skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Aerodynamics (and thus fuel efficiency) could be another factor - even with the Volvos, compare the boxier 240/740/850 vs the later, more rounded models; the sloping curves are more aerodynamic but definitely make it harder to see exactly where the edges of the car are and what's around it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:%2780-%2782_Volvo_240DL_S...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:2012_Volvo_S60_--_NHTSA_1...
> adultery and extra-marital sex are not crimes

It's still illegal in 21 states[0]. Those laws however are rarely enforced.

[0] http://www.theweek.co.uk/62723/adultery-laws-where-is-cheati...
I flagged you for libel because you lied.
...get permission from a tiny group of powerful people in order to get the government to recognize your marriage.
Completely echo this article except I'm working on moving from 5 figure to 6 figures in order to get the life I want. I doubt the article writer can get 6 figures in Cupar.
Making the Move from GWT to AngularJS
And here you are calling them people when they may identify otherwise.
Name.com is giving away free 100 .news domains
Simply put: dependencies are code, and code comes at a maintenance cost. Thin abstractions, such as a this library, can be replaced by a function or two, which is a lower maintenance overhead because there is less code, you wrote the code, and all the code is being used.

IMHO, dependencies should be pulled in for things that would take you weeks to do correctly. Avoid pulling in a dependency for something you can do yourself in 5 minutes. So I would pull in an http library if it actually did the mechanics of http better than the one in the stdlib, but not one that just wrapped it up for me a bit.

For me, that's not a Go thing, that's just an I'm Older Now thing.

Also, snarkily, dependency management is a mess in Go right now; none of us have any dependencies because we can't figure out how to do it. :P That is definitely a hole right now (though it's starting to get plugged in 1.5 with the /vendor directory) and is definitely exacerbated by the core team not being able to use any solution they could provide for the community.
You argue with the sanctity of marriage. But which modern authority makes it sacred?
To be fair, the things you mention (slavery, segregation, oppression, even genocide) have been justified by people led by pure atheistic humanism effectively cloaking oppression in logic, academia and scientific theory (Mao, Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot). I think it's fair to say that people with all sorts of ideologies have treated those they fear, don't understand or just plain don't like pretty poorly.

I'll add that some who have been at the forefront of fighting for the abolishment of the oppressions you list have done so while following Christianity (MLK, Wilberforce)
The Best Slide of DockerCon 2015
If you think that would be an unacceptable joke for a comedian to say today, you should watch the comedian Daniel Tosh's show Tosh.0 on Comedy Central for essentially 30 minutes of unacceptable humor.
Oh, I get it, and my intent is not to downplay the significance of this to same-sex couples.

My point is that anybody wailing and gnashing their teeth over this is being incredibly short-sighted.
> Polygamy is a deeply troublesome arrangement, with a storied history of abuse.

As is traditional marriage, but to a much larger extent.
And two GHC bugs fixed along the way. Well done everyone.
libreadline.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libreadline.so.6 (0x00007ff182e5d000)

libreadline is GPL'ed, not LGPLed, Kerf is therefore in violation.

https://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/php/chet/readline/rltop.html

Edit: The GPL doesn't allow any linking into non-GPL compatible software, dynamic or static. Readline has this license for exactly this reason, and they have forced software into the public with it before (ncftp comes to mind)

http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#GPLStaticVsDynam...

Edit2:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Readline#Implications_of_G...
Unfortunately, in NC, we have a law on the books allowing magistrates to refuse to perform marriages that would not be consistent with the magistrate's personal religious views. It's insane, I know.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/12/us/north-carolina-allows-o...
You're mistaking "the world" for "middle/upper class US". Horrible things happen every day to people who don't deserve them. Ignoring that is ignoring the struggles of those people, every day. This isn't a US-only forum, people of many nationalities and countries come here.

Softening your language makes it easier to pretend these people don't exist.

"That's why they call it murder, not muckduck." - Dwight Schrute, The Office
I studied a lot of people doing this as part of my PhD. The thing is that there are not many answers that work well in a lot of situations. Given that though, my suggestions is to iterate on developing three views of the code:

1. The Mile High View: A layered architectural diagram can be really helpful to know how the main concepts in a project are related to one another.
2. The Core: Try to figure out how the code works with regards to these main concepts. Box and arrow diagrams on paper work really well.
3. Key Use Cases: I would suggest tracing atleast one key use case for your app.
The problem with the Gale-Shapley algorithm for stable matching is that it's inherently unfair. The askers/proposers slowly get downgraded to their lowest possible match, while the other side slowly moves up to their highest possible match. Not sure how different the outcome would be from the current system.

Which actually brings me to another point: The GS algorithm is roughly that members of one party(in this case the schools) work down their list of preferences, asking members of the other party(the students) to partner with them. The members of the other party always say yes to their first match, and will always leave their current match when someone higher on their list asks them to be partners. Sounds pretty similar to the system currently in place in India.

