skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If only there was some agency or agencies responsible for investigating possible illegal activity, we could have contacted them instead, and then they could investigate the matter with the input of the judicial system, interview the people involved, and come to the appropriate response.
This is a perfectly valid agenda, but it doesn't entitle one to doing so using the results of somebody else's labour.
This sounds like a REALLY bad idea. Docker is not really meant to run untrusted images.
These emptying office parks presents an opportunity. Certainly the larger ones contain infrastructure that can be repurposed, and the asking prices is decreasing. In the next downturn, the cost of purchasing a park will go down even more.

Perhaps the larger parks can be repurposed into something akin to a village. Reformat the buildings into something more traditional, apartments on the upper floors, offices and stores in the bottom, etc. Add more buildings to create more continuity. Let people be creative, let the fabric emerge.

Now in any given area, each of these potential villages is quite isolated from another. Still, pedestrian connections can be forged and inter-village transportation arranged.

Over time, we can heal this anomaly.
Why Ember 2.0 is the Framework you want to use
I suspect "able" here means "allowed". "I wish people would be allowed to make educated decisions…" is not criticizing anyone except perhaps the people who wish that people would not be allowed to make certain decisions themselves.
The promise of traffic-free transportation to work briefly flourished and died. What's the point of putting up with the commuter hassle when you live in a box in the middle of Blandland. May as well live in a more urban environment and one with the infrastructure to offer realistic non-driving options for the same commuter hassles.
How to brew beer with a ‘paile of cold water’
> user freedom.

He was an academic.

Did he anticipate user demand, market forces or that a corporation (Google, Microsoft, Hashcorp) could drive a permissive licensed open source project in the open?

It turns out the Firefox and Chromium, both liberally licensed projects, usurped Internet Explorer's monopoly on browsers. Both ultimately are backed financially by corporations with huge troths of patents and proprietary code.
Paypal is not the service to use when you need to make a transaction without meddling by self-righteous busy bodies.
There is just a lot of friction. Want es6, get ready to put gulp in your work flow. Want to sanely include frontend dependencies? Time to add throw in bower. Want those js/css to be injected into the page? Throw in wiredep or bite the bullet and chuck in the wirepack.conf.js. Don't want that and want to use a skeleton? Install yeoman and run the isomorphic js generatior that gives you a 1k+ line project and you haven't even made your app yet.
This is the second recommendation I've heard recently for JavaFX. I will check it out to see what it is about.
You're saying you won't even use something GPL? Linux is GPL, so do you use something else on your servers?
I think that is commonly assumed to be the most common use case for avoiding GPL. I have no idea whether that is actually the most common use case for avoiding GPL, and I don't know of anyone who's actually done the research on that in a useful way.
Programming the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
I have scripts collect all sorts of other data about the server and send it to central log server every minute, i do not really need exact data more of a snapshot (traffic, ram, cpu, harddrive etc etc) and well I do not like running things all time on server, tho' yes vnstat is very light
Yeah — not in awhile though! About four years ago I wrote a few articles about looking for a cofounder and then about learning how to code and launching the site myself that got popular here. Good memory.
> the danger was small relative to the normal everyday danger of driving with humans

The danger of a car having its transmission crap out on the freeway is non-zero, yes. On the other hand, they explicitly cut a vehicle's transmission on the freeway. The danger for the people in the immediate area of this vehicle was increased because the situation (a cut transmission) went from "maybe it will happen" to "it is definitely happening." At that point, whether or not an accident happened depended entirely on the skill and attention of the drivers around this vehicle something completely out of the control of the researchers.
A bank doesn't distribute its internal system so it can use GPL software.
Awesome thanks, I just found one of the sellers from that link - http://www.q-card.com/store/products.asp?cat=8
Both sides of the story are equal: unsubstantiated.
Interesting acquisition considering they also bought Form[0]. Would love to see some designer-centric prototyping tools built by Google specifically for Android devices. The OSX/iOS ecosystem is particularly well equipped in this area, and finding good design prototyping tools built for Android is a pain point for many people in UX/UI imo.

_

0. http://www.relativewave.com/form/google/
Likewise, I read a news story (long time ago, source forgotten) that interviewed several people who had survived jumping from the Golden Gate Bridge. The reporter asked each one what thoughts went through their head after jumping before hitting the water. It wasn't relief or clarity - almost unanimously, it was "What have I done?!?" and immediate regret.
The blog post actually commented on this:

> As I said, I am not only pro-copyleft, I am also pro-permissive licensing. The difference between these is tactics: the first tactic is towards guaranteeing user freedom, the second tactic is toward pushing adoption. I am generally pro-freedom, but sometimes pushing adoption is important, especially if you're pushing standards and the like.

