skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yes, people are selfish. That's why you should think of what you can offer them that will make them want to sit in the car for 10-15 minutes longer. That's why unique content came to my head, I've sat in driveways much longer just to hear the end of a good radio program.

Also, I don't like stunts. It's not sustainable and it's short term thinking.

I think you should shoot for building a great community. That means thinking for the long term and building a lasting relationship with your customers and have them build those relationships with each other.

You seem more focused on what you can extract from your users. It's better to start with what can you give that they can't help themselves but want to take.
What kind of equipment do you propose to use for a mid-air recovery of a fragile rocket stage that's 200ft long and weighs a couple dozen tons?

A large rig suspended from beneath a large helicopter. If there's a parachute involved, then it supposedly has a mount point that can support the weight of the rocket under high g load. (And of course, that would add weight.)

What kind of liquid do you propose filling the pond with that won't destroy the rocket on impact? Hitting water at high speed is like ramming into concrete, and I don't think other liquids will be much better.

Points off for poor reading comprehension. The scheme is to replace the landing legs with inflatable ballutes. The 1st stage would still nearly land just above the water. The impact the ballutes would take would only be from a short distance.

Your ideas sound like, "What SpaceX is doing is far too easy, let's come up with vastly more difficult approaches so they have a proper challenge!"

Your comment sounds a tad bit sensitive and emotional? In reality, I'm just going through the intellectual exercise of seeing what would work, given the landing control getting no better than what we have now. I fully expect it to get better, however.
XcodeServerSDK
Epic Systems (healthcare software, epic.com) does.
Consciousness May Well Be Out of Control
206m Americans can still be fired for being gay – despite today's decision
Symbols in ES6 are much like symbols in Lisp. Basically much where Lisp software uses symbols applies to ES6.

The main difference: Lisp has simple printed representations for interned, uninterned and keyword symbols.

CL-USER 23 > (let ((color-interned-symbols ' (yellow green red))
(color-uninterned-symbols '(#:yellow #:green #:red))
(color-keyword-symbols '( :yellow :green :red)))
(list color-interned-symbols
color-uninterned-symbols
color-keyword-symbols))
((YELLOW GREEN RED) (#:YELLOW #:GREEN #:RED) (:YELLOW :GREEN :RED))

Lisp also has packages for namespaces of symbols.

Here you can learn more about computing with symbols, in Lisp:

https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/LispBook/
I'm quite tempted to choose n = 1 and get those tax breaks all for myself.
The children of immigrants who grow up in the new culture learn it quickly and it becomes their own. American Chinese who grow up here behave just like white Americans. And BTW the Japanese thing you mentioned is likely almost entirely due to more efficient & convenient lost and found process: https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/culture-conscious/20140...
How about Kotlin? It fits exactly between Scala and Groovy and takes the best of both worlds. Edit: Although it is not super valuable on the job market right now.
I honestly wasn't joking at all. It's something I've thought of off-and-on over the years.

I could see how a trust would be better, though, in the US at least, I think a corp / LLC might be more flexible. And here, especially if the corp is formed in a few rules state like Nevada or Delaware, the paperwork isn't too terrible for small organizations.
A day without the Apple Watch
LOL, might be cheaper to just rent a van and sleep in the car!
The Mormon Church was expanding outside the US to non-white countries since the 1800s.
I'm curious what device you would use to "catch it"?
Being straight has always been significantly more common, and will continue to be so.

You teach them that when they grow up, they can marry someone they love. Which, now, is now true no matter whether you're talking to a kid who happens to be gay or not.
Marlow also famously says that the doesnt understand the zygohistomorphic prepromorphisms in Haskell.
Nope, a car is not a system that was built to be 'sold', it was built to transport people/things safely. If you remove a part of a system and the system still works as intended, it was not part of the system. The head-rest can be removed and the car will still run but with less safety. Hence: all parts of the system are equally required to interact and make the system do what the system should do.
Even if you're only 10% efficient, 10 hours a day is a lot, in fact especially if you're 10% efficient, you only really have 1.6 hours in your day of effectiveness, spending the majority of that daily time on a leisure activity is... costly.
So, you are saying it's OK to give privileges to one set of people but not to another. How is that OK?
UI Testing with Xcode 7
Jedberg doesn't work for Reddit, and I have no idea why you'd bring up Reddit anyway.

