skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There is no visual element to go back, only to loop through the category again.

I can go back using arrow keys after making an error, but I didn't even know that was an option until reading the comments in this thread since I so rapidly skimmed through the introductory headlines. One doesn't expect to learn about a new/foreign navigation method under a headline titled 'SUPER DUPER SIMPLE', and so I missed it entirely.

The geo-locate area code, while maybe convenient for some, is creepy. I'd prefer another set of '555' 's or (xxx), but that's probably just me. I don't need help remembering what area code my primary phone number is within, and in my case the suggestion was incorrect anyway.

I very much like the styling and the liveliness of the UI otherwise. It feels very polished.
This reads as little more than pure emotion coupled with sweeping universalizing--the state is universally evil, private capital is universally good. Absolutely nothing about states or capital investors can be so easily reduced to such a binary conclusion.

Private capital, and the humans who administer it, has repeatedly mismanaged funds, and been responsible for enormous fuck-ups that have far-reaching and devastating social, environmental, political, economic, material, and global impacts. Private investors routinely make bad investments. They also rather frequently are found to prioritize the extraction of value from their investments in spite of the potential or realized impacts of such extraction.

The state does not take money. We no longer live under feudalism, friend. We no longer labor under the unquestionable divine right of kings. The modern democratic state is, by the free association and choice of its underlying organizational units, and the continued consent of its citizens, asked to assume the role and responsibilities, at least in the US, of the following:

- form a more perfect union

- establish justice

- insure domestic tranquility

- provide for the common defense

- promote the general welfare

- secure the blessing of liberty to its citizens and their posterity

Private capital could never fulfill these obligations, because its focus is most definitely on extracting value from that which it invests in. I doubt very much you'd enjoy living in a world where its investment in you was dependent on extracting value from you (well, actually, you already do, but you don't feel the full brunt of that burden thanks to ... you guessed it ... the state).

Now, if you'd much rather live under feudalism, serfdom, obedience to divine kings, etc., well cool. But those are sociopolitical conditions under which people lived for centuries where they definitely were able to "pay lower taxes and let the private investors do the investment". Those are the systems under which money/property was actually taken from people, because people had no methods or institutions by which they can seek to protect themselves from the arbitrary whims of value extraction, or engage in political action that can bring change. That's why most now-democratic states saw revolutions in their past--it was the only way to make change happen, the only way to abolish systems of unfettered value extraction and replace them with something that protected the masses.

At least in the US, even the revered and worshipped founders realized pretty quickly after becoming an independent nation that taxes were unavoidable, because without public funds, the state could not fulfill the obligations for which it was instituted.

I shudder at the thought of living in a world where people trust VCs to provide that which the state, even in its dysfunction, works to provide.
As I keep saying on all these sites, looks good but without a .doc export it is worthless in Europe.

Pro-tip if you are unemployed, send in a Word document and not a PDF and you are substantially more likely to get a reply. I know it is idiotic, but would you not rather have a job?
I was fortunate enough to be broken during a tonsilectomy. I woke up and couldn't stand anything sweet at all and it made me feel instantly sick. It has baffled many a doctor but they reckon its down to the anaesthetic and/or oxygen management. Yay to brain damage...

Unfortunately I was hooked on sugar at the same time so cue epic battle of addiction vs hatred of what I was addicted to.

Took two weeks to get over the cravings. Now the sweetest thing I can eat is a banana. Lost 35kg in six months though which cured a couple of problems I had. Dumping sugar albeit forcibly is one of the best things that happened to me.
Yes, because we live in a rape culture, but not in a coerced murder culture.
Most of all they are cutting down on total calories. It seems that for most people total calories are more important than the carbohydrate/fat-ratio.
A carbohydrate is any calorie not from fat or protein. You are eating them with all fresh foods, basically.
I completely agree. It's not ideal. I wish all people respected one another and understood social and personal boundaries. The comments here reflect my attempt to reconcile the fact that that's obviously not something we can count on. But in terms of the big picture I agree that "awareness" is an important hurdle.

So the reasoning goes: It appears there needs to be some mechanism in place to hold people accountable for their actions. Not that we don't want the overarching goal to teach people how to respect others, but that's a life lesson, and not necessarily something that you can put a definitive timeline on in terms of when you're going to achieve your goal.

I think a real-world solution needs to recognize that you can't guarantee that all employees will understand or follow your guidelines for how to behave in the workplace. So it follows that part of the plan needs to incorporate accountability. It's far more difficult to hold someone accountable when all you have is hearsay. With 3rd party testimony, however, a company is going to have more data to use when trying to figure out / arbitrate a dispute or investigate a claim of harassment.

