skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The scary part is that Google and other companies that are on the forefront of the new digital age still operate under a strict post-industrialist mindset. The cult of the busy man and the hinderance of personal life outside of work is absolutely mind blowing to me.

Aren't we supposed to work smart instead of working long hours? Aren't we supposed to improve ourselves spiritually and emotionally once we have reached a plateau of physical and social security?
The Rust version, from the coreutils rewrite project:

https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/blob/master/src/echo/ech...
> Google and Bing have a copy of them. You still need to convince them to delete them.

Search engines will re-index the URL over time, so you won't won't need to convince them to delete their archives.
Reddit keeps the submissions and comments and mark the author as "deleted". Seems to work for them.
Are you honestly expecting the author of this 4 year old commit to respond? Maybe if you included a link to the other version (even though it's already in a github comment) your first comment would have been useful and not downvoted, but as it is it's just pointlessly shared wondering that if serious would be better done as a private message to the author... as for your second, complaining about downvotes generally results in more.
A creative commons dataset of trivia questions
What you seem to be missing is that the barriers to entry for modern technologies are incredibly low (and getting lower). From basic microeconomics, we know that the ability for a company to maintain >0 economic profit for an extended period of time relies on them maintaining a competitive advantage - barriers to entry help a lot with that.

Today, disruption is so easy. Starting a app/website/platform involves almost no fixed costs and variable costs scale easily. We are now seeing century-old corporations being disrupted by university students. Technology has helped this situation, not hindered it.

(fixed spelling)
And you will still die poor and miserable, because try as you might YOU CAN NOT TAKE this which I have and you don't. You will just never have it and I always will.
"imagine a Sotheby's style auction clearinghouse for 'engineering art philanthropists' where pet projects are traded, sold and hung on walls"

This portion is basically the better parts of kickstarter. I've funded a movie about the 6502 microprocessor (kindly hurry up Jason Scott) and a CPM based single board computer and what boils down to a PDP-8 SBC and theres plenty of stuff I haven't funded in that category like software defined radio dev boards.

The latter, corporate dystopia part, doesn't sound very appealing to me.

"When collaborating on a joint art project"

Observationally, much like novels, plays, paintings, poems... the product of one excellent mind is invariably better than any team production, both in lit and engineering. Team always falls short of the individual. This is a profound thoughtcrime, hope I don't get in much trouble for it. As for the weasel words, not all projects are necessarily artistic, good enough is often good enough, etc.
The assumption here is "0. create a regex that does not have false negatives". You seem to be taking the author's word for the "99.9% Works" part - based on what? (Exactly.)
Let's talk about the ingredients you need to make your cookies shall we?
What am I peddling? I have nothing to sell you except my programming services.

I don't care if I'm "wrong" because this is a topic of exploration. People have to be willing to be "wrong" to challenge conventional wisdom leading to new understanding.
In JS the regex is built into the browser: you can leverage HTML5 .checkValidity() on any type="email" input.

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Guide/HTML/Form...

Note this is super liberal, so user@domainwithnodots (which is RFC valid, but probably also a user error) is still considered valid.
That's a pretty broad definition of "the same problem set," stuff that humans do.
The ironic thing of course is that you can tell everything you need to know about the readers of a paper from the brands that advertise in it, and the readers of the Graun are second only to the FT in their opulence. They are the 1%.
Yeah, I imagine that would be quite weird.
I would think twice before using a service that makes no effort to protect me in case of thieves or wannabe hackers. Of course, degrading the service because of security is an old and very common problem, but maybe the sweet spot would be to degrade it minimally, so that everyone gets a lot more security for just a bit less of Magic®?
> Simply put: they weren't.

Not sure this can truly be "simply put". On the one hand there was manual labor on the farm with very simple amenities like an outhouse and well water and no ability to advance as you're literally doing the same job your ancestors have done for centuries, but work ended at sun down and people had substantial control over their daily lives.