Your points about the limitations of the data seem sound however. I just don't know why you brought up Reddit randomly.
Genome Science Subreddit
It'd be nice to update "Why" with reasons why other recent developments in systems programming languages fail to address what you think Orange is addressing.
Long Live the Phone Call
And digg was 'inspired' by slashdot and reddit stole digg userbase.

It's the community and moderators who make the site, not only the technology.

Therefore all redeeming qualities lie in the respective users of those sites, and less in the programming.

Voat is just starting and reddit is perfectly capable of performing a 'digg' and alienate its users.

Let's wait and see.
"Individuals who happen to be members of a majority do not need a Bill of Rights."

Do you understand what you are saying? So if you are in the majority, the government can suppress your speech?!?!?
This is a joke right? Positive population growth = broken?Millions of people live in London despite these negative factors, so only parts of it are broken, other parts are so attractive as to draw in vast numbers in spite of the problems you list. So it's not 'simply' broken, there are parts of it that are clearly working .
Parachutes are not a good idea because of how rockets are built. The parachute would apply too much stress to the structure of the rocket which would reduce its lifespan/potential for reuse.

Thank you. I was waiting for this response!

While it's normal to try to think and find better alternative, let me remind you that going into space is not simple. I always have a strong feeling about people over-simplifying hard problems with clueless alternative.

I know I'm a layman in this field. Nothing wrong with asking questions.

I feel this shows a lack of understanding and respect to a field you clearly don't understand.

I know I don't understand everything, but you should know better than to just engage in harsh silencing tactics against anyone who simply asks a question out of curiosity. If you see something in my post suggesting this is not the case, please post a quote. Then if you can't find anything that isn't subjective "tone" then please know that this was all in your imagination. Try to take this as a constructive criticism.
Aw, now they have disclosed their secret weapon! [1]

[http://www.paulgraham.com/avg.html]
The next Human will use semver, v1.1.0
See my response to ScottBurson. The Constitution does not protect individual rights in general. Instead, it protects a small set of individual rights that are most relevant when that individual finds himself in a minority, so-called minority rights.

It was expected that democratic self-governance would protect against other basic rights (e.g., to freedom from unreasonable taxation, the right to not be raped and murdered, etc.). But most individual rights are not listed in the Constitution, because the purpose of the constitution was to establish democratic self governance with protection for minorities against mob rule. NOT to provide for individual rights.

> What specifically can you point me to, what founding father, specifically wrote that the Bill of Rights was to protect minorities and not individuals?

Read Thomas Jefferson's First Inaugural Address, for starters.

Of course rights of minorities are individual rights, since minorities are composed of individuals. But the constitution was designed specifically to protect the rights of minorities, not to protect individual rights in general. The assumption was that democratic self-governance would provide for "little-r" rights; i.e., for fir and just governance.
The first time I saw it in some old US silent-movie comedy as I was kid. I was scared just as I've seen it. You can imagine that those guys managed to make gags with that.

I can't find that movie (maybe somebody knows) (Edit: German Wikipedia mentions Charlie Chaplin?) the only thing I can find is something completely different I've also remembered:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXBmUOjgWJE&t=8m20s

Back to the chain elevator, as a grown-up I rode in it, and it felt not scary, more like "safe enough" and even interesting.

But it surely isn't made for everybody.
1) Slept in college.
2) Learnt programming most of the nights.
3) Built few apps.
4) Started writing open source code.
5) Got hired by bunch of startups and freelanced.
6) Taught some programming to my friends.
7) Tried.
8) Failed.
9) Tried.
10) Failed.

