skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Most of these are enabled automatically with Tinfoil:

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/tinfoil/

https://github.com/cohjam/tinfoil
Sounds like HN has its own sad puppys crowd
Namely Is Looking for a Lead Data Scientist – Come
Have you tried this https://github.com/andischerer/atom-keyboard-localization ? Looks like they almost fixed it.
On this MacBook Pro (MacBookPro12,1) i7(3,1GHz) 16GB of RAM, 512GB SSD ... it takes less that 5 seconds which is way to long for me. If that's ok for you no worries, but you can't say it isn't slow.
First they were only for terrorists on trial...
Or have 2 knobs (Power and Time).

I used to have one like that many moons ago. It also had a start button and a stop/open door button. That was perfect.
A problem with Erlang itself, you've got to have done it the hard way a lot of times to see the value in some of its built in things.
Actually the opposite Is true look at DNA and Discovery of Pulsars for two recentish examples from real life.
Poorly phrased, but I think the parent has a point. The problem I can see with this analogy is that there doesn't seem to be any discussion/voting at all on paperboy.
Oh, it totally makes sense after the first steps. It's a clear progression - obvious, even. But if they had started with a better technology stack up front, it wouldn't have been (such?) an issue.
Thanks for clarifying, I did not know that - I'll make sure I check this sort of stuff in the future.
I wonder how much time and money they would save if they had just bitten the bullet and rewritten the entire thing in PHP in the first place instead of doing what they did.
Key result: there's a bug in Java's library sort. It takes a sort of 6710886 chosen elements to force it, which will force a subscript out of range.
Indeed, the 1.2 development cycle was relatively sleepy as the preceding six months were spent in crunch mode preparing for 1.0, and everyone was eager for a bit of summer vacation. :) A lot of this cycle has also been spent prioritizing for future language development and organizing the new subteams. But I'd still say that 1.2 managed to get a lot done, since there's just so much low hanging fruit wrt stdlib APIs to stabilize.
Well, if you need multiple lines, you probably don't need your function to be anonymous. (Your example is just `sum`...)
I've heard progress on this front recently (it's mostly about the automation infrastructure), and I might expect official nightlies of both rustc and cargo for FreeBSD by the end of summer.

Don't hold me to that.
Sure, node CAN be faster to get going. So what? Shell scripts are even faster to bootstrap than node. Will you switch over to doing everything in bash instead?

Also, yes, I whip up quick scripts in Java all the time, because sometimes it's the closest hammer to my particular nail. Your entire comment can be summed up as "I don't really understand Java, and I don't like it" which is not a terribly compelling argument.
What Is the Big Secret Surrounding Stingray Surveillance?
And if someone else spies on the PM of France, and the US happens to get their hands on that data, then I'll bet they'd argue the US did not spy on them.
They rather quickly started collaborating and I understand that now most sentai shows are produced from the beginning in cooperation with the American studio they expect to be subbing in American non-costume scenes.
"We've learned to fly the air like birds, we've learned to swim the seas like fish, and yet we haven't learned to walk the Earth as brothers and sisters...” - MLK
Does it also deal with uneven heating? Test with a few papadums[1]... :)

[1] http://www.evilmadscientist.com/2011/microwave-oven-diagnost...
6 Reasons Why In-App Feedback Is a Must While Beta Testing Your App
Nope! Love the concept and the general outlook behind BSD and the spinoffs.

Am in no way involved with the community. Don't know a single individual personally or professionally. Have contributed the occasional patch to ancillary projects. That entire process consisted of "wow, good find, thanks!"

See my comment history. Also a similar discussion with the Varnish guy.

When something hits the front page you should expect some outsiders to have a peek and say "WTF?!" Sometimes I choose to type mine in. Frankly, it's the silent people you need to be worried about.
Still, there are six "highlight features" right on the home page:

- Cross-platform editing
- Built-in package manager
- Smart autocompletion
- File system browser
- Multiple panes
- Find and replace

Is it me, or most of these are so basic that of course any text editor would have at least this set from the start? Right, autocompletion came in several steps for Atom, but .. I have used Atom for a while and it seems to understate the real advantages over other editors, such as: it's a GitHub product!

