What, you know… Given that it should produce pretty health- healthy cash flows this year, you know, what else could impact, um, kind of, cash flows which… should we keep on mind? Um, and then as a… kind of, a second question, what… Can you, kind of, revisit what cashflow parties are, if- if cash, you know, does inflect higher this year, um, could we see dividens or, you know, deleveraging further? Um, any color on that would be great. Thank you. Thank you Matthew. Uh, w- well, you're right. We- we are reducing compared to 2019 our free inaudible and therefor our free CapEx from one billion to- to maybe 400 million. And- and some of inaudible will probably be arranged through inaudible. So, they will not be considered CapEx. And we will be inaudible. However, the company is still carrying on significant monthly investments. Uh, we are concluding our retrofit of the cabins. So, that is requiring cash flow this year. There are a lot of engine repairs that are included in the… in the monthly CapEx. And we're targeting a monthly CapEx of approximately one billion this year. Which is similar to the one that we had in- in 2019. Regarding priorities, our main two priorities besides the engine repairs that are mandatory for our recurrent- recurrent operations, the main… the main two projects I would say are- are the retro-fitting of the cabins, inaudible investment in IT. We're improving our digital, uh, IT services to our customers. And- and those are the two main priorities. Okay, great. That's all for me. Thanks. Thank you. Our next question comes from Bruno Amorime with Goldman Sachs. Hi. Good morning everyone. So, I just have a follow-up question on the unit revenue, uh, perspectives in- in Brazil. Uh, you have mentioned that, uh, you were seeing a deceleration in the rate of growth in unit revenue in the fourth quarter. And so, if you are now taking a passage out of the market, it means that, you- you know, the market as a whole will likely inaudible a comparison base in terms of year and year variation of ASKs of capacity in the second quarter and since you are alre-… of ASKs of capacity in the second quarter and things you are already in the single-digit level for unit revenue growth in the first quarter. Is it possible for us to see, you know, a negative unit variation, unit revenue in the second quarter? Any indication you could provide at this point? Thank you very much. Hi, Bruno. This is Lorenzo. Uh, just to clarify, we are not taking out capacity. What I was trying to explain is that incorporation of the 14 aircraft happened around mid next- uh, last year. And therefore what you will see is that high growth in the first half, as compared of the first half of last year because of the lower base, and that gap will start- will shrink as the year continues because we will have already the impact of those 14 aircraft in, we had it in the second semester of 2019. So capacity will still be possible, and our guidance has crosstalk- crosstalk… is 79% for domestic versus in the year as a whole. Okay? So, uh, yields have, uh, improved as I said, as compared to last year in the first quarter. Uh, and in comparison second quarter, we'll still see, um, also how the market develops. Uh, the only point of consideration is that yield base also increased significantly last year because by the time of the second quarter, Avianca has mostly ceased it's- ceased it's operation. Yeah, so th- that was my concern because, you know, there was a big, uh, you know, jump in yields, it's only adjusted in the second quarter last year. And, and then with the much tougher comparison this, uh, you know… do you have any indication if it could be, you know, negative in the second quarter? Or it's too- too early to say? I think it's too early to say. Uh, however, I think that if you put everything together, our expectation for yields for RASK, if you want for the whole year, would be in the range of stability as compared to what we found in 2019. Thank you very much. Thank you. Our next question comes from Roberta Versiani with City Bank. Hi, good morning. Just a quick question, if you have had recent conversations with Qatar Airlines regarding that, uh, careers- inaudible future with inaudible. Thank you. Thank you, Roberta. N- no, we have not had, um, management conversations with Qatar. Other than the recurrent business conversations. Okay, thank you. No problem. Thank you. And our next question comes from Joe Kogan with Scotiabnk. Hello, and thank you for the call. I wanted to ask another question about the coronavirus. Um, I know it's still very early and there's not very much information, but I was wondering if you could help us, uh, get a sense of how large the impact could be in different scenarios. I mean, are there any historical precedents for something like this you would use in your analysis of figuring out what the traffic impact is? Are you considering some bad scenarios or good scenarios? I'm just trying to understand order of magnitude. I mean, would the impact on traffic be 5% or 50%, i- is really the thrust of the question. Yes, hi, Joe. Um, first, I'm not sure that any of the precedents before would serve as an example. Uh, both MERS and SARS had very little effect in Latin America when both happened. However, swine flu, that started in Mexico last- two decades ago, I don't know… 15 years ago, had a slightly bigger effect and traffics were double-digit impacted at the time. Honestly, can't remember exactly the figures. Um, and I'm not sure that this is a good point of comparison with whatever can happen this year. However, what I can tell you is we have very little traffic coming and going from and to Asia. So the impact in Southeast Asia and Asia in general is relatively limited in terms of our exposure. Um, in Europe, we fly to certain cities, several… eight cities- eight cities. We've seen the impact mostly in Milan. We are not seeing anything too significant yet in other countries in Europe and we do not fly to Iran either, which is another country where there is a significant, uh, number of cases. So, um, it's very hard to foretell, to be- to be thoroughly honest. What I can tell you is that we're following the- very closely. And as Ramiro explained, how we took the measures in terms of decreasing non-essential hiring, non-essential expenses and non-essential investments, just to be on the safe side, uh, with respect to this. All right, thank you very much. Thank you. And ladies and gentlemen, as a reminder, to ask a question, just press star then one your telephone keypad. And our next question is from Sabby Sisk with Raymond James. Hey, thanks for the follow up. Uh, just, uh, I- I- I want to