Two things that you need to experience in your 20 is "Trying and Failing". It will teach you the lessons that you need for rest of your life.

Have a great Twenty , Opportunities are Plenty.
>1:56 pm ET
Jun 26, 2015

(The original paper was posted here, though https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9760864
Because the institution, historically speaking, has been between people of different genders. It is only recently that people have even considered allowing same-sex marriages. It certainly wasn't considered or was part of the intent of the 14th amendment, when it was added to the constitution.

If you want to add a law to consider prohibiting same-sex marriage as discriminatory, then go through the process to add a law through the legislative process. Changing the meaning and intent of the current laws through the judicial process seems like the wrong way to go about it. It just isn't currently part of the constitution.
I live in LA, if they are actually going to attempt a return to land, it's going to be hard to resist going up there to try to catch a glimpse of it.
How to get access to Telegram account
You're not required to set yourself on fire to keep others warm.

There is such an incredibly huge gap between what is considered good software craftmanship and what is actually happening in practice in the industry. Nobody really talks that loudly about the ugly parts - it's embarrassing and just reflects badly on your employer (or worse - client). But judging from my own experience, and what my friends working at other places tell me, and how much articles like "Programming Sucks"[0] resonate with people, you are very likely to run into the same problem at your next job if you decide to quit.

It sounds like you're doing a good job, so instead of quitting, consider caring less about the company, the project and your own reputation. Let deadlines slip. Don't do patch releases. Go home at 5.

You might catch some extra flak at the start since you've been doing this stuff so far, but at worst you will be as ineffective as your coworkers. The company is probably better off with you working normally than quitting.

[0]http://www.stilldrinking.org/programming-sucks
It was a cool talk, but it didn't really address adoption.

It featured (to the best of my memory):

A new data model for om next. Instead of cursors, components have a composable datomic style DSL to locate their data, which is pluggable and can be from local memory or a cached server side query.

Using this approach you can request data in new ways from the client without adding server side code.

An update on cljs in cljs (small example but showing lots of plumbing work done)

The path to react native, repls and dynamic code loading on the device (was demoed) via ambly
I think you mean "Feature Tracker".
Credit card fraud solution coming to America, finally
Gotcha, that's a really good way of putting it. And I agree that reservations as tasks are not the way to go to prove the concept out.

Seems like we have quite a bit of thinking to do. Any further advice for us? Thanks!
Something suspended from underneath a large cargo helicopter, or a large cargo helicopter specially constructed for the purpose. As in the Genesis probe, the device would be catching the parachute.
I'm not saying they don't have those rights, I'm saying they don't need them. Not at the particular moment when they are expressing an idea that the governing party agrees with.

If you agree with a supermajority of Congress and the President on issue X, your first amendment rights to say you support issue X aren't really super important. Of course you should still have them, but they are easily protected by way of democratic processes -- constitutional provisions aren't necessary when the lawmakers are on your side.
>That's a polyamorous (group) marriage, not a polygamist one

Hmmm, please excuse my ignorance in such matters. I only married one woman and that is quite enough.

>you're basically saying polymarriages would be like corporations

Yes, exactly. Well put.

>with their associated complexity

I can't even begin to imagine the complexity, legal or relational. However, I can imagine situations where such an arrangement could be beneficial to the individuals involved.
Meh. Apparently retrofit kits will be $2000 two years after self driving cars are on the market (source: that company that drove one from la to ny a few months ago, forgot the name) so cost isn't going to be a biggie.
Specifically, which large helicopter has the required payload capacity?

Also, rockets are built to support compressive loads. The tensile loads imposed by a parachute slowing the stage down are completely different, so there's no guarantee you could even use a parachute without significant strengthening of the structure.
Oh I wasn't talking about Perl specifically but about languages in general. I agree that Perl projects tend to stay small enough to be quickly understood and refactored. In fact I don't remember seeing a Perl script more than a few thousands line long.

