Give you a statement and table with its title in Markdown format, please determine whether the statement is supported or refuted by, or is unrelated to the table. It'a binary classification problem, you should choose the answer between supported and refuted. Table cells in one row are seperated by '|', and different rows are seperated by '
'.

Table:
| date | name | developer | clock | process | cores per die / dies per module |
| 2000 | athlon xp | amd | 1.33 - 1.73 ghz | 180nm | 1 / 1 |
| 2000 | duron | amd | 550 mhz - 1.3 ghz | 180nm | 1 / 1 |
| 2000 | rs64 - iv | ibm | 600 mhz - 750 mhz | 180nm | 1 / 2 |
| 2000 | pentium 4 | intel | 1.3 - 2 ghz | 180 - 130nm | 1 / 1 |
| 2000 | sparc64 iv | fujitsu | 450 - 810 mhz | 130nm | 1 / 1 |
| 2000 | z900 | ibm | 918 mhz | 180nm | 1 / 12 , 20 |
| 2001 | mips r14000 | sgi | 500 - 600 mhz | 130nm | 1 / 1 |
| 2001 | power4 | ibm | 1.1 - 1.4 ghz | 180 - 130nm | 2 / 1 , 4 |
| 2001 | ultrasparc iii | sun | 750 - 1200 mhz | 130nm | 1 / 1 |
| 2001 | itanium | intel | 733 - 800 mhz | 180nm | 1 / 1 |
| 2001 | powerpc 7450 | motorola | 733 - 800 mhz | 180 - 130nm | 1 / 1 |
| 2002 | sparc64 v | fujitsu | 1.1 - 1.35 ghz | 130nm | 1 / 1 |
| 2002 | itanium 2 | intel | 0.9 - 1 ghz | 180nm | 1 / 1 |
| 2003 | powerpc 970 | ibm | 1.6 - 2.0 ghz | 130 - 90nm | 1 / 1 |
| 2003 | pentium m | intel | 0.9 - 1.7 ghz | 130 - 90nm | 1 / 1 |
| 2003 | opteron | amd | 1.4 - 2.4 ghz | 130nm | 1 / 1 |
| 2004 | power5 | ibm | 1.65 - 1.9 ghz | 130 - 90nm | 2 / 1 , 2 , 4 |
| 2004 | powerpc bgl | ibm | 700 mhz | 130nm | 2 / 1 |
| 2005 | opteron athens | amd | 1.6 - 3.0 ghz | 90nm | 1 / 1 |
| 2005 | pentium d | intel | 2.8 - 3.2 ghz | 90nm | 1 / 2 |
| 2005 | athlon 64 x2 | amd | 2 - 2.4 ghz | 90nm | 2 / 1 |
| 2005 | powerpc 970 mp | ibm | 1.2 - 2.5 ghz | 90nm | 2 / 1 |
| 2005 | ultrasparc iv | sun | 1.05 - 1.35 ghz | 130nm | 2 / 1 |
| 2005 | ultrasparc t1 | sun | 1 - 1.4 ghz | 90nm | 8 / 1 |
| 2005 | xenon | ibm | 3.2 ghz | 90 - 45nm | 3 / 1 |
| 2006 | core duo | intel | 1.1 - 2.33 ghz | 90 - 65nm | 2 / 1 |
| 2006 | core 2 | intel | 1.06 - 2.67 ghz | 65 - 45nm | 2 / 1 , 2 |
| 2006 | cell / be | ibm , sony , toshiba | 3.2 - 4.6 ghz | 90 - 45nm | 1 + 8 / 1 |
| 2006 | itanium montecito | intel | 1.4 - 1.6 ghz | 90nm | 2 / 1 |
| 2007 | power6 | ibm | 3.5 - 4.7 ghz | 65nm | 2 / 1 |
| 2007 | sparc64 vi | fujitsu | 2.15 - 2.4 ghz | 90nm | 2 / 1 |
| 2007 | ultrasparc t2 | sun | 1 - 1.4 ghz | 65nm | 8 / 1 |
| 2007 | tile64 | tilera | 600 - 900 mhz | 90 - 45nm | 64 / 1 |
| 2007 | opteron barcelona | amd | 1.8 - 3.2 ghz | 65nm | 4 / 1 |
| 2007 | powerpc bgp | ibm | 850 mhz | 90nm | 4 / 1 |
| 2008 | phenom | amd | 1.8 - 2.6 ghz | 65nm | 2 , 3 , 4 / 1 |
| 2008 | z10 | ibm | 4.4 ghz | 65nm | 4 / 7 |
| 2008 | powerxcell 8i | ibm | 2.8 - 4.0 ghz | 65nm | 1 + 8 / 1 |
| 2008 | sparc64 vii | fujitsu | 2.4 - 2.88 ghz | 65nm | 4 / 1 |
| 2008 | atom | intel | 0.8 - 1.6 ghz | 65 - 45nm | 1 / 1 |
| 2008 | core i7 | intel | 2.66 - 3.2 ghz | 45 - 32nm | 2 , 4 , 6 / 1 |
| 2008 | tilepro64 | tilera | 600 - 866 mhz | 90 - 45nm | 64 / 1 |
| 2008 | opteron shanghai | amd | 2.3 - 2.9 ghz | 45nm | 4 / 1 |
| 2009 | phenom ii | amd | 2.5 - 3.2 ghz | 45nm | 2 , 3 , 4 , 6 / 1 |
| 2009 | opteron istanbul | amd | 2.2 - 2.8 ghz | 45nm | 6 / 1 |
Title:
microprocessor chronology
Statement:
in 2008 , intel 's atom had a clock of 0.8 - 1.6 ghz
Answer:
supported