skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Or bring back the original 'ye'. It is still in use in some parts of Britain and Ireland.
The same way that legalizing brother-sister marriage increases risk. Or could you explain more fully why one would increase risk but not the other?
Sorry, but as a lawyer totally in favor of gay marriage, Roberts, at least, is completely right on the legal theory.

There has been basically nothing, in the history of our country, considered more of a state right than defining marriage.

The supreme court is not a ruling council. Our constitution is about freedom from government intervention, not guaranteed government benefits.

The debates over everything in the past that led to amendments looked roughly the same as the debate over same sex marriage. The only difference is this time a court ended it by deciding to change the constitution.
I agree with them in a sense -- it's not democratic. Neither was desegregation. As the saying goes: democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on dinner.
Exactly. Which was the case being discussed. As discussed.
It's the opposite. You can be together whoever you want. What they mean, in this case, is the government recognition of your union. As the government need defined laws to operate...

And why do the government need to recognize the union? To give them some rights that united people need. Like keeping important possessions (like a house), becoming responsible for kids, taking important medical decisions when the other person can't take them, etc.
> What should happen is the government should stop defining marriage of any form (leave that to religion or personal tradition), and simply define all these rights under civil union (or a similar phrase with no significant religious/cultural attachment).

Sure. And that was not in the cards. What you want is not on the table and likely never will be. But expanding the rights of people because of basic fairness is a step in the process of making the lives of our fellow Americans better.

Asking gay people to wait for a unicorn is bullshit. Please don't be That Guy. Ideological purity is so often the enemy of making the world better.
Square (reader), bitcoin, WePay, PayPal, ...

(I do cash and cards, my "wallet" is a broccoli rubber-band.)
One idea is to use Linux's `perf` to sample stack traces, as the program is running, over a minute or so and see where the code flows.
IMO, the one tool you can't do without is grep.

My typical strategy is to get the project running, then just get to work. Start fixing bugs, and adding requested features. Use the code around you as a guide on what is right and wrong within that company, and forge forward. When you are unsure of something turn to grep, find some examples, and keep going.
Absolutely! We're using Rails at Precision Nutrition. We use it to serve up a JSON API, and in a more traditional sense with ERb templates.

We're finding it to be incredibly productive, and more than performant for our needs — especially when you couple it with Postgresql.
Heavy-handed with governments, not with individual users.
Wow, this is a really great talk for anyone using rails. Ernie Miller manages to dissect a few gnarly parts of ActiveRecord while keeping it positive and constructive.
Hi Sam and Kevin,

Company: http://PassWhiz.com

Question: We have an awesome product that schools love. It's time to sign up as many middle schools and high schools as possible before the new year rolls around. As a one or two man show, what advice could you give about approaching these schools and how to expose our product to this market? Thanks!
I can't think of any important ones. As always, manage your risk. Even if you believe 99% in something, you should not put all of your money into it:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelly_criterion
Sorry, but as a lawyer totally in favor of gay marriage, Roberts, at least, is completely right on the legal theory.

There has been basically nothing, in the history of our country, considered more of a state right than defining marriage.

The supreme court is not a ruling council. Our constitution is about freedom from government intervention, not guaranteed government benefits.

The debates over everything in the past that led to amendments looked roughly the same as the debate over same sex marriage.
For example, people beat each other on the floor of the senate chamber over slavery. The only difference to this debate is that a court ended it by deciding to change the constitution.

This is not how the process is supposed to work. The fact that the majority of the US may be tired of a broken political system does not change this.
You think that gay men are more likely to have unprotected sex with multiple partners if they get married than if they don't?
One of the most brilliant ideas I've heard on the subject is a couple of proposed constitutional amendments stating that (a) your body is your personal property, and (b) you have an inalienable right to define who is a member of your family. When framed in that way, even most social conservatives would agree with the underlying principles.
Sure it's still a relevant option. You can integrate the current popular frontend frameworks easily if you want. It provides a relatively painless and speedy development experience.
The main downside I've experienced is that managers (and sometimes co-workers) react negatively to anyone who has skill in more than one area. They become obsessed with making it seem as though you're an idiot and that you aren't actually skilled in multiple areas. Also, managers at larger companies often pretend they're trying to hire Full-Stack Engineers, but are really trying to hire someone to write Javascript (that is, they are full of it and start trying to box you in right away).

It's true that more time has to be spent keeping up with advancements, but it doesn't take that much longer than paying attention to one area, as things don't change that often and you don't have to "level up" immediately.
I don't claim this argument is valid, only that it is non-bigoted (and defensible).
What Elixir Is about
In this case, the quote omitted the context of archetypes and specific people, namely George W. Bush, that Chapelle was very obviously satirizing. I say very obviously, because it wasn't a nuanced depiction: the skit was literally described as him being black Bush, and he was in a suit behind the POTUS podium, addressing the media.

