AND THEN SORT OF THE MEETING IS THE WHOLE THING AND THE CHUNKS ARE THE INDIVIDUAL SEGMENTS THAT MEANS SORT OF WE HAVE MULTIPLE LEVELS OF OF REPRESENTATION WHICH WE PROBABLY IF WE IF WE DO IT THIS WAY LIKE WE F WE HAVE TO DISCUSS THAT IF WE DO IT THIS WAY THEN WE SHOULD PROBABLY FIND SOME ABSTRACTION MODEL SO THAT THE INTERFACE IN THE SENSE LIKE DEALS WITH IT AS IF IT'S SAME SO THAT THE INTERFACE DOESN'T REALLY HAVE TO WORRY WHETHER IT'S A MEETING IN THE WHOLE MEETING SERIES OR A SEGMENT WITHIN A MEETING YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN AND THAT'S PROBABLY STUFF THAT WE HAVE TO SORT OF LIKE PROCESS TWICE THEN LIKE FOR EXAMPLE THAT LIKE THE SUMMARY OF A MEETING WITHIN THE WHOLE MEETING CORPUS OR MEETING SERIES Y IS MEETING SERIES A GOOD WORD FOR THAT I DON'T REALLY KNOW WHAT HOW TO CALL IT YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN LIKE NOT NOT THE WHOLE CORPUS BUT EVERY MEETING THAT HAS TO DO WITH ONE TOPIC UM SO IN IN THE MEETING SE SERIES SO THAT A SUMMARY FOR A MEETING WITHIN THE MEETING SERIES ARE SORT OF COMPILED OFF LINE BY A SUMMARY MODULE AND THAT IS SEPARATE FROM A SUMMARY OF A SEGMENT WITHIN A MEETING 'CAUSE I DON'T THINK WE CAN SO ALL WE DO IS TREAT THE WHOLE LOT AS ONE MASSIVE DOCUMENT I MEAN THEY'LL IT'S NOT GONNA BE SO BIG THAT WE CAN'T LOAD IN A INFORMATION DENSITY FOR EVERY UTTERANCE AND WE CAN JUST SUMMARISE BASED ON THAT I I THOUGHT WE WOULD JUST HAVE LIKE UM ONE BIG SUMMARY UM WITH ALL THE UH DIFFERENT IMPORTANCE LEVELS UM DISPLAYED ON IT AND DEPENDING ON WHAT OUR UM ZOOM LEVEL IS WE JUST DISPLAY A PART OF IT SO ARE WE DOING THAT AT ALL LEVELS ARE WE UM AND WE WOULD HAVE ONE VERY BIG THING OFF LINE AND FROM THAT WE WOULD JUST SELECT WHAT WE ARE DISPLAYING AND JUST HAVE DIFFERENT LIKE FINE GRAINEDNESS LEVELS SORT OF SO FOR EXAMPLE YOU WOULD UM GIVE A HIGH VALUE TO THOSE UM SEQUENCES YOU WANT TO DISPLAY IN THE MEETING SERIES SUMMARY AND YOU JUST CUT OFF IS THAT THE ZOOM LEVEL CHANGES LIKE THE TH THE START AND THE END POSITION CHANGES AND THE ZOOM LEVEL CHANGES THAT WAS WHAT I SH I THOUGHT YEAH I THOUGHT LIKE I WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT WE COULDN'T DO THAT BECAUSE WE COULDN'T LOAD THE DATA FOR ALL THAT BUT I DON'T KNOW I MEAN THAT HMM I DON'T THINK THERE'S REALLY MUCH POINT IN DOING LIKE THAT WHEN IT'S JUST GONNA FEED OFF IN THE END THE INFORMATION DENSITY MEASURE BASICALLY AND THAT'S ALL CALCULATED OFF LINE SO WHAT YOU'RE REALLY DOING IS SORTING A LIST IS THE P COMPUTATIONALLY HARD PART OF IT SO I'M S NOT SURE IF I GOT IT I WAS MM-HMM MM-HMM SO WHAT YOU DO IS YOU SAY IF YOU'RE LOOKING AT A SERIES OF MEETINGS YOU JUST SAY WELL OUR WHOLE DOCUMENT COMPRISES OF ALL THESE STUCK TOGETHER AND THEN ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS SORT THEM BY J INFORMATION DENSITY LIKE MAYBE WEIGHTED WITH THE SEARCH TERMS AND THEN EXTRACT THEM I DON'T THINK IT'S TOO SLOW TO DO ON LINE TO BE HONEST I WA I WAS JUST WORRIED ABOUT THE TOTAL MEMORY COMPLEXITY OF IT BUT I I COMPLETELY ADMIT I MEAN I JUST SORT OF LIKE TH