skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The criteria are outline on:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O_visa

http://www.uscis.gov/working-united-states/temporary-workers...
Ah right, I forgot about ABCL. I haven't used it, though I keep meaning to give it a try. Hmm, it can't do TCO even on local calls? My code may not run in it, then.
Intel Xeon E5 v3: Up to 18 Haswell EP Cores
Are SSL connections to the remote IRCd (usually via port 6697 or 9999) supported?
ES5 or ES6?!? :)
Control of borders is practically the definition of a nation. If you don't have a say in who comes in, you aren't a nation.
Even 30-40 years ago inertial confinement schemas were obviously better at producing fusion. They have also been more promising at miniaturization and thus weaponization. So, except for the laser driven - which due to low efficiency of lasers have very low miniaturization potential - the inertial confinement hasn't got any meaningful development during all that time until current days when mostly private money got into it.

>What was decided 20 years ago? Where?

Somewhere in 199x i remember reading something like a Congress committee's paperwork where cost of fusion was very unfavorably compared to the $0.04 cost of coal energy with thus pretty clear conclusion about economical unviability of fusion. It was like a bulb lit in my head back then - "that explains!" :).

Edit: to the comment below - i should have worded better, the inertial confinement schemas are obviously better for developing future reactors as, at least, since understanding of bremsstrahlung losses in thermodynamically equilibrium plasmas it became clear the enormous, on the border of any practicality, size of possible break-even reactor and other limitation on them. Like no aneutronic p-Boron even in the great-great future of Star Trek. Where is inertial confinement have no such limits. As H-bomb - a successful break-even inertial confinement device shows - it is just a matter of miniaturization. Look at Sandia Z-machine for example - basically miniature model of what happens inside H-bomb after fission primary goes off - they aren't in a rush for any practical reactor, mind you, only to reproduce explosion conditions for weapons research - yet even from the start - something like in 1998 they were immediately closer to the goal than everybody else. 10-15% input conversion into X-rays at the 100TWt+ peak - that can be reached by NIF only today only if they replace the current lasers with semiconductor ones.
Designer here. Would be a blast to work on.

I've designed resumés for friends which HR managers have told me won their attention and priority simply by looking a level of craft and professionalism above the rest. The difference between a self-created Word resumé and one well-designed is exponential, especially in an environment where sensible people dwell.

Let me know if there's any way I can help with this. Cool project.
I think the right thing might be, "default empty to a tainted zero", and then propagate and display taint. That gives immediate feedback and lets you get some sense of things playing with an incomplete spreadsheet but won't silently give you bad data that you think is good.
This was an interesting quote:

“China just put a huge chunk of money and hired hundreds of people to work on molten salt reactors. I think that’s probably going to come first—and it’s going to come from China”

China also built a pebble bed reactor at Shidaowan, and has plans to build up to 19 more. (http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-02-21/china-wants-...) (http://nextbigfuture.com/2014/04/construction-progresses-on-...)

It will be interesting to see if the Chinese can make nuclear fission clean and economical over the long term.
5 Things to Consider When Automating Mobile App Testing
You're probably already aware of this, but Haskell's JSON parser (named Aeson) does exactly what you ask for. In particular, it can be operated in two modes:

1. Untyped mode. Here we parse out values of type, amusingly, Value which reflect the total, untyped structure of JSON. We can then express queries deep inside of that structure and see what get's pulled out. For instance, using the `lens-aeson` package

v :: Value

x :: Maybe Integer -- Maybe means it might fail
x = v ^? key "foo"
. key "bar"
. key "baz"
. ix 3
. _Integer -- looks a bit like XPath, right?

