skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The .0 is a tuple access. Foo is a 'tuple struct' of length 1: http://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/book/tuple-structs.html (though the syntax is explained in the section on tuples: http://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/book/primitive-types.html#t... )
Check out law school transparency. They've got stats for every school, including what percent are school funded jobs like you describe.

http://www.lstscorereports.com
Hopefully Taco Bell doesn't win the franchise wars...

That was some ill-advised product placement. Maybe not as bad as Lockheed in the new Terminator movie, but still...
A human pilot can't be simply disconnected of reprogrammed to turn around and bomb Washington. I think that's a major consideration.

Yes, there are drones that work quite well against countries like Afghanistan but good luck using these against China or Russia. (not that I'd want to see that ever happen)
https://logentries.com/ has worked out well for us, at least at the small scale we're using it now. Pricing is reasonable.

The important feature for us is S3 archiving. They'll keep your logs online for a certain period of time, and then copy the old ones to S3. You don't have to get rid of anything, and you're still able to keep costs under control.
I'm probably guilty of this, as a guy who is learning Haskell. FizzBuzz can be just

main = putStrLn $ unlines $ map fizzer [1..100] where
fizzer n | n % 15 == 0 = "FizzBuzz"
| n % 3 == 0 = "Fizz"
| n % 5 == 0 = "Buzz"
| otherwise = show n

but I think the first time I tried to solve it in Haskell I had something more like:

import Data.Monoid (Monoid, mconcat)
import Data.Maybe (catMaybes)

specialcases :: (Monoid y) => [x -> Maybe y] -> x -> Either x y
specialcases rules x = case catMaybes (map ($ x) rules) of
[] -> Left x
xs -> Right (mconcat xs)

ifDivBy :: Integer -> x -> Integer -> Maybe x
ifDivBy n x m = if m `mod` n == 0 then Just x
else Nothing

main = putStrLn $ unlines $ strings where
strings = map (either show id) cases
fizzer = specialcases [ifDivBy 3 "Fizz", ifDivBy 5 "Buzz"]
cases = map fizzer [1..100]

This is basically thinking about an imperative problem the "wrong way around": starting with the logical distinction between "we're in a special case" and "we're in the normal case" and building everything else around it. (Also, who is ever going to use that Monoid instance? Replace `id` with `concat` and you can just remove `Data.Monoid` altogether -- and if you really wanted it generic, taking an explicit `y -> y -> y` and using `foldl1` would be more flexible anyway.)
> A language where any rule like "You should always free resources in advance in case the destructor doesn't run" is captured statically by a compiler error.

This only shows up if you're specifically opting into unsafe code by using the "unsafe" keyword. Rust doesn't (yet) try to ensure safety of unsafe code, because it's unsafe. As long as you don't step into unsafe code, you can ignore this entire article.
In addition to all of the other examples given, countless SoHo routers (just about everything from the old WRT54G workhorse on up) run MIPS processors.

Edit: Fixed typo.
Between the lines of your comment is a lot of disregard against the EU and the EU parliament. How come so?
And with OSS we can see when the create back doors or modify the code. We can see what the modifications do. And if they are doing anything wrong we can revert the changes and publicise it. Following on from your thinking, what is their angle here? On the surface it seems more difficult to exploit OSS but is there something they can do with it that users won't know about and is easier to exploit?
But also this things don't have money to spend on software they can use for free. Or time to contribute in any other way.
A lot of people do argue that about big object-class hierarchies and inheritance, and they've been declining since the mid-2000s at least in mainstream OO languages like Java and C#.
Trey Songz – Slow Motion |dance
And that's a huge mistake.
Politicians in EU and US call various institutions a "NGO" when they disagree with it and want to ridicule it to intentionally reduce its public reputation.

EP is a high reputation organization and has force within the EU structure. Calling an EPRS study "something by the parliament's research service" is not only redundant (EPRS = European Parliament Research Service) but also short-sighted (do you do the same thing to the deliverables by your R&D department?).