Removing the context from that and hitting Chapelle for it is just a convenient target.
If you love coffeescript syntax, ISTM you'll be happier in coffeescript. That isn't to take anything away from ES6, but coffeescript is just as capable, and your aesthetic preferences are more valid for you than anyone else's would be.
Don't worry, we'll elect a woman president before Europe elects a black one. Guaranteed.
Can a mobile app really save your business?
Yeah, that was my initial reaction as well. It looks like she flexes at her shoulders more than I'm used to seeing, but nothing groundbreaking.

We've known that a dolphin kick is faster than any of the strokes for a long while.

I haven't ever seen someone do it sideways, but I suppose that's probably because it's more difficult to keep going straight.
MMIX
That comment wasn't necessarily direct at you specifically, but at anyone who wants to see polygamy legalized. It was just a suggestion.
Not paying your taxes on your employees is "better"? What needs to change for current taxis to provide an "Uber" level of service beyond a ratings system and an app?
The assertion under discussion is that sodomy is not "gross." Do keep up.
Well, the SCOTUS just decided that same sex unions are, in fact, weddings and sex is an existing protected class based on actual legislation and precedent. That means the baker would be discriminating illegally as a public accommodation on a federal level if they refused their service based on the sex of that event's participants.
A child labor analogy would have worked better IMO
It's still acceptable for a comedia to say to say demeaning things about gay, black, indians, asians, jews, whites, WASPs etc -- including rape victims, terrorism survivors, heroes, politicans, babies, etc.

That's what comedians do. Listen to Louis C.K (or anyone, really).

>Michael Richards is a comedian, and made anti-Semitic remarks that resulted in a significant backlash

Depends if he made them as part of a comedic routine or not. And actually even when part of a routine, depends if they were told as genuine preaching / ranting, or just for the comedic effect / exaggeration / black humor of it.
> and looks like there are better alternatives now.

...such as? It'd help to know what you consider to be "better alternatives" because it gives scope to what your priorities are. I've seen discussions in which people say, "Well now there's Sinatra"...which is fine, but that's more of an opinion about "Lightweight projects and systems are nicer" rather than "Sinatra is better than Rails". I used to use Rails all the time but now I do most data projects in Middleman...but that's because I prioritize static builds and front-end engineering and most importantly, simplified my data infrastructure so that it can be represented as a spreadsheet or plaintext YAML...but that's not something applicable to all projects.

One of the most valuable parts of Rails is its opinionated infrastructure...and I think that's helped it be a little more nimble from version to version.
http://www.zerodb.io/

ZeroDB is an end-to-end encrypted database that lets you operate on data while it's encrypted.

Demo video: https://vimeo.com/128047786

Question: We want to sell to large enterprises (financial services, healthcare, saas providers, etc.). The common advice is to start with SMBs/startups and get traction that way before going upmarket to enterprises. How can we balance that with the fact that what SMBs are asking us for is very different from what enterprises have told us they'd like in a fully-baked product?
It is about Government benefits primarily. The government incentivizes marriage through tax breaks, etc. So the definition of marriage matters in administering these benefits. The legislative branch should first start with redefining the eligibility for these benefits to keep religion out.
Which one is better?

1) A culture of segregation in the minds of part of the population AND segregative laws.

or

2) A culture of segregation in the minds of part of the population.

I would say 2 is better than 1. They already fixed part of it. And a part that was hurting a lot of people.
Likewise. Square Cash is great. Especially if you're cool with splitting the bill equally, you can send the same cash request to a group of people in seconds.
Any evaluation of retroreflective safety features should start with a short overview of what retroreflectivity cannot do: improve visibility, when the object is not within the light cone of the observer's headlights. With that in mind, those impressive side shots are becoming nothing more than show, because any bike sideways in the lights will either be long gone when the car reaches the point where the paths cross, or be already way too close to avoid an accident. And head/tail visibility must be provided by active light anyway, because visibility only inside that headlight beam is never enough. Once you have active light, any retroreflectors are merely adding minor (but important) attitude/dimension/range cues and improvements by "lifepaint" over conventional reflectors will be marginal at most.
Well this still happens in Windows 7.
Marriage is really important to people. If you define the legal part of that as "civil union", people will add new cultural/religious significance to that new definition. Then when polygamy or whatever becomes popular in 2115, the conservatives of that time will cry out about the "sanctity of only two people in civil union, the way it's always been!" And around the circle we go.

What's important today is that our country has expanded our liberties and rights, and a lot of people can now live fuller and more secure lives as a result.
Essentially, the question is whether marriage is a right, or is it a privilege.

