skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There are two problems with your response. The first is that not all of the ocean is a shared resource. Within national boundaries the ocean is anything but a shared resource. See Fisheries Management[1] and for a specific example see Stellwagons Bank[2].

The other problem is that just because something is a shared resource does not mean that it is automatically a lost cause. See tragedy of the commons[3]:

Elinor Ostrom found the tragedy of the commons not as prevalent
or as difficult to solve. She and her coworkers looked at
how real-world communities manage communal resources, such as
fisheries ... and they identified a number of factors conducive
to successful resource management.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisheries_management

[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellwagen_Bank_National_Marin...

[3]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons
In theory, yes, but in practice, 32-bit support is a work in progress. You could try it, but you would want to make certain that you boot the kernel with vmalloc set to something larger than the amount of RAM that the system has, yet smaller than the 2GB of kernel address available on 32-bit (e.g. 1G). Otherwise, you could run into problems where kernel virtual memory allocations hang because of virtual address space exhaustion. This is due to a design decision in Linux to cripple kernel virtual memory, although it does not affect 64-bit systems because the kernel virtual address space is much larger than system memory at this time. This should be fixed in the next 6 months, but until then, you will need to be careful with it.
The magazine is called The Magazine. Maybe being undescriptive is part of their brand :p
Is Googling around for names and email addresses to use for marketing purposes even legal?
You mentioned staying off caffeine, but recommended teas that both (usually) contain caffeine. Not trying to be a jerk, but genuinely curious - is the caffeine from tea better for the body than the caffeine from coffee? Or did you mean decaffeinated types of tea?
Why Introverts Don't Always Want to Be Alone
one hurdle of J is that the verb train approach is too raw.
Can you explain to what extend it is "silly" to make an effort to avoid sexism or racism?
Would you say that emacs (with evil-mode) is significantly better than vim using ScreenShell or slimv, for clojure development?
Correct. When we speak of moral we assume that there are choices, and then you pick one. If there is no choice, there is no moral. The description of what happened to animals and wildlife (especially from the 20th century) as a deterministic force of nature, a.k.a gas release, can lead us to think that this is how evolution works, no choice, no moral. You can say "I support ivory jewels" or "I object ivory jewels". Both opinions are very different than saying "ivory jewels is a natural force of nature like gas release". The level of nature depletion by humans is, to some extent, a choice.
Are you sure you are not their product?
> Vim wasn't backwards compatible with vi.

Yes, but, it tried to be with the 'compatible' option: http://vimdoc.sourceforge.net/htmldoc/options.html#'compatib... (Not to say it fully succeeded.)

> And your reasoning lacks a logical basis, with all points being subjective.

If by points you mean my list at the top, those are facts. Past the list, everything else is subjective, yes. Liking and disliking a name is a subjective matter. Whether a name is 'appropriate' is very subjective. Should I have made a disclaimer that it was my opinion?
HN really, really needs to stop showing just the domain and show the full hostname (perhaps minus ^www\d*.) instead.
Sr. Python/Django Engineer – USAToday/Gannett Digital
In response to your edit: Zimmerman's defense did not invoke Florida's Stand Your Ground law.
> Not sure if that article is really about shifting risks from corporates to workers and weakening their protections.

Jacobin articles are rarely 'about' anything. Their primary mode of reasoning is like folk etymology on a discourse level. There's usually a fair amount of factual evidence included, but it's forced through a narrative -- that's there for the sake of appearing novel -- into a conclusion that doesn't logically follow from anything presented.

(I haven't read this one yet, but if it's anything like Against Chairs[1], my criticism should apply. Admittedly I'm doing the same thing in this comment that I'm criticizing Jacobin for doing.)

[1] https://www.jacobinmag.com/2012/04/against-chairs/
It's silly to worry about it in the context of a fictional medium. Arguments have been made that, say, for instance, the human trafficking ring in Watch Dogs (recent video game) shouldn't have ever existed because it's overtly sexist, despite the fact that you break it up at the end of the mission arc. (To which I say: That's what human trafficking is. Sexist? Ya think?! People are being sold into slavery and you focus on sexism?)

Such arguments ring as hollow as the railing against violence in video games. Saying what kind of artwork people should and shouldn't make transcends all *isms into straight-up repressiveness.
I think it should be fairly clear from the context that it is the act of self expression that is alluded to, in this particular case the act of writing.

It is similar to the use of the word act in "you act surprised". This is something you can say, even in writing, and people will generally understand what is meant.

What is important for a civil debate is not to pick on words, but to try to understand one another. If someone you are responding to writes something that can be understood in several ways, choose the one that is more flattering to their side of the argument.
I think the main reason for refinements not catching on is because of how poorly they were rolled out. I believe they were explicitly described as not for production use in 2.0 and how they worked changed in 2.1 (but I think they are now considered stable). The level of trust in the feature hasn't been high but may grow in time and especially once 2.1+ becomes the norm (after Rails 5 is released, I think).
That's my point. In this model it's a race to the bottom.

