skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don't know what you mean. The example they show is hello world.

The website will remember the last thing you compiled and ran on it, and display that again when you come back. Perhaps you're looking at a different code snippet.
Also check out http://toonloop.com/
Or the .5% tax on stock trades Bernie Sanders suggested. I like that better as it should have a smaller effect on consumer prices.
Raven – A drone story
It also works well on a desktop.
I agree. Reading the title, I thought scrape would offer something beyond HTML manipulation.

The way that it is now, goquery provides easier and more familiar HTML manipulation.
Sadly, a lot of people subscribe to the mantra "never let a crisis go to waste". I miss the quite contemplation of the dead and then a thoughtful analysis of if we have a problem and what we can do to solve it. I guess that's long gone or only alive in niche areas.

rest in peace troubled brilliance
Doesn't work on OSX, but: cool anyway. Every editor needs multi-cursor support.
1. A basic income doesn't mean that you have enough to fulfil all dreams. There will still be reasons to earn more income, especially with those who are capable of delivering value.

2. There is a fundamental assumption that we are at a technological stage where work can be automated. If there are not enough jobs that someone a standard deviation below average intelligence can fulfil, we could be coming upon a societal disaster.

If instead, we incentivize automation by saying, "no job is a superior alternative to an easily automatable, low value job where people are treated as disposable," there is no significant conflict. If people with low skill do not choose to work, and their skills are automatable, it is only our moral qualms that get in the way.

As it is now, significant portions of the population cannot provide enough value to ensure their subsistence, minimum wage or otherwise. Is it only our morals that require some work from them?

3. Incentivizing not working also means incentivizing spending a year on an idea that could advance society, or works of art and literature. Harry Potter was written by someone who decided not to work. There might be major value to society that we're losing because we don't have a basic income.
> Somehow, the attacker got KVM access credentials for the server. [...] After he got KVM access, the attacker convinced NFOrce that he was me (using his KVM access as part of his evidence) and said that he had locked himself out of the server. So NFOrce reset the server's root password for him, giving him complete access to the server and bypassing most of our carefully-designed security measures...

Ugh. We need to remember that social engineering your ISP, hosting provider, etc. is a very real attack vector. Do not trust them.

Reminds me of the "N" twitter username story:
https://medium.com/@N/how-i-lost-my-50-000-twitter-username-...
Well, I think assumption #1 (especially the corollary) is voiced, for instance, as follows:

>Loafers could live comfortably without lifting a finger.

But, I do think that sentiment is a root part of the resistance against BI. People have bought pretty heavily into the current status quo that says, "you eat what you kill". So, if you don't work you are an undeserving freeloader or loafer.

Whereas, BI, for some, essentially acknowledges the common ownership of natural resources, etc., treating sustenance derived therefrom as more a natural right than something that must be earned.
Rust convention is for 4-space indentation, not tabs. In fact, in the compiler's own code tabbed indentation fails tests. The way the playpen works is a "best of both worlds" approach I guess.
I see your point, but here the problem is not only tracking, but ads serve.

As a content provider, my content is "what the broadcast transmitter sent", this is a code sent from my server to the browser of the client. Now Mozilla and AdBlock extensions are modifying my code. It's very clear what I wish to send - my code, but this program is modifying my code. Superfish and other injection malware replace parts of my code with theirs, while ad blockers and Mozilla, just remove some of my code.

As a content provider, ads or subscription (ad free) are my only ways to monetize.

It's very hypocritical to disable ads and in the same time to make 97% of your money from Ad company.

Almost all of Mozilla's revenue for 2013, the last year for which it has reported financials, came from search deals that make various providers, notably Google, the default in Firefox. Of the $314 million in revenue for 2013, $306 million, or 97%, came from the search deals.
http://www.computerworld.com/article/2862717/mozilla-were-no...

They are abusing their dominate positions and basically stealing from websites. The product "Mozilla" will be very popular because of the feature "Disable Ads and Track". They could make tons of donations because of that. And websites, that actually create content will serve content for free.

