Can we pipeline it so that say uh the transcriber gets done with a quarter of the meeting and then we you run it through this other other stuff Well Uh stuff is just thinking that from so data point of view it may be best to send them whole meetings at a time and not try to send them bits and pieces Oh right So the first thing is the automatic thing Right and then then then the transcribers tightening stuff up and then IBM Right OK so you might as well ha run the automatic thing over the entire meeting and then and then uh you would give IBM whatever was fixed And Right them fix it over the entire meeting too Well yeah but start from the beginning and go to the end right So if they were only half way through then what give IBM OK Right As of what point I mean The I guess the question on my mind is do we wait for the transcribers to adjust the marks for the whole meeting before we give anything to IBM or do we go ahead and send them a sample Why wouldn't Let s their i if they were going sequentially through it why wouldn't we give them I mean i are we trying to get something done by the time Brian comes Well I I I mean I That don't was know question Though So if we if we were Yeah then it seems like giving them something whatever they That had gotten agree to I would agree be better Well than I nothing think I mean h they they typically work for what four hours something like that Hmm I gue hmm I think the they should be able to get through a whole meeting in one sitting I would think unless a lot harder than we think it is which it could be certainly If got like for speakers then I guess I Or mean if seven the or individual eight channels right Individual channels Yeah So gonna be depending on the number of people in the meeting um I guess there is Well this issue of you know if if the segmenter thought there was no speech on on a particular stretch on a particular channel and there really was then if it didn't show up in a mixed signal to verify then it might be overlooked so I mean the question is should should a transcriber listen to the entire thing or can it g can it be based on the mixed signal And I th eh so far as concerned fine to base it on the mixed signal at this point and seems to me too in that if they that need cuts to down just time the other cases they can listen to the individual if they need to Yeah But they don't have to for most of it Yeah good So Yeah don't see Good how good that good will work though What what aspect about tightening up time boundaries Yeah So So they how have the normal channeltrans interface where they have each individual speaker has their own line Yeah but listening to the mixed signal and tightening the boundaries correcting the boundaries You shouldn't have to tighten them too much because Should be program good does that yeah Except for it doesn't do well on short things remember so so It will have miss them It will miss most of the really short things Like that But those would be those would be It will it will miss Yeah you have to say more slowly Sorry to get c No work on that actually serious So it will miss stuff like that which Well I so so something that the transcribers will have to Yeah have but do presumably most of those they should be able to hear from the mixed signal unless embedded in the heavil heavy overlap section when Right case be what listening what the channels sure anyway concerned about the part Yeah I am too And I think an empirical question we uh couldn't we just have um I don't know maybe this just doesn't fit with the software but I guess if I didn't know anything about Transcriber and I was gonna make something to let them adjust boundaries I would just show them one channel at a time Oh they Well with can then marks do and but let they them for adju this meeting they would have to do seven times real time Yeah and it would it probably be more than that Yeah Right Because have to at least listen to each channel all the way through i but if very quick right I mean you scan I mean if you have a display of the waveform Oh Yeah talking about visually I w just don't Well think the other problem is the breaths cuz you also see the breaths on the waveform looked at the int uh s tried to do that with a single channel and and you do see all sorts of other stuff besides just the voice Yeah and I I think that going much more on acoustics than they are on visuals Well that that So not sure What you the digital what the digital task that you had your interface Um I know for a fact that one of those sh she could really well she could Yeah judge what actually what true number was Yeah based on right the on the absolutely waveform Yeah I found the same thing that when I was scanning through the wave form I could see when someone started to read digits just by the shapes Yeah she could tell which one was Um seven maybe Yeah So I don't But now entirely confused about what they do So looking at a mixed signal or looking what what are they looking at visually Well they have a choice They could choose any signal to look at tried lookin but usually they look at the mixed But tried looking at the single signal and and in order to judge when it Oh when it was speech and when it wasn't but the problem is then you have breaths which which show up on the signal But the procedure that imagining Yes people vary from this is that they have the mixed signal wave form in front of them Yes and they have multiple uh well see there isn't we don't have transcription yet So but markers of some Right sort Yes been happening automatically and those show up on the mixed signal N Oh the they t show up clicks separate ribbons Right So you separate separate ribbons ribbon for each channel and and i i be because being segmented as channel at a time with his with new procedure then you don't have the correspondence of the times across the bins uh across the ribbons uh you could is have there a line moving across the waveform as Yes goes Yes