Give you a statement and table with its title in Markdown format, please determine whether the statement is supported or refuted by, or is unrelated to the table. It'a binary classification problem, you should choose the answer between supported and refuted. Table cells in one row are seperated by '|', and different rows are seperated by '
'.

Table:
| year | edition | round | date | location | surface | against | opponent (s) | score | result |
| 2007 | group i e / a | rr | 19 april | plovdiv | clay | estonia | anett kaasik margit rüütel | 1 - 6 , 6 - 1 , 6 - 4 | 3 - 0 |
| 2007 | group i e / a | ppo | 21 april | plovdiv | clay | switzerland | patty schnyder | 3 - 6 , 6 - 3 , 2 - 6 | 0 - 2 |
| 2008 | group i e / a | rr | 31 january | budapest | carpet | belarus | ima bohush tatiana poutchek | 1 - 6 , 3 - 6 | 0 - 3 |
| 2008 | group i e / a | rr | 1 february | budapest | carpet | georgia | ekaterine gorgodze | 6 - 7 (3 - 7) , 7 - 6 (7 - 5) , 7 - 5 | 2 - 0 |
| 2010 | group i e / a | rr | february 3 | lisbon | hard | israël | shahar pe'er | 1 - 6 , 4 - 6 | 2 - 1 |
| 2010 | group i e / a | rr | february 3 | lisbon | hard | israël | julia glushko shahar pe'er | 6 - 1 , 7 - 6 (9 - 7) | 2 - 1 |
| 2010 | group i e / a | rr | 4 february | lisbon | hard | netherlands | arantxa rus | 6 - 7 (5 - 7) , 7 - 5 , 6 - 2 | 2 - 1 |
| 2010 | group i e / a | rr | 6 february | lisbon | hard | switzerland | sarah moundir | 6 - 4 , 6 - 1 | 3 - 0 |
| 2010 | world group ii | po | 24 - 25 april | maribor | clay | japan | ayumi morita | 3 - 6 , 6 - 1 , 6 - 3 | 4 - 1 |
| 2010 | world group ii | po | 24 - 25 april | maribor | clay | japan | kimiko date - krumm | 4 - 6 , 2 - 6 | 4 - 1 |
| 2011 | world group ii | qf | 5 - 6 february | maribor | clay | germany | julia görges | 7 - 5 , 6 - 4 | 1 - 4 |
| 2011 | world group ii | qf | 5 - 6 february | maribor | clay | germany | andrea petkovic | 1 - 6 , 2 - 6 | 1 - 4 |
| 2011 | world group ii | qf | 5 - 6 february | maribor | clay | germany | anna - lena grönefeld tatjana malek | 6 - 7 (3 - 7) , 0 - 0 ret | 1 - 4 |
| 2011 | world group ii | po | 16 - 17 april | koper | clay | canada | eugenie bouchard | 6 - 0 , 6 - 4 | 3 - 2 |
| 2011 | world group ii | po | 16 - 17 april | koper | clay | canada | rebecca marino | 5 - 7 , 6 - 2 , 8 - 6 | 3 - 2 |
| 2011 | world group ii | po | 16 - 17 april | koper | clay | canada | sharon fichman rebecca marino | 7 - 6 (7 - 5) , 6 - 2 | 3 - 2 |
| 2012 | world group ii | qf | 4 - 5 february | hyōgo | hard | japan | kimiko date - krumm | 6 -- 2 , 4 - 6 , 2 - 6 | 0 - 5 |
| 2012 | world group ii | qf | 4 - 5 february | hyōgo | hard | japan | ayumi morita | 6 - 3 , 6 - 7 (6 - 8) , 1 - 6 | 0 - 5 |
Title:
polona hercog
Statement:
carpet was the surface that has an opponent (s) of anett kaasik margit rüütel
Answer:
refuted