Give you a statement and table with its title in Markdown format, please determine whether the statement is supported or refuted by, or is unrelated to the table. It'a binary classification problem, you should choose the answer between supported and refuted. Table cells in one row are seperated by '|', and different rows are seperated by '
'.

Table:
| district | incumbent | party | first elected | result | candidates |
| new york 1 | silas wood | anti - jacksonian | 1818 | lost re - election jacksonian gain | james lent (j) 52.3% silas wood (aj) 47.7% |
| new york 6 | john hallock , jr | jacksonian | 1824 | retired jacksonian hold | hector craig (j) 55.7% samuel j wilkin (aj) 44.3% |
| new york 8 | james strong | anti - jacksonian | 1818 1822 | re - elected | james strong (aj) 50.9% james vanderpoel (j) 49.1% |
| new york 11 | selah r hobbie | jacksonian | 1826 | retired jacksonian hold | perkins king (j) 61.6% jacob haight (aj) 38.4% |
| new york 15 | michael hoffman | jacksonian | 1824 | re - elected | michael hoffman (j) 100% |
| new york 17 | john w taylor | anti - jacksonian | 1812 | re - elected | john w taylor (aj) 54.9% john cramer (j) 45.1% |
| new york 21 | john c clark | jacksonian | 1826 | retired jacksonian hold | robert monell (j) 63.6% tilly lynde 36.4% |
| new york 22 | john g stower | jacksonian | 1824 | lost re - election anti - jacksonian gain | thomas beekman (aj) 53.4% john g stower (j) 46.6% |
| new york 25 | david woodcock | anti - jacksonian | 1821 1826 | lost re - election jacksonian gain | thomas maxwell (j) 60.1% david woodcock (aj) 39.9% |
Title:
united states house of representatives elections , 1828
Statement:
new york district 1 's candidates james lent (j) 52.3% silas wood (aj) 47.7% resulted in the re - election loss for the incumbent silas wood
Answer:
supported