point will be computed and recorded in the source documents and entered in the CRFs.   
 
The MacArthur Bates Communicative Development Inventory should be administered by the 
same rater for a given subject at all applicable visits throughout the trial. The parent/legal 
guardian completing the assessment with the study staff member should also remain the same 
at all applicable visits throughout the trial. If the same rater cannot administer the assessment 
and/or the same parent/legal guardian cannot complete the assessment, the site must contact 
the Study Team prior to proceeding and/or scheduling. 
 
Administration time: Caregiver completes independently at own pace, but typically requires no 
more than 45 minutes. 
 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 74 of 121 
The Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Third Edition (Vineland-3) will be administered as 
an interview to a parent/caregiver by trained study staff authorized to perform the interview at 
Screening, AFQ Baseline and 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 month and Follow Up visits (visit 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 
12, 14, and 15). This assessment can be administered by a Coordinator, Psychologist or 
Speech and Language Pathologist. 
 
The Vineland-3 is a valid and reliable measure of a person's adaptive level of functioning from 
birth to 90 years of age.82 It is commonly used in clinical care and research to measure the 
development and functioning of individuals with and without disabilities, including studies of 
natural development and clinical trials in FXS. The Vineland is an informant-based measure that 
yields an adaptive behavior composite score and domain standard scores in domains of: 
Communication (receptive, expressive, and written adaptive language functions), Daily Living 
Skills (personal, domestic, and community skills), Socialization (interpersonal relationships, play 
and leisure time, and coping abilities), and Motor Skills (gross and fine motor skills). This 
structure corresponds to the three broad Domains of adaptive functioning recognized by the 
American Association of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 83.  
 
The Survey Interview Edition will be administered to parents or caregivers using a semi-
structured interview format.  Interview booklets with raw and standard scores should be 
maintained in the source documents at the site if utilized; alternatively, the Q-global application 
can be used during the assessment to input responses directly in to the system.  Sites should 
use the Q-global application to calculate the composite and individual domain scores, and 
produce a score report.  The score report must be printed from the Q-global application and filed 
in the subject’s binder. The composite standard score and all Vineland-3 domain raw and 
standard scores will be entered into the CRFs. 
 
The Vineland-3 should be administered by the same rater for a given subject at all applicable 
visits throughout the trial. The parent/legal guardian completing the assessment with the study 
staff member should also remain the same at all applicable visits throughout the trial. If the 
same rater cannot administer the assessment and/or the same parent/legal guardian cannot 
complete the assessment, the site must contact the Study Team prior to proceeding and/or 
scheduling. 
 
The Vineland-3 can be administered via phone following completion of the study visit if there is 
not enough time to complete the assessment during the visit.  
 
 Administration time: 45-60 minutes with caregiver. 
 
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Language and Communication will be completed at 
Screening and all subsequent study visits (visits 1 – 15). In an attempt to measure the general 
level of language difficulty experienced by the parent/caregiver with respect to the child with 
FXS, the VAS will allow parents to mark on a visual line measuring 100 mm with one side 
marked “worst language/communication” and the other side marked “best 
language/communication for age”. Families will rate the subject’s overall 
language/communication which will include receptive language and non-verbal communication 
as well as expressive language. The vertical marks are measured in millimeter distance where 
they fall from the “worst language” side (left end of the line) so that improvements or worsening 
of language/communication over the treatment period can be evaluated. The VAS has been 
successfully used in a FXS-specific clinical trial.84 Copies of the VAS with lines and 
measurements will be kept in the source documents. Scores in terms of centimeter distance 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 75 of 121 
from the “worst language” end of the line will be recorded in the source documents and entered 
into the CRFs.  
 
The VAS for Language and Communication should be administered by the same rater 
(parent/legal guardian) for a given subject at all applicable visits throughout the trial. If the same 
rater cannot administer the assessment, the site must contact the Study Team prior to 
proceeding and/or scheduling. 
 
Administration time: 5 minutes for caregiver. 
 
The Aberrant Behavior Checklist- Community Edition (ABC) scored using the FXS-
specific factoring system (ABC-FX) will be completed by the parent/caregiver at Screening, 
AFQ Baseline and 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, 16 month and Follow Up visits (visit 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 
and 15). This parent/caregiver report measure is the gold standard measure of problem and 
interfering behaviors in clinical trials in DD.85  
 
The ABC is actively used in over 70 countries and has been translated into over 30 languages 
including Spanish. The ABC asks responders to rate behaviors from 0 “not a problem at all” to 3 
“the problem is severe in degree” across 58 questions. Its use has been validated in a variety of 
clinical populations, including in ASD and FXS, has been used extensively in clinical trials, and 
is a FDA-vetted endpoint utilized in the FDA approvals for use of risperidone and aripiprazole 
targeting irritability in youth with ASD.70,86 It has been subjected to utility analysis in FXS87 and 
linked to caregiver stress in families.88  
 
Scores will be analyzed using the FXS-specific factor structure such that 54 of the items resolve 
into 6 subscales (Irritability, Lethargy, Social Avoidance, Stereotypic Behavior, Hyperactivity, 
and Inappropriate Speech).89 Questionnaires with raw data and the six FX-factor subscale 
scores will be kept in the source documents. Scores for the six FX-specific factors will be 
recorded in the CRFs.  
 
The ABC-FX should be administered by the same rater (parent/legal guardian) for a given 
subject at all applicable visits throughout the trial. If the same rater cannot administer the 
assessment, the site must contact the Study Team prior to proceeding and/or scheduling. 
 
Administration time: 10-15 minutes for caregiver 
 
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Behavior will be completed at Screening and all subsequent 
study visits (visits 1 – 15). In an attempt to measure the general level of behavioral difficulty 
experienced by the parent/caregiver with respect to the child with FXS, the VAS will allow 
parents to mark on a visual line measuring 100 mm with one side marked “worst behavior” and 
the other side marked “best behavior”. Families will pick and rate the subject’s three behaviors. 
The vertical marks are measured in millimeter distance where they call from the “worst 
behavior” side (left end of the line) so that improvements or worsening of behavior over the 
treatment period can be evaluated. The VAS has been successfully used in a FXS-specific 
clinical trial61. Copies of the VAS with lines and measurements will be kept in the source 
documents. Scores in terms of centimeter distance from the “worst behavior” end of the line will 
be recorded in the source documents and entered into the CRFs.  
 
The VAS for Behavior should be administered by the same rater (parent/legal guardian) for a 
given subject at all applicable visits throughout the trial. If the same rater cannot administer the 
assessment, the site must contact the Study Team prior to proceeding and/or scheduling. 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 76 of 121 
 
Administration time: 5 minutes for caregiver. 
 
Children’s Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ) will be completed at Screening, AFQ 
Baseline, 1, 2, 8, 9, 10, and 16 month and Follow Up visits (visits 1, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 14, 15). 
The CHSQ is a parent report, sleep screening instrument that has been used in FXS to 
characterize sleep problems in the population,90 and which will be utilized to screen for the 
presence and impact of sleep problems that may occur as a side effect of AFQ056.  
 
The CSHQ should be administered by the same rater (parent/legal guardian) for a given subject 
at all applicable visits throughout the trial. If the same rater cannot administer the assessment, 
the site must contact the Study Team prior to proceeding and/or scheduling. 
 
Administration time: 10 minutes for caregiver. 
 
6.3.14 Subject Adherence Assessments and Drug Dispensing 
 
Drug accountability/compliance will be assessed at every 2-month in-person visit after 
Baseline (even if there is a visit in between the two months). A medication diary will be provided 
to all parents/caregivers of subjects at each visit from baseline to the 16 month visit (visit 14). 
The parent/caregivers will record all doses given and the time given in the dosing diary. To 
assess compliance the diary will be reviewed with the study coordinator at each visit and missed 
doses noted.  
 
All bottles provided at the last study visit will be returned and empty bottles will be counted and 
volume remaining in partially used and unused bottles determined by approximation. Bottle 
counts and expected/actual bottle use will be recorded in source documents. Correspondence 
between study drug used and logs will be determined and discrepancies reconciled with the 
parents/caregivers at each study visit. If 7 or more consecutive days (14 consecutive doses) or 
14 or more total days (28 total doses) are missed between any two study visits, the subject may 
be withdrawn from the study. If any doses are missed compliance will be reinforced with the 
family at the visit. 
 
Dispensing of Study Drug will be done every 2-month in-person visit except Follow Up (visit 
15). Amount of drug dispensed will depend on the subject’s dose at the time of the visit and, for 
the AFQ Baseline, 8, and 16 month visits (visits 3, 9, 14), any potential allowed dose titration or 
weaning that may be done before the next drug dispensing visit. Sufficient study drug will be 
dispensed to cover all dosing until the projected next study visit at which drug will be dispensed, 
including the maximum length of time allowed before return by the visit window.  
 
In the case that a visit becomes delayed outside of the visit window due to weather or other 
unforeseen circumstances, additional study drug can be mailed to the subject to cover dosing 
until the subject is able to attend the study visit, so as not to interrupt dosing. 
 
Dose Titration will be a flexible dose forced-titration per the protocol between the Baseline and 
2 month visits (visits 3 and 5) in the placebo-controlled period of the study and again between 
the 8 and 10 month (visits 9 and 11) in the open-label extension. The initial dose at baseline and 
the 8 month visits will be 25 mg BID and dose titration will be done every week based on safety 
reports and side effects alone (efficacy will not be a factor in dose titration due to known strong 
early placebo effects in prior FXS studies). If the subject has no side effects at each call, the 
dose will be force titrated to the next level, 50 mg BID, 75 mg BID and 100 mg BID in order. 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 77 of 121 
Please refer to the Manual of Operations for more details regarding how the dose titration 
reviews should be done. 
 
If there is concern for side effects due to drug the dose may be left the same for an additional 
week or reduced. If the side effect has resolved or substantially improved after a week of 
holding the dose the same as the prior week or reducing the dose, the dose can then be 
increased. If there are side effects after the first week of treatment, the 25 mg dose will be 
allowed to be reduced to 12.5 mg BID. Patients who cannot tolerate 12.5 mg BID will be 
withdrawn from the study. The dose can be adjusted weekly through the 7th week after baseline 
(visit 3) and the 7th week after the 8 month visit (visit 9). The dose will be stable from the 2 
month visit (visit 4) through the 8 month visit (visit 9) and from the 10 month visit (visit 11) 
through the 16 month visit (visit14). 
 
The dose titration will depend on the side effects and their severity. If the side effect is 
moderately severe and possibly related, per the PI’s discretion, the dose may be held or 
increased. Any clinically significant new problems or worsening of conditions or behavior outside 
the range of known pre-enrollment fluctuation for the patient in question, will prompt a dose 
decrease, and will result in an Adverse Event as well.  
 
A subject’s dose may be decreased at any point during the open label extension if the 
investigator determines any adverse events may be related to study drug.  
 
Compliance with the language intervention will be assessed for the parents/caregivers in 
three ways.  
 First, clinicians will rate parent engagement and competence with the intervention during the 
coaching sessions. We will use a rating system adapted from that used successfully by 
Kasari et al.66 in their research on parent-implemented interventions for children with autism.  
 Second, clinicians will rate parent engagement and competence with the intervention during 
the parental homework sessions; again, using the adaptation of the Kasari et al.66 coding 
system.  
 Finally, clinicians will query the parent about mastery and ease of use of the taught 
strategies and the frequency of use during the past week. These queries will occur during 
feedback sessions. 
These three quantitative measures will be analyzed separately and in combination to determine 
parental mastery and use of the targeted strategies and thus the effective “dose” of the 
language intervention actually received by the subject.  
 
Parents will have a worksheet (Language Intervention Diary) they can use as a tool to keep a 
chart of their use of the intervention strategies to include the number of times and the length of 
time each day the intervention was used. The time chart will be formatted like a daily planner 
with each day divided into blocks of time in columns on the chart and the family will color in the 
time period when the intervention was used. One week of time will be represented on each 
page of the time chart. Based on times filled in by the family, the number of times the 
intervention is used can be tracked by the family to help them report this information 
systematically to the SLP during ratings of caregiver fidelity. This Language Intervention Diary 
will be reviewed at study visits and kept in the source documents but not entered into CRFs. 
The CRFs will contain only the bulleted information above. The Language Intervention Diary 
may serve as a guide for site staff to review intervention compliance with the family and 
encourage additional use when needed.  
 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 78 of 121 
Clinician fidelity in implementing the didactic, coaching, and homework sessions will also be 
rated following a rubric developed previously by Abbeduto and colleagues. It is expected that 
scores of 80-90% correct will be achieved. Fidelity will be assessed for up to 10% of sessions 
per clinician. 
 
The parent/legal guardian administering the language intervention for a given subject must 
remain the same throughout the trial. If the same parent/caregiver cannot administer the 
assessment, the site must contact the Study Team as soon as they become aware. 
 
6.3.15 Additional Evaluations 
 
Auditory ERP can be administered by a trained study staff member. ERP has been evaluated 
in FXS in a few pilot studies91,92, and provides a badly needed direct index of brain function. 
Auditory ERP is known to be abnormal with a larger magnitude of response in FXS due to 
sensory oversensitivity to sound.93 This is thought to relate to CNS circuit dysfunction from 
increased dendritic spine density in sensory cortices and lack of pruning leading to 
hyperactivation of sensory circuits.  
 
A model for this has been described for the Fmr1 knockout mouse (model of FXS) in the barrel 
cortex neurons that respond to whisker sensation.94 Thus auditory ERP may be a direct window 
into the synaptic dysregulation in FXS, and is similarly abnormal in the FXS mouse model and 
humans with FXS, making it a highly attractive measure that could be used for direct translation 
of drug effects from mouse to man, a gap area in outcome measure development.  
ERPs are inherent components of an electroencephalography (EEG) signal, and therefore must 
be extracted from an EEG through signal processing techniques. An EEG signal provides a 
coarse measure of brain activity, which makes it difficult to use it to assess highly specific neural 
processes or isolate individual neuro-cognitive processes. In contrast, ERPs are a class of 
potentials that display time relationships to a definable event such as a sensory, a cognitive, or 
a motor event.95 
 
One of the main advantages of using ERPs to analyze cognitive activity is that they provide a 
continuous measure of processing between a stimulus and a response, which makes it possible 
to identify and quantify the response and stages of processing that are affected by a specific 
experimental manipulation.95 This is especially useful when studying individuals with FXS 
because they often have hyper reactive responses to stimuli that are auditory, tactile, visual, 
and olfactory.96 Van der Molen et al. showed that the N1 and P2 components of sensory evoked 
potentials from sixteen males with the FXS full mutation and twenty age-matched controls were 
significantly enhanced in the FXS patients.92 By focusing on the changes in the N1, P2, and N2 
(relative to the common average reference) components of subject ERP signals, between the 
first and last 45 stimuli presented, Schneider et al. showed that there was abnormal 
electrocortical habituation to auditory stimuli in patients with FXS, and this improved at N1 and 
P2 in individuals with FXS who were given minocycline treatment compared to a control group.91 
 
The ERP will be administered in an EEG recording session during a single clinic or research 
visit for each participant at visits 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 14, and 15. Dense array electrode recording 
equipment will be used. Stimuli will be presented on a separate computer using Presentation 
software by NeuroBehavioral Systems, Inc.  Event markers synchronized with stimuli will be 
conveyed to the EEG system over a parallel digital interface.  
 
If the auditory ERP cannot be administered at the screening visit, sites may administer them at 
the -2 month visit (v2).  


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 79 of 121 
 
When the EEG recording system is set up and the head cap is properly secured on the subject, 
EEG recording will begin. The EEG signal can be viewed on the designated digitization 
computer (Figure 1). An Alpha Block Test will be performed to make sure that alpha waves are 
minimized and do not distort the EEG recording and to get an Alpha Reactivity Index. Two 1 min 
segments of eyes-open resting EEG and two 30 sec segments of eyes-closed resting EEG will 
be recorded with segments marked in the EEG data. Eyes closed versus eyes open data will be 
compared to ensure suppression of alpha with the eyes open. The EEG will then be recorded 
for 10 min with the passive auditory oddball paradigm using Presentation software that will 
serve as an auditory stimulus. Total recording time for each subject will be about 15 minutes.  
 
