DOES ANYONE HAVE A GOOD IDEA LIKE AT THE MOMENT TO PLAY AROUND WITH IT WHAT'S A GOOD WAY OF DISPLAYING TWO TYPES OF INFORMATION IN THE IN THE COLOUR DISPLAY I MEAN UH THERE'S PROBABLY LOGICAL WAYS LIKE IF ONE IS WHATEVER IF ONE IS THE DARKNESS AND THE OTHER IS THE REDNESS OR SOMETHING HAS ANYONE EVER EXPERIMENTED WITH SORT OF DISPLAYING TWO DIMENSIONAL INFORMATION IN IN COLOUR BECAUSE THEN WE COULD DO JASMINE'S AND AND VERA'S PROBABLY IN THE SAME SCALE YEAH F FOR NOW NO FOR NOW LIKE YEAH FOR US MIGHT BE INTERESTING TO THE USER THOUGH JUST THE WORD IMPORTANCE MAYBE HMM S YEAH YEAH I THINK WE SH WE SHOULDN'T T WE SHOULD ASSUME A N ASSUME A NON LINGUISTIC USER BUT I THINK PROBABLY FOR US LIKE IN DEVELOPING IT IT WOULD BE INTERESTING YEAH SO UM I'LL TRY THE RED GREEN BLUE WHA WHAT'S DOES ANYONE KNOW WHAT THIS HUE AND SATURATION THING LIKE WHAT THAT NO NOBODY'S DONE MUCH COLOUR WORK WELL I DON'T KNOW HOW TO DO IT IN JAVA BUT OH ACTUALLY IT'S NOT A PROBLEM OF DOING IT LIKE I THINK IT'S LIKE IT COMES UP TO LIKE RED TWO OR THREE TIMES AND STUFF LIKE THAT OKAY WELL I GUESS I'LL JUST TAKE A LOOK AT THE PHOTOSHOP COLOUR CUBE OR WHATEVER IT IS GIMP COLOUR CUBE AND LOOK AT OR YOU COULD JUST SPLIT IT INTO TWO BLOCKS I SUPPOSE FOR NOW YEAH YEAH 'KAY SO WE'LL PRODUCE A VERSION OF THIS WHICH OPENS UP WITH A DIALOGUE BOX UM WHERE YOU CAN SELECT A FILE IS THAT RIGHT DAVE WOULD WE BE ABLE TO DO THAT AND AND THEN YOU'LL GET THIS TYPE OF DISPLAY WITH THAT FILE AND THAT'S UH AT THE MOMENT ARE W SO ARE WE ARE WE STILL TALKING ABOUT USING THAT ONE MEETING THAT EVERYONE IS USING NOW ARE TALK ABOUT SWAT SWI SWAPPING NOW SWITCHING YEAH SO EVERYONE SHOULD PRODUCE STUFF FOR THE WHOLE CORPUS NOW OR OKAY OKAY WE NEED THE EXPLICIT INFORMATION ABOUT EACH MEETING THEN LIKE SORTA WHI FROM WHICH UTTERANCE WHICH UTTERANCE IT GOES AND STUFF YEAH THAT'S WELL IT'S NOT READING THAT IN YET BUT THAT WILL BE PART OF THE DATA MANAGER AS WELL LIKE THERE'S ACCESS CLASSES ALL DEFINED FOR THAT I DIDN'T DOES ANY MM YEAH 'CAUSE EACH UTTERANCE HAS GOT AN I. D. ASSOCIATED WITH IT YEAH OKAY OKAY BECAUSE AT THE MOMENT WE ALL PRODUCE THE NUMBERS FOR EACH MEETING SEPARATELY WELL IF YOU THREE YEAH BUT WE SHOULD ALL USE THE SAME PROGRAMME I THINK WOULD PREVENT US FROM HAVING TOO MUCH MISTAKES IN IT OR AT LEAST UH THE MISTAKES WOULD BE CONSISTENT YEAH I'M NOT SURE ABOUT THAT AS IN I JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND MUCH ABOUT HOW DIFFICULT IT IS TO DO TO DO DIFFERENT THINGS NO IT'S NOT REALLY DIFFICULT IT'S JUST YEAH I MEAN I CAN DO IT I CAN READ IN THE DIFFERENT UM IMPORTANCE MEASURES AND THEN RE RE CALCULATE THE NUMBERS AS LONG AS EVERYTHING'S IN THE RIGHT ORDER IT SHOULDN'T LIKE WE SHOULD EVEN BE ABLE TO JUST I. D. IT WHEN WE'RE READING IT IN BUT WE HAVE GOT THE INDEX UM FOR CONVERTING FROM VERA'S I. D. S TO TO YOURS SO IT SHOULDN'T BE A PROBLEM SHOULD IT YEAH I'VE DONE THAT FOR THE CORRELATION AS WELL SO THAT'S WHAT THAT WAS QUITE EASY TO DO 'KAY YEAH I'VE GOT THE INDEXES FOR ALL THE MEETINGS I