skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
As a user, you have to choose between different risks: the risk of attackers using easily-made exploits to hit a known flaw; the risk that they issued a patch that doesn't patch. One sounds much more serious than the other. Further, you can test the patch after the exploit is released later.

Instead, you want to acquire immediate vulnerability to a large group of hackers to prevent a patch from maybe making you vulnerable to a smaller number that either has an existing exploit or RE'd the non-working patch to devise a new one. Makes no sense lol... Better to get the patch, do basic tests to ensure it doesn't break functionality, install it, monitor the system/network, and then verify the security later when the sploit is released.
Since I can't reply directly that paper references classical FRP and how elm differs.

Anyway my metapoint still stands in that tone is a poor way to foster community and collaboration.
I just thought of another set of implications:

WordPress Foundation is the non-profit that owns the WordPress trademarks and source code. Automattic is a commercial entity working to "defend" the trademark and attack a license infringer. And Matt Mullenweg runs both organizations.

If they're using funds from the commercial to support the non-profit and Matt Mullenweg runs both organizations, who's behalf are they acting on? Are they really separate organizations? Legally they are, but in practice, is that the case?

Does this begin to create legal liability because
a) WPF isn't really being a non-profit; or
b) Automattic has been attaching requirements to their contributions and support?

I honestly don't know. I'm wondering.

Ref: http://torquemag.io/wpf-automattic/
> "That demon horse scares the crap out of me, though"

We call him "Blucifer". He killed his creator (really -- a piece of the sculpture fell on the artist's leg and severed an artery.)

http://www.slate.com/blogs/atlas_obscura/2014/03/17/the_blue...
> The last time I looked into the WP theme GPL issue, by some of the mentioned logic, every PHP script ever written and distributed would end up being a derivative work of the PHP engine.

Running code through an interpreter or compiler has never in the past been held to create a derived work under the GPL. Linking with a library is pretty much the definitive example of what the GPL views as a derived work. I'm not sure how you see this case as particularly odd.
Google 100% absolutely touts the free food when it's recruiting people.
CrossFit’s lucrative and simple business plan
Short answer, no.

But, consumers expect a infotainment user experience at least as good as hanging an iPad in the car, and if your car doesn't provide that, they will rate it poorly in surveys.

Source / Disclaimer - I work for GM.
Although Raymond Hettinger has also called them generator "comprehensions" in the early proposals, the current documentation calls them "generator expressions". And good examples.

Here's how you make those set/dict whatever comprehensions in Python 2.6, before the native syntax is used:

s = set(i for i in xrange(10) if not i%2)
I should have elaborated better. I think that the feedback should in theory always be the same. However, the check for existent user and the check for correct password are different procedures in the program. The program masks this fact by always having one feedback prompt for actions that don't result in login. Perhaps the original bug report only allowed multiple retries for existent users but not for non-existent users, thus shattering the illusion that the feedback is always the same.
>applying computer-security mindset here to vehicle-safety

That might be a valid complaint if this attack required physical access, but it's a remote exploit. It is computer security, except the target is many times more interesting because it can kill people.
Yes, in Python 2.7 onward:

s = {i**2 for i in range(10) if i}

and the colon is what makes the dict comprehension different from the set comprehension:

d - {i:i**2 for i in range(10) if i}
No build system thus far reaches the elegance of redo, though.
like open(not unlock, open) doors while you drive?

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/07/21/chinese_uni_students...
Seems like a comprehension is just a particular form of Python expression.
There are very few "non-critical" systems in a 2+ ton vehicle moving at highway-to-expressway speeds. For an example of what a "minor" system like seat position can do, consider the following:

http://www.lakecountrynow.com/opinion/blogs/communityblogs/1...