The auditory stimuli that will be used by the Presentation software will consist of 480 sinusoidal 
tones of frequencies 1000 Hz (standard tone) and 2000 Hz (target tone) that will be emitted 
from the speakers of the simulation computer.59 These tones will be generated using Matlab 
software (The Mathworks, Natick MA). The order of the tones will be randomized, consisting of 
six 1000 Hz standard tones and then one different 2000 Hz target tone at either the 7th, 8th, 
9th, or 10th position, with 1000 Hz standard tones filling in the remaining positions.59 The 
stimulus onset-to-onset time (stimulus onset asynchrony, or SOA) will be 1 second. A bandpass 
filter will be set at .1 Hz-100 Hz on the EEG signal during recording of all data and will be 
digitized at 1024 Hz.59 Offline, EEG data will be filtered .5-30 Hz for ERP data analyses. This is 
done to remove any large electrical artifacts that may be present. Moreover, this allows for an 
efficient way to eliminate most noise, since ERPs of interest are usually found at less than 30 
Hz.64  
 
The EEG data for each patient will first be segmented according to event type, standard or 
target tone59 using a 1000 ms window with 100 ms before the event (the tone) and 900 ms after 
the event.59 The purpose of this segmentation is to generate an easy reading frame to analyze 
the data both before and after a tone. In order to obtain each individual’s ERPs, the EEG signal 
must be averaged. Each participant’s EEG will be averaged and baseline corrected using the 
signal data from the 100 ms interval before an event (before a tone).59 When the ERP is 
successfully separated from the original EEG signal for each participant, the significant auditory 
ERP components will be identified at each of the electrode positions. Although there are several 
components to an ERP, the most significant known auditory ERP components in the age range 
studied are P1, P2, and N2.59 Only the electrode sites that display the largest voltage 
deflections for these three components with respect to the appropriate reference for that 
component will be selected for statistical analysis and comparisons. Amplitudes for P1, P2 and 
N2 components, habituation of these components between the first 45 and last 45 stimuli 
presented, a mismatched negativity measure (MMN) which is the earliest ERP indicator of 
cortical auditory processing in a passive listening paradigm, and resting state measures with 
eyes open and closed will be obtained from the ERP software. All ERP data will then be 
uploaded to SharePoint (University of Oklahoma) for central analysis.  
 
The ERP portion of the trial will not occur at all sites. It is expected that only a subset of subjects 
– approximately 50% – will complete this procedure as part of the study. This is due to concerns 
over site equipment as well as difficulty in terms subject cooperation in this particular population. 
 
Administration time: 20-30 minutes with subject, depending on set up time, recording will be 15 
minutes. 
 
Computerized Eye-Tracking will be done with the subjects at Screening, AFQ Baseline and 2, 
4, 8, 16 month and Follow Up visits (visit 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 14, and 15). This assessment can be 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 80 of 121 
administered by a trained study staff member. Gaze avoidance is a hallmark behavioral feature 
of FXS and individuals with FXS have difficulty in establishing and maintaining eye-gaze during 
social interactions. Studies have shown that pupillary responses are regulated by the autonomic 
nervous system in part in response to level of emotional arousal. A computerized eye-tracking 
device (Tobii) will be used employing a standardized protocol that is suitable for individuals of 
varying ages with FXS.97  
 
If the eye tracking cannot be administered at the screening visit, sites may administer them at 
the -2 month visit (v2).  
 
Subjects will be required to look at a screen for approximately 10 minutes while 60 images of 
human faces with differing emotional content (happy, calm, fearful) will be presented alternating 
with scrambled faces. Automated assessments of time spent looking at and number of fixations 
on regions of interest (e.g. eyes, nose, mouth) in face images will be recorded. Changes in pupil 
diameter will be measured associated with viewing of faces as an index of autonomic arousal. 
Data from the Tobii eye tracker will be analyzed according to the method of Farzin et al. 98 and 
output including time looking at and fixations to regions of interest during each type of face 
presentation, as well as pupil diameter changes relative to scrambled face background for each 
type of face presentation will be collected. All eye tracking data will then be uploaded to 
SharePoint (UC Davis) for central analysis.  
 
It is expected that only a subset of subjects – approximately 50% – will complete this procedure 
as part of the study. This is due to concerns over difficulty in terms subject cooperation in this 
particular population. 
 
 Administration time: 15-30 minutes with subject. 
 
7 
MANAGEMENT OF ADVERSE EXPERIENCES 
 
Expected side effects include those observed in the prior adult/adolescent phase 2b trials in 
FXS and the pediatric PK study. These include dizziness, insomnia, headache, decreased 
appetite, vomiting, diarrhea, and behavioral “activation” with irritability, aggression, hyperactivity, 
anxiety, and impulsive behavior. These side effects are expected to be relatively infrequent, 
mild-moderate in degree, and insomnia and other side effects will in most cases be identified in 
the flexible dosing period and managed by dose adjustments during the flexible dosing period.  
 
Insomnia may be managed by moving the dose from evening to afternoon as early as 3 PM, 
though doses must remain at least 4 hours apart. If the subject’s dose is reduced to 12.5 mg 
BID during the flexible dosing period and the subject still has intolerable side effects, that 
subject will be withdrawn from the study. This is not expected to occur frequently based on past 
experience with AFQ056 in the above-noted studies. Subjects requiring dose reduction for 
presumed side effects after the flexible titration when the dose is to remain fixed in the placebo-
controlled period (between the 2 and 8 month visits) will be withdrawn from the study. Dose 
reductions for side effects during the fixed dose period of the open label extension will not be 
encouraged but may be allowed after review of the situation. 
 
No clinically significant laboratory or EKG abnormalities have been seen in other studies of 
AFQ056 outside of non-drug related abnormalities that may have occurred during intercurrent 
illness. If laboratory or EKG abnormalities that are deemed to be clinically significant by the site 
investigator occur, these can be repeated and if still abnormal will require specific follow up 
testing depending on the nature of the abnormality and medical standard of care for the type of 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 81 of 121 
abnormality observed. The subject may be withdrawn from the study depending on investigator 
and medical monitor assessment of likelihood of relationship to the study treatment with 
AFQ056. 
 
Adverse events seen in the prior adolescent and adult placebo-controlled studies of AFQ056 in 
FXS more frequently in the group treated with AFQ056 than with placebo include the following 
list arranged in alphabetical order. No side effect exceeded a frequency of 20%, even at the 
highest doses of AFQ056 (see section 2.2 above for exact frequencies). In the Pediatric PK 
study, side effects all fell into the below categories, with vomiting and insomnia being the most 
frequent side effects. These were typically short-lived occurring in the first day or two of dosing 
and seemingly related to advancing to the full dose right from the outset of doing rather than 
titrating the dose up over time. This was evident in that vomiting after the initial dose was seen 
in 50% of the 5-11 year old cohort studied first all of whom were dosed from the outset at the full 
dose, but not seen in the 3-4 year old cohort after dosing was advanced over the course of a 
day (half dose for one day, followed by the full dose). 
 
 
Abdominal pain  
 
Agitation 
 
Aggression 
 
Anxiety 
 
Decreased appetite 
 
Diarrhea 
 
Dizziness 
 
Fatigue 
 
Headache 
 
Insomnia 
 
Irritability 
 
Nausea  
 
Pyrexia  
 
Self-injurious behavior  
 
Vomiting 
 
Although not seen in prior trials in humans with FXS, including after AFQ056 exposure for over 
two years in the open-label extension studies with adults and adolescents (2278 and 2279), 
learning and memory impairment have been noted in preclinical testing of AFQ056.  Learning 
was, however, enhanced in preclinical testing in the FXS mouse model, presumably due to the 
AFQ056 targeting the abnormal signaling pathway in the FXS mouse. Risk of learning and 
memory impairment will be monitored closely using assessments that are being administered as 
part of the protocol. Raw scores on the MSEL and VABS-II assessments will be monitored at 
the sites to assess global developmental functioning.  If there is a decrease in raw scores on 
both measures by 10% incrementally at two consecutive visits where both assessments are 
administered (e.g. 10% decrease from screening to baseline, baseline to month 2, month 2 to 
month 8, or month 8 to month 16 as described in the schedule of assessments), subject data 
will be reviewed by the Medical Monitor and it will be decided if the subject should be withdrawn 
from the study. If there is decrement in these scores without any obvious alternative cause the 
participant will be withdrawn from the study. 
 
8 
CRITERIA FOR INTERVENTION DISCONTINUATION 
 
Discontinuation criteria for individual subjects will be as follows. 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 82 of 121 
 
Study treatment must be discontinued [and the subject withdrawn from the trial] under the 
following circumstances and according to Investigator discretion: 
 
The legal guardian withdraws informed consent. 
 
A serious AE occurs that is in the opinion of the investigator suspected to be related to the 
study medication. 
 
A severe CNS-related AE occurs that is in the opinion of the investigator suspected to be 
related to the study medication. 
 
A subject has intolerable side effects on the lowest dose of AFQ056 allowed in the study, 
12.5 mg BID, that subject will be discontinued from the study. 
 
The investigator feels continuation in the study would be detrimental to the subject’s well-
being. 
 
A subject may be withdrawn from the study, if: 
 
Clinically significant changes of laboratory parameters and/or vital signs occur that are in the 
opinion of the investigator suspected to be related to the study medication. The clinical 
significance of laboratory abnormalities and other abnormal assessments will be assessed 
and interpreted by the investigator in the context of the overall clinical presentation. 
 
The subject is lost to follow-up and is late for a study visit by over 1 month. 
 
≥ 7 consecutive days of study medication are missed or a total of ≥ 14 days of study 
medication are omitted once the subject has begun dosing between study visits at any time 
during the study. 
 
A protocol deviation occurs that in the opinion of the Site PI or Study Team may alter the 
study results (e.g. administration of concomitant medication). 
 
In cases in which it is unclear if the patient should be withdrawn from the study, the site 
investigator will discuss the case with the PPI, Study Team and medical monitor if needed, and 
a decision will be made regarding whether the subject can stay in the study and if so under what 
conditions. Subjects discontinued from the study after randomization will complete a 
Termination visit at which they will undergo the procedures listed for the 16 month visit (visit 14) 
and then a Follow Up visit at which they will undergo the procedures listed for that visit (visit 15). 
Subjects will not be maintained in follow up activities through the study after completion of the 
Follow Up visit. 
 
Subjects will be monitored for AEs from the time they sign consent until the final Study visit. If an 
AE is ongoing or discovered at a subject’s final Study visit, the AE will be followed until resolution, 
or for a minimum of 30 days, whichever comes first. Resolution means that the subject has 
returned to status at enrollment. If the AE is still ongoing after 30 days, it will be resolved with 
sequelae. All AEs monitored past the final visit can be followed via telephone – a repeat 
Termination/Final Follow-up visit does not need to occur. 
 
All SAEs must be followed until resolution throughout the trial. SAEs that are discovered less the 
60 days prior to the subject’s final Study visit will be followed until resolution or for a minimum of 
60 days, whichever comes first, even if it is past the final visit. If a new SAE is discovered at the 
subject’s final Study visit, it must be followed until resolution, or for a minimum of 60 days, 
whichever comes first. If the SAE is still ongoing after 60 days, it will be resolved with sequelae. 
All SAEs monitored past the final visit can be followed via telephone – a repeat Termination/Final 
Follow-up visit does not need to occur. 
 
9 
STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS 
 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 83 of 121 
The NeuroNEXT Data Coordinating Center will develop a formal statistical analysis plan, in 
collaboration with the protocol principal investigator and protocol steering committee. 
 
9.1 
General Design Issues 
 
Trial Design: The trial will be a phase II double blind placebo-controlled parallel-group flexible-
dose forced-titration study that will use a novel design to address the impact of AFQ056 on 
language learning in 3-6 year old children with FXS. The flexible dose design will mimic practice, 
take into account differential responsiveness and the known inter-child variability in drug levels 
with AFQ056, and allow use of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) where MTD is defined as the 
maximum tolerated dose of the available dose levels in the protocol, which is felt likely to be most 
effective. There will be a 4-month single-blind placebo lead in after screening assessments during 
which subjects will have therapy treatments as usual to control for the effects of the language 
intervention. The placebo lead-in will also control for placebo effects which are prominent in 
clinical trials in FXS. This will be followed by an 8-month placebo-controlled phase in which 100 
subjects with FXS will have AFQ056 baseline assessments and be randomized 1:1 to AFQ056 
or placebo. Dose titration to MTD starting at 25 mg AFQ056/matching placebo will occur over 2 
months and then subjects will have language intervention baseline assessments and initiate the 
language intervention, remaining on a stable AFQ056/placebo dose for the next 6 months. After 
8 months of treatment in the placebo-controlled phase (6 months of language intervention), all 
subjects will have final assessments and will enter the extension and be treated with active drug 
according to the same schedule as in the placebo-controlled phase with 2 months of flexible dose 
titration to the MTD followed by a period of stable treatment. The duration of the stable treatment 
will depend on the month the subject is consented into the study. As such, some subjects will 
have an acute dose decrease if they were on a dose of 50-100 mg BID of active drug in the initial 
phase but experience from the Pediatric PK study conducted previously suggests that children 
can stop AFQ056 without withdrawal symptoms and the dose decrease and titration in the open 
label extension are unavoidable to maintain the blind of the study through the completion of the 
placebo-controlled period by the final participant. The open-label extension will allow all children 
a period of active drug exposure to make recruitment feasible, despite the long placebo period, 
and will allow additional collection of long-term safety data. Subjects will continue the language 
intervention through the extension phase to gain additional data on long-term effects of the 
combination of AFQ056 and the language intervention on developmental trajectory and the ERP 
biomarker. 
 
Both treatment groups will receive an intensive language intervention for 6 months after 2 
months of dose optimization, to drive learning effects proposed to be enhanced by the AFQ056, 
during the blinded treatment exposure. A post-intervention follow up visit will be conducted one 
month after the final assessment visit of the trial (month 16, visit 14). At that point, all subjects 
will be weaned off of AFQ056 for at least a week. Most assessments, including the biomarkers, 
will be completed at the follow-up visit in order to determine if there have been changes from 
coming off AFQ056. The language intervention will continue through the end of the study and 
parents may continue to apply it after the study is completed but patients will not be followed 
further after the end of the follow-up visit. 
 
Goals and Hypotheses: The overall goals are to change the paradigm for development of 
mechanism targeted pharmacotherapy in neurodevelopmental disorders and provide a definitive 
test of the mGluR theory in humans by determining whether AFQ056, an mGluR5 negative 
modulator, can enhance neural plasticity in the form of language learning during an intensive 
language intervention in very young children with fragile X syndrome. This trial therefore will use 
an innovative but exploratory trial design to examine efficacy of an agent with substantial support 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 84 of 121 
as a drug targeting CNS plasticity in preclinical models of a developmental disorder. If the design 
is successful, this trial can serve as a model for future trials of mechanistically-targeted treatments 
operating on neural plasticity in other neurodevelopmental disorders. 
 
The primary objective is to demonstrate greater improvement in language in young children with 
FXS treated with AFQ056, using an overall weighted communication score, in combination with 
an intensive standardized parent-implemented language learning intervention. The improvement 
in mean overall weighted communication scores over 6 months in the intervention group will be 
compared to placebo. This comparison provides a marker of drug effect on neural plasticity, the 
core problem in this disorder. 
 
9.2 Factors Influencing Choice of Study Design 
 
Studying Core Features of FXS: Cognition and Learning as a Surrogate for Neural 
Plasticity: This study was designed to incorporate features that would address problems that 
have been observed in prior trials in FXS and uncertainties about whether prior trials targeting 
behavior in adults and adolescents with FXS have provided adequate surrogate outcomes for 
the normalization of synaptic morphology/plasticity and learning observed with mGluR5 blockers 
in the mouse model of FXS. The general consensus in the field is that it is unclear whether 
behaviors that have been fixed by many years of development in older individuals with FXS can 
actually be modified by targeted treatment in a time frame compatible with a placebo-controlled 
trial and whether behavior and functional skills will necessarily improve concurrently and be 
treated by the same interventions. Thus, to truly address the potential of mGluR5 blockers to 
modify disease in humans with FXS, effects on learning and cognition, the core problem in FXS, 
need to be studied and these effects need to be evaluated at the youngest age possible. Given 
this, the age group for this study was chosen to be the youngest possible children (age 3-6 
years) for whom PK studies had been completed and in whom an mGluR5 blocker (AFQ056 
has been used at the youngest ages currently) could be used and the key outcomes chosen for 
study will address learning and cognition. 
 
Language Learning Intervention: To mimic the plasticity studies in the animal model it was 
critical to embed a learning intervention in the trial. The language learning intervention was 
chosen because in the young FXS age group to be studied, language is emerging and this is 
the main developmental focus for this age group. Children with FXS at this age are not typically 
able to do currently available cognitive or academic interventions, thus the language 
intervention chosen is optimal because it targets skills that are in a critical developmental period 
and can be carried out with the age group to be studied. 
 
Parallel Group Design: Given the complexity of running a study in which a learning 
intervention is embedded, and the lack of knowledge about how much carry-over effects might 
be seen in a study directed at plasticity and learning a crossover study was considered too 
difficult to interpret, a parallel group design was chosen. As there are no approved treatments 
for FXS, an equivalency or non-inferiority study could not be done. Likewise, as there is no 
approved comparator drug for treatment of FXS, the comparator for AFQ056 will be placebo. 
 
9.3 Rationale for Specific Design Features 
 
Length of Placebo-Controlled Treatment Period: A concern in prior trials of targeted 
treatments for FXS has been inadequate length of the placebo-controlled treatment period to 
see effects emerge in a developmental disorder. In particular, to see an improvement in learning 
take place, a relatively long exposure to drug will be necessary, even as long as one or several 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 85 of 121 
years. Although the learning intervention is expected to speed progress so that effects can be 
seen in a shorter time period, at least a 6-month placebo-controlled active treatment period in 
the presence of the language intervention is deemed necessary even in young children, and 
was incorporated to have the best chance of seeing learning effects. A longer period would 
likely be better for measuring learning progress; however, this must be balanced against the 
difficulty of maintaining children with FXS on placebo for such an extended period of time during 
the critical assessment period of the study. In order to avoid the potential attrition that might be 
associated with a 1 year placebo-controlled period, the 6-month period was chosen for the 
active/placebo treatment coupled with language intervention. 
 