On the other hand, in industry there was less physically demanding labor for (relatively) more money and living in conditions with heat and water, but your work day might be 14 hours, you could easily be gravely injured at work, and your apartment was shared with a dozen people.

Both seem to have pluses and minuses to me. For whatever reason, people chose to leave the farm and enter industry.
Making companies liable for any hacking would be one way to go, which may be quite effective - granted the politicians will actually listen to the People on this, and not the army of lobbyists that will be set unto Washington against such a proposal.
Rewritten, not knowing anything more about you than the above:

- Enthusiastic self-taught hacker with 13 years of experience. Currently seeking work in the IT Sec field: drop me an email at xxx@xxx to find out how I can help you.
Great post.

There is really no such thing as deleting your trail in the internet, except maybe superficially. This is why privacy is so important and losing it exterts an undoable damage. A one-way currency of sorts.

If you are not carefully keeping your internet persona (Japanese "tatemae" of sorts) by all means keep STRICTLY pseudonymous and never link your internet persona with your real one.
After extensive research, I have finally come up with a way to improve upon 99.99%. I have come up with a regex which will work for 100% of email addresses, and a significant number of regex engines, as an added bonus! Behold:

.*@.*

/s
This is an example of "execution is everything." People might try this as novelty. If it gets any traction, there will be millions of imitators. This won't succeed or fail because of the idea, but because of execution.

This needs to be really awesome to be good, really awesome. So awesome people get dependant.
I operate a small forum and somewhat solved the issue of being scanned by the bots by letting the users to decide whether their posts/threads are visible to unauthenticated users, or users with less karma than some threshold. They can either be completely hidden to them or hide their names and let just the post be visible.
a: It's only inflammatory because there's a strong bias

b: It's only "poorly formulated" because the prevailing opinion isn't critical of western medicine

c: Discussions of conjecture are allowed. At this point, the causes cancer is conjecture, as the isolated causes have been elusive despite the billions poured into research
Yes, let's do that! Here's a wake up call: I don't have access to any ingredients that everyone else doesn't also have access to!

Because it's not the ingredients. It's how I see them and what I do with them. You choose to cry all day long about scarcity and injustice. I choose to rejoice in the abundance and the unlimited opportunities given to me.

This is what makes me wealthy and you poor. Not the government. Not the political system. Not any form of justice or lack thereof. There is ULTIMATE justice in this world, ALWAYS. It is just as it should be.
Oh, the updates should definitely be automatic (like Chrome). For one, it would ensure the companies are a lot more careful with what they're sending for update so as to not break millions of devices at once, and second, as you said, it removes the hassle from users having to deal with tens of different devices.
The flip side of that is Schmidt's no-hiring-from-my-friends scam for which he deserves jail time IMHO.
Yeah this is not great practice.

We built an app where sending a validation email upfront was not a practical option some time ago, and the best strategy I found for ensuring the email was valid was to lookup the MX records and ask the mailserver for the given domain, by issuing RCPT commands. Many mailservers will just drop connections when RCPT is for someone who doesn't exist or can't be routed to which was a good indicator of a typo or invalid address. And of course if the MX lookup fails the domain is incorrect.

Still wouldn't recommend this method either though really.
An interesting to reason to avoid GC would be a belief that you could make a usable general-purpose language without GC.
I asked my artist friend to try drawing on my Surface Pro 3 a month ago (using Clip Studio Paint). Her impression was that N-trig's preciseness and lacking pressure level make the Surface 3 unsuitable for a serious work, but it's OK for light drawing session or for a rough drawing. The Surface 2 might be another story though.
How do you fit the BRCA genes into your anti reductionist framework?