I'm aware with ambitions of ISPs in Europe to disable ads for mobile, in the same way as Mozilla. They hope to milk Google, just like Mozilla and AdBlock.
http://www.theverge.com/2015/2/2/7963577/google-ads-get-thro...
http://www.businessinsider.com/google-microsoft-amazon-taboo...
http://www.theverge.com/2015/5/15/8610741/mobile-carriers-eu...

I don't like tracking, bad ads and so on, but I don't believe some guys from Mozilla can decide what is good and what is not.
This one had an impact on me, it kind of explains why we're here:

- "I was an unknown treasure and I desired to be known so I created the universe and the creatures to know Me." - God

I repeat myself these two often:

- A man who wants something will find a way a man who doesn t will find an excuse quote.

- Nothing is ever gained, nothing is ever lost.
I don't see how you could get rid of spending on roads, police, foreign relations, defense, regulatory oversight? It's a jump to assume crime would disappear with basic income and police would no longer be needed.

Also expenditures where economies of scale can be achieved are better off as government expenditures as an individual would get nowhere near the cost effectiveness (healthcare, education) or the incentive to build as an individual (roads, parks, water networks, cleaning, etc).

There's also the prime issue of how it can be afforded in the first place, besides all the consequences of reallocating existing expenditure.
That's an interesting take on it. I'd always thought it was because: when ATMs were first introduced, people thought of the cash as more important than the card... Nowadays, I'd say the reverse is true for most people: I've occasionally started to walk away from the machine, stuffing my card into my wallet, only to be drawn back by the whirring sound of the cash counter... People are too set in their ways to reverse it now, but perhaps they could give us both cash and card at the same time?
That makes some sense, superficially. But you forget that the workers who enter into a contract have a reasonable expectation that the employer is abiding by laws and will pay them minimum wage.

The minimum wage on the other hand is meant to make someone able to feed themselves and maybe even a family. Especially when holding multiple jobs, such unpaid overtime, even just opening/closing a shop can cut into that ability in a serious manner.
Plausible deniability really is the best tool I can really think in this case, specially if the attacker is not aware of that possibility (it should be concealed as much as possible).
Or just start with a small Basic Income to test out the system.
John Nash's letters to the NSA (1955) [pdf]
Content Went Viral in the 1800s, Too
>he can't be disadvantaged

The point is not that they are disadvantaged in absolute terms, but in comparison to those who value profit above all else. Voluntary gifts to gov diminishes relative power of those more compassionate and increases relative influence of those who are less inclined to help others.

Also, the increase in taxation in question could be applied only at the top of income ranges.

Moreover, if you have $2-5K left in your bank account you may be considered privileged by some standards.
This disincentivizes working and incentivizes not working.

Some might see that as a good thing. Being forced to do something you hate for fear of not being able to feed your family is probably not healthy for anyone involved. Imagine if that person could quit their job and spend time with their kids instead.

Imagine the passionate painter or musician being able to paint or make music full time without worrying about having to pay rent next month.

Imagine the corporate programmer being able to quit his job and work 6 month on that open source project he always wanted to do.

As someone who actively enjoys his job and looks forwards to going to work most mornings, I think it would be kind of neat if more people could feel that.

Sure some people will just use their new freedom to drink beer and watch TV all day, but perhaps those people weren't contributing too much to begin with, making the net loss minor.

The main 'down' side would be that getting people to do 'shit' jobs will get harder and more expensive, but I think that might work out to be a reasonable price to pay.

Personally I'm not really convinced the numbers add up economically to make it actually viable, but I see it as an interesting utopia.
We do have some evidence:

http://m.huffpost.com/ca/entry/6335682
The culture around seatbelts in the US confounds me.

As an Australian I've spent my entire life wearing seatbelts. It's second nature. I don't even think about it. Taxis or otherwise. In fact I think it's required in all cases.