If it is a right, then it should not be subject to the democratic process in the first place, so taking it out does not count as erosion. If it is a privilege, then it can be granted (or not) through the democratic process. The Court held today that it is a right.

Disclaimer--I have not finished reading all the opinions yet.
I see some fair points in here. It's possible that what I've heard was influenced by the recent findings of the shooter.

But I'm just so pissed, because in my country (Bulgaria) the roma (gypsy) population are always treated (by the media, and unfortunately a lot of people I know) as non-bulgarians, non-citizens, even non-people by some.
In my case, aggressively reject any printf statements in code review. Get that shit out of my repo.
check disney's wall-e
Hi, Kevin and Sam,

I am the founder of https://ManualTest.io. My app automates manual testing. It generate and run integration tests by recording and replaying users' actions on their websites. Manual testing is still being used everyday (by developers or not), so this could be a huge time saver for them.

My app is recently available on the Chrome Web Store, it only got a few users, despite having quite positive feedbacks. My question is, I am not sure the lack of users is because (1) I haven't done enough marketing/SEO/etc to get it in front of people, or (2) because I need to build more features before users would find it useful enough to try, or (3) it is just not something users want.

If its (1), I should stop coding and start focusing on letting people know about my product. If it is (2), I have a few very useful features that are still waiting to be done, but they could take at least weeks to complete. Without enough initial users, I am not sure which features users want most, or if the current set of features is enough for now, so I should focus on letting users know about it (so it is (1)).

Thanks!
Back when I did Java, using static analysis tools like findbugs, then going and fixing all the issues found was a good way to get coverage of the codebase... I'm sure for JS there must be similar analysis tools.
Since that post development has picked back up:

http://www.sublimetext.com/3dev
> So according to this ruling, the right for two men to marry has been "lurking" in the Constitution since 1868, right?

Yep. Just as the right to marry someone of a different race than you was lurking there but was not discovered until 1967.
The map doesn't seem to show the icons if I load the site at a 2160p resolution, at a smaller resolution closer to 1080p it renders the icons.
>Uber got where they are - managing a massive fleet of vehicles

Uber does not manage a massive fleet of vehicles. They don't have to service these cars, pay insurance on them, fill them up etc. They are just middle man that links people with cars with people without them.
On that note, could someone recommend a tool for automatically generating the graph that shows the class dependencies/hierarchies in a Java code base? I'm sure there are good tools out there, but all the ones I tried so far (JArchitect, CodePro Analytix, SonarQube) don't seem to have a good graph layout engine.

I'd like to print out a big graph and stick it to the office walls so I'll have a good view of the logical structure.
It sounds like our hypothetical baker can't object to giving service on any grounds by your explanation. Are there truly no limits in your mind?

Must the Muslim baker need to bake the gay marriage cake and deliver it to the ceremony just because some customer wants one made? Must the Christian baker bake a cake with a pentagram and goat head on it and deliver it to the sacrificial altar just because some customer wants one made? Or, how about yesterday's lurch issue? Shall we force the black baker to bake a rebel flag cake with some racist epithet on it because some a-hole customer wants it?

Can't we back off here and simply respect one another's personal or religious beliefs? Respect must flow in both directions in a civil society, in my opinion. If the baker doesn't want to participate in the target celebration based on personal or religious beliefs, why not just amicably part ways? Why the bent noses if the customer can find some other baker that will gladly take the money and participate. Why does this even rise to the legal challenge level?
This was exactly my reaction after looking at the article. Mastering underwater dolphin kick has been critical to success at the national and international level since the late 1990s.
In summary swim like a tuna and not a dolphin by doing your underwater dolphin kick on the side.
>Idiomatic code is so called, because people familiar with the language can quickly read it. It makes reading code a much lighter task.

In the case of Java circa 2000-2006 it needlessly messed up code, making it more difficult and slow to read EVEN for people familiar with the language.

Following conventions doesn't make code better to read automatically just because people are already familiar with them -- those conventions should be good in the first place for that to happen.

Node has the callback hell "idiom" many are familiar with. And yet if somebody rewrote the code with async, await, even the people "familiar" with callbacks would be able to read it faster and understand it better.
I can't upvote this hard enough. OP is right in my mind, but....

I'm straight (and divorced), and we got married for many of the same reasons that LGBT folks want to--it makes sense. Visitation rights, inheritance, tax treatment, etc.

It's unlikely that marriage would be removed as something of concern to lawmakers--has that kind of thing ever happened anywhere, any time, any way?

I respect OP's opinion, but it's ivory tower and we're talking about real people right now.

possibly unnecessary edit: just want to reiterate that I think OP is _right_, it's just not practical, and I'll sacrifice rightness for a rather-large "quick and dirty win".
I get people to send me Square Cash right then and there.
>if you take them out without using "eject" first.

