skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Perhaps. Half of all software developers earn less than average. Cost of living isn't uniform.
Perhaps he should have included this, "we stopped talking about arab spring once we realized how it was a bad job that pushed people into depeer shit, perhaps now is the time to lift the carpet again and start talking about how we can build better tools that are powerful enough to put these fucked up countries back together"
6 podcasts for dads
tl;dr; Microservices first is premature optimization.
It's not just improve-stat-get-dopamine. It's a very fine-tuned, well-balanced implementation of improve-stat-get-dopamine. That same fine-tuned well-balance was seen in FFVII, in my opinion. It's subtle (1), but just think what a fine line it is between "grinding hits a plateau" (2) on one side and "grinding makes you grow out of control" (3) on the other.

(1) "Good design is obvious; great design is transparent"

(2) E.g., FFIV

(3) E.g., FFVI
> The important point here is that he's changing his curriculum to avoid provocative works, so he doesn't get in trouble.

I think that the rather spurious grounds that he identifies for the fear motivating those changes is also important, particularly, it is important in identifying the source of the problem -- which is not, contrary to the headline, his liberal students, or even his students more generally.
Indigenous Software | Software Developer | San Diego, CA | Remote; Onsite | Full-Time; Contract | Node.js, AngularJS, MongoDB, full-stack developers preferred

Indigenous is building a single platform for content, customer (relationship management), commerce and digital marketing management for small businesses and non-profits. We’re looking for polyglot, full-stack developers already adept in Node.js, Angular and MongoDB. All skill levels, all engagement types. If you’ve done something amazing with the technologies above or something related, send portfolio, CV and comp. needs to chris@indigenous.io. Remote cool.
This analogy will not resonate with the under-30 crowd. I realized the other day that my kids don't have firsthand recollection of what "going to the bank" might be.
You might be confusing straightforward linear systems of differential equations (some exceptions when you have a nasty heterogenous part, but which are 'always' solvable by a standard method) with so-called Differential Algebraic Equations (DAEs).

These beasts often pop up when trying to solve larger electrical circuits with time-dependent elements (ie. RLC). The only thing you can really do to solve them usually is linearizing them approximate them by some integration scheme (this is what Spice, the electronics simulator is based on).
Actually I trust Schmidt more after that particular quote because he was warning about the Patriot Act before pretty much anyone but privacy advocates cared:

> "People are treating Google like their most trusted friend. Should they be?"

> "I think judgment matters. If you have something that you don’t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn’t be doing it in the first place. But if you really need that kind of privacy, the reality is that search engines, including Google, do retain this information for some time. And it’s important, for example, that we are all subject in the United States to the Patriot Act. It is possible that information could be made available to the authorities."

But as I said below, that never got play back then, so we get the incomplete quote everywhere. It took Edward Snowden to make the tech blogs finally change narrative.

Also I'm not sure how an obviously poor sampling of quotes demonstrates much of anything. Even if you were doing some squishy sentiment analysis your study would still be thrown out for poor coverage.
I was in the same boat until I tried Periscope.

I ended up questioning some news anchors for an hour yesterday on one of the feeds, and the thought hit me about how much better this was than just the news.
You don't actually need the modulo operator though.

Modulo is effectively x - x * (x/y) with integers but you don't even need that.

You can do something like this.

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdbool.h>

int main(void) {

int five = 5;
int three = 3;
int count;
bool numprint;

for (count = 1; count <= 100; count++){
numprint = true;
if (count - three == 0) {
three += 3;
printf("Fizz");
numprint = false;
}
if (count - five == 0) {
five += 5;
printf("Buzz");
numprint = false;
}
if (numprint) {
printf("%d", count);
}
printf("\n");
}

return 0;
}
This is the world's tiniest Shia LaBeouf
Well "...need more..." implies you are superior because you don't. As well as "... and spontaneously tell me as much." which implies they give you facts you didn't ask for and coupled with the rest of the comment implies you had no interest in knowing i.e. are time wasters.
A 298-byte (without comments) Brainfuck interpreter written in K
What solution did you go with?
I have tried many flavors of Linux (I presume you mean desktops - I've run GNOME, KDE, Xfce, and a bunch of others), and I run Fedora (dev) and Ubuntu (HTPC) boxes at home. I've tinkered with switching fulltime to Linux desktops a number of times, and they're great 99% solutions, but the big showstoppers for me have been DRM'd video (Netflix, Amazon) and Steam (I'm a gamer, and 95% of my library doesn't run on Linux). With my setup, literally everything I care about runs without any real effort, and I don't sacrifice any dev power.

