Problem: You have a sequence a with n elements 1, 2, 3, ..., k - 1, k, k - 1, k - 2, ..., k - (n - k) (k ≤ n < 2k).

Let's call as inversion in a a pair of indices i < j such that a[i] > a[j].

Suppose, you have some permutation p of size k and you build a sequence b of size n in the following manner: b[i] = p[a[i]].

Your goal is to find such permutation p that the total number of inversions in b doesn't exceed the total number of inversions in a, and b is lexicographically maximum.

Small reminder: the sequence of k integers is called a permutation if it contains all integers from 1 to k exactly once.

Another small reminder: a sequence s is lexicographically smaller than another sequence t, if either s is a prefix of t, or for the first i such that s_i ≠ t_i, s_i < t_i holds (in the first position that these sequences are different, s has smaller number than t).

Input

The first line contains a single integer t (1 ≤ t ≤ 1000) — the number of test cases.

The first and only line of each test case contains two integers n and k (k ≤ n < 2k; 1 ≤ k ≤ 10^5) — the length of the sequence a and its maximum.

It's guaranteed that the total sum of k over test cases doesn't exceed 10^5.

Output

For each test case, print k integers — the permutation p which maximizes b lexicographically without increasing the total number of inversions.

It can be proven that p exists and is unique.

Example

Input


4
1 1
2 2
3 2
4 3


Output


1 
1 2 
2 1 
1 3 2 

Note

In the first test case, the sequence a = [1], there is only one permutation p = [1].

In the second test case, the sequence a = [1, 2]. There is no inversion in a, so there is only one permutation p = [1, 2] which doesn't increase the number of inversions.

In the third test case, a = [1, 2, 1] and has 1 inversion. If we use p = [2, 1], then b = [p[a[1]], p[a[2]], p[a[3]]] = [2, 1, 2] and also has 1 inversion.

In the fourth test case, a = [1, 2, 3, 2], and since p = [1, 3, 2] then b = [1, 3, 2, 3]. Both a and b have 1 inversion and b is the lexicographically maximum.

Solution (in CPP):

Solution:
#include<cstdio>
#include<cmath>
#include<iostream>
#include<algorithm>
#include<vector>
#include<map>
#include<stack>
#include<queue>
#include<cstring>
#include<string>
#include<set>
//#include<unordered_map>
using namespace std;

#define rep(i,a,b) for(int i=a;i<=b;i++)
#define dep(i,b,a) for(int i=b;i>=a;i--)
#define m_p make_pair
#define fi first
#define se second
#define pb push_back
#define sz(x) (int)(x).size()
#define pi acos(-1)
#define IO ios::sync_with_stdio(false);cin.tie(0)
#define io ios::sync_with_stdio(false)
#define bug puts("---------bug----------")

typedef  long long ll;
typedef pair<int,int> pii;
typedef pair<ll,ll>pll;
const int inf=0x3f3f3f3f;
const ll INF=0x3f3f3f3f3f3f3f3f;
const int eps=1e-9;
inline int gcd(int a,int b){return b?gcd(b,a%b):a;}
inline int lcm(int a,int b){return a*b/gcd(a,b);}
inline int rd()
{
    int x=0,f=1;
    char ch=getchar();
    while(ch<'0'||ch>'9') { if(ch=='-') f=-1; ch=getchar();}
    while(ch>='0'&&ch<='9') { x=(x<<1)+(x<<3)+(ch^48); ch=getchar(); }
    return x*f;
}
// inline char nc() {static char buf[1000000],*p1=buf,*p2=buf;return p1==p2&&(p2=(p1=buf)+fread(buf,1,1000000,stdin),p1==p2)?EOF:*p1++;}
// inline void read(int &sum) {char ch=nc();sum=0;while(!(ch>='0'&&ch<='9')) ch=nc();while(ch>='0'&&ch<='9') sum=(sum<<3)+(sum<<1)+(ch-48),ch=nc();}
const int maxn=1e5+50;
int t, n, k;
int main()
{
    //IO;
    t = rd();
    while(t--)
    {
        n = rd(), k = rd();
        int cnt = n - k;
        rep(i, 1, k-cnt-1) cout << i << " ";
        rep(i, 1, cnt+1) cout <<k-i+1 << " ";
        cout << endl;
    }
    return 0;
}