After more investigation they ended up suspecting a different failure mode, but it speaks to the danger of even pedestrian functionality. Most people are shit drivers who are unsafe to be around in the best of times, "minor" things like stereo control, windshield washing, etc are certainly enough to distract them let alone being physically moved out of the reach of the controls. Particularly in combination, let alone in rush hour traffic or bad weather.
Try googling by it's name of "1 vs 100". The game played out where one person was randomly chosen as the main contestant who answered trivia questions. If they failed a question they were booted.

The kicker to the game was, 100 other randomly selected players were playing against you answering the same questions. If they got it wrong, and the contestant got it right they were eliminated and the contestant continued.

The goal of the main contestant was to outlast the 100 players, and the more they outlasted the better prizes (usually MS Points) they won. The goal of the 100 was to outlast the main contestant to also win prizes (usually less than the main).

All other players watching the game could participate for fun and play along for no reward. It was actually pretty fun and the events all happened live with an announcer and everything.
Yes it's quite possible to write obfuscated Python. See the docs:

https://docs.python.org/2/faq/programming.html#is-it-possibl...
I suspect that's the impact of other burners also shopping, generating a good list of "people who bought A and B also bought C, D, E...". As soon as you hit A & B, you trigger the rest, while the average person doesn't.
After a certain point, you can't get over compiler processing time.
I'm seeing criticism but no suggestions.
I agree on the turboprop; was looking into services for some New England travel recently, and I thought a service like this would be useful for that.
See, I really don't get that from "Teach men not to rape". All I see it implying is that there are men who rape--this is indisputable, with most reported rapes being male on male or male on female, and almost all of my female friends in the past either having experienced either a rape or a sexual assault by a man. That doesn't make me a rapist any more than it makes you a rapist: but it makes some men out there rapists. Consider the studies cited here: http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2014/05/01/campus_sexua...

If the numbers agreed with you, then I'd say that "teach X not to Y" being ineffective was true.

However, the numbers really don't agree with you, given the repeated case of things like this being effective: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/british-columbia/dont-be...

And even for things like muggings/theft, a lot of the time the crime is an impulsive act, and there's also evidence that you can teach people to avoid making that impulsive jump to mugging/etc. It's a bit more complicated than just telling people "Don't mug", but something pretty much resembling "Teach X not to Y" is used by the US Govt. to reduce recidivism in criminal offenders: https://www.crimesolutions.gov/ProgramDetails.aspx?ID=242 and there's a large body of research that shows that it's effective. (There are other studies of similar CBT based programs in inner city schools with similarly good effects on people who aren't yet criminals but are likely to become criminal.)
You know I started to dive back into WordPress very recently after a few years and there are a few things I noticed:

- Commercial themes are the selling point of the WordPress ecosystem. The themes are what gets a user to use WordPress in the first place, because it solves a real world problem (examples: you need a portfolio site, you need an urban bar site or you need a real estate site).

- That said the quality of WordPress themes can be terrible. They can have conflicting plugins or terrible security holes. So the quality of the developer base is uneven at best (quite a few script kiddies).

- WordPress still feels like it's stuck in the year 2008. The usability has only grown more complex, yet the functionality feels stuck in the web 2.0 era.

- Automattic is not a unicorn, in fact I feel that it's doomed. Right now the open web feels like it's in deep trouble, and WordPress just isn't mobile first platform. This should have their management in panic mode, but it does not.

- For example there should be a way to wrap a WordPress site into an app. Yes there are third party solutions that do this, but Automattic should be doing that. In fact WordPress should have done that in say 2010.

- There are also a number of third party plugins that allow you to create a web page sort of like InDesign, but they're all terrible hacks. Again this is something that Automattic should do, but doesn't.

- Even the branding of WordPress is a convoluted mess. I find myself time and time again explaining the difference between WordPress.com and self hosting the software itself.

So in the end you have a product that is too complex for a normal person (this is why squarespace or facebook pages do well) yet it's a platform that tech people feel is a bit of an old hack.