If Uber or Lyft don't take advantage of the supply of drivers with 10 year old cars someone else will. So Uber and Lyft can either take that low-cost market under a different name and hope that they can maintain income at a quality point that doesn't pollute their brand, or someone else steps in and Uber/Lyft become merely services for people who would take limos.
The WAF product has had a LOT of upgrades since that report, and has a huge update coming in Q4. That report is pretty out of date; I'd be happy to provide a test setup for Zeroscience to do a new analysis if they'd like, and am looking at how to do a continuous test/demo of the new WAF, because it's pretty interesting how it works.

When a source IP is shared (Tor exits, carrier NAT, etc.), trying to push as much into URL pattern vs source-IP filtering, for instance.
I don't think anyone said making an effort to avoid sexism or racism is silly.
E-mailing Canadians for marketing purposes is definitely illegal now due to CASL legislation (Canada Anti-Spam Law) passed this year.
This argument assumes that there is a monotonic effect of taxes on my desire to work. I'd argue that if taxes were raised a little, I would work a little more. I think therefore that it is more reasonable to assume that the taxes->work hour function is concave.
Is "changing the locks" (revoking the certificate) really so complicated that this "janitor-solution" is easier/cheaper/safer?
To answer your question honestly, it's going to depend on how much disposable income I have.

If I'm making enough to pay for all of my needs and wants after the rate goes up, then I'll probably work less... Because what's the point?

If the difference is whether I can pay rent or not, then I'll probably work more.
Chromeos-apk – Run Android APKs on Chrome OS, OS X, Linux and Windows
I guess I have a different view of "sharing economy".

There are many other businesses which facilitate the connection of contractor to customer, but we don't call them part of the sharing economy. This is true even when they provide the tools (e.g. car) in addition to their services (e.g. driving). The fundamental difference for me comes down to whether they are providing this service as their primary means of livelihood (in which case it's a job), or are they simply looking to make better use of a resource (e.g. car) that they already own but do not fully utilize.

Uber seems to be used for both "job" and "share," but the problems seem to be with the former.
I am a bit biased, being the founder of a startup whose products are all Open Source. BUT... nonetheless, I'll say that I don't necessarily think that going Open Source is going to be a magic cure-all for you. And it could make things worse, depending on may details.

Remember, Open Source really is more of a development methodology than a business model. And being Open Source doesn't obviate the need to think about marketing, advertising, sales, etc.

If you wanted to go the OSS route because you believe in OSS ideologically, or because you think it's a way to make the world a better place, I'd wholeheartedly say "go for it". But if you want to do it just because you don't like marketing, I'd say you should consider giving the whole thing some more thought.

Basically, what d0m said is pretty much dead-on, IMO.
>The other parts of this earth play an essential role in maintaining ecological balance on this planet, and a world with just farms and cities and the animals that can survive within is not going to bode well for us or any other species. Hopefully that's a good enough argument if you still don't think that mass extinction and habitat lose isn't a negative outcome in and of itself.

Why?

Humans don't even need animals. It's brutally cruel to enslave, torture, kill and eat animals the way we do. Humanity can be fine on its own.

Regardless of whether or not you like things like, say, hippos, or mosquitoes, or prairie voles, humanity does not need them.

Should we set half the earth aside for wildlife? I think it'd be better used by humans.
Ah I see. Yeah, that would be useful.

Slight tangent, What do you think about buzzsumo.com for evaluating content ideas?
Its legal in the US so long as you follow the CAN-SPAM rules:

Federal rules require the following for commercial email sent to your mobile phone:

- Identification – The email must be clearly identified as a solicitation or advertisement for products or services;

- Opt-Out – The email must provide easily-accessible, legitimate, and free ways for you to reject future messages from that sender;

- Return Address – The email must contain legitimate return email addresses, as well as the sender’s postal address.

http://www.fcc.gov/guides/spam-unwanted-text-messages-and-em...
As data points go: male developer, serious systems programming background, 1 semester of college.

Maciej Ceglowski is, I think, even worse off than I am. He went to art school. Now he controls the Internet from his perch atop Pinboard.
To get more women seriously involved into technology, you realistically need to get more women to be unsocial and spend the majority of their lives planted in front of a glowing computer screen.

The reality is not that "careers in computers" are too hard to get into, or that we need them to be friendlier. In fact, I have personally found working in computers to be generally unfriendly across the board. I welcome any changes to make working in computers more attractive to women, because it would make it appeal more to myself as well. Since I already work in the field, it would just make the field better.

The fact is that a majority of women don't realistically want to be in the field once they know the full story of what is required to succeed in it.

