skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Good post here. I'm doing similar things with Angular and Rails. For the most part jQuery gets me most of the way. In cases where I need something really complex I just look to Angular 1.x for that one page. It works, it's easy to use(for the most part), and you actually end up writing less javascript then if you tried to do adhoc jQuery stuff.

I'm finding Turbolinks partial replacement a good option in some cases too.

The thing with not doing a traditional SPA in one Javascript framework, is you can rip out or add anything at anytime. So say in the next 30 seconds when a new Javascript framework comes out, I can use that in my Rails app. If I embraced Angular for my entire app it would be impossible to change the framework out. I've been able to play with React, Knockoutjs and others on certain parts of my app because I'm still embracing traditional navigation(with Pjax or Turbolinks)
I Hope the Internet Ends Before My Kid Needs a Cool Screen Name
The usability of Duo Security's SSH two-factor and PAM two-factor make Google MFA look like an early beta of Microsoft Bob.

It's already in the most popular repos. It's used by the likes of NASA, Facebook, Box, Arbor Networks, Internet2, Twilio, Yelp, etc.

https://www.duosecurity.com/docs/duounix
They needn't envision those laws, just as they needn't have envisioned automobiles or the internet. You could think of the Constitution establishes axioms. Just like math, what arises from those axioms can be boundless in complexity, but that has no bearing on the axioms.
Then by what you wrote, gay marriage shouldn't be palatable to the state or society, since same-sex marriages usually do not result in natural children with today's technology. So we shouldn't provide any advantages to gay marriages by your argument.

What about "traditional" opposite-sex marriages where children are not produced within the optimal reproductive age window? Should we take away their "advantages"?
Actually these errors are relatively easy to spot and and often there are solutions for that. Sometimes a compiler might need to be hacked on. The good thing: the compiler is written in Lisp and debugging is possible.

The more nasty errors are lurking for example in the GC... there we move into C and assembler land...

Most platforms have nasty errors. With popular platforms one can hope that many of these have be found and somebody has fixed them already. With language/runtimes which are no so widespread in production one is more likely to find these problems oneself. Especially in more complex runtimes.
I'd say my problem with the whole massive containerization hype circus is less that I'm a curmudgeon who hates anything new, and more of a practicioner who hates marketing and social hype promoting a half solution to a narrow problem as a full solution to all problems.

Containerization isn't new. It just has a brand name now, and the "all the way" solution to this problem is unikernels.
I'm not a lawyer, but a few come to mind. Vandalism, destruction of property? Employees don't have free reign to... ahem, defecate where they please at work just by virtue of being an employee.
Even though Scalia probably agrees with your unspoken rule, he doesn't reach the same conclusion because of it:

(Scalia, I): "...Take, for example, this Court, which consists of only nine men and women, all of them successful lawyers, who studied at Harvard or Yale Law School. Four of the nine are natives of New York City. Eight of them grew up in east- and west-coast States. Only one hails from the vast expanse in-between. Not a single South-westerner or even, to tell the truth, a genuine Westerner (California does not count). Not a single evangelical Christian (a group that comprises about one quarter of Americans19), or even a Protestant of any denomination. The strikingly unrepresentative character of the body voting on today’s social upheaval would be irrelevant if they were functioning as judges, answering the legal question whether the American people had ever ratified a constitutional provision that was understood to proscribe the traditional definition of marriage. But of course the Justices in today’s majority are not voting on that basis; they say they are not. And to allow the policy question of same-sex marriage to be considered and resolved by a select, patrician, highly unrepresentative panel of nine is to violate a principle even more fundamental than no taxation without representation: no social transformation without representation..."
No, Windows RT "Apps" are nothing about progress. It's simply MS trying to piggyback in the profitability of the Google Play and Apple stores.

There are many software packages that can install without mixing stuff, just check the option of USB install, or standalone install.

In fact, check all the applications in http://portableapps.com/

They have NOTHING to do with WinRT.
It's easy if you stick with vanilla Rails. Where it gets complicated is if your team decides to use a different view language, a decorator gem, a factory framework, and a different testing framework. The more deviations from Rails proper, the higher the learning curve gets.

If a person know Git, HTML, JavaScript, and one server-side language, I can teach them enough Rails to build production apps in a few weeks. I've had a lot of success with that.
It does have the advantage of both immediacy and continuation.

You can dump statements through a function and see it's progression when run without having to interact with it.

Throw in something like FirePHP (which allows dumping pretty much anything out as a viewable/collapsible trace, other languages have similiar) and the use case for a lot of using a full blown debugger is removed (it's still incredibly powerful when needed).