2. Typed mode. Now we suggest to Aeson that some of the types of our program have direct translation into or from JSON (or both) and let the parser produce these translations in a type safe way. For instance, should we have a type like

data Point = Point { x :: Double, y :: Double }

then we can introduce a translation like

instance FromJSON Point where
parseJSON = withObject "Point" $ \o ->
Point <$> o .: "x"
<*> o .: "y"

which indicates that JSON objects of a syntax like `{"x": 1, "y": 1}` can be parsed into `Point`s. Technically, the parser designed there is minimal in that JSON objects with more fields can still be properly parsed, although that can be fixed.

Finally, you can easily anoint your untyped mode XPath-like queries with typed fragments. This is especially powerful if your typed fragments include untyped JSON Value fragments inside of them. It means that we can use lenses to dive into an untyped JSON Value, parse some fragment of it into a Point in a type-sensitive fashion, then dive further into that Point. If Points contained more JSON values then that "further dive" could be untyped or typed again.
Reddit launches full-site HTTPS via CloudFlare
Why you shouldn't fly on a Boeing 787
It was really meant just as a toy and not a scientifically rigorous simulation. Any value of theta is going to make not 100% accurate (not to mention the simulation speed which also affects accuracy).
Your first and second sentences contradict one another.

You say it is "just not true" (that browsers declare them secure/insecure) and then go on to say "users are trained to look for HTTP security indicators" (exposed by the browsers).

So I'm quite confused about what it is you think I said which is "not true." Since you obviously do agree that browsers declare things secure or not.

Your example about credit cards is entirely non sequitur. It doesn't follow what you said before nor make sense in the context.

I can only suspect you misread something earlier in this conversation as your replies are quite confusing.
Wow, this is truly impressive! I would like to leave some feedback of my first experience.

Re-ordering:
I could not get this to work as intuitively as it seemed it should have been (likely user error). It would be nice to be able to shift entire paragraphs/columns/sections up/down one column/section at a time, and perhaps a 'delete' button to remove the entire section or a trash icon to drag it into on the side. (I realize that by removing content from a section you effectively remove that section, but only by publishing did I know this)

After I was finished re-ordering, I was not sure what it wanted me to do. I think it just wanted me to continue on towards viewing the resume tab to publish. Perhaps a modal could offer that guidance (save-continue to publish, or keep reordering) When I clicked on the resume tab, JS error popped up asking me to leave or stay on this page like there were unsaved changes.

Again, this feedback I mentioned is likely already considered and taken care of, but my ignorance has got the best of me. :)

So awesome though! Don't take my suggestions/feedback as anything other than compliments, as I am jealous how exceptional you made this!
Find which slide grabs most attention from your customer or investor
The big difference between SpaceX and the others is SpaceX has to do it competitively. They can't just do whatever and send the gov a bill for it.
There exists a similar if not more robust gravity simulator that's available for free to schools. It's called Universe Sandbox. Here is a link for instructions on obtaining educational licenses. http://universesandbox.com/blog/category/education/
Left me wondering what could that mean for FirefoxOS apps.
Amazon Drops the Price of the Fire Phone to 99 Cents
Apple redirects its main homepage to a countdown for it’s event
So, in the Jobs case, his programming skills/engineering skills were basically nonexistent. He had a lot of opinions, and had very good people skills, but he was a joke of an engineer.
This is why I appreciate that Haskell calls this type 'Maybe'.

I think this better captures the types semantics. I mean, an 'Option' or and 'Optional' makes it seem like you are given a choice... but a 'Maybe' implies more that what you are declaring exists only with some probability!

Q. Will this function give a result? A. Maybe.

Q. Will this function give a result? A. Option.

The choice is obvious.
People are lazy. People don't want to learn new things and/or leave their comfort zone. The makers of the Espurino realized this and are exploiting it to market their product. All power to them for the good market research.

And as long as I am not forced to use JavaScript I don't really care if people use it to do things that it wasn't intended to do in the first place.
This reminds me of SharkTank where Mark Cuban would make a shot-clock offer and give 30 seconds for someone to accept the offer.

Here's the thing. Mark Cuban can walk away from any deal, at anytime and not feel like he is missing out.

