The 110 th Congress will consider several measures that bear directly on funding for the programs and activities of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). The 109 th Congress adjourned without completing action on the FY2007 agriculture appropriations bill ( H.R. 5384 ), which funds most of USDA for the current year. The 110 th Congress is expected to combine all unfinished appropriations bills into either an omnibus spending bill or a year-long continuing resolution that likely would hold spending at close to FY2006 levels for most discretionary programs. These funding decisions for FY2007 might intersect with congressional consideration of the FY2008 budget and appropriations, which begins shortly after the release of the Administration's budget request in early February 2007. Of interest to agriculture is the FY2008 budget resolution, whereby Congress will establish a blueprint for all federal spending over a multi-year period, which could set the fiscal parameters of the next omnibus farm bill, to be debated in 2007. (See CRS Report RL33412, Agriculture and Related Agencies: FY2007 Appropriations , coordinated by [author name scrubbed], and CRS Report RL33037, Previewing a 2007 Farm Bill , by [author name scrubbed] et al.) The 109 th Congress debated extensively whether a multi-billion dollar emergency disaster assistance package should be enacted to compensate farmers for 2005 and 2006 production losses caused by natural disasters. In the final week of the 109 th Congress, an amendment ( S.Amdt. 5205 ) that would have provided an estimated $3.8 billion in supplemental disaster aid was defeated during debate on the FY2007 agriculture appropriations bill ( H.R. 5384 ). The amendment was supported by numerous farm groups primarily in response to a severe drought in the Plains states. Opposing the amendment were the Administration and fiscal conservatives in Congress, who insisted that any assistance needed to be offset with other spending reductions. In the 110 th Congress, supporters have introduced a package of assistance ( S. 284 ) that is similar to S.Amdt. 5205 . A series of severe winter storms in late 2006 and early 2007 could broaden the scope of proposed assistance to include 2007 production losses. (See CRS Report RS21212, Agricultural Disaster Assistance , by [author name scrubbed].) Since most provisions of the current omnibus farm bill ( P.L. 107-171 , the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002) expire in 2007, the 110 th Congress will be making decisions about the content of a new farm bill. Commodity price and income support policy—namely, the methods, levels, and distribution of federal support to producers of farm commodities—is traditionally the most contentious component of a farm bill. However, other food and agricultural issues, notably those surrounding conservation, rural development, trade, domestic food assistance, and biofuels, also will be debated. A key question for the 110 th Congress will be whether to extend farm support programs as currently designed, or to adopt different approaches given the pressures of tight federal spending constraints, concerns about the distribution of farm program benefits, and the threat of potential World Trade Organization (WTO) challenges to farm price and income support spending. (See CRS Report RL33037, Previewing a 2007 Farm Bill , by [author name scrubbed] et al.) The 110 th Congress will continue to monitor the Administration's participation in the current Doha Round of multilateral trade negotiations, which has focused on agricultural trade liberalization. Negotiations were indefinitely suspended in July 2006 when a compromise agreement on reducing subsidies or expanding market access for agricultural products could not be reached. While a new multilateral trade agreement may not be in place before Congress takes up the 2007 farm bill, a new farm bill will nevertheless have to contend with existing WTO commitments in agriculture and possible challenges to U.S. subsidies in WTO dispute settlements. (See CRS Report RL33144, WTO Doha Round: The Agricultural Negotiations , by [author name scrubbed] and [author name scrubbed].) Meanwhile, the 110 th Congress will consider bilateral free trade agreements (FTAs) concluded with Colombia, Peru, and Panama, which are expected to boost U.S. agricultural exports. Separate bilateral agreements with other countries, including Malaysia and South Korea, are also being negotiated. Congress also might consider the extension of Trade Promotion Authority, which provides for expedited consideration of trade agreements and expires June 30, 2007. Other ongoing trade issues of interest to Congress include barriers to agricultural trade (see CRS Report RL32809, Agricultural Biotechnology: Background and Recent Issues , by [author name scrubbed] and [author name scrubbed], and CRS Report RL33472, Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Concerns in