IT DOESN'T REALLY MAKE SENSE TO CALL IT FILE OPEN OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT 'CAUSE THAT'S IT'S MORE LIKE AN OPTION TO SET THE PAR YEAH BUT WHY DON'T WE YEAH I KNOW SURE IT J LIKE IT IT WOULD NOT NECESSARY NEED TO BE A PART OF THE FINAL THING BUT WHY DON'T WE JUST PROVIDE SOME MEANS EVEN IF IT DOES IT AUTOMATICALLY IN THE BEGINNING AS A START UP OPTION JUST TO ASK FOR A FILE NAME 'CAUSE THEN WE CAN JUST PUBLISH A SCRIPT THAT YOU JUST RUN AND THEN THIS WHOLE THING STARTS HMM YOU KNOW WHAT HAPPENED TO ME TODAY LIKE I FORGOT ABOUT THE WHE I'M NOT SURE IF WE HAD THAT PROBLEM BEFORE FINDING THE JAVA MEDIA THE JAVA X. MEDIA STUFF ON ALL THE JARS FOR THAT YEAH I WAS LIKE SUDDENLY PANICKING AT ELEVEN WHEN I REALISED GOD I JUST THOUGHT IT WOULD BE VERY STRAIGHT FORWARD TO GET IT GOING HERE AND THEN I GOT THAT THING YES SO UM IF WE DO A VERSION WHICH AUTOMATICALLY OPENS UP A FILE OPEN BOX YOU'RE YEAH F SO YOU'RE AUTOMATICALLY PRODUCING THE RIGHT FORMAT WITH THIS NO UM WITH JUST PER UTTERANCE UH YEAH F PER UTTERAN UH I PRINT THE UTTERANCES IN THE I. D. UH NO THE THE I. D. OF THE UTTERANCE AND UH THE MEASURE I THINK SO WOULD IT BE EASY SLASH DISSU DIFFICULT SLASH IMPOSSIBLE LIKE AT THE MOMENT IF WE SKIP TO A S TREATING A WHOLE SERIES AS ONE THING SO LIKE CREATING ONE FILE FOR THE WHOLE SERIES THAT GIVES THE UTTERA THE IDEAS FROM TOP TO BOTTOM AND OR EVEN JUST THE ENTIRE CORPUS THAT'S WHAT UM COLIN'S FILE HAS GOT THAT SHOULDN'T MAKE TOO MUCH DIFFERENCE IF I JUST TAKE WELL M A FILE OR WHERE ONE MEETING IS IN OR CONCATENATE ALL THOSE SHOULDN'T BE TOO BAD HMM DOES HIS IT'S IT'S EASY TO LOAD THAT MUCH JUST TEXT YEAH WHERE DO YOU THINK YOU CAN UH PRODUCE SOMETHING LIKE THAT LIKE I THINK WE SHOULD GO FOR LIKE FOR ONE GROUP NOT FOR THE WHOLE CORPUS UH I THINK IT MAKES MORE SENSE TO GO FOR THE WHOLE CORPUS BECAUSE THE MEET THE UM THE I. D. S GONNA HAVE GAPS AND STUFF IN THEM OTHERWISE AND IT MEANS YOU HAVE TO READ THROUGH THE LIST OF UTTERANCES WHEN YOU'RE COMPILING ALL THE DATA OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN YEAH YEAH YEAH YEAH YEAH NO BUT DAVE UM YEAH SO THA THAT'S WHAT I WAS THINKING THAT LIKE THE SECOND MEETING SHOULD CONTINUE TILL THE FIRST ONE'S STOPPED A AND FOR ONE GROUP THAT'S TRUE BECAUSE IT'S SORT OF LIKE THEIR MEETING'S YOU KNOW LIKE THAT ONE MEETING AND THEN HMM WELL AT THE MOMENT FROM THE DUMP FILE IT'S JUST GOT THEM UNIQUELY NUMBERED THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE CORPUS HMM THE UTTERANCES OKAY AND AND THAT'S THE AND ONE THING YOU REALLY DON'T WANT IS EVER TO HAVE TWO UTTERANCES THAT COULD POTENTIALLY HAVE THE SAME I. D. BUT IT JUST DOESN'T MAKE SENSE IN THE LOGIC WISE SORT OF LIKE UNTIL HERE IT'S THE MEETING ABOUT THIS THING AND THEN IT'S THAT THING AND THEN IT'S IT'S THIS LIKE WHEREAS COULDN'T WE COULDN'T WE JUST UM TAKE THE UM A NAME EACH UM EACH DIALOGUE ACT UM MEETING DOT UM DIALOGUE ACT NUMBER IT WOULD BE A LA LONGER NAME BUT 'CAUSE AT THE MOMENT IT'S GOT QUITE NICE PROPERTY THAT THE DIALOGUE ACT NUMBER ALSO COINCIDES WITH THE ARRAY INDEX NUMBER IN THE