So, in principle I like the idea that people have mentioned where everyone should be responsible for everyone else. In theory this looks like it's a great idea, but in practice if this is your only rule / policy, it makes it very difficult for people to gauge whether progress is being made, or if they'll ever accomplish their goal. When you have a specific responsibility I find it's going to be far easier for the person to comprehend and observe whether or not they're accomplishing or are on the path to accomplish their objectives of keeping the workplace safe for everyone.

Imagine if one day Larry Page sends out a memo to all Google employees, and says that he's decided to change how they operate. From today forward, "There are no longer specific jobs or goals. Instead we're all just going to concentrate on our one overarching goal. All employees are now in charge of making sure the company makes money". And that's the only direction that is given. It's one big overarching goal and everyone just needs to make sure that happens. No specific tasks are laid out for any one individual in order to make that happen. Now consider this scenario in contrast to the world at Google today where I imagine everyone, though in spirit are all working toward the single overarching goal of the company, each "cog in the wheel" has their own specific responsibilities to make that happen.
No, that's not what I'm saying but I don't think I can safely ignore the rest of your comment even if it is based on an incorrect interpretation of my comment.

Where'd you get the inkling that I thought it was important to argue whether to word rape is the right word? Please quote the section of my comment that gave you that idea. You've made a baseless assumption of what I was saying and went on a tirade.

This is why I hate these sorts of topics on HN. The community morphs into an hot-tempered accusatory group of individuals who hiss at anyone who sounds like they may not be on their side.
Been playing for many years (I'm around 5k.) I also enjoy a game of backgammon (I picked it up last August) and still play casual, artificially-complex games with my friends, since they are not big go fans
Protein-heavy diets accelerate aging, don't they? I thought that was the result from studies into caloric restriction... a reduction in certain kinds of protein (leucine?) and a reduction in DHEA loss correlate heavily with calorie intake, and are what makes caloric restriction good?
Rape doesn't have to be violent. The person could have decided she was into it even though she was saying no, no, no and just proceeded. Presumably she didn't report the rape for her own reasons. I can only imagine how painful it is to revisit this without going into the gory details and be cross examined by the internet.

The sum of all the things she has dealt with are incredibly saddening to me. I have met Katy before and seen how much she did for Hacker Dojo and have a lot of respect for her.

I think the focal point for change is exactly what she is saying regarding "whistle blowers". Someone that comes forward to reveal crimes whether it be Snowden or a woman sexually harassed or raped by a colleague should be respected and not pilloried and made persona non-grata. Bring this bullshit into the light.
Socialised risk and privatised reward is how government should work. Universal health care is a good example: I am the most obvious benefactor of my own good health, but society also benefits from having healthy citizens.

Revenue generation is only the goal of government so that it can support its citizens.
That's especially true since our bodies essentially run on glucose. Supplying food closer to that state means faster utilization, which in turn helps a lot in situations of physical exertion. I would love to see the rat experiment repeated for athletic rats, where they train an hour a day or more.
I don't think we're going to reach an agreement on this.

Women have it harder, it sucks. But I don't think all that shit they deal with affects their basic moral obligations. I think moral obligations are tied into the level of power people have, and women have nonzero power so they have nonzero obligations.

Talking about a "male community" to argue they have the obligation and nobody else is a false grouping. You could just as easily lump "abusive men" and "women that know spanish" and start saying the responsibility lies on mexico to stop the abusers.

There is no male-only cabal with 3 billion members. There is a fucked-up patriarchy where men have more power but not all of the power.
Loved Postman as well, but I've switched to PAW [0] with a very polished and powerful native OS X experience.

[0] https://luckymarmot.com/paw
GnuGo is easy enough for beginners I think. I also used a bot called Aya when learning, but I don't know if that is available for OSX.

Regarding clients, there are a few options. CGoban2 is the only client you can use to access KGS, which is currently the biggest English-speaking server. You can also try online-go.com which is entirely browser-based so you don't need a client, and there's also IGS, a Japanese server which can be accessed through their own client called GoPanda2 or other clients like qGo2. There are also two servers called Tygem and WBaduk which are mostly Korean. They have proprietary clients you can run through Wine. I think they're supposed to be accessible through qGo2 as well, but I haven't been able to play through it, only observe others' games.

Also, if you're just learning, http://senseis.xmp.net/ is a great resource.
I'm not a native English speaker and I wouldn't bet on myself coming up with an appropriate description. However, using any word would be perfectly fine if the authors dedicate a short paragraph at the beginning explaining what they mean by the words they use, especially if they don't mean the same things most people are used to.

I keep getting down-voted, so, maybe it helps to repeat: I'm not saying that this isn't as bad as "violent rape", but we have to have a common understanding before people start coming up with useful solutions (I, for example, support systems for reporting such incidents being enforced for companies) and we do need useful solutions.