So I use both.
For pay since 2005. Do keep in mind that the code i am working with usually has some sort of test suite available, and that over time i have become very good at transforming code between different forms of expression without changing the effects it causes. (Excluding memory use and performance, which is not something one usually has to consider much in Perl.)
Hands-Free Slack: AWS Lambda Meets Amazon Echo
My Dutch bank has an internet banking app with this feature built in. I guess there is a reason they call it going Dutch. So yeah, switch to a Dutch bank. ;)
Yes, the civil and legal ramifications are important:

- my inheritance: my spouse can get my SS income when I die, my wife inherits my goods by default, etc. Now gays get the same treatment.

- taxes: are different for married and non-married folks. Now gays get the same treatment.

IOW "follow the money".

This ruling will change how much money the government pays to its citizens and how money is passed among its citizens (after marriage and death in particular). But nobody ever discussed the ramifications of this and the entire discussion was based around a bunch of bombast.

So we're not simply "changing the name".
It would be nice if a few of the people upvoting this came into the comments section to explain what they liked about it. I personally find absolutely no value.
Xdebug and with phpstorm 9 you have inline display of the values held in that variable which you can expand with a click.

That is incredibly powerful (PyCharm has it as well).
While that does look incredibly unsafe (and would get vandalised/abused a lot of left unattended) it also looks quite fun to use and I can see why people like them.
You aren't even wrong.
But it's not limiting that. People are already free to do so and some religious or philosophies encourage or make it highly desirable. They just cannot be legally recognized which is pointlessly discriminatory.
University Students Made a Working Model Hyperloop
Understandable. I'm also operating quite differently. Typically i am called into teams who are floundering already. So what i do is create one big commit with the goal of making the code easier to work with and to learn about the code base. Never do i just change random files, and never do i do it without the team lead having agreed and some sort of concensus from the rest of the team.
What should happen is the government should stop defining marriage of any form...

It's not a difficult thought experiment to imagine the consequences of this: hospitals refusing to allow visitation from people who are – but they do not accept as – members of your family. Employers refusing to extend health coverage, etc.

Government will have a place here so long as there is dispute over the definition of "immediate family".
The market dropped over 7% in a day, that's extreme for anyone other than a bitcoin speculator! The plunge could have been larger except for 70% of stocks hitting their automatic market stops.

http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2015/06/26/2133062/calling-a-top-...
Great solution, Congratz!
Just my 2 cents.

The government should not enforce marriage contracts, they should enforce legal contracts. Marriage is a private matter, not a government matter.

They shouldn't officially recognize marriage at all, nor should they discriminate on marital status for tax purposes. All people should be equal in the eyes of the law.

People should be free to enter into legal contracts with whomever they want.
Are you really trying to use Bitcoin as a measure of normality?
My suggestion: start with strong subcultures. Become known to drifters as the people who have all the data on 240sx's, or to Jeep people who have specs on every single difference between each model year. Develop a good reputation with each community before moving to the next. Toyodiy is a great resource for me that does what you're doing, but it's not available in handy app form. Basically a comprehensive catalog of every Toyota model every made, with microfiches, parts lists, part cost estimates, task tutorials, and the ability to find your car not only by model and year, but by different models or body styles/trim styles within the same year. Unbelievably comprehensive and very uesful. If you can be as good as them (and they are nonprofit) on a mobile app, even if it's just for toyotas, all you will have to do is shut up and take my money.
It sounds like you have bought into the fox news talking point that "marriage" is fundamentally a religious word and civil union is a legal thing. Merriam Webster's first definition talks about marriage as a union in law. It doesn't even mention religion at all in fact. Dictionay.com mentions both, though "legally" is mention before "religiously". The English word marriage, in the United States, can refer to either the government approved legal contract, or a religious ceremony. If we want to separate the church and state, let's invent a new word to refer to the religious aspects.
If i take longer than a week to do it, then other measures are called for, like, as you mention, subsets. However you seem to underestimate just how much functionality can be implemented in how little code with Perl.
So this is my research area.

Distributional vectors are a proxy to word meaning. Words with similar vectors have similar meaning or are semantically related in some way. But usually, you just measure similarity by a single number: the cosine similarity between the two words' vectors.

This number can tell you words are related or not, but it can't tell you how they're related [1]. There's been a good deal of work in automatically identifying that "ship is-a boat" (which is called hypernymy) or cats and dogs are unrelated animals (cohyponomy), but it's still being perfected.

But it is useful. Words that are similar in meaning can be treated similarly. As a bad example: maybe I know that "anger" has negative sentiment, but I don't know what sentiment "furious" has, but I can infer it probably has negative sentiment since it's so similar to "anger".

