Give you a statement and table with its title in Markdown format, please determine whether the statement is supported or refuted by, or is unrelated to the table. It'a binary classification problem, you should choose the answer between supported and refuted. Table cells in one row are seperated by '|', and different rows are seperated by '
'.

Table:
| date (ddmmyyyy) | tail number | location | fatalities | brief description |
| 19.02.1973 | cccp - 85023 | prague | 66 / 100 | landed 470 m short of the runway |
| 03.1973 | nd | near kiev | 0 / nd | crashed |
| 07.05.1973 | cccp - 85030 | vnukovo | 0 / 6 | crashed during training flight |
| 10.07.1974 | su - axb | cairo | 6 / 6 | crashed during training flight |
| 01.06.1976 | cccp - 85102 | malabo | 46 / 46 | crashed into a mountain on final approach |
| 1976 | cccp - 85020 | kiev | 0 / nd | rough landing , written off now in museum |
| 23.03.1978 | lz - btb | near damascus | 4 / 4 | crashed on final approach |
| 18.02.1978 | cccp - 85087 | novosibirsk | 0 / nd | fire onboard |
| 01.03.1980 | cccp - 85103 | orenburg | 0 / 161 | rough landing |
| 07.07.1980 | cccp - 85355 | alma - ata | 164 / 164 | crashed at take - off |
| 07.08.1980 | yr - tph | mauritania | 1 / 168 | ditched 300 m short of runway |
| 08.10.1980 | cccp - 85321 | chita | 0 / nd | rough landing |
| 13.06.1981 | cccp - 85029 | bratsk | 0 / nd | overran on landing , fuselage broke into two |
| 21.10.1981 | ha - lcf | prague | 0 / 81 | rough landing due to crew error |
| 1986 | 7o - acn | aden | nd | overran on landing , never repaired |
| 18.01.1988 | cccp - 85254 | krasnovodsk | 11 / 143 | rough landing , plane broke into two |
| 08.03.1988 | cccp - 85413 | veshchevo | 9 / nd | blown up by hijackers (ovechkin family) |
| 24.09.1988 | cccp - 85617 | norilsk | 0 / nd | rough landing , turned into training mock - up |
| 09.02.1989 | yr - tpj | bucharest | 5 / 5 | crashed at take - off due to engine failure |
| 20.10.1990 | cccp - 85268 | kutaisi | 0 / 171 | nosegear collapsed due to overloading |
| 14.09.1991 | cu - t1227 | mexico city | 0 / 112 | overran on landing |
| 05.06.1992 | lz - btd | varna | 0 / 130 | overran on landing in heavy rain |
| 18.06.1992 | ra - 85282 | bratsk | 1 + 0 / 0 | burned out during refueling |
| 18.06.1992 | ra - 85234 | bratsk | 0 / 0 | burned out in the same incident |
| 20.07.1992 | 4l - 85222 | tbilisi | 4 + 24 / 24 | crashed at take - off due to overloading |
| 01.08.1992 | ya - tap | kabul | 0 / 0 | destroyed in the airport by mortar fire |
| 05.09.1992 | ur - 85269 | kiev | 0 / 147 | rough landing with left gear still retracted |
| 05.12.1992 | ek - 85105 | erevan | 0 / 154 | overran on landing |
| 19.01.1993 | uk - 85533 | delhi | 0 / 165 | rough landing due to crew error |
| 08.02.1993 | ep - itd | near tehran | 2 + 131 / 131 | mid - air collision with iranian air force su - 24 |
| 22.09.1993 | 4l - 85163 | sukhumi | 108 / 132 | shot down by missile |
| 23.09.1993 | 4l - 85359 | sukhumi | 0 / 0 | damaged by shelling , never repaired |
| 03.01.1994 | ra - 85656 | irkutsk | 1 + 125 / 125 | engine fire at take - off , hydraulics failed |
| 13.09.1997 | 11 + 02 | namibia | 24 / 24 | mid - air collision with usaf c - 141 |
| 15.12.1997 | ey - 85281 | sharja | 85 / 86 | landed short of runway , crew error |
| 29.08.1998 | cu - t1264 | quito | 10 + 70 / 91 | aborted take - off , overran and caught fire |
| 24.02.1999 | b - 2622 | ruian | 61 / 61 | crashed on final approach due to technical failure |
| 04.10.2001 | ra - 85693 | black sea | 78 / 78 | mid - air destruction of unknown cause |
| 12.02.2002 | ep - mbs | khorramabad | 119 / 119 | crashed on final approach |
| 24.08.2004 | ra - 85556 | millerovo | 46 / 46 | exploded in mid - air by suicide bomber |
Title:
tupolev tu - 154
Statement:
prague did not have a tail number of cu - t1264 , quito did
Answer:
supported