skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don't know how to answer your question because I don't know what it means to say something "should be OK".

If you're asking if I would prefer to live in an Oak Park where hotels were legal as opposed to where hotels were illegal, of course. If you're asking me if I would be on board with storming into an established community and rewriting their zoning codes over their objections, probably not, although there may be exceptions. If you're asking me if I would sleep well at night while operating a hotel in Oak Park, then I would probably want to meet the surrounding neighbors and decide for myself how much the activity would disturb them, look at the size of the easement, what the noise floor is like, and so on. If you're asking me if I as a homeowner would be annoyed at a neighboring hotel, it's possible, but I'm annoyed at a lot of things, most of which I seek no special right to change.

Those are four answers to your hypothetical, but I don't know whether one of them, or any of them, are the kind of answer you're looking for.
Don't use that taleo, it's buggy garbage. I spent 5 minutes trying to fill out the form and it ate it.
I guess I should have been explicit and stated I was looking for a comparable system that competes with the soekris. Does the dell t20 really count as competition to a soekris? A quad port intel NIC and a Dell T20 w/ Xeon is at least twice as much as this soekris. And then there is the whole issue of size:

Dell Soekris
Width 6.89 11.40
Height 14.17 1.41
Length 17.15 6.11
Volume 1675.31 98.21
"“The officers charged with Gray’s homicide received bail from $250,000-$500,000,” the public defender noted. “Is that not fucked up? Is that not a window into what’s wrong here?”"

No, it's not fucked up. Not all of the officers are being charged with murder. Each one is charged with a different crime, which will lead to different bail amounts.

"Bullock’s bail is a stunning $500,000."

Bail is based on whether they think the person will show up to court. The officers will all most likely show up to court.

"I spoke with Bullock’s mother Bobbi Small, who told me, “I don’t have that anywhere near that amount of money. This is how the system gets the people of Baltimore.”"

“I don’t have that anywhere near that amount of money. This is how the system gets the people of Baltimore.”

Money isn't a get out of jail free pass. It just allows you to get out of jail until your trial.

Also, I'm not sure if the article is meant to be mis-leading, but you only actually need to pay 10% of bail:

http://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-procedure/getting-out-o...

“The response here has never been just about Freddie Gray,” he explained. “The people are rising up against joblessness, police violence, and neglect.”

I'm going to be honest. This sounds like the action of children. You are 'neglected', so the answer is to burn down buildings and throw rocks at the police? This shouldn't be accepted in a civil society.

Are they at all concerned that Freddie Gray got arrested 10+ times for selling drugs and ruining their community?

"Ferguson, New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, and now Baltimore have all been touched by passionate protests following police killing unarmed black people"

An unarmed citizen can still steal a gun from an officer. I'm not sure what happened to Freddie Gray, and if the police really did kill him, there should be justice. However, all of the martyrs I've seen so far have been criminals running from the police.

"Today the poorly kept basketball courts in West Baltimore are once again bustling with action. Children are riding their bikes. Children are playing in parks while their parents sit by smiling. And elderly women in big hats are trekking off to Sunday morning services. Meanwhile, the intersection of W. North and Pennsylvania Avenues, though still populated by some demonstrators, is no longer blocked off by police tanks and bulky, angry cops in riot gear."

Are we also going to talk about the angry protesters that hurt police officers, burned down businesses (what about the business owners..some can never recover what was lost), and generally destroyed their community?

If I don't get my way and I am frustrated, this is not an acceptable way for me to let my frustration out.

This entire article is completely one-sided, which should make anyone suspicious.
Also, driving just sucks. Absolutely nobody I know looks forward to getting in their car and driving somewhere. Why? Because they all live in reasonably dense urban locations where traffic ranges from "absolute nightmare" (weekdays, 7-10am and 3-7pm) and "pretty awful" (all other times).It's surprisingly emotionally and physically draining. I'm much happier sitting in the back of a bus with my book, even if it takes twice as long. Add a nice bicycle to the mix for around town stuff, and the huge amount of money you save by not owning a car, and I can easily see why nobody in our generation desires one.

(Of course this is all about the U.S.; my experience driving around Sweden was mile after mile of forest and open road!).
That's a fine theory but it isn't the reality at all. The people using polygraphs don't have that level of conspiracy cleverness.
Millionaire Dream Binary Review Need to Know
The problem with religion is that it describes facets of human mental, cultural, and emotional processes (as all fictions do,) but attributes them to non-human parts of reality. Thus it is, in any rational sense, a terrible model of anything.

Your mistake is in claiming that religion is about 'meaning' where science and mathematics aren't. Anywhere you use language, you study meaning. Meaning is a feature of language, and religion tends to use the least reliable and most inconsistent language of any of those subjects. If religion is a search for meaning, it is an incredibly stupid way of doing so.

