Give you a statement and table with its title in Markdown format, please determine whether the statement is supported or refuted by, or is unrelated to the table. It'a binary classification problem, you should choose the answer between supported and refuted. Table cells in one row are seperated by '|', and different rows are seperated by '
'.

Table:
| sec | offence | definition , example or notes | civilian | summary hearing | max sentence at court martial |
| 8 | desertion | being absent without leave to avoid active service | no | no | life imprisonment |
| 19 | conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline | eg , wearing a rank he is not entitled to | no | yes | two years' imprisonment |
| 25 | misapplying or wasting public or service property | eg allowing fuel to overflow a tank | no | yes | dismissal with disgrace |
| 31 | hazarding a ship | negligently hazarding a military ship | no | no | two years' imprisonment |
| 35 | annoyance by flying | flying an aircraft so as to annoy any person | no | yes | dismissal with disgrace |
Title:
offences against military law in the united kingdom
Statement:
the offence of annoyance by flying , which consists of flying an aircraft to annoy a person , is entitled to a summary hearing
Answer:
supported