Give you a statement and table with its title in Markdown format, please determine whether the statement is supported or refuted by, or is unrelated to the table. It'a binary classification problem, you should choose the answer between supported and refuted. Table cells in one row are seperated by '|', and different rows are seperated by '
'.

Table:
| tournament | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | career wr | career win - loss |
| australian open | a | a | a | a | a | 1r | 1r | 2r | 1r | 2r | 1r | 1r | a | a | a | 0 / 7 | 2 - 7 |
| french open | a | a | a | a | 3r | 1r | 2r | 3r | 1r | 3r | 2r | 1r | a | 1r | lq | 0 / 9 | 8 - 9 |
| wimbledon | a | a | a | a | a | 1r | 1r | 3r | 1r | 1r | 1r | a | a | 1r | lq | 0 / 7 | 2 - 7 |
| us open | a | a | a | a | 1r | a | 1r | 1r | 3r | 1r | 1r | a | a | a | a | 0 / 6 | 2 - 6 |
| grand slam win ratio | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 2 | 0 / 3 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 2 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 2 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 29 | n / a |
| grand slam win - loss | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 0 | 2 - 2 | 0 - 3 | 1 - 4 | 5 - 4 | 2 - 4 | 3 - 4 | 1 - 4 | 0 - 2 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 2 | 0 - 0 | n / a | 14 - 29 |
| indian wells | a | a | a | a | a | 1r | a | a | a | 1r | a | a | a | a | a | 0 / 2 | 0 - 2 |
| miami | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | 1r | 3r | a | a | a | a | a | 0 / 2 | 1 - 2 |
| monte carlo | a | a | 2r | a | a | 1r | a | 1r | 2r | 1r | 2r | 1r | a | a | 1r | 0 / 8 | 3 - 8 |
| rome | a | a | a | a | 2r | 1r | 1r | 1r | 2r | 1r | 1r | a | a | a | a | 0 / 7 | 2 - 7 |
| hamburg | a | a | a | a | a | 1r | a | a | w | 1r | a | 2r | a | a | a | 1 / 4 | 7 - 3 |
| canada | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | 1r | a | a | a | a | a | a | 0 / 1 | 0 - 1 |
| cincinnati | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | 1r | a | a | a | a | a | a | 0 / 1 | 0 - 1 |
| stuttgart / madrid | a | a | a | a | 1r | a | a | a | 1r | a | a | a | a | a | a | 0 / 2 | 0 - 2 |
| paris | a | a | a | a | 1r | a | a | a | 2r | a | a | a | a | a | a | 0 / 2 | 1 - 2 |
| atp world tour finals | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | a | 0 / 0 | 0 - 0 |
| atp tournaments played | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 24 | 18 | 23 | 29 | 23 | 20 | 16 | 6 | 12 | 3 | n / a | 199 |
| atp finals reached | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | n / a | 4 |
| atp tournaments won | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | n / a | 1 |
| year end ranking | 392 | 269 | 119 | 182 | 35 | 84 | 90 | 51 | 20 | 88 | 85 | 175 | 119 | 140 | 338 | n / a | n / a |
Title:
albert portas
Statement:
in 2004 , the australia open results were 1r , the indian wells results were a , the miami results were a , hamburg results were 2r , canada , cincinnati and the atp tour finals were all a
Answer:
supported