Give you a statement and table with its title in Markdown format, please determine whether the statement is supported or refuted by, or is unrelated to the table. It'a binary classification problem, you should choose the answer between supported and refuted. Table cells in one row are seperated by '|', and different rows are seperated by '
'.

Table:
| year | championship | 54 holes | winning score | margin of victory | runner (s) - up |
| 1999 | wgc - nec invitational | 5 shot lead | - 10 (66 + 71 + 62 + 71 = 270) | 1 stroke | phil mickelson |
| 1999 | wgc - american express championship | 1 shot deficit | - 6 (71 + 69 + 70 + 68 = 278) | playoff 1 | miguel ángel jiménez |
| 2000 | wgc - nec invitational (2) | 9 shot lead | - 21 (64 + 61 + 67 + 67 = 259) | 11 strokes | justin leonard , phillip price |
| 2001 | wgc - nec invitational (3) | 2 shot deficit | - 12 (66 + 67 + 66 + 69 = 268) | playoff 2 | jim furyk |
| 2002 | wgc - american express championship (2) | 5 shot lead | - 25 (65 + 65 + 67 + 66 = 263) | 1 stroke | retief goosen |
| 2003 | wgc - accenture match play championship | n / a | 2 & 1 | 2 & 1 | david toms |
| 2003 | wgc - american express championship (3) | 2 shot lead | - 6 (67 + 66 + 69 + 72 = 274) | 2 strokes | stuart appleby , tim herron , vijay singh |
| 2004 | wgc - accenture match play championship (2) | n / a | 3 & 2 | 3 & 2 | davis love iii |
| 2005 | wgc - nec invitational (4) | tied for lead | - 6 (66 + 70 + 67 + 71 = 274) | 1 stroke | chris dimarco |
| 2005 | wgc - american express championship (4) | 2 shot deficit | - 10 (67 + 68 + 68 + 67 = 270) | playoff 3 | john daly |
| 2006 | wgc - american express championship (5) | 6 shot lead | - 23 (63 + 64 + 67 + 67 = 261) | 8 strokes | ian poulter , adam scott |
Title:
list of career achievements by tiger woods
Statement:
wgc - american express championship (3) was the tournament where chris dimarco was tied for the lead
Answer:
refuted