Agricultural Trade , by [author name scrubbed]); the scope of restrictions that should apply to agricultural sales to Cuba (see CRS Report RL33499, Exempting Food and Agriculture Products from U.S. Economic Sanctions: Status and Implementation , by [author name scrubbed]); and funding for U.S. agricultural export and food aid programs (see CRS Report RL33553, Agricultural Export and Food Aid Programs , by [author name scrubbed]). In March 2005, a WTO appellate panel ruled against the United States in a dispute settlement case brought by Brazil, stating that elements of the U.S. cotton program are not consistent with U.S. trade commitments. In response, Congress authorized the elimination of the Step-2 cotton program, effective August 1, 2006. Following the indefinite suspension of the WTO Doha Round of multilateral trade negotiations in July 2006, Brazil has pressed for further reductions in U.S. cotton support in response to the panel ruling. Consequently, additional permanent modifications to U.S. farm programs may still be needed to fully comply with the "actionable subsidies" portion of the WTO ruling. Some policymakers are concerned that a successful challenge of the cotton program in the WTO could have implications for the other farm commodity support programs. For example, on January 8, 2007, Canada requested consultations with the United States on U.S. domestic corn subsidies, as the first step in pursuing a WTO challenge. Any changes to farm commodity programs ultimately will be decided by Congress, most likely in the context of the 2007 farm bill. (See CRS Report RS22187, Brazil ' s WTO Case Against the U.S. Cotton Program: A Brief Overview , by [author name scrubbed], CRS Report RL33853, Canada ' s WTO Case Against U.S. Agricultural Support , by [author name scrubbed], and CRS Report RS22522, Potential Challenges to U.S. Farm Subsidies in the WTO: A Brief Overview , by [author name scrubbed].) Although not as energy-intensive as some industries, agriculture is a major consumer of energy—directly, as fuel or electricity, and indirectly, as fertilizers and chemicals. By raising the overall price structure of production agriculture, sustained high energy prices could result in significantly lower farm and rural incomes, and are generating considerable concern about longer-term impacts on farm profitability. Agriculture also is viewed as a potentially important producer of renewable fuels such as ethanol and biodiesel, although farm-based energy production remains small relative to total U.S. energy needs. Current law requires that biofuels use grow from 4 billion gallons in 2006 to 7.5 billion gallons in 2012. This standard, along with tax credit incentives, is expected to encourage significant increases in U.S. ethanol production. Although the increased use of corn for energy improves the prices and income of corn growers, some policymakers are concerned that higher prices for corn will add to livestock grower feed costs. (See CRS Report RL32712, Agriculture-Based Renewable Energy Production , by [author name scrubbed].) Spending for conservation programs, which help producers protect and improve natural resources on some farmed land and retire other land from production, has grown rapidly since the 2002 farm bill. This growth in spending reflects the expanded reach of conservation programs, which now involve many more landowners and types of rural lands. One topic that continues to attract congressional interest is implementation of the Conservation Security Program, enacted in 2002. Some stakeholders have questioned why USDA has implemented the program in only a few watersheds, and why Congress has limited funding even though the program was enacted as a true entitlement. The environmental, conservation, and agriculture communities have started to identify conservation policy options that might be considered in the next farm bill. (See CRS Report RL33556, Soil and Water Conservation: An Overview , by [author name scrubbed] and [author name scrubbed].) The potential for terrorist attacks against agricultural targets (agroterrorism) is recognized as a national security threat. "Food defense"—protecting the food supply against possible attack—has received increased attention since 2001. Through increased appropriations, laboratory and response capacities are being upgraded. National response plans now incorporate agroterrorism. Yet some in Congress want additional laws or oversight to increase the level of food defense, particularly regarding interagency coordination, response and recovery leadership, and ensuring adequate border inspections. (See CRS Report RL32521, Agroterrorism: Threats and Preparedness , by [author name scrubbed] . ) Approximately 76 million people get sick and 5,000 die from food-related illnesses in the United States each year, it is estimated. Congress frequently conducts oversight and periodically considers legislation on food safety and could do so again.