But in the US people seem to view the choice to turn a mild car accident into a severe or even fatal one as some kind of moral stance or personal freedom. Or rather any effort to require their use as Big Government or the Nanny State.

Some states still don't require rear passengers to wear seatbelts. [1]

Personally I wear a seatbelt in cabs and don't think twice about it. I'd feel uncomfortable without one.

Anyway, sad news.

[1] http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seat_belt_legislation_in_the_...
Lucky motherfuckers. I hope when I'm that old I can get a nice quick death too. And to top it off, they got to die together! That just takes the cake. None of that nasty grieving business, feeling like your life is over but you're still alive.

Really, I can't think of a better way to go. Hats off to you, Mr. Nash.
That's why I said "one factor of many". If you have ten factors like that and combine them, you'll get an excellent spam filter. That's how Bayesian spam filters work. They combine a number of factors that are not very significant on their own, but using all of them adds up.
That's why I really like cars which make a sound if you don't have your seatbelt on. That way they don't give you the choice of not wearing the seatbelt and it's how it should be. This is why in such cases I strongly believe governments should force companies to enable something like that.

The social norms are stupid and this would give you the excuse to ignore them without giving it a second thought (hey, the car is making me wear it!).
I started wearing the seatbelt in NYC cabs after I saw the results of a relatively minor cab accident. The plastic barrier between the passenger and driver compartments was covered in blood. That's all the convincing I needed.
For those of you experiencing a lot of nostalgia for your old faithful Apple II machine, may I recommend checking out some of the other wonderful 8-bit machines of that era, too? If you've got the druthers, you can get a really nice taste for my favourite 8-bit machine from that era, the Oric-1/Atmos.

You'll need an emulator:

https://code.google.com/p/oriculator/

And some files to use it with:

http://www.oric.org/index.php?page=software&fille=top150game...

Take the first 10 or 20 entries from that list and have a lot of fun!

And remember: Old machines never die - their owners do!
I have gotten into the habit of always checking if the seatbelt is there before I get into a taxi and if its not I ride on the front seat. Well, I guess at least now I can tell a story about a famous guy who died from not wearing a seatbelt in the taxi whenever I get those odd looks from people.

I have always wondered why its so common to find cars with the rear seatbelts missing. The common story I get from taxi drivers is that passengers who don't like sitting on top of belt buckles shove them into the seat.
Note warp commits, the project is not too active. Maybe it's mature enough and requires few updates, I don't know as
zapcc uses the clang Preprocessor and not warp.

https://github.com/facebook/warp/commits/master
Does it surprise you at all that I also carried around a set of earplugs on my keychain all through my college years? I highly recommend these as they don't change the audio spectrum very much compared to the foam kind:

http://www.etymotic.com/consumer/hearing-protection/er20.htm...

I think I just really like low-impact high-reward behaviors. People tend to over-insure for common and minor issues and under-insure fore rare but costly ones.
Samurai: http://r.weavesilk.com/?v=4&id=gqm106exzb0
we might die in car accidents but at least we don't have an anti porn great firewall...
'Beautiful Mind' Mathematician John Nash Killed
Cmd + Click on OS X, as it should be.
I _always_ buckle up, even in bus.
I've gotten looks from taxi drives in south Europe for this, they treat it as an insult. I feel it's better to insult than be dead.
Afaik since you get fined quite severely in Norway where I live (and most of Europe) if you don't wear a seat belt, the rate of use is much higher than the US.

He will be missed. Hopefully it can put focus on such a simple thing to save lives.
Hi-tech car thieves use £30 jamming devices in car parks
"Seatbelt culture" probably depends greatly on the local culture. In the UK, the driver of a taxi is allowed to not wear one, but not the passengers.

http://www.driving-law.co.uk/offences/seat_belts-exemptions....
I have the same Etymotics earplugs as someone in an above comment.

They were the best 15 dollar purchase I've ever made. I wear them even in only moderately loud situations.

