skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I believe the architectural profession suffers similar issues of that in the computer world - namely, newcomers to a project don't really ever want to put in the effort to refactor and more often than not would rather tear everything down and rebuild anew than try to understand the original intention of the architecture, and then fulfill those intentions.

So its sort of refreshing to see this very human instinct being reflected in other fields/professions. Next time I'm confronted with the idea of completely rebuilding some system architecture from scratch, I'll try to keep in mind the sanctity of my position in relation to those of other architects - it may indeed be better to re-facade the system and keep all the original plumbing and services in place, than to tear it down and re-write from scratch. I'm glad we're not the only ones who go through this - and I'm certainly happy to see a positive example of fixing the really important issues in the real world.
Well, on first principles, what I would expect to do would be:

>brew install tor-server
>mkdir mysite && cd mysite
>echo "Hello secret friends!" > index.html
>tor-server
Access your site at http://<hash>.tor
Not sure how much it applies here as I haven't looked at the code, but the Golang blog has a good article that talks about how to "Simplify repetitive error handling"[1].

[1]https://blog.golang.org/error-handling-and-go
Why is one particular aspect of sexual preference singled out as (1) being ingrained from birth, rather than developing during childhood like every other aspect; and (2) necessarily being a core part of everyone's personal identity?
This might prove unpopular but why can we never call a spade a spade?

In the area I lived in London for 15 years there were numerous traveller communities. Out of the 50+ I met in person over that time period how many do you think were pleasant? About 4. The rest tried to rob us, intimidate us, bully us, outright harm us, usually all for no reason except, "we are not them". They near literally destroy whatever area they decide to live in. The youngest person to pull a knife on a group of us was an 8yo traveller child. They just don't give a fuck in any sense.

I agree that they behave like this, in part, because they do not feel included as part of "normal" society. But I have to ask: Why in hell would anyone want these people in their society when they behave like this? And so continues the endless circle of crime against society and societies hate against them (which really... is justified?).

So we have this endless circle. To me the question is: Why don't they break this circle? Society offers them help, education, support in varying amounts which is there. They refuse to take it, because they do not appear to want to live under societies rules.

Then you have others come along and say "Well you're Xenophobic". Really? I'm Xenophobic, despite working alongside people of all races, religions, creeds with no problem at all? All because I don't want to be harmed and have my home life made a misery by a shitty person who feels the law and societies rules do not apply to them in any way?

If anything, isn't it they who are xenophobic? As they outright refuse to assimilate into the society they live in in any way, shape or form.

I'll never automatically hate a person because of their birth, that's incredibly stupid. But certain groups I'll be wary of, until they prove which direction (good/bad) they lean, because past experience of that group has taught me to be (and isn't that their fault?). To not be wary seems blind and itself... incredibly stupid.
It's hard, but important, to tease out the personality issues from the business issues in a situation like this. The personality stuff is a pain in the neck, but the business stuff is very serious in this case.

Anger management: definitely a personality issue. The guy is probably under a lot of pressure and doesn't know how to deal with it, so he lashes out. If you could continue to put up with it, you could probably stay and succeed.

Does not pay on time: definitely a business issue. This is a sign that this guy will have to be replaced if the company's product gets to market and succeeds. There's no way this guy will be able to manage a business growth phase, where meeting commitments to all stakeholders (customers, suppliers, employees, shareholders) is vital. If he has enough power to prevent his own replacement, this company is doomed. If he doesn't the company may be doomed anyway, because investor-appointed CEO quality is unpredictable.

Keep in mind what Gen. Charles de Gaulle said. "Graveyards are full of indispensible men." Your departure won't trash this company.

You've given it four good years. You've (hopefully) learned a lot. You've done what you can to make the company successful. If you have options on the usual plan, they have probably vested. You can, with honor, move on to your next opportunity.

You'll go through a period of mourning when you separate from these people. You probably know the phases: denial, negotiation, anger, sadness and finally acceptance. It's unpleasant but perfectly normal. Good luck.
I've been in a very similar situation before (one of the first engineer hires in a company that grew to about 15 people when I left). It's great that you're loyal and conscientious (you won't have any problems finding a job).

The first thing you need to do is sit down with your CEO and have an honest conversation about how you feel. Come prepared with an outline of all your grievances and be very specific about what changes that you need to see to be made. This includes compensation and hours. These days early stage startups are offering super competitive salaries, and it's more than fair to ask.

Having this conversation gives him a chance to do you and your coworkers right. Best case scenario: he totally empathizes and has a change in heart, and the company as a whole benefits.

