Give you a statement and table with its title in Markdown format, please determine whether the statement is supported or refuted by, or is unrelated to the table. It'a binary classification problem, you should choose the answer between supported and refuted. Table cells in one row are seperated by '|', and different rows are seperated by '
'.

Table:
| school | record | conference | conf record | last app | seed | round eliminated | lost to (seed) |
| baylor | 25 - 7 | big 12 | 11 - 5 | 2008 | 3 | semifinals | kansas state (2) |
| byu | 29 - 5 | mountain west | 13 - 3 | 2009 | 2 | semifinals | unlv (3) |
| california | 23 - 10 | pac - 10 | 13 - 5 | 2009 | 1 | championship | washington (3) |
| clemson | 21 - 10 | acc | 9 - 7 | 2009 | 6 | first round | nc state (11) |
| florida | 21 - 12 | sec | 9 - 7 | 2007 | east 4 | second round | mississippi state (west 1) |
| florida state | 22 - 9 | acc | 10 - 6 | 2009 | 3 | quarterfinals | nc state (11) |
| georgetown | 23 - 10 | big east | 10 - 8 | 2008 | 8 | championship | west virginia (3) |
| georgia tech | 22 - 12 | acc | 7 - 9 | 2007 | 7 | championship | duke (1) |
| gonzaga | 26 - 6 | west coast | 12 - 2 | 2009 | 1 | championship | saint mary 's (2) |
| kansas state | 26 - 7 | big 12 | 11 - 5 | 2008 | 2 | championship | kansas (1) |
| louisville | 20 - 12 | big east | 11 - 7 | 2009 | 6 | second round | cincinnati (11) |
| marquette | 22 - 11 | big east | 11 - 7 | 2009 | 5 | semifinals | georgetown (8) |
| maryland | 23 - 8 | acc | 13 - 3 | 2009 | 2 | quarterfinals | georgia tech (7) |
| michigan state | 24 - 8 | big ten | 14 - 4 | 2009 | 3 | quarterfinals | minnesota (6) |
| minnesota | 21 - 13 | big ten | 9 - 9 | 2009 | 6 | championship | ohio state (1) |
| missouri | 22 - 10 | big 12 | 10 - 6 | 2009 | 5 | first round | nebraska (12) |
| new mexico | 29 - 4 | mountain west | 14 - 2 | 2005 | 1 | semifinals | san diego state (4) |
| notre dame | 23 - 11 | big east | 10 - 8 | 2008 | 7 | semifinals | west virginia (3) |
| oklahoma state | 22 - 10 | big 12 | 9 - 7 | 2009 | 7 | quarterfinals | kansas state (2) |
| pittsburgh | 24 - 8 | big east | 13 - 5 | 2009 | 2 | quarterfinals | notre dame (7) |
| purdue | 27 - 5 | big ten | 14 - 4 | 2009 | 2 | semifinals | minnesota (6) |
| richmond | 26 - 8 | atlantic 10 | 13 - 3 | 2004 | 3 | championship | temple (1) |
| syracuse | 28 - 4 | big east | 15 - 3 | 2009 | 1 | quarterfinals | georgetown (8) |
| tennessee | 25 - 8 | sec | 11 - 5 | 2009 | east 3 | semifinals | kentucky (east 1) |
| texas | 24 - 9 | big 12 | 9 - 7 | 2009 | 6 | quarterfinals | baylor (3) |
| texas a&m | 23 - 9 | big 12 | 11 - 5 | 2009 | 4 | semifinals | kansas (1) |
| unlv | 25 - 8 | mountain west | 11 - 5 | 2008 | 3 | championship | san diego state (4) |
| utah state | 27 - 7 | wac | 14 - 2 | 2009 | 1 | championship | new mexico state (3) |
| utep | 26 - 6 | c - usa | 15 - 1 | 2005 | 1 | championship | houston (7) |
| vanderbilt | 24 - 8 | sec | 12 - 4 | 2008 | east 2 | semifinals | mississippi state (west 1) |
| villanova | 13 - 5 | big east | 24 - 7 | 2009 | 4 | quarterfinals | marquette (5) |
| wake forest | 19 - 10 | acc | 9 - 7 | 2009 | 5 | first round | miami (12) |
| wisconsin | 23 - 8 | big ten | 13 - 5 | 2009 | 4 | quarterfinals | illinois (5) |
Title:
2010 ncaa men 's division i basketball tournament : qualifying teams
Statement:
louisville , part of the big east conference , had one of the best records with 12 - 20
Answer:
refuted