Give you a statement and table with its title in Markdown format, please determine whether the statement is supported or refuted by, or is unrelated to the table. It'a binary classification problem, you should choose the answer between supported and refuted. Table cells in one row are seperated by '|', and different rows are seperated by '
'.

Table:
| producer | product | samples taken | samples failed | melamine content (mg / kg) |
| shijiazhuang sanlu group | 三鹿牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉 | 11 | 11 | 2563.0 |
| shanghai panda dairy | 熊貓可寶牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉 | 5 | 3 | 619.0 |
| qingdao shengyuan dairy | 聖元牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉 | 17 | 8 | 150.0 |
| shanxi gu cheng dairy | 古城牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉 | 13 | 4 | 141.6 |
| jiangxi guangming yingxiong dairy | 英雄牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉 | 2 | 2 | 98.6 |
| baoji huimin dairy | 惠民牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉 | 1 | 1 | 79.17 |
| inner mongolia mengniu dairy | 蒙牛牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉 | 28 | 3 | 68.2 |
| torador dairy industry (tianjin) | 可淇牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉 | 1 | 1 | 67.94 |
| guangdong yashili group | 雅士利牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉 | 30 | 8 | 53.4 |
| hunan peiyi dairy | 南山倍益牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉 | 3 | 1 | 53.4 |
| heilongjiang qilin dairy | 嬰幼兒配方乳粉2段基粉 | 1 | 1 | 31.74 |
| shanxi yashili dairy | 雅士利牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉 | 4 | 2 | 26.3 |
| shenzhen jinbishi milk | 金必氏牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉 | 2 | 2 | 18.0 |
| scient (guangzhou) infant nutrition | 施恩牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉 | 20 | 14 | 17.0 |
| guangzhou jinding dairy products factory | 金鼎牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉 | 3 | 1 | 16.2 |
| inner mongolia yili industrial group | 伊利牌兒童配方乳粉 | 35 | 1 | 12.0 |
| yantai ausmeadow nutriment | 澳美多牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉 | 16 | 6 | 10.7 |
| qingdao suncare nutritional technology | 愛可丁牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉 | 3 | 1 | 4.8 |
| xi'an baiyue dairy | 御寶牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉 | 3 | 1 | 3.73 |
| yantai leilei dairy | 磊磊牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉 | 3 | 3 | 1.2 |
| shanghai baoanli dairy | 寶安力牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉 | 1 | 1 | 0.21 |
| fuding chenguan dairy | 聰爾壯牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉 | 1 | 1 | 0.09 |
Title:
official test failures of the 2008 chinese milk scandal
Statement:
qingdao suncare nutritional technology has under 53.4 melamine and a total of 3 samples were taken
Answer:
refuted