I am aware of the people who have had computer careers and found them generally cheery, friendly, and easy, but I don't think this is the common case.
One last comment - this post from Rand reminds me of the following from Ben Horowitz:

"By far the most difficult skill for me to learn as CEO was the ability to manage my own psychology. Organizational design, process design, metrics, hiring and firing were all relatively straightforward skills to master compared to keeping my mind in check. Over the years, I’ve spoken to hundreds of CEOs all with the same experience. Nonetheless, very few people talk about it and I have never read anything on the topic. It’s like the fight club of management: The first rule of the CEO psychological meltdown is don’t talk about the psychological meltdown."

http://www.bhorowitz.com/what_s_the_most_difficult_ceo_skill...
That's not a flattering photograph of Mr. Daniel. I find it hard to believe that that's the only one that was available.
But to what extent? Are all game worlds supposed to represent an ideal utopia? E.g. is the antagonist being sexist supporting sexism or is it a commentary on sexism? What about 'historical' games? Do we eliminate references to the Holocaust in WW2-era games because it might offend someone?

I think that this is where the arguments get fuzzy. Everyone has a different idea of where the line is drawn.
There would be a negotiation (regarding e.g. the UK contribution and rebate), yes.

Citizenship and self-determination are absolute fundamentals of the EU. I understand why there is pressure - particularly from Spain - to obfuscate this, but I very much doubt that the EU would be constitutionally able or willing to force a new country to jump through the hoops of rejoining.
I'm willing to concede that the effect is uncertain at low and middle incomes, but I think it has been shown quite convincingly that when tax rates go up the rich work less.
I use a fairly simple bash script to initialize my rails vagrant instances. Total of 34 lines including comments and didn't require learning any new config tools.

While I'd favor using proper config management this was a much better use of my time.
Sure. The last sentence you wrote is a restatement of the principle of charity, which is something HN is supposed to embrace but manifestly does not.
If software can execute a million times faster to test a solution, couldn't you theoretically write code to copy error messages or run through a list of questions, search and paste solution and test? If the test passes move on, if it doesn't pass just reformulate question and test the next google search result?

And couldn't this lead to jr. programmers jobs being automated?

Is software going to eat your job if you are a jr. developer?
I would suggest a different context. If someone states that 2+2 = 5, and at the same time he/she states that somebody is bleeding to death nearby, now - than the 2+2=5 is the less important statement, if at all. But the real issue is that it's far from 2+2=5. Consuming the biosphere is not gas release. It is a moral choice that individuals, communities and nations can change daily.
When did being a trained auto mechanic become a 'useless job'? It's easy to hand waive away all this work as bullshit, but so is most of software development. Yes we want to figure out how to make it more productive, but completely eliminating jobs and making people unemployed has a huge negative cost. When you have someone working FT they are growing their productivity through experience, plus training, plus any process improvements. If they are unemployed, their productivity is atrophying away.

The difference between slowly transitioning from one role to another and just getting cast aside as unemployed is profound.
That's true, but my point was that it's odd for the article to portray Uber as the exploitative capitalist when Uber does not own the capital.
The 30 Minute Business Plan: Business Model Canvas Made Easy
Spare me. Statements such as those are almost always concerned with promoting and upholding white supremacy/racism. Would the statement been given any legitimacy if it was stated that '...the average white IQ is 85...'? I doubt it. The fact that a statements like these are made with no or dubious evidence is bad enough. Asserting that there is an empirical question here, when said dubious statement is refuted, is the icing on the cake.

P.S. I do understand that this is an empirical statement/question. But so is the assertion that there is a teapot on the moon.
I have a question, is it possible to pin to pinboard using ctrl+d shortcut of browser of your liking? I have been wanting something like that but not knowledgeable enough to able to create something.
> If you're re-rendering a div in different places using Om/React in order to animate it, I would say you're probably doing it wrong. You should do one re-render to apply a new CSS transition class.

Unless, of course, that doesn't make sense, like if you're implementing drag and drop.
This article brings to light the business model differences Tim Cook highlighted again. Apple sells and makes money from devices while Google (and its OEMs) don't make much on the hardware but Google makes money from advertising fueled by personal data.

The implicit argument was that Google's services are better because of the personal data it collects but I didn't see any solid support for this. Are google's services really that much better than others (mail, maps/navigation, search) _that_ much better than competitors because of the personal data they collect? I'd argue that most of Google's services would be just as good without the harvesting of personal data. Does gmail really need my search history to be better? Does maps need to know _my_ locations etc. or just anonymous & randomized cartography data to improve its accuracy?