Number of Arms: The number of arms to be employed in this trial was carefully considered, 
including possible 2-, 3- and 4-arm designs. The 3-arm design would include an AFQ056 group 
with language intervention, a placebo group with language intervention and a placebo group 
with treatment-as-usual. Although this would have resulted in information about the 
effectiveness of the language intervention alone, families would know if they are getting a 
language intervention, and it would have been very hard to keep such a trial blinded.  A 4-arm 
design was considered modeled after Compton et al.123 in a study of SSRI treatment and 
behavioral therapy for OCD, with treatment-as-usual and language intervention groups for both 
placebo and AFQ056 groups, however in the Compton study the pharmacotherapy and 
behavioral therapy were considered potentially equivalent interventions from an efficacy 
standpoint, while in this trial the main hypothesis is that the AFQ056 will enhance learning 
in young children with FXS and the language intervention is being employed to push 
learning rate and “plasticity” and provide a substrate for the drug to act upon. Thus, this 
trial is conceptually different from that in the Compton study and the 4-arm design is not critical 
to the hypothesis. Given the hypothesis and the need to increase the trial size to at least 160 
participants for a 4-arm trial, the 2-arm trial with the language intervention with placebo and 
AFQ056 groups was chosen to maximize power to evaluate the key conditions, minimize cost 
and to maximize feasibility in a rare disease. However, given the value of understanding the 
effects of the language intervention itself, a placebo lead-in incorporated into the trial will allow 
comparison of 6 months of placebo treatment with and without the language intervention in the 
group randomized to placebo (see paragraph below). Further, all outcomes including the 
primary outcome will be evaluated at visit 5, two months after baseline when subjects are at 
MTD, before starting the language intervention, to determine if the AFQ056 has had an early 
independent effect on outcomes in the absence of language learning intervention. 
 
Placebo Lead-In: A major issue in prior FXS trials has been large placebo effects. Placebo 
lead-in periods have been used in some cases to try to control for placebo effect. While these 
have not eliminated placebo effects, they do allow for an understanding of the magnitude of 
placebo effects that are operating on the measures they are impacting. Placebo lead-in periods 
thus far employed in FXS trials have been 2-4 weeks. Based on the above considerations, a 4-
month placebo-lead in period was chosen for this trial. This should be long enough to ensure 
placebo effects are stabilized before the initiation of the placebo-controlled active treatment 
period. An additional motivation for the placebo lead-in and determinant of the placebo lead-in 
length is the potential to use the placebo lead-in period to study the benefits of the language 
intervention alone in the placebo-treated cohort. This cohort will receive placebo with treatment-
as-usual for 6 months followed by placebo with the language intervention for 6 months, followed 
by 8 months of treatment with both the language intervention and AFQ056, allowing comparison 
of rate of progress in this cohort in the first two periods to define the effects of the language 
intervention. 
 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 86 of 121 
Open-Label Extension: The prolonged placebo treatment period of 4 months (lead-in) and 6 
months during the placebo-controlled treatment period could result in difficulties with subject 
retention, even with provision of the language intervention which will be an attraction for 
recruiting. Retention is expected to be far less of a problem if an open-label treatment period 
follows the placebo-controlled period. An open-label extension for all subjects at the end of the 
trial will also allow for acquisition of 1) more long-term safety data (Note: If AFQ056 were ever to 
be used for treatment of FXS based on this and other subsequent studies, patients would be 
treated for life or at least for many years until something better is developed. Although there is 
safety data over long periods in older patients, there is no extended safety data for young 
children.  Even though we are not predicting specific safety issues, this extended treatment of 
up to 16 months will help build an important chronic safety profile for future use in very young 
children.);  2) more long-term data describing the trajectory of progress on the drug for the 
group getting AFQ056 during the placebo-controlled period, will allow more time for 
developmental progress on the AFQ056 to correlate with the auditory ERP and eye tracking 
primary and secondary biomarkers, to get better longitudinal data about how well these 
biomarkers predict long-term clinical outcomes; 3) will allow comparison of progress in the 
group treated with placebo in 3 treatment conditions for at least 6 months each (treatment-as-
usual, language intervention, language intervention + AFQ056); 4) will allow analysis of 
biomarker responses during each of these conditions, adding to data on long-term predictive 
value of the biomarkers for both a behavioral and pharmacological intervention; and 5) will allow 
a greater length of time to determine if tolerance to the AFQ056 occurs based on repeated 
assessments. 
 
Flexible Dose Design: Variability in maximal tolerated dose (MTD) has also been seen in 
numerous prior FXS studies, as expected based on the high interpersonal variability in optimal 
dosing for most psychoactive medications. This problem is compounded by the fact that the 
most common side effects seen with most targeted medications in FXS trials including mGluR 
blockers and AFQ056, are behavioral/CNS in nature and thus can at times be confused with the 
typical behavioral ups and downs seen in individuals with FXS. Since a fixed dose assignment 
may assign a patient to a suboptimal dose or a dose on which he or she has side effects, a 
patient assigned to a suboptimal dose may have less improvement in the primary outcome than 
if on a higher dose and a patient assigned to a dose producing side effects is likely to have side 
effects that get in the way of assessing cognitive, language, behavioral or adaptive functioning, 
and thus less improvement than if assigned to a lower dose. A beneficial drug effect may thus 
be partially masked by the wrong dose even within an expected therapeutic range. The range of 
doses required for similar blood levels was quite variable for AFQ056 in the Pediatric PK study 
conducted by Novartis, and side effects have not been particularly correlated to drug levels in 
any of the AFQ056 studies. Because of all of these concerns, a flexible dose design was 
chosen over a fixed dose design. The flexible dose design will also best mimic clinical practice. 
 
Forced Titration Design with Sufficient Time and Flexibility to Optimize Dosing: Given the 
flexible dose design, it is important to ensure the study participants are on the MTD when they 
start the language intervention to ensure it is delivered at the presumed most effective dose. In 
order to achieve the MTD a dose titration period is thus required before starting the language 
intervention. In prior FXS studies with flexible dosing, it has been clear that because of the 
frequent day-to-day behavioral ups and downs in patients with FXS that often overlap with 
potential drug-induced CNS side effects, it is important to have adequate time at each dose to 
make decisions about dose escalation, and also sufficient flexibility to allow doses to be moved 
up or down if it becomes clear with time whether a side effect such as hyperactivity or 
behavioral activation is actually occurring or not. Also, given week-to-week behavioral variability 
in FXS it is important to avoid leaving the patient on too low of a dose because the family feels 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 87 of 121 
he or she is having a good week and thus titrating to a suboptimal dose and discovering later 
that transient behavioral improvement had nothing to do with the dosing. Given these 
considerations, a forced (mandatory) titration strategy was chosen, such that the dose will be 
titrated up to the next level if there are no side effects, and a 2-month dose titration period with 
dose adjustments no more frequently than weekly was chosen to ensure plenty of time for 
careful assessment of side effects and provide enough flexibility to hold or move up or down on 
doses if it takes more than a week to ascertain whether a dose is producing side effects.  
 
Tolerance Issues and Assessment: Concerns have been raised about whether tolerance 
occurs in previous trials of targeted treatments in FXS; this concern has been raised with 
respect to AFQ056 treatment although it has not been substantiated. To evaluate for tolerance 
effects, most outcome measures will be repeated multiple times during treatment period 
including assessments during the placebo-controlled period at 2 months, 4 months, and 8 
months of drug exposure and subsequently during the open-label extension at 2 months, 4 
months, and 8 months. This should allow determination of whether tolerance effects are 
occurring with respect to cognitive language and biomarker measures. 
 
 
 
 
9.4 Randomization 
 
In order to prevent age imbalance, randomization will be stratified by age with two strata, 3-4 
years and 5-6 years. Block randomization will be used with random block sizes, and age (coded 
as a two-level factor) will be used as a covariate in all statistical analysis. The stratification will 
ensure that all individuals enrolled will have a Mullen ELC (equivalent to Developmental 
Quotient) of <75. This will ensure sufficient symptoms to measure learning improvement and will 
result in enrollment of only significantly affected females, most likely excluding at least the 
higher functioning half of females with a full mutation (because of this, females are expected to 
comprise about 20% of study participants). Likewise, very high functioning males (the best 
functioning 10-20%) will be excluded. Thus, the males and females enrolled are expected to 
show heavily overlapping clinical phenotypes and developmental function and stratification is 
expected to be unnecessary. Further, there is no reason to expect a priori a difference in 
response in lower versus higher functioning individuals within the impaired group with delays 
enrolled, and thus even if the females are on average higher functioning within the impaired 
range than males, it is not clear they will respond sufficiently differently to justify stratification in 
a randomized design.  
 
9.5 Outcomes 
 
9.5.1 Primary Outcome (Including Definition) 
The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate greater improvement in language in young 
children with FXS treated with AFQ056 in combination with an intensive standardized parent-
implemented language intervention, relative to those treated with the language intervention and 
placebo, after 6 months of intervention, as a marker of drug effect on neural plasticity, the core 
problem in the disorder. This will be assessed using a primary language endpoint involving a 
weighted child intentional communication score coded from a 22-minute structured task which is 
an examiner/child dyadic play session, including a structured and unstructured play session. 
 
Because the language intervention will specifically be targeting increased communicative 
behavior and increased use and production of language, the weighted communication measure 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 88 of 121 
was chosen as the primary outcome because it will specifically measure child initiated 
communication that involves the child’s use of gestures, eye contact, vocalizations, and/or 
words and word combinations to communicate during a standardized play session, the precise 
skills which are directly being taught by the language intervention. The measure is thus ideal for 
measuring the type of learning expected to take place from the language intervention and which 
potentially would be enhanced by the concomitant AFQ056 treatment. Although this measure is 
less well-validated than standardized language measures, it was chosen to be the primary 
outcome because it is so optimally matched to measure the skills the intervention is delivering 
and will be more sensitive to skills that are likely to improve from the language intervention than 
other standardized cognitive, adaptive, or language measures that have more extensive 
validation. Because the FXS phenotype varies, participants will range from having minimal 
language/infrequent communication to using phrases or sentences and/or be more talkative. 
Because the WCS reflects both linguistic sophistication and frequency of communicative 
attempts regardless of form, it has the potential to capture change in the full range of FXS 
participants. This measure will not have floor effects for non-verbal individuals seen with 
standardized measures. It is likely that an important effect of the interventions (both LLI and 
AFQ056) will be to increase social engagement and the frequency of participant communicative 
attempts and thus, improvement is possible even for participants who enter with sophisticated 
language. In addition, it is possible to extend the upper bound of the score if we find that the 
complexity of multiword combinations participants use changes (e.g., by adding a number rating 
point for communicative attempts consisting of more than three words), Thus ceiling effects are 
not expected. 
 
The Weighted Communication Score coded from a standardized play session has been used in 
cohorts with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and has been able to measure change in 
language skills with age74 and change in language skills in response to an intervention.75 
Although there is not specific data on this measure in FXS, it is not possible to validate every 
outcome specifically for FXS given the rarity of the disorder. Communication and language 
issues are similar in FXS and ASD so the measure is likely to perform similarly in response to 
an intervention in children with FXS.  
 
9.5.2 Key Secondary Outcome(s) 
Functional Key Secondary Outcomes: One key secondary objective of this study is to show 
greater improvement in specific standardized language, cognitive, and adaptive measures (see 
Endpoints Derived from Evaluations Section).  To address this objective, a number of key 
secondary functional endpoints will be obtained (using all raw scores, except as noted): 
 
 
Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) 
o Development Quotient (DQ) 
o Expressive Language Subscore 
 
Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale – Version 3 
o Composite Score 
o Communication Subscore 
 
Preschool Language Scale – 5th Edition 
o Expressive Communication Score 
 
McArthur-Bates Communication Development Index 
o Number of Spoken Words 
 
Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) 
o Overall Function 
 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 89 of 121 
Although the primary outcome was chosen to be the likely most sensitive measure to the 
intervention, albeit less validated, the additional key secondary functional outcomes were 
chosen to be the measures most validated, accepted and utilized in the FXS population, albeit 
potentially somewhat less sensitive to change. This should allow exploration of both novel and 
sensitive strategies for measuring outcome as well as standard strategies. The secondary 
measures chosen will most reliably assess broad domains of cognitive, language, adaptive and 
maladaptive functioning. It is anticipated that gains in language will result in broader 
improvement in overall functioning in multiple domains, and it is possible the AFQ056 will target 
learning in domains outside of those covered by the language intervention, although it is hard to 
predict which domains will be most impacted. Thus, the mostly broadly used and well-validated 
general standardized measures for the cognitive, language, adaptive and maladaptive domains 
were chosen as key functional secondary outcomes. 
 
The Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) has been used to track developmental progress of 
children with FXS in longitudinal studies and to characterize cohorts of young children with FXS 
for many years 77-79. More recently the MSEL was analyzed in a retrospective chart review to 
evaluate effects of early sertraline treatment on development in FXS106 and has been used in a 
6 month placebo-controlled clinical trial of sertraline in young children with FXS.107 
 
The Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale (Vineland, all editions) has been used extensively to 
track progress of children with FXS in large longitudinal studies10 and to characterize cohorts of 
patients with FXS both for clinical trials and other studies.61,84,114,115 The Vineland-II has been 
used in a phase 2 trial of arbaclofen and showed improvement in the Socialization subscore in a 
post-hoc analysis of the more socially impaired subgroup of FXS participants116 and the Daily 
Living subscore showed significant improvement in a recent placebo-controlled phase 2 trial of 
metadoxine in FXS.117 
 
The Preschool Language Scale, now on Version 5 (PLS-5), has been used to track language 
progress of children with FXS in longitudinal studies and to describe the language profile of 
patients with FXS for many years.108,109 
 
The MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory gives an opportunity to make sure 
language data is acquired even for children uncooperative with assessment, as it is a parent 
interview that allows tracking of the child’s progress in developing words, sentences, and more 
complex language.  This involves a parent-report measure that has been well-validated against 
direct observation and assessment measures of typical child language status and growth. This 
measure has been used to track language developmental trajectory in young children with 
ASD110,111 as well as other developmental disabilities112,113, and has been shown effective in 
characterizing language change in populations with limited communication abilities. 
 
The Clinician Global Impression (CGI-I) assesses clinician or caregiver impression of global 
functioning or a specific symptom to which the CGI-I is anchored. Collection of global clinician 
and parent impressions allow mapping of specific responses to more general perception of 
function, and give a sense of whether changes on more specific measures are meaningful. The 
CGI-I has been used in virtually all prior trials in FXS to assess global change in various pre-
specified target behaviors or function.115 Standardized training modules exist for training 
investigators to reliability on this measure. The CGI has been sensitive to change in the ITT 
population in a placebo-controlled trial of minocycline in FXS121 and in post-hoc subgroup 
analyses of placebo-controlled trials of arbaclofen)84 and AFQ056.122 
 
  


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 90 of 121 
 
9.5.3 Other Secondary & Exploratory Outcomes 
 
Safety Endpoints 
The number of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) will be tracked over 
time.  Counts will be statistically compared among the AFQ056 and placebo groups to evaluate 
safety in regards to whether levels are statistically equivalent over time.  This will be looked at 
separately during the main study phase and extended study phase. In order to evaluate safety, 
the following will be assessed. 
 
 
Safety measures including clinically significant laboratory values and adverse events 
tabulated for descriptive comparison between the placebo and active drug groups.  
 
 
Tolerability, defined as the ability to at least continue treatment after the dose has been 
reduced to the lowest allowed dose (12.5 mg) due to side effects. The necessity to discontinue 
treatment after dose reduction to 12.5 mg would be considered lack of tolerability.  
 
Biomarker Exploratory Outcomes: Another key secondary objective of this study is to show 
improvement in specific measures from ERP biomarkers in the combination of the 
AFQ056/language intervention group relative to those in the language intervention/placebo 
group. To address this objective, a number of key secondary biomarker endpoints will be 
obtained: 
 
 
ERP 
o Auditory habituation first 15% versus last 15% for amplitude of pediatric p50/N1 (P1) 
peak occurring at approximately 100 ms post-stimulus 
o Amplitude of auditory response at three components: pediatric p50/N1, N2, and P2 
 
Eye Tracking 
o Percent of looking time to eyes (all conditions) 
o Number of fixations to eyes (all conditions)  
 
The major key secondary biomarker outcome was chosen as auditory habituation on ERP given 
the test is abnormal in FXS, it directly measures cortical activity which is what the drug is 
proposed to change, auditory processing is linked to language functioning, and it has shown 
improvement in a prior trial of minocycline.91  Abnormal enhanced cortical auditory responses 
are seen in the FXS mouse.93 Further, MPEP (mGluR5 NAM) was shown to reduce N1 auditory 
EP amplitudes in a mouse model of autism, suggesting mGluR5 involvement in modulation of 
this response.103 Habituation of N1, P2, N2 component s of auditory ERP has been studied in 
FXS and these components were shown to be significantly enhanced in 16 males with the FXS 
full mutation relative to 20 age-matched controls.92  By focusing on the changes in the N1, P2, 
and N2 components (relative to the common average reference) of subject ERP signals, 
between the first and last 45 stimuli presented, Schneider et al. showed that there was 
abnormal electrocortical habituation to auditory stimuli in patients with FXS, and this improved at 
N1 and P2 in individuals with FXS who were given minocycline treatment compared to a control 
group.91 Data from the ERP recording will also be subjected to analyses of MMN and resting 
state (when obtainable) as an exploratory marker as no data currently exists on these measures 
in FXS. 
 