So the one thing you've claimed it is useful for is something that it is demonstrably bad at.
From a quick skim of the manpages and a few google searches, it looks like pf is a really poor substitute for tc. Without CoDel and friends, OpenBSD can at best implement half of a good QoS system.
Can you explain some more or point to the exact part of the research paper. When you say "GC'ing actors themselves vs GC'ing memory reachable from actor" what exactly do you mean? Are you talking about the process dictionary and mailbox vs the state of actor passed through its loop function?

For arguments' sake here is what a simple Erlang actor looks like:

loop(State) ->
...
loop(NewState).
...

Maybe you can spawn it with:

Pid = spawn(fun () -> loop(InitState) end)
But most of polygraph gated jobs are boring office work related to (over)classified topics, not jobs that require deception.
Onenote will give you a diff. And it has some hotkeys. It's a good program, but in its core it is made to be used with a mouse - so it might not be what you are looking for.
And there is at least one liar in the room, but it isn't always the interrogatee.
Your webform is broken. I tried Firefox and IE on windows and it didn't work.
J1 and J2 are the same colour. The key used for the slices is on the left of the image. The labels on top show more detail, but several haplogroups are grouped into the same colour.

For distinguishing between red and green hues for some people, http://colortest.it/enhance-r:http://brilliantmaps.com/the-g... might be useful (or the "Enhance green" setting, or switching between the two).
Ask HN: Whether my logo will sued or not?
I have launched my Tweelerts android app in beta. My friend suggested me that i might get sued by Twitter because of twitter bird in logo (https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/594034922827882496/SDPDv7J1.png )

Please view my logo above and suggest whether i need to change my twitter bird or not . I took this twitter bird from https://www.iconfinder.com and it has license "Creative Commons (Attribution 3.0 Unported)"
The sheer mindless idiocy of this substitution makes one hesitate to dive into such a long-ish and potentially involved article as this one, even if written by such an ostensibly clever person as Norvig.
I wish Ruby would focus in immutability before this.

As things stand, the language is built in a way that you've no guarantee that any object you hold as variable won't change without you knowing. The net result is you either ignoring the problem entirely (until you runinto a bizarre bug introduced by a new library) or (more rarely) you re-inventing the wheel by being extremely verbose in all accessors where it matter.
On Dart's type system:

https://www.dartlang.org/articles/optional-types/

https://www.dartlang.org/articles/why-dart-types/
Slapping "In God We Trust" on everything was not only a fairly recent development, it was a cynically calculated response by a chastened business class that found itself coming under extraordinary scrutiny in the wake of the Great Depression.

The redemption of capitalism by Christianity demanded a heavily modified version of the religion that basically abandoned all the parts about people looking after each other and created a new ethos in which getting rich was both a duty and a reward.

Given a bunch of plutocrats who would pay well for effective propaganda and some creative but unscrupulous preachers willing to do their dirty work, a distinctly American (and conspicuously un-Christian) version of Christianity was born. It's been polarizing our politics and supporting the concentration of wealth in fewer and fewer hands ever since.

A couple of recent books by Nicole Aschoff and Kevin Kruse have done a good job unpacking this reprehensible hustle. If you have any interest in finding out just how much bullshit has gone into shaping your world view, Elizabeth Bruenig has reviewed both of them here: http://www.newrepublic.com/article/121564/gods-and-profits-h...

You can also read Kruse himself, who has summarized his effort (How Corporate America Invented Christian America) here: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/04/corporate-ame...

On a separate note, Newton's total disregard of evolutionary theory is not a product of any disagreements he had with the theory itself. Rather, it's due to the fact that died more that 130 years before "On the Origin of Species" was first published. Class dismissed.
I see it often enough already. In fact, I'd rather it was on someone else's house. I would forget it was up there if it was on my own.
Here's another interesting thought: QV might reduce the influence of PACs by solving the principal-agent problem. PACs like Crossroads are not, in fact, wealthy people. They're pools of donations from many politically sympathetic individuals. People donate to PACs because they want to do more than cast their one vote on a particular issue.

But donating to a PAC is a really inefficient way to have a political effect. The rules governing PACs are so loose that the people controlling them can do anything they want with the money, including flying a private jet to Tahiti and drinking MaiTais during the election. Even more responsible PACs will probably not spend the money exactly the way the donor would. They might, for example, concentrate their spending on certain "key" elections and ignore the donor's favourite candidate. Or they might support all the candidates from a given party, when the donor only really cares about one of them.

