skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Because it's an interesting and well written article about a taboo theme.
I don't think most adults are mature, so I wouldn't call it ordinary. But it is still 100% being honest all the time. You still have a filter, but you're being honest about all the emotions you're feeling and what is motivating you to do any given thing. You can work to start to remove the filter too, this is called self-actualization. That's something different.

I think you need to be 100% honest with yourself before you start removing your filter or it won't work and you'll end up throwing out the baby with the bathwater. 100% honesty is as much about knowing yourself as it is about not misleading others. Only once you understand yourself and your motivations can you start to experiment with just saying stuff that's on your mind without thinking about it first. The things you say will clue you in on deeper motivations that you can then work on being honest with yourself about.
And how amusing do you find the fact that their censoring works for the most parts, and that many, many Indians, Chinese, etc. do indeed never see the content that's been censored?
How do you benefit from this over using a seedbox from a dedicated seedbox host? Is it just because you use droplets that you've already spun up and are using for other things?
Dreams Turn to Reality with the Lucid Dream Life Magazine
Or maybe they're referring to the fact that the business sells home furnishings, so they might be marketing more actively to women than men.
I'm kinda amazed at how easy it apparently is to intercept even the encrypted GSM traffic. All you need is a Software Defined Radio, available in a USB stick for $20, and a half-dozen open-source packages? I might have to mess with that sometime.
This seems like a weird way to flog a 15 year old dispute.
>Doesn't Firefox already show the slowest addons?

I don't know about Firefox, but Internet Explorer definitely warns about addons that slow down launch times and opening new windows/tabs.
The client site, http://www.autoaccessoriesgarage.com, is engaging in cloaking.

Go to
http://www.autoaccessoriesgarage.com/Seat-Covers/

Use the picker to pick a particular make and model:
http://www.autoaccessoriesgarage.com/Seat-Covers/_Acura-RDX?...

So far so good, no problem. Your browser now has a cookie that says you're interested in just this make and model. Now for the problem: use the nav links to go to "Cargo trunk liners", and where do you land?

http://www.autoaccessoriesgarage.com/Cargo-Trunk-Liners

That's cloaking -- it's not showing you all of the liners, just the ones relevant to the make and model you picked earlier. Instead, the site should add _Acura-RDX?year=2008 to the url, just like before.

Why do search engines care about this stuff? Now imagine you type in [auto accessories cargo trunk liners] into your favorite search engine, and the result is http://www.autoaccessoriesgarage.com/Cargo-Trunk-Liners ... what does the search engine think you'll see? It has no idea, really.
Yale is hiring a UX Designer
I kept expecting to read the part where he was charged with some combination of trespassing, building code violations, drug trafficking, etc. Instead it looks like the police correctly recognized that he wasn't a threat, and let him off with a warning.

Happy endings are nice.
> It's a bit silly to make it sound like he gamed the system. He didn't pass the notability test; it just wasn't administered yet.

Precisely. The moment someone goes and checks the citations, it turns out they're mostly junk: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletio...

This stuck around for the same reason hoaxes stick around: it looked vaguely legitimate so nobody bothered looking in-depth or nominating it for deletion.
As a first line, I'd like to echo graeme. Sleep, diet, and exercise are tremendously important and you should make sure those are in good shape first.

I've found mild anxiolytics (benzodiazepines like alprazolam and clonazepam) amazingly useful as a secondary, occasional relief from anxiety that is harming performance. I wouldn't want to take these every day, but they can be very useful for mitigating acute anxiety.
No, i'm not.
Shocking: heavy GNU contributor doesn't like this viewpoint :)
Train yourself to simply act more slowly. Give yourself time to reply, to think, to relax.

MAKE TIME.

Everyone is anxious in stressful situations. Simply slowing everything down, within reason of course, and finding time for yourself is one way that I handle it.
Probably more due to the fact of how high profile he is.
Leaked details about new Apple Watch
At my company, we'd call the position the author is interviewing for "QA Lead". We subcontract QA testers, so they're not responsible for managing people beyond making sure work gets done.

I think these are great questions for QA leads, not the person who manages them.
FWIW the guy who made this also made that huge quine from a year or two ago: https://github.com/mame/quine-relay
I agree that it is wrong for people to construct their self-identity based on their job. Unfortunately though, that's what society teaches us: that one must work to earn their living, and if they are unemployed then there is something wrong with them.

Still, there's a big difference between voluntary and involuntary unemployment. Your wife's situation was the former: she quit her job voluntarily, and she had you (versus, e.g. the government) to lean on financially. Furthermore, she didn't have to quit. She had the power to choose, and she chose being a home-maker. Whatever external heat she got from her peers probably paled in comparison to the stigma she would have faced if she were fired instead. And she would probably have felt differently about herself as well, at least for a while.
Yes, the health insurance one is the big issue in the US. Even with emergency funds after the COBRA period ends you simply cannot buy the same health plan individually, no matter what you were willing to pay. Many people are surprised by this.
Sorry, but you are completely and utterly wrong.
I wish you weren't.

