the potential ore within that, uh, Campbell zones. Uh, Daniel, I, I walked nine, 11, 14, and a few other levels this time. And it's, and it's right for the taking. It's just this the access we gotta get there. So that's what's taken the time. Thank you. And last question is probably be a bit simpler. Um, just Mungari. Um, just the numbers on page four. Can I just get a confirmation on whether these are equity numbers or, or do they have JV production in them? I just wanna make sure I'm treating like with like here. Sorry. Yeah. Dan so the, the physicals up, up the top will be 100% of what's processed when we're talking about, um, gold production, silver production that is our equitable share. So we, we're wanting to show, um, what the actual mining and processing has been able to do. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. Your next question comes from Levi Spry from UBS. Please go ahead. Uh, yeah. Good day. Uh, happy new year. Thank, thanks, thanks for the call. Um, c- can, can I just follow up on Dave and Dan's questions there around Red Lake. Um, Bob, can we get the tons and grades for the second half? And, and do I assume that the three year, 200,000 ounces means that we're going for a 50,000 ounce per quarter run rate into the, you know, 12 months or whatever expect to be <inaudible>? I think before Bob answers that, I, I'll have a go. Happy new year, Levi. Um, yes. Is, is the, i- is the answer to your last question. You know, to get to 200,000 ounces, we need to get to consistently doing a run rate of 50,000 ounces per quarter. Um, we'd prefer not to kind of break down into tons and grades for the next six months, because we just feel we will wanna build confidence ourselves. Uh, on a group guidance basis, we are comfortable we'll make the, the, the guidance range, uh, but we'd prefer just to give us, give us another, you know, couple of months, um, to just get comfortable that these, that these changes that we're seeing are gonna be repeatable and consistently deliverable. Yep. Okay. Thank you. Thanks Jake. Thank you. Your next question comes from Alex Barkley from RBC. Please go ahead. Uh, hi Jake team. Um, first a, a quick one at Cowal. It seems like sustaining CapEx is maybe running a bit low on an annualized basis. Is that, um, is there a reason for that or, or should we be expecting a lift in second half? Lawrie. Yeah, Alex, it is just basically, um, timing more than anything. Um, we expect that their second half will, will lift. I mean, the primary focus in the first half was getting the, the underground and the IWL, um, projects continuing. And in the second half, you'll see some sustaining capital come through. All right. No problem. And, uh, a quick one at Red Lake, uh, just to follow up on what's been asked. So for, for the second quarter, can we confirm that there was no grade reconciliation issued? Uh, yeah, there, there was dilution, but that was improving. Uh, and in the, in, in the months of December, we felt very comfortable that it we'd, we'd addressed some of the issues that we were getting in terms of both dilution, um, a and, um, and we feel confident that the models are performing to plan. Yeah. Okay. Yeah. I, I was sort of talking about the model but you've answered me there. Thanks very much, guys. Yeah. Thank you. Your next question comes from Matthew Friedman from Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead. Sure. Thanks. Morning, Jake and team. Um, I don't wanna labor the point on Red Lake and you did kind of just touch on it there, Jake, but I, I'm just, just wondering, you know, you, you've highlighted on the call and, and in the report a number of ways, but you know, tons are improving and volumes are improving. You know, we can see mining rates lifting, development rates lifting. But obviously grade keeps falling. Um, you've been underperforming the reserve grade for a year now. So I guess, does it, you know, does that mean we'll see an over performance at some point? Um, is there a need to rethink some of the dilution assumptions and other factors that underpin that reserve grade? You said, you, you know, you're comfortable with the way the model was performing at the moment. But, uh, I guess there's another year of data on this asset, um, you know, now, uh, I guess le- lead to any sort of expectations or anything that we should think about at the next, um, mineral reserves, uh… Sorry. Mineral resource or reserve update. Um, you know, any, any, anything to think about in terms of that? Yeah. Thanks Matt. I mean, a good, good question again. And Bob and his team have been doing a lot of work on understanding that. And, and again, we came to the, we are of the view and empirically that the models are performing to plan. But Bob, maybe you can give, uh, some color as to some of the issues and then hand over to Glen to just, uh, give some guidance on the, o- on the <inaudible>. Yeah, no problems. How you doing, Matt? Um, the number that I quoted, uh, when I was speaking, that was the December number. So the number in the report is, um, i- is an average for the quarter of 3.95. And in December it did lift to, to 4.9, which is starting to show out some of the, uh, dilution, uh, issues that were, I spoke about being under control. It's also showing some, uh, improvements in, uh, drilling accuracy and, um, and the like within the scope. So it's actually starting to improve significantly. And that's why, what Jake said about, we're pretty confident on the, on the models. Um, we're working on all those things. Are we where we need to be? I still think we've got improvements to be had. So I still think that there's, there's further uplifts to come. Um, but it is actually all moving in the right direction. So it's pretty, pretty pleasing. Um, Glen, did you wanna talk, uh, comment on the model? Yeah. Thanks Bob. Yeah, Matt, um, I think, uh, just a, you know, really, I guess a bit of a, a preview, um, you know, on our MRR update, which will, uh, come out with mid next month. Um, as you'll recall, when we, when we, when we did the sort of, I guess, the Evolution update to bring it in as compliance, uh, you know, with, with jock, um, we consolidated the models from over 130 to 19 principal models. Um, in the last 12 months, um, we'll, we've had new data and mining from six of those models. So, so they are the ones that, um, you know, we are going to be revising, you know, into the MRR annual update.