Give you a statement and table with its title in Markdown format, please determine whether the statement is supported or refuted by, or is unrelated to the table. It'a binary classification problem, you should choose the answer between supported and refuted. Table cells in one row are seperated by '|', and different rows are seperated by '
'.

Table:
| district | incumbent | party | first elected | results |
| michigan 1 | bart stupak | democratic | 1992 | re - elected |
| michigan 2 | pete hoekstra | republican | 1992 | re - elected |
| michigan 3 | vern ehlers | republican | 1993 | re - elected |
| michigan 4 | dave camp | republican | 1990 | re - elected |
| michigan 5 | dale kildee | democratic | 1976 | re - elected |
| michigan 6 | fred upton | republican | 1986 | re - elected |
| michigan 7 | joe schwarz | republican | 2004 | lost renomination republican hold |
| michigan 8 | mike rogers | republican | 2000 | re - elected |
| michigan 9 | joe knollenberg | republican | 1992 | re - elected |
| michigan 10 | candice miller | republican | 2002 | re - elected |
| michigan 11 | thad mccotter | republican | 2002 | re - elected |
| michigan 12 | sander levin | democratic | 1982 | re - elected |
| michigan 13 | carolyn kilpatrick | democratic | 1996 | re - elected |
| michigan 14 | john conyers jr | democratic | 1964 | re - elected |
| michigan 15 | john dingell | democratic | 1955 | re - elected |
Title:
united states house of representatives elections , 2006
Statement:
two democratic incumbents were re - elected before 1964 in the state of michigan
Answer:
supported