However, don't underestimate how hard it can be to understand your own Perl code when you've been away from it for 6 months :)
I believe that Google Authenticator uses TOTP. Six digit HMAC-SHA1 TOTP from a base32 encoded secret using a 30 second timestep. At least, that has been my experience. I wrote an OATH client and it works with Google Authenticator using those parameters. https://github.com/w8rbt/oathgen

Duo supports this as well (and also other TOTP/HOTP modes). If you have access to a Duo account, look at the 'Import Hardware Tokens' feature under 'Devices'. That's not named accurately. Really it should be named, 'Import TOTP/HOTP secrets' as that's what they ask you to import and those secrets can be used in OATH compliant HW fobs or any software that does standard TOTP/HOTP. They also allow you to import Yubikeys as well if you like (of course, that's not OATH).
Very impressive for a first project. I've been writing code for 20 years and haven't ever made anything this cool :D You're inspiring me!
Can Stack Overflow and Meta's logos be changed to the “#LoveOverflows” logo?
Is the syntax python-inspired?

It looks a lot more clean to read than Nim, so this will be interesting.

I couldn't find any more examples besides the simple "hello world", so it would be nice to see a few more in-depth examples.
Your missing the point. If the cartels can get RPGs from the Mexican military, they can get rifles from them also.
Great article, and good reminder on using trace. Every time I rediscover trace, I can't remember how I ever forgot to use it in the first place for most of my problems.

I used CL in a production environment a while back for a threaded queue worker and nowadays as the app server for my turtl project, and I still have yet to run into problems. It seems like you guys managed to push the boundaries and find workable solutions, which is really great.

Thanks for the writeup!
>There has been basically nothing, in the history of our country, considered more of a state right than defining marriage.

Sorry, this statement just isn't true:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loving_v._Virginia

>The debates over everything in the past that led to amendments looked roughly the same as the debate over same sex marriage. For example, people beat each other on the floor of the senate chamber over slavery. The only difference to this debate is that a court ended it by deciding to change the constitution.

So you are saying that every social issue must end with a constitutional amendment? The 14th amendment is already there. Why must we repeat the mistakes of the past every time a new issue comes along? Are you suggesting we should go to war to settle same sex marriage?

>This is not how the process is supposed to work.

You have not established this conclusion with anything you said. Nothing in this comment strikes me as from a "lawyer" but what do I know, I'm just an astronaut doctor lawyer in space.
Has the book caught up with the software? Last I checked, the book was written in terms of obsolete APIs that didnt match the yesod-geneterated app boilerplate, and Snoyman said that he didn't have time yet to update the book.
What is Visual Hierarchy and why it's important?
Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez obtained this sort of leverage against Representative Jane Harman: http://www.salon.com/2009/04/20/harman/

I was amazed that this story had such short legs. It seems like a big deal to me, a really big deal.
> Duo's two factor auth can be bypassed by someone with access to Duo's systems.
This is interesting... why?
Allows this? Or recognizes it as marriage? (I'm assuming that it's closer than first cousins.)
I only recently developed this skill a little.

The Ruby application server I looked at was for doing social network feeds. Posts/Likes/Comments go in, feeds come out.

I followed some common code paths for things such as posting a comment and getting a feed. I would write the stack trace down on paper as I went.

It also helped that I happen to know that this ruby server used wisper and sidekiq. This way I didn't overlook single lines of code such as 'publish: yada yada'
> But you can always sell the house, or rent it to others and move to cheaper neighborhood (and rent there yourself).

The cost of transaction is higher than it seems if the goal is to minimize the loss.

There's an expected 6% off the selling price, to be divvied up among the agents of your and buyer's choice.

Depending on the nature of mortgage, there might be costs to recuperate, such as points and origination fees.