Eye tracking was chosen as an additional key secondary biomarker outcome because it is 
abnormal in FXS,97,98 it corresponds well to a key phenotype of gaze aversion in FXS, it has strong 
feasibility and test-retest reliability97, it might be expected to improve if language improves, as eye 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 91 of 121 
gaze is often used to initiate communication, and most importantly, it improved in the phase IIb 
placebo-controlled trial of AFQ056 in adolescents and adults125 suggesting it is sensitive to 
treatment with and may provide an index of disease reversal by mGluR5 NAMs. Eye Tracking 
has good feasibility and reproducibility in FXS97 and has been used in several targeted treatment 
trials for older individuals with FXS. 
 
Other Functional, Biomarker and Exploratory Outcomes 
A number of additional secondary and exploratory outcomes will be collected and assessed. 
These objectives include, but are not limited to the following: 
 
(1) Explore whether greater improvement occurs in additional language, cognitive, adaptive, 
and behavioral measures in the combination AFQ056/language intervention group relative 
to the language intervention/placebo group. 
(2) Examine long-term safety and tolerability of AFQ056 in young children with FXS. 
(3) Explore whether improvement can be shown in multiple additional measures from the ERP 
and eye tracking in the combination AFQ056/language intervention group relative to the 
language intervention/placebo group. 
(4) Explore whether normalization of eye tracking/pupillometry biomarkers is correlated with 
improvement in clinical outcome markers including language. 
(5) Explore whether normalization of blood biomarkers of translational pathways regulated by 
FMRP and mGluR5 receptors is associated with language, functional, and/or biomarker 
improvements from AFQ056 treatment. 
(6) Explore whether blood levels of AFQ056 correlate with improvement in language, 
functional, or biomarker measures. 
(7) Explore whether longitudinal analysis shows an improvement in the rate of change of 
language, functional, or biomarker responses with the language intervention alone, and 
further improvement in rate of change when AFQ056 is added to the language 
intervention. 
 
In order to explore these additional objectives, the following outcomes will also be assessed: 
 
Additional Functional Outcomes 
o Weighted Communication 
 
Structured play score 
 
Nonstructured play score 
o Preschool Language Scale – 5th Edition (PLS-5) 
 
Auditory Comprehension Subscore 
 
Total Language Score  
o Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) 
 
Receptive Language Subscore 
 
Visual Reception Subscore 
 
Gross Motor Subscore 
 
Fine Motor Subscore 
o Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale – Version 3 
 
Communication 
 
Daily Living Skills 
 
Socialization 
 
Motor 
o Aberrant Behavior Checklist – Fragile X Validated Version (ABC-FX) 
 
Irritability Subscore 
 
Stereotyped Behavior Subscore 
 
Abnormal Speech Subscore 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 92 of 121 
 
Hyperactivity Subscore 
 
Social Avoidance Subscore 
 
Lethargy Subscore 
o Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of Target Behavior (1, 2, & 3 sum) 
o Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of Language 
o Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) 
 
Language 
o Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) 
 
Overall Function 
 
Language 
 
 
Additional Biomarker Outcomes 
o ERP 
 
Auditory Habituation first 15% versus last 15% for amplitude of each of N2 and P2 
peaks 
 
Resting State – Power in Alpha band, power in Gamma band, and Alpha Reactivity 
Index (Eyes Open vs. Eyes Closed) 
 
Mismatched Negativity Amplitude 
o Pupillometry 
 
Maximum Relative Pupillary Diameter Change after each type of emotional stimulus 
(Calm, Happy, and Fearful) 
o Eye Tracking 
 
Percent Looking Time for each of three Individual types of emotional stimulus (Happy, 
Calm, and Fearful) 
 
Number of Fixations for each of three Individual types of emotional stimulus (Happy, 
Calm, and Fearful)  
 
The Aberrant Behavior Checklist- Community Edition (ABC-C) has been used in virtually all 
prior trials in FXS to assess maladaptive behavior.115 This assessment has been validated in 
populations with intellectual disability and improvements in this scale were used to support FDA 
approval of Risperdal118 and Abilfy119 for management of irritable behavior in ASD. The ABC-C 
was subjected to validation and factor analysis based on over 600 ratings in FXS and found to 
factor into 6 domains instead of 5.89 Since that time the ABC using the FX-specific factor 
analysis (ABC-FX) has been used in FXS trials. The ABC-FX has been sensitive to change in 
post-hoc subgroup analyses of placebo-controlled phase 2 trials of arbaclofen (Berry-Kravis 
2013) and AFQ056 (Jacquemont 2013) and in the ITT group at the highest dose in a phase 3 
trial of arbaclofen.120 
 
Visual Analog Scales (VAS) have been used in multiple clinical trials in FXS to measure parent 
assessment of the level of various problems behaviors or specific functional skills115, and the 
VAS for problem behaviors was sensitive to change in a phase 2 study of arbaclofen in FXS.84 
 
Exploratory biomarker outcomes represent key proteins in the signaling pathways regulated by 
FMRP and thus may normalize with reduction in mGluR5 activity by AFQ056. It is recognized 
that mGluR5 receptors may not regulate signaling cascades similarly in blood cells and brain, 
and this is a major reason these measures are considered exploratory. If there were a 
correlation between one of these markers and clinical response, however, this finding would be 
extremely helpful to the field, since currently no proven pathway-based cellular or molecular 
biomarkers of treatment response exist. Hence this trial has included the most promising of the 
measures that interrogate the mGluR5 pathway being targeted in the trial.  
 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 93 of 121 
9.6 
Statistical Analysis Plan 
 
9.6.1 Primary Hypothesis 
Primary Efficacy Hypothesis: Children treated with AFQ056 will show greater improvement 
in language and its nonverbal communicative precursors as reflected in on change in a 
weighted communication score designed to assess both the proclivity to engage in 
communication and the sophistication of the means employed for communication from 
baseline (visit 3 assessment) to 8 months (visit 9 assessment) than those treated with 
placebo. 
 
The study design is longitudinal involving unequally spaced data collections over the placebo-
controlled phase at 0 (baseline), 2, 4, and 8 months (see Figure 2). Focus is on the difference in 
the rate of change among the placebo (PL) and treatment (TX) groups. To account for the 
model design and potential dropout, linear mixed models (LMMs) will be used for the analysis. 
Suppose that Yij is the outcome (e.g., language score) for the ith participant (i = 1, … , N) at the jth 
time point (j = 1, … , Ti). Assuming linear change over time, the LMM can be written as: 
 
Yij = β0 + β1tij + γ0gi + γ1tijgi + (b0i + b1itij + eij) (1), 
 
where gi = 1 if the participant is in TX and 0 if in PL, tij is time in months, b0i and b1i are random 
effects, eij is random error, and the remaining parameters are fixed effects. We make the typical 
normality and related assumptions for the random effects and random error.99 Due to 
randomization, there is no average intercept difference and we set γ0 = 0. The mean 
longitudinal change is then: for PL is then: 
 
For PL: E(Yij)PL = β0 + β1tij (1a), 
 
For TX, E(Yij)TX = β0 + (β1 + γ1)tij (1b). 
 
The target of inference is γ1 that represents the mean difference in rate of change among the 
groups. For the primary language endpoint, treatment efficacy occurs when γ1 > , because 
language is acquired at a faster rate for TX (cf. Equations 1a and 1b). Therefore, the primary 
null hypothesis for the analysis is: 
 
H0: γ1 = 0. 
 
The LMM is estimated with maximum likelihood, which provides unbiased estimates under an 
ignorable missing data mechanism.100 The likelihood ratio test (LRT) will be used to evaluate H0 
by comparing the full model of Equation 1 with a reduced model that omits γ1 (cf. Equations 1a 
and 1b). There is a one-parameter difference among the models, and the LRT test statistic, χ1
2, 
has an asymptotic chi-squared distribution. Evidence of treatment efficacy is provided when 
χ1
2 > χ1,1ିα
2
, the latter being the upper 1 −α chi-squared quantile, which leads to the rejection of 
H0. An alternative index of efficacy relevant for this proof-of-concept proposal is the difference in 
Akaike's information criterion (AIC) among the models.101 The AIC is an unbiased estimator of 
−2 times the mean expected log likelihood, and the difference in AIC among two models is their 
statistical distance 102. Suppose AIC(full) is the sample AIC for the estimated full model of 
Equation 1, and AIC(reduced) is that of the reduced model that omits γ1. Smaller AIC values 
indicate better statistical fit, so evidence of efficacy is provided when ΔAIC = AIC(reduced) − 
AIC(full) > 0 because the model with γ1 >  has better fit than the model with γ1 = 0. 


 
A F Q 0 5 6 f or L a n g u a g e L e ar ni n g i n C hil dr e n wit h F X S  
V er si o n v 1 5  
V er si o n d at e 0 2/ 0 3/ 2 0 2 1  
P a g e 9 4  of 1 2 1  
 
T h e o p e n l a b el p h a s e of t h e st u d y h a s b ot h gr o u p s r e c ei vi n g tr e at m e nt ( s e e Fi g ur e 2). C h a n g e 
d uri n g t hi s p h a s e will al s o b e a n al y z e d u si n g a s e p ar at e L M M. F o c u s will a g ai n b e o n t h e P L 
a n d T X sl o p e diff er e n c e, b ut t h e i nt er c e pt diff er e n c e will b e n o n -z er o (
 ≠
) d u e t o t h e 
p o s si bilit y of a tr e at m e nt eff e ct i n t h e tr e at m e nt p h a s e (i. e., a n i n e q u alit y at t h e e n d of t h e 
tr e at m e nt p h a s e). T h e gr o u p sl o p e diff er e n c e mi g ht n ot b e st ati sti c all y si g nifi c a nt if t h e P L gr o u p 
c at c h e s u p t o t h e T X gr o u p d uri n g t h e o p e n l e v el p h a s e. T h er ef or e, t h e o p e n l a b el p h a s e 
a n al y si s i s c o n si d er e d e x pl or at or y.  
 
I n t h e pl a c e b o gr o u p, L M M a n al y s e s will b e u s e d t o c o m p ar e tr aj e ct or y of d e v el o p m e nt al 
pr o gr e s s d uri n g t h e 6 m o nt h s o n pl a c e b o al o n e a n d d uri n g t h e 6 m o nt h s r e c ei vi n g t h e l a n g u a g e 
i nt er v e nti o n w hil e o n pl a c e b o. T hi s will g e n er at e i nf or m ati o n a b o ut t h e effi c a c y of t h e l a n g u a g e 
i nt er v e nti o n al o n e. Tr aj e ct or y of d e v el o p m e nt al pr o gr e s s i n t h e s e t w o p eri o d s will b e c o m p ar e d 
wit h tr aj e ct or y i n t h e 8 m o nt h s aft er t h e pl a c e b o gr o u p b e gi n s A F Q 0 5 6 i n t h e o p e n l a b el 
e xt e n si o n.  
 
9. 6. 2  K e y S e c o n d ar y H y p ot h e s e s  
F or t h e k e y s e c o n d ar y h y p ot h e s e s, a hi g h l e v el st ati sti c al a n al y si s pl a n i s d e s cri b e d b el o w.  
F urt h er d et ail s a n d s p e cifi c ati o n s r e g ar di n g t h e a s s e s s m e nt of e a c h h y p ot h e si s will b e pr o vi d e d 
i n a f or m al st ati sti c al a n al y si s pl a n pri or t o d at a l o c k. 
 
F u n cti o n al K e y S e c o n d ar y H y p ot h e s e s : C hil dr e n tr e at e d wit h A F Q 0 5 6 will s h o w gr e at er 
n or m ali z ati o n of s p e cifi c m e a s ur e s of l a n g u a g e a n d o n e or m or e ot h er d o m ai n s 
(i n cl u di n g c o g niti v e, a d a pti v e b e h a vi or, gl o b al f u n cti o ni n g b a s e d o n c h a n g e fr o m 
b a s eli n e ( vi sit 3 a s s e s s m e nt) t o 8 m o nt h s ( vi sit 9 a s s e s s m e nt) t h a n t h o s e tr e at e d wit h 
pl a c e b o.  
 
All of t h e k e y s e c o n d ar y f u n cti o n al o ut c o m e s ar e m e a s ur e d o n s c al e s si mil ar t o t h at of t h e 
w ei g ht e d c o m m u ni c ati o n s c or e pri m ar y o ut c o m e. All k e y s e c o n d ar y f u n cti o n al h y p ot h e s e s 
g e n er all y st at e t h at t h er e will b e gr e at er i m pr o v e m e nt i n l a n g u a g e, c o m m u ni c ati o n, c o g niti v e, 
d e v el o p m e nt al, a n d a d a pti v e f u n cti o ni n g i n t h e A F Q 0 5 6 -tr e at e d gr o u p o v er t h e pl a c e b o gr o u p 
d uri n g a n 8 -m o nt h  p eri o d [ b a s eli n e ( vi sit 3 a s s e s s m e nt) t o 8 m o nt h s ( vi sit 9 a s s e s s m e nt)].  
E a c h s c al e pr o d u c e s a n u m eri c s c or e t h at c a n b e a s s e s s e d i n a m a n n er si mil ar t h at d e s cri b e d 
f or t h e a s s e s s m e nt of t h e pri m ar y e n d p oi nt i n s e cti o n 9. 6. 1. 
 
 
9. 6. 3  E x pl or at or y H y p ot h e s e s  
Bi o m ar k er E x pl or at or y  H y p ot h e s e s : C hil dr e n tr e at e d wit h A F Q 0 5 6 will s h o w gr e at er 
i m pr o v e m e nt of t h e s e s p e cifi c E R P a n d e y e tr a c ki ng m e a s ur e s b a s e d o n c h a n g e fr o m 
b a s eli n e ( vi sit 3 a s s e s s m e nt) t o 8 m o nt h s ( vi sit 9 a s s e s s m e nt) t h a n t h o s e tr e at e d wit h 
pl a c e b o.  
 
F or t h e bi o m ar k er a s s e s s m e nt s, t h e E R P r e q uir e s d at a pr o c e s si n g c e ntr all y b ut e v e nt u all y 
pr o vi d e s a s c or e t h at c a n b e a s s e s s e d i n a m a n n er si mil ar t o t h at d e s cri b e d f or t h e a s s e s s m e nt 
of t h e pri m ar y e n d p oi nt i n s e cti o n 9. 6. 1.  T h e e y e tr a c k er pr o d u c e s t w o i m p ort a nt o ut p ut s 
r el e v a nt t o t h e s e h y p ot h e s e s –  t h e p er c e nt of l o o ki n g ti m e t o e y e s a n d t h e n u m b er of fi x ati o n s 
t o t h e e y e s. W e e x p e ct b ot h t o b e e s s e nti all y c o nti n u o u s v ari a bl e s, a n d f e el c o nfi d e nt t h at t h e y 
c a n al s o b e a s s e s s e d i n a m a n n er si mil ar t o t h at d e s cri b e d i n s e cti o n 9. 6. 1.  
 
A n u m b er of a d diti o n al e x pl or at or y h y p ot h e s e s c a n b e c o n si d er e d u si n g t h e d at a pr o d u c e d fr o m 
t hi s st u d y.  T h e s e will i n cl u d e, b ut ar e n ot li mit e d t o: 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 95 of 121 
 
 
Examine whether the same effects observed for the overall population are also observed for 
the group of males only enrolled into the study. With the anticipated enrollment of about 80 
males and 20 females, power should be sufficient to analyze the male-only group. 
 
 
Examine whether one or more blood biomarkers will be abnormal in FXS, and will normalize 
in children treated with AFQ056 relative to those treated with placebo. 
 
 
Biomarker (ERP, eye tracking/pupillometry, molecular/cellular) responses, if present will be 
evaluated for correlation with responses on clinical measures and with drug levels from PK 
determinations, in order to determine whether biomarkers track with and predict clinical 
and/or pharmacological responses to provide clinical and pharmacological validity data for 
future work. 
 
 
Examine whether blood levels of AFQ056 will correlate with improvement in language, 
functional, and biomarker measures relative to baseline throughout the study. 
 
 
Clinical responses and side effects presumed likely due to AFQ056 will be evaluated for 
correlation with drug levels from PK analyses. 
 