So, this is an EP study that you can cite in order to support your arguments for switching to free software in your government / school / workplace / home / hobby group.
Can someone explain to me what "real things" are in the context of the statement 'once you are using [insert language] for real things'?

Is there a a difficulty barrier for considering an application real? A lines of code requirement? Is it like pornography and I'll know it when I see it?
The problem is that all of this is safe code. The problem, to my mind, is that you can write mem::forget (as in the code here's safe_forget)* without ever using the unsafe keyword*.

Edit: I was wrong. The problem isn't with forget. This is hairy.
I actually like to think that he is an alien lost on earth trying to build a spaceship to go back home. With Paypal, Tesla and SpaceX, he is just bootstrapping what he needs to build to go back home.
I sure hope Silicon Valley isn't buying what D.C. is selling.
Can you say Acxiom? I knew you could.
Score is still "go" vs. "no go". You can only shut off so many people because parallel "grey" finance market arises.

More finesse is needed. You can try banks to offer different deals to identical (finance-wise) people based on their HS score, but they're probably sue.
Yeah i found out about that after i wrote this guide, will be doing another / revised guide based on Gin.
The US has a pretty casual understanding of international law...
Ask HN: What do you do when you're depressed for a day?
I'm a founder of a funded company. We have plenty of runway left, will probably be able to raise another round, etc. Have a small team of really talented people.

But the past couple of days I've been completely down in the dumps. Like... barely able to get out of bed and function. A lot of it comes from my frustrations with the product that I keep playing over and over in my mind - I'm not sure how we're going to "win." It makes me want to crawl into a hole and die.

But I know I can't do that. I have to go talk to users and our employees and pretend like nothing is wrong (maybe nothing is?) I mean we have a long way to go, but we're on the right course.

I just don't know what to do on days like today. I don't know how to keep going.
Well I'll sheepishly raise my hand and say I don't have a bloody clue what the sentence is trying to say.

Individually, the words make sense, but after trying to parse the combination I feel like I have less information than when I started.
I think the animations do add some spatio-temporal information. Different states get highlighted at different times as the line graph progresses. I can't claim to know much about front-end design but I liked the animations.
Informally, the results of "Asymptotic distribution of coordinates on high-dimensional spheres" by M. C. Spruill (http://www.emis.ams.org/journals/EJP-ECP/_ejpecp/ECP/include...) is that as n gets large, the distribution of x approaches a normal distribution with mean 0 and standard deviation 1/sqrt(n). That paper contains what might be some interesting references to the literature.
Google Faces Enormous Forces in Fight Over the Future of Android
The simplest explanation for the plateau in a SaaS business is that you're likely at the point where churn eats growth, which you can quickly verify by looking at the math. (e.g. If you have 5% monthly churn, which you'd be doing well to have at your price point, then you need to find 50 new accounts every month. If it's card-up-front then that's 100 trials. If you convert 2% of visitors that's 5,000 visits. Just to tread water.)

Your solutions include less churn and more growth. Both of these are deep topics.

That said, given that you have an average account value of around $10 per month, I'd be looking for some way to move upmarket. It's just brutally difficult to build a business at $10 a month unless you have massive Dropboxian scale on the back of a very viral product.
Precisely. Rc is not easy to "fix": the fact that it allows cycles is part of its design.
You get a discount on your insurance if you let the company monitor your vehicle and fitness tracker.

To get a job your employer might need to see your Facebook history.

It's coming, it's just going to be decentralized and (arguably) opt-in.
Yeah, based on the Chrome network panel it is loading all the unminified view files separately. They should definitely combine and minify all the files to prevent a bad first impression.
RIP Twitter’s ‘Timeline Views’ – What Metric Will Replace It?
I don't recommend the link above. It's garbage
It would be nice to see these charts mapped against public opinion polls, to help show which rights have been led by the government vs the people.
Qubes 3.0 RC1 Released
> You could just as well argue that laying out object class hierarchies and using inheritance is "[solving problems] that have nothing to do with what you’re actually trying to achieve."