ARRAY OF DIALOGUE ACTS WHICH IS QUITE NICE WOULD THAT HANDLE IT THAT THIS WOULD ONLY LIKE THE DISPLAY WOULD ONLY DISPLAY ONE GROUP YEAH SO IF I MEAN I DON'T MIND WHERE IT'S DONE SO IF THE DATA MANAGER FILTERS IT OUT AND LIKE I JUST THINK THAT IN IN THE LOGIC OF THE PROGRAMME IT'S IT'S MUCH EASIER TO JUSTIFY WHY WE SAY WE TREAT A SERIES OF MEETINGS AS ONE SINGLE THING RATHER THAN W YOU MIGHT WANT TO DISPLAY ALL MEETINGS THAT HAD A PARTICULAR PHRASE MENTION SAY AND THOSE MIGHT NOT BE THE ONES THAT WE ENUMERATED AS ONE MEETING IN WHICH CASE YOU'RE GONNA HAVE CONFLICTING I. D. S AND THINGS LIKE THAT WHEREAS THE DA IF YOU DO IT IN THE DATA MANAGER YOU CAN CONTROL ANY LOGIC LIKE THAT PROGRAMMATICALLY RATHER THAN DOING IT BY HAND AND SETTING IT IN STONE FOR ALL TIME I B LIKE WOULD JUST I WOULD FIND LOGICAL REASONS FOR WHY YOU CAN SUGG SAY PEOP LIKE IT SEPARATES THE DATA FROM THE PROGRAMME LOGIC WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT DOING IS EMBEDDING SOME OF THE PROGRAMME LOGIC IN THE DATA UH BUT I SEE THIS TWO COMPLETELY G DEF LIKE I SEE EACH SER EACH GROUP IS COMPLETELY SEPARATE AMOUNT OF DATA THAT SHOULDN'T OKAY BUT WOULD IT STILL LIKE WOULD WE STILL IN THE LOGIC OF IT STILL HAVE CONTINUOUS I. D. S IF WE SAY WE TAKE JUST JUST ONE MEETING LIKE WOULD WOULD THE DISPLAY FOR EXAMPLE STILL BE ABLE TO JUST SAY I WANT FROM WHATEVER FROM THE FIRST UNTIL THE LAST AND AND EVERYTHING IN BETWEEN SORT OF AND AND THE DATA MANAGER WOULD THEN DISPLAY THAT JUST FOR THAT MEETING OKAY WELL IF THAT'S POSSIBLE YEAH HAVE YOU CURRENTLY GOT CONTINUOUS I. D. S FOR YOUR TOPIC SEGMENTS BUT YEAH TH THAT'S THE PLAN UM FOR THE TOPIC SEGMENTS YEAH SORRY FOR TOPIC SEGMENTS I HAVE BUT FOR THE UTTERANCES I'VE JUST GOT ONE MEETING SO FAR BUT THE IDEA WAS THAT IT WOULD BE CONTINUOUS OKAY I THINK IT SH EVERYTHING SHOULD BE LIKE THAT CONTINUOUS IN CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER OKAY IS THAT WHAT V WHAT YOU'VE GOT BECAUSE UM BECAUSE THE DIFFERENT MEETING SERIES OVERLAP I THINK REMEMBER HOW DID I DO IT A PROBLEM UM YEAH I DON'T KNOW FOR EXAMPLE AS THERE ARE NOT UM F. ZERO VALUES FOR EVERY SPEAKER OR ON SOMETIMES NOT FOR EVERY MEETING UM HOW WILL I COUNT THAT UP I MEAN IF THERE'S NO VALUE I GUESS YOU HAVE TO PUT A ZERO IN AH OKAY AT THE MOMENT I DON'T EVEN GENERATE ANY DOCUMENT UH DOCUMENT FOR THOSE YEAH BUT BECAUSE I MEAN IT'S NOT ZERO IT'S JUST A NOUN HMM WELL IT MIGHT BE MORE SENSIBLE TO ASSIGN IT AN AVERAGE VALUE BUT WOULDN'T IT BE BETTER FOR THE IMPORTANCE MEASURE IF THAT JUST WOULDN'T BE PART OF IT THEN THE WELL WE'D W ONLY USE F. ZERO WHEN IT WAS PRESENT THOUGH WOULDN'T WE HMM WE WELL WE'D WANT TO USE F. ZERO WHEN IT'S PRESENT YEAH THAT'S WHAT VERA SAID NO SO YOU YOU'D YOU'D ALSO SAY THAT IT SHOULDN'T BE PART OF THE IMPORTANCE MEASURE IF THERE'S NO F. ZERO YEAH YEAH WELL I I DON'T KNOW HOW WE'RE GONNA DO THE FUSING OF THE DIFFERENT IF INF IMPORTANCE MEASURES ANYWAY BU IF THAT'S DONE IN THE PROGRAMME OR IF THAT'S DONE OFF LINE I TH THINK IT SHOULD BE DONE IN THE PROGRAM 'CAUSE WE'RE PROBABLY GONNA WANT TO CHANGE IT YEAH YEAH