 
Longitudinal analysis to determine whether the rate of change in language, functional, or 
biomarker responses in the group assigned to placebo will be lowest during the first 6 
months of the study (Screening to visit 5/month 2), higher in the next 6 months with the 
language intervention (visit 5/month 2 to visit 9/month 8), and highest in the final 8 months 
with both the language intervention and AFQ056 treatment (visit 9/month 8 to visit 14/month 
16) – with inflection points at visit 5/month 2 when the language intervention is started and 
visit 9/month 8 when AFQ056 is started. 
 
 
Analyses of change from baseline at the 2 month visit (visit 5) will be evaluated for all clinical 
and biomarker outcomes, to determine if effects of drug alone can be identified before the 
language intervention is initiated. Likewise analyses of change from baseline and from the 
final visit before weaning treatment with AFQ056 (16 month visit, visit 14) at the Follow Up 
visit (visit 15) will be evaluated for all clinical and biomarker outcomes, to determine if 
regressive effects of coming off drug are evident. Covariates in the analyses will be 
medication (coded as a factor with a small number of levels), age, and additional variables 
that are shown to be imbalanced through unlucky randomization. 
 
9.7 Safety Analysis 
 
Secondary analyses to examine long-term safety of AFQ056 in this cohort of young children 
with FXS will be done as follows. Frequencies of adverse events occurring throughout the entire 
treatment period (both clinical and laboratory) will be tabulated and compared between the 
active drug and placebo groups during the placebo-controlled period of the study (8 months) 
and compared across the entire study duration divided based on treatment-assignment at the 
time of the AE. Low frequency AEs occurring in less than 5% of the cohort and those that are 
not different between the drug and placebo groups by visual inspection will not be analyzed 
further. Higher frequency events for which statistical comparison would be possible and that 
appear to be occurring at different frequencies between the drug and placebo groups for either 
set of comparator groups will be formally compared statistically using a chi-squared analysis. 
Longitudinal analyses will be done for AEs occurring more frequently in the AFQ056-treated 
group to determine if there is an increase over time of treatment in these AEs. 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 96 of 121 
 
9.8 Sample Size and Accrual 
 
Estimated required sample size was calculated for the primary endpoint of language. Data from 
the observational study of126 was used, and additional estimates of effect size (no raw data) 
were from an unpublished pre-post randomized clinical trial (RCT). Winarni et al.126 extracted 
data from chart reviews for 45 FXS children age 12-50 months. Eleven children were treated 
with sertraline, and the remainder of 34 were not. Variance components of the random effects 
and error were estimated and sample size was computed using analytic formulas for LMMs127. 
Recall that in the LMM of Equation 1, γ1 is the difference of the slopes, and it is defined as the 
proportionate increase of the PL slope, β1, due to the efficacy of TX (if there is any). We write, 
γ1 = πβ1, where π is the effect proportion. For example, if π = 1, Equation 1a shows that the 
TX slope is twice the PL slope, because β1 + γ1 = β1 + (1)β1 = 2β1. The analysis used the 
expressive language and receptive language subscales (age-equivalent scores) of the Mullen 
Scales of Early Learning124. The effect proportion (π) was estimated considering the on-
sertraline group (N = 11) as a proxy for TX, and the off-sertraline group (N = 34) as a proxy for 
PL. The effect proportion was also estimated using slope estimates from unpublished data in a 
RCT of sertraline efficacy.103 The RCT used a pre-post design over 6 months to study the effect 
of sertraline versus placebo with FXS children with enrolled age of 24-72 months. Estimates of 
the effect proportion for the Winarni et al. data were π^ = 1.27,  2.66 for expressive language and 
receptive language respectively, and the estimates from the clinical trial were π^ = 1.43,  1.52. 
For the analysis, power was set to 80%, and Type I error rate (α) was determined as the 
following. Because this is a proof-of-concept (Phase IIa) proposal with a novel design for a 
critical population (children with FXS), the α-level was set to allow for a sensitive detection of 
efficacy, defined as ΔAIC >  (see statistics section above). It can be shown that ΔAIC = χ1
2 −
2, so that using χ1,1ି0.16
2
 as a critical value for the LRT will allow for detection of ΔAIC > . In 
addition to α = 0.16, sample size was calculated with α = 0.10 because this level is often used 
in Phase II studies. Figure 3 shows the function of π and α. A filled circle indicates the required 
N for the smallest effect proportion among the studies, min(π^) = 1.43,  1.27 (expressive, 
receptive). The figure shows that for the combination of the smallest effect proportion (π^ = 1.27) 
and the smallest α, the required single-arm N = 50 (expressive language). We consider this to 
be an upper bound on the required sample size, so that a total of N = 100 (50 in each group) 
should be more than sufficient to detect any magnitude of efficacy (i.e., ΔAIC > ). Because of 
high parental motivation, the dropout rate is anticipated to be very low. However, the α = 0.16 
panel of the figure indicates that with total N = 100, power will still be sufficient to detect ΔAIC >
 with as much as 20% dropout (100 −0.2 × 100 = 80 or 40 in each group for expressive 
language). 
 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 97 of 121 
 
 
Figure 3. Single-arm sample size as a function of effect proportion, type of language measure, 
and Type I error rate. Filled circles indicate N for the smallest effect proportion among studies. 
 
9.9 
Data Monitoring 
 
All aspects of the study will be monitored by qualified individuals designated by the sponsor.  
Monitoring will be conducted according to Good Clinical Practice and applicable government 
regulations.  The investigator agrees to allow monitors access to the clinical supplies, dispensing 
and storage areas, and to the clinical files of the study subjects, and, if requested, agrees to assist 
the monitors. 
 
Safety monitoring will include careful assessment and appropriate reporting of adverse events.  
Medical monitoring will include contemporaneous assessment of serious adverse events. 
 
The monitoring of subject safety and data quality will follow the NINDS Guidelines for Data and 
Safety Monitoring in Clinical Trials.  A Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) appointed by 
the NIH/NINDS will meet at six-month intervals (or as determined by the NINDS) to review partially 
unblinded study data provided by the study statistician.  This committee will monitor rates of 
adverse events and endpoints in the trial and will monitor the performance of the trial. The 
frequency and format of DSMB meetings, reports, and guidelines for interim analysis will be 
agreed upon prior to study subject enrollment. 
 
The Protocol PI will appoint an Independent Medical Monitor (IMM) to review all adverse events, 
in a blinded fashion, on a periodic basis. In addition, the IMM will review all events that meet the 
regulatory definition of a Serious Adverse Event, upon receipt of notification via the Electronic 
Data Capture (EDC) system.    
 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 98 of 121 
An adverse event (AE) is any unfavorable and unintended sign (including a clinically significant 
abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with a 
study, use of a drug product or device whether or not considered related to the drug product or 
device.  FDA, Office of Human Research Protection (OHRP), and NeuroNEXT CIRB requirements 
for reporting AEs will be followed. Subjects will be monitored for AEs from the time they sign 
consent until 30 days following permanent discontinuation of study drug. At that point, all ongoing 
AEs will be followed to resolution, but no new AEs will be recorded. The IMM/DSMB will review 
cumulative AEs; the frequency of this review will be determined by the IMM/DSMB in conjunction 
with the Protocol PI. 
 
Subjects will be monitored for AEs from the time they sign consent until the final Study visit. If an 
AE is ongoing or discovered at a subject’s final Study visit, the AE will be followed until resolution, 
or for a minimum of 30 days, whichever comes first. Resolution means that the subject has 
returned to status at enrollment. If the AE is still ongoing after 30 days, it will be resolved with 
sequelae. All AEs monitored past the final visit can be followed via telephone – a repeat 
Termination/Final Follow-up visit does not need to occur. 
 
All SAEs must be followed until resolution throughout the trial. SAEs that are discovered less the 
60 days prior to the subject’s final Study visit will be followed until resolution or for a minimum of 
60 days, whichever comes first, even if it is past the final visit. If a new SAE is discovered at the 
subject’s final Study visit, it must be followed until resolution, or for a minimum of 60 days, 
whichever comes first. If the SAE is still ongoing after 60 days, it will be resolved with sequelae. 
All SAEs monitored past the final visit can be followed via telephone – a repeat Termination/Final 
Follow-up visit does not need to occur. 
 
Each Clinical Study Site Investigator and research team (co-Investigators, research nurse, 
clinical trial coordinator) are responsible for identifying and reporting AEs and determining the 
relationship of the event to the study drug.  Aggregate reports blinded by treatment group, 
detailed by severity, attribution (expected or unexpected), and relationship to the study drug, will 
be available from the DCC for review by the IMM. A separate report detailing protocol 
compliance will also be available monthly from the DCC for review by the Protocol PI, who will 
provide feedback to individual sites as needed. The Protocol Steering Committee (PSC) will 
advise the Protocol PI as to whether the protocol or informed consent document requires 
revision based on these reports.  
 
10 DATA COLLECTION, SITE MONITORING, AND ADVERSE EXPERIENCE REPORTING 
 
10.1 Data Management 
 
Site personnel will collect, transcribe, correct, and transmit the data onto source documents, 
CRFs, and other forms used to report, track and record clinical research data.  The DCC will 
monitor clinical sites to ensure compliance with data management requirements and Good 
Clinical Practices. The DCC is responsible for developing, testing, and managing clinical data 
management activities, as required, at the study sites, the CCC, and at the DCC. 
 
The general NINDS Common Data Elements (CDE) will be used to construct data collection 
forms. All study data will be collected via systems created in collaboration with the DCC and will 
comply with all applicable guidelines regarding patient confidentiality and data integrity. 
 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 99 of 121 
10.1.1 Registration 
Registration of participants on this protocol will employ an interactive data system in which the 
clinical study site will attest to the participant’s eligibility as per protocol criteria and obtain 
appropriate informed consent. NeuroNEXT CIRB approval for the protocol must be on file at the 
DCC before accrual can occur from the clinical study site. 
 
The DCC will use a system of coded identifiers to protect participant confidentiality.  When the 
participant is registered to participate in the study using the DCC-provided web-based registration, 
the system will assign a participant ID number. The unique ID code will include a site ID, and a 
unique participant ID.  To confirm the correct participant ID, the data entry system will require a 
second entry of the unique participant ID and compare for consistency.  In this fashion, no 
personal identifiers would be accessible to the DCC and the data will be collected on the correctly 
identified subject.  
 
10.1.2 Data Entry 
Data entry will occur at the enrolling clinical study sites. Data quality assurance and analyses will 
be performed by the DCC.  The DCC, located at the University of Iowa, will coordinate all data 
and statistical services for the study, as well as on-site monitoring for all participating clinical study 
sites. 
 
Data collection for this study will be accomplished with online electronic case report forms.  Using 
encrypted communication links, online forms will be developed that contain the requisite data 
fields.   
 
10.2 Role of Data Management 
 
Data Management (DM) is the development, execution and supervision of plans, policies, 
programs, and practices that control, protect, deliver, and enhance the value of data and 
information assets. 
 
All data will be managed in compliance with NeuroNEXT policies, and applicable Sponsor and 
regulatory requirements. The DCC will instruct site personnel to collect, transcribe, correct, and 
transmit the data onto source documents, CRFs, and other forms used to report, track and record 
clinical research data.  The DCC will monitor clinical sites to ensure compliance with data 
management requirements and Good Clinical Practices. The DCC is responsible for developing, 
testing, and managing clinical data management activities, as required, at the clinical study sites 
(CSS), the CCC, and at the DCC. 
 
The DCC is responsible for all aspects of clinical data management, and for properly instructing 
key study personnel (including the CCC, the CSS, and DCC staff) on how to collect, transcribe, 
correct and transmit the data onto CRFs or other data collection forms and logs. 
 
The DCC is responsible for establishing procedures to ensure that clinical data management 
activities occur as required at the CCC, the CSS, and at the DCC. 
 
10.3 Quality Assurance 
 
By signing this protocol, the Sponsor and Investigator agree to be responsible for implementing 
and maintaining quality control and quality assurance systems with written standard operating 
procedures (SOPs) to ensure that studies are conducted and data are generated, documented, 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 100 of 121 
and reported in compliance with the protocol, accepted standards of GCP, and all applicable 
federal, state, and local laws, rules and regulations relating to the conduct of the clinical study. 
 
10.3.1 Development of Monitoring Plan 
Onsite and remote monitoring visits will be conducted by DCC monitors according to a pre-defined 
Monitoring Plan.  The monitoring plan will detail the frequency of on-site visits and remote review 
of source documentation and CRFs, the study data to be monitored, the review of any regulatory 
files, drug and supplies accountability (if applicable), documentation of remote reviews and on-
site visit, and the resolution process for data errors that are discovered during visits and remote 
reviews.   All participating clinical study sites will be monitored at least once after a study initiation 
visit and all sites will have a close-out visit for each protocol.  Two remote reviews are anticipated 
for each clinical study site per year.  All subjects will be monitored for inclusion and exclusion 
criteria, informed consent procedures, and adverse events.  A certain percentage of data is also 
monitored/ source data verified against the data entered into the study database.  The monitoring 
plan will include flexibility to revise the frequency of visits/remote reviews, or data monitored 
depending on clinical study site or study related issues. 
 
10.3.2 Site Monitoring Visits 
On-site monitoring visits will be conducted by DCC monitors according to a pre-defined monitoring 
plan for each protocol.  The goal of on-site monitoring is to analyze (review) the data as it is 
collected, to check the validity and integrity of the data, to verify source documentation, to ensure 
protection of human subjects, and to ensure protocol compliance with federal regulations.  During 
the monitoring visit, the monitor assesses the overall status of the study, staff, and facilities to 
determine whether the study is being conducted per protocol and in compliance with regulatory 
requirements.  The monitor also conducts a CRF review that includes checks of all adverse event 
documentation, verifies the presence of all critical correspondence and records related to 
investigational products and clinical supplies (if applicable), and determines if protocol violations 
have occurred and are documented properly.  After the monitoring visit, the monitor documents 
the results of the monitoring visit and completes a post-visit monitoring letter that conveys any 
issues discovered during the visit and the need for data corrections, if appropriate.  Drug and 
supplies accountability may also be monitored during the site visit.  The DCC will work closely 
with the CCC to monitor and document drug distribution from the manufacturers to the clinical 
study sites (CSS).  Each CSS will be provided with a drug accountability log which will be reviewed 
by the DCC monitors and reconciled with distribution logs.  At the study closeout visit, the monitors 
confirm that appropriate data have been reviewed, source documentation has been verified, and 
all required documents are present in the Study Regulatory File. 
 
10.3.3 Remote Monitoring Visits/Review 
DCC monitors and data managers will also perform remote review of source documentation, 
CRFs and investigational product accountability to achieve the goals described in section 
10.3.2. Remote review involves a range of data management procedures (queries, edit checks, 
review of missing data, etc.), as well as more traditional monitoring procedures conducted 
remotely through the exchange and review of source documentation and CRFs.  DCC monitors 
will request access to source documentation and CRFs through the following methods: 
1. Remote review of electronic medical records 
2. Site upload of source documentation and CRFs to a secure portal 
hosted and managed by the DCC. 
3. Site upload of source documentation and CRFs to a secure portal 
hosted and managed by the site. 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 101 of 121 
DCC monitors will contact site staff as early as possible in the course of a trial to arrange 
remote access to source documentation and CRFs.  Sites are required to comply with DCC 
requests for remote access. 
 
Additionally, the DCC will conduct remote reviews of investigational product accountability and 
storage conditions after an initial on-site visit to each site’s pharmacy.  DCC monitors will 
request accountability records and temperature logs from CSS coordinators or study 
pharmacists in order to complete these remote reviews.   
 
 
10.3.4 Laboratory Data Flow 
Safety Monitoring Labs: The DCC will provide laboratories with online forms and/or electronic 
data exchange mechanisms - depending on their capabilities and needs - to enter, update and 
obtain relevant data. When a blood sample has been obtained, the clinical study site study 
coordinator will send the sample (participant ID, site ID, and protocol ID numbers will be used) to 
the University of Rochester Central Laboratory. The laboratory will electronically communicate 
the test results to the respective clinical study sites in a secure manner.  The laboratory will also 
transfer test results electronically to the DCC. 
 
10.4 Adverse Experience Reporting 
 
The adverse event (AE) definitions and reporting procedures provided in this protocol comply with 
all applicable United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations and International 
Conference on Harmonization (ICH) guidelines.  The Site Investigator will carefully monitor each 
subject throughout the study for possible adverse events.  All AEs will be documented on CRFs 
designed specifically for this purpose.  It is important to report all AEs, especially those that result 
in permanent discontinuation of the investigational product being studied, whether serious or non-
serious. 
 
Subjects will be monitored for AEs from the time they sign consent until the final Study visit. If an 
AE is ongoing or discovered at a subject’s final Study visit, the AE will be followed until resolution, 
or for a minimum of 30 days, whichever comes first. Resolution means that the subject has 
returned to status at enrollment. If the AE is still ongoing after 30 days, it will be resolved with 
sequelae. All AEs monitored past the final visit can be followed via telephone – a repeat 
Termination/Final Follow-up visit does not need to occur. 
 