A final note on the GS algorithm: If an anecdote told by a professor of mine is correct, this has been tried before. It was how hospitals chose their residents after med school, but it was set up so the hospitals always got the best match. I believe the students sued them.

edit:formating
I was thinking that too, since its full volume / mute right now.
Which raises the question why isn't there a standard protocol so that two near-autonomous car could broadcast and/or negotiate their next move ?
This is a duplicate, story already posted: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9784470
I would bet the biggest opposer to polygamy will be the INS ... imagine the Green Card businesses that would enable!
In Europe in the modern era, the trend is more in the other direction: as society gains more respect for both men and women's choice of sexual self-determination, instead of being fixated on traditional opposite-sex, pair-courtship rituals, polyamorous relationships are becoming more accepted. They were once strongly disapproved of and even illegalized, but are now increasingly being seen as a legitimate personal choice. On the activist side, many (most?) LGBTQ organizations also include poly activists, especially the organizations which have a more left-wing flavor.

I think the more likely path than legal polygamy, though, is to expand a more flexible set of legal arrangements for families, as a replacement for traditional marriage being the legal framework. The fact that a huge proportion of couples here (Denmark) no longer get married is already forcing that for another reason. Since many families which otherwise look traditional — long-term cohabitation of an opposite-sex couple, jointly raising children of which they're parents, etc. — don't get married, marriage as the organizing principle of families is becoming less relevant, so the law already has to start handling things differently.
What part of "hey people, please don't use 'guys'" is censorship?

I still say 'guys' pretty regularly but every time I do I now check in with myself and think "was that a strongly gendered use? could I have said it better". Not because I feel forced to protect everyone around me, but because I want to do better at including people.

And finally, the obligatory "Free Speech" xkcd: https://xkcd.com/1357/
> Nobody in 1789 would have said that gay marriage is a fundamental right.

Its marriage. Its a fundamental right.

It doesn't matter if you are gay or straight.

> It is important that the Court not act ahead of society.

That is another way of saying "Yes, the judicial system is as political as politicians."

One of the primary purposes of the Court is to make sure the political majority can't deny equal rights to everyone in the country. The idea they have to wait for that political majority to exist before "giving people" rights is an awful idea.

> I'm also a strong supporter of abortion rights, but I can't help but wonder if in the long run abortion rights wouldn't be in a stronger position today had the Court waited a bit longer for public consensus to catch up before dictating a result.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade#/media/File:Roevwa...
http://www.gallup.com/poll/160058/majority-americans-support...

They did wait for a majority before Roe v. Wade as well. :/
Is there anything similar for Google spreadsheets?
The last point, I think, is the most important -- pedestrians in bicycle lanes are to bicyclists what bicyclists on roads are to motorists. In fact I think a lot of the time, even worse. Old ladies are sometimes not even aware they're in the middle of a bike lane.
Average UK salary is £26K according to Google

That's the mean average though, and it assumes a standard Bell curve distribution - it's completely wrong and obfuscates the truth horribly. There are a lot more low income earners than high income earners. If you look at the Guardian article I linked to you'll see that ~70% of people in the UK earn less than £25k or less (all the adults in the seventh decile and below).

Note the article is claiming you need to be on a six figure salary to live anywhere near London, which is a load of tosh.

If you're not in a relationship where you can buy a house together I'd say you certainly need to be in at least the top 10% of earners (>£60,500). Sure, that's not a six-figure salary, but it indicates that the over-whelming majority of people have been priced out of London, which is the spirit of the article.
This is a remarkably well-written article. Made me really feel for the company, both in terms of sympathy and wanting to see them succeed.

One thing it did left me wondering, was covered in the final paragraph:

"...Engineers can spot his name and edits throughout the code repository. And occasionally, back-end commands will pop up messages, little surprises that Tang built into the system years ago. One reads, “You’re doing a good job today.”

How would your company react to messages like that? Do any of you take a strategy for injecting joy into your code?
>When a person dies, what made them a person is suddenly gone. What remains is a lifeless shell

This is a quite convenient thought conforming to our current pro-death culture.

Information that is stored in the cell connection structure of the mammal brain isn't irreversibly destroyed at the moment of death, as one of the many similar studies shows [1] . There are existing methods to preserve some (possibly large) part of this information lots of HN readers have probably heard about. Knowing these facts and being really honest with ourselves we will have to conclude that the final death of the individual occurs when this information-storing fine tissue structure of him disintegrates into unstructured matter. The question becomes then - who, by his indifference or by his profession lets this disintegration process run to its end.

Perhaps future generations will look down on us for perpetuating such barbaric customs that lead to rotting of uncountable millions of people into nothingness.

1. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v521/n7552/full/nature1...
These people are part of government, so that's roughly equivalent. Different parts of government disagree about the details, but it appears they all agree that the government should get to decide who can get married.
Getting married was the worst thing I ever did for my taxes.

That being said, it has a lot of other benefits that outweigh the cost.
Ask HN: Please help with Heart Questions for my dad
NOTE: I know this is a very medical specific question and general advice may or may not be too useful but Ir eally need some general advice here. Already talking to multiple cardiologists and other doctors of course.
Longtime HN user but using a throwaway. I am taking a shot in the dark but really need some advice from anyone who either gone through heart failure conditions and been on devices like CRT, CRT-D or LVAD (if you don't know what this means, no worries). Also, any cardiologists on HN with general advice are very welcome.

My dad has been suffering from heart issues over a decade and had a bypass in 2002. Today, he is 67 years old and afor the last 24 months or so, he is under serious trouble with his heart and diagnosis is heart failure (EF 30% if any cardiologist reading this). He has other issues including weak kidney etc as everything is impacted due to his heart not pumping well.

At this point, one of the doctors have recommended LVAD device which costs over 100,000 USD in India (where my dad is). Ok, so we are arranging the money but we are a little skeptic if this is the only last option for him ?

More research told us that there are some other options like CRT and CRT-D but again, the doctor who is recommending LVAD is saying that my dad's QRS complex is 120ms which is not ideal for CRT etc.

Sorry for all this medical mumbo-jumbo but if any of you have any idea about any of this that I just mentioned, please let me know. I would love to hear your stories either as a patient or as a doctor.

Also, I live in the US and would like to bring him here if possible for treatment but without insurance, it is not possible for me. Any suggestions for this ?
Replace Polygamy in your comment with marriage and see what happens:

Marriage is a deeply troublesome arrangement, with a storied history of abuse.

Yes, there is probably more abuse in marriages then outside, but this is not an argument against marriage, but against abuse.
I try to work backwards from the public api to get a sense of the operations that are supported by the system. A trick I picked up from a thoughtbot training video a couple years ago for Rails applications is to look at the routes file. If you work with webapps, the routes generally define the things that people can do.
> Glad this won't be an issue going into the next presidential election.

I wish this was true. But I think the decision will increase the discussion of marriage equality in the next election. Just look at the political impact abortion had after the supreme court decided Roe v. Wade. Abortion was used to galvanize conservative votes against liberals and SCOTUS.
Though sometimes it can be entertaining. In the UK the debate included one lord embarrassing himself by "warning" that gay marriage might lead to a lesbian queen giving birth to a future monarch through artificial insemination, as well as musing about how it could allow said lord to marry his son to escape inheritance tax [1]

I'm already looking forward to reading some of the tripe that will be written about this SCOTUS decision...

[1] http://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/may/21/tebbit-gay-ma...
It's almost like words can take on different meanings depending on context.
"Polygamy will further the deterioration of society!"
"Polygamy has a history of abuse!"

And where have we heard precisely these arguments before?

People are great.
I'm poly and I'm more for abandoning marriage-laws all together and keep this stuff to religions.
How does the hot-swapping work? The only way I had seen of making this happen is what xmonad does. I'm assuming this is radically different from that.
I think I prefer the term 'polyamorous', but agreed :)
He's got some good points. I lived in London for a long time, but never bought because it just seemed so insane.

When you're young it just about works, though: you want to have friends around, so why not share a house with them? That way it's still expensive, but you have someone to hang out with. And your expenses as a single guy are not exactly high. You don't need a car as it's just you and your bag on the tube. You're drinking anyway, so it's either tube or cab. What you care about is seeing loads of other young people, and London is great for that.

When you get a family, everything turns against living there. You can barely stand on most tube trains, so good luck getting the pram on board (and god help you if you need a wheelchair). You want to take the kid out of town? There's a traffic jam in every direction. Want to find a school for the kids? Good luck getting in the catchment. Some of them are actually less than a literal stone's throw. Private school? Sure, but school's have to pay rent too. It's not the teachers taking home all those fees.

IMO the best compromise is one of the commuter towns. Some of them have fast trains. They are still expensive, and the train itself isn't cheap either. But you get a little more space, a decent selection of things parents want, and the schools are not bad. Even better, live in a commuter town but work remotely. Then you can network, see people now and again, but not have to get in the sardine can each morning.
Many USB devices over time also starts to fill the registry with . . . stuff, leading to more slowness and instability as the system ages. WTF.

I found out that for a few years I sat next to the guy largely responsible for this behavior. I had no idea. Not that I wanted to slug him, but, but . . . argh :-)
I have no problem with polygamy, as long as it is a consensual relationship between all adults involved.

