skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Not the OP, but yes, I see it differently. IMHO, it's none of my business. The division of chores between the man and his wife is between the man and his wife.

The reason is because of a quirk of psychology. What you're describing is basically shaming people: making them feel like they are unworthy because of what they do or do not choose to do. And that's a logical response to trying to influence behavior. Except it doesn't work. When you, me, society in general makes people feel like they're unworthy of honor and respect because of what they do, they end up confirming those expectations of unworthiness in what they do, they don't end up adjusting what they do to escape your judgments.
Not disputing what you say, but they also learn other languages at the same time.

"All students learn at least two foreign languages, mainly English and obligatory Swedish, up to high school."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_in_Finland
Teacher tackling technology gender gap
On the other hand, the Chinese education also has great results but would be disadvantaged from that perspective, right?
As someone who has worked in branding it's pretty clear that the author isn't a domain expert. For example for one brand there can be multiple versions of the same logo that are slightly different.

So a good example would be the AT&T death star logo. First there are several versions of the logo that have been modified over the years. Then even if you look at one release (say when the death star was first introduced) the color version will be different than the black-and-white version (and sometimes there is a grayscale version).

There may be different versions of the logo done for different sizes, so the logo that goes on a truck is not the same logo that goes on a business card. There may also be different layouts for the logo playing with the placement of the symbol and the logotype.

Another problem in the digital age is the ability of non-designers to muck up a logo. I've seen people distort the proportions of the logo because they don't use the shift key when resizing. And of course sometimes non-designers even feel "creative" and start to play with a logo.

Also not all logos are what you'd call "cookie cutter logos" some are full color illustrations (think Quaker Oats, Mister Clean or Aunt Jemima).

Lastly one trend I've noticed from the digital era is that thanks to sites like 99designs there are quite a few people who think that they have an original logo, but it's in fact been copied from an award annual or recycled by the "designer".

So the task isn't as black and white as some people believe...
Is your paper available online? I would like to read it.
Antergos: Arch Linux for Everyone
While the "tell them to subpoena you" answer is obviously more correct than the "do the authentic thing" one, I want to point out that by making certain sacrifices (you probably shouldn't make any babies if you're going this route) it's entirely possible to have a career where you simply make the ethical decision every step of the way.
Power vacuums are always filled. Prior to the 14th amendment; the states filled the power vacuum of 'police power & moral standards' which was intentionally denied the Fed. With the 14th amendment; the power to establish 'moral standards' was taken from the states; and filled by the Supreme Caliphate. If the Supreme Caliphate applies the moral standards of Congress to moral issues like abortion and marriage it is 'problematically' over-riding the Establishment Clause. If it applies solely its own 'moral standards'; then the Supreme Caliphate is consistent with the Establishment Clause. Language usually gives lip service to latter path.
Heh? Debian cross toolchains work fine: https://packages.debian.org/sid/gcc-4.9-arm-linux-gnueabi for armel and https://packages.debian.org/sid/gcc-4.9-arm-linux-gnueabihf for armhf
> So all neglect laws should be removed?

I am not a libertarian, so I wouldn't. But several libertarians I know have said we so, and also argue that there should be no duty to feed the poor, etc.

> The libertarian thing to do would be to ban such regulation.
That requires a constitutional amendment. Those are not easy to get passed.

That depends on what regulation we want passed. The First Amendment already includes some pretty important limits on the power of government (included limits which Paul seems loathe to enforce).
This is something I cannot figure out, people do not get bored after a while of doing nothing ?
That's certainly an advantage, but the reason people are so interested in Finnish schools is that the went from below average to the top after a deliberate reform movement in the 1970s and 1980s.
Do you consider losing %98 of its value "stable"? The US Dollar has lost at least that, probably closer to %99.9999, though it's harder to measure now that the fed is not giving us reliable stats anymore.

Do you realize the FED is a private bank, owned by the upper %1 of the %1? And that giving them an interest rate on ever dollar in circulation was probably the worst example of a government granted monopoly ever?

Do you realize that the incentives are completely aligned against us? The government wants to deficit spend with impunity, the fed wants to collect rent on the entire economy, so the fed prints money, and makes it look like it's not been irresponsible in doing so? (For instance, via the FOMC, by manipulating the gold price)

It's really amazing to me that Liberals seem to never have met a corporation they like, yet they are universally in favor of the Federal Reserve.

Maybe you don't realize it's a private corporation? Yeah, yeah the governing board is appointed, blah blah, that's like saying one fox appointed another to make sure the henhouse was safe.

And now, thanks to Obama, the Fed has the power to FORCIBLY MERGE smaller banks. No way that could be abused, right?