Outside of that situation: because they might give back changes to your software, even if they don't free the rest of the code. Of course, this might be a good argument for the LGPL.
GitHub != Git. Git is free and open version control software, GitHub is a commercial hosting service and social network that uses Git. You can use Git without using GitHub.
BigCorp can try negotiate different terms if they really want the software under different terms, at least if the software is from a single source (or copyright has been assigned to that person/entity by the other contributors). Such negotiations may fail though, but this is no different to how they do business day in day out with other commercial entities so it shouldn't be a great culture shock for them. To put it further into BigCorp speak: adherence to the license is the standard "payment" plan for GPLed code, if that payment/licensing plan doesn't fit then you may be able to negotiate something else or find a competitor who accepts terms more compatible with your business.

It gets a bit more difficult of course where there are different contributors or the project itself relies on GPL code from elsewhere, which is not unlikely for large projects - it might not be possible (or at least practical) for the maintainer to even consider entering negotiations. This is by design how the GPL is intended to work. And again: this is no different to dealing with code from other commercial entities. If BigCorp doesn't like the choice that SomeOtherDeveloper has made license wise, they can of course take their interest elsewhere - nobody is forcing them to use GPL licensed code (as some people imply by use of terms like "viral").

Personally I prefer more permissive licenses when looking to use things in my own projects, especially in my day job where like you the GPL would generally be difficult to consider, but just like BigCorp this is my choice. It isn't something I would expect others to change their ways to accommodate.
Something is wrong with your browser or screen resolution. The page renders fine in Chrome with no artifacts like that, etc.
Or, as many others have pointed out, that her experience with her immediate management and group can be true without being representative of the entire company.

Note that, unlike the unverifiable hecklers, deelowe did not claim that her experience was invalid or that the numbers in the spreadsheet were inaccurate but instead discussed the question of sampling bias or simply the sample size being small enough to be skewed by other known factors.
Pitch your startup at the EU-Startups Conference 2015 in Berlin
Spot on. I live in a suburban town that is unique for my metro area in that it has a nice thriving downtown, great schools, 10 minutes from the downtown exit on the freeway, and really great quality of life. I have friends who want to move here and there are developers champing at the bit right to take some polluted and therefore useless and undeveloped property and clean it up to turn it into some nice condos.. it got shut down in a public vote. New houses haven't been built in the city in about 20 years, and the ones that are here are starting to show their age. The city has been in a boom, but that cycle is going to end if we don't get fresh money and new houses. The developers are moving further up the main artery to other, smaller towns, which leads to more congestion on the main roads. It used to be that the traffic started at my town, now it's starting at the next town up. But everyone is worried that their house value will go down if there is more availability. They don't realize the value will go down if the property becomes undesirable as well.
What about Linux kernel and Android?

There is an argument that companies should prefer the GPL for their own software that they open-source. It goes like this. If you are the copyright holder you own the software anyway and can change licenses at anytime so you are not bound by the GPL. However, your competitors (and future competitors) are. Therefore the GPL protects your company from someone else forking and closing the source for their improvements in the future.
I've seen Mr. Miller present at Black Hat and have talked with him about my own vulnerability reports to automotive vendors (I worked with one about two years ago to fix a rather embarrassing remotely exploitable flaw). However, I do not support testing or demonstrating any of the flaws on open public roads. Unforeseen things can and do happen. If the reporter would have been rear-ended this wouldn't have gone well for either researcher & that's enough right there to justify not doing this on public roads. The term "keep it to the track" which is often applied to the automotive racing scene is more than applicable here. The general public already tends to have a negative view of security researchers and performing "research" like this just re-enforces the perception.
Probably not, if you say so. I will give it a try. Thanks!
And that's a great thing to care about, and a great reason to create a license. The secondary question is: which license is best at perpetuating user freedom? This is a separate question than that of whether users should have freedom to mess with code. IMHO, the GPL is not the best license for perpetuating the most user freedom. Many people disagree with me on this, but their disagreement usually comes down to "the GPL is best for user freedom because it was created for user freedom and RMS is talking about user freedom." I'm not yet convinced that MIT-like, BSD-like, and Apache-like are any worse at perpetuating user freedom, and may in fact be far better at perpetuating user freedom due to their greater acceptance.
I did, though I asked permission from the Commissioner first
Right.

I'll attempt to bolster your argument, if I may...

We know that human and animal brains are made out of simple components. Probably the same components.

The difference between animals and humans seems to be in how those components are arranged and how many of them there are.

We've already demonstrated digital components that approximate individual neurons, and we've already demonstrated wiring groups of them up to perform useful work.

