Question: Which movie cost less to make, Back to the Future Part III or Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (the one that was nominated for BAFTA Award for Best Special Visual Effects)?
Choices:
The Flintstones in Viva Rock Vegas
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
National Treasure: Book of Secrets
Alvin and the Chipmunks: Chipwrecked
Holes
The Flintstones
G-Force
Back to the Future Part III
Old Dogs
John Carter
Program:
function: Find
inputs: Back to the Future Part III
function: Find
inputs: BAFTA Award for Best Special Visual Effects
function: Relate
dependencies: 1
inputs: nominated for
backward
function: Find
inputs: Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
function: And
dependencies: 2
3
function: SelectBetween
dependencies: 0
4
inputs: cost
less
SPARQL: SELECT ?e WHERE { { ?e <pred:name> "Back to the Future Part III" .  } UNION { ?e <pred:name> "Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban" . ?e <nominated_for> ?e_1 . ?e_1 <pred:name> "BAFTA Award for Best Special Visual Effects" .   } ?e <cost> ?pv . ?pv <pred:value> ?v .  } ORDER BY ?v LIMIT 1
Answer: Back to the Future Part III