skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
On their indiegogo page the estimated delivery date is October 2014, but their latest blog post says October 2015.

I'm guessing the actual date is never.
$35B is reasonable if Tesla actually has a good chance of becoming as big as Ford, GM, or Honda. Maybe it doesn't, but a lot of people seem to think it does.
For poverty line, on a family basis, the incremental cost of another person approaches $5k (compared to $11.7k) so taking families into account the lower bound of payments is $1.5-2 trillion (if all we had were really big families)

http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/15poverty.cfm
what year was this?
Quite interesting, especially after some rumors that MC won't be developed anymore.
hi,

how old are these systems? servers are only usefull/have significant monetary value for other companies if age is << 5 años.

if they are not too old: sell them and play with an older standard pc - 64 bit / virtualization possible, enough ram.

cheers
az
That's just FUD. Pure and simple. There isn't that much that matters. It's jut routers from edge to core to leaf. Your L2 switches don't care about L3 protocols.

Some of the worse colo vendors aren't offering it because they're lazy or see increased income from higher v4 rental prices.
Love me some postgres. If I could be so bold as to ask for a feature or two, it would be great if the initial setup were easier to script.

Perhaps this is outdated already but we have to resort to here-documents and other shenanigans to get the initial db and users created. Is there a better way to do this?

Next would be to further improve the clustering, to remove the last reason people continue to use mysql.
That's the difference between loaning money and buying equity in a company.
Yes, agreed, there are already many good OSes that can run containers fine. I run many "containers" (jails) on FreeBSD, I don't need a specialized OS for this. SmartOS can do this well. And like you said, Debian would be fine running Docker or whatever else.
Companies put stuff on concepts knowing they won't make it to production. If his concept had them and they just couldn't make it work out but they legitimately tried, that doesn't seem as bad.
One of the very first actually useful programs I wrote was a simple macro program for UO. It would read a text file, parse the very basic commands in the file and then send them to the UO client by finding its HWND via FindWindow and calling SendMessage to send the key presses. I used this to macro easy skills like hiding with scripts like (I don't remember the exact command names now):

STARTLOOP

KEYPRESS F1 // client macro key for hiding skill

WAIT 1000

MOVERANDOM 4 // move 4 times in a random direction to get around server checks for using a skill in the same spot

WAIT 8000

ENDLOOP
Peg the basic income to the Consumer Price Index or MIT's BPP [ http://bpp.mit.edu/usa/ ]
Well, it's called "insistence" when it comes from an average person. But when it comes from a visionary genius like Steve or Elon (or the likes of Larry Page for that matter), it's really something else.
I have a buddy with a rack in his garage he uses to run proxmox and asterisk. I suppose you could also run your own SMTP server for private email. Those are some things that seem like they'd be compromised by renting a VPS. I'm assuming your motives are more about fun than economics.
Are you aware of the command line utility, security? https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/Darwin...

Some examples of using it: http://joshtronic.com/2014/02/17/using-keyring-access-on-the...
We should have insisted on owning a stake, given the risky nature of the loan, and the size, at the very least.
This phenomenon has had a profound effect on the history and philosophy of science. There have been entire schools of thought based on verification of hypotheses, and entire movements based on refuting those schools. The most effective strategy in this puzzle(and the one that is unintuitive for many) is to systematically generate alternative hypotheses and falsify them. Karl Popper claimed that this method is actually at the core of how we gain scientific knowledge, and his brand of philosophy of science is the most popular and arguably the most successful today.
An "All rights reserved" license statement doesn't make it unlawful for readers to view code. Why would this license statement be different?

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say this it's just false that his current license statement prohibits reading the code on Github. I don't think that's a "right" controlled by copyright.
Better than blowing another $1 trillion on another pointless Mideast war or a fighter jet that can't fight.

If making a $500 million loan that not only gets paid back but produces a valuable and productive American company is the worst thing my government did today, I'd count us all extremely lucky.
Sometimes, when I read the state-of-the-art cs articles, can't hardly understand anything.