Disclaimer: I'm a guy who found someone he cares about, in such a situation. Going to police was the worst idea, ever.
Excluding water, honey is about 85% fructose and glucose in a ratio which is close enough not to matter to HFCS. It also has about a 10% of maltose and sucrose.

Either there is something extremely protective in that remaining 5% that we all should consider supplementing ourselves with or the whole 'honey is healthier' thing is nonsense.
>without a .doc export it is worthless in Europe

Not sure what part of Europe you are referring to but that certainly doesn't apply to the UK & Ireland.
Paw – REST Client for Mac OS X
Wow... I understand that you'd be much more productive with a large monitor and good keyboard, but to the extent that you couldn't perform in a coding interview? Give me a break...

In the past, I've used CollabEdit for "phone screens" and the whiteboard for in-person interviews. I try to ask some "coding" questions (identify a better data structure / algo for a particular scenario and then implement it in code) and some problem-solving conversational questions. Seems to work pretty well, but I'm always on the lookout for better approaches. Part of the problem is that the software field is so broad that it's hard to get a sense of a person's abilities with such a limited amount of time to ask questions.
> Between white flour and glucose powder there is little difference except for the taste.

That's not the only difference. Simpler carbs are processed faster than more complex ones. This plays a big role in the body's chemistry after eating.
It looks to me like it was a mistake to have the url embedded into the finished product. I don't know if it possible to exploit browser page printing as a means to convert the result without this happening. Having that plus the page count/date on every page does ruin the entire utility of the product, unfortunately.

I would suggest that considering that he already has an html based generator, he could use that and then pandoc [0] on the backend to convert to pdf and (optionally) print.

[0]http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc/

PS - To the author - the standard keyboard shortcut for moving to the next form field is tab, why not use that?
International and regional bodies that combat money laundering (part B)
Pachi and fuego are open source engines you can make work on Mac. To play online, IGS is quite nice-looking on Mac, and the most western-populated server is KGS. Ogs is a browser based turn & real time server, too.

KGS: Kiseido Go Server
IGS: Internet Go Server
OGS: Online Go Server
Yeah... Nobody asked for a .doc version of my resume in France either.
>Property values and migration flows attest to people generally preferring the coasts.

Actually, migration flows show people preferring the Sun Belt, despite the lower salaries and productivity rates. The coasts simply can't build housing fast enough to both accept migrants and maintain their own native-born populations.
I like this idea. I actually like it across many industries. Is anyone doing a great job of this in any industry? Hotels and Flights maybe?
This article is praising a man who is very apt at selling lies. Not only is Kombucha (another bullshit health brand) ineffective in curing his mother's "so-called cancer" but even worse, causes serious side effects and occasional deaths which have been linked with drinking Kombucha.* Why would someone believe it is curing them of cancer if the mother who has sold this product was just as good as a snake oil salesman? I agree that the article has identified some faults of his in his industry, but praising him isn't doing any justice.

*http://www.cancer.org/treatment/treatmentsandsideeffects/com...
In section 4 they found that traversing an organized list is FASTER than traversing an array of the same size when both fit into the L1 cache. I find this highly implausible [0] because 1) traversing a list needs more instructions, 2) both L1 and L2 cache miss numbers are smaller for the array. The authors provide no explanation for the result either.

[0] I believe they got these numbers, but they should have dug more into the cause instead of accepting the conclusion at face value. Given this is a LISP benchmark, maybe array bounds checks are costly? Maybe a different result would have been obtained had they instructed the compiler to generate unsafe code?
The view technique was actually great. You could write performant parsing and matching code without having to keep track of positions in the string. The current situation is much worse. You get crazy amounts of allocation and GC for code that used to produce almost none.
I'm not sure what the point of replying to my comment is if you're not going to answer my question to you. Here it is again if you missed it:

Are you saying even if it wasn't a rape by whatever your very own definition of rape, you would rather call it rape to express outrage?

I see a lot these sorts of threads end up with people talking past each other and not really responding to each other questions. Let's try not to do that. We can maybe move forward in the conversation and perhaps you can educate me on the topic. But if you don't answer straight-forward yes or now question I'm just left wondering if I should take any education I receive from you seriously.
Ah but that's not recursion, it's corecursion ;)
That is revolting. I hear a lot of nightmare stories like this. Unfortunately, I think as engineers, we are forever doomed to be treated like peasants, unless you know how to play politics, kiss ass, and move up into a manager position.

The concept of manager seems so old fashioned and backwards especially when we are now dealing with a manufacturing industry that produces nothing physical, where the concept of a product is actually just a vote of minds of all the stakeholders, engineers, customers. Having traditional managerial that were suitable for overseeing factories and suppress workers from rioting and maximizing labor output in an information based product is nothing short of censorship.