With QV, the donor can put his money to work in exactly the way he wants. That might leave PACs with much less money to spend.
It depends on whether one also needs a NAS with RAID disks, or a Windows desktop, or a media server, or a personal cloud. If you need any of those, then there is nearly zero marginal size or cost to add a router VM, with more hardware headroom and OS flexibility than a special-purpose router.
"was that companies with flexible work policies or maternity leave benefits were actually linked with a slower promotion of women into top ranks. The explanation: Such benefits can lead to a check-the-box mentality, in which companies think they've done enough to help women along."

Or how about the more likely (but less P.C.) explanation : taking more time off work leads to well... less opportunities at work. As it arguably should be (because meritocracy)

Is the alternative (artificially "correcting" pay gaps) really fair to other colleagues who worked their asses off ? I can understand the good intent but it's a slippery slope : is that also going to apply to men who decide to take time off for hobbies, or is it a female-only privilege btw ?
There are not two different problems.

And more importantly, religion has never actually answered a "why" question in a reasonable manner. So it is objectively useless. It is not how you answer "why" questions.

Assuming your distinction is actually meaningful, here's a question for you: "How do you properly answer 'why' questions?"
Programmers as assembly line workers. No thank you.
I half agree with you. I do think that the language used to describe religious viewpoints includes off the cuff insults far too often. The word benighted was unnecessary in that sentence and does detract from the article. I don't think it was egregious enough to demand the article not be posted, but I do agree that it is a form of philosophical point scoring that serves neither the article, nor the wider discussion.

The first person to derive the Hubble constant and one of the main developers of big-bang theory was Georges Lemaître, a devout Catholic who would later become president of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, who described the idea as "the Cosmic Egg, exploding at the moment of the creation", though he didn't like the Pope relying on it in proclamations. I think it would be fair to call him a creationist.

Also, Hoyle, who was not a creationist, coined the term 'Big-Bang' to take the piss out of Lemaître's idea and promote the steady-state theory, which he preferred. Hoyle however believed that a god was guiding the fine tuning of the constants to help the evolution of life, so was effectively a proponent of intelligent design, while not being a creationist. Weirdly, the two ideas do not have to go together.

I am not saying this from the article offending myself in any way, I am what most people would think of as strongly athiest, though personally I have come to dislike the label. I just think it is a lazy form of signaling that detracts from the argument and also demonstrates an ignorance of the wide variety of religious and philosophical viewpoints held by those throughout the scientific community.
I would much rather Google focus on Python than Dart for Android.
Looks very interesting. Any examples of Erlang-style distributed actors?
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=I%20want%20a%...

:)
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/users/drivers/b43 says that the BCM4360 802.11ac chip in that is unsupported. So what open-source driver are you using for that?
But as I recall, the company had to pull its own weight financially, and was effectively bootstrapped.
Sounds to me more like programmers as programmers instead of programmers as rock star ninja cowboys
Incredulity? To me, that has flipped around dramatically recently.

I'm a freelancer, so to me it's the hourly rate that matters. About two years ago, when recruiters asked for my hourly rate, it always ended up with less than what I originally asked for. This year, I've noticed that every single recruiter is very eager to agree with my rate, and my next project marks the first time I'll make more than my asking rate. Something clearly changed, and I suspect I may have to increase my asking rate.
The Never Call
It may be informative and entertaining to look at some of these videos on my website:

http://www.polygraph.com/media

And, if you are interested in more, read these essays:

http://www.polygraph.com/index.php?i-don-t-teach-countermeas...

http://www.polygraph.com/index.php?the-lie-detector-is-bulls...

And yes, I am the Doug Williams who is the subject of this article...
Quick link for anyone that is curious, as I was:
https://github.com/CausalityLtd/ponyc/blob/master/packages/n...
Not to be too much of a truther, but a polygraph examiner has no interest in admitting that their work is bunk.
I guess the claim was that such an erlang actor would run forever when nobody sends it a message to stop it. And with pony it would be detected that the actor is no longer reachable and it would be automatically stopped.
Bandwidth has gotten better, but latency hasn't.
Once again, read my parent post. I found his post a good read so that's one bit of anecdotal evidence right there already. Something tells me you don't fully understand 'signal to noise ratio' either.
Because they're "conservative" and don't change their entire stack to use the latest cool-kid technology every 6 months?

Because they recognise that devops means something other than "we let our developers run wild in prod"?
I wrote the solver code used here as an example for the JuMP modeling package for Julia, which is available at https://github.com/JuliaOpt/JuMP.jl. The specific TSP example code is available at https://github.com/JuliaOpt/JuMP.jl/blob/master/examples/tsp..., and more general information about optimization in Julia is available at http://juliaopt.org
Yeah, the extension situation is supposedly questionable. I think you should always be wary with extensions. I usually limit myself to popular and open-sourced extensions.
Not OP, but you can expect to start at about $1500 a month for a studio apartment (maybe cheaper if you find a damn good deal). If you want a one bedroom, $2000/month is probably closer.
The big difference between Austria and Germany is striking. It would be interesting to see Germany's pie chart by region.
Your categorical rejection of openbsd+pf is based on a cursory google search and man page comparison? I have not seen any QoS comparisons of OpenBSD 5.6 versus Linux. Did you find any?
I recently switched to using vagrant for devving under windows and I have to say that I am really enjoying it at the moment.
Interesting to contrast with contributing to Servo, https://github.com/servo/servo/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md. Basically open a pull request on github and wait for review by a project team member.

