Problem: PolandBall is a young, clever Ball. He is interested in prime numbers. He has stated a following hypothesis: "There exists such a positive integer n that for each positive integer m number n·m + 1 is a prime number".

Unfortunately, PolandBall is not experienced yet and doesn't know that his hypothesis is incorrect. Could you prove it wrong? Write a program that finds a counterexample for any n.

Input

The only number in the input is n (1 ≤ n ≤ 1000) — number from the PolandBall's hypothesis. 

Output

Output such m that n·m + 1 is not a prime number. Your answer will be considered correct if you output any suitable m such that 1 ≤ m ≤ 103. It is guaranteed the the answer exists.

Examples

Input

3


Output

1

Input

4


Output

2

Note

A prime number (or a prime) is a natural number greater than 1 that has no positive divisors other than 1 and itself.

For the first sample testcase, 3·1 + 1 = 4. We can output 1.

In the second sample testcase, 4·1 + 1 = 5. We cannot output 1 because 5 is prime. However, m = 2 is okay since 4·2 + 1 = 9, which is not a prime number.

Solution (in CPP):

Solution:
#include <bits/stdc++.h>
int cekprima(int num) {
  for (int a = 2; a <= num / 2; a++) {
    if (num % a == 0) return -1;
  }
  return 1;
}
int main() {
  int num;
  scanf("%d", &num);
  int add = 1;
  int cek = cekprima((num * add) + 1);
  while (cek == 1) {
    add++;
    cek = cekprima((num * add) + 1);
  }
  printf("%d\n", add);
  return 0;
}