I get that personal data helps the make more money but I'm not fully getting how it makes the services better. On the other hand I'd also be interested in understanding some of the hidden costs or consequences of them having all of our data.
Sleepy Cat Software, the makers of Berkeley DB, went on with a fully open-source model for 10 years until getting acquired by Oracle in 2006. They however started the company around an existing open-source product, so it may or may not be relevant to your case.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkeley_DB
Avoiding the topic of sexism and racism is worse than not talking about it. So yeah, avoiding it is silly: it helps nobody.
What I was referring to, is the part of the article where everyone had to complain about something regarding the vision of the developers.

My point was that it looks like it is a futile effort to comply with what everyone expects and that it is more important to concentrate being happy creating something.
Unionization do work. Just look at current labour laws now and 100 years ago. Usually unions band together and elect politicals who change the law to benefit the worker.
Before you start implementing this for your own services, make sure you meet the guidelines[1] for being approved by Google. Specifically, you must have a history of sending hundreds of emails a day to gmail users.

This isn't for small projects (yet, at least).

[1] https://developers.google.com/gmail/actions/registering-with...
I always found it silly that the main character can murder hundreds of people in the most gruesome way, but any hint of racism/sexism is enough to enrage everyone.

Is racism/sexism really that much worse from torture and murder that it's ok to use the later for storytelling, but the former always brings an outcry from the community?
LEADS Act Extends Important Privacy Protections, Raises Concerns
I think this is incorrect, the point of Guile-Emacs is to implement support for all Emacs Lisp in Guile. No backwards-incompatibility will be present in whatever Emacs eventually moves to.
iOS 8 Security
If you met someone who could use your company's product/service-- wouldn't you put them in touch with the appropriate sales people?

Same applies to recruiting talent. If you recognize a high-potential candidate-- help them connect with a hiring executive. You'll be seen by the higher-ups as a Big Picture thinker. Unfortunately, myopic corporate HR staff often fail to enlist the broader networks of existing employees.
Exactly this

This is not a job anymore. It is a company. Your company.

You have to take care of every single aspect. Including toilet paper

"You could either find a co-founder or hire someone to handle that stuff."

That is the correct answer.
Can you expand on what you mean? I've only played with buzzsumo a bit to bulk check sharing stats for sites.
I have mapleader set to ",", which has served me well.

I just realized I only use my left thumb with the spacebar, so the ambidextrous argument doesn't fly for me.

But I did realize space currently does nothing for me in normal mode. So I made it work like less/more, i.e., it pages the screen down:

nnoremap <space> <C-d>
nnoremap <S-space> <C-u>
There are pleanty of people using a property fulltime for AirBnB.
UPDATE: I could not find any other such words in the more traditional dictionaries. But Urban Dictionary has some informal usages that follow that pattern:

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=a-alike

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=gee-gawker

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=p-pissed
Should just be:

nnoremap <space> <C-d>

The shift-space doesn't work.
yes, as someone commented already you can use homebrew. I think xcode might include nasm too, but I'm not sure if that is still true.

There are some hello-world examples for 32bit and 64bit with nasm on osx here:

https://gist.github.com/desertmonad/36da2e83569bc8b120e0
$50k MRR and growing sounds like you're in a position to pay the salary of someone who actually likes marketing and PR.

Open-sourcing the product is only going to help it grow in very specific niches, and open source projects often succeed because someone behind the project is very good at marketing and PR.
Hopefully our seed vaults, and cataloging DNA of species before they die off, will let us re-introduce biodiversity into our agriculture.

Of course, I doubt we will attempt to do so until after the first monoculture collapse, but that is a (relativly) short term catastraphy.
I feel for you, but I'm going to be blunt. You've got to get rid of the weed. As long as you're smoking, your head isn't going to clear and you're not going to want to do anything. Flush your stash down the toilet and don't look back.

Then, as someone else has said, getting a job is a really good idea. Otherwise you're going to wind up on the street, which will be far more depressing than your situation now.

Once those two things are taken care of, get help. I don't personally recommend staying on antidepressants for life -- no, I'm not a psychiatrist; this is just my opinion -- but they can be a useful temporary crutch.
The workers very much do not control production.
(Author here)

"... it’s just that the layering of the three is no longer pre-ordained by the framework."

That is pretty close to what I think. And I don't have any great certainty about any of this. I'm not going to go around saying "MVC is dead!"

What I observe with Om is that Om works well because it determines a flow of data, and the tools that we have to influence that flow of data, which could be identified with M, V or C, don't need to have any kind of formal separation, as opposed to a framework where you would have Model objects, Controller objects and View objects. It seems to me that Om and React have shifted the metaphor a little bit, and that the MVC metaphor isn't the best one to describe what is going on.
Assuming I understand you, that's what I was getting at with "computational" scientists as a separate or intermediate category.
Link to developers Github page - https://github.com/vladikoff/chromeos-apk
You sound like you know a lot more about the VC industry than me, but if what you say is true, why is there still so much VC money flowing?
Another excellent example of this is the paper "How Not to Prove the Poincare Conjecture".