Give you a statement and table with its title in Markdown format, please determine whether the statement is supported or refuted by, or is unrelated to the table. It'a binary classification problem, you should choose the answer between supported and refuted. Table cells in one row are seperated by '|', and different rows are seperated by '
'.

Table:
| district | incumbent | party | first elected | result | candidates |
| pennsylvania 6 | mathias morris | anti - jacksonian | 1834 | re - elected | mathias morris (w) 51.4% john rockman (d) 48.6% |
| pennsylvania 10 | william clark | anti - masonic | 1832 | retired democratic gain | luther reily (d) 50.8% george w harris (w) 49.2% |
| pennsylvania 11 | henry logan | jacksonian | 1834 | re - elected | henry logan (d) 58.2% jacob kirk (w) 41.8% |
| pennsylvania 13 | jesse miller | jacksonian | 1832 | retired democratic hold | charles mcclure (d) 57.5% william sharon (w) 42.5% |
| pennsylvania 15 | andrew beaumont | jacksonian | 1832 | retired democratic hold | david petrikin (d) 52.1% john mcreynolds (w) 47.9% |
| pennsylvania 18 | job mann | jacksonian | 1832 | lost re - election anti - masonic gain | charles ogle (am) 51.7% job mann (d) 48.3% |
| pennsylvania 20 | andrew buchanan | jacksonian | 1832 | re - elected | andrew buchanan (d) 100% |
Title:
united states house of representatives elections , 1836
Statement:
jesse miller is not the candidate that is a part of the anti - jacksonian party
Answer:
supported