But what's sad to me is that this feels like a reflection of the dead end that the open web has become.
Depending on the level and requirements of the role, junior to senior, coding to architecture, the emphasis shifts from what you can do today with specific knowledge and understanding, to what you think we should be doing tomorrow with insights and reasoned opinion.

The answers are important but how you answer the questions, or reason about them when you don't know, more so.
If you're looking up here (and can get over the fact that it's a single), Planesense seems to dominate that market (or maybe I have PC-12 lust); I see a N___AF PC-12 on an awful lot of ramps around New England.
20 years later the visionaries have been proven to be visionaries.
In other news Apple just hired Doug Betts, former FCA 'quality' boss

http://blog.caranddriver.com/fiat-chrysler-quality-chief-res...

http://www.autonews.com/article/20141028/OEM02/141029851/bet...

http://www.techtimes.com/articles/70582/20150721/apple-hires...

because nothing screams quality like a 'decided to leave one day after yet another drop in Consumer Report rankings' and 1.4m car recall!
Super-elastic conducting fibers for artificial muscles, sensors, capacitors
I think the idea is that it overrides git diff for image files, so you can use the same tool for text and images.

Given the intended use case (making sure you're not uploading the wrong image), displaying side-by-side is a broadly reasonable approximation of diff for the image domain.
I'm in a strange circumstance where the USPS won't normally deliver packages to my house (I'm on a major road). UPS and FedEx both will. The exception is on Sundays, when the USPS normally doesn't deliver to anyone, except Amazon pays them to. On Sunday, they'll deliver packages to my door. So to have true convenience, I actually TRY to get my Prime packages delivered on Sundays. That's just weird.
Honestly, the easiest way to see how this is consistent with conservation of energy is to just imagine that the craft is physically striking the planet and bouncing elastically from it. It's very obvious that if you lightly toss a whiffle ball into the path of a speeding bowling ball then the whiffle ball will exit the interaction with much more speed than it entered it (and, in fact, with as much as twice the speed of the bowling ball).
The community as a whole is completely oblivious. It's pretty funny to see the youtube reviewers get all worked up over how nvidia and amd are going at it again and such. As if gaming is what's driving this battle. Anyone working in computer science knows the battle is over machine learning, not first person shooters.

Soon headless, socketed solutions will be the preferred form factor for HPC. I image the desktop and server product lines will diverge at that point. It'll be curious to see what will happening to PC gaming at that point.
Doradus: OLAP on Cassandra by Dell
Here is a link to the app in google play :https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.kasungamla... . But you won't have access to the new version unless you are a beta user(member of of above G+ community).
interesting and great that you open up communication lines, but why an ios app? why not a simple web version?

and what's the relationship between kpcb and kpcb edge?
I’ve worn glasses since my mid-teens, and in my mid-forties now. I’m near sighted but also have an astigmatism, so I pretty much need glasses to see anything, be it close up or far away. I’ve also found contacts never really worked well for me. On account of the astigmatism they have to be oriented at just the right angle. They are usually weighted to help this, but I never found them as good as my glasses for staring at my computer screen all day. Too much squinting and dry eyes after a while.

I wear contacts occasionally when going out. (I’m fine putting them in, but digging them out again at the end of the night I find difficult, probably because I don’t wear them often enough to become adept.)

Having grown up before laser surgery was available, the thought of cutting up your eyeball was pretty scary. The 3% dissatisfaction rate another comment cited seems far too high a risk to me when talking about your eyes. And given your prescription changes over time, it seems like an impermanent solution with permanent side-effects.

But at the end of the day, I’m a risk-averse nerd. YMMV.
I didn't mean to say that taxes are bad. I like civilization, too. I mean, I don't like paying taxes any more than anyone else does, but I prefer living in a state with taxes than in one without. Don't get me wrong; I'm not going to pay more than I have to, but I'm also not going to take risks on things that are maybe legal, and maybe end up with a bunch of debt that can't be cleared by bankruptcy. Student loans and screwing up your taxes. Stay away from both.

