skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
People love to carp and criticise here, don't take it to heart. The good news is your product is impressive, the bad news is you're not great at selling it as yet, and your target market is not clearly defined.

I found the article really interesting, because it highlights what is clearly a huge gulf between what you expected of YC, and how they behave. You were looking for validation of what you think is a great idea, and to discuss an idea with people who have spent a long time thinking about it and perusing your carefully prepared documents. They don't really care about your idea, they care about you, how well you can sell any idea to them, how well you can sell yourself to them (and by extension customers) in limited time, how you deal with pressure, how much contact you have had with customers, and how you plan to make money. You didn't have convincing answers to those questions, because you were expecting entirely different questions and an impressed audience. YC are not even really interested in your idea, they're interested in whether you can execute. That's probably because most ideas do not survive contact with the harsh reality of customers and the market, but companies do if they can adapt.

In this sense YC is behaving far more like a potential customer of yours than you might imagine - most customers spend about 30 seconds evaluating your product, and if you can't sell them in that time, you have a problem. Most customers will never read your sales docs or understand your product at first, they might read the home page if you're lucky. From a customer point of view, there is a fundamental problem with your idea which I think you're going to have a lot of trouble with:

Who could have developed a new multiplatform programming language with a blazing fast virtual machine?

You're asking people to build a business on top of your platform and a new language. There are a lot of reasons why that's a terrible idea for customers (even if it is a great thing for you), but foremost among them is lock-in. This is not really a technical problem, it's an issue of trust, and these decisions are not even often made on a technical basis. IMO you need to open-source your platform (get rid of trust issues), show customers everything, and make money on support/bespoke development if the platform is good enough to actually attract users (that'll be a very tough sell, and not one based mostly on technical concerns).

Thanks for posting and I hope any criticism you find here will be useful to you.
nock is good.. used it a few times..
I'm sorry, but last I recall ME3 was a 20-30hour long game that is way more than just a 10-minute ending sequence. Maybe criticism of it should take that into consideration?
Well, floorless kitchens are pretty hipster as well
The Next Space Race – Innovating the Internet
Testing the HTC (Re) Vive with Steam VR: Better Than Oculus…?
But some products can't be validated in their early stages. It's hard enough to find early adopters willing to spend hours learning a new IDE and language that no one else uses. If the product is also buggy or missing important features, who would want to use it?

It's also not a brand new paradigm they're inventing. Look at Game Maker which is pretty commercially successful.
Sales, Marketing and Accounting departments are filled with people whose only job is to think how to make more money for the company. Is that covered in the core beliefs of Behavioral Science?
These articles are always political, it even says in the article that it's not uncommon for reps to role their own mail solutions. Are anyone else's names listed?
Adam Savage's Overlook Hotel Maze Model
I just watched the video expecting it to show how to build an app. Instead it felt like 15 minutes of messing around with widgets.

If the Creo guys are reading (and I'm sure they are), take a look at how these guys (http://www.atomic.io) show off their product - https://vimeo.com/120035868
Find out how much your Peers get Paid Anonymously.
Hi All,

I have recently launched a new professional network @ www.pay-gap.com about 1 month ago, it helps people to find out what their peers are earning anonymously, without infringing on their privacy.

What makes it different?

Users can anonymously share and find out their peers:

1. Pay.

2. Work Life Balance. Work Life Balance is a hot topic right now, with people looking to Balance the challenge of an over increasing work day and that of other important life activities such as spending time with family, friends and pursuing hobbies. Pay-gap.com facilitates new connections for people who are interested in improving their Work Life Balance.

3. and Job Benefits.

Who is it for?

- People who want to move up, down or sideways on the Career ladder between the ages of 18-50.

- People who want to improve their Work Life Balance.

- People looking for new jobs. pay-gap helps them to connect with people in the job roles they are interested in and find out their Pay, Work Life Balance and Job Benefits.

- People preparing for Appraisals/Reviews.

I am interested in reaching your target audience, which are early technology adopters, with an open mind. IIt's currently in Beta, please check it out and let me know whether you "Love it" or "Hate it".

Thanks N.
Robocalls: Humanity Strikes Back (FTC Contest, $50k in Prizes)
I'm not affiliated with or using dart at all, but what do you think is missing?
It's not so simple. State of fitness/wellness can be interpreted as a mindset.

With this interpretation, exercising and eating adequately are very strictly related, I'd say they have the same root.

But also from a more physical point of view, nutrition is also a function of exercise, since there are many needs of the body which are function of it. So it goes both ways, I wouldn't say one of them is primary.