skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The critical distinction here is popular with the people who have to use it or most widespread? :-)
That is actually how trademark already works, if you have enough money. E.g. well funded brands like Coke, Google, Facebook, can easily use trademark to retroactively remove rights to a name from anyone who wasn't actively using it for some non-squatting purpose - within certain trademark and legal scopes.

Doesn't matter if someone simply owned property with that name prior to the trademark. The test is more complex than that.
I don't really understand the thing about computers writing code and this resulting in less demand for programmers. Don't computers already write a lot of code in the form of compilers, frameworks, preprocessors etc.? Seems that these technologies only make demand go up.

If anything, code generation is the worst option out of any form of code reuse and results in code that is entirely unmaintainable. Code generation is often a sign of a language that handles abstraction badly, like Java.

I can imagine some form of ai that instead o being trained to recognize images etc., is trained to present an interface. However this will likely be deathly slow and require custom code for anything custom anyway.
Yes, it's unexpected and less commands should do that.

Did you read the manpage of every utility on your computers to know that they won't execute a user supplied program? If you didn't you are up to nasty surprises.

That $HOME trick alone would give privilege escalation to anybody that gets a user-level access to a server of mine. Gota change it.
FWIW, I date it from the issuance of the first really convenient paper postage stamp, much like how OP probably is complaining about smartphones post 2007, as opposed to the first mobile phones in the 70's.
But that's the inherent problem; these companies are still setup for a bureaucracy that works fine in a particular area of business, but completely crumbles under the new rules of the technological age. We shouldn't be apologetic for their resisting of change, but rather pushing them to take a long hard look at what needs to be reorganized to fit into the new paradigm.
Technically I'd say no. I had to apply for one when I was the lead software developer at a healthcare startup two years ago, and it was more involved. My boss had to submit a bunch of paperwork.
"Firing Victoria on the spot for what seems to have been an AMA gone wrong"

It's even worse than that... the firing seems to have been related to friction about monetizing AMA's

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CI9iYW7VAAAzzJN.png
The real problem with NFS is that NFSv3 is easy to implement but insecure and has scalability issues (e.g. users can be in no more than 16 secondary groups) while NFSv4 is complicated and requires a complete Kerberos infrastructure (which is more complicated than rocket science!) to utilize in a way that works around the limitations of NFSv3.

There's much better network file systems but because of many factors (boat/complexity being the biggest) their adoption is minimal.

Once you move beyond single-user/simple read/write permissions there's really no easy to avoid complexity. It's just the nature of the beast that is sharing files over the network in a way that appears native to the user.
It already is, sort of: http://www.dtpli.vic.gov.au/property-and-land-titles/land-ti...
Excellent paper.

TL;DR
Majority illusion paradox occurs when many people are observing a small and loud group "saying" something that is actually globally rare. Imagine 100 people who all observe three people who say the same things.

Own a media company and get people to believe in junk. Find the most connected individuals among a group and make them "active". If an "inactive" person perceives .5 of their connections are active they may switch to the active state themselves.

The "type" of network can affect the perceptions.
Same could be said about real estate or any kind of assets in that matter. Thesaurizing isn't and shouldn't be illegal, this is a cornerstone to the right to personal property.
If you define "unused" domain as "doesn't have a working website associated to it" then this definition is (imo) wrong. The internet is more than just websites. I have several domains that don't have any websites associated with them, but I still use them for things such as email, hostnames, etc.
How to negotiate a raise
The fundamental idea of algorithmic trading doesn't really fall into the category of screwing-people-over. However, some techniques employed by institutions engaged in it can easily be seen as outright cheating. One common example is front running [1] where a player with access to real-time order information exploits the knowledge of pending trades from other players to turn a profit at the other players' expense. These techniques can also be used across exchanges.

The issue is a consequence of the lack of market transparency. The exchanges are only required to make order information public with a significant delay. However, they sell the real-time order information to a few market players enabling them to engage in the dubious tactics at the expense of other players.

Note that tactics like front running used to be employed by brokers before algorithmic trading and have since been banned.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Front_running
New York bans 'poor doors' in win for low income tenants
ImmutableJS's lists are collections which are implemented behind the scenes as trees. When you append to an immutable list a new list is returned so the comparison in shouldComponentUpdate() becomes simply a reference comparison between the old and new list (return nextState.list !== this.state.list).
That's a bit of a surprise!
I understand the idea but I still think the BEM methodology is better than this approach.
We've seen the code that comes from companies and societies that treat it as blue collar work. Bloated and unmaintainable. Quality over quantity.
Throwing a bunch of people under the bus as pawns to 'get Apple's attention' is abhorrent. The 'your kind' wording really takes it that much lower.
My issue is that the problems you listed are solvable if you write good CSS.

