Problem: PolandBall is a young, clever Ball. He is interested in prime numbers. He has stated a following hypothesis: "There exists such a positive integer n that for each positive integer m number n·m + 1 is a prime number".

Unfortunately, PolandBall is not experienced yet and doesn't know that his hypothesis is incorrect. Could you prove it wrong? Write a program that finds a counterexample for any n.

Input

The only number in the input is n (1 ≤ n ≤ 1000) — number from the PolandBall's hypothesis. 

Output

Output such m that n·m + 1 is not a prime number. Your answer will be considered correct if you output any suitable m such that 1 ≤ m ≤ 103. It is guaranteed the the answer exists.

Examples

Input

3


Output

1

Input

4


Output

2

Note

A prime number (or a prime) is a natural number greater than 1 that has no positive divisors other than 1 and itself.

For the first sample testcase, 3·1 + 1 = 4. We can output 1.

In the second sample testcase, 4·1 + 1 = 5. We cannot output 1 because 5 is prime. However, m = 2 is okay since 4·2 + 1 = 9, which is not a prime number.

Solution (in JAVA):

Solution:

import java.io.IOException;
import java.math.BigInteger;
import java.util.ArrayDeque;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.*;
import java.util.Scanner;

public class JavaApplication13 {
    
    private static boolean isPrime(int num) {
        if (num < 2) return false;
        if (num == 2) return true;
        if (num % 2 == 0) return false;
        for (int i = 3; i * i <= num; i += 2)
            if (num % i == 0) return false;
        return true;
}
    public static void main(String[] args)  {
        JavaApplication13 j = new JavaApplication13();
        Scanner in = new Scanner(System.in);
        int n = in.nextInt();
        int m=1,ch=0;
        for (;;) {
            ch=n*m+1;
            if (!j.isPrime(ch)) {
                System.out.println(m);
                break;
            }
            m++;
        }
    }
}