Problem: You have a sequence a with n elements 1, 2, 3, ..., k - 1, k, k - 1, k - 2, ..., k - (n - k) (k ≤ n < 2k).

Let's call as inversion in a a pair of indices i < j such that a[i] > a[j].

Suppose, you have some permutation p of size k and you build a sequence b of size n in the following manner: b[i] = p[a[i]].

Your goal is to find such permutation p that the total number of inversions in b doesn't exceed the total number of inversions in a, and b is lexicographically maximum.

Small reminder: the sequence of k integers is called a permutation if it contains all integers from 1 to k exactly once.

Another small reminder: a sequence s is lexicographically smaller than another sequence t, if either s is a prefix of t, or for the first i such that s_i ≠ t_i, s_i < t_i holds (in the first position that these sequences are different, s has smaller number than t).

Input

The first line contains a single integer t (1 ≤ t ≤ 1000) — the number of test cases.

The first and only line of each test case contains two integers n and k (k ≤ n < 2k; 1 ≤ k ≤ 10^5) — the length of the sequence a and its maximum.

It's guaranteed that the total sum of k over test cases doesn't exceed 10^5.

Output

For each test case, print k integers — the permutation p which maximizes b lexicographically without increasing the total number of inversions.

It can be proven that p exists and is unique.

Example

Input


4
1 1
2 2
3 2
4 3


Output


1 
1 2 
2 1 
1 3 2 

Note

In the first test case, the sequence a = [1], there is only one permutation p = [1].

In the second test case, the sequence a = [1, 2]. There is no inversion in a, so there is only one permutation p = [1, 2] which doesn't increase the number of inversions.

In the third test case, a = [1, 2, 1] and has 1 inversion. If we use p = [2, 1], then b = [p[a[1]], p[a[2]], p[a[3]]] = [2, 1, 2] and also has 1 inversion.

In the fourth test case, a = [1, 2, 3, 2], and since p = [1, 3, 2] then b = [1, 3, 2, 3]. Both a and b have 1 inversion and b is the lexicographically maximum.

Solution (in PYTHON):

Solution:
from __future__ import division
from sys import stdin, stdout
# from fractions import gcd
# from math import *
# from operator import mul
# from functools import reduce
# from copy import copy
from collections import deque, defaultdict, Counter

rstr = lambda: stdin.readline().strip()
rstrs = lambda: [str(x) for x in stdin.readline().split()]
rstr_2d = lambda n: [rstr() for _ in range(n)]
rint = lambda: int(stdin.readline())
rints = lambda: [int(x) for x in stdin.readline().split()]
rint_2d = lambda n: [rint() for _ in range(n)]
rints_2d = lambda n: [rints() for _ in range(n)]
pr = lambda args, sep: stdout.write(sep.join(map(str, args)) + '\n')
out = []
sum_n = lambda n: (n * (n + 1)) // 2

for _ in range(int(input())):
    n, k = rints()
    inv, ans, mem = sum_n(n - k), [0] * k, [0] * (k + 1)

    cur = k
    for i in range(n - k, 0, -1):
        ans[k - i - 1] = cur
        cur -= 1

    cur = 1
    for i in range(k):
        if not ans[i]:
            ans[i] = cur
            cur += 1
    out.append(' '.join(map(str, ans)))

pr(out, '\n')