skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
OK, so who thinks it would be a good idea to post their credit card number and CVV2 code on their Facebook wall?

Because that's essentially what Mastercard has caused everyone to do here.
What's wrong with 3? It has a lot of options because the user needs control. They are well organized.
Scala is not a functional programming language, it is OO first and foremost. It has better support for functional programming than Java 8, Python or Smalltalk. And that in itself is great.
Or, you know, a proper capability-based security model.
Here is an explanation of how it works: https://blog.lateral.io/2015/07/newsbot-under-the-hood/
Maybe we should start calling this something besides inline styles, because of the huge negative connotation it carries. It's more like component-ized styles or something. This is a pretty interesting concept though. I've noticed that in really large and interactive web apps sass becomes super unwieldy, and many styles just aren't re-usable.
It's pretty silly to describe IEX as curbing "abusive" practices.

What IEX is attempting to do is build a platform where large traders can move lots of shares while their smaller counterparties are stuck absorbing the price impact. This is potentially useful for large traders (e.g. Goldman, JP Morgan and Citi, as mentioned in the article) but bad for small traders.

What's actually kind of "abusive" is IEX's marketing - they are encouraging unsophisticated investors to direct liquidity to them rather than having brokers route for best execution.

http://www.iextrading.com/insight/letter/

This letter directs your broker to route your trades to IEX, rather than the best available venue. This means you may be stuck paying IEX fees - which could be greater than other venue's fees - and of course, you are providing liquidity to sharks who want to make sure you absorb the price impact of their trades.
You haven't really said why that should matter though. There are other alternatives and essentially many things in the world favor "those who have more money", right?
Need someone on the team with a Greek name and look.
So it is essentially 5x7 bitmap font?
Netflix tax: Chicago to charge extra levy on streaming TV and music services
What? The antitrust case against Microsoft had absolutely nothing to do with web standards.

You can read all about it here (search for Netscape): http://www.justice.gov/atr/cases/f3800/msjudgex.htm

Even when the EU looked into IE specifically, they weren't directly concerned with web standards: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-09-15_en.htm?local...
Sockpuppet rings will get your accounts and sites banned on Hacker News.
PureRenderMixin would defenitely help here, even to the point where it's comparable with the js solution.

Even though keys help here, render is still called for every image every time and then diffed.

He'd have to extract the image divs to a component and put PureRenderMixin on it so that the component's render is skipped altogether.
Sounds convincing but a lie. Unfortunately, those pesky facts just keep getting in your way. Microsoft has always been the laggard in browser standards.

https://html5test.com/results/desktop.html

https://html5test.com/results/mobile.html

Sure, Apple has made Microsoft a little better but the monopoly that Microsoft has really means that they don't need to compete.
John Oliver on Online Harrassment
The real problem wasn't just Yes/No, it was "Continue" to mean Exit (Continue exiting). Which would have been just as bad if the verb from the question were pushed into the options, as "Do you want to continue? <Continue> <Stop>", where "Continue" still means, as in the question, "continue exiting" and "Stop" means "stop exiting".

"Do you want to exit? <Yes> <No>" would improve what was presented, though, yes, "Do you want to exit? <Exit> <Don't Exit>" would be better. But it was the question more than the manner that the responses were presented that was the problem.
Towns in Massachusetts Are Building Their Own Gigabit Fiber Network
Fireside Chat with Paul Graham [video]
12 guys started Housing.com in 2012. (4 of them had more control of the company if I'm not wrong). Rahul Yadav was the CEO till yesterday. Good team, they executed things quickly, got attention from investors, got handsome funding early on. Bought a domain name like Housing.com. But Rahul Yadav is very brashy too and publicly ridiculed the VCs several times on not taking decisions on his terms.

Softbank (Japan) had nearly 30% stakes in housing.com . Rahul had ~4.5%. Anyway the investors eventually had enough power to expel Rahul "with immediate effect" after yesterday's board meeting saying "The board believed that his behaviour is not befitting of a CEO and is detrimental to the company".

