Please read the following table in HTML format from a webpage and then answer the question in detail according to the table. Each table cell is defined by a <td> and a </td> tag. Each table row starts with a <tr> and ends with a </tr> tag. 'rowspan=m' and 'colspan=n' represents a cell spaning over 'm' rows and 'n' columns.

Webpage title:
International Botanical Congress
Table title:
History
Table:
<table id='hittask' contenteditable='False'>
<tr> <th colspan=1 rowspan=1 >  </th><th colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Year </th><th colspan=1 rowspan=1 > City </th><th colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Country </th><th colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Code </th><th colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Major actions concerning nomenclature </th></tr>
<tr> <td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > I </td><td class="highlighted"  colspan=1 rowspan=1 > 1900 </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Paris </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > France </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 >  </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Decisions on nomenclature deferred. </td></tr>
<tr> <td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > II </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > 1905 </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Vienna </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Austria </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Yes </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > First binding Rules of Nomenclature; French became the official language of the meeting; requirement for Latin plant descriptions from 1908 onwards (not enforced); end of the Kew Rule. </td></tr>
<tr> <td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > III </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > 1910 </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Brussels </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Belgium </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Yes </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Separate starting dates for nomenclature of fungi established. </td></tr>
<tr> <td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > IV </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > 1926 </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Ithaca </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > United States </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 >  </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Decisions on nomenclature deferred. </td></tr>
<tr> <td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > V </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > 1930 </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Cambridge </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > United Kingdom </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Yes </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > The type method incorporated; Latin requirement deferred until 1932; "absolute homonym rule" accepted, or "once a later homonym always illegitimate (unless conserved)", which altered the status of many names, including many that had previously been conserved. </td></tr>
<tr> <td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > VI </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > 1935 </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Amsterdam </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Netherlands </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 >  </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > English became the official language of the Congress, replacing French. No formal Code was published. </td></tr>
<tr> <td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > VII </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > 1950 </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Stockholm </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Sweden </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Yes </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Adoption of the first International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants; arbitrary dates defined for some foundational works; decision to hold future congresses every five years (except four years for the next one). </td></tr>
<tr> <td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > VIII </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > 1954 </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Paris </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > France </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Yes </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Two additional principles added, II and III, dealing with types and with priority. Proposals to conserve or reject specific names were rejected, but a committee was established to find ways to improve the stability of names. </td></tr>
<tr> <td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > IX </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > 1959 </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Montreal </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Canada </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Yes </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Presentation of a completely reworked list of conserved and rejected names necessitated by changes made at the 1930 congress, but the list for species was not accepted. </td></tr>
<tr> <td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > X </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > 1964 </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Edinburgh </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > United Kingdom </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Yes </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > No major changes to the code. </td></tr>
<tr> <td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > XI </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > 1969 </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Seattle </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > United States </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Yes </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Established the International Association of Bryologists. </td></tr>
<tr> <td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > XII </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > 1975 </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Leningrad </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Soviet Union </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Yes </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Official versions of the code in English, French, and German (the English version to take precedence in case of discrepancy); rejection of species names allowed in a few special cases; organ-genera for fossil plants are eliminated, replaced by form-genera. </td></tr>
<tr> <td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > XIII </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > 1981 </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Sydney </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Australia </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Yes </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Official versions of the code in English, French, and German (the English version to take precedence in case of discrepancy); conservation procedure (and rejection) extended to species names "of major economic importance"; fungi starting date restored to 1753 with sanctioned name status established; the types of genera and higher categories become the types of species (i.e., the taxa themselves are no longer types, only specimens or illustrations). </td></tr>
<tr> <td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > XIV </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > 1987 </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Berlin </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Germany </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Yes </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Official version of the code only in (British) English; later translations in French, German, and Japanese; conservation extended to species names that represent the type of a conserved generic name. </td></tr>
<tr> <td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > XV </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > 1993 </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Tokyo </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Japan </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Yes </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Moves towards registration of plant names; extensive re-arrangement of the nomenclature code; official version of the code only in (British) English; later translations in Chinese, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Russian, and Slovak; conservation extended to all species names; rejection permitted for any name that would cause a disadvantageous nomenclatural change; epitype concept introduced. </td></tr>
<tr> <td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > XVI </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > 1999 </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > St. Louis </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > United States </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Yes </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Refinement of type requirements; illustrations as types mostly forbidden from 1958; morphotaxa for fossils. Proposals defeated included the BioCode and registration of plant names. </td></tr>
<tr> <td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > XVII </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > 2005 </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Vienna </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Austria </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Yes </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Morphotaxa and regular taxa for fossils; illustrations as types mostly forbidden from 2007; glossary added to the code of nomenclature. </td></tr>
<tr> <td class="highlighted"  colspan=1 rowspan=1 > XVIII </td><td class="highlighted"  colspan=1 rowspan=1 > 2011 </td><td class="highlighted"  colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Melbourne </td><td class="highlighted"  colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Australia </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Yes </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Electronic publication permitted; registration of fungal names; English or Latin descriptions (or diagnoses) from 2012; the concepts of anamorph and teleomorph (for fungi) and morphotaxa (for fossils) eliminated. </td></tr>
<tr> <td class="highlighted"  colspan=1 rowspan=1 > XIX </td><td class="highlighted"  colspan=1 rowspan=1 > 2017 </td><td class="highlighted"  colspan=1 rowspan=1 > Shenzhen </td><td class="highlighted"  colspan=1 rowspan=1 > China </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 >  </td><td colspan=1 rowspan=1 >  </td></tr>
</table>
Question:
When and where were the first and two most recent International Botanical Congresses held?
Answer:
The numbering system for the International Botanical Congress starts from the year 1900 with a congress in Paris; the XVIII IBC was held in Melbourne, Australia in 2011 and the XIX IBC was held in Shenzhen, China in 2017.