[1] There's a good deal of evidence that words that have high cosine similarity are more likely to be cohyponyms.
ZeroDB co-founder here.

Basically, end-to-end encryption for client (browser, mobile) software vs protecting backend software which uses some flavor of SQL
So how do you start using this example?
How a driverless car sees the road
Once they see a male working in a Child Care Center there is going to be lawsuit, that's for sure.

Isn't this a gender discrimination problem, not a sexual orientation problem?
Common Lisp's macros and grammar go together like bread and butter. A grammar module in the app I built [1] uses macros to generate huge amounts of repetitive code.

[1] https://github.com/tshatrov/ichiran/blob/master/dict-grammar...

I wonder if they're still hiring Lispers. I once passed on the opportunity to work in their Kiev office, but I might give it a shot again.
It works even on code without tests, simply due to lots of experience. It helps that i also have a lot of tools available in terms of realtime syntax and sanity checkers. And sometimes if the code is sufficiently insane enough, i'll write tests to make sure.
Mostly because there are very very few people in the world who are able to develop such a complex thing for Lisp (or similar runtimes). Since the market is relatively small and many applications are not overly concurrent, there is very little money to support the development.
> Scalia's argument is the stronger here

Scalia's argument is not new and goes back to before the civil rights era. It was wrong-headed then and it's wrong-headed now.

> there's no way the federal court system would start mucking around with marriage.

And maybe if fed and state governments hadn't felt the need to placate the angry mobs by passing super discriminatory laws, the court never would have had the demonstrable harm necessary to step in and make a ruling.

> For a fundamental issue like this, it's not a good thing that nobody knows even whether it's relevant to the court or not.

That's kind of the hitch though, isn't it? We wouldn't even need the courts if there weren't always fairly smart people (smart enough to get elected, at least) who disagree that minorities should have Rights.

Court decisions to confer Rights are tricky because the procedural question is exactly the substantive question -- if Gay people have a Right to marry, then the court has no choice but to step in. And if they don't, then the court has no choice but to stay hand off. And whether they have that Right depends, basically, on your opinion. As Kennedy pointed out, the due process and equal protection clauses were written in an intentionally non-explicit way.

Edit: For example, it would be absolutely insane today for us to imagine the equal protection clause not providing a basis for banning discrimination based on race. Obviously, either our constitution forbids that practice under the Fourteenth Amendment or else our Constitution is seriously, seriously flawed. Right? Right. Now, go read the Plessy v. Ferguson decision.
Did you read Your citation? Because it doesn't back up your assertion. It's says that for for first degree relations (brother-sister or parent child) the risk of death or severe defect increases 31.4% over the general risk. It doesn't say what the general risk is, but I assume it is relatively rare, on the order of 1 in 1000 or fewer. So risk to offspring from siblings would rise to about 1.3 in 1000. I would hardly call that proof that sibling marriage results in defective offspring.
> States screwed up when they took the civil part of marriage and associated it with the ceremonial part in a church.

In England that was because the church - specifically the Anglican church - wanted to gain religious power over marriage as a mechanism to make it harder for Anglicans to marry into other faiths. So I'm not really sympathetic to churches in common law countries crying about this one.
You're talking centuries of property and estate rights laws in all states and counties. It would be a freakin' mess.

But yeah, this ruling eschews poly relationships.
Thanks! It's also easier to comment the xeger code.
I will write details of the graph, possibly open-source it, at the meantime I want some feedback on the implementation of myfrancisco.com
I should have phrased my earlier comment more specific to same-sex marriage, that's true. I don't think your second argument that marriage is sex discrimination is valid though. As you point out, both men and women have been allowed to enter into non same-sex marriages, regardless of their orientation or gender.

What's in question here is whether its discriminatory to not allow same-sex marriages to occur and whether states should be able to determine what marriage means and restrict it accordingly. Marriage has traditionally been between a man and a woman and certainly wasn't intended to be part of the 14th amendment when it was added to the constitution in 1868.

To add it more than 100 years later seems like a case of the judicial branch legislating and adding to the law, more than interpreting existing law in the context and intent of which it was passed.
So far, a really smooth approach to solve our everyday tech management process issues.
GapJumpers seems like a good alternative to resume screening: https://www.gapjumpers.me/

Even if not using GapJumpers itself, you can follow the concept by requesting solving a problem or submitting a piece of original technical content along with the resume.
Their market has been in one of the greatest bubble runs in the history of stock markets. It's extraordinarily significant to see it go parabolic for weeks, then crash 20% in ten or so trading days, particularly given the amount of margin Chinese investors had taken on in such a short amount of time.