I'm still not sure whether to side with Rahul or the investors. But he does like the spotlight for sure, even if it comes as negative publicity. I don't entirely disregard his opinion or frank talks, but there's a certain professionalism he lacked viz. bringing boardroom talks to media frequently, trying to sensationalise how he talked brazenly to the VCs.
Now that is just ridiculous! With O2 and O3 I get 0.03 seconds on average! I try to understand what could possibly mean all of the flags that get switched on with optimizations from this page: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html

I also wonder if Java has any kind of optimizations to experiment with.
Have you tried freelance networks like TopTal?
Solar-powered plane lands in Hawaii, pilot sets nonstop record
The spread is tight for small orders, but if you keep hitting them in one direction, market makers quickly get wise to this and start pulling back. The cost to trade for large funds isn't just the bid-offer spread, but also how quickly the market reacts to their flow. Modern market makers are very good at pricing a small spread to uninformed flow while making informed traders pay.

This is also why big funds want rules like trade-at (all orders must trade on-exchange) which eliminate the ability for market makers to explicitly segregate order flow. If all retail orders went to exchanges, market makers would give tighter prices on average to win the retail flows. Basically retail traders would subsidize institutional ones.
Canonical article explaining the phenomenon and people's misunderstanding of it:

http://askakorean.blogspot.com/2009/01/fan-death-is-real.htm...
http://matrix.org/docs/spec/#identity

"""
Users in Matrix are identified via their matrix user ID (MXID). However, existing 3rd party ID namespaces can also be used in order to identify Matrix users. A Matrix "Identity" describes both the user ID and any other existing IDs from third party namespaces linked to their account.
Matrix users can link third-party IDs (3PIDs) such as email addresses, social network accounts and phone numbers to their user ID. Linking 3PIDs creates a mapping from a 3PID to a user ID. This mapping can then be used by Matrix users in order to discover the MXIDs of their contacts.
In order to ensure that the mapping from 3PID to user ID is genuine, a globally federated cluster of trusted "Identity Servers" (IS) are used to verify the 3PID and persist and replicate the mappings.
Usage of an IS is not required in order for a client application to be part of the Matrix ecosystem. However, without one clients will not be able to look up user IDs using 3PIDs.
"""

OK, so aside from that last paragraph, that reads very integral. If it's just a case of "you have an identity at a domain" by default, and the 3PIDs are all an extension^Woptional-feature-that's-part-of-the-baseline, then what's the "strong identity system" you claim XMPP is lacking?

Actually if you read through that Twitter search, you see a bunch of XMPP folk getting annoyed at you for "half-truths, as usual", you referring to XMPP as a failure, you claiming that only the baseline counts, you claiming that MUC - universally and interoperably supported in every server (and every client that wants it) - is fragmented.

If this is you being supportive, I'd hate to see your actual disinformation campaigns.

Now, if you actually want a constructive conversation, that's great, but trolling just isn't the way to do that.

If you'd like a case where I suspect that Matrix models better, it's that ad-hoc, "ungoverned" multiparty chats work better in Matrix than XMPP.

That's because XMPP's multi-user chat model is (intentionally) based around IRC-channel-like models, where there's a single identity and authority. As I understand Matrix (and I don't claim expertise here), Matrix instead models a multi-party chat as simply a conversation involving multiple parties.
I guess I don't understand what step 2 would be here:

1. Bitcoin

2. ?

3. Savings
Sadly I'm sceptical that the JVM can support practical and efficient use of functional structures such as monads. I hope this will change.
In my opinion, it is wrong to sit on a scarce resource that you didn't create and are not using, thereby preventing anyone else making use of it.

Wine and art are dissimilar cases because they can be created in as large a quantity
as there is a market for.

