skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Sure. But you only have 2-3GB of usable address space, and if your app has a lot of other variables to work with, there's not much space left over.

I should note that in LMDB 1.0 we'll have dynamic unmapping and remapping, to allow 32-bit machines to work with larger DBs. (There's still a significant performance cost for this. It's only being done to allow folks to use the same code on 32 and 64.)
Thanks. I absolutely do need to do more research but due to time constraints wanted to go the service route. Thanks for the heads up on the taxes, will get in touch with tax contacts when filing.
5 ways to initialize JPA lazy relations
> Personally I'm of an opinion that IQ doesn't mean much

Opinions certainly vary there! My first "real" programming job interview began with an IQ test, and passing it was basically what got me an offer. The company owner scored the test in front of me, and said "Not bad.. five points above the minimum I'd consider hiring for a developer position."
Same here... I´ve been seing things like this everyday, for years (Network / NetSec Support Engineer here :))

Just today: Servers with a static IP address getting it changed to an APIPA just because some other 3rd party device sent a unicast ARP request to it that should've been a broadcast as per RFC4436. I personally find ARP to be one of the funniest protocols out there and I love the faces people make when they understand how ARP glues L2 and L3 and suddenly everything makes sense.

It is funny to see articles like this, because the network seems to be the "last frontier" for IT companies/workers. Only a handful seem to be brave enough to work on it (and actually like it). It is supposed to work like the lights when we switch them on and any interaction with a network engineer is just to tell them about an issue :)

In my opinion, the network guys are the geeks among the geeks. Don't get me wrong, it is easy to understand networking, it just takes dedication.
way to cherry pick your dates, thre were people calling it a scam when I got in at $5, there were people calling it a scam when I encouraged family to get it at around $10. there were people calling it a scam all the way up to the $260 peak and lost more when it dropped from there. People have called it a scam plenty of times and none of them have been right. the value has peaked and troughed and plenty of people have been fortunate to make a lot of money with it and you know what, it is not going away.

Your hypothetical day of a bitcoin worth $0.00 will come when something better replaces bitcoin, not because bitcoin failed against fiat/national currencies, but because it was superseded by a superior product.
Your long descriptions could be in an about page and tell us what it does in 4 words as a subtitle. Right now I went to the page and had no idea what to do. So I typed in "python" and it gave me Scala jobs. It's a good idea. What about a "what is this?" button or something? Your description is more of a testimonial and it was tl so I dr.
In the UK there is some sort of electronic cash (I forget the name) that can be bought using cash in almost every newsagents. These can in turn be exchanged for bitcoins online. Pretty simple!

That said we also have pre-paid debit cards in some stores now, so it's even easier to have one of those.

(Also it is not uncommon at all for teenagers to have a debit card)
wouldn't hurt to put a preprocessed version of the page there, except for payload.
Well, to be pedantic, TPB never actually shares content with anybody. It just links people to other people who are sharing content. And it isn't always copyrighted content. The point isn't to help people steal stuff, it's to help people share information, regardless of whatever arbitrary laws exist about sharing information. That's a worthy cause, IMO.
Apple delayed this app for almost two months, wonder what the developer had to remove to be accepted.
Dunno whether the feature of "self-hosted" boxes indexed on vagrantcloud will still be free after end of tech preview :-/
Cool. Please link to online repository of everything you've ever produced, under any circumstances, for any purpose.
I actually contributed quite a bit to a fork of godit called vigo [0]. It gave me lots of insight into how text editors work.

When I went to start writing Iota, I found that there was no termbox-type library in Rust, so I created a wrapper [1]. My goal is to create a pure-Rust version, similar to termbox-go. It's a long way from that, but it will get there!

[0]: http://github.com/kisielk/vigo
[1]: http://github.com/gchp/rustbox.
It comes across to me as her clumsy way of hitting on the OP. Ignoring might not be the correct course of action.
it was the "now all i need" as if you had been waiting for MS.

anyway to obtain them truly anonymously you can buy from an exchange using your bank and then mix them so the coins you are sent back are in no way related to the coins you bought on an exchange. further you could sell them for an alt-coin e.g. litecoin, transfer the litecoin to a different exchange (that only deals in cryptocurrencies and so does not require your real details) and buy bitcoins. these againw ould be totally unlinked to your original purhcase. Voila anonymous bitcoins.
> It is common to use ARC and unsafe shared memory access
> in Rust

This is false. `Arc` is not common, and when it is used, it is to enable safe shared memory access.