Section 6 is amazingly clear, and this is completely and totally unambiguous.

I don't remember if Eben disagrees (I actually don't think he does, last I remembers), but it's generally accepted that this is the likely outcome.
I also have no aspirations to rise the corporate ladder. Pay goes up, maybe, but so do work hours and stress. Job stability goes down. Playfulness goes down. Free time goes down. Peon programming is where it's at. If I want more more, then I can freelance or start side projects and they'd likely both pay better and be a lot more fulfilling.
can you explain? why would someone not take it at face value?
Learn to let go. These are 4 of my most valued resources for learning to let go:
http://tempr.org/54fa11d692db8.html
Is there even a reason the co-founders would do this with malicious intent? Is there possibly any financial gain they could realize out of not telling the other co-founder? Could it be an attempt to make him leave (he only owns 3%) before fully vested?

I very much agree with you, likely not malicious.
Life-changing browser automation: http://crontabs.org
Sorry, but no.
They get all the rights. The rights auto-terminate if they are still violating the license (so they lose that license).
If they have cleaned up their act, they gain all rights.

I can't even see how you would come to the conclusion you did, given it says "6. Each time you redistribute the Program (or any work based on the Program), the recipient automatically receives a license from the original licensor to copy, distribute or modify the Program subject to these terms and conditions. "

IE it very specifically says they get the rights you claim they don't.
www.reddit.com/r/anxiety
I'd like to see this applied to this video, targeting "hushed": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BpsMkLaEiOY
We're both right, TazeTSchnitzel. I agree with you 100% about junky citations and the article's inability to meet true notability standards. But now that it's become a publicized article, various pranksters and Wikipedia critics aren't likely to let it disappear quietly.
That's cute. You think the US government is still bound by the Bill of Rights.
Uh, have you been on unemployment? There's a max. In Massachusetts it's $698 / week (with no taxes taken out). That would only barely cover my mortgage, let alone car payment, food, health insurance, etc.

And yes, people should have emergency funds... but when you were a few years out of college, did you have 3-6 months of salary saved up? I certainly didn't.
Data as a Competitive Advantage
My solution has been a healthy dose of being outward about my awkwardness/anxiety. In a meeting two days ago, the consultant wanted to shake hands and I had to warn them about the puddle they were going to encounter in that brief handshake. Afterwards, I let them know I would gladly donate my body if they found a way to harvest energy from anxious sweat. A good (albeit sometimes awkward) laugh is still a laugh.

When I feel bad about my performance, I try to look at my past achievements. I used to just do projects and disconnect once they had completed. Now, I have a small archive of pieces of code I can look at where I feel I genuinely improved as a programmer or had an 'aha' moment.

Recall, the intersection of technology and medicine fields is not simple. Both fields are expanding and adapting on a daily basis. The amount of expertise required just to hone a single skill (potentially extinct!) is a lifetime's achievement. Do you really believe you have already peaked and this is it? Believe me, there is so much more to come! Maybe you're not the all-knowing-expert-guru, but aren't you aspiring to reach that point?

Just relax. You'll be fine. Even if they found out, and it turns out you were an impostor, do you really believe you're going to get fired? You're already trained and in the field. You're being an impostor of what you're actually doing on a daily basis? Seems ridiculous.
You have yet to point out any misunderstanding or why this is wrong past saying "that makes the license crappy in some ways". Which may in fact, be true.

But this is a policy argument, not a legal one, and it will absolutely never win in court over very clear and unambiguous text.

This is, as i said, why GPLv3 was revised here.
Excellent point Greg, the article does address this though: check the "U/X vs. Googlebot/X" section
I find DRF far superior. Nice consistent API once you get the hang of views and serializers, and the built-in browser UI is just awesome.
> If you tie in the Google brand you are setting expectations that this will be a long-lasting effort.

I don't think anyone has that expectation anymore :p
or ever was
You clearly have done your homework. You know what things may help. You also got confirmation that indeed you are not alone with this kind of problems.

If you've done so much research then your problem is likely something that you've been fighting for years. Yes probably with much work you can fix it with just working on yourself. But it's like having a broken arm and telling yourself it will heal. It may. But if for some genetic or whatever other reason your brain does not produce enough dopamine, or have some other imbalance of neurotransmitters, then go to the doc, try his help, and spend all saved time on becoming even more awesome coder. If you want to, of course (But do you really? or maybe you just 'arrived' at the point you always imagined as a goal and the thing is you don't really know what you want now - that's a very real problem to have. But if you do know that what you really want is this career, then optimize for it trying not to be biased.)*

* sorry if that sounds like telling you what to do, just sharing my thoughts hoping that you may find some of them useful
In which case, you might want to supply us with a little more detail. Last I looked (it's been a while) CAS seemed the most sane choice for something like this for an intranet-ish thing over http(s!) -- if you can't just use ssh and ssh certs (obviously very different use cases).