Real estate, on the other hand, is a very similar case, and in my opinion there should be laws against playing dog in the manger with real estate - either an outright ban or a hefty penalty in the form of extra property tax.

Though I'm not quite sure how you would go about defining and enforcing such laws for domain names.
Whether you should keep or let go totally depends on the domain name and what your money situation is, not what you paid in the past that money is gone. If you care
to disclose the domain I can render an opinion on what I would do based on my knowledge and experience.
You really don't need the "./configure" there. make alone can obviously run arbitrary commands - but then again, so can the program whose source code you probably downloaded in order to run it.

In general, all the hype about not executing stuff from the web has a point but is largely confused about where the risks are and aren't (e.g. the "don't pipe wget into the shell" meme).
This is what prevents front running, according to my understanding. Once you submit an order, no one can react to that information within a time greater than round trip latency to the servers.

That's not correct. Front-running is the crime by which your broker trades ahead of you after you state your intent to trade. Your broker does, in fact, see your trades before they reach the market (the broker is actually the one pushing them to the market). It's mainly a crime because your broker has a fiduciary duty to act in your best interest, and because the broker occupies a privileged position as an intermediary, not because there is something inherently wrong with demand anticipation.

Of course, it is correct that no one besides your broker has the physical ability to react to that information.
Advertising 101: Fear monger. Sell solution to the fear.
For the purposes of this discussion, it's not a difference at all. The question is not what should be legal or not, but what customers would prefer, and what makes a better market.

If you ask a customer "would you like an exchange that gives people enough information to front run your order" or "would you like a broker who front runs your order" the answer in both cases would be a resounding no. The claim in the article is that you can create a better exchange by providing an equal footing for all participants.
this has seemed obvious to me since I first got on computer networks in the 80s. it's nice to have my intuition be scientifically validated. I don't think there will be much impact from this on a human level, though. maybe some marketers who didn't really see the formula before will benefit.
Here's the thing, the reason EV SSL certificates aren't a good purchase is nothing to do with the technicalities of the matter.

It has to do with "will users trust my site more if they see an EV cert"

And the answer to that (IMHO) is, no, definitely not.

Most users don't even notice when a site goes from HTTPS to HTTP, the chances that they will notice the difference between the display of an EV cert. and a DV cert. is negligable.

Ask yourself this, can you list the sites that you visit that use EV certs? If you can't, what's the chances your users will....
It's always a trade-of between speed of development/maintenance vs performance. I think React is the best good enough compromise there is. It's really fast and a joy to work with. But obviously, in certain very specific cases, vanilla javascript where you have 100% control over the javascript/DOM will be faster, there's no arguing about that.
that’s different – that’s the taxi license.

Uber does not operate as taxi, but, as they can be not directly hailed from the street, they act as chauffeur for hire.
Download taig 2.3 jailbreak tool download for iOS 8.4
In 2006, if I saw 100,000 shares of AMD offered, and I wanted it, I could go out and buy it. It was a simple as that. In 2007, if I tried to buy 100,000 shares, I would get 80,000. Then in 2008 I would get 60,000. The market is showing me a volume at a price that I can no longer buy or sell at. I can’t buy or sell what I see on my screen.

Another way to put this:

"Once upon a time, I was paid a fortune by a giant investment bank to move large blocks of stock on behalf of their spectacularly wealthy clients. As recently as 2006, if one of those clients needed me to move a block of 100,000 shares, I could do that at literally the click of a button. This despite the fact that I earned a commission on the trade; it must have been a very expensive button my bank owned! And this despite the fact that my 100,000 share order was bound to move the market, and so I was in effect acting on inside information. But that's just how this is supposed to work, right?

"Anyways, the markets evolved, and my giant investment bank could no longer earn massive commissions just by pushing a single button. Even though I knew my giant hedge fund clients were going to dump vast numbers of shares on the market, depressing prices for all the other investors, the markets no longer allowed me to trivially profit from that information! My 100,000 share orders get broken into small numbers of lots just like everyone else's. No fair!"

