Problem: You have a sequence a with n elements 1, 2, 3, ..., k - 1, k, k - 1, k - 2, ..., k - (n - k) (k ≤ n < 2k).

Let's call as inversion in a a pair of indices i < j such that a[i] > a[j].

Suppose, you have some permutation p of size k and you build a sequence b of size n in the following manner: b[i] = p[a[i]].

Your goal is to find such permutation p that the total number of inversions in b doesn't exceed the total number of inversions in a, and b is lexicographically maximum.

Small reminder: the sequence of k integers is called a permutation if it contains all integers from 1 to k exactly once.

Another small reminder: a sequence s is lexicographically smaller than another sequence t, if either s is a prefix of t, or for the first i such that s_i ≠ t_i, s_i < t_i holds (in the first position that these sequences are different, s has smaller number than t).

Input

The first line contains a single integer t (1 ≤ t ≤ 1000) — the number of test cases.

The first and only line of each test case contains two integers n and k (k ≤ n < 2k; 1 ≤ k ≤ 10^5) — the length of the sequence a and its maximum.

It's guaranteed that the total sum of k over test cases doesn't exceed 10^5.

Output

For each test case, print k integers — the permutation p which maximizes b lexicographically without increasing the total number of inversions.

It can be proven that p exists and is unique.

Example

Input


4
1 1
2 2
3 2
4 3


Output


1 
1 2 
2 1 
1 3 2 

Note

In the first test case, the sequence a = [1], there is only one permutation p = [1].

In the second test case, the sequence a = [1, 2]. There is no inversion in a, so there is only one permutation p = [1, 2] which doesn't increase the number of inversions.

In the third test case, a = [1, 2, 1] and has 1 inversion. If we use p = [2, 1], then b = [p[a[1]], p[a[2]], p[a[3]]] = [2, 1, 2] and also has 1 inversion.

In the fourth test case, a = [1, 2, 3, 2], and since p = [1, 3, 2] then b = [1, 3, 2, 3]. Both a and b have 1 inversion and b is the lexicographically maximum.

Solution (in CPP):

Solution:
#include <bits/stdc++.h>

using namespace std;

typedef vector<int> vi;
typedef vector<vi> vvi;
typedef vector<vvi> vvvi;
typedef long long ll;
typedef vector<ll> vll;
typedef vector<vll> vvll;
typedef pair<int,int> pi;
typedef pair<ll,ll> pll;
typedef pair<double,double> pd;
typedef vector<pi> vpi;
typedef vector<pll> vpll;
typedef vector<bool> vbool;
typedef complex<double> cd;
typedef vector<cd> vcd;

#define pb push_back
#define eb emplace_back
#define mp make_pair
#define forall(it,s) for(auto it = s.begin(); it != s.end(); ++it)
#define F0(i,n) for(int i = 0; i < n; i++)
#define F1(i,n) for(int i = 1; i <= n; i++)
#define REP(i,a,b) for(int i = a; i <= b; i++)
#define F first
#define S second

int main(){
  int t; cin>>t;
  while(t--){
    int n, k;
    cin>>n>>k;
    for(int i = 1; i < k - (n-k); i++) cout<<i<<' ';
    for(int i = k; i >= k - (n-k); i--) cout<<i<<' ';
    cout<<'\n';
  }
}