But then there's the "lol startup ruby app lol javascript framework!" type articles that convinces me to stay in the deep end of the pool, even if it feels like drowning.
> If this way of putting pressure on the publishers does not work, the next step would be to ask reviewers to stop working for Elsevier. After that, scientists could be asked to stop publishing in Elsevier journals.

Why is stopping publishing in the journal the last resort? This may be my lack of understanding showing, but why wouldn't that be the first step? I would think that all the other pieces would be much more replaceable than the actual papers themselves.
Yes, we understand the libertarian argument. We've had it shoved down our throats for years now.
Nope, quarters are always compared year over year.
Be sure to read some of the other comments for balance. In particular, the ones where people mistake their aptitude for copypasta language-du-jour for a deep understanding of subjects in which they have zero training or experience.
that's not a bad thing. reduces costs, reduces HR overhead, etc.
Free Integrated Financial Model
privateequitymodels.com
I'm using my MBP 2014 for over a year now. There have been minor (really minor) bugs, but nothing to make uncomfortable. I don't like the Finder and I think it's bad for productivity. But that's it. I have no other complaints.
The NYT test is wrong. I have found a case where their "rule" is violated.

By using following three numbers I got No when the result should have been YES, just goes on to show that there are too many "YES" Men. I think the reasoning and logic employed in this article is shoddy. The reality is much more complex and we do not have access to a perfect oracle.

0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001

0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002

0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000003
In France they certainly do. And no, descriptions are not reproductions so they are not covered under this proposal.

"Practical use" would also extend to other kinds of copyrighted material, just think of art catalogues, music databases, and newspaper archives.
The modern economy is hit driven. 1 J. K. Rowling pays for a lot of not J.K. Rowlings.

Individual's fortunes look a whole lot like a random walk. Some people, get over their crack addiction and become writers for the new york times, some people get over their wall street addiction and become crack smokers. It's tough to say where a particular person will be in 20 years. Before you start listing off titans of silicon valley, i'd like to point at all the super rich Vanderbilts running around.

It's up to us as a civilization to decide how low to make the floor. any benefit will have fraud. Straight up anarchy, you keep what you kill sounds rough. If that's your plan, i'm going to get together with my friends and stop you. Nobody works ever, also sounds dumb. I'm going to get together with some other friends and stop that too.

So, we pick a spot somewhere between the two extremes. Historically, value was created by people. More and more, value is created by machines. Cab drivers, sports writers and port masters are all on the way out.

I'm not at all sure how civilization works when only the top 10% or 1% of people are actually capable of being useful to the economy, regardless of level of training.
For Startups or professional investors or anyone who wants to play around with a financial model typically used by institutional investors.
MultiCheck Google, Yahoo, Bing, and Baidu Search Results in a Jiffy
Well, there's the "disappearing door" option.[1] Sadly, this never seems to have made it into a production vehicle. It wouldn't work for Tesla's cars anyway; they need that underfloor space for the battery.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=loshV54nHeQ
When the outcome is negative, it's insistence. When the outcome is positive, it's rebranded as genius.
Tesla is most certainly valued correctly, with a P/E ratios similar to that of Amazon, and a valuation just slightly above the likes of Snapchat, Twitter, and LinkedIn. Seems to be a reasonable estimation to me.
Taig 2.2.1 Download Now for iOS 8.4 Jailbreak
Bear in mind that Vita Nuova is now one person - Charles.

Rog went to Canonical and does Go programming.

Inferno is still actively used by big boys though. Some people at IBM run it on Blue Gene, for instance.
One of the better ways to find bugs in other software is to first encounter them in your own. (Even if the bugs, as mentioned in this article, aren't actually severe.)

In particular, I remember, while writing an ASN.1 library, commenting to a friend that "most ASN.1 implementations are probably full of dangerous bugs" (since mine certainly was), and about a year or two later all those ASN.1-related vulnerabilities came out.

I guess that in general, bugs appear in patterns that recur again and again in independent code, as people try to solve the same problems with the same tools and make the same assumptions.
Thanks for the feedback! I do have an example of a silent failure that would be classified as extreme chaos.