THINK YEAH YEAH SO IF WE EMAIL OUT A SCRIPT ON HOW TO LIKE F LOAD IT UM SO YOURS WOULD ALWAYS LIKE YOURS WOULD ALWAYS BE LOADED IN I GUESS LIKE YOU Y THERE WOULD ONLY BE ONE VERSION OF YOUR DATA AND YOU CAN JUST OVERRIDE THAT VERSION IF YOU WANT BUT YOU WOULDN'T HAVE A FILE OPEN DIALOGUE BOX FOR THAT THEN NO I DON'T THINK SO WELL THAT'S WHAT I MEANT IS IT'S A BIT POINTLESS HAVING IT AS FILE OPEN 'CAUSE IT WILL BE OPENING THOSE FILES ALL THE TIME IT'S MORE SENSIBLE TO HAVE IT AS AN OPTION AND THE LOCATION OF THEM OR JUST SO YOU CAN CONFIGURE THE THE LOCATION OF ALL THE FILES AS AN OPTION BUT WHEN IT STARTS UP IT SHOULD JUST READ THEM FROM THE DEFAULT PLACE OKAY BUT LIKE SO MAKE IT AN OPTION WHICH ONE IT DISPLAYS OR WHICH ONE IT USES FOR THE SUMMARISATION OR 'CAUSE IT 'CAUSE I WAS JUST THINKING SORT OF SO THAT BOTH JASMINE AND VERA COULD UM SEE THEIR DATA WORKING AND I MEAN OBVIOUSLY YOU IT'D HAVE TO PICK WHICH ONE TO SYNCH THE CLOCK TO MM IS THAT NOT GETTING TOO MUCH TO ADD ANOTHER DIALOGUE ACT WINDOW IS REALLY EASY SO WE WOULD HAVE LIKE EACH OF THOSE COMPONENTS FOR FOR JASMINE AND VERA YEAH I KNOW SO LIKE THE TOP HALF ONE THE BOTTOM HALF THE OTHER OR MAYBE THREE ACTUALLY MAYBE TOP HALF ONE BOTTOM HALF THE OTHER AND THE THIRD ONE AN AVERAGE THAT WE CAN CHANGE THE PARAMETERS FOR MM-HMM AND THEN YEAH I COULD EASILY MAKE IT THROW OUT THREE DIFFERENT DIALOGUE ACTS BUT WOULD THAT NOT REQUIRE THREE CLOCKS AND I BUT THAT BUT BUT THAT ALSO MEANS OKAY 'CAUSE THE DIALOGUE UH THE DISPLAY ALSO GETS THE INFORMATION ABOUT LIKE THE RELATIVE AND THE ABSOLUTE TIMES SO THAT WOULD BE CONVENIENT IF THAT JUST IF THERE'S JUST ONE OF THAT 'CAUSE OTHERWISE IT'S GETTING MESSY OH RIGHT YEAH I SEE WHAT YOU MEAN OH NO NO IT'S STILL GOOD BECAUSE UM OH NO IT ISN'T YEAH I KNOW WHAT YOU MEAN YEAH WELL I GUESS REALLY I MEAN LIKE ALTERNATIVELY WHY DON'T WE GO FOR THE SIMPLEST THING AND JUST CREATE THREE SCRIPTS OR TWO SCRIPTS WHICH LOAD A PARAMETER UH F COMMON LINE PARAMETER WHICH IS WHICH FILE TO LOAD AND AND THEN IT'S JUST THERE NO HOLD ON YOU IT WOULDN'T NEED THREE INTERNAL TIME SCALES 'CAUSE ONLY ONE'S SYNCHED TO THE CLOCK OR IT C AND THE OTHERS ARE ALL ABSOLUTE REAL TIME AREN'T THEY THAT'S WHAT'S DISPLAYED ON THAT THE BAR IS REAL TIME ISN'T IT SO THEY WOULD ALL BE IN THE SAME TIME SCALE OKAY WOULD THE OTHERS OH YOU OH YOU JUST HAVE THREE SUMMARISERS AND THEN THEY'RE ALL SYNCHED UP WITH ONE CLOCK NO NO ONLY ONE OF THEM SYNCHS AND TWO OF THEM ARE JUST YEAH 'CAUSE IT DOESN'T REALLY MATTER THEY SYNCH UP FOR THE PURPOSE OF EVALUATING THE DATA OKAY YEP SO WE HAVE THREE COLOUR DISPLAYS LIKE THREE OR I MEAN NOT IN THE FINAL VERSION JUST FOR NOW JUST JUST TWO YEP 'KAY SHALL WE WRAP THAT UP SOR SORRY I'M IMPOSING HOW EASY WOULD IT BE TO MAKE IT SO YOU CAN ADD ARBITRARY NUMBERS OF THEM DO YOU THINK YOU MEAN DISCONTINUOUS NO LIKE UH DIFFERENT MEASURES TO THE DISPLAY IF I HAVE TO DO IT F LIKE FLEXIBLY THEN I PROBABLY THEN IT WILL NOT BE SIGNIFICANTLY MORE DIFFICULT BUT IS IT WORTH ANY EFFORT THOUGH I MEAN