TOOK THAT FROM SOME THING THAT JONATHAN ONCE SAID ABOUT NOT LOADING EVERYTHING BUT MAYBE I WAS JUST WRONG ABOUT IT HOW MANY UTTERANCES W AND THAT'S NOT SO MUCH WHAT HE MEANT WITH NOT POSSIBLY LOADING EVERYTHING WAS THAT YOU M UM LOAD ALL THE UH ANNOTATION STUFF ALL THE SOUND FILES ALL SO WHAT WE HAVE IS WE WOULD HAVE A WORD LIKE WE WOULD HAVE WORDS WITH SOME PRIORITY LEVELS AND THEY WOULD BASICALLY BE BECAUSE EVEN THE SELECTION WOULD WOULD THE SUMMARIES AUTOMATICALLY FEED FROM JUST HOW PRIORITIZED AN INDIVIDUAL WORD OR HOW INDIV UH PRIORITIZED AN INDIVIDUAL UTTERANCE IS OR I ARE THE SUMMARIES SORT OF REFINED FROM IT AND MADE BY A MACHINE TO MAKE SENTENCES AND STUFF OR ARE THEY JUST SORT OF TAKING OUT THE WORDS WITH THE HIGHEST PRIORITY AND THEN THE WORDS OF THE SECOND HIGHEST PRIORITY SO THE UTTERANCES WITH THE HIGHEST LIKE MEAN INFORMATION DENSITY OR ARE WE DOING IT ON WORD LEVEL LIKE THE INFORMATION DENSITY CALCULATION YOU'VE GOT NO WAY OF GETTING IN AND EXTRACTING JUST THAT WORD I MEAN IT'S IMPOSSIBLE WE I THINK WE HAVE START AND END TIMES FOR WORDS ACTUALLY BUT IT'S YEAH BUT IT M IT MIGHT S BUT IT MIGHT SOUND CRAZY IN THE PLAYER WE SHOULD REALLY MAYBE WE CAN DO THAT TOGETHER AT SOME POINT TODAY THAT WE CHECK OUT HOW THE PLAYER WORKS BUT THERE'S MAYBE SOME MERIT IN ALTOGETHER DOING IT ON AN UTTERANCE LEVEL IN THE END SO I MEAN DO WE DO BOTH OR IS IT THE SAME THING WELL THE SKIMMING'S GONNA USE THE IMPORTANCE YEAH OKAY BUT LIKE AT FIRST IT'S JUST GONNA BE I. D. F. WELL MOSTLY SKIMMING YEAH WELL BUT ALSO ABOUT THE DISPLAYS I MEAN THE DISPLAYS IN THE IN THE TEXT BODY IN THE IN THE LATEST DRAFT THAT WE HAD SORT OF WE CAME UP WITH THE IDEA THAT IT ISN'T DISPLAYING UTTERANCE FOR UTTERANCE BUT IT'S ALSO DISPLAYING UH A SUMMARISED VERSION IN YOU KNOW LIKE BELOW THE BELOW THE GRAPH THE PART MAYBE YEAH R HMM ISN'T THAT THE SKIMMING YEAH BUT IT USE THE SAME DATA YEAH MA MAYBE THERE'S SOME MERIT OF GOING ALTOGETHER FOR UTTERANCE LEVEL AND NOT EVEN BOTHER TO CALCULATE I MEAN IF YOU HAVE TO DO IT INTERNALLY THEN YOU CAN DO IT BUT MAYBE LIKE NOT EVEN STORE THE IMPORTANCE LEVELS FOR INDIVIDUAL WORDS AND JUST SORT OF RANK UTTERANCES AS A WHOLE WELL MORE OR LESS SO IT WILL MAKE MORE SENSE AND IF YOU GET JUST EXTRACT WORDS AND I MEAN IF YOU IF YOU KNOW HOW TO DO IT FOR INDIVIDUAL WORDS THEN YOU CAN JUST IN THE WORST CASE IF YOU CAN'T FIND ANYTHING ELSE JUST SORT OF MAKE THE MEAN OF THE WORDS OVER THE UTTERANCE YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN I'M NOT QUITE SO WHAT IT DID YOU WANT TO DO IT I YOU JUST WANTED TO ASSIGN WELL WHAT'S THE SMALLEST CHUNK AT THE MOMENT YOU'RE THINKING OF OF ASSIGNING AN IMPORTANCE MEASURE TO IS IT A WORD OR IS IT AN UTTERANCE UH I THOUGHT ABOUT WORDS SO WE'RE THINKING OF LIKE MAYBE JUST STORING IT ON A PER UTTERANCE LEVEL BECAUSE IT'S IT'S LESS STUFF TO STORE PROBABLY FOR DAVE IN THE IN THE AUDIO PLAYING AND FOR IN THE DISPLAY IT'S PROBABLY BETTER IF YOU HAVE WHOLE UTTERANCES THAN I DON'T KNOW LIKE WHAT IT'S LIKE IF YOU JUST TAKE SINGLE WORDS OUT OF UTTERANCES