Read The Creature from Jekyll Island. Learn the fed's history. It's not exactly secret this stuff. But most people never get told. And of course the fed isn't going to advertise it.
Why, rockets, retro-rockets, and some parachutes! :)
Come on. I just want to see a reply from ONE person on HN (presumably working as a programmer or related job) who had to testify against an employer in the US and then faced significant difficulties in getting a job.
Think of it in terms of free software identity politics, or free software deontological ethics. In these terms lack of a multi-stakeholder copyleft (or single stakeholder committed to free software) invites identity crisis or immoral behavior, and presence of an enterprise (ie proprietary) version is identity crisis and is immoral. Therefore in those terms, the argument you're replying to is in favor of Kallithea.

If you're not thinking in those terms, the argument you're replying to might seem irrelevant, or even in favor of Gitlab, if eg you prefer a permissive license or the software you use to have a profitable business behind it. Maybe that's where you're coming from?
> I really feel like we would end up with a country where the majority just live on basic income and do nothing.

The people who end up on "basic income" would do something they like to do; but that something is nothing of value to the economic elite of the world. In that sense, they do "nothing".
> I don't think it's fair to call someone who advocates against abortion and same-sex marriages a libertarian.

Regarding abortion: Libertarians believe in individual liberties. So if you believe that an unborn child is a person, it is very consistent with libertarian-ism to protect its life. The crux of the debate is when does does a fetus become a person.

Regarding same-sex marriages: Again, relating this question to personal freedom, a typical libertarian position is that in the eyes of the law and gov't, a gay marriage should be the same as a heterosexual marriage. However, an individual should have the freedom to not participate in a gay marriage. In other words, saying one person has the freedom to marry who they wish and another has the freedom to not participate in the wedding is very consistent with libertarian views.
Good pointer. I have an old laptop with Arch that basically only runs Chromium apps and terminal programs -- PapyrOS looks like the logical step up from there, when it's ready.
He would have authority over the NSA. That's something he could directly end.

However, FED / Deregulation, abortion, same-sex marriage & vaccination are not things that can be resolved by an executive order.

Every 4 years, people have the same arguments about the same things and they're all generally about things that Congress controls - not the President. And the popular ones (abortion, gun control, etc) haven't really changed all that much at all.
I'm not even taking a position on whether action A is more morally acceptable than action B. I'm just saying, maybe so, but at the end of the day, not only are they both ethically dodgy but A creates an environment that encourages B, so that in itself is reason to think A should be dialed back a few notches.
This. Marriage certificates were invented by the government originally to prevent white and black people from marrying. Their only purpose seems to be to oppress.
I thought the same thing. How long does it take to learn to write Chinese? A lifetime?
I haven't seen a model of basic income where math makes sense.

If the government has a significant source of non-income revenue (Alaska), the payouts seem to be too trivial ($1,884 annually at yesteryear oil prices). Nice, but not a deal breaker.

US on the federal level is so dependent on income tax revenue, that you have to tax income to distribute that income.
Learning how to perceive emotional states in greater detail/resolution both in quality and in change over time is a big one. So is being able to observe their effect on your behavior and if possible to intervene and do something healthier. There are also things that map very well to neurological processes that are known to get completely wrecked during addiction, such as the ability to put your prefrontal cortex in charge and pursue deferred rewards.
> So if you believe that an unborn child is a person, it is very consistent with libertarian-ism to protect its life.

Is it though? Most libertarians say the government shouldn't force you to feed a starving person, but banning abortion means forcing a mother to feed and care for another person (even if you consider a fetus a person).

> Regarding same-sex marriages:

Can you explain how a governmental (even at the state level) distinction between marriage types is consistent with libertarian philosophy?
PapyrOS, based on Arch Linux
1. The Federal Reserve is not an acronym. Neither is it an example of a successful government program, when it is explicitly a public-private institution that only serves to guarantee government blank-check spending and easy credit kickbacks to Wall Street.

2. If the free market dictating prices causes such rampant price gouging and monopolization, then why don't we see this in industries that are relatively deregulated like technology or hospitality, as opposed to the most regulated, ie. wall street? The power of industry disruption by nascent startups is systematically more powerful than regulators that have always, throughout history, been moved more by regulatory capture than by populist idealism.

3. The Paul's tend to favor the states deciding social issues.
There is more than one side to that story. Not to take away from your argument, but dupes are a sign of stagnation. A chasm between the new users (for whom it's not a dupe) and the old. A high dupe ratio will eventually drive away the older members.

The reason people complain about dupes is because for each of these forums, one can get attached to its evolution. You want to see it grow. Every time it surprises you: yay, it's still becoming better!

Dupes can mean the beginning of the end. Not to say it's a good reason to complain, but it is one. Don't tell the older members who've seen this site grow and want the best for it to "deal with it."

