skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
My Frenchman coworkers say harmed like 'armed' with silent h. Mount a gattling gun on this puppy and see how people respond to it. Have it fire a round every direction change or slip of 5°. This is getting real too quick for me.
Nice! This should make it a lot easier for developers to publish their projects.
I added kikkoman soy sauce to my food from the moment I stopped eating baby food. RIP Kenji! Thank you for your contribution. I enjoyed using it every day of my life.
I think I've started to read the amber books about 10 times, but I've yet to finish Nine Princes. It's just one of those books I want to like but don't. It's one of only 3 novels I own that I never finished.
Ejabberd XMPP server has been added Elixir support
Thank you for posting this. I was wondering how it worked also.
I stand corrected. Maybe it's limited to mobile browsers (doesn't work on Chrome mobile).
wow thanks yetanotherracc! That is very good to know. I talked to the group. I need to talk to the group and will keep you guys updated.
Although everyone is going to jump on the React Native bandwagon, there's good reasons not to. It's not like every write-once framework is going to go away. How far do you think you are from a components library that can compete in breadth and maturity with Ionic and do you think you'll go down the path of what Supersonic is doing with Ionic, but with React (the semi-native components/transitions/views aspect)? The answer probably lies in whether you're starting with an incubator like Drifty did or going to rely on community support. I think there's enough people out there that don't like Angular, but aren't ready for the commitment of a React Native project.

Also, it seems to be looking for a "http://kitchen.reapp.io/assets/sunrise.jpg" in the drawers demo, which isn't there.
From the landing page: "Using SALt lamp 8 hours a day every day will give you an anode lifespan of 6 months."
No but it makes phonegap 'hybrid'. I think that's the point.
yes. charge lifetime depends on the salinity of the urine
Yup, you'd need to implement the Bitcoin protocol and load the private key and sign all the messages the echo endpoint receives.
Suggestions with Azure Search
There are some llvm based shader compilers out there. Some even open (AMD), some not (Nvidia).

The situation with architectures in 90s sounds about right: Those that were kept closed (and where a gcc backend was thus no option for the vendor - mostly embedded stuff) have to this day shitty compilers with unpredictable optimizers.
“The computer will never be as important to society as the copier”
Anything by Schoppenhauer.
From the original article, notice that the advocate of reading books 100 times has personal reasons for reading both books as much as he did. In one case it was to achieve a superior level of familiarity for the text, in the other it was because he derived an unusual amount of comfort from it.
Yes! I had several of those books, the Fantasy Games one being my favourite. I frequently credit them with getting me into programming/CS. Though I don't think I ever quite understood the "Machine Code for Beginners" one, and I certainly never got all the way through typing in the others, it was the sheer "behind the curtain"-ness of it all that was amazing as a kid.
So? Ubon and Lisbon are too close to HOT wars being waged by violent islamists. I have no intention of being within 100 miles of Detroit either...
Uh. Why do you want to pee in a salt water powered lamp?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galvanic_cell
> Not if there are incentives for the algorithms to be subject to public scrutiny.

The problem is that we don't have that transparency now, and aren't particularly likely to in the future. [1] Particularly for software-as-a-service: I can't audit Facebook's algorithms, despite their effects on what my friends and family see and discuss. And I can't easily audit the black box models used to make public policy, despite the value of transparency there, either.

[1] http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/01/the-ca...
Show HN: Take Control of Your Career – A career management guide (free chapter)
By all means contradict me. Do they open source more than 25% of their code written?

More than 10%?

More than 1%?
At some point, I think we just have to stop pretending that SS numbers are a secret piece of information. Maybe we should just publish them all and be done with it.
Google Makes It Official: Answers Not Just Links
There are different kinds of enjoyment. On a certain level in our brains, we have different kinds of needs.

One need is for novelty. The other is a need for familiarity or confirmation.