Does anyone have any insight to what the state of the art is marrying kerberos ideas and nacl? I found this:

http://www.slideshare.net/pieterh/zeromq-security

But it is obviously somewhat dated now -- did zeromq+sasl+nacl go anywhere? In what form? I'd hoped that this would "get sorted" and allow saltstack to leverage something a little more standard (which would alleviate my last doubts about salt -- but my fears might be unfounded -- I've just not seen anything that really addresses the early issues they had with security/transport/encryption).

Anyone using: https://github.com/zeromq/libcurve in anger?

Finally, I can't resist posting this soundtrack that I had serendipitously playing in the background as I read the above slidedeck: "Nothin' - Townes Van Zandt". Seemed oddly appropriate to go along with forward secrecy:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZcH2OOMV4A
Hey all - I made this and am wondering if anyone here has any experience with pocketsphinx and could lend a hand in making the transcriptions more accurate. Let me know! (Or just make a pull request.)
He meant he likes the mod posting it because it's transparent, but knows that it's a pain for the mod and feels that having this automatically happen would aid in being transparent because then the mods don't have to do special things.
Depends where in the US, I can also imagine the local prosecutor shaking his/her head, walking away, and having a heck of a story to tell at the bar.
The Arc programming language is intended to be a more "futuristic" one. Does it have anything described in Elephant 2000 ?
I'm surprised no one has mentioned Ilya Gregorik's Video Speed controller[0]. It is a delight to watch tech videos / presentations / tutorials on youtube and other websites.

[0] - https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/video-speed-contro...
There was another thread about anxiety a while back, and someone mentioned how 'A Guide to the Good Life: The Ancient Art of Stoic Joy' by William B. Irvine had helped them (http://www.amazon.com/Guide-Good-Life-Ancient-Stoic/dp/01953...). I'm about half way through it, and have to say it was a great recommendation.

Stoic philosophy aside, sleep (cutting back on caffeine), exercise and spending time with family and friends helps me.
Ah, I see your point. Yeah, some people might want to keep it, I hadn't considered that.
There are other less direct ways to pose the question.
Except they get one from section 6.

You are reading who is giving who a license wrong.

Redhat, or whoever they download from, is the "you" there. Not the person who license was terminated.

So let's fill in the blanks:

6. Each time Redhat redistribute the Program (or any work based on the Program), the company who violated the license automatically receives a license from the original licensor to copy, distribute or modify the Program subject to these terms and conditions.

All i did was replace the word "you" and "recipient" with the right people.
This is clear and unambiguous.
You may not like the result. I actually don't like the result. It does not change the legal meaning, or whether you'd win.

But you don't have to take my word for it, ask another open source lawyer, they'll tell you the same thing i just did.
Have you tried using Kaldi instead? I think Kaldi has far more advanced models.

Existing trained models can be downloaded from here: http://www.kaldi-asr.org/ (via: http://www.openslr.org/12/ http://www.clsp.jhu.edu/~guoguo/papers/icassp2015_librispeec...)
> The point being, if I started a new company tomorrow, I would, without a doubt, go and try to hire some of those same people to help me start it. And maybe now, as a more capable manager than I was then, maybe some would make it longer,

I don't get this. Are you saying part of the reason you fired them was because you weren't a capable manager, and didn't identify ways to keep a valuable asset as the company changed during growth? And you think these folks would consider working for you again, after you fired them when the company "went another direction," as those conversations always go? I've never worked for you and this comment would give me pause.

I can't imagine what this entails. "Thanks for all your work getting us to where we are. The company has gotten a bit bigger, so some of your habits don't fit in your role any more and it's time to let you go." Can you elaborate? Because honestly, that doesn't sound good without further context. I don't believe in union-style loyalty where the first five years entitles someone to the next thirty, but I do believe someone who helped shape the company and generated a lot of value for you deserves more than "well, we've changed, and you don't fit any more."