All SAEs must be followed until resolution throughout the trial. SAEs that are discovered less the 
60 days prior to the subject’s final Study visit will be followed until resolution or for a minimum of 
60 days, whichever comes first, even if it is past the final visit. If a new SAE is discovered at the 
subject’s final Study visit, it must be followed until resolution, or for a minimum of 60 days, 
whichever comes first. If the SAE is still ongoing after 60 days, it will be resolved with sequelae. 
All SAEs monitored past the final visit can be followed via telephone – a repeat Termination/Final 
Follow-up visit does not need to occur. 
 
Each clinical study site’s Principal Investigator and research team are responsible for identifying 
adverse events and reporting them through the DCC Online Adverse Event Reporting System.  
Investigators are also responsible for complying with NeuroNEXT CIRB’s reporting requirements 
for all safety reports.  Copies of each report and documentation of IRB notification and receipt will 
be kept in the investigator’s study file.  
 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 102 of 121 
An adverse event is defined as: “…an unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease 
associated with a participant’s participation in this research trial.” 
 
Serious adverse events include those events that: “result in death; are life-threatening; require 
inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; create persistent or significant 
disability/incapacity, or a congenital anomaly/birth defects.”  
 
Unexpected adverse event is defined as any adverse experience…the specificity or severity of 
which is not consistent with the risks described in the protocol.  
 
Expected adverse events are those that are known to be associated with or have the potential to 
arise as a consequence of participation in the study. 
 
On-line Adverse Event Reporting System  
 
Upon entry of a serious adverse event by a site investigator, the DCC Online Adverse Event 
Reporting System will immediately notify the Independent Medical Monitor (IMM).   
 
 Within 24 hours (of learning of the event), investigators must report any Serious Adverse Event 
(SAE). Investigators should report all other AEs within 5 working days/7 calendar days (of 
learning of the event). 
 
Serious adverse events: The site investigator determines causality (definitely not related, probably 
not related, possibly related, probably related, definitely related) of the adverse event. The IMM 
will review the SAE report.  The IMM may request further information if necessary.  The Online 
Adverse Event Reporting System maintains audit trails and stores data (and data updated) and 
communication related to any adverse event in the study.  The IMM may determine that the 
Serious Adverse Event requires expedited reporting to the FDA.  The DCC will prepare a 
MedWatch safety report for submission to the FDA.  If warranted, the IMM will notify the DSMB 
chair.  The DSMB may suggest changes to the protocol or consent form to the Study Chair as a 
consequence of adverse events.  
 
Non-serious adverse events: Non-serious adverse events that are reported to or observed by the 
investigator or a member of his research team will be submitted to the DCC in a timely fashion 
(within 5 working days). The events will be presented in tabular form and given to the IMM on a 
quarterly basis or as requested. Local site investigators are also required to fulfill all reporting 
requirements of their local institutions. 
 
The DCC will prepare aggregate reports of all adverse events (serious/not serious, 
expected/unexpected and relationship to study drug) for the IMM and the DSMB on a quarterly 
basis or as requested. In addition, all adverse events will be coded using the MedDRA system. A 
separate report detailing protocol compliance will also be available from the DCC for DSMB and/or 
site review monthly or as requested. The research team will then evaluate whether the protocol 
or informed consent document requires revision based on the reports.  
 
10.4.1 Definitions of Adverse Events, Suspected Adverse Drug Reactions & Serious 
Adverse Events 
 
10.4.1.1 Adverse Event and Suspected Adverse Drug Reactions 
An adverse event (AE) is any unfavorable and unintended sign (including a clinically significant 
abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with a 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 103 of 121 
study, use of a drug product or device whether or not considered related to the drug product or 
device.  
 
Adverse drug reactions (ADR) are all noxious and unintended responses to a medicinal product 
related to any dose.  The phrase “responses to a medicinal product” means that a causal 
relationship between a medicinal product and an adverse event is at least a reasonable possibility, 
i.e., the relationship cannot be ruled out.  Therefore, a subset of AEs can be classified as 
suspected ADRs, if there is a causal relationship to the medicinal product. 
Examples of adverse events include: new conditions, worsening of pre-existing conditions, 
clinically significant abnormal physical examination signs (i.e. skin rash, peripheral edema, etc.), 
or clinically significant abnormal test results (i.e. lab values or vital signs), with the exception of 
outcome measure results, which are not being recorded as adverse events in this trial (they are 
being collected, but analyzed separately). Stable chronic conditions (i.e., diabetes, arthritis) that 
are present prior to the start of the study and do not worsen during the trial are NOT considered 
adverse events. Chronic conditions that occur more frequently (for intermittent conditions) or with 
greater severity, would be considered as worsened and therefore would be recorded as adverse 
events. 
 
Adverse events are generally detected in two ways: 
 
 
Clinical  symptoms reported by the subject or signs detected on examination. 
 
Ancillary Tests  abnormalities of vital signs, laboratory tests, and other diagnostic procedures 
(other than the outcome measures: the results of which are not being captured as AEs). 
 
If discernible at the time of completing the AE, a specific disease or syndrome rather than 
individual associated signs and symptoms should be identified by the Site Investigator and 
recorded on the AE CRF.  However, if an observed or reported sign, symptom, or clinically 
significant laboratory anomaly is not considered by the Site Investigator to be a component of a 
specific disease or syndrome, then it should be recorded as a separate AE CRF. Clinically 
significant laboratory abnormalities, such as those that require intervention, are those that are 
identified as such by the Site Investigator. 
 
An unexpected adverse event is any adverse event, the specificity or severity of which is not 
consistent with the current Investigators Brochure or package insert or described in the protocol.  
An unexpected, suspected adverse drug reaction is any unexpected adverse event that, in the 
opinion of the Site Investigator or Sponsor, there is a reasonable possibility that the investigational 
product caused the event. 
 
10.4.1.2 Serious Adverse Events 
A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as an adverse event that meets any of the following 
criteria: 
1. Results in death. 
2. Is life threatening: that is, poses an immediate risk of death as the event occurred. 
a. This serious criterion applies if the study subject, in the view of the Site Investigator or 
Sponsor, is at immediate risk of death from the AE as it occurs.  It does not apply if an 
AE hypothetically might have caused death if it were more severe. 
3. Requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization. 
a. Hospitalization for an elective procedure (including elective PEG tube/g-tube/feeding 
tube placement) or a routinely scheduled treatment is not an SAE by this criterion 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 104 of 121 
because an elective or scheduled “procedure” or a “treatment” is not an untoward 
medical occurrence. 
4. Results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity. 
a. This serious criterion applies if the “disability” caused by the reported AE results in a 
substantial disruption of the subject’s ability to carry out normal life functions. 
5. Results in congenital anomaly or birth defect in the offspring of the subject (whether the 
subject is male or female).   
6. Necessitates medical or surgical intervention to preclude permanent impairment of a body 
function or permanent damage to a body structure. 
7. Important medical events that may not result in death, are not life-threatening, or do not 
require hospitalization may also be considered SAEs when, based upon appropriate medical 
judgment, may jeopardize the subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to 
prevent one of the outcomes listed in this definition.  Examples of such medical events include 
blood dyscrasias or convulsions that do not result in inpatient hospitalization, or the 
development of drug dependency or drug abuse. 
 
An inpatient hospital admission in the absence of a precipitating, treatment-emergent, clinical 
adverse event may meet criteria for "seriousness" but is not an adverse experience, and will 
therefore, not be considered an SAE.  An example of this would include a social admission 
(subject admitted for other reasons than medical, e.g., lives far from the hospital, has no place to 
sleep). 
 
A serious, suspected adverse drug reaction is an SAE that, in the opinion of the Site Investigator 
or Sponsor, suggests a reasonable possibility that the investigational product caused the event. 
 
The Site Investigator is responsible for classifying adverse events as serious or non-serious. 
 
10.4.1.3 Assessment and Recording of Adverse Events 
This study will utilize the CTCAE version 4.0 coding system for adverse event recording.  Adverse 
events reported using CTCAE will be recoded into MedDRA terms by the DCC. 
 
Assessment of Adverse Events 
At each visit (including telephone interviews), the subject will be asked “Have you had any 
problems or symptoms since your last visit?” in order to determine the occurrence of adverse 
events. If the subject reports an adverse event, the Investigator will determine: 
 
1. Type of event 
2. Date of onset and resolution (duration) 
3. Severity (mild, moderate, severe) 
4. Seriousness (does the event meet the above definition for an SAE) 
5. Causality, relation to investigational product and disease 
6. Action taken regarding investigational product 
7. Outcome 
 
Relatedness of Adverse Event to Investigational Product 
The relationship of the AE to the investigational product should be specified by the Site 
Investigator, using the following definitions: 
 
1. Not Related: Concomitant illness, accident or event with no reasonable association with 
treatment. 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 105 of 121 
2. Unlikely: The reaction has little or no temporal sequence from administration of the 
investigational product, and/or a more likely alternative etiology exists. 
3. Possibly Related: The reaction follows a reasonably temporal sequence from administration of 
the investigational product and follows a known response pattern to the suspected 
investigational product; the reaction could have been produced by the investigational product 
or could have been produced by the subject’s clinical state or by other modes of therapy 
administered to the subject. (suspected ADR) 
4. Probably Related: The reaction follows a reasonably temporal sequence from administration 
of investigational product; is confirmed by discontinuation of the investigational product or by 
re-challenge; and cannot be reasonably explained by the known characteristics of the subject’s 
clinical state. (suspected ADR) 
5. Definitely Related: The reaction follows a reasonable temporal sequence from administration 
of investigational product; that follows a known or expected response pattern to the 
investigational product; and that is confirmed by improvement on stopping or reducing the 
dosage of the investigational product, and reappearance of the reaction on repeated exposure. 
(suspected ADR) 
 
Recording of Adverse Events 
All clinical adverse events are recorded in the Adverse Event (AE) case report form (CRF) in the 
subject’s study binder. The site should fill out the AE CRF and enter the AE information into the 
online Adverse Event Reporting System within 5 working days of the site learning of a new AE or 
receiving an update on an existing AE.   
 
Please Note: Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) must be reported to the NeuroNEXT Data 
Coordinating Center within 24 hours of the site learning of the SAE.  
 
Entries on the AE CRF (and into the online Adverse Event Reporting System) will include the 
following: name and severity of the event, the date of onset, the date of resolution, relationship to 
investigational product, action taken, and primary outcome of event. 
 
Subjects will be monitored for AEs from the time they sign consent until the final Study visit. If an 
AE is ongoing or discovered at a subject’s final Study visit, the AE will be followed until resolution, 
or for a minimum of 30 days, whichever comes first. Resolution means that the subject has 
returned to status at enrollment. If the AE is still ongoing after 30 days, it will be resolved with 
sequelae. All AEs monitored past the final visit can be followed via telephone – a repeat 
Termination/Final Follow-up visit does not need to occur. 
 
All SAEs must be followed until resolution throughout the trial. SAEs that are discovered less the 
60 days prior to the subject’s final Study visit will be followed until resolution or for a minimum of 
60 days, whichever comes first, even if it is past the final visit. If a new SAE is discovered at the 
subject’s final Study visit, it must be followed until resolution, or for a minimum of 60 days, 
whichever comes first. If the SAE is still ongoing after 60 days, it will be resolved with sequelae. 
All SAEs monitored past the final visit can be followed via telephone – a repeat Termination/Final 
Follow-up visit does not need to occur. 
 
Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events - Reportable Events 
The following are considered reportable events and must be reported to the NeuroNEXT Data 
Coordinating Center within 24 hours of the site being notified of the event.  
 
 All events that meet the above criteria for Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) 
 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 106 of 121 
All occurrences of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) must be reported within 24 hours of discovery 
of the event.   All other Adverse Events (AEs) must be reported within 5 working days/7 calendar 
days (of discovery of the event). 
 
Additionally, the PPI (Sponsor) shall forward to Novartis any SAEs and reports of Study Drug 
misuse or abuse, including initial and follow up reports, arising from the Study in subjects exposed 
to the Study Drug, as soon as it becomes available, but in any event within fifteen (15) calendar 
days of becoming aware of such information. 
 
The PPI shall forward to Novartis any findings that might alter the current benefit-risk profile of 
the Study Drug or that would be sufficient to consider changes in the Study Drug’s administration 
or in the overall conduct of the Study, as soon as it becomes available, but in any event within 
five (5) calendar days of becoming aware of such information, by transmitting it to Novartis 
 
The PPI shall prepare and issue expedited safety reports for suspected unexpected SAEs 
(“SUSARs”) in the Study in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations, this includes 
preparing and issuing Investigator Notifications (INs) or biannual SUSAR listings, where 
applicable. The PPI shall provide a copy of any PPI-generated INs to Novartis DS&E within fifteen 
(15) calendar days of first notification of the SUSAR or subsequent follow-up information. 
 
For each SAE report, report of Study Drug misuse or abuse and report of drug exposure during 
pregnancy arising from subjects exposed to the Study Drug (both initial and follow-up reports), 
the Sponsor shall forward a MedWatch form completed with full information (as known at the time 
of forwarding). The PPI shall ensure that at a minimum the form contains: 
 
(a) 
Information on the person who contacted PPI (i.e., the initial reporter); 
(b) 
Information about the patient or clinical trial subject; 
(c) 
Details of the suspected Study Drug  
(d) 
Details on the safety events experienced by the subject  
 
Adverse Event Data Management System (AEDAMS) 
Upon entry of a serious adverse event by a clinical site, the DCC Online Adverse Event Reporting 
System will immediately notify the IMM. If warranted, the IMM will notify the DSMB chair.  
 
Serious adverse events: The site investigator determines causality (definitely not related, probably 
not related, possibly related, probably related, definitely related) of the adverse event. The IMM 
will review the SAE report.  The IMM may request further information if necessary.  The DSMB 
may suggest changes to the protocol or consent form to the Project PI as a consequence of 
adverse events. The Online Adverse Event Reporting System maintains audit trails and stores 
data (and data updated) and communication related to any adverse event in the study.  
 
Non-serious adverse events: Non-serious adverse events that are reported to or observed by the 
investigator or a member of his research team will be submitted to the DCC within 5 working days. 
The events will be presented in tabular form and given to the IMM on a monthly basis or as 
requested. Local site investigators are also required to fulfill all reporting requirements of their 
local institutions. 
 
The DCC will prepare aggregate reports of all adverse events (serious/not serious and expected, 
unexpected) for the DSMB.  
 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 107 of 121 
11 HUMAN SUBJECTS 
 
Documented approval from the NeuroNEXT CIRB will be obtained for all participating centers 
prior to clinical trial start, according to ICH GCP, local laws, regulations and organization. When 
necessary, an extension, amendment or renewal of the CIRB approval must be obtained. 
Evidence of training in responsible conduct of research shall be on file for each CSS PI and co-
investigator. 
 
11.1 Institutional Review Board (IRB) Review and Informed Consent 
 
This protocol and the informed consent document and any subsequent modifications will be 
reviewed and approved by the NeuroNEXT CIRB responsible for oversight of the study.  A signed 
consent form, approved by the NeuroNEXT CIRB, will be obtained from the subject.   For subjects 
who cannot provide consent for themselves, such as those below the legal age, a parent, legal 
guardian, or person with power of attorney, must sign the consent form; additionally, the subject's 
assent must also be obtained if he or she is able to understand the nature, significance, and risks 
associated with the study.  The consent form will describe the purpose of the study, the 
procedures to be followed, and the risks and benefits of participation.  A copy of the consent form 
will be given to the subject, parent, or legal guardian, and this fact will be documented in the 
subject’s record. 
 
11.2 Subject Confidentiality 
 
All laboratory specimens, evaluation forms, reports, video recordings, and other records that leave 
the clinical study site will be identified only by the study specific Subject Identification Number 
(SID) to maintain subject confidentiality.  All records will be kept in a locked file cabinet.  All 
computer entry and networking programs will be done using study specific SIDs only.  Clinical 
information will not be released without written permission of the subject, except as necessary for 
monitoring by CIRB, the FDA, the NINDS, the OHRP, the sponsor, or the sponsor’s designee. 
 
11.3 Study Modification/Discontinuation 
 
The study may be modified or discontinued at any time by the CIRB, the NINDS, the sponsor, the 
OHRP, the FDA, or other government agencies as part of their duties to ensure that research 
subjects are protected. 
 
12 PUBLICATION OF RESEARCH FINDINGS 
 
Publication of the results of this trial will be governed by the policies of the NeuroNEXT Network 
and procedures developed by the NeuroNEXT Data Sharing and Publication Committee.  Any 
presentation, abstract, or manuscript will be made available for review by the sponsor and the 
NINDS prior to submission. 
 