Unlike foam earplugs, the only part that is visible is clear plastic so most people don't notice.
>their number is likely to no higher than the currently idle

Why do you think giving some people free money that do not get it now would not result in some of them becoming idle?

There is evidence as payments increase the idle increase. For example, I think the OECD has data showing there are more people on disability by a wide margin across countries, and this correlates with the benefits the various countries offer. Do you really think there are naturally more disabled people in the UK than the US, or that because they offer better support more people are inclined to try and get it?

>if I wanted to spend a couple of weeks cleaning up my local beach of garbage I should be free to do so - the benefit to society is obviously large but the effort might just be me or a small group of similar minded folks

Obviously large to whom? Why does this group or person not already pay someone to clean the beach? Apparently the value is so low that people spend their money on things they want, instead of hiring you to clean the beach.

What you're arguing is that people will produce things of lesser value to society, but of some value to their own belief set, things of such low value overall that no one will pay for it. This results in a lower amount of goods and services, which ultimately results in society getting poorer, not richer.
What High-Bandwidth Memory Is and Why You Should Care
As an American, I wear seatbelts automatically. I don't know anyone who don't.
Also a good option.

Personally, I think I would favor providing something like food through a system like food stamps first. It provides less risk of the money being wasted on addictions (drugs, gambling and other bad financial decisions) and better ensures the money is used to help someone (especially in the case of children, where they are not spending the money, but their parents are).
“Safe writing, ladies”: It’s female reporters holding Uber’s feet to the fire
A person who I knew nothing about became one of the inspiring figures in my life after I watched the movie, "A beautiful mind". I am neither a mathematician, nor an economist. So, I didn't get to dig his work deep. But, I often use his struggle with schizophrenia and his recovery as an example of unlimited potential of human mind.
Eh?

Apartment-building (and home-building) isn't about the landlord making ends meet. It's about the landlord owning or borrowing a few million dollars to buy property and/or build upon it, then trying to make money over the next several decades, as he pays interest (or incurs opportunity cost), incurs maintenance expenses, pays insurance and property taxes, and watches as the investment depreciates due to the building getting old. A subsistence income is not a substitute for a real return on that investment.

Rent control substantially limits the upside potential of that sort of investment at best and usually goes further to act as a massive wealth transfer from landlord to tenant. As you can imagine, that deters investment, so housing shortages get worse and you end up either paying way too much or you just can't find an apartment to rent. (Moreover, even if rent control is eventually rolled back, the political risk that it will return is likely to haunt every future investment in the city for decades to come.)

You don't need to like landlords in general, or lionize them for their investment (the money is its own reward), or trust your landlord any further than you can throw him, but if you want people to live inside a decent piece of capital (instead of four-to-a-crappy-bedroom) then you'd do well to both study and respect the incentives that capitalism gives landlords (the money is its own reward) and how rent control distorts them.

... or you'll just screw over everyone, like New York City's War Emergency Tenant Protection Act, which continues to this day to protect certain lucky residents from World War II but resulted in something like 1/3 of the buildings in Harlem being abandoned, to say nothing of the Bronx. (and a little like today's San Francisco, though there are plenty of other barriers to new development there.)
Only if you don't build enough houses in the central part of town.

These housing issues work out to nothing but simple arithmetic - if N people want to live in a region and you have K < N houses, N-K people are unhappy. Set K=N and all the problems are solved.
Young Saudis, Bound by Conservative Strictures, Finds Freedom on Their Phones
" It was especially difficult for us to explain the concept of how Pac-Man, who spends most of his time avoiding ghosts, is able to turn the tables and chase the ghosts after eating a power cookie."

I don't know how this could be a difficult concept to grasp - even in the context of the alien-shoot-em-up-fest that was inflicting the industry at the time, surely it made sense to have a 'powerup' that would turn the tides?