It's par for the course that you can write introspection like this and reflect on your shortcomings as a manager, after culling those with similar shortcomings who have now been asked to leave the company they helped build from early days. Meanwhile, your company is wildly successful and you continue to be rewarded despite your shortcomings while someone else has to start over somewhere else. Where's the accountability for your management?
You know we have all hurt ourselves thinking one or another way. In my case I couldn't tolerate doubts regarding why people behaved in some way, that I arrived at really awkward conclusions. Maybe those conclusions were not real but they had real effects. Because what other people thinks does not exist. The only thing that exists is how the thoughts you attribute to them makesvyou feel. And hey it turned that my ability to thinking in terms of relations and patterns applied to computers instead of people was an advantage. Do you really need to learn body language? In my opinion the more you know about human nature the worse that knowledge can play. You've got fear, ok. Then don't feel guilty for it. Make friends with him and arrive at some agreement. Do not try to deny it, because it's going to get worse. When people tell you not to think too much, can make you feel guilty. There are some techniques for that. While you do not know them just be sure that bad feelings go as they come.
I get anxious when I feel unprepared. It sounds like you feel unprepared to handle the task(s) at hand- this can be a very stressful situation. I've been there and I've supported others going through this as well.

The way I overcame it was to become prepared- I would start my day a few hours early, that kept my mind sharp and gave me plenty of time to start tackling problems ahead of everyone else. I also used my free time wisely to continue educating myself.

After 6 months of this, my comfort level improved tremendously- I went from being a complete novice that was way over his head to a very respected developer on the team. Stress absolutely kills my productivity so it was critical for me to understand the triggers that created it. Once I was confident in my skills and realized that struggling is a natural part of the learning process, my mental state improved dramatically.

I also want to mention that I have ADD. I need to force myself to focus on a single task or else I get overwhelmed. I also need to have headphones on to block our my surroundings (check out windy, sunny and thunderspace iOS apps). This give me the ability to have intense focus without all of the noise.
The recruiter's response: https://twitter.com/aaronbassett/status/573228230687264769

And One Kings Lane's response to that: https://twitter.com/onekingslane/status/573362369826557954
I found this a few days ago: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/select-like-a...

It allows you to select text that's part of a link by just clicking and dragging, just like all other text.

Other addons I use are: uBlock (https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock#firefox)

imagus (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/imagus/)

self-destructing cookies (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/self-destruct...)

clean links (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/clean-links/)
FWIW I was let go many years ago. When I was interviewing for the next job, the hiring manager asked what happened at the last job.

Before I could share the story, he interrupted me & said."its ok. sometimes life throws curveballs at you. don't worry"
Honestly, if the fired employees manager hasn't been giving them feedback that pretty clearly spells out where the current path is heading, that is a major failure of the manager.

But some companies aren't great at feedback, particularly young ones where the mechanisms for regular, structured feedback aren't really in place yet.

That said, I was laid off once at a company that was not doing well and had to make cuts across the board. They were very sad to have to let me go, but did one of the classiest things I've seen a company do in my entire career...as part of my 2 weeks severance, they let me continue telling companies I was currently employed there still. I had three competitive offers in a week, and I feel I was in a much stronger position because of how they handled that.
Show HN: I built a Hacker News app using Reapp
Right, I've added in the right word (cloaking) and a much better fix. Adjusting cookie policy for crawlers is a bad idea.
That doesn't always work because simply not answering a question can reveal information that you don't want shared.

When I was in middle school my mom cut my hair to save money. I was embarrassed by this. I dreaded people asking me questions about my haircut because I didn't want to tell them my mom cut it, but I didn't want to lie about where I got it cut.

If someone asked me where I got my hair cut and I respond with "I don't want to talk about it", that answer would have revealed just as much sensitive information.

I started changing my behavior to avoid this question--getting my hair cut at the beginning of a long break, so I could avoid people right after it was cut when they were most likely to ask.

All I was doing was finding new ways to hide information.

Now the obvious solution would have been to stop worrying about what other people thought. But I couldn't do that. We all have information like this, and we can be honest with ourselves and realize that 100% honesty with other people is a joke, or we can try to come up with other means to keep the information hidden that we think are morally superior to direct deception.
As someone who tried using it: There's nothing about this for power users. Even with an absolutely minimal website, it consumes ~20mb per tab.
I haven't, but I'll take a look. Thanks!
This type of withholding of information prevents others from making informed choices.

"Don't burn your bridges" implies that these are bridges worth preserving--sometimes they aren't, and you're doing others a favor by letting them know.
One of the Largest Reported Data Breaches in U.S. History
YES. Everybody deserves this. As a manager, I try extremely hard to make sure this happens.

The way I think of it is this. On the day you are fired, when you get called in a room, if I ask you, "why do you think you're here?", you'd reply: "I think I'm getting fired". Because I want us to have had so many conversations about it, and been so direct, that the actual firing is incredibly unsurprising.

I think any manager owes this to their employees, as a matter of basic human decency.
Does anyone have happy memories using SAML for anything remotely useful? It always struck me as possibly even more convoluted to get right than x.509 (and recall eg: python not validation server host names in certs by default for a long, long time -- so getting x.509 right in production isn't exactly trivial -- especially if you're not a domain expert).

That said, yes I think SAML could be leveraged to fulfill the requirements in the question. I just think it would be quite painful ;-)