They are, at a minimum, highly specific predictors.
Lazy development. Any hurf blurf you hear about right of others to trace you or readability of the forums or responsibility for your comments or futility of local deletion is just a smoke screen for a bunch of developers that really don't want to re-engineer their products to support deletion months to years after they wrote the spec that forgot to include it.
> `foo@bar` fails these regular expressions and `foo@bar.invalid` passes them, but neither will receive mail.

foo@bar could still receive email, if you had a host in your DNS domain named bar, with a user named foo.
How do you handle support issues - returns, exchanges, credits? Same mechanism?

Where do you draw the line on "anything"?

Also, this whole thing is April Fool's joke, right?
Very inspiring, the stories matter!
Cuba's doing pretty well, except for the fact that the USA has put an embargo on them (due to political reasons), making it extremely hard for them to trade with anyone, and massively driving down the value of their currency.
.+@.+

Should do the trick
Clojure helper library that utilises Spurious for setting up local AWS resources
I'm not a practitioner so I'm not going to make any studies.

As far as the holistic crowd, many are artsy people, with a wide range of interests, who have little interest in creating scientific studies. They have to earn a living, which is often difficult. Yes, there is also quackery, though I suspect there are some nuggets of gold in these practices.

Among the scientists, it feels like there is a strong sentiment against such holistic practices & a perception that the practitioners are scammers. Judging from the reaction to me in this discussion, it would take a brave scientist to stick out his/her neck to spend years, money, & reputation to research such practices; when Bayer is offering a large grant to study their drugs.

There's an old IT saying, "Nobody got fired for using Microsoft". Wouldn't the same apply here?
So in 1 million emails, there are 10,000 valid emails that will be rejected. I guess if you use this regex then you'd better hope your service doesn't become popular.
This is literally day 3 for them... a bit early for the investor talk.
... Except that they are specifically not hiring people. An Uber driver is not an employee with all the protection and rights afforded employees. An AirBnB host, is not an employee either. This is not just about tech automating jobs away, it's about it facilitating a race to the bottom.
Your math is off by a factor of 100.
The fact(?) that you can't delete this data from these 30 other places does not imply that you shouldn't be able to delete it from the source.

And honestly, if you remove it from the source, many of the crawlers will lose the data the next time they crawl, and the rest will be unable to justify archiving everything, forever. Your biggest "adversary" in this space would be the Internet Archive, though they respond positively to requests to remove content.
I'd wonder what the effect of bees concentrating the byproducts of combustion in their honey would be.
Assuming that the 99.99 figure is not something the author pulled out of...thin air. In absence of any data, I'm inclined to believe that the figure was gained by this very method.

Edit: Oh look, the submitter has pulled yet another figure out of thin air (author says "three nines, trust me," submitter says "four nines, omgwtfbetterthanslicedbread!!!1!"). Suspiciouser and suspiciouser.
Well, except for that Howard Dean noise incident.
You just did a partial description how real time Java works.
Mostly that we already know what the answer's going to be.
I haven't bothered with validating an email address for awhile, but I have used https://isemail.info successfully in the past.
I think lots of programming languages are been created, and the vast majority of them fall into obscurity, but some have nice features and grain a bit of traction, which is what is happening right now with Nim. If you forgive me the comparison, I would say that Nim is to the programming languages what Flappy Birds is to the video games: a successful product built by a talented programmer in a place where lots of people try their own - of course, the analogy is not completely right since the barrier to create a programming language is much, much higher than to create a small video game.
You probably wouldn't say that if you had been to Cuba. The real problem they have is that when the USSR collapsed, no one was willing to pay 10x the market price for their sugar. They have plenty of people to trade with, oil from Venezuela, and lots of cars, refrigerators, etc from China. They have a parallel tourist economy, with two different currencies. And in downtown Havana you will see 3 families crowded into a single apartment with cardboard over the windows because they can afford neither curtains nor even glass, and a mile away gorgeous ex-colonial villas in landscaped gardens, for the Party elite.

Don't believe the propaganda, go see for yourself.
> Don't get discouraged by the negative comments.

No, of course not. Jump in feet first with all that you've got and to hell with common sense.