In fact, I'm incorporated in California, none of the "I have a condo in vegas" tax dodges so common among people who do corp-to-corp contract work, and most of my labor is done by people paid as employees, you know, paid on W2s, rather than as contractors. I play by the rules to the best of my ability.

>So if you make $1000 in profit and immediately spend it all on servers, you still made $1000 in taxable profits and that's what you're being taxed on, which you should count the taxes on before buying more capital goods.

Assuming it's a capital good that depreciates to near zero (and it's more complicated than that) the depreciation is written off against revenue as a cost, just like payroll. Unlike payroll, it's not all written off at once.

If you stay in business long enough, then yes, nearly all your capital goods are eventually all written off against your revenue.

The problem is that as a growing company, you have to buy shit out of post-tax money at a time when there's a much bigger chance of you being around next year to pay taxes at all if you can write off the whole cost of your depreciating capital purchase up front.

There are also a bunch of small-business loopholes here where you're allowed to write down the whole value all at once, all of which I don't really understand. As you point out, there are also ways of writing off your stuff on schedules different from the official IRS schedule, which I also don't really understand (and I suspect you don't fully understand either) - It's really, really complicated; the IRS doesn't often give you clear guidelines; when they do, it's usually best to follow those guidelines.
> I need things to be boiled down (I'm looking at you, New Yorker!)

Then perhaps New Yorker is not the sort of thing you should be reading?
Introducing etcd 2.1
Leave it to ATT to make a big bold aggressive move into pay TV, just as everyone starts cutting the cord... The FCC should have blocked this to protect ATT from their own stupidity...
For a particular system to actually be exploited, you need someone who (1) knows an exploit, (2) wants to use it on that particular system and (3) has access to that particular system.

A lot of the analysis in the comments here does not seem to be taking all of these requirements into account. They are particularly relevant in this case because, I believe, the exploit is a local privilege escalation for people with shell access.
I guess my question would be, why on earth do we need to change vehicle settings through the infotainment system? If you have systems that need to talk to the ECM, you either need to just hook up a tool through the OBD2 port, or have a dedicated interface. I also find the built in cellular link, at best, mildly insane, but under no circumstances should there be any real interconnect between a device that can send and receive with the internet, and the increasingly controlling and complex ECM, as the risks are enormous.
I really enjoy cooking and think that it lets me unleash my creativity in a way. Cooking from raw ingredients at home is not only easier on the pocket but helps make sure that you eat healthier. I started cooking only in grad school and YouTube and a variety of recipe websites were a blessing to ensure I knew what I was doing.
Thanks for the recommendations. Admittedly I'm just being perverse in applying this to fundamental physical laws but the distinction feels very important in areas like linguistics (where researchers' ideas of "truth" tend not to be expressible in calculus).

That is, I picture an exchange where a deep-learning researcher says "our clustering algorithms found that languages A & B share characteristic C", and a linguistics professor replies "Aha, but the underlying truth is that A & B belong to the X class of languages, and X-like languages always have C". Intuitively the latter version somehow feels more robust, but in practice they're basically equivalent, and the first version arguably carries less baggage.
You don't get that it's offensive to men to say "teach men not to rape"?

What about "teach black people not to murder"? Does that not sound incredibly racist to you? If it does, and I really hope it does, what is the effective difference? After all, there is ample data that the majority of murders are by blacks.

https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/...

Regardless of the effectiveness of "Don't Be That Guy", the ends do not justify the means. It would also be effective to immediately throw into prison the people most "at risk" to commit a crime, but that does not make it morally right. After all, how well do you think a "Don't Be That Black Guy" campaign would go over in Detroit?
I remember seeing that post and having it be the first time I thought "huh, does van Rossum know what he's doing" but it certainly wasn't the last.
If you've booked a private jet and paid north of $75k round trip, can you please share what was the rational behind it?