I think that if we find ourselves at an inflection point in history, it is because there might exist some relatively simply arrangement of digital neurons which results in a machine which can learn some sort of rudimentary self awareness[1] while also possessing a computer's ability to do math, store data, and recall data, communicate on the internet, etc.

1. Spend year of days with a newborn if you don't already know that humans have to learn it, too.
We're capitalists here, mostly, so people don't mind. People who are just here to spam get turfed out pretty quickly. I don't recommend stuff that I don't think is pertinent to a conversation.
Arduino Development in Atom Editor
Simplicity and minimalism are core values in Go, both in the language itself and the community and developers that use it, so clutter tends not to be a concern.

That aside, tags are currently in use in several ORM frameworks with a fair amount of success.
Google Acquires Pixate (YC S12) – Mobile Prototyping Redefined
I went through a period of depression as well and had such thoughts. If you don't talk with someone you wind up solving a temporary problem with a permanent "solution". Thankfully someone lit into me with both barrels to seek help and I haven't had any recurrence in the past decade.
We could easily reverse that reasoning:

Security researchers should only be liable for potential risks if we manage to hold those companies for potential risks.

If we fail to do the latter it's quite unfair to let individuals bear the brunt of legal enforcement.
Brother sues CEO who gave workers $70k minimum salary
That's like saying the movie theater is stacked against you because they charge admission to get in.

There is a huge difference between playing a game against the house which is mathematically set up to lose you money in the long term, vs. paying an entrance fee to compete against other players.
FWIW, Kubernetes provides its own load balancer, which you can put behind ELB.

Other than that, Kubernetes works on AWS out of the box, with a one line setup.

Full disclosure: I work at Google, on Kubernetes.
You're doing it right by living close to your work. Suburbs work well when they're really just small complete cities. Nothing wrong with that.

What I was thinking when I when I wrote "I'm not sure anyone loves suburbia" was that I'm not sure anyone loves that big suburban commute to the city. If that's eliminated, or mitigated by excellent transit connections (ie. pre-automobile street car suburbs), then a lot of negatives go away.
"(namely circumventing a type-anal non-strict compiler)"

Monads don't circumvent anything.

"in imperative languages straightforward code works just fine"

Or seems to, but is actually deeply broken. Which is regularly the case in the code bases I deal with day-to-day.

"the use case for this kind of function chaining doesn't appear all that often"

Or it does, and you miss it. All of computation can be expressed as function chaining. Writing C or Python, I've often wanted to be able to constrain things at that level.
“There are too many shitty programmers out there.” Take the pledge not to code
> different kinds of commercial space.

And different uses for existing space. I'm not a big believer in any economic theory, but I see supply-side drivers abound. Case in point, there are so many vacant ex-Dominick's you can rent/buy for a song.
I created something like this a long time ago (about 2 years, in fact) in the now defunct tryrethink.info[1]

I worked on it some more after doing a few try* sites, and open sourced a version [2] which could take any docker image name and do the same.

1: https://blog.docker.com/2013/07/try-rethinkdb-in-the-cloud-w...

2: http://github.com/keeb/any-saas
I work in industry as well, and GPL is rarely a problem, at least for pharmaceutical R&D. Perhaps you could be a bit more clear about which industry field you're talking about?
Customer Experience Management Platform Medallia Raises $150M from Sequoia
Why is v3 more annoying for you than v2?
Yes, there has been some recent studies that suggest the Central Dogma [1] may not apply in all cases. If I remember correctly, some forms of DNA methylation is heritable on the male side. Disclaimer: not a molecular biologist.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_dogma_of_molecular_bio...
The noise/chaos is attractive when you're young and have not found your own sound. When you have, the city becomes a lot less attractive. More interestingly, the city doesn't necessarily help you find yourself any faster.

Absolutes like this don't really help. That may be true for you, but it isn't for all of us.
It might not be illegal, but you have to realize you've labeled yourself as a pain in the ass, or someone willing to irritate and cause problems for a company, thus this will probably affect your ability to be promoted, or work on important projects / teams.

Everyone can respond how it is legal, their right, etc, but the fact that you are now known as a troublemaker won't bode well for you.
I wonder if that makes unix-likes so resilient is that at its core it is not a tool, but a toolbox.

If one look into a physical toolbox, many of the tools have not changed for generations. Heck, the basic hammer is likely as old as civilization itself.

Thing is that these tools can be combined as the user see fit at time of usage, even it if would freak out the original designer.

Upon writing this i find myself reminded of a Star Trek TNG episode where they have one of the designers of the Enterprise on board, and La Forge is giving her a tour.

