PUMA: Planning Under Uncertainty with Macro-Actions

Planning in large, partially observable domains is challenging, especially when a long-horizon lookahead is necessary to obtain a good policy. Traditional POMDP planners that plan a different potential action for each future observation can be prohibitively expensive when planning many steps ahead. An efficient solution for planning far into the future in fully observable domains is to use temporallyextended sequences of actions, or “macro-actions.” In this paper, we present a POMDP algorithm for planning under uncertainty with macro-actions (PUMA) that automatically constructs and evaluates open-loop macro-actions within forward-search planning, where the planner branches on observations only at the end of each macro-action. Additionally, we show how to incrementally refine the plan over time, resulting in an anytime algorithm that provably converges to an ǫ-optimal policy. In experiments on several large POMDP problems which require a long horizon lookahead, PUMA outperforms existing state-of-the art solvers. Most partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) planners select actions conditioned on the prior observation at each timestep: we refer to such planners as fully-conditional. When good performance relies on considering different possible observations far into the future, both online and offline fully-conditional planners typically struggle. An extreme alternative is unconditional (or “openloop”) planning where a sequence of actions is fixed and does not depend on the observations that will be received during execution. While open-loop planning can be extremely fast and perform surprisingly well in certain domains, acting well in most real-world domains requires plans where at least some action choices are conditional on the obtained observations. This paper focuses on the significant subset of POMDP domains, including scientific exploration, target surveillance, and chronic care management, where it is possible to act well by planning using conditional sequences of openloop, fixed-length action chains, or “macro-actions.” We call this approach semi-conditional planning, in that actions are chosen based on the received observations only at the end of each macro-action. Copyright c © 2010, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org). All rights reserved. For a discussion of using open-loop planning for multi-robot tag for open-loop planning see Yu et al. (2005). We demonstrate that for certain domains, planning with macro-actions can offer performance close to fullyconditional planning at a dramatically reduced computational cost. In comparison to prior macro-action work, where a domain expert often hand-coded a good set of macro-actions for each problem, we present a technique for automatically constructing finite-length open-loop macroactions. Our approach uses sub-goal states based on immediate reward and potential information gain. We then describe how to incrementally refine an initial macro-action plan by incorporating successively shorter macro-actions. We combine these two contributions in a forward-search algorithm for planning under uncertainty with macro-actions (PUMA). PUMA is an anytime algorithm which guarantees eventual convergence to an ǫ-optimal policy, even in domains that may require close to fully-conditional plans. PUMA outperforms a state-of-the-art POMDP planner both in terms of plan quality and computational cost on two large simulated POMDP problems. However, semiconditional planning does not yield an advantage in all domains, and we provide preliminary experimental analysis towards determining a priori when planning in a semiconditional manner will be helpful. However, even in domains that are not well suited to semi-conditional planning, our anytime improvement allows PUMA to still eventually compute a good policy, suggesting that PUMA may be viable as a generic planner for large POMDP problems.