mean it just depends on how much disk space is a problem I mean the what you could do is decompress it to a temporary place and then operate on it and then delete it But I mean the segmentation also saves you space in the sense that you cut out all the nonspeech silences regions yeah And true you have you know twenty channels Well and assuming five speakers Assuming then you then the original Yeah Switchboard files So Mmm Well it seems like just shortening them is a good Yeah solution so we yeah don't have to do any coding Yeah think So kind of had There was a big disk crash when you were gone and No it was I was still here It was the day I left Oh was that the day you left suspicious He did it on purpose Yeah Leave to Japan the day No disk if crashes if I had done it on purpose I would have timed it right after I left But um Yeah so Chuck helped me out in uh r regenerating all the cha the different channel files for like a few meetings for like six meetings So I think split up even further kind of even more disorganized now since we moved some of the meetings to different directories on a different disk even right I Are think they you didn't you expand them to XE on Abbott XF No you the ones different that ones You the ones that you put them on when you put them on XE I don't remember where I put them now I think you put them on XE OK So what we found out was that um the disk that crashed was it w with a with a meta disk allocation you had both c t transcripts and the shortened files and the expanded files were all on XE were on the same sorry different Physical partitions disk of the same physical disk Mmm And conceivable I mean I I don't I mean so um I was told that possible that that might have uh caused additional wear on it Maybe caused it to to go Hmm think sooner was something else going on because uh Dave Johnson said that DD was getting accessed frequently Oh And it shouldn't be Right That Well why data not gets touched because sure we it write does it once and then we never touch it Yeah again Except meeting we copy the data to Well I mean so the wavefiles or or The anything files all because the transcripts saying there gigabytes Oh gigabytes so it has see be the wave files Yeah was something weird about that Yeah so I asked Dave about it and he hasn't looked into it yet but we should definitely double check on it Yeah like like the same meeting shortened files that we pull off of Popcorn when done doing the recording Yeah looked to the backup software as if they had been written you know Every every night single night Is that right f you know a week in a row very which strange weird I didn't realize that OK So at any rate so for file reorganization we need to first decide what gonna do and then when gonna do it Yeah So not sure who isn't involved with that I mean certainly me Chuck and Jane Anyone else care No and like in terms of the conventions to also uh you know s send a bit to Dan Ellis to see if if any get his input on it I don't Right think I don't think be Yeah So maybe we should do that Yeah not during this meeting Yeah but s another time and Yeah just get a list of everything Yeah gonna do Maybe n next week if we could OK trying to finish up Yeah some sure stuff like to So just update all the naming conventions and put all the files where they really belong on one disk That sounds like a good idea and then leave leave everything in place until the until the next full and then delete the old ones OK now and So just not talking about the s the X disks the X uh partitions just the backed up space or Well both need to be reorganized OK So um various paths th I mean this is why we have to do it in a synchronized way because um I think we should also at the same time try to uh convert over to your new naming conventions exactly That be too good So what I was saying We need to get a Yeah of all that stuff that we wanna do OK And so I didn't really get any responses from the naming conventions that I sent out so I assume alright with everyone actually haven't looked at it yet I haven't haven't No either chance Sorry so I will And by next week though Uh I don't should know have about made the that naming agenda mean item Th so these names that been using so far are with uh uh uh I wouldn't just wanna change them you know without some advance notice I mean th all these segment names that we Yeah been using I would rather not mess with them Yeah until we have some closure on some of the things we are currently Right dealing I with how so choose to do it the naming is up to you Well So talking about mean it different probably files eventually should probably be consistent with what doing but yeah I kind of agree with Andreas like a little bit I mean these I looked at the naming conventions and they look fine to me but at the same time it was just like you Well know if to we rename everything would be If we change things it won't really affect what doing No will but it think just to be consistent we should also I mean have the same conventions Right you case but you you want can switch that any time you want Yeah right Yeah I mean only gonna affect my work So Yeah not gonna I mean if assume we not gonna go like into you know my directories and Right change my file names So I Actually I was gonna Everybody global Yeah use it on all entries at at Fine ICSI slash to U change slash MR to MRM at all places Yeah at ICSI be great Really enjoy that With no with no advance Y warning you Well maybe I shouldn't say that on re record OK There was a typo in some of the contracts that Morgan got that someone one of our sponsors did a global sear search and replace for between sponsor and their name Oh no oh no And so it it was saying uh Well anyway I won't Yeah not sure whether one can right imagine that that might Yeah be one problematic problems that that would engender But So