Give you a statement and table with its title in Markdown format, please determine whether the statement is supported or refuted by, or is unrelated to the table. It'a binary classification problem, you should choose the answer between supported and refuted. Table cells in one row are seperated by '|', and different rows are seperated by '
'.

Table:
| Unnamed: 0 | name | tenure | courtesy title | court rank | revenues | lineage |
| 1 | ōoka tadasuke (大岡忠相) | 1748 - 1751 | echizen - no - kami (越前守) | lower 5th (従五位下) | 10000 koku | 4th son of hatamoto ōoka tadataka |
| 2 | ōoka tadayoshi (大岡忠宜) | 1755 - 1766 | echizen - no - kami (越前守) | lower 5th (従五位下) | 10000 koku | 2nd son of tadasuke |
| 3 | ōoka tadatsune (大岡忠恒) | 1766 - 1784 | echizen - no - kami (越前守) | lower 5th (従五位下) | 10000 koku | 2nd son of tadayoshi |
| 4 | ōoka tadatomo (大岡忠與) | 1784 - 1786 | echizen - no - kami (越前守) | lower 5th (従五位下) | 13000 koku | 3rd son of ogasawara nagamichi |
| 5 | ōoka tadayori (大岡忠移) | 1786 - 1828 | echizen - no - kami (越前守) | lower 5th (従五位下) | 10000 koku | 3rd son of tadatsune |
| 6 | ōoka tadayoshi (2nd) (大岡忠愛) | 1828 - 1857 | echizen - no - kami (越前守) | lower 5th (従五位下) | 10000 koku | son of tadayori |
Title:
nishi - ōhira domain
Statement:
Ōoka tadayoshi (2nd) (大岡忠愛) , in the lineage as 3rd son of ogasawara nagamichi , had a tenure of 1748 - 1751
Answer:
refuted