My idea of a dream team of software engineers is one where we have as little technical and business censorship as possible. It would be sort of like how day trading desks operate but we end up building one product that reflects the demands of the customers, the future market. Instead of having a manager telling you what to do or what to build, you act on information from a customer directly. This might be a tougher hybrid to find but I reckon we'll see more and more entreprengineers as traditional manufacturing corporate structures lose their appeal.

Wishful thinking but I hope some people share the same ideas and values.
what about all the stuff that has been created since the dawn of time up to this point? crap?
Because there was less rape when there were larger family. Right...
The move to Jersey 2.
I think this essay is a pretty good foray on the 'education' front.

I liked the essay for having some concrete and practical suggestions for what we can do organizationally and personally, that are neither 'legal frameworks' nor exactly just 'sexual harassment policies'. Did you read that part? What do you think?
> But those men do not automatically drag in all other men as far as obligation to fix the problem.

If not them then who? Or do you not agree that women aren't obligated to fix male problems? OR, are you going non-gender binary on me?

> Nothing in that sentence is particular to women.

Men are rarely punished for speaking up about harassment. Men are also rarely harassed, and there isn't an institutional, cultural, societal epidemic of men being sexually harassed in the workplace. I thought we were talking about men harassing women in the workplace re: the topic of the thread.

This is a "but what about the men" comment that, again, deliberately misses the point. Men aren't victims of systemic sexism. Yeah sometimes they're sexually harassed or raped, and that's all horrible and ought to be dealt with. But those events are separate from the institution of sexism that has oppressed women since the inception of the US. We're talking about a huge, entrenched social problem that disadvantages women, not about isolated incidents where men are victims.

> Remember that I'm only talking about speaking up about the harassment of other people.

"Other people" doesn't make a difference. I don't see why you think it would.
> So the US killed 500,000 civilians because they didn't weren't willing to negotiate

That is debatable, but not by you, as you seem to be missing the point. Negotiating with irrational actors is risky - burning them to death, or until they say uncle, is pretty safe.

> ... and you think that that's funny. That says a lot about you.

I have to admit, watching a frustrated care troll twist does put a smile on my face - but it gets old fast. The topic at hand is logical justification, so appeals to emotion are comically out of place here.
Fibers (very long/complex carbonhydrates) actually retard the intestines ability to process simpler carbonhydrates. That's why it's ok to eat a lot of fruit, cause they have the right mix of simple and complex ones.
To lose 3-5 pounds per week is crazy! That's 10800 - 18000 calories less than used per week. That's 1550 - 2570 calories less per day. A sedentary person needs somewhere between 2000 and 3000 calories per day. You were either eating half as much food than you needed or there is a more likely explanation.

It's obviously a combination of eating less and losing water weight. Your body can maintain about 1 lb of glycogen and 3 lb of water associated with that glycogen. Not eating carbs will likely lead to a big decrease in this weight. Also the fat itself is stored in 1:1 ratio with water. So your 3-5 lbs per week is likely either a 1 or 2 time thing where you progressively lose all your glycogen. Together with a moderate calorie restriction you end up losing some fat and an equivalent amount of water.
there is also https://github.com/themnd/mvnenv
Or if that fails: https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...
Nobody argued that that isn't rape, but that's because you've folded in what sounds like a physical threat. "Kick you out right now and you can live on the street" sounds more violent than "have sex with me or I initiate divorce proceedings".

The question is whether there's a distinction between economic coercion and rape. rayiner argues no, it's just as coercive as "pulling a knife", but most state laws (I believe) do have distinct definitions of sexual extortion. It's still a felony, so it's really bad, but not quite as severe. I think that probably reflects the truth of a spectrum of coercion from knife-to-throat (class A felony), to lose-your-job (class E felony), to divorce-with-financial-consequences (sad but not criminal). That's the slope one can slide down if we don't have clear tiers and definitions along the way.
Chocolate capital of the world being in the United States? I take exception to that.
> Where'd you get the inkling that I thought it was important to argue whether to word rape is the right word?

The part where you engaged in argument about whether rape was the right word (for some hypothetical undescribed situation), arguing it was important not to use it unless it was... was where I got that idea. So, the whole comment.

I'm sorry if I got the wrong idea, and at any rate I acknowledge I was reacting to the direction of this collective thread with many participants, not just specifically to your post. In fact, I wrongly assumed you were the same person who participated in the replied-to replied-to post, without checking the names.

I am also sorry that you feel your safety was threatened by my post, requiring you to reply to restore your safety, my intent was not to threaten your safety in any way.