Give you a statement and table with its title in Markdown format, please determine whether the statement is supported or refuted by, or is unrelated to the table. It'a binary classification problem, you should choose the answer between supported and refuted. Table cells in one row are seperated by '|', and different rows are seperated by '
'.

Table:
| district | incumbent | party | first elected | result | candidates |
| pennsylvania 1 | bob brady | democratic | 1998 | re - elected | bob brady (d) unopposed |
| pennsylvania 2 | chaka fattah | democratic | 1994 | re - elected | chaka fattah (d) 89.3% rick hellberg (r) 10.7% |
| pennsylvania 3 | kathy dahlkemper | democratic | 2008 | lost re - election republican gain | mike kelly (r) 55.7% kathy dahlkemper (d) 44.3% |
| pennsylvania 4 | jason altmire | democratic | 2006 | re - elected | jason altmire (d) 50.8% keith rothfuss (r) 49.2% |
| pennsylvania 6 | jim gerlach | republican | 2002 | re - elected | jim gerlach (r) 57.1% manan trivedi (d) 42.9% |
| pennsylvania 9 | bill shuster | republican | 2001 | re - elected | bill shuster (r) 73.1% tom conners (d) 26.9% |
| pennsylvania 10 | chris carney | democratic | 2006 | lost re - election republican gain | tom marino (r) 55.2% chris carney (d) 44.8% |
| pennsylvania 11 | paul kanjorski | democratic | 1984 | lost re - election republican gain | lou barletta (r) 54.7% paul kanjorski (d) 45.3% |
| pennsylvania 12 | mark critz | democratic | 2010 | re - elected | mark critz (d) 50.8% tim burns (r) 49.2% |
| pennsylvania 13 | allyson schwartz | democratic | 2004 | re - elected | allyson schwartz (d) 56.3% dee adcock (r) 43.7% |
| pennsylvania 16 | joe pitts | republican | 1996 | re - elected | joe pitts (r) 65.4% lois herr (d) 34.6% |
| pennsylvania 17 | tim holden | democratic | 1992 | re - elected | tim holden (d) 55.5% dave argall (r) 44.5% |
Title:
united states house of representatives elections , 2010
Statement:
kathy dahlkemper was the incumbent in the pennsylvania 3 district
Answer:
supported