Problem: PolandBall is a young, clever Ball. He is interested in prime numbers. He has stated a following hypothesis: "There exists such a positive integer n that for each positive integer m number n·m + 1 is a prime number".

Unfortunately, PolandBall is not experienced yet and doesn't know that his hypothesis is incorrect. Could you prove it wrong? Write a program that finds a counterexample for any n.

Input

The only number in the input is n (1 ≤ n ≤ 1000) — number from the PolandBall's hypothesis. 

Output

Output such m that n·m + 1 is not a prime number. Your answer will be considered correct if you output any suitable m such that 1 ≤ m ≤ 103. It is guaranteed the the answer exists.

Examples

Input

3


Output

1

Input

4


Output

2

Note

A prime number (or a prime) is a natural number greater than 1 that has no positive divisors other than 1 and itself.

For the first sample testcase, 3·1 + 1 = 4. We can output 1.

In the second sample testcase, 4·1 + 1 = 5. We cannot output 1 because 5 is prime. However, m = 2 is okay since 4·2 + 1 = 9, which is not a prime number.

Solution (in JAVA):

Solution:
/* package whatever; // don't place package name! */

import java.util.*;
import java.lang.*;
import java.io.*;

/* Name of the class has to be "Main" only if the class is public. */
public class Ideone
{
	public static void main (String[] args) throws java.lang.Exception
	{
		
		Scanner in= new Scanner(System.in);
		int n=in.nextInt();
			int d=0;
			int c=0,x=0;
			for(int i=1;i<1000;i++)
			{
				d=n*i+1;
			
				for(int j=2;j<d;j++)
				{
					if(d%j==0)
					{
						c=1;
						break;
					}
					else
					{
						continue;
					}
				}
				if(c==1)
				{x=i;
					break;
				}
			}
	
		System.out.println(x);
	}
}