It very likely points to a further drop ahead. I don't think you'll be regarding a 40% drop as not being newsworthy.
Interesting, maybe they made the tabs more chrome like breaking each into separate processes.
For clientside JavaScript, one useful way in is to run the Chrome profiler on it. That will produce a treeview of the calling hierarchy, and give you an idea of what are the code's 'hotspots' - the functions that are called from everywhere, or the functionality which dispatches everything.

This can be especially useful for event driven code (looks like SlickGrid is jQuery-based, so that definitely applies here); you can start a recording profile, carry out the action you're interested in, then stop recording, and you can then find out exactly which anonymous function is handling that particular click or scroll or drag.
Or write code in languages that, you know, don't encourage unwanted arbitrary code execution?
And yet, jrs235 is making an important point. The question is, which way does the causality run? Do individuals have rights because they're members of minorities, or do minorities have rights because they're composed of individuals? The correct answer, in my view, is the latter.
What's supposed to happen? All I see is a big photo of a kid, and a music player that isn't making any sound.
I wonder if you could use an air "force field" to capture the rocket. e.g. a circular arrangement of air turbines, dynamically adjusted to smoothly capture and land the rocket. Has something like this been tried?
I love it :0) I tried grammarly, and typed in a remembered poem. It informed me that it had detected significant plagiarism.

Edit: It's still not advice I would pay for, though.
I agree with you on the end goal, but perfect is the enemy of the good, and I could not more strongly disagree about waiting until that perfect solution is on the table.

Having every gay couple wait another couple of decades until everybody gets their head out of their ass to have basic rights like visitation of their partner in the hospital, inheritance rights, co-parental rights of children, etc. is an unacceptable moral compromise, and it is heartless to demand that millions of gay Americans make that sacrifice so that the law can look like I want it to.

We still have a long way to go to recognize all of the shapes relationships take (I'm non-monogamous, for example, and don't really expect to see multi-party legal unions in my lifetime), but making one huge group of people suffer while those other things get sorted out is an ethically untenable option, for me. And, honestly, I suspect this is a step in that direction...the religious loons will continue to campaign for changes, because of this. And, we can continue to push for reform.
While this generally works best for larger code bases, I tend to start reading through open bugs/tickets and find things that appear easy. Then I will assign them to myself and do what I can to fix it or at least track it down.

Generally I find it hard to just start reading through packages, source, functions, etc. and find it much easier to try and solve some sort of problem. By tracking and debugging a particular issue through to the end, I find a learn a lot about the codebase.
Uh, everybody? I'm not talking about lots of money. But people will usually have about ten dollars on them. If they dont, well, go to the atm.
Google's Summer Solstice Doodle Was (Is) Wrong
usually, we assume that a meat grinder does not "understand" meat, that a rice cooker does not "understand" food, and that a telephone or a CD player does not "understand" human language.

Wiktionary terms "understand" as (i) be aware of the meaning of something (so we've just reduced it to the meaning of awareness and meaning), or (ii) to impute meaning that is not explicitly stated.

To put it in more colorful terms, a blind person can understand the difference between green, yellow and brown bananas, but they usually cannot understand the visual aspect of color.

By the same rationale, a vector does not understand the word it describes any more than the telephone book understands the people listed in it or the city that they live in.
I think paternosters are really, really cool. I'd love to ride one.

However, I must wonder whether they can be used by the elderly or disabled. How do you board one with a wheelchair? Or do they just run alongside modern elevators in buildings where handicapped accessibility is a requirement?
Regarding the y-axis -- that is standard practice in financial graphs. You can see the same thing when looking at a related index in Google Finance: https://www.google.com/finance?q=INDEXDJX%3ADJSH&ei=LKGNVeHf...
The single sign out problem
No, that's why you should only browse https websites when using TOR.

TOR doesn't provide encryption of your data. It just doesn't allow any listener to guess who is visiting what websites since they can't correlate the source to the destination.

The problem with the article approach is that it's only gonna attract small players. What you could do is signing up in a relevant website using high target's looking credentials. For example signing up in some http wikileak page using fake julian assange's credential.

What could be cool is to somehow leak your fake credential while logging into gmail (and I don't know how to do that since they use https only) and then check what IPs connected to that gmail from the gmail settings.
To add a bit to michwill's answer:

Startups want a JavaScript version so they can use it in-browser. And they are more interested in full-text search than other types of queries.

Enterprises are big on integration with existing stuff (Microsoft SQL Server, SharePoint, etc.) and using it as a CASB-esque solution.