Which brings me to the part where I couldn't stand Atom: I should be able to do any git operation strsight from Atom, no configuration files needed, with a default plugin! Instead, we are left with many community plugins, like git-diff and atomagit. I hope things will evolve in a way similar to autocomplete.
Attention Playstation TV Lovers – Hacking News
Try it in a couple of years.
Mozilla is reliant on the money integrations bring. The search engine integration alone brings in millions.
You don't have to guess about the startup time – you can find the actual startup time by searching for Timecop in the Command Palette.
This article pointed me down the path of the "Black Knight satellite." I've never heard of this before and this is the first time I've seen a plausible description/photograph of something truly extraterrestrial. That's crazy... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Knight_satellite
"I get the impression Fred is more or less warning his portfolio, and leading future would be pitchees."

Correct.
Why offices are where work goes to die
I had that too - Amana RadarRange. It was great for me. But terrible for little kids - up to school age. They would ask "How much time?" for their popcorn. I'd tell them. They'd turn the knob, it would go to some time, they'd ask "More or less?" We'd play that game until they had about the right time.

With a digital control, they'd just press 2-3-3 and Start.
“A power plant for the Internet”? That’s a bit presumptuous of Google, assigning themselves the position of powering the Internet. It’s like if China would call itself “creators of the computers for the Earth”. In both cases, the viewpoint has technical merit, but it’s a bad sign for the rest of us that they chose that particular way of putting it.

> Every time you check your Gmail, search on Google for a nearby restaurant, or watch a YouTube video, a server whirs to life in one of our data centers.

I see. Hmm, I don’t use Gmail or Google Search, but I do watch things on YouTube. I take this as a sign that I should stop. No real loss – I have other things to do with my time.

I suddenly realize what this reminds me of; it’s that quote from The Matrix:

“The Matrix is everywhere. It is all around us. Even now, in this very room. You can see it when you look out your window, or when you turn on your television. You can feel it when you go to work, when you go to church, when you pay your taxes.”
I'd never heard of it until this post. And I'm no noob (read: I am old).
Both emacs keybinding emulation packages are sub-optimal. One misses C-p, the other misses C-e, both basic editor movement commands. Not impressed.
We completely agree. We do all of our interviews via screen share, allowing candidates to use whichever language and environment they're most comfortable with. We also give a selection of problems, one of which is algorithm based, allowing candidates to choose which they prefer.

Ultimately though people are aware they're being watched and assessed under timed conditions so it's going to be somewhat stressful. If we think someone is so nervous they're clearly not able to code at all, we'll offer a take home test as well before making a final decision.
I can see what you mean in that case, but what about wordplay and puns? A running gag in Dragonball is Goku keeps calling Fortuneteller Baba (Uranai Baba) "old broad that nobody wants" (urenai baabaa). Do you want to read an explanation that takes up half the screen every time they do that joke? Would you even find it funny if you had to have it explained to you?
Do what you love and evaluate what you do
1. Prestige = status symbol. OK. We get it.

2. Quality... Well, my phone is my watch. Moot point. I'm not buying and discarding $20 Timex's every year. Not to mention this says you could keep the watch and your children could inherit and it would be worth more and it totally will still be a thing, just like beanie babies, right? What could go wrong?

3. Investment? There are plenty of other investment vehicles with a lower barrier of entry and less risk. Anything that is collectible can be called an investment, using this as a reason to buy a luxury watch is not very compelling.

Luxury items are just that... luxury items.