But you have to be prepared for the worst (which will probably happen): not only will he offended by your honesty, he'll come out attacking your character. These kinds of CEO are just emotionally clueless, and nothing you say or do will change their minds. In this situation, you must be fully prepared to walk away from this company. By staying you'll be enabling his behavior and you have nobody to blame but yourself for being in a hostile environment. By leaving, you not only will find a better opportunity (and you will), you hopefully will give the CEO a wake up call.

When I put in my 2 weeks notice, I got blasted and put my founders and fellow engineers in a tough spot. But a lot of good came out of me leaving. Immediately after my 2 weeks notice, the CEO pulled everyone aside and gave everyone raises which were near market rates. The founders also became more aware of how employees felt. A few other coworkers who were as miserable as I was eventually left the company too, and they're all in better, happier places.

There will be some people who will see you as leaving people behind and making things tougher for them. Over time those individuals will come around and see that whatever decision you made, you made it for the right reasons. The most important thing to keep in mind while you go through this: your top priority is your physical, mental, and (most important) emotional health. Don't listen to what other people say.

Good luck with all this. This will be a tough journey, but if you keep your chin up, I guarantee that this will be the best thing that you'll ever do.
Tou need to luck at marginal cost: An old person is going to die, 100% chance, and that will cause sadness, etc. The question is what is the marginal value in each extra year of life, not is the death itself undesirable.

Your question also touches on abortion, and the argument that a fetus deserves less protection from society because of its lack of social connection.
http://www.equip.org/article/steven-pinkers-evolutionary-exp...

But you touch on a deeper question also: "saving lives" is a very modern idea. Traditionally, death was quote common all all corners of society, and the solution was to make more new people.
Similar to the tool written about here, FASD is also awesome! https://github.com/clvv/fasd

It remembers where you go and which files you open. These days I just do "z gn" (for example) and it'll go to the project directory I've most recently been working in containing the letters "gn". ("zz gn" gives me a list, sorted in order of probability)
> This also means that there's a higher chance that the software will be packaged in the distribution of your choice, because the bar is lower

Static linking and bundling of dependencies is a no-no in most distributions. If anything, the Go model is a headache for package maintainers to deal with.
Once the singularity [0] hits, the human score will be a constant.

So please don't make this an action of all of us, I'm not entirely sure robots are not vengeful.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_singularity
IPv4 Exhaustion Counters
serve2d looks promising, can see some good uses for it.

If anyone's interested, Corkscrew is an alternative solution, allows you to disguise SSH as HTTP/HTTPS traffic, useful for getting through restrictive firewalls to administer remote machines:

https://github.com/elia/corkscrew
I liked the article, but this is like the cultural equivalent of Not Invented Here. Does it really matter that organized Christianity believes that a guy woke up from the dead? If you want a sense of community and the rituals that go along with it, then you could absolutely join a church of your choosing and just not believe in zombie messiahs.

The wife and I have been talking about this at great length as of late. We are not wired to believe in the supernatural, but I am having a hard time coming up with reasons why that would prevent us from finding a church to go to. It does limit which churches might be accepting of us, as I will not be handling snakes or washing anyone's feet. But as churches get more and more devoid of fundamentalism (a survival maneuver), they become more and more like the thing being talked about in the fine article. Maybe it'll all meet in the middle one day.
What does the CTO say about the CEO's behavior?
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9990881
Mike Tyson also spoke that before his matches, most of his opponents were already defeated.

Then again, when he was 15 years old, he was destroying adult pro boxers during sparring.
Really? The Foundation has been founded. Does it need Bill?
List of Ian Lance Taylors Linker Articles
Great video. I'm amazed that so much of the system is still run on old, highly manual technology.

By comparison, the London Underground is all computerized, to the point where you can actually monitor the entire system in real time: http://traintimes.org.uk/map/tube/. The Tube is much older than the NYC subway, too, although admittedly smaller (11 lines compared to NYC's 34, 270 stations vs 468; on the other hand, the annual ridership is about 70% of NYC's).
Yep, and when the US U16 men's team scrimmaged the 2015 World Cup Champion USWNT, they won 8-0.
Show HN: The place for those, who want to change the world
"You can typedef a function declaration... and declare function prototypes..."

This is actually a very useful technique that I use all the time. It allows you to make sure that a function and any function pointers that point to it always have matching types (since you only have to change the prototype in one place - the typedef).
Those whiteners don't create the super-bright almost-blue color you get from the dentist.
None. I had experimented with low carb/keto diets for years for no more than a few weeks at a time, I find the theory is quite interesting. Never had the willpower to power through it for longer but it left me that empirical sensation that I function a lot better when cutting carbs.