Anyway, upvoted because I'm not one of the older members and I've never seen this before :)
Jobs wanted to kill Flash because it sucked.

They were basically four uses of Flash on the Internet. Some people used it to make entire websites, which generally ended up looking nicer but been much harder to use (I am STILL looking at you HBO). I was didn't work on the iPhone at all.

Next up you had games, which also didn't work on the iPhone. Games basically all assumed a mouse and keyboard so the chances of them actually working well if you try to play them on an iPhone would've been terrible anyway.

A highly despised use with advertising. Thanks to the incredible power of flash not only could pop ups be made, but you could have dancing around little distracting graphics with lots of sound and even video sucking up all your bandwidth.

Last you had online video, which was fixed by the built-in YouTube app and Apple's pushing for HTML5 and HTML live streaming.

But the most important thing you have to remember is that flash absolutely sucked down resources. On a (at the time) recent laptop you could easily tell when a website loaded flash. Not only did things respond better with flash off but battery life could be significantly affected. You could get extra hours on your computer. And if you think flash on windows was bad, you should've tried living in the Macintosh ecosystem. Adobe clearly didn't care so flash performance was drastically worse.

If it was bad on a laptop, you know how much worse it would've been on the original iPhone. The original (and even the 3G) were very constrained devices. Even if flash could've been put on them, I doubt it would've been performant at all for real content.

I think Apple was completely correct. I had already started using a flash blocker by that point just so my laptop wouldn't get too hot and drain the battery too fast. There were better ways to do video, answer now less of noxious since they can't play sound, and games run better than ever
since they are apps.

Incredible popularity of the iPhone and the iPad was the thing that finally put flash out of its misery you. It should've died long before that for being so on optimized but no one else had enough power to do it. Apples move did more than anything else to get us into the modern HTML5 Web 2.0 world. I imagine there'd still be tons of flash only sites if it wasn't for the iPhone.
Isn't studying a second or third language a different process than learning your first language? Your first language provides your basic operating system which you build on top of. Unless you grow up bilingual (another topic that is quite interesting).
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2003/0312.sullivan...
I can plainly see the backlash they got from that arrogant blog post about 'making you not pay for the download of our ubuntu clone we slapped a pretty ui on' didn't do much at all.
PostgresSQL is a much netter choice, especially when compared to SQLite with Python. The lack of multiple cursors can make doing any sophisticated and comllex analysis very frustrating with SQLite.
I had been using a flash blocker for years. Not only did that block basically ALL of the most obnoxious ads, it made my laptop run significantly quieter and longer without every web page animating junky ads at as high a frame rate as possible.
That's the American dream if you were born into the means of achieving the American dream.

Libertarians seem to universally believe that everyone is just born with wealth, or that if you bootstraps hard enough, you are just bound to trip over wealth.
> Do you consider losing %98 of its value "stable"?

Yeah, I don't understand how inflation works either.
"I believe in old-fashioned traditional marriage but I don't really think the government needs to be too involved in this..."

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/21967...

"Senator Paul believes marriage is an issue that should be dealt with at the state level,” political adviser Doug Stafford told The Daily Beast. “Nothing about his position has changed." Stafford later added: "Senator Paul does not want his guns or his marriage registered in Washington. He has said this repeatedly and consistently. Marriage is not a federal issue. It is an issue for state and local governments to deal with."

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/03/28/rand-ditche...

According to the second quote, Paul is also opposed to federal opposite-sex marriage. That's pretty much a standard libertarian position.
"several libertarians I know have said we so" This is a first for me to hear, though it's important to note libertarians are individuals too, and have their own ideas! I have not found any libertarians promoting children as full-class citizens; so this is very new to hear this. Suffice it to say, I don't think that viewpoint is common.

"First Amendment ..." to the constitution. Are you just agreeing with me here?
>The visualization is terrible.

That's a feature not a bug. Plotting libraries for Python have always been abysmal. Matplotlib is both ugly and hard to use.
Outside of Flash games and one or two all flash websites (like HBO) what is it used for? Browsers can do HTML5 for YouTube and Safari can play Netflix without plugins.

I run a flash blocker and I don't remember the last time I had to enable a pee I run a flash blocker and I don't remember the last time I had to enable Flash on a page. Facebook games (if I were to use that kind of thing) would be the one exception I can think of.
People have an odd view of gay marriage, where people have some sort of right to marry who they choose. Marriage isn't a right, it's a privilege granted by society to try to promote nuclear families. They get tax breaks, etc. at the expense of anyone who doesn't prefer that family structure.

Ideally, these rights could be assigned piecemeal between any two individuals, with non-exclusion (i.e., polyamory is allowed.) Perhaps my spouse isn't the best at difficult decisions, and I'd prefer my stable son to be able to make difficult medical decisions, like whether I should be kept on life support. Perhaps I would like to file taxes jointly with my roommate for two years, if we shared household expenses.

