Give you a statement and table with its title in Markdown format, please determine whether the statement is supported or refuted by, or is unrelated to the table. It'a binary classification problem, you should choose the answer between supported and refuted. Table cells in one row are seperated by '|', and different rows are seperated by '
'.

Table:
| name (year commissioned) | owner / operator | length | maximum diameter | from / to | licence number |
| dampier to bunbury natural gas pipeline (1984) | dampier bunbury pipeline | 1530 km | 660 mm | dampier to bunbury | pl 40 |
| goldfields gas transmission pipeline (1996) | ggt joint venture (apa group & others) | 1426 km | 400 mm | near compressor station 1 to kalgoorlie | pl 24 |
| parmelia pipeline (1971) | apa group | 416 km | 356 mm | dongara to pinjarra | pl 1 |
| pilbara energy pipeline (1996) | epic energy | 215 km | 450 mm | karratha to port hedland | pl 22 |
| mid west gas pipeline (1999) | apa group and western power | 352 km | 219 mm | geraldton to windimurra | pl 43 |
| kambalda esperance pipeline (2003) | esperance pipeline co | 340 km | 150 mm | kambalda to esperance | pl 59 |
| telfer pipeline (2003) | apa group & eii | 443 km | 250 mm | port hedland to telfer | pl 60 |
Title:
list of natural gas pipelines in western australia
Statement:
esperance pipeline co is an owner operate with a license number that isn't pl 59
Answer:
refuted