When we enjoy something, when we feel something that is fun, it goes along in this process: We encounter something new, we remember it, we predict a result, and we have that response confirmed or we are surprised. If we are surprised, we learn the new result, and next time we try to use that experience to predict the next result. When we are right, we are satisfied that we predicted the correct response and that feels good.

It's both the surprise, and the confirming of expectation that feels good in different ways. Music follows this pattern too. You listen to a song, if you've heard it before it triggers a memory and you sing along as much as you can remember. If you listen to a song for the first time, it repeats itself, so you learn the first verse, and then you recall it for the second one.

Music that is too unpredictable is just noise, it's not as easily enjoyable as normal music. Music that is too repetitive is not enjoyable either, it gets annoying and tiresome.

And that's sort of the thing. As you are satisfied with your recall, the good feelings from that start to fade. Hearing the refrain and then signing along the next time you hear it is satisfying. Hearing it 60 times makes you really wish you could listen to a different song.

But if you are with a friend who skips through the first measures of 60 songs, you're going to go nuts and want him to just stop and pick some song to listen to fully.

We balance the desire for novelty and for familiarity. This isn't just in music or entertainment or books. This is also in life. When we turn to entertainment, we look for things that fill the needs that we're otherwise missing.

If you hate to re-read books, you have little craving for familiarity, and you are seeking novelty. You probably don't enjoy listening to the same music album over and over either.

This might just be your personality, some people just crave novelty more than others. It might be because of what you do with the rest of your time, you might have a really repetitive day job and want some kind of novelty in your spare time.

My day job is pretty dynamic. It alternates between nose-to-the-grindstone drudgery and constantly dealing with new problems and coming up with new solutions.

If I have a day where I'm going through paperwork, and doing data entry for hours, then when I get home I really need to do something new. I need to find a new movie. I need to play a game I've never played before. I need to go somewhere or do something new.

On the other hand, if I've had a week where I'm constantly doing new things, solving new unexpected problems, I come home tired and I want to watch Star Trek, I want to play a game that I've finished. I want to remember, to do better, but not see something necessarily brand new.

I'd recommend that you try to do it anyways. It might be something you enjoy.
Can you explain the comparison to jQuery? I wasn't aware that jQuery was dead.
It will be interesting to know to what extend this research is transferable to other app categories?
Not a lot of people get pensions where I live anymore (or at least, not enough of one to live on comfortably). If you don't want to spend your entire life working, you could save for retirement, same as you (hopefully) do now. A lot of people plan their retirement so that they can live off the returns of their investments without touching the principal. If you do this, there's not much difference between retiring for 20 years versus 200.
I think they define creator as Disney the company rather than Disney the man.
Probably want to also go ahead and catch up on the TCP/IP stack; the pqwy/mirage-tcpip repo is some 232 commits behind mirage/mirage-tcpip, and is missing fixes for things like https://github.com/mirage/mirage-tcpip/issues/56
As someone who tried to use WinForms on Mono on Linux, I'll save everyone who tries a few hours evaluation work: don't waste your time.

Text components in particular are very broken. Text selection, context menu, copy and paste, cursor movement, rendering, it's all very shaky.

Use Gtk# on Linux.
Is it just me, or did anybody else see here a comment from a Google dev just one minute ago, stating this was "just a simple bug", going to be "fixed in short time"? I refreshed the page and now it's gone.

Edit: well I don't really know if the comment came from a Google dev, I guessed so because it looked very authoritative.
That's a very fair question. When I first presented my corporate open source anti-patterns talk at FISL in 2012[1][2], I closed by saying that I was certain that we (Joyent) were making mistakes, and that they would have to come back in 2022 to hear what they were. Suffice it to say that after the developments of the last year -- which include not just the io.js fork but also us open sourcing our entire stack[3] -- I'm really looking forward to doing that update, and hope to do it much earlier than 2022. ;)

To answer your question: no, I was not overruled -- it's been clear to me for quite some time that node.js would be best served by a foundation. That said, getting the mechanics of that foundation established has taking (is taking) a long time (and, it must be said, involves a lot of hard, thankless work from a lot of people). Foundations might feel "easy", but they aren't: 501(c)(3) organizations are highly regulated entities that require not just a lot of groundwork and forethought but extensive maintenance. Fortunately, we have made great progress (and we have built a terrific collection of founding members), and we are getting the node.js community what it needs: a foundation that can assure the consensus-driven advancement of the technology, in perpetuity.