EDIT: Also that article is about buying pre-owned watches which means a serious investment in time and energy in finding a good quality watch from an individual who is willing to sell it at a low(ish) price. This makes the whole thing more of a hobby than anything else...
In part, this is because VS Code is currently not extensible at all – there is no package ecosystem, and therefore no vector for users to possibly introduce instability / performance issues.
>Is this whole category of law a place where the DoJ has intercepted enough sketchy conversations that they've got leverage against key Senators and Reps?

That's all I can think of too after reading Daniel Suarez' "Influx." With the resources and information at their disposal I would not put it past them to take this approach.

That raises the question of how we can change the system if we have to assume some sort of blackmail like that might be taking place. Is there a workaround?
What is this? I can't even tell. A text editor?
We were an image-processing SDK with OCR add-ons which were us reselling 3rd party SDKs with integration to our codecs and the processing code. It needed to be completely general purpose use in any .NET program (web, service, desktop, console, etc) since we didn't really want to get into usage with our customers (we had no royalties or usage restrictions on our part).

I think we opted for the customer actually obtaining their Abbyy license from Abbyy in the end because of the licensing mis-match. We sold just the wrapper.

Our parent company was a big user of Abbyy, and I think had a totally custom deal. They needed it for all of the language support and similarly wanted the full power to run it at high-speed and inside of .NET programs.
If you have proven your code correct, it doesn't matter what language it is in or whether it has a type system at all. Proven correct in the absence of a type system is proven correct.
You could just blow everyone's mind of sneak APL into R:

http://statistics.ucla.edu/system/resources/BAhbBlsHOgZmSSIp...
I'm happy things are moving along, but I would still like to see the documentation be more polished. I still don't know how to write a task queue (ie queue of closures) that executors can concurrently read and run from.

I don't feel like the docs empower me enough to write multi threaded code comfortably without the borrow checker spitting at me. Is it just me, or does anyone else feel this way?
I can't speak for the gender ratio in "science" but I can speak for my experiences in Computer Science, which are by definition anecdotal.

I'm the son of a computer programmer. My mother got her degree in this back when it had just barely become a college degree. I went to the same college in Junior High to take programming classes. I was taught by a woman. Later in High School our computer sience teacher was a woman, about %40 of the students in the classes were females.

There was no perceived gender imbalance in computer science in the southern USA in the 1980s and early 1990s. In my early jobs there was a 50/50 split roughly, though women were slightly more likely to be testers than programmers, our whole team was managed by a woman.

Slowly there were fewer women programmers over the years until the great programmer boom around 2000. At that point we stopped seeing "programmers" being almost always "logical hacker types with a strong interest in computers" and we started seeing people who had never written a line of code before college who decided it was a good career to go into. Those types of programmers were almost always men.

I really don't have a problem mythologizing real heros-- like Alan Turing. The other three are celebrities, and you're always going to see that kind of celebrity stuff. Tyson deliberately chose to make himself a celebrity.

I do lament that now "tech girls" are so often women who are not actually technical (Adrianna Richards, Shanley, FemFreak for example) who use that title for the sole purposes of pushing a political agenda and harassing people. Adrianna deserves to pay a lot of money to the men she victimized. (That political agenda, people seem to be calling cultural marxism, which is at least consistent with the marxist ideology most of them have).

Like the "War on terror", so called "Feminism" has found that it makes a lot more money and lands more punches when it switches from "women are people too" to "men are rapists, you're not safe!!!1!1".

The geek is stereotypically meek and socially awkward, and thus a perfect target for their abuse. Same thing with gamers.

I have noticed that actually technical woman have almost zero correlations with these types.

The idea that men should be ashamed because there aren't more women in programming is silly. Women aren't in programming because they've chosen not to be.