In no way is granting gay marriage some kind of rights equalization, but an expansion of an already unfair system, so I oppose it, just as if white people could own black people, but not vice versa, I would not be in favor of allowing black people to own white people, and would oppose any such measure, while being in favor of real equalization by abolishing the system of anybody owning anybody.
Yeah. I would hesitate to call anything under 60 terabytes as big data.
The industrial revolution was mostly a question of having a large number of people not directly producing food. It's hard to get good estimates, but if you look at the ratio of food producers:population, and total population you see a large spike start right before the industrial revolution.

PS: The estimated world population was only 15 million at the time agriculture emerged in around 10,000 BCE. A lot of the 'exponential' increase in technology has to do with the exponential increase in population especially idol population.
What happens if the President hates abortion and gay marriage (serious question)? Does he have any power to repeal/overturn, other than having access to the bully pulpit? It's not like he can get elected and say "OK gay marriage is over now", which he could do to the NSA (whether he will is certainly up for debate).
> I was kind of shocked

What's so shocking about letting parents decide what medical treatment their children undergo?

He has repeatedly said that parents should get their children vaccinated. And they should. Parents who don't are irresponsible, both socially and toward their children.

However, should and must are two very different words.

When you start talking about mandatory, you're talking about cops breaking down doors, taking children away, and vaccinating them by force.

Is that what you support? That's sick.
I think you're overestimating the degree to which the average US voter gives a shit about the Patriot Act (or NSA surveillance, for that matter). The response was red meat for the primary voters, sure, but it's not likely to be significant negative for the wider electorate.
i'd suggest that intelligent employers realize that the language and stack are only a very small part of building a product. The more interesting problems are hard not due to language, but due to algorithms, data structuring, design patters and general architecting et al.

The 10yr C++ programmer ought to have those things nailed, the junior may not know they even exist.
Yeah, being bilingual may actually be an educational advantage.. I think of it like learning one language is understanding syntax, learning multiple languages is understanding the underlying concepts.

I don't know if the Finnish people I have known are exactly representative of the whole, but they were all bilingual (ie. parents spoke finnish and english or swedish at home).
Sikka: A Firewall for Meteor Apps
He didn't need to be dragged out - he was asked multiple times to get out, and it was only after he flailed around and resisted the officers orders that he was maced/tased.

And guess what: maybe the reason the person didn't want to get out of the car, and resisted a lawful order multiple times is because he actually had pot on him, and he had enough to be classified as intent to sell. Which is exactly the case.

I'm fine with you if you think that marijuana laws are bullshit(I'd be on your side then), but while they are on the book, it would be good if officers actually enforce the laws that they are sworn under an oath to enforce.
Expectations here are that the vast majority of people employed there will probably choose to, or already will be living in Fernley. The ties to Reno in the press are more about the name and the fact that it's the largest population center in this area.
I like this one even better:

http://www.economics-charts.com/cpi/cpi-1800-2005.html

First, it goes back to 1800; second, it's from the Fed itself, which means it's doubly entertaining. For example, I love this little note in the "description and comments" section:

Notice how the peaks in inflation over the last 200 years have coincided with major wars.

But don't notice at all how there was, on average, no inflation until after the Fed was created, but since then it's skyrocketed. No, these aren't the droids you're looking for.
Hi rtz12, I try to be informative and listen to fellow commenters. I'm sorry to hear that you perceive it as you do. My impression was that the quote 'corporate entity primarily in charge of Kallithea development' was a reference to GitLab as it is the largest (and only?) open source product in this category with a corporate entity. I wanted to make sure everyone knew about the role of the core team. As the CEO I think about GitLab a lot and I try to be present everywhere it is discussed on the internet. Coincidentally my last comment on HN was on an article about Twitter without any comments https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9361159 But I certainly comment about it a lot of HN. Actually our company got started by a Ask HN post.
I'm sorry, you must have misunderstood me. I wanted to see an example of him proposing a policy that would proscribe same-sex marriage in contrast with his statements that he is personally uncomfortable with it. You have offered only the latter.
I distinctly recall a whole slew of pundits ready to hold a coronation for Hillary Clinton in 2007 prior to a single primary vote being cast.

The Republican field is completely different, of course, but that's why Rand Paul could win. The "front runner" has less than 17% of the vote and there are less than ten percentage points between #1 and #7. Those are exactly the conditions under which a candidate who can differentiate himself can succeed by capturing the entirety of his own base while the base of the other camp is split between several different candidates.
Keyword stuffing might actually penalize your site. Google's Panda updates penalize attempts at keyword stuffing.