[1] http://www.slideshare.net/bcantrill/corporate-open-source-an...

[2] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NhgXQFk9noI

[3] https://www.joyent.com/blog/sdc-and-manta-are-now-open-sourc...
Zillow includes the Google Street View image option on for sale properties, where available. It really does give you a better sense of the house and its surroundings.

I wonder if Google could/would implement a toggle option, so that homeowners could turn Street View on or off.
the difference I see is that you are missing a period before "dev" in your dnsmasq.conf

I don't know how to configure dnsmasq at all, so that may not be a problem.
I'm not sure about the exact conclusion you seem to draw but it seems to be something like "GPL projects tend to have better outcomes than non-GPL". The whole point of the thread doesn't support that conclusion coming directly from the GCC brain trust. It's only natural that niche GCC users are going to hang around the longest.

I'd also like to note LLVM/clang didn't gain large non-apple marketshare until GCC adopted GPLv3 which has more to with it's stagnation than anything IMO. v2 is palatable to many business needs, v3 is not.
And even then, you couldn't prove the piñata wasn't only proxying the replies from some other server.
It is creepy as hell to watch them walk, and that makes me wonder what groups like ISIL would think about being hunted by a small pack of them.

Right now dropping bombs on houses kills some terrorists, but the collateral damage has a side-effect of bringing more to their cause. Would attack robots scare the shit out of them and make them stop, or just backfire and end up as another recruiting tool for fundamentalists?
Could you clarify this? Have we stopped using jQuery? Actually I find myself switching back and forth between io and node with little trouble. If that becomes untenable, one might have to make choices, but we're not there yet.
It feels like you are using click for touch events. Which causes a ~300ms delay only on mobile phones.

Makes me a little concerned about what other "common" hybrid bugs you've missed. Is this your first rodeo with Hybrid apps or have you pushed them to production?
Thanks. As per ionic: give it a few months, but I think it's already gotten pretty far. I tried to throw as much in as I could while still launching within a reasonable time. I've had a ton on my plate between the launch site, docs, apps, platform, cli, etc.

For now I'm going to start doing consulting using Reapp, starting today. So as I go I'll be pushing stuff back to it.

I'm considering funding, I think it would help to really build it out right. Would open it to cool native features, easier build/deploy tools, and focusing on the tech and featureset.
Okay, with a pair of big electrode plates, retail cost will be, what, $200?
SS Numbers are definitely becoming increasingly problematic. I don't know if public disclosure is the solution, but within the next 10 years some major changes will need to be enacted.
Who the hell browses the google play store from firefox anyways
JetBrains is giving out free licenses
The Bible, worth reading daily.
node.js and io.js really need to merge or one has to die. I can't see this turning out well unless one or the other happens.

io.js is trying to push the envelope by supporting ES6, more APIs, etc while node.js isn't focusing on that. This eventually means if I write my module for node.js it should still work for io.js but if I write it for io.js, even if it does take advantage of better performance, ES6 syntax, etc, it won't work for node.js.

I can't imagine anyone wants that kind of fragmentation.
ex-ample.com

"eee ex hyphen ample.com"

Does this fail your test?
Is CallLoop closing down?
If you think there's something wrong about the benchmarks game then don't point to the benchmarks game as evidence for what you wish to be true.
Mostly in regards to pace of progress. Whenever the bureaucracy is smaller you can get more done faster. jQuery is just a good example of something that has become relatively bloated with time, with almost no real hope of ever improving to the point that it's not one of the first things you micro optimize out of your libraries.
Should you outsource your product development?
There's a bug on the hamburger menu that's actually not the 300ms delay but seems like it.

