Problem: PolandBall is a young, clever Ball. He is interested in prime numbers. He has stated a following hypothesis: "There exists such a positive integer n that for each positive integer m number n·m + 1 is a prime number".

Unfortunately, PolandBall is not experienced yet and doesn't know that his hypothesis is incorrect. Could you prove it wrong? Write a program that finds a counterexample for any n.

Input

The only number in the input is n (1 ≤ n ≤ 1000) — number from the PolandBall's hypothesis. 

Output

Output such m that n·m + 1 is not a prime number. Your answer will be considered correct if you output any suitable m such that 1 ≤ m ≤ 103. It is guaranteed the the answer exists.

Examples

Input

3


Output

1

Input

4


Output

2

Note

A prime number (or a prime) is a natural number greater than 1 that has no positive divisors other than 1 and itself.

For the first sample testcase, 3·1 + 1 = 4. We can output 1.

In the second sample testcase, 4·1 + 1 = 5. We cannot output 1 because 5 is prime. However, m = 2 is okay since 4·2 + 1 = 9, which is not a prime number.

Solution (in JAVA):

Solution:
import java.util.*;


public class bucky{




public static void main (String args[]) {

Scanner input=new Scanner(System.in);

HashMap<Long, Integer> map1= new HashMap<Long, Integer>();
HashMap<Integer, Integer> map2= new HashMap<Integer, Integer>();
HashMap<Integer, Integer> linieleft= new HashMap<Integer, Integer>();
HashMap<Integer, Integer> linieright= new HashMap<Integer, Integer>();

	
	
			
		//	String str=input.next();
			
			
			int n=input.nextInt();
			if(n==2) System.out.println(4);
			
		else if(n%2==1 && n!=1) System.out.println(1);
		else if(n%2==1 && n==1 ) System.out.println(3);
		else if(n%2==0) System.out.println(n-2);
		
		}
		
		}