A month ago I started keto again, and I've started to notice that some keto-friendly foods still give me some kind of physical discomfort, like bloating and other digestive issues. I've never been diagnosed with anything, but I wanted to get rid of everything that may cause gut discomfort, since many scientists espouse the idea that mental health is directly correlated to gut health and the main purpose is to understand if I can function better.

So I got rid of:

* all FODMAPs (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FODMAP), recommended against for all IBS sufferers

* all sweet stuff, especially fruit

* foods containing histamines (http://www.histamineintolerance.org.uk/about/the-food-diary/...)

This list is mostly experimental: on keto diet I feel myself shrinking down (i.e. the opposite of bloating), and it helped me to see the real effect of some kind of foods that I've always eaten but I've never been able to see the real effect they have on my body.

Anyway, this restriction doesn't leave very much, but I mostly live on unprocessed meat, eggs, butter, zucchini, bell peppers, olives (technically containing histamines but whatever), good quality cheese, some cream.

It's an interesting ride, not very scientific but I'm not trying to write a paper here, I'm just trying to eat what my body likes and avoid what my body doesn't handle well. And as an anecdote, yesterday, I ate onions again after 2 weeks of restriction, a vegetable I've probably eaten once a day for all my life, and I instantly felt like I was exploding from the inside. How haven't I noticed till now?

Some seem to joke that cutting out food groups is the reason for food intolerance: you are fine all your life, you get in the no gluten craziness and now you can actually feel sick when you reintroduce it in your diet. It's funny and it's also partly true: I could eat anything without any problem and now I feel measurably different on a lot of different nutrients.

Nutrition is rocket science.
I'm aware of constructivism, but what is "intuitionistic logic?" I am under the impression that the real numbers (and their uncountability) are generally accepted by constructivists.
... set up version control.

Thankfully nowadays this is basically git init for me.
In the past it involved much more.
> A few weeks ago I was driving through Calais, and there were so many migrants on the road they spilled onto the opposite lane.

Did you stop to help any of them? If the answer is no - that answers all of your question.

On a longer note - observant Muslims just rub the Europeans the wrong way. Because they pit against each other 2 strongly held beliefs - religious freedom and women are totally equal - politically, sexually and everything else to men.

Until Islam reforms in Europe - it will only become worse. We tamed the Christian Church - but right now it seems that secularism is under attack.

You will see how better will be received (lets hope it does not get to it) refugees from Ukraine or Armenia or Georgia.

Let the downvotes begin ...
>Do people become less religious only because of a rejection of the supernatural, or for other reasons as well?

Sociologically, people mostly become less religious when they feel that they control their own fate, and feel no need to ask for divine intervention. Hence why societies grow less religious as they grow rich and egalitarian, while highly unequal and/or poor societies have a tendency towards greater levels of religiosity.
I attend both religious and secular weddings and funerals, and no one seems to be missing a beat.

As an agnostic, I've never thought, "we need an alternative." That probably has to do with the fact that marriages and funerals, even religious ones, are already highly personal, custom affairs.

> secular alternatives for [...] baptisms

An initiation ceremony for secularism? I find that bizarre.
And some American subcultures have a cuture around teeth goldening!
Rousey's best shot against a comparably sized male fighter, would be an armbar. She is a relatively poor striker. It's why there's even a discussion to be had about her beating male fighters her size - her specialty around armbars. It's pretty obviously understood what comparable male fighters would do to women fighters like Bethe Correia. Everything else would give Rousey a lot of problems. Her ability to grapple with a comparable top-ranked male fighter that is even just 1/3 stronger would be very problematic.
> Why? I thought the whole reason men tend to be stronger is that we're generally physically larger. As in more pounds of muscle to be strong with.

No, a 180 pound man would absolutely destroy a 180 woman. It's just the way it is. To a large extent it's because the only weight in your body that's doing 'work' are your muscles, and women biologically have higher body fat percentages than men, including in top trained athletes in weight-division based sports. That difference can be quite substantial depending on the sport and the level. For normal people the average difference is about 11% (and you wouldn't see it, either, a man at 12% bodyfat looks very similar to a woman at say 18 or 20%) Meaning for a say a 180 pound individual at a 10% differential in bodyfat percentage, we're looking at a difference of 18 pounds of muscle. That's multiple weight divisions, a huge difference in division based sports like most martial arts. In other words you can have more muscle while being the same weight. A lot of this has to do with different steroid hormonal levels, like testosterone, and genetics, which dictate the ability and propensity to build muscle and store fat, which differ quite significantly between sexes.

