Problem: A permutation is a sequence of n integers from 1 to n, in which all numbers occur exactly once. For example, [1], [3, 5, 2, 1, 4], [1, 3, 2] are permutations, and [2, 3, 2], [4, 3, 1], [0] are not.

Polycarp was presented with a permutation p of numbers from 1 to n. However, when Polycarp came home, he noticed that in his pocket, the permutation p had turned into an array q according to the following rule: 

  * q_i = max(p_1, p_2, …, p_i). 



Now Polycarp wondered what lexicographically minimal and lexicographically maximal permutations could be presented to him.

An array a of length n is lexicographically smaller than an array b of length n if there is an index i (1 ≤ i ≤ n) such that the first i-1 elements of arrays a and b are the same, and the i-th element of the array a is less than the i-th element of the array b. For example, the array a=[1, 3, 2, 3] is lexicographically smaller than the array b=[1, 3, 4, 2].

For example, if n=7 and p=[3, 2, 4, 1, 7, 5, 6], then q=[3, 3, 4, 4, 7, 7, 7] and the following permutations could have been as p initially: 

  * [3, 1, 4, 2, 7, 5, 6] (lexicographically minimal permutation); 
  * [3, 1, 4, 2, 7, 6, 5]; 
  * [3, 2, 4, 1, 7, 5, 6]; 
  * [3, 2, 4, 1, 7, 6, 5] (lexicographically maximum permutation). 



For a given array q, find the lexicographically minimal and lexicographically maximal permutations that could have been originally presented to Polycarp.

Input

The first line contains one integer t (1 ≤ t ≤ 10^4). Then t test cases follow.

The first line of each test case contains one integer n (1 ≤ n ≤ 2 ⋅ 10^5).

The second line of each test case contains n integers q_1, q_2, …, q_n (1 ≤ q_i ≤ n).

It is guaranteed that the array q was obtained by applying the rule from the statement to some permutation p.

It is guaranteed that the sum of n over all test cases does not exceed 2 ⋅ 10^5.

Output

For each test case, output two lines: 

  * on the first line output n integers — lexicographically minimal permutation that could have been originally presented to Polycarp; 
  * on the second line print n integers — lexicographically maximal permutation that could have been originally presented to Polycarp; 

Example

Input


4
7
3 3 4 4 7 7 7
4
1 2 3 4
7
3 4 5 5 5 7 7
1
1


Output


3 1 4 2 7 5 6 
3 2 4 1 7 6 5 
1 2 3 4 
1 2 3 4 
3 4 5 1 2 7 6 
3 4 5 2 1 7 6 
1 
1 

Solution (in PYTHON):

Solution:
from __future__ import division
from sys import stdin, stdout
from collections import *

rstr = lambda: stdin.readline().strip()
rstrs = lambda: [str(x) for x in stdin.readline().split()]
rstr_2d = lambda n: [rstr() for _ in range(n)]
rint = lambda: int(stdin.readline())
rints = lambda: [int(x) for x in stdin.readline().split()]
rint_2d = lambda n: [rint() for _ in range(n)]
rints_2d = lambda n: [rints() for _ in range(n)]
pr = lambda args, sep: stdout.write(sep.join(map(str, args)) + '\n')
ceil1, out = lambda a, b: (a + b - 1) // b, []

for _ in range(int(input())):
    n, a = rint(), rints()
    mi, ma, used, rem = [a[0]], [a[0]], {a[0]}, list(range(n, 0, -1))
    rema = list(range(1, a[0]))

    for i in range(1, n):
        if a[i] == a[i - 1]:
            while rem[-1] in used:
                rem.pop()

            mi.append(rem.pop())
            ma.append(rema.pop())
        else:
            mi.append(a[i])
            rema.extend(list(range(a[i - 1] + 1, a[i])))
            ma.append(a[i])

        used.add(mi[-1])
    out.append(' '.join(map(str, mi)))
    out.append(' '.join(map(str, ma)))
pr(out, '\n')