In some states it's also customary for the seller to purchase a one-year home warranty in buyer's name. Depending on the price and size of the house, this could be another substantial expense.
The substance of my post above was that on balance, "minority rights" is a better characterization of the enumerated rights in the bill of rights than "individual rights".

Yes, saying "individual rights" isn't technically incorrect. But it's less accurate a protrayal than saying "minority rights".

Anyways, you're clearly ignoring the obvious intent of my posts in favor of stupid nit-picking. So I'm done.
Which post addresses which concerns?

Unless I'm wrong you're arguing that Uber is safe and efficient because market forces made it so. It's efficient because of technological advances and it's safe literally to the extent required by law.

Because they've opted out of the regulations their competitors are subject to Uber could offer a a more dangerous and less efficient service than current taxi companies and still "compete".
> this is just similarity

That may be all that "learning" and "understanding" are.
Speaking solely as one potential customer:

I like this idea.

As for the "moat", I think the product with the best automation will win at least a defensible niche within the market. I would encourage you to start upmarket and not worry about price so much right now. Get really good at making the thing run itself; you can cut the price later. (But, I'm someone with a lot more money than time, so that colors my view here.)

(Yes, I'm already on your mailing list.)
Want to Get Rich? Forget Work-Life Balance
I agree with this sentiment and therefore my Response method is also an `io.ReadCloser` (exposing the http.Response.Body io.ReadCloser that Go has to offer).
> The best marketing is when you don’t know it’s marketing

There's an entire industry that revolve around this idea.

We call the people that work in that industry "publicists".
You probably need to ask the GCU Just Read The Instructions

I'm just hoping that his first ship to land on Mars is called The Ends of Invention
You underestimate social conservatives. They're perfectly capable of working out the consequences of such a change.
Hello!

I think that the next big step in Medical Technology will the the rise in software making medical decisions. This doesn't pose a big technological problem but it does pose a large regulatory problem.

I have experience getting cloud-based software through the FDA as a "medical device" and have overcome some of the most common hurdles.

I have an idea on how (and the ability to implement) a product to reduce the regulatory and monetary barrier to entry for this type of software.

My question is, in the current market, does this have any shot of getting funding? The product could never be used without the approval of the FDA, an expensive process. Is this a non-starter for most funds?
TEDxNewHaven – Steli Efti – Entrepreneurial Happiness
Windows doesn't delay writes to a non-fixed drive by default, so the blinking light works fine.

A new write is possible but unlikely if the user is done with the drive, and again shouldn't cause major damage.
The largest production helicopter ever made, the Mi-26, has a maximum cargo capacity of 20 metric tons, which is already insufficient. Making things worse, there would be a tremendous shock when the catch is first made. I guess if you want to add "building a helicopter far larger than any so far yet built" to the list of SpaceX's activities....

The stage will fall over on impact with water, so you're still talking about a 200ft drop for the top of it, and it's still going to hit hard when this happens.

You don't appear to have any concept of the numbers involved here or the physical limitations, so I don't see how this could possibly be an intellectual exercise of seeing what would work. Saying "just catch it in mid-air with a helicopter," when no helicopter capable of doing this currently exists in the world, and building one that's suitable would be a massive undertaking, is intellectually lazy, not an intellectual exercise.

I don't see where I'm being sensitive or emotional. I'm just pointing out that your suggestions are, in fact, a whole lot worse than what's currently being done, and are therefore kind of ridiculous to just suggest off the cuff. Brainstorming is fun, but is it too much to ask to do a basic smell test on the ideas before you start talking about them as if they were realistic?
Should I Work for Free
There is a clear distinction between granting rights and denying rights. The Supreme Court should not be actively denying rights to people, unless it is clearly called out in the Constitution or state law. This is not one of those examples.

And thus far this court has been fairly consistent in granting rights broadly. This ruling stands in that tradition, but this time in a direction ideologically opposed to the right.