Through a number of legislative actions, Congress has indicated its desire that agencies create telework programs to accomplish a number of positive outcomes. These actions have included recognizing the need for program leadership within the agencies; encouraging agencies to think broadly in setting eligibility requirements; requiring that employees be allowed, if eligible, to participate in telework, and requiring tracking and reporting of program results. Some legislative actions have provided for funding to assist agencies in implementing programs, while other appropriations acts withheld appropriated funds until the covered agencies certified that telecommuting opportunities were made available to 100 percent of each agency’s eligible workforce. The most significant congressional action related to telework was the enactment of Sec. 359 of Pub. L. No. 106-346 in October 2000, which provides the current mandate for telework in the executive branch of the federal government by requiring each executive agency to establish a policy under which eligible employees may participate in telework.In this law, Congress required each executive branch agency to establish a telework policy under which eligible employees of the agency may participate in telework to the maximum extent possible without diminishing employee performance. The conference report language further explained that an eligible employee is any satisfactorily performing employee of the agency whose job may typically be performed at least 1 day per week by teleworking. In addition, the conference report required the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to evaluate the effectiveness of the program and report to Congress. The legislative framework has provided both the General Services Administration (GSA) and OPM with lead roles for the governmentwide telework initiative—to provide services and resources to support and encourage telework, including providing guidance to agencies in developing their program procedures. In addition, Congress required certain agencies to designate a telework coordinator to be responsible for overseeing the implementation of telework programs and serve as a point of contact on such programs for the Committees on Appropriations. GSA and OPM provide services and resources to support the governmentwide telework implementation. OPM publishes telework guidance, which it recently updated, and works with the agency telework coordinators to guide implementation of the programs and annually report the results achieved. GSA offers a variety of services to support telework, including developing policy concerning alternative workplaces, managing the federal telework centers, maintaining the mail list server for telework coordinators, and offering technical support, consultation, research, and development to its customers. Jointly, OPM and GSA manage the federal Web site for telework, which was designed to provide information and guidance. The site provides access for employees, managers, and telework coordinators to a range of information related to telework including announcements, guides, laws, and available training. Although agency telework policies meet common requirements and often share some common characteristics, each agency is responsible for developing its own policy to fit its mission and culture. According to OPM, most agencies have specified occupations that are eligible for telework and most apply employee performance-related criteria in considering authorizing telework participation. In addition, OPM guidance states that eligible employees should sign an employee telework agreement and be approved to participate by their managers. The particular considerations concerning these requirements and procedures will differ among agencies. In our 2003 study of telework in the federal government, we identified 25 key practices that federal agencies should implement in developing their telework programs. Among those were several practices closely aligned with managing for program results including developing a business case for implementing a telework program; establishing measurable telework program goals; establishing processes, procedures, or a tracking system to collect data to evaluate the telework program; and identifying problems or issues with the telework program and making appropriate adjustments. Yet, in our assessment of the extent to which four agencies—the Department of Education, GSA, OPM, and the Department of Veterans Affairs—followed the 25 key practices, we found these four practices to be among the least employed. None of the four agencies we reviewed had effectively developed a business case analysis for implementing their telework programs. In discussing the business case key practice in our 2003 study, we cited the International Telework Association and Council, which had stated that successful and supported telework programs exist in organizations that understand why telework is important to them and what specific advantages can be gained through implementation of a telework program. According to OPM, telework is of particular interest for its advantages in the following areas: Recruiting and retaining the best possible workforce—particularly newer workers who have high expectations of a technologically forward-thinking workplace and any worker who values work/life balance. Helping employees manage long commutes and other work/life issues that, if not addressed, can reduce their effectiveness or lead to employees leaving federal employment. Reducing traffic congestion, emissions, and infrastructure effect in urban areas, thereby improving the environment. Saving taxpayer dollars by decreasing government real estate costs. Ensuring continuity of essential government functions in the event of national or local emergencies. In addition, some federal agency telework policies suggest other potential advantages. For example, the Department of Defense’s telework policy includes enhancing the department’s efforts to employ and accommodate people with disabilities as a purpose of its program. The Department of State’s policy notes that programs may be used to increase productivity. As another example, the U.S. Department of Agriculture credits telework with having a positive effect on sick leave usage and workers compensation. A business case analysis of telework can ensure that an agency’s telework program is closely aligned with its own strategic objectives and goals. Such an approach can be effective in engaging management on the benefits of telework to the organization. Making a business case for telework can help organizations understand why they support telework, address relevant issues, minimize business risk, and make the investment when it supports their objectives. Through business case analysis, organizations have been able to identify cost reductions in the telework office environment that offset additional costs incurred in implementing telework and the most attractive approach to telework implementation. We have recently noted instances where agency officials cited their telework programs as yielding some of the benefits listed above. For example, in a 2007 report on the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), we reported that, according to USPTO management officials, one of the three most effective retention incentives and flexibilities is the opportunity to work from remote locations. In fiscal year 2006, approximately 20 percent of patent examiners participated in the agency’s telework program, which allows patent examiners to conduct some or all of their work away from their official duty station 1 or more days per week. In addition, USPTO reported in June 2007 that approximately 910 patent examiners relinquished their office space to work from home 4 days per week. The agency believes its decision to incorporate telework as a corporate business strategy and for human capital flexibility will help recruitment and retention of its workforce, reduce traffic congestion in the national capital region, and, in a very competitive job market, enable the USPTO to hire approximately 6,000 new patent examiners over the next 5 years. As another example, in a 2007 report on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), we noted that most NRC managers we interviewed and surveyed considered telework and flexible work schedule arrangements to be very to extremely valuable in recruiting, hiring, and retaining NRC personnel and would be at least as valuable in the next few years. With regard to the second key practice aligned with managing for results, none of the four agencies had established measurable telework program goals. As we noted in our report, OPM’s May 2003 telework guide discussed the importance of establishing program goals and objectives for telework that could be used in conducting program evaluations for telework in such areas as productivity, operating costs, employee morale, recruitment, and retention. However, even where measurement data are collected, they are incomplete or inconsistent among agencies, making comparisons meaningless. For example, in our 2005 report of telework programs in five agencies—the Departments of State, Justice, and Commerce; the Small Business Administration; and the Securities and Exchange Commission—measuring eligibility was problematic. Three of the agencies excluded employees in certain types of positions (e.g., those having positions where they handle classified information) when counting and reporting the number of eligible employees, while two of the agencies included all employees in any type of position when counting and reporting the number of eligible employees, even those otherwise precluded from participating. With regard to the third key practice—establishing processes, procedures, or a tracking system to collect data to evaluate the telework program—in our 2003 review we found that none of the four agencies studied were doing a survey specifically related to telework or had a tracking system that provided accurate participation rates and other information about teleworkers and the program. At that time, we observed that lack of such information not only impeded the agencies in identifying problems or issues related to their programs but also prevented them from providing OPM and Congress with complete and accurate data. In addition, in our 2005 study at five agencies, we found that four of the five agencies measured participation in telework based on their potential to telework rather than their actual usage. The fifth agency reported the number of participants based on a survey of supervisors who were expected to track teleworkers. According to OPM, most agencies report participation based on telework agreements, which can include both those for employees teleworking on a continuing basis as well as those for episodic telework. None of the five agencies we looked at had the capability to track who was actually teleworking or how frequently, despite the fact that the Fiscal Year 2005 Consolidated Appropriations Act covering those agencies required each of them to provide quarterly reports to Congress on the status of its telework program, including the number of federal employees participating in its program. At that time, two of the five agencies said they were in the process of implementing time and attendance systems that could track telework participation, but had not yet fully implemented them.