> It's completely possible to make a profit (with low risk) without resorting to HFT.

Yes it is. For a while at least.

> I'd recommend you read Quantitative Trading by EP Chan for a great overview of the basic methods and some example implementations.

Reading is always good, second that.

> Disclaimer: I've done exactly this successfully for >2yrs now.

I know gamblers that have been on winning streaks too. Unfortunately that's not how the story ends, especially not for novice gamblers.

It's nice you have found a way to consistently beat the market and I really hope that you're outperforming the lowly index funds but without more data 'successfully' is awfully un-specific.

I made some money in the stockmarket too, but I'm not going to dress is up as intelligence, I'd rather admit that it was dumb luck.
I considered that one, but I'm sure there's some system out there which doesn't require an account name ahead of the "@" symbol. We're shooting for 100% accuracy, after all. ;)
Three nines is now the new four nines? No data to back it up? Bah humbug!
The Specialist-Generalist Balance
100 Best Free Business Cards, Resume Templates and More of 2014
William Pogue, Astronaut Who Staged a Strike in Space, Dies at 84
Does't work on the dreaded "I am a terrible but nonetheless valid email address"@example.com.

I echo the advice of everyone else - validate with something very simple like .+@.+ and then by sending an email. Trying to recapture the complexity of the email system via a tool like regular expressions is tilting at windmills. It's like trying to develop a regular expression to determine whether a name is real or not.

https://www.exratione.com/2012/09/what-constitutes-an-accept...
Or you can require the gateway to be formally verified, running something like this[0]

Of course, then you have to construct a spec which is foolproof.

[0]- http://www.ok-labs.com/_assets/image_library/NICTA-Technical...
Patriotism in India is a favorite device of persons with something to sell; A true patriot honors all nations;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scandals_in_India
But it seems totally uncontroversial and obvious to me that some people will generate vastly more wealth than others. Like think back to your class in high school. Some people were intelligent and industrious and went on to have creative jobs. Some people did just enough to get passing grades and went on to have repetitive, non-creative jobs. Extrapolate this differential in productivity over their entire working lives, what would you expect to happen? You cannot easily identify who created any given piece of wealth, but you can conduct thought experiments like the above that tell you something about the wealth generating process. Of course, the nice thing is, all of society gets the benefit of improved technology and scientific knowledge, regardless of how much they contributed in that direction.
... As the OP is about to discover, the hard way.
Or having code that's callable from another GC-ed language like Ruby/Python/etc. Two GCs dancing around each other (e.g. Python calling Nim) is a recipe ripe for problems.
You know the different languages match different sets of email addresses, right? The reason the Perl ones are so much longer, is that they work for _all_ RFC5322 addresses, where the JS match a subset.
Where Squirrels Are Cuter Than the Girls
I've worked in the electronic trading aka hft market now almost 7 years. The big boys are optimizing their trades down to the nanoseconds, they are spending big money on bleeding edge network technologies, colocating their servers inside exchanges, etc.

If you expect to compete with them on AWS save yourself the loss and just stop right there. However, if your strategy is more or less buy and hold for weeks / months then this doesn't sound entirely unreasonable. From my experience, simply getting into this industry as a serious player is roughly a 10-12 million investment, and that is starting very very small in only a few exchanges.
So, just to be clear, you are claiming that power and chance are the ultimate justice in this world?

Are you the villain on a cartoon for 12-year-olds?
How come the .NET version is so small compared to the others?
In that case, let me improve it further :-)

/@./

Though I'm not really sure there could be an email without username part.
I have used Parcellite in the past, but recently I've found copyq, a much more complete clipboard manager. But, as you said, if it not for the clipboard manager, I would certainly embrace the solution posted here.
I'm sorry, my previous comment was not an attempt at changing your functionalist, would-be-objectivist and elitist view of the world but just a veiled reference to space cookies because you seem to be high on something. Maybe it's a big white horse, who knows?

