As the central human resources agency for the federal government, OPM is tasked with ensuring that the government has an effective civilian workforce. In carrying out its mission, the agency delivers human resources products and services, including policies and procedures for recruiting and hiring, provides health and training benefit programs; and administers the retirement program for federal employees. The agency reports that approximately 2.7 million active federal employees and nearly 2.5 million retired federal employees rely on its services. According to OPM, the retirement program serves current and former federal employees by providing tools and options for retirement planning and retirement compensation. Two defined-benefit retirement plans that provide retirement, disability, and survivor benefits to federal employees are administered by the agency: (1) the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS), which provides retirement benefits for most federal employees hired before 1984 and (2) the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS), which covers most employees hired in or after 1984 and provides benefits that include Social Security and a defined contribution system. Retirement processing includes functions such as determining retirement eligibility, inputting data into benefit calculators, and providing customer service. The agency uses over 500 different procedures, laws, and regulations, which are documented on the agency’s internal website, to process retirement applications. For example, the site contains memorandums that outline new procedures for handling special retirement applications, such as those for disability or court orders. Further, OPM’s retirement processing involves the use of over 80 information systems that have approximately 400 interfaces with other internal and external systems. Recognizing the need to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of its retirement claims processing, OPM has undertaken a number of initiatives since 1987 that were aimed at modernizing its paper-intensive processes and antiquated systems. Initial modernization visions called for developing an integrated system and automated processes to provide prompt and complete benefit payments. However, following attempts over more than two decades, the agency has not yet been successful in achieving the modernized retirement system that it envisioned. In early 1987, OPM began a program called the FERS Automated Processing System. However, after 8 years of planning, the agency decided to reevaluate the program, and the Office of Management and Budget requested an independent review of the program, which identified various management weaknesses. The independent review suggested areas for improvement and recommended terminating the program if immediate action was not taken. In mid-1996, OPM terminated the program. In 1997, OPM began planning a second modernization initiative, called the Retirement Systems Modernization (RSM) program. The agency originally intended to structure the program as an acquisition of commercially available hardware and software that would be modified in- house to meet its needs. From 1997 to 2001, OPM developed plans and analyses and began developing business and security requirements for the program. However, in June 2001, it decided to change the direction of the retirement modernization initiative. In late 2001, retaining the name RSM, the agency embarked upon its third initiative to modernize the retirement process and examined the possibility of privately sourced technologies and tools. Toward this end, the agency determined that contracting was a viable alternative and, in 2006, awarded three contracts for the automation of retirement processing, the conversion of paper records to electronic files, and consulting services to redesign its retirement operations. In February 2008, OPM renamed the program RetireEZ and deployed an automated retirement processing system. However, by May 2008 the agency determined that the system was not working as expected and suspended system operation. In October 2008, after 5 months of attempting to address quality issues, the agency terminated the contract for the system. In November 2008, OPM began restructuring the program and reported that its efforts to modernize retirement processing would continue. However, after several years of trying to revitalize the program, the agency terminated the retirement system modernization in February 2011. In mid-January 2012, OPM released a plan to undertake targeted, incremental improvements to retirement processing rather than a large- scale modernization, which described planned actions in four areas: hiring and training 56 new staff to adjudicate retirement claims and 20 additional staff to support the claims process; establishing higher production standards and identifying potential working with other agencies to improve the accuracy and completeness of the data they provide to OPM for use in retirement processing; and improving the department’s IT by pursuing a long-term data flow strategy, exploring short-term strategies to leverage work performed by other agencies, and reviewing and upgrading systems used by retirement services. Through implementing these actions, OPM said that it aimed to eliminate the agency’s retirement processing backlog and accurately process 90 percent of its cases within 60 days by July 31, 2013. While its Fiscal Year 2013 Summary of Performance and Financial Information indicated that the agency was on track to eliminate the backlog, the agency nonetheless reported that two factors beyond its control prevented achieving the goal.First, Voluntary Early Retirement Authority and a Voluntary Separation Incentive Program offered by the U.S. Postal Service