Clojure has many more steps. I'm curious if those steps are by default due to the software they use (JIRA) or because of specific issues Rich saw with contributing.

Linux also has a very different contributor model, mailing list based, to either clojure or servo. Which I know is due to the volume of changes for each release.
In my view a gaping hole in the Python for Android "stack" is the lack of Tkinter. I know that there are technical hurdles, though I don't understand them.
The really unfortunate thing about that post is it completely fails to understand the essential part of solving the TSP this way, which are the lazily-added subtour elimination constraints. I don't think the blog author at Forio really understood the code they were using, hopefully they will update it one day!
Really? Are you like that with every word? Have you kept yourself from reading master pieces of literature because you thought "oh, well I think they should've gone with X word instead"?
The warranty lasts 10 years. It is basically guaranteed to work for ten years. This is probably analogous to the 60k mile warranty that comes with a Prius. Nobody is junking their Prius after 60 thousand miles.

Look at the press kit for more information.

http://www.teslamotors.com/presskit/teslaenergy?via=newslett...
Use a black dropshadow, to aid in contrast, on any white text over the keyboard photo.
Maybe it's gotten better in recent years, but last time I tried consumer hardware (Linksys), there were actual hardware problems like overheating that didn't get any better with alternative firmware. My Linksys routers (I went through three of them before giving up) would lock up with increasing frequency as they aged, under both Tomato and DDWRT. When I went to Cisco (real Cisco, not Linksys Cisco) and Ubiquiti routers, the problems went away. For the price of a Ubiquiti router (under $100), I personally find no reason to spend time with open source firmware on crappy consumer hardware. It just works and is rock solid.
The same way you test any other piece of code.

A stored procedure is just an encapsulation of logic, with inputs and possibly state changes and/or outputs.

Expected/actual asserts can be coded in SQL.

The code tends to be verbose, but some RDBMS have evolved to include more powerful language features. It's probably possible in almost all RDBMS, but certainly easier in some than others.
Looks like their PR people are on the job, as this is the 4th time that service has been pointed in the last few days. ( https://hn.algolia.com/?query=dufl&sort=byPopularity&prefix&... )
2 year old DJ
Create invoices for free
We have been working on distribution support. We should get it into the runtime soon!
Great stuff from Norvig, as per usual. I find it strange that the next step after enumeration is a heuristic approach, something that comes up a lot in "solve a TSP" posts - there are many ways to solve TSP to provable optimality that perform really well on non-pathological instances, and can often be stopped at any point to get both a probably near optimal solution and, even better, a bound on how good the best solution could be. I would argue that the implementation cost is outweighed by the possibility of usually getting optimal solutions and by having confidence in how far off you are (no chance of producing a terrible solution).
The reason I use Mercurial as an example is because that's the other DCVS I'm most familiar with.

> A simple example of the usefulness is to be able to compare the behavior of different versions side-by-side (particularly when you're dealing with slow builds).

That usecase I can understand. The other two you mention though could easily be solved by branches.
Force Touch Trackpad Could Eventually Simulate Temperatures or Materials
That's because social is very hard to do in a distributed way.

Here you are trusting AWS to host your data for example. And how do you distribute the keys to decrypt your data, and at the same time seamlessly have a buddy list etc?

And how do you actually FIND your friends without centralized identities somewhere?

Interesting questions :)
I fear we are part of a small self-selecting group that has chosen the convenience to living in densely populated, well connected cities

I think there's also the issue of differing definitions of "convenience." I used to live in a city where I walked or used public transit to get everywhere. Now I live in a suburb and drive everywhere, and I find most of the things I like to do MORE convenient. Yeah, in the city it was easy to walk to bars and restaurants, but I don't eat out that much, and I'm beyond the age where I want to hang out in bars.

As just one example, I like to cook at home, and grocery shopping when I have to carry everything in my arms is a pain in the butt. I know people like to talk about how much fresher your food is when you buy just what you need every day, and that sounds great, but I have a lot of other things going on in my life. Having to plan time to go to the grocery store every day after work is a hassle. Being able to drive five minutes to the store, park easily, and carry my stuff home in my trunk, is vastly more convenient than what I did when I lived in the city.

Having lived both ways for several years, I will never willingly go back to living in a densely populated city.