So, while you are certainly getting the shorter end of the stick with an exploding offer...It's usually coming from a place where the person making the offer has enough leverage to be ok with losing the deal.

In this case, waiting will make you lose the deal.

Sometimes, a good enough offer is better than a slightly better offer.

More importantly, as Robert Ringer says, "The results you get out of a negotiation is inversely proportionate to how intimidated you are when negotiating."
Right now, the Internet needs your help to survive
Does that propagate, or is it only one hop?
A lot of routers, set-top boxes, and other embedded systems also use alternative libcs, but I think you're right for Linux desktop and server systems -- most of those either use glibc or a fork/variant like eglibc.
You raise an interesting point. James Gosling went to my university for undergrad (U. Calgary) and then went on to do a PhD from Carnegie Mellon after being turned down everywhere else. The day of his graduation, they told him that each year they randomly accept one individual they originally rejected and that he was the first one to graduate. I'd love to see the results of this after a 5-year run.
On the other hand, you can pour money into fusion for decades, maybe centuries, and get nothing useable. Solar gets much better the more money you put into it, and that's on top of already being competitive vs other traditional energy sources now.

If I had to choose one, I'd choose the one I get actual returns on.
When it works, Firebug is good and useful, though with some Firefox "Nightly" versions, Firebug is broken. Of course, I know, that's what I get for running Nightly...

The Firefox developer tools have matured and recent iterations work a lot like Firebug so I miss it less.

Your second point is very much on target. Because of problems rendering web pages, I haven't found Chrome and webkit-based browsers useable for developing or testing web-based interfaces.

Pages that look good and essentially the same in Firefox and IE will have strangely different fonts (and sometimes layout) when viewed in Chrome, Opera, Safari, etc. Users of these browsers sometimes notice my sites appear a little misshapen and ask what to do. I suggest trying Firefox, or in a pinch, IE.

This is less an issue with mobile viewing since page rendering is different on those devices vs. desktop/laptop anyway. Of course, browser development travels at near light-speed, so the situation can change quickly. But given the mix of old and new systems out there, it's a headache that won't go away for quite a while.
The thing that struck me as the most odd about this article was the assertion that keeping a hidden service securely hidden must be easy, because the TOR website's Wiki article on it is so short. I think it's clear that there isn't that much proven experience out there in keeping a hidden service secure against a determined and well-funded adversary, and what experience there is probably hasn't made it to the TOR Wiki page for various reasons. Just the last HN article on this generated dozens of comments with various best-practices for securing such a service that clearly weren't followed by Silk Road, and we're mostly amateurs at this.
I don't know that it will be fusion but I think eventually we will solve the energy problem. If we look at nature the energy scale of natural processes such as solar flares, movement of planets, oceans and atmospheres, etc dwarf human needs. The energy is out there we just haven't figured out how to efficiently access it. When we look at atomic processes the conversion of even tiny amounts of mass to energy also easily dwarf human needs. I know we are constrained by the First and Second laws of Thermodynamics but I think this is powerful evidence that there has to be a way.

Both fusion and fission convert mass to energy but are crude ways to do it. Physics is currently stuck and has been for 60-70 years. Physicists cannot integrate the large scale theory (General Relativity) with the small scale theory (Quantum Mechanics). They are incompatible. I can't prove it but I suspect that once this impasse is resolved we will find elegant ways to convert mass to energy and the energy problem will be solved.
Fortunately for you, twitter is now forcing tweets into your timeline!
Can't it be extended for a year at a time as long as a permanent residency application is pending?
Sam - This is standard fare not just for accelerators but VC term sheets as well. Curious if you apply your logic in that case as well?
Merchants are paying 3% or so to accept money from their customers today. There are zero-fee, instant conversions for customers and merchants to use Bitcoin (Circle and BitPay, respectively). Once the user experience is right, customers will pay using funds from their bank account via Bitcoin with near-zero costs (slight exchange rate differences between services), and merchants will offer their customers discounts to pay that way.