Before we went into production, we were having problems with leader election that could cause multiple masters per cluster. This is an extreme chaos state not only because it could result in corrupted or missing data (as a cloud service, we take data integrity very, very seriously), but also because it didn't raise any immediate notifications, only downstream errors.

This problem has since been fixed, but even before we did that, the highest priority was to ensure our system detected this state as quickly as possible. We added a service that monitored cluster leader status and that quickly alerted us whenever anything was unexpected.

Even after fixing the problem, I've set the Search Chaos Monkey to injecting failure into leader election at various points to ensure that the cluster can always recover in an expected way that won't put customer data at risk.
This is a really important point, and I think it derives from a fundamental asymmetry. Employees have ~1 job, but employers have lots of employees. The end of an employee-employer relationship is necessarily way harder on the employee than the employer. Employers can cause way more trouble for employees than vice versa. And employers can amortize the cost of trickery.

A good example is contract negotiation. Employers can sneak in terms that many employees won't understand. The ones who do understand have a much harder time fighting, and pay a much higher proportional cost to do so. Hiring a good employment lawyer to help negotiate could easily cost 10% of a median employee's annual salary, and a lawsuit could cost 5-10x a median salary. (For lower-paid workers, it's proportionally even worse.) But those same costs for employers are generally negligible.

Market outcomes are much more likely to be optimal when you have many agents of approximately equal power. As you move toward strong power asymmetries (that is, toward monopolies and monopsonies) you get much lower odds of optimal outcomes.

So the common counter to this is where employees band together to negotiate as a unit: unions. And regulations let us rule out things that it's basically a waste of time for everybody to negotiate, or where allowing negotiation will lead to systemically poor outcomes. For example, CA basically forbids noncompete clauses in worker contracts. This is possibly bad for individual employers, but it's way better for employees and employers as a whole, because it increases innovation and therefore total wealth.
I could see this being a huge boon for Augmented Reality applications. It's frankly quite exciting. I'm kind of jittering right now. Imagine how difficult it would be for an application to determine the difference between a real person and a suitably detailed mannequin. The human might be able to tell, but the application wouldn't. But test the "skin" of the form and it will know, and then know different overlays to apply.

Oh man oh man oh man.

Human -> facial recognition -> overlay Twitter feed.

Mannequin -> check for NFC tags -> show product details + highlight sales.

Banana -> ask the user if they're going to eat it -> add to daily calorie intake.

Generic plate of food -> estimate density of individual ingredients based on image coverage -> save the world from heart disease!

I'm dead serious, how soon can we get this in a device? I have work to do.
A slight pause to apply the Principle of Charity makes clear what he meant: "that feeling" of being stupid that the OP described.
I do believe you are right. Burroughs was the firs US manufacturer to provide it.
That may be the case with the node community, however AFAICT the React community seems much more open to fully utilizing ES6
It depends on the well. My well goes down 65 feet, where it hit a spring, and we have an artesian well off that spring. Every other well within a mile of me had to go down to 225 feet, and they are all certainly sharing a water supply at that level.

I do not believe my well shares water with their supply because they have much safer water than I do. We have many more heavy metals in ours, and more arsenic. They run off some basic water filters, and I have a much more complex water treatment system in my basement.

I'm not pointing this out just to argue - the point is that those of us on a well do maintain an awareness of where our water comes from and what is in it, probably much more so than those on public water supplies.
US Govt will collect at least 15% capital gains on that 35B plus 20-40% of the salaries. It's not equity, but it's pretty close.
A redesign of my website
That was a hypothesis I considered, as was x,2x,4x. Invalidated both of those, and ultimately drew the intended conclusion (which is not quite "correct", given javascript numeric precision issues).
The Worst Argument In The World: http://squid314.livejournal.com/323694.html
But Caro isn't reproducing the image, merely hosting it, as part of a larger image-sharing site. The site has ads, which is how the image is monetized. Ben uploaded it without getting permission from anyone.

So Caro is getting money because Ben is using a copywritten photo for private use.
The old government = household fallacy. A government is fundamentally different from a household because its spending is a significant percentage of its own income. Every time a dollar originally spent by the government changes hands in the economy, taxes are paid.

