In August 2008, we reported that almost half of MUAs nationwide— 47 percent, or 1,600 of 3,421—lacked a health center site in 2006, and there was wide variation among the four census regions and across states in the percentage of MUAs that lacked health center sites. (See fig. 1.) The Midwest census region had the most MUAs that lacked a health center site (62 percent), while the West census region had the fewest MUAs that lacked a health center site (32 percent). More than three-quarters of the MUAs in 4 states—Nebraska (91 percent), Iowa (82 percent), Minnesota (77 percent), and Montana (77 percent)—lacked a health center site. (See app. I for more detail on the percentage of MUAs in each state and the U.S. territories that lacked a health center site in 2006.) In 2006, among all MUAs, 32 percent contained more than one health center site; among MUAs with at least one health center site, 60 percent contained multiple health center sites, with about half of those containing two or three sites. Almost half of all MUAs in the West census region contained more than one health center site, while less than one-quarter of MUAs in the Midwest contained more than one site. The states with three-quarters or more of their MUAs containing more than one health center site were Alaska, Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island. In contrast, Nebraska, Iowa, and North Dakota were the states where less than 10 percent of MUAs contained more than one site. We could not determine the types of primary care services provided at individual health center sites because HRSA did not collect and maintain readily available data on the types of services provided at individual sites. While HRSA requests information from applicants in their grant applications on the services each site provides, in order for HRSA to access and analyze individual health center site information on the services provided, HRSA would have to retrieve this information from the grant applications manually. HRSA separately collects data through the UDS from each grantee on the types of services it provides across all of its health center sites, but HRSA does not collect data on services provided at each site. Although each grantee with community health center funding is required to provide the full range of comprehensive primary care services, HRSA does not require each grantee to provide all services at each health center site it operates. HRSA officials told us that some sites provide limited services—such as dental or mental health services. Because HRSA lacks readily available data on the types of services provided at individual sites, it cannot determine the extent to which individuals residing in MUAs have access to the full range of comprehensive primary care services provided by health center grantees. This lack of basic information can limit HRSA’s ability to assess the full range of primary care services available in needy areas when considering the placement of new access points and can also limit the agency’s ability to evaluate service area overlap in MUAs. In August 2008, we reported that our analysis of new access point grants awarded in 2007 showed that these awards reduced the number of MUAs that lacked a health center site by about 7 percent. Specifically, 113 fewer MUAs in 2007—or 1,487 MUAs in all—lacked a health center site when compared with the 1,600 MUAs that lacked a health center site in 2006. (See app. I.) As a result, 43 percent of MUAs nationwide lacked a health center site in 2007. Despite the overall reduction in the percentage of MUAs nationwide that lacked health center sites in 2007, regional variation remained. The West and Midwest census regions continued to show the lowest and highest percentages of MUAs that lacked health center sites, respectively. (See fig. 2.) Three of the four census regions showed a 1 or 2 percentage point decrease since 2006 in the percentage of MUAs that lacked a health center site, while the South census region showed a 5 percentage point decrease. We found that the minimal impact of the 2007 awards on regional variation was due, in large part, to the fact that more than two-thirds of the nationwide decline in the number of MUAs that lacked a health center site—77 out of the 113 MUAs—occurred in the South census region. In contrast, only 24 of the 113 MUAs were located in the Midwest census region, even though the Midwest had nearly as many MUAs that lacked a health center site in 2006 as the South census region. While the number of MUAs that lacked a health center site declined by 12 percent in the South census region, the other census regions experienced declines of about 4 percent. The South census region experienced the greatest decline in the number of MUAs lacking a health center site in 2007 in large part because it was awarded more new access point grants that year than any other region. Specifically, half of all new access point awards made in 2007— from the two separate new access point competitions—went to applicants from the South census region. For example, when we examined the High Poverty County new access point competition, in which 200 counties were targeted by HRSA for new health center sites, we found that 69 percent of those awards were granted to applicants from the South census region. The greater number of awards made to the South census region may be explained by the fact that nearly two-thirds of the 200 counties targeted were located in the South census region. When we examined the open new access point competition, which did not target specific areas, we found that the South census region also received a greater number of awards than any other region under that competition. Specifically, the South census region was granted nearly 40 percent of awards; in contrast, the Midwest received only 17 percent of awards. In our August 2008 report, we noted that awarding new access point grants is central to HRSA’s ongoing efforts to increase access to primary health care services in MUAs. From 2006 to 2007, HRSA’s new access point awards achieved modest success in reducing the percentage of MUAs that lacked a health center site nationwide. However, in 2007, 43 percent of MUAs continued to lack a health center site, and the new access point awards made in 2007 had little impact on the wide variation among census regions and states in the percentage of MUAs lacking a health center site. The relatively small effect of the 2007 awards on geographic variation may be explained, in part, because the South census region received a greater number of awards than other regions, even though the South was not the region with the highest percentage of MUAs lacking a health center site in 2006. We reported that HRSA awards new access point grants to open new health center sites, which increase access to primary health care services for underserved populations in needy areas, including MUAs. However, HRSA’s ability to target these awards and place new health center sites in locations where they are most needed is limited because HRSA does not collect and maintain readily available information on the services provided at individual health center sites. Having readily available information on the services provided at each site is important for HRSA’s effective consideration of need when distributing federal resources for new health center sites, because each health center site may not provide the full range of comprehensive primary care services. This information could also help HRSA assess any potential overlap of services provided by health center sites in MUAs. Mr. Chairman, this concludes my prepared statement. I would be happy to answer any questions that you or Members of the Committee may have. For further information about this statement, please contact Cynthia A. Bascetta at (202) 512-7114 or bascettac@gao.gov. Contact points for our Offices of Congressional Relations and Public Affairs may be found on the last page of this statement. Key contributors to this statement were Helene Toiv, Assistant Director; Stella Chiang; Karen Doran; and Karen Howard. This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. The published product may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without further permission from GAO. However, because this work may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this material separately.