Problem: PolandBall is a young, clever Ball. He is interested in prime numbers. He has stated a following hypothesis: "There exists such a positive integer n that for each positive integer m number n·m + 1 is a prime number".

Unfortunately, PolandBall is not experienced yet and doesn't know that his hypothesis is incorrect. Could you prove it wrong? Write a program that finds a counterexample for any n.

Input

The only number in the input is n (1 ≤ n ≤ 1000) — number from the PolandBall's hypothesis. 

Output

Output such m that n·m + 1 is not a prime number. Your answer will be considered correct if you output any suitable m such that 1 ≤ m ≤ 103. It is guaranteed the the answer exists.

Examples

Input

3


Output

1

Input

4


Output

2

Note

A prime number (or a prime) is a natural number greater than 1 that has no positive divisors other than 1 and itself.

For the first sample testcase, 3·1 + 1 = 4. We can output 1.

In the second sample testcase, 4·1 + 1 = 5. We cannot output 1 because 5 is prime. However, m = 2 is okay since 4·2 + 1 = 9, which is not a prime number.

Solution (in JAVA):

Solution:
import java.util.*;

public class CFPollandBall {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        Scanner sc= new Scanner(System.in);
        int n = sc.nextInt();
        // if(n%2 != 0){
        //     System.out.println(1);
        // }
        // else{
            alpha:
            for(int i=2;;i++){
                int num = n*i + 1;
                for(int j=2; j<=num/2; j++){
                    if(num % j == 0){
                        System.out.println(i);
                        break alpha;
                    }
                }
            }
        // }
    }
}