The really nice thing about my setup is that because all I need is an SSH client, I can work from my Chromebook, Macbook, or even my phone if I have to, and I have full access to my whole dev environment from anywhere. The biggest thing I've lost is the ability to attach to processes directly to debug them, but I just end up using terminal-level debugging or remote debugging facilities when they're available, and it works fine.
its based on a very famous childrens book http://withgoodreasonradio.org/2013/03/mindful-children/
for some reason the book is very effective with children and getting them to sleeep
That sounds like a fun weekend project. Any good Asterisk guides or just use the official documentation? I wonder if a Raspberry Pi could handle it.
> The evidence clearly shows [...]

No, your source shows nothing of the sort. It doesn't even purport to address the issue of causality. There's nothing more than conjecture (anywhere) as to what the straw that broke Manning's conscience was, and it's irrelevant because it's just the straw. It's focusing on the messenger not the criminal.

What we do know is that Manning tried to report war crimes, first to a commander and then to the media, and was unable to be heard and stop the crimes. This didn't end the duty to report them, it just exhausted the "proper" channels.

> That's a settled fact of record, and that's all my comment was meant to point out.

Your comment was meant to be the same baseless slander that all other baseless, factless, slander-filled posts are. There are sources that directly contradict you and yet you choose to continue. Your posts are part of a campaign of lies to destroy the life of an innocent - if not a hero.
Even with the Cocoa styling, Qt based applications always seem to feel weird or out of place. Things like button placement, toolbars, things of that nature just don't "feel" right.
Monty from Xiph/Mozilla wrote a great article about why 24-bit/192kHz format (which is what Neil Young's Pono delivers) makes no sense:

http://xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html
Yeah, I've just learned to use the Windows clipboard rather than buffers when I want to move stuff. Takes a bit of self-training, but it's not too bad now.
All services need to process and store large amounts of data. For that they need the building blocks firming the core stack which most projects (YouTube seems to be the big exception from what I hear) share. That is shown.
Running my ETA script on the total pledge, it's currently predicting it will reach its target on June 11th. My script has only been running 10 minutes - I'll come back later with a more accurate update. It is, of course, only measuring the current rate.

Edit:

Here's the output from the script:

@ Jun 3 21:17:33 ETA = Jun 11 18:56:20 : 32852 /600000 @ Rate 0.83/sec
@ Jun 3 21:22:33 ETA = Jun 10 06:05:37 : 33322 /600000 @ Rate 1.03/sec
@ Jun 3 21:27:33 ETA = Jun 10 15:07:53 : 33482 /600000 @ Rate 0.97/sec
@ Jun 3 21:32:33 ETA = Jun 11 06:17:02 : 33632 /600000 @ Rate 0.89/sec
@ Jun 3 21:37:33 ETA = Jun 12 03:15:10 : 33717 /600000 @ Rate 0.80/sec
@ Jun 3 21:42:57 ETA = Jun 12 03:20:50 : 34117 /600000 @ Rate 0.80/sec
@ Jun 3 21:47:57 ETA = Jun 12 08:21:53 : 34267 /600000 @ Rate 0.78/sec
@ Jun 3 21:52:57 ETA = Jun 12 13:05:00 : 34457 /600000 @ Rate 0.76/sec
@ Jun 3 21:58:32 ETA = Jun 12 21:35:22 : 34577 /600000 @ Rate 0.73/sec
@ Jun 3 22:03:32 ETA = Jun 12 02:03:19 : 35502 /600000 @ Rate 0.80/sec
@ Jun 3 21:58:32 ETA = Jun 12 21:35:22 : 34577 /600000 @ Rate 0.73/sec
@ Jun 3 22:03:32 ETA = Jun 12 02:03:19 : 35502 /600000 @ Rate 0.80/sec
@ Jun 3 22:08:32 ETA = Jun 11 17:09:41 : 35692 /600000 @ Rate 0.84/sec
@ Jun 3 22:13:32 ETA = Jun 11 12:13:06 : 35932 /600000 @ Rate 0.86/sec
@ Jun 3 22:18:32 ETA = Jun 11 10:17:43 : 36122 /600000 @ Rate 0.87/sec
@ Jun 3 22:23:32 ETA = Jun 11 08:23:13 : 36427 /600000 @ Rate 0.88/sec
@ Jun 3 22:28:32 ETA = Jun 11 03:30:46 : 36977 /600000 @ Rate 0.90/sec
This doesn't even make sense from a Catholic/Greek Orthodox perspective. Why would the body be preserved without the soul? Strikes me as almost blasphemous.
We're students making a product based in Hip-hop, CompSci, and Entrepreneurship
We're students at Lehigh University's Mountaintop Project making a product/service this summer based in Hip-hop, computer science, and entrepreneurship. Our first task was to make a music video in 24 hours, and we need to get at least 1,000 YouTube views by Thursday and 200 facebook likes https://www.facebook.com/mttopmoneyteam.

