Problem: PolandBall is a young, clever Ball. He is interested in prime numbers. He has stated a following hypothesis: "There exists such a positive integer n that for each positive integer m number n·m + 1 is a prime number".

Unfortunately, PolandBall is not experienced yet and doesn't know that his hypothesis is incorrect. Could you prove it wrong? Write a program that finds a counterexample for any n.

Input

The only number in the input is n (1 ≤ n ≤ 1000) — number from the PolandBall's hypothesis. 

Output

Output such m that n·m + 1 is not a prime number. Your answer will be considered correct if you output any suitable m such that 1 ≤ m ≤ 103. It is guaranteed the the answer exists.

Examples

Input

3


Output

1

Input

4


Output

2

Note

A prime number (or a prime) is a natural number greater than 1 that has no positive divisors other than 1 and itself.

For the first sample testcase, 3·1 + 1 = 4. We can output 1.

In the second sample testcase, 4·1 + 1 = 5. We cannot output 1 because 5 is prime. However, m = 2 is okay since 4·2 + 1 = 9, which is not a prime number.

Solution (in JAVA):

Solution:
// package CF;

import java.io.BufferedReader;
import java.io.FileReader;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.InputStream;
import java.io.InputStreamReader;
import java.io.PrintWriter;
import java.util.StringTokenizer;

public class A {

	public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
		Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);
		PrintWriter out = new PrintWriter(System.out);
		int n = sc.nextInt();
		sieve(1000002);
		for (int i = 1; i <= 1000; i++) {
			if(isComposite[i*n+1] == 1)
			{
				out.println(i);
				break;
			}
		}
		out.flush();
		out.close();
	}
	static int[] isComposite;

	static void sieve(int N)	// O(N log log N) 
	{
		isComposite = new int[N+1];					
		isComposite[0] = isComposite[1] = 1;			// 0 indicates a prime number

		for (int i = 2; i <= N; ++i) 					//can loop till i*i <= N if primes array is not needed O(N log log sqrt(N)) 
			if (isComposite[i] == 0) 					//can loop in 2 and odd integers for slightly better performance
			{
				if(1l * i * i <= N)
					for (int j = i * i; j <= N; j += i)	// j = i * 2 will not affect performance too much, may alter in modified sieve
						isComposite[j] = 1;			
			}   
	}
	static class Scanner {
		StringTokenizer st;
		BufferedReader br;

		public Scanner(InputStream s) {
			br = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(s));
		}

		public Scanner(FileReader fileReader) {
			br = new BufferedReader(fileReader);
		}

		public String next() throws IOException {
			while (st == null || !st.hasMoreTokens())
				st = new StringTokenizer(br.readLine());
			return st.nextToken();
		}

		public int nextInt() throws IOException {
			return Integer.parseInt(next());
		}

		public long nextLong() throws IOException {
			return Long.parseLong(next());
		}

		public String nextLine() throws IOException {
			return br.readLine();
		}

		public boolean ready() throws IOException {
			return br.ready();
		}
	}
}