> You can't isolate unsafe memory access

This is also false. If you get memory unsafety outside of an `unsafe` block, it is a by definition a bug in the compiler.
I can totally understand that. Don't take me wrong. The thing is that I don't want to meet you because it may end bad for me. I don't know you. It feels like buying weed as a teenager again. I don't need that anymore ;)
Being Wired In (2013)
It's the same style as the title sequence. it's probably a special youtube thing like what they did with Psy's video. I can guarantee that youtube escapes HTML and you can't do that yourself.
Torrenting is an answer to bad service. I want to look up a movie I want to watch, choose between different quality/file size options depending on my bandwidth/hard drive space needs, download an MP4 with decent speeds, watch it, then store it to watch again if I feel like it.

I can do this legally for games via GOG or Steam, I can do this legally for (most) software I use, I can do this legally for music (limited artists) via Bandcamp, but there's NO option for movies, TV series, or most mainstream music. I literally cannot legally watch the latest episode of any of the shows I follow, because when they do have an online offering, it's restricted to the US.

So for me, downloading a movie on TPB is first about convenience, I want to get to the movie and TPB is the means to it. But implicitly it's also sending a message to the gatekeepers of content that I'm interested in their product. The other part of the message is making a habit of looking for and paying for convenient, DRM-free content when it's available.
We don't sell any application per se, we do enterprise consulting, everything goes.

Customer comes with Powerpoint/Photoshop mockup of their idea, based on how native UIs work.

Usually when it comes down to paying, there should be a 1:1 correspondence to their idea, across all requested devices.

While native UIs allow for full control down to pixel level and hooks on control behaviors.

Web requires a CSS/HTML/JavaScript magic mix to make it work properly across all requested browsers and devices, and still not good enough for some.

A recent example was a control for file uploads and the information that should be displayed while the file was loading. The files were too big to be processed server side and HTML 5 File API doesn't provide all the required features.
I'm sure parents are going to love the idea of their child going to meet a strange adult from the internet who has unorthodox ideas about the government.
Unite the People – The World and Beyond
Technically watching movies form internet is perfectly legal in most countries. Some distributor made movie accessible under some sort of license. It is not user obligation (or duty) to investigate wherever all legalities are sorted between producer and distributor.

Plus some countries made it legal to make copy for personal use... and so on.
+1 agreed
Cybersecurity Skills Shortage Panic in 2015?
This is a complex issue.

While I believe copying without compensation is bad, and not something to feel proud of, I also understand the position of a Chinese or a person from Ghana that have to work 15 times more to be able to access the same item than an American.

The West has used countries like Ghana to dump technological trash that make children get malformations and cancer.

Think on this for a moment: what does 20 dollars means for you, now multiply it x15.

Now if you want to access an important resource for you or your family like a book, what do you do? You pirate it.

Most of the people in this world economic power is closer to the people of Ghana that to the people in California.

Copyright is out of control, it should be like patents 20 years, with the extensions it is becoming eternal and making impossible to reuse any work legally.
God that sounds complicated. Maybe I should make a trip to Berlin instead...
>executives at massive companies are taking it seriously.

Having come from they heydays of Facebook gaming, and having seen the rise and fall of numerous payment providers, I'm not sure how you draw that conclusion.

Implementing a new form of payment is trivial, especially one that's now relatively "mainstream", as Bitcoin is. I doubt there were many late nights in the board room considering this decision.
Yes yes, Hanlon's razor. My choice of words there was perhaps poor; the point is clear, the system does not (X), but instead (Y)s, and my attribution to malice in doing so was incorrect phrasing.
What I'd like to know is: when will all the people who are guilty of these terrible crimes, as well as the ones who lied to Congress about it, be tried for those crimes?

Will the US as a nation really condemn torture? I hope it will, but I fear it won't.
There are exceptions to copyright to minimise the impact on free speech (satire, news for example). I guess people's opinions on this will ultimately come down to their views on free speech and that varies throughout the world.
> you’d measure how many days they’d last at the optimum temperature and match the gelatine formula so it would also last the same amount.

Because the gelatin will also respond to sub-optimal temperatures and spoil faster. Presumably this means you could reasonably set the gelatin tag to the actual point of spoilage for the product -- rather than the 'peak freshness' current 'use-by' dates usually represent.
Let's say you wrote a book and writing books is your only means of putting food on the table - and then one day you sit next to someone on the train who is reading a scanned copy of your book on their tablet. You ask them about it, and they say "yeah I don't buy books really, I downloaded this off torrents". Sure, the book they have is not "stolen" per se, but would you personally not feel like someone "stole" at least some of your work from you?