Beyond that there are differences in hand-eye coordination between men and women, which I don't know exist for top athletes (although looking at women in sports like football or boxing that I know pretty well, it's often considerably worse with all due respect, so I'd assume technically there is a difference, too in general, although there are exceptions), and then there's aerobic fitness related things where men have better oxygen uptake, bodyweight adjusted, too, more hemoglobin mass etc.

But yeah outside of sports, a lot of it is weight based. You simply won't find guys the size of Valuev or Anthony Joshua in the opposite gender.

Anyway the whole 'beat a man' thing with Ronda is just marketing. The fact we're talking about this is exactly what it gets her: a ton of exposure even on platforms totally non-fighting related. Everyone within their own sport knows how big the gap is. She's sparred with tons of guys and has experienced getting toyed with. And that is true for many other sports. Some women have tried in various sports, tennis being the most common one, where you ended up with the nr 1 woman in the world not being able to win a single set against her brother who plays for recreation at college level. In fighting we've had Dutch pride Lucia Rijker, one of the greatest female fighters of all time, undefeated, actually trains Ronda in her striking, and she got knocked out unconscious by a complete and utter nobody easily and quickly, she never tried again.
It is a fantasy. Regarding the sparring between BJ Penn and her, it somewhat confirmed that he held back. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g8TBlo3yPUM#t=51m11s

There are various other videos of her rolling with other men (albeit bigger ones) like Mousasi and Luke Rockhold, and it is anything but competitive.

I think the situation is pretty comparable to Serena Williams, who would win against most "regular" men, but not be able to provide a competitive match against roger federer.
Chameleon Reconfigurable Processor
For some reason this comment was in the grey. When you look at the evidence, it seems quite obvious that Buchanan was, in fact, gay, which is interesting and completely detached from his performance.
> no more having to deal with dependencies at runtime

So, it is the same that linking the libraries statically? C and C++ has done that like since forever.
This is a somewhat misleading headline as Microsoft/Google/.. are mostly "pulling", not "pushing". Broadcom is the real pusher of 25 and 50GE; they basically bypassed the IEEE & developed it in near-secret, to become first-to-market at the expense of their competitors in the NIC and top-of-rack switching markets.

Now that they have working products ready-to-ship (or nearly so), they are trying to make it an industry standard, complete with its own standards body. The standard, of course, is going to be exactly what Broadcom has already implemented.

The technology is a natural and significant improvement over 10GE and 40GE within a datacenter though, and it is clearly going to be be gladly pulled by Microsoft, Google, et al over the next year.
According to the Wikipedia article of Olympic weightlifting world records, the 69kg men's record total lift is 359kg, while for women that record is 286kg. That's about a 25% difference.

Of course, world records might not be the best thing to look at, since the variance among the genders is probably different (although this discussion is about top MMA fighters, so it's fairly appropriate). Also, you can probably find very different numbers by looking at different weight classes and events.
Alain de botton has pondered about this as well. http://www.ted.com/talks/alain_de_botton_atheism_2_0?languag...

Rituals, let's just call them recurrent events, are a great way to bring people together. When people get together lots of good things can happen. However it has to be tied to something that people care about, not just some made-up gathering without purpose. The ancient greek agora comes to mind.
Another instance of this is in Moby Dick, which starts with the (great) scene of Ishmael sharing a bed with Queequeg before they ship out together. There's clearly no sexual relationship involved: it's just a way to save some money on a room, in an old-school version of the sharing economy, I suppose.
Hmmm, I found this http://www.thewire.com/technology/2011/10/how-survive-switch... which talks about Google ending the Reader social features as of the end of October 2011, sort of in favor of Google+ but that wasn't done well/thought out; I can't figure out if it was out of private beta by then.

So the narrative of at minimum neglecting Google Reader in favor of the not a substitute of Google+ would seem to be correct.
Really beautiful, but I wish you could go back easily - i.e. not having to click back through every location you visited.
s/everything/ready-made sandwiches/;

I live in Iceland. The trick is to either prepare your own sandwiches or eat something else.
Just a side note, "175%+" is actually a bit of an underestimate.

As an example, I'm 175# and can bench press 285# (3 whites) but I'm not a "strong male athlete" by any means.

Athletes who train for strength (linemen, powerlifters like GZCL) are putting up 2x their body weight or more, and that's just for bench press alone which is usually the lightest event.

Deadlifts and squats can hit 4x body weight which is just insane.
Both Rousey and Cyborg are champions, of bantamweight and featherweight respectively. There is no rule that one must go down in weight classes; Pacquiao, for example, went up.
"A startup requires that you pour your life into it."

The dude is a salaried employee from what I can tell from his post. Unless he is part owner this is a highly unethical proposition.
Will you send them my resume?

Is there something like glassdoor for startups so people can try to avoid startups like this?