Definitely, 100%.
TripMode: Save data while using a cellular connection on OS X
Mixing Gmail, Swipes App and Siri to Get Inbox Zero
You make some very good -if wordy- arguments. I'm sure everyone here has been convinced by the multiple well-defended reasons given.
I like that the animations allow you to follow the trend without much effort of finding the appropriate lines. It's clear, just fast enough, and works smoothly at least on my browser. At the very least, your claims are definitely subjective in terms of usability.
Jq – A Command-line JSON processor
Conde Nast to Announce VR Series
Intemperate Planet: How Natural Systems Magnify the Effects of Global Warming
You'd be amazed how money can be wasted in online retail. I know of a 2,000 employee company that took 1.5 years to produce a mobile version of its site and another year for the app. Another (also thousands of employees and over 500 developers to manage code bloat) hires a "Chief Data Scientist" to build a data science team every 6 months or so - the guy quits after 3 months without even getting access to a database, and a few months later the CEO asks the CTO how that data science effort is going and they put a job ad out again. I think they parallelized the effort and hired three in one go last round to speed up finding one that will stick...

These companies have in common that they hired "cheap and many" rather than "expensive and few" initially to lower their startup costs and "tech risk", and that they are run by former bankers and McKinseys who consider tech "below them", something that is "commoditized" and can just be "bought in".
We can always rescind our involvement in treaties.
Good point! You're absolutely right when you say that static analysis is more difficult to do for dynamically typed languages like Python. This is why we develop our own type inference algorithms in order to generate additional knowledge about the code beyond its structure, which in turn allows us to detect more interesting and relevant problems.
> that there are fully verifiable imperative languages out there (with their own serious problem -- correctness is never free), that have actually been used by the industry to write some very important, safety-critical software, and have been actually put to the test much more than Haskell.

Ada is absolutely painful to work with as a developer (I used to work in Aerospace). But if you could get your code to compile, it stood a very good chance of just working.
Yup..after re-reading my comment this tiny nitpick: "buddy, you're out of market." was a bit condescending on my part. Apologies.
You can hack this up yourself using the output from 'docker save'. 'save' produces a tarball which contains layers, and you can delete the layers from your 'save' tarball that you know you already have on the destination.
The Airport Frustration Index
A Fedora 22 beta walk-through (Slideshow)
Most recent discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9153203
Glia Lands Key Advisors and Cash in Effort to Help People Shop with a Purpose
It is always a mistake to assume the opponent is ignorant or stupid. Of course the government knows the futility of trying to enforce the use of only "approved" encryption.

A law that required the use of "approved" encryption necessarily bans real encryption tools. Anybody that is actually secure is made a criminal, which is one more law that can be enforced arbitrary if someone decides you are a problem.

It should be fairly easy to filter for non-approved encryption with DPI. This gives them a nice map of all the "subversives" that are trying to evade the "monitoring and controlling of casual citizens".
That looks pretty interesting and flexible on one hand, on the other, I don't see why it's better than classes. Is it just more explicit?
Lots of discussion about whether the '7 common plots' are an artifact of the low pass filter he used.
https://annieswafford.wordpress.com/2015/03/07/continuingsyu...

Both sides also seem to acknowledge that the sentiment analyzers chosen don't work well for literature.
Junk data + lowpass filter = Beautiful curves generated from noise.
I've tried out a number of new-fangled languages from a web development perspective (Rust, Go with gorilla, primarily) and in my opinion don't really provide the same set of tools for this sort of web development as higher-level languages like python, ruby, js w/node. That's not to say they don't have important use cases, they just aren't designed with this sort of web development in mind.

And of course, it's totally valid to prefer the different paradigm that these provide! Hasn't been ideal for me, though.

Services though? Totally an appropriate time to fire up Go, in my opinion.