I'm trying to think of other games of that era that might have had a powerup for the user to enjoy, but I can't honestly think of something prior to Pacman so readily .. is it myopia, or was Pacman really one of the first video games that offered a 'turn the tables' power mechanic?

Because its such an obvious feature of games these days, its sort of befuddling to be thinking of game design without powerups. I remember the first time I played Super Mario, thinking .. oh, this magical shroom is a bit like the Pacman power pill .. but why is any similar example prior to Pacman so obfuscated to me? I guess the Pacman powerpills were the ultimate in player revenge ..
Did somebody already install Linux on it? I think my next laptop will either be a MacBook 12 inch or whatever this new very light apple laptop is called. Or a Surface 3. I just need to be sure it runs Linux.
>Money doesn't disappear

But it can be used efficiently or inefficiently. For example, if there are two bread bakers, and I can pay $10 to one and he makes two loaves, or $10 to the other and he makes one, then the money has not disappeared but one use produced more goods for society.

>Money always trickles back up, especially when it's put into the hands of low income people who tend to spend more than they save.

Where do you think savings goes? It is most certainly invested back into society, and is not generally spent on consumption. Giving money just so people can consume will mostly make more of the goods they consume. If you want future looking invention and innovation, you need savings that can be lent to startups, businesses, and other uses.
How are we going to have a city (and food and jobs) without that industrial usage?
Samsung Galaxy S6 Give Away Android Authority
Re: state lotteries and education, I think John Oliver's segment is at least worth watching

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9PK-netuhHA
it was a very good and surprising movie.
At the scale needed to meet world demand? Give me a break.
Google Developing Lightweight Android OS 'Brillo' for Internet of Things
Seeing Prof. Nash enjoying his walks on campus is one of my fondest memories from grad school. This is very sad.

I was curious to learn more about his work a while ago and had looked up his PhD thesis. Here's a link: http://www.princeton.edu/mudd/news/faq/topics/Non-Cooperativ....

What struck me was that it only had 2 references to prior work! That's how you know you're doing innovative research.
Can you summarize the conjetured reason why having your trainee surgeon getting enough sleep to do their job correctly leads to more deaths, I'm intrigued.
What's interesting about your point 3. is that it speaks to these archetypes we have defined for people.

We have so ingrained in our minds that a person's value to society is defined by his/her economic contribution in the traditional sense (i.e. via a job or business ownership), that we assume that a person who does not work has no value by definition. In fact, they are even morally deficient. So, how can they possibly be of a quality/character as to contribute anything to society via arts, ideas, or otherwise?

It's a sneaky bit of circular logic that, for many, argues against a BI.
Linux kernel initialization, part 10: Running first process
Here's a tip for those who may read this and pick up a pair of these. It may sound obvious, but do take some time to adjust the depth of the plug based on what sounds good. I spent a year using them, but taking them out for a favorite song, or only for bands I didn't like much, because they rolled off the highs too much. Then, (at an underwhelming Wolves In The Throne Room show) I backed them out of my ear just a little. It was a touch louder, and I got the highs I wanted.
The same in Spain.
Garbage Collectors Are More Likely to Die on the Job Than Police Patrol Officers
Do you want symmetric encryption? NaCl does that too, it's just a section bellow the asymmetric ones on its documentation.

But I'm not sure you completely thought this out. If somebody can read your disk, and if that includes software configuration, the only way to make it impossible for people to read your logs is by using asymmetric crypto. And yes, that'll require using different keys on the writing and reading software.
Strangely, the N username now look likes a legit account.
Or is it the same guy?

https://twitter.com/n
Just under 64 years ago, Nash's Ph.D dissertation 'Non-Cooperative Games' was published in the Annals of Mathematics.

The most legible copy I've found on the web is here: http://www.cs.upc.edu/~ia/nash51.pdf

Requesciat in pace.
Actually the property was $43k, it's a 30 year loan I plan on paying off extremely early. And the other reply is correct, it's in Paulding County, Georgia.