That's not exactly true. That only happens if the NTFS volume has a dirty bit set. That happens when you corrupt something and some check fails. I pull drives in and out all the time without ejecting and almost never see the error you mention.

If you pull the drive when there's a write going on, then you'll activate the dirty bit and get that message.
Did you ever see Denis Pankratov do his underwater? Back in the day he was truly unbelievable!! It's too bad there are limits on the underwater portion, the cameras they have on the pools now are really great at capturing the underwaters and I don't think much would be lost unless you're not able to watch it on screen. But on freestyle there are no limits on anything except pushing off the bottom, so if you wanted to chance it I wonder if someone could try and win the 50 fr with a fish kick?
How on demand culture is changing consumer behavior
I'm not disagreeing with your general premise that the fundamental right for equality is the basis of the constitution and therefore equal marriage is implied by it. But to your points:

"the right of black people to be free and equal to the other people" (specifically the abolishment of slavery)
Is made explicit in the 13th amendment[0]

And "women's suffrage" is the 19th amendment[1]

So for both of your examples, these things are explicity added to the constitution.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirteenth_Amendment_to_the_Un...

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nineteenth_Amendment_to_the_Un...
Hey guys,

We are CodePicnic (codepicnic.com), a platform for sharing, running and showcasing code through a browser. We help people and business improve their demos, APIs documentation, or anything that needs for their users to run and try some code online.

We'd love to improve our "getting there" process. We've been interacting with users here in Hacker News, Reddit, Product Hunt and other sites, and getting better and increasing our usage, but still we feel is not enough right now. Our first users love us, the service and the potential, but perhaps there's something glaring we aren't doing well in order to be more well known. Is a long process, we get it, but the more we learn, the better.

I also believe this is an important matter that many other startups would love to learn about.
This is a logically-consistent line of thought that---inconveniently---doesn't seem to align with evidence.

Historically, it seems to be the case that when society legalizes something, and people can observe that under that new order, society doesn't crumble, societal attitudes on the morality of that thing change to reflect the reality (albeit slowly).

Consider women's suffrage. Consider no-fault divorce. Consider black men and white men being forced to serve side-by-side in WWII by the draft, then coming home to a country that still treated them unequal in the eyes of the law.

It's not a 100% consistent scenario (contrast abortion rights debate in the wake of Roe v. Wade), but the trend is for culture to adapt in the face of evidence.
You say that like it'd take a weekend and a bunch of Red Bull to get done...
Regcure PRO License Key [ Activation +Serial ] Plus Crack Full Download
It stood up and whispered to my ear to move to Python, which I did, circa 1997.
Microsoft's new mission statement revealed in email
They might; something being officially sanctioned might increase the frequency.

Can you at least see a reasonable comparison between the two? If you don't think changing marriage laws affects behavior, shouldn't that apply to incest as well?

It seems to me that "legalizing gay marriage won't increase gay sex overall" and "legalizing sibling marriage won't increase sibling sex overall" are likely to be inconsistent with each other, and that the first is implied by your wording; if gay sex increases, it should also increase "unprotected sex with multiple partners".
You 'shell' choose for yourselves?
Very interesting, because it would undermine basically everything SCOTUS has ever said about marriage.

(undermine in the sense of reverse a principle upon which the arguments used by SCOTUS to defend various decisions depend.)
It may be a moot point though, i've always felt that it's a gray area - not black or white.

Eg, i could feel/claim to be entirely straight. But if i have a drunken experience in college, perhaps i realize that i enjoyed it a bit. Did i change? Or was i never "100% straight" to begin with?

Who's to say that you can't even be wrong about your own sexuality? We're wrong about things all the time, even within our own minds. Is sexuality any different? I doubt it.

The idea that you're born straight or gay appears to be created by a desire to separate humanity. You're in one camp, they're in another, and with that separation you can judge them differently.

Interesting how it all comes about though. We're complex creatures in everything we do, it seems.
It's really hard to find and apples to apples comparison in practice.
The fastest 50m swim on record is 20.91.
The fastest underwater dolphin kick, different from the one in the article, is 23.10 [1].
These aren't super fair comparisons for many reasons but one major one is that the underwater has a slower start.
Probably a better comparison is world record for 50m backstroke which is 24.04.
I imagine if there were any olympic underwater race (be it fish or dolphin kick), it could probably get close to and possibly overtake the freestyle record, but it would probably take a few years.

[1]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EFjQDgIfKM
Actually, Detroit is just starting a renaissance of sorts right now. If I had the spare cash, I would absolutely buy up a bunch of houses in Detroit Metro, fix 'em up, and rent/sit on them for a couple years. Alternate business plan: buy a large (or several small) commercial plots for pennies on the dollar, and build a Level 3 datacenter in Detroit.