I mean, specificity wars... isn't that one of the first things we learn to avoid when writing stylesheets?
It doesn't matter how long Kneen has sat on his domain. The only reason the domain has value is because Kneen found it worth registering, and Harsh now wants it. If Kneen had registered www.:-mgpdgwcpdgw.con instead, he'd have been perfectly in his right to do so, and no one (presumably) would be interested in taking his domain. So why should someone else get a chance to take it away just coz he wants to? As long as there is no company called workbetter, the domain might as well be gibberish, and gibberish.com is not valuable to society.
In one case, I could have used tcpdump to elevate privileges on a customer's router.

They had an x86 box running RHEL as their firewall/router and I was hired to resolve an (IPSec) issue they were having. I asked for a capture of some specific traffic but their I.T. guys (small company w/ only two technical staff) weren't "fluent" with bpf filters, so they created a user account for me, provided me with access via SSH, and granted me the ability to run tcpdump via sudo.

From the example given, I could have used the "-z" flag to run arbitrary commands and escalate to root (although, in this case, I likely could have gained root simply by asking nicely).
Splinter is based on that
To Stop Mosquito Bites, Silence Your Skin's Bacteria
> you'll always have people on both sides - Stalin did nothing wrong and Stalin was literally worse than Hitler 90 million killed with his own hands

You'll always find some people who say anything, but having people say them doesn't make those assertions any more factual. Saying the Earth is flat or that Stalin did nothing wrong is false (without getting into debates about the meaning of "wrong"), even if people say it, no matter how many people say it. Saying the NK regime is not a brutal, murderous dictatorship, or suggesting that it is questionable or that there is some ambiguity in the responsibility of the perpetrators, is deceit.
It's an odd statement, but I guess it means the author thinks they (or one of them) should know better.
I've seen a lot of novice sysadmins do silly things like rely on sudo's command restrictions, expecting this to actually contain a user.

For those sysadmins, yeah, it's unexpected.
US income inequality
When we can't afford to buy something, do we then say that the seller is "sitting" on the product?

I would like to buy a cottage on the lakeshore, but the owner (who doesn't use it) won't sell it to me at the price I would like to pay. Perhaps I should sue him?
There's been a bit of attention recently on these things. The big issue is people using " * " on the command line without prefixing with an "--" argument or simply "./*". If someone has managed to sneak in particularly evil filenames (that look like -options), then the unsuspecting user may be in for a surprise, for example tar'ing up a public upload directory.
wait, display corruption?

Is that when these black bars flicker across my screen about once every hour or so when ff is open?

I thought my gpu was dying...
While I fully agree that Trello could be js-free I don't think either of us would have known the name "Trello" to talk about today if it was. I understand that you can degrade your web app to the point it works without JS but at what (UI/UX) cost? I could, given time, recreate the entire platform I code on every day to be js-free but I'd be fired for pissing off clients. I could probably even reimplement our google map that you can draw a polygon on without JS but it would take a LOT more time and it would be so painful to use that it wouldn't matter.

I don't want to say people who rely on screen readers don't matter and I think it can be fixed for them. However people who disable JS really shouldn't matter to you unless you are Facebook, Google, Apple, Amazon, etc. Even then some of those sites don't work without JS which could (Like google drive). It's simply not worth the resources to support a small group of people who have knocked out the foundation of a house and are expecting it to stand up just fine. "Screen readers don't play nice with js frameworks" (which is not true across the board) are not an argument for no-js, it's an argument for building better screen readers.

When it comes to the web you need to optimise for the 98% not the 2% (I'm being generous with that 2% number BTW) especially when that 2% CHOOSE to create this problem for themselves.
I guess the charitable interpretation is that they're trying to encourage growth. Whether you believe it will work or not is another matter.
You can at least configure virtually every middlebox to pass UDP. You cannot reliably do that for random ipprotos.
All the time. Many times per day. I've been programming for fifteen years, and I think my willingness to Google things has only gone up over that time. There are a lot more things that I know off the top of my head now than when I started, but I've got way less tolerance for wasting time trying to figure out weird problems when there's already an answer online.
Yep, just like KFC is no longer "Kentucky Fried Chicken" - it's just KFC.
Sell me your domain for 5000 or I'll offer 100000...
I think lots of the bloat is actually cruft that piles up over the years. Why can't we remove it? Because somebody will use the feature and complain about it getting removed.
No. It was thanks to the ISPs dumping NNTP servers.

Back in the dialup days, they had NNTP servers available, pulling nearly all the NGs. As time went by, alt.binaries took over 99% of the bandwidth, along with a nice cornucopia of pirated content. It was rather awesome.

When DSL/Cable took over, those companies axed their news servers, if they had any at all. And your server choice was to use a non-binaries carrying, post limited free server or paid server.