In nearly 30 years working in the software business, not one of the offices I've worked with was hostile to women-- and I've worked for some real jerks-- I've never seen any of the so called rampant sexism that these people claim.
LOL my thoughts exactly.
That's the crux of this situation. Mozilla needs money. Unless they find another way to finance themselves, they will continue selling user data, directly or indirectly. This will not change however we cry out.
Yes I am sure they did to the local politicians ;-)

Unless you collocating a call centre for adwords support I cant see how any DC would need 100 people full time - anyone got the org chart for a google DC?
It's definitely something to work on, but note that the Rust compiler tries hard to eagerly crash rather than possibly generate broken code. I'm very pleased at how few codegen-related bugs have been found since 1.0.
I'd guess that each button equates to a feature. So nobody wants to be seen "removing features" from the product.

Microwave A:

- heats food for the duration you want and power level you want

Microwave B:

- heats food for the duration you want and power level you want

- thaws food

- warms pizza

- makes popcorn

- boils water in a cup

- etc.
In addition to the flaws that this brings when there's any sort of severe bug, it also makes third party addons to your software much more painful. Dynamic linking lets a user, at runtime, add new libraries and new functionality, without having to stop their workflow, recompile the binary, then start their workflow again. If the program's source is several hundred megabytes, like many user facing apps tend to be these days, that can lead to a lot of painful waiting. The upsides to being able to dynamically add functionality severely outweigh the problems of dynamic versioning.
true that, I can't remember one highly profitable big win for USV, but I can remember a number of high growth big win exits for USV.
>It's like these companies just woke up suddenly

What companies?

> had a conference call

You mean, watched/read the same news in the same country?

> US is unique in that 9 people gunned down in cold blood somehow turns into a discussion about a flag?

The guy who shot them had pretty strong feelings about the flag, and a racist manifesto.

US is unique in that actual state and city governments (SF flew a confederate flag at civic center plaza in the 60s), in response to the civil rights movement, revived the symbol of a civil war in which the substantive disagreement was whether or not human beings are property.
VBScript was literally the prescribed way of building web applications for IIS. This was a long time ago and things were way different than they were now. ASP was a revelation compared how web applications were built prior to it's introduction.

It seems archaic now but those were archaic times.
If it wasn't clear when I say "I'm noticing a pattern" I'm talking about recent history, as in the last twenty years not the last hundred. I'm looking at what we're doing now, your way only tells us if the unfairness of the past 20 years is greater than or less than the 80 years before that.

Instead of IMDB's list of mostly TV movies, how about Wikipedia's Films About Mathematicians[1], look at the biographical films. There are only 8, but the last film biopic of an average white dude was Feynman's back in '96. Last year alone we had major films about Turing and Hawking, and A Beautiful Mind came out in 2001.

Take a look at the most recent big-budget sci-fi. Q: Who had 95% of the screentime in Gravity? A: A woman. Q: Who were the hero scientists in Interstellar? A: A black guy and two women. (How long did Doyle last? What was the race and sex of the disgraced scientist in Interstellar again?)

If you would like to provide a counterpoint, simply name the regular white guy scientists or mathematicians we've mythologized in the past 20 years.

We'll compare that to the efforts towards mythologizing females on HN in the past 30 days. Emmy Noether (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9606497), The Women Science Forgot (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9744684), and today's Ada Lovelace.

We'll throw in male scientists who have been publicly disgraced in the past year (offhand I can think of 3) and compare that to the number of disgraced female scientists (I count 0).

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_about_mathematic...
Would love to see some more background on this. Is it the C++11 ABI itself that changed, or just the ABI of libstdc++ when compiled as C++11?
You can look at the the other videos of Hans Rosling which might answer that. Whether it's a correlation and not a cause might still be up for debate, but the observation of that effect have been observed in virtually all places around the world.
Possibly. Lots more detail needed in a deployment plan.(lights/heating/cooling are just a some of the issues that would need solutions) While I can't find it now - I recall an article of a company that had individual work "offices" on wheels, that had dry-erase board for the exposed surfaces. Someone could become part of a given team by moving their personal office to the team area, and plugging in locally for power/connectivity/etc. I think it cost more than $500 - but at the time I though it was a very unique approach to making any open space (cheap unfinished warehouse?) into a "teamspace" with individual offices.
> By granting legal immunity for service providers to share so-called "threat" data—potentially containing unminimized private customer data—law enforcement agencies are opening a huge backdoor for uncontrolled warrantless mass surveillance

Section 4(d)(2) requires removal of personal information before sharing unless that personal information is directly related to a cybersecurity threat.

