Give you a statement and table with its title in Markdown format, please determine whether the statement is supported or refuted by, or is unrelated to the table. It'a binary classification problem, you should choose the answer between supported and refuted. Table cells in one row are seperated by '|', and different rows are seperated by '
'.

Table:
| team | contest and round | opponent | 1st leg score | 2nd leg score | aggregate score |
| rosenborg | champions league 2nd qual round | breiðablik | 4 - 0 (h) | 0 - 2 (a) | w 4 - 2 |
| rosenborg | champions league 3rd qual round | viktoria plzeň | 0 - 1 (h) | 2 - 3 (a) | l 2 - 4 |
| rosenborg | europa league play off round | aek larnaca | 0 - 0 (h) | 1 - 2 (a) | l 1 - 2 |
| strømsgodset | europa league 3rd qual round | atlético madrid | 1 - 2 (a) | 0 - 2 (h) | l 1 - 4 |
| vålerenga | europa league 2nd qual round | mika | 1 - 0 (h) | 1 - 0 (a) | w 2 - 0 |
| vålerenga | europa league 3rd qual round | paok | 0 - 2 (h) | 0 - 3 (a) | l 0 - 5 |
| tromsø | europa league 1st qual round | daugava daugavpils | 5 - 0 (a) | 2 - 1 (h) | w 7 - 1 |
| tromsø | europa league 2nd qual round | paks | 1 - 1 (a) | 0 - 3 (h) | l 1 - 4 |
| aalesund | europa league 1st qual round | neath | 4 - 1 (h) | 2 - 0 (a) | w 6 - 1 |
| aalesund | europa league 2nd qual round | ferencváros | 1 - 2 (a) | 3 - 1 (aet) (h) | w 4 - 3 |
| aalesund | europa league 3rd qual round | elfsborg | 4 - 0 (h) | 1 - 1 (a) | w 5 - 1 |
Title:
2011 in norwegian football
Statement:
in norwegian football in 2011 , rosenborg and aalesund both made it to the europa league 1st qualification round
Answer:
refuted