increased OPM’s retirement processing workload by over 20,000 cases. Second, funding reductions due to sequestration required the agency to curtail overtime work on retirement processing in April 2013. In March 2014, OPM again articulated a retirement claims processing improvement goal as part of its Fiscal Year 2014-2015 Agency Priority Goals strategy. Specifically, the agency reiterated the goal to process 90 percent of retirement cases within 60 days, but extended the date for doing so to July 2014. However, OPM did not achieve this goal, reporting that 77.9 percent of cases were processed within 60 days in July 2014. Further, in October 2014, the most recent month for which the agency has reported, 83.2 percent of cases were processed within 60 days. Our prior reports noted that OPM’s efforts to modernize its retirement system were hindered by weaknesses in key IT management disciplines. For example, in reporting on RSM in February 2005, we noted weaknesses in project management, risk management, and organizational change management. Project management is the process for planning and managing all project-related activities, including defining how project components are interrelated. Effective project management allows the performance, cost, and schedule of the overall project to be measured and controlled in comparison to planned objectives. Although OPM had defined major retirement modernization project components, it had not defined the dependencies among them. Specifically, by not identifying critical dependencies among project components, OPM increased the risk that unforeseen delays in one activity could hinder progress in other activities. Risk management entails identifying potential problems before they occur. Risks should be identified as early as possible, analyzed, mitigated, and tracked to closure. OPM officials acknowledged that they did not have a process for identifying and tracking retirement modernization project risks and mitigation strategies on a regular basis but stated that the agency’s project management consultant would assist it in implementing a risk management process. Lacking such a process, OPM did not have a mechanism to address potential problems that could adversely impact the cost, schedule, and quality of the retirement modernization project. Organizational change management includes preparing users for the changes to how their work will be performed as a result of a new system implementation. Effective organizational change management includes plans to prepare users for impacts the new system might have on their roles and responsibilities, and a process to manage those changes. However, OPM officials had not developed a detailed plan to help users transition to different job responsibilities. Without having and implementing such a plan, effective implementation of new systems could be hindered by confusion about user roles and responsibilities. We recommended that the Director of OPM ensure that the retirement modernization program office expeditiously establish processes for effective project management, risk management, and organizational change management. In response, the agency initiated steps toward establishing management processes for retirement modernization and demonstrated activities to address our recommendations. We reported again on OPM’s retirement modernization in January 2008, as the agency was about to deploy a new automated retirement processing system.management capabilities, including system testing, cost estimating, and progress reporting. We noted weaknesses in additional key Effective testing is an essential activity of any project that includes system development. At the time of our review, test results showed that the new system had not performed as intended. Although the agency planned to perform additional tests to verify that the system would work as intended, the schedule for conducting these tests became compressed, with several tests to be performed concurrently rather than sequentially. The agency stated that a lack of testing resources and the need for further system development, contributed to the delay of planned tests and the need for concurrent testing. The high degree of concurrent testing that OPM planned to meet its February 2008 deployment schedule increased the risk that the agency would not have the resources or time to verify that the planned system worked as expected. Cost estimating is the identification of individual project cost elements, using established methods and valid data to estimate future costs. Establishing a reliable cost estimate is important for developing a project budget and having a sound basis for measuring performance, including comparing the actual and planned costs of project activities. Although OPM developed a retirement modernization cost estimate, it was not supported by the documentation that is fundamental to a reliable cost estimate. Without a reliable cost estimate, OPM lacked a sound basis for formulating retirement modernization budgets or for developing the cost baseline that is necessary for measuring and predicting project performance. Earned value management (EVM) is a tool for measuring program progress by comparing the value of work accomplished with the amount of work expected to be accomplished. Fundamental to reliable EVM is the development of a baseline against which variances are calculated. OPM used EVM to measure and report monthly performance of the retirement modernization system. The reported results indicated that the project was progressing almost exactly as planned. However, this view of project performance was not reliable because the baseline on which it was based did not reflect the full scope of the project, had not been validated, and was unstable (i.e., subject to frequent changes).