Everything else avoid the 300ms delay. We are using react-tappable[0] as a mixin into many of our components that allows a nice onTap={this.handleTap} usage.

It is alpha. For example, I need to fix behavior that allows you to overflow scroll the entire body, which will require some thought and care in it's implementation, but I've already gotten it most the way there. More optimizations will come.

As far as rodeo's it's not my first with hybrid though, I made a large mobile hybrid site in 2u.fm (now deceased, it avoided the 300ms delay though :)), and with my previous employer's site in production quite a bit.

[0] https://github.com/JedWatson/react-tappable
10 Most Innovative Companies 2015
Disney's legal team has big pockets to make sure they dont lose copyrights
Does anyone know why Anthem's clients have not been notified, at all, yet?

I am part of Anthem and I have heard literally nothing directly about this, it's all been through news/tech sites.
I've never read a book more than once, not even a comic book when I was a kid. I have, though, seen cerebral films (pretty much my favorite kind) as many as 5-15 times each.

What I haven't seen anyone mention here in the comments, is reading several books on the same subject, but from different perspectives. IE, 2-3 history books, by different authors, on the same country and era. This is something I have done and do get a bit of enjoyment out of.
What that says to me is that people love and spend most their time on mobile devices. And that they use Apps mostly to access their websites.

I don't think that means they "love" mobile apps. It's just that on mobile, web browsing is an inferior experience. Take a look at this data on the top apps:
http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Data-Mine/Top-25-Mobile-App...

Personally, I'd rather use the complete websites than mobile sites or apps. I'd also like to have better choices when it comes to mobile browsers (more on this later). I'd also like to have better tab management on mobile.

Browser choice on Android seems to be Chrome, Firefox and Webviews. Firefox never ran well on my phone and for some reason or another doesn't render sites properly. Webviews based browsers also don't render sites properly and they are lacking support for some web technologies.

Chrome is the only properly working browser on my phone and it always has me logged into Google sites and resumes from my previous session. Every time I use it I feel like I'm naked in a public place. And, every site has to be a longterm commitment as there is no easy way to close multiple tabs.

TLDR:

I use apps mostly because mobile browsing still sucks. I bet I'm not alone with this.
Remember that ESR writes things like this: http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=5001 in all apparent seriousness.
Still, the problem with having occupation-style technology and drones is that it further spreads the power of those with capital at the expense of those without. The current class setup prevents truly depraved and evil systemic evil (beyond a point) from occurring, because officers and soldiers are human and will blatantly refuse to do things that are Evil (perpetually).

There is no such guarantee with drones--in fact, to refuse orders is a design flaw.

I can't help but imagine some descendant of these things, in the mode of one of Bradbury's mechanical dogs, attacks a throng of protestors.
There's kind of a circular dependency here, since several companies use emulators developed by enthusiast reverse-engineers to package their games for resale: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOSBox#Usage
This seems kind of ridiculous, honestly.

Unless your house is surrounded by high walls in real life, what it looks like is quite clearly public information.
Node.js open governance, v0.12, and big growth numbers
At first I thought they were supposed to be a parody. It was quite upsetting to realise that they were deadly serious.
I disagree about the "hate speech" one. In particular, the article you link to cites Chaplinsky, which was limited very strongly by Brandenburg, Virginia v. Black, in which the court limited the statute in question to apply only when intimidation is intended, and Hustler v. Falwell, which the article gets completely backward - Hustler won!
Before I read the page to find that this is an actual project from the Phillipines, I thought the ".ph" was just a clever domain hack.
What happened to SourceForge?
I was going to download elementary OS beta 2, but SF.net showed me the message:

The sourceforge.net website is temporarily in static offline mode.
Only a very limited set of project pages are available until the main website returns to service.