"So I started a new exchange to rewind the markets back to the glorious, equitable, fair, transparent days of 2006."
Sure but the can smash up food well enough to live.
Claire Cain Miller and Farhad Manjoo Get Important Things Wrong in the NYT
I don't see the big deal with using a poor door if I get a massive break on the rent I pay. I guess there's a slippery slope argument here. There are low-rent apartments where I live and some of the low-renters are making trouble for the rest of the tenants. I can see how people want to avoid an entrance frequented by the trouble-makers. What is the solution then? Evict the trouble-makers? Where will they go? If you filter out the troublemaking low-renters then having one entrance is fine. But that could be violating some law out there or there is a lengthy process of eviction.
The fix for any deflationary concerns is to denominate prices and contracts in the price level, not a currency. If Bitcoin deflates and increases in value, Bitcoin-denominated prices and wages go down automatically. If you wanted to save for near-term spending, you'd purchase derivatives that reduce your exposure to Bitcoin swings relative to your price level, and since Bitcoin's value would increase at a relative predictable rate in a Bitcoin-saturated economy, competition in this derivative market would drive the issuer to pay the buyer some fraction of the expected increase in value.

Instead of most of humanity having to suffer through losses of wealth because their currencies are small and volatile, everyone will have stable currency pegged to their local price level, and they'll be paid to hold it.
Pao seems to directly refute Marc's claims: https://i.imgur.com/0LZWrFp.jpg

It's not impossible that she is lying, but I think it is quite plausible that Marc's contact is not as authoritative as Marc seems to think. He is probably just repeating that person's speculation.

I'd also like to point out that if they fired Victoria for embarrassing Jackson, admitting that this was the case would be counterproductive because it would make a mob of angry redditors [even more] angry at Jackson.
Nice try with the voting circle, but the link is broken. Fixed link is https://medium.com/@jibly/how-producthunt-helped-me-go-from-...
Well, Apple made them mostly white. White people holding hands, white people praying, a white family.

Google and Microsoft’s neutral yellow was a lot more neutral there, yes.
The cynical answer to this is good marketing and savvy backers with a vested interest in getting retail customers to trade at a disadvantage.

The less cynical answer is that trading has always been a back and forth between sophisticated actors, some of which make money providing liquidity and some of which make money others ways but buying liquidity is a cost. The cheaper the latter can get from the former the better it is for them.

IEX is a dark pool setup directly for the benefit of savvy hedge fund types to move large blocks of trades and pass on those costs to others. Nothing wrong with it, but their moralizing in books is a little off putting.
There is a Unicode character PERSON WITH BLOND HAIR, but no corresponding PERSON WITH BLACK HAIR. This is obviously discriminatory. We need new emoji modifiers for: blonde-hair, black-hair, brown-hair, red-hair etc.
Reddit's IAMA is back as mods state they will no longer work with site admins
Why Many CS Degrees Are Stagnating
I think you're in a bubble. Lots of people have interest in the 30s given it was the golden age of Hollywood: Gone with the Wind references have entered the cultural lexicon, so have The Wizard of Oz references.
Look at the source. It's quite literally inline styles.
xyz will be a lucrative profession if and only if
1. xyz is gated
2. xyz is intrinsically hard
3. fewer people attempt to get into xyz over time
4. xyz yields higher wages per hour relative to other professions.

I don't see programming fitting any of these axes, let alone all of them.
So, just to clarify...is this a port of the venerable Python lexer generator called Plex? https://pypi.python.org/pypi/plex/
I have always felt that Postel's Maxim combined with network effect leads to complications in long term while it promotes interoperability in the short term.

It's game theoretically successful strategy to get your implementation to work with everyone. When you accept sloppy input, this allows sloppy implementations to become popular.