Also, debt always has 2 sides: it is a liability of the government, but an asset of the lender, who is very often a citizen of the same country and whose offspring will inherit the claims.
Himself.

"I notice a lot of Python programmers tend to use less descriptive variable names."
I met with Raph IRL once - he is a really smart guy. He is now working on a somewhat of a spiritual successor to UO called Crowfall. http://crowfall.com
Similar story here. I got it in zero because this problem shows up at the early part of HPMOR.

I suspect that the basic idea behind it is about right (people who insist on failures before committing to a theory will probably do "better"). But it seems to me that this test will be best at selecting people who've seen it before and can pretend they didn't (or even remember to ask negative questions when someone asks you to guess three numbers to get the job).
Reminds me of the game mastermind which I loved playing as a kid.

Here's a javscript version: http://www.archimedes-lab.org/mastermind.html
How We Built Our Blog
Have you tried the security commandline utility? As far as I know it reads anything you want from the keychain. For example, to grab what password Spotify is storing in my keychain: `security find-generic-password -s Spotify -w`
The only way I see this cycle changing is if someone ships a real application which uses SCTP to provide significant benefits to users. If deploying SCTP improved performance or reliability for video-chat, a popular game, etc. there'd be a more compelling reason to go to e.g. Cisco, NetGear, etc. and ask them to ship kernel-level code with likely security impact to everything they sell.

WebRTC is the most obvious candidate for this but maybe one of the HTTP2-over-SCTP experiments will go well enough that someone will ship it in a real browser and start the process of saying “Web users get n% performance improvements if SCTP is implemented”. That certainly seems like a rather long game to play, however.
I've never had issues understanding you before man! Always amazing to hear your thoughts out loud because it shows how much you truly care about the projects you put so much time in :D
Large government loans to big industries are not uncommon. Ford secured a 5.9 billion dollar loan from the government in 2009 (not a bailout, a loan to retool factories).
Depending on how good the specm is...

The article says that besides being small it's also high bandwidth and high resolution. Not sure how many distinct things you can identify based on spectral analysis alone, but I have high hopes for one day owning a Tricorder like device. Being able to fingerprint and identify real world stuff we might ingest seems huge, am I drinking Coke or Diet Coke? Vodka or Gin?
TY^n ++ as am utmost grateful towards diz entire perception being emerged !
No need of revolt as itself is revolutionary !
Why Web Apps Disappoint Me
Having worked in the stock-trading world and seeing some of the murky things that go on first-hand, I would not be surprised to learn that many of the negative comments we see every time Elon Musk is mentioned is due to a concerted effort by short-sellers.
The question could have read the exact same way, with a different final rule as the answer. Without testing at all, you wouldn't/couldn't know that...and so you didn't solve it..you just guessed...
It's not ironic. Dijkstra's assertion is, in a convoluted way, related to the main point of the quiz and the article :)
I don't understand why this is getting downvoted. The 'loan' the US made was extremely high risk and taxpayers got a terrible ROI for the amount given and the risk taken:

http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2013/05/tesl...

Edit: I am a big fan of Tesla, SpaceX, and the feats Elon Musk has accomplished, but I don't think that means one can't be critical of him, his companies, or the way taxpayer money might have been spent to prop them up. It's undeniable that if the US govt had received some equity stake taxpayers could have more equally shared in Tesla's success, and I don't think there would have been anything unreasonable about that.
No, but couple it with thermal imaging and "water, 0C" is ice and "water, >0C" is rain.
He almost certainly was just too lazy or too stupid. I don't mean unintelligent here. I mean that he didn't give it enough thought, either because he is lazy, or because he didn't know he should have been more careful. The technology those people use isn't magic, and for someone on the inside, it is completely trivial to circumvent. It can't have just been a matter of misjudging the technological capabilities of his peers. And I completely agree that he has probably been dirty for years and years and only recently got caught. People are either dirty, or they're not. I have a very hard time believing that people can slowly become dirty cops over time. That kind of moral compass is hard to recalibrate outside of some kind of psychological trauma. I mean, based purely on anecdotal evidence, of course.
By most defintions, I think structured "flat files" in a filesystem IS a type of database.