13 REFERENCES  
 
1. Willemsen R, Levenga J, Oostra BA. CGG repeat in the FMR1 gene: size matters. Clinical 
genetics. Sep 2011;80(3):214-225. 
2. Hagerman RJ, Berry-Kravis E, Kaufmann WE, et al. Advances in the treatment of fragile X 
syndrome. Pediatrics. 2009;123(1):378-390. 
3. Loesch DZ, Huggins RM, Hagerman RJ. Phenotypic variation and FMRP levels in fragile X. 
Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews. 2004;10(1):31-41. 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 108 of 121 
4. Kidd SA LA, Barbouth D, et al. . Fragile X syndrome: a review of associated medical 
problems. Pediatrics. 2014;134(5):995-1005. 
5. Kaufmann WE, Abrams MT, Chen W, Reiss AL. Genotype, molecular phenotype, and 
cognitive phenotype: Correlations in fragile X syndrome. Am.J.Med.Genet. 1999;83(4):286. 
6. de Vries BB, Wiegers AM, Smits AP, et al. Mental status of females with an FMR1 gene full 
mutation. Am.J.Hum.Genet. May 1996;58(5):1025. 
7. Dykens EM, Hodapp RM, Leckman JF. Strengths and weaknesses in the intellectual 
functioning of males with fragile X syndrome. American Journal of Mental Deficiency. 
1987;92(2):234. 
8. Fisch GS, Carpenter N, Holden JJA, et al. Longitudinal changes in cognitive and adaptive 
behavior in fragile X females: A prospective multicenter analysis. Am.J.Med.Genet. 
1999;83(4):308. 
9. Fisch GS, Simensen R, Tarleton J, et al. Longitudinal study of cognitive abilities and 
adaptive behavior levels in fragile X males: A prospective multicenter analysis. 
Am.J.Med.Genet. 1996;64(2):356. 
10. Klaiman C, Quintin E-M, Jo B, et al. Longitudinal profiles of adaptive behavior in fragile X 
syndrome. Pediatrics. 2014;134(2):315-324. 
11. Wang LW, Berry-Kravis E, Hagerman RJ. Fragile X: leading the way for targeted treatments 
in autism. Neurotherapeutics Jul 2010;7(3):264-274. 
12. Berry- Kravis E, Potanos K. Psychopharmacology in fragile X syndrome—present and 
future. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews. 
2004;10(1):42-48. 
13. Bailey DB, Raspa M, Bishop E, Olmsted M, Mallya UG, Berry-Kravis E. Medication 
utilization for targeted symptoms in children and adults with fragile X syndrome: US survey. 
J Dev Behav Ped. Feb 2012;33(1):62-69. 
14. Brady N, Skinner D, Roberts J, Hennon E. Communication in young children with fragile X 
syndrome: A qualitative study of mothers' perspectives. American Journal of Speech-
Language Pathology. 2006;15(4):353. 
15. Roberts JE, Mirrett P, Anderson K, Burchinal M, Neebe E. Early communication, symbolic 
behavior, and social profiles of young males with fragile X syndrome. American Journal of 
Speech-Language Pathology. 2002;11(3):295-304. 
16. Roberts JE, Mirrett P, Burchinal M. Receptive and expressive communication development 
of young males with fragile X syndrome. Journal Information. 2001;106(3). 
17. Murphy MM, Abbeduto L. Indirect genetic effects and the early language development of 
children with genetic mental retardation syndromes: The role of joint attention. Infants & 
Young Children. 2005;18(1):47-59. 
18. Belser RC, Sudhalter V. Conversational characteristics of children with fragile X syndrome: 
Repetitive speech. J Info. 2001;106(1). 
19. Sudhalter V, Cohen IL, Silverman W, Wolf-Schein EG. Conversational analyses of males 
with fragile X, Down syndrome, and autism: Comparison of the emergence of deviant 
language. American Journal on Mental Retardation. 1990. 
20. Berry-Kravis E, Knox A, Hervey C. Targeted treatments for fragile X syndrome. J Neurodev 
Disord. 2011;3(3):193-210. doi: 110.1007/s11689-11011-19074-11687. Epub 12011 Feb 
11619. 
21. Huber KM, Gallagher SM, Warren ST, Bear MF. Altered synaptic plasticity in a mouse model 
of fragile X mental retardation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the 
United States of America. Jun 28 2002;99(11):7746-7750. 
22. Deng P-Y, Rotman Z, Blundon JA, et al. FMRP regulates neurotransmitter release and 
synaptic information transmission by modulating action potential duration via BK channels. 
Neuron. Mar 20 2013;77(4):696-711. 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 109 of 121 
23. Berry-Kravis E. Mechanism-based treatments in neurodevelopmental disorders: fragile X 
syndrome. Pediatr Neurol. May 2014;50(4):297-302. 
24. Grossman AW, Aldridge GM, Weiler IJ, Greenough WT. Local protein synthesis and spine 
morphogenesis: Fragile X syndrome and beyond. The Journal of neuroscience : the official 
journal of the Society for Neuroscience. Jul 05 2006;26(27):7151-7155. 
25. Bilousova TV, Dansie L, Ngo M, et al. Minocycline promotes dendritic spine maturation and 
improves behavioural performance in the fragile X mouse model. Journal of medical 
genetics. Mar 2009;46(2):94-102. 
26. Henderson C, Wijetunge L, Kinoshita MN, et al. Reversal of disease-related pathologies in 
the fragile X mouse model by selective activation of GABAB receptors with arbaclofen. 
Science Translational Medicine. Sep 19 2012;4(152):152ra128-152ra128. 
27. Yuskaitis CJ, Mines MA, King MK, Sweatt JD, Miller CA, Jope RS. Lithium ameliorates 
altered glycogen synthase kinase-3 and behavior in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome. 
Biochemical pharmacology. Mar 15 2010;79(4):632-646. 
28. McBride SMJ, Choi CH, Wang Y, et al. Pharmacological rescue of synaptic plasticity, 
courtship behavior, and mushroom body defects in a Drosophila model of fragile X 
syndrome. Neuron. Apr 03 2005;45(5):753-764. 
29. Michalon A, Sidorov M, Ballard TM, et al. Chronic pharmacological mGlu5 inhibition corrects 
fragile X in adult mice. Neuron. 2012;74(1):49-56. 
30. Meredith RM, de Jong R, Mansvelder HD. Functional rescue of excitatory synaptic 
transmission in the developing hippocampus in Fmr1-KO mouse. Neurobiology of disease. 
2011;41(1):104-110. 
31. Su T, Fan H-X, Jiang T, et al. Early continuous inhibition of group 1 mGlu signaling partially 
rescues dendritic spine abnormalities in the Fmr1 knockout mouse model for fragile X 
syndrome. Psychopharmacology. 2011;215(2):291-300. 
32. Dolen G, Osterweil E, Rao BS, et al. Correction of fragile X syndrome in mice. Neuron. Dec 
20 2007;56(6):955-962. 
33. Thomas AM, Bui N, Graham D, Perkins JR, Yuva-Paylor LA, Paylor R. Genetic reduction of 
group 1 metabotropic glutamate receptors alters select behaviors in a mouse model for 
fragile X syndrome. Behavioural Brain Research. 2011;223(2):310-321. 
34. de Esch CE, van den Berg WE, Buijsen RA, et al. Fragile X mice have robust mGluR5-
dependent alterations of social behaviour in the Automated Tube Test. Neurobiol Dis. Jan 3 
2015. 
35. Busquets-Garcia A, Gomis-Gonzalez M, Guegan T, et al. Targeting the endocannabinoid 
system in the treatment of fragile X syndrome. Nature medicine. May 2013;19(5):603-607. 
36. Min WW, Yuskaitis CJ, Yan Q, et al. Elevated glycogen synthase kinase-3 activity in Fragile 
X mice: key metabolic regulator with evidence for treatment potential. Neuropharmacology. 
Feb 2009;56(2):463-472. 
37. Wang GX, Smith SJ, Mourrain P. Fmr1 KO and Fenobam Treatment Differentially Impact 
Distinct Synapse Populations of Mouse Neocortex. Neuron. Dec 17 2014;84(6):1273-1286. 
38. Gandhi RM, Kogan CS, Messier C. 2-Methyl-6-(phenylethynyl) pyridine (MPEP) reverses 
maze learning and PSD-95 deficits in Fmr1 knock-out mice. Frontiers in cellular 
neuroscience. 2014;8:70. 
39. Aschrafi A, Cunningham BA, Edelman GM, Vanderklish PW. The fragile X mental 
retardation protein and group I metabotropic glutamate receptors regulate levels of mRNA 
granules in brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of 
America. 2005;102(6):2180-2185. 
40. Gross C, Nakamoto M, Yao X, et al. Excess phosphoinositide 3-kinase subunit synthesis 
and activity as a novel therapeutic target in fragile X syndrome. J Neurosci. Aug 11 
2010;30(32):10624-10638. 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 110 of 121 
41. Osterweil EK, Krueger DD, Reinhold K, Bear MF. Hypersensitivity to mGluR5 and ERK1/2 
leads to excessive protein synthesis in the hippocampus of a mouse model of fragile X 
syndrome. J Neurosci. Nov 17 2010;30(46):15616-15627. 
42. Nakamoto M, Nalavadi V, Epstein MP, Narayanan U, Bassell GJ, Warren ST. Fragile X 
mental retardation protein deficiency leads to excessive mGluR5-dependent internalization 
of AMPA receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Sep 25 2007;104(39):15537-15542. 
43. de Vrij FM, Levenga J, van der Linde HC, et al. Rescue of behavioral phenotype and 
neuronal protrusion morphology in Fmr1 KO mice. Neurobiol Dis. Jul 2008;31(1):127-132. 
44. Levenga J, Hayashi S, de Vrij FM, et al. AFQ056, a new mGluR5 antagonist for treatment of 
fragile X syndrome. Neurobiol Dis. Feb 17 2011. 
45. Pop AS, Levenga J, de Esch CE, et al. Rescue of dendritic spine phenotype in Fmr1 KO 
mice with the mGluR5 antagonist AFQ056/Mavoglurant. Psychopharmacology. 
2014;231(6):1227-1235. 
46. Volk LJ, Daly CA, Huber KM. Differential roles for group 1 mGluR subtypes in induction and 
expression of chemically induced hippocampal long-term depression. J Neurophysiol. Apr 
2006;95(4):2427-2438. 
47. Gibson JR, Bartley AF, Hays SA, Huber KM. Imbalance of neocortical excitation and 
inhibition and altered UP states reflect network hyperexcitability in the mouse model of 
fragile X syndrome. J Neurophysiol. Nov 2008;100(5):2615-2626. 
48. Hays SA, Huber KM, Gibson JR. Altered neocortical rhythmic activity states in Fmr1 KO 
mice are due to enhanced mGluR5 signaling and involve changes in excitatory circuitry. J 
Neurosci. Oct 5 2011;31(40):14223-14234. 
49. Chen T, Lu J-S, Song Q, et al. Pharmacological rescue of cortical synaptic and network 
potentiation in a mouse model for fragile X syndrome. Neuropsychopharmacology. 
2014;39(8):1955-1967. 
50. Michalon A, Bruns A, Risterucci C, et al. Chronic metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 
inhibition corrects local alterations of brain activity and improves cognitive performance in 
fragile X mice. Biological psychiatry. Feb 1 2014;75(3):189-197. 
51. Yan QJ, Rammal M, Tranfaglia M, Bauchwitz RP. Suppression of two major Fragile X 
Syndrome mouse model phenotypes by the mGluR5 antagonist MPEP. 
Neuropharmacology. Dec 2005;49(7):1053-1066. 
52. Chuang S-C, Zhao W, Bauchwitz R, Yan Q, Bianchi R, Wong RK. Prolonged epileptiform 
discharges induced by altered group I metabotropic glutamate receptor-mediated synaptic 
responses in hippocampal slices of a fragile X mouse model. The Journal of neuroscience. 
2005;25(35):8048-8055. 
53. Qiu L-F, Lu T-J, Hu X-L, Yi Y-H, Liao W-P, Xiong Z-Q. Limbic epileptogenesis in a mouse 
model of fragile X syndrome. Cerebral Cortex. 2009;19(7):1504-1514. 
54. Gantois I, Pop AS, de Esch CE, et al. Chronic administration of AFQ056/Mavoglurant 
restores social behaviour in Fmr1 knockout mice. Behav Brain Res. Feb 15 2013;239:72-79. 
55. Vinueza Veloz MF, Buijsen RA, Willemsen R, et al. The effect of an mGluR5 inhibitor on 
procedural memory and avoidance discrimination impairments in Fmr1 KO mice. Genes, 
brain, and behavior. Apr 2012;11(3):325-331. 
56. Franklin AV, King MK, Palomo V, Martinez A, McMahon LL, Jope RS. Glycogen Synthase 
Kinase-3 Inhibitors Reverse Deficits in Long-term Potentiation and Cognition in Fragile X 
Mice. Biological psychiatry. Feb 1 2014;75(3):198-206. 
57. Suvrathan A, Hoeffer CA, Wong H, Klann E, Chattarji S. Characterization and reversal of 
synaptic defects in the amygdala in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome. Proceedings of 
the National Academy of Sciences. June 22, 2010 2010;107(25):11591-11596. 
58. Thomas AM, Bui N, Perkins JR, Yuva-Paylor LA, Paylor R. Group I metabotropic glutamate 
receptor antagonists alter select behaviors in a mouse model for fragile X syndrome. 
Psychopharmacology (Berl). Jan 2012;219(1):47-58. 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 111 of 121 
59. Abbeduto L, Brady N, Kover ST. Language development and fragile X syndrome: Profiles, 
syndrome- specificity, and within- syndrome differences. Mental Retardation and 
Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews. 2007;13(1):36-46. 
60. McDuffie A, Oakes A, Machalicek W, Bullard L, Abbeduto L. Early language intervention 
using distance video telconferencing: A pilot study of young boys with fragile X syndrome 
and their mothers. In Submission. 2015. 
61. Berry-Kravis E, Sumis A, Hervey C, et al. Open-label treatment trial of lithium to target the 
underlying defect in fragile X syndrome. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral 
Pediatrics. Aug 2008;29(4):293-302. 
62. Hoeffer CA, Sanchez E, Hagerman RJ, et al. Altered mTOR signaling and enhanced 
CYFIP2 expression levels in subjects with fragile X syndrome. Genes, Brain and Behavior. 
2012;11(3):332-341. 
63. Gross C, Bassell GJ. Excess Protein Synthesis in FXS Patient Lymphoblastoid Cells Can Be 
Rescued with a p110beta-Selective Inhibitor. Mol Med. 2012;18(1):336-345. 
64. Westmark CJ. The quest for fragile X biomarkers. Molecular and Cellular Pediatrics. 
2014;1(1):1-4. 
65. Dziembowska M, Pretto DI, Janusz A, et al. High MMP- 9 activity levels in fragile X 
syndrome are lowered by minocycline. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A. 
2013;161(8):1897-1903. 
66. Kasari C, Gulsrud AC, Wong C, Kwon S, Locke J. Randomized controlled caregiver 
mediated joint engagement intervention for toddlers with autism. Journal of autism and 
developmental disorders. 2010;40(9):1045-1056. 
67. Lord C, Rutter M, DiLavore PC, Risi S, Gotham K, Bishop SL. Autism diagnostic observation 
schedule: ADOS-2. Western Psychological Services Los Angeles, CA; 2012. 
68. Guy W. Clinical global impression scale. The ECDEU Assessment Manual for 
Psychopharmacology-Revised. Volume DHEW Publ No ADM 76. 1976;338:218-222. 
69. King MK, Jope RS. Lithium treatment alleviates impaired cognition in a mouse model of 
fragile X syndrome. Genes, brain, and behavior. Oct 2013;12(7):723-731. 
70. McCracken JT, McGough J, Shah B, et al. Risperidone in children with autism and serious 
behavioral problems. New England Journal of Medicine. 2002;347(5):314-321. 
71. Posey DJ, Erickson CA, McDougle CJ. Developing drugs for core social and communication 
impairment in autism. Child and adolescent psychiatric clinics of North America. 
2008;17(4):787-801. 
72. Posey DJ, Stigler KA, Erickson CA, McDougle CJ. Antipsychotics in the treatment of autism. 
The Journal of clinical investigation. 2008;118(1):6. 
73. Greenwood CR, Carta JJ, Walker D, Hughes K, Weathers M. Preliminary investigations of 
the application of the Early Communication Indicator (ECI) for infants and toddlers. Journal 
of Early Intervention. 2006;28(3):178-196. 
74. Yoder P, Stone WL, Walden T, Malesa E. Predicting social impairment and ASD diagnosis 
in younger siblings of children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of autism and 
developmental disorders. 2009;39(10):1381-1391. 
75. Carter AS, Messinger DS, Stone WL, Celimli S, Nahmias AS, Yoder P. A randomized 
controlled trial of Hanen’s ‘More Than Words’ in toddlers with early autism symptoms. 
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2011;52(7):741-752. 
76. Mullen EM. Infant Mullen Scales of Early Learning (Infant MSEL). TOTAL Child, 
Incorporated; 1989. 
77. Rogers SJ, Wehner EA, Hagerman R. The behavioral phenotype in fragile X: symptoms of 
autism in very young children with fragile X syndrome, idiopathic autism, and other 
developmental disorders. Journal of developmental & behavioral pediatrics. 2001;22(6):409-
417. 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 112 of 121 
78. Philofsky A, Hepburn SL, Hayes A, Hagerman R, Rogers SJ. Linguistic and Cognitive 
Functioning and Autism Symptoms in Young Children WithFragile X syndrome. Journal 
Information. 2004;109(3). 
79. Garcia-Nonell C, Ratera ER, Harris S, et al. Secondary medical diagnosis in fragile X 
syndrome with and without autism spectrum disorder. Am J Med Genet A. 
2008;146A(15):1911-1916. doi: 1910.1002/ajmg.a.32290. 
80. Zimmerman IL, Steiner VG, Pond RE. Preschool language scale, (PLS-5). Age. 2011. 
81. Fenson L. MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories: user's guide and 
technical manual. Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company; 2007. 
82. Sparrow SS, Balla DA, Cicchetti DV, Harrison PL, Doll EA. Vineland adaptive behavior 
scales. American Guidance Service Circle Pines, MN; 1984. 
83. Intellectual AAo, Disabilities D. Intellectual disability: Definition, classification, and systems 
of supports. AAIDD. 2010. 
84. Berry-Kravis EM, Hessl D, Rathmell B, et al. Effects of STX209 (arbaclofen) on 
neurobehavioral function in children and adults with fragile X syndrome: a randomized, 
controlled, phase 2 trial. Science Translational Medicine. Sep 19 2012;4(152):152ra127-
152ra127. 
85. Aman MG, Burrow WH, Wolford PL. The Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Community: Factor 
validity and effect of subject variables for adults in group homes. American Journal on 
Mental Retardation. 1995. 
86. Owen R, Sikich L, Marcus RN, et al. Aripiprazole in the treatment of irritability in children and 
adolescents with autistic disorder. Pediatrics. 2009;124(6):1533-1540. 
87. Kerr C, Breheny K, Lloyd A, et al. Developing a utility index for the Aberrant Behavior 
Checklist (ABC-C) for fragile X syndrome. Quality of Life Research. 2014:1-10. 
88. Bailey Jr DB, Raspa M, Bishop E, et al. Health and economic consequences of fragile X 
syndrome for caregivers. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics. 
2012;33(9):705-712. 
89. Sansone SM, Widaman KF, Hall SS, et al. Psychometric study of the aberrant behavior 
checklist in fragile X syndrome and implications for targeted treatment. Journal of autism 
and developmental disorders. 2012;42(7):1377-1392. 
90. Kronk R, Bishop EE, Raspa M, Bickel JO, Mandel DA, Bailey Jr DB. Prevalence, nature, and 
correlates of sleep problems among children with fragile X syndrome based on a large scale 
parent survey. Sleep. 2010;33(5):679-687. 
91. Schneider A, Jacena LM, Patrick A, et al. Electrocortical changes associated with 
minocycline treatment in fragile X syndrome. Journal of Psychopharmacology. 
2013:0269881113494105. 
92. Van der Molen M, Van der Molen M, Ridderinkhof K, Hamel B, Curfs L, Ramakers G. 
Auditory change detection in fragile X syndrome males: a brain potential study. Clinical 
Neurophysiology. 2012;123(7):1309-1318. 
93. Rotschafer S, Razak K. Altered auditory processing in a mouse model of fragile X 
syndrome. Brain research. 2013;1506:12-24. 
94. Greenough WT, Klintsova AY, Irwin SA, Galvez R, Bates KE, Weiler IJ. Synaptic regulation 
of protein synthesis and the fragile X protein. Proceedings of the National Academy of 
Sciences. 2001;98(13):7101-7106. 
95. Miller L, McIntosh D, McGrath J, et al. Electrodermal responses to sensory stimuli in 
individuals with fragile X syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 1999;83:268-279. 
96. Luck SJ. An introduction to the event-related potential technique. MIT press; 2014. 
97. Farzin F, Scaggs F, Hervey C, Berry-Kravis E, Hessl D. Reliability of eye tracking and 
pupillometry measures in individuals with fragile X syndrome. Journal of autism and 
developmental disorders. 2011;41(11):1515-1522. 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 113 of 121 
98. Farzin F, Rivera SM, Hessl D. Brief report: Visual processing of faces in individuals with 
fragile X syndrome: An eye tracking study. Journal of autism and developmental disorders. 
2009;39(6):946-952. 
99. Verbeke G, Molenberghs G. Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. Springer Science & 
Business Media; 2009. 
100. 
Little RJ, Rubin DB. Statistical analysis with missing data. John Wiley & Sons; 2014. 
101. 
Akaike H. Information Theory as an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle. 
Paper presented at: Second international symposium on information theory 1973; Budapest, 
Hungary: Akademiai Kiado. 
102. 
Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical 
information-theoretic approach. Springer Science & Business Media; 2002. 
103. 
Gandal MJ, Edgar JC, Ehrlichman RS, Mehta M, Roberts TP, Siegel SJ. Validating γ 
oscillations and delayed auditory responses as translational biomarkers of autism. Biological 
psychiatry. 2010;68(12):1100-1106. 
104. 
Roberts TP, Cannon KM, Tavabi K, et al. Auditory magnetic mismatch field latency: a 
biomarker for language impairment in autism. Biological psychiatry. 2011;70(3):263-269. 
105. 
Harvey B, Siok C, Kiss T, et al. Neurophysiological signals as potential translatable 
biomarkers for modulation of metabotropic glutamate 5 receptors. Neuropharmacology. 
2013;75:19-30. 
106. 
Indah Winarni T, Chonchaiya W, Adams E, et al. Sertraline may improve language 
developmental trajectory in young children with fragile x syndrome: a retrospective chart 
review. Autism research and treatment. 2012;2012. 
107. 
Greiss L, Mundy P, Hagerman R. Effects of Sertraline Treatment for Young Children with 
FXS. Paper presented at: 14th International Fragile X Conference2014; Orange County, CA. 
108. 
Hernandez RN, Feinberg RL, Vaurio R, Passanante NM, Thompson RE, Kaufmann WE. 
Autism spectrum disorder in fragile X syndrome: a longitudinal evaluation. American Journal 
of Medical Genetics Part A. 2009;149(6):1125-1137. 
109. 
Kaufmann WE, Cortell R, Kau ASM, et al. Autism spectrum disorder in fragile X 
syndrome: Communication, social interaction, and specific behaviors. American Journal of 
Medical Genetics Part A. 2004;129A(3):225. 
110. 
Charman T, Drew A, Baird C, Baird G. Measuring early language development in 
preschool children with autism spectrum disorder using the MacArthur Communicative 
Development Inventory (Infant Form). Journal of Child Language. 2003;30(01):213-236. 
111. 
Luyster R, Qiu S, Lopez K, Lord C. Predicting outcomes of children referred for autism 
using the MacArthur–Bates Communicative Development Inventory. Journal of Speech, 
Language, and Hearing Research. 2007;50(3):667-681. 
112. 
Mervis CB, Robinson BF. Expressive vocabulary ability of toddlers with Williams 
syndrome or Down syndrome: A comparison. Developmental Neuropsychology. 
2000;17(1):111-126. 
113. 
Miller JF, Sedey AL, Miolo G. Validity of parent report measures of vocabulary 
development for children with Down syndrome. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing 
Research. 1995;38(5):1037-1044. 
114. 
Berry-Kravis E, Krause SE, Block SS, et al. Effect of CX516, an AMPA-Modulating 
Compound, on Cognition and Behavior in Fragile X Syndrome: AControlled Trial. Journal of 
Child & Adolescent Psychopharmacology. 2006;16(5):525-540. 
115. 
Gross C, Hoffmann A, Bassell GJ, Berry-Kravis EM. Therapeutic Strategies in Fragile X 
Syndrome: From Bench to Bedside and Back. Neurotherapeutics. 2015:1-25. 
116. 
Berry-Kravis E, Hessl D, Abbeduto L, et al. Outcome measures for clinical trials in fragile 
X syndrome. J Dev Behav Pediatr. Sep 2013;34(7):508-522. 
117. 
Alcobra Announces Results From Phase 2 Clinical Trial of MDX for Fragile X Syndrome  
[press release]. http://globenewswire.com/news-


