Problem: PolandBall is a young, clever Ball. He is interested in prime numbers. He has stated a following hypothesis: "There exists such a positive integer n that for each positive integer m number n·m + 1 is a prime number".

Unfortunately, PolandBall is not experienced yet and doesn't know that his hypothesis is incorrect. Could you prove it wrong? Write a program that finds a counterexample for any n.

Input

The only number in the input is n (1 ≤ n ≤ 1000) — number from the PolandBall's hypothesis. 

Output

Output such m that n·m + 1 is not a prime number. Your answer will be considered correct if you output any suitable m such that 1 ≤ m ≤ 103. It is guaranteed the the answer exists.

Examples

Input

3


Output

1

Input

4


Output

2

Note

A prime number (or a prime) is a natural number greater than 1 that has no positive divisors other than 1 and itself.

For the first sample testcase, 3·1 + 1 = 4. We can output 1.

In the second sample testcase, 4·1 + 1 = 5. We cannot output 1 because 5 is prime. However, m = 2 is okay since 4·2 + 1 = 9, which is not a prime number.

Solution (in JAVA):

Solution:

 // Don't place your source in a package
import java.util.*;
import java.lang.*;
import java.io.*;

// Please name your class Main
public class Main {
	public static void main (String[] args) {
	    int n = new Scanner(System.in).nextInt();
	    if (n == 1 || n == 2) System.out.println("25");
	    for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++) if (!isPrimeNumber(n * i + 1)){
	        System.out.print(i);
	        return;
	    } 
	}
	public static boolean isPrimeNumber(int i) {
        int factors = 0;
        int j = 1;

        while(j <= i)
        {
            if(i % j == 0)
            {
                factors++;
            }
            j++;
        }
        return (factors == 2);
  }
}