The product is still in its early stages, but it will focus on up-and-coming artists and hip-hop culture. Help us spread the word!
No, but providing a salary which is mutually agreed upon does not seem particularly bad in my book.
Eh, that's a stretch. You can call the tray asynchronous if you want, but you still have to wait for it to return.
To clarify, this entire statement is categorically incorrect: "The only thing I'll add is that k8s isn't targeting the same scale as Mesos. Their current goal is to support up to 400-500 nodes, max."
One thing the article writer comes back to several times is the idea of human editors.

He's right.

The insistence of tech companies on algorithms is understandable, but it's also incredibly limiting. I think of it as the "Google mindset" (it hurts them too).

In the end, you need live people involved. You can do SO much more with even just a few live curators. Looking from the outside, insisting that they aren't needed is deeply weird.
Sheryl Sandberg on husband's death: 'I have lived 30 years in these 30 days'
That depends on whether you carry your friends there with you or not, I guess. I don't see why it should be different to Facebook in that regard. (I have probably sent thousands of DMs over the years.)
it's hard to follow when it's thrown in the same chronological time line with other conversations

That, at least, shouldn't be the case. Your conversations live in the Notifications tab.
Making 125k in San Fran is worse than making 85k in Atlanta.
Not if that 'best trumpet' takes more effort to play. Every new generation of games hardware brings extra demands on the artists making the games (through expectation of increased level of detail). Their creativity isn't being unleashed, it's being forced into a narrow specialism.
> Why subject people to that?

If Christians truly believe nonbelievers are going to hell, it's the only loving response. The magician (and atheist) Penn has a great story about this [0].

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owZc3Xq8obk
not even talking that. I'm talking, click a square and it changes colors, or a number counter increases; something I could conceivably build. But, nothing actually cool has come up yet, just gimmicks.

But, I wouldn't be opposed to tinkering with something in unity either; but thats obviously a WHOLE other ball of wax.

and for anyone else who's curious: https://www.kingdomofloathing.com
What is 'nextgen' in this case ? The other place that I've seen this is on consoles, and we know how that worked out.
It seems strange to reject deep dives into mathematics, but then start by talking about nuclei and valence electrons. I personally like the hydraulic analogy, but only for one paragraph to explain the corresponding concepts of voltage, current, and resistance.
Letters from the Next Economy
It seems like you're purposely picking a fight. Is this really a line of discussion that belongs here, given the topic?
Because one couldn't find a job which actually pays the amount one desires? What stops a person from looking for another job while continuing to work their current job? It's not fun, but it certainly is possible.
Yup. I love that OS X is an actual POSIX environment with easy access to the standard GNU toolchain, but the UX drives me absolutely up the wall. I think that Windows 10 is actually a much nicer desktop than OS X.
I see truth in what you write.