I believe that this is a very interesting entry point to a discussion, because the immediate reply to this is - that library books don't generate any extra income to the author. And that is also true. But I feel like even without calling it theft it is not entirely fair.
As a rap fan from childhood, I respect your opinion and I am not offended at all.

Personally, I cannot stand alternative rock, grunge, garage, thrash & death metal.

For me, hip hop beats in my heart.

Every person is different.
> since it doesn't harm anyone

How did you come this this conclusion?
I agree with everything you've said and might rephrase my statement into a its a "lacking service" problem. But I still think the hardware and technology has to exists - which as far as I know is currently not the case, so that startups and entrepreneurs can provide what you are talking about to customers.

Anyone, who can choose between state survellianced/traffic prioritized internet and a survelliance free/encrypted/net neutral internet will take the later option all other things being equal.
And @aphyr's twitter response:

So I'm delighted by http://lucidworks.com/blog/call-maybe-solrcloud-jepsen-flaky... … but tbh "may get a successful response for a document that is lost" is actually a CP failure.

-- https://twitter.com/aphyr/status/542820272626491392
Your "right to profit" only exists in so far that you can try to profit from it, but naturally that might fail if someone takes your idea and implements it cheaper.

Copyright is only a government-granted, temporary monopoly on that idea to incentivize you to live from creating them in the first place and to create more.

Once you have given your idea to someone else, where does your natural right come from to control what they do with it?
I cant reply to hnnewguy so i will post it here.

What services does a bank provide? it holds your money, it sends your money, it allows people to send you money. all of these can be achieved by bitcoin.

Outside of these functions everything else is a finacial service; loans, overdrafts, mortgages etc. all of which attract fees and charges, these are products you are being sold, this is not banking.

hnnewguy says that banks accept risk, well the risk they accept is not you, not if you are the one depositing money with them. you are taking the risk by letting them hold your money. they do assume risk but that is when you are taking out a loan or an overdraft, bitcoin does not replace these fucntions. bitcoin replaces, holding, sending and receving money, it does this far cheaper than a bank does, especially for the poor who are hit unfairly with charges that are very high in comparison to their income.
Good comment, and I'm replying 75% to give that feedback and 25% to comment on one point:

Isn't Uber serving taxi-like needs through UberX anyway? It's not as if the poor would be without transport even if only Uber was available. Let's allow private companies to provide what transportation they can. The existence of these companies does not stop the city from offering alternative solutions for various market segments, or offering a subsidy to entice companies to meet those needs.

The presence of unliscensed (as a livery service) operators in a city has two possible negative effects on the transport options for the community.

1. The "creaming off" of some high-value trips makes it less economical to have cars in the area to serve other needs (like bringing groceries home from the supermarket with good selection and low prices rather than buying all food from a corner bodega).

2. It's well and good to suggest that the city step in to provide subsidized transportation (directly or via an agent), but without the licensing and taxation revenue, that money now has to come from general funds whereas, before Uber, it was provided without hitting the general funds of the city.

3. There is a public good provided by "must transport" laws that most livery services operate under. That relates to #1, so I won't call it a third point.

For the record, I agree with you that the current taxi system is antiquated and if we were to design an idealized system from scratch, it might look closer to Uber/Lyft than the current system, but I don't agree with "screw the laws; they're stupid anyway, so let Uber do whatever they want" approach that many pro-Uber advocates seem to advance (of course, not in so many words).
Yes but you really almost never need to do that. The speed difference is usually only a factor of 2ish... It's not like the factor of 10-30x for interpreted languages.
The Enterprise Mobile Dilemma: I Dont Know Whether to Laugh or Cry
Yes, Fiddlewax Blue is gridded. That is both a weakness and a strength. :)

There are two main use cases for the app:

1. New musicians (i.e. people who haven't really played an instrument before) can jump directly into playing notes and chords in a way that far less intimidating than most physical instruments, but still build intuition around chord types, pitches, harmonies, relationships, etc.. It's a foot in the door to no longer feeling like making music is beyond you, and encourages you to play/enjoy the process. When you hit the app's limits of griddedness, that's when you take that intuition and excitement to other instruments.

2. Proficient/comfortable musicians can pick up Fiddlewax Blue to create new sounds and progressions than they would otherwise explore on their main instrument. For example, a lot of people play the guitar, but spend so much time learning a few chords that they can feel boxed in. When you have a larger palette of chords and scales, you can find new melodies and riffs, then translate those back to your main instrument.
Somehow you see "links to hashes" as stretching freedom of speech and the ability to arbitrarily ban hashes in strings as the way it's supposed to be?