This message appears after search or clicking any links from the frontpage. For a second I notice hitting URL http://sourceforge.net/#!/Testing then redirect to sourceforge.net/error-404.html.

I'd be grateful if anybody could provide me with more information, thanks!
As long as U.S. laws fail to impose significant costs for data security breaches, we can expect companies to treat the costs of these breaches as the cost of doing business--just as they do with litigation costs for faulty automobile parts, manufacturing pollution, and the like.
Newsweek Twitter Account Hacked by ISIS Hacker
you're looking at the wrong branch... https://github.com/pqwy/mirage-tcpip/tree/pinata
From the description this sounds like they are using a form of what is commonly called a lemon or potato battery (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lemon_battery). The salt water is the the electrolyte in the battery cell and the actual energy comes from a chemical reaction between the zinc and copper electrodes.

In this blog post (https://saltph.wordpress.com/2014/05/14/know-more-about-salt...) they mention that part of their revenue model is "Electrode rod refill", and in their main page (http://www.salt.ph/), under "Our Product" / "Just add water and salt!" they mention replacing the anode every 6 months. The anode they are referring to would be the zinc electrode. This is usually a galvanized nail in those popular lemon / potato battery science experiments.
Presumably because they now have to use C++, C or even Java.
Since having a kid I relate to Calvin's dad in Calvin and Hobbes a lot more.

Dad: "Anything but Hamster Huey! It's the same story every day!"

Calvin: "I WANT HAMSTER HUEY!"

... (later)

Calvin: "Wow, the story was different that time."

Hobbes: "Do you think the townsfolk will ever find Hamster Huey's head?"

[0] http://www.gocomics.com/calvinandhobbes/1992/10/06
His master branch isn't uptodate, but the pinata branch that's deployed is tracking the head of mirage/mirage-tcpip. See the opam manifest here: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mirleft/btc-pinata/master/...
Being able to have an idea of the assembly that will be generated from Rust code is certainly a motivating goal (I believe that pcwalton has previously indicated his ability to divine as much), though I personally have no experience with bare assembly so I cannot attest to it myself.

You can certainly guarantee data layout (such is required for C interop, for which Rust has very nice support), though by default Rust will e.g. reorder a struct's fields in order to optimize its representation (taking into account padding and such) unless you explicitly ask it not to.

Rust also tries to favor explicitness where it can. For example, even though many people have requested C#-style properties where `foo.bar = baz` can implicitly call a setter function, Rust has rejected this because the runtime behavior of a function call is too different from the runtime behavior of a field lookup. As another example, anything that looks like `foo.bar()` will always be a method call, and `foo.bar` (without direct parentheses) will always be a field lookup, so if you want to call a function pointer stored in a struct field you need to write `(foo.bar)()`.

There are also places where Rust is more explicit than C++. For example, a C++ function `void bar(int& foo)` can be called like `bar(6)`, but the analogous Rust function `fn bar(foo: &i32)` must be called like `bar(&6)`.

However, Rust also has places where it is less explicit than C++. For example, whereas C++ has both `bar.foo()` for direct method calls and `bar->foo()` for method calls that are invoked through a deref, Rust has only `bar.foo()` which has the capability to dereference `bar` if necessary. So it would be incorrect to say that Rust is ultimately more or less explicit than C++... it just has a different mix of explicit and implicit operations.

As to the rest, Rust does indeed have inline asm, and I hear that Rust produces DWARF debuginfo which allows it to be debugged via gdb (though it has to pretend to be C++ in order to play nicely with existing tooling, which can make it awkward sometimes).
There are still plenty of open problems in compilers. For instance, writing a program to effectively use all four of my CPU cores is pretty tedious. It would be awfully nice if my compiler could automatically parallelize operations, do effective register allocation across cores, distribute data for best use of L1 cache, etc.

Certainly researchers who are working on this sort of thing today are doing it in LLVM or some custom framework. I can't imagine GCC has any significant traction at least.
Yep; all I need is a terminal,web browser, and a music player.