Give you a statement and table with its title in Markdown format, please determine whether the statement is supported or refuted by, or is unrelated to the table. It'a binary classification problem, you should choose the answer between supported and refuted. Table cells in one row are seperated by '|', and different rows are seperated by '
'.

Table:
| tournament | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | career wr | career win - loss |
| australian open | a | a | a | a | a | 1r | 1r | 2r | 1r | 2r | 1r | 1r | a | a | a | 0 / 7 | 2 - 7 |
| french open | a | a | a | a | 3r | 1r | 2r | 3r | 1r | 3r | 2r | 1r | a | 1r | lq | 0 / 9 | 8 - 9 |
| wimbledon | a | a | a | a | a | 1r | 1r | 3r | 1r | 1r | 1r | a | a | 1r | lq | 0 / 7 | 2 - 7 |
| us open | a | a | a | a | 1r | a | 1r | 1r | 3r | 1r | 1r | a | a | a | a | 0 / 6 | 2 - 6 |
| grand slam win ratio | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 2 | 0 / 3 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 2 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 2 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 29 | n / a |
| grand slam win - loss | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | 2 - 2 | 0 - 3 | 1 - 4 | 5 - 4 | 2 - 4 | 3 - 4 | 1 - 4 | 0 - 2 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 2 | 0 - 0 | n / a | 14 - 29 |
| indian wells | a | a | a | a | a | 1r | a | a | a | 1r | a | a | a | a | a | 0 / 2 | 0 - 2 |
| miami | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | 1r | 3r | a | a | a | a | a | 0 / 2 | 1 - 2 |
| monte carlo | a | a | 2r | a | a | 1r | a | 1r | 2r | 1r | 2r | 1r | a | a | 1r | 0 / 8 | 3 - 8 |
| rome | a | a | a | a | 2r | 1r | 1r | 1r | 2r | 1r | 1r | a | a | a | a | 0 / 7 | 2 - 7 |
| hamburg | a | a | a | a | a | 1r | a | a | w | 1r | a | 2r | a | a | a | 1 / 4 | 7 - 3 |
| canada | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | 1r | a | a | a | a | a | a | 0 / 1 | 0 - 1 |
| cincinnati | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | 1r | a | a | a | a | a | a | 0 / 1 | 0 - 1 |
| stuttgart / madrid | a | a | a | a | 1r | a | a | a | 1r | a | a | a | a | a | a | 0 / 2 | 0 - 2 |
| paris | a | a | a | a | 1r | a | a | a | 2r | a | a | a | a | a | a | 0 / 2 | 1 - 2 |
| atp world tour finals | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | 0 / 0 | 0 - 0 |
| atp tournaments played | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 24 | 18 | 23 | 29 | 23 | 20 | 16 | 6 | 12 | 3 | n / a | 199 |
| atp finals reached | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | n / a | 4 |
| atp tournaments won | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | n / a | 1 |
| year end ranking | 392 | 269 | 119 | 182 | 35 | 84 | 90 | 51 | 20 | 88 | 85 | 175 | 119 | 140 | 338 | n / a | n / a |
Title:
albert portas
Statement:
in 2000 , the results for indian wells , miami , hamburg , canada , cincinnati , and the atp world tour finals were all a , and the results for the australia open were 2r
Answer:
supported