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 114 of 121 
release/2015/06/24/747043/10139541/en/Alcobra-Announces-Results-From-Phase-2-
Clinical-Trial-of-MDX-for-Fragile-X-Syndrome.html: Globe Newswire2015. 
118. 
Aman MG, De Smedt G, Derivan A, Lyons B, Findling RL, Group RDBS. Double-blind, 
placebo-controlled study of risperidone for the treatment of disruptive behaviors in children 
with subaverage intelligence. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2002. 
119. 
Marcus RN, Owen R, Kamen L, et al. A placebo-controlled, fixed-dose study of 
aripiprazole in children and adolescents with irritability associated with autistic disorder. 
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 2009;48(11):1110-
1119. 
120. 
Berry-Kravis E, Visootsak J, Hagerman R, et al. Arbaclofen in Fragile X Syndrome: 
results of phase 3 trials. Annals of Neurology. 2014;76:174. 
121. 
Leigh MJS, Nguyen DV, Mu Y, et al. A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial 
of minocycline in children and adolescents with fragile x syndrome. Journal of 
developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP. May 2013;34(3):147-155. 
122. 
Jacquemont S, Berry-Kravis E, Hagerman R, et al. The challenges of clinical trials in 
fragile X syndrome. Psychopharmacology. 2014;231(6):1237-1250. 
123. 
Compton SN, Walkup JT, Albano AM, et al. Child/adolescent anxiety multimodal study 
(CAMS): Rationale, design, and methods. Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental 
health. 2010;4(1):1. 
124. 
Mullen EM. Mullen scales of early learning. AGS Circle Pines, MN; 1995. 
125. 
Berry-Kravis E, Sansone S, Crestodina C, McLennan Y, Chin J, Joshi R, Schneider A, 
Leigh MJ, Hagerman R, Hessl D. Sensitivity of the KiTAP executive function battery and an 
eye tracking paradigm to effects of AFQ056 in fragile X syndrome. Ann Neurol 2016; 
80:S413. 
126. 
Winarni T, Chonchaiya W, Adams E, et al. Sertraline may improve language 
developmental trajectory in young children with fragile x syndrome: a retrospective chart 
review. Autism research and treatment. 2012; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3420618. 
127. 
Yi Q, Panzarella T. Estimating sample size for tests on trends across repeated 
measurements with missing data based on the interaction term in a mixed model. Control. 
Clin. Trials. Oct 2002;23(5):481-496. PubMed PMID: 12392862. 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v0.1 
Version date 03/25/2015 
Page 115 of 121 
Appendix A:  PET Study Data with AFQ056 
 
 
Excerpts from CSR from CAFQ056A2104 (PET Study with AFQ056) 
Estimation of regional brain mGluR5 receptor occupancy following single oral doses of 
the mGluR5 antagonist AFQ056 with positron emission tomography (PET) of [11C]-
ABP688 in healthy volunteers 
 
Treatments administered: AFQ056 
Subjects were assigned to 1 of 2 cohorts and received 2 single doses (separated by 1 week) of 
oral AFQ056 as follows: 
Cohort 1: 25 mg AFQ056 in Period 2 and 200 mg AFQ056 in Period 3 
Cohort 2: 100 mg AFQ056 in Period 2 and 400 mg AFQ056 in Period 3 
Demographic data for participants Is shown in Table 1. 
 
 
[11C]-ABP688 and [15O]-water 
In each of the 3 treatment periods, subjects received a slow bolus i.v. injection with 200 MBq 
(207±28.6 MBq, mean ±SD) [11C]-ABP688 starting at 3h after AFQ056 administration. Before 
each PET scan with [11C]-ABP688, subjects received a slow bolus i.v. injection with 500 MBq 
(0.62 mSv) of [15O]-water in order to measure the cerebral blood flow in each treatment period. 
 
Identity of investigational product(s): AFQ056 
The investigational drug AFQ056 was prepared by Novartis. The study drug for the subjects and 
an equal number of replacement subjects was packaged, labeled and supplied to the 
investigator by Novartis Drug Supply Management as open labeled bulk medication. The 
dosage form for the early clinical studies is a dry powder in hard gelatin capsules intended for 
oral administration. Dosage strengths available in this clinical study were 5, 10, 25, 100 mg. The 
drug product is packed in high density polyethylene bottles with induction seal. The 
investigational products used in the study were the following. Doses consisted of a single oral 
dose of the following: 25 mg AFQ056 1 x AFQ056 25 mg capsule, 100 mg AFQ056: 1 x 
AFQ056 100 mg capsule, 200 mg AFQ056 2 x AFQ056 100 mg capsules, 400 mg AFQ056: 4 x 
AFQ056 100 mg capsules 
 
PET Study Data 
Table 2 shows pharmacokinetic parameters after administration of the AFQ056 at the doses 
used on this study. 
 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 116 of 121 
 
 
Analysis of receptor occupancy as a function of exposure 
Two cohorts of three subjects were examined for each of the 4 AFQ056 doses (25/200 and 
100/400 mg). This included all examined brain regions. Table 3 summarizes obtained specific 
distribution volume (BPP). An estimate of the binding potential relative to the non-displaceable 
compartment (BPND) at baseline has also been given. This is calculated from the estimated 
rate constant parameters k3/k4 per region at baseline described in (Innis 2007) 
 
 
 
The distribution volumes (BPP) agree very well with previously published data using ABP688 
(Ametamey et al, 2007) across regions. The highest distribution volume was observed in the 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 117 of 121 
anterior cingulate region. White matter (myelinated axonal sheets which are likely devoid of 
mGluR5 receptors and sheathed from drug absorption) and cerebellum show a low uptake also 
in agreement with the previously published data. Fitting an Emax model to the cerebellum and 
white matter data also resulted in a poor fit to data and outlying low Emax estimates (35% and 
27%) vs. other regions (estimates ranging from 56% to 72%). For these reasons, these regions 
are not shown in Table 4 and were not used in the analysis of pooled cortical areas. The 
displacement measured was regressed on doses and on plasma concentrations between 3 and 
4 hours after drug intake (time of the PET scan). The Saturation Binding Model was used to 
estimate: 
- ED50 and Emax based on the dose 
- EC50 and Emax based on plasma concentrations 
for each individual region of the brain, and also for the pooled displacement across all regions 
(except cerebellum and white matter) (Table 4 and Table 5). 
 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 118 of 121 
 
 
The pooled displacement values (summing across all regions except cerebellum and white 
matter) are plotted versus doses and plasma concentrations in Figure 1 and Figure 2.  
 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 119 of 121 
 
Then assuming that Emax corresponds to a mGluR5 receptor occupancy of 100% and that 
therefore the observed EC50 is the same for receptor occupancy, the prediction curve of the RO 
was plotted versus the dose and the mean of concentration between 3 and 4 hours (Figure 3 
and Figure 4). Predicted RO at 3-4 hours post-dose was also summarized per dose in Table 5. 
The EC50 of striatum (caudate and putamen) does not differ from other regions of the cerebral 
cortex. Emax was also observed to be similar across cortical regions and striatum. An Emax 
was observed in cerebellum and white matter, suggesting specific binding in those areas. It is 
also possible that spill-over from neighboring regions with specific uptake could result in an 
apparent observed RO in those two regions, especially in white matter. 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 120 of 121 
 
Conclusions 
AFQ056 penetrates the brain and induces dose/exposure dependent displacement of [11C]-
ABP688 from the mGluR5 receptors in humans in vivo. The observed EC50 (KD) for AFQ056 at 
the mGluR5 receptor was 43 (+/- 20) ng/mL. The single oral dose of 400 mg induced an 
estimated displacement of 63% at scan time of 3-4 hours post-dose, inferring a receptor 
occupancy estimate of 85%. 


 
AFQ056 for Language Learning in Children with FXS 
Version v15 
Version date 02/03/2021 
Page 121 of 121 
Appendix B:  Prohibited Medications 
 
 
Concomitant medications that are strong/moderate inhibitors or inducers of CYP1A1/2, 
CYP2C9/19 or CYP3A4 such as: 
• Amiodarone 
• Amprenavir 
• Aprepitant 
• Atazanavir 
• Barbiturates (e.g. primidone) 
• Carbamazepine 
• Clarithromycin 
• Cimetidine, 
• Ciprofloxaxin 
• Digoxin 
• Diltiazem 
• Erythromycin 
• Fluconazole 
• Fluoroquinolones 
• Fluvoxamine 
• Fosamprenavir 
• Gemfibrozil 
• Gestodene 
• Glucocorticoids (except for topical or inhalation use) 
• Indinavir 
• Itraconazole 
• Ketoconazole 
• Metoclopramide 
• Mibefradil 
• Nefazodone 
• Nelfinavir 
• Nicotine 
• Phenytoin 
• Rifabutin 
• Rifampin 
• Rifapentin 
• Ritonavir 
• Saquinavir 
• St. John’s Wort 
• sulphaphenazole 
• Telithromycin 
• Trimethoprime, 
• Thioridazine 
• Verapamil 
• Warfarin 
 
...are prohibited during this study.