That's how it was killed.
You did not think this through, did you. His chart shows that rendering 1000 photos is _faster_ (>3X) than rendering 200 photos.
Think about it. How long it took to render photos 200-1000 (in the 1000 run) ? Negative time? Please don't tell me that V8 is so awesome that it can run JS in negative time.
I've also been sitting on a bunch of domainnames; all with the interest of "maybe some day" projects. One can hardly call that cybersquatting. It is, however very frustrating these days, .com is still king and for example I had whole dictionaries running for my keyword*.com -- and surprisingly enough, even the most insane combinations were taken. Ofcourse, selling a premium domain once in a while for 15k, makes it possible to hog 100's of other domains. Regardless of this frustrating setup, as it is now, I still prefer it over some kind of regulated way where people can just steal away your side-project's old domainname, just because they trademarked it. It's the wild west, yes for sure, but often, still it's better then an over-regulated state.
Where is source code ? I need proof that React has performance problems., I use React.JS for large application with huge logic in one page and all works pretty fine on mobile devices and desktop ...
Indeed he would need to change the books if there is a breakthrough in some of the algorithm areas described, but TAO is an excellent way to "quicky" move to the state of art in many areas.
My favorite pillar: "Automation of knowledge work" Apparently the future of manufacturing involves automating the creation of new automation.
We manage to assess real estate without running into those problems. It definitely wouldn't be an easy policy to enact.
Come over to Android. We have lots and lots of browser choice here!
I should have said creators rather than content creators. (My bad) I will refer to an MIT PDF titled "Do Some Business Models Perform Better than Others?"

Creator is defined on page-7 and on page-17 creators are acknowledged per the MIT study as most profitable at the time of the study:

"...Creators account for 49.6% of all revenues in our dataset at both the beginning and end of the period. Landlord models are next, followed by Distributors and Brokers...."

Hope this helps.

http://seeit.mit.edu/Publications/BusinessModelsPerformance1...
Please keep HN comments substantive. Drive-by provocations are low-quality to begin with and risk starting tedious flamewars.
Thanks for the interest!

We have a tiered subscription pricing based on the amount of calls being made and records being stored to recommend from. I’d be very happy to chat in more detail and to send over some additional information. My email is martin@lateral.io
For those "out of the loop", this was probably posted in relation to this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9822580
Of course you could do fractional reserve lending with BTC (technically at least, legal issues aside). When you deposit coins into an exchange today, the majority of them are sent into cold storage and remain untouched. When you withdraw Bitcoin, you are not getting the exact same coins you deposited. There is nothing technically preventing exchanges from lending out Bitcoin instead of keeping it in cold storage, which would increase the money supply.

An analogy would be walking into a bank and handing the teller $100. This money goes into the cash draw (analogous to a hot wallet). When the customer behind you asks to overdraft their account and withdraw $100, your note is handed to them, but your account balance remains at $100. Now you both have $100.

Coinbase does not "defer" or "aggregate" transactions between their customers. Most internal transactions are processed "off-blockchain", which simply means that ledger entries are being updated in the background and no actual Bitcoin is being transferred.
Interesting!

tl;dr?

More serotonine -> Better moral behavior
More dopamine -> Worse moral behavior

People with gambling problem and risk seeking behavior have high dopamine levels [1].

High serotonine is achived with good mood, physical exercise, getting some sunlight,...[2] People with low serotonine can be more aggressive [3]

link to the paper:
http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822(15)0...

Highlights:
Serotonin and dopamine had distinct effects on decisions to harm self versus others
•Computational models revealed a hyperaltruistic preference to harm self over others
•Pharmacological enhancement of serotonin increased harm aversion for self and others
•Pharmacological enhancement of dopamine reduced hyperaltruism

[1] http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/02/100201171517.ht...

[2] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2077351/

[3] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19802333
Surprisingly, I think Clojure has much more traction than Scala.
Javascript / Nodejs

it's multi-paradigm: scripting, object-oriented (prototype-based), imperative, functional ( source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JavaScript )

Many languages known as functional (Scala, F#, Lisp, Scheme, OCaml) are multi-paradigm languages (check out Wikipedia!), purely functional programming language like Haskell are the exception (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purely_functional ). And the IO part is hardly functional.

@Down voter: care to explain?
> Besides, you kinda lose all the advantages of using javascript to style, which is complex computations and co.

No, you dont' loose it. You can still script the "is" attribute, also you can escape to regular className in case of advanced cases. So this is a 80-20 solution.
Evidence for “Unconscious Learning” Questioned
We indeed do that with land and housing, aka real estate: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adverse_possession

But the Internet landscape is very different and less finite in nature.
For the life of me every time this issue comes up there are people who end up saying the same thing as what you are replying to.

