Problem: You have a sequence a with n elements 1, 2, 3, ..., k - 1, k, k - 1, k - 2, ..., k - (n - k) (k ≤ n < 2k).

Let's call as inversion in a a pair of indices i < j such that a[i] > a[j].

Suppose, you have some permutation p of size k and you build a sequence b of size n in the following manner: b[i] = p[a[i]].

Your goal is to find such permutation p that the total number of inversions in b doesn't exceed the total number of inversions in a, and b is lexicographically maximum.

Small reminder: the sequence of k integers is called a permutation if it contains all integers from 1 to k exactly once.

Another small reminder: a sequence s is lexicographically smaller than another sequence t, if either s is a prefix of t, or for the first i such that s_i ≠ t_i, s_i < t_i holds (in the first position that these sequences are different, s has smaller number than t).

Input

The first line contains a single integer t (1 ≤ t ≤ 1000) — the number of test cases.

The first and only line of each test case contains two integers n and k (k ≤ n < 2k; 1 ≤ k ≤ 10^5) — the length of the sequence a and its maximum.

It's guaranteed that the total sum of k over test cases doesn't exceed 10^5.

Output

For each test case, print k integers — the permutation p which maximizes b lexicographically without increasing the total number of inversions.

It can be proven that p exists and is unique.

Example

Input


4
1 1
2 2
3 2
4 3


Output


1 
1 2 
2 1 
1 3 2 

Note

In the first test case, the sequence a = [1], there is only one permutation p = [1].

In the second test case, the sequence a = [1, 2]. There is no inversion in a, so there is only one permutation p = [1, 2] which doesn't increase the number of inversions.

In the third test case, a = [1, 2, 1] and has 1 inversion. If we use p = [2, 1], then b = [p[a[1]], p[a[2]], p[a[3]]] = [2, 1, 2] and also has 1 inversion.

In the fourth test case, a = [1, 2, 3, 2], and since p = [1, 3, 2] then b = [1, 3, 2, 3]. Both a and b have 1 inversion and b is the lexicographically maximum.

Solution (in JAVA):

Solution:
import java.util.*;
import java.io.*;

public class C1473 {
	static int arr[] = new int[] { 1, 2, 6, 5, 4, 3, 4, 5, 6 };

	static int getInvCount(int n) {
		int inv_count = 0;
		for (int i = 0; i < n - 1; i++)
			for (int j = i + 1; j < n; j++)
				if (arr[i] > arr[j])
					inv_count++;

		return inv_count;
	}

	public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
		Scanner sc = new Scanner(System.in);
		PrintWriter pw = new PrintWriter(System.out);
		int t = sc.nextInt();
		while (t-- > 0) {
			int n = sc.nextInt();
			int k = sc.nextInt();
			int lim = 2 * k - n;
			for (int i = 1; i < lim; i++) {
				pw.print(i + " ");
			}
			for (int i = k; i >= lim; i--) {
				pw.print(i + " ");
			}
			pw.println();
		}
		pw.close();

	}

	static class Scanner {
		BufferedReader br;
		StringTokenizer st;

		public Scanner(InputStream s) {
			br = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(s));
		}

		public Scanner(FileReader f) {
			br = new BufferedReader(f);
		}

		public String next() throws IOException {
			while (st == null || !st.hasMoreTokens())
				st = new StringTokenizer(br.readLine());
			return st.nextToken();
		}

		public int nextInt() throws IOException {
			return Integer.parseInt(next());
		}

		public long nextLong() throws IOException {
			return Long.parseLong(next());
		}

		public double nextDouble() throws IOException {
			return Double.parseDouble(next());
		}

		public int[] nextIntArr(int n) throws IOException {
			int[] arr = new int[n];
			for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
				arr[i] = Integer.parseInt(next());
			}
			return arr;
		}

	}

}