Note: I am genuinely curious.
...leading to a 6.13 W/kg. [Sky] also claim that their chain rings hamper the measurement of power by 6%, and give 5.78 W/kg to account for this.

I can't think of any set of facts that would make this adjustment make sense. Can any mechanical engineers help?

I doubt Shimano will be happy if Jean-Louis Talo starts claiming that it was his weird elliptical chain ring that turned a 5.78 W/kg loser into a 6.13 W/kg champion.
I disabled this plug-in months ago because I was not too interested in who is watching me (of which I know - google analytics, facebook, and most importantly the NSA). I was rather more interested in blocking their APIs, scripts, e.t.c. Hence, I began to use reactive mechanisms - plugins like HTTPS Everywhere, Privacy Badger, RefControl and Ghostery. I know they are intertwined (i.e. some doing the same work). But I prefer that approach to a listing or graphical visualization of who watches me (with little of no (re)action).
Zero to One by Peter Thiel [Book Summary]
The cookie dining changing the way people order online
If you don't have the function handy and don't want to go thru the effort of making a lambda, list (set, dictionary, generator) comprehensions can be more convenient (and you can comprehend over nested lists too)
Homoiconic languages
I didn't realise I could scroll down at first (13" Macbook Pro)
Latest iRoot apk 2.2.1 for Android
Many comments here focus on this being a bad idea because 'who wants to fund somebody elses travel', but as the blog post states, they had revenue and brands were interested in partnering. They didn't find a workable model, but that doesn't mean one doesn't exist.
The REBOL Scripting Language (2000)
I see where you're coming from but we're not really competing. If we were competing I agree it'd be pretty lame. We're a totally different experience for a similar use case. If the OP requests in the thread to do so I'll remove the comment but I also thought it might result in a back in forth on the tricks for doing this, which is actually pretty tough.
That's not really the same thing, you are comparing a fancy hot water pot with an automated tea maker that holds actual tea and can blend it in individual cups.

Producing hot water at the right temperature is not the complex part here, in the Far East people have been using water boilers that keep a set temperature for ages. It's in every home and every office.

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00133WML8/
"Snow White" shouldn't be allowed as a trademark as it's a traditional term in the fields of story telling/movies/cartoons/fiction.

You are of course entitled to that opinion but the fact is that the USPTO decided otherwise. When I say you are 'wrong, wrong wrong' it's because I am talking about how things go in the real world rather than how they should go in the ideal world.
Doable, but voice recognition is severely lacking outside of targeted small dictionaries, and a simple wav file can beat it. I wouldn't rely on it for a long while.
I feel like other people have said what I want to say about your other points, but...

> If you go to a college campus and attempt to set up a "mens center" in the same vein as the womens centers that are increasingly common, you will most likely be 1) called a misogynist, 2) not taken seriously, 3) not succeed.

Interestingly, one of the longest running institutions at universities are fraternities.
but SF supply is relatively inelastic as a result of NIMBY etc. the supply of engineers maybe not so much
Self-pickup/Drop-off wall of drop boxes ... mounted on a self driving truck that sends you sms 10 minutes before showing up, or better yet lets you schedule your own time and place.

Shit, with retarded patent system in US someone is already patenting this as you read my post.
Sure, as soon as they solve the battery problem.
The idea of centralized air traffic control for drones seems completely backwards to me. Birds don't have air traffic control, they have eyes and a brain and avoid obstacles and each other autonomously.

Maybe there will be a need for some defined airways for drones, but they should be able to fly and navigate for themselves.
Thanks for the feedback! We're working on a more elegant solution to handle the alternate airports, balanced field length, etc. We're erring on the safe side right now, but there are always these edge cases.

As far as the prices, we're working on adding more aircraft everyday (lower repositioning costs, greater aircraft choices, etc). I'd love to ping you for some further discussion, especially around alternates.