She keeps pointing out way they are "doing it wrong" until they have a situation that falls completely outside of design anticipations, and they have to create a solution on the fly.

After that La Forge gives her a explanation about how in the field things rarely work as they do on the drawing board, in particular when millions of light years from the nearest space dock.

As such i think unix-likes are resilient because at its core it was made for admins by admins. It was made to work in the day when you didn't have the net to reach out to for solutions, nor another computer to work on to create the tools to fix what is broken.

One of the horrors of modernity is that we keep forgetting or ignoring how our present lives got bootstrapped in the first place. The kind of A boots B that Boots C that replace A type catch-22.
On YouTube it's "legal" because they have agreements with movie and music industries so they revenue from those ads go to them, not you. Even then, in some countries (Germany?) they flag it anyway and you won't even have the ads option, hence those quotes around legal.
My mother is technical and well educated. She probably understands General Relativity better than I do.
To me it seems like it is gross recklessness with public safety from car manufacturers. The car manufacturers are risking lives of all these people by not keeping the air gap between CAN and Internet...
This is about as meaningless as not comparing it to anything.

A valid comparison would be comparing the operations conducted with robotic assistance to a similar operation conducted using traditional means.

When there is no comparable treatment e.g. if there is no traditional surgery for the same endoscopic robotic procedure than the effectiveness of alternative treatment's needs to be investigated.

Other things needs to be accounted as well mostly post-op deaths and lasting side effects, endoscopic surgeries are known for having less severe effects at the post op stage as they do not affect as much tissue as a traditional surgery.

On the other hand endoscopic surgeries tend to miss things that might be apparent in a traditional surgery such as additional conditions or secondaries since a traditional surgery gives a much "wider" view of the well the insides as well as getting additional information the tactile feedback from touching the actual tissue.

Another data sets which will be interesting to see is what is the damage or loss of life due to waiting for robotic procedures as they require special equipment and specially trained surgical and support staff.

And there are probably countless other valuable data sets which us non-medical professionals can't even begin to fathom, but comparing a narrow field of surgery conducted in the states to general surgery information in the Netherlands is pretty meaningless to my eyes...
They always have.

Then they have kids.
But on the other hand, VLC was packaged for the iphone at one point to let users of that platform use it. Source was made available to everyone. It was decided that GPL version 3 wouldn't allow GPL software on the iphone so users were not free to use GPL software on their platform. It is available now for iphone so I'm not sure what changed. I thought it was very odd that GPL advocates wanted to limit user freedom in that case.
This is such nonsense, using GPL software can't 'infect' software you are writing. I could understand having a rule about not putting GPL source code on your machine in the case you might accidently reuse some of it -- but even that seems unlikely.

I guess it's just easier to say 'GPL bad' than actually explain copyright to every developer.
Well, you did comment on an article where many corporations view free software as a stepping stone to "attaching strings."

Why can't the corporations negotiate separate licensing deals?

Why do the corporations keep building the same tooling over and over instead?

If you hate working for such a corporation (and I know it may seem trite) but put your resume out there and try to find a better job.

Is software freedom doomed simply because we, the developers, can't negotiate sane licensing agreements and better jobs?
I'm afraid answers like this actually make the confusion problem worse (nothing against your comment, just an observation in general.)

If you're confused about the differences between similar-sounding products X and Y, the fact that "X runs on Y" or "Y supports X" has never made the situation any better, it only makes the line between X and Y even more blurred.

I think this is especially true of Mesos, because people have a tendency to attribute qualities to Mesos that are actually qualities of a particular Mesos framework like Marathon or Aurora. As it is, Mesos is more of an SDK than anything, giving you the tools to write an orchestration system. It comes with built-in ways to communicate with nodes over a message bus, the ability to look at your nodes as resources, etc... but all of the scheduling logic is up to the frameworks themselves.

I think Mesos has a perception problem because of this. They want to build up hype about what mesos is and can do, so they claim things like Mesos being able to schedule docker images and keep them running, etc... but that's really the job of something like Marathon that runs as a Mesos framework. But if they didn't claim such things, Mesos wouldn't seem very compelling.

To me, the biggest benefit of Mesos is what the gain would be if every datacenter scheduler was a Mesos framework (yarn/spark/kubernetes/marathon/fleet/swarm/aurora, etc), and Mesos was only used to maintain multitenancy on the same hardware. That's where the real advantages come from... if you want to try Kubernetes you shouldn't have to dedicate hardware to it, you should just install it on your existing mesos cluster that is already running the rest of your stuff. In this respect, mesos is only useful insofar as all the big cluster managers use it as their underlying substrate.
If this is of any consolation to you, I'm pretty sure Twitter strips EXIF data on upload.