Two years from now, merchants won't be paying 3%.
My friends and I replaced our IRC server with Slack and just use the IRC gateway to connect to it as if it were an IRC server. Pretty much seamless.

On the plus side, the Slack Android app is pretty good. Much better than any IRC app I've used.
It's unlikely that it's significantly Pavlovian because reflex is typically taught with blunt reward or punishment schemes, which isn't much like the kind of training most get. Also, you'd expect reflex to respond more to superficial components than deeper principles like visual harmony (though my judgement isn't free superficiality in my judgement and others'). Similarly, you'd expect a reflexive effect to be strongest when seeing conditioned stimuli, i.e. the exact art I learned about, but it's frequently much stronger when seeing something new.

Beauty isn't "there" in the object to in the same way mass or volume is there; it's contingent on human perception. Beautiful things trigger similar effects in a huge variety of people, perhaps universally (though being attentive to conscious of those feelings doesn't come automatically). So it seems meaningful to discuss what's beautiful and what's not, though skepticism about any single individual's or culture's standards of beauty is warranted.
The creator of Every Noise at Once enjoyed the article:

http://www.furia.com/page.cgi?type=log&id=415
Thanks. Also wondering: should more senior people be offended by exploding offers. Architects, team leads, etc?
The problem is with mixing pure + vile. Nobody cares that Huffpo or TMZ hosts sideboob galleries or privacy invading gossip just for clicks. People do care if "show off your baby pictures" is hosted next to "we sell meth at discount rates anonymously."

(Reminder: reddit is just centrally controlled usenet with some wonky turducken corporate structure. nobody ever claimed usenet had to moderate standards, but your provider could filter you if you wanted to be filtered. the problem is... you can't apply arbitrary filters to reddit (outside of nerd-fueled browser extensions) because they aren't just a message provider, but they are also the closed, proprietary message reading interface.)
An unrelated annoying thing: I want to disable TLSv1 support for my site, for obvious reasons. I don't care about backwards compatibility for my personal site, but I still can't flip the switch... because Googlebot doesn't support anything newer than TLSv1.
Control of borders doesn't imply "everyone keep out." It just means that the government reserves the right to keep people out.

Kinda like a trademark, actually. One has to "defend" a trademark in order to keep it, which can either take the form of an overeager legal department, or you can just find all the people who are using your trademark and give them explicit permission to do so with the caveat that you may rescind that permission at your discretion (like Hormel did with the word Spam).
> There is more than enough headroom to make interpretation a viable model for micro controllers, and there is hardly a better way to make the technology more accessible to beginners.

Making tech accessible to beginners is a fair point.

But I don't really buy the headroom argument: There's always the case to use as few resources as possible when it comes to embedded (the micro controller kind of stuff): Power usage. The less overhead your software stack creates the less power your always on/battery powered device will consume.
True, but how many modern file system solutions provide snapshots for all users. Fossil and Venti will do that for you.
While I applaud Sam and his statement: "an accelerator that does the wrong thing for founders will not last long.", your advice is wrong. An offer is basically giving an option to sell for free. The longer the option is available, the more you're giving away. Exploding offers are just limits on how much people want to give away for free.
Yes. They are subject to a lottery when te number of applications exceeds the number of available spots. This has been true for the last couple years, and last year was almost three times over.
There's no reason Shout couldn't accept HTML5 copy-and-paste, upload locally or to s3, and the send a link to the uploaded image.
Pretty cool stuff, guys. Congratulations on two years.
From the guidelines: "If you want to add initial commentary on the link, write a blog post about it and submit that instead". This would seem to explicitly allow telling others how to perceive a story, so I don't really see how the privilege thing can be the crucial point. But reading dang's comment I realised how an inferior title might damage the prospects of a story that would have been submitted under a better title by someone else.
You are right. In retrospect I am a fool.
Well, ya. If content generally vanishes before the DMCA notice arrives via US Mail... ;)
> As a matter of good software engineering (and numerical analysis, and mathematics, too), your software shouldn't have magical parameters with mysterious consequences for the correctness of your software.