That is that it's just so unfair and unjust that the name they want was purchased by someone before them and that they can't use it or buy it cheaply or at all. [1] I don't know why people seem to think the Internet is different than other ways people make money buying and selling. For example coin collecting, art work, wine to name only a few things. And of course land and housing as you are mentioning.

[1] Try buying a domain name from google or a host of large "we don't need any more money" type of companies. You will learn to love anyone who is in the business of actually selling the domains that they own because given the right offer they will at least sell those names to you.
Oh for explicity typed IO.

(Sadly command-line programs have yet to pass the threshold of even having a types system at all.)
Front running is already illegal.
if you have continuous trading, you are going to have complicated interactions (such as outlined in the article.)

instead, an occasional crossing (once a day? once an hour?) would provide much more "fairness" since everything happens at once, at the expense of "timeliness".

back when I worked in this industry (a decade ago) POSIT provided something a lot like this

you can't have it both ways, though.
> While I would heavily recommend reading and learning documentation, once you get a passing familiarity (not memorize it) you at least understand what you are using and googling it simply can save time. If you need specifics on the implementation the docs will always be there.

And these days, the docs are usually online, and usually don't have a great dedicated search engine, so often googling is the best way to find what you are looking for in the docs, anyway.
here's a great video about inlining css with react.

Colin Megill - Inline Styles are About to Kill CSS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NoaxsCi13yQ
Oddly, I can't determine what location this is for. The workbetter.us domain redirects to a Squarespace landing page that has no real info (who, where, etc.). It seems they are mostly doing business as OfficeLinks (NYC and Chicago) and own the .com for that domain outright, so why do they have to go after this guy?
There might be some great information here but it's completely unreadable. Add some borders on your table, It's impossible to read in it's current state.
Google Analytics Today widget for OS X (track basic metrics for multiple views)
Probably platform I would say. Hard to compete against languages that fit pretty naturally into an existing Java or .NET ecosystem. I'm referring to Scala, Clojure, and F# of course. It is definitely "popular" in some other senses though.
Super interesting, and somewhat disappointing as well.

Also — off topic, but I really wish they'd provided graphs, or at least given those tables some formatting love. Does anyone know of similar benchmarks that have?
sometimes money is not enough, see steam.com
> When EV is used, iOS ONLY shows the EV information - not the URL - in the address bar.

I expect only a tiny portion of users understands this.
Front running is already illegal, so if any group is doing that they are already breaking the rules of the game, and should be punished/stopped if found out.
Don't be so down on what you do. It's not hogging and it's not cybersquatting. This whole concept of it being wrong to register domains was back in the mid 90's when there was no cost and people would register names with clear trademark rights (like panavision.com) with the sole idea of selling it to only one person. The trademark owner. Not the same as what you and many others are doing.

Let's say a name that you would one day sell for $15k was registered by a flower shop that used it for business. In that case if someone else came along and wanted that name they would very well have to pay more than 15k for it and might not be able to purchase it at all.
It's possible to work on challenging things. But, if you want to work on things which are specific to a company and which require a long time to learn (say about 6 months before you can become productive), the only way is employment or long term contract. I have friends who work on challenging things via long term contracts, may be this is what you are looking for.
"Drag and drop enabled for nodes in Inspector markup view "

This is going to make me never use Chrome dev tools again. Nice
Still does not sound fractional to me dude.
AlbozZ
All I can think is... Poe's Law.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztVMib1T4T4
What I find interesting is the thread title being a pun from a 40 year old movie. Back in the 70s, there wasn't any interest in movies, music, etc. from the 30s. And there still isn't interest in 30s culture, but plenty in the 70s.

I wonder why.
Typesafe is contributing greatly to that list. http://www.typesafe.com/resources/case-studies-and-stories
The Styx Architecture for Distributed Systems (1999)
the same way you would in es5?
Cool thanks - I'll look at it!
"Yep, just like KFC is no longer "Kentucky Fried Chicken" - it's just KFC."

The very first words at KFC.com are "Kentucky Fried Chicken"

Doing a text search on the home page says Kentucky shows up two more times.
More like people die because they (or, quite possibly other people) choose to drive drunk.

The presence of the law should help deter them from making that choice. But that doesn't establish that laws should always be followed or shouldn't be changed - it just supports the case that that law should be followed and should not be changed, which no one was arguing against.

Other things also help decrease drunk driving. Healthy social norms can have a big impact. Convenient alternatives also has a big impact. What we're discussing here is a particular, especially convenient alternative.

It is wrong to excuse people who put others' lives at risk because doing otherwise is inconvenient. But it is incorrect not to expect that some people will do so, and account for that as a part of the impact of laws.
Is OOP “anti-modular”?
Amazon is known to pinch pennies. Anything Jeff can do to save a few grand.
'You will arrive at home in exactly 32 minutes.' It's real time