If it matters to you I'm not poor, at least according to HMRC it's quite the contrary.
10 Sustainable Dividend Growth Stocks with High Yields and Low Payouts
Correctness beats complexity any day. Incorrectness is an unforgivable sin.
> There is really no such thing as deleting your trail in the internet [...]

Deleting accounts is a thing though.
Can you explain that to this lot: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_revolutions_and_rebelli...
Gadget Hunt – Product Hunt for Gadgets (obviously)
Because it actually validates any RFC compliant email address, while the others (especially the .NET) ones are people's attempt at "good enough" regexes.
Your verbosity is outlandish.

.*

will match all email addresses, and as an additional feature, all other strings too!

As we all know, more functionality with less code is better, therefore, this is clearly superior to all other regexes.
Einstein's general relativity does replace/generalize Newton's theory of gravity.
Hard for me to feel anything other than sympathy of anyone who has to ride a bus to work.

"Elite" and "riding a bus" are two concepts that are "living in a parallel universe." Not the same one.
The idea of digital assistant does not require it to be tied to any specific device. It can live in the cloud and follow you anywhere the entrypoint being any device you are using (and you are logged on). Think of Jarvis from the Iron man movies. If I understood the aim of the VIV correctly, they are trying to do this by not tying the service to any given platform but being this platform. This is what makes it so powerful and intriguing (and scary if you do not have the control of the assistant).
On the English coast, the white cliffs would sometime mean that you were not inline with an English tower but if the weather is right you could pick up a French telephone tower.

Much to the annoyance to the local residence the telephone company would mark you as roaming and all data and calls for that day would be charged as international. I was caught out about 10 years ago, one would hope charging was more granular these days, however the roaming issue does still exist:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-21739029
yo, ferris here; never thought I'd see this stuff on hacker news! Thanks for all of the kind words! (and some of the less kind ones too, hehe :D)

P.S. ALL YOUR SNES ARE BELONG TO US =D
yep, this is true :) I tweeted at the author about that at least
That causes a lot more harm than good. You fuck up a site just because you didn't care to read the Universal small print of the interwebs, and you do so for barely no practical advantage.
Connected Cycle – an elegant solution to bike theft
That's an interesting thought. Any papers you'd recommend in particular?
Linux kernel booting process, part 5
I'm not sure what I just read - it seemed like a bunch of disparate points drawn together with a tinge of rage at something, for the sake of having rage at something.
No, you're poor. Make no mistakes about this. I don't care what HMRC says.

You are poor because you don't believe in yourself. You are poor because you think someone owes you something. You are poor because you think others got lucky and you didn't. You are poor because you REFUSE TO SEE THE FUCKING DAYLIGHT but are more than happy to bitch about the wrongdoings and villainity of those others and drain all your energy doing this instead of CREATING the life and the WEALTH that you are here to create!

That's why you're poor.
Whenever I've seen people complaining about Rust religiosity, is mostly because other languages trained them to be careless about certain things.

Rust cares great deal about PartialEq and Eq because you can have stuff like non-deterministic float NaN sorting or Run-time errors as demonstrated by previous posts.

Or Rust cares about doing manual memory management safely, but since you are arriving from either C/C++ which cares little about doing it safely, or GC language which cares little about memory management, you find it obnoxious.

Hell, even the TFA mentions how hard it is to use Hash, I'm pretty sure that's because Rust is aiming for actually making the hash work correctly and not allow you to just randomly compromise yourself.
But the EU price you quote is the legal maximum they can charge you without any package. So that $ 27.32 is the EU equivalent of the $ 750 that's in the post title. (And I think the US price also does not include VAT since, just like Europe, it varies by state)
If you guys don't mind, just going to mention a product that we've developed ourselves for tracking time, but compared to yours, it does require manually clocking in and out through clicking a button: http://zhen81.com/product/zhen-hrm/
What do you think about what the article says about that?