To some extent, yes, but consider that we're speaking of a numerical differential equation solver. If we make the time steps too large, the program runs fast but the simulation is less realistic. If we go too far and make the time steps very small, we'll start seeing rounding errors in the floating-point processing.

The reason this class of simulation is numeric is because all but the the most trivial orbital simulations must be performed numerically. The reason for that, in turn, is because of the Three-Body Problem:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-body_problem

By the way, while we're on the topic, here's my HTML5/JavaScript orbital simulator plus math tutorial:

http://arachnoid.com/orbital_dynamics
One use case in production i might see for this:

1. Using callbacks as commonly done in javascript, might offer a very easy to use way to write low power code(because the chip can automatically sleep between callbacks). This is nice versus today's high complexity low power design.

2. The author used regular mcu for this board. But low-power mcu needs orders of magnitude less power. And of course low-power pcb design can save even more.

Combining the 2 together, maybe we can see a good enough option for building 1st version, low-power products(say kickstarter guys) where they can spend a bit more on chips and there's less competition on specs - but things like low cost of development, time to market, and high domain knowledge with less technical knowledge are important qualities.
How does this compare to FRP style ?
One thing that I found to be missing from this article is that reddit doesn't really actually care for free speech-- it cares for making money.

When the "free speech" is getting them really bad PR, it gets removed from the root. When the "free speech" is ignored by the mainstream or lauded, it's allowed. It isn't really free speech because you're still not allowed to say certain things.
China isn't thinking climate change, it's thinking "wow breathable air in cities sure would be nice"
Apple Using Patented Tokenization to Secure Mobile Payments
Everything you need to know about WordPress 4.0
bypassing iCloud Activation
Could you elaborate? One of my lecturer suggest me to get an MBA, instead of getting master on CS (although i want to get my master)
Braintree One Touch Payments for PayPal and Venmo + Bitcoin
Run Swift Online (The Original)
Emotions aside, you are 100% correct. The current trend of catering to "easiness" is introducing a slew of cons ranging from bad practices, to just down right stupid engineering.

Do not ever justify having high standards. ;)
It's more general than FRP so is better at stuff like simple async coordination (what most people use promises for). But you can easy do FRP-style stuff on top of channels, which is basically what transducers are. So they are closely related, but have different roots.
NASA Launches New Era of Earth Science from Space Station
The UK has a government that spends tax revenues raised in the UK on stuff people in [some parts of] the UK don't want.

A new country called Scotland will it seems have a government that spends tax revenues raised in Scotland on stuff people in [some parts of] Scotland don't want. If you lived in a tax raising city state then your city would do the same thing.

If you didn't want an extra tier of government then why vote for one? We could have saved £414 million in one swoop on that.
Most IRC networks have a per-IP connection limit.

The slots in this case are the amount of connections that can come from the demo server (20 at the moment).

If you ran this software on your own server, you wouldn't run into the problem unless you tried to open 20 simultaneous connections to 1 IRC network.
Wait until hyperinflation kicks in.
I like the Swiss 'canton' concept, where each canton is fairly autonomous, with its own constitution and courts. These cantons were previously completely separate states, ironically formed as part of the Treaty of Westphalia:

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cantons_of_Switzerland

I'd like to hear any Swiss opinions on this system, since they have to live in it, but as an outsider I've always considered this local governance, with limited national state powers to be attractive. However, I'm not sure whether this kind of model is applicable everywhere. I'm guessing there are some historical, geographical, cultural and/or economic reasons for its success in Switzerland compared to other countries.
It may take a generation, but Snowden will come home, eventually, once we throw the fascists out. He's a hero.

We seem very far from that right now, but we are getting closer and closer.