And, even then, Python (which I'm most familiar with) has downsides for JSON services. Translating from an ORM (sqlalchemy) to formatted JSON is something you have to relegate to some magical methods or do one by one, neither is a great solution.
>> he processes SIM cards dropped off by men on motorcycles, paying a few cents for a card that would sell for $5 to $10 in the United States
Adding transparency to graphene paper improves supercapacitor capacitance
Is there a way to silence particular errors (i.e. false positives). For example, the python linter is unhappy that I have the following in my code:

ParticipantFormSet = modelformset_factory(Participant, can_delete=False, max_num=8, extra=8,
form=ParticipantForm)

It claims that this is a violation of the naming convention for variables, but in this case ParticipantFormSet is actually a python class, albeit created with a factory function.

This is just one example, but I would think long-term that it would be a great annoyance to deal with persistent misapplication of rules.
To some extent however most of the changes since the 60's have been evolutionary rather than revolutionary, pilotless aircraft are revolutionary.

Even putting modern electronics into an ancient design like the Mig-21 produces a very capable aircraft (the Mig-21 Bison has held it's own against F16's and even F15C's) putting a pilotless control system into something like a modern F15 would create one hell of a fighter.
Astrophyicists draw most comprehensive map of the universe
Despite this, I had my geek code proudly displayed on my website for years! :) (d- for appearance, although less so these days.)
Dependent builds in Travis
Post-nationalist may be a bit of a strong term, or an overstatement, but I think you're on the right track.

People are more connected to each other across the world than before. The government is not the only body with multinational links and multinational information coming is as part of everyday life. The 'othering' of people in other countries no longer so prominent. We care a little less about our own country compared to the wider world.

And yes, the government has totally, thoroughly earned our distrust and disrespect in this field. Almost any new security work assumes not just hackers as its threat model, but pervasive network monitoring and compromised service-providers at every level.

New security systems, created by freedom-minded individuals - not terrorists, not criminals - actually count the government as a direct threat.

This is quite a big thing...
I'd be really interested in this area of research, too. And not just trees- what about smaller plants (even house plants)? I'd imagine an engineered "heavy breather" that people could easily grow in their homes and yards could make a measurable impact if widely adopted. It could also be tied in to a type of carbon-based tax to encourage people towards a carbon-neutral lifestyle.
Not if one considers the rights of the unborn.
Ah! I had this same(-ish) idea but couldn't figure out how to write it. And when I realized how much time I was spending on Fizz Buzz forced myself to stop.
And yet others of us who are making progress solving that problem have thicker skin, and can handle a little prodding.
You have a five minute difference in your posts. Did you ever read the article?

I'm not agreing completely with it, but I'll refrain from commenting until I finished reading it.
Pearls before swine.

Also, they're not my arguments -- better men have written more on this topic than I have, and with higher quality writing.
Beyond pink: The rise of the female-specific bike shop
The particular model chosen in the article reflects physical reality, and the physical reality of it is that cell phones do not produce ionizing radiation. There is no debate as to whether this is correct, because this is how we see the world operating.

As the article states, you only start running into ionizing radiation at much higher energy levels, the kind you are exposed to just walking outside in sunlight. The link between sun exposure and skin cancer is well-established. The link between cell phone exposure and any cancer is non-existent.
W1ADV here!
http://redradix.com is pretty neat
Details are just details. It all depends on how you interpret and perceive them :-)
Brooklyn Author Recreates Borges’ Library of Babel as Infinite Website
> You could just as well argue that laying out object class hierarchies and using inheritance is "[solving problems] that have nothing to do with what you’re actually trying to achieve."

Could, indeed semi-regularly do. I actively dislike solving problems with inheritance.

