Problem: Lunar New Year is approaching, and Bob received a gift from his friend recently — a recursive sequence! He loves this sequence very much and wants to play with it.

Let f_1, f_2, …, f_i, … be an infinite sequence of positive integers. Bob knows that for i > k, f_i can be obtained by the following recursive equation:

$$$f_i = \left(f_{i - 1} ^ {b_1} ⋅ f_{i - 2} ^ {b_2} ⋅ ⋅⋅⋅ ⋅ f_{i - k} ^ {b_k}\right) mod p,$$$

which in short is

$$$f_i = \left(∏_{j = 1}^{k} f_{i - j}^{b_j}\right) mod p,$$$

where p = 998 244 353 (a widely-used prime), b_1, b_2, …, b_k are known integer constants, and x mod y denotes the remainder of x divided by y.

Bob lost the values of f_1, f_2, …, f_k, which is extremely troublesome – these are the basis of the sequence! Luckily, Bob remembers the first k - 1 elements of the sequence: f_1 = f_2 = … = f_{k - 1} = 1 and the n-th element: f_n = m. Please find any possible value of f_k. If no solution exists, just tell Bob that it is impossible to recover his favorite sequence, regardless of Bob's sadness.

Input

The first line contains a positive integer k (1 ≤ k ≤ 100), denoting the length of the sequence b_1, b_2, …, b_k.

The second line contains k positive integers b_1, b_2, …, b_k (1 ≤ b_i < p).

The third line contains two positive integers n and m (k < n ≤ 10^9, 1 ≤ m < p), which implies f_n = m.

Output

Output a possible value of f_k, where f_k is a positive integer satisfying 1 ≤ f_k < p. If there are multiple answers, print any of them. If no such f_k makes f_n = m, output -1 instead.

It is easy to show that if there are some possible values of f_k, there must be at least one satisfying 1 ≤ f_k < p.

Examples

Input


3
2 3 5
4 16


Output


4


Input


5
4 7 1 5 6
7 14187219


Output


6


Input


8
2 3 5 6 1 7 9 10
23333 1


Output


1


Input


1
2
88888 66666


Output


-1


Input


3
998244352 998244352 998244352
4 2


Output


-1


Input


10
283 463 213 777 346 201 463 283 102 999
2333333 6263423


Output


382480067

Note

In the first sample, we have f_4 = f_3^2 ⋅ f_2^3 ⋅ f_1^5. Therefore, applying f_3 = 4, we have f_4 = 16. Note that there can be multiple answers.

In the third sample, applying f_7 = 1 makes f_{23333} = 1.

In the fourth sample, no such f_1 makes f_{88888} = 66666. Therefore, we output -1 instead.

Solution (in CPP):

Solution:
#include <bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;
const int mod = 998244353, g = 3;
const int MAXN = 105;
int n, N, M;
inline int qpow(int a, int b) {
  int re = 1;
  while (b) {
    if (b & 1) re = 1ll * re * a % mod;
    a = 1ll * a * a % mod;
    b >>= 1;
  }
  return re;
}
inline int BSGS(int a, int b) {
  const int m = int(sqrt(mod) + 1);
  static map<int, int> myhash;
  myhash.clear();
  for (int i = 0, t = b; i < m; ++i) myhash[t] = i, t = 1ll * t * a % mod;
  for (int i = 1, base = qpow(a, m), now = 1; i <= m + 1; ++i)
    if (myhash.count(now = 1ll * now * base % mod)) return i * m - myhash[now];
  return -1;
}
struct matrix {
  int a[MAXN][MAXN];
  matrix() { memset(a, 0, sizeof a); }
  inline void clear() { memset(a, 0, sizeof a); }
  inline matrix operator*(const matrix &o) const {
    static matrix re;
    re.clear();
    for (int k = 1; k <= n; ++k)
      for (int i = 1; i <= n; ++i)
        if (a[i][k])
          for (int j = 1; j <= n; ++j)
            if (o.a[k][j])
              re.a[i][j] = (re.a[i][j] + 1ll * a[i][k] * o.a[k][j]) % (mod - 1);
    return re;
  }
  inline matrix operator^(int b) {
    static matrix re, A = *this;
    re.clear();
    for (int i = 1; i <= n; ++i) re.a[i][i] = 1;
    while (b) {
      if (b & 1) re = re * A;
      A = A * A;
      b >>= 1;
    }
    return re;
  }
} ans, trans;
int main() {
  scanf("%d", &n);
  for (int i = 1; i <= n; ++i) scanf("%d", &trans.a[1][i]);
  for (int i = 2; i <= n; ++i) trans.a[i][i - 1] = 1;
  ans.a[1][1] = 1;
  scanf("%d%d", &N, &M);
  ans = (trans ^ (N - n)) * ans;
  int indx = BSGS(qpow(g, ans.a[1][1]), M);
  printf("%d\n", (~indx) ? qpow(g, indx) : -1);
}