to project into the future when we had a lot of data uh and um such things might be useful for that in or before we invested too much uh effort into that he should uh with help look into some of the data that already have and see is there anything to this at all Is there any point which you think that you know you could gain some advantage and some potential use for it Cuz it could be that look through it and you say well this is just the wrong Wrong task for yeah for him to pursue his And and uh I got the impression from your mail that in fact there was enough things like this just in the little sample that that you looked at that that plausible at least possible Uh Yeah he was he he you know We met and he was gonna go and uh you know y look through them more systematically and then uh meet again So you know not a matter of Yeah But yeah I think I think So it anyway optimistic e a quite different thing from anything talked about that you know might might might come out from some of this But he can use text basically I mean talking major just using text I mentioned much several that w had to do with implications drawn from intonational contours and that wasn't as directly relevant to what doing OK interested in these these interesting knowledge structures inferences that you draw i from I mean he certainly could use text but we were in fact looking to see if there is there is there something in common between our interest in meetings and his interest in in in this stuff So And I imagine that transcripts of speech I mean text that is speech probably has more of those than sort of prepared writing I I don't know whether I it don't would know not but probably seems de like it would probably depends on what the prepared writing was But Yeah I don't think I would make that leap because i in narratives you know I mean if you spell out everything in a narrative it can be really tedious so Yeah just thinking you know when when face to face you have a lot of backchannel and Oh And That aspect Yeah And so I think just easier to do that sort of broad inference jumping if face to face I mean Well so if I just read that Dan was saying ahead of the game in that in that context Yeah I might not realize that he was talking about disk space as opposed to anything else I you know I I had several that had to do with backchannels and this wasn't one of them This this one really does um m make you leap from So he said you know ahead of the game w we have downsampling And the inference i if you had it written down I would it be same But there are others that have backchannelling just Can he I was less interested in those Sorry to interrupt Um I f f f d A minute uh several minutes ago I like briefly was was not listening and So who is he in this context Yeah a lot of pronoun So I was just realizing believe it You guys have been talking about he um for at least uh I don't know three three four minutes without ever mentioning the name again Yeah So Actually is my to notes worse this uh Morgan big you big and problem if you want to later with do gaze uh identification indexing or speech understanding of any sort wrote this down You just Yeah Yeah Cuz Morgan will say well you had some ideas and he never said Li He looked Well I think doing that intentionally Right aren't so you great Right So this is Yeah great because the thing is because looking at the per even for addressees in the conversation I bet you could pick that up in the acoustics Just because your gaze is also correlated with the directionality of your voice Could be Yeah that Can That would we interesting Yeah so that I mean to even know um when Yeah if you have the you should be able to pick up what a person is looking at from their voice Well especially with Morgan with the way we have the microphones arranged sort of right on axis and it would be very hard to tell Right Oh but Put Morgan the always like this and have fainter Wouldn't you these get fainter reception out here Sure but I think if talking like this Right now looking at Jane and talking now looking at Chuck and talking I don't think the microphones would pick up But that you difference this this problem I see Morgan is the one who does So this if most talking at you or talking at you I probably been affect No I th I think been affected by too many conversations where we were Lawyers about lawyers and talking about and concerns about oh gee is somebody going to say something bad and so on And so I so tending to stay away from names even am though Even uh you could pick up later on just from the acoustics I am you too t who you were looking And at we did mention who he was Yeah in Right conversation missed it But Do it Sh was Can uh Yeah say Yeah or Yeah yeah that Yeah just No too no sensitive No no it isn't sensitive at all I was just I was just I was overreacting just because been talking about it And No in OK fact it is interesting it is sensitive I I came up with something from the Human Subjects people that I wanted to mention I mean it fits into the m area of the mundane but they did say You know I asked her very specifically about this clause of how um you know it says no individuals will be identified uh in any publication using the data OK well individuals being identified say you have a a snippet that says Joe s uh thinks about about this field but I think wrongheaded Now I mean gonna be careful not to have the wrongheaded part in there but but you know say we say you know Joe used to think about this area in his publication he says that but I think changed his mind or whatever But I Then the issue of of being able to trace Joe because we know in this field and all this and and tie it to the speaker whose name was just mentioned a moment ago can be sensitive So I think really really kind of adaptive and wise to not mention names any more than we have to because if a slanderous aspect to it then how much to we wanna be able to have to remove