I also actively dislike people missing the point. The problem is not "using programming to solve problems". The problem is letting the novelty of the programming you're using to solve problems con you into thinking you're doing something more clever than you actually are.
I've never even heard of the 'Shapley Concentration'
For some reason, the 50% of people are above/below average fallacy cracks me up every time I see it. Consider, how many people have more/less than the average number of fingers?
Looks like the writer listens to NPR: http://www.npr.org/2015/03/12/392568604/dont-you-dare-use-co...
Perhaps I should revise with more of a focus on JSON/Services. I was trying to stick to a common pattern across languages. But that might not be the best approach.
In America, there's no longer much legitimacy placed in legislation; we generally look to the judiciary for any actual governing thought these days.

Legislation is mostly seen as a stepping stone; it's not until it's been tested in court that a law is really valid.
also: things can get really ugly if your corp. decides to throw post-911 terrorism charges at you. I know of several instances where just using work machine for personal email got that treatment so the corp could get out of paying contract fees.
Do you know that by invoking "Case of the Mondays" you're referring to a specific character from the movie Office Space ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AB9zPfXqQQ ) who, in making that comment and then chuckling to herself as she walked away, presented almost a perfect example of someone who thinks they are far more funny than anyone else does? You do get that right?
Teen beats world record, solves Rubik's Cube in 5.25 seconds
Thanks for the feedback! This feature will be available very soon, we'll notify all users by e-mail as soon as it's deployed.

Right now, you can already disable certain patterns in your project settings if you're bothered by individual messages.
Does it handle route variables? no

Does it have a middleware stack? no

Martini is a request router not a http server.
Actually, I was an undergraduate in 1993 (when this was first written) and I can assure you that there did exist women who did geeky stuff, were in STEM fields, etc. In fact, I did research for a professor then who was precisely such a woman. I don't want to overstate this, but little things like these add up to a perception that things were a way that wasn't really the case.
One problem is that existing devops tools are not that good.

For instance it seems insane to me that packer and vagrant exist as entirely separate products. As a java programmer I find that vagrant files are way too verbose. I am sure I could write some Ruby functions to take care of that and also to fix zillions of other things that are awful about Vagrant, but then everybody writes their own functions.
Thanks for the response, I appreciate it.

I thought I was giving a counterpoint to the statement "there were very few investors" and adding advice from my experience:

The important thing to note is that they won't come to you just because you're there. You have to attract them in some way (or better yet: contact them in advance and have meetings already set up).

My other comment similarly was a counterpoint to "the only winner was the organizers", giving my experience and why I think I had the experience I did.

I'm sorry that this came across as "no you're wrong" without any details. :-(
Google Maps leads Toronto man down treacherous road
Lightweight yet Powerful – LiteCart Review
Seems like a great application for cryptocurrencies, though maybe better with those using proof of stake rather than proof of work.

Distribute one coin to every citizen (this is the hard part). Each citizen votes anonymously by giving the coin to the candidate of their choice. The network verifies that no coin (vote) is spent (cast) twice. Done.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8731040
In this scenario it was candidate responsibility to make sure she/he has all of the necessary skills before they press the submit button.
Please Do Not Walk Out of These Doors
That's a point that I've seen many try to make, regardless of their actual opinion on the matter, only to be shouted down. It's as if some people don't understand that such a thing could eventually be used against them. It seems that many people don't consider the long-term effects of their short-term gains. The court system can be fickle, what it does that benefits you today can be reversed in the future to your detriment.
This is bad. But before judging China, people need to ask themselves if the hold their own government to the same standard of criticism. As an American, I feel if the US government had similar plans and someone had leaked them on Wikileaks, there would be more conversation about the leaker's girlfriend than outrage about the plans themselves.
A sleek webfont containing 95 icons of all main payment operators and methods
I would just like to point out that, for the number of time you have say, in different phrasing, that Haskell is not the best solution to the problems it aims to solve, you provide not one bit of argument or evidence to support that for any of the areas you say it about.

Anyway, lots of the reported production uses of Haskell are in exactly the areas it is supposed to be strong; the problem for sharing that experience is many of them are in internal proprietary systems, not publicly-available or open-source software, so external evaluators don't have the code -- or even, often, a chance to interact with the software.
Introducing the iToilet