Problem: PolandBall is a young, clever Ball. He is interested in prime numbers. He has stated a following hypothesis: "There exists such a positive integer n that for each positive integer m number n·m + 1 is a prime number".

Unfortunately, PolandBall is not experienced yet and doesn't know that his hypothesis is incorrect. Could you prove it wrong? Write a program that finds a counterexample for any n.

Input

The only number in the input is n (1 ≤ n ≤ 1000) — number from the PolandBall's hypothesis. 

Output

Output such m that n·m + 1 is not a prime number. Your answer will be considered correct if you output any suitable m such that 1 ≤ m ≤ 103. It is guaranteed the the answer exists.

Examples

Input

3


Output

1

Input

4


Output

2

Note

A prime number (or a prime) is a natural number greater than 1 that has no positive divisors other than 1 and itself.

For the first sample testcase, 3·1 + 1 = 4. We can output 1.

In the second sample testcase, 4·1 + 1 = 5. We cannot output 1 because 5 is prime. However, m = 2 is okay since 4·2 + 1 = 9, which is not a prime number.

Solution (in JAVA):

Solution:
import java.util.*;

public class Main {

    public static void main(String[] args) {

        Scanner a = new Scanner(System.in);
        int n = a.nextInt();

        int num=0;

        int m=0;

        for(int i=1;i<=1000;i++)
        {
            num  = (n*i)+1;
            if(prime(num))
            {
                m=i;
                break;
            }
        }
        System.out.println(m);
    }

    public static boolean prime(int num)
    {
        int start = num/2;

        for(int i=start;i>=2;i--)
        {
            if(num%i==0)
                return true;
        }
        return false;
    }

}