The real problem is that government has gotten into the marriage business and it doesn't belong there. The issues you mentioned (child custody, hospital visitation, inheritance rights) really have nothing to do with marriage and should all be assignable without a government endorsed marital contract.
I would argue that the state of the economy, mass political failure, infrastructure decay, wars in the Middle East, how the US deals with globalization, climate change, and income inequality are more important from a national perspective than both. We (Americans) spend an inordinate amount of time debating religious and social issues (which are ultimately irrelevant for most people involved in the debates) while ignoring huge systemic problems. People should be focusing their attention on real, pressing problems, not opposing social change which has little to do with them. Get out of the way and let progress occur so we can be productive. I think this is what the parent commenter meant.
That's odd - usually it's just disabled. Had you received complaints in the past?
...except that you can't know that ahead of time. Some people are unreasonably touchy, or even looking for an excuse to start a fight. I found one among my followers on Twitter the other day, using my positive reference to a group as an excuse to burnish his own Enlightened Person credentials. We can argue over whether they're few or many, but to deny they exist is to leave the realm of rational or productive discourse. The best we can do is make an estimate of how a reasonable person might want to be treated and taught, and that's what the OP is trying to address.
And then you realize that if we wouldn't have games about wars (be it civil war games or WWII games or whatnot), we wouldn't have this issue.
Thanks for sharing. I often get lost in large projects. Blindly jumping around is quite inefficient and frustrating.

How hard do you think it is to write a tool to draw dependencies map for a specific language?

May be there're built-in code analyzing tools in compilers for popular languages that I'm not aware of?
Did you use a particular framework? I've been greatly enjoying my 4th attempt at learning Haskell (I think only now am I seasoned enough to really get it), and my general proof that I know something and can use it usefully is to develop a web app (as all apps are now anyways). However, I didn't find anything which looked like it had majority community buy-in unlike Rails/Sinatra/Flask et al.
Irrelevant. The technique you used was the same as Smathers, and your intent was the same - to damage someone's reputation by insinuations and smears. It is low behavior.
The performance and physics of the fish kick
Learn UX Design – 5 free Udemy video course giveaway
No, because there is an objective difference. One pairing tends to procreate, the other cannot. The state has an objective interest in facilitating one over the other.
Sweet! It works great with Chromecast and Apple TV, so have at it :)
But when say the victims of a violent crime are all white, the news don't typically say things like 'all five white victims were....' They just say all five victims were...' and whatever dependent clause.
As a Python programmer, I live and die over Pylint. Yes it's annoying to configure it, but it saves me hours every _day_. The two biggest benefits are:

- syntax or undefined variables in exception handlers

- showing which modules are no longer used, so we can have a clearer import block
My point is not to throw away the speaker's intent, my point is that the speaker's intent is only one factor in how people will interpret what is said.

For example if I say "She sure is smart for a girl." I may not be intending to be a misogynistic asshole, I may be intending it as a compliment. But most people are going to read it for what it is; a comment that shows my own bigotry and means nothing outside of that.
Fuel efficiency is another interesting stat that seems to not have improved much since the mid 90s. Tighter emissions standards are probably the reason, but it's funny to see new cars advertising "35mpg!" when 1995 VWs could pull that off easily.
I wish more people saw it this way. The fact that a government has any say in who can/can't marry and be with in their private lives is absurd. The concept of marriage should be left up to religious entities.
Worth noting that at least one of the triples I referred to is a woman and two men. At least one is a man and two women. I'm being vague here, because bigamy is a felony.

We really have quite a long way to go on this front.
Yesod is the most actively developed and popular web framework for Haskell.
Still, for people or organizations who have no measurable ability to affect infrastructure, but have the ability to make protective or high-visibility gear, doesn't it make sense to do so?
You remove the printfs when you have fixed the problem.
In all fairness, in the days of the Medicis, those who were both educated and well-off lived in as cosmopolitan a society as the one you describe.
Sounds pretty shitty. You've been there 5 months? I'd say that's probably long enough to see if this is just a temporary period of craziness or just the way things are. If things are unlikely to change just by waiting, I'd say you need to leave.

But first, I'd personally start making noise about the way things are. Maybe the bosses think everything is fine. If you're mentally done anyway, there's no barrier to speaking up. Start making the case that the way things are is unsustainable. If they don't listen or you can't push through any changes, start preparing a story you can tell your next employer and get out the door. No, this particular job is not worth your sanity.
Traditional for the US.
Yep. "Folks". I use it in all of my communications to my group (I am not the manager). I've tried others: "Guys" is clearly gender specific, "Ya'll" is pretty informal (although I use it on occasion), "Team" is barf-o-rama.

"Folks" works well. It's reasonably formal but not gross and, best yet, its inclusive.
Kennedy is addressing the idea (myth) that churches would be compelled to perform same-sex marriages or somehow face legal consequences for speaking on the issue.