Give you a statement and table with its title in Markdown format, please determine whether the statement is supported or refuted by, or is unrelated to the table. It'a binary classification problem, you should choose the answer between supported and refuted. Table cells in one row are seperated by '|', and different rows are seperated by '
'.

Table:
| district | incumbent | party | first elected | results | candidates |
| pennsylvania 1 | bob brady | democratic | 1998 | re - elected | bob brady (d) unopposed |
| pennsylvania 4 | melissa hart | republican | 2000 | lost re - election democratic gain | jason altmire (d) 51.9% melissa hart (r) 48.1% |
| pennsylvania 5 | john peterson | republican | 1996 | re - elected | john peterson (r) 60.1% don hilliard (d) 39.9% |
| pennsylvania 6 | jim gerlach | republican | 2002 | re - elected | jim gerlach (r) 50.7% lois murphy (d) 49.3% |
| pennsylvania 7 | curt weldon | republican | 1986 | lost re - election democratic gain | joe sestak (d) 56.4% curt weldon (r) 43.6% |
| pennsylvania 9 | bill shuster | republican | 2001 | re - elected | bill shuster (r) 60.3% tony barr (d) 39.7% |
| pennsylvania 10 | don sherwood | republican | 1998 | lost re - election democratic gain | chris carney (d) 52.9% don sherwood (r) 47.1% |
| pennsylvania 11 | paul kanjorski | democratic | 1984 | re - elected | paul kanjorski (d) 72.5% joseph leonardi (r) 27.5% |
| pennsylvania 12 | john murtha | democratic | 1974 | re - elected | john murtha (d) 60.8% diana irey (r) 39.2% |
| pennsylvania 13 | allyson schwartz | democratic | 2004 | re - elected | allyson schwartz (d) 66.1% raj bhakta (r) 33.9% |
| pennsylvania 14 | mike doyle | democratic | 1994 | re - elected | mike doyle (d) 90.1% titus north (g) 9.9% |
| pennsylvania 17 | tim holden | democratic | 1992 | re - elected | tim holden (d) 64.5% matthew wertz (r) 35.5% |
Title:
united states house of representatives elections , 2006
Statement:
in pennsylvania paul kanjorski was re - elected
Answer:
supported