A cybersecurity threat is defined as "an action, not protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, on or through an information system that may result in an unauthorized effort to adversely impact the security, availability, confidentiality, or integrity of an information system or information that is stored on, processed by, or transiting an information system" and "does not include any action that solely involves a violation of a consumer term of service or a consumer licensing agreement".

There is no mass surveillance implied in this.

> Because this surveillance would be done in secret, people would have no legal basis to challenge what amounts to an end-run around the U.S. Constitution.

The Constitution restricts government from forcing companies to give up information against their will. Nothing in the Constitution prohibits companies from voluntarily giving up information, and so nothing you have cited is in any way an end-run around the Constitution.
I don't believe they will need to be unique. Users can browse for skills and manually enable them. I'm sure the app will alert you that there's a conflict when you attempt to enable a new skill that uses the same invocation name.
Which is good if you're programming in an object-oriented imperative language that has a defined program flow. But while that style is the most popular, applying the same concepts to anything that isn't imperative OO will result in unfathomable suffering.

When in Rome, code as the Romans do.
I guess there is a similar howto on various opt-out settings in Google account itself?

https://history.google.com/history/ and https://plus.google.com/settings/endorsements etc.?
Imagine all the data points a body generates at any moment. This maybe the first step toward a cyborg future. When you have that much information about yourself the chances for experimentation are endless. I get excited just tracking my sleep, I have no idea what I'll be able to achieve with technology like this...
Just gcc produced ones. GCC wanted to add a feature so that developers can add and change functions without changing the library version number. Which, to be quite honest, is a silly feature, as it leads to problems like the one we're seeing right here.
In my opinion, both. Chrome's new tab screen looks very out of date to me, and both the UI and page loading feels faster on Firefox.
Check out the movie Europa Report if you want an advance look at what lurks below the ice.
Would you like to cite a source?
So basically you want Jarvis from Iron Man. Might help to connect it to cameras too.
I completely agree. I think that is the hypocrisy of Uber. They are modeling their business and getting politicians to create carve outs specifically for them.
0.116.0? That's an ancient version (or a typo). You should probably upgrade to 1.0.
Newsonomics: 10 numbers that define the news business today
When you start documenting a language from scratch, you have to start at the beginning. A language is a huge project as well. The current book is about ~250 pages when rendered as a PDF. I've finally gotten to the point where the basics of almost everything have been documented, and am starting to move on to more intermediate style things.

In addition, we've only had a stable Rust for six weeks: there just hasn't been enough time to write more advanced things. Nobody wants to invest in stuff while things are still changing. As an example of this, I know there's an O'Reilly book coming out in the fall which covers advanced topics exclusively.

A basic task pool isn't too many lines of code: https://github.com/rust-lang/threadpool/blob/master/src/lib.... Hopefully that can help for that case, though obviously, this isn't just a comment about threadpools :)
Bayes’ Theorem – What is it and what is it good for?
Not yet. Will be soon.
The big advantage of the ASP/VBScript version is that there were almost no dependencies and it would install on the most basic IIS setup. Many companies already had IIS installed and configured but not doing anything.

Getting companies to install PHP on Windows (a dicey position those days) was a non-starter.
I don't think there was anything specific about C++11 that would have forced every implementation to change their ABI.

IIRC, one of the most significant was a change that made copy-on-write an invalid (or at least much more difficult) implementation for std::string, and gcc's std::string was CoW.

http://developerblog.redhat.com/2015/02/05/gcc5-and-the-c11-...
Idris is already more safe than Rust. What would this give you?