I believe you and the parent post have fundamentally different views of what's right, just and moral, and any discussion between you and him/her or anyone else with the same views will lead to nothing.
There is almost never code that requires inheritance.
This link is broken, looks like they've recently redone their webpages. http://www.ece.tamu.edu/~spalermo/ecen620.html
As with all performance, it really, really, really depends on what you're doing. I _hate_ the Benchmarks Game, but there are some that we are faster: http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u32/rust.php
Amazing Free Hosted Blogging service available and  Which one should you choose
Rust has fewer edge cases than C++ by an order of magnitude or so. Rust is effectively all the tools and best practices of C++11, except without the burden of twenty years of backwards compability (not to mention the albatross of being an almost-but-not-quite superset of C), and as a result it can design the entire language around these best practices and optimize them for ergonomics (Rust's boxed pointer is much easier to use than std::unique_ptr, especially since Rust defaults to move semantics), for safety (Rust's borrowed references are amazing when all you're used to is the use-after-free-for-all that is C++ references), and for speed (Rust's Rc smart pointer is faster than C++'s std::shared_ptr, because knowledge of ownership allows Rust to safely use non-atomic operations to bump the refcount).
Rr 3.0: lightweight recording and deterministic debugging
>>> sharing of information

But what TPB mainly distributed, was not information, it was products. And they are not essential products, you can live just fine without TV series or movies. People don't die because they can't play their favourite video game. It's like saying designer clothes should be free.

Information should be shared without profit, yeah, that's what wikipedia is doing fine.

But video games are not information, so are TV shows, movies, etc. They are products which cost money to produce. It doesn't make economical sense to give it away for free hoping to get money from ads or whatever. Mobile games do that, and mostly they are unplayable without purchasing credits, etc. Even then, the quality is often very poor.

You can point to open source, but people producing open source software are minority of all engineers.

What you are saying might be morally 'right' but unfortunately being morally right doesn't pay the rent, bills and food.
Idiots say idiotic things. Mostly idiots who have low self esteem. So bear that in mind when you interact with them.

Sure there's a subset of society that rejects those that are 'geeky' or 'nerdy', but that's fine. They'd probably annoy you in the long run anyway.

But everyone gets to be able to have relationships.

Yes, relationships can be distracting ... but that's not a reason to not have one!

The only real requirement is self-confidence, work on building on that and you'll find out that interesting people take notice! :-)

Have fun and good luck!
Creators should have complete say in how their work is to be distributed and monetized, within the confines of the law.

That doesn't tell us what the law should be, though.
Mobile Friendly Labels Appearing in Mobile Search Snippets
I'm not going into the "sharing links vs sharing content" debate.

> And it isn't always copyrighted content.

True, it isn't ALWAYS, but I guess it's mostly copyrighted.

> The point isn't to help people steal stuff, it's to help people share information, regardless of whatever arbitrary laws exist about sharing information. That's a worthy cause, IMO.

I do think we should be able to share information freely, not necessarily share whatever I want. My problem is with the "regardless of whatever arbitrary laws exist about sharing information" part.
>if BitCoin is supported and has zero costs and a lower risk

That's a big "if". As it is, neither of these things are true.

There's no such thing as "free"; services have to be implemented, infrastructure must be built, systems must be supported. Hopefully Bitcoin will be cheap, cheaper than the alternatives, but it won't be free.
Or, the world-famous Llama song (http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/llama)
(Disclaimer, I'm working on FCIQMC right now)

One of the reasons that FCIQMC doesn't have nuclear motion is that the gradients from FCIQMC, and actually most QMC techniques, are really computationally intensive, so this means that creating the ab-initio surface for the nuclei to roll over is really hard. Perhaps you were considering some sort of FCIQMC approximation to the path integral, but it's not entirely obvious to me how this would work.

As for how DFT would work for this... It should work quite well for qualitative predictions. Actually, DFT does remarkably well for metals and functionals like asymptotically corrected PBE0 are providing remarkable physical insight. While I wouldn't trust the numbers that come from any DFT simulation to three decimal points, I'd certainly trust the physics that's captured.

That being said, metallic hydrogen should be a strongly multireference system, so I'd be interested in seeing how a green's function approach based in many-body perturbation theory (see GF2 from Zgid at U Michigan) would do, as it doesn't struggle with issues of references while still giving you coupled cluster level accuracy.
The Internet should be a 'human right'
This is all based on the ability of the organism to strongly adapt. In order to do this, they need enough energy (calories) and micronutrients. I assume the organisms studied in labs for the ability to adapt to these stressors, are (outside of calorie restriction or related studies) well-fed...

Humans are often not so well-fed, at least not nutritionally.