However, given that I can't see a movie for less than $15, that $1.5B represents only 100M views, and if you theorize that only 1B of the world population is wealthy enough to occasionally blow $15 to watch a movie, that implies 90% of the population is uninterested in VFX demo reels, which isn't all that dramatically different from my engineering estimate, especially given we could cherry pick examples to "prove" either your claim or mine, or play games with $ per unit time to reach either conclusion.

I completely agree that $1.5B is important business, yet it makes my point that appealing to a narrowcasted local maxima of VFX fans also simultaneously means perhaps 90% of the population will be uninterested. And the point I'm trying to make isn't that 10% of the population is irrelevant, but if someone could crack the code and disrupt the industry and instead of narrowcasting, make something of broad appeal that perhaps half the population would be interested in, that mysterious idea would be worth about $7.5B which is actually pretty good revenue for a startup. But it'll never happen if the entrenched oligopoly isn't disrupted.

I honestly have no idea how to exploit the market, but "obviously" there's a huge under served market with possibly staggering revenue, for some future startup that can figure out how to make movies that appeal to more than about 10% of the population. Piles of money are sitting out there, waiting to be harvested...

There are similar analogies and financials with pop music. Entrenched industries have pretty much figured out how to sell simple mass produced formulaic music to each generation's (each years?) teens. There seems no biological or psychological reason a better industry competitor couldn't sell 3 to 7 times as much if they could appeal to more than young kids. Eventually someone will crack that startup opportunity and make mid nine figures.

Finally ditto, kind of, with sports. "Everybody is a baseball fan" but only about 5% of the population actually watches the world series. If you take existing advertising revenue and multiply it by a fraction representing some magic startup pixie dust that gets maybe 50% of the population to watch, that's some serious ad revenue money; in fact its "football" type money, LOL, which is a whole nother topic.
Can always buy a cheap vm on amazon and tunnel though that.
Sorry, I would've offered if I did. All the good devs work for us now. :-)
Not to mention that I am more of a sound engineer who has a lot to do with sound quality while musicians care less about that, I know several musicians who could not setup even basic sound system. It is also pretty common that DJs (and other types of musicians) require the roads to help them to achieve the best sound of their music. The musician is in charge of the music, while the sound engineers are in charge of the sound. Quiet different subjects.
I wouldn't have a problem with that but the terms specifically mention surveys and special offers.
It can only be viewed as a loving response if you think its effective, rather than alienating. If you believe unbelievers are going to hell, and believe (or observe) that that approach to evangelization is alienating, then its more than just rude...
Can we please change the title to GitUp makes Git painless for OS X Users?
I think the people behind this come from a OpenGL-ES / WebGL background. Coaxing data back out of OpenGL-ES / WebGL is a bit tricker compared to original OpenGL. But only a little bit (you need a proxy FBO to retrieve texture data; you can't write to buffer objects with shaders in ES/WebGL so hooking glBufferData suffices).
You don't need to use xor, unless you are trying to be clever or have a number representation already in bits: n(n+1)/2 - sum(array) is your answer and is O(n);
Uber: An oral history
The thing I worried about the most is "What If I am Actually not fit to be in good programming team?"
The thing about Twitter is that it should have been TV vs trying to be channels. I don't know why they were never comfortable enough in their skin to let third parties extend the living heck out of their platform. Using Twitter and getting a Gen 1.0 iPhone were very similar experiences. Pretty much wow and thinking the sky was the limit (vs what they actually were initially). Apple harnessed an app developer community and made their product 10x more valuable. Twitter locked everyone out. I always thought the Twitter competitor launched by Dalton (App.net) totally missed the boat. We didn't need a paid service to save us from ads we needed an open free platform that drew in millions and millions of users to draw in app developers etc. That would have crushed Twitter.
Good article, but irrelevant. This is about lossless vs 320kbps mp3, not 24/192k vs 16/44.1k
In the bar I used to work in we used to give the change to customers on a tray to prompt the customer to give us a tip. So I always assume that's why they are being used.
​A new day, a new Ubuntu smartphone
Mine too. I search for dog, and two photos have a dog in them, 4 photos have a cat, and 1 has no cats or dogs, just a baby.
>I still don't understand what that notion is

I was taught that the division is the goal.