Eventually de facto protocol becomes unnecessarily complicated and you need to understand quirks in popular implementations.
There are also order types the specifically advantage large block traders at the expense of HFT market makers. IEX only offers those interestingly, while speaking out about the others.

There is also a big difference between pricing something at 9.90 when you think there is very little demand for it, and being prevented from changing the price when the demand changes.
Wow, it's like you didn't even take the time to process what he said and decided to get outraged anyway.
Well, the market allows competition. If it plays by the existing rules.

Anyone can provide a chauffeur for hire service, even without a taxi license – you just need a special insurance and a special drivers license that permits you to transport people.

Many competitors of uber did the same.

uber was the only one who tried to operate without insurance, without the drivers license for chauffeurs, taxi and bus drivers.
Building a React component with TypeScript
Obviously diffing is going to have some overhead.

But this overhead is minimal in most use-cases. The benchmark in this article is not a real use-case.

If you wanna show 1200 images in a web page, or 1200 elements of any kind in one web page, then you should only create DOM elements for those of them that should actually be visible by the user. You read the scroll position and calculate which ones would be visible in the viewport, create DOM elements for those, and disregard the rest.

In most real-world applications, this technique would suffice. Your DOM and vDOM would be small, and you'd only be diffing maybe 5-10 elements at a time.

Although, I can think of use-cases where this technique, and React's style of coding may not be sufficient. One example is iOS's Photos app. Sometimes it animates hundreds of elements at a time (where you're viewing photos by year or location). I guess diffing might not be a fast enough solution for this use-case.
I was talking in general, not New York specifically. Of course if a third party (the government in this case) basically pays the difference, anything can happen. But it seems like it's because you can't just build new housing in New York City, so existing houses have to accomodate the poor, which is a pretty unique situation.
That's a legitimate use and that's another reason for it is difficult to detect if a domain is used.
In order front-run someone, you must have a fiduciary duty to them. HFTs do not.

When you think about this broader proposed definition of front-running, where any anticipatory trading is "front-running", you quickly realize that virtually any informed trade could be described that way. Do extensive research on the supply chain of a billion dollar industry, notice a spike somewhere, and trade on that? You're front-running!
whose money do you think is in those hedge funds? it's all a question of what game you want to play. the players are always the same. it's capitalism after all.
The article doesn't link to it but here is the relevant info from Housing and Preservation: http://www1.nyc.gov/site/hpd/developers/tax-incentives-421a....

For a bit of NYC history, back in the '60s POPS (Privately Owned Public Space) came into being as part of the new zoning laws. They gave higher density allowance to commercial properties which provided public space, leading to many of the plazas one may be familiar with today in the city. Of course, architects, sociologists, and others have observed that many facilities provided under the program failed to attain what I'll just call an inviting atmosphere; that is, whether deliberately or not, many so-called public plazas and parks were designed out of the normal flow of things so that many simply didn't know that they existed. Part of the requirement is to have a clear sign indicating that the space is public, though many are obscured, unmaintained by plants, grime, or columns.

These kinds of initiatives (tax breaks for social benefit) have supporters from all areas and so as time goes on it's interesting to see them put to the test and be continuously improved– or at least worked on.
Exactly, I don't see the point of this bill. They'll just call it something else.
Do you think it should be illegal to look at the order book for a stock (public info), formulate a prediction, and trade on that prediction? Seems much different than a broker trading ahead of his client.

Large informed traders and intermediaries like specialists/locals/market makers have been in a cat & mouse game since the dawn of time. Back in the day, big hedge funds would split their orders through multiple brokers or try to make their intentions. It's natural that one seeks to hide his intentions and buy/sell without moving the price the other wants to get the hell out of the way or trade with the big order. That's just competition.
Not all code bases need to be minimal to be valid. Some people like having the features you class as superfluous. So long as you have the option to choose software that suits your taste there's not really much of a problem. I, for one, am glad that the web continues to evolve beyond its original design, clearly that's not something you're as interested in, both viewpoints are valid.