Give you a statement and table with its title in Markdown format, please determine whether the statement is supported or refuted by, or is unrelated to the table. It'a binary classification problem, you should choose the answer between supported and refuted. Table cells in one row are seperated by '|', and different rows are seperated by '
'.

Table:
| district | incumbent | party | first elected | result | candidates |
| north carolina 3 | walter jones jr | republican | 1994 | re - elected | walter jones jr (r) 63.2% erik anderson (d) 36.8% |
| north carolina 4 | david price | democratic | 1996 | re - elected | david price (d) 74.4% tim d'annunzio (r) 25.6% |
| north carolina 6 | howard coble | republican | 1984 | re - elected | howard coble (r) 60.9% tony foriest (d) 39.1% |
| north carolina 7 | mike mcintyre | democratic | 1996 | re - elected | mike mcintyre (d) 50.1% david rouzer (r) 49.9% |
| north carolina 8 | larry kissell | democratic | 2008 | lost re - election republican gain | richard hudson (r) 54.1% larry kissell (d) 45.9% |
| north carolina 10 | patrick mchenry | republican | 2004 | re - elected | patrick mchenry (r) 57.0% patsy keever (d) 43.0% |
| north carolina 11 | heath shuler | democratic | 2006 | retired republican gain | mark meadows (r) 57.4% hayden rogers (d) 42.6% |
| north carolina 12 | mel watt | democratic | 1992 | re - elected | mel watt (d) 79.7% jack brosch (r) 20.3% |
Title:
united states house of representatives elections , 2012
Statement:
larry kissell , was the only candidate to lose re - election if they ran again in the following term
Answer:
supported