You use concurrency because having multiple execution contexts at "the same" time is useful, even if they are merely interleaved by the thread scheduler on the same core. E.g. an IRC server: having a thread per socket, blocking until there is some I/O to be performed on that socket, is a very workable, straightforward design.

A concurrent process is concurrent for design reasons, and could not (sanely) be any other way.

You use parallelism because your problem gets solved faster when worked on in parallel instead of sequence (and obviously not all problems are this way.) A parallel program running on a single core machine would not buy you any performance increase (and its design is unnecessarily convoluted.)

A parallel process is parallel for performance reasons, but could be run (just proportionally slower) on a single core.
Queuing up to send your ebay parcels might be a more current example. That's my frequent experience at our local post office anyway.
That's not a counter-argument to tragedy of the commons.

You just described off-chain transactions which aren't considered Bitcoin, and if anything are only a temporary fix to the block-size problem.

Tragedy of the commons exists because any of the solutions to a number of problems in the Bitcoin implementation need to be directly profitable for the miners in order to happen. For block-size and supply, they are the opposite of profitable for the miners.
The quickest way to get to that money is contracting, but it is possible through more traditional employment but you're going to have to probably do 2 things, unless you're willing to wait for some good luck

1. Find yourself a niche. Expert in X where X isn't just a programming language. Build relevant domain expertise which means people who are hiring you are hiring your experience as well as your skillset and you get to stop them running down rabbit holes. e.g. Java programmer who's built large real time streaming systems with Spark. Find a niche that's hot where lots of companies are looking for that expertise.

2. Be fairly mercenary with pay and job. Holding out for higher offers, setting expectations with recruiters early in the process about your salary expectations etc. Ask for exactly what you want.

If you're on $160k now, walk in and ask for $190k with a view to taking that for a year or two and then looking for $220 or $240k. Don't wait for the employer to give you a figure. Set that expectation with the recruiter early so they're not wasting your time. Be aware on that kinda money, employers are going to expect big things and in lots of cases will expect more than just coding.

I realise this is may be very obvious, but you will literally be optimizing for money. That could lead you in to shitty situations / companies. Personally I'd caution against that for most people. However, I understand money can sometimes be the most important hole in peoples lives with certain personal / debt situations, so I don't mean to judge.

If you are assessing your self worth against your paycheck though, this route won't satisfy you!
Spotify Quantifies Listener Loyalty by Genre
>No showing of tweets with content from other social networks

Where does it say that? I've been working with folks and using products that do exactly that and they haven't had issues. Yes you have to display it like Twitter wants, but I've not seen any limit to also showing FB or other content.
Not a bad text. Didn't find anything obviously wrong in a quick scan.

Two comments:

1. As usual, and as per all electronics resources, its pretty much devoid of the practicalities of BJT/FET amps. Sort of, here are some facts, now go away. How do I go about designing a non-inverting amp with a small signal gain of 6dB? How do I calculate the input and output impedance to determine stage loading? Not even TAOE (2nd ed) nails that down well. This is really really important if you want to do anything analogue.
2. Tails off towards the end.

I spent a number of years in a past life doing EE and I've found only disappointment in books. All the useful knowledge I had was from sitting down with guys who are older than transistors and like their Teks with vacuum tubes in them. Frustrating because they're a dying breed of engineer.

Edit: if you want a really decent book on electronics but don't want to pay for TAOE, the "ARRL handbook" which is a yearly publication is a good bet. Anything from about 1995 onwards has a number of decent electronics chapters in it covering basics, linear, digital, transmission lines etc right up to RF plus all the maths you need. Turns up for not much money on Amazon, ebay etc. About 20% of the book is self-love about amateur radio so just ignore those bits. Also, maths are a bit wonky as they are practically inclined and mostly using ratios in imperial units but you can substitute SI units in and out fine if you look at the equation definitions rather than their application. Earlier ones have decent self-build projects for power supplies, test equipment and the like. I built an AF oscillator and various crystal-based RF oscillators and filters literally directly from the book.