Problem: PolandBall is a young, clever Ball. He is interested in prime numbers. He has stated a following hypothesis: "There exists such a positive integer n that for each positive integer m number n·m + 1 is a prime number".

Unfortunately, PolandBall is not experienced yet and doesn't know that his hypothesis is incorrect. Could you prove it wrong? Write a program that finds a counterexample for any n.

Input

The only number in the input is n (1 ≤ n ≤ 1000) — number from the PolandBall's hypothesis. 

Output

Output such m that n·m + 1 is not a prime number. Your answer will be considered correct if you output any suitable m such that 1 ≤ m ≤ 103. It is guaranteed the the answer exists.

Examples

Input

3


Output

1

Input

4


Output

2

Note

A prime number (or a prime) is a natural number greater than 1 that has no positive divisors other than 1 and itself.

For the first sample testcase, 3·1 + 1 = 4. We can output 1.

In the second sample testcase, 4·1 + 1 = 5. We cannot output 1 because 5 is prime. However, m = 2 is okay since 4·2 + 1 = 9, which is not a prime number.

Solution (in PYTHON):

Solution:
n=int(raw_input())

def is_prime(n):
    '''check if integer n is a prime'''

    # make sure n is a positive integer
    n = abs(int(n))

    # 0 and 1 are not primes
    if n < 2:
        return False

    # 2 is the only even prime number
    if n == 2: 
        return True    

    # all other even numbers are not primes
    if not n & 1: 
        return False

    # range starts with 3 and only needs to go up 
    # the square root of n for all odd numbers
    for x in range(3, int(n**0.5) + 1, 2):
        if n % x == 0:
            return False

    return True

m = 1

result = n*m+1

while is_prime(result):

	m+=1
	result = n*m+1


print m